{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":112,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":112,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"b99e4faee063","filters":{"venue":"Land Use Policy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2040876195","doi":"10.1016/s0264-8377(03)00007-3","title":"China's land resources and land-use change: insights from the 1996 land survey","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":404,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Urbanization; Land use; China; Per capita; Agricultural economics; Land development; Agricultural land; Industrialisation; Population; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Hectare; Beijing; Mainland China; Agriculture; Environmental protection; Economic growth; Ecology; Political science; Economics; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04229824748934274,"gpt":0.2907016361748893,"spread":0.2484033886855466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004220745,0.00017455,0.0002497584,0.00003630611,0.0006469433,0.0004473311,0.0002247965,0.0001426256,0.00003822234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005372314,0.0001027998,0.00005592246,0.0001718538,0.0001929771,0.0004712761,0.00006205326,0.0001850807,0.00002506961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006835032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009540786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.816696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6063905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986455,0.0003465494,0.0001816528,0.0002840991,0.0001852857,0.0003568731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990007,0.0003898609,0.000139896,0.0002795789,0.00002586593,0.0001640986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001898799,0.0000222271,0.9743798,0.000002854355,0.00002460356,0.000003005572,0.02210031,0.000001519602,7.069766e-7,0.002275507,0.0006682084,0.0005022259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005295279,0.00001344972,0.7833707,0.0000149769,0.000008246507,0.000001060999,0.00009261953,0.00000953147,0.00000206605,0.001809311,0.2140076,0.0001409812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937582,0.001097708,0.000002320134,0.002257946,0.0001841131,0.0002223004,0.0003158843,0.00003870653,0.002122845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927477,0.002774839,0.00003035947,0.001075845,0.001008669,0.00001250688,0.00003034228,0.00001839353,0.002301374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2133394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.497583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1864232817","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.001","title":"Multi-scale analysis of urban sprawl in Europe: Towards a European de-sprawling strategy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Nuclear Energy University Program; Bundesamt für Umwelt; European Commission","keywords":"Urban sprawl; Geography; Mediterranean climate; Environmental planning; Land use; Urban planning; Scale (ratio); Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Cartography; Environmental science; Civil engineering; Engineering; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04504786711775478,"gpt":0.2807476525357542,"spread":0.2356997854179994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004698015,0.0001232565,0.000255057,0.0001810941,0.00003131527,0.00005457284,0.0002524688,0.00004078153,0.0001011927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000529772,0.00009318263,0.00006324966,0.001479871,0.00001930865,0.0002346765,0.0001519324,0.00007679955,0.0001489826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007730927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003812407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04909309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04084226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988412,0.0001814366,0.0002775106,0.0002289404,0.0001708146,0.0003000588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994089,0.00001655814,0.00009893002,0.0002717865,0.00001615252,0.0001876671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001454589,0.0001071133,0.9804546,0.00001042994,0.00005609229,0.00001803098,0.001826492,0.01633771,0.0004906755,0.000005146836,0.00008607569,0.0005930385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000590176,0.00003444866,0.9500502,0.00001480418,0.0001024545,0.000002189421,0.00009337255,0.04633362,0.0001875776,0.000005874084,0.002448821,0.0001364424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942477,0.00004442158,0.00014756,0.00009971936,0.00002205475,0.00006867351,0.00002922764,0.00002652109,0.005314077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986369,0.00003865351,0.000838428,0.0001674049,0.00006301951,0.000002469357,0.00001596821,0.00001569863,0.0002214425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03040443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9766599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906936775","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.017","title":"When value conflicts are barriers: Can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Farm Service Agency","keywords":"Incentive; Stewardship (theology); Incentive program; Environmental resource management; Business; Value (mathematics); Agency (philosophy); Ecosystem services; Environmental stewardship; Thematic analysis; Environmental planning; Environmental economics; Qualitative research; Geography; Economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04153532386645946,"gpt":0.2639657691463232,"spread":0.2224304452798638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000124802,0.0001268102,0.0001317202,0.00001973257,0.0001847406,0.00009390125,0.0001212803,0.0001198261,0.0001365772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003084521,0.00004907494,0.00003679511,0.0003649293,0.00007543895,0.0002384692,0.00005058967,0.00009740155,0.00002789429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005462876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002361068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005919127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01223072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990112,0.0001202193,0.0001940665,0.000229549,0.00017219,0.0002727558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995272,0.00007278788,0.0001096427,0.00005456061,0.0001112259,0.000124576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004420511,0.0001270704,0.97952,0.000006338774,0.00001844242,0.000002899584,0.004102138,0.000003136787,0.00813007,0.00266962,0.002513637,0.002862476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002946246,0.0001609009,0.9645229,0.00005644768,0.00000809464,0.000001577813,0.0005384298,0.0001397201,0.001253018,0.001328264,0.0315394,0.0001565999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802945,0.00002123776,0.000002203921,0.01910671,0.00006631625,0.000251971,0.00007000693,0.00005458322,0.0001324827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968927,0.00001137146,0.0001065531,0.001494708,0.0007473163,0.00002885333,0.0002206703,0.000001276706,0.0004965448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02902576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8947989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997448715","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.02.004","title":"Urban containment strategies: A case-study appraisal of plans and policies in Japanese, British, and Canadian cities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Containment (computer programming); Urban planning; Environmental planning; Control (management); Business; Regional science; Economic growth; Geography; Economics; Civil engineering; Engineering; Computer science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02570434561298298,"gpt":0.3189917381073459,"spread":0.293287392494363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000192013,0.00008406329,0.00017843,0.0001326377,0.0001860367,0.0001909533,0.00007283605,0.0000597787,0.00001852958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004180321,0.00008567162,0.00001578238,0.0001653908,0.0002617691,0.0003414963,0.00001259577,0.00007301246,2.864872e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005888984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003563598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991832,0.00006212489,0.0001888276,0.0001557362,0.0001116237,0.0002984295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995885,0.00008111772,0.00003669524,0.00008296948,0.00002051263,0.0001901914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004896837,0.00005113868,0.8821577,0.00001088774,0.00000800309,0.0001051672,0.1166811,0.000001427075,8.935204e-7,0.0006836483,0.00005350418,0.0002416372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000491632,0.00003632662,0.8966774,0.00001400822,0.000008836119,0.00001875404,0.100658,0.000008764845,8.624611e-7,0.00005245617,0.001937706,0.00009533136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965729,0.0001617086,3.445491e-7,0.0004929951,0.00001965621,0.0002301718,0.0001497222,0.00001445685,0.002358095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993874,0.00005279922,0.00001333177,0.000105939,0.000163712,0.000009459441,0.000003779567,0.000005453993,0.0002581572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01602314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3493587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092571744","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105080","title":"Land tenure security for women: A conceptual framework","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Land tenure; Environmental security; Conceptual framework; Business; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Archaeology; Law; Agriculture","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02986265825325374,"gpt":0.2490030362544705,"spread":0.2191403780012168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003848218,0.0001001478,0.0001503695,0.00000418202,0.0001591066,0.00007039691,0.0001050586,0.0001234206,0.0001372784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006881165,0.00001685643,0.00006686735,0.0001528494,0.00004790987,0.00007879424,0.00003426722,0.0001008007,0.00002289955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001208239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001145149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005157149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002282716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993451,0.00001447169,0.0001012543,0.0001716294,0.00007777427,0.0002898219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996205,0.00008418399,0.00003545059,0.00003045339,0.00002402445,0.0002054193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001776303,0.001132753,0.6765551,0.0003017432,0.0004723303,0.0000946752,0.06950176,0.00003741341,0.007269293,0.08547395,0.06259649,0.09478819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003808543,0.0003557275,0.03301843,0.00001051304,0.000004661848,0.00000356754,0.0002248994,0.00009508634,0.00009772288,0.00978246,0.9558526,0.0001734409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798701,0.00004116393,0.00001394987,0.01925437,0.00007179374,0.0001856289,0.0003202463,0.00007004276,0.0001726829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916455,0.00007296084,0.00008062838,0.004342462,0.002404305,0.00002031074,0.0000510145,0.000001090425,0.001381797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8932562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1503103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2540748817","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.006","title":"Understanding the long-term dynamics of forest transition: From deforestation to afforestation in a Mediterranean landscape (Catalonia, 1868–2005)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Woodland; Deforestation (computer science); Geography; Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Afforestation; Agroforestry; Forest restoration; Mediterranean climate; Forest dynamics; Disturbance (geology); Agriculture; Forest management; Forestry; Ecology; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04308344192572033,"gpt":0.2389956449650733,"spread":0.195912203039353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001223791,0.00008573625,0.00008349711,0.0001043432,0.00009421077,0.00003139494,0.000141994,0.00003720282,0.0001258048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002532395,0.00005206383,0.00003114456,0.0002233133,0.00008015104,0.0001812982,0.00006345854,0.00003237807,0.00003191112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002904022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001173421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007276184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2449313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992876,0.00003947718,0.0001409261,0.0001580099,0.0001960846,0.0001778927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996234,0.00008801263,0.00006120184,0.0001616087,0.000005498484,0.00006024732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004563137,0.00003030822,0.9935783,0.000007102548,0.000007222652,0.000004061213,0.003071972,0.001507594,0.00003825476,0.0001330206,0.00009741461,0.00147909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000653289,0.00002686124,0.994864,0.00004228876,0.00001436493,9.475675e-7,0.0002709446,0.0030813,0.00001084984,0.0008502696,0.0001029501,0.00008197309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493693,0.000003403433,0.0424648,0.007604529,0.00004002135,0.000232804,0.0001221962,0.0000137608,0.0001491767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992484,0.00002407843,0.0001329508,0.0002572826,0.00004676687,0.000006621202,0.0001322407,0.000006066434,0.0001455492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2376551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075829357","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.03.003","title":"Decision-making by farmers regarding ecosystem services: Factors affecting soil conservation efforts in Costa Rica","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Soil conservation; Watershed; Ecosystem services; Soil water; Geography; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Business; Agriculture; Ecology; Soil