{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":18,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"3b769ed3b7ab","filters":{"venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association"}},"results":[{"id":"W2540090060","doi":"10.1017/apa.2016.27","title":"Revisiting the Early Modern Philosophical Canon","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Rationality; Consciousness; Philosophical methodology; Context (archaeology); Canon; History of science; Philosophical theory; History; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Shapiro","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02968219547416683,"gpt":0.2353732758346094,"spread":0.2056910803604426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01259103,0.0004851066,0.0005078471,0.004366089,0.006350218,0.009060755,0.001422853,0.003444802,0.005963971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01167728,0.0004051846,0.0002900171,0.002710188,0.04692516,0.01139149,0.005639526,0.008933618,0.0007553462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01324349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006000395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005702727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009792689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939294,0.003688789,0.0002032983,0.0005257178,0.001205307,0.0004474258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884267,0.007900417,0.0005589667,0.0008086652,0.001858182,0.0004470412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009208251,0.00001118739,0.00009399897,0.00004210238,0.000001951305,0.00003827831,0.007037758,0.0000522089,0.0000445659,0.9864708,0.003130129,0.003067869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001587809,0.00001937092,0.0005875624,0.0005821435,0.000005784559,0.0001557664,0.007772163,0.000471055,0.0002599298,0.5651022,0.4250081,0.00002013358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06657175,0.0678311,0.02087498,0.2609578,0.009160981,0.00004932196,0.00013972,0.0001325704,0.5742818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9264889,0.01683232,0.006789989,0.01838128,0.004506821,0.00009490732,0.00006190302,0.0001524743,0.02669138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01324349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09608871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901516831","doi":"10.1017/apa.2018.23","title":"How to Take Offense: Responding to Microaggression","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Psychology; Anger; Social psychology; Salient; Simple (philosophy); Criminology; Political science; Law; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Regina Rini","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03246147168387726,"gpt":0.3381233702194762,"spread":0.3056618985355989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007401209,0.0003712518,0.0002518948,0.0006163398,0.003186939,0.003954688,0.0007428019,0.003245535,0.004998911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02118544,0.0001813693,0.0002619827,0.0002693492,0.01082052,0.003590406,0.004246746,0.004542593,0.001060201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009684769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001201475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006025204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001222611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898177,0.007789034,0.0002328167,0.000307569,0.001082213,0.0007706094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893505,0.005582701,0.00220755,0.0006073695,0.001195571,0.001056219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000256092,0.0009894912,0.05485957,0.0008906525,0.0001405031,0.004468461,0.3528647,0.002271254,0.01657876,0.2751422,0.0380934,0.2534451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003762209,0.0007791264,0.04156559,0.001409312,0.0001096662,0.004956218,0.5003549,0.003016066,0.009864077,0.2092636,0.228487,0.000156797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5607067,0.00267023,0.04858043,0.1354564,0.001077427,0.0002433982,0.0000412166,0.0001665046,0.2510576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800423,0.0009742816,0.005014689,0.008456189,0.0001525881,0.00005884221,0.000008756713,0.0000300945,0.005262267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007401209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03914183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365149060","doi":"10.1017/apa.2022.53","title":"Universalism and the Problem of Aesthetic Diversity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Diversity (politics); Aesthetics; Identity (music); Epistemology; Aesthetic experience; Sociology; Psychology; Personality; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Alex