{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":16,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":16,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"a8ac5304ac59","filters":{"venue":"Journal of research practice"}},"results":[{"id":"W2169798898","doi":"","title":"Interdisciplinary Studies and the Bridging Disciplines: A Matter of Process","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Nomothetic and idiographic; Discipline; Nomothetic; Fallacy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Cross disciplinary; Epistemology; Process (computing); Consilience; Transdisciplinarity; Management science; Social science; Computer science; Data science; Engineering; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2099659428164786,"gpt":0.607393841136353,"spread":0.3974278983198744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08048923,0.0001117738,0.0004283636,0.0009557777,0.0005978119,0.00038194,0.001015639,0.00005067743,0.00006110143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03745516,0.00005266467,0.000120527,0.002138391,0.001493762,0.002379882,0.001408364,0.001004838,0.00004168735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008147452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003451365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004197188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005382399,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914239,0.001926974,0.001367376,0.0002431492,0.004597868,0.0004407275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9590799,0.02669932,0.001121723,0.0004150231,0.0124982,0.0001858102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1346891,0.001694511,0.03102452,0.001054532,0.002128158,0.002697936,0.3101975,0.0005129817,0.005894211,0.01726886,0.3592754,0.1335623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003105766,0.00175906,0.01137028,0.0006573253,0.00006419081,0.001679029,0.835195,0.0008363197,0.002306637,0.1375109,0.00534829,0.0001672734],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8236951,0.005651365,0.005247114,0.1508263,0.0004387601,0.0005566758,0.000003612383,0.000005119263,0.01357593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968177,0.0001657264,0.0006928639,0.0001019132,0.0005082304,0.000006433319,1.428543e-7,0.000009340252,0.00169767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5249975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799302346","doi":"","title":"Ethical Issues in Designing Internet-Based Research: Recommendations for Good Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Transparency (behavior); Internet privacy; Research ethics; The Internet; Beneficence; Engineering ethics; Economic Justice; Ethical code; Context (archaeology); Online research methods; Internet research; Informed consent; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Autonomy; Law; World Wide Web; Medicine; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.921694402609945,"gpt":0.780984895918717,"spread":0.1407095066912279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3098672,0.0001645258,0.0005793392,0.001471786,0.001067466,0.0009682746,0.001695918,0.0010037,0.0002412015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9149704,0.000139047,0.0002265092,0.0006944743,0.001499204,0.002008838,0.0006431252,0.03334731,0.00009756139],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008128223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00593914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009330967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003251158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9806162,0.009615998,0.001569064,0.000563102,0.006351188,0.001284424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4946361,0.4679323,0.001354405,0.001705414,0.03341215,0.0009596993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.08002844,0.01202276,0.008206059,0.002809958,0.001384619,0.01010084,0.007589774,0.00004956211,0.01049688,0.2128425,0.593738,0.06073065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005998107,0.007897044,0.0009105256,0.004396286,0.00009567512,0.0005133238,0.009963474,0.0009540226,0.005362354,0.03455467,0.9291783,0.0001762151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002573582,0.0008151921,0.00461624,0.9595927,0.0003743851,0.001268909,0.000005091395,0.00001442857,0.03073945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5354618,0.008335078,0.4348623,0.005304014,0.00229708,0.00017425,0.000007232573,0.0001139812,0.01344431],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899397100","doi":"","title":"Management of a Multidisciplinary Research Project: A Case Study on Adopting Agile Methods","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agile software development; Facilitator; Teamwork; Knowledge management; Multidisciplinary approach; Project management; Process management; Engineering management; Engineering; Management science; Computer science; Systems engineering; Psychology; Management; Sociology; Software engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3599830269811758,"gpt":0.6201785980844964,"spread":0.2601955711033206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0657598,0.0001276012,0.0002511994,0.001324192,0.0004713456,0.0002872816,0.001494085,0.00006969683,0.000009123636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01263258,0.0001015301,0.00007805767,0.002708053,0.0001765455,0.001957075,0.001457788,0.002006028,0.00001340111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001584977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003387582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003305145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003751669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907136,0.005463715,0.0006104856,0.0003421404,0.002333535,0.0005365484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784992,0.0145868,0.0005212731,0.0009191815,0.005319871,0.000153723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002833963,0.01149349,0.0007909405,0.000829232,0.001574271,0.2330384,0.06608851,0.0002642552,0.001733459,0.009878191,0.02558264,0.6458926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005212539,0.09200153,0.002193239,0.003640499,0.0002732045,0.07871656,0.3073843,0.03175263,0.01436906,0.004321476,0.4590127,0.001122236],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1821712,0.0009302955,0.8001133,0.003360864,0.0009733831,0.002383786,0.000001585208,0.0001852767,0.009880285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3138828,0.0001363292,0.685522,0.00000889336,0.0002346418,0.00002817748,4.003194e-8,0.00001475943,0.000172322],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6447704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794681790","doi":"","title":"Key Components of Collaborative Research in the Context of Environmental Health: A Scoping Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge translation; Context (archaeology); Key (lock); Knowledge management; Process (computing); Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9598877167473072,"gpt":0.841997747110411,"spread":0.1178899696368962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.243633,0.0002459422,0.002953922,0.001636622,0.001532966,0.00004493373,0.002672807,0.0002522816,0.0002574898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08603007,0.000157515,0.0002454855,0.002276647,0.001149614,0.001046097,0.000656111,0.008149952,0.0001455412],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001631669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02931632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001029484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002631019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8736207,0.1121231,0.006059308,0.0003670378,0.006433694,0.001396171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8815942,0.1012869,0.01234465,0.001132533,0.003208187,0.0004335087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002094502,0.0004567673,0.00005454289,0.4846598,0.00013545,0.0001183912,0.02718309,6.628137e-8,0.000004280051,0.0003933802,0.05839355,0.4283913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004230004,0.0004797499,0.0000307212,0.3788329,0.00003118717,0.00005161937,0.01443598,1.854181e-7,2.405528e-7,0.00001544696,0.6056452,0.00005370974],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001878026,0.9501455,0.00000282664,0.03811908,0.0002354717,0.0093072,0.0002381358,0.000001629945,0.001931418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001737145,0.9963669,0.0004650149,0.002241483,0.0002752411,0.0003253915,0.000008765556,0.00003031162,0.0001131589],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5472517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587902391","doi":"","title":"Self-Reporting in Plagiarism Research: How Honest is This Approach?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Phenomenon; Reliability (semiconductor); Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Power (physics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3082897255954191,"gpt":0.5172569451949262,"spread":0.208967219599507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2100589,0.0001266563,0.0003505231,0.001146711,0.001079049,0.0004101502,0.001167448,0.001086452,0.0003637155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2637713,0.00008502383,0.0001346485,0.001875781,0.0008917406,0.003657389,0.0002367119,0.01270121,0.000185554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009421115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002922024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003059937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001726228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9791498,0.01165716,0.001167166,0.0003487284,0.006304592,0.001372574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693644,0.02254942,0.001783283,0.0003190365,0.005469346,0.000514478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008322547,0.001058515,0.01036036,0.0001353857,0.0002417304,0.002386554,0.1515135,0.000001306755,0.002173812,0.04525704,0.7575334,0.02850614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005163356,0.0001888561,0.0002974633,0.0002784271,0.00001311135,0.0002734907,0.06144582,0.00002669058,0.0004304666,0.004732394,0.9316711,0.0001258298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04257365,0.001502639,0.001139427,0.5400162,0.0005945708,0.0006915633,0.000005171132,0.00004582981,0.413431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9303091,0.01464845,0.02351668,0.0007061055,0.003723416,0.00002217746,5.143887e-7,0.00004111181,0.02703242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8877355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2560574590","doi":"","title":"Bench, Bedside, Curbside, and Home: Translational Research to Include Transformative Change Using Educational Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Translational research; Bench to bedside; Transformative learning; Translational