science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009136180032664414,"gpt":0.2284657226896679,"spread":0.2193295426570035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002742516,0.0001466065,0.0001450126,0.0001283417,0.0002879674,0.0001354123,0.0002048781,0.00008795529,0.0001210141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001068617,0.000124112,0.00004878122,0.0003969268,0.0000322821,0.0002716888,0.0002516108,0.0001507792,0.00005061394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001726036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000104337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02078607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04375673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989314,0.00004607634,0.0002035792,0.0002915007,0.0002363738,0.0002910839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993364,0.0002206547,0.0001272982,0.0002259047,0.000009001187,0.00008073694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001095938,0.0000289667,0.9953289,0.00002158807,0.00000787962,0.000003734507,0.001370156,0.000360685,0.0004134317,0.000004257513,0.0003173477,0.002132093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004039141,0.00001060573,0.9686784,0.00006768371,0.00001108063,0.000001943878,0.0006633193,0.002760215,0.00007386869,0.00003214774,0.0271284,0.0001684213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978921,0.000005771848,0.0001253858,0.0002467165,0.0001705589,0.000239555,0.00002501391,0.00005255896,0.001242349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989712,0.00001338775,0.0002628548,0.0005457621,0.00003939142,0.000003039266,0.0000203061,0.00001048302,0.0001335283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02681105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9857346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030787423","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.003","title":"A group multicriteria spatial decision support system for parking site selection problem: A case study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Smart Parking Systems Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Site selection; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Capital city; Transport engineering; Decision support system; Citizen journalism; Urban planning; Computer science; Business; Environmental planning; Operations research; Geography; Engineering; Civil engineering; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02684662867152689,"gpt":0.3064687487465295,"spread":0.2796221200750026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006425019,0.0001877666,0.000271213,0.0003138196,0.0001619905,0.0002236633,0.00009769072,0.00009175692,0.000004673633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001455746,0.0001684093,0.00006071342,0.0002579472,0.00000808871,0.0001549724,0.00004390026,0.0001210217,0.00003595263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002100217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002525406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02113665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01526081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985927,0.0001188132,0.0003552283,0.0002689291,0.0002150216,0.0004493014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992296,0.0002581597,0.0000433674,0.000262011,0.00007667111,0.0001301809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003544721,0.000427262,0.9212736,0.002497617,0.000333302,0.0006536626,0.01159086,0.007237085,0.01234756,0.0001588844,0.001679507,0.04144618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005960499,0.000798346,0.02201477,0.000322697,0.00007741896,0.002960484,0.0003584058,0.9400489,0.0005379793,0.00001434441,0.02629491,0.000611223],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9007041,0.000005813909,0.09728291,0.000004809314,0.0003170738,0.001206968,0.00002244904,0.0003918756,0.00006392911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950777,8.486095e-7,0.003405831,0.000009110364,0.001005108,0.0003628202,0.00001250118,0.0000726735,0.00005344307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9328119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161553381","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.03.005","title":"Why the public thinks natural resources public participation processes fail: A case study of British Columbia communities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Natural resource; Natural (archaeology); Natural disaster; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Political science; Public administration; Geography; Archaeology; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06737426954315098,"gpt":0.2400459914783692,"spread":0.1726717219352182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002066952,0.00007286225,0.0001021321,0.00004342824,0.000577134,0.0004107945,0.000334456,0.00003312068,0.000474402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009448576,0.00006921682,0.00002691173,0.0004398718,0.0002378593,0.0003842458,0.0004281219,0.0001033647,0.00001231338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003577338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001465442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7722899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9373606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999081,0.0001834553,0.0001667031,0.0001254753,0.0002306094,0.0002128085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994257,0.00006823623,0.0001113225,0.0002911089,0.00004308789,0.00006053955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004023547,0.0003298017,0.9459676,0.00001592246,0.00002958451,0.00003374669,0.049636,0.00000310235,4.707538e-7,0.000001496946,0.002987345,0.000990954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003886803,0.00008638605,0.9332981,0.000006738835,0.00003151487,0.00004852424,0.04600386,0.0001104796,6.856143e-7,0.00003302899,0.01989647,0.00009557082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980987,0.00003439678,0.00000378155,0.0007286356,0.00003019206,0.0003425346,0.00002060284,0.00004530311,0.0006958414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978702,0.00002100652,0.00002451884,0.0008665736,0.00002442757,0.00002582562,0.000006926692,0.000006077804,0.001154417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1650707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.519437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1762391685","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.030","title":"Land, water & power: The demise of common property resources in periurban Gurgaon, India","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Livelihood; Demise; Urbanization; Casual; Geography; Irrigation; Business; Natural resource; Agriculture; Water resource management; Natural resource economics; Economic growth; Economics; Ecology; Environmental science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03206642205504716,"gpt":0.2892903174748507,"spread":0.2572238954198036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003563361,0.00008617757,0.0001515777,0.00004925096,0.0001085194,0.00008194648,0.0002972555,0.00009308436,0.00005668223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001611573,0.00003554725,0.00003401202,0.0001674015,0.0001682927,0.0002111982,0.00007214306,0.0001351713,0.00003122505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005376607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001029745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1261319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02869195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990473,0.0001492508,0.0001630739,0.0001106647,0.0002369528,0.0002927265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995722,0.00002479837,0.00005950643,0.000205866,0.00004669884,0.00009091557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003129336,0.00002211686,0.8531416,0.00000401609,0.000005752558,0.000001932554,0.1410276,0.00001040523,0.0000529781,0.0002661777,0.00526256,0.0001735647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003661033,0.00001948095,0.2852537,0.00001633555,0.000003483018,0.000001289344,0.0006325161,0.000001814849,0.0002017884,0.0006365111,0.712788,0.00007901585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865006,0.00006459113,5.513352e-7,0.004415616,0.00006667957,0.0001328823,0.00001966002,0.00001663276,0.008782763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943496,0.00004049666,0.00002858341,0.000717537,0.0002463405,0.000005488363,0.000006136184,0.000008228101,0.004597586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7075254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995546094","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104411","title":"Whose village? Stakeholder interests in the urban renewal of Hubei old village in Shenzhen","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Urban village; Stakeholder; Geography; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental protection; Socioeconomics; Political science; Sociology; Civil engineering; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03471162757286939,"gpt":0.2983041708755473,"spread":0.2635925433026779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005050027,0.0001018412,0.0002115935,0.00008775944,0.00005096965,0.00007233807,0.0003629319,0.00009622249,0.00006964467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001274953,0.00006702379,0.00006225171,0.0002300621,0.00008620761,0.000265376,0.00005551742,0.0001400686,0.00003110028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001688887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001403699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2454715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1944644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989737,0.000112409,0.0002592996,0.0001782817,0.0001657321,0.0003105306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994215,0.0001176357,0.0001252849,0.0002744389,0.00001434084,0.00004681696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002635045,0.00006281611,0.878521,0.00001379191,0.000006673019,0.000004465175,0.0854445,0.00001851092,0.00006740273,0.03491158,0.0005186371,0.0004042315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001056875,0.00004749102,0.9548846,0.00007122476,0.000002877034,6.873279e-7,0.00278767,0.00002541272,0.00003490441,0.004634645,0.03629142,0.0001621796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.982792,0.00007689858,5.071552e-7,0.001830799,0.0001143614,0.0002505244,0.00002403841,0.000009587326,0.01490132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958858,0.0001623442,0.00001461051,0.0005826153,0.0002246978,0.000006207382,0.000002589811,0.000009421776,0.003111714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08265682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8202346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162756568","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105477","title":"Does participatory farmer-to-farmer training improve the adoption of sustainable land management practices?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"McKnight Foundation","keywords":"Livelihood; Business; Context (archaeology); Agroecology; Citizen journalism; Sustainable agriculture; Participatory action research; Tobit model; Agriculture; Intervention (counseling); Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Socioeconomics; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; Geography; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08108525503691381,"gpt":0.3177495419365147,"spread":0.2366642868996008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003051661,0.0001001688,0.0001186819,0.00001572565,0.0002531483,0.0001701641,0.0001321612,0.00004659607,0.0001539466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000273911,0.00002448751,0.00004721029,0.0007076371,0.00002668021,0.0003882798,0.0001043458,0.0001005922,0.00001575735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001948939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001872045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002722002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001268315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990659,0.0001110801,0.0001982644,0.0001911672,0.0001508383,0.0002827838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991567,0.0002427549,0.0002770656,0.00007991885,0.0001839569,0.0000596373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004426244,0.001432622,0.3353679,0.0003525842,0.0008220318,0.0002194803,0.01213854,0.0003141296,0.2016466,0.1468867,0.006888253,0.2934886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001663983,0.00009303304,0.5460422,0.00001791874,0.00006179691,0.000006036141,0.01457503,0.00002526611,0.00153314,0.0004672461,0.4368466,0.0001653638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838578,0.00004748884,0.000008370534,0.01420205,0.00008117441,0.0002240738,0.00002813168,0.00002295953,0.001528022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896373,0.0001190346,0.0002630599,0.001108667,0.0003542538,0.00003193372,0.00004324382,0.000001011061,0.00844148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4299583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.411487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031888485","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.017","title":"Tenure security, land registration and customary tenure in a peri-urban Accra community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Urban and Rural Development Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Customary land; Livelihood; Land tenure; Government (linguistics); Business; Land administration; Agricultural land; Agriculture; Administration (probate law); Land use; Land law; Land