{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":11,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"5466e9d830a1","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History"}},"results":[{"id":"W4361028902","doi":"10.1353/sch.2000.0012","title":"The Clear and Present Danger Test","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Wife; Law; Supreme court; Presidential system; Test (biology); League; Ideology; History; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Laycock","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03814086693857501,"gpt":0.2887625941057969,"spread":0.2506217271672219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008557611,0.00006477432,0.000120228,0.00003553323,0.0005186024,0.00005917713,0.0002395881,0.00005588526,0.0008938488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001015122,0.00004810369,0.00007115455,0.00003371307,0.0004127273,0.0001565592,0.00001285534,0.0002438041,0.00001956716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003709585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003063039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005562344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989286,0.0001113482,0.000265459,0.00006727815,0.0003844553,0.0002428764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991509,0.0002576994,0.0001400131,0.0001146926,0.0001236775,0.0002129707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004742877,0.00008124478,0.001340936,0.000008390418,0.00002567393,0.00003681404,0.01497507,0.000003747258,0.00005009764,0.008064193,0.9524798,0.02288666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000154177,0.00007500951,0.004233334,0.00001405315,0.00001456593,0.00001577738,0.0007369615,0.00001040909,0.000002515925,0.001200837,0.9934831,0.00005930888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4632274,0.02755273,0.00001027952,0.09420433,0.00303189,0.0003742054,0.00001173647,0.00004532485,0.4115421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228969,0.004870501,0.00007425788,0.0005082689,0.001475148,0.000001105823,1.778219e-7,0.00001199606,0.0701616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4596695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9787017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029625","doi":"10.1353/sch.2004.0017","title":"Justices Seeking the Presidency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Presidency; Supreme court; Law; Presidential system; Constitution; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Allen Sharp","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03672102118204673,"gpt":0.2886208088227264,"spread":0.2518997876406797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007770758,0.00006084336,0.0001177059,0.00005276722,0.000389988,0.00001923527,0.0003454572,0.00004175647,0.0003973948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003659022,0.00004423883,0.0001033451,0.00006097131,0.0009579369,0.0002912184,0.00001624104,0.0002227428,0.00001932845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001011133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004897127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001395928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004133563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988787,0.000100549,0.0002497912,0.00005568225,0.0005314503,0.0001838589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990327,0.0001879223,0.0002993393,0.00008772564,0.0002769254,0.0001153742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001406513,0.00004347235,0.0006110361,0.000008265073,0.00003348504,0.00004699987,0.009386048,0.0003889515,0.0001890308,0.953192,0.03573721,0.0003494671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001342033,0.00003591148,0.0007464258,0.000041174,0.00005701959,0.00003073201,0.002470091,0.000001154925,0.000006865643,0.002121542,0.9942918,0.00006307437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04890684,0.02255456,0.006187227,0.02625244,0.006406824,0.0001802756,0.00000510951,0.00004418203,0.8894625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935248,0.0003204272,0.0007140117,0.0008406031,0.00141016,6.613781e-7,1.342345e-7,0.000004852629,0.003184387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9585546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8687292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029208","doi":"10.1353/sch.2001.0090","title":"Conscience in the Court, 1931–1946: Religion as Duty and Choice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Duty; Law; Politics; Constitution; Citizenship; Allegiance; State (computer science); Political science; Faith; Naturalization; Sociology; Military service; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey M. Anderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03006971230215591,"gpt":0.296318543991927,"spread":0.266248831689771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00156859,0.00007859002,0.0001589988,0.0001025221,0.0002981915,0.00002837306,0.0003444718,0.00005763069,0.0001518665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006188066,0.00006042579,0.00006016751,0.0001493355,0.001709409,0.0003219777,0.00001742761,0.0002870823,0.00001231525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006316638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00250161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003953589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00167614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985499,0.0002198814,0.0002627292,0.0001001761,0.0006324248,0.0002349173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988257,0.0004789852,0.000245747,0.0001013159,0.0002032107,0.0001450141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007015326,0.0001614086,0.05005921,0.000009504265,0.000019315,0.0003543007,0.01357524,0.00003448689,0.0003646917,0.6544895,0.2798509,0.001011363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000196196,0.00006632125,0.005201865,0.00003037322,0.00001647185,0.0001980063,0.001865584,0.000006483535,0.000001575237,0.0008582948,0.9914801,0.000078758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4725238,0.009922573,0.0002128399,0.02571972,0.00154535,0.0001669121,0.000003665441,0.0000159893,0.4898891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914331,0.001988033,0.0001721169,0.003066608,0.0005048509,0.000001114809,2.601645e-7,0.000003664601,0.002830252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7116292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6298389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029082","doi":"10.1353/sch.2001.0074","title":"A