{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":107,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":107,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"5c5e4f7d9ded","filters":{"venue":"Law & Society Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W1581383108","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00441.x","title":"Seeing Like a City: The Dialectic of Modern and Premodern Ways of Seeing in Urban Governance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":269,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Zoning; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Subjectivity; Sociology; Space (punctuation); State (computer science); Law; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; History; Economics; Management; Archaeology; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Mariana Valverde","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07295310878313868,"gpt":0.2689468245477734,"spread":0.1959937157646347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009125297,0.0001969755,0.0005167671,0.002672172,0.003035526,0.008867461,0.0008368411,0.00251801,0.001033909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005587874,0.0002714482,0.0001962856,0.003401174,0.03553626,0.009049293,0.003633907,0.004044238,0.00014422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008870483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00858769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01205074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0205053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897451,0.007784814,0.0002021985,0.0003910991,0.001410195,0.000466585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995004,0.003528236,0.0004583198,0.0002053738,0.0005156941,0.000288326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006792553,0.00001421041,0.0004558022,0.000257785,0.000006315724,0.00005447635,0.01190144,0.0001249015,0.00005626176,0.9621377,0.004031665,0.02095268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000152394,0.00005890484,0.004677446,0.002134632,0.00001947764,0.0001937587,0.02091094,0.0002009418,0.0001333522,0.4165969,0.5550332,0.00002507453],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03585778,0.6156598,0.007899214,0.1490354,0.001039457,0.000044193,0.00003501572,0.00002198131,0.1904071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7094653,0.2689742,0.001683424,0.01247335,0.0007747935,0.00009551659,0.0000346439,0.00002477208,0.006474066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01205074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06436014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111125170","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00266.x","title":"Countering Punitiveness: Understanding Stability in Canada's Imprisonment Rate","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Punitive damages; Divergence (linguistics); Criminology; Political science; Balance (ability); Sociology; Law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Anthony N. Doob","is_ca":true},{"name":"Cheryl Marie Webster","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05334901755953451,"gpt":0.2960665443394107,"spread":0.2427175267798762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001813644,0.0001676537,0.0003342579,0.004348208,0.003959738,0.004383515,0.001607548,0.0006431398,0.001456967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01674841,0.0001327334,0.0002987205,0.006736255,0.003142385,0.001324549,0.001287886,0.0007783337,0.00007918281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04855428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04992046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985489,0.0001799219,0.00007176394,0.0001542104,0.0005114781,0.0005336735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913414,0.001353882,0.002234545,0.000180157,0.004114008,0.0007761254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007371866,0.00003018874,0.8904602,0.0001557601,0.0001183145,0.0003113811,0.02240129,0.003153554,0.0002836488,0.02770861,0.005112319,0.050191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003919537,0.00001805732,0.9765104,0.0001121346,0.00004565411,0.00004088827,0.01370522,0.00205461,0.0001067103,0.001763246,0.005613226,0.00002588186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9529601,0.003106121,0.000758226,0.008937669,0.00004252814,0.00003318497,0.001048784,0.00002305611,0.03309026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983132,0.0008551182,0.0001460464,0.0001230076,0.000007540503,0.00000390077,0.0001300634,0.000003845117,0.0004174073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04855428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3522875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123550072","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00290.x","title":"Lawyer Satisfaction in the Process of Structuring Legal Careers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social stratification; Structuring; Odds; Job satisfaction; Survey data collection; Sociology; Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Social class; Ranking (information retrieval); Psychology; Social psychology; Process (computing); Public relations; Political science; Law; Social science; Computer science; Logistic regression; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Ronit Dinovitzer","is_ca":true},{"name":"Bryant G. Garth","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07002435928812972,"gpt":0.3456658178578247,"spread":0.275641458569695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002009486,0.00005628772,0.0002195473,0.0006718087,0.0008180583,0.001452702,0.0002117406,0.0003471052,0.0042201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009643206,0.00007564182,0.0001396023,0.000737449,0.000531612,0.0005129021,0.0007182666,0.0004992594,0.0003270644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008179312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009908907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005121015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981487,0.0010016,0.00006419712,0.00009097125,0.0003664746,0.0003280221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932752,0.00229228,0.00210801,0.0001294098,0.0007955553,0.001399554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004908728,0.000612253,0.8097615,0.000132206,0.00004162963,0.0003926061,0.01653944,0.0002675605,0.0009791746,0.008415305,0.00251195,0.1598555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001478582,0.0002586578,0.978724,0.00004792133,0.000009215956,0.0001952199,0.0108429,0.000416423,0.0001835923,0.001852438,0.007446392,0.000008479795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855354,0.0009283489,0.0004104803,0.00130066,0.00001828559,0.00001089702,0.00003526429,0.000004873951,0.01175573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988003,0.0002046676,0.00009783221,0.00005952686,0.00001758507,0.000003373272,0.00002551441,0.000001504569,0.0007896075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01411766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122009549","doi":"10.1111/1540-5893.3703006","title":"Judicial Decisionmaking and the Use of Panels in the Canadian Supreme Court and the South African Appellate Division","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Assertion; Ideology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Lori Hausegger","is_ca":false},{"name":"Stacia L. Haynie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08489844829569734,"gpt":0.3009401245616682,"spread":0.2160416762659709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01425812,0.0002612434,0.0003612773,0.002478892,0.01950374,0.006741499,0.001258907,0.001590116,0.003926723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04295353,0.000375456,0.0002550122,0.003284506,0.008456227,0.001510462,0.002472497,0.002095671,0.0003111363],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03136226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03947964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8066214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9821133,0.007071231,0.0004102906,0.001349611,0.004399463,0.004656101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747949,0.01092455,0.004277792,0.001074533,0.005072325,0.003855857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007589536,0.0004150806,0.3587587,0.0002784148,0.0002893283,0.001672406,0.2051324,0.00716909,0.006312017,0.2266638,0.02237978,0.1701701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002202226,0.00019802,0.7554179,0.0005136552,0.0002281569,0.0003099565,0.09727357,0.007214282,0.003211842,0.03514092,0.09998159,0.0002899109],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8909386,0.001059765,0.0008928109,0.005039274,0.00004719957,0.0001170156,0.0001042196,0.00001330553,0.1017877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963526,0.0002766503,0.0003287356,0.0002680573,0.00001049703,0.00001603203,0.00002680051,0.000003727052,0.002717086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3890348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559594946","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12182","title":"The Boundaries of Property: Complexity, Relationality, and Spatiality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Simplicity; Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Universality (dynamical systems); Sociology; Boundary (topology); Perspective (graphical); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Blomley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03305244597083248,"gpt":0.2564117046582499,"spread":0.2233592586874174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004751672,0.0002259192,0.0004931794,0.002690126,0.003184612,0.007095491,0.001011738,0.002184822,0.00235615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123858,0.0002388048,0.0002939386,0.002987826,0.054284,0.01200228,0.003713353,0.002343409,0.0001788098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006594149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00433076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03021708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03283103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947015,0.003303813,0.0001676102,0.0003739191,0.001052674,0.0004004462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928422,0.004502947,0.0008848319,0.0005220558,0.0008702105,0.0003778557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001362396,0.00001033991,0.003282689,0.0003147016,0.00001724512,0.000128523,0.02080875,0.0003084385,0.000180806,0.9494793,0.002048636,0.02340692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001733975,0.00004918097,0.02105277,0.001832231,0.00004239325,0.000418586,0.04983185,0.0005463823,0.0002888273,0.7484357,0.1774395,0.00004517505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2176341,0.2270981,0.03123736,0.1376172,0.0005274265,0.00007033984,0.0001297164,0.00004748438,0.3856383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759299,0.01938724,0.001292494,0.001456809,0.0001098478,0.00002386872,0.00002392862,0.00001069744,0.001765327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03021708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06008238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1697345030","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00436.x","title":"Toward a Theory of Compliance in State-Regulated Livelihoods: A Comparative Study of Compliance Motivations in Developed and Developing World Fisheries","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Livelihood; State (computer science); Enforcement; Politics; Typology; Political science; Empowerment; Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Geography; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Stig S. Gezelius","is_ca":false},{"name":"Maria Hauck","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2732317615536172,"gpt":0.3790988497831722,"spread":0.105867088229555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008998375,0.0001569327,0.0002849265,0.002897067,0.004267495,0.004505297,0.0007478868,0.001581395,0.001321777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01077883,0.0001745948,0.0002742227,0.003141504,0.01895502,0.005730032,0.002428953,0.001501661,0.00005539862],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006254754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008448762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01539901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0219959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928955,0.005527652,0.0001401778,0.000240033,0.0007928824,0.0004037342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911906,0.006474194,0.001462756,0.0002028228,0.0004878926,0.000181728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002552114,0.0001390186,0.03363352,0.0002057009,0.0000228345,0.0002752718,0.2286471,0.0004201845,0.0002884846,0.7145987,0.0006089344,0.02113472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004375603,0.000197121,0.115454,0.00121603,0.00005915434,0.0003729659,0.6129377,0.002022685,0.0004906965,0.2006754,0.06648084,0.00004959462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7988995,0.006415995,0.01155054,0.01640882,0.00006298748,0.0001104788,0.00002554914,0.00001217749,0.1665141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974213,0.001131543,0.0006396648,0.0002519033,0.000006757502,0.00003214338,0.000006814205,0.000002255616,0.0005076595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01539901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04758853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989260612","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00291.x","title":"Even Lawyers Get the Blues: Gender, Depression, and Job Satisfaction in Legal Practice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Job satisfaction; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Power (physics); Clinical psychology","authors":[{"name":"John