registration; Law; Geography; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03616530765008354,"gpt":0.3014719911813677,"spread":0.2653066835312842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004907887,0.0000995252,0.00013954,0.0000982832,0.0004103044,0.0001262699,0.0001096777,0.0001394546,0.00001418482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002865322,0.00008030837,0.00002104947,0.0001881155,0.0001386366,0.0002405218,0.00006044462,0.0002684354,0.000008787571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005027296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009624929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04308283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1380787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989771,0.0003830196,0.0001271978,0.0001190047,0.000152292,0.0002414021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995379,0.0001237439,0.00005011092,0.0001511841,0.00002902377,0.0001080635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002435003,0.000139326,0.8901109,0.00005101045,0.00001343465,0.000007552721,0.07917602,7.013265e-7,0.00002118544,0.02041478,0.007796959,0.00224382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006698265,0.00004654894,0.845852,0.00006188518,0.0000070433,0.000004409949,0.001952905,0.00004494282,0.000005967408,0.005640677,0.1455097,0.0002040639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685966,0.0001706127,0.000002451183,0.009619102,0.00006605366,0.0001356444,0.00000984938,0.00005990885,0.02133978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961262,0.0006686738,0.0000559952,0.0004156397,0.0003312919,0.000006319783,0.00001706117,0.000007649153,0.00237119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1377128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9632894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006328587","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.01.001","title":"Perceptions of impacts, public participation, and learning in the planning, assessment and mitigation of two hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand, India","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Shastri Indo-Canadian Institute","keywords":"Sustainability; Public participation; Local government; Hydroelectricity; Government (linguistics); Hydropower; Environmental planning; Business; Equity (law); Environmental resource management; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Engineering; Economics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03557357300221579,"gpt":0.4415561691282069,"spread":0.4059825961259911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005344003,0.00006620999,0.0001095444,0.0002262732,0.0001090701,0.00007604913,0.00006095021,0.00003968291,0.00003634491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002431016,0.00005052807,0.00001222268,0.0004131996,0.0001381318,0.0004494707,0.00002103724,0.0001280447,0.00000154618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009894845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001122447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03730373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005213036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989018,0.0004035455,0.0001867587,0.00009987375,0.0001769698,0.0002310319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996055,0.0001338748,0.0001160919,0.00006774272,0.00001148798,0.0000653029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002027647,0.00008428328,0.9640107,0.000009552512,0.000004814921,3.367556e-7,0.03382209,0.00006905456,0.0009093576,0.0005940239,0.00001904163,0.0004747903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005079763,0.00008822158,0.9944993,0.00002465786,0.000005842065,5.798084e-7,0.003835722,0.0007140188,0.00004251095,0.0001821194,0.00004622777,0.00005288388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981328,0.00004147785,0.0000146217,0.0006693329,0.000005673615,0.0003855519,0.000003266659,0.000005393444,0.0007418671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995877,0.0001469098,0.00007605565,0.00007779806,0.00002047367,0.00003508671,0.000009439674,0.000004740964,0.00004177994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0320907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.969107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796261499","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.047","title":"Contested commons: Agricultural modernization, tenure ambiguities and intra-familial land grabbing in Ghana","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University","funders":"Nordiska Afrikainstitutet","keywords":"Customary land; Land tenure; Land grabbing; Commons; Agricultural land; Modernization theory; Agriculture; Corporate governance; Business; Government (linguistics); Land law; Food security; Economic growth; Land management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02257254631366394,"gpt":0.2271314471557647,"spread":0.2045589008421007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006435037,0.0001236716,0.0001593434,0.00002230113,0.0002333718,0.0001290135,0.00008173333,0.00009763525,0.00001688101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003630433,0.00002342943,0.00002678213,0.0002351446,0.0001148491,0.0001937996,0.00004525745,0.00008401545,0.000006647874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001581254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008045465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01677944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05930867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992973,0.00003638208,0.0001644956,0.000168312,0.00008750297,0.0002460271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997322,0.0000481076,0.00004498334,0.00003586006,0.00005826174,0.00008060964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006704189,0.0001373583,0.9710227,0.00001937787,0.00003155785,0.00001338054,0.002290435,0.000005215893,0.00454575,0.002338282,0.0007556769,0.0187732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000487594,0.0001327057,0.99216,0.00003824277,0.000006178334,0.00002489624,0.0002697475,0.0002249085,0.000265733,0.0009183644,0.005294162,0.0001774616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968712,0.00005319785,0.000002710587,0.002439639,0.00007907142,0.0001222385,0.00005124089,0.00004584317,0.0003349003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970216,0.0001055427,0.00002291498,0.0003216382,0.0008728888,0.000004595431,0.00008142091,0.000001063212,0.001568297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04252924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023788111","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.004","title":"Evaluating water market products to acquire water for the environment in Australia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Australian Research Council; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; University of Lethbridge; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Flexibility (engineering); Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Business; Water use; Water sector; Environmental economics; Natural resource economics; Water conservation; Water industry; Water trading; Inclusion (mineral); Environmental resource management; Economics; Water resources; Environmental science; Water supply; Environmental engineering; Microeconomics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06227193201650717,"gpt":0.2904527553017117,"spread":0.2281808232852046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005073411,0.00009134666,0.00008777404,0.00007160523,0.00003722499,0.00005289518,0.00007760001,0.00002508045,0.0001303696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002288373,0.00004358084,0.00002198376,0.00003726576,0.000005174785,0.0001461052,0.00004033745,0.00003457485,0.00008620456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004012248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":6.642542e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001076425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001057512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993155,0.00002872256,0.0001376477,0.00008277512,0.00007443747,0.0003609271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997805,0.00001943781,0.00000697782,0.0001515805,0.000003960606,0.00003755681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005084151,0.0000667773,0.05003263,0.0002483753,0.0001134306,8.447474e-7,0.01644913,0.906969,0.01033708,0.00007192359,0.009860808,0.005799126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001652442,0.00008405926,0.1372259,0.00005632277,0.0001462347,0.000001958821,0.00009010221,0.1781579,0.09649439,0.0001469675,0.585209,0.0007346802],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951538,0.00002764129,0.002064728,0.00159445,0.0001399904,0.0007840347,0.000005778648,0.0000474061,0.0001821588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894757,0.00001024805,0.001675088,0.0001106435,0.0003956706,0.000134269,0.00002840442,0.00002317833,0.008146805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7288111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1777175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973203282","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.05.005","title":"Source water protection in the Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia: Lessons for building local capacity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Water Network; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Nova scotia; Face (sociological concept); Environmental planning; Business; Water source; Water resources; Resource (disambiguation); Watershed; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Geography; Water resource management; Environmental science; Ecology; Archaeology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2069202697771254,"gpt":0.4473074988818543,"spread":0.2403872291047289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001069193,0.0001318365,0.0001801128,0.0001849535,0.0008303273,0.0000227718,0.0001986476,0.0001708344,0.00004563158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002446491,0.00007823129,0.00004531365,0.000191832,0.00003743256,0.0001326851,0.0001030816,0.0007347203,0.0001271005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000311875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003057111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1009972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1019302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981441,0.0004554749,0.0003603818,0.0001553814,0.0001345919,0.0007500675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999119,0.0003103197,0.00006645195,0.0003124879,0.00007025094,0.0001214423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001627601,0.002011988,0.2076891,0.003821442,0.0001459932,0.000005929817,0.5240919,0.002867767,0.002044015,0.0474191,0.06100414,0.147271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003414247,0.0001043622,0.1119988,0.0002808143,0.00001416932,0.00001257252,0.002524517,0.002200671,0.0005369908,0.001981337,0.8765925,0.0003390711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8834307,0.00001849369,0.016125,0.09796047,0.0001554036,0.001803844,0.00002123715,0.0000630098,0.000421819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871022,0.00001674093,0.0017578,0.0094425,0.0007552792,0.0002473663,0.00001680556,0.00001956539,0.0006417397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8155883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9144572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018775162","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.06.001","title":"Land use and forest fallowing dynamics in seasonally dry tropical forests of the southern Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Yucatan peninsula; Peninsula; Tropical forest; Land use; Peasant; Tropics; Deforestation (computer science); Government (linguistics); Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; Forestry; Ecology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01350973773581523,"gpt":0.2084944491587478,"spread":0.1949847114229326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005537104,0.0000895436,0.00009659495,0.00004018195,0.0001019942,0.00004972127,0.0001590638,0.00004745555,0.00001264752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005855204,0.00006109983,0.00004447374,0.0001664718,0.0001250125,0.0001101605,0.0002913371,0.0000736148,0.00001124725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001535419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001801714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03520222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2486062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993595,0.00002987022,0.000113603,0.0001524528,0.0001706828,0.0001738866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996959,0.00003291678,0.00004404293,0.0001655001,0.000004910193,0.00005674256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001519002,0.00005162655,0.9967719,0.000007733158,0.000007979302,0.000003986435,0.000903875,0.001927878,0.000008118875,0.0001693291,0.000006953982,0.0001253747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007626663,0.00001469065,0.9954246,0.00001946176,0.00001264321,0.000001320767,0.0001258328,0.002718319,0.000003890697,0.0003871054,0.0004510863,0.00007842112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998169,0.000009696962,0.00011295,0.001328481,0.00002121293,0.0001509699,0.00003354308,0.000009704018,0.0001644143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989392,0.00001371239,0.0001997645,0.0003160095,0.00002113912,0.000001994097,0.000006198823,0.000005863659,0.0004961673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.213404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9712225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070804466","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.03.002","title":"Land regularization on agricultural frontiers: The case of Northwestern Petén, Guatemala","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Florida","keywords":"Frontier; Property rights; Land tenure; Land titling; Agriculture; Regularization (linguistics); Food security; Business; Agricultural land; De facto; Economics; Natural resource economics; Economic growth; Agricultural economics; Political