{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":61,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":61,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"a919d898e77f","filters":{"venue":"Judgment and Decision Making"}},"results":[{"id":"W2106568252","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500002205","title":"Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3803,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Subject (documents); Data science; Quality (philosophy); Social media; Population; Computer science; Data quality; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Engineering; Sociology; Operations management; Physics; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0201525776565425,"gpt":0.293849149241808,"spread":0.2736965715852655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004191235,0.0001535542,0.0001556771,0.0001247255,0.000297413,0.0004338732,0.0003285446,0.00009157523,0.00002932977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005234358,0.0001277192,0.0000553783,0.0001514904,0.00002175011,0.000187742,0.0003201242,0.0002804352,0.00005279471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001801621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001268079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002410832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002339635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985985,0.00001580589,0.0002345605,0.0004681305,0.0004163906,0.0002666275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990755,0.0002037161,0.00007980136,0.0005063792,0.00003047762,0.0001041146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004876986,0.00008585112,0.0004505447,0.000005147913,0.0000102096,0.00005334455,0.0006250491,0.00008850282,0.07266989,0.08208358,0.001695942,0.8421832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00420405,0.0009487097,0.008373145,0.001679066,0.000036495,0.0003169657,0.0006095175,0.5686054,0.275513,0.1071387,0.03036012,0.002214864],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7800125,0.00006551653,0.2163926,0.0001080876,0.001083884,0.00008466867,1.761527e-7,0.0001271004,0.002125391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9327685,0.000003374546,0.06647147,0.0005622982,0.000126315,0.000005617305,2.952874e-7,0.00001030782,0.00005178688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8399683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5208239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282631200","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006999","title":"On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":556,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Discernment; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Vagueness; Focus (optics); Skepticism; Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1738164545830398,"gpt":0.3250061057352174,"spread":0.1511896511521775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004170483,0.0000772597,0.00008556792,0.00006852567,0.0001341292,0.00003414778,0.00007145951,0.00004420273,0.00003130897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002657001,0.00004855203,0.00002119391,0.00009899702,0.00008979784,0.00007755982,0.00006119547,0.00008773116,0.00003321544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002094119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005256551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002538899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002208862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991597,0.00005369115,0.0001562316,0.0002252334,0.0003036222,0.0001015084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993446,0.0003887911,0.00008346519,0.0001145856,0.00002377343,0.00004472074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001570201,0.0002251322,0.001216497,0.00001680871,0.000009890875,0.00001112329,0.0006669911,0.0001471477,0.2897057,0.03902818,0.006586143,0.6608162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002855452,0.001735305,0.04497727,0.0004908129,0.00003694591,0.0001650552,0.0007246575,0.00739027,0.09331629,0.8414631,0.006374903,0.0004698613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940531,0.00005815426,0.002409358,0.0009182387,0.0003671268,0.0001313869,0.000001331148,0.00001489006,0.002046463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984033,0.00005418961,0.0003717167,0.001034357,0.00004223628,0.000006106891,1.943165e-7,0.000004407645,0.00008351073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.802435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1979894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118185477","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500000334","title":"A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Replicate; Risk perception; Variation (astronomy); Trait; Psychology; Multilevel model; Perception; Econometrics; Social psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04789777491659246,"gpt":0.3528333583393616,"spread":0.3049355834227692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005544168,0.0001007048,0.0001270274,0.0001308891,0.001503838,0.0002694723,0.0001118229,0.00006504594,0.000266645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004466553,0.00009152002,0.00008818698,0.0001865477,0.00006847121,0.0001646304,0.00005061254,0.00005887876,0.00003763122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009456168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009517405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005245312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006371915,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987704,0.00004427301,0.0002706181,0.0002757982,0.0003772447,0.000261693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993083,0.0001340481,0.0002531357,0.0001422885,0.0001068199,0.00005535025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007334674,0.00008672531,0.03468941,0.000006267727,0.000005535251,0.000001756736,0.003363269,0.0002110681,0.00005632118,0.4674388,0.04382258,0.450245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006000358,0.00002044358,0.1047758,0.00006465039,0.00001511624,3.633386e-7,0.003922235,0.0004461533,0.000002608716,0.1548453,0.7351314,0.0001757709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5552482,0.0002206814,0.4061004,0.0007246837,0.0005304863,0.0005708726,0.000007487123,0.00009541692,0.03650181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8761499,0.0003313024,0.1220664,0.0002590862,0.0004397672,0.00004409884,0.00000631045,0.00001183643,0.0006913065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6913089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W90283668","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005933","title":"Decisional enhancement and autonomy: public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Boettcher Foundation","keywords":"Subconscious; Covert; Nudge theory; Vignette; Psychology; Social psychology; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Cognition; Affect (linguistics); Psychological intervention; Cognitive psychology; Applied psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1123574101406742,"gpt":0.3859037021502991,"spread":0.273546292009625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002378,0.0004025133,0.0006672056,0.0005833243,0.0005548291,0.003189473,0.000550809,0.0001939511,0.001972754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001497167,0.0002885198,0.0001221021,0.0003738875,0.0002449137,0.001447985,0.001243005,0.0002257462,0.0003876385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001357758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001595108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003584368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000305549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954339,0.00008295923,0.001228531,0.00125017,0.001483392,0.0005211097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952286,0.002986413,0.0003793439,0.0006758393,0.0003351379,0.0003946997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006342602,0.00007312254,0.02712247,0.000003483086,0.0000156676,0.000007381139,0.0001503424,0.000007910356,0.0001563864,0.001056913,0.006985731,0.9643572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001670364,0.0004438414,0.3072635,0.000285813,0.00003884445,0.0001051832,0.0006356158,0.01135829,0.000119844,0.5731884,0.1039865,0.0009037973],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786444,0.001451363,0.0149392,0.00153215,0.000637672,0.0004105364,0.00001325155,0.00005010409,0.00232129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685878,0.0003554586,0.02911278,0.001310493,0.0001193558,0.00004346331,0.000002470552,0.00002422052,0.0004439985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9634534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425062","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007439","title":"On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Paranormal; Psychology; Skepticism; Social psychology; Ideology; Politics; Scale (ratio); Perception; Confirmation bias; Fundamentalism; Relevance (law); Rationality; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3691861727012953,"gpt":0.4564502937217441,"spread":0.08726412102044878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001153221,0.0001586247,0.0002185848,0.0001095875,0.002110483,0.0004825726,0.0004595483,0.0001108845,0.00002361819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002032901,0.0001171277,0.00006259549,0.000579185,0.0005900897,0.0003894585,0.000244925,0.0001479809,0.00001953609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008621574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009145829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001432399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006916514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980796,0.00006384779,0.0002692354,0.0005427895,0.0004682313,0.0005763146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972697,0.00192399,0.00009948771,0.0002146845,0.0001485747,0.0003435927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001614731,0.00004205549,0.01431765,0.00001071627,0.00001120816,0.000001094495,0.009686217,0.00000142561,0.00103834,0.9138973,0.02915313,0.03167938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001906825,0.002893142,0.061332,0.001719737,0.0001309247,0.000007619429,0.03524237,0.0002861175,0.0007292629,0.7002502,0.1939748,0.001526999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7742544,0.001811174,0.004943606,0.2105993,0.001449536,0.002349735,0.00003068579,0.0001413289,0.004420273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584809,0.0005182677,0.0008779749,0.038915,0.0009737284,0.0002111375,5.609512e-7,0.00001240705,0.0000100387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2136471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121427863","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007695","title":"Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test is stable across time","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Psychology; Cognition; Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Set (abstract data type); Cognitive style; Stability (learning theory); Reflection (computer programming); Social psychology; Computer science; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1468511458828891,"gpt":0.4260042680523236,"spread":0.2791531221694344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003373598,0.0002232126,0.0002883868,0.0001903984,0.001264985,0.001064529,0.0005056196,0.0001156972,0.002059593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002093897,0.0001296743,0.0001004156,0.0006531615,0.0002298443,0.0004483815,0.0003592041,0.0002122501,0.005797253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006984408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003225674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001274933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970456,0.00005059609,0.0006710369,0.0007245672,0.001113263,0.0003949882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927425,0.005838146,0.0003291409,0.0005871876,0.0004138169,0.00008915747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002533516,0.00006985075,0.009409419,6.683487e-7,0.000005292342,0.000003089244,0.0006533532,0.000009357773,0.0002075847,0.0000329238,0.02345329,0.9659018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004082639,0.005661898,0.1827238,0.002522787,0.0001326797,0.0001764792,0.008663177,0.1889962,0.0134456,0.3928054,0.198381,0.002408347],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832978,0.00003059424,0.0009195775,0.0003652083,0.0005613264,0.0002218661,0.00003093957,0.00004371313,0.01452894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948418,0.00002456792,0.0009075574,0.002061479,0.0002416883,0.00001199885,8.954928e-7,0.00001780046,0.0018922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9634935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313428942","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008640","title":"Beyond “fake news”: Analytic thinking and the detection of false and hyperpartisan news headlines","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Australian Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Miami Foundation; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Misinformation; Motivated