{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":52,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":52,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"6d17b6904320","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Social Policy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2787192533","doi":"10.1017/s0047279417000915","title":"Impact of Welfare Benefit Sanctioning on Food Insecurity: a Dynamic Cross-Area Study of Food Bank Usage in the UK","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Economic Research Service; Wellcome Trust; University of Toronto; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Sanctions; Austerity; Welfare; Food insecurity; Distribution (mathematics); Payment; Unemployment; Food stamps; Business; Economics; Food security; Demographic economics; Public economics; Agriculture; Political science; Economic growth; Finance; Geography; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1426829258458739,"gpt":0.5078151413018837,"spread":0.3651322154560097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001219406,0.0001529211,0.0004962247,0.0006011666,0.001290548,0.00001537442,0.0003424442,0.0002303206,0.0002542674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004955236,0.000112848,0.0002334163,0.0008341668,0.0001545689,0.000172165,0.00007720762,0.001028401,0.000005977325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004981277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006506523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004552778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01647437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971921,0.0004969019,0.001253146,0.0001207666,0.0005270803,0.0004100053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974275,0.000232869,0.001451094,0.0001983553,0.0005938243,0.00009635901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001182443,0.001919437,0.5282022,0.000262429,0.0003622051,0.000005202457,0.4379747,0.0001401703,0.0000312805,0.02769577,0.0008562103,0.001367968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002494872,0.008288156,0.9605779,0.0001749725,0.00003845616,0.00000323996,0.0233448,0.00002391612,0.000001989091,0.00475656,0.0002116986,0.00008340479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950704,0.00004226012,0.000003546323,0.002100821,0.0003346992,0.0005616132,0.0001632321,0.000006767061,0.00171667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985303,0.00001850979,0.00001544782,0.0002931883,0.001098934,0.00001095027,0.000003329736,0.00001570896,0.00001360607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4323758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024383087","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000056","title":"Fairness and the Politics of Resentment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Blackberry (Canada)","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Resentment; Populism; Austerity; Reactionary; Politics; Political economy; Welfare; Political science; Punitive damages; Framing (construction); Feeling; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0219498578095805,"gpt":0.3479372400542,"spread":0.3259873822446194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008455914,0.00006348718,0.0002145177,0.00009744664,0.000486766,0.00006589597,0.0002603052,0.00006415151,0.00005809377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004201657,0.00003988083,0.0001078035,0.000187023,0.0008169191,0.00021058,0.00005125023,0.0001375652,0.000006318958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001598683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003412295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0178776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001307627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998544,0.0002696601,0.0003519772,0.00004778001,0.0005398895,0.0002467178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990385,0.0001099666,0.0004311091,0.00005904868,0.0002527713,0.0001086475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002436067,0.00008325461,0.001458756,0.00001378143,0.000108445,0.000002393057,0.08663593,8.427824e-7,0.0003097787,0.8923314,0.01514394,0.003887155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004034641,0.0001242122,0.1406261,0.00006188791,0.0001025928,0.000006422817,0.04031169,0.000006706692,0.0006985966,0.7500597,0.06375106,0.0002164059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9310153,0.0001150194,0.000012304,0.05346169,0.0002196069,0.0001626239,0.000003203264,0.000004882268,0.01500543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947812,0.00009766856,0.00006262743,0.0006830834,0.002522592,0.000002033879,1.269835e-7,0.000006115311,0.001844528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1422716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121752680","doi":"10.1017/s0047279401006365","title":"The Age-Orientation of Social Policy Regimes in OECD Countries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Social policy; Welfare; Population; Population ageing; Social insurance; Demographic economics; Social Welfare; Economics; Political science; Politics; Economic growth; Sociology; Demography; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02695987547279599,"gpt":0.3887384920434183,"spread":0.3617786165706223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001761249,0.0001446369,0.0004196654,0.0003575563,0.002131179,0.00009639862,0.0003995605,0.0002091016,0.00001571973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001267096,0.0001046353,0.0002951291,0.0009412873,0.001653755,0.000353436,0.00005697794,0.0003143232,0.000009088814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006562234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001975901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004657486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973102,0.0003749602,0.0007248669,0.00009550553,0.0009464189,0.0005480071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983053,0.0002106843,0.0008767915,0.00006137841,0.0004709092,0.00007498149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002143829,0.0000962758,0.004723292,0.00001731477,0.0001337032,0.00001518595,0.2968929,0.000002404373,0.00005766306,0.6703632,0.01176436,0.01571935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001622126,0.0001485353,0.3422869,0.00003464098,0.00006222103,0.000009000792,0.1353768,6.100749e-7,0.0000900848,0.1692082,0.3508683,0.0002926498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6423064,0.0003095866,0.000006554462,0.1987779,0.0007100686,0.0002546764,0.00001503319,0.00002538334,0.1575945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705243,0.002961862,0.0000140712,0.0007667921,0.02202684,0.000004656879,6.129098e-7,0.00001495396,0.003685872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.501155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132160079","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000306","title":"Children's Rights and Children's Wellbeing: Equivalent Policy Concepts?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit Leiden; University of Central Lancashire; McGill University; UNICEF","keywords":"Framing (construction); Statutory law; Duty; Legislation; Best interests; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03496734631343496,"gpt":0.3759364704031627,"spread":0.3409691240897278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001002428,0.0001853181,0.0003731209,0.0003667595,0.0008508404,0.0002034557,0.0003085231,0.0001875972,0.0000455259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000407489,0.0001473336,0.0001851321,0.0005313251,0.0006373773,0.0005282951,0.00006310774,0.0003034126,0.00002164502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003812668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001304841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01995579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005368791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976423,0.0003444219,0.0005263454,0.0001680353,0.0008024594,0.0005164488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983184,0.00005487588,0.0005831323,0.00009975105,0.0003383686,0.000605518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000179714,0.0003780207,0.03743633,0.000008403154,0.0003635185,0.00001632338,0.1527997,0.0000293982,0.00006280546,0.7561098,0.03967787,0.01293812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005039956,0.0005912566,0.6564195,0.00008122816,0.0002342193,0.0001238735,0.002269551,0.000008021104,0.0002505124,0.2007549,0.1334302,0.0007968253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668561,0.000225267,0.00003687515,0.01923808,0.0003169154,0.0002119256,0.00001817006,0.00003241787,0.0130643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755949,0.00008975748,0.0001016798,0.0005258539,0.02267664,0.000001526682,0.00000488369,0.00001652228,0.0009881989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6189831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9865704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097845821","doi":"10.1017/s0047279411000821","title":"The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Narrative; Presentation (obstetrics); Context (archaeology); Narrative inquiry; Identification (biology); Strengths and weaknesses; Field (mathematics); Focus (optics); Key (lock); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; History; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09848772467763912,"gpt":0.5212652790576524,"spread":0.4227775543800133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00791592,0.00008527378,0.000343549,0.001002536,0.0003354623,0.0001597904,0.0003978249,0.00005089031,0.00003499866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00586326,0.00003834275,0.0002413176,0.003220114,0.0004083934,0.0006004774,0.00007443898,0.0001846488,0.000004749405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001996081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008664553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002033867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003489587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969413,0.0006524071,0.0008479122,0.00006595989,0.001265817,0.000226659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996842,0.001171389,0.0012327,0.0001574974,0.0005155702,0.00008086392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004527404,0.0001621691,0.2259261,0.000007594049,0.0005973359,4.653202e-7,0.1983261,0.0005530462,0.0001925993,0.4659164,0.003731828,0.1041336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00111292,0.0000470958,0.9199737,0.000005798927,0.00012852,0.00000476219,0.01932419,0.0001274557,0.0002661186,0.0498295,0.009107886,0.00007209514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8700899,0.0002456977,0.0002419199,0.1256011,0.0001670033,0.0001066,0.000009632956,0.000001710799,0.003536328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995988,0.0002468606,0.00003464791,0.0004117109,0.002802721,0.000002418504,5.402288e-7,0.000003776218,0.0005093307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6940475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7019294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119720861","doi":"10.1017/s004727940300744x","title":"A Long Financial March: Pension Reform in China","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Pension; China; Dominance (genetics); Context (archaeology); Economics; Private pension; Politics; Liberalization; Economic policy; Finance; Economic system; Political science; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0322815302710439,"gpt":0.3622836123537908,"spread":0.3300020820827469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001020675,0.0001255003,0.000360566,0.0003678936,0.0009198653,0.00004304813,0.000275021,0.0002155156,0.00001179876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008877259,0.0001006951,0.0002521375,0.0008712371,0.0004731644,0.0003675469,0.00006538326,0.0004625667,0.00001304177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001601816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001716464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03519954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01243454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982139,0.0001217663,0.0004864712,0.00009509802,0.0005684144,0.0005143291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992703,0.00002383992,0.0003703214,0.00005152624,0.0001453834,0.0001385995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002764904,0.00041072,0.00251151,0.00003960539,0.00006669298,0.0002108226,0.2979519,0.00002419356,0.000117455,0.6684624,0.001890048,0.02803816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001959506,0.0001662862,0.710937,0.0001003167,0.0000206847,0.00001638987,0.0143673,2.051214e-7,0.00004776617,0.265267,0.006871634,0.0002459444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8391221,0.000138447,0.00001373843,0.09698015,0.0005803954,0.000160532,0.000004784396,0.00002099166,0.06297889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852368,0.0006167711,0.00006396064,0.0007264059,0.01289799,0.000002104878,4.043945e-7,0.00001175479,0.0004437741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7084255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9712251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182400478","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000677","title":"Are you really Financially Excluded if you Choose not to be Included? Insights from Social Exclusion, Resilience and Ecological Systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Social exclusion; Phenomenon; Resilience (materials science); Ecological systems theory; Context (archaeology); Psychological resilience; Extant taxon; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Economic growth; Geography; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07064667317119355,"gpt":0.3817285542263015,"spread":0.311081881055108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001704005,0.0002308385,0.0007897745,0.0002470194,0.001883479,0.0002787543,0.0006081047,0.0004671729,0.00002521701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00475784,0.000197997,0.0001744067,0.0005768951,0.0003988527,0.000455739,0.0002975541,0.0004823552,0.00001552596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001011436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002940996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02550204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006474175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960493,0.0006890111,0.0009601467,0.0002757742,0.001308732,0.0007170757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968427,0.0002536928,0.001059648,0.0001114687,0.0007681527,0.0009643068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001216849,0.0006752333,0.02057163,0.0001583219,0.0001325073,0.0004546646,0.5301996,0.00007058736,0.0001789219,0.2075081,0.2291722,0.009661379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001070623,0.0001444414,0.7494525,0.0000692427,0.00003072875,0.000005558903,0.04255273,0.000005121531,0.000005787855,0.008970785,0.197411,0.0002815195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8748529,0.0002321342,0.00002187863,0.1189675,0.001106507,0.0002945585,0.00005903865,0.00003351772,0.00443199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714426,0.0001781347,0.0001397232,0.01460674,0.0126444,0.000007363903,0.000002064367,0.00001956544,0.0009593737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7288808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788076413","doi":"10.1017/s0047279418000028","title":"Moving In and Out of In-work Poverty in the UK: An Analysis of Transitions, Trajectories and Trigger Events","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Cardiff University; Nuffield Foundation; University of Essex","keywords":"Poverty; Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Phenomenon; Working poor; Culture of poverty; Basic needs; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economics; Economic growth; Geography; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05024672741308343,"gpt":0.4342494475738092,"spread":0.3840027201607257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009065825,0.00006123268,0.0003809785,0.0004726074,0.000141424,0.000002418997,0.00006526022,0.00007236368,0.00001677044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001429763,0.00004139392,0.00006082596,0.0006734104,0.00009591951,0.0001002609,0.00001643976,0.0002182381,9.139375e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006808958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009850901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002490435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01316498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987327,0.0003609519,0.0005557123,0.00005323581,0.0001518919,0.0001454672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994069,0.0001492545,0.0002915794,0.00004111755,0.00008759592,0.00002349241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001227326,0.00006476517,0.8194393,0.00002634708,0.00008492791,9.93947e-7,0.1788993,8.074387e-7,0.00005823715,0.0005592559,0.0001652473,0.0005780927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007863283,0.00008693035,0.9733254,0.00009120934,0.0000763784,1.473072e-7,0.02387382,0.000002598784,0.000004395674,0.001642555,0.00007591234,0.00003427572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921558,0.0001157137,0.000003596699,0.007252894,0.0000530866,0.00009650471,0.00001328725,8.918396e-7,0.0003082241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991009,0.0001459044,0.00001321832,0.0003402873,0.0003639155,0.000002246346,6.59577e-7,0.000003600369,0.00002925289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1550255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7346366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806016612","doi":"10.1017/s0047279418000351","title":"The Politics of Minimum Income Protection in OECD Countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Social insurance; Politics; Welfare; Economics; Social security; State (computer science); Public economics; Social protection; Work (physics); Social assistance; Social Welfare; Debt; Economic Justice; Political science; Economic growth; Finance; Law; Market economy; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02804405166522515,"gpt":0.3679184502883142,"spread":0.339874398623089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001243055,0.00007711236,0.0002354479,0.0001730858,0.001631163,0.00004189667,0.0002469639,0.0001334772,0.000007698951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008568869,0.00005116605,0.0001301733,0.0003799906,0.002025077,0.0001688199,0.00004058694,0.0002061272,0.000008584218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002820456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008602921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00817705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003261433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998451,0.0002189926,0.0004787605,0.00004935077,0.0004545864,0.0003472907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988018,0.0001279601,0.0005365905,0.00004788434,0.0004259521,0.0000598012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001508661,0.0000889978,0.004114728,0.00003544967,0.0001327354,0.000003108913,0.2628477,5.04491e-7,0.000163143,0.7219256,0.003411591,0.007125554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001474434,0.000659816,0.1635329,0.0001010875,0.00005687837,0.000007738143,0.1055381,0.000003454159,0.0009269298,0.528234,0.1991547,0.0003099387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8893629,0.0002133337,0.000008411444,0.07469545,0.0009487488,0.0002362382,0.000008832275,0.00001270251,0.03451342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825269,0.0004046595,0.00001162915,0.0002471515,0.01566921,0.000002608456,4.671625e-8,0.000006808341,0.001130996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1957432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476160031","doi":"10.1017/s0047279416000428","title":"Modernising the European Social Paradigm: Social Investments and Social Entrepreneurs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social entrepreneurship; Employability; Social policy; Argument (complex analysis); Investment (military); European union; Entrepreneurship; Social order; Economic system; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Finance; Economic policy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05250243062945348,"gpt":0.3515985140298806,"spread":0.2990960834004271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001832254,0.0002745595,0.0005192058,0.0001921667,0.007315135,0.0002197527,0.0005403199,0.0002350591,0.00002579985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000363281,0.0001672058,0.000480373,0.0003868015,0.002664929,0.0004951485,0.0001994149,0.0003955298,0.00002283354],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003996564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005316609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008575471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001711926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959663,0.001436365,0.0006619544,0.0002179391,0.0009105983,0.0008068953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984779,0.0001904042,0.0009107699,0.00006225493,0.0002100063,0.0001487094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001130385,0.0001439255,0.001374687,0.00002150061,0.000494782,0.00002891459,0.488852,1.827496e-7,0.0004841803,0.3289333,0.05173155,0.1278219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005280409,0.0001597806,0.3200064,0.00007368817,0.0004868556,0.00005091804,0.0715,0.000001095849,0.00007719961,0.3938799,0.2073348,0.001148911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4545051,0.0001592147,0.00005075629,0.4401354,0.0008209568,0.0003047221,0.00005714501,0.00007822947,0.1038884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513164,0.0003198723,0.00001259588,0.002397272,0.04412602,0.000003700578,6.856098e-7,0.00004017223,0.001783252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4968113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003363669","doi":"10.1017/s0047279407001043","title":"Assessing the Capacity of Pension Institutions to Build and Sustain Trust: A Multidimensional Conceptual Framework","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Salient; Foundation (evidence); Conceptual framework; Business; Process (computing); Conceptual model; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Public relations; The Conceptual Framework; Private pension; Public economics; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Finance; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.062754094543284,"gpt":0.4087620353672399,"spread":0.3460079408239559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00203881,0.00008824573,0.0002305703,0.0001232431,0.001252017,0.0000587134,0.0001573308,0.0001970369,0.00001890718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001990535,0.00006627377,0.0001333461,0.000601249,0.001296342,0.000357005,0.00006065044,0.0004292184,0.000001249578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002170974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006155108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002505534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984742,0.0002047623,0.000383675,0.00008104418,0.0005420576,0.0003142796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984827,0.0005054953,0.0003476455,0.00004744271,0.0004197902,0.0001969285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005302772,0.0000723893,0.001683124,0.000004523786,0.00003295708,0.000008974399,0.1793555,0.00001986864,0.0007914859,0.8098307,0.001768093,0.0063793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001006144,0.0002794931,0.344447,0.0002003952,0.00009462013,0.0000285765,0.471314,0.00001125724,0.0004033466,0.09100841,0.09081337,0.0003934383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755977,0.0001369957,0.001642929,0.0201261,0.0003544114,0.0001229622,0.000003536883,0.000007980333,0.002007428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921656,0.00003683782,0.001569117,0.001610549,0.004571922,6.005844e-7,2.274372e-7,0.000006134706,0.00003907518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7188223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9629627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153746251","doi":"10.1017/s0047279414000373","title":"Personalisation and Austerity in the Crosshairs: Government Perspectives on the Remaking of Adult Social Care","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Austerity; Localism; Politics; Government (linguistics); Appeal; Personalization; Political science; Social exclusion; Public administration; Public relations; Political economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Business; Economics; Marketing; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05658850690784973,"gpt":0.3988525888462673,"spread":0.3422640819384176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001407169,0.0000524868,0.0001213585,0.00004044273,0.0005916068,0.00005309876,0.0001475881,0.00007427105,0.00001176098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008460091,0.00003326089,0.00006083456,0.0002027163,0.0002854258,0.00008805016,0.00001229631,0.000229991,3.68026e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003417152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001832189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00103753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001975388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983881,0.0005526649,0.0002352797,0.0000564989,0.0006417704,0.0001256761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999132,0.0001634243,0.0003443331,0.00003315483,0.0003064293,0.00002069615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001846538,0.00001899013,0.000428606,0.0000109877,0.000004846307,2.581361e-7,0.5726457,1.162109e-7,0.00001837672,0.4208021,0.0001982285,0.005853343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002062712,0.00007214885,0.06839446,0.00002812652,0.000004019206,7.554932e-7,0.9199866,0.000002082088,0.000009332306,0.002096469,0.009162026,0.00003772507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7702601,0.00004196433,0.000004378018,0.2208695,0.0000465777,0.0000694429,0.000004199263,0.000002074779,0.008701743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995844,0.00007664768,0.000009520084,0.00153396,0.002508713,0.000001684981,1.223701e-7,0.000003359174,0.00002198309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4187056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4550221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116249011","doi":"10.1017/s004727940200689x","title":"The Scarman Report, the Macpherson Report and the Media: How Newspapers Respond to Race-centred Social Policy Interventions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Race (biology); Psychological