King","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02313683066529088,"gpt":0.2206831839851296,"spread":0.1975463533198388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01191449,0.0003322838,0.0008541311,0.001614034,0.006595805,0.006758609,0.001547103,0.002415885,0.004261159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01598045,0.0003594955,0.0006583704,0.0009245675,0.07378937,0.008962702,0.01107287,0.005183592,0.0002748278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003532345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001434011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001402446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868001,0.007838412,0.000404957,0.001662827,0.002390328,0.0009034321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869517,0.007079383,0.0009173275,0.002824591,0.001486472,0.0007404728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001518232,0.00001089806,0.0005032071,0.00002898415,0.000008491383,0.00003674371,0.004390598,0.0002242067,0.0001263961,0.9894188,0.0006084271,0.004628087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008277718,0.000007750669,0.000448248,0.0000303552,0.000003543858,0.00006294584,0.001763883,0.0002901759,0.00008393689,0.9909822,0.006311236,0.000007423701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2737308,0.005302659,0.06546911,0.0596279,0.0007401205,0.00004373711,0.00006747823,0.0001508846,0.5948673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953516,0.0001668026,0.001738215,0.000648864,0.0001271721,0.00001572065,0.000007426747,0.0000270504,0.001917057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01191449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06301063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940527999","doi":"10.1017/apa.2019.8","title":"Scientific Practice and the Epistemology of Governing Laws","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Natural law; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Scientific law; Law; Sociology; Political science; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Tyler Hildebrand","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01388965218150239,"gpt":0.2257983679238485,"spread":0.2119087157423461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03056191,0.0004003517,0.0008275853,0.003677915,0.005777712,0.0106713,0.002462708,0.008178138,0.003744607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05668049,0.0005875772,0.0007632919,0.002119701,0.0828943,0.01582423,0.007232017,0.008345946,0.0004365287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006093674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007063782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00304879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001466716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9726464,0.01850163,0.001245575,0.002433676,0.004221017,0.0009518548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9182032,0.05999635,0.004847125,0.009916266,0.005575531,0.001461565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001598463,0.000006186554,0.00009494765,0.00001070046,0.00000178643,0.000009840277,0.0007638687,0.0001143249,0.00001686768,0.9981681,0.0001096016,0.0007020417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007782559,0.000003919105,0.00007534375,0.00005640952,0.00000176934,0.0000129654,0.0003845647,0.0004596413,0.00004870402,0.9946023,0.004343206,0.000003551316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1168844,0.007281466,0.2175586,0.1131527,0.0009193039,0.0001338458,0.0001144492,0.0001631153,0.5437922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864922,0.0009564569,0.008620933,0.001345862,0.0002548484,0.00009107912,0.000029078,0.00002771567,0.002181846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1616288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322621084","doi":"10.1017/apa.2022.43","title":"Defensiveness and Identity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Criticism; Ignorance; Identity (music); Politics; Psychology; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Social psychology; Social criticism; Psychoanalysis; Identity formation; Sociology; Aesthetics; Self-concept; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Audrey Yap","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03145618888437331,"gpt":0.3525112228458553,"spread":0.3210550339614821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003788949,0.0002547906,0.0002707733,0.001146573,0.003459555,0.005344734,0.0005961521,0.002399041,0.005911517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01297417,0.0001841364,0.0002634151,0.0006749806,0.03149745,0.004537645,0.004912363,0.003675537,0.0004008961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001933784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001032691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000668051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003636651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945035,0.003495184,0.0001696321,0.0004471492,0.0008833153,0.0005011357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890385,0.006062065,0.002234163,0.001052366,0.0007430355,0.0008699064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004632611,0.00005920093,0.006014727,0.0001153231,0.00001748521,0.0004630323,0.1010418,0.0001270174,0.002193724,0.8780025,0.00112787,0.0107909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005196689,0.000204141,0.02171084,0.0007230735,0.00004146015,0.0019047,0.138843,0.0008707747,0.0037711,0.7335584,0.098248,0.00007275525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4293111,0.002198076,0.0121948,0.01755569,0.0004010185,0.00004687033,0.00002629802,0.00005395653,0.5382122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970261,0.0001728555,0.0002977166,0.0003940863,0.00002617325,0.000007077781,0.000003180831,0.000005774524,0.002067062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005911517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02003813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392294730","doi":"10.1017/apa.2023.28","title":"Courageous Love: K. C. Bhattacharyya on the Puzzle of Painful Beauty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bhattacharyya distance; Beauty; Aesthetics; Chemistry; Psychology; Traditional medicine; Philosophy; Medicine; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Dominic