Visit to the Quebec Citadel","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03035397116800434,"gpt":0.2692053274426597,"spread":0.2388513562746553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000802176,0.00006405725,0.0001323706,0.00009418956,0.000218605,0.000026409,0.0004507386,0.00005018801,0.0007864646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003312226,0.00005104162,0.0001184589,0.0001512043,0.0001458978,0.0002385514,0.00001498657,0.0002039808,0.00009890638],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00205197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001337778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1600761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5335081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988731,0.00008710418,0.0002276494,0.00007138272,0.0005018333,0.000238991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991387,0.0000768414,0.0002039252,0.0001362443,0.0001710332,0.0002732322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002491019,0.0000146475,0.0002305297,0.000001177629,0.00001099822,0.00004983472,0.01612803,0.00002188836,0.00006946264,0.004038001,0.9763187,0.00309179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001131573,0.00002977437,0.004877079,0.00002264797,0.00001222486,0.00002622427,0.0006851323,0.000002992122,0.000002644051,0.0001882238,0.9939714,0.00006850947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2407578,0.01438461,0.001068503,0.566437,0.00597955,0.0003970148,0.0000301394,0.00003799541,0.1709074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7830478,0.0005456651,0.0001419319,0.02047187,0.003729468,0.000002439057,1.430629e-7,0.00001498439,0.1920457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5459651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8611236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029077","doi":"10.1353/sch.2010.0014","title":"Joining the Court: Pierce Butler","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Honor; Wife; Economic Justice; White (mutation); Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David J. Schroeder","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03113289648361357,"gpt":0.2806524931317905,"spread":0.2495195966481769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001314895,0.00007909731,0.0001554015,0.00006372012,0.0004574999,0.0000236136,0.0004058381,0.00007687857,0.00260629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003666565,0.00005804559,0.0001328032,0.00004741931,0.001338325,0.0002255145,0.00002094628,0.0006403902,0.00007004327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003719009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003514231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004353372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004309648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987044,0.0001155668,0.0002859387,0.00006851988,0.000592613,0.0002329773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987001,0.0002905554,0.0003153272,0.0001348817,0.0003727532,0.0001864173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001396856,0.00003807341,0.001272685,0.000002643099,0.00003041481,0.00002476573,0.003653732,0.000009305902,0.001242357,0.5216408,0.4713005,0.0007707626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001084489,0.0000258181,0.0006086577,0.000009742807,0.00003294364,0.00004837936,0.00154051,0.00000417032,0.00001127811,0.0003442341,0.9971875,0.00007830425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05655409,0.002114673,0.0006769699,0.02374602,0.007834054,0.0001116089,0.000009640809,0.00003091233,0.908922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827077,0.00009915462,0.0007627155,0.002703846,0.002379873,8.918681e-7,4.593487e-7,0.000008596869,0.01133673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9261537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361028911","doi":"10.1353/sch.2011.0003","title":"The Passenger Cases Reconsidered in Transatlantic Commerce Clause History","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; State (computer science); Law; Immigration; Commerce Clause; Dormant Commerce Clause; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Federalism","authors":[{"name":"Tony Freyer","is_ca":false},{"name":"D. Thomas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1200555222171974,"gpt":0.2814875693357428,"spread":0.1614320471185454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00121824,0.0001030185,0.0002317554,0.0001180009,0.0002306338,0.000007514858,0.0003333879,0.00008222641,0.0009355659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003881452,0.00008292114,0.0001441002,0.00005613164,0.001638855,0.0002495378,0.000009877577,0.0003857949,0.00001671983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002511908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004312688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00441693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00710629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983433,0.000399891,0.0004835961,0.0000910814,0.0003866351,0.0002954836