reasoning; Psychology; Social psychology; Discernment; Content (measure theory); Social media; Confirmation bias; Analytic reasoning; Politics; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03216683891097311,"gpt":0.3276348011791145,"spread":0.2954679622681414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000798156,0.00007455543,0.0001657285,0.0000742071,0.0005192996,0.0002902064,0.00005294451,0.00005442012,0.00004706897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005092692,0.00005062584,0.00003349909,0.0002257448,0.0001495284,0.000309128,0.0000764821,0.0000706593,0.000001777259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001477692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003700097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001550366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002183837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990361,0.00008223044,0.0002702134,0.0001282383,0.0003485332,0.0001347408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991897,0.0004391762,0.0001282241,0.0001039901,0.0000677446,0.0000711322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001264237,0.00001536406,0.0038195,0.0000184515,0.00001846523,0.000002658749,0.02658112,0.00002410881,0.0003723795,0.0234179,0.0003062221,0.9452974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01072804,0.0002646138,0.09839665,0.001175809,0.0003749538,0.0001152516,0.2857998,0.02685848,0.002422533,0.4836836,0.08911429,0.001066015],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838617,0.00233299,0.003855631,0.001436809,0.0001492687,0.0001441834,0.00000117062,0.00001640613,0.008201885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656,0.001440648,0.000983741,0.0008220574,0.00006630461,8.255112e-7,5.584098e-7,0.00000350527,0.0001223347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9442314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3994085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526394992","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500003788","title":"Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Certainty; Cognitive style; Cognition; Psychology; Intuition; Betrayal; Style (visual arts); Social psychology; Faith; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Political science; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Literature; Art; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05128446185875323,"gpt":0.3899230104575077,"spread":0.3386385485987544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003425115,0.00008350047,0.0001391771,0.0000899656,0.0003098035,0.00007923172,0.000162706,0.00008761972,0.00103835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002063381,0.00005577842,0.00004891464,0.0001732947,0.00009643632,0.0001302006,0.00008667966,0.00004127745,0.00030288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005617645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001229717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009303135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005157343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99898,0.0000427909,0.0001653749,0.0002470956,0.0002828933,0.0002818381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993492,0.0002659878,0.00008299922,0.0001211748,0.00005431064,0.0001263432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001358169,0.00004693704,0.03742461,0.000002403631,0.0000125044,0.00001480443,0.009144151,7.762963e-7,0.00224952,0.01390189,0.1761599,0.7609066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009506781,0.0001831549,0.13755,0.0005892141,0.00001381316,0.000002870467,0.01046238,0.000004594986,0.0001370932,0.1206618,0.7289945,0.0004498964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614351,0.0001022182,0.0035173,0.01036974,0.0008531535,0.0001719478,0.000002977916,0.00006516237,0.02348238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989006,0.00006644289,0.001475275,0.004932862,0.0004313785,0.00001240683,1.222574e-7,0.000008361,0.004067141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7604567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W648149064","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005969","title":"I can take the risk, but you should be safe: Self-other differences in situations involving physical safety","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Risk aversion (psychology); Risk-seeking; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06588615894340759,"gpt":0.3466725328961536,"spread":0.280786373952746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005610723,0.0001120216,0.0001750001,0.00006789862,0.00081358,0.0001787848,0.0002345736,0.00009684017,0.000457477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000226868,0.00007264688,0.00006436399,0.0002463688,0.0001699052,0.000164245,0.00008199942,0.0002239358,0.00003504188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007836663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00497745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009902461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986659,0.0002164406,0.0002329638,0.0002431091,0.0003650254,0.0002765864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987421,0.0009040051,0.0001100782,0.0001362335,0.00004820047,0.00005938003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006893725,0.000374803,0.3157359,0.000005304943,0.00006580862,0.000003364808,0.1617442,0.00001300172,0.0003737439,0.06741074,0.01014345,0.4440607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005561217,0.00007222042,0.6999341,0.00009493095,0.00003050808,6.210714e-7,0.04364794,0.002363094,0.000008408581,0.2385792,0.01442216,0.0002907165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771987,0.0001554921,0.0005582863,0.006748283,0.0003666945,0.0003167174,0.000005510857,0.00003935484,0.01461096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973313,0.0001998355,0.0004599,0.00129973,0.0003276799,0.00003748929,7.18004e-7,0.000007487609,0.0003359034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.44377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7524449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263996908","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005167","title":"It pays to be nice, but not really nice: Asymmetric reputations from prosociality across 7 countries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nice; Prosocial behavior; Selfishness; Social psychology; Reputation; Altruism (biology); Psychology; Trait; Cross-cultural; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1876841873687597,"gpt":0.446884117951685,"spread":0.2591999305829253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006320417,0.0001793099,0.0002842806,0.00008252448,0.0003091889,0.0003502347,0.0001931608,0.0001441322,0.0002439929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003575837,0.0001365956,0.00007197478,0.0003559728,0.00005050771,0.0001613297,0.0001988706,0.0001356426,0.0002524999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008855895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003233706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005578178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006436458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981307,0.00007335797,0.0004446363,0.0004908288,0.0005322521,0.0003282659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986128,0.0005296436,0.0001683431,0.0003014151,0.0002130796,0.000174691],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001962243,0.0003326319,0.08970311,0.00002166894,0.0002031474,0.000061386,0.06557008,0.00003205574,0.0001617856,0.0128781,0.3798932,0.4491806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002085777,0.0003399548,0.8143405,0.0001718593,0.00008603052,0.00000967797,0.01726341,0.0002045264,0.0001009933,0.02715957,0.1376479,0.0005898167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838123,0.0004953403,0.002519705,0.002687334,0.0009529436,0.0003437712,0.0002121357,0.00006817517,0.008908333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905322,0.00005213474,0.002551512,0.004568751,0.0002496003,0.00004560722,0.00003257638,0.00001363883,0.001953968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7246374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5570208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893743957","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006240","title":"How generalizable is good judgment? A multi-task, multi-benchmark study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Quality (philosophy); Axiom; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.23110184384626,"gpt":0.4355178639077162,"spread":0.2044160200614563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004093754,0.0005773568,0.0009551508,0.0006141643,0.002384938,0.00911426,0.002403296,0.0002474845,0.0005075136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002305811,0.0004308652,0.000347076,0.0003165666,0.0001874564,0.001696834,0.001903326,0.0003613411,0.0004515566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001247125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006833987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008612473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003349857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938061,0.0001585321,0.001356581,0.001867625,0.00206399,0.0007471461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938281,0.001141529,0.001257999,0.003035591,0.0003836534,0.0003531534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001198768,0.0008098748,0.1484112,0.000003014258,0.00003832201,0.0001022469,0.0008207912,0.00009757371,0.0001850798,0.00006410572,0.009974505,0.8393734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02121766,0.001734245,0.4833037,0.0008398346,0.0004356361,0.0001274151,0.01564992,0.1432549,0.0005366998,0.1428047,0.1860072,0.00408797],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9557912,0.000397364,0.03914011,0.0006589344,0.002006057,0.000853288,0.00004811151,0.00007412244,0.001030822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.926681,0.00006106991,0.06813366,0.0005923138,0.0001791065,0.00004869392,0.000002226476,0.00004743097,0.00425443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8352854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948638383","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500003417","title":"Cross-cultural support for a link between analytic thinking and disbelief in God: Evidence from India and the United Kingdom","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian Research Council; Miami Foundation; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Intuition; Psychology; Belief in God; Social psychology; Cognitive style; Cognition; Religious belief; Belief system; Argument (complex analysis); Kingdom; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09745994042259425,"gpt":0.4323333970417803,"spread":0.334873456619186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002339614,0.0001241962,0.0002844224,0.000129692,0.0004748197,0.0005895076,0.0002023775,0.0001504481,0.00004638904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004754374,0.00008148062,0.00005045267,0.0002684325,0.0003788117,0.0003338866,0.0001230299,0.0001559151,0.00000491772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003176269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000273374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003422211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009954058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985441,0.0001454546,0.0003509133,0.0003723601,0.0003258881,0.000261316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961856,0.003363706,0.0001490746,0.0001641894,0.00006955598,0.00006785159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002254074,0.000005980269,0.9506362,0.00001143439,0.00001767761,0.000002079596,0.01838994,0.000006021595,0.000009545053,0.006523085,0.0002044094,0.02396823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002177284,0.00007181786,0.8802524,0.0004044519,0.00004209732,0.00000125945,0.002135566,0.0004222779,0.000002780237,0.1072576,0.007044937,0.0001875969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951152,0.00091642,0.000585457,0.002049608,0.0002487597,0.0004960251,0.000007071247,0.0000169736,0.0005645396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975047,0.0004261665,0.0008837337,0.0007977923,0.0002884373,0.00001163183,0.000007853676,0.000006847065,0.00007285798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1007345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5684635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151912132","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500000395","title":"A short form of the Maximization Scale: Factor structure, reliability and validity studies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nomological network; Scale (ratio); Maximization; Reliability (semiconductor); Construct validity; Validity; Context (archaeology); Criterion validity; Psychology; Predictive validity; Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Psychometrics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Structural equation