{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":13,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"134cb3676b8c","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology"}},"results":[{"id":"W2890366377","doi":"10.1037/teo0000097","title":"What is social justice? Implications for psychology.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Erin Thrift","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jeff Sugarman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1520638048842726,"gpt":0.54872642740767,"spread":0.3966626225233974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001576571,0.0001505067,0.0004342285,0.0001376045,0.001118374,0.00001455221,0.000342576,0.0004802059,0.0009969489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000429389,0.0001126464,0.0001253128,0.0001538573,0.001307815,0.0001137986,0.0001022467,0.001106691,0.00008056949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003325316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000139917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.617535e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001150228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976741,0.0005326876,0.0009509185,0.0002194397,0.0001259469,0.0004969264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969214,0.001423913,0.0003651541,0.0002608408,0.0006380735,0.0003906699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001406242,0.0001974794,0.0006073352,0.00009085675,0.00004320556,0.000001453841,0.001466736,4.756808e-9,0.0001261134,0.9031758,0.07690737,0.01597735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001729896,0.0009067903,0.0197448,0.00006063196,0.00007299571,0.00006723581,0.0001558896,0.000004398684,0.000002226313,0.8483018,0.1288533,0.00009998568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03974443,0.0004491261,0.00534325,0.9345735,0.003690451,0.0004484519,0.0000233556,0.00001869636,0.01570876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7858576,0.001048139,0.002303364,0.2061458,0.004535263,0.00003381426,0.000003783489,0.00001823351,0.00005405424],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7461131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519069346","doi":"10.1037/teo0000048","title":"Quantification in psychology: Critical analysis of an unreflective practice.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Cognitive Abilities and Testing","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Donna Tafreshi","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true},{"name":"Scott D. Neufeld","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07144827821364612,"gpt":0.4601562174715627,"spread":0.3887079392579166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00217303,0.0001761128,0.0006966489,0.0006877308,0.00004014563,0.00001098072,0.0002643958,0.0003218217,0.001399489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005399977,0.0001136307,0.0002116716,0.0007348158,0.002298204,0.0002036314,0.00004058691,0.0005042595,0.00001265266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002080242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002210305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005588492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003102956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965518,0.001374573,0.001066408,0.0004459184,0.0002297928,0.0003315767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924653,0.006023662,0.0003923271,0.0003621799,0.0005255457,0.0002309849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003115472,0.001517905,0.007090131,0.000006939557,0.0004980296,0.00009577605,0.0003861777,5.484524e-7,0.002768203,0.9360256,0.00004037121,0.04845481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001530378,0.002272861,0.1326359,0.00004587056,0.0006198748,0.0004004888,0.000154328,0.00003385698,0.00004525087,0.8618529,0.0002653995,0.0001428877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7917593,0.0006364844,0.01838115,0.1513683,0.0008034667,0.0001583392,0.00004135409,0.0000170708,0.03683452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955342,0.000096692,0.001532721,0.002551693,0.0002571075,0.000005835123,0.000001675492,0.00001506316,0.00000494485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.203775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529841034","doi":"10.1037/teo0000025","title":"Constructing psychological objects: The rhetoric of constructs.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and psychological constructs research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true},{"name":"Donald