{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":25,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"7a4a0a1c3963","filters":{"venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W1977232788","doi":"10.1353/ken.2003.0023","title":"Zones of Consensus and Zones of Conflict: Questioning the \"Common Morality\" Presumption in Bioethics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Skepticism; Deliberation; Epistemology; Presumption; Bioethics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Leigh Turner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2902980117117661,"gpt":0.5308242407207625,"spread":0.2405262290089965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03642404,0.0001756127,0.0005389689,0.0002195453,0.0009767909,0.00001412379,0.0003085725,0.001083651,0.00005921919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06127814,0.0001326606,0.0000755483,0.0003332314,0.003919304,0.0002631217,0.0001171019,0.013838,0.000002913399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007146539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001641439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002212103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003330295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892856,0.007345702,0.001852909,0.0002004591,0.0009651834,0.0003500727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776775,0.01836141,0.001951218,0.0004009588,0.001455749,0.0001531752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001519538,0.0001368895,0.03511845,0.001160073,0.00006236372,0.00001523352,0.01922092,0.0003210461,0.0008592724,0.9426082,0.0001316875,0.0002138483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006184104,0.0007338271,0.06270823,0.01393392,0.0004359967,0.0004463132,0.05093674,0.0008294421,0.002554127,0.8341118,0.02647131,0.0006541927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9223885,0.003132104,0.002952484,0.05594162,0.003063639,0.0006808658,0.0000279231,0.0000217439,0.01179112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830093,0.005553156,0.01039506,0.0008216428,0.000117683,0.000007706237,0.000002834933,0.00001676336,0.00007586765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1084965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249085374","doi":"10.1353/ken.2003.0014","title":"Rehabilitating Equipoise","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical equipoise; Fiduciary; Psychology; Randomized controlled trial; Clinical trial; Sociology; Medicine; Social psychology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Paul B. Miller","is_ca":true},{"name":"Charles Weijer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5810947537599485,"gpt":0.5966335110490297,"spread":0.01553875728908127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02451893,0.0001557209,0.0004377729,0.0002224854,0.0003551043,0.00004756725,0.0003011746,0.0007879858,0.000367887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2306042,0.0001299204,0.0002791596,0.0003787351,0.001201708,0.0002458549,0.00008512776,0.01120816,0.00004502206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001472046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003753515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002190411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009249792,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958767,0.0004094647,0.001070858,0.0002719465,0.001917345,0.0004536664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982776,0.01238307,0.0004090653,0.0006860601,0.003105381,0.000640406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002646306,0.0005619674,0.01628655,0.001199965,0.0002003779,0.0004038282,0.002777005,0.0001522522,0.01268916,0.9622106,0.0008155326,0.002438114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004959959,0.00279638,0.004908374,0.00427515,0.0001904083,0.00229489,0.001722439,0.00009666676,0.00945122,0.8782009,0.09067301,0.0004305602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7383998,0.0017285,0.008232352,0.04525797,0.003691315,0.0005481872,0.000007675333,0.00006902595,0.2020652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922372,0.001577693,0.07278264,0.001315603,0.0003035823,0.000003986663,0.000001672695,0.00002911315,0.001613696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2060852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021750318","doi":"10.1353/ken.2005.0015","title":"Developing Human-Nonhuman Chimeras in Human Stem Cell Research: Ethical Issues and Boundaries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Pluripotent Stem Cells Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Environmental ethics; Transplantation; Stem cell; Sociology; Personhood; Biology; Epistemology; Political science; Cell biology; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Phillip Karpowicz","is_ca":true},{"name":"C. M. S. Cohen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Derek J Van der Kooy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.150013073777996,"gpt":0.4331293298312986,"spread":0.2831162560533026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006327038,0.0002169347,0.0003126632,0.0003844201,0.001492224,0.0003265824,0.0005709187,0.0008675001,0.00002531518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002351628,0.0002109497,0.00008161749,0.0002250355,0.001892057,0.00003696487,0.0004871658,0.00444546,0.000007936665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001139462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001074677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001834192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002369617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966827,0.0006653766,0.0006657018,0.0004131748,0.0009345864,0.0006384448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985704,0.00008023989,0.0001696788,0.0003380267,0.0006290952,0.0002125591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001249196,0.0002038267,0.003365197,0.0003545458,0.00008891284,0.0001081709,0.003305529,0.0001952492,0.9482259,0.03962202,0.002672325,0.001733442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002148534,0.0006980268,0.004023854,0.0005185434,0.00001660303,0.000242469,0.000757898,0.00003866294,0.4477948,0.006643932,0.5365641,0.0005525634],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836465,0.00360579,0.0003386457,0.008690116,0.0001714075,0.0002031505,0.000005932619,0.000008214612,0.003330209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926317,0.002445308,0.002583056,0.0003075105,0.0005439809,0.000007216428,0.00002216708,0.00003009262,0.001428952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5338918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115153429","doi":"10.1353/ken.2014.0021","title":"The Value of Unhealthy Eating and