{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":20,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":20,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"d95011e36a98","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Science Communication"}},"results":[{"id":"W2891979380","doi":"10.22323/2.17030208","title":"Digging deeper? Muddling through? How environmental activists make sense and use of science —an exploratory study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Citizen science; Science communication; Sociology; Public relations; Situational ethics; Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Science education; Social psychology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4454020205540797,"gpt":0.4531769124514657,"spread":0.00777489189738606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005867006,0.00008637892,0.0001526346,0.0003041459,0.002690432,0.0004044978,0.0009476988,0.00003548216,0.00002454098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000614284,0.00008021343,0.0000300826,0.0008040638,0.01135159,0.004898488,0.000422339,0.0002021452,0.000002129509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002972118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002710953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001311181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001159769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978625,0.0004857233,0.0003137546,0.0001714292,0.0009431563,0.0002234109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978372,0.0002039296,0.0005990037,0.0007265969,0.0004751637,0.0001581491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004720443,0.0005584655,0.02354053,0.00000471915,0.000006913262,0.000001192751,0.736169,0.000009604748,0.2096461,0.0008095361,0.00001412576,0.02919267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005217008,0.0006430349,0.1420341,0.0001496913,0.00003561141,0.00003148218,0.8453445,0.001164826,0.005249935,0.0007054832,0.003862234,0.0002574018],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980493,0.0001386671,0.0002091528,0.0008561636,0.0001450886,0.0001723129,0.000001541256,0.00001223061,0.0004155178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935714,0.00272757,0.003540117,0.00006918102,0.00006679599,0.000002287143,8.53061e-7,0.000005983467,0.00001580407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2043961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317213546","doi":"10.22323/2.22010204","title":"`Pandem-icons' — exploring the characteristics of highly visible scientists during the Covid-19 pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Göteborgs Universitet; Chalmers Tekniska Högskola","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Credibility; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Phenomenon; Public relations; Medicine; Virology; Law; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5992953918133371,"gpt":0.4865735848810375,"spread":0.1127218069322997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01203661,0.00006786492,0.000137571,0.0003216948,0.00371227,0.0002266819,0.00286181,0.00003350569,0.00006978322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002631314,0.00004340697,0.00007659399,0.002344931,0.003403209,0.0008590352,0.0004147417,0.0003036101,0.00002100383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003589275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005547972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000306066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005948527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977574,0.0005618512,0.0005012916,0.00009597031,0.0008455284,0.0002379075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968709,0.0009128739,0.0007264637,0.0008021048,0.000544871,0.000142763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001147474,0.000222267,0.3147567,0.00010905,0.00003895696,0.000002966007,0.4582829,0.0003637277,0.1272535,0.02812751,0.001945275,0.06878237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004408797,0.00004593164,0.827635,0.0001515261,0.00003024331,0.00004289368,0.0738386,0.0004385964,0.0003487387,0.002247598,0.09461502,0.0001649878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820291,0.0001977837,0.00004924458,0.01581145,0.0003853704,0.0001484767,0.000004379857,0.00003621557,0.001338026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746403,0.0247468,0.00009115654,0.0002158608,0.00008488861,0.00001040094,0.000002694924,0.000004872471,0.0002030632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5128782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113078843","doi":"10.22323/2.19070208","title":"Spikey blobs with evil grins: understanding portrayals of the coronavirus in South African newspaper cartoons in relation to the public communication of science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Communication and COVID-19 Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Pandemic; Population; Meaning (existential); Media studies; History; Quarter (Canadian