{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":18,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"3b769ed3b7ab","filters":{"venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association"}},"results":[{"id":"W2540090060","doi":"10.1017/apa.2016.27","title":"Revisiting the Early Modern Philosophical Canon","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Rationality; Consciousness; Philosophical methodology; Context (archaeology); Canon; History of science; Philosophical theory; History; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Shapiro","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02968219547416683,"gpt":0.2353732758346094,"spread":0.2056910803604426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001336209,0.0001750152,0.000396137,0.00007309072,0.0007426844,0.0001299535,0.0009027704,0.00005323466,0.0000849244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001630589,0.00007200342,0.0004287756,0.0002172574,0.0007103824,0.0004008497,0.0001057195,0.0005731891,0.00005265325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006630351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000978664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003794978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008406078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971377,0.0004647118,0.0006773866,0.0001889853,0.001198272,0.0003329229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962063,0.0009297596,0.001925,0.0003076553,0.0004935065,0.0001377471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002987521,0.0001817936,0.01008562,0.00001325,0.0002832966,0.00001853109,0.007351779,0.00002804171,0.003984565,0.9136657,0.003454483,0.06063424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000386562,0.0002494093,0.008916546,0.0001045138,0.0001006487,0.0000171476,0.00004150409,0.00004710292,0.00005149681,0.9631157,0.02676461,0.0002047651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3138029,0.0001309618,0.0001253924,0.6719043,0.001109949,0.0001197714,0.0000194004,0.00002731797,0.01275996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860631,0.00003015804,0.00002599153,0.003007178,0.01004318,0.000003145441,1.484189e-7,0.00001727279,0.0008098299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6722602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5712203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901516831","doi":"10.1017/apa.2018.23","title":"How to Take Offense: Responding to Microaggression","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Psychology; Anger; Social psychology; Salient; Simple (philosophy); Criminology; Political science; Law; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Regina Rini","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03246147168387726,"gpt":0.3381233702194762,"spread":0.3056618985355989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002775393,0.0001059444,0.0002940324,0.00022954,0.0006710336,0.0001756346,0.000566396,0.0001165231,0.00001889526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009162568,0.00007388656,0.0001919869,0.001373827,0.0002664269,0.0001916991,0.00008974844,0.0004825294,0.00002814751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008079577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002042089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008199639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001941517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971982,0.0007891353,0.0003201547,0.0001536077,0.00120767,0.0003311839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970742,0.000491458,0.00123598,0.000169644,0.0007241719,0.0003045277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003417556,0.0007684776,0.1143772,0.00002656587,0.0007682165,0.00005804768,0.1180154,0.00006167726,0.1588352,0.1980822,0.3105027,0.09508668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004021926,0.000993873,0.05383334,0.0002336391,0.00009047558,0.000007473549,0.001892299,0.000005214443,0.002310494,0.06222922,0.877678,0.0003237645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4665928,0.00002178541,0.0001419668,0.5299003,0.001125221,0.0001204243,0.000004322175,0.0000148338,0.002078401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789834,0.00001801788,0.0007641244,0.01077444,0.006290405,0.000001495299,1.929901e-7,0.0000131836,0.00315476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5671753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365149060","doi":"10.1017/apa.2022.53","title":"Universalism and the Problem of Aesthetic Diversity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Diversity (politics); Aesthetics; Identity (music); Epistemology; Aesthetic experience; Sociology; Psychology; Personality; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Alex King","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02313683066529088,"gpt":0.2206831839851296,"spread":0.1975463533198388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001219661,0.00006813618,0.0002471645,0.00005937963,0.0004332011,0.00003696095,0.0002626224,0.00002714712,0.00001097643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001347855,0.00003673083,0.0001767655,0.00009883519,0.001013116,0.0000988354,0.0001756461,0.000333797,0.000005983035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006417514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002989721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001122351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004827451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988286,0.0002864812,0.0002617027,0.00006039373,0.0004501299,0.0001127034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