McIver Lopes","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02143527742509381,"gpt":0.2317185981528066,"spread":0.2102833207277128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002084819,0.0002542068,0.0006010932,0.0005543261,0.01177687,0.005474773,0.0006200916,0.001799186,0.004188063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002936938,0.0003065895,0.0001844716,0.0008484021,0.02122208,0.00434555,0.003117905,0.005725923,0.0008287457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005414449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001981226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01362828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01688607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998234,0.001077301,0.00002766399,0.0001366208,0.0003117041,0.0002127442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983273,0.0009401792,0.0001214289,0.0001383912,0.0002475518,0.0002251843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007291839,0.00003650037,0.0003245709,0.0000672144,0.00001048057,0.0004056111,0.06472426,0.0001371323,0.0004337003,0.8882107,0.02756843,0.01800848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002798353,0.00005756679,0.002543336,0.0003001976,0.00002129663,0.0009050368,0.03441579,0.0004816834,0.0005773507,0.4587304,0.501861,0.0000783334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08447146,0.04782001,0.002372802,0.1803412,0.002337891,0.00003411797,0.00003697242,0.00007088641,0.6825147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451499,0.01182517,0.0006793348,0.006325871,0.000688599,0.00002341352,0.000007359488,0.00005743184,0.03524286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01362828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03928483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195838738","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.48","title":"A Puzzle for Social Essences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Presupposition; Sketch; Epistemology; Sociology; Social thought; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Algorithm; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Michael J. Raven","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02795546404645338,"gpt":0.3392637836465738,"spread":0.3113083196001205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005741023,0.0003721011,0.0007133044,0.002016331,0.004230426,0.007010458,0.001183995,0.003265703,0.0050811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0115439,0.0004173756,0.0006082229,0.001170465,0.05288428,0.01984548,0.009637434,0.005208745,0.0003796038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003499717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001676673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001114605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008067806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950089,0.002719464,0.0002357663,0.0006560507,0.001048196,0.0003314811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948079,0.002502964,0.0006194814,0.001097849,0.0006306156,0.0003411887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004654836,0.000002559299,0.0001061042,0.0000103686,0.000001874911,0.00001234916,0.001260863,0.00005132642,0.00003127022,0.9973649,0.0002302863,0.0009233762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007521184,0.000004957044,0.0002023842,0.00002229376,0.000003276581,0.00003082885,0.0009380158,0.0002017458,0.00004075813,0.9906879,0.007856033,0.00000439507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2670409,0.005943128,0.1485891,0.09290668,0.001010818,0.00009188641,0.0002594137,0.0002198701,0.4839383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888287,0.0004336963,0.005018016,0.001108593,0.0001351176,0.00003002435,0.00004643651,0.00003726669,0.004362086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007010458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03036183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114036874","doi":"10.1017/apa.2019.53","title":"The Modal Status of Leibniz's Principle of Sufficient Reason","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Modal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Position (finance); Inference; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Owen Pikkert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03284619682111996,"gpt":0.2462778136491117,"spread":0.2134316168279918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008924533,0.0004134864,0.001036732,0.003158536,0.004323013,0.006373975,0.001592387,0.00418883,0.005723177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009567009,0.0005523391,0.001194103,0.001389133,0.02494047,0.01264905,0.004857376,0.004791344,0.0007695137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004635184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002823811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002228614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001620855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995008,0.001920685,0.0003543471,0.0007968968,0.001435483,0.0004846604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936821,0.003707924,0.0003908127,0.0009123118,0.0008973338,0.0004095603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003908251,0.000002387831,0.00002521284,0.000006993271,0.000002218847,0.00001077362,0.0001606017,0.00005827468,0.00005619576,0.9988434,0.0003192067,0.000510751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005808552,0.000003046923,0.0000560889,0.00001449323,0.00000296374,0.00001423529,0.00006812521,0.0003275572,0.00005961967,0.9969413,0.002502067,0.000004672731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09614982,0.006738907,0.202428,0.05069007,0.0008253764,0.00009372209,0.0005248844,0.0004813951,0.6420678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778869,0.0009259571,0.01223601,0.001878257,0.0005177299,0.00009960256,0.0001357216,0.00006964689,0.006250324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008924533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196750577","doi":"10.1017/apa.2021.21","title":"Shame, Vulnerability, and Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Openness