coin); Coronavirus; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Literature; Art; Demography; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2021233297016818,"gpt":0.3781421242839296,"spread":0.1760187945822478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009368389,0.00009368426,0.0002197032,0.0004351095,0.001127973,0.0001534808,0.004933677,0.0000431786,0.00001517151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003316788,0.00006104781,0.00006130817,0.006816431,0.005383122,0.001454119,0.0005122101,0.0004806243,0.000001278646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008815711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002713237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001426927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01242837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966469,0.000821327,0.0007563567,0.0001454698,0.00135907,0.0002708327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962737,0.0004910703,0.001191925,0.001220995,0.0006472762,0.0001750634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001583957,0.0002983228,0.2298877,0.00001726565,0.0000136491,5.485521e-7,0.622686,0.004924885,0.01174838,0.1235497,0.00008468085,0.006630517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008979675,0.0002590841,0.6701893,0.0005748165,0.00002999232,0.000006345766,0.3179672,0.001603696,0.0008168534,0.002849771,0.004582474,0.0002224402],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8985879,0.0005272798,0.0003757239,0.09254437,0.00005877987,0.0004991919,0.000002738054,0.000008753684,0.007395295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981248,0.0004339521,0.0008983255,0.0005122923,0.00001038083,0.000004353015,4.395117e-7,0.000005395388,0.00001010505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4403016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2669641018","doi":"10.22323/2.11040202","title":"Synthetic biology in the Science Café: what have we learned about public engagement?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Genome Alberta; Genome Canada","keywords":"Public engagement; Science communication; Citizen science; Synthetic biology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Nanotechnology; Political science; Sociology; Science education; Engineering; Physics; Biology; Bioinformatics; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.190604010344784,"gpt":0.4327720879800641,"spread":0.24216807763528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03643329,0.0000596002,0.00009961546,0.0005868512,0.001989729,0.001000644,0.002903774,0.00003845352,0.00009320469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004575314,0.00003919038,0.00003493569,0.001804652,0.004642667,0.01121971,0.0001645946,0.0003525649,0.00002489784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000305471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001004147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008439329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008308591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974335,0.000700004,0.0003849115,0.00007112326,0.0009423684,0.0004681064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980206,0.0003621755,0.0004793368,0.000464751,0.0004717945,0.0002012871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007762185,0.0002016113,0.003575857,0.000004295619,0.000003145506,2.112982e-7,0.5561188,0.00002186542,0.003628779,0.2264338,0.00037027,0.2096336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004272394,0.0001103224,0.05563996,0.0002061228,0.00001113341,0.00003334292,0.77363,0.0005062636,0.0009625445,0.006380403,0.1618887,0.0002040226],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8787001,0.003274297,0.0002222863,0.06105813,0.0006517572,0.0002372272,3.562619e-7,0.00001228418,0.0558435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914223,0.007331944,0.0005520564,0.0005896033,0.00005644104,0.000001097878,2.452755e-7,0.00000180389,0.00004450251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2200534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550241363","doi":"10.22323/2.15020203","title":"Media portrayal of non-invasive prenatal testing: a missing ethical dimension","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Alberta; University of Alberta; Genome Canada","keywords":"Dimension (graph theory); Mass media; News media; Media coverage; Ethical issues; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04960334417400399,"gpt":0.3295505416968444,"spread":0.2799471975228405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001893709,0.00006419085,0.0001971067,0.0001805344,0.0001276645,0.00001434748,0.0004181706,0.00008387554,0.000007662583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02082079,0.00003797775,0.00005373451,0.0003948162,0.001147432,0.000286964,0.000152643,0.0003475323,0.000002457289],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007501828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007095488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001717258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986226,0.00005478619,0.0004336107,0.00008662422,0.0006636303,0.000138728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956141,0.002260625,0.0005381812,0.0003860241,0.0009986751,0.0002024562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001922543,0.0001813997,0.03424966,0.00003928386,0.00001445705,0.00003084751,0.001181643,0.00001447346,0.8680164,0.0004090782,0.0002698482,0.09540068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002278647,0.001084671,0.5154228,0.00813279,0.0001147963,0.00109287,0.0004527109,0.001076611,0.4685257,0.001575461,0.00009530935,0.0001477078],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885279,0.0003187532,0.002644977,0.007026788,0.00009272715,0.0000688552,0.000002154476,0.000008973575,0.001308898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944698,0.0001348352,0.05499665,0.0001128604,0.00004442313,4.268726e-7,9.157881e-7,0.000004274802,0.000007580685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4811731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136749786","doi":"10.22323/2.20020205","title":"Science