modeling; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1880696885798228,"gpt":0.4337229011967236,"spread":0.2456532126169008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001540025,0.00008278916,0.0001603853,0.00004340509,0.0002325262,0.000008103568,0.00006584479,0.00006677875,0.0001331678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005220272,0.00005180001,0.00005480719,0.0001022053,0.0001166362,0.00007438306,0.0001001704,0.00009547623,0.000001165102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002627195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007752232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001316586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004816669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991575,0.0000464078,0.0003149146,0.0001921888,0.0001671913,0.0001218339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994652,0.0001159296,0.00008576972,0.0002168112,0.00007881773,0.00003745582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001270187,0.00008408009,0.7834895,0.00002741413,0.00001099128,0.000001255125,0.00159007,0.000002526035,0.00004697206,0.0002558069,0.00208982,0.2122746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002413097,0.0000843705,0.9934059,0.00008411941,0.00001687215,0.00001346956,0.000228179,0.00005879416,0.0000725916,0.005478606,0.0002583827,0.00005735709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975911,0.0006288132,0.0007462883,0.00005776672,0.0005547786,0.0002462679,0.00002854448,0.00001187012,0.0001345041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987053,0.0001068018,0.0009943718,0.00007184844,0.00002526141,0.000008435474,0.000001311993,0.000005111491,0.00008157793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2122172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2112343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123012778","doi":"10.1017/s193029750000334x","title":"Finding meaning in the clouds: Illusory pattern perception predicts receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perception; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Irrational number; Social psychology; Illusory contours; Relation (database); Cognitive psychology; Optical illusion; Mathematics; Computer science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1054972157992893,"gpt":0.3236923072402082,"spread":0.2181950914409189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009577422,0.0001664372,0.0001753684,0.000175547,0.0002223614,0.0001255159,0.0002979466,0.00008328833,0.0002744212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001473894,0.0001187743,0.00005360404,0.000259496,0.00004216358,0.0002095065,0.000187031,0.0002440556,0.0005425196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000863493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008948011,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009348277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001597995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980616,0.0001495112,0.0002910806,0.0005702186,0.0005981483,0.0003294346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990435,0.0005347856,0.00008820494,0.0002569971,0.00001609672,0.00006043329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005587874,0.0003459456,0.08978127,0.00004736929,0.000008259113,0.00007810073,0.008605136,0.000966225,0.1465942,0.002108955,0.005495568,0.7454102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002674199,0.000798373,0.9467742,0.001284248,0.00002394643,0.0001718563,0.003406393,0.008043135,0.00102323,0.02809812,0.006881234,0.0008210252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898061,0.00001588659,0.002633365,0.001566417,0.000769022,0.0004914075,0.000004714125,0.00003362206,0.004679486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923269,0.00003262809,0.0008978057,0.006391721,0.0001260425,0.00002170282,0.00000167821,0.00001163926,0.0001898457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.856993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6973172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425055","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005386","title":"Bullshit makes the art grow profounder","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prestige; Style (visual arts); Perception; Mode (computer interface); Psychology; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Visual arts; Computer science; Art; Philosophy; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02854340655671983,"gpt":0.331113053061777,"spread":0.3025696465050571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008559324,0.00006135958,0.00007448121,0.00004829037,0.0003990467,0.0003365101,0.0001261702,0.00004631323,0.001718647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001236033,0.00003783799,0.00003106351,0.0001338495,0.00005122886,0.0003149364,0.00004769439,0.00007164031,0.001027646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003141585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003783112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001056045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005899135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999052,0.00003307779,0.0001483607,0.00009667464,0.0004773598,0.000192494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999473,0.0002391824,0.00006841109,0.0001287732,0.00003611592,0.00005447232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008816993,0.00003816458,0.00627397,0.000015781,0.00001855361,0.000001929478,0.04812728,0.00004455744,0.00005105839,0.2600953,0.1789076,0.5063376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000456632,0.00003746105,0.01867804,0.0001151042,0.000008345845,0.000002696074,0.01638257,0.0007050162,0.00001515068,0.04769196,0.9157291,0.0001779197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.586875,0.0001288676,0.002268626,0.003190526,0.0005728576,0.000400962,8.038083e-7,0.00004760554,0.4065148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884669,0.00006345354,0.0006494247,0.002249873,0.00009311165,0.000001442456,6.645607e-7,0.000003954554,0.00847114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7368215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123344650","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008251","title":"On the validity of the CNI model of moral decision-making: Reply to Baron and Goodwin (2020)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Western University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Dilemma; Moral dilemma; Subjective expected utility; Psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1711582064817975,"gpt":0.3223093677832993,"spread":0.1511511613015018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004511691,0.0001545223,0.0002288897,0.00005028755,0.000213311,0.00003574244,0.0003841405,0.00005272606,0.00005922489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001140325,0.00008584196,0.00009148667,0.0002591546,0.0001331398,0.00007491535,0.0004566962,0.0001667208,0.0000106998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001720965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001889119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001605287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001213174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998201,0.00008861112,0.0003968583,0.0004731053,0.0006581135,0.0001823379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979972,0.001359932,0.000181066,0.00034265,0.00003563096,0.00008352324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007160096,0.0009708083,0.01699516,0.0001418197,0.00005630534,0.00005614696,0.004600358,0.05822629,0.2381514,0.1464737,0.1505003,0.3766676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002115554,0.001569662,0.06825406,0.001775706,0.00008299397,0.00004280041,0.0003917197,0.1766463,0.03735986,0.7090331,0.00204289,0.000685303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825728,0.00003670054,0.007277788,0.008629538,0.0002188258,0.0003066617,0.00001996936,0.00001362904,0.0009240907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815139,0.00003136992,0.002958214,0.01541817,0.00004040339,0.000006020002,1.476776e-7,0.000009380214,0.00002239645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5625594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3500533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900647770","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006628","title":"Boosting intelligence analysts’ judgment accuracy: What works, what fails?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Boosting (machine learning); Intelligence analysis; Psychology; Unpacking; Overconfidence effect; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2369632656398206,"gpt":0.4637587489756343,"spread":0.2267954833358137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001567656,0.0002338343,0.0003302261,0.0002219619,0.0003347878,0.004024273,0.0002524566,0.0001048531,0.000566921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004541328,0.0001930193,0.00007556748,0.0003172893,0.0001233662,0.002845693,0.0002721523,0.0001711933,0.0001087991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008250024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004120912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002657496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001697478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980062,0.0001172022,0.0006064001,0.0004524643,0.0004655242,0.0003521882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917542,0.007147945,0.0003249999,0.0004565088,0.0002037364,0.0001125597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005998183,0.00004611878,0.0001082058,0.00002731242,0.0000263777,0.000005012456,0.001863208,0.000005728998,0.00008681897,0.0079902,0.005119251,0.9846618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003511666,0.0001476962,0.0005507582,0.007060645,0.0001207754,0.00002643414,0.092204,0.005400483,0.002889814,0.8838962,0.006793987,0.00055808],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1646944,0.004818582,0.8256859,0.0005947999,0.003323269,0.00033056,0.000001128618,0.0001167161,0.0004347366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4698703,0.004511731,0.5242966,0.000826447,0.0003309927,0.00002290091,0.000003608082,0.00002523597,0.0001121117],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155792879","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005404","title":"Cultivating credibility with probability words and numbers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Credibility; Probability distribution; Psychology; Probability model; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0810091612559306,"gpt":0.3692078297221894,"spread":0.2881986684662587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003876545,0.0002572285,0.0005009784,0.0002137081,0.0002640624,0.0008195153,0.0003768414,0.0001218794,0.0005460397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001413448,0.0001640073,0.00008304432,0.0004816306,0.0001566872,0.0006184333,0.0004706483,0.0002296549,0.0001442457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007715716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004924493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001758665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005728509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996419,0.00008995808,0.0008716774,0.001157621,0.00112668,0.0003350389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951638,0.00327288,0.000365605,0.0008451222,0.0001910002,0.0001616104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002060708,0.00004206447,0.3446024,0.000004721346,0.00000448448,0.000003967494,0.0003195002,0.0001341139,0.00005879185,0.0002129984,0.0003118191,0.654099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002271601,0.0004929829,0.2342016,0.0005869805,0.0000380515,0.00007894778,0.003899212,0.01304347,0.0000879282,0.7347111,0.009732649,0.0008554679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889158,0.0000904716,0.005597604,0.000130365,0.0003254584,0.000439118,0.000006775152,0.00005112544,0.004443279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469789,0.000007639072,0.05254935,0.0001915191,0.00004110617,0.000008764549,7.512879e-7,0.00001524697,0.0002067313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7344981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7902604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120650628","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500003661","title":"Preference-driven biases in decision makers’ information search and evaluation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Psychology; Confirmation bias; Loyalty; Selection (genetic algorithm); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Marketing; Machine