science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01525084552344896,"gpt":0.2218486122004308,"spread":0.2065977666769818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006007066,0.0001003264,0.0001180208,0.00001107811,0.0001966249,0.00006235015,0.000113657,0.000066948,0.00002382512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000820468,0.00001331898,0.00006743352,0.0001678815,0.00003795994,0.0001328693,0.00002589332,0.00006414366,0.00001345196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001328957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000521409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006474811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01828862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994428,0.00003366246,0.0001478328,0.0001255205,0.00008337689,0.0001667654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999738,0.00003098696,0.00007875904,0.00005995151,0.0000374529,0.00005485688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002429837,0.0009744273,0.6619389,0.00005281633,0.0002198673,0.000237081,0.003996393,0.0007339356,0.007231939,0.00694359,0.008360245,0.3090678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005099555,0.0002359173,0.9021303,0.00003294848,0.00002860585,0.0003528209,0.0002194364,0.0002645856,0.001300026,0.0003886148,0.09430126,0.0002355488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943186,0.00003107732,0.000002734074,0.005061876,0.0000653113,0.00012232,0.00005649688,0.00002272752,0.0003188335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912447,0.00008232149,0.00003773607,0.0002613213,0.0008937516,0.000003512185,0.00006933846,7.731556e-7,0.007406565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3088323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793184882","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.006","title":"The changing nature of mining towns: Reflections from Australia, Canada and South Africa","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Boom; Government (linguistics); Bust; State (computer science); Politics; Ideology; Globalization; Political science; Economy; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02942046689924055,"gpt":0.259655655890786,"spread":0.2302351889915455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003778156,0.0000618369,0.00006330279,0.00005707976,0.0001180476,0.00003057879,0.00005935034,0.00004048864,0.000009055932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003165389,0.00004179209,0.00001153862,0.0001455758,0.00002335918,0.00001469141,0.00002979625,0.00008285002,0.000001020305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002442993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001711529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2076661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3570284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996158,0.000008148729,0.00007334002,0.00006562447,0.00006196609,0.0001751506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997692,0.00004355053,0.00001734393,0.0001212344,0.00001121102,0.00003752273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001215469,0.00007761073,0.1630708,0.0004600463,0.002622677,0.00006661803,0.6613318,0.01293873,0.003250156,0.007212896,0.1174579,0.03138913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004518868,0.00004530357,0.0515641,0.0001269354,0.00006490261,0.00000346242,0.005883459,0.008293475,0.001025412,0.00007289091,0.9321532,0.0003149355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99645,0.0001943483,0.00007229856,0.0001194743,0.0001613385,0.00003436258,0.00003028951,0.00003576518,0.002902086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953487,0.00001452061,0.0002829935,0.00003860838,0.0003546227,0.000002938305,0.000001803679,0.00000913819,0.003946685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8146954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7976102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885516526","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.015","title":"Livelihood exposure to climatic stresses in the north-eastern floodplains of Bangladesh","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Climate change impacts on agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation; McGill University","keywords":"Livelihood; Geography; Floodplain; Resource (disambiguation); Wetland; Sustainability; Climate change; Flood myth; Agriculture; Flash flood; Environmental resource management; Socioeconomics; Ecology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04951561700427904,"gpt":0.2735612290058261,"spread":0.2240456120015471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009754978,0.0001286409,0.0001629412,0.00002667643,0.0000749647,0.00008231957,0.0003293945,0.00006448787,0.0001103787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000190996,0.00003488801,0.00004814562,0.0007125551,0.00003654364,0.0001101073,0.00007427185,0.00008112606,0.00007062286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001487109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006995405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003455081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1038528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990901,0.00007925927,0.0001931686,0.0001599755,0.0001762676,0.000301193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995055,0.0001735114,0.0000711689,0.00008930829,0.00006852655,0.0000919747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003327595,0.0002766369,0.9769934,0.00002548086,0.00001153427,0.000007235695,0.006199633,0.000003337668,0.009316536,0.00006332463,0.00152955,0.005539999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001508296,0.0004411845,0.9956303,0.000054218,0.000007158766,0.000007100699,0.0009104861,0.000008283818,0.0003226011,0.00002839256,0.0023343,0.0001051574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994998,0.00003400402,3.854668e-7,0.004071225,0.00003563322,0.0002505432,0.0002890439,0.00002184321,0.0002993214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977072,0.00004017182,0.00003910547,0.001389714,0.0006680546,0.00001295907,0.00005447473,0.000001039838,0.00008722096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1003977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9124995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361290840","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106666","title":"Determinants of mechanized technology adoption in smallholder agriculture: Implications for agricultural policy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Business; Subsidy; Agricultural machinery; Socioeconomic status; Agricultural economics; Economic growth; Economics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06473691179605313,"gpt":0.3222628700845858,"spread":0.2575259582885326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001470896,0.0001570519,0.0002343131,0.0001490177,0.000172213,0.00005587405,0.0002258069,0.0001976957,0.00001192166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003800309,0.00005335537,0.00008493233,0.004334275,0.00003573804,0.0003789104,0.00007219907,0.0001011622,0.00001278652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004904923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002065923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002728122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008782429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989169,0.0000337419,0.000359589,0.0002520641,0.00008174903,0.000355988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991962,0.000236109,0.0002222503,0.00007229445,0.0002209553,0.00005219738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004737656,0.0002524471,0.3597499,0.00002971482,0.00002852566,0.000001580302,0.0001713838,0.00003947543,0.4981019,0.08234832,0.001284339,0.05794499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000298621,0.00009607671,0.9865616,0.00002345605,0.00001016131,0.00001433716,0.0002171321,0.00002569916,0.003411574,0.002599602,0.006575515,0.0001662456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850958,0.00002726919,0.000007134268,0.01384843,0.00003992947,0.0004702095,0.0002262641,0.0001904941,0.00009449806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981382,0.0001842612,0.0003187698,0.0001350452,0.0003097431,0.0001886616,0.0001748439,0.000002311133,0.00054811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6268116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4900801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901278463","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.056","title":"How the end of armed conflicts influence forest cover and subsequently ecosystem services provision? An analysis of four case studies in biodiversity hotspots","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Wayamba University of Sri Lanka; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Illegal logging; Business; Biodiversity; Natural resource economics; Agriculture; Goods and services; Corporate governance; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity hotspot; Forest ecology; Logging; Ecosystem; Geography; Ecology; Economics; Finance; Forestry; Economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04481387219094937,"gpt":0.2673929720077162,"spread":0.2225790998167668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002067584,0.00009175509,0.0001913887,0.0001723242,0.0001511168,0.00003910436,0.0001670403,0.00003302136,0.00001828944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000326115,0.00006007014,0.0000368666,0.0005807735,0.0003803607,0.0002396898,0.0003100286,0.00003097503,0.000004661657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000543395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007245059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04892488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1314614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992932,0.00007930159,0.0001329513,0.0001883705,0.0001719907,0.0001341511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999468,0.00006310912,0.0001504137,0.0002292643,0.0000384359,0.00005078523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002611739,0.00003687784,0.99059,0.00005285707,0.000135708,0.00003258328,0.008414667,0.0005176259,0.00007359658,0.000005831724,0.000007917832,0.0001062227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003467613,0.00005925227,0.9941955,0.00001324976,0.0001903899,0.000007485948,0.002200064,0.002130544,0.00006073936,0.000009795086,0.0007161166,0.00007012579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991604,0.00002078749,0.000002807263,0.0004310495,0.00001307989,0.000209384,0.0001231238,0.000006290131,0.00003309155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995731,0.00006366727,0.00002853126,0.0002220465,0.0000105613,0.000001705405,0.000004285431,0.000001543712,0.0000946229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08253647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9574084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976958286","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.018","title":"Can large scale land acquisition for agro-development in Indonesia be managed sustainably?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Oil Palm Production and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research; European Commission","keywords":"Sustainability; Business; Certification; Government (linguistics); Scale (ratio); Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental economics; Economics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01196033702558952,"gpt":0.2586999879528806,"spread":0.2467396509272911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005075758,0.000116914,0.0001247938,0.00009084394,0.0001628071,0.00003369213,0.0000908646,0.00006584902,0.0001322319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006276493,0.0001023998,0.00003224298,0.0002778176,0.00004246158,0.0002629995,0.00009775277,0.00007775675,0.00002394253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005057817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003494006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002551712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003065631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988279,0.00006476284,0.0001711368,0.0002242704,0.0001389579,0.0005729404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995847,0.0000228882,0.00004058189,0.0001999217,0.00001150094,0.0001404564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003328461,0.0001979943,0.9939991,0.00003911443,0.000003425017,0.000001416706,0.003412059,0.00003962901,0.00003350625,0.0003549828,0.0006239478,0.001261545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008111032,0.00001332313,0.9444019,0.000003003267,0.000003768697,0.000002610487,0.0004271772,0.0000477447,0.0002326781,0.0003425843,0.05357522,0.0001389553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954425,0.00001140519,0.0001809879,0.00310354,0.00006129984,0.0004127918,0.00001307438,0.00003492177,0.0007394423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952502,0.000005172542,0.0006649177,0.0007975308,0.0001488301,0.00007622525,0.00003394977,0.000012291,0.003010883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05295127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4175744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943162517","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.031","title":"Powers of exclusion and counter-exclusion: The political ecology of ethno-territorial customary land boundary conflicts in Ghana","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Customary land; Boundary (topology); Land tenure; Redress; Maritime boundary; Dilemma; Land use; Politics; Statutory law; Expropriation; Stakeholder; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Geography; Ecology; International law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01415027292094239,"gpt":0.2468127732729329,"spread":0.2326625003519905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001415679,0.00009947451,0.0002340857,0.00002626904,0.00008603452,0.00002168443,0.0001442659,0.0001555696,0.00007170279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002167339,0.00001885782,0.000049748,0.0001275879,0.0001658968,0.00007781859,0.0001241084,0.0001148465,0.000003837158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002096897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002997654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02405203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01040648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991763,0.00006107453,0.0002174401,0.0001480346,0.0001380713,0.0002591017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995769,0.0001745898,0.00007477925,0.0000657199,0.00003253073,0.00007552302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002892929,0.0002068516,0.9797059,0.00004843267,0.00002813802,0.00001068207,0.0009672152,0.000001450989,0.01068786,0.004107175,0.0002042777,0.003742715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00104841,0.0004826911,0.9479111,0.00005696997,0.00001041608,0.00002425606,0.0002366554,0.00006008227,0.0009371709,0.001087587,0.04800523,0.0001394188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943013,0.00005187619,1.111391e-7,0.004430088,0.0003641321,0.0001631148,0.00006549144,0.000007794036,0.0006160612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984254,0.00007807494,0.000005210348,0.0004146947,0.0005389747,0.000001574821,0.00002224372,0.000001006688,0.000512809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04780096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185029977","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.018","title":"Climate