{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"e60e1366ea22","filters":{"venue":"Judicial Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2181249333","doi":"10.5235/108546811799320844","title":"Judicial and Political Decision-making: The Uncertain Boundary","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Politics; Judicial opinion; Boundary (topology); Judicial review; Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan Sumption","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07119389565167876,"gpt":0.3685869565634812,"spread":0.2973930609118025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0600047,0.0009004496,0.001923771,0.004141313,0.006722878,0.01872184,0.002397009,0.01319642,0.005385132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1516816,0.001073421,0.001034824,0.004501624,0.04221447,0.03150027,0.00600985,0.01459614,0.001424105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01075847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01286882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00618537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01016227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9457875,0.03430184,0.002548722,0.003012454,0.01219316,0.002156134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8003088,0.175292,0.006896504,0.005001417,0.01060894,0.001892323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005759364,0.0000164327,0.000324857,0.0002302272,0.00003390718,0.0001068835,0.001267106,0.0006577125,0.00006328906,0.9358345,0.04164788,0.0197596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002187783,0.00000862253,0.0003604788,0.000352793,0.00001372981,0.00003370186,0.0003043068,0.0003366267,0.00004698227,0.9732484,0.02525361,0.00001900211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006185507,0.3078151,0.03107713,0.5701513,0.002982538,0.00008158724,0.0003382562,0.00007481527,0.0812938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7411413,0.1301485,0.01819568,0.08559357,0.01798768,0.0004758578,0.0002365385,0.0001272307,0.006093671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0600047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3173389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334211255","doi":"10.5235/108546812801228149","title":"The Incoherence of Judicial Review in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Law","authors":[{"name":"Matthew P. Harrington","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03762319479688505,"gpt":0.3273233739651873,"spread":0.2897001791683023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0154317,0.000274974,0.0008387459,0.00417064,0.03000285,0.01191606,0.002522575,0.004251318,0.00583397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06998363,0.0007937911,0.0004759874,0.009885357,0.01293424,0.00321906,0.004593447,0.00826261,0.0003303842],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2498551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.470551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9636312,0.004070682,0.001168398,0.001834323,0.01935128,0.009944106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9231031,0.02049414,0.004928655,0.001115642,0.03997406,0.01038437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001590909,0.00005798614,0.03002122,0.0004485653,0.0001392761,0.0007451162,0.01789788,0.001686111,0.0003837876,0.5903961,0.2735827,0.08448212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002250434,0.0001093872,0.2220024,0.001757688,0.0003030752,0.0003545391,0.01918826,0.003982635,0.001144744,0.08711526,0.6633521,0.0004649039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1404408,0.0642982,0.003089977,0.5621472,0.001848216,0.0002124993,0.001732481,0.0001339398,0.2260967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9286272,0.01471877,0.001380993,0.02961969,0.0004686479,0.00007144762,0.0001918178,0.00007354442,0.02484794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2498551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8700618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773082658","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2014.11426821","title":"Standing Space Only in the CJEU: Comment on <i>Inuit TapiriitKanatami v European Parliament and Council</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Space (punctuation); Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"J. Mervyn Jones","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06891814079131052,"gpt":0.3213060442729876,"spread":0.2523879034816771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02497844,0.001404764,0.003003036,0.002121914,0.01739488,0.01445586,0.01473243,0.1526841,0.01155429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1112047,0.002234748,0.003391682,0.004733715,0.0118206,0.01160642,0.007282305,0.07054459,0.007035627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01569705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03147241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1426864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2320857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9717436,0.004403874,0.00332996,0.003454455,0.01170844,0.005359695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9243615,0.04949994,0.004481157,0.001547519,0.01568707,0.004422792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004080787,0.0000131791,0.0002042874,0.00009826966,0.00001318896,0.0003762923,0.0008974693,0.00003027737,0.0001463054,0.01032229,0.9866747,0.001182869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001827705,0.00008679547,0.004275824,0.001152763,0.0001343922,0.0003632621,0.003780638,0.0003265675,0.001091627,0.01481008,0.9734772,0.0003181029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.000830405,0.002428311,0.0001606725,0.9730309,0.01364654,0.00003630759,0.0002898198,0.00005615027,0.009520972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004405706,0.0004636199,0.0001198083,0.985302,0.004772687,0.00006293213,0.00005523333,0.00004319173,0.0047748],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8573136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2837118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570120334","doi":"10.5235/jr.23.2.1","title":"Standing Space Only in the CJEU: Comment on &lt;I&gt;Inuit TapiriitKanatami v European Parliament and Council&lt;/I&gt;","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Space (punctuation); Law; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07731161660712133,"gpt":0.3230648305755056,"spread":0.2457532139683843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01698466,0.0007555457,0.00133974,0.001335662,0.01704385,0.01153865,0.005578185,0.0789455,0.006823625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05559237,0.001103587,0.001443637,0.002510235,0.009374355,0.007127102,0.004541606,0.0355453,0.002369722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008884789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01336659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1011666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1828304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880098,0.002291772,0.0008805311,0.001853337,0.003819702,0.003144825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9690959,0.02400457,0.001253735,0.0007899202,0.003510432,0.001345405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001387678,0.00006287381,0.002067143,0.0002129734,0.00004217671,0.002733669,0.008166339,0.0002288253,0.000932747,0.254122,0.724524,0.006768434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001295901,0.000114704,0.006519444,0.00113831,0.0001500405,0.0006296868,0.008491478,0.0007871569,0.003774698,0.04080745,0.9371175,0.0003400645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01687011,0.005976148,0.001065047,0.8649472,0.007802447,0.00008352646,0.0002359321,0.0001388154,0.1028809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06963759,0.0007676835,0.0003807953,0.901825,0.003023193,0.00008664432,0.00005071386,0.00008778687,0.02414055],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1011666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2011554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402448089","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2024.2392371","title":"The Case for Fiduciary Duties in Public Law or when Public Law Duties are not Enough …","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Public law; Political science; Business; Duty","authors":[{"name":"James Maurici","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1677216278565002,"gpt":0.3980406291344969,"spread":0.2303190012779968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02044917,0.0004482361,0.0007650808,0.0009170509,0.01236483,0.01129829,0.001987725,0.02570403,0.01128671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05207664,0.0007456981,0.0006456095,0.0008747489,0.03275004,0.01411174,0.004740529,0.02037418,0.00411009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005790622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01160883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01141949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02183134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9760933,0.009723605,0.0006977629,0.003417982,0.005822132,0.004245233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792435,0.01242137,0.001846393,0.002000156,0.003449786,0.001038837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001536422,0.000007912799,0.0001583594,0.00004007379,0.000005606826,0.00009280109,0.001397014,0.00001900651,0.00008833407,0.8233407,0.1709771,0.00385768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002363294,0.00002036141,0.0009018113,0.0004146374,0.00001780704,0.0004041858,0.002285169,0.0001594294,0.0003740298,0.4126137,0.582734,0.00005120596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006537867,0.009629345,0.003675619,0.666251,0.005647478,0.00003710657,0.0001036986,0.00008991673,0.308028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4279985,0.004717824,0.004116924,0.4374428,0.009228948,0.0001693843,0.0001152657,0.0001942943,0.116016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02570403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1081468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}