learning; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2301623961655558,"gpt":0.2888387794089135,"spread":0.05867638324335775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008717674,0.0001025006,0.0001751676,0.0003200808,0.00008662949,0.0001926281,0.00006479827,0.00007706097,0.0009292769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001275614,0.0001065857,0.00002366151,0.000098365,0.00002816848,0.001162533,0.0001073483,0.00007863753,0.0005999284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001586604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007955793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001111794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003666155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989442,0.00001493303,0.0005345864,0.0002405464,0.00009552685,0.0001702451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994817,0.0001830441,0.0001276283,0.0001382763,0.00001831513,0.0000510739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000255973,0.0000255262,0.4418301,0.000008239454,0.000006103272,1.878e-7,0.0006115091,0.005578567,0.00001300415,0.002606808,0.0003308327,0.5489635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007508965,0.00003400761,0.6905202,0.00007475682,0.000002503629,0.000001320702,0.0002602488,0.2757572,0.000007827115,0.03225664,0.000227586,0.0001068581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990657,0.0005017085,0.005685346,0.00008572575,0.0001131806,0.0004951382,0.000007918974,0.000009254646,0.002444767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932922,0.0004358978,0.005994202,0.0001623126,0.00001818715,0.00005541215,0.00001824205,0.000006321887,0.00001722393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5488566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301929366","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007658","title":"It’s still bullshit: Reply to Dalton (2016)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1063872466340327,"gpt":0.3298522586512913,"spread":0.2234650120172587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003308989,0.0001547248,0.0001592253,0.0001489996,0.0001538402,0.00005900139,0.0002322364,0.00005392481,0.0004858822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003778977,0.00009459334,0.00005203091,0.0001431155,0.00006448466,0.0001619478,0.0002223826,0.00007029031,0.001093292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004648767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001367253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002174796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002054236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982748,0.00003823104,0.0002913529,0.0006305447,0.0004434564,0.0003215908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989206,0.000505565,0.00007702195,0.0003053813,0.00002726951,0.0001641288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005047293,0.0001260576,0.001065359,0.000006074868,0.00000477644,0.00006854557,0.0002067808,0.00001385106,0.1022898,0.003839198,0.2163952,0.6754797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001721451,0.0004751151,0.02182984,0.0008986703,0.00001355852,0.000106539,0.00004584355,0.0000927184,0.01802275,0.04872591,0.9075401,0.0005274495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9229447,0.00008276892,0.02056047,0.04280272,0.001475361,0.0003337985,0.00001758414,0.0001074454,0.01167518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520876,0.0001113588,0.003570938,0.04186418,0.0001458307,0.00001496084,2.744664e-7,0.00001315059,0.002191696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6911449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265722090","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005763","title":"On the psychology of self-prediction: Consideration of situational barriers to intended actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Situational ethics; Psychology; Social psychology; Test (biology); Affect (linguistics); Focus (optics); Applied psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0973092329114026,"gpt":0.4311693879073777,"spread":0.3338601549959752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000447866,0.00006845711,0.0001226536,0.0001539146,0.0001569257,0.000009758343,0.00007001985,0.00006970242,0.002060488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002097955,0.00005072333,0.00005866767,0.0001320087,0.00004399935,0.00003823394,0.00002460906,0.0001027136,0.00003885727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001728601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000184575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008421196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001846832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990775,0.00009105009,0.0003890171,0.0001689978,0.0001674805,0.0001059593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989965,0.000463956,0.0001370507,0.000216647,0.0001050254,0.00008083491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007524692,0.0003914507,0.01195812,0.00001195492,0.00006312014,8.971348e-7,0.001871478,0.00009828032,0.001080223,0.6961591,0.1075324,0.1800805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003066308,0.003177178,0.8099356,0.0006134619,0.0001360127,0.00003912609,0.003067069,0.002845737,0.0005675163,0.1539275,0.02230499,0.0003194042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514658,0.00002630074,0.03805267,0.001467281,0.000824558,0.0002451214,0.00001886804,0.00002133459,0.007877999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953997,0.000003271885,0.002749601,0.001708922,0.0000387001,0.00003690863,0.000003348919,0.000005254009,0.00005428464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7979775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425009","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008603","title":"Facilitating sender-receiver agreement in communicated probabilities: Is it best to use words, numbers or both?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Communication source; Agreement; Meaning (existential); Bounded function; Computer science; Scheme (mathematics); Natural language processing; Statistics; Linguistics; Psychology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2893744416054432,"gpt":0.4379435700530929,"spread":0.1485691284476497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002921595,0.0003492203,0.0006777677,0.0005349285,0.0003937409,0.001492338,0.0007928878,0.0001699134,0.00296871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006227103,0.0002684011,0.0001730977,0.001373295,0.0001007877,0.0007378459,0.001222769,0.0003253642,0.0006188249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000275702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001530527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001676234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002505027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948468,0.000265042,0.001735706,0.001173232,0.001431269,0.0005479499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878662,0.009788013,0.0003151852,0.001433086,0.0003533313,0.000244195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003514533,0.0002792419,0.02196425,0.00000815001,0.00001580106,0.0001238811,0.01010616,0.001113537,0.0001021637,0.00007709438,0.02287364,0.9429846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00641304,0.0009682854,0.02169091,0.005006848,0.0001177209,0.0001991695,0.3061371,0.0366558,0.0004646727,0.2082836,0.4108939,0.003168968],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905618,0.0001433101,0.00463279,0.001295275,0.0004664646,0.0004455052,0.0000608367,0.00002966189,0.002364297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9075952,0.0000929514,0.08542144,0.002883173,0.00002765578,0.0000328318,0.000004842843,0.00002329205,0.003918658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113297348","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006100","title":"Right-wing ideology and numeracy: A perception of greater ability, but poorer performance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Numeracy; Ideology; Psychology; Social dominance orientation; Social psychology; Cognition; Perception; Authoritarianism; Developmental psychology; Politics; Literacy; Democracy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0225783977088379,"gpt":0.3280059275475961,"spread":0.3054275298387581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005009935,0.00007659148,0.0001734648,0.00007606841,0.0001930339,0.00003402198,0.00008531987,0.0001097197,0.001015356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003883064,0.00006102606,0.00003800202,0.00008346775,0.0001732914,0.0002027539,0.00007965452,0.00007899609,0.00004467203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003322348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001182912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002147608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004330758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991234,0.00006393781,0.0002121715,0.000231279,0.0001905655,0.0001786762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995739,0.0001582324,0.00007971167,0.00009894492,0.00005064456,0.00003852375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001048359,0.00002356657,0.8265267,0.00001445769,0.000009476815,0.000001146887,0.008298595,0.000001178903,0.002259067,0.002615574,0.000194699,0.1599507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004441363,0.0001388779,0.9771935,0.00009487288,0.0000105923,0.000003204611,0.003494933,0.0002855604,0.00002996454,0.01594045,0.002245632,0.0001182815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857242,0.00007092651,0.0001945019,0.0002988067,0.0005336772,0.0001499121,6.995303e-7,0.00001574269,0.01301155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983402,0.00008828902,0.0008441841,0.0003572378,0.00009562234,0.000003931694,4.770881e-7,0.000004682651,0.0002653149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1598324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412317068","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007269","title":"Backward planning: Effects of planning direction on predictions of task completion time","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Conceptualization; Task (project management); Situational ethics; Psychology; Plan (archaeology); Process (computing); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0784911569911952,"gpt":0.3773283579389439,"spread":0.2988372009477487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001477739,0.0001944131,0.0005180577,0.0006847703,0.0001783254,0.00009260951,0.0003153578,0.0001294384,0.0001552974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001838772,0.0001215001,0.0001586589,0.0003922149,0.0001121294,0.0002917307,0.0001733823,0.00009998173,0.0001286493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006680903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002442612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002982467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.123951e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970639,0.0001020173,0.001025394,0.0005380306,0.001054921,0.0002157634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914644,0.007076599,0.0006811779,0.0004872749,0.0001998187,0.00009074542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005459154,0.0001685242,0.02070048,0.00001093753,0.00002137508,0.00001063311,0.0003145263,0.001684498,0.01456526,0.0002373209,0.009422358,0.9523182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006602679,0.003727923,0.5740345,0.01244302,0.0002365372,0.00007361018,0.0006020812,0.02747386,0.01519816,0.3279897,0.03032446,0.001293534],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403865,0.0001424888,0.05659093,0.00006586855,0.0007802389,0.0002091226,0.00002406759,0.00004196561,0.001758798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964428,0.00001705492,0.003211739,0.00004859226,0.00007565066,0.000007882119,0.000001506919,0.00001516962,0.0001795998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9510247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4954631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974363303","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008135","title":"Inducing feelings of ignorance makes people more receptive to expert (economist) opinion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Normative; Ignorance; Privilege (computing); Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Expert opinion; Motivated reasoning; Illusion; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06131097249003212,"gpt":0.3849035506342956,"spread":0.3235925781442635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026461,0.0000848258,0.0002062427,0.00005127799,0.0002152625,0.0000490961,0.0001566744,0.00008375044,0.0002125921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002783637,0.00008128573,0.00005270771,0.0002294213,0.00006257812,0.0001295805,0.00008226169,0.00007525335,0.00002579462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003922295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002412817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002936362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001485178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990589,0.00003994075,0.0002547503,0.0002771936,0.0001941074,0.0001750902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945,0.0001972181,0.0001076829,0.00007632967,0.0000606507,0.0001081754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004350049,0.00004834613,0.01084981,0.0000158059,0.00002130362,0.000001654894,0.2925359,0.00003307882,0.002322309,0.005173994,0.02261478,0.665948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00298022,0.00127754,0.1188171,0.001803384,0.00002779053,0.000002776075,0.3202285,0.00121434,0.00152774,0.02450463,0.5261913,0.001424651],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768355,0.0004850269,0.006593468,0.007943394,0.0008114523,0.0002275035,0.000002642905,0.00003657588,0.007064388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913698,0.0001972701,0.00396126,0.003965977,0.0004441581,0.0000118199,7.00271e-7,0.000007559421,0.00004145638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6645234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3314736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104694716","doi":"10.1017/s193029750000214x","title":"Bracketing