{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":16,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":16,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"a8ac5304ac59","filters":{"venue":"Journal of research practice"}},"results":[{"id":"W2169798898","doi":"","title":"Interdisciplinary Studies and the Bridging Disciplines: A Matter of Process","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Nomothetic and idiographic; Discipline; Nomothetic; Fallacy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Cross disciplinary; Epistemology; Process (computing); Consilience; Transdisciplinarity; Management science; Social science; Computer science; Data science; Engineering; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Dawn Youngblood","is_ca":false},{"name":"Edwin J. Foscue","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2099659428164786,"gpt":0.607393841136353,"spread":0.3974278983198744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04616569,0.0007995497,0.001278664,0.004358381,0.01219464,0.02418377,0.002971899,0.006819952,0.005296572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04052153,0.0006176665,0.0007142438,0.005021038,0.1144326,0.03320708,0.01606651,0.008806737,0.0009284799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005955409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01338214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001824768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001371809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9570836,0.03319443,0.001192728,0.002436902,0.004955749,0.001136565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9370521,0.0499373,0.002586919,0.005314963,0.0025187,0.002590104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000502253,0.00002225876,0.0002067268,0.00007824459,0.000004623955,0.00008008147,0.01654694,0.00007765835,0.00006762381,0.9743542,0.0007167885,0.007839932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001091713,0.00002295963,0.0001728631,0.0003702847,0.000004047617,0.00009825764,0.01594122,0.0001721393,0.0001026321,0.9089566,0.07413656,0.00001149285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04684255,0.05922274,0.313599,0.205709,0.003147834,0.0006948511,0.00006108511,0.0002250728,0.3704979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8486272,0.02171778,0.09373803,0.008309859,0.001950318,0.00100893,0.00005559512,0.0001831587,0.02440912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9538343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2441504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799302346","doi":"","title":"Ethical Issues in Designing Internet-Based Research: Recommendations for Good Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Transparency (behavior); Internet privacy; Research ethics; The Internet; Beneficence; Engineering ethics; Economic Justice; Ethical code; Context (archaeology); Online research methods; Internet research; Informed consent; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Autonomy; Law; World Wide Web; Medicine; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Shikha Gupta","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.921694402609945,"gpt":0.780984895918717,"spread":0.1407095066912279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5417965,0.004764224,0.005994406,0.01552505,0.02033229,0.03935687,0.01324261,0.0379592,0.008744322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5801305,0.003753798,0.006629726,0.0144151,0.04666069,0.04888968,0.02415362,0.05174077,0.008935737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02629386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1391119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01159674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02290664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4657907,0.4464871,0.03893807,0.005946112,0.03582804,0.007009986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1987736,0.6455091,0.01637235,0.02506083,0.08882603,0.02545801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001559512,0.001401762,0.00458926,0.01497932,0.0003170721,0.002161357,0.0499691,0.003148369,0.000436846,0.1791399,0.2727997,0.4709012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003966548,0.000283527,0.001740201,0.09438825,0.0002402073,0.001787723,0.07831414,0.002337376,0.000644416,0.4186353,0.4007358,0.0004963562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001628151,0.04002549,0.1013632,0.8199942,0.008956298,0.006958781,0.0001532912,0.0008567298,0.020064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02486418,0.07273303,0.7551811,0.1150649,0.003865343,0.02280951,0.0003556436,0.0006215821,0.004504681],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5650465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899397100","doi":"","title":"Management of a Multidisciplinary Research Project: A Case Study on Adopting Agile Methods","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agile software development; Facilitator; Teamwork; Knowledge management; Multidisciplinary approach; Project management; Process management; Engineering management; Engineering; Management science; Computer science; Systems engineering; Psychology; Management; Sociology; Software engineering","authors":[{"name":"Enric Senabre