981725,0.0003180886,0.00109902,0.00009416603,0.0002818884,0.00003435998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002005448,0.00008138662,0.01164456,0.0000182174,0.0001465504,0.000004557784,0.048287,0.00005888685,0.00002537462,0.932757,0.004536011,0.002239898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001198969,0.0002380823,0.00896325,0.00006165693,0.0001850813,0.00001086546,0.003330152,0.0001090949,0.00001557719,0.9691942,0.01658764,0.0001054424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7406588,0.00003698832,0.00000233847,0.2556783,0.000190798,0.00008037122,0.000008919023,0.00001272386,0.003330749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978132,0.0002158267,0.000017652,0.0009182275,0.0003271409,3.786836e-7,3.861085e-7,0.00000629622,0.0007008819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2571544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.373287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940527999","doi":"10.1017/apa.2019.8","title":"Scientific Practice and the Epistemology of Governing Laws","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Natural law; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Scientific law; Law; Sociology; Political science; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Tyler Hildebrand","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01388965218150239,"gpt":0.2257983679238485,"spread":0.2119087157423461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002211485,0.0000638586,0.0002736512,0.00004854412,0.0003608761,0.00009219103,0.0003329526,0.00001977148,0.00003900812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001359228,0.00003356599,0.0001380138,0.0001026857,0.001708179,0.0003620836,0.00006518869,0.0003007855,0.00001584569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001254683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006467273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005281765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000120731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985307,0.0003606857,0.0003418416,0.00009160263,0.0005664707,0.0001086499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960387,0.0009445147,0.002440154,0.0001397495,0.0004054485,0.0000314572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004516233,0.0001108767,0.003101436,0.00001736088,0.0001307817,0.000001639835,0.01078728,0.00003465036,0.0009442783,0.9820001,0.001648023,0.0007719509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002527035,0.0009612573,0.0131324,0.0001275908,0.0003727573,0.00009635909,0.003376258,0.0003130838,0.0000840792,0.6416419,0.3371071,0.0002602029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7838059,0.0002517061,0.000003774556,0.1769662,0.001431944,0.0001116366,0.000009187284,0.000004605391,0.03741502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968483,0.00001841646,0.0000426994,0.001512678,0.0004958953,5.819058e-7,1.778742e-7,0.000004085126,0.001077172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3403582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6293857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322621084","doi":"10.1017/apa.2022.43","title":"Defensiveness and Identity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Criticism; Ignorance; Identity (music); Politics; Psychology; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Social psychology; Social criticism; Psychoanalysis; Identity formation; Sociology; Aesthetics; Self-concept; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Audrey Yap","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03145618888437331,"gpt":0.3525112228458553,"spread":0.3210550339614821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001627037,0.0000435339,0.0001791323,0.00004693279,0.0004880361,0.00002684522,0.0001731616,0.00004016116,0.000002856555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002334446,0.00003075915,0.00009141423,0.0005502074,0.0003205189,0.0001328695,0.00006958427,0.0001795356,0.00001159634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001461451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006465307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007620121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000885963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987606,0.0004314769,0.0001804033,0.00005958085,0.0004264746,0.0001414456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985657,0.0004852067,0.0006521781,0.00005230818,0.0001980716,0.00004656582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006218817,0.00004941862,0.8964782,0.000009294407,0.000262963,0.00001891134,0.008098426,0.00001610503,0.0001565111,0.08388633,0.008127464,0.002834193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001127454,0.00004315825,0.7103795,0.000009519355,0.00003949224,0.000003894182,0.001574842,0.000003267127,0.000008835725,0.2844917,0.003287456,0.00004555212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8095326,0.00006642716,0.00001043994,0.1879824,0.0004856388,0.00003717245,0.00000168202,0.00001378867,0.001869815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979747,0.0003455806,0.00002143841,0.0008378859,0.0004873953,7.682847e-7,1.155692e-7,0.000002950873,0.00032919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2006054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3753628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392294730","doi":"10.1017/apa.2023.28","title":"Courageous Love: K. C. Bhattacharyya on the Puzzle of Painful Beauty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bhattacharyya distance; Beauty; Aesthetics; Chemistry; Psychology; Traditional