to experience; Vulnerability (computing); Social psychology; Autonomy; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Jing Iris Hu","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06207430284216691,"gpt":0.3554329713927527,"spread":0.2933586685505858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004143697,0.0002319592,0.0002614262,0.001052935,0.004674742,0.005123338,0.0005583226,0.001785456,0.003239775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008870768,0.0001133551,0.0001991962,0.0006114178,0.03559114,0.004153048,0.006730199,0.002177175,0.0001707654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003065762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002022786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001565112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001191241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947549,0.003620121,0.00009160273,0.0002935918,0.0006716148,0.0005681783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956138,0.002437577,0.0007765269,0.000274827,0.0003244538,0.0005726618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003522226,0.00008849692,0.009574907,0.0001156906,0.00002993123,0.0007236547,0.1326038,0.0004926935,0.0006556622,0.8291349,0.004055112,0.02248999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001704526,0.00008806831,0.01085111,0.0003506951,0.00001707878,0.0009989004,0.1267827,0.0006163714,0.0004188475,0.80038,0.0594302,0.00004909169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5442368,0.009475771,0.006347805,0.09282759,0.0005296653,0.00004996121,0.00003852829,0.00004651611,0.3464473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971117,0.0006143954,0.0002113334,0.0006068531,0.00003210338,0.000009426351,0.000002454395,0.00000254262,0.001409174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005123338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0222438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389622224","doi":"10.1017/apa.2023.24","title":"Ubuntu in Elephant Communities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien; Queen's University; Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Morality; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Culling; Attribution; African philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; Ecology; Psychology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Birte Wrage","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dennis Papadopoulos","is_ca":false},{"name":"Judith Benz-Schwarzburg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04107681329660381,"gpt":0.32174770285105,"spread":0.2806708895544462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002185702,0.0001429089,0.0001783857,0.0007879073,0.01199038,0.002947778,0.0006406552,0.001468009,0.006001138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003156443,0.0001192168,0.0001184568,0.000462505,0.009976107,0.002405087,0.00627082,0.001391548,0.0001584788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002408583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001733035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004185321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009344464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976433,0.001602139,0.00003668234,0.0001497443,0.0001429141,0.0004252526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983581,0.0004910155,0.000471153,0.00007174462,0.0001457837,0.000462169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008202498,0.0001604147,0.03185577,0.00007473581,0.00001111921,0.002363985,0.3544008,0.0001835674,0.001159122,0.5748049,0.00261361,0.03228991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003887493,0.0002199426,0.04402877,0.0005315017,0.00002659797,0.002975819,0.6556472,0.00292466,0.001087418,0.195024,0.0974511,0.00004409617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404244,0.0004741139,0.001704286,0.005498944,0.00005428119,0.00002202507,0.000007618893,0.000005760724,0.05180862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980077,0.00005994384,0.0001860279,0.0001541434,0.000007598362,0.000006271929,0.00000170998,0.000001194448,0.001575416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01199038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02007586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196644496","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.47","title":"Using and Abusing Moorean