communication for social inclusion: exploring science & art approaches","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Fundação Champalimaud","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Citizen journalism; Community engagement; Plan (archaeology); Public relations; Sociology; Participatory action research; Social exclusion; Social engagement; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2897788961395961,"gpt":0.3800526897630794,"spread":0.09027379362348326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01262897,0.0001589161,0.0002510654,0.001938401,0.00867471,0.0009120795,0.01058584,0.00006473924,0.000007310516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002598242,0.0001536541,0.00009031523,0.009956229,0.008685091,0.01284931,0.006998978,0.0006570189,0.00001474171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001082379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003406216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003603621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001987418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963974,0.0001451504,0.0007755257,0.0004698272,0.001708034,0.0005040732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904146,0.0002731246,0.001151478,0.001974478,0.006070734,0.0001155423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001498367,0.0002337412,0.0001609732,0.00001143137,0.000007600419,0.000001125761,0.01089371,0.00009597168,0.4052596,0.5470376,0.0003320673,0.03595114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001799847,0.0005144139,0.02015358,0.000599341,0.00004725633,0.0009958103,0.009269692,0.04519457,0.7122001,0.1534552,0.05470552,0.001064675],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6175207,0.0007075532,0.3482352,0.02397602,0.001265583,0.0003949687,0.000001637611,0.0001345481,0.007763825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7871093,0.0001053441,0.2124176,0.0001887349,0.0000500396,0.00002196155,0.000001893869,0.000006406887,0.00009874094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3935824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385423981","doi":"10.22323/2.22040204","title":"Besieged from all sides: impediments to science journalism in a developing country and their global implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bộ Giáo dục và Ðào tạo; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Journalism; Battle; Status quo; Political science; Vietnamese; Normative; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Politics; Media studies; Sociology; Law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1443527324088257,"gpt":0.4685787653243745,"spread":0.3242260329155487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02703439,0.0001149687,0.0002604865,0.001266357,0.0009054782,0.002467419,0.008761466,0.00006171676,0.000008267207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01243006,0.00007969296,0.00003527947,0.01121016,0.001240092,0.006571207,0.001739431,0.0004225903,0.00002118103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006019767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001587117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003080069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001272973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995997,0.0001944246,0.001097231,0.000354849,0.001953959,0.0004025867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953774,0.00116936,0.0008535461,0.0008158247,0.001427382,0.000356474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001015201,0.0001537611,0.6214529,0.000005599114,0.00003537758,0.00001004583,0.0394552,0.001748347,0.07691211,0.03235246,0.02774271,0.20003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002909159,0.00002704064,0.8672684,0.0001499798,0.000004412402,0.00005703821,0.008531364,0.00194759,0.0009386787,0.1143694,0.006272835,0.0001422963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9617935,0.0003398276,0.001635369,0.03512003,0.0002796947,0.0001206903,0.00001521635,0.00001375278,0.0006819242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930653,0.0004811037,0.004685053,0.001699433,0.00004407617,0.000004062988,0.000001466642,0.000003778369,0.0000157235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2458156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385637241","doi":"10.22323/2.22040205","title":"``It's my job'': a qualitative study of the mediatization of science within the scientist-journalist relationship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outreach; Public relations; Sociology; Science communication; Point (geometry); Humanism; Qualitative research; Media studies; Political science; Social science; Pedagogy; Science