{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":11,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"5466e9d830a1","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History"}},"results":[{"id":"W4361028902","doi":"10.1353/sch.2000.0012","title":"The Clear and Present Danger Test","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Wife; Law; Supreme court; Presidential system; Test (biology); League; Ideology; History; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Laycock","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03814086693857501,"gpt":0.2887625941057969,"spread":0.2506217271672219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01825587,0.0006725079,0.0008075425,0.002287586,0.005258789,0.0071239,0.002627095,0.008356091,0.06837282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1367775,0.0004039984,0.0006926879,0.001713266,0.01913598,0.01685422,0.008709955,0.01298983,0.01451471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003523032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005656359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005931061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004938055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9728492,0.009953351,0.001493454,0.002824356,0.009487255,0.003392376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9446728,0.03058985,0.004101294,0.003698616,0.01075345,0.006183911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002187192,0.00008466557,0.007079983,0.00009417586,0.00001598795,0.0004031498,0.001370409,0.0001367097,0.00009190344,0.7770685,0.1723522,0.04108361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009055339,0.0001762178,0.008975544,0.0007992056,0.00002725648,0.001278591,0.003723873,0.0006883248,0.0004436884,0.5204743,0.4632149,0.0001076299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01986896,0.006487622,0.008629206,0.197647,0.006011112,0.0001802607,0.0009445112,0.00009301911,0.7601383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7037891,0.004370136,0.003869125,0.1600238,0.006669024,0.0008195267,0.001274424,0.0002872881,0.1188977],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06837282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2287298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029625","doi":"10.1353/sch.2004.0017","title":"Justices Seeking the Presidency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Presidency; Supreme court; Law; Presidential system; Constitution; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Allen Sharp","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03672102118204673,"gpt":0.2886208088227264,"spread":0.2518997876406797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002285192,0.0007367974,0.0006216677,0.001147861,0.02037684,0.009200368,0.001240792,0.009541425,0.0424872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008700689,0.0005853823,0.0005161256,0.0006920557,0.003077572,0.004159417,0.006966738,0.01507183,0.008157024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003770012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007624031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01604484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04805389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994952,0.0004253981,0.0001487808,0.0009982635,0.001309519,0.002166157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982002,0.0003980013,0.00009047636,0.0001212094,0.0006096279,0.0005805945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002370195,0.00005328038,0.0008285805,0.00004114888,0.000007534687,0.0008109986,0.005058967,0.00003211764,0.0006488138,0.3134888,0.6488835,0.03012256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001177579,0.00002801274,0.0005728912,0.00007457322,0.000005047222,0.0001345239,0.001524745,0.00003586361,0.0002045712,0.01188711,0.9855071,0.00001367215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0181368,0.003991798,0.001177088,0.1080729,0.02258985,0.0001995875,0.0001652773,0.0001607619,0.845506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1126858,0.001668031,0.001062038,0.1558715,0.006757168,0.0001949144,0.0001875457,0.0001701178,0.7214028],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0424872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1421338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029208","doi":"10.1353/sch.2001.0090","title":"Conscience in the Court, 1931–1946: Religion as Duty and Choice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Duty; Law; Politics; Constitution; Citizenship; Allegiance; State (computer science); Political science; Faith; Naturalization; Sociology; Military service; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey M. Anderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03006971230215591,"gpt":0.296318543991927,"spread":0.266248831689771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006542788,0.0003121471,0.0003517738,0.001001936,0.01650507,0.008732076,0.001018887,0.00907655,0.004301842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01132721,0.0004673525,0.0003887061,0.001569884,0.04607049,0.01065986,0.004536978,0.01612199,0.0003756009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02233833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01039066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1570439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2005221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965814,0.001508572,0.0001349842,0.0003360783,0.0005961887,0.0008429196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960071,0.002650173,0.0003358619,0.0001770188,0.0003693114,0.0004604967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003427816,0.00003768502,0.001040204,0.00001530712,0.000004242655,0.000310315,0.02202789,0.000155999,0.000061454,0.9577917,0.0130635,0.005457415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009527769,0.00004374575,0.01267635,0.0008001794,0.00001645399,0.0003823071,0.02359122,0.0005429104,0.0002353286,0.6338003,0.3277088,0.0001071548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1419683,0.05951338,0.001959991,0.2675786,0.002037596,0.0001063128,0.0002287377,0.00001702509,0.5265899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553214,0.007080051,0.0003045156,0.01135568,0.0009529059,0.00005428668,0.00003094442,0.00001228589,0.02488803],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1570439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3122596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029082","doi":"10.1353/sch.2001.0074","title":"A