Hidalgo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3599830269811758,"gpt":0.6201785980844964,"spread":0.2601955711033206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03391402,0.001147047,0.001006589,0.002050743,0.01796564,0.005542706,0.004416782,0.006903626,0.001892828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04655203,0.0009100409,0.001454253,0.002258045,0.006356318,0.004804722,0.007420677,0.005837732,0.0008087137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003462991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005960772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002858968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005387133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9485024,0.04247069,0.001295564,0.001900906,0.00328829,0.002542179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465177,0.03133857,0.004063474,0.003333119,0.003894233,0.01085289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004742783,0.004338901,0.02012131,0.0009988049,0.0001205947,0.07566834,0.7864539,0.002252813,0.007909415,0.009564193,0.004835049,0.08726238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001494046,0.004811349,0.01213488,0.0009854831,0.00008726888,0.03865486,0.8430752,0.004985308,0.004539148,0.004713169,0.08562921,0.0002347508],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.945732,0.0007134593,0.03201593,0.008467923,0.0001995372,0.001215743,0.00006120843,0.0001267744,0.0114673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468086,0.001285253,0.04384806,0.001561008,0.0001227444,0.0008999146,0.00007496103,0.0001236148,0.005275782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.966086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1793566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794681790","doi":"","title":"Key Components of Collaborative Research in the Context of Environmental Health: A Scoping Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge translation; Context (archaeology); Key (lock); Knowledge management; Process (computing); Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Osnat Wine","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sarah Ambrose","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sandy Campbell","is_ca":true},{"name":"Paul J. Villeneuve","is_ca":true},{"name":"Katharina Kovacs Burns","is_ca":true},{"name":"Álvaro Osornio-Vargas","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9598877167473072,"gpt":0.841997747110411,"spread":0.1178899696368962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1226311,0.002782229,0.006746127,0.04483699,0.005346113,0.01454377,0.004183644,0.007267906,0.002798698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2317626,0.002709562,0.006863557,0.04482866,0.00630593,0.01482293,0.008688786,0.005038958,0.0008129408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01413802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07325408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01012951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02339706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8764674,0.0665646,0.0341874,0.004052857,0.01668311,0.002044679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6868258,0.2539947,0.019631,0.006667273,0.03083758,0.002043705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001139213,0.000100082,0.001098885,0.474932,0.001270963,0.000298813,0.006932916,0.0003687306,0.000382132,0.01346144,0.00394644,0.4970938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003681623,0.0001050286,0.001231495,0.8922944,0.002876349,0.0004418881,0.004097297,0.00020877,0.0003638594,0.005576196,0.09270507,0.00006290288],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006012971,0.9897664,0.003127207,0.002601482,0.000493699,0.001637168,0.00005971147,0.00001713811,0.001695734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008937567,0.9728864,0.01269129,0.0008620092,0.0002110991,0.004041025,0.0001172974,0.00001253265,0.000240796],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8773689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6485431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587902391","doi":"","title":"Self-Reporting in Plagiarism Research: How Honest is This Approach?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Phenomenon; Reliability (semiconductor); Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Power (physics)","authors":[{"name":"Julia Ann Colella-Sandercock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3082897255954191,"gpt":0.5172569451949262,"spread":0.208967219599507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5983971,0.001163447,0.003387836,0.008786465,0.008329517,0.01807115,0.007213718,0.009264393,0.001954229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.815392,0.001962764,0.002442941,0.008828395,0.03005463,0.02839498,0.01285775,0.01420945,0.001821859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006836619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01540331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008662913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01054729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2727472,0.5811422,0.04855847,0.01213778,0.08301365,0.002400757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09350096,0.6434512,0.08905336,0.06095333,0.1077104,0.005330793],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006496958,0.0005283939,0.1820956,0.009701111,0.001909443,0.000662383,0.2803244,0.0006363778,0.001725382,0.04811853,0.04266624,0.4309824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004325807,0.001946608,0.1801783,0.08733431,0.002157052,0.005697538,0.2348799,0.008492425,0.007300896,0.2088551,0.2610229,0.001702314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1000469,0.0724712,0.2005846,0.5708867,0.01734506,0.002792319,0.0005792292,0.0006905054,0.03460358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6697755,0.04168613,0.1562502,0.1075039,0.01218347,0.006296537,0.0004094343,0.0006277894,0.005266938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.495248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2560574590","doi":"","title":"Bench, Bedside, Curbside, and Home: Translational Research to Include Transformative Change Using Educational Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Translational research; Bench to bedside; Transformative learning; Translational science; Medicine; Medical education; Translational