{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":37,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":37,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"8d4cea48863e","filters":{"venue":"Journal of World Trade"}},"results":[{"id":"W4297852509","doi":"10.54648/trad2012037","title":"The Trade Implications of the Post-Moratorium European Union Approval System for Genetically Modified Organisms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Genetically modified organism; European union; World trade; Business; International economics; Politics; Economics; Political science; Law; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07178421314593808,"gpt":0.2214737374512125,"spread":0.1496895243052744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001276879,0.0001083054,0.0001488529,0.00007773529,0.0003448916,0.0001055948,0.0005011976,0.00002638757,0.000008770879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001175688,0.00005373028,0.00016762,0.0003290667,0.00006270956,0.0002804663,0.00005203882,0.0001887241,0.000009172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003000015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003097341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005712254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009074988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989075,0.00008504597,0.0004757583,0.00006910152,0.0002145948,0.0002479978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990681,0.0001025247,0.0004788695,0.0001891402,0.0001371016,0.00002426508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001206145,0.001825986,0.01856826,0.001788994,0.001110139,0.0000082238,0.003156184,0.001159311,0.313373,0.5113032,0.07557874,0.07092176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003817476,0.0002498915,0.4694918,0.0006285418,0.001259305,0.0002154371,0.002414561,0.002696366,0.03225439,0.002539352,0.4836121,0.0008207317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7543408,0.001924365,0.02008878,0.1236422,0.01041127,0.002786442,0.0000405685,0.0001316831,0.08663391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974171,0.000005213603,0.0001126703,0.0005450764,0.001728267,0.000002954191,0.00000202284,0.00002557895,0.0001611312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5087639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2652662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212880640","doi":"10.54648/trad2012024","title":"Protectionism and Multilateral Accountability during the Great Recession: Drawing Inferences from Dogs Not Barking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Corporate governance; Political science; Great recession; Global governance; Business; Economics; International economics; International trade; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02750274483869037,"gpt":0.2966512670549323,"spread":0.2691485222162419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001057295,0.0001151066,0.0001888368,0.0001008025,0.001110657,0.0002966265,0.0002424545,0.00005711704,0.0004130821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001623025,0.00007752881,0.00006553441,0.0004257695,0.0002488165,0.001308471,0.00004012386,0.0004262606,0.000003353136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001359704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007795935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007242057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001708017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983781,0.0003174127,0.0004084862,0.0001174945,0.0004983481,0.0002801669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990517,0.0002766209,0.0003411409,0.0001108823,0.0000543776,0.0001652269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005863691,0.00007000169,0.9548239,0.00001693744,0.00005894745,0.000004484933,0.03379631,0.00001634194,0.005184804,0.001437744,0.00009736819,0.004434586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003477721,0.000008703394,0.9599795,0.00009751319,0.000034911,0.00001538592,0.001231741,0.000006504195,0.003282822,0.0003191911,0.03455978,0.0001161417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765301,0.0002892967,0.00002611881,0.02117218,0.0009370811,0.0001623295,0.000002225494,0.0000289581,0.0008516729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973062,0.00006366888,0.0005735645,0.0001408604,0.001665468,0.000002610895,3.151436e-7,0.00001157597,0.0002357192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03446241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8542385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124092563","doi":"10.54648/trad2021003","title":"Towards a New Treaty on Digital Trade","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Treaty; General partnership; Negotiation; Convergence (economics); Divergence (linguistics); Business; Political science; International economics; Economics; Law; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02365813885333778,"gpt":0.2900676343768381,"spread":0.2664094955235004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002286824,0.0001361887,0.0002811915,0.0001845265,0.000199042,0.0003104728,0.0002967765,0.0000577612,0.001034543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003106476,0.0001233691,0.0002252402,0.001225046,0.0001116232,0.0005542329,0.00001432233,0.000336047,0.0000306718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002016495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001086735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002738781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000493895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982041,0.0001213102,0.0004450917,0.0001534357,0.0007861782,0.0002899111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989951,0.0001497836,0.0002494635,0.000146455,0.00004500044,0.0004141703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001715705,0.001472752,0.01140199,0.00002482138,0.0004320901,0.001767808,0.0218636,0.0001989786,0.001036066,0.5549681,0.2686078,0.1380544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008965998,0.00007718393,0.03141806,0.00007462033,0.00005314929,0.00007970286,0.0007984926,0.000001705346,0.002832873,0.002395395,0.961199,0.0001731907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02959327,0.0008406971,0.0002817814,0.6970539,0.001877428,0.000166281,0.00001985096,0.0001096056,0.2700572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859229,0.00009652904,0.0007383188,0.001166461,0.001663966,2.896601e-7,0.000002480868,0.00002432913,0.01038468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137900945","doi":"","title":"The Biosafety Protocol: Multilateral Agreement on Protecting the Environment or Protectionist Club?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; International trade; Ratification; Biosafety; Convention on Biological Diversity; Negotiation; Agriculture; Business; Law; Political science; Biotechnology; Politics; Biology; Biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04004590239227283,"gpt":0.2753497620550021,"spread":0.2353038596627292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001387631,0.0001279418,0.0001170458,0.00001512357,0.00123123,0.0001852431,0.0004740345,0.00003760921,0.000423762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008757938,0.00002811256,0.0001164719,0.0002007102,0.0001189402,0.00004434721,0.00006511579,0.0007693424,0.00004038124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001208629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002012719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001619381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004485936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981053,0.0003417572,0.0004414862,0.00014499,0.0006476555,0.000318805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991968,0.0003491457,0.000241753,0.00008479061,0.00002500227,0.0001024774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001069178,0.000510642,0.0003042535,0.00001032455,0.00006442469,0.00001558521,0.0002715054,0.0009878861,0.2553693,0.0001600518,0.0009234865,0.7403134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006996454,0.002021373,0.1712195,0.00005817113,0.00001214623,0.00007957847,0.0003184133,0.0003442053,0.09668381,0.0001554904,0.7282362,0.0001715126],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4787659,0.00004965728,0.00004686997,0.4568598,0.0002027393,0.0625844,0.000007732195,0.00003875555,0.001444125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993951,0.000007476891,0.0004607668,0.0002382954,0.0007157696,0.003060652,2.029137e-7,0.000001893397,0.001563964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7401419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9469749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190521716","doi":"10.54648/trad2015030","title":"International Trade Law Challenges by Subsidies for Renewable Energy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Renewable energy; Pillar; Energy law; Economics; Energy subsidies; Yield (engineering); Settlement (finance); Business; International trade; Public economics; Law and economics; Energy policy; Law; Environmental law; Market economy; Political