Hagan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Fiona M. Kay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0810875045482875,"gpt":0.359235974850351,"spread":0.2781484703020635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001079504,0.00005777009,0.0002421659,0.0006048071,0.0003866072,0.000561631,0.0001505057,0.0003405811,0.001012433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003054149,0.00006386256,0.0001680226,0.0008571621,0.0005556901,0.0002681298,0.0003020703,0.0002449931,0.0000665031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006668663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008237545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01084532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0293426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995009,0.0002599375,0.00003297488,0.00002952896,0.0001239065,0.00005270013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988866,0.0004342662,0.0003268386,0.00001532556,0.0001562459,0.0001806767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001854614,0.0001601496,0.7544429,0.001034203,0.0001577701,0.0005512554,0.003307655,0.0001297154,0.0004348634,0.001803904,0.004154397,0.2336376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001029155,0.0001695331,0.9881145,0.000335466,0.00005989091,0.0005206716,0.003705658,0.00007283162,0.00005438966,0.0005532065,0.006397418,0.000006145574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7194397,0.2632706,0.0001477369,0.01008228,0.0001464363,0.00001476844,0.00009338438,0.000002304608,0.006802829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521295,0.04678486,0.00004949234,0.0004650092,0.0001143246,0.000006229071,0.00003079225,6.661796e-7,0.0004191186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01084532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02156442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018682701","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00313.x","title":"Rights and Quarantine During the SARS Global Health Crisis: Differentiated Legal Consciousness in Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Toronto","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Situated; Consciousness; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Medicine; Psychology; Nursing","authors":[{"name":"Lesley A. Jacobs","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02217295307116931,"gpt":0.3987052729684147,"spread":0.3765323198972454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001880093,0.0003336298,0.0002836234,0.0009365214,0.01225847,0.005143024,0.0007610716,0.0008362353,0.001401669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002352539,0.0003217842,0.0002505639,0.001781928,0.01776679,0.001831644,0.004710268,0.002220812,0.0000723949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05138094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03262986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.868212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9187104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984017,0.0005605101,0.00007907955,0.00009554301,0.0001607458,0.0007024388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969732,0.0006341761,0.0005763451,0.0001187191,0.0003907489,0.001306916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004829804,0.00003256413,0.05447385,0.00007341002,0.00001396906,0.001353958,0.9256432,0.0001628135,0.0004676171,0.01100153,0.001697327,0.005031516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003373807,0.00003169735,0.05341674,0.00006893664,0.000009611731,0.0001012559,0.9369012,0.000117725,0.0001393632,0.0003789939,0.008805183,0.00002605355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900566,0.0005151901,0.0001008829,0.00337553,0.00002986361,0.00001233915,0.00002677815,0.000003321561,0.005879452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981294,0.0003144042,0.00004915812,0.0002903056,0.000006549647,0.000004313088,0.00001818816,0.000002357531,0.001185369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.131788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3727966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167159390","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00268.x","title":"Social Capital and Constraints on Legal Careers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Individual capital; Prestige; Social mobility; Social reproduction; Social status; Sociology; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Capital (architecture); Economic capital; Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics; Social science; Psychology; Economic growth; Human capital","authors":[{"name":"Ronit Dinovitzer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0365608258257188,"gpt":0.3748328916741761,"spread":0.3382720658484573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001670318,0.0001036581,0.0002220727,0.001098253,0.00198518,0.002090781,0.0003831195,0.0004961197,0.008201276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01109498,0.0001020559,0.0001422782,0.001124356,0.002156219,0.0009706588,0.002001975,0.0005725725,0.0004288112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001626042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002297869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005285341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01719332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976904,0.0009309048,0.00007612942,0.0001303494,0.000548432,0.0006238158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859372,0.004579444,0.003758655,0.0003218299,0.0009364521,0.004466372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002222989,0.0007342956,0.6301797,0.0002799886,0.0001230151,0.001738076,0.01372798,0.001746443,0.001170917,0.133833,0.004806386,0.2114381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003569317,0.0002263572,0.9018993,0.0003999629,0.00003419516,0.0009897676,0.02005595,0.001046037,0.0002231528,0.03782257,0.03723248,0.00003448124],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9293647,0.002176061,0.0006098628,0.004065052,0.00002536093,0.000015724,0.00007473923,0.000006079174,0.06366248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978088,0.00055807,0.00008108785,0.00006028167,0.00002365266,0.000004208272,0.00001661261,0.000001134074,0.001446266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008201276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02743596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587986845","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12249","title":"The Elastic Ceiling: Gender and Professional Career in Chinese Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Glass ceiling; Attrition; Politics; Promotion (chess); Political science; Bureaucracy; Inequality; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Demographic economics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Zheng Chunyan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jiahui Ai","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sida Liu","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07100507457543902,"gpt":0.4041086614765247,"spread":0.3331035869010857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001763137,0.0001085887,0.0001978232,0.001361853,0.001921064,0.001169242,0.0003165727,0.0002703121,0.002887008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003142651,0.00007825784,0.0001563755,0.002058774,0.00257626,0.0009677371,0.001382123,0.0005417431,0.00009670509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003173144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003651584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05243531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0917184,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989445,0.0002500667,0.00006277424,0.0001298255,0.0003261778,0.0002867398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989038,0.0003365142,0.0003100933,0.00004303086,0.0001590023,0.0002476855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001807714,0.00007524213,0.6105755,0.0006204517,0.00008067931,0.001112344,0.05685157,0.0003842466,0.0008244663,0.1491876,0.007572069,0.1725351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001513956,0.00008580262,0.9326623,0.0004442478,0.00005219381,0.0003173079,0.02150236,0.0005695138,0.0002641042,0.012534,0.03153027,0.00002269228],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9384435,0.01203882,0.0004293996,0.006487637,0.000113211,0.00001928932,0.0001573745,0.000004907188,0.04230572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961695,0.002369286,0.00004500247,0.0002761619,0.00003588248,0.00000557143,0.00003562715,0.000001135748,0.001061871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05243531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1042602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159819816","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00299.x","title":"Does <i>the</i> Lawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Test (biology); Political science","authors":[{"name":"John Szmer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Susan W. Johnson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tammy A. Sarver","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02161224787635746,"gpt":0.2842204796590145,"spread":0.262608231782657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00238426,0.0001188411,0.0002998527,0.001347468,0.0049547,0.0038073,0.001041177,0.0007602263,0.005829671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02190181,0.0001233416,0.0002184719,0.001469652,0.002690185,0.0008213131,0.001517158,0.001260751,0.0002932889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02964988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03978512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9663149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970235,0.0004067744,0.00006681529,0.0002675746,0.00113763,0.001097634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828206,0.003582682,0.003120906,0.0002940768,0.005268835,0.004912811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001662404,0.0002005456,0.9304794,0.00004580921,0.0001015082,0.0007544563,0.01130859,0.001909076,0.0006535638,0.008222391,0.01135724,0.0348011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001549822,0.00003835166,0.9766058,0.00007110848,0.00003146299,0.00007341819,0.01131817,0.0009214674,0.0003343007,0.001054259,0.009505421,0.00003085665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750744,0.0004505525,0.00008063138,0.00400761,0.00001927392,0.00002199333,0.0002414229,0.000005461067,0.02009864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986134,0.0001413184,0.00002583518,0.0001167045,0.000007561186,0.000002190454,0.0000599035,0.000002382382,0.001030721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03368515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2151259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137757784","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00395.x","title":"Failure to Update: An Institutional Perspective on Noncompliance With the Family and Medical Leave Act","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Family Leave; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science; Engineering; Work (physics)","authors":[{"name":"Erin L. Kelly","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.040148573559244,"gpt":0.4172543459269554,"spread":0.3771057723677114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01933534,0.00008675209,0.0002095677,0.00180195,0.002569027,0.004060375,0.0009298039,0.001611218,0.0009424179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03741214,0.0001905243,0.0001755563,0.001962785,0.009461855,0.004017286,0.002197119,0.002656981,0.0001077093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004875711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01079183,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02377037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03003335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9792528,0.01551889,0.0008495647,0.0005165126,0.00250281,0.001359398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9455031,0.0330645,0.01359011,0.001351757,0.005036593,0.001453968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007530144,0.0003624365,0.2398486,0.0005147569,0.00007433889,0.001760792,0.2405893,0.0007573306,0.0008129338,0.3633286,0.01342169,0.1384539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004729328,0.0003577317,0.290078,0.00241712,0.0001055496,0.001153567,0.4620197,0.001318504,0.00101597,0.0602594,0.1811325,0.00009448617],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7943772,0.03009128,0.003252242,0.08644982,0.0002081068,0.00004354758,0.00005476209,0.00001881123,0.08550421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921607,0.004852712,0.0001836556,0.001991617,0.0000585325,0.000009806412,0.00001027084,0.000004027673,0.0007285287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02377037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1022563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121312343","doi":"10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00057.x","title":"Judicial Power in Russia: Through the Prism of Administrative Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Impartiality; Principle of legality; State (computer science); Discretion; Power (physics); Exclusive jurisdiction; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Peter