adaptation in ‘new world’ cultural landscapes: The case of Bay of Fundy agricultural dykelands (Nova Scotia, Canada)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Corporate governance; Psychological resilience; Recreation; Agriculture; Geography; Wetland; Environmental resource management; Public land; Environmental planning; Climate change; Adaptive capacity; Public participation; Adaptive management; Stakeholder; Political science; Business; Public administration; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02864152152809697,"gpt":0.2495341599747659,"spread":0.220892638446669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001503127,0.0001081529,0.000176723,0.00003878929,0.00003503017,0.00002502348,0.0001502232,0.00003421662,0.00009846322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002353243,0.00005372757,0.00003122459,0.0004251195,0.00001166944,0.00025331,0.000076695,0.00006286836,0.0000203268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009580473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009609968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9491579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991503,0.00005166442,0.0002603609,0.00012834,0.0001760608,0.0002332315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999537,0.00004586184,0.0001334911,0.0001534369,0.00001644408,0.0001137646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004157316,0.00003208003,0.9889385,0.00003271407,0.00001290293,0.00004016954,0.002908257,0.00555008,0.00003930903,0.000101832,0.001982043,0.0003206039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001475872,0.00006014851,0.9883109,0.00007936409,0.00002994547,0.0001652296,0.002708509,0.004745888,0.0003172325,0.00005128247,0.001848161,0.0002074382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971257,0.00005356144,0.00000210345,0.0004591368,0.00008387787,0.0001194301,0.00004058352,0.000006791676,0.002108794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995216,0.00001368716,0.00006102198,0.00009217023,0.00008935753,0.000001516951,0.00002336945,0.000005134628,0.0001921597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0493674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2190947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565932808","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.006","title":"Evaluation of planning policy for protecting green infrastructure from loss and degradation due to residential encroachment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Green infrastructure; Government (linguistics); Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Policy development; Ecosystem services; Climate change; Natural resource economics; Economics; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Economic policy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07355909607508068,"gpt":0.3488457384858419,"spread":0.2752866424107613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000639256,0.00008445464,0.0001177296,0.0000874366,0.00009233588,0.00003059805,0.00007237875,0.00005581118,0.00001855161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003740791,0.00007321176,0.00001626262,0.0001730424,0.00002638677,0.0001945348,0.00008385666,0.00006240043,0.000005841704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002752169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001566669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.190075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01278213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990105,0.00009125526,0.0001541895,0.0001837525,0.0003770791,0.0001832166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995517,0.00003634049,0.00009891516,0.0001293844,0.00003515738,0.0001485571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007618715,0.00001553886,0.9717281,0.0000119264,0.00001345518,6.680566e-7,0.006370369,0.002257961,0.0008571431,0.00007573995,0.0008139471,0.01777901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001172316,0.0001275451,0.9852885,0.00002713832,0.00003984514,0.000004302311,0.0001452506,0.004694223,0.0005304943,0.007157851,0.0007026892,0.0001098308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994963,0.00002336684,0.002834155,0.001341192,0.00002630805,0.0006497245,0.00004870646,0.00001203543,0.000101515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934292,0.00000169474,0.005798947,0.0002374233,0.000343998,0.0000408175,0.00002184539,0.000009490732,0.0001166014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1772929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8153183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735564282","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.008","title":"Explaining rural land use change and reforestation: A causal-historical approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reforestation; Abandonment (legal); Deforestation (computer science); Subsistence agriculture; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Agriculture; Geography; Land use; Ecology; Construct (python library); Political science; Forestry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09561715563919297,"gpt":0.2582327732742488,"spread":0.1626156176350558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008262375,0.00008785137,0.00008821049,0.00004056645,0.0005807673,0.0002122052,0.0001392114,0.00004088102,0.00002816923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005897013,0.00006895699,0.00002129839,0.00004917284,0.00008498007,0.0004102173,0.0003182751,0.00005332953,0.00002409914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001513932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004038705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05529607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002618335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994263,0.00002324987,0.00007609058,0.000163251,0.0001368591,0.0001742502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995599,0.00001790236,0.00006839015,0.0002543271,0.000004650214,0.00009485725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001122727,0.00002396653,0.9955076,0.000007113108,0.00000629772,0.000006076892,0.002054673,0.000009018434,0.00000409176,0.00004658545,0.0005470231,0.001776341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003852409,0.00001778924,0.9377109,0.000005480211,0.00001165486,0.0000040804,0.00007455394,0.0007043543,8.714159e-7,0.00002307853,0.06096582,0.00009620382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957255,0.00001587301,0.0000850504,0.001754448,0.00005280028,0.000140871,0.000009641542,0.00002530503,0.002190488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921047,0.00009689597,0.0007641817,0.0004800544,0.0002082864,0.00001223038,0.00001737704,0.000006518414,0.006309768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06041879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9509948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953696981","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104045","title":"Factors influencing intergenerational succession in family farm businesses in Brazil","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Family Business Performance and Succession","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Family Process Institute","keywords":"Successor cardinal; Ecological succession; Odds; Family farm; Family business; Likert scale; Graduation (instrument); Scale (ratio); Identification (biology); Marketing; Logistic regression; Economics; Business; Agriculture; Geography; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02843162428340682,"gpt":0.2688623362196954,"spread":0.2404307119362885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001393954,0.0002262268,0.0002654221,0.001108154,0.00007504541,0.0003285729,0.0002200386,0.0001126807,0.00009628679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000984354,0.0001689651,0.00004365342,0.001412315,0.00001975534,0.002931016,0.0001799577,0.0001741,0.0001594093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007823855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008323079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02565403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007598466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987411,0.000009740531,0.0003725137,0.00029018,0.0002280031,0.0003584874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995387,0.00003345232,0.0001245365,0.00019716,0.00009292608,0.00001327013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003412212,0.00006685581,0.9933127,0.00012232,0.00000260642,0.000004304802,0.0000994372,0.001798082,0.002345576,0.000792357,0.0001168317,0.001304797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009439377,0.000004212563,0.9859686,0.0002537758,0.000002988712,2.923553e-7,0.0001183359,0.006232158,0.00007505395,0.0001490859,0.006014125,0.0002373549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972771,0.00005254383,0.00001804634,0.0003434797,0.0004466804,0.0001750698,0.000002792974,0.00005629341,0.001627937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961372,0.00003730068,0.00002526696,0.00286358,0.0005569978,0.00001152096,0.00009521111,0.00002622582,0.0002466981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01805557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9808342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039844035","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.022","title":"Mapping mountain diversity: Ethnic minorities and land use land cover change in Vietnam's borderlands","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Diversification (marketing strategy); Geography; Land cover; Land use; Ethnic group; Socioeconomic status; Diversity (politics); Ecology; Political science; Agriculture; Demography; Sociology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04416863407508274,"gpt":0.243505461417698,"spread":0.1993368273426153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000177304,0.0001285272,0.0001440071,0.0001328167,0.0002464287,0.00009564318,0.0001296845,0.0000686984,0.0001361952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003783297,0.0001122356,0.00002781789,0.0002339392,0.00009310644,0.000307339,0.0007248423,0.00008214542,0.00005415526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008247034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000401383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09193232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02445586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991639,0.00006549215,0.0001030536,0.0002330292,0.000170132,0.0002643689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996426,0.00006090621,0.00004418691,0.0001611022,0.000005425144,0.00008576237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001539505,0.00002887848,0.9940042,0.00002188485,0.000009518896,0.000006033378,0.004019008,0.00003933436,0.000004946534,0.00001111849,0.0002703615,0.001569337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008765269,0.00002425818,0.9408829,0.0000172315,0.00001120438,0.000001827561,0.0001140192,0.001187339,0.000001094873,0.00004454958,0.05668673,0.000152354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975469,0.00005787504,0.00003441325,0.00108044,0.00003917694,0.0001785238,0.00003093485,0.00002681018,0.001004949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994433,0.0003309729,0.00008022157,0.001963845,0.0001077763,0.000005178525,0.00002132431,0.00000633472,0.003051369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06747646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005383837","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.02.006","title":"Factors influencing participation in the Nova Scotia Environmental Farm Plan Program","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Dalhousie University; Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Agriculture; Government (linguistics); Stewardship (theology); Sustainability; Plan (archaeology); Agricultural economics; Environmental resource management; Marketing; Agricultural science; Economics; Geography; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07554254458015354,"gpt":0.315494880279669,"spread":0.2399523356995155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000109113,0.00008341276,0.00006138358,0.00001201825,0.0001113977,0.0001599611,0.000131701,0.00005841484,0.0001555659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005775195,0.00002092874,0.00002441148,0.0003075706,0.00002859155,0.0002507687,0.00002286286,0.0001803476,0.00002202041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000924415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003615635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01033737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04974274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994473,0.00004007162,0.0001283509,0.0001101459,0.00009930377,0.0001747887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997135,0.0001433086,0.0000659521,0.00003939218,0.000007593555,0.00003020921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003475473,0.0001378221,0.9399135,8.380941e-7,0.000003144413,7.310613e-7,0.0005943794,0.000002291401,0.03786501,0.0003855097,0.00004514952,0.02104816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005080721,0.00005223769,0.9802045,0.000002040004,0.00000351441,0.000002141449,0.0003755034,0.00001693716,0.0004106451,0.00003636466,0.01877353,0.00007184353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983223,0.0000043424,1.237396e-7,0.001120886,0.00005498592,0.0001880538,0.00002622453,0.00002544238,0.0002576236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991958,0.000003700277,0.00003921382,0.0003440263,0.0002273775,0.00001037596,0.000127311,4.291181e-7,0.00005177141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04029094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978130271","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104218","title":"Towards developing a cultural and creative quarter: Culture-led regeneration of the historical district of Rasht Great Bazaar, Iran","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bazaar; Tourism; SWOT analysis; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cultural tourism; Vitality; Cultural