science; Engineering; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04958073700835314,"gpt":0.2975818930646446,"spread":0.2480011560562914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007303408,0.0001195932,0.0002375337,0.0001523666,0.0001890249,0.00010377,0.0004735699,0.00006165395,0.00009659194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001508532,0.0001126595,0.0001223309,0.0002723005,0.0001978333,0.0005593775,0.00001530542,0.0001194853,0.000001567034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001920246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001878486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003308477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006486837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984028,0.0001221966,0.0004275435,0.0001338298,0.0006511992,0.0002623909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990131,0.0001941478,0.0003417389,0.00009343275,0.00007739331,0.0002801342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006457663,0.0001880524,0.0001938874,0.000007560833,0.0001255571,0.000009595885,0.005339601,0.0001497955,0.0003950536,0.6690346,0.3231616,0.001330068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008060447,0.00006149749,0.0001239084,0.00002680743,0.00003096481,0.00001100011,0.001678179,0.00001399359,0.002692231,0.004956828,0.9894742,0.0001243599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002852539,0.006894878,0.0008319503,0.7677895,0.003339658,0.0001656226,0.00003323826,0.00008474041,0.2205752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990263,0.001277154,0.001659585,0.0008982616,0.001715057,0.000004009016,0.000006319809,0.00002788011,0.004148766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4594121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W890744083","doi":"10.54648/trad2015018","title":"A Protectionist Bargain?: Agriculture in the European UnionCanada Trade Agreement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Agreement on Agriculture; International trade; International economics; Subsidy; Agriculture; Trade agreement; European union; Negotiation; Free trade; Economics; Commercial policy; Customs union; Trade barrier; Business; Political science; Geography; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02984408410477294,"gpt":0.2111144622975112,"spread":0.1812703781927382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008591159,0.0001194716,0.0001614638,0.00002043458,0.0001197474,0.0001132615,0.0003960425,0.00002785479,0.00003241692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002449559,0.00003097154,0.0001175397,0.0004457068,0.00002850126,0.0001387591,0.00001830216,0.0003229588,0.000007406576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001093546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002232159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000545316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01273069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988059,0.0002850908,0.0003831673,0.00009949179,0.0002248124,0.0002014754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994739,0.00006199293,0.000255799,0.00003596443,0.00002112237,0.0001512682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001710769,0.001078385,0.009399218,0.00002132357,0.0001698382,0.0004908364,0.005579042,0.00121293,0.04912243,0.007251382,0.7426216,0.182882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000294078,0.0002281839,0.3759172,0.0000244831,0.00001150927,0.0002056107,0.0015756,0.000005875871,0.0001412953,0.0003775758,0.6210996,0.0001189975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8386046,0.0004243762,9.439747e-7,0.1278347,0.000288324,0.0002974938,0.00001523026,0.00001044029,0.03252385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969843,0.0000339132,0.00003019516,0.001258819,0.001331038,0.000002667954,0.000006261822,7.285616e-7,0.0003520435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.366518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7104025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600982351","doi":"10.54648/trad2010003","title":"Sprinting During a Marathon: Why the WTO Ministerial Failed in July 2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Patience; Modalities; Sprint; Political science; Economics; Outcome (game theory); Market access; Agriculture; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Management; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Law; Geography; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03362417411470684,"gpt":0.2042713144272795,"spread":0.1706471403125727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006439105,0.0001359817,0.0004022527,0.0002801523,0.00008312429,0.0001416901,0.0003906052,0.00006730772,0.0002087269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006757186,0.0001067686,0.0002024667,0.0002100709,0.00004937375,0.0003034667,0.00003881254,0.0006292865,0.0000790624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005796285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001840744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002588058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005289398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984704,0.00001422866,0.001019329,0.0001668997,0.00003703419,0.0002920705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989754,0.00005428535,0.0006603454,0.0002136948,0.000008480524,0.00008778672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007419327,0.0007901323,0.8763785,0.0001387863,0.0003655823,0.0005000608,0.003281714,0.0009097225,0.008202822,0.08581084,0.02048684,0.002393101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00191416,0.00005172925,0.5822547,0.0000389101,0.00001068723,0.0001826456,0.0001062083,0.0001957504,0.0007995992,0.005548172,0.4086298,0.0002676574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806406,0.0003658711,0.00001303145,0.008152104,0.002025472,0.00008514307,0.00001305382,0.000006040419,0.008698662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975906,0.00007268862,0.0006047153,0.0003439292,0.0009312195,0.000002266736,4.348397e-7,0.00001657463,0.0004375413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3881429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4353896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539099484","doi":"10.54648/trad2012008","title":"FDI Regimes, Investment Screening Process, and Institutional Frameworks: China versus Others in Global Business","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign direct investment; Multinational corporation; China; Investment (military); International trade; Business; International economics; International business; Investment policy; Economics; Political science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01820503277606146,"gpt":0.2575635396473449,"spread":0.2393585068712834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003186987,0.0001347013,0.0001634391,0.0002512053,0.00009535335,0.0001439384,0.0001425705,0.00005861835,0.00009042058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009101382,0.0001131391,0.00005014143,0.0005847873,0.00008795439,0.002337003,0.00002841732,0.0002910976,0.000008315204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009484141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005341266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006207457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006404582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989375,0.00001074525,0.0003720121,0.00009610871,0.0003759705,0.0002076097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994715,0.00001990111,0.0003454727,0.00005569424,0.00007253668,0.00003484191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000421532,0.0003271572,0.0679885,0.00007923644,0.00009327953,0.00002645593,0.0001325856,0.0009723985,0.00004052295,0.9253589,0.003305217,0.001254231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003962906,0.00002711568,0.755129,0.0005326978,0.00008262615,0.00007325228,0.0002029904,0.001967476,0.00005096474,0.01343385,0.2241995,0.0003375821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7218266,0.001624556,0.001474993,0.02215282,0.002688574,0.0002937643,0.000004397079,0.00004681589,0.2498875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869558,0.00001929536,0.001425066,0.009923748,0.001599361,0.000003070111,0.000006695495,0.000009252539,0.00005776398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.911925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4613679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213678478","doi":"10.54648/trad2008023","title":"Non–tariff Barriers Facing Trade in Selected Environmental Goods and Associated Services","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Tariff; Mandate; Intellectual property; Certification; Goods and services; Government (linguistics); Trade barrier; International trade; Product (mathematics); Technical barriers to trade; Procurement; Government procurement; International economics; Economics; Marketing; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01961203065733563,"gpt":0.1784744744168104,"spread":0.1588624437594748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000298123,0.0001678142,0.0005280706,0.0003549958,0.0001016269,0.00003959966,0.0001860852,0.00009751918,0.0001060473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000165222,0.0001941028,0.0001140991,0.0002963835,0.00005619538,0.0004316615,0.00001919266,0.0003912015,0.00001257345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002509288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002636703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007269763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001995295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985247,0.00001515681,0.0008926236,0.0002022246,0.00004680699,0.0003185164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990969,0.00003460182,0.0005722199,0.00009469222,0.000002046502,0.0001994967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003175576,0.0001112809,0.9965173,0.00001455113,0.0001199876,0.00006975859,0.001688574,0.0003185163,0.000268583,0.0003447364,0.0003917852,0.000123154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001586875,0.0000958645,0.9886513,0.00003355107,0.00001200135,0.0001258985,0.0002552928,0.001181313,0.0002097492,0.0007292091,0.006897178,0.0002217532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953939,0.001444622,0.000007738756,0.001169296,0.0002038504,0.0000748914,0.00006440045,0.000007660045,0.001633661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982975,0.0009344619,0.0001952887,0.0003825142,0.00007865082,0.000001157203,0.000006614731,0.00001892898,0.00008491833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007866002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7915284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124339221","doi":"10.54648/trad2019031","title":"Digital Trade and Dispute Settlement in RTAs: An Evolving Standard?