science; Medicine; Medical education; Translational medicine; Population; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7297673156214933,"gpt":0.6650631427688739,"spread":0.06470417285261942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09233081,0.000185087,0.0004973016,0.004014376,0.0009992803,0.0001610025,0.0004711605,0.0002567318,0.0009117981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3050832,0.0001188312,0.0001041357,0.003279411,0.001283422,0.002663161,0.0002228417,0.004782433,0.000189819],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00134058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02246733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005144618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005825963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9788376,0.005653678,0.00100014,0.0004214676,0.01141654,0.002670576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9133261,0.05401072,0.000229191,0.0005213523,0.02008827,0.0118244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02914511,0.004242679,0.01107452,0.002335029,0.0006469599,0.001876688,0.0334524,0.000003069061,0.08156539,0.01182898,0.3445549,0.4792743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007525447,0.0103334,0.03790387,0.005318136,0.00005884929,0.0042157,0.008551255,0.0001246819,0.003290839,0.01033089,0.9120241,0.0003228606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3039207,0.00296999,0.0004966072,0.6843312,0.000180416,0.001931947,0.00003405111,0.000007749855,0.006127309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689745,0.01082917,0.01094831,0.003334676,0.00390526,0.0001356637,0.000005960071,0.00006817628,0.001798313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6809965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560183138","doi":"","title":"Challenges of T3 and T4 Translational Research.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Translational research; Translational science; Medical research; Translational medicine; Engineering ethics; Translational research informatics; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Health care; Sociology; Social science; Engineering; Health informatics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6927599107837089,"gpt":0.6578854780149989,"spread":0.03487443276871005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05494945,0.00007424368,0.0003175841,0.000930045,0.0001237976,0.00001919069,0.0001867291,0.0001324809,0.0002226074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3868211,0.00004073261,0.00006532986,0.0004902553,0.0008207919,0.0007081357,0.00006893514,0.001821436,0.00003285973],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001515762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008138756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003611119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000789264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909306,0.002139619,0.0005530003,0.0001669742,0.005227669,0.000982173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525191,0.03262267,0.0002664278,0.0003518998,0.008443017,0.005796916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00942722,0.0009925365,0.001009946,0.001142213,0.0002129576,0.001292131,0.001460753,1.141574e-7,0.03075708,0.01523013,0.05563994,0.882835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005102797,0.00782076,0.01753966,0.002478705,0.00002957513,0.002285813,0.002776332,0.000009162306,0.003511924,0.004656859,0.9537199,0.00006858511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07187227,0.02111292,0.0002283269,0.8669567,0.00008946678,0.0005176235,0.000006078444,0.00000665888,0.03921001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099888,0.08543582,0.002449557,0.0004345054,0.0007335209,0.000005867061,2.819024e-7,0.00001797627,0.0009336536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8980799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533795429","doi":"","title":"Reflections on Giving Back and Giving Thanks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Virtue; Power (physics); Reciprocal; Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Social science; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6420454206178962,"gpt":0.7204314439347254,"spread":0.0783860233168292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1217778,0.00006635741,0.0001682041,0.0004136772,0.001379222,0.0004152844,0.0003001855,0.0001164297,0.00024871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2199167,0.00005361381,0.00006019962,0.0007200837,0.0009430385,0.00121967,0.00009388323,0.002534854,0.00006910817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000189512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006273811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007307566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003070039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9754043,0.02138866,0.0002849449,0.0001489165,0.002266082,0.0005070776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454021,0.05155142,0.0002459887,0.0001404494,0.002272501,0.0003875212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006209003,0.0004222297,0.0005542568,0.0001993235,0.0001697888,0.00008253511,0.09449893,0.00002476445,0.004421684,0.7416269,0.02216288,0.1352159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001976877,0.0007309296,0.0004542112,0.0001605697,0.000005268579,0.0000252851,0.04296071,0.00003453254,0.00009716576,0.02741504,0.9278565,0.00006209857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01364446,0.0004847146,0.01336555,0.191516,0.0003689631,0.000236975,0.000001593864,0.00001478521,0.780367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8251573,0.01227804,0.1294224,0.00138872,0.003755446,0.000008955512,2.082947e-7,0.00004162809,0.02794732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9056937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1754593537","doi":"","title":"Logic