medicine; Population; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Christoper Felege","is_ca":false},{"name":"Emily Clare Hahn","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cheryl Hunter","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rebecca Gleditsch","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7297673156214933,"gpt":0.6650631427688739,"spread":0.06470417285261942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07114147,0.001052294,0.001455802,0.00377132,0.007622158,0.02082301,0.003631974,0.01703972,0.005476511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04355046,0.0008600118,0.002158269,0.00368875,0.0939023,0.03622295,0.0192228,0.0179364,0.001796931],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01361799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04803039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00465572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007195712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9147888,0.06538894,0.004434726,0.004017056,0.008979309,0.002391231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9277854,0.04375632,0.006062866,0.01172848,0.005642139,0.005024718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004399128,0.0001946785,0.0009251127,0.001126813,0.00002834178,0.0001917543,0.02041933,0.0002967745,0.0003241637,0.9265507,0.007329534,0.04256874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006836627,0.0004312948,0.001884194,0.003918498,0.00006095137,0.0006983216,0.02220341,0.0008258743,0.001134352,0.7761395,0.1925367,0.00009858583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01415104,0.02973419,0.2284079,0.5904759,0.006618129,0.001250014,0.0001272655,0.0005854385,0.1286501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5343961,0.02194977,0.2595485,0.1617573,0.00308804,0.003257481,0.00014336,0.0002676552,0.01559183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3762366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560183138","doi":"","title":"Challenges of T3 and T4 Translational Research.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Translational research; Translational science; Medical research; Translational medicine; Engineering ethics; Translational research informatics; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Health care; Sociology; Social science; Engineering; Health informatics","authors":[{"name":"Jr. Charles J. Vukotich","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6927599107837089,"gpt":0.6578854780149989,"spread":0.03487443276871005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4816464,0.001741465,0.003742442,0.004501338,0.01099525,0.03326656,0.01092693,0.02842852,0.01204885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4203565,0.001593484,0.004770373,0.00489074,0.07404189,0.03684152,0.02811768,0.03813559,0.004133348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02152138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1310144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009136112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006678541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5349535,0.3110297,0.03242825,0.02240488,0.08716003,0.0120236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3120223,0.5767737,0.01983074,0.02531243,0.04518378,0.0208771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002788484,0.000369884,0.002458806,0.005386394,0.0002199977,0.0006327278,0.01253482,0.0008233507,0.0005033532,0.8001028,0.08633047,0.09035851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002232469,0.0004420778,0.001241777,0.005857412,0.00007944226,0.000659837,0.01307205,0.001150914,0.0003568701,0.7414232,0.2353257,0.0001673259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001997555,0.02113692,0.01426196,0.9356535,0.007377336,0.0004040552,0.0001206784,0.00007642947,0.0189716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13153,0.03248341,0.07281197,0.7368361,0.01471458,0.003959243,0.0003942696,0.0002359762,0.007034433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5183536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6392223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533795429","doi":"","title":"Reflections on Giving Back and Giving Thanks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Virtue; Power (physics); Reciprocal; Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Social science; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jade S. Sasser","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6420454206178962,"gpt":0.7204314439347254,"spread":0.0783860233168292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07169383,0.001517876,0.001530422,0.002927463,0.03278343,0.02293291,0.005927932,0.01846984,0.01239873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1805257,0.001405639,0.002846897,0.002719015,0.0395157,0.02791829,0.02947501,0.04863829,0.003476747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01286165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01163556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008189877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007228129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8862591,0.08750817,0.002976533,0.002843742,0.01023303,0.01017946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8896759,0.07481746,0.004343948,0.004951976,0.01494449,0.01126624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006393185,0.00006874754,0.0006171492,0.0003304885,0.00001279063,0.001979052,0.8717716,0.0001066132,0.0004060616,0.0490443,0.0651885,0.01041072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000869107,0.00004450615,0.000319318,0.0007075467,0.000006522871,0.0007246646,0.6828174,0.00005966826,0.000295449,0.007643418,0.3073123,0.00006044385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1102945,0.009837772,0.01430552,0.707234,0.06476752,0.000555705,0.0003938302,0.000480429,0.09213081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.676609,0.01052141,0.007249867,0.2145825,0.00891854,0.001054346,0.0002255694,0.001678709,0.07915999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07169383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3791577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1754593537","doi":"","title":"Logic