education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5269363333444109,"gpt":0.5474542689623372,"spread":0.02051793561792625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0377537,0.00008171206,0.0001792705,0.0006856479,0.0045816,0.0001994407,0.004509898,0.00004209863,0.00003040627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009224573,0.00005143513,0.00008087396,0.00967504,0.01272613,0.001482277,0.0005143352,0.0003867287,0.000005924483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003099687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001334667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005257349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003179507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941968,0.002015465,0.0009649869,0.0001368536,0.002475974,0.0002099456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924294,0.001401655,0.002260882,0.001039161,0.002769592,0.00009933984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001314319,0.0001520656,0.01320951,0.000006449498,0.000005623766,7.702031e-8,0.9615724,0.0004086242,0.005163435,0.01846128,0.0002862468,0.0007211053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002871497,0.00008969676,0.174181,0.0001420705,0.00002768131,0.0000030778,0.8187791,0.0008036583,0.0002862308,0.004918772,0.0004151016,0.00006648236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781803,0.0001007661,0.0000662886,0.015984,0.0005444678,0.0003728496,0.000003657574,0.00001178279,0.004735818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986664,0.0007568032,0.0003100543,0.00008518328,0.00003815044,0.000006734092,0.00000124729,0.0000050039,0.0001304449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1609715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734910865","doi":"10.22323/2.08020307","title":"The theatre, (art) and science: between amazement and applause!","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Drama; Museology; Virtuality (gaming); Interpreter; Realm; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Media studies; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Art; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03624234464051674,"gpt":0.2802546779567158,"spread":0.2440123333161991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001775484,0.00004454625,0.0000674487,0.0000624992,0.002186034,0.0007108388,0.0005624724,0.000007578221,0.00001563407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002783718,0.00002299784,0.00001402436,0.0000957579,0.003128694,0.0009056481,0.00007928665,0.0001117371,0.000001777501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002784645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005485711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001074549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002814871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992911,0.00001982138,0.0001850959,0.00006103414,0.0003242627,0.000118653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993156,0.00005027009,0.0001588876,0.0001880484,0.0002171626,0.00007009811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001563313,0.00005363088,0.001761772,0.00000512946,0.000008175361,5.063803e-7,0.04094394,0.000001328419,0.007693261,0.5026848,0.001786048,0.4450458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005594098,0.0007150915,0.2219587,0.0001523993,0.00003956997,0.00003857392,0.03704635,0.0002277729,0.001008756,0.03461659,0.7034066,0.0002301855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.954981,0.001396317,0.000004395955,0.006907682,0.00007270034,0.00006979517,7.804418e-7,0.000005001709,0.03656228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998362,0.001033548,0.0001968411,0.0001271885,0.00007459019,4.506801e-7,1.662495e-7,0.000001054431,0.0002041456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7016205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338204681","doi":"10.22323/2.12010202","title":"Newspaper portrayals of spinal manipulation therapy: Canada, United States, and the United Kingdom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Framing (construction); Popularity; Spinal manipulation; Psychology; Medicine; Advertising; Political science; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Chiropractic; Business; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03211741687856518,"gpt":0.3063426772944702,"spread":0.2742252604159051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001904757,0.00005770467,0.0001513318,0.0002779816,0.000166692,0.00002783924,0.000236559,0.00002412329,0.00002524894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003692289,0.00003162392,0.00003582665,0.0007662603,0.001023197,0.0002618419,0.00003112399,0.0001669953,3.459511e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008579985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003332341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1782393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003805728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988035,0.0001708553,0.0004218718,0.00005641205,0.0004582566,0.00008912881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979674,0.0002124637,0.0004684522,0.0003023389,0.0009724718,0.00007688629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003961776,0.00123346,0.2814507,0.0009160441,0.0004437291,0.000004658627,0.02000777,0.00708802,0.4618587,0.06291924,0.007952748,0.1521631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001710399,0.0002911089,0.9811251,0.0002376198,0.00002091077,0.00002340545,0.001705793,0.01105266,0.0005088612,0.001314471,0.001957645,0.00005206229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852083,0.0004367235,0.0001165309,0.01371452,0.00004322623,0.0002582656,2.996814e-7,0.000002665499,0.0002194226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974092,0.0008184408,0.001085267,0.0006292922,0.00001616107,0.000002478831,0.000008872526,0.000003671184,0.0000265911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6996744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8272328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393158656","doi":"10.22323/2.23020803","title":"Teaching