{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"e60e1366ea22","filters":{"venue":"Judicial Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2181249333","doi":"10.5235/108546811799320844","title":"Judicial and Political Decision-making: The Uncertain Boundary","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Politics; Judicial opinion; Boundary (topology); Judicial review; Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan Sumption","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07119389565167876,"gpt":0.3685869565634812,"spread":0.2973930609118025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001145593,0.0001424034,0.0003391105,0.00003245881,0.001838263,0.00004775957,0.0003076731,0.00007456035,0.0005333358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00231976,0.00009621095,0.0001225649,0.0003895708,0.002100659,0.0001178665,0.0001472481,0.0001862257,0.0001449136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008743037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005098939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008217528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003148017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981566,0.0002253779,0.0003368849,0.000248563,0.0005431646,0.0004893941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989725,0.0004872103,0.00009003595,0.0001524079,0.000140886,0.0001569243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001493484,0.00002670935,0.0009563941,0.00002291435,0.0000204434,0.00001325069,0.0007433667,7.928877e-9,2.159409e-7,0.9063125,0.01091353,0.0809757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005735113,0.0000293923,0.006897188,0.00105111,0.00009015933,0.000005208915,0.0005968933,4.432693e-7,3.544036e-7,0.4721245,0.519016,0.000131408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003596737,0.2446466,0.0002653453,0.02186808,0.001114799,0.0008959016,0.00001437713,0.000104644,0.7274935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9373881,0.04844426,0.0002221555,0.01272292,0.001137248,0.00004188705,8.474049e-7,0.00000811105,0.00003444419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9337914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334211255","doi":"10.5235/108546812801228149","title":"The Incoherence of Judicial Review in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Law","authors":[{"name":"Matthew P. Harrington","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03762319479688505,"gpt":0.3273233739651873,"spread":0.2897001791683023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002072983,0.0001140666,0.0004896313,0.00001592377,0.0005145653,0.000006102417,0.0003567292,0.00003073362,0.000179665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002132671,0.00008056992,0.00009298829,0.0007368402,0.0004425416,0.0001150654,0.00008029417,0.0001560839,0.00003893757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003858851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003037098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9581366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978173,0.0003385211,0.0005678813,0.0001228579,0.0006945821,0.0004588388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989937,0.0003493834,0.0002397859,0.000149602,0.0001517614,0.0001157928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001184961,0.00007879896,0.04569836,0.001617571,0.00005040977,0.00000653479,0.0004463468,2.199441e-7,0.000003485436,0.4741254,0.1387069,0.3392541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000492381,0.000007703023,0.01539885,0.009474101,0.00006151717,6.740792e-7,0.0002075834,8.996582e-8,0.000002075721,0.003186991,0.971489,0.0001221374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008426893,0.8754227,0.000002009409,0.01521708,0.0007437811,0.0006646736,0.000007367285,0.000008674213,0.107091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3842509,0.6113037,0.00000595425,0.004009292,0.0003526537,0.00004931035,0.000001011578,0.000002915082,0.00002430756],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8327821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5387681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773082658","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2014.11426821","title":"Standing Space Only in the CJEU: Comment on <i>Inuit TapiriitKanatami v European Parliament and Council</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Space (punctuation); Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"J. Mervyn Jones","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06891814079131052,"gpt":0.3213060442729876,"spread":0.2523879034816771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004846934,0.00009901945,0.0001937161,0.00001374256,0.0003111731,0.00006818613,0.0002541279,0.00001177147,0.00006792055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007248504,0.00006697865,0.00004476968,0.0001337162,0.0001486862,0.00005452238,0.00005739601,0.0001264447,0.0001260451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002646391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008147733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007924105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003841327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99777,0.0009228773,0.0002222212,0.0001710917,0.00072852,0.0001853373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993849,0.0002624455,0.0000974882,0.0001329849,0.00007577155,0.00004640082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006485714,0.00005075899,0.000399419,0.00008774759,0.00001182415,0.0000091063,0.004860245,3.473721e-7,0.000001548731,0.7667849,0.1875153,0.04027233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001188357,0.00007187698,0.0014606,0.001309043,0.00001500786,5.360078e-7,0.0005541302,0.000001308461,4.884358e-7,0.0006256208,0.9957608,0.00008176207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001509597,0.02819757,0.00001146581,0.06410976,0.0001884296,0.0004251811,0.000006999675,0.0000212207,0.9055298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6588112,0.2293299,0.00002274302,0.1108498,0.0004338889,0.000009674332,0.00000187249,0.0000124349,0.0005284709],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9050013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.273131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570120334","doi":"10.5235/jr.23.2.1","title":"Standing Space Only in the CJEU: Comment on &lt;I&gt;Inuit TapiriitKanatami v European Parliament and Council&lt;/I&gt;","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Space (punctuation); Law; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07731161660712133,"gpt":0.3230648305755056,"spread":0.2457532139683843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005677623,0.0001607047,0.0002818363,0.00002636018,0.0004436264,0.00007725706,0.0003308098,0.00002213136,0.0002206824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006180761,0.000112615,0.00007678556,0.000215375,0.0002208406,0.0001511127,0.0001039721,0.0001548533,0.000264487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005727609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001316463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003136101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970571,0.0009679412,0.0003304743,0.0002016646,0.001063145,0.0003796279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991992,0.0002479332,0.0001556578,0.0001830089,0.0001078425,0.0001063618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008488495,0.0001123427,0.0005523311,0.00007991833,0.00002526463,0.00001135917,0.008251705,1.969877e-7,0.00001386341,0.7486085,0.2255365,0.01679949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001440444,0.00006381134,0.00627349,0.001159993,0.00003413112,0.000001297645,0.0004359246,5.665121e-7,9.908094e-7,0.0002284466,0.9915225,0.0001347839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004653258,0.1588189,0.00000667886,0.03093474,0.0004161206,0.0006801446,0.00002003405,0.00003149091,0.8044386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7001368,0.266972,0.00002929737,0.03116583,0.000705649,0.00001503557,0.000004051915,0.00001809653,0.0009531616],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8034855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4592307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402448089","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2024.2392371","title":"The Case for Fiduciary Duties in Public Law or when Public Law Duties are not Enough …","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Public law; Political science; Business; Duty","authors":[{"name":"James Maurici","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1677216278565002,"gpt":0.3980406291344969,"spread":0.2303190012779968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002077767,0.0001432312,0.0003096845,0.00003641282,0.001673927,0.0007899783,0.0004573927,0.0000906006,0.0003131635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001035976,0.00009293715,0.0001587605,0.0006085066,0.0005088658,0.0005196299,0.0001177566,0.0002220987,0.0001033898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001567166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005604882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01421405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3203315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982644,0.0002251591,0.0004407241,0.0003046289,0.0002798444,0.0004852752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984707,0.0008311198,0.0001070901,0.0003064011,0.0001620176,0.0001226892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003054846,0.00002525956,0.000004930876,0.0004039417,0.00001417913,0.00004143034,0.0008506021,4.616854e-8,4.306303e-7,0.9458039,0.02473946,0.02811273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005340204,0.00001599298,0.000007440288,0.0006008199,0.00003391744,0.00001247424,0.001018604,0.00001057553,0.000002220172,0.05259189,0.9455239,0.0001287387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004307824,0.1989879,0.00003465762,0.6140737,0.0008364714,0.002654743,0.0001756743,0.0002536442,0.1825524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9165136,0.06741234,0.0001057797,0.01088849,0.001132531,0.001060209,0.00001584422,0.00002688923,0.00284437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9207845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}