intervention; Quarter (Canadian coin); Narrative; Media studies; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Criminology; History; Psychology; Literature; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05067935972255597,"gpt":0.3855373778890362,"spread":0.3348580181664802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00513023,0.0002201822,0.0004852775,0.000181734,0.008420333,0.0003888913,0.0005780192,0.00019646,0.00001357495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01362683,0.0001090319,0.0007895054,0.001235456,0.002786075,0.0002454568,0.0001363146,0.000599317,0.000004297302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004475656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001550727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007803494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006982587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957292,0.001546597,0.0008196309,0.0001850443,0.001004492,0.0007150401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971222,0.0006855556,0.001342651,0.0001844857,0.0004342609,0.0002308741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003291763,0.00007703614,0.0003165008,0.00001472198,0.0006406644,0.0002049397,0.4390504,0.000001122608,0.00003646319,0.394031,0.1520226,0.01327532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002014489,0.0000684426,0.01762111,0.00004502001,0.0002757344,0.000435876,0.3577562,4.600078e-7,0.00001911224,0.06845944,0.5530131,0.0002910061],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06401056,0.001076657,0.000009502707,0.8906484,0.00123333,0.0006028547,0.00001110891,0.00002908009,0.04237847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940824,0.001966334,0.00003608644,0.003295867,0.0325098,0.00003535927,0.000001047067,0.00003711151,0.02129439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8873526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101407006","doi":"10.1017/s004727941500029x","title":"Welfare Capitalism in Crisis: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Labour Market Policy Responses to the Great Recession","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Recession; Economics; Welfare state; Capitalism; Welfare; Politics; Welfare reform; Market economy; Macroeconomics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1066531090274341,"gpt":0.4878321691311469,"spread":0.3811790601037128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00412223,0.000168769,0.0008237899,0.001458634,0.0007403041,0.00005830751,0.0004816029,0.0001617304,0.00003187948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003810203,0.0001088486,0.0003803846,0.005467037,0.0005108966,0.0003489654,0.0001048555,0.0002943409,0.000004339833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000665427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001284837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09067313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0192166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951271,0.00265524,0.0007543342,0.0001338974,0.000905956,0.0004234838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975275,0.0003890691,0.0008091264,0.0001068061,0.0009227264,0.0002447956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004653682,0.00007064458,0.0006467623,0.000006964125,0.0006092919,0.000004359887,0.8769963,0.0000207752,0.00000671427,0.0994533,0.02121923,0.0005002237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005320838,0.0001469455,0.0867638,0.00002741741,0.0001847348,8.406005e-7,0.8602282,0.00000181349,0.00001486289,0.02372699,0.02822387,0.0001484852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6545973,0.000233725,0.000005883454,0.3265551,0.0001866181,0.0002018306,0.0001405948,0.0000101302,0.01806878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928323,0.0001940194,0.00005510679,0.001401023,0.003284625,0.000008698677,9.373003e-7,0.000008005392,0.00221529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.338235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596318816","doi":"10.1017/s0047279417000113","title":"Discrimination Against Ethnic Minorities in Activation Programme? Evidence from a Vignette Experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Edinburgh; York University","keywords":"Vignette; Norwegian; Plaintiff; Ethnic group; Front line; Psychology; Social psychology; Front (military); Political science; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1740455027398038,"gpt":0.4761051004330228,"spread":0.302059597693219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001370318,0.00008770847,0.0001907163,0.0003182483,0.001097764,0.0005655624,0.0005385686,0.0001169833,0.00006305206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003783216,0.00008654805,0.0001225012,0.0001940151,0.0004328194,0.00177874,0.00007571443,0.000244638,0.000006338535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007578915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008099307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04100995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008940446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979187,0.0003101046,0.0003698148,0.0001178286,0.0009611791,0.0003223878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986348,0.0001311675,0.0005986338,0.0001173908,0.0003951095,0.0001228647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002360554,0.0007245337,0.04018063,0.000091017,0.00007660358,0.00004028605,0.4057597,0.000006188366,0.01323092,0.04641517,0.006890614,0.4863483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001067183,0.0001036141,0.896152,0.0003021541,0.00002407871,4.362906e-7,0.0715223,0.00001634074,0.002350284,0.02470657,0.003534147,0.0002209535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561335,0.0003442483,0.00005916819,0.03282977,0.0002903472,0.0002122525,0.000003389386,0.000009918857,0.01011733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947788,0.0006256588,0.0001312636,0.0001450035,0.003306508,0.00001314599,0.000001924665,0.00000762621,0.0009901117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8559713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.965376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126307969","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000317","title":"Activation Workers’ Perceptions of Their Long-term Unemployed Clients’ Attitudes towards Employment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Allowance (engineering); Quarter (Canadian coin); Unemployment; Work (physics); Social security; Job security; Paid work; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Economics; Working hours; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06849458592126631,"gpt":0.4333170139021843,"spread":0.364822427980918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003795346,0.000173962,0.0004567756,0.0002749845,0.0007526781,0.00001507113,0.0002218519,0.0001675727,0.0007292472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001365824,0.0001281654,0.0002676395,0.0003060221,0.0001438608,0.0003305133,0.0001282288,0.0004694763,0.00006346653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004784274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000399794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001748979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009384506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979358,0.0002688627,0.000903879,0.0001084257,0.0003905295,0.0003925083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980226,0.0001184115,0.0009298868,0.0001168868,0.0006943366,0.0001178384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005798428,0.0002445467,0.9450578,0.00009488423,0.0002736197,6.406165e-7,0.02016734,0.000001312758,0.001938223,0.001169747,0.02019836,0.01079552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008317832,0.0001560433,0.9917313,0.0002402032,0.00003841355,7.706961e-7,0.004868576,2.556575e-7,0.00008331884,0.001021389,0.0009204457,0.0001074619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793096,0.0000397763,0.0001213488,0.01711595,0.0003606997,0.0004200402,0.0000115999,0.00002464975,0.002596301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945238,0.000143977,0.00006008926,0.0006740235,0.002893133,0.00003407152,0.000005668091,0.00002646895,0.001638791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04667352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7984746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109650663","doi":"10.1017/s0047279410000279","title":"Cycling Off and On Welfare in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Welfare; Earnings; Work (physics); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Welfare reform; Social assistance; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03050994719057544,"gpt":0.4066198591508839,"spread":0.3761099119603085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002693914,0.00006270962,0.0001988273,0.000105655,0.000467921,0.000003177229,0.00006408266,0.00006330972,0.00005803887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002472776,0.00004952284,0.00002815258,0.00009580937,0.00002533252,0.00004683436,0.00003476731,0.0007411027,0.000002280121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003158598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009684082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7031407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9100968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991744,0.00006911393,0.0003317574,0.0000461957,0.0001605057,0.000218092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994956,0.00009362372,0.000234315,0.00003295599,0.00007608736,0.00006741245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001286689,0.00005157542,0.8682865,0.00008614032,0.0000679641,0.00005321328,0.01610594,0.000002123433,0.0003889764,0.04544069,0.03942666,0.02996158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005775362,0.00002880872,0.8995084,0.00004012069,0.000005742161,0.000001138877,0.004426819,7.405678e-7,0.000005719263,0.0007278214,0.09462295,0.00005424113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8982579,0.00003410013,6.612404e-8,0.08473164,0.0005256417,0.00005584904,0.000005603171,0.000002508355,0.01638676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951257,0.00005652776,0.00000743542,0.001840614,0.002678883,0.00000158846,2.436872e-7,0.000007643296,0.0002813418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2069561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3598917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070660254","doi":"10.1017/s0047279410000516","title":"Changes in Parental Assets and Children's Educational Outcomes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Premise; Reading (process); Perspective (graphical); Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03150442508899462,"gpt":0.4089467650151727,"spread":0.3774423399261781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004752166,0.00005788407,0.0001307774,0.0001602342,0.0003380918,0.00004493757,0.00009848474,0.00005646153,0.0001292685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006588846,0.0000499426,0.00004913568,0.0001350937,0.0001746184,0.0001486617,0.00001942764,0.0001817275,0.00000430454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007455057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000532227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002792386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01765013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992729,0.00006325663,0.000198602,0.0000554461,0.000269664,0.0001400854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994904,0.00009837107,0.0001522407,0.0000197398,0.0001728958,0.00006629644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005666102,0.0001132958,0.6717184,0.000001836222,0.00002639129,3.001735e-7,0.01711498,2.353975e-7,0.0001899607,0.3045158,0.005400787,0.0009123625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000124844,0.00001177074,0.9763171,0.000003283943,0.000004466594,0.000003995265,0.002131659,1.364902e-7,0.00001531071,0.01596249,0.005371176,0.00005378747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8359041,0.00002548023,2.886754e-7,0.1616346,0.000572903,0.00003447105,0.000009260486,0.00000196338,0.001816888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910415,0.00004545168,0.0001266434,0.000825941,0.007216237,0.000003212801,0.000003299168,0.000003335243,0.0007343726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3045987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123458431","doi":"10.1017/s0047279417000381","title":"Beyond Special Privileges: The Discretionary Treatment of Ethnic Minorities in China's Welfare System","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Livelihood; Allowance (engineering); Welfare; Political science; Incentive; China; Social policy; Social Welfare; Social insurance; Government (linguistics); Welfare reform; Economic growth; Sociology; Development economics; Economics; Law; Market