{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":18,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"df2c4cebb9e5","filters":{"venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes"}},"results":[{"id":"W2019597205","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2010.504378","title":"Acoustic correlates of information structure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":432,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Information structure; Prosody; Object (grammar); Duration (music); Ambiguity; Linguistics; Set (abstract data type); Verb; Contrast (vision); Subject (documents); Semantics (computer science); Psychology; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition; Acoustics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00686801751451751,"gpt":0.3016056445181209,"spread":0.2947376270036035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004505547,0.00005779609,0.00008046116,0.00006083259,0.00003520977,0.00001458954,0.000057702,0.00008984577,0.001085062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002823354,0.00004669237,0.000008302563,0.0001214693,0.0001211119,0.00008842318,0.00002587293,0.0002083456,0.00002996206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":5.748047e-7,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003103402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006968995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001638087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996524,0.0000131623,0.00008885441,0.00007507697,0.00005823758,0.0001122718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995093,0.0001682272,0.00004907406,0.00005667704,0.0001850756,0.00003168414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007595541,0.0002510118,0.1311358,0.001170453,0.000375243,0.00005612375,0.3240035,0.000001127907,0.1564362,0.001822233,0.0006484831,0.3833403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003139221,0.0007498949,0.7675707,0.0001533064,0.0002329753,0.0003598771,0.0716667,0.00007350436,0.1449665,0.0100452,0.0004921786,0.000549948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934441,0.000946645,0.0002514563,0.00001943499,0.0001234694,0.00008877418,0.0001135981,0.00001390397,0.004998636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995958,0.00002085148,0.00003013126,0.00008782012,0.0000344314,0.0000100555,0.00004411886,0.000003895612,0.0001729196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6364349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128376159","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2011.613209","title":"Cognitive control for language switching in bilinguals: A quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":377,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Baycrest Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Public Health Service; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Neuroimaging; Middle temporal gyrus; Psychology; Cognition; Angular gyrus; Cognitive psychology; Aphasia; Functional neuroimaging; Precentral gyrus; Inferior frontal gyrus; Superior temporal gyrus; Supplementary motor area; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Middle frontal gyrus; Prefrontal cortex; Neuropsychology; Neuroscience; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2340197345298939,"gpt":0.3972252547696133,"spread":0.1632055202397194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004526597,0.0002832019,0.001016927,0.0005459592,0.0001254895,0.00002422855,0.0001244598,0.00006042153,0.00009116707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008654797,0.0002127797,0.0003078892,0.0009508257,0.0003046574,0.000260127,0.00006504294,0.0001858081,0.000002324696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005709301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006710622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001212321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004764287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980681,0.0002795165,0.0004479614,0.0007063944,0.0001738054,0.0003242113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933927,0.005715711,0.0003134599,0.0001046015,0.000421216,0.00005232452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003287764,0.001077202,0.004624372,0.00127603,0.04755752,0.002379257,0.5131736,0.00001477925,0.4181579,0.0007591164,0.000007042976,0.007685408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003560634,0.0007988642,0.001681848,0.0001446871,0.1035196,0.0001350966,0.3027322,0.0003442845,0.5851062,0.001248075,0.000002821439,0.0007257707],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753992,0.01981906,0.003218383,0.00005118031,0.00004691994,0.0005964558,0.0004747397,0.00005284727,0.0003412309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974768,0.0001202098,0.0001772331,0.001887349,0.00002947287,0.0001893935,0.00002236835,0.00002216293,0.00007501343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2104415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149104988","doi":"10.1080/01690960500139363","title":"Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":258,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Sentence; American Sign Language; Verb; Age of Acquisition; Language acquisition; Computer science; Grammar; Psychology; Sentence processing; Sign