to bridge research and practice: perspectives from science communication educators across the world","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Veracruzana; University of the West of England; Technische Universität Dortmund; University of Bristol","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5683002512154804,"gpt":0.6365189141715797,"spread":0.06821866295609924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04829757,0.0000903282,0.0001254096,0.0007385308,0.009120821,0.002517844,0.004143337,0.00004106677,0.00005890993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007911409,0.00006952677,0.00004185706,0.003959445,0.01101398,0.003865906,0.001167781,0.001185719,0.00003467324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001074459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001156947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006376291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006225502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955896,0.001775635,0.0003988466,0.0002492567,0.001593802,0.0003929249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915637,0.004521825,0.0002418371,0.001269895,0.002145699,0.000257058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002917157,0.0001239121,0.000311977,0.000004386549,0.000007322896,4.014537e-7,0.8300506,0.000004215108,0.008639953,0.09188867,0.001652011,0.06728733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008699657,0.00006516666,0.02763163,0.0003848542,0.00001307007,0.0000188044,0.7229207,0.0002091277,0.0001195547,0.008025337,0.2404005,0.000124312],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7384932,0.008143033,0.00006010718,0.2180687,0.000329577,0.0003110748,0.00000535181,0.00003865949,0.03455023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826376,0.012182,0.004137412,0.0003411212,0.0001908143,0.00001220608,0.00000171292,0.000008721333,0.0004883514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2441444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730382380","doi":"10.22323/2.07040701","title":"How-to establish PCST. Two handbooks on science communication","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Field (mathematics); China; Sociology; Science communication; Point (geometry); Media studies; Engineering ethics; Social science; Library science; Epistemology; History; Engineering; Computer science; Science education; Pedagogy; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4797274534539139,"gpt":0.4779213545407001,"spread":0.001806098913213761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009642748,0.0001429287,0.0002312743,0.001114928,0.006743842,0.0007838179,0.005789464,0.00006529316,0.00007671749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003154654,0.000134779,0.00009079519,0.003153837,0.008181527,0.003358134,0.0005800842,0.0005291115,0.00005128901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009722486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001300171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004321984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008114747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963158,0.0005425068,0.0005263325,0.0002361144,0.001925294,0.0004539279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938444,0.0004351647,0.0007282244,0.001871127,0.002648129,0.0004729333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003136031,0.001342237,0.009558455,0.00002052478,0.00002487879,0.000006915232,0.4652219,0.0005326116,0.1533109,0.1653576,0.01207869,0.1922316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003617919,0.001228077,0.1110608,0.001602044,0.00007818235,0.0002529518,0.1555,0.001512675,0.01705816,0.01327788,0.6931708,0.001640628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8598539,0.0006782293,0.00061077,0.04317301,0.0004672562,0.0004557637,0.000003718419,0.00007580669,0.09468159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799019,0.01013039,0.008346535,0.0008419824,0.0001115959,0.00001113148,0.00000356746,0.00001096051,0.0006419887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6810921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295981278","doi":"10.22323/2.21060601","title":"A focus on science communication at #ICA22","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Skepticism; Science communication; Theme (computing); Field (mathematics); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Communication sciences; Focus (optics); Engineering ethics; Communication studies; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Social science; Engineering; Science