economy; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02862947488200651,"gpt":0.3507437187999374,"spread":0.3221142439179309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005494803,0.0001102158,0.0003266736,0.0001390375,0.001907832,0.00008179439,0.0004521292,0.0001479538,0.00009596177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001744561,0.00007356741,0.0003062698,0.0001587485,0.0007981983,0.0002722681,0.00004545936,0.0001952995,0.000002366235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006077582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005209846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02024561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007293071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985213,0.0002208032,0.0004739061,0.00008081843,0.0004576253,0.0002454996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988307,0.00006639138,0.0007611585,0.0001575559,0.0001097403,0.00007439041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006086496,0.0002032211,0.005899139,0.00004643119,0.00009967033,0.00002681444,0.2191569,0.00001142405,0.0000102759,0.7479205,0.001574993,0.02498975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008336591,0.0001559942,0.8645027,0.00008076579,0.00006004953,0.00001333725,0.08739316,0.000003656688,0.000005784538,0.009492229,0.03734517,0.000113486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7108571,0.001305181,0.000003970916,0.06492243,0.001623302,0.000289604,0.00006496956,0.000009007822,0.2209244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782386,0.0008632831,0.00001996208,0.00001687048,0.01853998,0.000004329485,0.000001282662,0.000007968006,0.002307667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8586036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121505208","doi":"10.1017/s0047279412000074","title":"Reaching the Hard-to-Reach: Conceptual Puzzles and Challenges for Policy and Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; CLARITY; Receipt; Rhetoric; Politics; Inequality; Health policy; Public policy; Public health; Social policy; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Public economics; Health care; Economics; Medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1896784033297746,"gpt":0.4528907167464027,"spread":0.2632123134166281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003528865,0.00008694211,0.0002247823,0.0001058989,0.001126371,0.0001066075,0.0001439418,0.00009686028,0.000003562256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009508849,0.00006178983,0.00007326381,0.0001225405,0.0003888374,0.0005883011,0.00004622453,0.0001931434,0.000001480505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001819323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005833502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007222039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004910019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984627,0.0004177045,0.0002710157,0.00006780049,0.0002862652,0.0004944977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997541,0.001611314,0.0002887324,0.00004635924,0.0001531796,0.0003594476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004634795,0.0000264361,0.0004719627,0.00003264995,0.00003214215,4.24574e-7,0.2173401,1.03349e-7,0.000007395239,0.7387924,0.003029178,0.04022087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002725139,0.00004587428,0.05188625,0.00001845491,0.00003105469,0.00001791751,0.1156543,2.339058e-7,0.000001831862,0.003268084,0.8287308,0.00007275342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0884862,0.007105616,0.00003265129,0.8903867,0.0003237511,0.0002509058,0.00001257157,0.0000110422,0.01339054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518588,0.007318526,0.000716069,0.01753251,0.02207841,0.000006669901,2.145011e-7,0.00001410419,0.0004746525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8728542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114420595","doi":"10.1017/s0047279407001481","title":"Neighbourhood Ethnic Concentration and Discrimination","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Locale (computer software); Immigration; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Demographic economics; Ethnic discrimination; Ethnically diverse; Chinese americans; Sociology; Geography; Psychology; Demography; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02927953936717922,"gpt":0.3817823398580842,"spread":0.352502800490905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001247706,0.00005633437,0.0001076735,0.00008423468,0.0003925598,0.00006854456,0.00007014842,0.0001045571,0.00007106772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004502983,0.00004950893,0.0000612158,0.0002154405,0.000139884,0.0005562686,0.000005058158,0.0001310782,0.000003569962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002080687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003163032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001220273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006149035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990177,0.0001054516,0.0003142284,0.00005376442,0.0003404239,0.0001684458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991947,0.00004890111,0.0003354911,0.0000238224,0.0003021168,0.00009492751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000403948,0.00005678396,0.001232127,0.000008336016,0.00001824981,0.000001801374,0.200453,7.411652e-7,0.002811783,0.6443441,0.002360145,0.1486725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001195031,0.0003025059,0.811495,0.00004855484,0.0000779626,0.00001391096,0.06242941,0.00003382237,0.001999028,0.05073685,0.07139164,0.0002762553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494402,0.0003475358,0.003804579,0.008461408,0.000360494,0.0001129626,0.000002164929,0.00001415318,0.03745651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99394,0.0004196269,0.0001211392,0.0003263081,0.004662123,3.742092e-7,0.000002020835,0.000004547858,0.0005238617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8102629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3431306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208848791","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000805","title":"How do you Shape a Market? Explaining Local State Practices in Adult Social Care","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics","funders":"Department of Health and Social Care; Economic and Social Research Council; National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Typology; Workforce; Business; Procurement; General partnership; Public economics; Public relations; Economics; Economic growth; Marketing; Political science; Sociology; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07511248848994519,"gpt":0.4191188003684097,"spread":0.3440063118784645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001972034,0.0001150673,0.0002853952,0.0004087703,0.001576235,0.0001924847,0.0003617228,0.0001113714,0.0002829129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001163051,0.0001243006,0.0001305827,0.001008208,0.000201153,0.0005453822,0.00008665444,0.0008913245,0.00000191079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001280876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002396872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001615968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003347639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968599,0.001028123,0.0004384144,0.0001417841,0.001074162,0.000457605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976964,0.000128672,0.001362219,0.00004572948,0.0006421034,0.0001248809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002359141,0.0001118978,0.001294615,0.000053033,0.00004263204,0.0001046098,0.5862305,0.000004037598,0.00001857078,0.06293013,0.0112919,0.3376821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000569574,0.000099763,0.004032846,0.00001294284,0.000006106594,0.000006412551,0.6612606,0.00000915426,0.000002182009,0.001065064,0.3328161,0.0001193046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5384947,0.0003015871,0.00001286297,0.4423584,0.0005142621,0.0001505625,0.00003035552,0.00002475282,0.0181125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929432,0.0002462831,0.00004820973,0.002016599,0.004084123,0.00001162997,0.000001648068,0.00001702574,0.0006313002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4544485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119632180","doi":"10.1017/s0047279407001195","title":"Welfare Retrenchment as Social Justice: Pension Reform in Mexico","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Welfare reform; Framing (construction); Pension; Restructuring; Reform Act; Blame; Political science; Public administration; Corporatization; Welfare; Economics; Political economy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03040085022221741,"gpt":0.4039228949890533,"spread":0.3735220447668359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002695902,0.000182544,0.000471022,0.0005052458,0.002331538,0.00005983951,0.000340931,0.0003716575,0.0000574131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007616862,0.0001507351,0.0003257974,0.001112901,0.0005513806,0.0003518013,0.00008864144,0.000592554,0.00002259073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00214903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006860163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01065324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004401238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970867,0.0001749454,0.0007979117,0.0001390243,0.001014671,0.0007867511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986488,0.00006824407,0.0006714973,0.00005904855,0.0003469854,0.0002053989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002967692,0.0002769358,0.001032603,0.00004300051,0.0001113368,0.0001337527,0.21435,9.398228e-7,0.0001113793,0.7408338,0.009976552,0.03283297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002508607,0.0003422276,0.3008561,0.00008256732,0.0001741732,0.00002441938,0.3983403,6.680953e-7,0.0002226899,0.08702336,0.2098158,0.0006091371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3357911,0.0001573073,0.00000664032,0.1752082,0.001380159,0.0002046172,0.000006957147,0.00003678045,0.4872083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975851,0.0003646517,0.0000468554,0.001701362,0.0205523,0.000001558565,0.000001048915,0.00001665796,0.001464584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6538104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139277459","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000755","title":"Escaping the Curse of Economic Self-interest: An Individual-level Analysis of Public Support for the Welfare State in Japan","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Self-interest; Individualism; Welfare state; Solidarity; Welfare; Positive economics; Curse; Salience (neuroscience); Social psychology; Ideology; Political science; Public economics; Economics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1237597205414929,"gpt":0.3925974825038471,"spread":0.2688377619623542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002475632,0.0001219197,0.0005262,0.000507278,0.0007652098,0.00009492731,0.0007152651,0.0001067239,0.00006323174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004218861,0.00007146261,0.0005026512,0.0008465034,0.0006887139,0.0004999084,0.00007812918,0.0002166989,0.000001711626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002176515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007000396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0264818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02374881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998071,0.0003162406,0.0007881428,0.00009447173,0.000320751,0.0004093628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979912,0.0003155314,0.001156204,0.0001143341,0.0003276299,0.00009510242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004739975,0.0003472169,0.03331409,0.00004763201,0.006113073,7.043921e-7,0.696694,0.0001262716,0.00005351087,0.204148,0.003216156,0.05589198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006286653,0.0001566375,0.8047513,0.00001111606,0.0006358066,7.752452e-7,0.1639924,0.00007133364,0.00002877579,0.02738601,0.002183367,0.0001538648],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532998,0.00006658456,0.00001361403,0.04453111,0.0002016539,0.0003348024,0.0001161455,0.000007527952,0.001428756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997641,0.0002748146,0.00003257316,0.0002710253,0.001626748,0.00001430924,0.000002067099,0.00001082085,0.0001266957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7714372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799691531","doi":"10.1017/s0047279418000235","title":"Social Insurance as Fiscal Policy and State-Building Tool: The Development and Politics of Payroll Contributions in Israel and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Social security; Revenue; Payroll; Economics; Payroll tax; Social insurance; Tax revenue; Public economics; Economic system; Economic policy; Finance; Political science; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.018785100389127,"gpt":0.352530467671372,"spread":0.333745367282245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008028932,0.0001218237,0.0003490012,0.0001462898,0.002004973,0.00005595001,0.0001332518,0.0001097088,9.47338e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001342013,0.00008910366,0.00004514914,0.0003688776,0.001570315,0.0001549427,0.00009732132,0.0002203573,1.692642e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004826347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003147882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7271961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5586648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984122,0.0001824353,0.0004859546,0.00009251171,0.0003900317,0.0004368541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990033,0.0002175096,0.0003602285,0.00003101974,0.0002706111,0.0001173685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000961981,0.00006672811,0.0593702,0.00004604182,0.0002235356,0.000007823814,0.2428677,5.172895e-7,0.0001329271,0.682427,0.002550175,0.0122112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00140872,0.0001000543,0.8484389,0.00004861463,0.00002992717,0.00001081481,0.04565564,0.000001264875,0.0002881493,0.07688062,0.02689049,0.0002468531],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9464906,0.0001649026,0.000002199971,0.0492488,0.00009013166,0.000108379,0.00006121135,0.00000392967,0.003829805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935486,0.0003374609,0.00003026248,0.001006986,0.004827376,0.000002220569,2.661934e-7,0.000007432257,0.0002393751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7890686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030565705","doi":"10.1017/s0047279411000572","title":"Intimate