medicine; Philosophy; Medicine; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Dominic McIver Lopes","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02143527742509381,"gpt":0.2317185981528066,"spread":0.2102833207277128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001126194,0.0001338387,0.0003043821,0.0001003576,0.0002492524,0.00009294689,0.000388744,0.0000426843,0.0004049887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000387661,0.00007028173,0.0004197468,0.0001477012,0.0003203708,0.0001474748,0.00003220241,0.0006889881,0.0001104927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003642365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008425613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002140915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001021432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982279,0.0003553969,0.0004695191,0.0001042621,0.0006622818,0.0001806532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997533,0.0009526867,0.00104889,0.0001950537,0.0002166816,0.00005372693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003150387,0.0004262185,0.00101793,0.00008421921,0.0008932866,0.00004816366,0.04008394,0.0001209092,0.0004124774,0.8729609,0.08092692,0.00271005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002801103,0.0009733112,0.001829606,0.0003065775,0.0002826583,0.00002744832,0.0005897144,0.0001591441,0.0003062538,0.4110512,0.5839289,0.0002649821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5946769,0.000427692,0.000009291588,0.3546061,0.003019677,0.0002065618,0.0001204741,0.00002714864,0.04690622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918932,0.00002831895,0.000006558199,0.002970163,0.00349454,0.000001351699,0.000001195806,0.00001839079,0.001586305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.503002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4434342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195838738","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.48","title":"A Puzzle for Social Essences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Presupposition; Sketch; Epistemology; Sociology; Social thought; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Algorithm; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Michael J. Raven","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02795546404645338,"gpt":0.3392637836465738,"spread":0.3113083196001205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001056122,0.00008563953,0.0002931719,0.0000313677,0.000312858,0.00003705888,0.0003767632,0.00006621611,0.0001008303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001893364,0.00005655711,0.0003677343,0.0005407739,0.0002432414,0.00008789451,0.00005283523,0.0003711412,0.00001784173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001633075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009792192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003847791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002431437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982947,0.0004753924,0.0003668506,0.0001414895,0.0004786111,0.0002429872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974318,0.0008492335,0.001130695,0.0001229224,0.0003888356,0.00007649825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001753436,0.0002859487,0.002636519,0.000003657179,0.0001621711,0.00001127104,0.0004285776,0.000003910154,0.001693008,0.9881959,0.002623654,0.003780036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004336512,0.0001810769,0.03478703,0.00001036445,0.0000790253,0.00003553651,0.0001688958,0.00001544374,0.0004983587,0.96021,0.003489572,0.0000911027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4629324,0.0000956877,0.0008181452,0.5007042,0.002369585,0.0001411964,0.00003382174,0.00001769948,0.03288722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948753,0.000005265858,0.0002442387,0.002613134,0.001955847,0.000004439718,6.362054e-7,0.000007588653,0.0002936076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5319428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2406282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114036874","doi":"10.1017/apa.2019.53","title":"The Modal Status of Leibniz's Principle of Sufficient Reason","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Modal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Position (finance); Inference; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Owen Pikkert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03284619682111996,"gpt":0.2462778136491117,"spread":0.2134316168279918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005894597,0.00008825601,0.0003305856,0.00003143304,0.0002715214,0.00003076782,0.0004835125,0.00002480218,0.00002182865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001811944,0.0000469622,0.000273061,0.0002262956,0.0005235953,0.0001168964,0.0000734803,0.0003335889,0.000003479867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002564953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001226244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004905375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008132363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979356,0.0002175741,0.0006232177,0.00009273492,0.0009193164,0.0002115899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964106,0.0004183103,0.002404821,0.0001441366,0.0004952014,0.0001268945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005722691,0.0004850067,0.01068888,0.0000330278,0.0002130016,0.000002662743,0.0175003,0.0008858384,0.002784274,0.9613911,0.002865508,0.00257815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002172,0.006827895,0.06638443,0.0001927365,0.0005265501,0.000009767106,0.003102825,0.004153102,0.002621665,0.3877264,0.525564,0.0007186002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8889197,0.0002201762,0.00003607733,0.1020936,0.0005805544,0.0001144566,0.00003583845,0.000008394813,0.007991232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983819,0.00006315816,0.00003636021,0.0005638011,0.0008521589,7.399967e-7,3.148989e-7,0.000006628386,0.00009499842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5736647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2169198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196750577","doi":"10.1017/apa.2021.21","title":"Shame, Vulnerability, and Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Openness