{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"ebf19a7e050d","filters":{"venue":"Journal of academic language and learning"}},"results":[{"id":"W2146175970","doi":"","title":"Probing normalized institutional discourses about writing: The case of the doctoral thesis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of academic language and learning","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Academic writing; Professional writing; Vision; Pedagogy; Higher education; Perspective (graphical); Psychological intervention; Political science; Psychology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Doreen Stärke-Meyerring","is_ca":true},{"name":"Anthony Paré","is_ca":false},{"name":"King Yan Sun","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nazih El-Bezre","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01916321907251048,"gpt":0.2854380481082054,"spread":0.266274829035695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001351858,0.0001153521,0.0002546886,0.00007609664,0.0007953802,0.00008701281,0.0002445284,0.00004115736,0.000207811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006260088,0.00005247435,0.0001699626,0.00005592208,0.0005893799,0.0002883933,0.00009765444,0.000904321,0.000001231816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001454341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003781147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002068709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001594891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998791,0.0003026926,0.0004402907,0.00008365001,0.0002231205,0.000159181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988333,0.0003025953,0.0006125657,0.0001031064,0.0001147022,0.00003374505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008785851,0.00006961988,0.009439455,0.0001780293,0.0008889804,0.000370819,0.7115661,0.001860724,0.002541963,0.1710984,0.00121844,0.1006796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001354027,0.0001951777,0.00198282,0.001184771,0.001180459,0.002120801,0.9079051,0.001109054,0.001259901,0.0008024128,0.0805089,0.0003965476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856707,0.005374334,0.00004687244,0.001227628,0.0001779863,0.00005480177,0.000002696758,0.000007949065,0.007437051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972945,0.0001308167,0.00004338897,0.0002251277,0.001291977,0.00000175393,5.78051e-7,0.00000908456,0.001002762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.196339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6117501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109640497","doi":"","title":"Rhetorical genre theory and academic literacy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of academic language and learning","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Interpretation (philosophy); Literacy; Perspective (graphical); Action (physics); Repetition (rhetorical device); Sociology; Element (criminal law); Discourse community; Linguistics; Rhetorical modes; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Anthony Paré","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0165706978116509,"gpt":0.3083419952953892,"spread":0.2917712974837383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002113004,0.0001428983,0.0003300357,0.000169664,0.0002937776,0.00009196602,0.0001488871,0.0001001912,0.0003659932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001091907,0.00009735549,0.0000833842,0.00003853071,0.0002211501,0.0004583687,0.00008557525,0.00188608,0.000008272148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001463141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001253566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001273036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002017591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986307,0.0003887531,0.0004086955,0.0001353485,0.0002325931,0.0002039091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988373,0.0005377031,0.0003644387,0.00006737551,0.00008925416,0.0001039285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009698697,0.00001546593,0.003681666,0.00006900031,0.0002959662,0.0000617283,0.5398372,0.00001828446,0.001626947,0.0861882,0.001546143,0.3665624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001822795,0.0006553166,0.003683507,0.0007941225,0.0009976469,0.000583202,0.3965131,0.0004519595,0.000343826,0.009592109,0.583764,0.0007984133],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556357,0.03340919,0.0003267777,0.0004957372,0.0001977804,0.00003202425,0.000001053854,0.00002243545,0.009879356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988455,0.00183334,0.0001104413,0.0005780811,0.002746589,9.019354e-7,0.000001191139,0.00001712406,0.006257348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5822179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8194183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803987840","doi":"","title":"Using digital peer observation to balance professional development and performance evaluation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of academic language and learning","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collegiality; CLARITY; Process (computing); Peer feedback; Professional development; Computer science; Psychology; Process management; Pedagogy; Business","authors":[{"name":"Rachel Anna Maissan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Fiona Elizabeth Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0843463409123782,"gpt":0.4553213590818707,"spread":0.3709750181694925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003239808,0.00004222074,0.00006350157,0.00007085864,0.0004148675,0.00006191985,0.0000585531,0.00006197438,0.00002742243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002801337,0.00003531955,0.000007078629,0.0001325249,0.00004970254,0.001122876,0.00002271305,0.0004055275,0.000002916445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001318493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002961923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001344711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003095842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989935,0.0001724977,0.0001754058,0.00007238811,0.0004851122,0.0001010837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991137,0.00009866935,0.0002706491,0.0000196618,0.0004328768,0.00006442291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004331472,0.000009020108,0.2531051,0.000006585779,0.000009986672,4.943402e-7,0.2845092,0.00005576195,0.004222805,0.00002974369,0.00008781646,0.4579202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005571895,0.0002423842,0.7012101,0.0004739325,0.0000492351,0.00005328815,0.120465,0.005853996,0.002668356,0.0001527865,0.1680298,0.0002438878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964774,0.0002866717,0.0003217266,0.0009219356,0.0003589788,0.0000784762,7.078835e-8,0.000004435823,0.001550305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913965,0.00003738469,0.006362161,0.0001281188,0.0007946952,0.000001258918,7.593241e-7,0.0000038718,0.001275223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4576763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3353664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}