Relationships as Routes into and out of Homelessness: Insights from a Canadian City","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Perception; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09065526225016392,"gpt":0.3949675457338888,"spread":0.3043122834837249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004020589,0.0001242058,0.0006210603,0.000291073,0.000866532,0.00001337862,0.0001809492,0.000326024,0.0001449443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005302903,0.0001072652,0.00009763496,0.0001988695,0.0001545329,0.0002777827,0.00005642791,0.000690805,0.00002344225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002661416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001332728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6631964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6295849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998251,0.0004458992,0.0007185173,0.00009533043,0.0002122197,0.0002769901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982452,0.0001801873,0.0007318383,0.00008681972,0.0004351443,0.0003207749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005781873,0.00004673851,0.1057492,0.00006605752,0.0001043433,0.00001390697,0.825169,1.017144e-7,0.00008076881,0.06615742,0.0001527965,0.002401856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006605698,0.00006360063,0.6673652,0.0001437552,0.00005997764,1.998795e-7,0.1869975,0.000002105293,0.00008809559,0.1415006,0.002973048,0.0001453046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790662,0.0003952249,0.00001927973,0.0007630634,0.0003683832,0.0001244508,0.00002708535,0.000009902927,0.0192264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975244,0.0002080274,0.0002264563,0.0001214557,0.001770414,0.000004507165,0.000003228125,0.00001888062,0.0001226598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6381714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6664751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119216511","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000482","title":"On ‘Activation Workers' Perceptions’: A Reply to Dunn (1)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Conditionality; Unemployment; Welfare; Perception; Welfare dependency; Social policy; Sample (material); Work (physics); Sociology; Welfare state; Welfare reform; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Politics; Accounting","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02601523752644111,"gpt":0.367374832710755,"spread":0.3413595951843139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000482465,0.0001026861,0.0002253709,0.0002942404,0.001246496,0.0001028662,0.000209417,0.0001150483,0.0001614173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001491733,0.0000818983,0.0002008431,0.0006807992,0.0002154617,0.0003635154,0.00003116979,0.000245956,0.0002600355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004176151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003893317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01658795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001222956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998553,0.0001614939,0.0003385153,0.00008987107,0.0005142515,0.000342832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989586,0.0001176958,0.0002795614,0.00006184591,0.0003863124,0.0001959338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008993059,0.000185276,0.001209102,0.000008564028,0.0001383997,0.000002221735,0.2441415,0.00001482914,0.0004163154,0.1578876,0.5609071,0.03499914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009804339,0.0005059532,0.4411745,0.0001271345,0.0000458336,0.000003654207,0.1710597,0.000001153482,0.00008174478,0.2403792,0.1451668,0.0004740197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5955291,0.000007673826,0.00004051138,0.3088422,0.0003968457,0.0002618706,0.000002208237,0.00003224037,0.09488739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674233,0.00004472067,0.0001163698,0.01335958,0.01433995,0.00001122318,2.761757e-7,0.00001221513,0.004692335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4399654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9899607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116142675","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000276","title":"Young Adult Social Networks and Labour Market Attachment: Interpersonal Dynamics that Shape Perspectives on Job Attainment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Social mobility; Educational attainment; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Perception; Social network (sociolinguistics); Interpersonal ties; Social psychology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Social media","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02169485792388766,"gpt":0.3235992739234481,"spread":0.3019044159995604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001341881,0.0002313246,0.0004257066,0.0001668504,0.00105098,0.0002427248,0.0003272058,0.0003222251,0.0001226583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003001606,0.0002174649,0.0002829817,0.0003919457,0.000671944,0.0003713891,0.0001010362,0.0006356208,0.000005737615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001735191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004665468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001522134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001031817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973504,0.000476876,0.0003714531,0.0002090747,0.00100256,0.0005896607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984775,0.0001078891,0.0004974258,0.00005250549,0.0004835935,0.0003810604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000789383,0.0002573477,0.01740796,0.00001399243,0.0002930414,0.00004479952,0.4797957,0.00001028459,0.000002206486,0.408524,0.0686479,0.02421339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002407755,0.0005872061,0.1642661,0.00008175985,0.0001111725,0.00002607814,0.8096053,0.0008555862,0.000001057179,0.01245878,0.009003997,0.0005951798],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8995227,0.0007309906,0.0001172017,0.03282166,0.001130789,0.0002260347,0.00003233456,0.00004387048,0.06537446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805901,0.0006236917,0.00004177116,0.001139315,0.01599946,0.000004478648,0.000001922297,0.00002739074,0.001571875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3960653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.886796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221080197","doi":"10.1017/s0047279422000022","title":"Does the family care best? Ideals of care in a familialistic care regime","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Face (sociological concept); Child care; Nursing; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01178727787194597,"gpt":0.3210268874924114,"spread":0.3092396096204655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007134625,0.0001064425,0.0002828244,0.0002209359,0.001037181,0.00005424987,0.0005486342,0.00007274871,0.0000282587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003730844,0.00007270488,0.0002785115,0.0005150513,0.0002013665,0.0001057928,0.0001222734,0.0003680817,9.184204e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001254668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001805485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02224584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01289442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976669,0.0005784382,0.0004885602,0.0001315238,0.0008685595,0.000266021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985549,0.0001073179,0.0004521385,0.0001187931,0.0007084321,0.00005842571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008701609,0.00004153804,0.00337121,0.00007969667,0.0000509177,0.00003134264,0.8319949,0.001128644,0.0007489482,0.1503127,0.001797994,0.01035509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003235302,0.0001694973,0.008176675,0.00004525554,0.00003485649,0.000001845905,0.9539222,0.00000962125,0.00001565686,0.002582889,0.03459286,0.0001250959],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690098,0.003090218,0.000008674979,0.005051915,0.001461222,0.0002200781,0.0002087815,0.000007046196,0.02094226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961842,0.0001947657,0.00002676928,0.0006165435,0.002570794,0.0000108044,0.000007617715,0.00001436977,0.0003741735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1477298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389145832","doi":"10.1017/s0047279423000533","title":"Impact of unconditional cash transfers on household livelihood outcomes in Nigeria","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Cash; Food security; Marital status; Malnutrition; Cash transfers; Socioeconomics; Business; Dietary diversity; Multistage sampling; Environmental health; Diversity (politics); Geography; Medicine; Economics; Agriculture; Economic growth; Finance; Population; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03052004814846746,"gpt":0.3609514441722522,"spread":0.3304313960237847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005121147,0.00009027109,0.0002667526,0.0004231006,0.0002561874,0.00002732604,0.0002082193,0.0001018771,0.0001182658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002300058,0.00007720526,0.0003362588,0.0006886079,0.0001300548,0.0002054395,0.000005293475,0.0001818731,0.00001027623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004175456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002032924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006163885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002209106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986852,0.0001386014,0.0003590572,0.00006982,0.0004846762,0.0002626838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994096,0.0001031241,0.0002153695,0.00004584828,0.0001100196,0.0001161103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001600118,0.0009833064,0.6248847,0.00002606429,0.0003653872,0.0000265101,0.2703438,0.0002527756,0.0002140501,0.03780631,0.06016222,0.004774818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005519211,0.0001383102,0.9841605,0.00001928508,0.000008928636,0.000001269573,0.006971267,2.761484e-7,0.00001285278,0.006836426,0.001221593,0.00007732472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98084,0.00001431534,8.818736e-7,0.01223346,0.0002857871,0.00006513266,0.0001789444,0.00001331561,0.006368109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975166,0.0001767418,0.000005398749,0.0002242028,0.001718442,0.000001149451,0.000006468206,0.00001056214,0.0003404629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3592758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9317991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806056734","doi":"10.1017/s004727941800034x","title":"The Neoliberal Targeted Social Investment State: The Case of Ethnic Minorities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; Canadian Friends of Tel Aviv University","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Disadvantaged; Social exclusion; Investment (military); State (computer science); Ethnic group; Scholarship; Political economy; Corporate governance; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Development economics; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03874946439688746,"gpt":0.2859370739403633,"spread":0.2471876095434759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000823217,0.0001406192,0.0004030305,0.0001649725,0.0007383208,0.00007511037,0.0003342811,0.0001044779,0.00004740083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005282738,0.0001009855,0.0002915245,0.0004227218,0.0007703318,0.0001819849,0.00006194755,0.0002953183,0.00002711763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001655231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001853004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004441487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000476186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984774,0.00007023502,0.0009059366,0.0001090317,0.00007354211,0.0003638577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982803,0.00006891635,0.001286883,0.0001284312,0.0001736654,0.0000618261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000182339,0.0001509442,0.0002439877,0.00003478943,0.0003566748,0.0001344604,0.1349544,0.000005010861,0.0001111301,0.7632924,0.08151698,0.01901686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002605571,0.0006644844,0.05531281,0.00002676603,0.00005957875,0.0005609308,0.005645373,0.00009738497,0.0006712613,0.3643543,0.5694577,0.0005438635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729943,0.002269245,0.00003479251,0.006873709,0.0007641368,0.0001045422,0.00009549912,0.000007687254,0.01685614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889187,0.0003913654,0.00007294693,0.00210371,0.005699778,0.000003219971,7.889715e-7,0.00002313426,0.002786422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4879408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6714229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086145565","doi":"10.1017/s0047279420000264","title":"Balancing