Visit to the Quebec Citadel","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03035397116800434,"gpt":0.2692053274426597,"spread":0.2388513562746553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001158685,0.0005299536,0.0008395307,0.001708923,0.03392249,0.01003175,0.001342942,0.008159632,0.08630162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004343854,0.0005631456,0.0007128586,0.003063543,0.00428797,0.002431704,0.002218626,0.008293433,0.004964343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09617046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0740326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982026,0.000306167,0.00002947685,0.000145682,0.0004665753,0.0008495083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982823,0.0002660433,0.00005775487,0.00007547093,0.0008295789,0.000488849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000320043,0.0000146779,0.0006946084,0.00004597307,0.00001488194,0.0004092154,0.00143287,0.0001672615,0.0000973094,0.02245911,0.9637635,0.0108686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006234321,0.000004043768,0.002493637,0.00008028976,0.000005262868,0.00004348277,0.002081647,0.00005252757,0.00003741542,0.001276123,0.9938984,0.00002087281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01441582,0.06481872,0.0005171149,0.5297386,0.02223515,0.00006587939,0.002051669,0.0002038696,0.3659533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07505162,0.009592146,0.0004649023,0.0490493,0.001917242,0.00003377789,0.0002875127,0.0001573938,0.8634461],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09617046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6977687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029077","doi":"10.1353/sch.2010.0014","title":"Joining the Court: Pierce Butler","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Honor; Wife; Economic Justice; White (mutation); Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David J. Schroeder","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03113289648361357,"gpt":0.2806524931317905,"spread":0.2495195966481769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00153999,0.0005395344,0.0004482759,0.0007067938,0.01619843,0.006906768,0.001173962,0.007525079,0.07192203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007902187,0.0006147163,0.0002803136,0.0005959899,0.002819361,0.004202635,0.004745506,0.01941235,0.01838678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006129766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01028102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06029449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.172854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997112,0.0004647739,0.00006661533,0.0004652524,0.001148605,0.0007428008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970021,0.0003396063,0.00007139222,0.00005159755,0.0005165662,0.002018802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003221762,0.00001008973,0.000119625,0.000008692595,9.774917e-7,0.0003868456,0.0004631479,0.000006765824,0.00003331056,0.003914919,0.9899514,0.005100848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005694377,0.000005977117,0.0002507478,0.00009231122,0.000001628176,0.000675099,0.002155348,0.00001682432,0.00003555925,0.001679731,0.9950716,0.000009392238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001968855,0.01463957,0.0003778208,0.7496026,0.02283911,0.00005188562,0.0000598903,0.00007762726,0.2103826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03557875,0.01344892,0.0005426951,0.4397908,0.009910343,0.00008054919,0.00008306807,0.0001668299,0.5003981],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07192203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2406031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361028911","doi":"10.1353/sch.2011.0003","title":"The Passenger Cases Reconsidered in Transatlantic Commerce Clause History","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; State (computer science); Law; Immigration; Commerce Clause; Dormant Commerce Clause; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Federalism","authors":[{"name":"Tony