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; International trade; Political science; Settlement (finance); Dispute resolution; Corporate governance; Regional trade; Quarter (Canadian coin); Free trade; Business; Geography; Law; Payment; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02616353210660596,"gpt":0.2143276744729932,"spread":0.1881641423663873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004253631,0.0001369279,0.0004691272,0.0003369963,0.00002791227,0.0002178392,0.0001905818,0.00004494513,0.0001511491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001931878,0.000146182,0.0001093749,0.0001610761,0.00002646548,0.001231649,0.00002316946,0.0002484672,0.00002742619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001671321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002211863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006764128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003540775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986111,0.000008541409,0.0008622598,0.0002049092,0.00004825391,0.0002649193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992316,0.00003766909,0.0004224302,0.0001530711,0.000005500548,0.000149703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007955926,0.0001576486,0.9653718,0.00003751738,0.00008034446,0.00003146427,0.0005502407,0.0004079854,0.00002013707,0.02724458,0.001788287,0.004230446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002448605,0.0004254529,0.7927462,0.00008695039,0.00001035677,0.00007063469,0.0003797635,0.00121423,0.00004022159,0.01312563,0.1891113,0.0003406411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789242,0.00220471,0.00007176173,0.00377655,0.0005171745,0.0001290548,0.0002865825,0.000007537544,0.0140824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986708,0.0002289523,0.0005232322,0.0002576159,0.0001305181,8.068357e-7,0.000005898601,0.00001710208,0.000165107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.187323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5961128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594113611","doi":"10.54648/trad2004007","title":"Open Trade With the US Without Compromising Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02070328804601418,"gpt":0.2808086248124436,"spread":0.2601053367664294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003616562,0.00007398381,0.0001665951,0.00003331194,0.0004249377,0.0001719409,0.0006854112,0.00001747792,0.00003003721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002811701,0.00004713577,0.00004141229,0.0003110374,0.0001619577,0.0002541767,0.00001324868,0.0002729236,4.763687e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005062704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003750379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9242254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989804,0.00006661346,0.0001826326,0.00007045246,0.000450127,0.000249748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993375,0.00006410737,0.0002814179,0.00009436139,0.00001431694,0.0002082864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004954343,0.0002223028,0.01801641,0.00002841588,0.0004033511,0.001228839,0.04394933,0.006148834,0.0002836131,0.1505537,0.7707741,0.007895704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000785138,0.00003584286,0.07877821,0.00009179391,0.0000250921,0.00006222641,0.0005307466,0.000001306916,0.0001239888,0.0005309958,0.9189402,0.00009442916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3330763,0.0003057942,0.00003119317,0.6432018,0.0002589233,0.0002181154,0.00002318162,0.000004491998,0.02288023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890201,0.00001776161,0.0002359064,0.008765191,0.0004605417,7.824644e-7,1.096129e-7,0.000007759641,0.001491815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6559439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6653012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1862693536","doi":"10.54648/384806","title":"Greener Multilateral Pastures for Canada and Mexico Dispute Settlement in the North American Trade Agreements","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Settlement (finance); Political science; Geography; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01475497143067734,"gpt":0.2208047929543975,"spread":0.2060498215237201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001201071,0.0001051664,0.0001754519,0.00001356763,0.00008931838,0.00004485773,0.0002006032,0.00001078354,0.00001274188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005115891,0.00003007163,0.00006986819,0.0001803388,0.00002947435,0.00007695216,0.00001291995,0.0001156613,1.16091e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005111963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001362112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05219325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9437317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992303,0.00003540608,0.0002981621,0.00009320273,0.0001248226,0.0002181136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999545,0.000123022,0.0002151917,0.00002313041,0.000007578247,0.00008611369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009072822,0.00009770002,0.8836485,0.000004192653,0.00005400721,0.00003274225,0.000445979,0.0001092413,0.0008488387,0.0000808166,0.02137673,0.09321059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001990347,0.0001310075,0.8541458,0.000005944655,0.00001051011,0.00003037521,0.0002003397,0.00003011481,0.00002754045,0.00002818975,0.1451174,0.0000738206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.948937,0.0000640847,3.83499e-7,0.05068129,0.00007098307,0.0001229419,0.00007655269,0.000001453887,0.00004531844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962714,0.0001140249,0.00004915931,0.00305851,0.0004244653,0.000004484329,0.00001468999,6.460751e-7,0.00006261013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8915385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9541183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126073136","doi":"","title":"Extent of Protection via Antidumping Action: A case study of the Vitamin C industry in India","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Business; Dumping; International economics; Action (physics); Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08824733424983598,"gpt":0.2544315734978455,"spread":0.1661842392480095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005013988,0.00008720295,0.0003543589,0.0003795113,0.00003765545,0.00001410458,0.0001587223,0.0001036832,0.00003231672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002075806,0.00007990657,0.0001228654,0.0004169705,0.00002699605,0.0002744104,0.00002203407,0.0006702126,0.0000022784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001479108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002569774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002371272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004416424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998619,0.00002607361,0.001075543,0.0001101024,0.00004166736,0.0001276233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986044,0.00001890776,0.001169538,0.0001535503,0.00001320129,0.0000404115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001457629,0.003262948,0.9602336,0.0001061119,0.0003016234,0.0002269492,0.00531943,0.01087009,0.0005731666,0.001488049,0.0002435256,0.01722876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002043599,0.0003065995,0.9883546,0.00009031061,0.00002283701,0.001111408,0.002931327,0.0007779798,0.001618483,0.0005095484,0.002095015,0.0001383226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979329,0.0001964431,0.00003661789,0.000802203,0.0003170606,0.0002110925,0.000006023184,0.000001880767,0.0004958427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996068,0.00002793498,0.0001116489,0.00005130815,0.0001486841,0.000002888632,7.757749e-8,0.000007982723,0.0000427022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02812099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3258496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781781014","doi":"10.54648/trad2017040","title":"Understanding EU Trade Policy on Geographical Indications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; International trade; European union; Negotiation; Trademark; General partnership; Product (mathematics); Business; Commercial policy; Foreign direct investment; Geographical indication; International economics; Economics; Political science; Geography; Regional science; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2248543474957859,"gpt":0.28185567771993,"spread":0.05700133022414408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004234029,0.0001382894,0.0003979635,0.0007996414,0.0003936579,0.0002565707,0.0005981814,0.00008083898,0.00009132093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001236507,0.0001477901,0.0003065321,0.0001782775,0.000131134,0.0004131385,0.00002547712,0.0004149315,0.00006453775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002731872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005546986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003902869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005845891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987006,0.00001006725,0.0007628836,0.0001811897,0.00005357409,0.0002917536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981557,0.0000578316,0.001199039,0.0003789346,0.000004183497,0.0002043488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000241565,0.0001370152,0.06655341,0.000006943682,0.0001129332,0.00001237953,0.0001343121,0.00008628255,0.000004739461,0.926267,0.006318438,0.0003424301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001101889,0.000147808,0.6116507,0.00004884893,0.00001539899,0.00004394376,0.00007198577,0.0001002619,0.00003426669,0.2167997,0.1697536,0.0002316473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1513691,0.001256235,0.002204942,0.4193448,0.00246647,0.0002793636,0.0002466456,0.00004379434,0.4227887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969016,0.0004597353,0.0003234253,0.001538062,0.0006552821,0.000001255434,0.000001302889,0.00001812406,0.0001011659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8455325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6026704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572576417","doi":"10.54648/trad2004026","title":"The Canada - United States Softwood Lumber Dispute: Where Politics and Theory Meet","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Politics; Political science; Economics; Law; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008179363803184677,"gpt":0.2253326280159521,"spread":0.2171532642127674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004875817,0.0001482575,0.0001987594,0.000104295,0.0004224049,0.0003526662,0.0002208859,0.0000316455,0.000010585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001923643,0.000098519,0.00008366069,0.0004510826,0.0001512562,0.0004712033,0.00003905822,0.0002353717,5.125579e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002272334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002641208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1283564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3869551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988235,0.00003355807,0.0003518223,0.00008755608,0.0003344126,0.0003691599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992548,0.0001672487,0.0002759768,0.0001111407,0.0001353378,0.00005545654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001893545,0.0003686327,0.07948869,0.0004233269,0.0005405991,0.0003698186,0.002255232,0.001942814,0.00000821599,0.8537849,0.05706732,0.003561124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001634871,0.00003470409,0.112084,0.0001358573,0.000297431,0.00003344833,0.02080395,0.0000554439,0.000009497278,0.3927186,0.4718596,0.0003325228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493491,0.001366037,0.00004849377,0.0456627,0.0006101885,0.0001394374,0.0000125583,0.00002194172,0.002789568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961522,0.0001271709,0.00002710062,0.002671659,0.0007814699,5.391288e-7,0.000003566628,0.00001608844,0.0002202085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4610663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.877448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306692208","doi":"10.54648/trad2022035","title":"Means of Influence, the Joint-Decision Trap and Multilevel Trade Negotiations: Ontario and Québec and the Renegotiation of NAFTA Compared","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Negotiation; International trade; International economics; Political science; Economics; Power (physics); General partnership; Business; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04697921402672009,"gpt":0.2063514723759192,"spread":0.1593722583491991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008753038,0.0001045984,0.0004665983,0.0002083087,0.0001808695,0.00003893499,0.0001810231,0.00002637436,0.00005515425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000796185,0.00007842307,0.0001010311,0.000147852,0.0001943971,0.0002305153,0.00004835378,0.0002772852,2.795341e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001038654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006995894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006548626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02073683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985923,0.0000423768,0.001048052,0.0001327946,0.00006983893,0.0001146079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983988,0.0003124032,0.001074154,0.0001480171,0.00001410456,0.00005251413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001374448,0.0005422145,0.7546853,0.0001104195,0.0008218971,0.000006609278,0.04303334,0.02417802,0.0002939407,0.1581161,0.003168253,0.01366948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003005793,0.000119386,0.953788,0.00002540273,0.0000513017,0.00007150196,0.0008911016,0.003278558,0.00004162805,0.01671739,0.02190629,0.000103686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869191,0.004749172,0.0001127427,0.00741529,0.0001391794,0.000163938,0.00006564521,0.000002047344,0.0004328581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983072,0.0009018427,0.0004354477,0.0002764479,0.00002805627,0.000003510167,0.000001411182,0.000007695212,0.0000384103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1991027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303112022","doi":"10.54648/trad2009019","title":"SWFs, Recent US Legislative Changes, and Treaty Obligations Sovereign Wealth Funds, Recent US Legislative Changes, and Treaty Obligations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Legislature; Sovereign wealth fund; Sovereignty; Business; Political science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02960030774927272,"gpt":0.2457822770529022,"spread":0.2161819693036295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003906014,0.0003693247,0.0005672558,0.0005167251,0.0004186576,0.0003266131,0.0001972806,0.00009730748,0.0001074724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001364206,0.000321901,0.0000936526,0.00114035,0.0001406701,0.001387102,0.00005231444,0.0004149768,0.000006600067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001769691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001006205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004087154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003812769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980769,0.00004181885,0.0005728209,0.0003605579,0.0004705387,0.0004773825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981253,0.0001045631,0.001201882,0.0002090446,0.0002547257,0.0001045449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009346496,0.001159294,0.04864565,0.000223918,0.000446161,0.0003193942,0.00628452,0.00007285143,0.0009909235,0.2419241,0.09910463,0.599894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002096085,0.0002154093,0.376439,0.0002882205,0.0002262807,0.00004549783,0.0003444114,0.0001582994,0.0001265381,0.01250675,0.6071523,0.0004011463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5721844,0.03048211,0.0004170171,0.2622565,0.002357905,0.001978214,0.0004834601,0.0001922446,0.1296481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954149,0.03479492,0.000677556,0.005502038,0.003172809,0.00001612235,0.0000757947,0.00004902998,0.00156273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5994928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044579811","doi":"10.54648/trad2014040","title":"When Chinas National Champions Go Global: Nothing to Fear but Fear Itself?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Opposition (politics); Foreign direct investment; Nothing; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Mergers and acquisitions; Political economy; Development economics; Market economy; Business; International trade; Economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04814053771127835,"gpt":0.2369927290475694,"spread":0.188852191336291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009054698,0.0001835421,0.0005057552,0.0003397852,0.0001300821,0.000161858,0.0004503649,0.00007774198,0.0003450247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020808,0.0002048347,0.000277403,0.0002952002,0.00003041174,0.0004352343,0.00004707986,0.0003115427,0.0006681714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003699811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004919957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004993747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007730075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982928,0.0000189809,0.0009728014,0.0002515091,0.000105461,0.0003584201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987967,0.00006892245,0.0006146703,0.0001855018,0.00004031137,0.0002938946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008421537,0.0003339955,0.04273321,0.00003641867,0.0002901168,0.00001655923,0.001556265,0.004564945,0.00006521759,0.8773974,0.07059347,0.002328162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000770472,0.0001204911,0.07954688,0.0000405731,0.00001127046,0.00008078257,0.00005319403,0.0006494097,0.00003816327,0.06826724,0.85015,0.0002714804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5158396,0.001905349,0.008655162,0.1361483,0.004545698,0.000407248,0.000531927,0.00008782353,0.3318789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850456,0.00007709605,0.007605825,0.004891204,0.001036482,0.000002464181,0.0000040725,0.00002536438,0.0013119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8091302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8588215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288686995","doi":"10.54648/trad2015042","title":"WTO and Renewable Energy: Lessons from the Case Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Renewable energy; Feed-in tariff; Energy subsidies; Tariff; Economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Business; Public economics; International trade; Natural resource economics; Energy policy; Market