work and care: the effect of paid adult medical leave policies on employment in Europe","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Care work; Work (physics); Paid work; Payment; Population; Population ageing; Psychology; Nursing; Business; Medicine; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Working hours; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009720426312181745,"gpt":0.301065569278882,"spread":0.2913451429667003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006121842,0.00006636544,0.0001836908,0.00005846893,0.0001926223,0.00003541221,0.0001767158,0.00006086142,0.000008658074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001665188,0.00004411243,0.00007532345,0.0003751523,0.000154695,0.00004698083,0.00003914637,0.0002349937,9.288928e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001120793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003082812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00165161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007163505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986132,0.0003376211,0.0002597636,0.0000574701,0.000583203,0.0001487471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993649,0.0001765929,0.0001704328,0.00002526256,0.0001698956,0.00009299157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004312256,0.00005054441,0.1505713,0.00008306099,0.0001341832,0.00005581348,0.4996468,0.000287068,0.0005032438,0.3069378,0.009876788,0.03142224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006335685,0.00567553,0.8000528,0.001418047,0.000187391,0.00001736964,0.1211412,0.0004104024,0.001463487,0.0018316,0.06047087,0.0009956497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362735,0.0001201568,0.000008944793,0.06023237,0.0001392745,0.00006262206,0.000002568617,0.00000303887,0.003157526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947596,0.0001137909,0.000004820002,0.002385956,0.002699505,0.000001005689,3.29852e-7,0.000006402868,0.00002864031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6494815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2496751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200117551","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000763","title":"Basic Income and the Legitimization Crisis of Neoliberalism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Basic income; Mainstream; Grassroots; Political economy; Hegemony; Context (archaeology); Politics; Welfare state; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01934049589492384,"gpt":0.2446428448899196,"spread":0.2253023489949958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004712649,0.00008176191,0.0004429189,0.000183821,0.0001450272,0.00005140556,0.000116623,0.00008126055,0.00006040231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006169378,0.00007215591,0.0001835378,0.0003440745,0.0001788079,0.0001925424,0.00004208449,0.0001492749,0.000005821819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004850989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009896157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006388814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001182482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990203,0.00004600606,0.0006488144,0.00009195098,0.00005106033,0.0001418953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989053,0.00004540469,0.0008275068,0.00008010348,0.0001054285,0.00003627786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004022843,0.00003643905,0.0008715997,0.00002498054,0.00007228623,0.0000079717,0.006320631,0.0000497075,0.00001456168,0.988224,0.003468957,0.0008686684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01173466,0.000202806,0.1417235,0.0001070277,0.0001062163,0.0003208391,0.001339437,0.0004344446,0.0007049533,0.588291,0.254441,0.0005940867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8948002,0.003721851,0.0009748192,0.0493096,0.0004782144,0.00009647747,0.00006333223,0.000008425654,0.0505471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941352,0.001267752,0.0003781575,0.002299873,0.001297736,0.000001009138,0.000001077278,0.0000147118,0.0006044563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.399933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2942433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214864298","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421001045","title":"Who should pay for social care for older people in England? Results from surveys of public attitudes to the funding of adult social care","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department of Health and Social Care; National Institute for Health and Care Research; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Sample (material); Service (business); State (computer science); Psychology; Business; Public relations; Political science; Marketing; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1651170310588949,"gpt":0.4447415089241017,"spread":0.2796244778652068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003543253,0.0001260893,0.000515726,0.0003151643,0.001676089,0.00005424527,0.000515894,0.000184203,0.00002967277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001899154,0.0001033671,0.0003023299,0.0009536291,0.0001089965,0.0001499059,0.00008856328,0.0003898307,2.448944e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000782649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002006831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01110154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1299288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965705,0.001074879,0.0009128355,0.0001645411,0.0008274091,0.0004498524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964199,0.0005832223,0.0008900656,0.00006892793,0.001947524,0.00009037974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021348,0.00009905313,0.005596778,0.0001338618,0.00006707485,5.801579e-7,0.8897629,0.000005752142,0.00003853739,0.03175127,0.004712404,0.06761826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003086972,0.000254297,0.2267683,0.00003449247,0.00002499303,2.709867e-7,0.6281237,0.00000235168,0.00004277423,0.001126518,0.1403551,0.0001802535],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7556312,0.0001528784,0.0001235629,0.2398928,0.0006236212,0.0007103412,0.002254964,0.00001183919,0.0005987973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924464,0.00003964105,0.00006791024,0.000685034,0.00655897,0.00005038456,0.00005046646,0.0000208644,0.00008028364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2616393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215123419","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000751","title":"Comparing Government Social Welfare Service Acquisition Regimes: Marketisation and Bases for Competition in Canadian and English Homelessness","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Incentive; Social Welfare; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Quality (philosophy); Business; Service (business); Order (exchange); Public administration; Public economics; Market economy; Economics; Public relations; Political science; Finance; Marketing; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01973334933464044,"gpt":0.294963644850478,"spread":0.2752302955158376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006260907,0.0000681789,0.0001965876,0.00008776659,0.000631595,0.0001207942,0.00005447478,0.00008771262,0.0000223299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001853611,0.00008043314,0.00004022545,0.0002333097,0.00005548633,0.0002960338,0.00001839356,0.0001091868,1.011683e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008095587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004204756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1326981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5613988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999082,0.0001394521,0.0002061644,0.00008738412,0.0002509824,0.0002340324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993832,0.00005501402,0.0001540435,0.00002045233,0.0002653709,0.000121979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003267911,0.0001399842,0.276962,0.000578324,0.0001123932,0.00004430315,0.3126205,0.00001655435,0.001165698,0.3924833,0.001003192,0.01454707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009579235,0.00002393643,0.8855174,0.00007127721,0.00002461218,0.000004039351,0.08120017,0.00005058631,0.00006022966,0.00109212,0.03086203,0.000135629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793256,0.0000706426,0.00002270844,0.01727618,0.0001874776,0.00009746473,0.00003545867,0.000005684942,0.002978788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969825,0.0000554824,0.00006277372,0.0003239388,0.002527109,0.000003641826,0.000006074406,0.000007836031,0.00003069705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6085555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8730773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381336488","doi":"10.1017/s0047279423000314","title":"Competition and childcare quality: Evidence from Quebec","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Quality (philosophy); Christian ministry; Subsidy; Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06054360797665718,"gpt":0.3855921848844354,"spread":0.3250485769077782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008451376,0.00007279331,0.0002033374,0.0001456194,0.0005182672,0.0001146592,0.00017649,0.0001122079,0.00002290305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006400363,0.00007102237,0.0000985019,0.0004999872,0.0002308708,0.0003240809,0.00003818171,0.0001805673,0.00001907448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001973747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006247445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09607018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03011895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986547,0.000279065,0.0002925339,0.00008821917,0.0004639428,0.0002215137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991567,0.0001913053,0.0002667503,0.0000504392,0.0002080074,0.0001267893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006081963,0.00007437111,0.1270326,0.00004632698,0.0001487704,0.00003413813,0.5268059,0.00001659502,0.001505859,0.3055543,0.01257278,0.02614756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002135065,0.00002048115,0.9184536,0.00004935099,0.00001847723,7.846549e-7,0.05637342,0.000005865526,0.000003503249,0.01897842,0.005791168,0.00009140542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760456,0.0002294269,0.00005229075,0.02054076,0.0003571152,0.0000532537,0.00003135327,0.00003152802,0.00265865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923016,0.001460954,0.00007886078,0.0005966325,0.004865048,6.659609e-7,0.000003964144,0.000007990433,0.0006842777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7914211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125676766","doi":"10.1017/s0047279420000720","title":"Do Assessment Tools Shape Policy Preferences? Analysing Policy Framing Effects on Older Adults’ Conceptualisation of Autonomy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux Cavendish; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Framing (construction); Long-term care; Public relations; Independence (probability theory); Psychology; Service (business); Political science; Public economics; Social psychology; Business; Economics; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05188100296107138,"gpt":0.4486025946456028,"spread":0.3967215916845314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007103177,0.0002227901,0.0007743824,0.0008792764,0.0005793633,0.00006100362,0.0002225734,0.0003221757,0.0002112017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018,0.0002001554,0.0003878831,0.001411968,0.00008873152,0.0003088115,0.00008256015,0.0008383301,0.00001180811],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001875868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01080899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002331611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003401763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964982,0.0009530567,0.001162292,0.0002130415,0.000642052,0.0005313469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960713,0.0007967343,0.001717006,0.0001951252,0.001022782,0.0001970365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003851308,0.0006390581,0.009983039,0.001452421,0.0007489116,0.00004804973,0.2297539,0.00005112429,0.004228316,0.06492115,0.01228583,0.675503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006478174,0.0007997676,0.8991368,0.003271345,0.0003968434,0.00001461003,0.06839707,0.00006909676,0.001942448,0.01178487,0.00714227,0.0005666509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.968072,0.0002230328,0.0002161989,0.01879259,0.0007146779,0.0003324869,0.00003292476,0.00002524663,0.01159086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841569,0.0000819911,0.0005491705,0.001799333,0.01303755,0.00001041236,0.0000196919,0.00002855165,0.0003163744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8891538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403700094","doi":"10.1017/s004727942400028x","title":"The