of Leadership Research: A Reflective Review of Geeks & Geezers by Bennis and Thomas","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Leadership; Pseudoscience; Transactional leadership; Field (mathematics); Neuroleadership; Servant leadership; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Engineering; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"D. P. Dash","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.908325353870032,"gpt":0.7081043829731254,"spread":0.2002209708969066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009145251,0.0008533071,0.001862965,0.006909319,0.001476375,0.005345241,0.001308628,0.002789283,0.001979431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01916216,0.0009641906,0.0006824008,0.01160954,0.004081013,0.006764505,0.002077682,0.005024505,0.001635657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007677201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01089108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01052102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01805409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935986,0.003119164,0.0005042325,0.000389263,0.002208739,0.0001799291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852135,0.01072294,0.0005928833,0.0001821421,0.003010752,0.0002778006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007762293,0.00008089239,0.0003112557,0.01847382,0.000110602,0.0002282427,0.0023716,0.0006056876,0.0003075729,0.0668631,0.4465661,0.4640036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012848,0.00003238277,0.0005349014,0.01371132,0.00002129311,0.0002514107,0.000479191,0.00007296568,0.00006407902,0.01081836,0.9739821,0.00001912197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005211174,0.9890036,0.0002346334,0.007903626,0.001607533,0.00000996256,0.000007824559,0.000002805474,0.001177868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001052116,0.990927,0.0006448529,0.004609415,0.001379422,0.00003286482,0.00001840478,0.00000637517,0.001329558],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01052102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05570221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2923483049","doi":"","title":"Toward a Dialogue: Following Professional Standards on Education Achievement Testing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Test (biology); Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Sociocultural evolution; Process (computing); Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Gabriel M. Della‐Piana","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael K. Gardner","is_ca":false},{"name":"Zachary Mayne","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4493990704713637,"gpt":0.6295861663902028,"spread":0.1801870959188391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3135305,0.001163098,0.002279517,0.004902562,0.02500193,0.03313791,0.008001942,0.04105937,0.003330986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3402176,0.001975154,0.001729251,0.003108158,0.05785807,0.03886406,0.03639263,0.05377011,0.001761915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01789481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06470524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005285544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007171033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6124234,0.31111,0.020115,0.01037979,0.03436847,0.01160344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4263319,0.4549792,0.0188282,0.01422244,0.05022483,0.03541328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000854972,0.0005089635,0.004152849,0.0009581047,0.00005895738,0.003227112,0.5443264,0.0006592277,0.001015577,0.1997514,0.1136897,0.1315662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000443694,0.0002503465,0.001207371,0.003033801,0.00002397363,0.001139982,0.3684843,0.0009078591,0.00070109,0.1646558,0.4593573,0.0001937946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008673177,0.003064535,0.02063413,0.9533603,0.003691484,0.0002014506,0.00001501477,0.0001157664,0.01024418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3923538,0.008153245,0.1511214,0.4269462,0.005187181,0.001548021,0.00007806855,0.0003368028,0.01427525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3135305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8465391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761882915","doi":"","title":"Current Reflections on Collaborative and Engaged Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Island Health; Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Public relations; Work (physics); Sociology; Service (business); Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Political science; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing","authors":[{"name":"L.M. Rodrigues","is_ca":false},{"name":"Carson McPherson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Wendy B. Young","is_ca":true},{"name":"Johanne Hémond","is_ca":true},{"name":"Dawn