effects on risk tolerance: Generalizability and underlying mechanisms","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Bracketing (phenomenology); Generalizability theory; Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0798934455622458,"gpt":0.3910124316510394,"spread":0.3111189860887936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005430279,0.0003108647,0.000502863,0.0003667251,0.0007699994,0.001177649,0.0004537441,0.0002195213,0.0001943187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003902376,0.0002284597,0.0001360231,0.000349031,0.00009954481,0.0003908366,0.0004191832,0.0005341836,0.0001283308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003702902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002700665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001389034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006934354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963462,0.0001701966,0.0008794408,0.001124827,0.001090171,0.0003891769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904801,0.007886162,0.0004577285,0.0008253891,0.0001377685,0.0002128947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001104676,0.00004096181,0.01226259,0.000004131752,0.000003954377,0.000009904506,0.0001382611,0.0001299971,0.002043459,0.00153794,0.0004823625,0.983236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008534519,0.0002227493,0.05569385,0.0001537505,0.00002746515,0.00001932409,0.0002166048,0.01917813,0.0007501304,0.9199986,0.002474293,0.0004116466],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708344,0.0001057273,0.02608344,0.0001086254,0.001761456,0.000284708,0.00000883625,0.00006640147,0.0007464323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9443418,0.00003471665,0.05478079,0.0006431759,0.00012801,0.00001194922,7.006612e-7,0.00002335392,0.00003548753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9828243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404644679","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2024.22","title":"Individual differences in overconfidence: A new measurement approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.284576603963731,"gpt":0.3978623479183708,"spread":0.1132857439546399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005645682,0.0002831872,0.0005063528,0.001023961,0.0001522975,0.00269706,0.0007838423,0.0001619232,0.0004745011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001284875,0.0001950223,0.0001562415,0.0009929485,0.00007227188,0.0006622026,0.0004508241,0.0003296517,0.0002793851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001419944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002065381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004125352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008252226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944675,0.00009248278,0.001146383,0.001095985,0.002805535,0.0003921358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971678,0.00187432,0.0001548097,0.0005126866,0.0001043865,0.0001860125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005129452,0.00005584992,0.009954899,0.000004930914,0.000009999509,0.00003505435,0.0007503953,0.000067803,0.0000332713,0.001443621,0.01018631,0.9774066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007030078,0.0001320068,0.07194483,0.0009995986,0.00004159329,0.00005478326,0.001858466,0.02434974,0.00002172808,0.8853201,0.01402046,0.0005536386],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9474083,0.003458174,0.04349502,0.0002582674,0.001236235,0.0002764017,0.0000092979,0.00007938134,0.003778875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850369,0.00008322802,0.0142634,0.0002090127,0.000159895,0.00001374643,9.056572e-7,0.00001732972,0.0002155687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.976853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425078","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007920","title":"Effect of confidence interval construction on judgment accuracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Confidence interval; Univariate; Statistics; Range (aeronautics); Interval (graph theory); Expert elicitation; Skepticism; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Multivariate statistics; Engineering; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1003102140971167,"gpt":0.408698774410091,"spread":0.3083885603129743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002555722,0.0002718476,0.0006673851,0.0002946615,0.0001697836,0.000401878,0.0006141129,0.0001205327,0.0005903203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005618567,0.0001881101,0.0002247876,0.0004595531,0.0001543213,0.0003768791,0.0004017048,0.0002342245,0.0003528439],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005044643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003332727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004198133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002145599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962112,0.0001872763,0.001229423,0.0008010989,0.001319125,0.0002519057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899012,0.00855609,0.0006669978,0.0005217568,0.0001606791,0.0001932743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001086866,0.00002967164,0.003525801,0.000008717788,0.000009046158,0.00001423635,0.0002116437,0.0003005923,0.000555896,0.0008431009,0.002652566,0.9907619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0152448,0.02329776,0.01898561,0.004860465,0.0004916291,0.0002954749,0.005301521,0.1184148,0.06699713,0.6816477,0.06099832,0.003464787],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980232,0.0001081646,0.0164894,0.0004875514,0.0008561691,0.0003154835,0.00001476364,0.0000424273,0.001454039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941151,0.00003306914,0.004975166,0.0007297912,0.0001070412,0.000008262741,0.000001045829,0.00001492042,0.00001555986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7670906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923163906","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500002928","title":"The effect of limited availability on children’s consumption, engagement, and choice behavior","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Food choice; Consumption (sociology); Psychology; Food consumption; Economics; Social psychology; Agricultural economics; Medicine; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01388433656567368,"gpt":0.2886937049970766,"spread":0.274809368431403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000845699,0.0001127037,0.000120801,0.00002177433,0.0002279643,0.00004113555,0.0001000438,0.00003975602,0.001075311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000161809,0.000072581,0.00003400585,0.00005987384,0.0002032325,0.00008739852,0.000216681,0.0001122493,0.00009290467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001056444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002238406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002691175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001024712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989326,0.0001249133,0.0002166944,0.0003043045,0.0002808074,0.000140703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985617,0.0009819197,0.0000888521,0.0003115613,0.000003382615,0.0000525261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006621846,0.00004887919,0.895796,0.000006425529,0.000003286524,1.254162e-7,0.00009162536,0.00003207947,0.0002640968,0.00002810749,0.0002765971,0.1033866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004679291,0.0002232897,0.9971134,0.00001711429,0.00001532673,0.000001283133,0.00005190004,0.0001445441,0.000428781,0.0001423572,0.001315636,0.00007844438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984666,0.0001055237,0.00002974943,0.00006348741,0.00009769417,0.0007133296,0.000002607669,0.00001047758,0.0005106043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994488,0.00005073449,0.000194428,0.0001032327,0.000007442881,0.00002758571,0.000001983287,0.000005655246,0.0001601859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1033081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313429046","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008159","title":"Coherence of probability judgments from uncertain evidence: Does ACH help?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Credibility; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Weighting; Psychology; Bayesian probability; Empirical evidence; Reliability (semiconductor); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Inter-rater reliability; Computer science; Statistics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Rating scale","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2747169052001284,"gpt":0.4185332312462089,"spread":0.1438163260460806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002569813,0.0003086136,0.0007608943,0.0001861025,0.0002144125,0.0005380169,0.001161341,0.000172741,0.001396407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006564579,0.0001956826,0.0002138507,0.0007026511,0.0001897549,0.0007136144,0.0008442696,0.0002474351,0.000222147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007598035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009940219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005946312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003304072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994666,0.0001789551,0.001668513,0.001258802,0.001886592,0.0003411847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991506,0.006241347,0.0007524823,0.0008746084,0.0003525057,0.0002730188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005006103,0.00009565058,0.09104511,0.00001005959,0.00001390436,0.00001451856,0.000736005,0.0003620766,0.001548994,0.0001055501,0.005070225,0.9004973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001116805,0.0004342568,0.04175493,0.001022238,0.00007360896,0.000003984824,0.001887368,0.01252892,0.002053866,0.93431,0.004174553,0.000639428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867671,0.0005864904,0.01020529,0.000968569,0.0005725029,0.0004220138,0.0000665796,0.00004897081,0.0003625103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619377,0.00004770334,0.03709251,0.0007298089,0.0001199845,0.00001481885,0.000002212146,0.00001593548,0.00003929647],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9342045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313423768","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008548","title":"A brief forewarning intervention overcomes negative effects of salient changes in COVID-19 guidance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Salient; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Intervention (counseling); Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Public health; Affect (linguistics); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Nursing; Disease; Outbreak; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07371288765298652,"gpt":0.3493696149530593,"spread":0.2756567273000728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003031892,0.000116112,0.0002073903,0.0001558278,0.0000924129,0.0000376786,0.0001032483,0.00005336793,0.00007387186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001394176,0.000103969,0.00006469389,0.000263865,0.00007131659,0.0001298114,0.000189633,0.0001024867,0.000005044189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007949482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000209523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001389389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008100008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986784,0.0001300407,0.0002840427,0.0004034334,0.0003192519,0.0001848001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985598,0.001044498,0.0001619919,0.0001364118,0.00002606236,0.00007119776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001311597,0.001545895,0.03947162,0.0008822482,0.00003486631,0.0009431536,0.004161692,0.001182247,0.2931219,0.0162873,0.004126649,0.6369308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01311187,0.001346147,0.2939339,0.00917029,0.00005607278,0.0001703723,0.001428306,0.00566293,0.3742644,0.2923785,0.007566891,0.0009103825],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864236,0.0007416989,0.01086922,0.0009970675,0.0004099441,0.0001874555,0.000004060919,0.0000198785,0.0003471026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993977,0.0002264867,0.002616791,0.003049701,0.00002735315,0.00002106645,0.000001686502,0.000006615178,0.00007335223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6360204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4239734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313429049","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008652","title":"Denotative and connotative management of uncertainty: A computational dual-process model","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Waterloo","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Computer science; Rationality; Artificial