dynamic effects of becoming disabled on work, wages and wellbeing in the UK from 1991 to 2018","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Labour economics; Disabled people; Economics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Sociology; Applied psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06548489135021704,"gpt":0.4206611222913489,"spread":0.3551762309411318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001350872,0.00007681552,0.0001652766,0.00007265151,0.0003943884,0.0001734468,0.0002615964,0.00005119735,0.00000765506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005110431,0.00004419267,0.0001035743,0.0003422043,0.0002378461,0.00007718184,0.00003769542,0.0001943616,0.000004142013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002665947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009833399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006873917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003822789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986752,0.0003345452,0.0002814044,0.00008685051,0.0004006216,0.0002213843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987069,0.001034856,0.0001082775,0.00006878343,0.00002295054,0.00005822262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000301459,0.0003646755,0.04060807,0.0002225266,0.0003183222,0.00003601112,0.6926992,0.00003476278,0.001940246,0.08377574,0.02310906,0.15659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000902163,0.0004423658,0.778564,0.001103581,0.0001357314,0.000001101614,0.05516264,0.00002303546,0.0001615456,0.1353652,0.02784842,0.0002902157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9581898,0.0003942192,0.000004172423,0.03801493,0.0004287934,0.0001891968,0.000002310203,0.000004339301,0.002772243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978577,0.0003836024,0.00001444609,0.0003345254,0.001210969,0.000004024429,2.564833e-7,0.000006365387,0.0001881158],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7379559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146845150","doi":"10.1017/s0047279403007219","title":"National Health Insurance and Health-Based Drug Policy: An Examination of Policy Linkages in the USA and Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Retrenchment; Health policy; Welfare; Health care; Public health; Political science; Public administration; Social policy; Public policy; Welfare state; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05644564968017183,"gpt":0.3354934347080462,"spread":0.2790477850278744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002284471,0.000102285,0.0003745589,0.0007576799,0.0001899323,0.00003298916,0.0001563652,0.00004741546,0.000001611248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002676033,0.00009883138,0.00003971433,0.0004793527,0.00008393681,0.000197381,0.00002039917,0.0001996441,4.272511e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001399754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005422137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.958872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7206663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985052,0.0001116024,0.0008323208,0.0001245037,0.0001470471,0.0002793237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986888,0.00005675296,0.0009667826,0.00007343779,0.00007657688,0.0001376408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105499,0.0001215683,0.01862958,0.0002292373,0.00002122876,0.000002345314,0.01452028,0.0003831099,9.554958e-7,0.9476847,0.0005815161,0.01781495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008592784,0.0001447868,0.9686683,0.00003290327,5.264338e-7,0.000005813951,0.0005139518,0.00002309944,0.000002520863,0.02363207,0.006039679,0.00007700352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6263102,0.0005156075,0.00003523814,0.3716311,0.00005028354,0.0001611636,0.0001623382,0.000002169018,0.001131924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786393,0.0007374877,0.000141955,0.0192186,0.001223794,0.000003129082,0.000003598587,0.000009081013,0.00002307461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9500388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9618638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200388790","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000878","title":"Disability and Employment Policy in Canada: National Policy Variation for Working Age Individuals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Poverty; Demographic economics; Social policy; Political science; Policy analysis; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05628819331530458,"gpt":0.3822910563232336,"spread":0.326002863007929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225627,0.0001301345,0.0003752562,0.0002322865,0.0008623084,0.00009190705,0.0001635176,0.0001320747,0.000007079465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004096534,0.0001229107,0.0001401883,0.001050015,0.0003333687,0.0002076708,0.00007692246,0.000216538,4.223217e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004634127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01693498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9021229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9090197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997778,0.0002796537,0.0005766971,0.000140964,0.000753168,0.0004715149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987367,0.0003340348,0.0004222888,0.00004470608,0.0003075522,0.0001547232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005684128,0.0002615179,0.07601704,0.00005219091,0.0002779147,0.00001550399,0.1168038,0.00002753329,0.00008336336,0.7754323,0.003928973,0.02704302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008201776,0.00002236253,0.8018683,0.00002798771,0.00001885934,0.000003437053,0.01053057,0.000001573992,0.00001545638,0.1680071,0.01853626,0.0001479087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6576403,0.0002429616,0.0000190887,0.324825,0.0004881287,0.0003999438,0.0001194332,0.00001513066,0.01624995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790061,0.0003076323,0.0001361784,0.002213193,0.01795233,0.00001182201,0.00000331514,0.00001181687,0.0003576416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7258512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552002249","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000573","title":"In the Shadow of the Welfare State: The Role of Payday Lending in Poverty Survival in Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Welfare; Shadow (psychology); Workfare; Welfare state; Social policy; Economics; Corporate governance; Mainstream; Development economics; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Finance; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02676762475283097,"gpt":0.2608657748437696,"spread":0.2340981500909386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001021223,0.00009506939,0.0003821414,0.0002462118,0.00006433441,0.00002965094,0.0004804234,0.00008192021,0.00008993914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007770868,0.00005782359,0.0001633477,0.0005961354,0.0001020319,0.0002536465,0.00004552278,0.0003909214,0.000007035042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001366659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006729896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04083461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002070116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986244,0.00009628475,0.0008629147,0.00008255542,0.00008867282,0.000245197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988958,0.00005124729,0.0008642353,0.0001306516,0.00003556444,0.00002247784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006683607,0.0003811191,0.3993421,0.00005265484,0.00005564325,0.000008688582,0.07309759,0.0003456789,0.0003750639,0.518131,0.004461277,0.003682376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005777021,0.00002994545,0.9339444,0.0000274035,0.000002343514,0.000003518016,0.001771097,0.00003568117,0.00008467549,0.04552167,0.017923,0.00007855561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768318,0.0001818563,0.000001430117,0.01501806,0.0002136445,0.0001321916,0.00003889938,8.009405e-7,0.007581312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988394,0.0001221078,0.000008377373,0.0004749814,0.0003003274,0.000002947241,2.679348e-7,0.000009591694,0.0002419421],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5346023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9655526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154897835","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000209","title":"Poverty and Sources of Income Support Among Older People With Disabilities and Out of Work: Comparison of Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Poverty; Income Support; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Population; Inequality; Economic growth; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04585028390247158,"gpt":0.3822236244757403,"spread":0.3363733405732687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003410664,0.00008084274,0.0005365827,0.00006373813,0.0003106695,0.000004498172,0.00005030163,0.00005001856,0.00002023322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002603561,0.00004711275,0.000034713,0.0001792578,0.0004717035,0.00005337591,0.0001041459,0.0002138133,1.430147e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004681608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005241159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2566203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3533341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998817,0.0002167521,0.000524395,0.00005308361,0.0002330408,0.000155679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983495,0.0005693822,0.0006802319,0.00005098744,0.0002970306,0.00005284198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001427819,0.00002294965,0.9108489,0.0002257834,0.000129521,6.258765e-7,0.08456497,0.00000111833,0.000005775581,0.001733903,0.002255681,0.00006804225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001413445,0.00006439492,0.932165,0.0001973593,0.00007306822,0.000001186015,0.0651233,0.000001540662,0.00002663562,0.0003712005,0.0005185954,0.00004432432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989309,0.0001713634,0.000001986996,0.009904469,0.00005781022,0.00009923097,0.00001991916,0.000001396752,0.0004348006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992245,0.00006642505,0.00001016928,0.0002094866,0.0001808132,0.000001536938,0.000001045285,0.000006771734,0.0002992016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09671383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7483299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113353196","doi":"10.1017/s0047279402006815","title":"Richard Titmuss and Social Policy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Welfare; Social Welfare; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0508148518527148,"gpt":0.3677796070803176,"spread":0.3169647552276029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006340807,0.0001718324,0.0004466272,0.0003974298,0.002429799,0.0001184427,0.000283232,0.0002625312,0.00007878609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006143031,0.0001461322,0.0002924748,0.0007524624,0.001028404,0.0003528243,0.00008308593,0.000376088,0.0000401234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003374137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003603226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004729733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002552125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979553,0.0002357379,0.00045749,0.0001212353,0.0006291702,0.0006010963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989584,0.00006536353,0.0004870397,0.0000477421,0.0002555512,0.0001858938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003689724,0.0001731614,0.0004916866,0.0000370218,0.0002792658,0.00002219092,0.3856185,2.927037e-7,0.0001191523,0.413992,0.1271944,0.07203532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002330817,0.0002425908,0.04776539,0.00003419873,0.0001569014,0.0000370256,0.05955124,0.000003898827,0.0000369394,0.105606,0.7835117,0.0007233241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2235643,0.0008553079,0.00001006643,0.5163579,0.0008005693,0.0002354449,0.00003328048,0.0000814103,0.2580617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9252936,0.001727182,0.00003903342,0.003311525,0.06386227,0.00000267675,3.388155e-7,0.00002224087,0.005741115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7017294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280766219","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000641","title":"Getting Citizens to Save: Media Influence on Incentive-Based Policies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Order (exchange); Public economics; Investment (military); Deferral; Tax incentive; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Microeconomics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02827465056869578,"gpt":0.291578697147826,"spread":0.2633040465791303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007570264,0.000205263,0.0004027238,0.001119961,0.0002569237,0.0002844976,0.0003815584,0.00008492381,0.00004810026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002750167,0.00018483,0.0002310875,0.001452176,0.000084905,0.0007458497,0.0001273376,0.0002413598,0.0002385731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002831111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002696477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001686259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001005947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979201,0.00003214258,0.0006216953,0.0001541063,0.0008731253,0.0003988136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977525,0.00006489456,0.0008203085,0.0001256147,0.001164367,0.00007230619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001405537,0.0007270541,0.6212252,0.0002525973,0.0001576093,0.0002252342,0.01488932,0.004046543,0.008408991,0.1712058,0.163324,0.01413218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001840161,0.0000954113,0.8853341,0.0002709832,0.0001672366,0.000002325414,0.001061868,0.0002300736,0.0003780476,0.007859075,0.1022212,0.0005395054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859025,0.00001855059,0.00001600138,0.009514106,0.0002759914,0.00009894173,0.000004487763,0.00003135797,0.004138083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717615,0.000001856529,0.000210608,0.016726,0.01117402,0.00000201346,0.000005027536,0.00002746474,0.00009156681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.264109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7537149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035853200","doi":"10.1017/s0047279400235897","title":"Jacques T. Godbout in collaboration with Alan Caille, <i>The World of the Gift</i>, McGill-Queens University Press, London, 1998, viii + 250 pp., £29.95 pbk.