H. Solomon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07481347722011512,"gpt":0.3828701922453495,"spread":0.3080567150252344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006263331,0.0001221529,0.0002764129,0.002336234,0.003714283,0.005578854,0.0005668619,0.001040248,0.001218932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01457751,0.0002097539,0.0002001779,0.001458175,0.009529603,0.00223775,0.002813476,0.001478722,0.0001836231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003638822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008531176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01059858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01507921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908778,0.0054453,0.0003413239,0.000553947,0.001778946,0.001002617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912594,0.005272374,0.001398851,0.0003934946,0.001174217,0.0005016623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000359857,0.00002319258,0.01362346,0.0002242349,0.00002952719,0.0003097737,0.02432709,0.0007490807,0.0007491103,0.9044545,0.003226225,0.05224769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006073321,0.0002372302,0.1220603,0.001101582,0.000110455,0.0007870041,0.01611434,0.001458262,0.001609549,0.3497259,0.5066646,0.00006997086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3447082,0.05149578,0.01289454,0.03517251,0.0004870051,0.00006892423,0.00006629845,0.00006556593,0.5550411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926751,0.003388555,0.0004405315,0.0005211376,0.0001754932,0.00001291076,0.000007817984,0.00000404991,0.002774444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01059858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03312403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486934769","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12214","title":"Undermining Gender Equality: Female Attrition from Private Law Practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Attrition; Private practice; General partnership; Private law; Law; Legal practice; Legal profession; Private sector; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Demographic economics; Psychology; Public law; Economics; Social psychology; Medicine; Family medicine","authors":[{"name":"Fiona M. Kay","is_ca":false},{"name":"Stacey L. Alarie","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jones Adjei","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2152941133607135,"gpt":0.4604914777344897,"spread":0.2451973643737763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006854216,0.00008895903,0.00026339,0.0006961553,0.001121386,0.001081549,0.0005897412,0.0005796587,0.004563899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01998869,0.000113478,0.0002679576,0.0008177219,0.001200184,0.001440682,0.001684271,0.000785512,0.0003229161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001323917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004062767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0120577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02772306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953775,0.002366566,0.0001606346,0.0003503782,0.00107146,0.0006733284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907972,0.004503466,0.002216604,0.0002816138,0.001052756,0.001148376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001316041,0.0001249063,0.3830162,0.0008796557,0.00007036181,0.0005308376,0.02761926,0.00015922,0.0003894385,0.0220751,0.01716129,0.5478421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003353589,0.0003128822,0.8232393,0.002768929,0.00007534192,0.00139345,0.03699772,0.000353897,0.0005269034,0.005852883,0.1284209,0.0000243149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8366455,0.0470318,0.00190023,0.06644344,0.0004810509,0.00007764309,0.000284686,0.00001445582,0.04712125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777498,0.01440278,0.0002582169,0.004056702,0.0002464202,0.00003464293,0.00006953452,0.000008252079,0.003173711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0120577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03624904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077505633","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00277.x","title":"The People's Law versus Judge Judy Justice: Two Models of Law in American Reality-Based Courtroom TV","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Legal culture; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Steven Kohm","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0416094702890638,"gpt":0.3570747563829654,"spread":0.3154652860939016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003563443,0.0004545015,0.0003916557,0.002861426,0.005690886,0.01464372,0.001962414,0.003484573,0.005245438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008309108,0.0004970249,0.0004970903,0.002766954,0.03882989,0.01027882,0.003487207,0.004397054,0.0003863675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01059315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002792771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0260558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02616764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936359,0.004214227,0.00009193221,0.0004169027,0.001058799,0.0005821927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926535,0.005052692,0.0006030553,0.0004055659,0.0005631809,0.000722107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002600141,0.00006889593,0.001497108,0.0000324977,0.000007441478,0.0001009443,0.07939021,0.0002088014,0.0001272714,0.9126508,0.001228503,0.004661524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008526561,0.000138094,0.0154694,0.0004541849,0.00005318852,0.0003019191,0.3426581,0.005790344,0.0004357983,0.5580088,0.07651316,0.00009168311],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3743388,0.003697154,0.01441137,0.03751089,0.0003546217,0.0000712016,0.00009617161,0.00004705824,0.5694727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945397,0.0006356654,0.0006214971,0.0008480924,0.00007565285,0.00003862661,0.00001785345,0.00001456281,0.00320831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0260558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07685912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999196306","doi":"10.2307/1512168","title":"Lobster Poaching and the Ironies of Law Enforcement","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poaching; Law enforcement; Law; Criminology; Deterrence (psychology); Political science; Business; Sociology; Demography","authors":[{"name":"John L. McMullan","is_ca":false},{"name":"D. Perrier","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04480938956617034,"gpt":0.2561649069844477,"spread":0.2113555174182774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00243459,0.0001170891,0.0002173176,0.002240082,0.007669909,0.005094092,0.0007453177,0.001558585,0.002787109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006949703,0.0001634734,0.0001134051,0.001472181,0.0145307,0.001393124,0.001385503,0.001174281,0.0001407114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01510951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02973134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7105153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8658912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967122,0.000591997,0.00006459538,0.0002146987,0.001572674,0.0008437735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960227,0.001204033,0.0008211868,0.0001215912,0.001476031,0.0003545091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007240916,0.0001326419,0.1043115,0.0007027678,0.0000846347,0.002398649,0.04759133,0.002037065,0.00114753,0.6195458,0.02460871,0.1973669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003730948,0.0001087873,0.2899651,0.00162655,0.0001210916,0.0007560108,0.06302901,0.001276965,0.001023418,0.06603414,0.5759472,0.0000744734],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5077714,0.03200591,0.002205261,0.04151891,0.0001808808,0.0000579517,0.00006444482,0.00003062134,0.4161647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787135,0.006790229,0.0002278,0.001330459,0.00003552041,0.000008388683,0.0000198067,0.000005324844,0.0128691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7105153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.582379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003560571","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12458","title":"Realizing the Right to Be Cold? Framing Processes and Outcomes Associated with the Inuit Petition on Human Rights and Global Warming","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); Human rights; Political science; Law; Commission; Indigenous; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Sébastien Jodoin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Shannon Snow","is_ca":false},{"name":"Arielle Corobow","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1050335652373381,"gpt":0.3502923361792305,"spread":0.2452587709418924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02192519,0.0002973736,0.0004660686,0.001659374,0.009163252,0.007632412,0.001286838,0.002672125,0.002066477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03415954,0.0002368865,0.0003128872,0.00233908,0.01452463,0.004442095,0.004735002,0.00410716,0.000120739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01163712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01533094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1247578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2268193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9807354,0.01455437,0.0003218686,0.0006353631,0.002156075,0.001596972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745529,0.01831364,0.003463867,0.000509853,0.002418153,0.0007415346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008962048,0.0001390873,0.01458848,0.0009293863,0.00006764354,0.001092167,0.8240212,0.0002316463,0.0005574436,0.09494302,0.004386685,0.05895358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001962213,0.0001313799,0.04116316,0.002324456,0.00008895544,0.0002127606,0.8590425,0.0002394728,0.0006509632,0.01691362,0.07915263,0.00006054837],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7835816,0.03359267,0.002411172,0.06165598,0.0008694591,0.0002545905,0.00008239751,0.00001064403,0.1175415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989061,0.00638176,0.0003594328,0.001969382,0.00009650138,0.0000815169,0.00002218768,0.00000774905,0.002020485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2480634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377138232","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12649","title":"Relational legal consciousness in the one-child nation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Legal consciousness; Consciousness; Population; Social psychology; China; Sociology; Relational theory; Law; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Qian Liu","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08590189137597894,"gpt":0.3288924232028986,"spread":0.2429905318269197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004684078,0.0001490853,0.0003398226,0.001140078,0.008217948,0.004468895,0.0009444692,0.001114622,0.003756684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005004122,0.0001787954,0.0001344304,0.001101017,0.02080508,0.004509951,0.005766539,0.002170177,0.00009934163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00837726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01069782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04054558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04658105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964123,0.002352542,0.00007018609,0.000251488,0.0004261277,0.0004873224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975765,0.001190277,0.0004041795,0.0001443712,0.0002147699,0.0004698835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007361123,0.00004561961,0.004516954,0.00007902225,0.000005061291,0.00090534,0.840353,0.00004601027,0.0004113634,0.1440664,0.0007865831,0.008777371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005780758,0.00004780788,0.01266995,0.0002891445,0.000007715851,0.0004709653,0.9022111,0.0001441571,0.0002511906,0.01190426,0.07197748,0.00002043756],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9087758,0.003269616,0.0011086,0.01195232,0.00007602379,0.00006140428,0.00002484949,0.00001169057,0.07471976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980569,0.0004198637,0.00008571143,0.0002781376,0.000004726301,0.00001062493,0.000003611705,0.000002001786,0.001138212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04054558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08061916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213095761","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12587","title":"Taxes, taxpayers, and settler colonialism: Toward a critical fiscal sociology of tax as white property","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Indigenous; Politics; Sovereignty; Colonialism; Political economy; Property tax; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Political science; Tax reform","authors":[{"name":"Kyle Willmott","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0287732212505229,"gpt":0.3409852615702061,"spread":0.3122120403196832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005387281,0.0002223958,0.0004147933,0.003121897,0.003632682,0.005356301,0.0006378341,0.002351846,0.001627135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004255191,0.0001638827,0.0001588746,0.001984495,0.01822344,0.003766235,0.001847988,0.00347152,0.000105305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009223016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01476602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05820484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09681889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973969,0.00200541,0.00004265823,0.00008062035,0.0002602623,0.0002140551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961256,0.002589237,0.0003630687,0.00007020913,0.0005488595,0.0003031107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001466182,0.00004880859,0.001086815,0.0006827509,0.00001472693,0.0001846113,0.03292257,0.0002048052,0.0001156625,0.9266522,0.01655667,0.02151576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003018606,0.00006886324,0.006074309,0.005031444,0.00003728309,0.0002139456,0.0754799,0.0003322356,0.0001549841,0.1546043,0.757946,0.00002652166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04630522,0.6654806,0.001164817,0.1761267,0.0017352,0.0000399538,0.00002709764,0.00001176788,0.1091086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6427688,0.3357686,0.0004855235,0.01116706,0.001431871,0.0000390595,0.0000186834,0.00001343474,0.008306982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05820484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1157321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584017231","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00492.x","title":"Specters