{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":4,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"1d61662c94aa","filters":{"venue":"LSE law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2901064361","doi":"10.61315/lselr.25","title":"The Inadequacy of UK Moral Rights Protection: A Comparative Study on the Waivability of Rights and Recontextualisation of Works in Copyright and Droit D’auteurs Systems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE law review","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waiver; Moral rights; Section (typography); Law; Convention; Political science; Law and economics; Work (physics); Intellectual property; Sociology; Business; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Jonas Brown-Pedersen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08910917853850718,"gpt":0.2802024429420639,"spread":0.1910932644035567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009856788,0.0001749204,0.0005358355,0.006223124,0.004389883,0.008086678,0.0008682779,0.001799203,0.003956739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03356369,0.0002725784,0.0002223924,0.01007305,0.007417517,0.004603896,0.003053635,0.001366683,0.0003695419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02920015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01092173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2782302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3942994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9788874,0.01008144,0.001187733,0.001033177,0.00671247,0.002097812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965114,0.02198479,0.003659379,0.001336931,0.007200586,0.000704299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004411211,0.000167985,0.04050285,0.003088589,0.0001612788,0.003760428,0.293618,0.0007989298,0.001376511,0.3289509,0.01955107,0.3075824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005531817,0.0003189701,0.2293196,0.003978203,0.000149372,0.001639731,0.2507721,0.0004499427,0.001473066,0.008481694,0.5032403,0.000121704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6757726,0.05643603,0.0008545054,0.009796196,0.0002456602,0.00005966356,0.0001550376,0.0000139564,0.2566664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840785,0.009178074,0.0002166803,0.0005402169,0.00002880477,0.00001534112,0.00004582844,0.000008329679,0.005888121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2782302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5532215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388980739","doi":"10.61315/lselr.574","title":"Questioning the Potential of the Forthcoming WIPO’s Diplomatic Conference on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources: Endless Negotiations Coming to a Successful End?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Intellectual property; Traditional knowledge; Genetic resources; Negotiation; Compromise; Folklore; Law and economics; Transparency (behavior); Public domain; Indigenous; Business; Political science; Law; Public relations; Sociology; Biotechnology; Biology; Ecology; History","authors":[{"name":"Marie-Denise Vane","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08975247469920018,"gpt":0.2512166634122954,"spread":0.1614641887130953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03902416,0.0006766656,0.0007938615,0.001439463,0.01188547,0.02977663,0.00372556,0.03668588,0.005369458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06006823,0.0006154992,0.001307804,0.001391149,0.0293098,0.02672981,0.008465252,0.03625299,0.001365449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01136308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02049814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009688248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008027107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9754376,0.01080452,0.0007332254,0.001835832,0.007529417,0.003659399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727818,0.01999496,0.00156115,0.001373458,0.0027594,0.001529256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006954778,0.0000140034,0.00006181117,0.00002384647,0.000003583483,0.0001104566,0.001098698,0.00008724773,0.00005922576,0.9816706,0.0132654,0.003598105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004513491,0.00004378934,0.0004081944,0.0005188667,0.00001531311,0.0001557329,0.005265174,0.0005795899,0.0004375667,0.6164284,0.3760327,0.00006948095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.008475558,0.009072555,0.006775339,0.8083013,0.003172119,0.00005714166,0.00004386496,0.00003911907,0.1640629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5356475,0.01245608,0.01002894,0.3668833,0.005031035,0.0004618377,0.0000821447,0.0001618612,0.06924729],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03902416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.206382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392891524","doi":"10.61315/lselr.666","title":"Fighting for IP Equity: A Zoom on the Forthcoming Who Pandemic Agreement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE law review","topic":"Biotechnology and Related Fields","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Zoom; Equity (law); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Business; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Law; Physics; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Optics","authors":[{"name":"Marie-Denise Vane","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07197264315269193,"gpt":0.366656520615119,"spread":0.2946838774624271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03875191,0.0005493255,0.0008239783,0.002047482,0.006551606,0.01436599,0.00271458,0.02694942,0.006898276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02421627,0.0005006023,0.001627723,0.00205718,0.01882795,0.0228496,0.006117815,0.0272492,0.00132047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008777607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01950435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01430926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02269429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9787618,0.01041661,0.0009312651,0.001441307,0.005959526,0.002489422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699008,0.02456005,0.000946296,0.0009267252,0.002768809,0.0008974525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005636296,0.00001518828,0.0001211384,0.0001104415,0.000004263076,0.0002935866,0.001148461,0.0001239479,0.0001170289,0.9411035,0.0465198,0.01043705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001821735,0.00003835223,0.0003811988,0.001290632,0.00001055215,0.0002769444,0.002542151,0.0002854948,0.0002431845,0.2056196,0.7892472,0.00004645075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002556932,0.03221266,0.004875837,0.7815623,0.003524598,0.0000923719,0.00007001476,0.00003275841,0.1750725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09723265,0.04644668,0.00682077,0.7937513,0.007861143,0.0003164186,0.00009410229,0.00008968246,0.04738722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03875191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2049422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023081599","doi":"10.61315/lselr.79","title":"How Can the Methodology of Feminist Judgment Writing Improve Gender-Sensitivity in International Criminal Law?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Law; Criminal law; Criminal court; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; International law; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Kathryn Gooding","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1823084407023345,"gpt":0.3834310477785706,"spread":0.2011226070762361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1423339,0.0006663838,0.0009781516,0.005917113,0.007410695,0.01817104,0.00294412,0.003032728,0.004438459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2105901,0.0005357494,0.0006346751,0.003933015,0.04207468,0.012396,0.005876083,0.006671898,0.0007826642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01033766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01113213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008057241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01661471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8254107,0.1481016,0.003637311,0.004352953,0.01572374,0.002773668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7227519,0.235856,0.009830221,0.009301901,0.02075507,0.001504983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019197,0.00002957459,0.001148045,0.0003535022,0.00002529417,0.0001339257,0.04686387,0.0006343472,0.0002425182,0.8350722,0.01185871,0.1036189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002334919,0.00007167235,0.002540857,0.001382104,0.00002676819,0.0001493473,0.04077073,0.001783983,0.001671982,0.6685539,0.2829274,0.00009782716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04720155,0.01844633,0.2151037,0.2133301,0.007490905,0.0004464489,0.0001414655,0.0002644114,0.4975751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8504525,0.007123035,0.1003171,0.01623259,0.00269348,0.0005034495,0.0000685974,0.0003292591,0.02228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7527426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}