A. Garcia","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1099091870648502,"gpt":0.4245541460557932,"spread":0.314644958990943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002604557,0.0002907951,0.0008217004,0.0002329784,0.00009381419,0.00003300482,0.0007523899,0.0004771902,0.00240429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001942616,0.0001618313,0.0002724024,0.0005733579,0.007806515,0.00007826914,0.0001624706,0.001616787,0.00006010794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002562147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005461592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001872378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.231401e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995705,0.001472754,0.001239936,0.0004486798,0.0005891685,0.0005444516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995508,0.002090648,0.000576324,0.0004723259,0.000757133,0.0005956269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002273339,0.0003787806,0.00449033,0.00001077859,0.0001809019,0.0002051738,0.0003777928,1.404171e-7,0.0001772951,0.9321955,0.001409854,0.05830011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003536861,0.00358735,0.006134512,0.00004739403,0.00009977033,0.008547531,0.001173435,0.000005409881,0.00005225681,0.9747341,0.001861779,0.0002196449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6083705,0.002319628,0.001002157,0.03030878,0.002488556,0.0002745528,0.00002906727,0.00002291197,0.3551839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957471,0.0001260462,0.0008118682,0.002443281,0.0008100906,0.000005876355,0.000001641655,0.00001918834,0.00003488327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3873767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987547682","doi":"10.1037/a0022077","title":"On the ambiguity of concept use in psychology: Is the concept “concept” a useful concept?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true},{"name":"Timothy P. Racine","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07386244450551185,"gpt":0.3393515116932449,"spread":0.265489067187733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001307957,0.0003667953,0.0008178609,0.0001510462,0.0001389795,0.00002711809,0.0009173927,0.0004774062,0.008098906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006854885,0.0001942097,0.0003327455,0.0003162229,0.006061431,0.00008228022,0.000128711,0.002040148,0.00004802692],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002052949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004012495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000142875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001232768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958523,0.001426112,0.001240753,0.0005550354,0.0003816972,0.000544092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962737,0.002015392,0.0006256851,0.0006664426,0.0001778088,0.0002409515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002086832,0.0008439678,0.003025368,0.000002909258,0.0002140463,0.00012481,0.008593225,0.000001253039,0.00009473643,0.9687355,0.01295735,0.003320026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003147614,0.003030858,0.1915785,0.0001156712,0.00007944743,0.0004759289,0.0002735357,0.000004855062,0.0002648694,0.7953076,0.005435524,0.0002856052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8036011,0.001716355,0.0005081504,0.1584385,0.001988999,0.0005367553,0.00006760156,0.00002727999,0.03311526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682299,0.00008199793,0.0001689338,0.0309707,0.0004471397,0.000008015776,0.000002053431,0.00002987031,0.00006142067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1885531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003425151","doi":"10.1037/teo0000134","title":"Doing science, doing gender: Using history in the present.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Alexandra Rutherford","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1136353547957038,"gpt":0.3357960371105712,"spread":0.2221606823148674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008360766,0.00007911088,0.0001593586,0.00003720256,0.0001364354,0.00002670977,0.0003820839,0.00005299476,0.0002703076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002268501,0.00002704437,0.00005235819,0.0004622372,0.001405434,0.0001225277,0.00007972874,0.0003400797,0.00000399812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003285172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002524443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001880508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.67314e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989231,0.0001309639,0.0003113503,0.0001627467,0.0002966408,0.0001752262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992347,0.0003729469,0.0001244961,0.00003363783,0.0001380084,0.00009624692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000965346,0.000143945,0.002073935,0.000004910514,0.00001282314,0.00002223175,0.0006663134,0.000008664812,0.01654401,0.974175,0.001260655,0.004991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005242225,0.0007307978,0.05914176,0.00003148336,0.00004456254,0.0004042034,0.0009951438,0.0003003729,0.00004600512,0.8103035,0.1272485,0.0002294526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7753838,0.0007281325,0.00006050446,0.205436,0.0003252701,0.00006955324,0.000002131673,0.000004728905,0.01798985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883009,0.00004998707,0.0008908109,0.009762159,0.0009934134,7.919864e-7,4.14663e-7,5.67505e-7,9.432108e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2129171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.517838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158807583","doi":"10.1037/a0033033","title":"Social justice and psychology: What is, and what should be.