the Ethics of Healthy Eating Policies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Value (mathematics); Healthy eating; Limiting; Unhealthy food; Psychology; Social psychology; Virtue; Order (exchange); Medicine; Political science; Law; Business; Obesity","authors":[{"name":"Anne Barnhill","is_ca":false},{"name":"Katherine F. King","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nancy Kass","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ruth Faden","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1558347045297241,"gpt":0.4986296824931506,"spread":0.3427949779634265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05101072,0.0001877577,0.0006702678,0.000144897,0.007435631,0.00002965028,0.0005479917,0.0006991941,0.00002066158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03129631,0.0001094597,0.0001237228,0.0003102713,0.002034294,0.0003740714,0.0002447543,0.01016066,0.000005152151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000761331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003548463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005255336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004856897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988548,0.007444388,0.002210514,0.0001761245,0.0009663627,0.0006545813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9535038,0.04016643,0.004219076,0.0004592325,0.001410928,0.000240561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007389866,0.00006603563,0.02503215,0.005030535,0.00008010747,7.361547e-7,0.09659167,0.0002820829,0.00009895683,0.8694513,0.0003762803,0.002251114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01846275,0.004122458,0.140354,0.02716986,0.0006054839,0.0002087785,0.1380172,0.008730668,0.000296005,0.3090545,0.3520627,0.000915585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6802617,0.005284997,0.00303654,0.2909248,0.003556322,0.001070014,0.00001966294,0.00002852917,0.01581741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641282,0.02143992,0.004469019,0.008946402,0.0008300151,0.00001313957,0.000001551008,0.00002312829,0.000148652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5603969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996187860","doi":"10.1353/ken.2013.0017","title":"A Disability Critique of the New Prenatal Test for Down Syndrome","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Down syndrome; Test (biology); Psychology; Psychiatry; Intellectual disability; Medicine; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Chris Kaposy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0388558815293966,"gpt":0.3265706954626637,"spread":0.287714813933267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007877865,0.000138863,0.0003436025,0.00003945519,0.0001676776,0.00002968561,0.0003088871,0.0002591444,0.00008828596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0164131,0.000088812,0.0002519812,0.000150371,0.0006609797,0.0002787018,0.0001017989,0.001181547,0.000004395057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005574487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008126138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006284507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001401279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985863,0.00005082315,0.0005417818,0.0001452374,0.000436578,0.0002392854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971036,0.001386626,0.0002731198,0.0003856831,0.0005781366,0.0002728465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001557472,0.008059989,0.6856366,0.01039688,0.001577112,0.0003017196,0.008055043,0.001616733,0.03260795,0.1046346,0.100263,0.04529297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01015839,0.004312381,0.8180634,0.009494147,0.0008770381,0.008534369,0.0005091742,0.001087515,0.04611663,0.0834065,0.01674924,0.0006912031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488871,0.0005189616,0.007603406,0.03868,0.00115983,0.001081366,0.0001480003,0.00003127801,0.001890055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898141,0.0000878202,0.00918199,0.0004229904,0.0002224315,0.00001148701,0.000008862601,0.00001275394,0.0002375435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1324268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988576354","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0041","title":"Valuing Risk: The Ethical Review of Clinical Trial Safety","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Context (archaeology); Mandate; Risk assessment; Clinical trial; Psychology; Common Rule; Scholarship; Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science; Informed consent; Alternative medicine; Business; Law; Computer science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan Kimmelman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6750610294722323,"gpt":0.6543314193011597,"spread":0.02072961017107267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1472938,0.0002380024,0.00145801,0.0001324318,0.0005251379,0.00003137735,0.001021084,0.002492117,0.0002340142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4662142,0.0001455223,0.001244458,0.0005579236,0.003710118,0.000148581,0.0003366269,0.05035893,0.0000298818],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001370728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01101615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001131175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001751857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868774,0.002297477,0.005230613,0.000445204,0.00461848,0.0005307792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9280983,0.05698202,0.003866954,0.002174614,0.007793902,0.001084273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.07488485,0.00365348,0.004516106,0.02588146,0.002250403,0.0006829258,0.002679689,0.0006335837,0.0003323506,0.8457863,0.003663516,0.03503536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1609263,0.01228197,0.01029753,0.1577889,0.002472748,0.001541301,0.0004031726,0.00007830367,0.0008544457,0.5013348,0.1513233,0.0006972832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1681921,0.03596247,0.01924954,0.7252997,0.01403098,0.003696833,0.00007050457,0.00008108332,0.03341674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3341481,0.6301317,0.01713204,0.01519354,0.003104676,0.0000093458,0.00000856198,0.00004457515,0.0002275196],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7101062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059222908","doi":"10.1353/ken.0.0307","title":"Extending Clinical Equipoise to Phase 1 Trials Involving Patients: Unresolved Problems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Clinical equipoise; Phase (matter); Clinical trial; Psychology; Medicine; Internal medicine; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"James