{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":13,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"134cb3676b8c","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology"}},"results":[{"id":"W2890366377","doi":"10.1037/teo0000097","title":"What is social justice? Implications for psychology.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Erin Thrift","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jeff Sugarman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1520638048842726,"gpt":0.54872642740767,"spread":0.3966626225233974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009455149,0.0003648809,0.0008602402,0.001763146,0.006530424,0.009133047,0.001493663,0.006537175,0.009678768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02525491,0.0002097562,0.0004584748,0.001442064,0.05638174,0.01104487,0.003762161,0.006711154,0.0005302285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005240942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008675744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006325325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008307819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946606,0.003297397,0.0001591957,0.0004597739,0.0008259038,0.0005972147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788176,0.0160229,0.0008595258,0.000686787,0.00144758,0.002165646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001518975,0.00006272287,0.0007373822,0.0001109116,0.00001377203,0.00009154044,0.003439117,0.0001139657,0.00004065023,0.9581124,0.01928919,0.01797323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007499395,0.00001324753,0.001012251,0.0002867968,0.000004876712,0.00005704818,0.005291145,0.0001082164,0.00003283683,0.9736502,0.01952899,0.000006862773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01068396,0.06472249,0.004586944,0.8099401,0.003020645,0.00003399751,0.00006020467,0.00003422819,0.1069173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652529,0.03593548,0.003090729,0.08183924,0.004988164,0.0001362599,0.00004883394,0.00004792157,0.008660486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009678768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05000418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519069346","doi":"10.1037/teo0000048","title":"Quantification in psychology: Critical analysis of an unreflective practice.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Cognitive Abilities and Testing","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Donna Tafreshi","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true},{"name":"Scott D. Neufeld","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07144827821364612,"gpt":0.4601562174715627,"spread":0.3887079392579166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02957263,0.0006254605,0.0006109914,0.003193693,0.002552585,0.004358184,0.002026242,0.001796124,0.003329819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1065047,0.0004001889,0.0005842644,0.001509948,0.03982206,0.01099789,0.004083436,0.004325723,0.0003274029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002949402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002808477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001062466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00132618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9814338,0.01444528,0.0006835889,0.000908008,0.002261571,0.0002677555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.854041,0.1243799,0.002690288,0.008518552,0.009496835,0.0008734017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002924389,0.00002148952,0.0001835903,0.0001556378,0.00001217232,0.00006158203,0.006068418,0.0002537333,0.0002185398,0.9688271,0.004210817,0.01995775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007067598,0.000008470271,0.0001965702,0.0001415005,0.000004617317,0.00003979335,0.001069052,0.001331525,0.0002996079,0.9872356,0.009657468,0.000008800954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04657055,0.02740409,0.7385129,0.08644252,0.003208446,0.0004417568,0.000146706,0.000363972,0.09690916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8364259,0.003741983,0.1464544,0.003743357,0.001472802,0.0005505463,0.00004839928,0.0002205997,0.007342129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1563969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529841034","doi":"10.1037/teo0000025","title":"Constructing psychological objects: The rhetoric of constructs.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and psychological constructs research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true},{"name":"Donald A. Garcia","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1099091870648502,"gpt":0.4245541460557932,"spread":0.314644958990943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01354338,0.0008721282,0.0008671737,0.004383369,0.004174054,0.008114886,0.002201698,0.004217194,0.004558281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03566025,0.001036707,0.0009250468,0.002719714,0.06272765,0.01977543,0.004979339,0.008862731,0.001074892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002857624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002541934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001856741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001706092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907259,0.007146609,0.0004425244,0.0006976505,0.0008273329,0.0001600403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738951,0.0209942,0.0008765008,0.002515169,0.001245676,0.0004733517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005768871,0.000002807702,0.00003968744,0.00003561663,0.000002777422,0.00001906834,0.001669718,0.00003290097,0.00003118143,0.9954764,0.0009485024,0.00173547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001257055,0.000005453516,0.00006987315,0.0001023419,0.000006277449,0.00007715297,0.0007068081,0.0002587471,0.0001009755,0.9718929,0.02676114,0.000005743057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01618856,0.03938867,0.5469562,0.1190363,0.003700447,0.0002241934,0.0004299046,0.0005571083,0.2735187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7136367,0.0105226,0.2471035,0.01084538,0.00235336,0.0008639051,0.0003794296,0.0006864,0.0136087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07162511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987547682","doi":"10.1037/a0022077","title":"On the ambiguity of concept use in psychology: Is the concept “concept” a useful concept?