language; Cognition; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009025577327516139,"gpt":0.3170975277994405,"spread":0.3080719504719244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001703194,0.000144689,0.0002376499,0.0002344288,0.00004496793,0.00003435604,0.0001002435,0.0000774248,0.00007653299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003826567,0.0001377291,0.00001719338,0.00062941,0.00006746376,0.0002033201,0.00004221928,0.000207214,0.00001167471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003521041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002580532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005928665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002513347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989773,0.0001527562,0.0002544338,0.0002455734,0.0001342029,0.0002357004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993181,0.0003210749,0.0001102834,0.0001382378,0.00005454966,0.00005775045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003789764,0.000459686,0.07723352,0.001072239,0.00002392996,0.0001634885,0.322461,0.00001238993,0.009589585,0.0001030853,0.00000763864,0.5884944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001733457,0.0004697826,0.8977363,0.001368511,0.00007306309,0.00003079091,0.08961357,0.0002280941,0.008195905,0.000192939,0.00001880063,0.0003388378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944404,0.002577329,0.001179652,0.0002117716,0.00001407862,0.0004565029,0.000008024385,0.0000423055,0.001069893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986767,0.00001159283,0.000712686,0.0002832964,0.00005654806,0.000093831,0.00006775309,0.00001857466,0.0000790038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8205027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.561643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125570487","doi":"10.1080/01690960802180420","title":"A visual M170 effect of morphological complexity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Magnetoencephalography; Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Word (group theory); Psychology; Word recognition; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology); Natural language processing; Neuroscience; Computer science; Communication; Cognition; Biology; Linguistics; Electroencephalography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05650248950830863,"gpt":0.333463890452539,"spread":0.2769614009442304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006070744,0.0000963558,0.0001556189,0.00004276781,0.0001065756,0.000009935015,0.00004162428,0.00004332238,0.000494685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00100925,0.00007068206,0.00002692443,0.0001831102,0.000354667,0.00009994492,0.0000293862,0.000083288,0.00005808649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002416493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001682182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000180187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006855734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993296,0.0001154205,0.00009678336,0.000211603,0.0001259426,0.0001205991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993864,0.0004302016,0.00004647167,0.00003070771,0.00005853534,0.00004764972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001076667,0.0004935621,0.01998332,0.00101269,0.00001735188,0.0009233535,0.0101326,2.504812e-7,0.8743227,0.00004589471,0.0001052191,0.09188647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009609776,0.0008020842,0.01029062,0.00008015536,0.000026442,0.0008243452,0.0009245658,0.00003780691,0.9857773,0.00009735045,0.00002927692,0.0001491493],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953214,0.0002483235,0.0002473818,0.00002245083,0.00001780237,0.0001557494,0.00004589077,0.00005388511,0.003887133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999164,0.0002207064,0.00002169831,0.0003956071,0.00003071312,0.00002039909,0.00001406351,0.000005750194,0.0001270433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1114546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5416453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090413150","doi":"10.1080/01690960802201010","title":"Morphological effects in auditory word recognition: Evidence from Danish","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Suffix; Word (group theory); Word recognition; Lexical decision task; Danish; Computer science; Point (geometry); Comprehension; Uniqueness; Psychology; Word processing; Word lists by frequency; Natural language processing; Lexical access; Speech recognition; Linguistics; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Mathematics; Sentence; Reading (process)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03302386138428928,"gpt":0.3060875362745025,"spread":0.2730636748902133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001033796,0.0001481126,0.0001962389,0.00007043281,0.00008403944,0.00002530509,0.00008089618,0.0000956664,0.0006989022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006990622,0.0001259598,0.00002003768,0.0002279001,0.0001098367,0.0001679722,0.0000371588,0.0001885767,0.0002706911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001167445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004420505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002613552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004550824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989569,0.0001240496,0.0001720362,0.0004053746,0.000118263,0.0002234144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984447,0.001255638,0.00005931444,0.00008073732,0.00009188188,0.0000677438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007776025,0.0005763434,0.3155029,0.0003482673,0.0001562706,0.0138882,0.1751734,1.167308e-7,0.001551906,0.000008609382,0.003506892,0.4885094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001428897,0.000206092,0.9796618,0.001867046,0.00005229406,0.000424966,0.009920116,0.000001454055,0.004892044,0.000635517,0.0004637697,0.000446055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98224,0.01256556,0.0002803314,0.00004930878,0.0002364387,0.0001897823,0.0000211815,0.00006788626,0.004349498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969844,0.0003657781,0.0004029405,0.0006740338,0.0002848558,0.0001921821,0.00005503252,0.00001184119,0.001028921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6641588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7652489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131809738","doi":"10.1080/01690960344000152","title":"Admitting