economy; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04892463269020991,"gpt":0.3045969912830773,"spread":0.2556723585928674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006555886,0.00007814967,0.0001522557,0.00005023803,0.000385723,0.0001697777,0.0002298301,0.00003623438,0.0001080574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000124796,0.00005527457,0.00004640321,0.0004400343,0.0002778094,0.0003354723,0.00002439252,0.0001581358,0.000002736219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007611984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002115595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01773463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.181725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989004,0.0002505028,0.0002564593,0.00009050883,0.0003313261,0.0001708606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990302,0.0003027453,0.0002069426,0.0001181688,0.00007001911,0.000271971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002943784,0.00009344164,0.002972527,0.000001816914,0.00009267791,0.001244983,0.01382239,0.0002140697,0.0001260256,0.8061398,0.1737263,0.001536533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004581567,0.00001930131,0.0008548461,0.00002260562,0.00005785696,0.0002569339,0.003346798,0.000009987689,0.0003330864,0.01283841,0.9817152,0.00008679008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04056118,0.005086273,0.0004117557,0.849077,0.001777058,0.000139966,0.00002786294,0.00006853807,0.1028503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946164,0.00008661817,0.000657413,0.001742484,0.0009958138,4.824336e-7,7.33987e-7,0.00001256092,0.001887437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9540552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225290516","doi":"10.54648/trad2022009","title":"Duty Evasion in Free Trade Agreements: Norm Emergence and Implications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Evasion (ethics); Enforcement; Norm (philosophy); International trade; Negotiation; Dumping; Business; General partnership; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02170066399597874,"gpt":0.2930597996286837,"spread":0.271359135632705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008252644,0.00008326069,0.000159887,0.0003191247,0.0005127449,0.00003989395,0.000432354,0.00002262171,0.001219841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009358332,0.00008859806,0.00005768142,0.001510029,0.0001165803,0.0003952934,0.00006975739,0.000365986,0.000001629429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002059964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000175445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001604699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004065611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983908,0.000230864,0.0004702696,0.0001320932,0.0005474288,0.0002285668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993067,0.00009993764,0.0002858079,0.0001366096,0.00002285591,0.0001480799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001030438,0.001757433,0.2736998,0.00004668507,0.0001504675,0.000136055,0.05108395,0.0008309013,0.005451121,0.4074842,0.2325195,0.02673681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008966545,0.00006838155,0.3870624,0.00002561657,0.00003431116,0.00004294937,0.003804672,0.00001326396,0.0001263429,0.005540122,0.6022227,0.0001625648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1462161,0.003310923,0.000163188,0.833328,0.00167916,0.0004734763,0.00004627982,0.00004794995,0.01473491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974383,0.0004130897,0.0005666311,0.0006873591,0.0002136868,0.000005863069,0.000001702751,0.00001224559,0.000661093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8512222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118011017","doi":"10.54648/trad2009042","title":"Health Protection at the World Trade Organization: The <i>J</i>-Value as a Universal Standard for Reasonableness of Regulatory Precautions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Business; Ex-ante; International trade law; Government (linguistics); Precautionary principle; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01455815860461901,"gpt":0.2854225110990403,"spread":0.2708643524944213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001715866,0.0001497873,0.0003194354,0.0002132811,0.001665253,0.00008729447,0.0004871487,0.00005516295,0.0001964714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000283489,0.0001026541,0.0001535115,0.002771027,0.000406015,0.000393297,0.0000180644,0.0003115946,0.000001694421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007867715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001417716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007948348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002562458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974877,0.0005529257,0.0006414152,0.0001656127,0.0008379566,0.0003143944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981323,0.0002824556,0.0009505845,0.0002513274,0.0002210028,0.0001622588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003625994,0.0002976688,0.0008490647,0.00005175795,0.0001661428,0.000005745044,0.01492648,0.002607439,0.001004735,0.906556,0.0660914,0.007080988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001415221,0.0003680029,0.03567221,0.0002344686,0.000162894,0.00007536766,0.002184863,0.00002802557,0.006482091,0.00479599,0.948365,0.0002159147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01479621,0.0009647889,0.002546232,0.9752025,0.0008095293,0.001661788,0.00003929097,0.00007835031,0.003901287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927312,0.0001270424,0.0005357376,0.001265178,0.0006136714,0.000003844445,0.000003949563,0.0000267485,0.004692669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.977935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542688802","doi":"10.54648/trad2007044","title":"Effects of Dumping vs. Anti-dumping Measures: The US Trade Remedy Laws Applied to Wheat Imports from Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; International trade; Economics; International economics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009631864259804135,"gpt":0.2401668766623126,"spread":0.2305350124025085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001778654,0.0002100117,0.0005263419,0.0002413194,0.000466903,0.00008713829,0.0006581658,0.00007582861,0.0000619783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002596958,0.0001705752,0.0001416479,0.00129504,0.0001674025,0.0002077462,0.00002973709,0.0004693919,0.000001254066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004882698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008948026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0724541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6914002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965229,0.0002079712,0.0009763088,0.0002191753,0.001530454,0.0005431887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976844,0.0009284029,0.0006799198,0.0002302279,0.00006218756,0.0004148391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001108997,0.001365667,0.2903521,0.0004744571,0.00228265,0.002459584,0.09906718,0.004651688,0.3887729,0.04740959,0.1360753,0.0259798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009834432,0.00004180349,0.6353675,0.0003426035,0.0001960632,0.00001550003,0.001301945,0.000002522459,0.08953577,0.0002514458,0.2716307,0.0003308023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8871427,0.000869317,0.0007410508,0.1021598,0.002392871,0.000843384,0.00001017957,0.00005224757,0.005788406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951665,0.00005973882,0.000642102,0.002727043,0.001309386,0.000001619773,0.000001282725,0.00003688613,0.00005543359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.618946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9337225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517949253","doi":"10.54648/trad2009012","title":"Using Preferences to Promote LDC Exports: A Canadian Success Story?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Preference; Reciprocal; Scheme (mathematics); Product (mathematics); Business; International economics; International trade; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1044762099337071,"gpt":0.2515858851085534,"spread":0.1471096751748463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004609694,0.000140526,0.0004223063,0.0006797051,0.0001028533,0.0001150308,0.0003376125,0.00005555464,0.000150884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003597293,0.0001533127,0.0001441687,0.0003204989,0.0000166681,0.0004367961,0.000008113707,0.0002696732,0.00005683112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003609392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001276632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001961616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009959067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986704,0.00000997883,0.0007238472,0.0001864315,0.00004142545,0.0003678907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.00001160928,0.0004800704,0.0001588905,0.00001874966,0.0004631807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004070376,0.001372109,0.5829855,0.0001636417,0.001055068,0.001119971,0.01051093,0.02126985,0.0006266689,0.2069979,0.1019747,0.07151677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006663339,0.0003433026,0.2359112,0.0001218553,0.00002438777,0.0001462511,0.00009922859,0.0003636855,0.0002079864,0.02384946,0.737788,0.0004784147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659763,0.001747033,0.0001644989,0.00925872,0.0008414754,0.0001496871,0.00005577173,0.000009560815,0.02179695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949521,0.00006910138,0.003078039,0.001352819,0.0003130577,6.572776e-7,9.794384e-7,0.00001123522,0.000222026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6358133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6251911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173075571","doi":"10.54648/trad2021005","title":"Electronic Government Procurement in the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement: An Opportunity for Increased Transparency and Accountability?