{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":27,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":27,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"3f5e0057d6fb","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Semantics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2887626589","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffy014","title":"The Anatomy of a Comparative Illusion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; City University of New York; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ellipsis (linguistics); Linguistics; Computer science; Sentence; Sentence processing; Syntax; Interpretation (philosophy); Parsing; Relative clause; Ambiguity; Semantic interpretation; Perception; Illusion; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04367541121187906,"gpt":0.3601997245122649,"spread":0.3165243133003858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002695215,0.00005314503,0.0001460196,0.00004716164,0.0001331251,0.00001285875,0.0002579422,0.00002800386,0.00001285907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002483627,0.00002779591,0.00006239791,0.0001240331,0.0004503356,0.00005800709,0.0000495841,0.0001380216,0.000008366208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000519215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003530961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001118527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004437626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992909,0.0000977126,0.0002834166,0.00006071854,0.0001649961,0.0001021892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998919,0.0003625781,0.0003938727,0.0001093353,0.0001856107,0.00002965654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008838969,0.00005767761,0.0001720101,0.000005481146,0.000009244774,0.0002148745,0.002751844,0.000002182653,0.993688,0.001046699,0.001241568,0.0007220302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003124374,0.0006336234,0.0003735678,0.00004065794,0.00001880544,0.001141448,0.0006391908,0.0001362965,0.9815491,0.001304041,0.01379793,0.00005292992],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975245,0.0001130109,0.00008122971,0.0009988229,0.0004911528,0.00003752917,0.000001041388,0.000003186603,0.0007495037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990029,0.0001120018,0.0001597909,0.0003724103,0.000231998,6.492344e-8,3.67087e-8,0.000003056255,0.0001177312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01255636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1659281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147932261","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffu015","title":"Ignorance and Inference: Do Problems with Gricean Epistemic Reasoning Explain Children’s Difficulty with Scalar Implicature?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"National Research University Higher School of Economics; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Radboud Universiteit","keywords":"Operationalization; Implicature; Scalar (mathematics); Inference; Ignorance; Bounded function; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Pragmatics; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004934049243808189,"gpt":0.2326104242694274,"spread":0.2276763750256192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004330644,0.000199567,0.0003577848,0.00008915225,0.0001355038,0.00009067272,0.0001771838,0.00009142908,0.00001953689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004497634,0.0001197985,0.00003977963,0.000155963,0.00009615699,0.0000980311,0.00003207116,0.0005778249,0.000009700745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002842386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003844844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008741808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009466229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987711,0.00008257799,0.0003507209,0.0002385271,0.000284239,0.0002728827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989027,0.00009358999,0.000516067,0.0001827022,0.0001572324,0.000147655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002499006,0.0001637865,0.984701,0.00006890785,0.0002177866,0.0000376243,0.003161347,0.0001676681,0.0006456426,0.00476821,0.0003121507,0.005505995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001567803,0.0008980613,0.991945,0.000925888,0.00007213628,0.001909674,0.0003264731,0.00003279739,0.00007392925,0.0001731286,0.001830691,0.0002444246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942508,0.0005466361,0.003119009,0.001078464,0.00008054826,0.0001330333,0.000001822712,0.00002126618,0.0007684036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965599,0.000113748,0.002819471,0.0001259604,0.0002262992,0.000002445373,0.000003087077,0.00002601235,0.000123087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007244014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4885241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322008306","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffr004","title":"Japanese Indeterminate Negative Polarity Items and Their Scope","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; Scope (computer science); Polarity (international relations); Computer science; Mathematics; Chemistry; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04839574268131535,"gpt":0.2380518497449923,"spread":0.1896561070636769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004535303,0.00015433,0.0002959146,0.0001660495,0.0001696762,0.0001038673,0.0001680101,0.00006130524,0.0002057832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003810918,0.0001126528,0.00006754396,0.00003076501,0.0002213293,0.0002773302,0.00005383806,0.0002596938,0.00001090332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001956699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003877058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006035717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003877618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999011,0.00007849595,0.0004747721,0.00008961235,0.0001721723,0.0001739437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986157,0.0002012917,0.00057008,0.000134896,0.0003872476,0.00009077649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001746458,0.0002584246,0.004531859,0.0001445537,0.0002486461,0.00008040707,0.9470798,0.000001453939,0.001038966,0.04438043,0.0001058546,0.001954985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005291868,0.003155903,0.06800154,0.001896379,0.001229245,0.00132853,0.3331655,0.004988894,0.02474574,0.54818,0.006128938,0.001887549],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873829,0.0002215013,0.0002925595,0.001157072,0.001580858,0.0001068116,0.00001015666,0.0000176402,0.009230439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977367,0.00012773,0.0006743902,0.0001095325,0.0009671586,3.073082e-7,7.593654e-7,0.00001994774,0.0003635096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6139143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4593847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107744105","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffm010","title":"On the Meaning of