of Indigeneity in British-Indian Migration, 1914","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Asian American and Pacific Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Colonialism; Dominion; Sociology; Law; Conversation; Appeal; Media studies; History; Gender studies; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Renisa Mawani","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01452216124763861,"gpt":0.2879125983265735,"spread":0.2733904370789348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001023442,0.0002533824,0.0002242508,0.001422322,0.02766868,0.007122545,0.000773637,0.001359798,0.003509922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002686811,0.0002918502,0.0001036567,0.002528811,0.02088861,0.001441917,0.005248627,0.003243894,0.0002936725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01934092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009082394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7534894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8849546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986088,0.0004575186,0.00002683536,0.0001015047,0.0002019986,0.0006034505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987418,0.0004008297,0.0001802549,0.00007044585,0.0002966495,0.0003099555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003713869,0.0000103536,0.009795134,0.00004369626,0.000005917517,0.001428182,0.9355331,0.00004098758,0.0004664365,0.03893553,0.004354277,0.009349296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002844555,0.00001478506,0.02307666,0.00009671383,0.000008856946,0.0005451535,0.8405739,0.00003478728,0.0002128028,0.001284759,0.1341212,0.00002761917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8348026,0.002159376,0.0002019223,0.006871032,0.0001302939,0.00001133956,0.00005815901,0.00001695823,0.1557484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823741,0.0006381249,0.00006199845,0.0004833316,0.00002151614,0.000004422611,0.00001936659,0.00001601447,0.01638106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7534894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4959246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379743106","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12653","title":"Legitimacy and online proceedings: Procedural justice, access to justice, and the role of income","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; University of Toronto; University of Michigan","keywords":"Legitimacy; Procedural justice; Economic Justice; Perception; Political science; Law and economics; Public relations; Law; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Avital Mentovich","is_ca":false},{"name":"J.J. Prescott","is_ca":false},{"name":"Orna Rabinovich‐Einy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0372675933224029,"gpt":0.3597134672432311,"spread":0.3224458739208281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00555993,0.0001118196,0.000329467,0.002628882,0.001416986,0.004109762,0.0005893624,0.0008594021,0.0113494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03794623,0.00009778597,0.0003274341,0.002219325,0.005496855,0.002672316,0.002335794,0.001664337,0.0002935301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001523866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001782801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005481109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008155065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937708,0.003249368,0.0002478093,0.0003457889,0.001854047,0.000532267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489837,0.02874227,0.01349294,0.001061945,0.003896508,0.003822688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001733321,0.0008961953,0.7108653,0.0003265399,0.0002043237,0.0005471943,0.01578176,0.0009558317,0.0004952226,0.1740673,0.003588646,0.09209843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002460056,0.000188252,0.9294558,0.0005179116,0.00009704893,0.0002842025,0.01567124,0.001792787,0.0002257465,0.0404649,0.0112412,0.00003639911],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9171594,0.003750901,0.001699333,0.01106796,0.00005897706,0.00003176523,0.00006616706,0.000008596999,0.06615687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989334,0.0004246537,0.00008176282,0.0001019665,0.00003761497,0.000005279339,0.000008852468,0.000001625607,0.0004049273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03796756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113386147","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00300.x","title":"“Maybe Tomorrow I'll Turn Capitalist”: <i>Cuentapropismo</i> in a Workers' State","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Citizenship; Ideology; Sociology; Framing (construction); Communism; State capitalism; Transition (genetics); State (computer science); Political economy; Political science; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Emma F. Phillips","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01502704269966506,"gpt":0.3138609471935889,"spread":0.2988339044939239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007241716,0.0001048108,0.0001363584,0.0004096866,0.003398881,0.00258824,0.0003609942,0.0007313643,0.00171734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008417018,0.00007957233,0.00007879391,0.0007357894,0.002383667,0.0009374027,0.0006181175,0.0009793083,0.000206877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006624716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006698484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2691046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3734725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994742,0.0002773855,0.00001057004,0.00004729716,0.00007349396,0.0001169387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997299,0.00008994869,0.0000527857,0.000007712742,0.00007483461,0.00004470795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003187612,0.0001495357,0.02573046,0.002904896,0.00005217639,0.002542079,0.1060853,0.0005332748,0.002217359,0.328857,0.1938011,0.3368081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001915094,0.00006184817,0.03677491,0.001499443,0.0000430733,0.0004390101,0.06514282,0.00009409842,0.0006701517,0.004550224,0.8906818,0.00002346194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3090349,0.3461371,0.0006876032,0.1303948,0.001632606,0.00004573979,0.0001067705,0.00002376654,0.2119367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8899513,0.07136294,0.0001257569,0.006419674,0.0002100908,0.00002983471,0.0000473215,0.000008350025,0.03184478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2691046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5350764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964853464","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00284.x","title":"Collecting on Moral Debts: Reparations for the Holocaust and Pořajmos","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; The Holocaust; Criminology; Framing (construction); German; Nazism; Victimology; Political science; Sociology; State (computer science); Law; Poison control; Sexual abuse; History; Suicide prevention","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Woolford","is_ca":false},{"name":"Stefan Wolejszo","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07497066497273898,"gpt":0.2714136559543116,"spread":0.1964429909815726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001918827,0.0001920758,0.0002556864,0.0007302521,0.005771208,0.003002854,0.0006133707,0.001288222,0.002504459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003385986,0.0002055816,0.0001273543,0.001022162,0.006255076,0.00259279,0.003041842,0.001695909,0.0002735847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002119861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001493055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004106835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01048566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987133,0.0007659594,0.00004199511,0.00007018734,0.000156542,0.0002520738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991923,0.0002785268,0.0002353257,0.0000708282,0.0001101344,0.0001127844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002819707,0.0001794744,0.01965645,0.000645983,0.00004708731,0.007667186,0.4806551,0.0002439243,0.001463804,0.2927374,0.0245098,0.1719118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002746519,0.0001800555,0.0390889,0.0005201043,0.00003069599,0.003816234,0.4124872,0.0001505634,0.001220557,0.01787762,0.5245652,0.00003538367],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8363141,0.01648997,0.001139545,0.01741546,0.000350347,0.00004232756,0.0000525262,0.00002105691,0.1281748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825153,0.00509623,0.0002035615,0.001097236,0.00008685388,0.00001536157,0.00002645117,0.000008741983,0.01095011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005771208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01538068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990839517","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12433","title":"The Will to Change: Lessons from Canada's Successful Decarceration of Youth","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Political science; Politics; Criminology; Psychology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Cheryl Marie Webster","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jane B. Sprott","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anthony N. Doob","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03882400569520452,"gpt":0.3315372470155455,"spread":0.292713241320341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005081379,0.000317649,0.0004419469,0.001200774,0.01197788,0.005163379,0.002311837,0.001953792,0.002295437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009977059,0.0002443728,0.0004039686,0.002655433,0.003882241,0.001357768,0.002263027,0.002901708,0.0002640792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08761559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2754528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935815,0.001005932,0.0001401185,0.000208089,0.001826874,0.003237435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921632,0.0007773613,0.0002962069,0.0001692152,0.004122759,0.002471314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002543874,0.0003176751,0.05160018,0.002219836,0.0001580359,0.002496774,0.04261232,0.001475992,0.0005971315,0.06435808,0.3420754,0.4918341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001468691,0.0002738006,0.1637591,0.002609794,0.0002738309,0.0004214356,0.06509546,0.0003653501,0.0009226532,0.005007763,0.7610294,0.00009460636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1781722,0.1545941,0.000655021,0.4637302,0.002474273,0.0003392314,0.001169699,0.0001051021,0.1987601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8635257,0.07545171,0.00101025,0.03176719,0.0003553006,0.00007471139,0.0004407457,0.00005064524,0.02732368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08761559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6356986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019231297","doi":"10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00058.x","title":"The Impact of Legal Mobilization and Judicial Decisions: The Case of Official Minority-Language Education Policy in Canada for Francophones Outside Quebec","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; French; Political science; Judicial opinion; Judicial interpretation; Judicial review; Law; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Public administration; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Troy Riddell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00967718559347873,"gpt":0.3126049597447436,"spread":0.3029277741512648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008383188,0.0004204201,0.000597799,0.002728615,0.0356673,0.01188271,0.002828132,0.006635726,0.004057017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01765494,0.0004185027,0.0006827983,0.003229297,0.01139646,0.001965898,0.003459405,0.005805617,0.0001594688],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2529371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.982358,0.002351376,0.0002710825,0.0006377221,0.003306874,0.01107487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865732,0.005201902,0.001091491,0.0002826939,0.004768524,0.002082147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002512468,0.0002458898,0.04466173,0.0003020687,0.0001539238,0.004188443,0.04309382,0.007067109,0.001058414,0.8224302,0.03824763,0.03829959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006272181,0.0002868088,0.2913874,0.001331256,0.0009319933,0.0009732005,0.1625275,0.01443741,0.003219985,0.0708022,0.4528271,0.0006478222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6897295,0.009390344,0.001081036,0.0723245,0.0002933007,0.0001731914,0.0002838804,0.0000305705,0.2266937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860654,0.001627995,0.0001924501,0.003837661,0.0000523962,0.00002384699,0.000031258,0.000005393073,0.008163631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.22159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9028453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996981631","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00287.x","title":"<i>Changing the Guard: Developing Democratic Police Abroad</i> . By David H. Bayley Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2006. Pp. vii + 171. $28.00 cloth.