{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":18,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"a3ad2e618c88","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics"}},"results":[{"id":"W1972355832","doi":"10.1177/0951629803015002645","title":"Institutionalism as a Methodology","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalism; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Axiom; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Class (philosophy); Positive economics; New institutionalism; Historical institutionalism; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Diermeier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Keith Krehbiel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07010984092665977,"gpt":0.2939530061150081,"spread":0.2238431651883483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01585075,0.000811035,0.001098371,0.00436567,0.002962871,0.00682646,0.003234945,0.00270595,0.008598024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01375838,0.0006429925,0.00167422,0.003245795,0.018109,0.008446877,0.006413538,0.005405059,0.00212538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005510711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005652469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001433082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009970166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867157,0.009149931,0.0006134751,0.001429233,0.001558181,0.0005335019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874219,0.007627883,0.001028272,0.00239355,0.001043072,0.0004853842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[9.467929e-7,0.000004537797,0.00004281835,0.00002034051,0.000003210197,0.000007533622,0.0001020865,0.0002833287,0.00001730475,0.9969391,0.0005801688,0.001998724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004643608,0.000006311772,0.00003539856,0.00005479855,0.000003365212,0.00002640354,0.00006857936,0.00101532,0.00007120743,0.9628294,0.03588042,0.000004130304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003195313,0.004904405,0.8339553,0.01866526,0.000612426,0.0003027325,0.0002746152,0.0002224739,0.1378675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3803334,0.008438658,0.5568572,0.008044038,0.001976863,0.003065464,0.0004776639,0.0003540651,0.04045263],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01585075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08382779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157458642","doi":"10.1177/0951692803154004","title":"Similarity of Options and the Measurement of Diversity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Axiom; Similarity (geometry); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Position (finance); Focus (optics); Computer science; Data science; Econometrics; Sociology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Mathematics; Geography; Law","authors":[{"name":"Walter Bossert","is_ca":true},{"name":"Prasanta K. Pattanaik","is_ca":false},{"name":"Yongsheng Xu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05340575176902274,"gpt":0.2324110641399203,"spread":0.1790053123708976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009524928,0.0003928911,0.001197272,0.004965118,0.001583499,0.004526588,0.001390357,0.001773142,0.002966053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07851771,0.0003750355,0.0007270157,0.003604951,0.008554807,0.01062754,0.005771902,0.001736432,0.0002561202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001799884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005768819,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004766104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003063622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.98046,0.01161343,0.001116468,0.002025054,0.004028453,0.0007565709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939282,0.04352525,0.00688808,0.005662706,0.002833186,0.001808686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001272404,0.00003981375,0.01029946,0.0001020756,0.0001055465,0.0000895367,0.001137928,0.01036844,0.001254693,0.9432517,0.0003670627,0.03285649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001271442,0.00006293035,0.004582662,0.0000475651,0.00001225531,0.0001727809,0.0004277632,0.01303061,0.0004544192,0.979305,0.001865145,0.000026146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5474108,0.003106655,0.3979665,0.003276292,0.000149014,0.0001163114,0.0003563618,0.00007989672,0.04753812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821164,0.0002283116,0.01664333,0.00008807882,0.0000827005,0.00005638184,0.0001028076,0.00001175434,0.0006702131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009524928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05037326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083969644","doi":"10.1177/095169280201400304","title":"Single-Peakedness and Disconnected Coalitions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Preference; Perception; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science; Law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Steven J. Brams","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael A. Jones","is_ca":false},{"name":"D. Marc