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true},{"name":"Timothy P. Racine","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07386244450551185,"gpt":0.3393515116932449,"spread":0.265489067187733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02339465,0.0006332473,0.001349167,0.004417273,0.00378562,0.01041244,0.003486322,0.006464518,0.004658199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07520026,0.0008418675,0.001015978,0.00401371,0.05389369,0.0370784,0.007180148,0.007510861,0.0005084525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002603854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002839684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001586726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007974842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9862691,0.008278363,0.0008494279,0.001113871,0.003043976,0.0004453306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9370573,0.05027757,0.003648958,0.003777912,0.004134196,0.001103968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080781,0.00002987851,0.001168456,0.0001657203,0.0000209869,0.0001563735,0.01608849,0.0002881741,0.0003433234,0.9603474,0.001295461,0.02001497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002108573,0.00001947569,0.0007426238,0.0002022348,0.0000190118,0.0002354127,0.00456014,0.0008199989,0.0002450759,0.987133,0.005970338,0.00003145299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2485695,0.03917532,0.3095516,0.212297,0.003246388,0.0001830532,0.0002738359,0.0001803249,0.1865231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701529,0.003813178,0.01966806,0.004122081,0.0008383358,0.0001241287,0.00006430303,0.00008073095,0.001136329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02339465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1237242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003425151","doi":"10.1037/teo0000134","title":"Doing science, doing gender: Using history in the present.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Alexandra Rutherford","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1136353547957038,"gpt":0.3357960371105712,"spread":0.2221606823148674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003867408,0.0003734964,0.0002539399,0.002134348,0.00378368,0.006431276,0.0007428196,0.001830126,0.004833856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006770784,0.0002159828,0.0001521292,0.002161875,0.02879499,0.0143302,0.003315144,0.002974337,0.0004393478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002008385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002226842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003245957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008753776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985512,0.001097693,0.00003779475,0.000123385,0.0001046159,0.00008519022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939323,0.004798702,0.0002541609,0.0003588729,0.0002562997,0.000399617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003855225,0.00003237267,0.002138906,0.0002376451,0.00001094094,0.0001842815,0.08527663,0.00008476938,0.0001967165,0.8442507,0.008832065,0.05871643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001165509,0.00005922183,0.003046168,0.001450698,0.00002516171,0.0004123193,0.07379993,0.0001945698,0.0003963796,0.4815868,0.4389891,0.00002795571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05984922,0.1815843,0.02083824,0.1333877,0.003827784,0.00004671789,0.0002298084,0.00008503706,0.6001512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9088934,0.05102813,0.006008684,0.008690525,0.001346342,0.00005656001,0.00008573698,0.0000889197,0.02380172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02045304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158807583","doi":"10.1037/a0033033","title":"Social justice and psychology: What is, and what should be.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Winnifred R. Louis","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kenneth I. Mavor","is_ca":false},{"name":"Stephen T. La Macchia","is_ca":false},{"name":"Catherine E. Amiot","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06645792874642947,"gpt":0.4183957804214494,"spread":0.35193785167502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01321296,0.0006085354,0.001255134,0.002242926,0.006268521,0.01532189,0.001600317,0.01029791,0.00458406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01881474,0.0003818756,0.0005380951,0.002557612,0.0698911,0.02588063,0.005894083,0.01250755,0.001013788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005624579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01224707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006842887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007629751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907504,0.006079136,0.0002469869,0.0007710924,0.001362841,0.0007896076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840588,0.009161193,0.001125534,0.001052743,0.002061434,0.002540245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000544051,0.0001307999,0.003078571,0.0009590021,0.00005581018,0.0001445618,0.01674033,0.0001495113,0.0002159295,0.7703055,0.06871022,0.1394553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001218184,0.0000299065,0.002362052,0.00204159,0.00001740497,0.0001565174,0.01999648,0.0001574911,0.00008012696,0.8656812,0.1094271,0.0000378663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004549704,0.1474616,0.00280877,0.8163233,0.004807776,0.00002221735,0.00004494625,0.00003812284,0.02394349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51644,0.1809258,0.005952526,0.2686287,0.01871657,0.000215148,0.0001426416,0.0001102135,0.008868303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01532189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06987768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012656741","doi":"10.1037/h0091257","title":"Analogy and Metaphor Running Amok: An Examination of the Use of Explanatory Devices in Neuroscience.