that admitting verb sense into corpus analyses makes sense","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Verb; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Ambiguity; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Exploit; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0252927054938304,"gpt":0.3218864663115489,"spread":0.2965937608177185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000266873,0.0003499982,0.0003374584,0.0002229362,0.0003681586,0.0004888455,0.0003075923,0.0001281434,0.000007478277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001396172,0.0002942652,0.0000669669,0.0008270346,0.0001398069,0.001078415,0.0003810917,0.0003214568,0.00001245058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003551773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002105938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003674902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001392058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980903,0.00007625313,0.0002735133,0.0007250241,0.0003771408,0.0004578104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984829,0.0004111927,0.0002430481,0.0002733845,0.0004267129,0.0001627602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001865707,0.0003944057,0.004592544,0.002781725,0.000362141,0.008198052,0.0960088,0.000009267672,0.06777554,0.004411061,0.00007366304,0.8152062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009930994,0.0002151753,0.0003047924,0.001400611,0.0001334568,0.001075699,0.009723196,0.0001984286,0.963937,0.02112311,0.00006603405,0.0008293604],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6690616,0.05813795,0.269802,0.0004471197,0.00009261321,0.0003089684,0.00001269444,0.001330254,0.0008068042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8980529,0.0001827541,0.1001408,0.001331459,0.0001243253,0.00003111593,0.00001467156,0.00002747649,0.00009445047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8961615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110838412","doi":"10.1080/01690960701799635","title":"Decomposition into multiple morphemes during lexical access: A masked priming study of Russian nouns","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Canadian Linguistic Association","funders":"","keywords":"Morpheme; Lexical decision task; Suffix; Priming (agriculture); Noun; Linguistics; Prime (order theory); Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Word formation; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Philosophy; Cognition; Combinatorics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02449621300724866,"gpt":0.3489667025491505,"spread":0.3244704895419019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005836151,0.0001379741,0.0002039228,0.000111354,0.0001917914,0.00003348804,0.00009731551,0.00004641651,0.0001224643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009508806,0.0001188751,0.00002083835,0.0002015356,0.00006357075,0.0001962891,0.000063901,0.00009830637,0.00001032178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009294082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003155147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004563423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001127739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991009,0.00005644282,0.0002350954,0.0002967185,0.0001326035,0.0001782233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999493,0.0001674749,0.0001037618,0.00008456982,0.00009392905,0.00005725308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005701768,0.001496328,0.442039,0.0004553528,0.0002540776,0.0005811523,0.5393736,5.330601e-7,0.002196193,0.00002289456,0.00001558596,0.0129951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003413858,0.0003889038,0.8484551,0.0003727262,0.00009787312,0.0002533215,0.1175343,0.000008238749,0.02903883,0.00007890813,0.00002482979,0.0003331038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960618,0.001063921,0.0003349851,0.0000206544,0.00004395629,0.0002991958,0.000006954415,0.00005399095,0.002114523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991352,0.00003140683,0.0002108123,0.00006660166,0.00006140138,0.0001153321,0.00002375577,0.00001509579,0.0003404105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4218394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4847585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101014284","doi":"10.1080/01690960701786111","title":"When hearsay trumps evidence: How generic language guides preschoolers’ inferences about unfamiliar things","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Hearsay; Property (philosophy); Semantics (computer science); Creatures; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; History; Natural (archaeology)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03612101532981132,"gpt":0.2975103798068827,"spread":0.2613893644770713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002095296,0.0002825673,0.0003122105,0.0001121036,0.0002974736,0.0001217135,0.0002011379,0.000120141,0.0008785208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009963645,0.000228588,0.00005450889,0.0002600585,0.0002111104,0.0004357657,0.0001000733,0.000297146,0.000139067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001274727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001548298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004919657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007101647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983881,0.0001243673,0.000214079,0.0005926395,0.0002730562,0.0004077984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990008,0.0003711132,0.0001331501,0.0001539171,0.0002054042,0.0001356046