Only","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03527310327054482,"gpt":0.254545827762007,"spread":0.2192727244914622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001289527,0.00008427723,0.0001907532,0.0001345613,0.0001225201,0.00005598455,0.0001897428,0.00003130825,0.0002355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001043919,0.00005282333,0.0001049133,0.00003391425,0.00009708951,0.00006293717,0.00001855966,0.0002068364,0.00001599567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002796557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004855291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003445879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002368604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988045,0.00002934496,0.0005666451,0.00005085503,0.0004108892,0.0001377988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979232,0.000659926,0.0007151438,0.0001352948,0.0005310405,0.00003541216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003345699,0.00006863574,0.0004539041,0.00001891303,0.00006536054,0.00001949518,0.02109748,0.00002945024,0.0002457689,0.9770624,0.000468357,0.0004367903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001170018,0.001074688,0.005434118,0.0009631615,0.0004388462,0.0001575147,0.04316828,0.0007874836,0.009299807,0.9235473,0.01358277,0.0003760624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9320292,0.00005011777,0.004487686,0.01486182,0.003156846,0.00009362859,0.000003146069,0.00001207168,0.04530549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997037,0.00001164104,0.0006672837,0.0002574553,0.00165316,5.893217e-8,3.914108e-7,0.00001347406,0.000359521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06500783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.257856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230023253","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffw006","title":"Training and Timing Local Scalar Enrichments under Global Pragmatic Pressures","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Sentence; Linguistics; Mechanism (biology); Comprehension; Reading comprehension; Interpretation (philosophy); Reading (process); Computer science; Reciprocal; Relation (database); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05014074015318835,"gpt":0.3187917940705155,"spread":0.2686510539173271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002691767,0.00009966429,0.0002012634,0.00004823452,0.00007163343,0.00003066687,0.0001658505,0.00005911846,0.00001809872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004231081,0.00005737926,0.00005046139,0.00007134851,0.0001976649,0.0001786958,0.00005760276,0.0001091707,0.000005276234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001915513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004285339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.185245e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001252174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990368,0.0001083106,0.0003040915,0.0001339075,0.0002161919,0.0002007161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992024,0.0003179625,0.0002591876,0.00008912975,0.00004258879,0.00008875441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008350729,0.0002124635,0.003071199,0.0000833848,0.00006760735,0.003117645,0.001961151,0.00009463848,0.9307852,0.002026822,0.0005839518,0.05791237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01435072,0.00487091,0.0182903,0.003954718,0.001157223,0.09825863,0.006879066,0.002021671,0.7541844,0.07407089,0.01973969,0.002221803],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879736,0.0002125234,0.009572642,0.00157035,0.0003478415,0.00005234664,0.000004153769,0.00001246914,0.0002540714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981784,0.0001155542,0.0005333674,0.000906994,0.0001356007,2.023046e-7,6.456563e-8,0.000006859797,0.0001229285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1766009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2339858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988016002","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffn007","title":"Syntax and Semantics of It-Clefts: A Tree Adjoining Grammar Analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Syntax; Programming language; Grammar; Semantics (computer science); Linguistics; Tree (set theory); Natural language processing; Abstract syntax tree; Philosophy; Mathematics; Combinatorics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01724109633521458,"gpt":0.2596329703731936,"spread":0.242391874037979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000520618,0.0001423714,0.0005039171,0.0004950314,0.0000876514,0.0000601348,0.0006594468,0.00008838061,0.000004826268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002342672,0.0001141519,0.0001860339,0.001043658,0.0001161897,0.0005260832,0.0002347923,0.0002854165,8.494011e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000270193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007386407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001435293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000127764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984586,0.00005448027,0.0006280605,0.0001580151,0.0005084074,0.0001924345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982799,0.0001377768,0.0008217673,0.0003107054,0.0003472439,0.0001025672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003677046,0.002127507,0.4758157,0.001952684,0.00900238,0.01219727,0.05118087,0.001678404,0.1238282,0.05163461,0.02641389,0.2438008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005768555,0.004673172,0.08508679,0.003767297,0.007777625,0.02412635,0.001986069,0.4320667,0.3260399,0.09908655,0.00571213,0.003908868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2105217,0.002595749,0.7843733,0.002184723,0.0001182363,0.00005344352,0.000001100285,0.00005489068,0.00009676936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6096689,0.0004744001,0.3896761,0.0001083966,0.00003536586,1.53253e-7,2.037191e-7,0.000006067252,0.00003046794],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4303883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.465498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900630539","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffz022","title":"Do Children Interpret ‘or’ Conjunctively?