Kilgour","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04591586075679256,"gpt":0.222110100237224,"spread":0.1761942394804314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004195581,0.000334372,0.0007107753,0.001742787,0.002225512,0.003741021,0.0009284875,0.001033518,0.007736292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01580595,0.0003689901,0.0007385084,0.001703017,0.006762266,0.004811729,0.004032273,0.00162503,0.0004932403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001329838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005987007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001238727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001173858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960988,0.001612737,0.0002320265,0.0007637279,0.0007663549,0.0005263264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866467,0.006183062,0.002636684,0.001730548,0.001080618,0.001722413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000414788,0.00002255357,0.002574811,0.00002828258,0.00002330983,0.0001181523,0.001276206,0.001583406,0.0002159458,0.9858213,0.0006635513,0.007631036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002489492,0.00001606904,0.001287393,0.00001734531,0.00000829994,0.0001754284,0.0008399159,0.005713441,0.0001410132,0.9871612,0.004601953,0.00001283702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5963891,0.0008513692,0.2315978,0.003036818,0.00008861189,0.0001553281,0.0003261337,0.000104747,0.16745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843186,0.000129269,0.01038578,0.0001273768,0.00002832318,0.00006726835,0.0001133918,0.00001573255,0.004814266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007736292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02588052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119711816","doi":"10.1177/0951629806064346","title":"Skating on Thin Ice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Dictator; Perspective (graphical); Dictator game; Mathematical economics; Economics; Game theory; Public good; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Norman Frohlich","is_ca":true},{"name":"Joe Oppenheimer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0195897838570992,"gpt":0.3400536788799533,"spread":0.3204638950228541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001757803,0.0007858936,0.0007258837,0.001039828,0.005445872,0.004562182,0.0009088655,0.001684776,0.05788058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006424486,0.0003761284,0.0007087032,0.000722204,0.003647882,0.007605718,0.00512886,0.002280213,0.01843218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001244144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001481926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007482199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01507607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989637,0.0003505546,0.00004197392,0.0001886588,0.0001943333,0.0002607865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982822,0.0004161602,0.000151448,0.000388472,0.000372487,0.0003892612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001476464,0.0002840458,0.01484966,0.0006848416,0.0002655135,0.001118946,0.01326234,0.007902195,0.004569915,0.5916987,0.2466577,0.1172297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008689232,0.0003539353,0.00790645,0.001074463,0.00009247566,0.0005491546,0.0238068,0.009534148,0.003435467,0.2379883,0.7150459,0.0001259383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1591363,0.001321026,0.02144694,0.0159557,0.002039571,0.0001357171,0.0008732324,0.0005127568,0.7985787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.780825,0.001818067,0.01094944,0.00220444,0.0003453098,0.0001017906,0.00092772,0.0005171937,0.2023109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05788058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1936299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027958363","doi":"10.1177/0951629804043203","title":"Proximity, Directionality, and the Riddle of Relative Party Extremeness","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Ideal (ethics); Perception; Political science; Comparative politics; Positive economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Paul Warwick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03920281316605294,"gpt":0.3443194872860485,"spread":0.3051166741199955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005385571,0.0001543398,0.0004897765,0.002730428,0.0009420849,0.001838516,0.0003988664,0.0004963301,0.002752929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03333251,0.0002078655,0.0003052837,0.003629166,0.002391797,0.002173058,0.003100858,0.0007473397,0.0002864903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004268663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001804245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008685329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001087274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942552,0.00344341,0.0003974756,0.0007932349,0.0007761146,0.0003345316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711712,0.01627229,0.007799877,0.002870664,0.001223487,0.0006624526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006087951,0.00004523437,0.8915731,0.0002376374,0.000231604,0.000243724,0.01033542,0.002394739,0.001585642,0.04605022,0.0003421414,0.0463517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000394251,0.00033389,0.9130693,0.0001096381,0.0001113671,0.0009139032,0.01538387,0.003140236,0.00135938,0.05967283,0.005808516,0.00005766348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805833,0.0004071204,0.007135398,0.0002132932,0.00001030543,0.00001877638,0.0001362366,0.00001126943,0.01148437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993016,0.0000454193,0.0004697967,0.000009958017,0.000006503933,0.000005201211,0.00004419171,0.000001547714,0.0001157264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005385571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02848202,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122800110","doi":"10.1177/0951629806061859","title":"Structural Reform Litigation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Agency (philosophy); Legislature; Interest group; Negotiation; Mandate; Statutory law; Law and economics; Bureaucracy; Economics; Political science; Public administration; Business; Law; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Anthony