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Guard (computer science); Citation; Democracy; Law; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Randy K. Lippert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03988311447443325,"gpt":0.3270451120028479,"spread":0.2871619975284146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002002728,0.0007128702,0.0003365398,0.001037081,0.00193209,0.003905827,0.0007790817,0.0022409,0.01951067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003409636,0.0005214324,0.0002527765,0.001848749,0.002130028,0.005967475,0.002141006,0.002924722,0.007827793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002229102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005679635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01776236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05474861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989807,0.0004699366,0.00004777917,0.00006346449,0.0002873859,0.0001507386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986865,0.0003668535,0.0002551931,0.00004292503,0.0003603569,0.0002881297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001307424,0.000007029279,0.0002219017,0.0004541719,0.000004341758,0.00003501746,0.000845024,0.00005587028,0.00007015948,0.007872089,0.9239115,0.06650981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005891756,0.00001830786,0.001139295,0.001184963,0.000006788326,0.0001238994,0.00241037,0.00003929023,0.00009040532,0.004079396,0.9908946,0.000006818964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00102195,0.7314624,0.0009563481,0.1946098,0.009857085,0.00003747426,0.0001296239,0.00007479961,0.06185061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04067924,0.7826793,0.002135559,0.02444853,0.004709972,0.00008307424,0.00028384,0.0001132068,0.1448673],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01951067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06526965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141148","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12643","title":"What makes an international institution work for labor activists? Shaping international law through strategic litigation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Washington; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Law; Political science; Institution; Jurisprudence; International law; Mobilization; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Filiz Kahraman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.167241897933761,"gpt":0.3348601881360428,"spread":0.1676182902022819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01351538,0.0003000042,0.0003983023,0.003501347,0.01153858,0.02789346,0.001944447,0.005181986,0.01269823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01486554,0.000382782,0.0004256808,0.002629326,0.03008166,0.01283049,0.008867239,0.003911485,0.002159506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009460228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01079767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005853084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01053011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9832628,0.01038398,0.0002432174,0.001016814,0.001286706,0.003806501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907789,0.004103209,0.001369432,0.0006631844,0.0008406445,0.002244652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001890174,0.00009572732,0.006018906,0.00006942156,0.00001019326,0.000320683,0.02882669,0.0004346024,0.0004389478,0.9309783,0.00557877,0.02720883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003327296,0.0001598708,0.01275021,0.001156927,0.0000393373,0.0004396212,0.2311495,0.001478279,0.001068889,0.4262794,0.3253861,0.00005854525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1127648,0.003221667,0.01090394,0.05559769,0.0002817925,0.00008502918,0.00002963498,0.00008757348,0.8170279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883894,0.0007867612,0.001188016,0.001881605,0.00009022632,0.00004261818,0.00001327951,0.00003448921,0.007573576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02789346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07147706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280626197","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12603","title":"“[Y]ou are better off talking to a f****** wall”: The perceptions and experiences of grievance procedures among incarcerated people in Ireland","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Perception; Psychology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Legal consciousness; Consciousness; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Sophie van der Valk","is_ca":true},{"name":"Eva Aizpurúa","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mary Rogan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01426780135038207,"gpt":0.3013577922031044,"spread":0.2870899908527224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005643479,0.0002527469,0.0006849556,0.0007520721,0.004860106,0.003083771,0.0008739321,0.00107864,0.001940247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0115592,0.0003785458,0.0004058886,0.0005434002,0.006178635,0.002100039,0.002973216,0.002748989,0.0003124281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002962863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00350636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04134452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05262426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949278,0.002821293,0.0002445577,0.0001958246,0.0006822531,0.001128366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928781,0.001991713,0.001939292,0.0002862726,0.001249633,0.001654896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009829359,0.0001034526,0.04956897,0.0001916374,0.00002790323,0.001014699,0.9338667,0.00003077997,0.0008305953,0.0005276852,0.001879953,0.01185929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003365055,0.00009014398,0.0280398,0.0001016204,0.000005981014,0.0003685217,0.9674268,0.00002975143,0.00008614371,0.00008020676,0.003744958,0.00002275952],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964795,0.0004132745,0.0001161996,0.001350657,0.00002971958,0.00001527761,0.00002358329,0.000005037686,0.001566862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980991,0.0004010147,0.00009648109,0.0005903234,0.000009832618,0.00001217359,0.00001369455,0.000004640712,0.0007726161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04134452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08220774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003926620","doi":"10.2307/3115139","title":"Narrowing the Gap by Widening the Conflict: Power Politics, Symbols of Sovereignty, and the American Vietnam War Resisters' Migration to Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Power (physics); Political science; Vietnam War; Political economy; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"John Hagan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009095145281449453,"gpt":0.2417518795759799,"spread":0.2326567342945305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00156241,0.000160733,0.0002675838,0.002037825,0.005413505,0.004235646,0.0006990387,0.0007967136,0.002291876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003389098,0.0001036044,0.0001092447,0.003138062,0.006507352,0.001072804,0.0008740433,0.000872923,0.0001035338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0303502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07063925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9547572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9786934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99893,0.0003173557,0.00002557008,0.00005464212,0.0003988916,0.0002734186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984148,0.0004954004,0.0001724837,0.00002289557,0.0006832041,0.0002112644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000186863,0.0001564119,0.06279062,0.003630035,0.0001216532,0.00251544,0.164094,0.0009426718,0.001303731,0.2456005,0.09342708,0.425231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003646691,0.00007998994,0.1079281,0.002046255,0.000138307,0.0006000634,0.1707302,0.0001967997,0.0004289513,0.008671267,0.7090964,0.00004719533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.307877,0.4716783,0.0002918211,0.07935308,0.0006892771,0.00004851736,0.0001316622,0.00001212052,0.1399182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8255128,0.1611829,0.0001809285,0.003718185,0.0001884823,0.00001976735,0.00005098296,0.000006562065,0.009139383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04524285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2202072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555335037","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12246","title":"Discussion Law &amp; Society Review at Fifty: A Debate on the Future of Publishing by the Law &amp; Society Association","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Conversation; Law; Association (psychology); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Joachim J. Savelsberg","is_ca":false},{"name":"Terence C. Halliday","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sida Liu","is_ca":true},{"name":"Calvin Morrill","is_ca":false},{"name":"Carroll Seron","is_ca":false},{"name":"Susan S. Silbey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04928845214196659,"gpt":0.3568292153379902,"spread":0.3075407631960236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0685451,0.0006844149,0.001538678,0.004946106,0.02307517,0.03994932,0.00383953,0.05811806,0.01886284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1262182,0.0009498829,0.001740091,0.004827822,0.03000183,0.04405326,0.01036383,0.03962701,0.003947448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01767527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02555069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008063646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009354476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9321875,0.03486042,0.002990464,0.004910123,0.01989935,0.005152148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8705839,0.09629673,0.004170153,0.003825896,0.01433292,0.01079039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003030116,0.00002475893,0.0002364431,0.000182796,0.00001394545,0.0001714047,0.005092703,0.0000752604,0.0001499947,0.4707682,0.5100096,0.01324457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000208374,0.00001947809,0.0005649937,0.0006093903,0.00001569301,0.000067349,0.004349845,0.00009775719,0.00008921664,0.07704826,0.9170697,0.00004744328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009621122,0.009331131,0.0002835377,0.9648534,0.009000182,0.000007249972,0.00002710607,0.00001559597,0.01551965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1059246,0.01434834,0.001222847,0.7910556,0.04965913,0.0001466476,0.00009422144,0.0001157079,0.03743301],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9600507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3625055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089555659","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00296.x","title":"Why Does the Federal Government Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada in Charter of Rights Cases? A Strategic Explanation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Scholarship","authors":[{"name":"Matthew Hennigar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02956017738327541,"gpt":0.283070811602102,"spread":0.2535106342188266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006840424,0.000256598,0.0004083369,0.002898368,0.007705572,0.007478174,0.001585522,0.003673114,0.004218181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02539586,0.0003119144,0.0005170829,0.004248985,0.008712888,0.003082325,0.00151144,0.0027743,0.0004062961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03121021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04419464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8156984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9045175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915406,0.001150423,0.0001883955,0.0005966792,0.003087869,0.003436026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903738,0.004978483,0.00106799,0.0002800222,0.002689455,0.0006102024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000546981,0.00005156574,0.02566785,0.000110976,0.0000311263,0.00117359,0.01057554,0.001383537,0.0002800333,0.9056685,0.03293313,0.02206944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002382775,0.0001026572,0.1334796,0.0006205377,0.0002218478,0.0007875451,0.05979543,0.01003,0.001825827,0.5658511,0.2268363,0.0002109398],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3859397,0.006164353,0.006059019,0.1647258,0.0004465104,0.0002626033,0.0005496747,0.0001255128,0.4357268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878203,0.00127709,0.0004131132,0.004657972,0.0001071645,0.00001455789,0.00006286817,0.00001188889,0.005635063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1843016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.370774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141181","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12639","title":"NGOs, international courts, and state backlash against human rights accountability: Evidence from NGO mobilization against Tanzania at the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Human rights; Accountability; Authoritarianism; Political science; State (computer science); Backlash; International human rights law; Public administration; Law; Democracy; Politics; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Nicole de Silva","is_ca":true},{"name":"Misha Ariana