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Computer science; Replicate; Competence (human resources); Linguistics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02876315549806096,"gpt":0.3081623980118546,"spread":0.2793992425137937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001329936,0.0000974448,0.0002112619,0.00006471585,0.00002558645,0.00003187853,0.00021864,0.00006182938,0.002346928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001216527,0.00006646028,0.00008740316,0.0001391257,0.00003538398,0.00008972756,0.00003787689,0.0002226069,0.0001761925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001116835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004939362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003108098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001112955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992176,0.00003981649,0.0003263984,0.00009553604,0.0001748068,0.0001458823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995017,0.00004769846,0.0001657718,0.00008134299,0.00008640309,0.0001170911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003302545,0.0005737554,0.4342901,0.00005866346,0.002107761,0.001647677,0.10773,0.00001811518,0.001003085,0.005909735,0.408607,0.0347515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02134913,0.005757647,0.8139516,0.000496414,0.0009109887,0.00341989,0.0601153,0.0001636165,0.002127035,0.003275382,0.08648346,0.0019495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722909,0.001010295,0.005597604,0.005564777,0.00108826,0.0001135154,0.000004876731,0.00002559788,0.01430421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958351,0.0000493429,0.0006743548,0.002730844,0.0003326208,3.931988e-7,0.000001733044,0.0000144878,0.0003611833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3796616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362456789","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffad001","title":"Copredication and Meaning Transfer","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Reinterpretation; Sentence; Philosophy; Predicate (mathematical logic); Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07281292118925622,"gpt":0.2725259959081947,"spread":0.1997130747189385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004632313,0.00005203277,0.0001413954,0.0000918497,0.0001181874,0.00004882055,0.00006227879,0.0000347637,0.00003589164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000451933,0.00004132705,0.00005103212,0.00002921284,0.00015787,0.0001357725,0.00000878783,0.0001859215,0.0000153528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006189928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002606069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004935566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003758359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994502,0.00002970098,0.0002310794,0.00004546424,0.0001527369,0.00009080002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995589,0.00009888404,0.00007847188,0.00005227001,0.000170341,0.00004118324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001952792,0.00004245251,0.0009344726,0.0001724752,0.0001276874,0.00004441938,0.08701599,0.00002704548,0.001321114,0.8996028,0.008085478,0.002606535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002070705,0.0008386695,0.004092275,0.0005727719,0.0006469318,0.0002152671,0.03377503,0.002020708,0.002180347,0.2834557,0.669626,0.0005055894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624723,0.0004847298,0.002118834,0.007546494,0.002292762,0.00008545146,0.000008214438,0.00005674498,0.02493443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971265,0.0006160933,0.00007558402,0.0002051254,0.0007829801,2.644694e-7,0.000001676781,0.000008916729,0.001182922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6615405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1685268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186963881","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffab008","title":"Causes and Expectations: On the Interpretation of the Tagalog Ability/Involuntary Action Form","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Tagalog; Presupposition; Action (physics); Event (particle physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03860714750207806,"gpt":0.2628203318380202,"spread":0.2242131843359421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002804544,0.00007723635,0.0001476952,0.00005768111,0.0001931251,0.00008937289,0.0001016926,0.00002953949,0.00008940577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001266843,0.0000447506,0.00008983003,0.00004353185,0.0001341677,0.0001502509,0.00002905486,0.0001672938,0.000002340884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004378303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007094914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006148746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008840265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990765,0.00009253506,0.000420663,0.00006952277,0.0002676664,0.0000730586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982412,0.0004318212,0.0005161485,0.0001605229,0.0006317994,0.00001850973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001385168,0.0003861819,0.007680701,0.0002924489,0.0004127857,0.00001511295,0.286538,0.0003090935,0.003487759,0.6966569,0.001237683,0.002844774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00112273,0.000558813,0.05243719,0.001407927,0.0008831008,0.0001898987,0.307196,0.01452351,0.02353993,0.5954045,0.002365203,0.000371215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688774,0.0001438793,0.0007410417,0.0274184,0.001914322,0.0001066681,0.000007516664,0.000005954227,0.0007848096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998842,0.00006229687,0.0001668231,0.0002370865,0.0005402798,0.00000118844,0.000001817398,0.000008605225,0.0001399282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1012524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1824877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792807544","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffx011","title":"Projecting Possibilities in the Nominal Domain: Spanish Uno Cualquiera","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Domain (mathematical analysis); Humanities; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04208769818330323,"gpt":0.2947679274406486,"spread":0.2526802292573453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003225817,0.0003443389,0.0006710643,0.0002931432,0.001443945,0.004736807,0.001249683,0.0001601392,0.0001286834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002640464,0.0002467882,0.0002987559,0.00003742186,0.000568333,0.000662916,0.0001622859,0.0009012151,0.00002817585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001485744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003210296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001354443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008570898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996721,0.0002683612,0.001422267,0.0002402304,0.0008515809,0.0004966087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948359,0.0006017615,0.002900084,0.0007666486,0.0008184617,0.00007710707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002128018,0.0005507981,0.03396486,0.0006433533,0.0002849352,0.0006720944,0.3714418,0.00002861447,0.000148357,0.5904998,0.0004712891,0.001081298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003910361,0.001630915,0.1453931,0.004842365,0.001062054,0.001054033,0.4128582,0.001562989,0.0002345515,0.4081499,0.01815208,0.001149374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509961,0.0002946608,0.0001583699,0.03706591,0.004624415,0.0003178753,0.00002128236,0.000009665087,0.006511693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886108,0.0001576705,0.001107346,0.0002088176,0.009224606,0.000002036004,0.000002161273,0.00004377818,0.0006427728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1823499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064997527","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffr001","title":"The Role of Microvariation in the Study of Semantic Universals: Adverbial Quantifiers in European and Quebec French","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adverbial; Quantifier (linguistics); Linguistics; Variation (astronomy); Semantics (computer science); Problem of universals; Computer science; Semantic property; Syntax; Lexical semantics; Focus (optics); Argument (complex analysis); Natural language processing; Lexical item; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0292324864006396,"gpt":0.2244034403788358,"spread":0.1951709539781962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001902415,0.0001058423,0.0002606472,0.0002303244,0.00009834811,0.00005630485,0.0003103325,0.00002951242,0.00001705056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003688113,0.00006788115,0.0000513288,0.00009183752,0.0001539947,0.0001413215,0.00004253393,0.0002134218,0.000001168198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002837659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005698198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01984285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08087017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998255,0.0003984907,0.000823552,0.00008990176,0.000299627,0.0001334879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982942,0.0003226023,0.0008782506,0.0001845582,0.0003002119,0.00002023046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001336936,0.0009769364,0.08798518,0.00006831386,0.0001464096,0.00005887303,0.7635459,0.00005150881,0.0007106414,0.1447385,0.00003103983,0.001552968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002286432,0.0008181328,0.4744451,0.0003395742,0.0003129337,0.00002327492,0.4920814,0.001437675,0.0004373778,0.02708784,0.0005299767,0.0002002629],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967409,0.0001311498,0.00007036029,0.0004425305,0.0004714543,0.0002023882,0.000002176504,0.000002608107,0.001936398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995759,0.00005542005,0.0001052754,0.00001176269,0.0001940844,3.590289e-7,6.31374e-7,0.00001167074,0.00004494077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3864599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330004190","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffq019","title":"A Note on Embedded Implicatures and Counterfactual Presuppositions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Presupposition; Semantics (computer science); Counterfactual conditional; Philosophy; Computer science; Classics; History; Linguistics; Epistemology; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01651869599251455,"gpt":0.2652697177953459,"spread":0.2487510218028314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002281148,0.0001183021,0.0001964177,0.0001366514,0.0002050722,0.0002404144,0.0001338144,0.00006935225,0.0002329525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003901442,0.00009361812,0.00006657533,0.00001723635,0.0001321423,0.0001279244,0.00002439266,0.0004411641,0.00002138919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000135783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004436886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003100386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000180619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991185,0.00001978575,0.0003643973,0.00009748034,0.0002563057,0.0001435274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988264,0.00022023,0.0003398203,0.0001580802,0.0003740432,0.00008145787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001411714,0.000308339,0.0004471076,0.00006633866,0.0001551763,0.00004422775,0.08202516,0.00002303271,0.01481529,0.8973342,0.003344565,0.001295435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005958952,0.003426587,0.02618731,0.0008726855,0.00166737,0.001741046,0.01757428,0.005063509,0.02329989,0.8045159,0.1079769,0.001715613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709025,0.00003570449,0.001296377,0.01718998,0.003710306,0.0001345153,0.00004368943,0.00002762623,0.00665929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958142,0.00002115404,0.001118955,0.0003028159,0.002503205,7.419542e-7,0.000003028223,0.00001750057,0.0002183787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1046323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3817636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990695985","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffr013","title":"Indefinites, Dependent Plurality, and the Viability Requirement on Scalar Alternatives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Scalar (mathematics); Semantics (computer science); Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04849098672533862,"gpt":0.273617053657584,"spread":0.2251260669322454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002234946,0.0001366052,0.0002801624,0.00008875043,0.0002208902,0.0001793988,0.0001793393,0.00003680957,0.0001554955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001030151,0.00008122244,0.00009492891,0.00002060797,0.0003215767,0.0002323204,0.00007310882,0.0002558363,0.00001639521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006670026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001352821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008259099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983768,0.0001892897,0.0005828071,0.00008928932,0.0005506223,0.000211185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982498,0.0005497261,0.0005976122,0.0001847766,0.0003325684,0.00008551668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001457528,0.0002576576,0.01503104,0.00005244266,0.0001611098,0.000005256072,0.04628349,0.00001741241,0.00003213869,0.9373127,0.0001124753,0.0005885615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009237275,0.000991718,0.08746619,0.000695998,0.00120968,0.0002070473,0.03135484,0.001980582,0.002557295,0.8421407,0.02126645,0.0008921782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584684,0.0003952883,0.0007329081,0.03134748,0.003496065,0.0002464715,0.000009549164,0.00001481985,0.005289012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965426,0.0001026847,0.0002900893,0.0004014717,0.002494422,0.000001400918,0.000001132222,0.00001304212,0.000153129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09517191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3312155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166326203","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffab007","title":"The Contribution of Gestures to the Semantics of Non-Canonical Questions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Presupposition; Rhetorical question; Interpretation (philosophy); Feature (linguistics); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Semantics (computer science); Canonical form; Speech