{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":60,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":60,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"cf0cfc08f8ad","filters":{"venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities"}},"results":[{"id":"W2064996605","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355583","title":"Cuts, Flows, and the Geographies of Property","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Spatialization; Ambivalence; Sociology; Space (punctuation); Intangible property; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Boundary (topology); Production (economics); Property rights; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Linguistics; Anthropology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Blomley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01690794552491665,"gpt":0.2544052982374007,"spread":0.237497352712484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004550534,0.00009645717,0.0001633105,0.00003174442,0.002491655,0.000347045,0.0002316434,0.00005841591,0.0001358589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006376326,0.00003685765,0.00009050611,0.00008212238,0.01079153,0.0002326475,0.00007161184,0.0002641818,0.00000278007],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001394425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009249364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02058369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3815991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993017,0.0001368341,0.00013445,0.0001064889,0.0001735603,0.0001470077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994506,0.0001800025,0.0000745051,0.0001494394,0.0001247044,0.00002075695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005664764,0.00001084868,0.00009500026,0.000008031355,0.00004502073,2.372152e-7,0.06377518,5.562093e-8,0.0000506902,0.9349642,0.0009445126,0.00004960326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006187403,0.00002428074,0.0003679839,0.00001349761,0.00007108111,0.00000446887,0.07356811,0.000002653597,0.00003006706,0.08163457,0.8435853,0.00007925093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1589543,0.003238647,2.499356e-7,0.003843343,0.0004440186,0.0004973493,0.00001190052,0.00006387042,0.8329463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619665,0.001287756,0.00003599644,0.0005946265,0.0002415928,0.0000341364,0.000001580419,0.000005378976,0.03583249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8533296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105541953","doi":"10.1177/1743872111407022","title":"Timely Deaths: Medicalizing the Deaths of Aboriginal People in Police Custody","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inquest; Criminology; Dead body; Race (biology); Law; Medical examiner; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; History; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Gender studies; Poison control; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Sherene H. Razack","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03185601205035762,"gpt":0.2953365637524799,"spread":0.2634805517021223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006764492,0.00009396373,0.0002126675,0.00001600931,0.001125031,0.00008781158,0.0002855469,0.00007815538,0.0001292853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003090726,0.00004954806,0.00006951304,0.000102579,0.001678258,0.0001425388,0.00002204586,0.0001719845,0.000006516785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001947829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007264635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1685202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3512197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989914,0.0002641492,0.0001692094,0.0001022561,0.0002495399,0.0002234093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995503,0.0001597261,0.00007694418,0.0001099289,0.00007376942,0.00002937678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019836,0.0000111473,0.0002594249,0.000004951816,0.00001112122,5.354651e-7,0.3890299,2.678699e-8,0.0000022934,0.6104789,0.00009736919,0.00008437622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007570226,0.00003023217,0.001178768,0.00003980809,0.00006893915,0.000001062039,0.2623093,0.000003647342,0.00002329128,0.05423918,0.6812297,0.0001191839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04335795,0.00298055,0.000008099647,0.0002944444,0.000165888,0.0002669226,0.00000607558,0.00003017509,0.9528899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889157,0.0007228152,0.00001550043,0.001013794,0.0004022409,0.00002302173,0.00000113099,0.000005817169,0.008899946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9455578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8652942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124631202","doi":"10.1191/1743872105lw010oa","title":"Legal Claims to Culture in and Against the Market: Neoliberalism and the Global Proliferation of Meaningful Difference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Political economy; Cultural homogenization; Cultural globalization; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Globalization; Environmental ethics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Rosemary J. Coombe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02010497831383144,"gpt":0.2466901113241274,"spread":0.2265851330102959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004062101,0.0001154297,0.0001639611,0.000005914091,0.001109923,0.0004623038,0.0001524541,0.00007282975,0.0000196755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002893259,0.00004475396,0.00002602432,0.00008404127,0.001526547,0.0001611772,0.00008127411,0.0001516466,4.566474e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003048815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002260563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003609558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07150697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991589,0.0002026095,0.0001639389,0.0001246082,0.0001919067,0.00015807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997131,0.00005935166,0.00006018438,0.00007627946,0.00006277941,0.00002835293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008324061,0.000005193371,0.0001756996,0.000004612294,0.00001424783,3.591115e-7,0.1555242,0.00000158414,0.000003650196,0.839388,0.00366568,0.001133586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009592109,0.00001925949,0.001702482,0.00004557526,0.00001817965,0.000004751624,0.04500197,0.00002458016,0.00002166942,0.01865112,0.9334452,0.0001059933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4087092,0.007377095,0.000005507503,0.0578523,0.0001765165,0.001524622,0.00002580932,0.0000395653,0.5242894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9021909,0.001038575,0.00002659023,0.006139296,0.0002996582,0.00003826052,0.000003089041,0.000003168086,0.09026046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9297795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9454356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324008955","doi":"10.1177/1743872110366653","title":"Is Religious Freedom Impossible in Canada?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Multiculturalism; Charter; Political science; Epistemology; Human rights; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lori G. Beaman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01274123940099889,"gpt":0.2421537199259563,"spread":0.2294124805249574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001163877,0.00005460362,0.00008595069,0.000006041593,0.0007904408,0.0000976115,0.0001192477,0.00003283178,0.000125014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001871409,0.00003417937,0.00001986601,0.00003194129,0.002343154,0.00005112196,0.0000180559,0.0001625714,0.000003673037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000355274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001029159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995182,0.00003917087,0.0000775899,0.00006714941,0.0001368073,0.0001611208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997581,0.00007707394,0.00002574021,0.00007165875,0.00003833239,0.00002910714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000430858,0.00000210085,0.0003652276,0.000001676431,0.000004350758,0.000002527594,0.01098174,2.633192e-7,0.00000280786,0.9844472,0.004174529,0.00001327609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001806916,0.000003290383,0.00008615311,0.00000412042,0.000005881458,0.000002420372,0.008068961,9.66239e-7,0.000007672942,0.03115988,0.9604226,0.00005731589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02431723,0.0005378401,4.954849e-7,0.00131777,0.0002863061,0.0000713765,0.00002138564,0.00001134946,0.9734362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541394,0.0001450455,0.00002304287,0.005624183,0.0003222542,0.000005820299,0.000001793235,0.000002283311,0.0397362],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.863345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330223703","doi":"10.1177/1743872113478530","title":"Governing Through Privacy: Authoritarian Liberalism, Law, and Privacy Knowledge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Authoritarianism; Liberalism; Information privacy; Relation (database); Sociology; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Law and economics; Business; Politics; Democracy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Randy K. Lippert","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kevin Walby","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03824641855335167,"gpt":0.2817167842378749,"spread":0.2434703656845232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003531102,0.000162643,0.0002001367,0.00001108693,0.003846118,0.001186256,0.0003896057,0.0001349001,0.0001443597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001206035,0.0001067529,0.00004907191,0.00006711386,0.001881523,0.001445883,0.0004142427,0.0002622092,0.0000579489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003307297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002951254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0568086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01914435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988186,0.0002877565,0.0001659061,0.0002373299,0.0001942061,0.0002961916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994066,0.0001063198,0.00008123184,0.0002613917,0.00008986031,0.00005455769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008883005,0.00001617167,0.00001432794,0.00002238026,0.00001962509,5.230348e-7,0.1808879,1.729351e-8,0.00001013608,0.815241,0.003549012,0.0002300359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003659699,0.00002100801,0.00006700664,0.00002290486,0.00002235423,0.000002707226,0.01403929,0.000004816714,0.00002161256,0.335944,0.6493731,0.0001152141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0161371,0.00901542,0.00006384097,0.00328687,0.0004925657,0.0007996073,0.00002554639,0.000212805,0.9699662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609604,0.001370692,0.0004657074,0.003526821,0.001626545,0.0001275901,0.00003202877,0.00002320429,0.03186703],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9448233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319469791","doi":"10.1177/1743872114534017","title":"New Resistance to Hate Crime Legislation and the Concept of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Criminalization; Legislation; Hate crime; Resistance (ecology); Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal law; Sexual orientation; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Amy