A. Anderson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jonathan Kimmelman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.758425240231175,"gpt":0.5912468262115161,"spread":0.1671784140196588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1617332,0.0003041749,0.002171681,0.0007700012,0.0006310482,0.0002674727,0.0007914296,0.0006697401,0.0005721135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.153575,0.0003377347,0.0005057987,0.0003448513,0.0003000072,0.001376027,0.0001621939,0.002967879,0.0005074932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002801598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008840972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002320181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000580827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9842329,0.001296183,0.01285666,0.000620017,0.0003441264,0.0006501335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984027,0.005204645,0.008348309,0.0007621585,0.000761167,0.000896763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000467438,0.003558917,0.1605124,0.001321783,0.0008799707,0.00002068246,0.01484306,0.001625303,0.001067142,0.7530189,0.05520681,0.007477671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01846312,0.002054047,0.02195367,0.001714126,0.0001182724,0.00006530223,0.001062313,0.003690326,0.0001187822,0.1334456,0.8156586,0.001655826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9076354,0.001147648,0.02744761,0.04080169,0.01847649,0.001542681,0.000366939,0.00006177853,0.002519771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463361,0.001066057,0.03533427,0.0132969,0.003538442,0.0000642774,0.00005434537,0.00007975892,0.0002298468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7604518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012744786","doi":"10.1353/ken.2012.0009","title":"Weighing Complex Evidence in a Democratic Society","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Democracy; Epistemology; Process (computing); Management science; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Heather Douglas","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4517584071779345,"gpt":0.3542163515808416,"spread":0.09754205559709289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002531169,0.0001154952,0.0002017543,0.0001060653,0.0009460304,0.000101566,0.0003672231,0.00008227278,0.0003971221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000334535,0.0001004726,0.0001345425,0.00006945723,0.001673407,0.002496444,0.00005248377,0.001190844,0.00002318538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002492153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008354036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004399785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986241,0.00007918516,0.000408451,0.0001069067,0.0004562237,0.0003250702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991059,0.0002021592,0.0002367932,0.0001280877,0.0001839694,0.0001430361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001870669,0.0001602569,0.0009894434,0.0001269595,0.00002508146,0.000009493374,0.183299,0.00008947329,0.001833872,0.8083437,0.004501441,0.0006026129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001245207,0.0004004119,0.004922841,0.003024481,0.0001040955,0.0002501036,0.01080727,0.001237709,0.0002261875,0.2296425,0.7472274,0.0009118387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.683063,0.01102574,0.003306211,0.03234812,0.01826514,0.0004340426,0.00002344636,0.0001029132,0.2514314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948976,0.0003536691,0.002116209,0.001112546,0.001199644,0.000001733017,7.312251e-7,0.00000639787,0.0003114625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7427259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7276196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029725525","doi":"10.1353/ken.2014.0029","title":"Redundant, Secretive, and Isolated: When Are Clinical Trials Scientifically Valid?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Complicity; Scientific integrity; Harm; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Clinical trial; Clinical Ethics; Scientific misconduct; Ethical issues; Research integrity; Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Kirstin Borgerson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7676941955245187,"gpt":0.6436633630035363,"spread":0.1240308325209823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1768236,0.0002694257,0.001593954,0.0003585159,0.0006169068,0.0002492206,0.0006052201,0.001865188,0.0002788369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4454044,0.0002035666,0.0005799982,0.0003264738,0.004056352,0.0003148326,0.0003513844,0.01536328,0.0000410155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007469364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002590306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002793578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001613734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888803,0.003581876,0.00359546,0.0007036717,0.00262883,0.0006099005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8994958,0.08371404,0.00365618,0.001858604,0.008488675,0.002786731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01241785,0.004183662,0.1499953,0.005193139,0.003439406,0.00149846,0.007142812,0.0001167718,0.02788383,0.6798828,0.0361941,0.07205194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01511746,0.00601614,0.03138991,0.01005019,0.001117676,0.001956624,0.0007885167,0.003231865,0.00179418,0.6930792,0.2345811,0.0008770844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6969262,0.001762522,0.07677704,0.1824231,0.01213936,0.001520523,0.00007821475,0.0001440009,0.02822897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575285,0.008760341,0.02467324,0.00365322,0.002223249,0.000005548538,0.00001235982,0.00005617657,0.003087423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2685809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165854615","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0026","title":"Social Contract Theory and Just Decision Making: Lessons from Genetic Testing for the BRCA Mutations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genetic testing; Context (archaeology); Health care; Accountability; Medicaid; Social contract; Business; Test (biology); Public health; Actuarial science; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Law; Nursing","authors":[{"name":"Bryn Williams–Jones","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael Burgess","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5842348112760535,"gpt":0.5181243147182224,"spread":0.06611049655783108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01965944,0.0001595746,0.000556842,0.0001848923,0.001554234,0.0002013905,0.0003299104,0.000266178,0.00004732376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02801222,0.000157043,0.0001386801,0.0001453565,0.0003694064,0.0004414166,0.0000484858,0.0007751553,0.00002936342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002627225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007207376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002967497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004413159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965398,0.0002265618,0.002500024,0.0002926022,0.0001406688,0.0003003626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849148,0.01217365,0.002273644,0.0002279305,0.0002993235,0.0001106411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006894555,0.00008028348,0.003651822,0.00009894757,0.0001779082,0.000003506982,0.009022295,0.01069478,0.00002527127,0.9710479,0.0005080747,0.004620256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001860608,0.00009532037,0.07914677,0.0003394904,0.00006300236,0.00005250643,0.001538855,0.00268361,0.000006469729,0.9062513,0.007726033,0.0002360057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4471976,0.004745072,0.4666145,0.07815684,0.001647909,0.0006346043,0.0004479343,0.00002314286,0.0005324529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456287,0.0002320943,0.04915685,0.004013882,0.0008938813,0.00002662131,0.000008340197,0.00002424564,0.00001537328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4984311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095272527","doi":"10.1353/ken.2014.0017","title":"The Risk-Escalation Model: A Principled Design Strategy for Early-Phase Trials","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Clinical trial; Premise; Psychology; Minimax; Task (project management); Risk analysis (engineering); Intensive care medicine; Medicine; Actuarial science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Spencer Phillips Hey","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jonathan Kimmelman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2811560880110345,"gpt":0.4517286945382107,"spread":0.1705726065271762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02516929,0.0001547339,0.0004833257,0.0001181644,0.0008237758,0.00009505608,0.0001752946,0.000617064,0.00000939177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01045677,0.00008780343,0.0002989995,0.000152001,0.0008001208,0.0001749159,0.00002423408,0.001777527,0.000001904545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005742316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001170655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000151799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000282057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970628,0.0006476617,0.001098889,0.0001710009,0.0007510616,0.0002685873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995152,0.002313019,0.001008641,0.0002626545,0.0009992239,0.0002644575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007780812,0.0008979425,0.0002011579,0.0004629497,0.000981514,0.0000108271,0.003175447,0.1322608,0.01696392,0.5533376,0.00134833,0.2825787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009306969,0.001848484,0.0007913301,0.0003094727,0.0004957122,0.00006570444,0.00004830855,0.7136964,0.001629053,0.2587468,0.01290486,0.0001569763],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03477279,0.0002168286,0.9487965,0.01433413,0.0007662267,0.0007491104,0.00001220228,0.00002191395,0.0003302729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698198,0.000982749,0.0279549,0.0002060472,0.0007684413,0.0000176874,0.0000158369,0.0000207641,0.000213746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.935047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741089746","doi":"10.1353/ken.2017.0032","title":"A Theoretical Foundation for the Ethical Distribution of Authorship in Multidisciplinary Publications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Foundation (evidence); Engineering ethics; Transparency (behavior); Sociology; Epistemology; Management science; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Elise Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5378732905641586,"gpt":0.6067647761594835,"spread":0.06889148559532499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0305394,0.0001132049,0.0003332298,0.0001222279,0.001067199,0.0001210662,0.0007951711,0.001354883,0.00007898445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2478773,0.0000762931,0.0002311332,0.0001639111,0.004878039,0.0002602073,0.0002523084,0.0106316,0.000003477258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001307674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002432399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004902213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005055157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970327,0.0002652183,0.0009800156,0.000222168,0.001200347,0.0002995618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769234,0.01805156,0.0007056601,0.0009807154,0.003101202,0.0002374566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000531476,0.0002566455,0.008293401,0.0002526967,0.00005474546,0.000005054846,0.0007708422,0.00004560479,0.000505654,0.9874499,0.00007991806,0.001754017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001855838,0.0004414303,0.1650316,0.0008657009,0.00009555525,0.00006624148,0.0002011543,0.00527908,0.0006046197,0.824046,0.001428461,0.00008435909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2559382,0.0001389665,0.111987,0.6257336,0.001323509,0.001124015,0.0000640279,0.00001747994,0.003673221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939446,0.0007925285,0.004566228,0.0001788888,0.0002977486,0.00003350823,0.00004181443,0.00001265264,0.0001320115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7380064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030165590","doi":"10.1353/ken.2006.0005","title":"Stem Cell Research in a Catholic Institution: Yes or No?