M. Bertelli","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sven E. Feldmann","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01143616630021497,"gpt":0.2360932170294789,"spread":0.224657050729264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02037306,0.0006113126,0.0007728747,0.002233681,0.006677741,0.005811587,0.002732075,0.008211744,0.01901531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05088036,0.0005564192,0.00141679,0.002849682,0.007196967,0.005588759,0.008431885,0.006153864,0.002641977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007358493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008617524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004069813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004421956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9657335,0.01117275,0.001633129,0.004348571,0.01207158,0.005040421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673349,0.01637047,0.004292153,0.005870484,0.004753382,0.001378577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000143926,0.00003598395,0.0004194105,0.00002763897,0.00001274535,0.00008069957,0.0007599992,0.0004681255,0.0002696597,0.9879941,0.004185239,0.005732014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000163042,0.0002626217,0.00226119,0.0002378813,0.00009281292,0.0006878703,0.001531897,0.009550562,0.002972443,0.7885237,0.1936561,0.00005988025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07204286,0.001249781,0.1493736,0.03598454,0.0007469109,0.0007962762,0.000325993,0.0003807382,0.7390993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052286,0.000558294,0.01911555,0.01101343,0.0005982997,0.000663499,0.0001745735,0.00006757293,0.06258037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02037306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1077443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068727666","doi":"10.1177/0951629807080774","title":"Justice Preferences and the Arrow Problem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Social welfare function; Arrow; Normative; Economics; Condorcet method; Redistribution (election); Majority rule; Voting; Function (biology); Welfare; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Norman Frohlich","is_ca":true},{"name":"Joe Oppenheimer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03216173026408328,"gpt":0.2570972878179075,"spread":0.2249355575538242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007129711,0.000406463,0.0007371595,0.001278834,0.004855454,0.004727804,0.0007909483,0.003845418,0.009025793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01123573,0.0003967289,0.001167907,0.001310561,0.00851097,0.009120904,0.003485767,0.00443686,0.0007466581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003002037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001904674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002752428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001614422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946676,0.002980999,0.0001982363,0.0007463287,0.0006741977,0.0007325959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954776,0.002483922,0.0004418458,0.0006719982,0.0005688823,0.000355796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050147,0.000004531022,0.00003928004,0.000005169741,0.000002591235,0.000009119798,0.00007490271,0.0003718997,0.00003057919,0.9974908,0.0003840497,0.001582074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004590628,0.000002277431,0.00004071093,0.000004028511,0.000001543258,0.000008898367,0.00003838502,0.0006598025,0.00003351164,0.9969945,0.0022088,0.000002945408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1651915,0.002809539,0.3149871,0.04395857,0.0006155985,0.0001536472,0.0003235569,0.0001822012,0.4717782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377643,0.0007490885,0.03410513,0.001847795,0.0003507781,0.0001584275,0.00006422364,0.00006529477,0.02489492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009025793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03770596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621077348","doi":"10.1177/0951629817710559","title":"Path-dependency and coordination in multi-candidate elections with behavioral voters","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Approval voting; Path (computing); Anti-plurality voting; Disapproval voting; Coordination game; Dependency (UML); Economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Costel Andonie","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daniel Diermeier","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04176586877360788,"gpt":0.3882975599956484,"spread":0.3465316912220405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002759345,0.0004462792,0.001164972,0.0006414039,0.001095226,0.001758534,0.001167479,0.001197517,0.007747548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009601763,0.0004490915,0.0007741322,0.0008214214,0.001500949,0.001725757,0.001485562,0.001257399,0.0007532648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00137823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008873816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003497595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003763599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980472,0.001036611,0.0000509136,0.0003171884,0.0001360237,0.0004120193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922494,0.004198498,0.00196926,0.0005496157,0.0003076268,0.0007256021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000550959,0.0002880521,0.01597638,0.0001076413,0.0001390911,0.0009999257,0.001009011,0.3022709,0.00272429,0.660253,0.001946529,0.01373424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002120437,0.000237019,0.005842114,0.00001702145,0.00005111905,0.0001308273,0.0003782794,0.6291039,0.0004798626,0.3612672,0.00223591,0.00004460657],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7883608,0.0001887505,0.189689,0.001998503,0.00003413297,0.0001322564,0.0003291136,0.000105836,0.01916164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887047,0.00008632702,0.006656743,0.0000578234,0.00001976706,0.00007443097,0.00009690544,0.00001507306,0.004288213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007747548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02591819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019223278","doi":"10.1177/0951629810375643","title":"Evaluating