Swiffen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02033744317997799,"gpt":0.2558328618838228,"spread":0.2354954187038448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004485807,0.00007399727,0.0001460348,0.000001133814,0.001574206,0.0002271359,0.0001502956,0.00006321182,0.00003613568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003238171,0.00003487474,0.00004889531,0.00003807886,0.002987046,0.0001558378,0.00003203056,0.00008908431,0.000002331072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005938162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001165271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00493934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02256968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99929,0.0002212396,0.0001028781,0.00009612595,0.0001758916,0.0001138506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995986,0.0001378113,0.00006300886,0.0001043779,0.00006973607,0.00002644053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003444492,0.000001456798,0.000001004293,0.000004003627,0.00001158942,3.628077e-8,0.2435962,4.48217e-7,0.000005883816,0.7523026,0.003992438,0.00004990381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005647513,0.000008237561,0.00001333295,0.00001930378,0.00002529162,1.864922e-7,0.0126072,4.710861e-7,0.0000899745,0.24645,0.7401746,0.0000466005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005411217,0.004372321,0.00005624295,0.003587281,0.0001183549,0.0002414923,0.000004501178,0.00002525313,0.9910534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7390247,0.0003328801,0.0001508841,0.007224631,0.0006173275,0.00001146531,0.000002497171,0.000005136814,0.2526305],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7384835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320093329","doi":"10.1177/1743872116643693","title":"Against the Witness: Hindu Nationalism and the Law in India","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Law; Witness; Political science; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Hindu nationalism; Nationalism; Politics; Criminology; Sociology; Geography; Religious studies","authors":[{"name":"Moyukh Chatterjee","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01986569357435486,"gpt":0.2423537540403558,"spread":0.2224880604660009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005299208,0.00007482724,0.0001087995,0.000005937738,0.002189602,0.0002239225,0.0001691552,0.00004154582,0.00001761452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004033657,0.00002342916,0.00003056335,0.00004442772,0.005360204,0.0001094441,0.00006057739,0.00008510151,0.000004229059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009666758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001261124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002316372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02023331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993116,0.0001997569,0.00009003662,0.00008852347,0.0001714519,0.0001386157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994837,0.0003309515,0.00004544455,0.000084698,0.00004263919,0.00001258908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001722556,0.000001992894,0.00005470985,0.000001354975,0.00001616812,5.16948e-7,0.18293,1.25434e-8,3.857946e-7,0.8166175,0.0001253821,0.0002347277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001109452,0.000004066977,0.000795342,0.00002126433,0.00001266307,6.327072e-7,0.08999337,2.509778e-7,0.000001872051,0.1605487,0.7474589,0.00005342762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01757946,0.004257721,7.995922e-7,0.01284528,0.0001396933,0.0002791084,0.000008489445,0.00001896517,0.9648705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682835,0.0008283746,0.00000101394,0.00868607,0.0003462659,0.00004848382,7.106569e-7,0.000003489587,0.02180214],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.950704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104163685","doi":"10.1177/1743872111416328","title":"Little Red Riding Hood Crime Films: Critical Variations on Criminal Themes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Referent; Narrative; Criminology; Political action; Action (physics); Criminal justice; Cultural criminology; Crime control; Sociology; Political science; Law; Art","authors":[{"name":"Steven Kohm","is_ca":true},{"name":"Pauline Greenhill","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07740679401220715,"gpt":0.2904318767336935,"spread":0.2130250827214863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001664697,0.0000798598,0.0001037816,0.0000115728,0.0007114059,0.0002838157,0.0001330871,0.00004880863,0.0003295795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001745579,0.00004713514,0.00005347281,0.00003118286,0.001126476,0.0002213009,0.00002888392,0.00009599244,0.00002179128],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007785799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002137128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005490051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006489993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993895,0.00007438733,0.0000887162,0.0001061725,0.0001603032,0.0001809438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996269,0.0001555562,0.00002389029,0.00009164878,0.00006171109,0.00004033586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001710781,0.00002660367,0.000001986964,0.00000508408,0.00001067048,0.000001551976,0.1719154,1.251093e-8,0.000003076177,0.8270605,0.0006592347,0.0002988555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002422973,0.00007221362,0.0001151853,0.00003710149,0.00006704287,0.000001720175,0.08528347,0.00000151234,0.0001005265,0.148555,0.7654215,0.0001025147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008443717,0.0004047423,0.000008698524,0.0003165099,0.000261239,0.00009370669,0.000009818859,0.00005121515,0.9980097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8890352,0.000107964,0.000144103,0.001677241,0.0004040934,0.00001981194,0.000003893394,0.000007021921,0.1086007],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8894089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5471631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122932972","doi":"10.1177/1743872112448362","title":"The Changing Relationship Between Labor and the State in Contemporary Capitalism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Power (physics); Industrial relations; Trade union; Labor relations; Market economy; Collective bargaining; Capitalist state; Political economy; Political science; Labour economics; Economic system; Economics; Law; Politics; History","authors":[{"name":"Chris Howell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05665776059628801,"gpt":0.2852952096162898,"spread":0.2286374490200018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001259958,0.00005963768,0.00008511544,0.00001092402,0.003006833,0.0003060716,0.0001049343,0.00002841086,0.000004902963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004920227,0.0000232587,0.00001899135,0.00007102643,0.001649383,0.0002559249,0.00004541309,0.0001216762,7.236515e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008656439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001285244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01070792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02035763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992204,0.0003279027,0.00009917495,0.00005078436,0.0001154746,0.0001863059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992579,0.0005725904,0.0000478109,0.00007599603,0.00002613024,0.00001958949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006496003,0.000001915772,0.004746329,8.616448e-7,0.000009000028,9.132369e-8,0.2611326,2.737053e-8,8.116955e-8,0.7339737,0.00009389672,0.00003497312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000740496,0.000004030329,0.03283967,0.00001119379,0.00001477142,1.548399e-7,0.09269202,4.290872e-7,0.000001668905,0.2406032,0.6330378,0.00005455057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6582289,0.03245602,0.000003964466,0.009905153,0.0003349632,0.0007192984,0.00004956112,0.00004209482,0.2982601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95917,0.0003668903,0.000001573734,0.001889806,0.0002962807,0.00002358788,0.000003695202,0.000003756797,0.03824437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6329439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464882502","doi":"10.1177/1743872116656777","title":"Sociological Aesthetics of Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Sociological theory; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Andreas Fischer-Lescano","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04097697863533825,"gpt":0.2739822557519672,"spread":0.233005277116629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003059745,0.00006877675,0.0001317804,7.415116e-7,0.00125137,0.00006012259,0.0001675904,0.0001284228,0.0001542641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001801734,0.00002612251,0.00008849521,0.00001877616,0.00821411,0.0001004552,0.0000341399,0.00007760119,0.000008740868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009524701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001098955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004629116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001648473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993638,0.0001613138,0.00009659304,0.00008357163,0.0001544566,0.0001402506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996709,0.0001047649,0.0000520975,0.00008350654,0.00007011808,0.00001860966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009856826,0.000009098721,0.000008104523,0.000003661735,0.0000137876,3.220904e-7,0.08093472,1.739655e-8,0.0000387135,0.9178838,0.001008416,0.00008947992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002498079,0.00001602851,0.000004842149,0.00001209518,0.0000130538,6.87633e-7,0.01079795,2.416199e-8,0.00007427467,0.3400815,0.6487085,0.00004119279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004386202,0.001845845,0.000005063544,0.002734551,0.0001043953,0.0001048563,0.000009585903,0.00004199322,0.9907675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9042898,0.001902717,0.0000384895,0.003133312,0.000361092,0.000009518251,0.000001075881,0.000003764626,0.09026017],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9005073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058088445","doi":"10.1177/1743872110388215","title":"Walter Benjamin and the Ethics of Violence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Messianism; Politics; Sovereignty; State of exception; Proletariat; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Kellogg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09369156461787526,"gpt":0.2348028045185141,"spread":0.1411112399006388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003370107,0.0001250528,0.0002059545,0.00001265123,0.001206232,0.0001470716,0.00014334,0.00003697821,0.0001252462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002012051,0.00005434835,0.00004804963,0.00001078558,0.006004314,0.000144117,0.0001180594,0.0002237753,0.000004026663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003135664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004743916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001407003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00433307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993027,0.0001521565,0.0001868189,0.0001116628,0.0001337244,0.0001129068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993615,0.0002408282,0.0001021194,0.0001626595,0.0001233893,0.000009566143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006728429,0.000006222015,0.000009937175,0.00002901071,0.00003574237,2.415655e-7,0.3351049,3.716356e-8,0.000001108216,0.664527,0.00007870896,0.0001397929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002000842,0.00008057817,0.000211656,0.0001790499,0.0001654946,0.000006664482,0.06253713,0.00002253034,0.0001996077,0.5575476,0.3768698,0.0001790291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03058625,0.008278552,0.00001678009,0.0005525696,0.0003819423,0.000406937,0.00002883963,0.00004625163,0.9597019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818934,0.001088841,0.00002507782,0.001838834,0.0002951682,0.00002517935,0.000003526851,0.000009068995,0.01482088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9513072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777922634","doi":"10.1177/1743872117749524","title":"Human Waste and the Border: A Vignette","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Romani and Gypsy Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Casual; Refugee; Narrative; Law; Humanity; Amnesty; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Sherene