to experience; Vulnerability (computing); Social psychology; Autonomy; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Jing Iris Hu","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06207430284216691,"gpt":0.3554329713927527,"spread":0.2933586685505858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004699609,0.00007023086,0.0002315062,0.00003611997,0.00008571301,0.00002456488,0.0001183272,0.0000520849,0.0001215769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003654803,0.00004829037,0.000145925,0.0002950287,0.00007909894,0.00008088427,0.00006506753,0.0003651192,0.00001092821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001422626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002750958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003794315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009080492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988353,0.0003665497,0.0002844531,0.0001074347,0.0002708643,0.0001354112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986236,0.0001578009,0.0007269521,0.0001626386,0.0002578197,0.00007120346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009147728,0.0008305325,0.9222846,0.000007932523,0.0002393166,0.00007152117,0.001284682,0.000001624895,0.002865362,0.0204362,0.00456924,0.04731753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003129855,0.0001530089,0.9756398,0.00001393689,0.00008647961,0.00010453,0.0001039816,0.000002758793,0.00007405857,0.02178363,0.00166134,0.00006353646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8893599,0.0001688917,0.00001208517,0.1089977,0.0005700293,0.00005186467,0.000008376935,0.000006123967,0.0008250708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960842,0.00003952055,0.0001643636,0.002465975,0.0008161936,0.000004006375,7.759393e-7,0.000008135395,0.000416798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1067243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1969224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389622224","doi":"10.1017/apa.2023.24","title":"Ubuntu in Elephant Communities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien; Queen's University; Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Morality; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Culling; Attribution; African philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; Ecology; Psychology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Birte Wrage","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dennis Papadopoulos","is_ca":false},{"name":"Judith Benz-Schwarzburg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04107681329660381,"gpt":0.32174770285105,"spread":0.2806708895544462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001837581,0.00009758293,0.0003542848,0.0001109761,0.0005012419,0.00004322461,0.0005318819,0.00006115568,0.00002181253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001412836,0.00006047082,0.0002162306,0.001723875,0.0003919492,0.0001632856,0.0001202058,0.0005434924,0.00003382371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005889468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008923754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009398406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007525475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974294,0.0008421947,0.0004311713,0.0000670753,0.0009101087,0.0003199905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977276,0.0008623357,0.0009689517,0.0001007636,0.0002531965,0.00008715305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002576251,0.0004055057,0.8058475,0.00001702059,0.000359807,0.00003971008,0.04352947,0.0003892182,0.0005046686,0.1237403,0.01610415,0.008804967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004135562,0.0001763844,0.4362086,0.00007307776,0.00004366172,0.000002821351,0.009567746,0.00004060961,0.00001628753,0.5235425,0.02971987,0.0001948633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7085237,0.00004584346,0.00000104637,0.2868945,0.0002729685,0.0000738083,0.00000578599,0.00002547425,0.004156824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966564,0.0006136693,0.00001927963,0.001297186,0.001090606,0.000003624793,8.474484e-7,0.000007195031,0.0003112038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3998022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3855198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196644496","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.47","title":"Using and Abusing Moorean