heritage; Sociology; Marketing; Business; Social science; Geography; Tourism geography; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06552500539818122,"gpt":0.3125034663839985,"spread":0.2469784609858173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000105365,0.00009645076,0.0001943229,0.00002927894,0.0001794472,0.00004615999,0.0001199881,0.00009473119,0.00004277857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001740722,0.00005215329,0.00005798801,0.0003348328,0.00008622378,0.0001713236,0.00004331691,0.00007564715,0.000001409226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003465354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001962889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03280256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003673179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991912,0.0001000708,0.0002051048,0.0001291378,0.0002169551,0.0001575138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995701,0.00002603814,0.0001348723,0.00009433884,0.0001204675,0.0000541563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001098707,0.0001009659,0.6253182,0.00008470946,0.0001740497,0.000001694415,0.1425156,0.00001394988,0.002568331,0.05942286,0.1588602,0.01082965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001050849,0.00009682334,0.4925428,0.000121687,0.00004152957,0.000003503165,0.004635357,0.00002662295,0.003316045,0.0002981794,0.4975723,0.0002942742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874717,0.0001915367,0.00004324116,0.007099652,0.0001962697,0.0002964919,0.00001759262,0.00001530754,0.004668231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594817,0.0003006718,0.0003689149,0.00009141245,0.0001809552,0.00000610191,0.000009832298,0.000004206654,0.03955622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3387121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963199495","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104097","title":"Displaced villagers’ adaptation in concentrated resettlement community: A case study of Nanjing, China","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"China; Adaptation (eye); Socioeconomics; Displaced person; Geography; Environmental protection; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Forestry; Refugee; Economics; Archaeology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03655253507926944,"gpt":0.3358888214347773,"spread":0.2993362863555079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000516151,0.0000745748,0.0001732772,0.00005388662,0.0001887174,0.000046432,0.0001263826,0.0000471265,0.00004323284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008682298,0.00006187228,0.00002791906,0.0001943503,0.00004836985,0.0002244603,0.00004348066,0.0001509281,0.000008077492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002310864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001585677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7908749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4402849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999037,0.0003063026,0.0002206309,0.0001009302,0.0001288221,0.0002062889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994742,0.00009163958,0.0001574416,0.0002000904,0.00002365107,0.00005297337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003429884,0.0003132325,0.619481,0.00001283408,0.00001937169,0.00002997241,0.3773938,0.0002719056,0.00002050247,0.001778786,0.0000616579,0.0005827075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004460224,0.0002911165,0.7817286,0.00005515476,0.00001108408,0.000007940098,0.2094224,0.001031829,0.00001558648,0.0003704906,0.002400328,0.0002052801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975353,0.00001493988,0.000002627883,0.0003159218,0.0000731503,0.0004868704,0.00002458532,0.00001277417,0.00153376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989955,0.00003578656,0.00001355238,0.00006432252,0.00004069466,0.000007770227,0.000005230504,0.000006562985,0.0008305824],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.35059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5699284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043536052","doi":"10.1016/s0264-8377(02)00045-5","title":"Neighborhood change at Love Canal: contamination, evacuation and resettlement","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"University at Buffalo; U.S. Department of Transportation","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Hazardous waste; Environmental planning; Contamination; State (computer science); Environmental remediation; Political science; Business; Engineering; Environmental science; Geography; Waste management; Archaeology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08938134167639909,"gpt":0.3446194078223438,"spread":0.2552380661459447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001266523,0.0000528847,0.00006567427,0.00005161905,0.0002608411,0.00004641158,0.00004223878,0.00004546754,0.0005817197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008364421,0.0000501405,0.00001133787,0.00007715099,0.00007330874,0.0002316822,0.0000286794,0.00003813346,0.0001236231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002171727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001609177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04183159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1267262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993502,0.00006296016,0.00009206661,0.0001017101,0.0001736482,0.0002193831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997017,0.00006082082,0.00003969394,0.00006514114,0.00001414486,0.0001185172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007318533,0.00006717817,0.8869671,0.00007405761,0.00001094106,0.000003050671,0.06151487,5.910229e-7,0.000007210892,0.03407958,0.01182174,0.005446383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004834759,0.00004000203,0.8151069,0.00002759477,0.00002290002,9.708322e-7,0.002217003,0.0001559733,0.000008339519,0.0003525337,0.1814684,0.0001159444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8565762,0.003753434,0.00003872355,0.1023595,0.0002117458,0.0008036296,0.0001555367,0.0000569236,0.03604436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976997,0.008945215,0.00003060146,0.005099589,0.0005264455,0.00001664972,0.00001531404,0.000006256068,0.008362885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1696467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9645489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072410854","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.007","title":"Irrigator preferences for water recovery budget expenditure in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge; University of Alberta","funders":"Australian Research Council; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; University of Lethbridge; National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Economics; Purchasing; Agricultural economics; Preference; Natural resource economics; Business; Microeconomics; Operations management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1482667934137834,"gpt":0.2621831302976894,"spread":0.113916336883906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005548684,0.0001112999,0.0002431965,0.0001060171,0.00006693017,0.0001597487,0.0001590076,0.0000889892,0.0008403749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007970964,0.00007374708,0.00008812793,0.00003556133,0.00002298729,0.0004573746,0.0000231151,0.00008895205,0.0009586114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008008962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006625701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006673601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002106559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990696,0.00002885629,0.000408143,0.0002191295,0.00001813564,0.0002560792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995642,0.0000895113,0.0001172987,0.0001861804,0.000003933452,0.00003883243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008538844,0.0000691113,0.9794096,0.00002244722,0.00003189155,3.116039e-7,0.001685477,0.0003026812,0.00004023833,0.01126233,0.006668386,0.0004990083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005202837,0.00004483249,0.9165618,0.000009300564,0.000004981194,0.000001597168,0.0001595756,0.0004806708,0.0001856361,0.05729149,0.02455218,0.0001876546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961925,0.00006090194,0.0003079202,0.00166435,0.0001699447,0.0004241827,0.0001459122,0.000008609662,0.001025711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959133,0.00006930415,0.0005923024,0.0009775409,0.0002574486,0.0001959516,0.00009602327,0.00001188121,0.001886242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06284779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187296507","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.017","title":"Exploring agricultural advice networks, beneficial management practices and water quality on the landscape: A geospatial social-ecological systems analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Brock University","keywords":"Geospatial analysis; Agriculture; Business; Environmental planning; Best practice; Quality (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Environmental resource management; Water quality; Geography; Ecology; Political science; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2338248587487766,"gpt":0.3241880540252797,"spread":0.09036319527650308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006712661,0.0001816597,0.0002414479,0.00002966627,0.0005799819,0.0005847768,0.0001875474,0.00008821834,0.00004953016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001330256,0.00004242968,0.00008406789,0.0008833414,0.00003131827,0.0005868689,0.0001428469,0.0001812033,0.00001778581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003092194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003529605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008460904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003340507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984795,0.0003392142,0.0002879155,0.0002936948,0.0002663886,0.0003332988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989709,0.0004368288,0.0003042214,0.0000611722,0.0001311208,0.00009574761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001496709,0.002499323,0.7273105,0.0001307496,0.005479352,0.00008690767,0.008791889,0.01524033,0.002765803,0.1686743,0.01918681,0.04833727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001598397,0.0001183708,0.9748845,0.000005087864,0.0001745806,0.000004384895,0.003446082,0.0006386552,0.0000107471,0.00002838301,0.02032915,0.0002002399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879493,0.00004627274,0.000003561684,0.01020412,0.0001124637,0.0002424177,0.00003106112,0.00007671678,0.001334156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997254,0.0001384419,0.00002251681,0.0004473043,0.001339876,0.00008775409,0.0001803418,9.338203e-7,0.0005288842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.247574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173089168","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105600","title":"Pandemic Victory Gardens: Potential for local land use policies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Urban Agriculture and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Government (linguistics); Empowerment; Local government; Resistance (ecology); World War II; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Public administration; Politics; Economics; Law; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02653570981886204,"gpt":0.2429391131469007,"spread":0.2164034033280386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009005453,0.0001655268,0.0002165958,0.00001254545,0.0002173441,0.0002023203,0.000132282,0.0001563181,0.0001136485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002409238,0.00005864811,0.0001790263,0.0002187247,0.00007089012,0.0001389195,0.00008416861,0.0001111087,0.00001482889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006565682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004940922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004330669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01291373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988527,0.00008218231,0.0001903298,0.0003041089,0.0001369664,0.0004336766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931,0.000215693,0.0000484538,0.00008665468,0.000190626,0.0001486288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001462743,0.0003645574,0.948266,0.00004869603,0.00008840445,0.00004801244,0.0004833424,0.000085359,0.01391518,0.0008316825,0.02787148,0.007850968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003098367,0.0000783656,0.755475,0.000007805159,0.00002539027,0.00003115255,0.0001962698,0.00005521878,0.0002529155,0.0005961239,0.2427749,0.0001970723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966078,0.0001899674,0.0000690823,0.002356024,0.00009463349,0.0002010669,0.0002257645,0.0000949182,0.0001607361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870118,0.0001021726,0.00007376499,0.001414471,0.001138358,0.00001840154,0.0002009695,0.000001697832,0.0100383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2149034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7206162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011151752","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.006","title":"Forgetting fire: Traditional fire knowledge in two chestnut forest ecosystems of the Iberian Peninsula and its implications for European fire management policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Native Mental Health Association of Canada","funders":"Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Geography; Fire regime; Climate change; Forest management; Ecosystem; Ecosystem services; Traditional knowledge; Environmental planning; Ecology; Forestry; Environmental