H. Razack","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05558397762098469,"gpt":0.3878379489928381,"spread":0.3322539713718534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004806219,0.0001436791,0.0002727396,0.000007283713,0.02071884,0.0002294119,0.0002491346,0.00007218879,0.00006661472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004207823,0.0000574111,0.00005004104,0.000008582423,0.002986301,0.0001390011,0.000330358,0.0003563766,0.00001820347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005434627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000806664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002351126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01225757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990709,0.0002543024,0.0001872023,0.0001412313,0.0001088634,0.0002374723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991689,0.0001857285,0.000172137,0.0003922224,0.00006183098,0.0000192163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005870717,0.000003927186,0.0001870846,0.00005348057,0.00006791796,0.000001356161,0.05351115,2.18399e-8,0.000006299857,0.9381995,0.007846991,0.00006361906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004227186,0.00003277347,0.002127483,0.0001095273,0.0001025191,0.000002819235,0.03535092,0.000003883058,0.000005124118,0.0938491,0.8640726,0.0001160946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04317689,0.007257987,0.000001342652,0.006354654,0.0003274586,0.0006567099,0.00001195517,0.00004687145,0.9421661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7180884,0.0007850974,0.000006409402,0.007874886,0.0007999144,0.0001417681,0.000002651416,0.0000122935,0.2722886],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8562256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328568497","doi":"10.1177/1743872113509443","title":"Evitable Conflicts, Inevitable Technologies? The Science and Fiction of Robotic Warfare and IHL","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Space exploration and regulation","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Robot; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Computer security; Law; Political science; International law; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Ian Kerr","is_ca":true},{"name":"Katie Szilagyi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01607923005712447,"gpt":0.2152213757329652,"spread":0.1991421456758407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002209712,0.00006300097,0.00009343958,0.00001546323,0.0007511192,0.0001735831,0.00006560293,0.00001987932,0.000007054282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001074909,0.00002960601,0.00001073492,0.00006632155,0.001474712,0.0002207308,0.00005390741,0.00006152354,4.845508e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002986081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000659061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001492347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002703242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996495,0.00002190291,0.00007174282,0.00008845449,0.0000906575,0.00007777345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997047,0.00003527334,0.00005661518,0.0001072141,0.00008868382,0.000007500761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004062634,0.000003989335,0.0001453666,0.00000929748,0.000008058456,7.35524e-9,0.002601281,0.00002027039,0.0004024342,0.9960253,0.0001206795,0.0006593034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002023492,0.0001556805,0.001838517,0.0001262099,0.0001434022,0.000006195511,0.07072718,0.006043917,0.01282055,0.17443,0.7313713,0.000313649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2874427,0.01396514,0.004580162,0.009984688,0.000692041,0.001961226,0.00002530912,0.0003202963,0.6810285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961312,0.00004911059,0.00003414553,0.00008102806,0.00005106534,0.00001166132,0.000003238135,0.000002841349,0.003635721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8215953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5777078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141531973","doi":"10.1177/1743872109339109","title":"Having Your Porn and Condemning it Too: A Case Study of a “Kiddie Porn” Expose","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Rhetorical question; Child pornography; Sexualization; Sociology; Taboo; Narrative; Rhetoric; Media studies; Performative utterance; Contradiction; Voyeurism; Aesthetics; Psychology; Criminology; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Art; The Internet; Literature; Human sexuality; Epistemology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Ummni Khan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08324905464131462,"gpt":0.3231634378619522,"spread":0.2399143832206376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004403531,0.0001086864,0.0002073495,0.00001793949,0.001228584,0.0001710515,0.00009482172,0.00005837351,0.00001945863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004039991,0.00006944502,0.00003456914,0.00004330665,0.0006067585,0.0001543196,0.00003249546,0.0001201008,7.153582e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008040076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002833481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005167091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02050207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991801,0.0001337777,0.0001667103,0.0001431311,0.0001888797,0.000187447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996214,0.00007653756,0.00008606612,0.0001037949,0.00006388414,0.00004832491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001499332,0.00005191973,0.0001110833,0.000007179089,0.0000207107,0.0001222408,0.7219976,1.189967e-7,0.00002902849,0.2770686,0.0001889454,0.0003876571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00101601,0.0001635998,0.0001293782,0.00002147574,0.00008150048,0.0001057014,0.94919,9.053759e-7,0.00002311046,0.006223888,0.04294144,0.0001030207],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8312027,0.00188133,0.000001338317,0.0002484969,0.0001036844,0.0003083432,0.000003916234,0.00003009096,0.1662201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849148,0.0001547924,0.00001679043,0.001086835,0.0002007741,0.00000880709,0.000001278661,0.000004424873,0.01361148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2708447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045204968","doi":"10.1177/1743872120942770","title":"Confronting Jurisdiction with Antinomian Bodies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Metaphor; Law; Common law; Dance; Sociology; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Joshua Shaw","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02239190263427221,"gpt":0.2317014670405033,"spread":0.2093095644062311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001435631,0.00008362293,0.0001212054,8.962314e-7,0.002736523,0.0003698291,0.0001087352,0.00006343765,0.00006008895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001167025,0.00004297643,0.00004426755,0.00003387591,0.00193332,0.000213767,0.00002332059,0.0001477796,0.000007394842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006912779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001591214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007757971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004120471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994261,0.00008750809,0.00007436622,0.0001117662,0.0001543581,0.0001459519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997879,0.00002751271,0.00004958203,0.00004771044,0.00005704119,0.00003022682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002055044,0.000002272526,0.00004641198,0.0000080762,0.00002243251,7.621928e-7,0.2988249,3.498081e-7,0.000007730276,0.6991834,0.001843588,0.00003950425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003831094,0.0000235622,0.00002537843,0.00001314622,0.00003576604,0.000001065114,0.1306696,0.000002120636,0.0000362506,0.005325581,0.8634087,0.00007573975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00530929,0.003162836,0.00001502264,0.005555798,0.00008979708,0.0001811086,0.000004806269,0.0001305417,0.9855508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200259,0.0009112065,0.0000971635,0.009124961,0.001219445,0.00001472529,0.000005965237,0.000008414414,0.06859218],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9169586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329449469","doi":"10.1177/1743872114538908","title":"Affirming the Human? The Question of Biopolitics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Rhetorical question; Fable; Constitution; SOCRATES; Subject (documents); Relation (database); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Law; Political science; Politics; Art; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Stuart J. Murray","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03524589939056276,"gpt":0.3236154099245809,"spread":0.2883695105340181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225698,0.00007302504,0.0001002209,0.00000635068,0.003409901,0.000208926,0.0002621722,0.00007122141,0.00002302133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001088366,0.00002918595,0.00005196891,0.00003816441,0.004764219,0.00008594656,0.00003941431,0.0001973425,0.000004385969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008788943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001709929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00894275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02341059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990027,0.0004369294,0.0001165589,0.00007055422,0.0002189524,0.0001543203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993092,0.0003418679,0.00007688894,0.0001591068,0.00009929331,0.00001368894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000246701,0.000004720393,0.00001240635,0.000008060328,0.000009099751,5.741359e-8,0.1516754,6.005764e-7,0.00000915615,0.8479242,0.0003103247,0.00004360097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001088272,0.00001441864,0.00004328856,0.00001928253,0.0000281976,6.541291e-7,0.053719,0.000004113809,0.00005524287,0.2716486,0.6743165,0.00004189227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01786892,0.001318093,0.0000187556,0.004734863,0.0003802384,0.0001989253,0.000003839844,0.00004257894,0.9754338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618298,0.0002080054,0.000007359771,0.002097023,0.0006682472,0.000007873607,0.000001799401,0.000004770706,0.03517516],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9439608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500281862","doi":"10.1177/1743872116661271","title":"Relative Lust: Accidental Incest’s Affective and Legal Resonances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect theory; Human sexuality; Kinship; Sociology; Psychology; Fetishism; Lust; Pornography; Affect (linguistics); Subjectivity; Queer; Accidental; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Gender studies; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Communication; Feeling; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Lara Karaian","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03050299979201022,"gpt":0.3034520406291384,"spread":0.2729490408371282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001589078,0.0001502191,0.0002036293,0.00002561473,0.0004819137,0.00008073026,0.0001357756,0.000150954,0.0001546117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001711922,0.0000708197,0.00003638222,0.00003659672,0.002464453,0.0002587932,0.0001285964,0.0001782392,0.00002562091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000149547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000523162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001672641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005257436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999177,0.0001694481,0.0001266493,0.0002497798,0.00008598825,0.0001911616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994937,0.0002003918,0.00007301498,0.000180324,0.0000340843,0.00001844868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001213488,0.00002439475,0.001477089,0.00000288039,0.000062229,0.0000190433,0.0151268,1.176919e-9,0.00006264156,0.979702,0.0004476244,0.00295394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003010577,0.0003093494,0.01186097,0.00004617443,0.0001038292,0.0002179755,0.02385118,1.138414e-7,0.0004129863,0.1853814,0.774564,0.0002415223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4260756,0.007587613,0.00001079556,0.0006673829,0.0005207537,0.0003080692,0.00002956487,0.0001404944,0.5646597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8193046,0.000132611,0.000009500422,0.0005371379,0.0001648562,0.00006147883,0.000002338566,0.000009718434,0.1797777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7943206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.908038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465461882","doi":"10.1177/1743872115627413","title":"Is Narrative