recognition; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0225722277499878,"gpt":0.3014186104188582,"spread":0.2788463826688704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006043271,0.00008201002,0.0002349861,0.00003851817,0.0002698782,0.0001234968,0.000417752,0.00003575012,0.00008535802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000437424,0.00004345272,0.0001400855,0.00007913137,0.0003239673,0.0001055328,0.0001127477,0.0002495274,0.000006277205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001938869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002006252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000409932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001523397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987736,0.0001398286,0.0005755904,0.00005070641,0.0003365978,0.0001237151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997309,0.0004655142,0.0005352651,0.000406614,0.001243257,0.00004032679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005662451,0.000289678,0.0008300175,0.00003962892,0.0003284319,0.00002062496,0.0236956,0.0009075036,0.00358291,0.9445007,0.0248326,0.0009157236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001853568,0.0008861125,0.031369,0.001248867,0.001240211,0.0003410297,0.1481436,0.0009042382,0.02525791,0.02866598,0.7595692,0.0005201976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8697768,0.006753852,0.004912557,0.09920471,0.001845824,0.0003772327,0.00005186163,0.00001751608,0.01705957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977718,0.0007084755,0.0004041916,0.0001553604,0.0003105159,0.000001221288,0.000002388583,0.00000825292,0.0006377675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9158347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2075713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405371696","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffae016","title":"Competence by default: do listeners assume that speakers are knowledgeable when computing conversational inferences?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of California, San Diego","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Computer science; Linguistics; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05350813562929412,"gpt":0.2864056893563179,"spread":0.2328975537270238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004440564,0.0001657927,0.0002827028,0.0001561583,0.0002354748,0.001160984,0.0004647867,0.00005021684,0.000934722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005636223,0.0001286714,0.0001362925,0.00005832007,0.0003326682,0.0007034587,0.00008622286,0.0004012335,0.00008474357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007668967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002061623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006569841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002068838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986622,0.0000873371,0.0004654884,0.0001298828,0.0004507562,0.000204292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984822,0.0003326985,0.0004606039,0.0002031153,0.0004366108,0.00008473999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004839841,0.0003456172,0.01048389,0.0007542669,0.001130656,0.0002594475,0.2256287,0.001409054,0.000598311,0.4898849,0.2651073,0.004349493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001154465,0.0002468513,0.002535065,0.003375937,0.0004740841,0.0002015912,0.2847768,0.01992407,0.0003943832,0.01861959,0.6673933,0.0009038369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7695168,0.02224438,0.00644856,0.01739596,0.007338033,0.000378714,0.0001674112,0.0002884523,0.1762217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952565,0.0002312092,0.0008051394,0.0001734057,0.0004422937,5.734859e-7,0.0000160724,0.00002038985,0.003054386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4712653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783250427","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffx015","title":"Underspecification in Degree Operators","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underspecification; Semantics (computer science); Scale (ratio); Identification (biology); Computer science; Vocabulary; Continuation; Degree (music); Feature (linguistics); Semantic interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Philosophy; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1025021986472623,"gpt":0.291030773315871,"spread":0.1885285746686087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004930302,0.00008893765,0.0001998458,0.0001640994,0.0002850996,0.000453069,0.0003449431,0.00004314025,0.0001620223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000808301,0.00007647947,0.00006285717,0.00001354266,0.0001199672,0.0003415612,0.00003192687,0.0001795416,0.00003506462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007222103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000627101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000205215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001349176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990393,0.000027543,0.0004705958,0.0000804585,0.0002518647,0.0001302431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984685,0.00005857442,0.0007193522,0.0002778755,0.0004308275,0.00004483995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002843833,0.0001470538,0.01314237,0.00003317887,0.00005180663,0.00006939289,0.02851177,0.00004544137,0.0001979219,0.9553671,0.0005525672,0.001852927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004832859,0.0005635388,0.293339,0.001144595,0.0003646558,0.0001427789,0.06345493,0.005285334,0.001996487,0.5927476,0.03510023,0.001028013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.897193,0.0001286566,0.002457073,0.06289824,0.006672021,0.000165814,0.000004838345,0.0000178607,0.03046247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966969,0.00007264179,0.0008025733,0.00006174306,0.001934329,3.960944e-7,9.25939e-7,0.00001409818,0.0004163534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3626195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4368955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304774961","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffac011","title":"On the Role of Focus-Sensitivity for a Typology of Presupposition Triggers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Focus (optics); Sentence; Utterance; Linguistics; Salience (neuroscience); Context (archaeology); Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Psychology; Meaning (existential); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01642817141062254,"gpt":0.2838373450504258,"spread":0.2674091736398033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008809958,0.0000596372,0.0002160653,0.0001129643,0.00006505023,0.000003133842,0.00009614407,0.00004329938,0.0003104472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113573,0.00004183238,0.0001721997,0.00009980139,0.00005342457,0.00002713188,0.00001924647,0.0001900009,0.000001910861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001807887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000310463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002081695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004628288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989806,0.0003266395,0.0003276789,0.00006453716,0.0001947672,0.0001057149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985178,0.0006053066,0.0005677427,0.0001265838,0.0001619335,0.00002060452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01198887,0.004258482,0.002160927,0.0001582737,0.002048473,0.0001984931,0.02677313,0.0005114797,0.3240077,0.5651322,0.01949826,0.04326367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01041019,0.01885796,0.01774268,0.0001983657,0.002229798,0.002121889,0.08591767,0.001670734,0.4114709,0.439863,0.008936766,0.0005800618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918122,0.0003661686,0.002278574,0.0009674643,0.0005059222,0.0001946768,0.00005688829,0.000003226601,0.003814846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994914,0.00001184576,0.0001342097,0.0001535363,0.00009932309,0.000005808019,0.000003205719,0.000008835359,0.00009186277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1252692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3399179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090445977","doi":"10.1093/jos/fft012","title":"Beyond