Waterhouse","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6274307155394501,"gpt":0.67210938402631,"spread":0.04467866848685997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1484304,0.001126556,0.001428077,0.004645732,0.02260763,0.05277242,0.007958602,0.02036355,0.01659606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.186116,0.001139594,0.001588126,0.007053148,0.1213931,0.06837332,0.03475363,0.02300751,0.003087159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01795191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02983684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005630853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006391309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7415542,0.1949783,0.007091412,0.01329795,0.0313578,0.01172034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6399533,0.2979213,0.007717354,0.02386225,0.01775268,0.01279327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004488098,0.0001182688,0.0004674204,0.0008424817,0.00001682554,0.0002497592,0.09893591,0.0001906004,0.0001123526,0.8478115,0.02051338,0.03069671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003875963,0.00006131399,0.0004096279,0.002325,0.00001130469,0.000333583,0.1641441,0.0002151081,0.0002041756,0.3170642,0.5151504,0.0000423268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01850647,0.04818422,0.02396655,0.6674752,0.007314192,0.0001877798,0.00009786326,0.0001602846,0.2341075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7955527,0.06899859,0.02197791,0.07539054,0.007686583,0.001297634,0.0002199041,0.0005210184,0.02835508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8515696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7849844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166349898","doi":"","title":"Submission Reviewers for Volume 1, 2005","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Physics","authors":[{"name":"D. P. Dash","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1639792908245669,"gpt":0.4838223853261843,"spread":0.3198430945016174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009131818,0.001237921,0.002062322,0.007502233,0.003917353,0.01275229,0.002398656,0.004520501,0.3764789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05623103,0.0008181203,0.001216868,0.002694333,0.0006589342,0.003349987,0.002280991,0.002389036,0.2515826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00233244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006978022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003461698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01135726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923734,0.001114488,0.0006932585,0.0004794721,0.004837712,0.0005015705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8829998,0.005811922,0.001931282,0.003178159,0.09820478,0.007873976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004052298,0.00002031498,0.00008625713,0.0000927857,0.000004469423,0.00003399183,0.00002134256,0.00002006042,0.0001131053,0.0003666024,0.979226,0.0199746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004536266,0.00006173382,0.0008883044,0.0001929982,0.0000167937,0.00007599331,0.0001782204,0.0001852685,0.0003262697,0.001052372,0.9969529,0.00002386711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003341891,0.005837161,0.007610756,0.05928501,0.7001081,0.002724196,0.003709667,0.003474254,0.2139089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005257931,0.002339867,0.003333736,0.00500563,0.02910932,0.0005088414,0.001839011,0.001232827,0.9513728],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8893772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523471975","doi":"","title":"Sensitive Research and the Collision of Advocacy and Research: Consequences for the Researcher","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Public relations; Social research; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Mary W. Stewart","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7530849627667346,"gpt":0.7189146914319636,"spread":0.03417027133477102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6683478,0.002530187,0.006970298,0.009462029,0.05663798,0.04974903,0.01054816,0.03543692,0.00525568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5994422,0.005467192,0.003173251,0.009106155,0.3401776,0.08403814,0.06598903,0.05256593,0.001531215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02645162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06008308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006334709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005167025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1007305,0.8381132,0.0133297,0.01235511,0.03103134,0.004440162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1497135,0.7519179,0.02133671,0.04285629,0.02196954,0.01220612],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001431541,0.0001453431,0.001341575,0.0009701781,0.00009143173,0.001022605,0.2580014,0.0001746623,0.0002236996,0.7120339,0.006815358,0.01903664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002236071,0.0002596283,0.0005674147,0.004913697,0.00007428856,0.002448275,0.224002,0.0009548615,0.000429922,0.6897296,0.07618085,0.0002157765],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02044397,0.01975099,0.1057873,0.8035716,0.006091868,0.001284249,0.0000407623,0.0001679636,0.04286132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7171387,0.01079694,0.08958823,0.1622458,0.005071759,0.007360526,0.0000338813,0.0004131246,0.007351137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3316522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4089863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758938526","doi":"","title":"A Book for Students of Science and Practicing Scientists: Review of Peter M. Pruzan's 'Research Methodology: The Aims, Practices and Ethics of Science'","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Sociology; Science education; Science communication; Nature of