{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":4,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"3d2d2a6e68ba","filters":{"venue":"Language Under Discussion"}},"results":[{"id":"W1488089735","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.239","title":"Pragmatism as ventriloquism: Creating a dialogue among seven traditions in the study of communication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01953216441841671,"gpt":0.2765606523197199,"spread":0.2570284879013032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005601175,0.0001276867,0.0002289315,0.0001227469,0.0003828478,0.00009904808,0.0003379446,0.00002651833,0.0004683487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000822867,0.00006232024,0.00007366604,0.0001018064,0.0001992966,0.0002074399,0.00004804784,0.000164768,0.00001391856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002121255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007021615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004195482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05031504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985051,0.0005729101,0.0003220505,0.0001602985,0.0002874053,0.0001522703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989728,0.0002572615,0.0001830903,0.0005339297,0.00003186524,0.00002100449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006420983,0.0006937744,0.001291197,0.00001420242,0.00006951451,0.000005630721,0.9448326,0.0001275872,0.00002201399,0.05013707,0.0003575791,0.002442464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005961522,0.0001538909,0.02038251,0.0001631758,0.0001516777,0.000001381518,0.9711649,0.0002560829,0.00001463845,0.006490707,0.0004860113,0.0001388596],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9343243,0.0001977465,0.00007038091,0.000895716,0.00005698757,0.0003841853,0.00001003364,0.00003132584,0.06402938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984452,0.00001252181,0.00003065377,0.0001504851,0.0001461779,0.00008272164,0.0000701585,0.00001405772,0.001048006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06412098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9670143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2683143566","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.243","title":"Ventriloquism’s methodological scope","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Conversation; Constitution; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Conversation analysis; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Communication; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1059571962156649,"gpt":0.3437313829616248,"spread":0.23777418674596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002357375,0.0001192258,0.0001755382,0.00006744318,0.0001787582,0.00009217073,0.000140882,0.0000397136,0.01841401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001502245,0.0000410566,0.0001282358,0.00002580666,0.0001333405,0.0000835465,0.00007088431,0.00005333296,0.0004641212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000243073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001568007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009384907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002330822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991013,0.0001016204,0.0001694119,0.0002227603,0.0001858523,0.0002190968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994675,0.0001026101,0.0000603857,0.0002432562,0.00004081484,0.00008542211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003850606,0.0001326773,0.0001537354,0.00001258695,0.00007519745,0.00005882083,0.007783832,0.000002585958,0.004163222,0.9372174,0.008739011,0.04162249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002092951,0.0002511695,0.0009190002,0.0003911907,0.000403416,0.000007987695,0.03391359,0.00006488723,0.00644253,0.1297299,0.8247386,0.001044787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07847825,0.003020573,0.02455371,0.03023371,0.002749593,0.0003885467,0.000148478,0.0005455264,0.8598816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9334489,0.00004894895,0.000335249,0.0005490835,0.001769227,0.000006455492,0.00001353169,0.00001550257,0.06381309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8549706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590177693","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.246","title":"Pragmatism as ventriloquism: A reply to comments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Intersubjectivity; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01614115991936287,"gpt":0.2835380214809994,"spread":0.2673968615616365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001769374,0.0002071387,0.0002482652,0.0001476822,0.0003098437,0.0001380428,0.0002605579,0.00002879526,0.01079962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109554,0.00008656469,0.000126846,0.00006551438,0.0001367645,0.0002590914,0.0002228747,0.00006795019,0.002088518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000717665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001736891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004920746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001028149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985815,0.00008123068,0.0002667421,0.0003478545,0.0003714869,0.0003512249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991405,0.00006172011,0.00009622204,0.0005170878,0.00005235913,0.0001321244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001132926,0.0004562042,0.0004318072,0.00004701866,0.0005338516,0.0002147476,0.2961946,0.00000493353,0.004162221,0.2756914,0.2707912,0.1513588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001471503,0.0002766903,0.0008136423,0.0007940238,0.0002244923,0.00001130724,0.1586758,0.000005002842,0.002101642,0.01360716,0.8212335,0.0007852504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2526125,0.001507966,0.003203539,0.2149841,0.002312021,0.001166873,0.0001917539,0.0007735064,0.5232478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8803883,0.00001548106,0.0001127682,0.008662226,0.0005769027,0.00004493237,0.00001585112,0.00003425668,0.1101493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6277758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984916091","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.240","title":"Planetary pragmatism? A response to François Cooren","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02940812680333755,"gpt":0.2694549558474808,"spread":0.2400468290441433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000314694,0.0001436905,0.000146719,0.00007820501,0.00016885,0.0001169905,0.000148809,0.00004312793,0.002023345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005267253,0.0000712719,0.00004686449,0.00003951768,0.00006171808,0.000175161,0.00007254356,0.0001045515,0.001329184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002643782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002959665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001662233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001039072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999047,0.0001667401,0.0001497009,0.0001932228,0.0002288055,0.0002145082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994455,0.00003888984,0.00003564291,0.0002286872,0.00003405514,0.0002172117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001199651,0.0001490818,0.00004968334,0.0000231112,0.00003959422,0.0001011411,0.7131799,0.00005052898,0.004294259,0.04354466,0.2312685,0.006099946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008861839,0.00041143,0.0003887197,0.0001241027,0.00003105448,0.0000133486,0.1629482,0.000038193,0.0007022125,0.005393869,0.8286769,0.0003858396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8942835,0.0008003988,0.0004370656,0.01649937,0.001104374,0.0005579451,0.0001301841,0.000450866,0.08573623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181721,7.516863e-7,0.00009726559,0.0027811,0.0005507793,0.00001344553,0.00008605312,0.00002157078,0.0782769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5974084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}