Arguments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"M. Scarfone","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07847848016735143,"gpt":0.3007912275173255,"spread":0.2223127473499741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01837236,0.0006329137,0.0007707084,0.002812918,0.0048473,0.007856323,0.002247143,0.006418428,0.00833272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04342647,0.0003785877,0.0007476335,0.001107487,0.02535907,0.01594364,0.007695218,0.006638615,0.001212711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004696961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002373239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001346858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001538063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9815901,0.01171122,0.0007446748,0.0014979,0.003812186,0.0006438832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572434,0.03069484,0.002229684,0.004492891,0.004447246,0.0008919438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001100197,0.000008445079,0.00009376944,0.00002176074,0.000004517843,0.00005744203,0.001308299,0.00009927517,0.0000747065,0.9945581,0.001243798,0.002518907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009400945,0.00001378011,0.000108986,0.0001270117,0.00001093513,0.00006469613,0.001119361,0.001815632,0.0005398486,0.9664855,0.02968777,0.00001700917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08372509,0.004885318,0.2075039,0.2043456,0.003088922,0.0001156819,0.0001498483,0.0004350727,0.4957505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484462,0.0008614925,0.02366481,0.00896654,0.0009595367,0.0001187317,0.00003881013,0.0001144959,0.01682928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01837236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09716356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409776382","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.12","title":"Disagreement, Public Reason, and Epistemic Abstinence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McGill University; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee","keywords":"Legitimacy; Public reason; Politics; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Elizabeth Edenberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03106477962561927,"gpt":0.2694985581371023,"spread":0.2384337785114831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02632991,0.0004044296,0.001002107,0.002565686,0.008348729,0.01035505,0.002095151,0.008036924,0.00955286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06587747,0.0004008485,0.0008933925,0.002006886,0.05069373,0.0164979,0.01259401,0.009574087,0.0006494008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005902896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003706557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001999496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001007464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9679431,0.01936411,0.001425165,0.003101388,0.005731517,0.002434702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9117036,0.06337542,0.008045326,0.008109516,0.006846249,0.001919868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001717233,0.00002277074,0.0006879584,0.00003241435,0.000007365035,0.00007496412,0.003272251,0.0002371682,0.00004919996,0.993266,0.0006733584,0.001659456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001271828,0.000007001351,0.0003477555,0.00005700927,0.000005595341,0.0000430998,0.002137051,0.0005358864,0.0000731555,0.9919931,0.004777652,0.00001002724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2205588,0.002728322,0.08781362,0.1235406,0.0006142879,0.0001172858,0.0001833522,0.0001176698,0.564326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961676,0.0001546332,0.001046291,0.0009056637,0.000104615,0.00003525342,0.00001922287,0.00001230928,0.001554401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02632991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1392476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387119162","doi":"10.1017/apa.2023.20","title":"Inductive Reasoning Involving Social Kinds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Inductive reasoning; Profiling (computer programming); Statistic; Affirmative action; Action (physics); Socioeconomic status; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","authors":[{"name":"Barrett Emerick","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tyler Hildebrand","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03957287484304383,"gpt":0.3413077710256478,"spread":0.301734896182604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02913734,0.001026224,0.001319121,0.004279129,0.006064672,0.006495235,0.004132857,0.004109422,0.01181648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05229779,0.001117978,0.003595642,0.002936113,0.03141059,0.01630505,0.01038893,0.007854299,0.001122289],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008008838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002890551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003410598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002879811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9705382,0.02013805,0.001385748,0.002826774,0.003961896,0.001149363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9214237,0.06495826,0.002058201,0.006696144,0.004018757,0.0008448755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005248685,0.000006474207,0.0001015936,0.0000378398,0.00001271695,0.00005076153,0.0004593243,0.0006481796,0.00005013092,0.9966419,0.0005902682,0.001395584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004292448,0.000001451944,0.00001793253,0.00001487794,0.000003380221,0.0000112072,0.00008069081,0.001217627,0.00006308946,0.9959446,0.002637822,0.000003140021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01802083,0.001410508,0.8089645,0.0266436,0.0006006666,0.0003650858,0.0005103147,0.0006244373,0.1428601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7325571,0.0009938835,0.2485733,0.004651695,0.001040927,0.0009746504,0.0006455203,0.0002916522,0.01027134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02913734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1540948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221075592","doi":"10.1017/apa.2021.38","title":"Resisting