education; Pedagogy; Medicine; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05223093520559259,"gpt":0.3752115866881671,"spread":0.3229806514825745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0158569,0.00007228027,0.0001239757,0.0007314396,0.009417641,0.0003091074,0.004219529,0.00002281902,0.0004562524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001934752,0.00006700793,0.0000585287,0.00285839,0.004149671,0.002571486,0.0008374525,0.000430736,0.00003402209],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001993701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001828646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001828306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001006402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960915,0.0004303402,0.0004693313,0.0001074094,0.002584016,0.0003174177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969349,0.0002602153,0.000873019,0.0008649928,0.0008035248,0.0002633291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001979309,0.0006009405,0.001005926,0.000005710401,0.00001207223,0.00000195017,0.3311411,0.002045858,0.01811374,0.5365506,0.01818178,0.09214234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002613579,0.001488572,0.05755718,0.000230485,0.00004772776,0.0002116889,0.285436,0.004482794,0.01346444,0.04362799,0.5899552,0.0008843317],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.761245,0.0003520685,0.00006854013,0.02373221,0.000328804,0.0002211622,0.000003586162,0.00002929131,0.2140193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968389,0.0005634612,0.001320884,0.0006553375,0.00002505752,0.000002611547,0.000001006867,0.00000399018,0.0005888074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5717735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402356442","doi":"10.22323/2.23060801","title":"Creating resonance with arts-based approaches to sustainability science communication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Privy Council Office","funders":"Novo Nordisk","keywords":"The arts; Mainstream; Sustainability; Constructive; Affection; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Visual arts; Engineering; Art; Social psychology; Process (computing); Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5574890306468313,"gpt":0.4904680245332693,"spread":0.06702100611356204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01636655,0.0001219376,0.0001804501,0.0007831779,0.003517818,0.001056425,0.003384832,0.00005502871,0.00005754697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002295056,0.0001020924,0.00006202892,0.004623794,0.006576052,0.002577253,0.0003338537,0.0004471619,0.00001288398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001804196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003434457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004339924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001013688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970351,0.0004333988,0.0005054201,0.0002611803,0.001382122,0.0003827575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953787,0.000633163,0.0003269597,0.001419395,0.001955184,0.0002866205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002143547,0.0005122788,0.009284788,0.0001372032,0.0000129063,0.000003454423,0.2687596,0.002446116,0.006913737,0.3326708,0.0005186985,0.378526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001274867,0.001075627,0.1372609,0.004375334,0.0001322839,0.00007230018,0.3692391,0.04693062,0.004841325,0.02930024,0.4040802,0.00141728],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8150282,0.004567252,0.006608754,0.09813804,0.0002349692,0.001038861,0.000005055498,0.0001865197,0.07419238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778721,0.001171354,0.02052639,0.000209888,0.00005211122,0.0000259205,0.000002953343,0.00001046997,0.0001287669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4035615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362579514","doi":"10.22323/2.22020202","title":"Socioscientific issues in science exhibitions: examining contributions of the informal science education sector","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Exhibition; Relevance (law); Sustainability; Science communication; Science education; Situated; Sociology; Higher education; Public engagement; Balance (ability); Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Psychology; Art; Computer science; Visual arts","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0675105587284729,"gpt":0.3270774185221593,"spread":0.2595668597936864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005269688,0.00005884979,0.0001030975,0.0006810616,0.002558868,0.0004732996,0.001844182,0.00001435999,0.0000701103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009792899,0.00003822893,0.00003859792,0.002499999,0.01080498,0.003653218,0.000303423,0.0001924157,0.00000881288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002197962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002567526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001171008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001826964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998284,0.00004067814,0.0004407522,0.0001086261,0.0008880956,0.0002378944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970089,0.00006226016,0.0004607718,0.0004146579,0.001988574,0.0000648101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006443277,0.0001751819,0.001710027,0.00002073094,0.00000219083,1.914187e-7,0.1169713,0.0001192395,0.3160694,0.5574745,0.001038198,0.006412566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008030865,0.0002970358,0.5191311,0.001727015,0.00002939278,0.00003863325,0.3258964,0.004047612,0.07945777,0.0165608,0.05155345,0.0004576899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886416,0.0001869124,0.000003199159,0.001665782,0.0008029931,0.0001201486,0.00000757454,0.00001046489,0.008561355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990997,0.0001088498,0.0001465066,0.00005742161,0.00006241258,0.00000417556,0.000001105116,0.000002076933,0.0005177636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5409137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987397,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2862060752","doi":"10.22323/2.17030801","title":"Beyond