Freyer","is_ca":false},{"name":"D. Thomas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1200555222171974,"gpt":0.2814875693357428,"spread":0.1614320471185454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004051405,0.0002642724,0.0003211599,0.001175012,0.009822465,0.01197465,0.001521887,0.01263719,0.005817858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006257265,0.0004785476,0.0004425499,0.002021499,0.01732933,0.006321789,0.003507736,0.01463068,0.000463476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01073237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005583098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06959213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09353699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967313,0.0008613621,0.0001266045,0.0004706076,0.0006877707,0.001122385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997427,0.001519834,0.0001649423,0.0001430644,0.0004830259,0.0002620899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001065631,0.00001011331,0.0006019137,0.00001186926,0.000002215621,0.0005095246,0.005101788,0.00007020139,0.00007767214,0.9781736,0.01199083,0.003439555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003323663,0.00004551456,0.0045718,0.0006652158,0.00002060411,0.0008300129,0.0208302,0.0004907796,0.0004905902,0.1397964,0.8321487,0.0000770127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1408622,0.01547344,0.001279707,0.0986683,0.00151469,0.0000351942,0.0001291507,0.00002510165,0.7420123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8850789,0.004887086,0.0003607433,0.05242391,0.00166718,0.00004690381,0.0001101902,0.00005250944,0.05537258],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06959213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1383741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029483","doi":"10.1353/sch.2015.0025","title":"The Clerks of the Four Horsemen (Part II, George Sutherland and Pierce Butler)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Economic Justice; Law; Civil servant; Peck (Imperial); Character (mathematics); Management; Sociology; Art history; Classics; History; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Barry Cushman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1013316183136096,"gpt":0.3137323234569229,"spread":0.2124007051433133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000646324,0.0005159557,0.0003172008,0.0005297031,0.002712193,0.00257287,0.0005140275,0.001559121,0.2666321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002578208,0.0003303605,0.0001855337,0.0003591,0.0007950129,0.001488771,0.0019218,0.002271521,0.07750429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001951235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004065121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01480203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04203352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994343,0.00007039862,0.0000213467,0.00009460972,0.0002556466,0.0001236783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988015,0.0001206402,0.00006478765,0.000043016,0.0004252724,0.000544743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007934375,0.00001637569,0.0002416386,0.00002172449,5.660509e-7,0.00004931674,0.0001009696,0.000009632859,0.0001110519,0.001163213,0.9802644,0.01801318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002583818,0.00001111838,0.0008975198,0.00004852397,9.12923e-7,0.0001005696,0.0003447697,0.00002186196,0.0001013219,0.0001250996,0.998342,0.000003699246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01119109,0.02381422,0.001238431,0.1137977,0.06490655,0.0003768352,0.0007711264,0.0004072151,0.7834968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009986272,0.002430853,0.0002476338,0.005383256,0.001621697,0.00004420491,0.0001717401,0.0000883888,0.980026],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2666321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8919731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161250834","doi":"10.1353/sch.2011.0013","title":"Lochner and Constitutional Continuity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Substantive due process; Doctrine; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David E. Bernstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05440738764365759,"gpt":0.261243954552733,"spread":0.2068365669090754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005723733,0.0002366161,0.0004373725,0.00138341,0.009277209,0.007707516,0.001151148,0.005266642,0.01332166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00796172,0.0002672926,0.0003168665,0.001298187,0.04534756,0.008989,0.007290096,0.007467514,0.000945487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0137593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007530148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01901305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01685209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932845,0.00266179,0.0001777292,0.001499509,0.000931363,0.001445083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996609,0.00180929,0.0002787373,0.0005495066,0.0003718006,0.0003817089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002252418,0.000001737611,0.00003859292,0.000002758352,3.825549e-7,0.00001668711,0.000435127,0.00002011007,0.000009840888,0.9963935,0.002105422,0.0009735871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002626413,0.00001460882,0.0004938549,0.0001421042,0.000004809876,0.00006599332,0.001508664,0.0001007085,0.00009543317,0.7597518,0.2377793,0.00001646499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02183682,0.01554304,0.003910819,0.1111007,0.0007120185,0.00004054497,0.00009972497,0.00004055324,0.8467159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8719646,0.004580981,0.001319777,0.02500891,0.001349795,0.0001262715,0.00008681716,0.00006141417,0.09550141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01901305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09983116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360986598","doi":"10.1353/sch.2019.0004","title":"Body and Soul: The Selective Draft Law Cases and World War I","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Washington; Syracuse University","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Military service; Constitution; Political science; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Capozzola","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01585205118714332,"gpt":0.2607625926446941,"spread":0.2449105414575508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006237389,0.0006996482,0.0004745959,0.002797679,0.0165557,0.00801657,0.001977147,0.01621195,0.006886582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01304249,0.0007496304,0.0008100696,0.002931979,0.02653852,0.00678727,0.00762717,0.01557982,0.000672029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00798035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00606266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04647201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07669736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948542,0.001386712,0.0002083078,0.000451552,0.0007996221,0.002299768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944338,0.003554648,0.0006858844,0.0003510378,0.0003490652,0.0006255211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008662795,0.0001006997,0.003146134,0.00008783167,0.00001524406,0.005067794,0.02936414,0.0001395916,0.0001725562,0.8508962,0.09511331,0.01580981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001746101,0.0001591371,0.01454081,0.002606,0.00006253168,0.005201486,0.1286163,0.000350625,0.001215607,0.1547809,0.6921562,0.0001357148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1632103,0.01736445,0.001227761,0.1698005,0.002059323,0.0001756349,0.0002497836,0.00002274574,0.6458894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8858953,0.01012412,0.0005448499,0.05271744,0.00162826,0.0003348301,0.0001955597,0.00003413613,0.04852556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04647201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09240305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360972849","doi":"10.1353/sch.2000.0002","title":"The Naturalization of Douglas Clyde Macintosh, Alien Theologian","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalization; Supreme court; Alien; Divinity; Conscience; Christian ministry; Law; Protestantism; Religious studies; Declaration; Sociology; Classics; Theology; History; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Ronald B. Flowers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01814054330233018,"gpt":0.2691512908180439,"spread":0.2510107475157137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002897521,0.0003169257,0.0002128863,0.0008293355,0.01216383,0.005074591,0.0007767621,0.002922317,0.003980695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004123961,0.0002278861,0.0001822628,0.0005987438,0.02363962,0.003560326,0.003101299,0.007121132,0.0004418473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01343359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009412643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09196216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1125628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978014,0.0007597168,0.00004213303,0.0003717715,0.0006556405,0.0003693514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988332,0.00050598,0.00008270562,0.0001035732,0.0002751003,0.0001993857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001665883,0.000009514628,0.0001909474,0.00002397726,0.000002033,0.0001248408,0.005719398,0.00004058206,0.0001190634,0.7691926,0.2188217,0.005738624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006368916,0.000003476083,0.0002692898,0.00008773147,0.000001378155,0.0001024976,0.001606493,0.00003308077,0.00006116675,0.03033241,0.9674865,0.00000959372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0155569,0.05474577,0.00162427,0.3784112,0.01016142,0.00002833034,0.0001038467,0.00004218025,0.5393261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5009058,0.01487686,0.0009760985,0.2342184,0.006033678,0.0001147676,0.00006426673,0.00009101128,0.2427192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09196216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1828538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029193","doi":"10.1353/sch.2009.0023","title":"Public Diplomacy in the U.S. Supreme Court: The Warren Years—Part II","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Biography; Politics; Diplomacy; Law; Warren Court; State (computer science); Sociology; Art history; History; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Theodore M. Vestal","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06035732786645352,"gpt":0.2870304650667115,"spread":0.226673137200258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00383014,0.0004046406,0.0004170098,0.001550617,0.009155835,0.0104158,0.001413232,0.00895763,0.007995214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008926245,0.0007061888,0.0004648066,0.002243735,0.007495412,0.005726608,0.006781792,0.01150885,0.0009585945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01384699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01286312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2060639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952552,0.001004944,0.0001399278,0.0004035664,0.00130817,0.00188827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996775,0.001326029,0.0004891077,0.0001326652,0.0003748767,0.0009023803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004949158,0.0001852328,0.005974615,0.0001065628,0.00002345966,0.0006928694,0.01190821,0.0002513241,0.0002706732,0.4746007,0.4473062,0.05863066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003243575,0.00007651327,0.03955065,0.001185908,0.00002309828,0.0003501521,0.01001086,0.0002239848,0.0003015298,0.03988154,0.9082885,0.00007475802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.08982413,0.1486711,0.0005996265,0.4179121,0.006451814,0.0001808205,0.0006786265,0.00004130771,0.3356404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7314732,0.04592542,0.0004256316,0.09984263,0.01081185,0.0005259574,0.0005581456,0.00005727605,0.1103799],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2069941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}