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Historical and Architectural Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Law and economics; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009705560259922861,"gpt":0.2106512823620571,"spread":0.2009457221021342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001052393,0.0001064161,0.0002335283,0.00005028162,0.0007844121,0.00003324493,0.0002081084,0.00002592958,0.00009505489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001939817,0.00005555063,0.0001088606,0.0002237606,0.0004298566,0.0001359397,0.00003201914,0.0002340674,0.000002961847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001683327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006741534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02379343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991506,0.0001251048,0.0002514097,0.00006830182,0.0002400173,0.000164604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945,0.00005454875,0.000265031,0.0000634989,0.0001302833,0.00003659196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001520505,0.0004993522,0.002143916,0.0001012233,0.0004776869,0.00005255494,0.2108029,0.0004080918,0.0002412926,0.3475716,0.4181897,0.01799122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004257796,0.00008895444,0.003652387,0.00003272842,0.00003386064,0.000002279692,0.001903263,0.000002090583,0.00004375906,0.0004320565,0.9933046,0.00007826475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7065424,0.001124143,5.65018e-7,0.04190666,0.0003035931,0.0003465453,0.0002253117,0.00002418248,0.2495266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707353,0.0004810788,0.00001012375,0.0004987737,0.00156523,7.46189e-7,9.108114e-7,0.000009373198,0.02669842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5751148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968521477","doi":"10.1017/s004727941200044x","title":"Ann Oakley (2011), A Critical Woman: Barbara Wootton, Social Science and Public Policy in the Twentieth Century. London: Bloomsbury Academic. £30, pp. 426, hbk.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies; Content (measure theory); Political science; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06174836366260211,"gpt":0.3972870584232268,"spread":0.3355386947606246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016194,0.0002528049,0.0005021668,0.0004209878,0.002910841,0.0004291279,0.001266739,0.0004673348,0.0002873865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01441361,0.0001918589,0.000237546,0.001735601,0.004976126,0.003410999,0.000233291,0.002001174,0.00004336797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005609263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002612032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001188561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001447059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99323,0.002719862,0.0007678784,0.0002615253,0.00158304,0.001437704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966993,0.001383201,0.0006174612,0.0001400304,0.0005294826,0.0006305686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001223916,0.0003338083,0.006399134,0.00001968474,0.00003714198,0.00002859853,0.07667721,4.119575e-8,0.0002009704,0.8716848,0.01730764,0.02718852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007198091,0.0001366439,0.08403869,0.00001881906,0.00004945879,0.00006901579,0.0293219,9.652007e-7,0.00001021977,0.06422576,0.8210748,0.0003338734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6023777,0.01150974,0.00001294614,0.3153687,0.001114662,0.0003993473,0.00002256309,0.00004823448,0.06914619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682662,0.003518549,0.00003330765,0.01033319,0.01764387,0.000007808997,7.686593e-7,0.00001573967,0.0001804994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8074591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081947733","doi":"10.1017/s0047279406280541","title":"S. Lace (ed.) 2005, <i>The Glass Consumer: Life in a Surveillance Society</i>, Policy Press, Bristol, 259 pp., £12.99 pbk","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Gerontology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0180757351576525,"gpt":0.3082048134407643,"spread":0.2901290782831118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002584402,0.0002170067,0.0004691711,0.0001397074,0.001072289,0.0002911926,0.0009837891,0.000306145,0.00003673714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002222086,0.0001915267,0.0003658088,0.0007330899,0.0008014795,0.0006441607,0.0001972816,0.0007462128,0.00002399414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002735486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.208582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03664245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966257,0.0007294129,0.0007754112,0.0002168383,0.0008622145,0.0007904519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981985,0.0002075689,0.000874715,0.0002321331,0.0002562196,0.0002308447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001168408,0.0002611372,0.007293398,0.00003804422,0.00007118117,0.00001227488,0.01005818,0.00001967694,0.0001695712,0.02708355,0.9520633,0.002812912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001234839,0.00004075548,0.03580333,0.00003095036,0.0000223053,0.00001431783,0.002023207,0.00002166995,0.00002741086,0.01252973,0.9479789,0.0002725532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2997431,0.03499844,0.0005238323,0.59136,0.002837194,0.002014936,0.0005882703,0.000304536,0.06762972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627548,0.01102746,0.0001600694,0.002741678,0.0221345,0.00001377605,0.000008260141,0.00003700073,0.00112247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6630117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267379118","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000367","title":"Daniel Béland and Klaus Petersen (eds.) (2014), Analysing Social Policy Concepts and Language: Comparative and Transnational Perspectives. Bristol: Policy Press. £70.00, 272 pp., hbk.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies; Economic history; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04993117869790777,"gpt":0.4067289245001836,"spread":0.3567977458022759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009260192,0.0003063381,0.0007942517,0.0004383714,0.001765819,0.0002909209,0.0002161629,0.0003390898,0.000006571882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006468279,0.0002694088,0.0002021379,0.0006220787,0.002568286,0.0006414543,0.0001098968,0.0005794909,0.000001229413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005063124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00166209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02480668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001637636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972635,0.0005050621,0.0005467722,0.0002829348,0.0007929822,0.0006087342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981241,0.0001615958,0.000623701,0.00006455572,0.0005598264,0.0004662242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000169587,0.00009892262,0.0005318174,0.00002930576,0.0004808811,0.00001703405,0.7947273,0.000002735573,0.0001692249,0.184761,0.01458653,0.004425736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007067955,0.000480376,0.1032341,0.00004975954,0.0004794728,0.0001325741,0.7665978,0.00003584462,0.00007047378,0.05721048,0.06354484,0.001096262],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7707078,0.01199867,0.00003386487,0.1770066,0.0002427242,0.0004649146,0.0001935501,0.00006753962,0.03928435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793596,0.002335189,0.00008927555,0.0006297613,0.01656919,0.000004406955,0.000003519073,0.00002373228,0.0009853669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2086518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961659684","doi":"10.1017/s0047279419000564","title":"Carolyn Hughes Tuohy (2018), Remaking Policy: Scale, Pace, and Political Strategy in Health Care Reform, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, $55.00, pp. 688, pbk.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Politics; Political science; Scale (ratio); Health care; Sociology; Public administration; Media studies; Law; Geography; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01957695568165531,"gpt":0.2846124552414633,"spread":0.265035499559808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003584938,0.0001353345,0.0004749467,0.00005301661,0.0002824131,0.00003186,0.000203982,0.0000834303,0.000304139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002918107,0.0001175246,0.0001081829,0.00003205823,0.0005169908,0.0007381322,0.00004555125,0.000192704,0.000003934952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002380623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001161155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4917833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1843192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998553,0.00008001239,0.0004116662,0.0001359515,0.0003698252,0.0004495264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999045,0.00002068025,0.0003922629,0.0001026893,0.0001841574,0.0002551707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003010471,0.0001759314,0.001008305,0.0005843189,0.00007219068,0.00002505282,0.4554408,0.000003986339,0.0003181076,0.4925643,0.03980859,0.009697465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001373212,0.0006951425,0.01500828,0.0002412412,0.00002378885,0.00001828442,0.239633,0.000004516776,0.00001296653,0.0005573122,0.7422428,0.0001895509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4048614,0.02117753,0.000001302373,0.01155641,0.0005539172,0.0003015749,0.0000965579,0.00002206445,0.5614292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908468,0.001537992,0.00002675943,0.000588259,0.002937123,1.701504e-7,0.000001980877,0.00001173602,0.004049142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7024341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8305649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983549816","doi":"10.1017/s004727940700133x","title":"Spalek Basia (2006), Crime Victims: Theory, Policy and Practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. £19.99, pp.200, pbk.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Law and economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01955392297978863,"gpt":0.3653121072430958,"spread":0.3457581842633071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007539377,0.0003455709,0.0007243428,0.0006012871,0.001840594,0.0003471913,0.0005228866,0.0004614614,0.0001401159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01407525,0.0003381864,0.000431518,0.001199411,0.001081139,0.0003205236,0.00007783158,0.0007399401,0.00004196656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000990467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003510857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01080169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000929854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951934,0.001115203,0.0009694088,0.0002919301,0.001230839,0.001199189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952973,0.001375441,0.001252441,0.0001731658,0.0009196971,0.0009819292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008292708,0.00008989879,0.001124516,0.00003377117,0.0002663531,0.0001744099,0.09579304,5.500085e-7,0.0003882884,0.8367547,0.01344523,0.05109997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002524133,0.0002633646,0.0332122,0.0000633179,0.0002922443,0.0001623469,0.0677145,0.000001474184,0.00003863102,0.1680277,0.7270852,0.0006148803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03912785,0.007345768,0.001427758,0.08991645,0.001938596,0.0008647164,0.0001037761,0.00017727,0.8590978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575818,0.002965823,0.0005321875,0.01161916,0.0263538,0.000002693148,0.000002266853,0.00005419749,0.0008881235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9184539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}