intelligence; Dual (grammatical number); Management science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1198535002038601,"gpt":0.4275015234737035,"spread":0.3076480232698434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001214107,0.0001949061,0.0004457908,0.0002547173,0.0002163149,0.0003226922,0.0002002285,0.00007069452,0.0001399769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000385417,0.0001562335,0.00008654398,0.0004923379,0.0001589732,0.0002976002,0.0004078817,0.0001104018,0.00002205974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003998835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007425404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001816236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008081473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970624,0.00006811248,0.0008792763,0.0007106558,0.001074921,0.000204621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960786,0.002530638,0.0004003813,0.0002894464,0.0005996521,0.00010129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001831491,0.00009086628,0.0009863637,0.00001364083,0.00003952886,0.00008493634,0.001602684,0.1347227,0.00003605787,0.01064528,0.0004694748,0.8511253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006567282,0.0000375165,0.002376562,0.000200681,0.00002996791,0.00001956686,0.005262042,0.2967065,0.00004161012,0.6944187,0.00009637485,0.0001537846],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8930243,0.0003352236,0.10434,0.0001360596,0.0001312152,0.0001390033,0.00003869117,0.00001443907,0.001840986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9216931,0.00005640824,0.07784829,0.0002338166,0.00001256024,0.000008880535,0.000004119426,0.00001091109,0.0001319354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8509715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6371016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126540218","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500001741","title":"A study of fairness judgments in China, Switzerland and Canada: Do culture, being a student, and gender matter?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Psychology; Social psychology; Wage; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0289219062501993,"gpt":0.3270826887967332,"spread":0.2981607825465339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004446482,0.0001527037,0.0003048536,0.0001040427,0.0004367063,0.0001463341,0.00009493931,0.00004927328,0.00001712532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002657051,0.0001238977,0.00001511506,0.0001364183,0.00004587953,0.0001676468,0.0001280041,0.00008396674,6.009645e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000840771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005356924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02406181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3302484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986407,0.00004622996,0.0003482814,0.0003327137,0.000395129,0.000236931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996168,0.00006920457,0.0001203615,0.00008516876,0.00003367223,0.00007477316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003558261,0.0001242348,0.9268613,0.000009990808,0.00002876109,0.00001756808,0.05864046,0.000003539928,0.000003495766,0.0005770308,0.001061658,0.01263632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001077835,0.00005511424,0.9405056,0.00008671812,0.00001792759,0.00000190785,0.05190245,0.000004224697,0.000001224883,0.00533241,0.0008557861,0.0001588583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986281,0.001080805,0.00003279078,0.0000975094,0.00009456485,0.0004026584,0.000001907593,0.000007897704,0.01200088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998902,0.0004900746,0.0002393421,0.0002171664,0.00003324274,0.00001018062,6.832134e-7,0.000004255321,0.000103094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3061866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.982437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313423669","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500009475","title":"Hypothesized drivers of the bias blind spot—cognitive sophistication, introspection bias, and conversational processes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sophistication; Introspection; Metacognition; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Social cognition; Cognitive bias; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0864918594662345,"gpt":0.3461707161799031,"spread":0.2596788567136686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005035872,0.00005332545,0.00009268054,0.00006915172,0.0008066781,0.00003566349,0.00009048894,0.00003270866,0.0004187252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009131562,0.0000426931,0.00002799642,0.0002982109,0.0002599318,0.00008357223,0.00008454852,0.00007720436,0.000002094036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005170386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007282768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006028813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009165826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991224,0.000114798,0.0001629563,0.0001612289,0.0003487089,0.00008984978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988123,0.0008237773,0.0001695514,0.00004730163,0.0001233732,0.00002367519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002121005,0.0004473276,0.2940172,0.00004853419,0.0001511516,0.000004534603,0.09489302,0.00003108164,0.000930377,0.1201772,0.009460256,0.4777184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004771432,0.0003441149,0.4088809,0.0002100188,0.0001552472,0.00001186027,0.09355142,0.0004834837,0.0003048958,0.4458886,0.04494423,0.0004538515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993466,0.0002369884,0.0007606511,0.00120663,0.00045381,0.0002364618,0.000009650192,0.00001404112,0.003615791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998984,0.0001377774,0.0002524159,0.0003569447,0.00009661736,0.00001952807,0.000001446543,0.000003576772,0.0001476503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4772645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6204398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313429112","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005398","title":"How the public, and scientists, perceive advancement of knowledge from conflicting study results","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Miami Foundation; American Academy of Arts and Sciences","keywords":"Nothing; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Normative; Perception; Sample (material); Association (psychology); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Epistemology; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3454387243015574,"gpt":0.4611718882900152,"spread":0.1157331639884578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001305328,0.00006529456,0.000114944,0.00006720701,0.00055033,0.0003157137,0.0001839479,0.00003207468,0.0001577799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000211766,0.00004674321,0.00002178291,0.0001622079,0.000118502,0.0002122995,0.0002389385,0.00006558145,0.00001086017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004074877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001758052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001195232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002380883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990363,0.0001442357,0.0001850286,0.0002026814,0.000308903,0.0001228112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998756,0.0006963609,0.0001385893,0.0002570677,0.0001106736,0.00004134338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009375218,0.0001512425,0.03969332,0.000007039067,0.00001408,3.776958e-7,0.1483162,0.000001005709,0.0005143987,0.005070118,0.0002718866,0.8058665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002007234,0.0001608666,0.192548,0.0002558803,0.00002678911,5.269712e-7,0.3922359,0.00122283,0.00001004497,0.001621948,0.4097023,0.0002076387],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872723,0.0008117022,0.0002292288,0.002259355,0.0002904823,0.0004522113,0.00001063679,0.0000143126,0.008659739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997319,0.001596522,0.0004254366,0.00006469824,0.00005353683,0.000007505242,0.000005052675,0.000003710011,0.0005245608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8056589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4232749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425013","doi":"10.1017/s193029750000543x","title":"Wronging past rights: The sunk cost bias distorts moral judgment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Harm; Morality; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Psychology; Action (physics); Investment (military); Cognitive bias; Dynamic inconsistency; Cognition; Positive economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1204119234260418,"gpt":0.3069090712436597,"spread":0.1864971478176179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000497114,0.0002482638,0.0002412596,0.0001288888,0.0005356018,0.0001768891,0.0003564497,0.00007870945,0.0005040432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004763396,0.0001523977,0.0001122549,0.0002155921,0.0001390013,0.000238696,0.0002701087,0.0002407405,0.0005826855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009735197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001189685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009168729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007539588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976932,0.00008671338,0.000390726,0.000663096,0.0007185283,0.000447723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986965,0.0005720647,0.000166539,0.000428095,0.00002534837,0.0001114715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001902748,0.001357848,0.1345763,0.00009612026,0.00009311121,0.0005454393,0.0020059,0.003366589,0.0239256,0.1032108,0.140578,0.5883415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007332274,0.000985798,0.2775384,0.001727723,0.0001446969,0.0007417111,0.0008356381,0.01687832,0.008172087,0.1901561,0.4930363,0.002450879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.983053,0.0002121499,0.001405812,0.002049719,0.001974265,0.0006166488,0.000008876916,0.00007256014,0.01060693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947402,0.00004173226,0.0005455179,0.003585181,0.0001940022,0.00002971498,0.000003083513,0.00001618169,0.0008443528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5858907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7489437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599627703","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500002825","title":"Cognition in the woods: Biases in probability judgments by search and rescue planners","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Psychology; Unpacking; Social psychology; Wilderness; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2396090586714311,"gpt":0.4301681761063678,"spread":0.1905591174349367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009165516,0.0001949353,0.0003274482,0.0004605936,0.0001914142,0.000542647,0.0004082947,0.0001265948,0.00009285221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001942757,0.0001230818,0.00005441901,0.0005824165,0.0001235556,0.000618784,0.0002876129,0.0002812583,0.00005359784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008222391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002523298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006693044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002978486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967006,0.0003107373,0.0008657968,0.0005720531,0.001057667,0.0004931469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950354,0.00425999,0.00009991912,0.0004299911,0.00005317279,0.0001215612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002346271,0.0003075515,0.1884323,0.000003936575,0.000002850353,0.00001003922,0.001443595,0.000246705,0.00008858865,0.0001158983,0.002785618,0.8063282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004127481,0.0004102748,0.6809383,0.001135494,0.00004468827,0.0000965685,0.0161316,0.01511502,0.0002674573,0.2723763,0.008325549,0.001031247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973676,0.0006450316,0.0002638145,0.0002638123,0.0002323354,0.0004352974,0.0000234375,0.00001292174,0.0007558094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975849,0.00008094609,0.001765347,0.0004601282,0.00004489492,0.00002840711,0.000004861079,0.000009700815,0.00002080111],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.805297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5232758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170229078","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007385","title":"Preferences for rank in competition: Is first-place seeking stronger than last-place aversion?