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Winnifred R. Louis","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kenneth I. Mavor","is_ca":false},{"name":"Stephen T. La Macchia","is_ca":false},{"name":"Catherine E. Amiot","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06645792874642947,"gpt":0.4183957804214494,"spread":0.35193785167502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001097319,0.0002238128,0.0005479712,0.0001354588,0.000470816,0.0004429376,0.0003125185,0.0007261399,0.001311698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002467621,0.0001735847,0.0001271881,0.000169617,0.006231143,0.001289571,0.00009669882,0.0008870075,0.00002308605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001606432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002335065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009595454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002712469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975582,0.0006654663,0.0005743777,0.0003994911,0.0003199452,0.0004824745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983445,0.000564765,0.0002352284,0.0001331772,0.0002257624,0.0004965032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003011954,0.000149663,0.0001993373,0.00001818132,0.00008052718,0.00002388233,0.004701599,5.35001e-9,0.0003774025,0.9090586,0.02031866,0.06477099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001037504,0.0006695865,0.004262338,0.00004075034,0.0001342977,0.0002427686,0.002421887,0.000003624738,0.000004223061,0.9399716,0.05101561,0.0001958405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2375657,0.005193945,0.00009794,0.7458207,0.001736961,0.0001498757,0.000001571103,0.00001609194,0.009417272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8359574,0.03151955,0.0001803208,0.1300331,0.002246393,0.000005664411,5.88997e-7,0.00001599613,0.00004092273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6157876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012656741","doi":"10.1037/h0091257","title":"Analogy and Metaphor Running Amok: An Examination of the Use of Explanatory Devices in Neuroscience.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Metaphor; Psychology; Explanatory model; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael D. Maraun","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06144601990434982,"gpt":0.3423785126610366,"spread":0.2809324927566868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001006869,0.0001156602,0.0003625939,0.0002384649,0.00003687863,0.00001094341,0.0002156534,0.0001783675,0.0001827039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002201528,0.00007211948,0.00008002457,0.0002295813,0.001328191,0.0001855482,0.00004102778,0.000391623,7.470791e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006323887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001167996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004336363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007032547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980891,0.0007034276,0.0006195395,0.0002127161,0.0002027042,0.0001724776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989228,0.0003206868,0.0003572917,0.0001890208,0.0001004617,0.0001097156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000687646,0.0007082476,0.0145816,0.00002390896,0.00004628142,0.00003764632,0.001954354,0.000008290536,0.006459161,0.9371836,0.00004442512,0.03826488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001440874,0.001104252,0.7317043,0.0000499346,0.000112359,0.0005417872,0.0002193662,0.0001808409,0.0002482786,0.2636768,0.0005997638,0.0001214622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921309,0.000616083,0.0002183439,0.005024979,0.0003045756,0.00007949337,0.000006394529,0.000002927033,0.001616283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997186,0.00009031447,0.000289395,0.002249107,0.000168695,0.000001801836,7.526761e-7,0.000007951508,0.000006005235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7171227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4893777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062186509","doi":"10.1037/a0029990","title":"Concepts in Aristotle and Aquinas: Implications for current theoretical approaches.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Current (fluid); Philosophy; Psychology; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Thomas L. Spalding","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christina L. Gagné","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1153179196774907,"gpt":0.3640962891739194,"spread":0.2487783694964287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007264902,0.0001726429,0.0004153983,0.0001094819,0.0001245012,0.00003984948,0.0001620703,0.0001401621,0.0002499113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002660371,0.0001184397,0.0001328703,0.00004452249,0.004041957,0.0001445655,0.00005946026,0.0005582593,0.000005447191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001533962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001209051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.116059e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.592207e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986438,0.0001645859,0.0005397351,0.0002007677,0.0001082149,0.0003429019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985328,0.0007771559,0.0001414771,0.0001437846,0.00007502899,0.0003298069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003621316,0.0005704659,0.0004386138,0.0000313257,0.00002442321,0.000001522213,0.001026969,1.127257e-7,0.00002516133,0.9890708,0.000255918,0.008192594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001043464,0.000437928,0.001665009,0.00003412808,0.00005850993,0.0001115568,0.00004646584,0.0000300814,0.000004415524,0.9695241,0.026899,0.0001453266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2810603,0.01433142,0.004332175,0.5427168,0.003149988,0.0009312149,0.0001577369,0.00004600818,0.1532744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956658,0.0001530687,0.0002071953,0.001147068,0.002785537,0.0000164074,0.000003509036,0.00001609074,0.000005327815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7146055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153048194","doi":"10.1037/teo0000018","title":"The historical boundedness of psychological knowledge and the ethics of shared understandings.