Essential to the Law?: Precedent, Case Law and Judicial Emplotment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Narrative; Law; Invocation; Political science; Legal opinion; Legal realism; Focus (optics); Sociology; Judicial opinion; Legal profession; Black letter law; Public law; Philosophy; Private law; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Benjamin Bricker","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02537967009557925,"gpt":0.289484105843372,"spread":0.2641044357477927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000324165,0.0001429507,0.0001555884,0.000001738803,0.006093467,0.0004803537,0.0001818528,0.0001034481,0.0002032764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001253606,0.0000566218,0.00007902665,0.00004779146,0.003627585,0.0002468664,0.00009995072,0.0001154681,0.00001616975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002615977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001653014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01013666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1839976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989508,0.0002317211,0.000123402,0.0001991521,0.0002542002,0.0002406636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995606,0.00009834045,0.000054122,0.0001373402,0.00009384839,0.00005576815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002011415,0.000008045613,0.000001389806,0.000002830907,0.00004075055,0.000005828865,0.3929556,4.143731e-8,0.00001312555,0.6014294,0.005490595,0.00003229195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004534555,0.00003676802,0.000002365141,0.00002578613,0.00005299183,0.00002544725,0.1680969,9.800893e-8,0.0001853835,0.05318547,0.7778298,0.000105535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04037759,0.003050686,0.0000100571,0.02710198,0.000732942,0.00103866,0.0001065049,0.0001098755,0.9274717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9227872,0.0004720942,0.00001403582,0.02015124,0.00127799,0.00007109952,0.000001521426,0.000008615207,0.05521618],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8824096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112284780","doi":"10.1177/1743872113499226","title":"Museums as Constitutions: A Commentary on Constitutions and Constitution Making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Negotiation; Politics; Meaning (existential); Political science; Focus (optics); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Stacy Douglas","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02541017143397505,"gpt":0.2756824729573618,"spread":0.2502723015233867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002211535,0.0001334202,0.0001517675,0.000006020886,0.006279667,0.0006124098,0.0001195357,0.0001186794,0.0002728776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004443416,0.00008133228,0.00005966413,0.00006277982,0.01392125,0.0004220062,0.00004715097,0.0002245883,0.00005495176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003848056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005266139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005302163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003818925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991457,0.0001655999,0.0001356738,0.0001600722,0.0001871478,0.0002057706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995646,0.0001340276,0.00005787667,0.0001094608,0.0000909491,0.00004301632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008956047,0.00002031585,0.00002393735,0.000008725513,0.00004102743,0.000001656824,0.03720609,0.000001323506,0.000007257901,0.9487743,0.01382534,0.00008102295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005398431,0.00002062857,0.00001081378,0.00007785884,0.00004815513,0.00001373998,0.05467964,0.000002440202,0.00001006577,0.1244922,0.8199885,0.0001160639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002485872,0.002573345,0.00002114346,0.009367408,0.0003107114,0.000596069,0.0000217977,0.0001067875,0.9845169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516124,0.001558644,0.00007566271,0.03679858,0.0003874928,0.0001067101,0.00001485073,0.000003375046,0.009442301],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344815150","doi":"10.1177/1743872115603665","title":"Truth Commission Discourse and the Aesthetics of Reconciliation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Commission; Confession (law); Testimonial; Spectacle; Law; Aesthetics; Materiality (auditing); Sociology; Forgiveness; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Mickey Vallee","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04915393180586895,"gpt":0.2950421446103727,"spread":0.2458882128045037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007572792,0.00006066885,0.0001194592,0.000001115351,0.001086861,0.0001348522,0.0001131373,0.00006658002,0.00001205427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005676247,0.00002486555,0.00004238915,0.00003250288,0.004470935,0.0001225517,0.00002974068,0.00009994148,9.76473e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008934108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002190666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008639413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001686705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993242,0.0002515826,0.00009348496,0.00006220405,0.0001870469,0.00008150509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996312,0.00009651163,0.00007227722,0.00008193396,0.00009327965,0.00002474229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003522049,0.000004655553,0.000008943547,0.000003913572,0.000007969404,7.017728e-8,0.2737145,3.108267e-7,5.344611e-7,0.7248141,0.001253197,0.0001566196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009687859,0.00001465312,0.000008627404,0.0000150833,0.00003646166,0.000001094688,0.2104354,0.000004710563,0.00001414293,0.2012603,0.5872011,0.00003962559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02106592,0.007811109,0.000005373052,0.005622348,0.000265356,0.0002820193,0.000008380012,0.00002963596,0.9649099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433963,0.001651142,0.00002617255,0.0007938619,0.0002407822,0.000009637532,0.000003645172,0.000003657376,0.05387476],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9223304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124316098","doi":"10.1177/1743872109360122","title":"‘ ‘Passing through the Mirror’’: <i>Dead Man</i> , Legal Pluralism and the De-territorialization of the West","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Indigenous; Realm; Sociology; Scholarship; Frontier; Premise; Legal pluralism; Negotiation; Embodied cognition; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Legal realism; Political science; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Ruth Buchanan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01443250552076582,"gpt":0.255492472209391,"spread":0.2410599666886251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006621581,0.0001152012,0.0001458178,0.000001007641,0.004961337,0.0006759982,0.000411166,0.0001420648,0.00003491715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005816438,0.00003933505,0.0001122304,0.00007256719,0.007573507,0.0002938806,0.00008635951,0.0003585264,8.920473e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000991671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003098919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01414357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06077189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988896,0.0004016038,0.0001450856,0.0001107372,0.0002820369,0.0001709665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993778,0.0001871078,0.0001281142,0.0002011927,0.00009157677,0.0000142205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001626675,0.00000511558,0.00001838151,0.000006615071,0.00002089121,1.149808e-7,0.2455289,2.82887e-7,0.0000763591,0.7528952,0.001412254,0.00001961469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005773709,0.000004603831,0.00006953446,0.00001888104,0.00007885432,0.000004713837,0.06084771,0.000003977068,0.000125893,0.1168719,0.8213307,0.00006590124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05492413,0.006576417,0.00001884719,0.04904286,0.005412612,0.001270108,0.00003130249,0.000100237,0.8826235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649913,0.0006789272,0.00003504517,0.005886733,0.001737395,0.00003210333,0.000003350107,0.000008891217,0.02662627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9100671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476390622","doi":"10.1177/1743872116660778","title":"Derrida’s Kafka and the Imagined Boundary of Legal Knowledge","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Franz Kafka Literary Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary (topology); Law; Space (punctuation); Context (archaeology); Consciousness; Focus (optics); Subject (documents); Epistemology; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; History; Comparative law; Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics; Physics","authors":[{"name":"William E. Conklin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01418445016402706,"gpt":0.1986020528813015,"spread":0.1844176027172744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002336045,0.0001865721,0.0003187783,0.00002050048,0.00145102,0.0004856376,0.0001677008,0.00002472194,0.0002177247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001916707,0.00006417522,0.00009159036,0.00001185074,0.01088016,0.0003948618,0.000135155,0.0001004235,0.00001251318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006237954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001436786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008464732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005912377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992157,0.0001290847,0.0002226993,0.0001479332,0.0001118104,0.0001727708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992819,0.0003034005,0.00008506595,0.0001901671,0.0001236071,0.00001583954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001781096,0.00001257667,0.00000800969,0.00004141023,0.0001163216,0.000001097259,0.1386286,6.938978e-9,0.000007217877,0.8558151,0.004809597,0.0003820723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002791216,0.00003948266,0.00002776747,0.00006685907,0.00008566499,0.00001071622,0.008125184,0.000001892583,0.0000379674,0.08537397,0.9033269,0.0001124114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007181048,0.04082722,0.000003888706,0.002645433,0.0004121559,0.0002931135,0.00006489475,0.0000553844,0.9485168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7387648,0.0004443419,0.000007412083,0.001439454,0.0006781555,0.00003655752,0.000002787748,0.00001380704,0.2586126],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8985173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122772823","doi":"10.1177/1743872111406428","title":"Legality Against Orality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Temporality; Orality; Indigenous; History; Oral history; Law; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Anthropology; Philosophy; Literacy","authors":[{"name":"Bradley Bryan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07098577379253916,"gpt":0.27080291452486,"spread":0.1998171407323208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005400869,0.00009184972,0.0001286291,0.000001060985,0.002762797,0.0002218885,0.0002135009,0.0001078809,0.0002450423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001886301,0.00004936316,0.00009180918,0.00004854626,0.003616807,0.0002645104,0.00004238787,0.0001673573,0.00001751807],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001483272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001958486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006778348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01556359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991689,0.0002392869,0.0001036714,0.0001206473,0.0001806517,0.0001868829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996855,0.00002663746,0.00004774299,0.0001323595,0.00007610979,0.00003168436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001123761,0.00001186008,0.00002797134,0.000005348125,0.00001828869,7.252918e-7,0.2548194,1.323538e-8,0.000001543474,0.7433969,0.001641911,0.00006473558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002263011,0.000006236998,0.00007421282,0.000006449335,0.00001989175,4.306814e-7,0.05531812,1.406198e-7,0.00004431717,0.154132,0.7900935,0.0000783737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005413264,0.001339991,0.000002132236,0.0003541588,0.0001863211,0.0001404562,0.000006946132,0.00008612934,0.9924706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8241763,0.0007118253,0.00006831124,0.007393684,0.0004898604,0.00002035053,0.000005651215,0.000005715662,0.1671283],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8253423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110624938","doi":"10.1177/1743872110378707","title":"Legal