Plagis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05049854165827422,"gpt":0.3469789758312977,"spread":0.2964804341730235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01023976,0.0002393521,0.0003102485,0.002662583,0.0114508,0.005066806,0.001284143,0.002183028,0.006366391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03523656,0.0003285714,0.000175755,0.002967627,0.01178594,0.003175225,0.005353468,0.003186593,0.0003064122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005585143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006284236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03873108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09798638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940636,0.003646794,0.0002316814,0.0003138353,0.0006565256,0.001087702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9241207,0.06185843,0.008346982,0.00131185,0.002992434,0.001369534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001539077,0.0004024495,0.1298838,0.0005246817,0.00003681984,0.00362563,0.7991238,0.0002480354,0.000725395,0.03978816,0.003112499,0.02237484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003067313,0.0001171952,0.08235151,0.001409941,0.00004811788,0.0002657617,0.8982245,0.0002534323,0.0005003292,0.003496245,0.01327618,0.00002620269],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977775,0.0005676185,0.0002298622,0.00273235,0.00001210702,0.00006058395,0.00004167134,0.000001808021,0.01857893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983305,0.0003289738,0.0001235424,0.0004769597,0.000007259257,0.00004273666,0.00001756627,0.00000196969,0.0006703495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03873108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07701129,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141090","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12642","title":"Foreign agents or agents of justice? Private foundations, backlash against non-governmental organizations, and international human rights litigation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pomona College","keywords":"Human rights; Premise; Political science; Law; Foundation (evidence); Economic Justice; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Heidi Nichols Haddad","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05267449039984401,"gpt":0.3565828156326064,"spread":0.3039083252327624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01128183,0.0001080265,0.0003879945,0.002988979,0.002594434,0.006568617,0.0006672878,0.00473179,0.002682557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02036777,0.0001805026,0.0003049852,0.001909924,0.008467506,0.003569202,0.001482372,0.002528657,0.0003011654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005944314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008166574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01913533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03198504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910899,0.005367644,0.0002955846,0.0005613187,0.001578233,0.001107347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803355,0.01383792,0.002943279,0.0003489766,0.001771203,0.0007631423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006739793,0.0001289158,0.01776603,0.001111936,0.0001009577,0.0007037953,0.009154874,0.0007203741,0.0005387827,0.8507897,0.0403485,0.07856869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009953114,0.000337257,0.09288437,0.008854223,0.0003102495,0.0008327698,0.03805096,0.001238412,0.001079622,0.1978156,0.6583824,0.0001145894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2109172,0.3886238,0.001320812,0.1914303,0.001510973,0.00005819252,0.0001016832,0.00001892908,0.2060182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9263979,0.05661412,0.0002431454,0.01038378,0.0008414576,0.00003026618,0.00002559509,0.000006006914,0.005457798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01913533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05966473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536047447","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00392.x","title":"Intraprofessional Competition and Earnings Inequalities Across a Professional Chasm: The Case of the Legal Profession in Québec, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Competition (biology); Rivalry; Inequality; Human capital; Capital (architecture); Diversity (politics); Legal profession; Political science; Law; Sociology; Business; Accounting; Economics; Economic growth; Ecology; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Fiona M. Kay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02064821470776039,"gpt":0.3455517702246536,"spread":0.3249035555168931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001902642,0.0001503221,0.0004115108,0.002556912,0.008990483,0.003064601,0.001474413,0.0008997472,0.002807394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004854897,0.0001394846,0.0002308012,0.006910861,0.003659756,0.000895995,0.001720457,0.0009687412,0.00008910226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07587182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07399455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977846,0.0003380093,0.00004506606,0.0001663793,0.0006136058,0.001052309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937218,0.001453519,0.0009543353,0.0001317929,0.002067069,0.001671556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001935213,0.0002008218,0.7781758,0.0003630964,0.0001363887,0.001878631,0.05785775,0.001356376,0.0004581372,0.04412649,0.01485686,0.1003961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002315463,0.0000393189,0.9313679,0.0003242897,0.0000543062,0.000189587,0.0502422,0.001093748,0.0001045586,0.001362567,0.01515858,0.00003972263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.970214,0.007017694,0.0002186871,0.006888798,0.00002503033,0.00003062101,0.0003073287,0.000004929944,0.01529291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971449,0.001109837,0.00006443873,0.0002940713,0.000007261189,0.000005403117,0.00006659649,0.000001333341,0.001306254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07587182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5504912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138437200","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00458.x","title":"Political Liberalism and Political Embeddedness: Understanding Politics in the Work of Chinese Criminal Defense Lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Embeddedness; State (computer science); Political science; Grassroots; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Sida Liu","is_ca":true},{"name":"Terence C. Halliday","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1734326347790768,"gpt":0.4092485452642673,"spread":0.2358159104851905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002141678,0.0002043584,0.0002396181,0.00246734,0.003833418,0.003877032,0.0005355793,0.0008243007,0.001597649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002459527,0.0001871268,0.0001262482,0.00254783,0.01148569,0.003012429,0.00224243,0.0008236243,0.00008109846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006445601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005521093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03544468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05371426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979022,0.001223905,0.00006223593,0.0001609481,0.0003142709,0.0003364635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985076,0.0008570345,0.0003379782,0.00004454907,0.0000911497,0.0001617393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001918081,0.00003882076,0.04483451,0.000173428,0.00001019712,0.0009104103,0.8713989,0.0001159811,0.000699034,0.06379911,0.0005150275,0.0174854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001750023,0.00004017412,0.1547341,0.0002204874,0.00002115016,0.000246695,0.8017317,0.0006107019,0.0001950207,0.01474627,0.02741688,0.00001925806],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652591,0.002375219,0.0007593855,0.003467743,0.00001899818,0.00002043255,0.000006873993,0.000002402136,0.02808996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988783,0.0004742061,0.00006626567,0.0001028944,0.000008027776,0.000007375854,0.00000289592,8.62924e-7,0.0004591208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03544468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07047671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898135958","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12350","title":"The Judicialization of Religion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Islam; Law; State (computer science); Politics; Secular state; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Political science; Power (physics); Sociology; History; Philosophy; Economics; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Tamir Moustafa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02013253215721045,"gpt":0.3319126239968166,"spread":0.3117800918396061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002351586,0.0001082476,0.0001569069,0.0006373765,0.002365865,0.002928124,0.0004990282,0.001030759,0.001242013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00374497,0.0001104942,0.0001176509,0.0007216969,0.009876852,0.001962507,0.00168173,0.001745317,0.0001493133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003500735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004103174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008148098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01187911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979789,0.001221031,0.00007698554,0.0001859475,0.0002653749,0.0002718283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983786,0.000720336,0.0004051689,0.0001577909,0.0002432914,0.00009486703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009657141,0.00001639667,0.002467762,0.0001724486,0.000005511675,0.0003692916,0.01042794,0.0001923798,0.0005096878,0.9464512,0.003423101,0.03595471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000251481,0.0001410876,0.0346088,0.001834903,0.00002960436,0.001148695,0.02200442,0.0006362894,0.002010413,0.134568,0.8029486,0.00004409674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2979518,0.07437746,0.003813185,0.03266497,0.0007036887,0.00007299422,0.00006403392,0.00002266902,0.5903292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805963,0.009600976,0.0002479923,0.001378709,0.0001483957,0.000009029466,0.00001103708,0.000003004277,0.008004538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008148098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02539968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200274082","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12576","title":"Women's law-making and contestations of “marriage” in African conflict situations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sierra leone; Harm; Law; Jurisprudence; Forced marriage; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Crimes against humanity; Political science; International law; War crime; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Criminal law; Sexual violence; Sociology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Annie Bunting","is_ca":true},{"name":"Heather Tasker","is_ca":true},{"name":"Emily Lockhart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06004452724853908,"gpt":0.3464013797806437,"spread":0.2863568525321046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004553659,0.0001739325,0.0005859908,0.002427302,0.001359683,0.002247575,0.000462836,0.0009900447,0.002939401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007028708,0.0001889154,0.0002748556,0.003189328,0.002628762,0.001615052,0.00122002,0.001013626,0.0001480621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002405749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005116906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01772365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04760978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968888,0.002369531,0.0001250483,0.0001151121,0.0003296555,0.0001718241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961568,0.002635832,0.0006173971,0.00003798302,0.0003920755,0.0001599419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002605084,0.0002802996,0.01820586,0.03052794,0.0004404886,0.0007976689,0.04991108,0.0003221444,0.0006346245,0.05720357,0.02160298,0.819813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000762039,0.0004512101,0.08343499,0.06543464,0.0003196214,0.00128975,0.09587508,0.00008105607,0.0004181952,0.009756067,0.7428108,0.0000524398],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01934405,0.9677797,0.00005096679,0.004331771,0.0001779566,0.00001964776,0.00002444467,8.75818e-7,0.008270645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1256788,0.8723681,0.0001076023,0.0008336367,0.0001365667,0.00003858776,0.00002807183,0.000001318659,0.000807296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01772365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03524095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115155064","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12518","title":"Sally Engle Merry, Legal Pluralism, and the Radicalization of Comparative Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Radicalization; Law; Colonialism; Legal profession; Legal realism; Criminology; Political science; Terrorism; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy Webber","is_ca":true},{"name":"Val Napoleón","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mireille Fournier","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Borrows","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06961489616522486,"gpt":0.3638979574877866,"spread":0.2942830613225617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003883746,0.0002888198,0.0004795004,0.002017354,0.003433586,0.004453816,0.0009571161,0.003259216,0.003258577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00764828,0.0002635344,0.0002127798,0.001695301,0.01101278,0.009114554,0.002427055,0.004875369,0.0004330736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004011318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002847763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006614544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01440667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966848,0.002314292,0.00007566818,0.0002490967,0.0005359834,0.0001401526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940869,0.004527978,0.0003726783,0.0001361881,0.000577185,0.0002990384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003152608,0.00004107473,0.0005965664,0.0004766949,0.00001189213,0.000120409,0.008625062,0.000113383,0.0002019557,0.785524,0.1735458,0.03071161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003014691,0.00004484352,0.001713778,0.001721564,0.00000881263,0.0001942034,0.005675222,0.0001660281,0.0002073804,0.3267664,0.6634489,0.00002270899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005969982,0.4696817,0.001458266,0.4890267,0.002016025,0.00001597318,0.00002569573,0.00001260712,0.03179309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3814473,0.3501576,0.00422776,0.2090982,0.01334548,0.0002924608,0.00007501165,0.00008674485,0.04126951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006614544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02910429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969543367","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00275.x","title":"Postapartheid Justice: Can Cosmopolitanism and Nation-Building Be Reconciled?