{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":9,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"38b91c374c07","filters":{"venue":"Language & Communication"}},"results":[{"id":"W3101209857","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2020.09.005","title":"Taking a detour before answering the question: Turn-initial okay in second position in English interaction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Turn-taking; Context (archaeology); Position (finance); Unit (ring theory); Linguistics; Conversation analysis; Variety (cybernetics); Transition (genetics); Question answering; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Communication; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03741345201777656,"gpt":0.3235420657384359,"spread":0.2861286137206593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004281024,0.0001613739,0.000177115,0.00011843,0.0002627013,0.0003844961,0.0006800044,0.00006472391,0.001347359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001928437,0.0001372288,0.00005829419,0.0001526285,0.0001437826,0.0009531641,0.0001947261,0.0006396997,0.00003075348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001274225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003763723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002070868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08044218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985064,0.0005306067,0.0004203643,0.0001854496,0.0001641149,0.000193064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986418,0.0001940892,0.0002726539,0.0007462392,0.0001073006,0.00003791485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005757223,0.00009913062,0.0009167971,0.0000479845,0.00002006503,0.00001449944,0.9065089,0.0001587415,0.000628991,0.07833106,0.0001810476,0.01303521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001900838,0.0001959555,0.03157777,0.0008667549,0.0000555651,0.00002002786,0.9272242,0.006426339,0.001420486,0.002790399,0.0268074,0.0007142456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9159605,0.001542163,0.00005839929,0.00451381,0.0001802474,0.0003948977,0.00002255033,0.0001978699,0.07712959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979522,0.00004512957,0.0001817722,0.000921266,0.0004134966,0.00009353481,0.0002375806,0.00002539874,0.0001296444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08199171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293525316","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2016.01.002","title":"Speaking like a citizen: Biopolitics and public opinion in recognizing non-citizen children in Israel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wenner-Gren Foundation","keywords":"Biopower; Citizenship; Public opinion; Government (linguistics); Public sphere; Political science; Sociology; Documentation; Semiotics; Voice; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Linguistics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03366261969438324,"gpt":0.3119076628789951,"spread":0.2782450431846119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006142068,0.0000855132,0.0001380776,0.0001524149,0.0001845,0.00007149688,0.0002986883,0.00007609234,0.000007779054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003620529,0.00007345757,0.00002170668,0.000246472,0.0001858394,0.0002880284,0.0002171255,0.0001151721,0.00001684983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001294263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004387076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02306638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07231379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989395,0.0002631621,0.0002026096,0.0001584381,0.0001302848,0.0003060783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993055,0.0001939358,0.0000830884,0.0003136553,0.00004485678,0.00005889954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005282361,0.00004825392,0.6988409,0.00001060604,0.00001024221,0.000001229646,0.0272423,3.773611e-8,0.0002999709,0.01320762,0.00003784244,0.2602957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002423208,0.00004650219,0.7673389,0.001294643,0.00001154281,0.000006923322,0.2181854,0.00003328603,0.0001104727,0.006690931,0.003322265,0.0005359404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715087,0.008234298,0.00005954277,0.003049441,0.00009468575,0.0002549735,0.000007873227,0.00004627303,0.01674417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962131,0.002763525,0.0004832697,0.0002197906,0.0001000723,0.00002043153,0.0000148363,0.00001012152,0.0001748724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2597598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9834391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W954727993","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2015.06.001","title":"“No, it is a hobby for me”: Examining the motivations of non-Irish learners of the Irish language in North America","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Hobby; Fluency; Diaspora; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Gender studies; Visual arts; Mathematics education; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1075732717003264,"gpt":0.4460424170113478,"spread":0.3384691453110213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007469089,0.00006540386,0.0001235783,0.00005538036,0.0001819837,0.00002181989,0.0007523233,0.00004894851,0.00006293567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001835935,0.00004761409,0.00005151957,0.000566734,0.0002842479,0.00009401749,0.00008903785,0.0001508016,0.000007383594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005909038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000269867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03221463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01490003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989251,0.0003823717,0.0002565485,0.00008942187,0.0002079094,0.0001385913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998275,0.0005167291,0.0002821865,0.0007031708,0.0001815334,0.00004137677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009474244,0.00007984393,0.01429688,0.00001257608,0.00001028677,3.755659e-8,0.9601158,0.0000623737,0.0004027973,0.0001209819,0.01363891,0.01125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005561914,0.00004411568,0.04264779,0.00007550781,0.00002605948,2.062307e-7,0.8672903,0.001232805,0.0005803036,0.00003691261,0.08737145,0.0001383266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9333585,0.0003454899,0.00005939534,0.005366128,0.00008127285,0.0004798503,0.00002738324,0.00001599858,0.060266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944707,0.00008811519,0.0009961737,0.001182418,0.00006913553,0.00004840984,0.00003429124,0.000008758729,0.003101973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09282549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9742299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075684672","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.010","title":"Words