Arguments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"M. Scarfone","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07847848016735143,"gpt":0.3007912275173255,"spread":0.2223127473499741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004840896,0.00007735143,0.0002660406,0.0000344348,0.0002565707,0.00009064536,0.00009562669,0.00003252789,0.00001798479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005695968,0.00005450786,0.0001445863,0.00006893311,0.0002357852,0.0001513327,0.00004828617,0.0003630747,0.000001725586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001612056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007476124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003758069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002427938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989093,0.0002570348,0.0003005663,0.00008078982,0.0003250692,0.000127216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980897,0.0002433092,0.001111821,0.00009069612,0.000416542,0.00004795439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002557392,0.001213514,0.1976593,0.0001541861,0.002722962,0.0001347125,0.04414319,0.0003140448,0.02793877,0.7076454,0.003107713,0.01471046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001223095,0.0002824527,0.03722038,0.0002543425,0.000791727,0.0001508296,0.003221174,0.0004708073,0.001388173,0.9305658,0.0240058,0.0004253928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650288,0.0001440795,0.00003067057,0.03160276,0.0007365838,0.00002981235,0.000006255332,0.000005458328,0.002415563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954873,0.00005932483,0.0003078074,0.002146426,0.001700795,2.015241e-7,6.559488e-7,0.000009475193,0.0002879667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2229205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2222766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409776382","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.12","title":"Disagreement, Public Reason, and Epistemic Abstinence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McGill University; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee","keywords":"Legitimacy; Public reason; Politics; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Elizabeth Edenberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03106477962561927,"gpt":0.2694985581371023,"spread":0.2384337785114831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009113239,0.00009503383,0.0002970256,0.00007118679,0.0002691866,0.000102704,0.0002454755,0.00003877746,0.00001593487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001283076,0.0000621881,0.0001496957,0.0001138182,0.000478956,0.0001671798,0.00006802211,0.0004459332,0.000004081651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001821532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008437614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004824493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006441722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987715,0.0002540665,0.0004059074,0.0001000906,0.0003117234,0.0001567387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976437,0.0004713276,0.001298007,0.0001348524,0.0004003224,0.00005178395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004482244,0.0001432955,0.05526906,0.00003794291,0.0003099317,0.000002082548,0.002293357,0.000002400756,0.0002474688,0.9290147,0.007492342,0.005142577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004053283,0.0001497926,0.04454026,0.0001121571,0.0001778443,0.000005066256,0.0007366132,0.0000338753,0.00003412084,0.9081087,0.0455685,0.0001278079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5133969,0.0003732441,0.00005742745,0.4682474,0.001099519,0.00009292347,0.0000117593,0.00001505517,0.01670581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934154,0.0001506169,0.0000430754,0.003420832,0.0008927915,0.000001758816,7.647383e-7,0.0000059668,0.002068773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4800186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2535957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387119162","doi":"10.1017/apa.2023.20","title":"Inductive Reasoning Involving Social Kinds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Inductive reasoning; Profiling (computer programming); Statistic; Affirmative action; Action (physics); Socioeconomic status; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","authors":[{"name":"Barrett Emerick","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tyler Hildebrand","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03957287484304383,"gpt":0.3413077710256478,"spread":0.301734896182604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002333108,0.00007969046,0.0002894039,0.00009253166,0.001218824,0.00003610803,0.0003264884,0.00009386549,0.000006900118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003419429,0.00005968466,0.000215419,0.001118226,0.0004057451,0.0001408906,0.00009453468,0.0004926455,0.00001937103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005666846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001758838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001243288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006183976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978071,0.000793277,0.000310127,0.00009902998,0.0007106363,0.0002798225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976434,0.0005374182,0.00139943,0.00006380302,0.0003007112,0.00005528586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001856642,0.0001694828,0.6846631,0.00001241966,0.000960013,0.00003857258,0.09336632,0.00003516239,0.000582934,0.1654471,0.04612947,0.008409798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002930762,0.000116551,0.7330403,0.00003145924,0.00009927405,0.000003918631,0.01330266,0.00001462168,0.00002989295,0.2456823,0.007230697,0.0001553292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7449587,0.00004331513,0.000006833003,0.2460308,0.0008539819,0.00006168792,0.000002826853,0.00003588244,0.008006019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961697,0.00009259193,0.00005833084,0.0008931214,0.002233299,0.000002184962,3.757055e-7,0.000007548193,0.0005428315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.251211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9374331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221075592","doi":"10.1017/apa.2021.38","title":"Resisting