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004468264,0.000320985,0.1964461,0.0007444054,0.0004849458,0.001303294,0.6241019,5.35499e-7,0.004496977,0.000278715,0.009215718,0.1621596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001908243,0.0007081752,0.8109687,0.002301591,0.0002476649,0.0005707044,0.1615804,0.00001195036,0.01044876,0.0003021833,0.009604072,0.001347479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9239957,0.06383985,0.0002306052,0.0006769337,0.0001084634,0.000247523,0.00002171241,0.0001771013,0.01070216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854179,0.001578787,0.000440539,0.002088181,0.0002817352,0.00007433259,0.00003283333,0.00002996376,0.0100557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6145226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9619186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006877875","doi":"10.1080/01690960902840279","title":"A computational model of learning semantic roles from child-directed language","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Natural language processing; Verb; Predicate (mathematical logic); Ambiguity; Artificial intelligence; Semantic role labeling; Comprehension; Language acquisition; Semantics (computer science); Meaning (existential); Probabilistic logic; Event (particle physics); Linguistics; Psychology; Sentence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006790039251520495,"gpt":0.2534377029089888,"spread":0.2466476636574683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009381943,0.0001786307,0.0002358911,0.0001290551,0.0001212855,0.0001134387,0.0003066762,0.00007064106,0.000008780851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003791498,0.0001561208,0.000033739,0.0003966418,0.00005629525,0.000456314,0.0001032815,0.0002168192,0.000002570459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006702647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007175696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005411126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002096631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989403,0.00004665311,0.0001980445,0.0003705038,0.0002487798,0.0001956662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992003,0.0001928099,0.000152299,0.0001114688,0.0002852619,0.00005786188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001692116,0.0005597688,0.001499533,0.0006740816,0.0001891256,0.0003204019,0.1163856,0.0009421442,0.03647247,0.006108017,0.00006625032,0.8366134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001777259,0.0004812077,0.001683435,0.002183281,0.0001736349,0.0001354561,0.009087531,0.5350671,0.3377207,0.1105092,0.000007440798,0.001173775],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4037423,0.02811071,0.5660446,0.0002270988,0.00001072252,0.0001502829,0.00003003897,0.0008192523,0.0008649976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88241,0.000048447,0.1169982,0.0003889124,0.00002805545,0.000007344978,0.00005206023,0.000009087219,0.00005786301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8354396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6366423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016240639","doi":"10.1080/01690960500372725","title":"Shallow semantic processing of text: Evidence from eye movements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Eye movement; Noun phrase; Phrase; Computer science; Semantic memory; Anomaly detection; Anomaly (physics); Comprehension; Natural language processing; Reading (process); Fixation (population genetics); Noun; Artificial intelligence; Semantics (computer science); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Linguistics; Medicine; Cognition; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01514639283550196,"gpt":0.3134153342098324,"spread":0.2982689413743304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009191225,0.0001379045,0.0001842423,0.00006599109,0.0000633488,0.00004907487,0.00008844616,0.00005081101,0.0003199605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001248973,0.0001164105,0.00001987189,0.0002016302,0.00006572528,0.0001802241,0.00003398037,0.00007473754,0.00003200924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005803906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004584913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001552159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000144119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990791,0.00003465812,0.0002303451,0.0003106931,0.0001534351,0.0001917618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999368,0.0002047316,0.0001330843,0.00007877486,0.0001816497,0.00003373439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002217343,0.0003901222,0.6485857,0.0009846737,0.0001517433,0.0001586048,0.07029803,4.981586e-7,0.007116104,0.00004492015,0.0001475173,0.2719004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001294437,0.0001486275,0.9240543,0.004696722,0.0001735655,0.00001386745,0.02695644,0.00002852698,0.04065517,0.001177981,0.0002989599,0.0005014513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.96473,0.02536498,0.001105083,0.00003621281,0.00004772107,0.0001423928,0.00002841573,0.00004148922,0.008503719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954131,0.00004721019,0.0002663538,0.0001749681,0.00009558159,0.00004738177,0.00004207737,0.00001465217,0.003898666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2754686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4747083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163138440","doi":"10.1080/01690960802536357","title":"Visual speech primes open-set recognition of spoken words","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders","keywords":"Amodal perception; Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Repetition priming; Speech perception; Psychology; Modality (human–computer interaction); Perception; Word