Judgment and Cape Colonial Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Contradiction; Performative utterance; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Power (physics); Legal realism; Epistemology; Political science; History; Legal profession; Philosophy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"George Pavlich","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01480268893002282,"gpt":0.2618092153669088,"spread":0.247006526436886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002823547,0.00008860104,0.0001220086,0.000005853727,0.002077631,0.0006363303,0.0001552622,0.00008637533,0.0001136614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000223207,0.00005309487,0.00002878821,0.00002797319,0.0042082,0.0001737622,0.00006880463,0.0002441133,0.00001298978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008412963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001789315,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02664536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2128209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99933,0.00008406462,0.00008662977,0.0001210762,0.0001928343,0.0001854227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997064,0.00006747055,0.0000356012,0.0001044326,0.00004604634,0.00004007816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001389045,0.000006020561,0.00001011509,0.000003608134,0.000009405947,0.000002238144,0.2035294,2.169632e-8,0.00002850599,0.7961547,0.0002089538,0.00003316098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003642519,0.00002087345,0.00001204596,0.000004261787,0.00002441871,0.000002173479,0.007004248,7.107553e-7,0.00005446786,0.03984787,0.9525816,0.00008300998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02337934,0.001175147,4.887793e-7,0.0008156397,0.0005391473,0.0001770638,0.000007847804,0.00005377106,0.9738516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.928039,0.00004853463,0.00005690118,0.002112205,0.0008319718,0.00001616875,0.000001547987,0.000005553502,0.06888814],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001802528","doi":"10.1177/1743872114524879","title":"Biopolitics and the Enemy: On Law, Rights and Proper Subjects","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Appeal; Law; Adversary; Sociology; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"J. Hardes","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01519372437108563,"gpt":0.2320422127931087,"spread":0.2168484884220231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000499656,0.0001203857,0.000163523,0.000001735556,0.004171054,0.0005347263,0.0001303737,0.0001091626,0.00002125111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002089499,0.00004683158,0.00004644676,0.00002903628,0.007708557,0.0001271847,0.00004549989,0.0001707468,0.000004380853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008456837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008481562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004328814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01386198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990839,0.0003074427,0.00008669712,0.0001408972,0.0001856168,0.0001953923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999576,0.000181232,0.00004085722,0.0001126671,0.00005279561,0.00003646635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002369835,0.000007522518,0.000002273998,0.00001138896,0.00002114868,2.786753e-7,0.1298608,5.159823e-8,0.00000207078,0.869329,0.0007151202,0.00002659609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006576218,0.00001972619,0.000007116218,0.00001705997,0.00003284312,0.000001990705,0.01173907,0.00000161775,0.00004146158,0.3622607,0.6251535,0.00006721474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01776452,0.002638361,6.038458e-7,0.001983759,0.00013095,0.0002696626,0.000005166145,0.00004329887,0.9771637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9031305,0.0007480957,0.00001188309,0.008692109,0.0007051427,0.00002107268,0.000002250385,0.000005981648,0.08668302],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964157049","doi":"10.1177/1743872119864674","title":"The Invisible Center: Christian Liberalism in American Religious Freedom Jurisprudence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Establishment Clause; Free Exercise Clause; Neutrality; Political science; Supreme court; Sociology; Separation of church and state; Scrutiny; Christianity; State (computer science); Classical liberalism; Politics; Philosophy; Religious studies; First amendment","authors":[{"name":"Hannah Dick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009422889290066083,"gpt":0.2532670554987353,"spread":0.2438441662086693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002671047,0.00009107835,0.0001433793,0.00001074794,0.00129479,0.0003145759,0.0002779984,0.00003161762,0.00002312331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002519141,0.00004875399,0.00004556622,0.00007903738,0.006858796,0.00009360511,0.00005171148,0.0001669478,0.00002933321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003017701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001163442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08229985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06212847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999108,0.0001799331,0.0001302375,0.000119111,0.0002034265,0.0002593057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994642,0.0002365862,0.00007216637,0.0001476003,0.00004704059,0.00003245238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001468039,0.000006757793,0.0006027818,0.000002718355,0.000008901415,0.00000162996,0.01833373,0.000001700081,6.83965e-7,0.9790289,0.001942236,0.00005522161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000266134,0.00002242886,0.0001507248,0.00001912229,0.000006467151,0.000002580698,0.01619755,0.00000195537,0.000001466012,0.0210624,0.962193,0.00007616227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0279554,0.002623044,0.000002084587,0.003011813,0.0003163717,0.0002344253,0.00001692688,0.00003660178,0.9658033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403167,0.00166164,0.00002156968,0.004127214,0.0003042812,0.00001350542,0.00000361753,0.000004856834,0.05354664],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060378585","doi":"10.1177/1743872109102492","title":"Time's Desire: Literature and the Temporality of Justice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Rhetorical question; Economic Justice; Torture; Spectacle; Aesthetics; Restorative justice; Sociology; Amnesty; Dream; Sacrifice; Punishment (psychology); Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Literature; Political science; Criminology; Art; Social psychology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jon Kertzer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02082696592113149,"gpt":0.2618990157571885,"spread":0.241072049836057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007165279,0.00009720566,0.0001810788,0.00000149004,0.002073592,0.0003231784,0.0001795046,0.0001169473,0.00003080148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004509583,0.00004102943,0.0000788675,0.00007960853,0.00485996,0.000194427,0.00002531911,0.0001875313,0.000001794521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006000792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001389009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002403768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002827803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991353,0.0003185725,0.0001187189,0.0001041602,0.0001919342,0.0001313879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995446,0.0001394332,0.0000766884,0.0001176963,0.0001004012,0.00002115996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005055952,0.000007899213,0.000001238155,0.00001884815,0.0000169641,4.82913e-7,0.2181995,1.201069e-7,0.000005708393,0.7799677,0.001668032,0.00006295008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009331973,0.00002087948,0.000039997,0.00005616782,0.0001390335,0.00000347376,0.0361626,0.000002462916,0.00002379481,0.4275408,0.5349938,0.00008370053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006627843,0.02842203,0.000001709205,0.005695413,0.0001212162,0.0003863256,0.00001823515,0.00005444604,0.9586728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8767983,0.003903528,0.0000541257,0.008197198,0.000590014,0.000008334738,0.000007976127,0.000004131495,0.1104364],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8701705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529062326","doi":"10.1177/1743872116673162","title":"Monsters and Madwomen? Neurosis, Ambition and Mothering in Women Lawyers in Film","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Monster; Subjectivity; Psychoanalysis; Metaphor; Sociology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Mode (computer interface); Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Psychology; Epistemology; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer L. Schulz","is_ca":true},{"name":"JiHyun Youn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01207733358889504,"gpt":0.21933268955251,"spread":0.207255355963615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002781999,0.00008007121,0.0001154022,0.000005412962,0.0004898656,0.0001688501,0.00006151442,0.00007016578,0.00002378059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001110782,0.00004263025,0.00001517589,0.00004830886,0.001389759,0.0002654553,0.000033265,0.00008497552,7.319316e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003356297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005808256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001046205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009806001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993847,0.0001193705,0.00008774734,0.0001260324,0.00009331827,0.0001888073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998289,0.00005841721,0.000027716,0.0000488229,0.00001064717,0.00002543845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002554013,0.000006890994,0.000383335,0.0000122582,0.000005468581,0.000001375375,0.2829874,2.476033e-7,0.0001345739,0.7160597,0.0001075462,0.0002755534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002539609,0.00005034274,0.002998763,0.0001950539,0.00001100211,0.000003853752,0.3736711,0.00000359685,0.00005226207,0.1192895,0.5009398,0.0002451137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8738671,0.001810182,9.053302e-7,0.001834417,0.00007381522,0.0002211627,0.000008335284,0.0000316625,0.1221524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816986,0.004038069,0.000007229704,0.002034823,0.00006762704,0.00003794101,4.627389e-7,0.000004847165,0.01211034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5967702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5471979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984670992","doi":"10.1177/1743872107086147","title":"On the Book of Job, Justice, and The Precariousness of the Criminal Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Law; Injustice; Political science; Mythology; Economic Justice; Subject (documents); Sociology; Criminology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin L. Berger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04706356449537347,"gpt":0.2702441567803643,"spread":0.2231805922849909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000539493,0.0000922308,0.0001691076,0.000004338334,0.003005479,0.00008689914,0.0003585155,0.00004475745,0.00004695473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008099907,0.00003097233,0.00007994599,0.00004217611,0.01106966,0.0001165769,0.00008028677,0.0001562082,0.000001356413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006206143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002773863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01201073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0205361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989933,0.0003410802,0.0001427364,0.0000918252,0.0003008988,0.0001301978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988715,0.0007242567,0.0001063242,0.0001955434,0.00008886721,0.00001352016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001010249,0.000008075165,0.000006664317,0.0000367075,0.00001535295,4.531926e-7,0.1552685,8.959463e-7,0.000005992819,0.8432908,0.001251166,0.00001436472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008861462,0.00007990012,0.0004525588,0.0001762504,0.0006526585,0.00001711673,0.1034175,0.000005391437,0.0004181063,0.1663902,0.7273693,0.0001348037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1113117,0.006887472,0.000001804384,0.00453774,0.0002315019,0.0004560208,0.000009709856,0.00001402825,0.87655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9670544,0.001017551,0.000002255007,0.003380396,0.0001530037,0.00001477998,2.431601e-7,0.000003937066,0.02837346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8557426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983158694","doi":"10.1177/1743872119886235","title":"Law and Humanities: A Field Without a Canon","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Scholarship; Humanities; Discipline; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Law; Political science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Sara Ramshaw","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0355903174241701,"gpt":0.3173839394147039,"spread":0.2817936219905338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002700023,0.00006856619,0.00009650083,0.00001249271,0.001540132,0.0007736551,0.00008775794,0.00005228455,0.0005724392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004225141,0.00004383189,0.00001947625,0.00004747109,0.0008070595,0.0005195021,0.00002317393,0.0001937096,0.00002572421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001119387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006092796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0387683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09502552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994691,0.0001053212,0.00009076343,0.00009398812,0.0001237246,0.0001170979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995478,0.000205039,0.00005285564,0.00009387563,0.00008415598,0.00001632262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001251515,0.000006385417,0.00005536078,0.00000902069,0.00001216265,1.564066e-7,0.1345647,2.714686e-8,0.000004395274,0.8642387,0.001052937,0.0000435594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000273427,0.00002280981,0.00001473427,0.00001341245,0.00001694414,0.00000200684,0.05247033,7.666299e-7,0.00001508214,0.04835822,0.8987438,0.00006843015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007569765,0.00060874,0.000001531388,0.004841661,0.000261323,0.0001995989,0.000002983828,0.00003583504,0.9864786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7371719,0.0001160111,0.00002072878,0.02777649,0.0002592514,0.00001779918,0.000003076735,0.000004184928,0.2346306],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8976909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120424606","doi":"10.1177/1743872120987010","title":"The American Border Wall: A History of Legal Division","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Latin American and Latino Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fence (mathematics); Narrative; Law; Political science; Software deployment; Engineering; Art","authors":[{"name":"Marie-Eve Loiselle","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0184501034427095,"gpt":0.2770508615498322,"spread":0.2586007581071227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002020341,0.00006304914,0.000149517,0.000004102801,0.001215916,0.0001034278,0.0001318945,0.00001259721,0.00003948481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005824988,0.00002957777,0.00005660996,0.00005645529,0.005353958,0.00008287,0.00006932561,0.00007909014,0.000001261617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003080459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007702982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01152966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02260915,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992986,0.0002137029,0.000098702,0.00008254244,0.0001813342,0.0001251067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994576,0.0002044559,0.0001014974,0.0001147752,0.0001085154,0.00001315588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007599303,0.000006622269,0.00003305018,0.000002817812,0.00002911034,0.000001105541,0.07413317,8.2097e-8,0.000009938729,0.9220576,0.001809044,0.00190982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001313745,0.00001809013,0.000371576,0.000006175703,0.00001395416,5.687166e-7,0.04260314,0.000002024295,0.000007478812,0.005374954,0.9514227,0.00004798797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00253945,0.01151119,0.000008372937,0.002173868,0.0001712157,0.00007014455,0.000001387144,0.00002563804,0.9834988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6566882,0.002649915,0.00004714106,0.002718171,0.0001086559,0.000009998202,0.000001010294,0.000004375388,0.3377726],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761163122","doi":"10.1177/1743872117737238","title":"“I’m Making the Streets Safer Ma’am”: Race, Coloniality, and the Redemptive Theologies of Pastoral Police Power","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Sociology; Power (physics); Politics; Sovereignty; Political theology; Sectarianism; Confessional; Race (biology); Criminology; State of exception; Law; Gender studies; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Zahir Kolia","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05120832244541051,"gpt":0.3313462411554134,"spread":0.2801379187100029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006356406,0.00009848886,0.0001900254,0.00000545147,0.005647047,0.0003948709,0.0004087784,0.00005529175,0.00004813746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001155526,0.00004003443,0.00006073846,0.00001573383,0.0301632,0.0001336242,0.0001935503,0.0001429773,0.000001444404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001207169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008725096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03018446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02712811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990471,0.0003731347,0.0001201704,0.00009534249,0.0001859244,0.0001783448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998949,0.0005315599,0.0001857629,0.0002218877,0.00009638802,0.00001541781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000956994,0.000004466812,0.0002157999,0.000003540081,0.00004588024,4.477001e-7,0.07316999,2.808769e-7,5.611393e-7,0.9257987,0.0006414514,0.00002314139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000541998,0.00002301327,0.001530719,0.00002388407,0.00006684874,0.000003782323,0.0650885,7.76972e-7,0.000004581751,0.1136407,0.8189957,0.00007947916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02529288,0.001322734,0.000003641935,0.006937735,0.0001843617,0.0002458076,0.00004286655,0.00001605219,0.9659539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652562,0.0002376426,0.00001306538,0.002299082,0.0002832355,0.00001227435,8.49921e-7,0.000003223558,0.03189442],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9399633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112498039","doi":"10.1177/1743872107073234","title":"The Politics and Inhumanity of Torture","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Politics; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Psychology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Mark Antaki","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03622480654959636,"gpt":0.2935495809658566,"spread":0.2573247744162603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001148687,0.00008201306,0.0001214546,0.000007168295,0.003258668,0.0002149315,0.0001580503,0.0001126843,0.00001385177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006972439,0.00004013886,0.00004097454,0.00002886955,0.005868,0.00009895877,0.000041926,0.0002322693,6.55575e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000111802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002623635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005711704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999226,0.0001241197,0.0001414426,0.00008370052,0.0002164052,0.0002083155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992524,0.0004184936,0.00007245229,0.0001151719,0.0001069909,0.00003448344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001176696,0.000004999676,0.00005198751,0.000009859043,0.00001571089,6.41781e-7,0.1165979,1.517843e-8,0.000003298986,0.8828039,0.0003718694,0.0001281312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001580323,0.00001510091,0.0002753215,0.000008666137,0.00002039229,0.000001160403,0.04654325,1.29572e-7,0.00003708226,0.1884217,0.7644691,0.00005007148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01872453,0.009938037,0.000007878401,0.001149622,0.000358493,0.000199831,0.000008740984,0.00003722708,0.9695756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9197749,0.001251121,0.00001318662,0.002146729,0.0006582616,0.000002494366,0.000001582412,0.000005607098,0.07614613],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9010504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316321423","doi":"10.1177/1743872114552247","title":"Grey Owl in the White Settler Wilderness: “Imaginary Indians” in Canadian Culture and Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Wilderness; Appropriation; National park; White (mutation); Lawlessness; Law; Cultural appropriation; Context (archaeology); History; Ethnology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Archaeology; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Fenn Elan Stewart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00933606165846299,"gpt":0.2062428643222068,"spread":0.1969068026637439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005735958,0.00009697937,0.0001395989,0.0000822003,0.002057316,0.001059882,0.0002285288,0.0001025722,0.00007617013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002187081,0.00006596172,0.00002913991,0.0001140999,0.002783187,0.0003308614,0.00001838547,0.0002748109,0.000009586311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001307456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001259536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9823992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990268,0.0002832702,0.0001047858,0.0001424541,0.0001502551,0.000292452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999712,0.00003615888,0.00003221517,0.0001180124,0.00002912762,0.00007243609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003480701,0.00000402718,0.0004881431,0.000009788486,0.000003452946,0.000008700591,0.2558727,2.068175e-7,2.625041e-7,0.7388887,0.004640984,0.00007962515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003006554,0.0000107342,0.00276276,0.00002957226,0.00001131412,0.000005352932,0.03325301,0.000001141173,8.530423e-8,0.04026759,0.9232541,0.0001037367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007578779,0.003664462,1.636809e-7,0.005758809,0.0001589463,0.0002352921,0.00002856378,0.00001403201,0.9825609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9197307,0.000449971,0.000004413784,0.01337575,0.0003344714,0.00002717038,0.00001310174,0.000007898048,0.06605649],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159606976","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355555","title":"Law and the Foucauldian Wild West in Michael Cimino’s <i>Heaven’s Gate</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Heaven; Lawlessness; Narrative; State (computer science); Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Diana