Demonstratives: Direct Reference in Perceptually Grounded Descriptions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02115685589645601,"gpt":0.2669893037253511,"spread":0.2458324478288951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003311794,0.0001106735,0.000212308,0.0002539951,0.00005766641,0.0002678116,0.0008124956,0.00007691517,0.00002077695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001446808,0.00008466326,0.0000528606,0.0003723295,0.00006477925,0.001582644,0.0001041247,0.0004125362,0.00001348448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007286134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001221821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003547212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003328891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988793,0.00007451232,0.000427772,0.0001295263,0.0002977125,0.0001911923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989983,0.00008619209,0.0002832359,0.0002051798,0.0003493903,0.00007762814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003840702,0.001208678,0.01345846,0.0002397755,0.0001618434,0.0008494902,0.02575206,0.00009898793,0.2760179,0.4510196,0.01463192,0.2165229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001110981,0.0009472,0.03889222,0.001083102,0.00004727648,0.001370872,0.002444851,0.01556298,0.02028768,0.9166818,0.0006480112,0.0009230377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2740725,0.002860878,0.7093501,0.004858454,0.0004211787,0.000260541,9.852419e-7,0.0001812035,0.007994135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6247039,0.000081752,0.3749701,0.0001331934,0.00002972699,0.000001369268,1.774556e-7,0.000004071614,0.00007574951],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4656622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3452468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387516844","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffad006","title":"Metaphorical Uses of Proper Names and the Continuity Hypothesis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Phenomenon; Class (philosophy); Proper noun; Literal (mathematical logic); Set (abstract data type); Spell; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03683111468613496,"gpt":0.294148250420926,"spread":0.257317135734791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009877342,0.00007557425,0.0003304452,0.0001089253,0.00004245799,0.00002197459,0.0001271583,0.0000571293,0.0001067201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003687222,0.00003847622,0.0001374204,0.0002045327,0.000183007,0.00005788599,0.00002853451,0.0001618735,0.00002609786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005067848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001746131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001721037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004934637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990022,0.0002132942,0.0003602919,0.00007148322,0.0002287367,0.000124052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988479,0.0005042717,0.0003087514,0.0001229918,0.0001770701,0.00003898757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009242858,0.002686442,0.125672,0.0008842222,0.01098625,0.002091211,0.1795278,0.00002988462,0.0357211,0.1699755,0.1254073,0.3377754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02047649,0.001771777,0.7408307,0.0005210698,0.00546217,0.002458944,0.08030706,0.0003321984,0.0247264,0.08715677,0.03504648,0.0009099494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943357,0.001461104,0.0001522317,0.001290001,0.0004132298,0.0000944776,0.00000393758,0.00001035759,0.002239005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978062,0.0005056573,0.0002123019,0.0001483885,0.0001833031,0.000001836494,3.117333e-7,0.00001024957,0.001131757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6151587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1569015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417303712","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffaf011","title":"Children interpret some disjunctions conjunctively: Evidence from child Romanian","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Universitatea din București; Western Sydney University; Connaught Fund; Macquarie University; Universität Wien; University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Markedness; Statement (logic); Romanian; Confusion; Artifact (error); Value (mathematics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00966774024050433,"gpt":0.2930286739224382,"spread":0.2833609336819339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002038468,0.0001440072,0.0002714998,0.0002449682,0.0001054986,0.0000565503,0.0003249784,0.00009812746,0.0006105797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001875746,0.0001158369,0.0001427411,0.0002185918,0.00007001458,0.0002955345,0.00006993751,0.0003527707,0.00009527348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000474454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007968257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001140199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003694951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989324,0.00007233092,0.000450746,0.0001614877,0.0001900864,0.0001929624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992329,0.000168774,0.0001971645,0.0002167657,0.0001133428,0.00007109335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007165415,0.0008712685,0.8390457,0.00003057803,0.003038048,0.0002242422,0.01565732,0.00002337886,0.0006907939,0.01621509,0.1113616,0.01212543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001300688,0.0001387693,0.9882957,0.0006874645,0.0002894681,0.00006943961,0.002114083,0.00001958188,0.0002415719,0.003880394,0.002755439,0.000207399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705541,0.004733672,0.007691119,0.005227253,0.00387046,0.0001500952,0.00001249995,0.00003214362,0.007728681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961975,0.0002022557,0.000460237,0.001180578,0.0004161749,0.000002020957,0.000006774701,0.00001286908,0.001521621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.14925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.668542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213845739","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffab009","title":"Random Choice from Likelihood: The Case of Chuj (Mayan)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Modality (human–computer interaction); Event (particle physics); Modal; Computer science; Linguistics; Component (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Point (geometry); Modal