recognition; Set (abstract data type); Speech recognition; Computer science; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Reading (process)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06999331286759683,"gpt":0.387883490804094,"spread":0.3178901779364972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008905546,0.0001174716,0.0001757318,0.00008388523,0.00008617355,0.00002533657,0.00007952571,0.00007988662,0.005604977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001943198,0.0001018839,0.00002349813,0.0001844817,0.0001243646,0.0002221739,0.00003608459,0.00009621845,0.0002276423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004953869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004302273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003285544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001265209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992547,0.00007395351,0.0001886179,0.0002459968,0.0001043746,0.0001323665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994037,0.0001039994,0.0001022569,0.0000643931,0.0002776202,0.00004800253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001277946,0.0009285955,0.02114575,0.0002844171,0.0001747994,0.0001900194,0.1311764,3.711564e-8,0.01419805,0.0001020012,0.002726954,0.8277951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008540858,0.002145292,0.3176983,0.0009883849,0.0003334761,0.001242707,0.3417242,0.00003531393,0.3220749,0.0007825491,0.003085663,0.001348353],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9389474,0.0008157195,0.0003480021,0.00002813671,0.00006478463,0.0002836604,0.00008626086,0.00003740609,0.05938859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935003,0.0002265334,0.0002378813,0.0004070207,0.00009948293,0.0000507653,0.0002193469,0.00001400169,0.005244704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8264467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063264935","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2010.511475","title":"Frequency effects in the production of Dutch deverbal adjectives and inflected verbs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Morpheme; Mental lexicon; Mathematics; Noun; Psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009517758613900109,"gpt":0.2716040841748831,"spread":0.262086325560983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001268387,0.0001061642,0.0001228913,0.00006667687,0.00007838,0.00002184305,0.00008914881,0.00005661849,0.00000773986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005327407,0.00006898562,0.00001123611,0.0003184444,0.0002876534,0.0001923535,0.00003228986,0.0002311002,0.000001274469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001194663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003935647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006486761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004303906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992537,0.0001208677,0.0001084963,0.0002921038,0.00008642554,0.0001384032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989232,0.0008491083,0.00006242955,0.00007469641,0.00007058465,0.00001996292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003952496,0.00007675823,0.007137361,0.00022782,0.000003769884,0.0002123776,0.0246357,1.266964e-8,0.9595819,0.0001102983,0.000002704776,0.007971842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003417821,0.0001508029,0.02164865,0.00009660647,0.00002606422,0.0005905639,0.005008835,7.664213e-7,0.9708524,0.001161737,0.000006405965,0.0001153423],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978259,0.001029855,0.00000692661,0.00009911699,0.00009048656,0.0002956646,0.000007349978,0.00002430469,0.0006204555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991918,0.00007217742,0.00004290605,0.0005455068,0.00007400108,0.00003105377,0.000002541668,0.000006305975,0.00003372984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01962686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6377789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159619557","doi":"10.1080/01690960701578112","title":"An evaluation of the interactive-activation model using masked partial-word priming","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Word (group theory); Priming (agriculture); Linguistics; Word recognition; Word lists by frequency; Computer science; Natural language processing; Psychology; Reading (process); Cognition; Sentence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07719095567641637,"gpt":0.3801780627474153,"spread":0.3029871070709989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002048734,0.00008411058,0.00009638193,0.00004685031,0.0001245777,0.00001431749,0.00005495942,0.00003626751,0.00007158763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000205633,0.00006163161,0.00001597876,0.0001517475,0.0000566219,0.0002322854,0.00001708788,0.00007311783,0.000001612101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001675836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001220465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009967787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006753855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992531,0.0001267838,0.0001440799,0.0001816976,0.0001897029,0.0001046348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993012,0.00008745845,0.0001321765,0.00008654279,0.0003693014,0.00002334958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004844855,0.0005302684,0.03422918,0.0001911412,0.0002142656,0.000008607728,0.6328329,0.0005842423,0.03676134,0.0001025282,0.00002500941,0.2940361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003744137,0.0002061016,0.2181166,0.001475981,0.0006525612,0.0001803734,0.117873,0.06801303,0.587503,0.001418018,0.00005783843,0.000759411],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912215,0.0003152846,0.005895742,0.00001531042,0.00005148389,0.0002197187,0.000005846524,0.00001669567,0.002258451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993244,0.000005792407,0.0003041183,0.000115743,0.00004049913,0.00004393991,0.00001406448,0.000009678579,0.0001417969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5507416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2513264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072518154","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2011.603932","title":"Does