Science; Pedagogy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"M. A. Uman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9436903171255073,"gpt":0.7908841705163858,"spread":0.1528061466091215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003046022,0.000628538,0.001265119,0.003231951,0.001275465,0.003752159,0.001251926,0.002796183,0.00630553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008168142,0.0005721874,0.0005414807,0.004552858,0.003268198,0.005392416,0.002111551,0.005506777,0.005091195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002633382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004180655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004415214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01080609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978839,0.0006706112,0.0001337944,0.0001516978,0.001088273,0.00007181867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948766,0.00302775,0.0002302649,0.00008804841,0.001497923,0.0002794119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107752,0.00003310396,0.00007262096,0.001848856,0.000009507246,0.00007151131,0.0008811124,0.0001353984,0.0001723653,0.01601838,0.8093084,0.1714379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000218885,0.000009028374,0.0001784361,0.00116217,0.000003070698,0.0001260883,0.0001607941,0.00002027202,0.00002214925,0.001616535,0.9966942,0.000005091025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002848508,0.9074448,0.001795006,0.04534932,0.01923039,0.00005533746,0.00005616512,0.00004052991,0.02574354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003109413,0.903131,0.003835679,0.02786808,0.01200045,0.0001500973,0.0001764683,0.0001246117,0.04960422],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.996954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02109402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899330006","doi":"","title":"Gaining a Fuller Picture of Sex Trafficking in Manitoba: A Case Study of Narrative-Based Research Utilizing 'Low Tech' Thematic Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Interview; Thematic analysis; Transferability; Sociology; Relevance (law); Qualitative research; Grounded theory; Gender studies; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Anthropology; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Robert Chrismas","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6952530294524429,"gpt":0.6777321517405274,"spread":0.01752087771191557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00584995,0.0007568377,0.0006319071,0.002553003,0.03300064,0.005821121,0.003125101,0.003081195,0.002056567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007587079,0.0006474883,0.0003532855,0.004723951,0.01204408,0.002371937,0.006262651,0.002734959,0.0002521324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02048045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03374681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5208492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8147323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962973,0.002414836,0.0000944921,0.0001695259,0.0003453876,0.0006784104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942971,0.003548976,0.0004921749,0.0002368981,0.000730168,0.0006947772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001107889,0.00003834552,0.002564556,0.00007153072,0.000003614028,0.003951082,0.9882892,0.00005424945,0.0003175799,0.001786775,0.0003076001,0.002604321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001362928,0.00001562622,0.001277259,0.0001085006,0.000004472609,0.0004828417,0.9917371,0.00006232732,0.0001379441,0.0001602381,0.006007043,0.000005342557],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813067,0.001152824,0.001643758,0.003512898,0.00005665333,0.0003639911,0.00009573568,0.00001243992,0.01185503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834424,0.002746018,0.003405973,0.001022961,0.00002214327,0.0002635319,0.00007333972,0.00002208519,0.009001593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4791508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9639453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569632423","doi":"","title":"Anthropologist-Parents as Researchers: A Critical Appreciation of 'Doing Fieldwork in China . . . With Kids!' by Cornet and Blumenfield","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); China; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Gender studies; Anthropology; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Malathi Raghavan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1242248891913106,"gpt":0.5257398825266907,"spread":0.4015149933353801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03149638,0.001018978,0.000749114,0.001275815,0.01759773,0.009874348,0.002483628,0.004292278,0.001196955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02346514,0.0009123021,0.0003156057,0.001870873,0.03866437,0.01339759,0.006258166,0.0104632,0.0001949356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006378075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01035108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01152718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02055475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9696362,0.02756861,0.0003092732,0.0005320131,0.001196018,0.0007577901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760692,0.01960226,0.0009965821,0.000681589,0.001233237,0.001417152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006483754,0.00001423092,0.0004680314,0.0001039804,0.000005229834,0.0006738352,0.9641665,0.00002788887,0.0001566806,0.01612174,0.01159982,0.006655632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006318347,0.00004547305,0.001139746,0.0005357589,0.000006636464,0.0006215101,0.7950514,0.0001039099,0.0001899117,0.007489257,0.1947888,0.00002131921],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.209204,0.1238323,0.02660793,0.5402468,0.0164137,0.0007337523,0.00006568926,0.0002884923,0.08260733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8772771,0.03919215,0.01016595,0.04035695,0.002730584,0.0007038435,0.00003145491,0.0001607348,0.02938124],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1665708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}