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychological science; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Henderikus J. Stam","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.124234581557844,"gpt":0.4281532721827565,"spread":0.3039186906249125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005531481,0.0002637999,0.0009831942,0.0001442258,0.0002157153,0.0000156002,0.0008449653,0.0009456918,0.0001555201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002673121,0.0001321155,0.00027904,0.0003279437,0.01487344,0.00005831185,0.0001765751,0.002751649,0.000006980008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001410888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005882219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005984588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.42638e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953753,0.001996748,0.001378912,0.0004040136,0.0004500157,0.0003949805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928166,0.005014702,0.000815495,0.0004626602,0.0004990918,0.0003914745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008311611,0.0005352335,0.0003826918,0.00001568489,0.000176452,0.00001853983,0.005378719,2.219046e-7,0.00003219753,0.9689117,0.0144988,0.001738135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005079791,0.00213282,0.001610458,0.00003112509,0.0001463039,0.001042585,0.0006500366,0.00001149002,0.000001809654,0.9678763,0.02127363,0.0001436117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07917405,0.07777678,0.01527231,0.5362835,0.0123125,0.0007070851,0.0000246722,0.00004074558,0.2784083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956667,0.001540446,0.0003490866,0.001528202,0.0007245294,0.000006636419,4.471846e-7,0.00002150628,0.0001624283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004082968","doi":"10.1037/teo0000133","title":"Critical feminist history of psychology versus sociology of scientific knowledge: Contrasting views of women scientists?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; History of psychology; Feminism; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Psychoanalysis; Gender studies; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Angela R. Febbraro","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09419881842847208,"gpt":0.4172327106056273,"spread":0.3230338921771552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002736833,0.0003409373,0.001822628,0.0004137165,0.00008463297,0.000004932284,0.001002015,0.0009351624,0.003611385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003772595,0.0002892934,0.0004275895,0.000429191,0.03480345,0.00007889381,0.0001824273,0.001651339,0.00002764922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000230145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000204156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001038135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.163902e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945937,0.00118075,0.00229774,0.000790134,0.0003799738,0.0007576892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941474,0.002729426,0.001254984,0.0004802836,0.0006703543,0.0007175686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008456209,0.001333078,0.000613659,0.0001225778,0.0003075649,0.00004865568,0.01610805,2.71585e-7,0.009263376,0.9451056,0.015005,0.003635923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007245801,0.01076049,0.002592911,0.00008499002,0.0002892043,0.0004967216,0.0009850872,0.00003060187,0.00006421815,0.9194778,0.05758445,0.0003877518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5571316,0.02840318,0.008916484,0.05118274,0.02600601,0.0004505254,0.0001039583,0.00004292972,0.3277625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957184,0.0001166116,0.0009714179,0.002194362,0.0008971275,0.000007255482,0.000001814757,0.00003236101,0.00006063236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4385868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003770492","doi":"10.1037/teo0000140","title":"Possibility for women in psychology and interdisciplinary sciences: Introduction to the special issue.