the Unfairness of Representation With the Nash Social Welfare Function","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Social welfare function; Index (typography); Representation (politics); Welfare; Function (biology); Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Economics; Social Welfare; Public economics; Logarithm; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; Market economy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Junichiro Wada","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05754395389845783,"gpt":0.4239780069297339,"spread":0.3664340530312761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01322333,0.0009215728,0.001245201,0.002802784,0.000829311,0.002556098,0.001090078,0.0009469236,0.002525825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03012294,0.0002620844,0.0005792864,0.002180454,0.003135828,0.003270819,0.002285164,0.001014513,0.0001448511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003665223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001751537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002224341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001815704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935222,0.003943386,0.0002296999,0.0003627788,0.001419459,0.0005224732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870907,0.008980065,0.001250555,0.0009798476,0.001253605,0.000445036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002868792,0.0001945464,0.01231123,0.0001059007,0.0001928755,0.000140272,0.0005042762,0.5652199,0.001877871,0.3617722,0.001330917,0.05606311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001737126,0.00016253,0.004302559,0.00003054082,0.00003236779,0.00006209328,0.0004314533,0.8109188,0.002002472,0.1809001,0.001091527,0.00004819586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3298694,0.0002300875,0.6465952,0.0006439979,0.00004769903,0.0001693072,0.0001605915,0.00009220502,0.02219155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366423,0.0001289691,0.06052765,0.00003899166,0.00003193046,0.0001658311,0.00009499034,0.00004266884,0.002326557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01322333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06993252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406909333","doi":"10.1177/0951629815586878","title":"Do parties converge to the electoral mean in all political systems?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Autocracy; Politics; Convergence (economics); Economics; Opposition (politics); Proportional representation; Political economy; Centripetal force; Political science; Economic system; Law; Macroeconomics; Physics; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Maria Gallego","is_ca":true},{"name":"Norman Schofield","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08731779137718267,"gpt":0.3891764441088976,"spread":0.3018586527317149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004550989,0.0002542104,0.001152603,0.002763478,0.001819921,0.003634301,0.001024839,0.001352225,0.008368886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03577555,0.0003984686,0.0008139392,0.00196281,0.003336468,0.00493967,0.002940733,0.001617356,0.001119512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001108544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004776806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001897433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001606868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965267,0.001439132,0.0001417201,0.0008440993,0.0005092872,0.0005391473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881037,0.00612632,0.001866654,0.001864233,0.001281849,0.0007573037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005364445,0.0001513856,0.1864351,0.0002591511,0.0003924322,0.0002648997,0.006174388,0.01444303,0.001204777,0.6989817,0.002977128,0.08817955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001362196,0.0002203348,0.1854579,0.0001582569,0.0001183341,0.0005480852,0.006061476,0.03827146,0.00146668,0.7556983,0.01176879,0.00009411501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8973646,0.0005035551,0.04807895,0.002104473,0.00005031809,0.00006186339,0.0002981313,0.0001855413,0.05135268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961436,0.0001477258,0.002163535,0.0001178864,0.00002696284,0.00004093103,0.0001463712,0.00002735601,0.001185634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008368886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02799672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004050731","doi":"10.1177/0951629819892339","title":"Subpoena power and informational lobbying","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subpoena; Economics; Power (physics); Law and economics; Conflict of interest; Misrepresentation; Order (exchange); Public economics; Actuarial science; Business; Law; Political science; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Arnaud Déllis","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mandar