of Leadership Research: A Reflective Review of Geeks & Geezers by Bennis and Thomas","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Leadership; Pseudoscience; Transactional leadership; Field (mathematics); Neuroleadership; Servant leadership; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Engineering; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.908325353870032,"gpt":0.7081043829731254,"spread":0.2002209708969066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1996297,0.0003975019,0.00430635,0.003891738,0.0003556778,0.0004383743,0.003167852,0.0004340817,0.0004515901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2939127,0.0002418442,0.001051278,0.006704204,0.001143921,0.001449382,0.001063775,0.005164099,0.00008716666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004050744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002749686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009283581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001838307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9463692,0.02844066,0.005986982,0.0009023905,0.01729698,0.001003782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8568446,0.1161047,0.007352231,0.001336314,0.01783477,0.0005273639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001370466,0.0001520627,0.000001274893,0.01318387,0.000174505,0.0001253375,0.0002099674,2.906757e-7,0.000006949009,0.001001089,0.3029487,0.6820589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002462231,0.001007629,0.000002328146,0.0982425,0.0001984383,0.00147709,0.004062943,0.000003336585,0.000002203373,0.002497915,0.8920944,0.0001649986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002076313,0.978353,0.0002147157,0.003279178,0.0001828957,0.001158866,0.00003525974,0.000004151187,0.01676982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000457414,0.9915788,0.003595205,0.0001478949,0.0004156969,0.00001906115,0.000001016282,0.00004246123,0.004154101],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6818939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2923483049","doi":"","title":"Toward a Dialogue: Following Professional Standards on Education Achievement Testing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Test (biology); Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Sociocultural evolution; Process (computing); Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4493990704713637,"gpt":0.6295861663902028,"spread":0.1801870959188391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05154277,0.0001078147,0.0002033283,0.0007707735,0.0005715383,0.0005801202,0.0008248885,0.00005337799,0.0003226517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1395109,0.00006985606,0.0001164399,0.001408749,0.0001247242,0.001856711,0.0002046881,0.0008645934,0.0001640916],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006172226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007781855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003182686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005335248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870124,0.001595697,0.0008816947,0.0002746255,0.009871206,0.0003643796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694817,0.01474168,0.0009292601,0.0003423805,0.01422632,0.0002786281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001450064,0.004465778,0.01686555,0.00002382689,0.0001896033,0.00005516066,0.00427585,0.00001108928,0.008162051,0.01101416,0.6430988,0.3103881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008058033,0.004966346,0.02371505,0.0004328242,0.00003055253,0.00006568763,0.02872119,0.0000855824,0.001729142,0.03378502,0.9055026,0.000160263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7657031,0.0003140539,0.001639853,0.1418477,0.009359733,0.0007140664,0.000010955,0.00001479599,0.08039582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756799,0.00001724302,0.01550499,0.001313238,0.002725481,0.00002010259,0.000001375158,0.00001157151,0.004726097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3102278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761882915","doi":"","title":"Current Reflections on Collaborative and Engaged Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Island Health; Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Public relations; Work (physics); Sociology; Service (business); Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Political science; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6274307155394501,"gpt":0.67210938402631,"spread":0.04467866848685997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1321458,0.0000613092,0.0001315207,0.0004705112,0.02478349,0.001250242,0.0009038132,0.00006752757,0.00008134716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1575421,0.00005307831,0.00003382856,0.0005878009,0.0008233407,0.001205475,0.0002903889,0.01090597,0.00005950794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000298995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001175496,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001829824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001341551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9515817,0.0452848,0.0002047767,0.0001259353,0.002375144,0.0004276778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683262,0.02522846,0.0003352374,0.0004387845,0.005392228,0.0002790738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002726477,0.002336461,0.001789238,0.00009770103,0.0003520004,0.0003349539,0.5396118,0.00004573224,0.0009311677,0.1319408,0.1172633,0.2025704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002877357,0.0005637852,0.001528413,0.0001327838,0.000007741759,0.00000591146,0.27202,0.00000338573,0.00005297438,0.001197903,0.7241596,0.00003984388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1695687,0.002228963,0.00004074809,0.1564297,0.0008872301,0.0005298567,0.000002468674,0.00002358554,0.6702887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982448,0.01394076,0.0009163541,0.00007792674,0.0007908767,0.00001143054,2.117102e-7,0.000009620266,0.00180479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8128793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166349898","doi":"","title":"Submission Reviewers for Volume 1, 2005","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1639792908245669,"gpt":0.4838223853261843,"spread":0.3198430945016174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008796747,0.00005736143,0.0001166286,0.0002260072,0.0001065091,0.0000678209,0.0001430139,0.00005477107,0.007021039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004501191,0.00004946297,0.00007533033,0.0001330864,0.00002672608,0.001074626,0.00001102642,0.0005200159,0.001953893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000958021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.184878e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002409148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983526,0.0002585967,0.0003278971,0.00006000236,0.0007629464,0.0002379851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980923,0.0005018859,0.0001058647,0.0001154836,0.001020633,0.0001638216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006765906,0.00003432681,0.000006011826,0.00006298571,0.00002032358,0.000003000523,0.0002100635,0.004203015,0.004047845,0.000008882683,0.9446722,0.04666363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003558064,0.0001085431,0.000202444,0.00008154638,0.0000171403,0.00005489727,0.0003027897,0.01508784,0.0002059974,0.00003575697,0.9834958,0.00005148318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1385842,0.05442551,0.202778,0.3292907,0.01381395,0.005782603,0.00003405382,0.0007196611,0.2545714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4670829,0.08285431,0.2416036,0.002497114,0.05403707,0.0001505238,0.00002490362,0.0003634886,0.151386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3284988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523471975","doi":"","title":"Sensitive Research and the Collision of Advocacy and Research: Consequences for the Researcher","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Public relations; Social research; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7530849627667346,"gpt":0.7189146914319636,"spread":0.03417027133477102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5695867,0.0001097348,0.0003723675,0.0008123408,0.004460746,0.0005470495,0.001046716,0.0002035736,0.00003738634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5701976,0.00004637919,0.0001023831,0.002140693,0.05590826,0.001234774,0.0006510182,0.003615553,0.000007002997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002823817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005603597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007074074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006528971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8803893,0.107112,0.000771073,0.0003925692,0.009820014,0.001515004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4174897,0.5509825,0.0003512706,0.0003933361,0.03032367,0.0004594575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01393551,0.0002096658,0.0001378845,0.0001584405,0.0002953057,0.00009253249,0.1046799,7.779688e-7,0.007460763,0.7909308,0.0302865,0.05181194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002124415,0.001791312,0.0003176903,0.0005298496,0.0000168559,0.00005371057,0.3827994,0.00002640755,0.002789599,0.2801653,0.3293115,0.00007396025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05786012,0.008465596,0.002297998,0.9163072,0.0001441323,0.002730168,0.00002652949,0.000006714773,0.0121615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86311,0.1196969,0.008683976,0.000144718,0.0009932793,0.0001177422,2.296531e-7,0.00003135853,0.00722186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758938526","doi":"","title":"A Book for Students of Science and Practicing Scientists: Review of Peter M. Pruzan's 'Research Methodology: The Aims, Practices and Ethics of Science'","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Sociology; Science education; Science communication; Nature of