phonology play a role when skilled readers read high-frequency words? Evidence from ERPs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Homophone; Phonology; N400; Spelling; Reading (process); Orthography; Psychology; Word (group theory); Linguistics; Phonetics; Portlandite; Word lists by frequency; Cognitive psychology; Event-related potential; Computer science; Cognition; Natural language processing; Neuroscience; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02008247325769855,"gpt":0.2817161674209919,"spread":0.2616336941632934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001318757,0.0002495501,0.0003028021,0.0001123546,0.0001076169,0.00005069133,0.0002058532,0.0001549329,0.00471042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005451652,0.0001632058,0.00003185843,0.0001678547,0.0001608434,0.0002839045,0.00006230905,0.0002103555,0.0002575411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001370194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000776341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007521342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006609539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984781,0.0001246004,0.0002723276,0.0006156553,0.000129644,0.0003796985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998724,0.0006440893,0.000145289,0.000210496,0.0001691548,0.0001069757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005850182,0.0002343469,0.07031299,0.0001009509,0.0004227123,0.0004559937,0.7972286,7.534999e-9,0.0009829993,0.0001993979,0.0003409457,0.129136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00512688,0.0009022813,0.3183491,0.004644412,0.0008552059,0.0002021062,0.5436648,0.000002038242,0.06381271,0.05850672,0.001588685,0.002345043],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9653664,0.01356277,0.0004436844,0.0001686826,0.0003409286,0.0002586701,0.00007531231,0.0001490116,0.01963454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900603,0.0003412143,0.002072681,0.0006605272,0.0001671518,0.0002320369,0.00007041382,0.00002848698,0.006367188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2535638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105439214","doi":"10.1080/01690960344000215","title":"Exploring the dynamics of the visual word recognition system: Homophone effects in LDT and’naming","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Homophone; Psychology; Lexical decision task; Phonology; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Word (group theory); Linguistics; Computer science; Cognition; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01967325453127068,"gpt":0.277035051061385,"spread":0.2573617965301144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001596793,0.0001023374,0.0001329804,0.00006116063,0.00009324732,0.00002940972,0.00005771162,0.00003078005,0.000003962364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001586659,0.0000620942,0.00001571145,0.000304873,0.00007117386,0.0001088319,0.00004058799,0.0001256792,0.000004726943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002145741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002577858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002498175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002223536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993753,0.00007540735,0.0001380049,0.0001778659,0.00008698004,0.0001464337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994491,0.0003289591,0.00007504882,0.00005981942,0.00006564624,0.00002145047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001558364,0.0001497997,0.01416195,0.001927865,0.0000959063,0.00009672761,0.1816688,0.000001155249,0.0003220588,0.0004876803,0.000002144442,0.8009301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004069857,0.000285468,0.4927115,0.01135254,0.0002297498,0.0003461216,0.4596784,0.00004944774,0.02966824,0.001029004,0.00001983448,0.000559934],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952937,0.002442513,0.0003563834,0.00006988909,0.000161125,0.0002623305,0.000008799158,0.00002267636,0.001382579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994515,0.00007192902,0.00004406738,0.00008349037,0.00004154634,0.0001784796,0.00001128775,0.00001092922,0.0001067525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8003702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2532128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142173462","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2010.491251","title":"Lexical competition in a non-Roman, syllabic script: An inhibitory neighbour priming effect in Japanese Katakana","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Syllabic verse; Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Linguistics; Word recognition; Word (group theory); Lexico; Psychology; Computer science; Lexicon; Natural language processing; Speech recognition; Reading (process); Cognition; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01822833676193477,"gpt":0.2936507696337539,"spread":0.2754224328718191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002783243,0.0001777732,0.0002363379,0.0002196026,0.00004793381,0.00003642876,0.00008215409,0.00009843695,0.0002509332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001187677,0.0001565076,0.00001752302,0.0002846547,0.0000699242,0.0002488309,0.00003147615,0.0002082327,0.00004687256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001920339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003915952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001203308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007881051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998836,0.0001566926,0.0002298346,0.0003860472,0.000102592,0.0002888014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995576,0.0001520652,0.00006045556,0.0000929621,0.00005857596,0.00007833927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001026498,0.0009788468,0.3154293,0.0009992529,0.00006186171,0.001575359,0.5887176,1.106607e-7,0.002145977,0.0004072415,0.00004309654,0.0886149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002654395,0.0006558559,0.9200504,0.001392766,0.00004103544,0.00009651344,0.0683917,0.00001402114,0.005891156,0.0003120996,0.0000431281,0.0004568963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757352,0.001619248,0.0000347015,0.00001244793,0.00009995135,0.0002820933,0.000007641866,0.00004068953,0.02216799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989341,0.00001429487,0.00007927146,0.0003227434,0.00007942536,0.0001485372,0.00005230539,0.00001895916,0.0003503487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6046212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6382197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065376310","doi":"10.1080/01690961003679574","title":"Basic processes in reading: On the relation between spatial attention and familiarity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Reading aloud; Stimulus (psychology); Reading (process); Spatial relation; Spatial ability; Read aloud; Cognition; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01675870837276927,"gpt":0.2974526147721356,"spread":0.2806939063993663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002452589,0.0001158671,0.0001157693,0.00007938814,0.0001130124,0.00006095461,0.00005134848,0.00008423241,0.00007765987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006706123,0.00008065684,0.00000884667,0.0002282146,0.00007589255,0.0001102543,0.00002129959,0.000277937,0.00002183655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004348387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003450562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003520221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005143332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992733,0.00005637568,0.0001469872,0.0002729587,0.00009855943,0.0001517964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990987,0.0006212262,0.00006817188,0.0000707262,0.0001051959,0.00003603986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001026075,0.00009519594,0.8079734,0.0002322585,0.00003801428,0.00002145556,0.04106537,1.856961e-8,0.0005457611,0.0005256993,0.00004635995,0.1493539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004479155,0.00007737373,0.9894733,0.0002709728,0.00003225657,0.00001248237,0.006858299,0.000003116266,0.001654205,0.0007247098,0.0003012484,0.0001441152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989509,0.0004678043,0.00014973,0.0002790352,0.00007284384,0.0002275165,0.00001966741,0.00003195762,0.009242386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988271,0.00004218131,0.00002390775,0.0002197221,0.0001234779,0.00007912763,0.00005155032,0.00001030493,0.0006226202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1814999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.328909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243368419","doi":"10.1080/016909600834756","title":"Multiple meanings are not necessarily a disadvantage in semantic processing: Evidence from homophone effects in semantic categorisation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Homophone; Ambiguity; Semantic memory; Task (project management); Categorization; Embodied cognition; Semantics (computer science); Computer science; Psychology; Meaning (existential); Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Semantic analysis (machine learning); Disadvantage; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01773009175421713,"gpt":0.2915546760431097,"spread":0.2738245842888926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000150391,0.0002004134,0.0002655234,0.0001903248,0.00008921802,0.00009276177,0.00008232858,0.0001212865,0.00009164449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007910806,0.0001936472,0.0000190042,0.0007242285,0.00006253686,0.0006043423,0.00002797314,0.0001833176,0.00003791425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003907933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005141355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005883319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009438155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986444,0.0001275474,0.0003226705,0.0004725468,0.0001873062,0.0002455515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987929,0.00067403,0.0002319903,0.00009497115,0.0001681923,0.00003793979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000224112,0.0003389816,0.949989,0.0007448826,0.00001461877,0.0001839142,0.02793623,0.00001876945,0.005028373,0.00002445836,0.00003344209,0.01546318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001917664,0.00005398087,0.965864,0.001288568,0.00004982679,0.000009801976,0.02105671,0.001241678,0.007788004,0.0004235527,0.00001707176,0.0002891061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.973724,0.005248954,0.01991232,0.0001923166,0.00009201038,0.0004408534,0.00001510864,0.00007972452,0.0002946876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986611,0.00005052134,0.0001147068,0.0003645743,0.0001190137,0.000159538,0.0001486822,0.00002682573,0.0003550544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02493706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8893858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}