{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":4,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"1d61662c94aa","filters":{"venue":"LSE law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2901064361","doi":"10.61315/lselr.25","title":"The Inadequacy of UK Moral Rights Protection: A Comparative Study on the Waivability of Rights and Recontextualisation of Works in Copyright and Droit D’auteurs Systems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE law review","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waiver; Moral rights; Section (typography); Law; Convention; Political science; Law and economics; Work (physics); Intellectual property; Sociology; Business; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Jonas Brown-Pedersen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08910917853850718,"gpt":0.2802024429420639,"spread":0.1910932644035567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00124352,0.000145389,0.0004999404,0.00004493861,0.0002296544,0.00006952474,0.000172747,0.00003862106,0.0001502956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009188522,0.00006483673,0.000047016,0.0003706769,0.0004842851,0.0003280282,0.00007123957,0.0001374209,0.000007757775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001787954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008147219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006921401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003888146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986528,0.0001840734,0.0006342204,0.0002152795,0.0001993534,0.0001143325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986816,0.0002268405,0.0004498955,0.0003208799,0.0003124437,0.00000833154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002056564,0.001933666,0.00536369,0.01224049,0.0005768986,0.000004650016,0.01007652,0.000003334094,0.0002961589,0.9298111,0.02045796,0.01717893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008143925,0.005304011,0.05397021,0.08075287,0.001676585,0.00002295212,0.005710817,0.04614813,0.004932404,0.3198598,0.4711411,0.002337216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633795,0.01072165,0.00001863735,0.0005274339,0.0001873396,0.003658653,0.000001753658,0.0000126895,0.02149235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994543,0.0002294246,0.000002474015,0.00008610616,0.0000888131,0.00008078463,0.000001300238,0.000004684547,0.00005210989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6099514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388980739","doi":"10.61315/lselr.574","title":"Questioning the Potential of the Forthcoming WIPO’s Diplomatic Conference on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources: Endless Negotiations Coming to a Successful End?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Intellectual property; Traditional knowledge; Genetic resources; Negotiation; Compromise; Folklore; Law and economics; Transparency (behavior); Public domain; Indigenous; Business; Political science; Law; Public relations; Sociology; Biotechnology; Biology; Ecology; History","authors":[{"name":"Marie-Denise Vane","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08975247469920018,"gpt":0.2512166634122954,"spread":0.1614641887130953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044683,0.0001735884,0.000279648,0.0000651661,0.000612871,0.0002119502,0.0004332857,0.00003787992,0.0002029237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006616282,0.00008058133,0.00009210674,0.0006784283,0.0001347927,0.0001921885,0.0003637605,0.0001849666,0.0002040455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001375253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001824038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001051221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003854297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987361,0.0001013908,0.0004052088,0.0002343911,0.0002842747,0.0002386741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991439,0.0001897237,0.0001867809,0.0003274096,0.0001363712,0.00001582533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006138564,0.0007948476,0.009224002,0.06153708,0.0009819791,0.0001078755,0.02257323,0.007238298,0.009050989,0.3714283,0.04461108,0.4718385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001704084,0.000308058,0.02042654,0.09768344,0.001897827,0.0001068165,0.002354531,0.1990645,0.001065196,0.0108132,0.6623688,0.002207003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9296861,0.006914849,0.001900821,0.02336707,0.0009364803,0.004821684,0.00001447058,0.0003215137,0.03203705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928622,0.001057668,0.00003476705,0.005372987,0.0001605941,0.00007125916,0.000006475617,0.00002257505,0.0004114641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6177578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.471377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392891524","doi":"10.61315/lselr.666","title":"Fighting for IP Equity: A Zoom on the Forthcoming Who Pandemic Agreement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE law review","topic":"Biotechnology and Related Fields","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Zoom; Equity (law); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Business; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Law; Physics; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Optics","authors":[{"name":"Marie-Denise Vane","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07197264315269193,"gpt":0.366656520615119,"spread":0.2946838774624271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006428948,0.0001107675,0.0002843277,0.00002011233,0.000127715,0.00001389888,0.0001030034,0.0005344559,0.0001797111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007292102,0.00005643967,0.0001787522,0.0001403811,0.00005550011,0.00002156647,0.0000633139,0.00111917,0.0001263232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003124056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002806457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007363113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001105962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999237,0.00002557101,0.0002372157,0.0001966528,0.000103808,0.0001997725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994345,0.0001820785,0.00003985886,0.0002908625,0.00001891593,0.00003380794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001210586,0.00001833416,0.00001476729,0.005854179,0.0001592692,0.00002847097,0.00003826803,1.05836e-7,0.0001507253,0.7412321,0.01394017,0.2385515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001490849,0.0001325091,0.000008714365,0.02951748,0.0003589056,0.00005800421,0.000006518691,0.0001679683,0.0004459939,0.00260422,0.9664789,0.00007174334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001319745,0.5988205,0.002013448,0.3628519,0.0005087171,0.002321544,0.000008203903,0.0003074667,0.0318485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2537006,0.5814572,0.0008240867,0.1518499,0.0006273008,0.0006217844,0.00004333366,0.0000697836,0.01080601],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9525387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4862298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023081599","doi":"10.61315/lselr.79","title":"How Can the Methodology of Feminist Judgment Writing Improve Gender-Sensitivity in International Criminal Law?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Law; Criminal law; Criminal court; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; International law; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Kathryn Gooding","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1823084407023345,"gpt":0.3834310477785706,"spread":0.2011226070762361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001578847,0.00008570002,0.0002532742,0.00001039913,0.0001902069,0.00005494088,0.0002744039,0.000040984,0.0001315175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001823208,0.00006150125,0.0001059815,0.00004967767,0.0003344636,0.00007880056,0.00007032875,0.0001608359,0.000006928341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007521231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006645406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005132927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01890226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984468,0.000592923,0.0002677581,0.0001884183,0.0003389758,0.0001651745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992211,0.0003420942,0.0001655312,0.00009811892,0.0001168995,0.00005627576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005414727,0.00001711178,0.00003377718,0.0002157675,0.0000173055,0.000014853,0.002445333,3.526939e-7,0.0001114875,0.9961439,0.00009415906,0.0009005498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002939971,0.00006342897,0.000356606,0.0007941577,0.0001105349,0.00001000529,0.001062235,0.00004782445,0.0010701,0.05766169,0.9382828,0.000246586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06930012,0.00886494,0.0007929072,0.3143759,0.001840381,0.002015397,0.0001773876,0.00009572593,0.6025373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804605,0.0005614656,0.0006964115,0.01761072,0.0003903155,0.00001688193,0.000007869458,0.000005668804,0.0002501762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}