self-confidence: a participatory evaluation of personal change in Science Gallery's Mediators","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Self-confidence; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Personal development; Exhibition; Citizen journalism; Social psychology; Political science; Art; Visual arts; Psychotherapist","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1659116364097267,"gpt":0.3658021706086295,"spread":0.1998905341989028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008011975,0.00006420333,0.000127283,0.000328414,0.0005275094,0.0001233371,0.0008577905,0.00001935958,0.0005859411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002704318,0.00004767729,0.00003602602,0.0003938891,0.004212243,0.002200632,0.00009575491,0.0001367943,0.000007412325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000197389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006127955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001430146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007717808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99786,0.0001047672,0.0003986837,0.00009099354,0.001361575,0.0001839916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967304,0.00004067548,0.000467486,0.0002420167,0.002435941,0.00008343666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002986565,0.0002642479,0.004112681,0.00001985855,0.000008794806,5.16658e-7,0.9010133,0.000003115206,0.01556388,0.06380921,0.0002024314,0.01497213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003640056,0.002161581,0.5169129,0.001506454,0.0002533739,0.0000584947,0.3598638,0.05528133,0.02075752,0.02538769,0.01326871,0.000908035],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888195,0.0004637386,9.556626e-7,0.0004942294,0.0003449956,0.0001202297,0.000001070262,0.000004911616,0.009750338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999368,0.0001064426,0.0001966633,0.00009732317,0.0002071319,0.000007873678,2.810671e-7,0.000002779868,0.00001350285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5411494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366090307","doi":"10.22323/2.22020204","title":"Who are “we”? Examining relational ethos in British Columbia, Canada's COVID-19 public health communication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Public Relations and Crisis Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Rhetorical question; Ambivalence; Public relations; Identity (music); Public health; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Media studies; Psychology; Linguistics; Medicine; Law; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1755369522020268,"gpt":0.3897035922677813,"spread":0.2141666400657546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02257909,0.000083067,0.0002929381,0.0005665118,0.004145559,0.000987719,0.002937262,0.0001072291,0.00009031526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007089532,0.0001273028,0.00005261921,0.004982902,0.001470936,0.002379097,0.0004064044,0.0007161769,0.000004062353],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003380916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01593578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7215346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946132,0.002108577,0.001049969,0.0001995566,0.001537709,0.0004910178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944044,0.001337409,0.00163072,0.001033612,0.001059959,0.0005339533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008875806,0.0003585911,0.6605954,0.00004641635,0.00003450113,0.000009901597,0.08523408,0.002663833,0.00004332029,0.03322247,0.1106353,0.1071474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004624964,0.00002753552,0.6025229,0.0003179765,0.000004454516,0.00001921035,0.1002533,0.001734627,4.391342e-7,0.005535744,0.2889479,0.000173427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6421876,0.004906927,0.0009461681,0.3443379,0.0002639205,0.0005029607,0.00001647794,0.00009078977,0.006747297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741951,0.02136588,0.00260446,0.001053372,0.00003471944,0.00002054271,0.00003234808,0.00001051935,0.0006830683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3432845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401090735","doi":"10.22323/2.23050205","title":"The power of dinosaurs: lessons learned from the sharing of #SciArt on Twitter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Science North","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Power (physics); Social media; World Wide Web; Computer science; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3198612891781879,"gpt":0.4949183396659952,"spread":0.1750570504878073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007374257,0.00004546768,0.0001044673,0.00009673241,0.001021056,0.0001497785,0.001938231,0.00004075461,0.0000243259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005352646,0.00002667948,0.00006325748,0.0009463805,0.002348577,0.0004334768,0.0001020632,0.0003400264,0.000005083438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002080816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000834501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001314133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002982577,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982137,0.0002622692,0.0004196732,0.00008789509,0.0008584379,0.0001580155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928004,0.005698076,0.0004886131,0.000478555,0.0004728234,0.00006154976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058971,0.0001775571,0.02349228,0.00001817614,0.00004093662,4.826016e-7,0.5848902,0.00005332457,0.008866538,0.221855,0.003254961,0.1572916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002980039,0.0002970557,0.4373941,0.002036924,0.00007989793,0.000002448758,0.2258112,0.0004773701,0.005897599,0.1785171,0.1489763,0.0002119966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8446781,0.001953583,0.00002438903,0.1487063,0.002136707,0.0001841395,0.000001358588,0.000006638498,0.002308723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969847,0.002396306,0.0002520931,0.0001300681,0.0001949797,0.000008906367,2.731437e-7,0.000003820843,0.00002880803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4139018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.865343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2670898717","doi":"10.22323/2.07040203","title":"Changes in publication statistics when electronic submission was introduced in an international applied science journal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Population; Agriculture; Period (music); Political science; Social science; Geography; Sociology; Demography; Computer science; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03526617458176604,"gpt":0.2742014016166683,"spread":0.2389352270349023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003601057,0.00008427814,0.000144202,0.000310065,0.0005782529,0.0002240392,0.001948619,0.00003981498,0.00007676249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003666602,0.00004102978,0.00002086606,0.001238476,0.0006870664,0.001803518,0.0001509196,0.0004282216,0.000002823481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004638456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003207477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001151904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007737871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982154,0.00006279822,0.0004528987,0.0001809763,0.0007594043,0.000328459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982761,0.00006894464,0.0005032789,0.0001463712,0.0008526367,0.0001526609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000470859,0.000197877,0.08375936,9.073777e-7,0.000001158981,0.000002935227,0.001197466,0.0000294027,0.8615562,0.001902606,0.00008435592,0.0512206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003741011,0.0002945398,0.9632208,0.00004167446,0.000002816588,0.0002588712,0.0007302184,0.00174084,0.02613956,0.004808674,0.002242237,0.0001456023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954178,0.00006374218,0.00003448618,0.003805227,0.0001305549,0.00008177922,0.000002912536,0.00000510542,0.0004584351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956393,0.001059051,0.00301355,0.0001242143,0.0001366135,0.000003104211,0.000009636155,7.911462e-7,0.00001370656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8794615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4447512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412479454","doi":"10.22323/148020250716165543","title":"How can we enable school students to learn and participate in science engagement initiatives? Roles and tasks of enablers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Justus Liebig Universität Gießen; Ocean Frontier Institute; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Student engagement; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07720070253088383,"gpt":0.348628885788546,"spread":0.2714281832576622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002728955,0.00005492343,0.0001147081,0.000220357,0.0005196261,0.0002251525,0.0007078194,0.00001300277,0.000005264109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001170085,0.0000267689,0.00001021668,0.002137329,0.001080351,0.000846551,0.0005152712,0.0001244573,3.16965e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001105366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001486785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000088055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001999471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990038,0.00007329771,0.0002391352,0.0001223944,0.0004152111,0.0001461183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988227,0.00017212,0.0002110652,0.00007883425,0.0006431724,0.00007204343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003526475,0.0003413415,0.4642145,0.00001905227,0.00002073726,5.769238e-7,0.008282185,0.0001250178,0.4768996,0.01417992,0.0002099989,0.03567187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001365812,0.0001142838,0.9532278,0.0001756136,0.000007155897,0.000001014555,0.03516098,0.00003418237,0.007869887,0.002083606,0.00113309,0.00005577185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792858,0.0003943589,0.000003184444,0.01951195,0.0000484084,0.0001151109,0.000001975214,0.000002115825,0.0006371048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981592,0.0008232552,0.0007461575,0.0001617502,0.000008311407,0.000006398501,3.528494e-7,2.266895e-7,0.00009439829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4890134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3996597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}