Young","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0142997731638764,"gpt":0.2373610901513585,"spread":0.2230613169874821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008609549,0.0001479492,0.0002102414,0.000002775648,0.003338135,0.0005382862,0.0002833145,0.0001952519,0.00010528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000318606,0.00007096087,0.00008378166,0.00006326869,0.008430339,0.0002473057,0.00007023405,0.0006342072,0.00001064521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001068355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002205542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01983777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4625421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989282,0.0002663753,0.0001481106,0.0001734417,0.0002099636,0.0002738667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999482,0.0001947723,0.0000602236,0.0001685831,0.00005173706,0.00004273004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002652732,0.000009845261,0.00002851946,0.000007893153,0.00001419905,0.000001342993,0.2231076,1.127735e-7,0.00001632,0.7755362,0.001223481,0.00002789685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001136899,0.000007821272,0.00005480047,0.00001628483,0.00002948303,0.00000588687,0.06297872,0.000001272011,0.00002121695,0.157986,0.7776533,0.0001082909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02323782,0.003386285,2.661254e-7,0.008855721,0.0005219994,0.0004258187,0.00001542826,0.00005276493,0.9635039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340053,0.001578507,0.0000244269,0.01984199,0.0007920436,0.00005959523,0.00000596605,0.00001009023,0.04368208],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9198218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146388455","doi":"10.1177/1743872110374264","title":"‘It Won’t Always Be Wrong’: Morality and Monsters in Legal Rational Authority","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gothic Literature and Media Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Bureaucracy; Negotiation; Underclass; Fantasy; Monster; Face (sociological concept); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Function (biology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Social science; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Sheryl N. Hamilton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Neil Gerlach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02434236848045186,"gpt":0.2787753244748404,"spread":0.2544329559943885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006501491,0.00008804508,0.0001513047,0.00002054248,0.0009204436,0.0004522727,0.0001054744,0.0001122837,0.000101467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005586362,0.00005419818,0.00004399001,0.00006741627,0.001699653,0.0003604694,0.00002999856,0.0003309298,0.000001304631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009531632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004170153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008595263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2147229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999211,0.0001601377,0.0001245611,0.0001391952,0.0002079324,0.0001571868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999674,0.00009812105,0.00003924624,0.00009271496,0.00005288298,0.00004300959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001207566,0.000009673573,0.0003739764,0.000005297525,0.00001458217,0.00000208176,0.1025831,1.121395e-7,0.00003549472,0.8961855,0.0007291853,0.00004891219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003955161,0.000008307399,0.0005789829,0.000008067472,0.00004059488,0.000001988112,0.02171814,0.000009333972,0.0000232898,0.02973649,0.947388,0.0000912785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.171053,0.0009162705,0.000007235458,0.02249895,0.0005982376,0.0003002511,0.00002755065,0.00004577301,0.8045528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661533,0.0001004536,0.00005647264,0.004106103,0.0004173346,0.00001535217,0.00001469283,0.000003019115,0.02913329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9466588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092462912","doi":"10.1177/1743872112446046","title":"Mikhail Bakhtin and the Field of Law and Literature","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroglossia; Dialogic; Narrative; Irony; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Chronotope; Sociology; Literature; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Art","authors":[{"name":"Desmond Manderson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01394084894217721,"gpt":0.2688587383387431,"spread":0.2549178893965659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000508267,0.0001059409,0.0002006295,0.00000824851,0.001527364,0.0003658082,0.00009312972,0.00008450303,0.00001559056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004517196,0.00004472956,0.00004390567,0.00004656978,0.003372531,0.0002703491,0.00006794065,0.0001653855,6.63382e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000217539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003959073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001041833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002396306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992883,0.0002043206,0.0001144863,0.00008775489,0.0001294523,0.0001756417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993718,0.0004051092,0.00005817226,0.00009253233,0.00004667377,0.0000257745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004812843,0.000007020668,0.0000664268,0.00002145403,0.00002791239,3.62585e-7,0.2468343,1.746382e-9,0.000001847619,0.751313,0.0015998,0.00007970895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009072287,0.0000194943,0.00008188274,0.00005399364,0.00005465734,0.000003866307,0.02538068,1.437815e-7,0.00003658229,0.0565834,0.9168028,0.00007522435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007467645,0.1057304,9.791531e-7,0.004071932,0.0001623591,0.0002110776,0.00001063253,0.00001948974,0.8823255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629006,0.002854733,0.00003120815,0.008838509,0.0007291466,0.00001431208,0.000002376938,0.000004472745,0.02462464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316237567","doi":"10.1177/1743872111404174","title":"Wisdom, <i>Torah, Nomos</i> : The Discursive Contours of Biblical Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Torah; Faith; Hebrew Bible; Judaism; Philosophy; Old Testament; Law; Religious law; Hebrew; Sociology; Biblical studies; Theology; Political science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Chaya Halberstam","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01747137822462847,"gpt":0.2045959285828681,"spread":0.1871245503582397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001045676,0.0001489961,0.0002340609,0.00002263085,0.001302463,0.000630139,0.0002073773,0.00003811626,0.001281089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001017314,0.00005871918,0.0001195953,0.00004376376,0.005142061,0.0003287435,0.00008604395,0.0001627134,0.00003780744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005938414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003690518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009890494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01522766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992435,0.00007622482,0.0002177473,0.0001219134,0.0001652001,0.0001754328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993436,0.0001591375,0.0001062115,0.0001573884,0.0002118972,0.00002179714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002395492,0.00001914224,0.000003233376,0.00001586403,0.00007539652,1.44657e-7,0.06492455,1.399875e-7,0.000007046383,0.9028218,0.03197248,0.0001362872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004332267,0.00008572038,0.00002364894,0.00002526306,0.00005677627,0.000001317932,0.03028276,0.00001022964,0.00004924947,0.1045803,0.8643591,0.00009248388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00429504,0.004759441,0.000004949664,0.003776207,0.0003011907,0.0004074997,0.00003631997,0.00003529077,0.986384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542631,0.000198232,0.00000342897,0.01647312,0.0006154302,0.000092878,0.000009251901,0.00001046589,0.0283341],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912250303","doi":"10.1177/1743872119826455","title":"Jurisprudence by Aphorisms: Francis Bacon and the “Uses” of Small Forms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Politics; Legal formalism; Legal history; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Literature; Philosophy; Black letter law; Legal profession; Political science; Comparative law; Art; Private law; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Penelope Geng","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01320449620338592,"gpt":0.1869158379448764,"spread":0.1737113417414904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002736057,0.0001412293,0.0002510916,0.0000137088,0.0007081106,0.000428528,0.0001716837,0.00004483897,0.0004026303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007184844,0.00005784756,0.00007297038,0.00001198011,0.001985736,0.000301944,0.00004737634,0.0001636731,0.00002792352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004760022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005253283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002555848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993224,0.00006420256,0.0002189418,0.0001113919,0.0001462367,0.000136878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994926,0.00009702842,0.0001250898,0.0001834218,0.00008354757,0.0000182478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009593072,0.000008168744,0.00001314919,0.00005717472,0.00003488612,1.138353e-7,0.1351071,2.8309e-7,0.000008382982,0.8634789,0.00100061,0.0001952705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002086544,0.00006106756,0.00003344668,0.00003523524,0.00004678882,0.000004432389,0.03009762,0.00010251,0.0001349407,0.0384828,0.9287819,0.0001327275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1382918,0.006901906,0.00004134534,0.0004537869,0.000304007,0.0005379273,0.00007891146,0.00004668834,0.8533436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9329275,0.0004481836,0.000005962123,0.001846681,0.0001329788,0.00001879983,0.00001272324,0.000009086068,0.06459801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7316529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758033517","doi":"10.1177/1743872117732941","title":"On the Duty to Host in International Law: Jacques Derrida and Political Literature","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hospitality; Politics; Duty; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Refugee; Sociology; State (computer science); Law; Political science; History; Tourism","authors":[{"name":"Naor Cohen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ilan Fuchs","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0261139081449226,"gpt":0.2302305377037792,"spread":0.2041166295588566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001093621,0.0001389507,0.0001533103,0.00001632277,0.00166369,0.001775348,0.0002778876,0.00004492326,0.0001404962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005199944,0.00006375847,0.00004575732,0.000005483835,0.001808881,0.0002407093,0.0001146579,0.0002359473,0.00001478742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002123636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005445249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00318733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01471712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993247,0.00005555482,0.0001342542,0.0001505922,0.0001325647,0.0002023501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995033,0.0001456782,0.00003368098,0.0002081728,0.00005706623,0.00005211173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005033845,0.00001952927,0.00001102566,0.000009313362,0.00001718419,0.000007969193,0.02680801,2.933507e-8,0.000001004358,0.9724002,0.0006504973,0.00002492913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002456119,0.00004065627,0.00008313416,0.00006001591,0.000007221925,0.00000299243,0.001921129,0.00001318604,0.000003149808,0.3750397,0.6225011,0.00008218426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01192887,0.0004607246,0.000001046166,0.01027383,0.0003307508,0.0001494773,0.00009126606,0.00002118823,0.9767429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8935441,0.00002302598,0.000003201381,0.01809283,0.0006121701,0.00002486858,0.00000859744,0.000007367243,0.08768385],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.889059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191740208","doi":"10.1177/17438721211026880","title":"<i>Belt v Lawes</i> and the Meaning of Authorship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Meaning (existential); Sculpture; Law; Drama; Art; Sociology; Visual arts; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Amitpal