Oak","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01847078134488391,"gpt":0.2317332966791405,"spread":0.2132625153342566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00807132,0.000481081,0.0006952818,0.001792451,0.001712505,0.005761997,0.0008537715,0.001800274,0.01525478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03070161,0.000364188,0.0006251146,0.001332562,0.007687851,0.007390606,0.005754141,0.002531877,0.001020468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00208257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002173351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001597087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001474372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938215,0.002968371,0.0002219285,0.0005583151,0.0009757509,0.001454187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531059,0.03309071,0.006727202,0.003322634,0.001578839,0.0021748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002278368,0.0001460962,0.01233215,0.0001603139,0.00007177858,0.0003931557,0.002041578,0.01080974,0.001446504,0.9497301,0.0007972167,0.0218435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000145913,0.0002512049,0.01368384,0.0001731253,0.00008815112,0.0002906878,0.002591318,0.0200183,0.002606028,0.9418804,0.01822234,0.00004883345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6033257,0.002025855,0.05210888,0.007369878,0.00009051852,0.0001277963,0.0001061633,0.0000818312,0.3347633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962825,0.0002143361,0.0006630266,0.0001417589,0.00003261086,0.00002150719,0.000009741185,0.000008131058,0.002626301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01525478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0510323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980384778","doi":"10.1177/0951629811398687","title":"Paradox lost: Explaining and modeling seemingly random individual behavior in social dilemmas","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Social dilemma; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Probabilistic logic; Function (biology); Psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Joe Oppenheimer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Stephen Wendel","is_ca":false},{"name":"Norman Frohlich","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09402872992152556,"gpt":0.353519939892713,"spread":0.2594912099711875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002843956,0.0004965741,0.0008207846,0.0007148832,0.0008785358,0.001606582,0.00177081,0.001736465,0.002880919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01581082,0.0003913597,0.0008439766,0.0005341664,0.002766184,0.0024031,0.001981378,0.002017087,0.0002744594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001019311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00151021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004404176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003029481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989585,0.0007304695,0.00003423253,0.00007713538,0.0001195094,0.00008011568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934497,0.005083106,0.0005383517,0.0003569462,0.0002104256,0.0003614207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007088763,0.0001141865,0.00267209,0.00007988107,0.00004686106,0.0003376233,0.0005916242,0.4398717,0.0003659355,0.5486414,0.001131383,0.006076477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003827723,0.00001817356,0.0002067597,0.000008594061,0.000007176718,0.00004004013,0.00005344009,0.7185681,0.00005550736,0.2802794,0.0007134263,0.00001109692],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4018036,0.001092162,0.5578679,0.006894755,0.0002362942,0.0001767222,0.0002650448,0.0002641888,0.03139941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523594,0.0002978458,0.04327485,0.0002543209,0.00007379748,0.0001557866,0.0000507551,0.00004329584,0.003490061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004404176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01504046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022227124","doi":"10.1177/0951629811429993","title":"Narrowing the field in elections: The Next-Two rule","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Apportionment; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Distribution (mathematics); Measure (data warehouse); Mathematical economics; Operations research; Econometrics; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Data mining; Law","authors":[{"name":"Steven J. Brams","is_ca":false},{"name":"D. Marc Kilgour","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0436146823545908,"gpt":0.3882665453038016,"spread":0.3446518629492108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01679235,0.0005008777,0.002511226,0.003212984,0.004555582,0.004211684,0.002145988,0.002787195,0.007626924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06409789,0.0004718146,0.001178503,0.00195353,0.005815437,0.005895399,0.003462468,0.00484929,0.001319311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001389274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001333053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001931909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002842691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9854943,0.006906663,0.0005720181,0.002575196,0.003349525,0.001102393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9569148,0.02833329,0.004317016,0.004908415,0.002881425,0.00264517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009719912,0.0006093569,0.05863956,0.0002732384,0.0001735769,0.0006162164,0.002340261,0.03193654,0.002788553,0.6379514,0.01173602,0.2519632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002343866,0.0007182635,0.02333459,0.0001117903,0.00005274008,0.0007053208,0.001021416,0.09358829,0.002023805,0.858188,0.01988243,0.0001389198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4349368,0.001954086,0.4779485,0.006594901,0.0005394779,0.0005772137,0.0003031029,0.0005582208,0.07658789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927265,0.0002430316,0.06510556,0.0008883445,0.0002899706,0.0002682383,0.0001565765,0.0001174826,0.005665779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01679235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08880752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122878896","doi":"10.1177/0951629811411751","title":"‘While