Marriage, Reclaiming Right: An (Early) Modern Critique of Marriage","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Institution; De facto; Subordination (linguistics); Dowry; Politics; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Dominance (genetics); Law; Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"KELIN EMMETT","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02827200768408728,"gpt":0.2419529506510548,"spread":0.2136809429669676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005081751,0.0002253731,0.0003870337,0.001168165,0.007136596,0.005637141,0.0009009092,0.003801539,0.003467343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007209348,0.0001745565,0.0002335214,0.000923694,0.04085241,0.004635688,0.00275587,0.004851069,0.0003171361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007606755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00251418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008029013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007816902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946181,0.003604513,0.00007913437,0.0004086652,0.0009314034,0.0003582998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679,0.002196412,0.0002187913,0.000230389,0.0003494434,0.0002150076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003746114,0.000004030858,0.00004886313,0.000005497395,6.145407e-7,0.00002518241,0.005034574,0.00003836522,0.00001948418,0.9923812,0.001533494,0.0009048938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001612598,0.00001976509,0.0003522518,0.0001081465,0.000003550457,0.0001317308,0.005043612,0.0005216933,0.0001413105,0.7989722,0.1946774,0.00001205584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0749841,0.015714,0.01613096,0.1875479,0.0007639293,0.00002052674,0.00005068575,0.0000395251,0.7047485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678945,0.00189501,0.001017821,0.004485524,0.000734332,0.0000225905,0.000007948371,0.00002362869,0.0239187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008029013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05519116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416100456","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.10017","title":"The Argument from Imagination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentational and representational acting; Variety (cybernetics); Perception; Direct and indirect realism; Argument (complex analysis); Content (measure theory); Realism; Qualia","authors":[{"name":"Boyd Millar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006866579307068485,"gpt":0.30047887754851,"spread":0.2936122982414415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003639495,0.0004631401,0.0004522335,0.001263908,0.001890346,0.004492503,0.001389566,0.003895263,0.009191752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01284145,0.0002690899,0.0007019429,0.0004456154,0.02102906,0.0120383,0.004539688,0.006843292,0.001288109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002060893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008965378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007122227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003507222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967986,0.001878295,0.00009206542,0.0003416507,0.0006361881,0.0002531726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915924,0.005666078,0.000403194,0.001053124,0.0009338064,0.0003513164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001219185,0.000006051985,0.00006472483,0.00003217008,0.0000024383,0.0000479619,0.000961851,0.00005534508,0.00008835646,0.9954652,0.001662856,0.001600871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001548668,0.00001130255,0.00009159873,0.00006681055,0.000003522033,0.00009405135,0.0006094769,0.0003784368,0.0001514058,0.9735334,0.02503925,0.000005356021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04401376,0.005821561,0.1056469,0.1860641,0.003146285,0.00008329483,0.0001744005,0.0002007223,0.6548489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622768,0.001093472,0.006237789,0.01096838,0.001747278,0.00008999813,0.00008788474,0.0000996482,0.01739875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009191752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0307495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402729622","doi":"10.1017/apa.2024.7","title":"Our “Cognitive Limitations” and the Hard Problem of Consciousness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Consciousness; Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Andrew