Science; Pedagogy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9436903171255073,"gpt":0.7908841705163858,"spread":0.1528061466091215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4045125,0.0000711,0.0003193769,0.0007151506,0.005763989,0.0006687527,0.002776075,0.00008296507,0.00005865893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6152493,0.00004913807,0.00005047868,0.001252651,0.03355861,0.005118988,0.001225809,0.001479501,8.285281e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000183986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004601627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001233151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003329422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9825155,0.008665603,0.0007424928,0.0002830543,0.007267406,0.0005260116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9231474,0.04556772,0.004221345,0.0008115915,0.02602091,0.0002310561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002743555,0.002493226,0.01153405,0.01710732,0.000340375,0.00002596794,0.6194144,0.000001350986,0.173027,0.06172955,0.03111396,0.0804692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009250834,0.001355879,0.01893874,0.0075413,0.0001699669,0.0001311207,0.1864817,0.00004693309,0.002945648,0.001757485,0.7795692,0.0001368884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2734625,0.1326756,0.0002980047,0.5415593,0.001031216,0.004680584,0.00002693661,0.000009766301,0.04625597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3201063,0.6651513,0.01323034,0.000813788,0.0001748157,0.00002388692,3.003847e-7,0.00001050058,0.0004887442],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7484553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899330006","doi":"","title":"Gaining a Fuller Picture of Sex Trafficking in Manitoba: A Case Study of Narrative-Based Research Utilizing 'Low Tech' Thematic Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Interview; Thematic analysis; Transferability; Sociology; Relevance (law); Qualitative research; Grounded theory; Gender studies; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Anthropology; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6952530294524429,"gpt":0.6777321517405274,"spread":0.01752087771191557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2431688,0.0001468908,0.0007659175,0.00382038,0.001259035,0.0001913642,0.0008219849,0.0002078102,0.0001710012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1259123,0.0001158338,0.0002045699,0.009739197,0.002750719,0.0009080536,0.000187167,0.003927974,0.000002214846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000481039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00262504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01070816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0236332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.934462,0.05634591,0.001284159,0.0003355637,0.006628051,0.0009443204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9316871,0.05582908,0.0009196495,0.0004068539,0.01085655,0.0003007215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001041536,0.002401891,0.004424348,0.0002627343,0.0008924853,0.003008926,0.9764103,0.0002886158,0.001526537,0.0007811685,0.0001487377,0.008812736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001035412,0.002916607,0.0002498847,0.0005482039,0.00009438102,0.00006378876,0.9915406,0.001455771,0.0004994649,0.0009772117,0.0005216156,0.00009706902],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897003,0.0003072289,0.001347376,0.003177223,0.00004587696,0.0008026304,0.000001969772,0.000006627999,0.004610819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890464,0.0001236345,0.01044815,0.00002307152,0.0002420765,0.00001898245,1.874041e-7,0.0000173792,0.00008012771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1172565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569632423","doi":"","title":"Anthropologist-Parents as Researchers: A Critical Appreciation of 'Doing Fieldwork in China . . . With Kids!' by Cornet and Blumenfield","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); China; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Gender studies; Anthropology; History; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1242248891913106,"gpt":0.5257398825266907,"spread":0.4015149933353801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007538137,0.00005308376,0.000144855,0.0001730096,0.0002293759,0.00009630936,0.0001739186,0.00009962322,0.0002543363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02332166,0.00003118509,0.00002143109,0.0003732367,0.0011506,0.00108422,0.00004247489,0.0005050653,0.000004435168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001033485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004159234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007123892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001465041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964367,0.00168039,0.0002879379,0.0001237725,0.001139943,0.000331286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926643,0.006129981,0.0001996328,0.0000945492,0.0007360613,0.0001754281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01670755,0.004486433,0.4204313,0.0003282332,0.0004657237,0.0007241042,0.11141,0.00003623503,0.006940329,0.1736254,0.0635748,0.2012699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01367833,0.0223896,0.1205473,0.006439118,0.000236624,0.0003619351,0.2322838,0.0002476654,0.01500967,0.06190524,0.5257143,0.001186463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.873877,0.0007552439,0.001190158,0.1051759,0.0001205587,0.0003162616,0.00000531775,0.000006193779,0.0185533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968146,0.001991356,0.0006906904,0.00003763889,0.0001474978,0.000003124121,3.604636e-7,0.000004449592,0.0003102713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4621395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}