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Procurement; Government procurement; Accountability; Business; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Language change; International economics; International trade; Accounting; Economics; Finance; Political science; Marketing; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03530721108534653,"gpt":0.264394404976306,"spread":0.2290871938909594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002233339,0.0002331273,0.0003399535,0.0001732109,0.000164223,0.0003329147,0.0006044296,0.00005007135,0.0001594014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001579249,0.0001730267,0.0001611916,0.0005564685,0.00004534435,0.001511489,0.00004673427,0.0003933834,7.525728e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001799976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002672798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007400048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003564402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976583,0.00006954695,0.0007366065,0.0002394254,0.0008127509,0.0004834232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990019,0.00008520207,0.0004780873,0.0003165198,0.00006123466,0.00005712477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003282181,0.01659227,0.2584988,0.0046881,0.001551945,0.000331084,0.008747308,0.00009541278,0.0142114,0.3999947,0.1487332,0.1432736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006163356,0.0002347601,0.1505734,0.0001800653,0.0003622407,0.00004407942,0.002177376,0.000396244,0.0004635397,0.01917483,0.8197666,0.0004635113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7755968,0.002789537,0.0003200627,0.2027363,0.0004327115,0.001860091,0.00006488103,0.00004276516,0.01615684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919651,0.0001118027,0.000146991,0.006539454,0.001107083,0.00004170339,0.00002165422,0.00001847072,0.00004780573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6710334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7055824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391747924","doi":"10.54648/trad2023040","title":"Europe’s GI Policy and New World Countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; International trade; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02278436993172051,"gpt":0.2272198692275846,"spread":0.2044354992958641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001473694,0.0001033816,0.0001753477,0.00005811192,0.0001062426,0.00009781506,0.0001766862,0.0000261783,0.0001825225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000483199,0.000031389,0.00007067528,0.001585345,0.00003407432,0.0001495352,0.00003571959,0.0001869078,0.00003442678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001469822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002765463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003620453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007891702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992105,0.0000305611,0.0002363136,0.0000968193,0.0002188656,0.0002069565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994903,0.0001314137,0.0001414329,0.00002165452,0.00002660398,0.000188561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005668969,0.00005764316,0.00531545,0.00001402616,0.00006075742,0.0001323919,0.0003205787,0.000005074393,0.110261,0.006605389,0.8258541,0.05131688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001207826,0.00009497526,0.2775362,0.00003343488,0.00001107118,0.00005612335,0.00006265344,7.819891e-7,0.001242635,0.0004266198,0.7203402,0.00007450848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6294694,0.001159512,2.321682e-7,0.3650479,0.0003493337,0.00007605285,0.0000199305,0.00007403862,0.003803581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739762,0.0005736605,0.00003370858,0.001221892,0.003366789,2.245948e-7,0.000003603815,0.000001240784,0.02082266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.363826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1998494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275588481","doi":"10.54648/trad2015041","title":"The Protracted WTO Battle over a Multilateral GI Register: What Lies Beneath?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Political science; International trade; Register (sociolinguistics); Battle; Law; Business; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0375855333627086,"gpt":0.2807640546969949,"spread":0.2431785213342864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008301524,0.0001921658,0.0002907717,0.0001619274,0.0002557534,0.001574998,0.0003809102,0.00006043149,0.00002051679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004073342,0.0001230384,0.000238508,0.0004244008,0.0001352827,0.003275862,0.0000595719,0.0003542198,0.00001071939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001575421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007579158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000187482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003800566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983942,0.00003991462,0.0005243284,0.0001323474,0.0005182841,0.0003909216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988786,0.0001047003,0.0005310451,0.0001965627,0.0002224548,0.00006663268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053184,0.003910943,0.4628837,0.001146031,0.001504216,0.00122775,0.02390324,0.0009236117,0.0006965225,0.03461638,0.3302897,0.1335796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002268787,0.00009407027,0.2423834,0.000239924,0.0001878767,0.00002703595,0.01315871,0.0002385208,0.00003005297,0.009873217,0.7311512,0.0003472243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654804,0.001842559,0.00001202082,0.02503623,0.002673651,0.0004032221,0.000002202627,0.00005360211,0.004496094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955952,0.00006949883,0.00005698347,0.0009845413,0.002662033,0.000003642954,0.00000236185,0.00002232357,0.0006034038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4008615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796426271","doi":"","title":"What Kind of Civil Society? Debating Trade at the WTO Public Forum","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Civil society; International trade; World trade; Public administration; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0368676713870284,"gpt":0.3064609908671925,"spread":0.2695933194801641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001361772,0.000151963,0.0003274848,0.00009638443,0.002099322,0.0008129151,0.001230468,0.00007940207,0.0006271434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004369188,0.0001082822,0.0003739559,0.0003873268,0.0008101495,0.002184508,0.00009790443,0.0004003637,0.000005284803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002055969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002689145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004642065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01673265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976124,0.0002055295,0.0006407425,0.0001486131,0.0009565357,0.0004361751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974241,0.0003768672,0.001520503,0.0003858217,0.00008294581,0.0002098073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009320793,0.0008167827,0.2387382,0.0001230446,0.001118624,0.00006951295,0.09639084,0.0001524803,0.01032669,0.2759046,0.3413143,0.03495177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001152503,0.00006292721,0.09222021,0.0002508934,0.0001268513,0.00003791575,0.01306182,0.00003193499,0.00483283,0.002242517,0.8857064,0.0002732194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08497562,0.001589373,0.00005785508,0.895292,0.002165495,0.0002367222,0.000005111439,0.0000262478,0.01565153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947451,0.0005709489,0.0002654591,0.0009919228,0.0007739866,0.000001272543,8.149343e-7,0.00002693126,0.002623529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9097695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405914899","doi":"10.54648/trad2025005","title":"From CPTPP to US–Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade: The Evolution of Good Regulatory Practices and Its Implications for Taiwan","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Business; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0360593448699909,"gpt":0.3311045550579674,"spread":0.2950452101879765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007722958,0.0001240249,0.0002128321,0.0002673983,0.0003568402,0.000138995,0.0003103091,0.00006076466,0.00005167546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005198649,0.00009570113,0.0001099877,0.001023302,0.0001465658,0.0005976591,0.00001781164,0.0002913427,0.00000327949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003085079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005276708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004264626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006628089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984624,0.0002514475,0.000483557,0.0001947775,0.000408541,0.0001992112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981764,0.0007777703,0.0006333296,0.000144586,0.0001037162,0.0001642248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007258428,0.000180315,0.002450078,0.00003736563,0.0002239707,0.000002650614,0.02233391,0.00005308256,0.00552484,0.9586677,0.00751968,0.002933817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007353364,0.0003506527,0.3335995,0.0004299452,0.0004343938,0.00001617202,0.01763683,0.00004634269,0.002086485,0.01466863,0.6297105,0.0002851984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.171369,0.006508395,0.0003005002,0.8107198,0.001477147,0.001123442,0.0002863691,0.00007434423,0.008141061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977065,0.0001396098,0.0004630168,0.0004983847,0.001013994,0.0000105663,0.000003742138,0.00002353353,0.0001406984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9439991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3902579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285476749","doi":"10.54648/trad2021014","title":"Labelling