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Harm; Sovereignty; Crimes against humanity; International law; War crime","authors":[{"name":"Rosemary Nagy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03441776350165194,"gpt":0.3368755710326251,"spread":0.3024578075309731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004406748,0.0001385987,0.000432534,0.00136238,0.004729067,0.004821657,0.000697534,0.003416907,0.002705212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01027912,0.0001414347,0.0002690119,0.001101159,0.0160822,0.005857575,0.003739223,0.003086938,0.0001858991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00485359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01488764,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01284546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03458298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961993,0.00199167,0.0001161817,0.000180378,0.0006518394,0.0008606102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968111,0.001792627,0.0005193643,0.0001395034,0.0003430482,0.0003942518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002083239,0.00005697487,0.002129895,0.0003563386,0.00002249952,0.0009765736,0.009958676,0.0001182945,0.0001286973,0.9219248,0.007507198,0.05679934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006598292,0.0001806218,0.01951203,0.002701904,0.00006777189,0.00106458,0.03689647,0.0001645625,0.0003942405,0.3911395,0.5477695,0.00004282055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1243806,0.2501061,0.001523192,0.3467413,0.00131038,0.00007927967,0.00002378449,0.0000100903,0.2758254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9129102,0.05703966,0.000354066,0.01796666,0.0005577791,0.00005619697,0.00001379066,0.000004988145,0.01109669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01284546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03521544,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521847757","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12237","title":"Judicial Impartiality and Independence in Divided Societies: An Empirical Analysis of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; British Academy; Queen's University Belfast; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Impartiality; Judicial independence; Political science; Law; Politics; Judicial activism; Independence (probability theory); Dissenting opinion; Judicial discretion; Constitutional court; Loyalty; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Alex Schwartz","is_ca":false},{"name":"Melanie Janelle Murchison","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05573365378808543,"gpt":0.3734158386377754,"spread":0.31768218484969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003814197,0.0001976045,0.0007051787,0.00357966,0.003379884,0.002505399,0.0007917903,0.0006083484,0.003943365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01385662,0.0002179921,0.0002656468,0.004640791,0.003317959,0.001667863,0.002545278,0.001028549,0.0003216766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002542789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001187873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03575808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06511341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969172,0.001384978,0.0001511315,0.000408779,0.0004327687,0.0007050359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895706,0.004986761,0.003559275,0.000411917,0.0006324272,0.0008389925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002328381,0.0005129401,0.9173378,0.0001188181,0.0003027859,0.001226035,0.03595506,0.001494184,0.0008357501,0.01289677,0.001298523,0.02778846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002811771,0.00009805026,0.9685881,0.00005610987,0.00005593602,0.0001435028,0.02601632,0.00133972,0.0001144787,0.001434974,0.002109556,0.00001524886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981506,0.0002136735,0.00004974911,0.00008413032,0.000002730638,0.000006155913,0.00002338807,4.910625e-7,0.001468922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999661,0.00008298377,0.00003812514,0.0000193951,0.000007246071,0.000004476107,0.00004726127,8.610705e-7,0.0001385814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03575808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07109988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376140502","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12651","title":"Face-work in Chinese routine criminal trials","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Politics; Law; Punitive damages; Performative utterance; Political science; Situational ethics; Face-to-face; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Sitao Li","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1018122145409206,"gpt":0.4170913701284895,"spread":0.3152791555875689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960366,0.0002457408,0.000385374,0.001605646,0.003589212,0.001406883,0.0006281461,0.0005762296,0.005909326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006624904,0.0001269851,0.0001945991,0.001570231,0.002243409,0.001121527,0.001582718,0.0005712585,0.0002511408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002348432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001630983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03210285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05713601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979279,0.0009688675,0.00008760676,0.0001765966,0.0005524707,0.0002865885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970341,0.0009789527,0.000958302,0.00015743,0.0003842158,0.0004869005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005046926,0.0007060433,0.4393577,0.001017467,0.0001357608,0.005606981,0.2225533,0.0009511803,0.004654248,0.01064973,0.007340846,0.3065221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002286734,0.0002110858,0.8911043,0.0001735828,0.00004258875,0.0008102696,0.08952575,0.001420285,0.0007544323,0.001852456,0.01402467,0.00005774074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905089,0.0004972245,0.0002306943,0.0002625129,0.00001652127,0.00003361026,0.00002987851,0.000003214189,0.008417437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981385,0.0002614797,0.0001241565,0.00006554591,0.00000939643,0.00002230498,0.00002721679,0.000001784818,0.001349581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03210285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06383198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212948317","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12586","title":"When altruism is remunerated: Understanding the bases of voluntary public service among lawyers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Compensation (psychology); Work (physics); Duty; Service (business); Public service motivation; Incentive; Public service; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Social psychology; Public sector; Psychology; Market economy; Marketing","authors":[{"name":"Fiona M. Kay","is_ca":true},{"name":"Robert Granfield","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09879548002277459,"gpt":0.3096884067333333,"spread":0.2108929267105586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004059324,0.00008353339,0.0003252758,0.00149616,0.0007554704,0.001691059,0.0005967236,0.001260681,0.001333308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008816041,0.00014474,0.0002689778,0.001112027,0.002921574,0.001682138,0.0008719529,0.001264335,0.0001230254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003019653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003261555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01111484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01738571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979672,0.001449445,0.00005314203,0.0001213038,0.000229958,0.0001788582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929537,0.004084737,0.001534078,0.0001510635,0.0009194619,0.0003568893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002532905,0.0002870169,0.04323965,0.004948833,0.0002227715,0.0004157963,0.02126797,0.001211248,0.001496407,0.3122069,0.01402896,0.6004211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106475,0.0003641177,0.3726756,0.01424757,0.0004055807,0.001021151,0.03606467,0.00233868,0.0008941304,0.2129563,0.3588423,0.00008343043],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1861084,0.7053754,0.00212019,0.04934512,0.0003925056,0.00004463245,0.00004749098,0.00001232071,0.05655388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8246577,0.1718358,0.0004008801,0.001709701,0.0002130316,0.00002344959,0.00003075384,0.000003830063,0.001124802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01111484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02210027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996489880","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00348.x","title":"“The Tree Is the Enemy Soldier”: A Sociolegal Making of War Landscapes in the Occupied West Bank","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Alibi; Colonialism; Politics; Adversary; Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Political economy","authors":[{"name":"Irus Braverman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04823945454113525,"gpt":0.3168228660375002,"spread":0.2685834114963649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001725004,0.000146982,0.0002032982,0.001012749,0.01118007,0.006558745,0.0006711917,0.001207957,0.002249958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001768953,0.0002432268,0.00005277957,0.001431491,0.02233202,0.002948712,0.002162143,0.001328533,0.0001190777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006856874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003565129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04991144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1491933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983085,0.001259462,0.0000214658,0.00005577744,0.0001304687,0.0002243924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990025,0.0006234851,0.0001617096,0.00002666226,0.00007493286,0.0001107458],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000321842,0.00006189951,0.005838666,0.000106296,0.000007089464,0.001353892,0.7885963,0.0001288845,0.0005834313,0.1731996,0.005700667,0.02439117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009043823,0.00003566675,0.01060551,0.0002516987,0.000008796968,0.0003353854,0.8996035,0.0001004953,0.0001563049,0.006857515,0.08202546,0.00001051459],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.889074,0.007928194,0.0005774904,0.01432403,0.00008016088,0.00002185068,0.00001258318,0.000005257733,0.08797657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958888,0.001597724,0.00005041856,0.0003769266,0.00001471507,0.00000455889,0.000002136,0.00000199189,0.002062698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04991144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09924185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386969811","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12664","title":"Discursive mismatch and globalization by stealth: The fight against corruption in the Brazilian legal field","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation; University of Toronto; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Globalization; Language change; Political science; Criminal law; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political economy; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Eduardo Gutierrez Cornelius","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0235163757930329,"gpt":0.3293493338293705,"spread":0.3058329580363376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01012781,0.0002019433,0.0004117124,0.003478849,0.004767121,0.006952146,0.000635849,0.001370082,0.002103266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01386074,0.0001683009,0.0002213963,0.002771366,0.02436894,0.00450817,0.004311782,0.001636858,0.0001031228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006314831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007252392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01517264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02473549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927446,0.005153836,0.0001717083,0.0004086839,0.001126019,0.0003951695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884808,0.007326965,0.001606492,0.0007336603,0.001376286,0.000475809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001486192,0.00002508902,0.005317903,0.0002953539,0.00001490861,0.0002696082,0.1097692,0.0001700625,0.0005325003,0.8573761,0.001988402,0.02422605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004362368,0.0001031686,0.0391174,0.004449176,0.00009295599,0.0005994488,0.2219703,0.001096393,0.0009604687,0.3804022,0.3511217,0.00004317758],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4584904,0.04562,0.007035937,0.06819287,0.0003125767,0.0001000282,0.0000413051,0.00002423064,0.4201826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945438,0.002990558,0.0003149991,0.0007835915,0.00005460871,0.00001340215,0.00000454695,0.000004981314,0.001289504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05356163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577376484","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00433_5.x","title":"<i>Reconciliation(s): Transitional Justice in Postconflict Societies</i> . By Joanna R. Quinn, ed. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2009. 313 pp. $95.00 cloth.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Economic Justice; Transitional justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Media studies; Library science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Lisa J. Laplante","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02347180366972815,"gpt":0.2571425105805459,"spread":0.2336707069108178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003881996,0.0005728954,0.0005537866,0.001530782,0.002834901,0.006175023,0.001827514,0.004380847,0.009627598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006538868,0.0002825249,0.000635498,0.002436979,0.009142767,0.009547072,0.004669819,0.00397769,0.002273641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00352618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008624655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01145153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02718158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966645,0.002190693,0.00008818258,0.000136372,0.0004945861,0.0004256417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981562,0.0007288768,0.0002885199,0.0001763754,0.0003553942,0.0002945586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001725224,0.00002093863,0.0002323264,0.001255221,0.00002053339,0.00009391367,0.002504868,0.0001424518,0.00007933789,0.1239195,0.6916458,0.1800679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009109322,0.00002558472,0.001449487,0.003254952,0.00001636986,0.0003682048,0.003826265,0.0001958458,0.0001359574,0.08755577,0.9031444,0.00001815815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009450588,0.7883453,0.002106174,0.1366646,0.007683006,0.00004210108,0.00005633457,0.0001014946,0.06405602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1062374,0.7772539,0.004286827,0.05122051,0.0116678,0.0002964608,0.0002273849,0.0001152397,0.04869455],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01145153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03220755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161534687","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00407_2.x","title":"<i>Child Pornography and Sexual Grooming: Legal and Societal Responses</i> . By Suzanne Ost. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. 273. $95.00 cloth.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Citation; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Dany Lacombe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01446978754552181,"gpt":0.2880451216328427,"spread":0.2735753340873209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001365849,0.0009488089,0.000654847,0.00176764,0.001944937,0.002561809,0.001244137,0.005623648,0.02788006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005666406,0.0006805349,0.0005667642,0.002195556,0.003324102,0.005042181,0.002632784,0.004632961,0.00674569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002459059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003545061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04478435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1110844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989237,0.0004888615,0.0000585772,0.00007983412,0.0003130653,0.0001358765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973785,0.001309446,0.0004155121,0.0000515005,0.0004896526,0.0003554256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001120445,0.000007446926,0.0003103388,0.0002486409,0.000004444037,0.00007392227,0.00053184,0.00001143343,0.00002490623,0.00224867,0.9751937,0.0213333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008357816,0.00002681284,0.005982434,0.003085358,0.00001337875,0.0008967701,0.00359707,0.00003462461,0.00007892555,0.004041389,0.9822165,0.00001837104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003766522,0.6957556,0.0000471228,0.2775552,0.008405353,0.00001343224,0.00009979113,0.00001185601,0.01773505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0107086,0.8402499,0.000201743,0.07036583,0.01443236,0.00005990791,0.000204899,0.00002669838,0.06375003],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04478435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09326804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141003","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12648","title":"Activists in international courts: Backlash, funding, and strategy in international legal mobilization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Backlash; Political science; Law; Public administration; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Freek van der Vet","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05077825185227353,"gpt":0.3677910104675116,"spread":0.317012758615238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02264523,0.0004578162,0.0004883049,0.002855784,0.0144374,0.02979578,0.002651475,0.01201473,0.02513318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0353507,0.0005512097,0.0005626973,0.002485238,0.0258753,0.01545211,0.01779227,0.01305763,0.001458014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01106414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02413664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01132271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01789314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9789024,0.009720155,0.0005584374,0.001959744,0.002247836,0.006611464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966934,0.01740006,0.002144405,0.001342907,0.002396787,0.009781835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001734235,0.00007805415,0.001753874,0.00005154904,0.000008347959,0.0001780029,0.01432779,0.0001658004,0.0001467473,0.9341006,0.0198807,0.02929116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008726366,0.000109996,0.005177086,0.001156774,0.00003632871,0.0001805366,0.05067503,0.0007681337,0.000378987,0.3292405,0.6121163,0.0000731218],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05557141,0.01287822,0.00579567,0.2900443,0.001800419,0.0001767018,0.00003900125,0.00008162255,0.6336128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8601418,0.00543821,0.002264366,0.05832498,0.001890822,0.0003407267,0.00005744715,0.0001256182,0.07141606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02979578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1197608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376141272","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12652","title":"Outside the brackets: Why school administrators fail to see gendered harassment within an antibullying law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Spencer Foundation; Russell Sage Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Harassment; Intimidation; Bracketing (phenomenology); Psychology; Human sexuality; Poison control; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey Lane","is_ca":false},{"name":"Hana Shepherd","is_ca":false},{"name":"Holly Avella","is_ca":false},{"name":"Aaron Martin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06124863352069222,"gpt":0.3615541974081528,"spread":0.3003055638874606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100373,0.0001134389,0.0003311359,0.001741967,0.003229541,0.004157716,0.0008153361,0.001415747,0.002466976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02170139,0.000282747,0.000250317,0.001699762,0.004400873,0.002309962,0.001794898,0.002707049,0.0003162053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003505625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006857251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03576264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1066474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896753,0.005399677,0.0004290941,0.0005435575,0.002795405,0.00115693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788126,0.007311731,0.005693513,0.0005677,0.005845425,0.001769159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001031109,0.0003366458,0.3299161,0.001780272,0.0002205502,0.00152855,0.1471142,0.0003326921,0.002215452,0.07526772,0.1076874,0.3334972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003153749,0.0003526698,0.4977748,0.002476658,0.0002715926,0.0007703722,0.1881798,0.0002504587,0.0009321717,0.01099559,0.2978833,0.00008110979],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7285596,0.08783859,0.002228972,0.09843484,0.001427177,0.00009073158,0.0001194743,0.00007476919,0.08122578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784807,0.01404747,0.0003428954,0.00484072,0.0001443593,0.00002366401,0.00002973135,0.0000142403,0.002076122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03576264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07110894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567137634","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12045","title":"Liberal Rights versus Islamic Law? The Construction of a Binary in Malaysian Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Carnegie Corporation of New York","keywords":"Political science; Secularism; Law; Legal realism; Philosophy of law; Politics; Injustice; Public law; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Tamir Moustafa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01727192239701993,"gpt":0.2823574663187051,"spread":0.2650855439216852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002509831,0.0001395064,0.0002001449,0.001274219,0.003388756,0.007191007,0.0003420351,0.001001062,0.00219833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003273113,0.0001919158,0.00008726351,0.001245368,0.02339557,0.00668709,0.003506695,0.002282679,0.0001953971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003960868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00255965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007140328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008451727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975247,0.001605249,0.00007620982,0.0001979145,0.0003576426,0.0002382371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998269,0.0007362531,0.0005363342,0.0001116634,0.0001393365,0.0002074427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002137926,0.00001422523,0.005287754,0.00007201738,0.000003336576,0.0001331129,0.09447914,0.00006353191,0.0004929297,0.8834963,0.0005439629,0.01539223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003384675,0.0001236042,0.06095791,0.001425999,0.00002732868,0.0007120579,0.3804938,0.001888653,0.00139007,0.3858725,0.1670113,0.00006284377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8062369,0.004902634,0.003661986,0.01813951,0.0001063537,0.00003223691,0.00003105031,0.00001207451,0.1668772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998152,0.0002786574,0.0001537592,0.0002074271,0.00001091286,0.000003527336,0.000003213729,0.000002351584,0.00118812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007191007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0287382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386958666","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12665","title":"Hollow law and utilitarian law: The devaluing of deportation hearings in New York City and Paris","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deportation; Adjudication; Devaluation; Law; Sociology; Immigration law; Immigration; Political science; Currency; Criminology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Lili Dao","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05481012281527511,"gpt":0.3357025589184175,"spread":0.2808924361031425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006644001,0.0002360278,0.0004560978,0.004277378,0.005602654,0.008588883,0.001408626,0.001316165,0.004150721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01094361,0.000337472,0.0002047701,0.005128907,0.02450024,0.004387845,0.005133639,0.002165881,0.0001197691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02655805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01250559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3063115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4195136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941984,0.003400607,0.0001828614,0.0003739364,0.0008584263,0.0009857659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889593,0.006058638,0.00216311,0.0004512884,0.001404194,0.0009634006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001961228,0.0001015246,0.03025138,0.001524734,0.0001293656,0.001972455,0.4803474,0.000716969,0.0006947773,0.3586427,0.01550854,0.1099141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007168794,0.0001630234,0.1785308,0.003104328,0.00009139799,0.0004838992,0.5283177,0.0003180449,0.0004155223,0.01581105,0.2725791,0.0001134422],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7901749,0.05959218,0.001149446,0.02035093,0.0002998948,0.00009708801,0.0001611185,0.0000320638,0.1281424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990764,0.0054175,0.0001216643,0.0005724752,0.00005469931,0.00003256457,0.00002788114,0.000006465405,0.003002857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3063115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6090572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}