science; Indigenous","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03910648642936513,"gpt":0.2794979598234314,"spread":0.2403914733940663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004719006,0.0001745131,0.0001987188,0.00005769312,0.0001507175,0.00005174586,0.0003316137,0.00003766732,0.000006593926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001832434,0.0001350923,0.00006699585,0.0004273711,0.0000539564,0.0002318558,0.0002279495,0.00007986751,0.00003880025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002763043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000458724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004678346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005274193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987301,0.0001621947,0.0003364434,0.0002964764,0.0001342947,0.0003404501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991861,0.000137072,0.00016171,0.0003399879,0.00001565776,0.0001594679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000367626,0.0003949742,0.9601513,0.0004362875,0.0000545461,0.000004318497,0.002781987,0.001000909,0.0004913203,0.01373847,0.006877116,0.01403207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001787472,0.00005817427,0.9275051,0.0001409252,0.00001805104,0.000030806,0.00004283154,0.05411929,0.00006029488,0.0008031594,0.0152202,0.0002137012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991329,0.000107602,0.00002079513,0.002122695,0.0001011403,0.001082853,0.0002356591,0.00003082192,0.004969457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983739,0.00001690073,0.0001799429,0.0001241477,0.0003171763,0.0001499616,0.00003356263,0.00003462764,0.0007698156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05311838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7072291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075200525","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.033","title":"Can organic fertilizers set the pace for a greener arable agricultural revolution in Africa? Analysis, synthesis and way forward","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arable land; Pace; Organic farming; Agriculture; Scale (ratio); Agricultural engineering; Organic product; Production (economics); Environmental science; Agricultural economics; Geography; Engineering; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07129771537445269,"gpt":0.2694807953069403,"spread":0.1981830799324876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003209432,0.000127984,0.0001854416,0.00003355719,0.0002073295,0.0001541708,0.0001305619,0.00007741622,0.00002543334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004401112,0.0000333943,0.00006708201,0.00165534,0.00003282011,0.000283638,0.00004312291,0.00008377667,0.000003365911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005683996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001315506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01140823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03896182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991205,0.00009890128,0.0001802223,0.000207661,0.0001166564,0.0002760015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999231,0.0003913184,0.0001095986,0.00005704329,0.0001217695,0.00008924961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005191289,0.0004343057,0.8423834,0.00005276614,0.001054784,0.000007615611,0.007144416,0.0005725083,0.04315646,0.009213089,0.07415239,0.02130908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001788335,0.00007219265,0.971437,0.000009418627,0.000155051,0.000007184831,0.002012561,0.0003415554,0.0002008884,0.0005038595,0.02489616,0.0001852964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788331,0.0002115983,0.000007077343,0.02038134,0.00002152891,0.0002347051,0.0001120406,0.00002510506,0.0001734695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980804,0.00008668632,0.0001088731,0.0002008785,0.000164067,0.00006187279,0.00008811281,8.303427e-7,0.001208313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1290535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490010249","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.007","title":"The effect of communication on individual preferences for common property resources: A case study of two Canadian First Nations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Indigenous; Tourism; Promotion (chess); Context (archaeology); Compensation (psychology); Public economics; Public relations; Focus group; Marketing; Business; Political science; Environmental resource management; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Geography; Law; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1360490537335111,"gpt":0.2774470851398999,"spread":0.1413980314063888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004316501,0.00006029645,0.0001448862,0.0001376985,0.0002586982,0.00002239717,0.0001506744,0.0000274238,0.00001110205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001595359,0.00003230236,0.00003044571,0.00006336397,0.00004731651,0.0000843283,0.00002688614,0.00002823465,0.000009281413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008678665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001348401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3905755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7363804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994659,0.00004398977,0.0002732047,0.00009990153,0.00001743505,0.00009959229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988716,0.0006112916,0.0002032625,0.0002706687,0.000006515645,0.0000366493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002013789,0.00005609436,0.9931881,0.000008238047,0.00004158127,2.121894e-7,0.001711877,0.00009878175,3.750246e-7,0.003183653,0.00006726542,0.001623614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00410315,0.001624933,0.9828196,0.00005905832,0.0000309903,0.000006857236,0.0005284614,0.0004884689,0.00009797273,0.001692845,0.008384124,0.0001635126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997667,0.00005299542,0.000008587051,0.000409368,0.00001970483,0.0005605055,0.0003722383,0.000003323011,0.0009063428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995182,0.00007190792,0.00002151872,0.00002281823,0.00001836458,0.000111685,0.00001018325,0.000006849497,0.0002185087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3458049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6134827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999963862","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104469","title":"What lies beneath: Climate change, land expropriation, and zaï agroecological innovations by smallholder farmers in Northern Ghana","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Expropriation; Climate governance; Corporate governance; Indigenous; Land management; Land tenure; Politics; Environmental resource management; Climate change; Natural resource economics; Business; Economics; Political economy; Political science; Agriculture; Geography; Market economy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0433295778557899,"gpt":0.2374091570272722,"spread":0.1940795791714824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007903115,0.0001884654,0.0002113592,0.00002216002,0.0001684173,0.0002388946,0.0001353294,0.000134435,0.00004441405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008874571,0.00006725889,0.00003210477,0.000612468,0.00003137582,0.0004512178,0.0001223181,0.0001264376,0.00002543783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003266516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001014983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001209638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01840465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988733,0.00004984128,0.0002505477,0.0003198781,0.0001438985,0.0003625576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999587,0.00008361896,0.0000864545,0.00003526277,0.00006176512,0.0001458928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002184202,0.0000639678,0.9858058,0.00001026555,0.00001099881,0.000005035391,0.00109337,0.000002275103,0.000420487,0.000459009,0.0006533024,0.01145364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003294411,0.000099332,0.9905534,0.00002465889,0.000005770968,0.000003176402,0.000584189,0.00002301064,0.00007627085,0.0002532279,0.007829028,0.0002184364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840615,0.0002516543,0.0000011359,0.01510471,0.00006317649,0.0003139333,0.00008961838,0.00006284176,0.00005140141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927344,0.001680402,0.00006753138,0.004566083,0.0003943925,0.00006409419,0.0003734499,0.000002000091,0.0001176036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01719501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978053333","doi":"10.1016/s0264-8377(03)00024-3","title":"Fair participation—a Canadian perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Public participation; Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Public involvement; Perception; Economic Justice; Public interest; Procedural justice; Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04269960235051352,"gpt":0.345299499576861,"spread":0.3025998972263475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000107178,0.00004225184,0.00004979811,0.00004931955,0.0002978282,0.00006666818,0.00005908101,0.00003994502,0.00008432782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001052527,0.00003958978,0.00001892698,0.0002044025,0.00004850319,0.0001129747,0.000002366369,0.0000502341,0.00009838035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002527006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007906529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9600956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9271588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994138,0.00007380435,0.00004645142,0.00009035817,0.0000946596,0.0002808542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996027,0.00004067609,0.00002158442,0.00007519883,0.00004664732,0.0002131841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001061301,0.00001093369,0.3359587,4.007883e-7,0.00000612973,0.000004618627,0.02060664,0.00001015873,8.189189e-7,0.6317559,0.01158794,0.00005663466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001233363,0.000007370269,0.2473743,0.000004359141,0.000004159114,4.529702e-7,0.001023563,0.000007110998,0.0000092111,0.003550619,0.7478105,0.00008507721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5452606,0.0001548706,0.00005471501,0.01083895,0.0002201916,0.0001268975,0.00006289356,0.00007765213,0.4432032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818853,0.00001889707,0.00009358503,0.0008617899,0.0001866269,0.000004668904,0.000001069493,0.000004146208,0.01694398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7362226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2290684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189878971","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.025","title":"Migration, land use and forest change in St. Lucia, West Indies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Urban and Rural Development Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Mount Allison University","keywords":"Afforestation; Geography; Urbanization; Agriculture; Land use; Clearing; Tourism; Agroforestry; Economic growth; Ecology; Forestry; Archaeology; Business; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1427778262617813,"gpt":0.3337526789930799,"spread":0.1909748527312985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001885894,0.00008197363,0.000111191,0.0001357594,0.0001163044,0.0001544945,0.00007161761,0.00008119219,0.00001170706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002620177,0.0000636031,0.00001235238,0.000189506,0.00008422924,0.0005457172,0.00003825166,0.00006226368,0.000019487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005097237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001079448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1863556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7837407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993256,0.00006875356,0.0001012936,0.0001241326,0.0001457637,0.0002344797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996462,0.00006194741,0.00003479003,0.00006744729,0.00004483321,0.000144715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006308448,0.00001981599,0.9530057,0.000004501756,0.000004760435,0.000004079186,0.04181588,3.833823e-7,3.696885e-7,0.002819446,0.001732851,0.0005858655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003610656,0.00001496282,0.8954102,0.0000200635,0.000002704019,6.333309e-7,0.0007572767,0.00001129744,0.000001151239,0.0006487342,0.1026749,0.00009703405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886779,0.0005327712,0.000001008251,0.009787951,0.00009719985,0.0001518182,0.00001895454,0.00003516904,0.0006972738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934589,0.002695032,0.00009406734,0.0004815177,0.0004548556,0.00001693745,0.0000165012,0.000007018769,0.002775229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.597385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8190625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921772333","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.034","title":"Public private partnership in brownfield remediation projects in China: Identification and structure analysis of risks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Underground infrastructure and sustainability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"University of Hong Kong; Northwestern Polytechnical University; Northwestern University","keywords":"Brownfield; Public–private partnership; General partnership; Risk analysis (engineering); China; Identification (biology); Delphi method; Merge (version control); Business; Risk management; Delphi; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Civil engineering; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0297526174877531,"gpt":0.2741705505490206,"spread":0.2444179330612675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001301022,0.0000820089,0.0001874273,0.0006310089,0.000009605727,0.00004623219,0.00006013429,0.00009985937,0.00001766454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001561119,0.00007238438,0.00002581306,0.001078534,0.00001355572,0.0003062838,0.0000157386,0.0001271592,3.601849e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008024628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002958584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001857736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004862789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993534,0.00004102032,0.0002317899,0.0001342903,0.00008123592,0.0001582832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996665,0.00003769485,0.00004571311,0.0001987489,0.00002184839,0.00002949616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006442783,0.000008660011,0.9902631,0.00008988549,0.00004110129,3.416999e-7,0.001183656,0.005634299,0.0007397818,0.001346824,0.000007907691,0.0006779934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002698645,0.000007878886,0.9768113,0.000004861985,0.00002132031,2.841636e-7,0.00004280808,0.01994752,0.0002511953,0.002507455,0.00006485851,0.00007064987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992003,0.00002899887,0.0001771463,0.0001488721,0.00002812396,0.0001892526,0.000008141997,0.00002264769,0.0001964596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997723,0.00003271536,0.00006587544,0.00001790531,0.00002463669,0.000004969768,0.00004247771,0.000006868417,0.0000322691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01431322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2951749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510157268","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.015","title":"Evolving