and things, goods and services: Problems of translation between language and political economy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Value (mathematics); Analogy; Goods and services; Exchange value; Linguistics; Historicity (philosophy); Use value; Sociology; Object (grammar); Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Economy; Neoclassical economics; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03461682812175088,"gpt":0.3899368156101986,"spread":0.3553199874884477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003936784,0.0000638683,0.0001095155,0.00005419107,0.0001681659,0.00006208242,0.0001124888,0.00007526117,0.00001969622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001767047,0.00006496299,0.00001282118,0.00008307408,0.0001964628,0.0002291503,0.00003141931,0.00008742221,8.502665e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001778043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003342753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0450565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005628948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993519,0.0001718025,0.0001743522,0.0001006852,0.0000678013,0.0001334131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994276,0.0002068338,0.00008173045,0.000189887,0.00002299139,0.00007094796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005703518,0.0000553351,0.05578054,0.0002252349,0.00001203226,1.888126e-7,0.661249,6.376845e-7,0.0005767357,0.2058842,0.00001382937,0.07619649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002450711,0.0001114871,0.3599594,0.0005473184,0.0002060156,0.00000726881,0.4955091,0.001444351,0.001858489,0.04929329,0.08772331,0.0008893005],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9141147,0.004223703,0.0000265081,0.003223164,0.000009672837,0.000190046,0.000009487677,0.00003650468,0.07816628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977669,0.0001472031,0.001492255,0.0002051983,0.00009324585,0.000006822766,0.0000656202,0.000006354259,0.0002164021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3041788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9613026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093766374","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2012.08.003","title":"The politics of huanghua: Gender, metaphors, and privatization in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Toronto; Wenner-Gren Foundation","keywords":"CONTEST; China; Agency (philosophy); Gender studies; Beijing; Politics; Sociology; Migrant workers; Gender relations; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02711770998429403,"gpt":0.3151059011088586,"spread":0.2879881911245645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001046126,0.00003830426,0.00006364225,0.00003203748,0.0003462667,0.00002277528,0.0001930721,0.00004347502,0.00002137548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002314832,0.00003195765,0.00001457183,0.0001314565,0.0001276158,0.0002255041,0.00004828796,0.00006874351,0.00000208612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003664818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002415145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008052003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01629068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992817,0.0003044268,0.0001552212,0.00004333973,0.0000820727,0.0001332265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993911,0.0001638388,0.00009658312,0.0002878999,0.00002794995,0.00003261301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002072714,0.00005132831,0.2207056,0.00001045477,0.000008453343,2.471163e-8,0.5105391,0.000003371225,0.0001526495,0.2627295,0.0001679931,0.005629421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001810604,0.000008241569,0.9085972,0.0000149501,0.00001579568,3.873184e-7,0.06949374,0.0002023528,0.0004972926,0.006042155,0.01484045,0.0001063784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.973712,0.01101979,0.0001693681,0.0005634603,0.00003806026,0.0001531477,0.000001810789,0.00001449279,0.0143279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965593,0.002464111,0.0005105422,0.00004104752,0.00004687986,0.000009441211,0.000018146,0.000003748849,0.0003467715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6878916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2690182870","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2015.11.004","title":"Language revitalization and the future of ethnolinguistic identity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Identity (music); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02672994165378606,"gpt":0.4410277526634336,"spread":0.4142978110096475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009535435,0.0000448544,0.00008328799,0.0000344711,0.0002206686,0.00002922112,0.0003047484,0.00004979199,0.0001493946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001144607,0.00002669065,0.00002742373,0.0001597486,0.0003804826,0.0001306921,0.00005470519,0.00005476611,0.00001103668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002569491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004970294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006248673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007458806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990774,0.0004863267,0.0001462562,0.00006639975,0.0001413921,0.00008219876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989702,0.0003454051,0.0001328428,0.0004236007,0.00009561185,0.00003237388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001512973,0.00002123311,0.0008012076,0.00001663689,0.000007342261,1.5871e-7,0.3533762,1.305031e-7,0.0006404527,0.5364418,0.0002579925,0.1084218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005348394,0.00004045254,0.03745882,0.0006964659,0.0001877275,0.000005563577,0.5168808,0.0001495052,0.002714789,0.03467259,0.4011804,0.0006645357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8878624,0.0271068,0.0006055246,0.02382378,0.0003424502,0.0005165651,0.00001556215,0.0001051119,0.05962179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940531,0.003478477,0.0002788295,0.0002870036,0.0002473636,0.000009347923,0.000008264449,0.000004879721,0.001632793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5017692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9446167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601394014","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2017.01.001","title":"Artificial