Settlement Products: When EU Consumer Law Meets Public International Law (But Ignores International Trade Law)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Settlement (finance); Political science; International law; Municipal law; Context (archaeology); Public law; Economics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06263288811727158,"gpt":0.3037976520741608,"spread":0.2411647639568892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001364551,0.0002139691,0.0003320918,0.0001695728,0.0005058221,0.0007306591,0.0009284332,0.00009041994,0.003024655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004348143,0.0001878732,0.0002187009,0.0003167905,0.0006286692,0.001283314,0.0001007319,0.0006248812,0.00003503652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004383178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004888598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006000177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01415072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963803,0.0004045496,0.0008727377,0.0003212141,0.001548068,0.0004731342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984766,0.0003075765,0.0004417724,0.0001938686,0.000335781,0.00024439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000668198,0.0003953962,0.0001290134,0.00001536701,0.0005332881,0.0001966366,0.006125585,0.00003132538,0.002703647,0.954776,0.03348142,0.001545442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006856503,0.00003971627,0.00004515507,0.0001180614,0.00005324404,0.0000917583,0.001616722,0.00003906908,0.01375051,0.005475372,0.9778643,0.0002204631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00311407,0.001353244,0.00006714678,0.6046902,0.005128064,0.0002265983,0.00007037839,0.00005873945,0.3852916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811329,0.0003065098,0.003646465,0.009020553,0.002353793,0.000005491569,0.00002791073,0.00003237593,0.003474025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867434931","doi":"10.54648/380082","title":"Appellate Body Jurisprudence Relating to Trade Remedies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01967675239391909,"gpt":0.3065020929987949,"spread":0.2868253406048759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001108415,0.0001556895,0.0003094214,0.0003835185,0.0004546623,0.0001365452,0.0005148429,0.00006559249,0.0004365887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004660724,0.0001472782,0.0001368595,0.001887395,0.0001646336,0.0005461649,0.00002724979,0.0004532084,0.00005476867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001912278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001988864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005100346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009397527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975421,0.0002105506,0.000706452,0.0001775292,0.0009191622,0.0004441404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986724,0.0002597352,0.0004314539,0.0001598167,0.00006124152,0.0004153853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003511274,0.00088856,0.2002365,0.00007769874,0.0005011353,0.001657952,0.1014028,0.002369945,0.02821849,0.3747776,0.2562198,0.03329829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003976651,0.00006915534,0.05299667,0.0001761126,0.00005183699,0.00007572652,0.00117793,0.00001175842,0.00120503,0.0009752085,0.9426392,0.0002237604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1463406,0.001184549,0.001163176,0.6915227,0.002890867,0.0005333222,0.000003779045,0.0002110194,0.1561501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893935,0.0002879645,0.002572531,0.001134523,0.00143863,9.006097e-7,3.938298e-7,0.0000291692,0.005142419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8430529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.600583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285689534","doi":"10.54648/trad2020014","title":"Executive Powers within the International Trading System – A Comparative Analysis of EU, Swiss, U.S. and Canadian Frameworks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; International trade; European union; Executive summary; Doctrine; Political science; Structuring; International economics; Business; Economics; Accounting; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02481979119903324,"gpt":0.2407097898884318,"spread":0.2158899986893985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002598429,0.0000998403,0.0002633391,0.0005483255,0.00008927483,0.0001775909,0.000267905,0.00003503883,0.0001030458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004223568,0.000070239,0.000145554,0.0007634039,0.00006812923,0.0005195599,0.00001913244,0.0003224788,0.000002639394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007613519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00179814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009520009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989967,0.00001586193,0.0004576239,0.00009589011,0.0003393163,0.00009464806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990801,0.00006014501,0.000629444,0.0000479368,0.0001382102,0.00004420723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001147482,0.00003690955,0.009909652,0.00003212709,0.002322265,0.00003171478,0.002633523,0.00189099,0.0003368354,0.9676796,0.01497274,0.00003891476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002092142,0.0001028409,0.1036662,0.0005476321,0.003333814,0.00003911728,0.0197966,0.6714217,0.0008669567,0.002634373,0.1949105,0.0005881049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3887617,0.0004506522,0.000992936,0.219271,0.00191983,0.0004447068,0.00004525529,0.00004113407,0.3880728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801827,0.000002173682,0.0001808203,0.01916935,0.0004228733,0.000001090194,0.00000786598,0.000004996874,0.00002812418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5312389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285454053","doi":"10.54648/trad2021019","title":"Public Morality Exception at the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Nothing; Public morality; Paragraph; China; Law; Test (biology); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05913187982962174,"gpt":0.3080267725053867,"spread":0.248894892675765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00119453,0.0001178739,0.0002246608,0.0001146689,0.0008001502,0.0003241558,0.0004191693,0.00006281296,0.004217971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004918292,0.00008745655,0.0001913052,0.001294179,0.0003020937,0.0006230003,0.00005285744,0.0004212281,0.00005299725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000361165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003863592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005228584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005473936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975582,0.0005433132,0.0005213734,0.000153336,0.0009074809,0.0003163497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986473,0.0002451265,0.0004346501,0.0002259753,0.000232689,0.0002142771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006383862,0.000823878,0.1113676,0.00005320391,0.0003495171,0.0003190037,0.04248235,0.0001376282,0.008055035,0.6152281,0.2069727,0.01414709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003434048,0.00001106228,0.1081157,0.00003222936,0.00004240726,0.00004554839,0.0008235109,0.000003695178,0.001707094,0.00127336,0.8874879,0.0001141177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1467293,0.00113459,0.0001694537,0.8205935,0.001654907,0.000135139,0.000006751774,0.00005421247,0.02952213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856586,0.000185048,0.0002440196,0.002508641,0.001191146,0.000001126307,0.000003245137,0.00001852025,0.01018961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8389294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399901643","doi":"10.54648/trad2024025","title":"Article: Harmonization of FTA Rules of Origin: Examination of General Provisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harmonization; Rules of origin; International trade; General partnership; European union; Template; Free trade agreement; Divergence (linguistics); Economic community; Political science; Business; Free trade; Economics; Computer science; Law; Economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05811971533988668,"gpt":0.2420960247464567,"spread":0.18397630940657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004383823,0.00007399022,0.0003388532,0.0004284427,0.00001477769,0.00002090804,0.0001368169,0.0000405411,0.0001256002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004004329,0.00007510094,0.0001370222,0.0002834873,0.00004359497,0.0003138858,0.00001232651,0.0001088773,0.00001025332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005235232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003427763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002205326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000059911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986756,0.00001226279,0.001063752,0.00009901157,0.00004716682,0.0001021459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990926,0.00004794303,0.0006718721,0.0001040231,0.00003852178,0.00004505553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005559022,0.0006259944,0.03992722,0.0005227529,0.0003851475,0.00001232231,0.001151094,0.0033224,0.00690363,0.9251748,0.003695864,0.01822321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002215069,0.0006820566,0.7880183,0.0005650771,0.0001599872,0.00006640762,0.000204729,0.03821094,0.04065329,0.06981975,0.05896872,0.0004356583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915314,0.002649297,0.0006368365,0.0007670509,0.0004417931,0.00006681052,0.000117779,0.000004752495,0.003784322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970831,0.0004325836,0.002071432,0.00001853375,0.0001172052,6.397415e-7,0.000005909218,0.0000108228,0.0002597417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.855355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3062527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964358926","doi":"10.54648/trad2019025","title":"Recent Evolution in International Trade in the Transatlantic Area: Unexpected Consequences or Nothing New Under the Sun?