verb; Verb; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02490790054597536,"gpt":0.2512566209982073,"spread":0.226348720452232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005393256,0.0001328536,0.0003950903,0.00007691231,0.0001988828,0.0001674008,0.0002049756,0.00005464367,0.0007905817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001674292,0.00009086177,0.0002059789,0.00005669579,0.0001244932,0.0001333386,0.00005524516,0.0002784776,0.00001779598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002770637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001427075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001319024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003542566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985168,0.0001269359,0.00077643,0.0001058906,0.0003040594,0.0001698653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966366,0.0009849096,0.0008397297,0.0002764363,0.001197202,0.00006507716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006320859,0.00197057,0.007948554,0.000618656,0.004064978,0.01771762,0.3709909,0.0005549074,0.007902249,0.5612688,0.01257779,0.01375292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0207017,0.0008673687,0.006826596,0.002197553,0.006338536,0.00833469,0.1888455,0.01213945,0.02895489,0.5930252,0.1302185,0.00155005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668112,0.001009322,0.001936301,0.02207722,0.004846494,0.0001100863,0.00005302037,0.00001372236,0.003142607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993805,0.0001258451,0.001030591,0.000265225,0.004370071,5.179529e-7,0.000005532578,0.00002117665,0.0003760429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1821454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8656315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213336685","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffab012","title":"Monotonicity Revisited: Mass Nouns and Comparisons of Purity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Measure (data warehouse); Constraint (computer-aided design); Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Noun; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Data mining; Mathematical analysis; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03204469584860422,"gpt":0.2584894318109978,"spread":0.2264447359623935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004368326,0.0001077173,0.0004331532,0.00009846811,0.0001139353,0.0001203734,0.0001129193,0.00005151361,0.0001674801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006031059,0.00009740007,0.0001099212,0.00004463361,0.0001247654,0.0001256956,0.0000425704,0.0002307035,0.000004477514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000266567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009176379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007037232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001461035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987186,0.00006862471,0.0006742653,0.00009939061,0.0003045156,0.0001346191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978236,0.0001847787,0.0007006263,0.0001661621,0.001056143,0.00006871323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008499297,0.0006237901,0.057937,0.0007674961,0.0006241648,0.0002583403,0.04163569,0.0001084278,0.003757721,0.891001,0.002550621,0.0006507321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007924901,0.001631587,0.09721633,0.004289128,0.004539213,0.001210169,0.1223574,0.03046381,0.0383097,0.5730761,0.1168601,0.002121619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.970589,0.001123727,0.008026753,0.0142161,0.0016879,0.0001123955,0.00004197074,0.00001577332,0.004186318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936224,0.0003683365,0.004911184,0.00008849206,0.0008043331,2.007602e-7,0.000003700163,0.00001212302,0.000189253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3179249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.397186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401797277","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffae002","title":"Co-predications and the quantificational force of summative predicates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Calgary","keywords":"Summative assessment; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematics education; Formative assessment","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01550755185513376,"gpt":0.2792327989883482,"spread":0.2637252471332144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008218212,0.00006067869,0.0001498816,0.00009733454,0.00008048875,0.0001105736,0.0004726816,0.00003269081,0.000005282808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002362223,0.00003385416,0.00007625645,0.0002106263,0.0002707815,0.0002618539,0.00004733331,0.0001538764,0.000006532204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001097797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001505371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001480133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.216169e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991619,0.00006112897,0.0003393547,0.00008724142,0.0002686245,0.00008173488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986478,0.0006432012,0.0002546113,0.0001616922,0.0002441696,0.00004849553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009854769,0.00004321482,0.001031391,0.00006941102,0.0001222224,0.000005828877,0.004762846,0.00003092824,0.001076787,0.9863954,0.004980514,0.001471574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002187344,0.0004464322,0.02769268,0.001000895,0.0004232684,0.001036687,0.001450988,0.6170396,0.02191455,0.3065599,0.01988887,0.0003588974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03826316,0.01005741,0.9322206,0.01371992,0.0007610363,0.000166751,0.000009481765,0.00003976904,0.004761863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947843,0.0007204795,0.004041485,0.0000339863,0.0001241213,0.000001328822,8.919095e-7,0.000003638767,0.0002897543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9565212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1380532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415221415","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffaf009","title":"Uncentered attitude reports","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Class (philosophy); Variation (astronomy); Tuple; Positive attitude; Contrast (vision); Possible world","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02533638573077991,"gpt":0.2648575456086577,"spread":0.2395211598778778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004533466,0.0001075412,0.0002653197,0.0002079767,0.0001363616,0.0001756391,0.0001420034,0.00004202413,0.0002334414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006291796,0.00009037428,0.0001272865,0.00004507791,0.00007659972,0.0001288865,0.00003885434,0.0001770989,0.00001361423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006136468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001096546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006148452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001617629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986905,0.0000300377,0.0007509643,0.00009664935,0.0002823101,0.000149578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983407,0.0000892145,0.0006550113,0.0001926379,0.0006784577,0.00004396072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005669603,0.0003649246,0.01934788,0.0002203857,0.0005265921,0.0007312454,0.01760325,0.0001152278,0.0004417635,0.945762,0.01352069,0.001309371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001817667,0.0003633877,0.01535605,0.001906317,0.001066057,0.0005215324,0.01036012,0.001271758,0.001937204,0.6752009,0.2896066,0.0005923806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7553222,0.0008407513,0.0172359,0.09902866,0.04287121,0.0003895446,0.00001117352,0.0001124677,0.08418816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939622,0.00003961831,0.00100144,0.0003457837,0.001537899,4.202552e-7,0.000002066389,0.00001109234,0.00309948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2760859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3685356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387805757","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffad008","title":"Spanish