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Metaphor; Psychology; Explanatory model; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael D. Maraun","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06144601990434982,"gpt":0.3423785126610366,"spread":0.2809324927566868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002985421,0.000287398,0.0002810886,0.002287809,0.001292949,0.003818307,0.0009365174,0.001996002,0.004295425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02693707,0.0002800021,0.0003528804,0.001647406,0.009543236,0.0119299,0.002807676,0.002310026,0.0002774333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006917198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00116844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007285689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982445,0.001153646,0.00007334007,0.0001068864,0.0003311971,0.0000904815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852695,0.01242183,0.0007945039,0.0009219567,0.0004494585,0.0001427758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103723,0.00004561204,0.003184259,0.0002425529,0.000018217,0.0004476637,0.03000615,0.0002884667,0.001681335,0.9122187,0.001004264,0.05075909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003089751,0.00007536622,0.009867134,0.0005684783,0.00005353549,0.002224489,0.02723393,0.004502368,0.001768471,0.9146768,0.03895545,0.00004311209],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5164547,0.01987165,0.09183948,0.01557818,0.0003392062,0.0001387981,0.0001524953,0.0002112353,0.3554142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98346,0.002191809,0.01188813,0.0003145643,0.00003486899,0.00005607445,0.00003138839,0.00003914104,0.001983984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01578861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062186509","doi":"10.1037/a0029990","title":"Concepts in Aristotle and Aquinas: Implications for current theoretical approaches.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Current (fluid); Philosophy; Psychology; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Thomas L. Spalding","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christina L. Gagné","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1153179196774907,"gpt":0.3640962891739194,"spread":0.2487783694964287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004751534,0.0005854406,0.000881365,0.002627869,0.004593262,0.006347947,0.001832611,0.003694059,0.00571102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009867157,0.0003031936,0.0005432552,0.003187864,0.03415374,0.02072262,0.00349151,0.005111474,0.0009084253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004251663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003362451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00240159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002924412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975917,0.00134296,0.0001182239,0.0002417634,0.0005489133,0.0001564587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959635,0.002702023,0.0002611277,0.0003339766,0.0005267671,0.0002126114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003487884,0.000003631467,0.00001624598,0.00001179398,8.198584e-7,0.000008136974,0.0008017442,0.00002294851,0.000005301369,0.9971234,0.0006204037,0.001382012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004722379,0.000003050975,0.00005994603,0.00003898397,0.00000117535,0.00002106563,0.0005792801,0.0001063134,0.0000142156,0.9906684,0.008499996,0.000002857188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03538324,0.07359558,0.09438505,0.09329161,0.003996509,0.00009460949,0.0002193745,0.000168117,0.698866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.918356,0.01561906,0.03548241,0.007346346,0.001924919,0.0002573425,0.0001300442,0.0001154693,0.02076837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006347947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03084809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153048194","doi":"10.1037/teo0000018","title":"The historical boundedness of psychological knowledge and the ethics of shared understandings.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychological science; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Henderikus J. Stam","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.124234581557844,"gpt":0.4281532721827565,"spread":0.3039186906249125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02563003,0.0005016766,0.0006850397,0.002740236,0.00990661,0.01280838,0.001854685,0.009092123,0.003994475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03102093,0.0007534526,0.0007047266,0.001579361,0.1516926,0.01901193,0.01029609,0.008837743,0.0006659051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008851224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006646635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004513725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003639787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9708438,0.02112169,0.0008358009,0.002598478,0.003423026,0.00117718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655465,0.02300702,0.002602915,0.004922553,0.002541252,0.001379744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003597406,0.000003693006,0.00006694097,0.00001198524,0.000004109491,0.00002385709,0.004337312,0.00005049598,0.00001867722,0.993714,0.0005589947,0.001206317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005032247,0.000003964204,0.000115712,0.000051654,0.000002914853,0.00003622188,0.001096691,0.000104273,0.00003943941,0.9884724,0.0100668,0.00000486203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04704649,0.02771754,0.08593994,0.2094999,0.001098971,0.00008989598,0.0001469958,0.0001017851,0.6283585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757314,0.002523298,0.008528573,0.004839243,0.0004810845,0.000149135,0.00004704498,0.00005690803,0.007643265],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1355463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004082968","doi":"10.1037/teo0000133","title":"Critical feminist history of psychology versus sociology of scientific knowledge: Contrasting views of women scientists?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; History of psychology; Feminism; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Psychoanalysis; Gender studies; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Angela R. Febbraro","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09419881842847208,"gpt":0.4172327106056273,"spread":0.3230338921771552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01750209,0.0005504597,0.0008274501,0.00420843,0.01170664,0.01641947,0.001897133,0.009413128,0.01061471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02098891,0.0004890222,0.0002759284,0.003211761,0.07933203,0.01356256,0.00587483,0.01051932,0.0008526166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01378704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01114945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01117073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01449901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925082,0.005006136,0.0001209311,0.000597092,0.0008235399,0.0009441644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975709,0.01974667,0.001041004,0.0005730081,0.001323604,0.001606674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002434822,0.0000183639,0.0002927461,0.00007368854,0.000005239274,0.00007140687,0.04759931,0.00002116461,0.00006819477,0.9350414,0.0114057,0.005378357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004581346,0.00002584187,0.00123041,0.0009610666,0.00001656759,0.0001315189,0.07981463,0.00008657563,0.0003247591,0.4180115,0.4993336,0.00001768793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01933258,0.03331034,0.001791596,0.7359948,0.002004176,0.00002688825,0.00007632258,0.0000209662,0.2074424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8645304,0.01508,0.0007378113,0.08745556,0.005618403,0.0001176545,0.00004351852,0.0001376694,0.026279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1000325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003770492","doi":"10.1037/teo0000140","title":"Possibility for women in psychology and interdisciplinary sciences: Introduction to the special issue.