{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":4,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"3d2d2a6e68ba","filters":{"venue":"Language Under Discussion"}},"results":[{"id":"W1488089735","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.239","title":"Pragmatism as ventriloquism: Creating a dialogue among seven traditions in the study of communication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"François Cooren","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01953216441841671,"gpt":0.2765606523197199,"spread":0.2570284879013032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0269074,0.000672249,0.0007669974,0.003303267,0.009211219,0.01489783,0.002468071,0.004643455,0.001805975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02404643,0.0004360712,0.0007416257,0.002495435,0.08836056,0.01970712,0.01191389,0.01032222,0.0003039884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005279881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004911643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001577726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001497525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9683727,0.02782435,0.0004281231,0.0009173829,0.001736296,0.0007210949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9502324,0.04373588,0.001793807,0.001947664,0.001263183,0.001027014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001920889,0.00001340342,0.0002918433,0.00008700391,0.00000550347,0.0001082478,0.3429365,0.00008038723,0.0003033131,0.6508567,0.0005072955,0.004790606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003803429,0.00008749959,0.0006459065,0.0008267957,0.00002099291,0.0004191498,0.2016682,0.001175692,0.0007904519,0.7128888,0.08138701,0.0000514543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2536686,0.02308843,0.2811702,0.1932446,0.001572227,0.0002732269,0.0000678287,0.000311266,0.2466036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729708,0.002215818,0.01837394,0.002799794,0.0004017826,0.0002034105,0.00001473006,0.00008157246,0.002938099],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0269074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1423016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2683143566","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.243","title":"Ventriloquism’s methodological scope","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Conversation; Constitution; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Conversation analysis; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Communication; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Elizabeth Wilhoit Larson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1059571962156649,"gpt":0.3437313829616248,"spread":0.23777418674596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05178188,0.000777129,0.001296261,0.003640389,0.005813138,0.01240008,0.004399574,0.006133189,0.00680877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08482642,0.0005053689,0.001319927,0.002191832,0.03880619,0.0128995,0.01193239,0.01407097,0.001664214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004278221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005185202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001769419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001508207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9616771,0.02733346,0.001305217,0.004733564,0.003949909,0.001000791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9039671,0.07819507,0.002221567,0.007180044,0.00631556,0.002120596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001726334,0.00001055587,0.0001672641,0.0001114404,0.000007560621,0.00002151412,0.003694216,0.00005484375,0.00005355317,0.9849337,0.006373094,0.004554975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002345254,0.0000218599,0.0002063057,0.0008300429,0.00001337517,0.0001229015,0.002724999,0.0005690305,0.0002846196,0.836284,0.1588997,0.00001975474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01569418,0.03602813,0.2122424,0.5633869,0.01999661,0.0003100741,0.0003406384,0.0003953699,0.1516058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7552571,0.01096034,0.07749139,0.103189,0.02124633,0.002635841,0.0002691053,0.0008993527,0.02805164],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05178188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.273852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590177693","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.246","title":"Pragmatism as ventriloquism: A reply to comments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Intersubjectivity; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"François Cooren","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01614115991936287,"gpt":0.2835380214809994,"spread":0.2673968615616365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02602919,0.001646228,0.001338864,0.001618695,0.01312926,0.01400573,0.007255434,0.03360168,0.005623566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09968951,0.000838519,0.001598544,0.002116959,0.03611369,0.01622181,0.01191468,0.05813538,0.001946161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01096225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007833832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009181926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006495373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9739983,0.01349091,0.001407976,0.004095417,0.005183265,0.001824155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8883604,0.09069538,0.005156537,0.002661164,0.009738286,0.003388203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001045357,0.00003676853,0.0004325619,0.000372479,0.000027023,0.001271314,0.09699108,0.0001851607,0.0004538643,0.2118335,0.6823517,0.005940037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004746512,0.00005041738,0.0007415156,0.000941852,0.0000290724,0.0007064396,0.06758206,0.0006036402,0.001062897,0.06372637,0.8643206,0.000187609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001246026,0.0008747479,0.0006164607,0.9827673,0.01242988,0.000009047197,0.00002470298,0.00002952756,0.002002308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08936035,0.002510352,0.001340079,0.8510492,0.04279677,0.000170984,0.00004923972,0.0003412127,0.0123819],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03360168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1376572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984916091","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.240","title":"Planetary pragmatism? A response to François Cooren","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Chris Russill","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02940812680333755,"gpt":0.2694549558474808,"spread":0.2400468290441433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009693547,0.0006491963,0.0007553895,0.0007862347,0.01751058,0.009445141,0.001642813,0.01674979,0.00345335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02324471,0.0004209607,0.0004109361,0.000977742,0.02985857,0.009980648,0.004295886,0.01632115,0.0007064887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01365844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005813879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05626358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04632919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901321,0.005880585,0.0001772687,0.001233715,0.001372322,0.001203912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979296,0.01562599,0.0007131486,0.0006544172,0.002170872,0.00153958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001241341,0.00004502091,0.001359581,0.0001229597,0.00001885822,0.001577553,0.1276979,0.0004574356,0.0003278762,0.500751,0.3542553,0.01326243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001939597,0.00002391618,0.0006685751,0.0003188087,0.000005804486,0.001127311,0.05788444,0.000560826,0.0004801563,0.04697949,0.8918132,0.0001179629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01532594,0.01094503,0.001277943,0.934476,0.004198375,0.00001011321,0.00001999282,0.00004956937,0.03369701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7115772,0.004919399,0.001127181,0.2428667,0.002693988,0.00005667023,0.00001599532,0.0001778034,0.03656498],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05626358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1118722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}