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Competition (biology); Rank (graph theory); Risk aversion (psychology); Social psychology; Psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1165063134904469,"gpt":0.3597721864090355,"spread":0.2432658729185886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001993967,0.0003209148,0.0006204277,0.000389699,0.0004160498,0.0008565768,0.0007482184,0.0001800691,0.0007952052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001286514,0.0002555449,0.000209815,0.0006298887,0.00008103267,0.0006362294,0.0004519849,0.0002498141,0.0002561095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008921664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006588648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009741977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002186134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961047,0.00009015435,0.001127042,0.001109312,0.00112763,0.0004412104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935349,0.005169482,0.0004213965,0.0004542316,0.0001992881,0.000220746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002057948,0.0001851476,0.06837499,0.00003495573,0.00002571403,0.00002841197,0.003607465,0.006486214,0.00009131799,0.0007590686,0.06857406,0.8497747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009674354,0.001244081,0.03496103,0.001776059,0.0001146911,0.00003508826,0.01121387,0.3145009,0.0002553873,0.2627376,0.3615436,0.001943379],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689533,0.0002570083,0.02561121,0.002603285,0.0007933915,0.0005665572,0.00006361797,0.00005667748,0.001094957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847915,0.00006612486,0.01322871,0.001501971,0.0001772771,0.00003018233,0.000005810027,0.00002352433,0.0001749435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8478313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300829124","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007580","title":"Predictions on the go: Prevalence of spontaneous spending predictions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Mental Health Research Topics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Everyday life; Economics; Personality; Psychology; Econometrics; Demographic economics; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1010208209390489,"gpt":0.4150113396228284,"spread":0.3139905186837795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006015929,0.00009160714,0.0001060171,0.0001280777,0.0002497349,0.00001864117,0.0001787416,0.00006018487,0.003721091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001819593,0.00004928428,0.00004204838,0.0001271318,0.00009529776,0.00005956973,0.0001038161,0.0001331347,0.0001909696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008733512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001604023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006128547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008983072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986563,0.00009964759,0.0003054794,0.0002561237,0.0004264715,0.000256011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976351,0.001767828,0.0001019097,0.0003844071,0.000030786,0.00007999539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001269151,0.0004557303,0.04638271,0.000145995,0.00008658549,0.0001764186,0.001353385,0.0000307468,0.0008819617,0.1517215,0.03174772,0.7657481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002911671,0.002407701,0.8933636,0.004902612,0.00009758647,0.000806138,0.00137313,0.002154434,0.0003718665,0.04616741,0.0449844,0.000459453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9374884,0.0004137759,0.01838193,0.001131062,0.001196721,0.0007483402,0.00008362748,0.00005625528,0.04049985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946335,0.0002065018,0.000513714,0.0001172723,0.0001203299,0.00004959969,4.341016e-7,0.00001008022,0.004348589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8469809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313424993","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500004320","title":"Too soon to tell if the US intelligence community prediction market is more accurate than intelligence reports: Commentary on","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Imputation (statistics); Intelligence analysis; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Missing data; Machine learning; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1131901529247397,"gpt":0.4007133235420235,"spread":0.2875231706172838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004762175,0.0002370846,0.0002718688,0.000244761,0.0007531189,0.0005363045,0.001020827,0.00009711082,0.0005961579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007064756,0.0001479106,0.0001155193,0.000819533,0.0001106472,0.0002655854,0.0009119329,0.0004769094,0.0001844475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008592901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001950589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001145841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003090417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967184,0.0001876976,0.0009819585,0.0006005359,0.001221007,0.0002904093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944473,0.003094597,0.0004137341,0.001727606,0.0001987557,0.0001180384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002321928,0.0001464323,0.02040023,0.000006756717,0.00001601828,0.000006863803,0.001881659,0.001874189,0.00008894071,0.0007380004,0.2871265,0.6874822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002270184,0.001391253,0.08189747,0.001372495,0.00006338525,0.0001439985,0.01192834,0.1789255,0.005805738,0.4212192,0.29603,0.0009955539],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8111276,0.00005786625,0.1758035,0.005159922,0.0004945986,0.001095785,0.00004266416,0.0001168651,0.006101194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822948,0.00006579757,0.008412826,0.008578572,0.00006793902,0.00005728656,0.000005653844,0.0000163081,0.0005008259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6864867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6527511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945876762","doi":"10.1017/s193029750000872x","title":"Choosing victims: Human fungibility in moral decision-making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Vignette; Nationality; Sacrifice; Social psychology; Feeling; Psychology; Fungibility; Preference; Political science; Immigration; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1100615837309435,"gpt":0.3645260770355541,"spread":0.2544644933046106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007593848,0.0002413249,0.0002857221,0.0003357982,0.0005622404,0.000157912,0.0003224665,0.0001279295,0.0004609576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000400139,0.0002081065,0.00008451124,0.0004234219,0.000238824,0.0003551584,0.0003434051,0.0002556351,0.0001686678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001733792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000660285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005220546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973559,0.00008385678,0.0005767546,0.0008984996,0.0006088519,0.0004760989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998601,0.0007144682,0.0001499668,0.0003886982,0.000046091,0.00009979985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001134336,0.0006087355,0.09200498,0.00002335995,0.000009713594,0.0001886166,0.001023291,0.0001869268,0.03748258,0.00758047,0.003701155,0.8560559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002210201,0.0004742556,0.5537579,0.001708086,0.00001822827,0.0001146616,0.0002466543,0.007183845,0.003687147,0.4278649,0.002005914,0.0007281638],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857708,0.0001098848,0.005967783,0.0002010679,0.0008559599,0.0002449715,0.000004139269,0.00007169366,0.006773764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890418,0.00001923915,0.008512906,0.002108304,0.0002508931,0.000009984716,7.674381e-7,0.00001786845,0.00003820324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8553277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8486335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313429357","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500003752","title":"It’s personal: The effect of personal value on utilitarian moral judgments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Property (philosophy); Social psychology; Psychology; Action (physics); Outcome (game theory); Value (mathematics); Personal property; Economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08758478826704974,"gpt":0.3225492182511196,"spread":0.2349644299840699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006525372,0.0002140985,0.000236955,0.0001109641,0.0002890102,0.00003347384,0.0002647935,0.00007678434,0.0002911346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002673534,0.0001008764,0.0001430555,0.0001276087,0.0002479259,0.0001253429,0.0001420599,0.0001345155,0.0001286974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005193472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001135304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000372291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001307477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979453,0.0001752375,0.0002963834,0.0005089375,0.0007659034,0.0003082357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997861,0.001703083,0.0001259277,0.0002103391,0.00001782289,0.0000818206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006166957,0.0004242353,0.03328995,0.00006247563,0.0000706401,0.00009783519,0.001660177,0.00002859253,0.0780382,0.01268549,0.04694954,0.8205259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03375299,0.01929895,0.5817195,0.00857142,0.0004318048,0.0006237695,0.001054586,0.01551088,0.1740741,0.09633023,0.06547105,0.00316072],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875813,0.00008781432,0.0004328285,0.006790822,0.0006641316,0.0002880301,0.00002028395,0.00002659475,0.004108207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959834,0.00004646887,0.0001459687,0.003348725,0.00009820833,0.00001786626,5.230971e-7,0.00001287874,0.0003459253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8173652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4113619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385273425","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2023.24","title":"Broad effects of shallow understanding: Explaining an unrelated phenomenon exposes the illusion of explanatory depth","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenomenon; Illusion; Debiasing; Zipper; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Ignorance; Salient; Epistemology; Explanatory model; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1740432031256672,"gpt":0.3298120805322932,"spread":0.155768877406626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000479783,0.0001437905,0.0002134768,0.0002388545,0.0002723553,0.00002444243,0.000238629,0.00007491696,0.00003028717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001707286,0.00009818067,0.00006010292,0.0004010509,0.0001570758,0.000175266,0.0001818885,0.0001219806,0.00001233279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000419378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001307978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003264272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004668364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984446,0.0001114666,0.0003469145,0.0003526618,0.0005143952,0.0002299307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982139,0.001278441,0.0001993477,0.0002277554,0.00001943976,0.0000611284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001526592,0.000628968,0.008517988,0.0002646451,0.00006590818,0.0001982875,0.009387776,0.001987341,0.7109328,0.05233667,0.002231936,0.2119211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01147991,0.004922747,0.3149245,0.006082778,0.000236709,0.0001364633,0.02007327,0.03924896,0.1650323,0.4344689,0.00161529,0.001778262],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946855,0.0001977023,0.002632828,0.0001342806,0.0004907186,0.0002253482,0.000003051408,0.00005832581,0.001572214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999091,0.0002417022,0.0002761054,0.0003018582,0.00002996203,0.000008676931,0.000002674674,0.00001290187,0.00003515489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5459005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4003692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927601509","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006604","title":"Why choose wisely if you have already paid? Sunk costs elicit stochastic dominance violations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Stochastic dominance; Economics; Irrational number; Dominance (genetics); Status quo; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Prospect theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08666690225901935,"gpt":0.3874983521646732,"spread":0.3008314499056538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002855749,0.0004265482,0.0006733501,0.0007253165,0.0009005068,0.001311795,0.0009567104,0.0002322789,0.0009432127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003154642,0.0003328131,0.0002230771,0.0007572384,0.0003006933,0.0008352962,0.0005806081,0.0002878497,0.001220767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001963653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007719453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004967921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002077002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949014,0.0001183025,0.001496315,0.00130192,0.001558002,0.0006240374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934661,0.003638151,0.0006721246,0.001218809,0.0007052664,0.0002995418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002824135,0.0001119931,0.004488403,0.00000117372,0.00001045657,0.00001710538,0.0003807141,0.0002988509,0.000128795,0.0005034273,0.03020802,0.9635686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003861165,0.000893809,0.07078882,0.001201791,0.0001689213,0.0001549549,0.00255442,0.1183527,0.0002175608,0.6439101,0.1559925,0.001903329],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8454469,0.000252221,0.1491986,0.0004731319,0.001440875,0.0004208286,0.00004476521,0.00008546041,0.002637214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841221,0.00002922286,0.01319093,0.001714414,0.0004296114,0.00002816603,0.000004716259,0.00004021298,0.0004406467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425063","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006641","title":"People respond to GM food with disgust more than fear: Comment on Royzman, Cusimano and Leeman (2017)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disgust; Psychology; Association (psychology); Social psychology; Scale (ratio); Granularity; Developmental psychology; Anger; Psychotherapist; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08492833933400414,"gpt":0.3238481541241134,"spread":0.2389198147901093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002854602,0.0002241707,0.0002200592,0.0001990563,0.0005043143,0.0001412837,0.0002071012,0.00006265045,0.00008197071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007928771,0.0001586661,0.00003413068,0.00021263,0.0001519921,0.0001345471,0.0002687939,0.00013216,0.0001114556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004257827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001033446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007845971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009504454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981253,0.00005153244,0.0002233211,0.0006896331,0.0005619516,0.0003482919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990498,0.0003122315,0.00008572457,0.0003317387,0.00003665335,0.0001838578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02569285,0.002761508,0.06301502,0.0001408559,0.0001349604,0.0004489684,0.01283849,0.0003334186,0.03560599,0.04203796,0.3894553,0.4275346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006895374,0.01574951,0.7992651,0.001746673,0.00008147869,0.0003658996,0.001827881,0.001579556,0.01472249,0.0202596,0.135837,0.00166936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832536,0.00003953124,0.00139872,0.01172918,0.0003018567,0.0003643766,0.00001385674,0.0000472838,0.002851601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809474,0.00002673305,0.001788945,0.01676923,0.0001368269,0.00002099165,0.000001568112,0.00001748586,0.000290796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7362501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6470215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362738479","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500004873","title":"Limited resources or limited luck? Why people perceive an illusory negative correlation between the outcomes of choice options despite unequivocal evidence for independence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Luck; Independence (probability theory); Psychology; Correlation; Negative correlation; Social psychology; Medicine; Statistics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2089579058339883,"gpt":0.4277323192823185,"spread":0.2187744134483303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004481262,0.0003356823,0.0007651658,0.0006052768,0.000583683,0.000696343,0.00102551,0.0002687366,0.0003231443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01082243,0.0001961692,0.0002596566,0.001030835,0.0001858863,0.001463105,0.0004717785,0.0003420322,0.0001074445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001045718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009880567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009481152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005452336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951628,0.0003045955,0.001471058,0.000985243,0.001684564,0.0003917356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564748,0.04057211,0.0009958711,0.001069949,0.0007310901,0.0001561929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009533206,0.0001073436,0.5384429,0.000008632554,0.00004190308,0.000002266434,0.003732665,0.005098417,0.0001651131,0.00017178,0.000691774,0.4505839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001143054,0.0007408447,0.9059883,0.0004403998,0.0001317032,0.000008528047,0.004820382,0.05023123,0.00003231448,0.0346463,0.001426006,0.0003908917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616336,0.0001588145,0.03598006,0.0004469035,0.000570881,0.001004798,0.00006535654,0.00004527008,0.00009431743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876698,0.00004714302,0.01139227,0.0004442403,0.0001022033,0.00003895461,0.000006590681,0.00002765596,0.0002711964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.450193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405591645","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2024.38","title":"Westerners underestimate global inequality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Psychology; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07708954349904916,"gpt":0.4071999639476258,"spread":0.3301104204485766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001360205,0.0001084071,0.0001437058,0.0000486281,0.0003759585,0.0005152771,0.0001419133,0.00008977397,0.000220329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000159578,0.00008918461,0.00006539217,0.0002644129,0.0001069458,0.0003095226,0.0001129143,0.00009111169,0.0001081867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001986038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004531845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008601983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985411,0.0001007563,0.0002663917,0.0002890732,0.0005258091,0.0002769245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993611,0.0003261937,0.00004198572,0.0001400942,0.00003477907,0.00009583094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006155898,0.00003975917,0.03936138,0.00006025386,0.00002358647,0.00003993191,0.003380742,0.00002286676,0.000009684944,0.5336455,0.009568689,0.4137861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004645531,0.00007074315,0.05484853,0.0007205251,0.00004687718,0.000005503498,0.003768919,0.005711969,0.000009346708,0.7399299,0.1938926,0.0005305846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8411526,0.001715572,0.04419549,0.001369727,0.002387045,0.000224527,0.00002294552,0.0002994011,0.1086327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968877,0.000137316,0.001842161,0.0006172426,0.0002551809,0.000003649645,0.000001738615,0.000006098832,0.0002488682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4132555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4968829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981668542","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500004861","title":"The glow of grime: Why cleaning an old object can wash away its value","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Object (grammar); Value (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03141405481658445,"gpt":0.3033134394187663,"spread":0.2718993846021818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000488347,0.0001168943,0.000174121,0.00009022615,0.0002919846,0.0001476169,0.0002651493,0.00004667174,0.0001830316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001244521,0.00007594702,0.0000854446,0.0002541805,0.00005225655,0.0001342359,0.0001298871,0.0001089084,0.00005274984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002390228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001712522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001254877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001783683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985613,0.00008714702,0.000278025,0.0003376653,0.0005285842,0.0002072305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992581,0.0001842896,0.0001380529,0.0003186055,0.0000343656,0.00006658945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002181356,0.0001413624,0.008050543,0.00002174915,0.000008833831,0.00001354942,0.001807582,0.001854248,0.4151307,0.02106044,0.001403351,0.5502895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007205749,0.002182141,0.1052115,0.002068846,0.0003466231,0.0002097063,0.0125092,0.6303043,0.1222675,0.04720248,0.06772448,0.002767461],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958853,0.00006829344,0.0009040874,0.0002328861,0.0001795168,0.0001240504,0.000002753543,0.00002753861,0.002575578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972565,0.0001439759,0.0004211751,0.001457618,0.00003286677,0.000002389472,5.402295e-7,0.00001128358,0.0006736063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6284501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.309703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123009374","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500003387","title":"Intuition speed as a predictor of choice and confidence in point spread predictions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intuition; Psychology; Confidence interval; Basketball; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0521888360647912,"gpt":0.3983926496291882,"spread":0.3462038135643971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002650555,0.00008428978,0.0001656343,0.0001976957,0.00004095252,0.00002074195,0.00005963803,0.00008946934,0.001549709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004460206,0.00007777705,0.00003778756,0.0001322734,0.00004041473,0.0001445501,0.0000584597,0.0001352989,0.00007291154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002758662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001448696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002974714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001149854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990055,0.00003845269,0.0003974232,0.0002434256,0.0001549223,0.0001602747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993942,0.0002004811,0.0001203774,0.0001765331,0.00004043554,0.00006794522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006805711,0.0005858423,0.7397537,0.00009649418,0.00002545896,0.00001134619,0.002336634,0.00001693089,0.001104595,0.03605943,0.003993091,0.2153359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001709069,0.0006510479,0.9833086,0.001010168,0.00001998678,0.00002154492,0.0007385986,0.0008408948,0.00003316902,0.01055951,0.001001582,0.0001058457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922129,0.0004933507,0.001403051,0.00009106265,0.0005587682,0.0003994007,0.00001602877,0.00001975108,0.004805724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999072,0.00004074423,0.0003665524,0.000134577,0.00003410226,0.00001607366,0.000004226732,0.000007024575,0.0003246993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2435549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409516416","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2025.8","title":"Using conventional framing to offset bias against algorithmic errors","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); Offset (computer science); Computer science; Social psychology; Psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2211695878301689,"gpt":0.4507252767246763,"spread":0.2295556888945075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003145638,0.0002857375,0.000522181,0.001127509,0.0006911947,0.001216586,0.00068514,0.0001691928,0.0003211914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00209938,0.000233564,0.0002241772,0.001202331,0.00008148283,0.0003932511,0.0007427753,0.0002268465,0.0002554984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000168603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001240569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001630507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002884692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959938,0.00009873067,0.00132018,0.0009639392,0.001214347,0.0004090053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960436,0.002484646,0.0003388518,0.0006598859,0.0002922136,0.0001807871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009072134,0.00005800258,0.005146164,0.000002762475,0.00001253884,0.00001986142,0.0000888178,0.002708652,0.0002472457,0.0006282523,0.01165003,0.9793469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001746334,0.0001222501,0.01400449,0.001405432,0.00007565663,0.00003323178,0.002188645,0.2417937,0.0002599533,0.6156557,0.121785,0.0009297074],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8116712,0.0001828135,0.1833144,0.0002521252,0.001679701,0.0002666949,0.00002388834,0.00004720477,0.002561993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.898199,0.00001458928,0.09932127,0.001780986,0.0001030214,0.00001011418,0.000003166163,0.00001741318,0.0005504937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998202,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}