there’s a breath in my body’: The systemic effects of politically motivated retirement from the Supreme Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Suspect; Politics; Economic Justice; Law; Economics; Ideology; Political science; Roberts Court","authors":[{"name":"Michael Bailey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Albert Yoon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02269786982688514,"gpt":0.2668974413497078,"spread":0.2441995715228227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002946482,0.000137264,0.0003700801,0.0004582941,0.001505779,0.001906226,0.0004541181,0.001136069,0.01129652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01612237,0.0001953177,0.0004027946,0.0007318803,0.002661552,0.00145758,0.00212513,0.002252475,0.000652717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001554464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001138035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01224825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02171879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985453,0.000867094,0.00002784814,0.0001754433,0.0001094668,0.000274877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857593,0.006828896,0.003975894,0.0009088962,0.0007032249,0.001823869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001774297,0.001905479,0.8112528,0.0001417408,0.0006327633,0.001087398,0.009030431,0.006396988,0.003362705,0.07339105,0.01587362,0.07515076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001496186,0.0005687705,0.943886,0.00006120185,0.0002387572,0.0001174145,0.005963114,0.002043712,0.0007236158,0.03742252,0.008778954,0.00004626768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720793,0.0008481464,0.0006869003,0.0121537,0.00005015023,0.00001410105,0.0001827182,0.00002385233,0.0139611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981673,0.0001536093,0.00007592951,0.0005963765,0.00005154128,0.000003917333,0.00003858427,0.000007231746,0.000905572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01224825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0377906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392161940","doi":"10.1177/09516298241233491","title":"Justice, inclusion, and incentives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Incentive; Economics; Distributive justice; Microeconomics; Politics; Economic Justice; Inequality; Public economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Ghislain Herman Demeze-Jouatsa","is_ca":false},{"name":"Roland Pongou","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jean‐Baptiste Tondji","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02524871525350309,"gpt":0.3794239509495444,"spread":0.3541752356960413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007645519,0.0003858379,0.0009709959,0.00121382,0.004212755,0.006964666,0.001081549,0.002856688,0.006354433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02040185,0.0003741727,0.000732131,0.001034038,0.01376399,0.007396874,0.005389414,0.002467772,0.0004957672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003892016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003082318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002805913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002194694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991454,0.004258342,0.0003047169,0.0009811701,0.001457417,0.001544372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856266,0.007028374,0.002466802,0.00226219,0.001324298,0.00129169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001920446,0.00003547482,0.0007878699,0.0000209077,0.000008708748,0.00003291967,0.0003765532,0.001508595,0.0001889476,0.9923975,0.0004203431,0.004202933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001079733,0.00001717159,0.0008425139,0.00002050098,0.000007277803,0.00002539869,0.0002048008,0.002093415,0.0001695368,0.9923272,0.004274288,0.000007126482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3554811,0.00166178,0.1329882,0.02920715,0.0002774566,0.0001801627,0.0001639414,0.00009990657,0.4799403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860749,0.0002505679,0.005218111,0.0005737804,0.0001050274,0.00007099023,0.00001609594,0.00002542172,0.00766514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007645519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04043382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122702586","doi":"10.1177/0951629820984848","title":"Don’t hatch the messenger? On the desirability of restricting the political activity of bureaucrats","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Economics; Control (management); Political economy; Public economics; Political science; Market economy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jean Guillaume Forand","is_ca":true},{"name":"Gergely