Bare Interrogatives and Number","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Université de Nantes","keywords":"Linguistics; Inference; Plural; Computer science; Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03708987663570877,"gpt":0.2713351762869606,"spread":0.2342452996512518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003205066,0.00009641275,0.0002065183,0.0001181834,0.0001271434,0.0001822717,0.0001060814,0.00003392207,0.0004529237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004626546,0.00008012432,0.00006411436,0.00004531335,0.0001131825,0.0001745859,0.00005066378,0.0001525583,0.0001239478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000183682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002638221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003751012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001682729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999148,0.00003169898,0.000367885,0.00007831008,0.0002320359,0.000142135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991567,0.0001479936,0.0002032408,0.0000827901,0.0003500355,0.00005923524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005206649,0.000121132,0.01662433,0.0002437455,0.0003685245,0.000302061,0.3279437,0.00003302279,0.0003920782,0.6400648,0.01203206,0.001822488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002726254,0.0006477308,0.05689187,0.001442018,0.0006792435,0.0005481203,0.2266921,0.00627933,0.001479094,0.6254597,0.07619675,0.0009578285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971782,0.00004114515,0.0002958822,0.01833123,0.002905124,0.00006656332,0.000009793499,0.00004882994,0.006519387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963774,0.0001002825,0.0004181885,0.0001000192,0.001817232,3.845379e-7,0.000002757629,0.00001844116,0.001165268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1012516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4959197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416386223","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffaf010","title":"Re-thinking the Agent Control Hypothesis: inanimate subjects without a change of state","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Jacobs Research Funds","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Construals; Control (management); State (computer science)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0479626361145272,"gpt":0.2592862053462565,"spread":0.2113235692317293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001111144,0.0001502371,0.0004206437,0.0002216638,0.000225877,0.0001649007,0.0003207218,0.00004063635,0.00005233278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007266926,0.00009887382,0.0001503257,0.00006607889,0.0001345982,0.0001410866,0.00004511702,0.0002235094,0.000006623828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005523571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008842997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002112786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007038228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984034,0.0001134568,0.0007575009,0.00009641528,0.0004227239,0.0002065095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976012,0.0004073735,0.001053508,0.0002123592,0.000690367,0.00003523624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006633527,0.0005672796,0.02156351,0.001055383,0.001850953,0.000149204,0.3796784,0.0001969882,0.001353017,0.5866539,0.001436265,0.004831673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00685047,0.001140287,0.04265741,0.005803006,0.003358981,0.00005336393,0.06934566,0.008319023,0.006396037,0.8372881,0.01791174,0.0008759435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.916294,0.001161635,0.006089292,0.06344502,0.006139506,0.000762313,0.00003625971,0.00004947265,0.006022549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972382,0.0001674995,0.0004651354,0.0008095415,0.0009138369,0.000003143671,4.75795e-7,0.00001929669,0.0003828986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3103328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4031957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391987585","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffae001","title":"THE HELL with questions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China; Universität Konstanz","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Computer science; Semantics (computer science); Class (philosophy); Domain (mathematical analysis); Linguistics; Cognitive dissonance; Semantic property; Expression (computer science); Epistemology; Philosophy; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematics; Programming language; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006740377960851957,"gpt":0.2427140667496465,"spread":0.2359736887887946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004702618,0.00004309124,0.00006562041,0.00005527999,0.0003618444,0.0001233976,0.000881503,0.000009097792,0.000002571867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003949567,0.00002341947,0.00002953596,0.0002543392,0.00002901729,0.0001933329,0.0001882535,0.0003244947,6.805832e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003822667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009806828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002020294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001867079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993085,0.00004920182,0.0001479996,0.00004907792,0.0003507376,0.00009452251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993336,0.00008159882,0.0002304738,0.0001780498,0.0001474492,0.00002884451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008406702,0.0002863699,0.001328167,0.00003780575,0.000130704,0.001284767,0.00290776,0.001436507,0.005865385,0.8819485,0.02365526,0.08103468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00135291,0.004206534,0.0009142642,0.0003130104,0.0001309755,0.0198391,0.001334304,0.03804347,0.03093595,0.539198,0.3628932,0.0008382407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005434296,0.005581826,0.9743739,0.01383027,0.0004134618,0.00005808503,4.741364e-7,0.0000802731,0.000227446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6569526,0.0000664431,0.342256,0.0002902751,0.00006703509,0.000001411448,6.912304e-8,0.000005203239,0.0003609835],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6515183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2783051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}