frontier land markets and the opportunity cost of sparing forests in western Amazonia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Clearing; Frontier; Opportunity cost; Amazon rainforest; Hectare; Geography; Agroforestry; Land use; Clearance; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Economics; Ecology; Agriculture; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02243715487179509,"gpt":0.224379794186941,"spread":0.2019426393151459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000263663,0.00006003108,0.00008979607,0.0000407397,0.00006606104,0.00002548506,0.000106674,0.00002382105,0.000106807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008200871,0.00003165505,0.00001794254,0.00007379459,0.0001498115,0.0001101786,0.0002857526,0.00003024567,0.0000106504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004257618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006612282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01303413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01779291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995061,0.00006171242,0.00009633887,0.0001075084,0.00009688987,0.0001315179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996846,0.00007143391,0.00004901224,0.0001382404,0.000003635694,0.00005306176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002893181,0.00001463517,0.994839,0.000005894335,0.000006017786,0.000002011464,0.0003773309,0.000007878314,0.00001124818,0.000006456806,0.0001942583,0.004506395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001204997,0.000004925864,0.9920648,0.00002313343,0.000007689116,9.499967e-7,0.00001994492,0.0002635777,0.000007008985,0.00009213934,0.006259148,0.00005163755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965795,0.00001877772,0.0001436618,0.001613914,0.0000194139,0.0001546053,0.000008945643,0.000006282209,0.001454853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972047,0.0001011458,0.00004347017,0.0002064193,0.00001934842,0.00000300864,0.000001006501,0.000002942451,0.002417944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00606489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154413548","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105445","title":"What does the UK public want farmland to look like?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta","funders":"Newcastle University","keywords":"Agriculture; Diversity (politics); Rural area; Land use; Survey data collection; Agricultural policy; Geography; Business; Environmental resource management; Economics; Economic growth; Agricultural economics; Public economics; Sociology; Political science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02451479542711327,"gpt":0.2449419637642624,"spread":0.2204271683371491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000138221,0.0001033987,0.000113322,0.00000970984,0.0002482032,0.0007182499,0.0001985897,0.00004978801,0.0003245332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000183584,0.00002357595,0.00006159865,0.0004316732,0.00003239434,0.0002553453,0.0001736761,0.00007414655,0.0000525609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003320728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004948659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001563712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01328937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991068,0.00007743296,0.0001273334,0.0002221141,0.0001392134,0.0003270689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995167,0.0001267717,0.00002280567,0.00009175315,0.0001049516,0.0001369627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000222846,0.0001014453,0.87479,0.00001053412,0.00002987965,0.0000311904,0.001265255,7.520619e-7,0.003736685,0.002766772,0.01313559,0.1041097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006693829,0.0000190703,0.6689543,0.000006604809,0.000002538419,0.000005184688,0.001031056,0.000002259095,0.0004686099,0.001536767,0.327801,0.0001057092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8910115,0.0001526595,8.408133e-7,0.1081933,0.000261581,0.0001222192,0.00001170429,0.00003054476,0.0002157012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981689,0.0002887774,0.00002855169,0.004803629,0.0004737033,0.00001585456,0.00003669739,6.574148e-7,0.01266315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3146654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7415781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032427440","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.014","title":"Land use perception of self-reported health: Exploratory analysis of anthropogenic land use phenotypes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Land use; Geography; Spatial analysis; Recreation; Land-use planning; Spatial planning; Geographic information system; Health geography; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental health; Cartography; Public health; Remote sensing; Medicine; Ecology; Environmental science; Health policy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1280072559780644,"gpt":0.4028892061499254,"spread":0.274881950171861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007152904,0.0001290988,0.0005253884,0.0003482233,0.0002055053,0.00007836341,0.0001262155,0.0001238492,0.00007532976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007193721,0.0001079138,0.0001438394,0.0009760747,0.0001473067,0.0005530827,0.00003819812,0.00009030721,0.000008040367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001750091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001016492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5079952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1753175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980686,0.0003652081,0.0005269841,0.0002068888,0.0004015384,0.0004307819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984789,0.0002339949,0.0003477368,0.0003013395,0.0002391253,0.00039893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003129241,0.0001067386,0.9788268,0.0000582951,0.0002812653,0.000002035107,0.01898038,0.00006977653,0.000002818354,0.0005502988,0.000822081,0.0002682483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005291399,0.0000519414,0.9799611,0.00002726481,0.0002599442,4.796119e-7,0.002132627,0.0001831065,0.000004009046,0.00004960279,0.01667161,0.0001291526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972841,0.0001855311,0.00004990328,0.001820942,0.0001458762,0.0001952059,0.0001689591,0.00006274702,0.00008672987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996161,0.00164534,0.0004412007,0.001075991,0.0002381516,0.000006006314,0.00006094435,0.00001418879,0.0003571214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3326778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8397309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026258470","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.002","title":"Community forests for forest communities: Integrating community-defined goals and practices in the design of forestry initiatives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Community forestry; Livelihood; Psychological intervention; Forest management; Environmental planning; Forestry; Business; Variety (cybernetics); Intervention (counseling); Environmental resource management; Community development; Agriculture; Geography; Economic growth; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1144890084033985,"gpt":0.3128814950150255,"spread":0.1983924866116271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001050809,0.0001161761,0.0001451882,0.00007658916,0.0007353871,0.0001140345,0.0006143208,0.00005001703,0.00002492732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009637082,0.00007747972,0.00002992332,0.0001901786,0.0003213903,0.0004533418,0.000563486,0.0003278217,0.000004388102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003678301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001354156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2505086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1005778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982063,0.001243974,0.0001961817,0.00005919806,0.0001136976,0.0001806536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963456,0.002877645,0.0002530964,0.0004688621,0.00002104454,0.00003379727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002069029,0.0001567811,0.9672276,0.00004950731,0.00001377503,1.882736e-7,0.03137735,0.0002862249,0.00001996981,0.0002102957,0.0002595053,0.0003780503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005247765,0.0001374006,0.9574376,0.00003866246,0.0000154668,0.000001481082,0.03447773,0.002930643,0.000007055927,0.003880602,0.0004619007,0.00008666528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956972,0.00001341379,0.0007812819,0.001476738,0.000008346843,0.0007177963,0.00002323505,0.00001284218,0.001269127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996681,0.00004754573,0.002335103,0.0007612443,0.00001261603,0.00006878397,0.00003138417,0.000006278737,0.00005606891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1499307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9158342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376253896","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106706","title":"The prospects of innovative agri-environmental contracts in the European policy context: Results from a Delphi study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Horizon 2020; Canadian Association of Palynologists; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Magyar Tudományos Akadémia; European Commission; HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Delphi; Delphi method; Environmental policy; Regional science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental science; Geography; Computer science; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03621696081546169,"gpt":0.2617578189516966,"spread":0.2255408581362349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001572547,0.0001608366,0.0001864557,0.0003243208,0.0003343763,0.0001325233,0.0004862515,0.0000596704,0.000001822887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001209494,0.00009412828,0.00002895216,0.002475857,0.0002260212,0.0002537866,0.0003592735,0.0002815528,0.00008412197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005530431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004608859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006925162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001450612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986665,0.0001175732,0.0004418499,0.0002290997,0.0002260306,0.0003189157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990814,0.0002556659,0.000296093,0.0003019352,0.00005991515,0.000005023689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003149873,0.0008732866,0.6442325,0.00001484879,0.0002466126,0.0001132507,0.02920436,0.000008891224,0.0002421472,0.2950165,0.003387986,0.02634467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001677725,0.00001750309,0.9745427,0.00001524989,0.00000660247,3.5425e-7,0.008970996,0.00002847074,0.00003223523,0.006665496,0.007923106,0.0001195319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984484,0.00001251327,0.000005422964,0.005239771,0.00007629272,0.0007120877,0.00004345417,0.00007570019,0.009350731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972482,0.00001691049,0.00001357735,0.001729853,0.0006286878,0.00004592668,0.00008391297,0.00001859579,0.0002142799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3303103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884463018","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.019","title":"Land embodied in Spain’s biomass trade and consumption (1900–2008): Historical changes, drivers and impacts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Natural resource economics; Biomass (ecology); Population; Agricultural economics; Population growth; Resource (disambiguation); Land use; Yield (engineering); Economics; Production (economics); Business; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02346144860682864,"gpt":0.2648256667003512,"spread":0.2413642180935225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001543504,0.0001395966,0.0001530361,0.00007320811,0.00009667846,0.00003775839,0.00005823361,0.00009177975,0.000129916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000646336,0.0001167596,0.00001621989,0.0001171393,0.0003314172,0.0002236134,0.0001085582,0.00008293303,0.00002402881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000806618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008911067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01903092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01389148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991065,0.00006354627,0.0001147269,0.0002546797,0.0001198309,0.0003407219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999545,0.00003620956,0.00003864461,0.0001471407,0.000001194404,0.000231813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003387918,0.00006022417,0.9955177,0.00001381913,0.000003843378,0.00001030978,0.001238176,6.196209e-7,0.001166227,0.00002882774,0.0002757596,0.001650614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008004148,0.0001341551,0.9904525,0.000006979024,0.000007616095,0.0000174356,0.00003061283,0.0001263768,0.0001598683,0.000192439,0.007923735,0.0001479015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974781,0.00008066086,0.000009266453,0.001837964,0.00003594835,0.0001769614,0.00001350877,0.00002097557,0.0003466403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988042,0.000285106,0.0001358074,0.0003737773,0.00007413062,0.000004862136,0.000005379851,0.000009887166,0.0003069224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007647975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}