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Embryonic stem cell; Context (archaeology); Stem cell; Environmental ethics; Narrative; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Biology; Cell biology; Philosophy; Genetics","authors":[{"name":"Michael R. Prieur","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jo‐An Occhipinti","is_ca":false},{"name":"L Hardingham","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Hill","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gillian Kernaghan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Debra L. Miller","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sandy Morton","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mary Rowell","is_ca":false},{"name":"John F Vallely","is_ca":false},{"name":"Suzanne Wilson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.271189541551263,"gpt":0.4531037268552789,"spread":0.1819141853040159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004203477,0.0001544988,0.0003956752,0.0008591292,0.0003730611,0.00003766813,0.0002596053,0.000450076,0.00002609327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006295072,0.0001129508,0.00008036098,0.0009913173,0.001060105,0.0003169095,0.00009466959,0.004161782,0.00005581855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002834261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002976839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005669522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004903025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974309,0.0001768823,0.0007095673,0.0003065827,0.0008465336,0.0005295842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997763,0.000193198,0.000204451,0.0004543368,0.001241045,0.0001440125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01268631,0.009738351,0.2259702,0.01554202,0.0002667837,0.02163167,0.01376077,0.002601318,0.08474592,0.4437453,0.02826944,0.1410419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009304722,0.004928395,0.06576119,0.003991145,0.00008461711,0.006899321,0.00227968,0.0001156689,0.04901684,0.02582629,0.8311245,0.0006676052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513218,0.002271717,0.0001704225,0.01197394,0.001067413,0.0004465807,0.000005303442,0.00005983785,0.03268296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915175,0.002543754,0.003638236,0.0001591817,0.0007081507,0.00001593539,0.000003690671,0.00001444386,0.001399059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8028551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157775171","doi":"10.1353/ken.2008.0004","title":"The Harm-Benefit Tradeoff in “Bad Deal” Trials","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Gillian Nycum","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lynette Reid","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6846819381835406,"gpt":0.6240361875274446,"spread":0.06064575065609601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1431653,0.0002105368,0.000843517,0.0003689229,0.0005499743,0.0001085685,0.0007378951,0.001214425,0.0001025214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1426832,0.0001341091,0.0004343943,0.0005931954,0.001371557,0.0002204647,0.0001382761,0.01621824,0.00002775525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002578885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003135025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001639517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004730359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922128,0.0005439837,0.003066942,0.0003395116,0.002950322,0.0008863967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9161195,0.0780609,0.001246406,0.001032689,0.002593913,0.0009465544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004629883,0.0008532129,0.01581029,0.0004916794,0.0005144106,0.001701527,0.00359436,0.0002200467,0.008730033,0.9020469,0.001505693,0.05990195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01300077,0.001920033,0.08323126,0.004106041,0.0002822779,0.001604601,0.001787215,0.0001587766,0.01308146,0.6298302,0.2504552,0.000542173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7467819,0.005578571,0.006348081,0.1909826,0.00557348,0.00131766,0.0000178107,0.00005608523,0.04334372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704949,0.01803232,0.006424422,0.002031781,0.001375555,0.000005825396,0.000003776383,0.00003691744,0.001594526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2722167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029226457","doi":"10.1353/ken.0.0273","title":"The HFEA Public Consultation Process on Hybrids and Chimeras: Informed, Effective, and Meaningful?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Pluripotent Stem Cells Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Public consultation; Political science; Law; Process (computing)","authors":[{"name":"Françoise Βaylis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02523847673060581,"gpt":0.3330425650058388,"spread":0.307804088275233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218169,0.0001249403,0.000121742,0.0000792154,0.0005511871,0.0001506975,0.0001832781,0.0001642461,0.000001461032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002155556,0.00008708175,0.00003502819,0.0000889268,0.0004126007,0.00003170686,0.0000478801,0.0006827596,0.000001415006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001678722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003575161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003047043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004024965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988943,0.0001090074,0.0002411003,0.0001683215,0.0003478679,0.0002394123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989409,0.0001654981,0.0001618965,0.000138061,0.0004527032,0.0001409719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003746385,0.0006074764,0.01161644,0.0009191553,0.001066481,0.0001182433,0.006617242,0.001266935,0.6070762,0.04759395,0.003357228,0.3160142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01630756,0.01334974,0.0960719,0.001380967,0.0001863273,0.004205153,0.002182998,0.001982059,0.5171778,0.02243113,0.3229604,0.001763971],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902445,0.001197535,0.0004354919,0.004840876,0.0001607248,0.0002546058,0.000005184238,0.000005145486,0.002855912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994382,0.004836714,0.0001747359,0.0003840139,0.0001126369,0.00000551051,0.00001016472,0.00000691816,0.00008729485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3196032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4239341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011012869","doi":"10.1353/ken.2005.0008","title":"Justice in the Genetically Transformed Society","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Primary goods; Distributive justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Relation (database); Environmental ethics; Race (biology); Consequentialism; Epistemology; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Biology; Economics; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Colin