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Mary Beth Quaranta Morrissey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03813592727804413,"gpt":0.4040453681359281,"spread":0.365909440857884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002258266,0.0002152447,0.0006083443,0.0001945903,0.0001728813,0.00001809106,0.0005672089,0.0003919633,0.001605639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008292854,0.0001413633,0.0001114018,0.0004248863,0.0032774,0.00007411167,0.000213615,0.001162782,0.00004160933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005948723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002081927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.527828e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.534561e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971775,0.000534175,0.0008159381,0.0007461545,0.0001720607,0.0005541698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983887,0.0005853028,0.0002132973,0.0002460727,0.00008728312,0.0004793461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008897003,0.0004137692,0.0008416955,0.00001887485,0.00007724931,0.00003382967,0.01257018,0.000002547091,0.0001695791,0.8225056,0.1143221,0.0401476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001557664,0.005091056,0.006975282,0.000007490223,0.00002108472,0.0004442066,0.0006516563,0.00001833904,0.000001068844,0.8671088,0.1179776,0.0001458013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08998715,0.0009468587,0.00362563,0.8647404,0.003598504,0.0003986795,0.00001254304,0.00001300241,0.03667729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406478,0.0001462787,0.0007319608,0.03070687,0.02766637,0.00002975804,5.915983e-7,0.00001854739,0.00005175815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8506607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982056669","doi":"10.1037/a0023427","title":"On the ambiguity of concept use in commentaries.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true},{"name":"Timothy P. Racine","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07385694327672293,"gpt":0.334029037045265,"spread":0.2601720937685421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007683549,0.0001257899,0.0003483917,0.0001020897,0.00003365342,0.000008000309,0.0002493806,0.0001922425,0.004952747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004148398,0.00007088967,0.0001231319,0.0001193947,0.001635265,0.00004859125,0.00003501777,0.000668294,0.00001433482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008305115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008036877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002274116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002574763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982916,0.0006350856,0.0005534503,0.0001617052,0.0001610589,0.0001971545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981438,0.001203076,0.00022733,0.0002380642,0.00008012413,0.0001076109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002068985,0.0007787709,0.001228009,0.000003117078,0.00007629738,0.00009436929,0.001679919,7.773425e-8,0.00007562228,0.9908131,0.001380336,0.001801362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00140901,0.001421443,0.02592257,0.00003075531,0.00004745008,0.0001717436,0.0001698214,0.000001651849,0.0002324068,0.9703034,0.0002107456,0.00007902688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9306315,0.0002427129,0.000412644,0.0247537,0.0006897614,0.0001286221,0.00001592643,0.000005229132,0.04311987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883856,0.00002709653,0.00009289898,0.01130837,0.0001597071,0.000003031482,0.000001128598,0.000009191401,0.00001302435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05775401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084920254","doi":"10.1037/h0091284","title":"There are no \"specific correct\" usages of concepts, only correct usages: Linguistic rules and the bounds of sense.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Sense (electronics); Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kathleen L. Slaney","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael D. Maraun","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02707376872999943,"gpt":0.3427376258626735,"spread":0.3156638571326741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00223687,0.000251603,0.0008720271,0.0001600595,0.00009463029,0.00002232114,0.0002672414,0.0003622079,0.001256016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009380727,0.0001471675,0.0002573427,0.0001651311,0.005223671,0.00003559509,0.00005537799,0.0008277677,0.00002090156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001028706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002367142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006887452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002286149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971944,0.0007908826,0.00104279,0.0003065965,0.0003233966,0.0003419259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995845,0.002437075,0.0007666732,0.0003206712,0.0004271734,0.0002033751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009103807,0.0005232188,0.002268162,0.00005440838,0.0003235912,0.0003548195,0.002360259,2.160571e-7,0.0008337029,0.9707189,0.0009407239,0.01251816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005459899,0.001868726,0.02310749,0.0002240554,0.0003139171,0.002985376,0.001159282,0.000009019744,0.0001837012,0.9616129,0.002830126,0.0002455407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9032046,0.0110493,0.002242015,0.005610588,0.00280228,0.0002388613,0.00004968873,0.00001429363,0.07478841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959205,0.001032128,0.0002155244,0.001446614,0.00126903,0.000001800601,0.000003203407,0.00002355247,0.00008764521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09271595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}