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Mary Beth Quaranta Morrissey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03813592727804413,"gpt":0.4040453681359281,"spread":0.365909440857884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002055513,0.0009027666,0.0009639785,0.001716908,0.00261094,0.003804476,0.001499794,0.004976443,0.01806116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004574463,0.0004026779,0.0009586338,0.001058329,0.005192128,0.007587532,0.003555655,0.008263822,0.003459152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00196161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001379908,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001251188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002557699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992471,0.0002858191,0.0000545085,0.000136252,0.0001882904,0.00008795327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664,0.002464895,0.0001124758,0.0001131015,0.0003317675,0.0003377507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003338583,0.0000511722,0.0005643023,0.0004763117,0.00001918387,0.0003950006,0.0007107092,0.0001371453,0.0002008692,0.2274044,0.7128,0.05720747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005701549,0.00002652548,0.0009245613,0.0004945009,0.00001049793,0.0006622001,0.0004925511,0.000136189,0.00005400536,0.08008537,0.9170892,0.00001868372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.001596129,0.4452847,0.005441893,0.2444852,0.2136884,0.00006390675,0.0002113843,0.00009464589,0.08913389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0309809,0.242357,0.004972675,0.07299846,0.534308,0.0002302791,0.0002959666,0.0002660769,0.1135907],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06042063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982056669","doi":"10.1037/a0023427","title":"On the ambiguity of concept use in commentaries.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true},{"name":"Timothy P. Racine","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07385694327672293,"gpt":0.334029037045265,"spread":0.2601720937685421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0359867,0.0005714439,0.0004554706,0.003897902,0.01004423,0.006922783,0.002829205,0.01016697,0.009972425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2919513,0.0006261655,0.0004194094,0.002973925,0.01169251,0.01439135,0.00625049,0.01202749,0.001705821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00489396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002905458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005836966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00619658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.959349,0.02731277,0.002718632,0.002461065,0.006493415,0.00166505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4395129,0.5080297,0.01128673,0.008260711,0.03119388,0.001716103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002414246,0.00002838707,0.002968824,0.0007303493,0.00003909306,0.001821342,0.3180191,0.0001679084,0.001939713,0.3756193,0.2830717,0.01535278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004127272,0.00003967906,0.007157368,0.003020525,0.00004069749,0.001103211,0.1557728,0.00117324,0.004163039,0.08842444,0.7388563,0.0002074111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08309603,0.008332528,0.0193429,0.643241,0.01540344,0.0002114919,0.001456529,0.0003247364,0.2285914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8697114,0.002311009,0.003722759,0.08918332,0.006818585,0.0002744395,0.0003922618,0.0005217121,0.02706454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0359867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1903182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084920254","doi":"10.1037/h0091284","title":"There are no \"specific correct\" usages of concepts, only correct usages: Linguistic rules and the bounds of sense.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Sense (electronics); Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael D. Maraun","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02707376872999943,"gpt":0.3427376258626735,"spread":0.3156638571326741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007626932,0.0005366333,0.001291613,0.002395013,0.002202414,0.007082643,0.001807682,0.002887056,0.002761127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04719409,0.001251488,0.0007884462,0.001441457,0.023013,0.0282332,0.004746968,0.004364207,0.0007176911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008304592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001197382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007099275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008928673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868515,0.005358037,0.001651116,0.002587075,0.002971066,0.0005812622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661533,0.0184865,0.002832471,0.007749049,0.003983057,0.0007955196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009588553,0.00003017491,0.002067547,0.0002121119,0.00006614161,0.0001477659,0.006060233,0.0003481352,0.002097807,0.9590411,0.00235033,0.02748284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001508553,0.00001174777,0.001040994,0.00008597325,0.00003526623,0.0003186319,0.001062245,0.0007881555,0.0009541335,0.9892905,0.006365447,0.00003170565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.292295,0.009696396,0.4372193,0.03132698,0.001119259,0.0001085783,0.0008582133,0.0007879187,0.2265883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481434,0.0009116096,0.04717043,0.001233424,0.0001718986,0.00008540734,0.000223924,0.0002227454,0.001837116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007626932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0403356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}