language, natural history: Speech, sign, and sound in the emergence of Damin","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Artificiality; Paralanguage; Linguistics; Phonology; Morpheme; Lexicon; Sign language; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05775557871070972,"gpt":0.3708642990234956,"spread":0.3131087203127859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008251814,0.000082882,0.0001170542,0.00005633172,0.0001805148,0.00003451925,0.001156296,0.00006369633,0.0002252186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001563211,0.0000691438,0.00002980833,0.00004931574,0.0001999481,0.0001380409,0.000197668,0.0002763957,0.00002525511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003103334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001212807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004858734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003821674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989925,0.0004102204,0.0002259531,0.0001199151,0.0001188216,0.0001326155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971278,0.0001638321,0.000217751,0.002447496,0.00002525849,0.00001785902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001753586,0.0007742355,0.05761816,0.00005157157,0.00006452521,0.00002470244,0.4666415,0.000001455811,0.03891024,0.04030286,0.004911747,0.3905237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005600711,0.0001054658,0.9418319,0.00006805453,0.00003869177,0.00002113309,0.0502796,0.0003703082,0.001081654,0.001754866,0.003619308,0.0002689022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712059,0.007503067,0.00002279739,0.001023877,0.000127826,0.0002039361,0.000002079409,0.00002133877,0.01988917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986655,0.00007520605,0.0003886592,0.0001318417,0.00003396253,0.00003042132,0.00003370016,0.00000905087,0.0006316787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8842138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7344984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897082414","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2018.09.004","title":"Pedagogic ventriloquation: Projected constructed direct reported speech in teacher talk","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Paralanguage; Representation (politics); Criticism; Linguistics; Psychology; Indirect speech; Pedagogy; Sociology; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1050196552698775,"gpt":0.4926445682345916,"spread":0.3876249129647141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000941198,0.00008641483,0.0001245333,0.0001443357,0.0003176699,0.00006688177,0.0003424162,0.0001103136,0.002094209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001461019,0.00009011542,0.00003175691,0.0007112205,0.0003906167,0.0001489542,0.00004754551,0.000180914,0.00009407284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001523161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003578811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03528087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03153848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983874,0.0007076786,0.0003063414,0.0001670786,0.0002232117,0.0002083094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987615,0.0001208991,0.000200398,0.0006449076,0.0002057293,0.00006658141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006629696,0.0004883338,0.02842963,0.00001696737,0.00003639137,0.00001502974,0.7191579,0.000001353178,0.002511618,0.009628873,0.002420384,0.2372272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002306434,0.0001179645,0.1458676,0.000250973,0.00007324859,0.000034423,0.2216337,0.001554353,0.005816973,0.001700694,0.6196812,0.00096232],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7197023,0.0003257899,0.000006604904,0.001722604,0.0001371966,0.0003553806,0.000002493832,0.0001547746,0.2775928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901142,0.00009654021,0.001307646,0.0002343246,0.0003033646,0.00003005746,0.0001041892,0.0000104628,0.007799187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6172609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327956755","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2023.03.002","title":"“Molière amoché”: Discourse on the quality of English-speaking Canadian politicians’ French in Canadian news media coverage of the 2020 conservative leadership debate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metadiscourse; Linguistics; French; Ideology; Language assessment; Sociology; Language transfer; First language; Critical discourse analysis; Discourse analysis; Political science; Language education; Comprehension approach; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08872092399547252,"gpt":0.3165849047303955,"spread":0.227863980734923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009121393,0.0001592222,0.0002957765,0.0002209329,0.0003794781,0.00005967993,0.0008982149,0.00005230943,0.0005138895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002027853,0.0001049444,0.0001215005,0.0003624494,0.0007701162,0.0001297727,0.0001058036,0.0003231069,0.0000159001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001972812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003363813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979665,0.0007383563,0.0004406496,0.0001581223,0.0002802532,0.0004160863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972876,0.0009685986,0.0002672417,0.001141819,0.0002436447,0.00009108794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004417509,0.00002679765,0.01447295,0.00002822606,0.00009405598,0.000005317833,0.7683764,0.00004904244,0.00001655755,0.2140331,0.001913719,0.0009794539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003056255,0.00002003774,0.1338829,0.000422267,0.00008102036,2.25749e-7,0.8503661,0.0001015158,0.0001823502,0.001543,0.01283038,0.0002645659],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7678261,0.0008857968,3.78157e-7,0.0123733,0.0002175932,0.0003194624,0.0004504788,0.00002472552,0.2179021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972801,0.00008312353,0.00000613737,0.001466817,0.0001619161,0.00003150446,0.0001409339,0.00001805881,0.0008114607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2294539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.562673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}