Ujhelyi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06374286432482551,"gpt":0.371171702533281,"spread":0.3074288382084555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01613793,0.0004369071,0.00113861,0.001029165,0.002241271,0.004422424,0.001123807,0.003917984,0.01761248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04830296,0.0003424222,0.0008024964,0.000874431,0.008624007,0.004924873,0.001775593,0.0030733,0.001307981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002406432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001568732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002446443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002543278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924451,0.004844022,0.000166411,0.0007242372,0.0008589718,0.0009613397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9513481,0.03856483,0.004022069,0.002223684,0.002641147,0.001200096],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006047725,0.0002895149,0.009978971,0.0002627161,0.000184152,0.0002186822,0.001315165,0.004186294,0.00138396,0.9242085,0.007838577,0.04952866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707487,0.0003105342,0.01555371,0.0002241791,0.0002435148,0.0002428054,0.002685228,0.01194744,0.001013244,0.951405,0.01605538,0.00004815612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4568588,0.001989876,0.02596226,0.1091456,0.0003782384,0.0001360942,0.0002780333,0.00006849131,0.4051826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873028,0.0006149932,0.001613579,0.003160539,0.0002861839,0.00005451399,0.00002691727,0.00002838822,0.006912182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01761248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08534652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037312320","doi":"10.1177/095169280201400108","title":"The Schartz-Metterclume Method","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Phenomenon; Statistical analysis; Epistemology; Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer science; Positive economics; Statistics; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Dagobert D. Manteltasche","is_ca":false},{"name":"Otto I.Q. Besser-Wisser","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01000125112375422,"gpt":0.29446271657801,"spread":0.2844614654542558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02137869,0.001171695,0.002471522,0.006026628,0.003100146,0.005425927,0.004053283,0.003244655,0.02157222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0810239,0.0009129976,0.003113022,0.00540781,0.007530052,0.006746661,0.005583962,0.004230378,0.005969192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003241298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005555296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004045902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004314878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9784405,0.01251698,0.00082497,0.002724428,0.004622455,0.0008706118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969959,0.02148792,0.00145023,0.00432991,0.002359741,0.0004132691],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005665337,0.00001821103,0.0007858314,0.00008618102,0.00005299897,0.00006380154,0.0002539919,0.001337676,0.0001244949,0.9316295,0.005670583,0.05992017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003401688,0.00003162791,0.0004987437,0.00009965523,0.00003767703,0.000147217,0.0001322172,0.02026149,0.0003359882,0.9409847,0.03739931,0.00003747935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004238689,0.00134674,0.9557375,0.003139854,0.0003464693,0.0003359226,0.0007110461,0.0003396015,0.03380421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1900115,0.001335472,0.778149,0.00196433,0.0008072638,0.002043925,0.0009336704,0.0004513945,0.02430351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02157222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1130626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157444028","doi":"10.1177/0951629814562289","title":"Predicting majority rule: Evaluating the uncovered set and the strong point","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Generalization; Majority rule; Set (abstract data type); Decision rule; Point (geometry); Mathematical economics; Admissible decision rule; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Decision analysis; Weighted sum model; Influence diagram","authors":[{"name":"Jacob S. Bower‐Bir","is_ca":false},{"name":"William T. Bianco","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicholas J. D'Amico","is_ca":false},{"name":"Christopher Kam","is_ca":true},{"name":"Itai Sened","is_ca":false},{"name":"Regina Smyth","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04084189433853768,"gpt":0.3823257140477445,"spread":0.3414838197092068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03845698,0.0009392434,0.001792402,0.00202952,0.001388964,0.00406752,0.001569141,0.00222852,0.003215622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2048706,0.0003789909,0.001086008,0.001244558,0.006376059,0.008429558,0.00459582,0.003160617,0.0005280277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001210241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001157584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005989056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005757825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9776358,0.01557426,0.0009300208,0.002094276,0.00329861,0.0004670301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7335484,0.2355594,0.01228827,0.0128905,0.004213036,0.001500373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003269473,0.0008490017,0.1572892,0.0009803309,0.0009587724,0.0002731162,0.005583416,0.1719843,0.002386833,0.4549008,0.003069485,0.1984552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002446038,0.001397465,0.03142298,0.0002083966,0.000120385,0.0001932757,0.002666992,0.3922579,0.002539303,0.5669224,0.001876127,0.0001500655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.78097,0.0006919759,0.2049365,0.001710383,0.00008224445,0.0002144811,0.0002455466,0.0001049478,0.01104397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788112,0.0001245071,0.02041223,0.00009116773,0.00003788292,0.0001192192,0.0001599815,0.00001645772,0.0002273203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03845698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2033824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}