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983895,0.0007130381,0.0003285807,0.0001484002,0.0002433898,0.0001770275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002561102,0.000318642,0.01131004,0.00001857338,0.0001000946,0.0008875217,0.0391949,0.000004161583,0.0001781996,0.3186638,0.6270018,0.002066132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002250565,0.00006262196,0.003080469,0.00003644248,0.00003691672,0.0001031049,0.002695431,0.00000142372,0.000003666319,0.0002849876,0.9933602,0.0001096923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2281172,0.05309958,0.0003048778,0.0106581,0.01095541,0.0003912767,0.00001201828,0.00006284482,0.6963987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908044,0.001381075,0.00036452,0.0008278065,0.0003836576,0.000002132381,3.37543e-7,0.00001030122,0.006225731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7626873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029483","doi":"10.1353/sch.2015.0025","title":"The Clerks of the Four Horsemen (Part II, George Sutherland and Pierce Butler)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Economic Justice; Law; Civil servant; Peck (Imperial); Character (mathematics); Management; Sociology; Art history; Classics; History; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Barry Cushman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1013316183136096,"gpt":0.3137323234569229,"spread":0.2124007051433133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003124814,0.00005739133,0.0001091287,0.00005011728,0.0005211133,0.00003819243,0.0003198317,0.00005560622,0.0002142178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001178065,0.00003495108,0.0000575535,0.0001130715,0.0004060399,0.0004245957,0.0000363988,0.0003624374,0.000005692707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003474693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001925155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006442221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008414604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998709,0.0002551676,0.0003352312,0.0000567931,0.0005149459,0.0001289195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982596,0.0002408588,0.0005643715,0.0001495024,0.0006724785,0.0001131873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004633124,0.00007280648,0.004317337,0.000003454561,0.00004268413,0.000001135814,0.03995363,0.000004511768,0.0001919796,0.01174774,0.9417022,0.001916215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002034616,0.00004478485,0.003102527,0.00001341784,0.0000299022,0.000009928589,0.01030343,0.000004378812,0.00001147425,0.0007314999,0.9855002,0.00004501949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.609879,0.006858464,0.00003823949,0.1839993,0.007764303,0.0002698604,0.000005875715,0.00001517812,0.1911698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685931,0.0003660276,0.0001041892,0.0006152081,0.000713851,0.00000168411,2.205471e-7,0.000007541218,0.02959817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3587142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4008035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161250834","doi":"10.1353/sch.2011.0013","title":"Lochner and Constitutional Continuity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Substantive due process; Doctrine; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David E. Bernstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05440738764365759,"gpt":0.261243954552733,"spread":0.2068365669090754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009157731,0.00005792049,0.0001716131,0.00007070541,0.0001704201,0.00001243769,0.0001350115,0.00006904108,0.0006416918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001661769,0.00005055973,0.00005651907,0.00004432549,0.002079628,0.0003996071,0.00001491951,0.0001490047,0.00001095413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000295593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000855283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000910336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003031635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991136,0.00007084347,0.0002639703,0.00006866859,0.0003521111,0.0001307953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990991,0.00003890099,0.0002648621,0.00004440672,0.0004047012,0.0001479717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001402293,0.0001968786,0.03233524,0.00004982457,0.00009395199,0.0001352611,0.05373789,7.774985e-7,0.0008356631,0.7363348,0.1716618,0.004477724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002338933,0.00006303321,0.002408664,0.00004277844,0.00002394924,0.0000288839,0.001117626,4.607184e-7,0.00002771639,0.001677803,0.9942994,0.00007586598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1030095,0.01733807,0.003934948,0.0008090512,0.004501379,0.0001690172,0.000004283629,0.00003731856,0.8701964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971132,0.0001941204,0.0003897131,0.0001499507,0.000597754,5.59442e-7,8.879626e-8,0.000003121422,0.001551499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8941036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7662475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360986598","doi":"10.1353/sch.2019.0004","title":"Body and Soul: The Selective Draft Law Cases and World War I","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Washington; Syracuse University","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Military service; Constitution; Political science; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Capozzola","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01585205118714332,"gpt":0.2607625926446941,"spread":0.2449105414575508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005802554,0.00004982634,0.00009548077,0.00005661019,0.0001973314,0.00002005155,0.00009435355,0.00002975795,0.0001609393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008406138,0.00003625277,0.00003732036,0.00003718475,0.0002000655,0.0003180592,0.00001383631,0.0001566379,0.00000813147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003428111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001636107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001192014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003725619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992956,0.00008851941,0.0001456884,0.00006426504,0.0003142602,0.00009167958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999239,0.0002616163,0.0001734653,0.0000395239,0.000234879,0.00005154546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002333291,0.0001324928,0.05243438,0.00002885833,0.0001857493,0.00006855851,0.04759018,0.00001702421,0.003657353,0.749859,0.1445963,0.001196776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002232285,0.00007851167,0.01112547,0.00002881411,0.00002616464,0.00003594893,0.001075548,0.00001831327,0.00006492109,0.001785564,0.9854719,0.0000656238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8848411,0.004279239,0.00001549117,0.004859772,0.001292347,0.0001401525,0.000002791132,0.00001037679,0.1045587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899959,0.0001720547,0.00004113999,0.0005064195,0.0003742472,5.954593e-7,2.686018e-7,0.00000455865,0.008904835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8408756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2078983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360972849","doi":"10.1353/sch.2000.0002","title":"The Naturalization of Douglas Clyde Macintosh, Alien Theologian","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalization; Supreme court; Alien; Divinity; Conscience; Christian ministry; Law; Protestantism; Religious studies; Declaration; Sociology; Classics; Theology; History; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Ronald B. Flowers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01814054330233018,"gpt":0.2691512908180439,"spread":0.2510107475157137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007645074,0.00006113084,0.0001393421,0.00004317864,0.0003052738,0.00001017126,0.0003167856,0.00006054933,0.00128124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001886996,0.00004262423,0.0001106661,0.00007416591,0.001519626,0.0001686943,0.000008800235,0.0001655119,0.00001302169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004496037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001439307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006098985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002696086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988142,0.000202057,0.0003263766,0.00005253287,0.0004397886,0.0001650246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989651,0.000225768,0.0003054969,0.00009742494,0.0003191859,0.00008698918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008994873,0.00004433369,0.001045928,0.000005286741,0.00004800933,0.00001027857,0.003785658,0.0001359029,0.0001151451,0.8567089,0.1325138,0.005496757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001130198,0.00004817322,0.00044245,0.00001656228,0.00002414711,0.00001273936,0.0007051959,0.000007917744,0.00001711479,0.001151898,0.9974081,0.00005269031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06969247,0.01086952,0.0003638856,0.006370371,0.004378924,0.0001439835,0.00001120268,0.00002316125,0.9081465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796002,0.001337672,0.0002500426,0.0003874615,0.0007742656,5.369604e-7,8.636254e-7,0.00000450008,0.01764448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9099077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029193","doi":"10.1353/sch.2009.0023","title":"Public Diplomacy in the U.S. Supreme Court: The Warren Years—Part II","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Biography; Politics; Diplomacy; Law; Warren Court; State (computer science); Sociology; Art history; History; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Theodore M. Vestal","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06035732786645352,"gpt":0.2870304650667115,"spread":0.226673137200258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004397554,0.0001483393,0.0003214876,0.0001710752,0.0006362354,0.0001236707,0.0012439,0.0001223905,0.0003678452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006513615,0.00009317363,0.0001961199,0.0003640897,0.0003651869,0.0008323331,0.00003817656,0.0006566887,0.00003127319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007944111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001186426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001050439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001586486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969451,0.0005063643,0.0006448049,0.0001533145,0.001312987,0.000437418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984626,0.000201941,0.0005189562,0.0002555371,0.0004070354,0.0001539665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005483101,0.0003727138,0.002840513,0.00001316317,0.00004436526,0.0001106686,0.0731641,0.00001075,0.0001651202,0.02537033,0.8908321,0.007021303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003344897,0.0001876893,0.0099007,0.00006491681,0.00002914135,0.00002453343,0.003447759,0.000003779845,0.000003731732,0.004726667,0.9811461,0.0001304643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4635788,0.03449575,0.00004879051,0.1368003,0.005252293,0.0008533782,0.000008059183,0.00008625167,0.3588764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926364,0.0005732902,0.00001681451,0.001905911,0.002588212,0.000003816016,7.087513e-7,0.00001164478,0.00226322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5290576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4893472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}