W. Stark","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03225947408102278,"gpt":0.3154374131907989,"spread":0.2831779391097761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008751513,0.0005031636,0.0006021576,0.0018465,0.003027005,0.006212858,0.002146206,0.004223684,0.004376116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02011812,0.0005785997,0.000771021,0.001037788,0.06063321,0.02288833,0.007810606,0.01007303,0.0004657828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00317925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002224498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002127137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001356426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940941,0.003313844,0.0002702828,0.000696516,0.001129751,0.0004955272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875718,0.008280993,0.0008387601,0.001838203,0.0009458459,0.0005243176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009195605,0.000005178091,0.0001484279,0.0000399801,0.00000657263,0.00003497097,0.001257275,0.0002495163,0.0001266261,0.9927875,0.001115315,0.004219367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004325647,0.000002433339,0.0001082166,0.00001890609,0.00000149751,0.00002103077,0.0004202396,0.0002591721,0.00005096413,0.9955036,0.00360489,0.000004726652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1494046,0.01599513,0.1564258,0.4250276,0.001875232,0.00007385607,0.000151968,0.0002949261,0.2507509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784864,0.00190112,0.0106126,0.005388906,0.0006581445,0.00007739887,0.00002931562,0.00004471547,0.002801376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008751513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04628295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413086233","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.10008","title":"A Functional Analysis of Self-Deception","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lingnan University; United Arab Emirates University; University of Cambridge; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Mistake; Deception; Self-deception; Psychology; Accident (philosophy); Interpersonal communication; Lying; Reputation; Social psychology; Function (biology); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Vladimir Krstić","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01582266523987205,"gpt":0.3107933155263046,"spread":0.2949706502864326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002770032,0.0004940632,0.0003904793,0.002307817,0.001141188,0.002372412,0.001069871,0.001454435,0.006880933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006365424,0.0002254185,0.0008390873,0.001170904,0.005050309,0.005021722,0.001707793,0.001554982,0.0004935393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002353129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000745237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00195925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007158028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979888,0.001025793,0.0001026801,0.0001888403,0.000518545,0.0001752886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925628,0.003521433,0.0008035507,0.001021639,0.001784215,0.0003063524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006719236,0.00001210853,0.0003209097,0.00002401657,0.000006405141,0.00004855215,0.0002189236,0.00224677,0.0002069155,0.9938486,0.0003367676,0.002723377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003629767,0.00002019319,0.0007297082,0.00004853361,0.00001028162,0.0001214948,0.0002572445,0.03819524,0.0002655833,0.9547021,0.005635525,0.00001045258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1117319,0.001702771,0.6689661,0.01059751,0.0002873612,0.00007367277,0.0002643673,0.0001807656,0.2061955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961681,0.0005391113,0.02930724,0.0003111502,0.0002150948,0.0000729669,0.00008771682,0.00004433164,0.007741396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006880933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02301902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195535244","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.24","title":"Buddhaghosa, James, and Thompson on Conscious Flow","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Rivalry; Consciousness; Binocular rivalry; Philosophy; Epistemology; Flow (mathematics); Cognitive science; Psychology; Perception; Economics; Physics; Visual perception","authors":[{"name":"Mark Fortney","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03200259226752623,"gpt":0.3022331302566455,"spread":0.2702305379891193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001734712,0.0002008566,0.0004265154,0.0008743631,0.001433608,0.003094214,0.00070357,0.002006507,0.003598113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007022953,0.0002006775,0.0003302953,0.0005204865,0.01051001,0.005757645,0.002828068,0.003451061,0.000367571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001345467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001090199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002340493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001456315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992555,0.0002942526,0.00003300629,0.0001406051,0.0002015154,0.00007507997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996726,0.002260322,0.0001595995,0.0003028215,0.0003796827,0.0001716429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003748723,0.00000898279,0.0002405771,0.00005108289,0.000006733197,0.00006371456,0.001443165,0.0002075996,0.0002921711,0.9827096,0.006335743,0.008603082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007595324,0.000009649306,0.0004959722,0.0000945143,0.000006332468,0.00006051436,0.0003701004,0.0004636668,0.0002587809,0.9744936,0.0237255,0.00001384364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1296015,0.06210201,0.07119192,0.3339055,0.006107453,0.00009084406,0.0002499823,0.0001079108,0.3966429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924601,0.01956328,0.01030652,0.02052166,0.003489337,0.00009054592,0.00005626008,0.00008958608,0.02128185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003598113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01203692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}