Marriage, Reclaiming Right: An (Early) Modern Critique of Marriage","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Institution; De facto; Subordination (linguistics); Dowry; Politics; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Dominance (genetics); Law; Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"KELIN EMMETT","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02827200768408728,"gpt":0.2419529506510548,"spread":0.2136809429669676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001752117,0.0001092354,0.0006651384,0.0001260702,0.0007085002,0.00002333788,0.0004393204,0.00004865509,0.00009148524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00105954,0.0001049485,0.000328582,0.0003528434,0.00009768298,0.0001835746,0.0001497518,0.0005477592,0.000004676996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001512629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004880851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004346666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001005939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981944,0.0002359949,0.001025936,0.0001756245,0.0001610888,0.0002069566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956213,0.0002582727,0.003766675,0.0001739504,0.0001029115,0.00007691594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006191478,0.001279358,0.3719286,0.00005840703,0.001275221,0.00003398151,0.009419899,0.002687766,0.0007593649,0.596756,0.007867511,0.007314765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005017316,0.0004496306,0.09923272,0.00001279235,0.00004279836,0.000004703027,0.0002384972,0.0006765721,0.00002226781,0.8917032,0.006888219,0.000226804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665401,0.0003671134,0.0004081299,0.02374748,0.0007299483,0.0001027563,0.00009731718,0.00001127498,0.007995887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979834,0.00005300375,0.0002927493,0.0006857682,0.0005277802,0.000006417843,0.000001106481,0.00001874174,0.0004310529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2949473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5449283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416100456","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.10017","title":"The Argument from Imagination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentational and representational acting; Variety (cybernetics); Perception; Direct and indirect realism; Argument (complex analysis); Content (measure theory); Realism; Qualia","authors":[{"name":"Boyd Millar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006866579307068485,"gpt":0.30047887754851,"spread":0.2936122982414415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001182362,0.00008524896,0.0001898722,0.00004239838,0.0002877314,0.00006393093,0.0006565677,0.00004393266,0.00003531629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001208865,0.00004369065,0.0001960545,0.0005662304,0.0003313966,0.00008382779,0.0000801321,0.0004404505,0.00003272233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003793101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005183989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003484436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002341508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982442,0.000515299,0.0004015545,0.0001196912,0.0005201658,0.0001991037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971222,0.00129818,0.001073507,0.0002408981,0.0002110065,0.00005418652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001640015,0.0001424545,0.009313206,5.85677e-7,0.0001977738,0.000002349623,0.0001327096,0.000007511058,0.0005926533,0.96784,0.003144988,0.01846175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002393992,0.00006313845,0.1595428,0.000014019,0.00005544732,0.000001734935,0.00004542392,0.00003648799,0.0001550089,0.8358533,0.003949846,0.00004331559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3213708,0.0002950504,0.0005139303,0.6135288,0.002636882,0.0001266645,0.000009765295,0.0000145461,0.06150357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952888,0.00003072171,0.0000511584,0.003662326,0.0005802201,0.000004010583,3.73305e-7,0.000004087208,0.0003783032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.673918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2213026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402729622","doi":"10.1017/apa.2024.7","title":"Our “Cognitive Limitations” and the Hard Problem of Consciousness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Consciousness; Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Andrew