Farrelly","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2257200525480788,"gpt":0.4083885500742342,"spread":0.1826684975261554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003029114,0.000167028,0.0001949247,0.0001353305,0.000606065,0.0001063948,0.0009678245,0.0002594179,0.0001339125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003907287,0.000122822,0.000148004,0.0007513949,0.00158181,0.0004578142,0.0000520376,0.003934498,0.0000285221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007835102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005827518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005021984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000108593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969983,0.0002904976,0.0008223188,0.0002662317,0.00119763,0.0004250238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979538,0.001164553,0.0002478813,0.0002928185,0.0002299365,0.0001110245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006140229,0.0008795384,0.00003314464,0.0002053432,0.00002478746,0.00009686222,0.01902993,0.001235087,0.5317835,0.4309257,0.00546955,0.01025518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005060009,0.0008169536,0.001695053,0.0005441757,0.0002528674,0.001325018,0.001997046,0.004306354,0.2881324,0.08601082,0.6089174,0.0009418911],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5623745,0.0002175154,0.07883851,0.3216363,0.004145113,0.0008483756,0.00004329999,0.00008544834,0.03181087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617996,0.001639028,0.006586292,0.0291774,0.0006334042,0.000009706224,0.000001456866,0.00001536537,0.0001377967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6034479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982883591","doi":"10.1353/ken.2002.0021","title":"Report of the IOM Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Participants","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human services; Quarter (Canadian coin); Human research; Common Rule; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Law; Informed consent; Pathology","authors":[{"name":"Tom L. Beauchamp","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8795710594181539,"gpt":0.6681001142595233,"spread":0.2114709451586306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08505141,0.0001545049,0.0004848768,0.0002023573,0.002983948,0.0001332602,0.0009253246,0.0006454227,0.00002846973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1526076,0.00008404758,0.0003261622,0.0006022599,0.002176866,0.0001551184,0.0002940091,0.01712643,0.000004885104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002732959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001297228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001100574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002249325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920356,0.001564026,0.00161444,0.0003111204,0.003788027,0.0006867888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689013,0.02324707,0.001095081,0.001415925,0.005078257,0.0002623122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001148781,0.004423555,0.06758029,0.02199593,0.002301092,0.002647375,0.03114184,0.001947483,0.1491546,0.6966696,0.009369911,0.01161951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02150752,0.0130727,0.06849428,0.1400036,0.001656914,0.01534902,0.04373851,0.01573206,0.3112122,0.3116083,0.05594974,0.001675134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9156592,0.0002206189,0.0009394743,0.05891974,0.001604057,0.001879999,0.000007356515,0.00002707088,0.02074243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963827,0.0000809032,0.001501842,0.0002156143,0.0006839699,0.0000462723,8.524156e-7,0.00003164551,0.001056252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3850613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054930204","doi":"10.1353/ken.2013.0010","title":"Physicians’ Strikes and the Competing Bases of Physicians’ Moral Obligations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Dan MacDougall","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1651346198874795,"gpt":0.4247778258296609,"spread":0.2596432059421814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002714821,0.0001501134,0.000507818,0.0000976325,0.001397808,0.00002242528,0.0002507107,0.0002743372,0.00006287292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009552917,0.000100209,0.0001191041,0.0001886333,0.0007765812,0.0003859443,0.00008505013,0.002537062,0.00001270903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003967081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006026651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002383645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001096173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969211,0.001117279,0.001014035,0.0001399182,0.0004507699,0.0003568867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955242,0.001884867,0.001064843,0.0002493048,0.001189042,0.00008771983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001314924,0.0002748904,0.02863071,0.003731043,0.0003888241,0.000008441189,0.1289865,0.0003419416,0.003426929,0.7922975,0.008792044,0.03298974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01628804,0.0009583244,0.1909375,0.0313164,0.0004332855,0.000109561,0.4917807,0.003785523,0.001275505,0.167187,0.09460855,0.001319643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9096813,0.001984402,0.0006800229,0.07534615,0.00205417,0.0008467041,0.00003997905,0.00002698832,0.009340342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948293,0.001620405,0.0009508381,0.001491858,0.0009034855,0.00003265407,0.000004253345,0.00001595053,0.0001512751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6251104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058912386","doi":"10.1353/ken.0.0310","title":"Market Stimulus and Genomic Justice: Evaluating the Effects of Market Access to Human Germ-Line Enhancement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Business; Economic Justice; Economics; Microeconomics","authors":[{"name":"G. K. D. Crozier","is_ca":false},{"name":"Christopher Hajzler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1740504363321392,"gpt":0.363248890231611,"spread":0.1891984538994718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004209776,0.0002068243,0.0002890044,0.0002301825,0.000831221,0.0003496089,0.0006874253,0.0001637412,0.0008624557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004000574,0.0001405956,0.00008300225,0.0002546456,0.000260552,0.0008218499,0.0004885978,0.001423266,0.000015706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000235717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001215559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001904872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002745313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982574,0.00007463955,0.0005940372,0.0002129169,0.0005592062,0.0003018189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979752,0.0004711452,0.0005491108,0.0002651296,0.0006990575,0.00004032465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001915129,0.0006204587,0.003568152,0.008265454,0.0005546791,0.00008153398,0.00304725,0.001114707,0.8897907,0.01216742,0.03376899,0.04510551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02682689,0.006786627,0.173687,0.01641946,0.009485463,0.0007274965,0.002026501,0.2031459,0.1250526,0.08497293,0.3444402,0.006428864],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778492,0.0001485378,0.001321052,0.001946189,0.003305139,0.0004870105,0.000002185075,0.00001222915,0.01492843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950228,0.0001270405,0.0006517259,0.002153946,0.001285878,0.000009812419,0.000003131499,0.00002123622,0.0007244716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7647381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796130551","doi":"10.1353/ken.2018.0002","title":"Assessing