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global Political and Economic Relations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Transatlantic relations; Alliance; General partnership; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Economic integration; Trade agreement; International free trade agreement; Free trade; Trade diversion; Political science; Trade barrier; Geopolitics; Negotiation; Economics; Economy; Politics; Foreign policy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04906677345559683,"gpt":0.3082508978536328,"spread":0.259184124398036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007203505,0.00006192326,0.0001294756,0.0001168032,0.00008731365,0.00007959613,0.000355599,0.00004010752,0.0003198626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009575114,0.00003301294,0.00007061549,0.000382549,0.000139017,0.0002573447,0.000004359809,0.0003406055,0.000006801032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002911226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003061449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001348133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01367278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988604,0.00020161,0.0003995694,0.00007449576,0.0002638493,0.0002000321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999229,0.000513627,0.0001332113,0.00005867498,0.000007954129,0.00005758086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003015889,0.0004549042,0.07606847,0.000009774066,0.000145566,0.00007710599,0.09188341,0.01212665,0.0003942369,0.8070941,0.006890432,0.004553759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001715842,0.00007481514,0.702741,0.0001997855,0.00004260094,0.00008678695,0.05378106,0.0007826578,0.00001692782,0.06698864,0.1733837,0.0001861942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4542361,0.0002721539,0.00006997895,0.5319044,0.0006970783,0.0001709647,0.000001985126,0.000005172104,0.01264209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998095,0.0002081871,0.00004590749,0.001126032,0.0002602985,9.93999e-7,5.676634e-7,0.000002534677,0.0002605187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7401055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.762973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401367442","doi":"10.54648/trad2024037","title":"Article: Do Private Actors Have Rights under the WTO? The Motivation for and (Inadequate) Implementation of GATT Article X","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Private rights; Political science; International trade; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02571405267817499,"gpt":0.3261780161220807,"spread":0.3004639634439057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008330474,0.00007558869,0.0001104714,0.00009274887,0.0003570831,0.0001974996,0.0001636422,0.00002429295,0.0001295539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005746189,0.00004143983,0.00006866624,0.0005004142,0.0002015816,0.0004178597,0.00001217869,0.000143226,0.000001195608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007748484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007791789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005894178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00127326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988378,0.000153836,0.0003935928,0.00008842921,0.0003601015,0.0001662217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989265,0.0006468668,0.0002191265,0.00008417731,0.00006324123,0.0000600932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002889627,0.00006002893,0.01343273,0.00003335749,0.0001531263,0.000002274589,0.02279735,0.0001308296,0.008029537,0.9480168,0.002486221,0.004828915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014729,0.0001826258,0.6467288,0.0001917989,0.0003748363,0.00001729533,0.01797443,0.0004106626,0.08773801,0.1179402,0.1267291,0.0002393428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8829356,0.0002813675,0.001085702,0.1149097,0.0002771643,0.0003081031,0.000004352398,0.00001507485,0.0001828926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991305,0.00003684069,0.0001752686,0.0001779887,0.0003075702,0.000003277574,6.703892e-7,0.00001112068,0.0001567026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8300765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.274643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413230145","doi":"10.54648/trad2025040","title":"The Changing Faces of Deference under the WTO SPS and TBT Agreements","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Deference; International trade; Technical barriers to trade; Business; Scientific evidence; Political science; Standard of review; World trade; International economics; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Trade barrier; Judicial review","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01591050765842241,"gpt":0.2973039458078517,"spread":0.2813934381494293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007644725,0.00006466767,0.0001220178,0.000132831,0.0006195541,0.0001050597,0.000359628,0.00002020928,0.00003593976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008887974,0.00003557088,0.00004789669,0.000842238,0.000314682,0.0001162256,0.00003474183,0.0001624106,7.707234e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004014195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001070673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000329203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002422446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989736,0.0001573492,0.000283929,0.00006152624,0.0003492624,0.00017431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991347,0.0004175733,0.0002568721,0.00009151095,0.00005534889,0.0000439491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002352839,0.00006002037,0.02737013,0.00001768577,0.0001895043,0.00000320227,0.01337515,0.00008405192,0.0005480512,0.943085,0.002955642,0.01228803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001007486,0.00005813098,0.3005888,0.0003906677,0.000221023,0.000008766468,0.04720703,0.0000356607,0.004763867,0.02454673,0.620959,0.0002128014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5441518,0.005821411,0.0006906577,0.4183379,0.001392841,0.0003528195,0.000003719386,0.00002239283,0.02922643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962767,0.0004915988,0.00007874695,0.0004346787,0.0001070291,6.198333e-7,8.9329e-8,0.000003555437,0.002606971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9185383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4765172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300765884","doi":"10.54648/391905","title":"Revival of Grey-Area Measures? <i>The US–Canada Softwood Lumber Agreement: Conflict with the WTO Agreement on Safeguards</i>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agreement; Softwood; Engineering; Pulp and paper industry; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02756171055074994,"gpt":0.2237486471862452,"spread":0.1961869366354953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009271384,0.0002969065,0.0004823561,0.000119677,0.0003582801,0.0002086444,0.0006257175,0.00004194866,0.000287319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001355549,0.0001556312,0.0002840746,0.0006604205,0.0001979412,0.00044057,0.00004886704,0.0004766686,0.000005803414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002486496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001086399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01285908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06066629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971299,0.00008391889,0.0006820217,0.000181462,0.001463305,0.0004593742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981782,0.0001437832,0.0009440441,0.0003602308,0.000319131,0.00005455795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008689667,0.001633134,0.1070689,0.0006493613,0.001684569,0.0003589255,0.00278322,0.002522619,0.0001093011,0.008479119,0.8587196,0.01512226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002189639,0.0001877877,0.09694548,0.0003343789,0.0007052006,0.00002596525,0.003843513,0.00009717028,0.00008209387,0.0004496149,0.8947618,0.0003773728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7704611,0.002211254,0.00005995282,0.1314734,0.00104996,0.001160124,0.0000236862,0.00002938353,0.09353107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991007,0.00006931419,0.000009894135,0.006701786,0.00137334,0.000003429419,0.000001542074,0.00002132114,0.0008123569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2205459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}