W. Stark","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03225947408102278,"gpt":0.3154374131907989,"spread":0.2831779391097761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001792113,0.00009145673,0.0002986977,0.00006636394,0.000110165,0.00004846522,0.0002775669,0.00004995677,0.00001018902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001291634,0.00004504032,0.0002078503,0.0005863644,0.0006916971,0.0001091571,0.00005943251,0.0004677963,0.00001442369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007345938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005930128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001369084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001200019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981374,0.0006889424,0.0004260066,0.0001299216,0.0004614371,0.0001563407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996555,0.00220832,0.0008108544,0.0001032892,0.0002590815,0.00006342221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000368356,0.00009360005,0.001883143,0.000009953624,0.0003089464,0.000006557487,0.001527329,0.000004554323,0.0002133777,0.9855873,0.0003853398,0.00961154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006274443,0.0002064459,0.02945065,0.0001007198,0.0002062988,0.00004812221,0.0005022885,0.00007176833,0.00006181595,0.9684726,0.0001857746,0.00006607753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5018894,0.0006427006,0.0003864451,0.4720017,0.0008821313,0.0002892018,0.00003007344,0.00001989427,0.02385847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998149,0.00005787707,0.00009700219,0.001113568,0.0004646632,0.000006643454,2.866228e-7,0.00000773481,0.0001031737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4962597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2548587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413086233","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.10008","title":"A Functional Analysis of Self-Deception","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lingnan University; United Arab Emirates University; University of Cambridge; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Mistake; Deception; Self-deception; Psychology; Accident (philosophy); Interpersonal communication; Lying; Reputation; Social psychology; Function (biology); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Vladimir Krstić","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01582266523987205,"gpt":0.3107933155263046,"spread":0.2949706502864326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001520537,0.00005065505,0.0002693193,0.0003470852,0.0001863635,0.00003170702,0.0001938784,0.00005008428,0.00008818992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001967706,0.00003589296,0.0003471012,0.002621512,0.00009356688,0.0002206446,0.00002191001,0.0001777638,0.000003961765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005943364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002895079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007657752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003688105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998253,0.0003292542,0.0004520956,0.00004543112,0.0008073456,0.0001128039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971823,0.0003116245,0.001805537,0.0000862513,0.0005593385,0.000054959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000586612,0.001261799,0.4821955,0.00003349179,0.01236332,0.000001131109,0.02971791,0.00596679,0.002227924,0.3729284,0.06644016,0.02627696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003080119,0.00006277982,0.9670566,0.00002033851,0.001111712,3.340686e-7,0.00127739,0.0004990306,0.00007592504,0.02415359,0.005371095,0.00006315931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8921264,0.00001773396,0.0007161452,0.09226247,0.0004339828,0.00007372387,0.000006000063,0.00001520992,0.01434828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997703,0.00006867443,0.0001333001,0.001471846,0.0002045725,2.500375e-7,0.000001074526,0.000001715044,0.0004155606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4848612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.235567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195535244","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.24","title":"Buddhaghosa, James, and Thompson on Conscious Flow","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Rivalry; Consciousness; Binocular rivalry; Philosophy; Epistemology; Flow (mathematics); Cognitive science; Psychology; Perception; Economics; Physics; Visual perception","authors":[{"name":"Mark Fortney","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03200259226752623,"gpt":0.3022331302566455,"spread":0.2702305379891193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000389261,0.00009524628,0.0002392557,0.00004796735,0.000190447,0.00008919789,0.0001622836,0.00004970167,0.00004349813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002881504,0.00006467916,0.0001190633,0.0003675833,0.00009669764,0.0001001205,0.00005199808,0.0003376618,0.00001802455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001538567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008733392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001479111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.16466e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983725,0.0004529036,0.0002701897,0.0001557983,0.0006015993,0.0001470335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984189,0.0003916664,0.0008327281,0.0001136372,0.0001521062,0.00009097398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000530964,0.001032938,0.003333826,0.0000326053,0.00008440248,0.0001415127,0.001291044,0.000330896,0.8141854,0.01968403,0.008414488,0.1509379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004306373,0.002991084,0.0552893,0.0004437523,0.0002919203,0.001204008,0.0006813882,0.005489045,0.3251278,0.5793188,0.02390448,0.0009520416],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8387501,0.00003474556,0.0001268809,0.1593737,0.000543335,0.00004288481,0.000008687045,0.00001697304,0.001102729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820861,0.0001302766,0.0002862683,0.01675955,0.0004353104,6.691926e-7,2.908363e-7,0.00001026791,0.0002912825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5596348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3449638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}