Rehabilitation Eligibility of Older Patients: An Ethical Analysis of the Impact of Bias","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rehabilitation; Context (archaeology); Population; Medicine; Gerontology; Psychology; Physical therapy; Environmental health","authors":[{"name":"Josephine Najem","is_ca":false},{"name":"Priscilla Lam Wai Shun","is_ca":false},{"name":"Maude Laliberté","is_ca":false},{"name":"Vardit Ravitsky","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4571707037013603,"gpt":0.5471890221899147,"spread":0.0900183184885544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04695834,0.0001599632,0.001352218,0.0007450432,0.0002259758,0.00004227959,0.0004922498,0.0005190359,0.0001849816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04358814,0.0001390617,0.0006905555,0.0009974679,0.001142812,0.001007536,0.00006905884,0.001033163,0.000004613039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003824576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001036397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002454146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007221077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918074,0.001393906,0.005912927,0.0003060842,0.0003486339,0.000231059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985824,0.002888762,0.008341043,0.0008058854,0.00199511,0.0001452292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005066582,0.0005755573,0.9436665,0.0004125574,0.0008045591,7.353226e-8,0.01470578,0.005115869,0.0001001359,0.03402762,0.0003582607,0.0001823696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006604483,0.0005410976,0.9731412,0.0002874202,0.0001236016,0.000001226213,0.0008227705,0.005751639,0.000102983,0.01831877,0.0001178265,0.0001309992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887041,0.0001136512,0.005001002,0.004467144,0.0006243555,0.0002708959,0.0002318912,0.000004625476,0.0005823384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941565,0.00003900606,0.005208388,0.0004431609,0.0001183072,0.000002634829,0.00001546364,0.00001200611,0.000004467577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02947467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410129924","doi":"10.1353/ken.2024.a958997","title":"Nothing About Us Without Us: Identifying Principles of Justice For Emancipatory Participatory Research in the Context of Neurodiversity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Nothing; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Injustice; Sociology; Epistemology; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Amandine Catala","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5477493797323871,"gpt":0.4917945688753739,"spread":0.0559548108570132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01310877,0.0001711659,0.0003859695,0.0007304908,0.0006837003,0.0001619274,0.001333959,0.0002064375,0.0000194415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007083775,0.0001391826,0.0001914744,0.0009480686,0.001826394,0.0009524516,0.0003710943,0.003569316,0.000007087623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001309917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001490437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002590888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005614766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994741,0.001245874,0.0009083458,0.0004151171,0.002037004,0.0006526757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953766,0.003383115,0.0003487897,0.0004612165,0.000308044,0.0001222722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007271789,0.0006667714,0.01960879,0.008093446,0.00008624065,0.0006602854,0.1382466,0.002845133,0.1344532,0.6931275,0.0001786457,0.001306217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009518332,0.003638271,0.1015317,0.0184284,0.0009917597,0.001211958,0.04453697,0.05645281,0.5879769,0.08107394,0.09275115,0.001887824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896759,0.00117287,0.001935974,0.00436743,0.001116493,0.000614094,0.00005542168,0.00001876703,0.001043003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982696,0.0009483261,0.0003015671,0.0002854473,0.0001037936,0.00001874552,7.867641e-7,0.00002358454,0.00004819864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6120535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964923009","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0008","title":"Will the Real Charles Fried Please Stand Up?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical equipoise; Informed consent; Embodied cognition; Psychology; Randomized controlled trial; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Surgery; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Paul B. Miller","is_ca":true},{"name":"Charles Weijer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4751834912171155,"gpt":0.5314808326619664,"spread":0.05629734144485099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01926836,0.0005884714,0.001296091,0.0004143047,0.0009173774,0.0002320568,0.001446428,0.006380562,0.0007945799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05626824,0.0003830018,0.0007735652,0.0004393994,0.003830373,0.0003974946,0.0002897813,0.0894161,0.00005373201],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000398584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01330988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001890659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003089457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989675,0.001045572,0.001950341,0.0006647879,0.005623563,0.001040677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782954,0.01389935,0.001254292,0.001676556,0.004320929,0.0005534975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004726882,0.0001511137,0.0002994275,0.002387123,0.0008920948,0.004483926,0.001434283,0.00001334201,0.0001391364,0.02458269,0.964512,0.0006321784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00195537,0.0005599457,0.0000977064,0.003007036,0.0004485284,0.001017206,0.0002171688,0.000009556747,0.0001373442,0.06424823,0.9279466,0.0003553012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001890415,0.002557967,0.0005762124,0.9643635,0.006283453,0.0006500926,0.0001459594,0.00003779857,0.02349467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003535556,0.1184994,0.002697756,0.8241203,0.01654312,0.0000279677,0.0001549575,0.0002295988,0.03419137],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1402432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080209351","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0009","title":"A Jewish Argument for Socialized Medicine","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Judaism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Corporate governance; Law; Human rights; Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Medicine; Theology; Management","authors":[{"name":"David Novák","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.26848152837631,"gpt":0.5517514798713725,"spread":0.2832699514950626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04351228,0.0002129563,0.000594825,0.0001745319,0.003324838,0.0000137401,0.0004433717,0.001130517,0.001322024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16681,0.0001702851,0.0001652908,0.0002650397,0.001156429,0.0003757638,0.00006518633,0.01445206,0.00004702289],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002887556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00373946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006586307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002387628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925291,0.003714875,0.001534231,0.0002532457,0.001295472,0.0006730939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802802,0.01545897,0.001327614,0.0003510243,0.002150408,0.000431834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001446208,0.0001235172,0.0005108344,0.0005898991,0.0001560724,0.00001966829,0.01153414,0.00001389364,0.0007884732,0.9421141,0.04315172,0.0008531261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003252981,0.0001989665,0.00006140939,0.000861494,0.0001186879,0.00003407702,0.003048531,0.00001493967,0.00007027898,0.4403638,0.5518494,0.000125469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01013233,0.004189946,0.2404627,0.3053965,0.04381337,0.00275148,0.0000416703,0.000142883,0.3930691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7963992,0.009399735,0.1211256,0.0567228,0.007572044,0.000267587,0.00003464923,0.0001600738,0.008318247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7862669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W239448657","doi":"10.1353/ken.2005.0027","title":"Acceptance, Avoidance, and Ambiguity: Conflicting Social Values about Childhood Disability","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Isolation (microbiology); Psychology; Health technology; Health care; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Public relations; Nursing; Sociology; Medicine; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Carol Levine","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05744366149438738,"gpt":0.4056607514036039,"spread":0.3482170899092165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003976079,0.0002436959,0.000613631,0.0001052002,0.001009349,0.00009548877,0.0002159735,0.0006733848,0.00008956106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002787857,0.0002163447,0.0001921074,0.0002677464,0.001240432,0.0004764709,0.0001121461,0.005384495,0.000005824603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001727369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008970502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000150158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002343883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971908,0.000208142,0.0009341827,0.0003282288,0.0008778118,0.0004608055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977264,0.0003513637,0.0004527662,0.0002740566,0.0008008421,0.0003945701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007160482,0.002259243,0.2498954,0.003902635,0.0007828546,0.00025071,0.1209576,0.0001714731,0.0008342303,0.110662,0.003580221,0.5059877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006868049,0.001136936,0.4919523,0.001603692,0.0005884265,0.001596357,0.00325265,0.0002651143,0.0009451431,0.01767616,0.4731929,0.0009222851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391028,0.004590607,0.0004049558,0.0406081,0.001179037,0.0002992974,0.0000286926,0.00005662022,0.01372987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822322,0.005078627,0.005354919,0.002326648,0.004761189,0.000004074691,0.000008470517,0.00002631764,0.0002075494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5050654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229568972","doi":"10.1353/ken.2016.0021","title":"Editorial Note","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Environmental ethics; Personhood; Sociology; Scholarship; Universalism; Transformative learning; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jing‐Bao Nie","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ruth Fitzgerald","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08841311829238499,"gpt":0.5264697830751545,"spread":0.4380566647827695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05978857,0.0007053579,0.001490066,0.0004806277,0.004412223,0.00007156499,0.002344389,0.01986341,0.001285214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4709245,0.0005273062,0.0004841946,0.0003121672,0.002088383,0.001092942,0.0007787027,0.1521099,0.001169696],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001146704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03555597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003140267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005592748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9780803,0.008008577,0.003287475,0.0007148407,0.008500068,0.001408775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8672844,0.1117306,0.005856003,0.001417956,0.01264547,0.001065615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004146807,0.00008602529,0.000008835587,0.001212863,0.0002053152,0.00007048089,0.002317181,0.000002402799,0.0001070776,0.01095923,0.9841039,0.0005120551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002551226,0.0002282658,0.000001387646,0.007050752,0.0002755431,0.00001026807,0.0001998007,0.000001267952,0.000007868144,0.07119965,0.9179789,0.0004950279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003591764,0.0004139394,0.004700441,0.01272601,0.9317231,0.0004691567,0.0003590785,0.0000919205,0.04951278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00004232094,0.01143088,0.002941595,0.0008832994,0.9788877,0.00003285471,0.00009104892,0.000158328,0.005531985],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4111359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}