C. Singh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02928069570406074,"gpt":0.2576960200962915,"spread":0.2284153243922308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007399801,0.00008112491,0.0001732233,0.000001033244,0.002314621,0.0002819218,0.0001430964,0.00009746915,0.00006299239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006796263,0.00003725963,0.00008513541,0.00006948457,0.004695288,0.0001237409,0.00006750812,0.0001924595,0.000001155218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005653842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002488913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001171093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01013517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990246,0.0004097265,0.0001130745,0.0001057288,0.0002054182,0.000141426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994844,0.0002103661,0.00006290349,0.0001078715,0.0001132707,0.00002114205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001580736,0.000003974869,0.000007029139,0.00001229097,0.00002972524,7.30761e-7,0.2885401,1.215076e-7,0.00001588463,0.7106725,0.0006650632,0.00003675944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006050706,0.000004230161,0.000007127144,0.00002201991,0.00005335299,0.000003392743,0.1110511,6.924294e-7,0.0001601218,0.3188697,0.569173,0.00005019476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004759359,0.01439931,0.000002325198,0.003655902,0.00016128,0.000139786,0.000006783454,0.00003066091,0.9768446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8322205,0.003885751,0.00007188418,0.005861403,0.0005106556,0.00001694547,0.000005842765,0.000007090543,0.1574199],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8274612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315295893","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355562","title":"Remarks on Sacrifice and Punishment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Violence, Religion, and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Sacrifice; Scapegoat; Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Key (lock); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Computer security; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Melissa Ptacek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01405899958435373,"gpt":0.1993264758581792,"spread":0.1852674762738255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001442653,0.0001600163,0.0001604572,0.00001928329,0.001496195,0.0006414055,0.0001172517,0.00005374278,0.0002594004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005814373,0.00008476368,0.00004915642,0.000008216034,0.001771911,0.0001353958,0.00003363127,0.0002933453,0.00002430998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000276785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005140132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005161659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003205731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993945,0.00003910927,0.0001278439,0.0001648691,0.0001295694,0.0001441606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996185,0.00006205683,0.00004773298,0.0001845715,0.00005647681,0.00003070827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004799438,0.00001745423,0.000004665529,0.00002166557,0.00002374585,0.000001637306,0.04320598,4.410797e-8,0.00001804337,0.9541845,0.002331192,0.0001430356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003771497,0.00006686361,0.0000142033,0.00002767566,0.00002919047,0.000007105584,0.002380922,0.000002030134,0.00003642675,0.2612857,0.7356656,0.0001072108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01620328,0.001200961,3.370638e-7,0.0005324912,0.0006053713,0.000165527,0.00002111746,0.00005294232,0.981218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513067,0.0004322664,0.000007970254,0.004875533,0.001471033,0.00002051576,0.00001153262,0.00001183559,0.04186264],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9393553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076558719","doi":"10.1191/1743872105lw001oa","title":"Making History: Representation and ‘Forgetting to Forget’","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Forgetting; Consciousness; Narrative; Representation (politics); Hegelianism; Reading (process); Emancipation; Politics; Epistemology; Recall; Psychoanalysis; History; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Kellogg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1232069938006473,"gpt":0.2860838863216948,"spread":0.1628768925210475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001925335,0.000130844,0.0001659753,0.00002942727,0.001133823,0.0004045251,0.0000969724,0.00004030738,0.00008948521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001998298,0.00008559539,0.00005206991,0.000008544594,0.0009237804,0.0003533177,0.00006880928,0.0001509199,0.00001426704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002856984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006828529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006315322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007795765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993141,0.0000518495,0.0001662595,0.0001739984,0.0001329958,0.0001607999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996464,0.00004909934,0.00006708046,0.0001360597,0.00007633276,0.00002505825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002560536,0.000005266843,0.000001904786,0.00002107614,0.00002094795,9.071285e-7,0.2459568,7.575694e-7,0.00001276271,0.7510828,0.002558266,0.0003129107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003479148,0.0000232214,0.000004479978,0.00003568328,0.00004070373,0.000006801094,0.0115315,0.00001934074,0.0000250626,0.0960908,0.8917497,0.0001247745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006493115,0.004339356,0.00001005601,0.003395076,0.0006552542,0.0002286099,0.00001220295,0.00009540363,0.984771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8678345,0.00006371467,0.00009000913,0.01339532,0.003047018,0.00002670666,0.000011242,0.00001776124,0.1155137],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8891914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8720567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994924235","doi":"10.1177/17438721100060021002","title":"Book Review: Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. By Jasbir Puar. Durham &amp; London: Duke University Press, 2007, 368 pp. $24.95 (Paper). ISBN: 082234114X The Reification of Desire: Toward a Queer Marxism. By Kevin Floyd. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009, 304 pp. $25.00 (Paper). ISBN: 0816643962","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reification (Marxism); Queer; Sociology; Queer theory; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Robert Nichols","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.020209702988071,"gpt":0.2379077418644733,"spread":0.2176980388764023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007935875,0.0002722067,0.0004226877,0.00001776685,0.0009479239,0.0001298623,0.0007262301,0.0002833682,0.000577839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000822185,0.000198456,0.0001700833,0.0001593879,0.002089196,0.0007708558,0.00013999,0.0004245287,0.00000704623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007239001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001364049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03549588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006948644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976277,0.0006447411,0.0003937334,0.0003900143,0.0005924763,0.0003513756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984023,0.0001867404,0.0004196794,0.0004862599,0.0004144679,0.0000905679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004160912,0.00007906649,0.00003512721,0.0001542456,0.00006058875,0.000002386252,0.01364591,0.000001545008,0.0003552721,0.3101761,0.6754298,0.00001835987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007653655,0.00002069975,0.0001827658,0.0001326438,0.0001449957,0.000004214844,0.00964435,0.000008867151,0.0002086191,0.001756944,0.9868947,0.000235806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003465019,0.7789046,0.00004498292,0.04154944,0.0007239055,0.002694337,0.001206896,0.0001133879,0.1712974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05997821,0.6274682,0.000160066,0.005166046,0.0005118146,0.00002399889,0.0005716544,0.00004715674,0.3060728],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.311465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9709268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002520626","doi":"10.1177/17438721070030031005","title":"Book Review: The Open: Man and Animal By Giorgio Agamben, translated by Kevin Attell. Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics Series. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004. viii + 102 pp. Index. $40.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8047-4737-0; $15.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-8047-4738-7","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Meridian (astronomy); Art history; Index (typography); Philosophy; Art; Computer science; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Bradley Bryan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01666798171095203,"gpt":0.2548074036976953,"spread":0.2381394219867433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001569565,0.0004982835,0.0007126697,0.00001829141,0.006025104,0.0008921969,0.0009548992,0.0004291683,0.0007458371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005364254,0.0003337444,0.0001797618,0.0001887127,0.01006491,0.001342005,0.0002430059,0.000755044,0.00001063893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001119006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001723207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006550764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00382125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99677,0.0007224025,0.0005212657,0.0005187429,0.0004660371,0.001001585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986144,0.0002888488,0.0002527235,0.0004249246,0.0001800304,0.0002390717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005439245,0.00005043615,0.00001371819,0.00009011904,0.0001061751,0.00002287277,0.008474589,3.403336e-7,0.0000202524,0.7625075,0.2279037,0.0002663986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001341093,0.0001730517,0.00002435466,0.0002104717,0.000192073,0.00002524864,0.007750795,0.000003724714,0.000153062,0.009668663,0.9799743,0.0004831527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001855429,0.5536662,0.00004991802,0.004598355,0.0001722236,0.00136739,0.0004527861,0.0001397116,0.4376979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1209411,0.3547013,0.0001017071,0.0917097,0.0006532144,0.00003880136,0.0002053807,0.000129332,0.4315194],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7528389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758958519","doi":"10.1177/1743872117735249","title":"In Praise of Rebellion: Constituent Power and Dissent in the American Revolution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Dissent; Power (physics); Multitude; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Democracy; Sociology; Limiting; Law and economics; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Politics; History; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Márcio Aparecido Pereira","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02269087386086939,"gpt":0.3083726659689862,"spread":0.2856817921081168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003263312,0.00004887504,0.0001131124,0.000009508278,0.0009444216,0.00009919787,0.0001329778,0.00001673026,0.00001080375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005744078,0.00002592938,0.00001900642,0.00002362251,0.01241045,0.0001065751,0.00002699034,0.00007802396,6.072866e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001174736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005017119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03331811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0425108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994894,0.0001393822,0.00009372023,0.00006420341,0.0001152227,0.00009809757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996458,0.0001020096,0.0001045857,0.0001085888,0.00002711149,0.00001189726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000178024,0.00001109351,0.0009628261,0.0000037259,0.000003475678,0.000002837638,0.02037624,2.016666e-7,0.000001895925,0.9784355,0.0001636107,0.00002075541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002581401,0.0000247786,0.005831126,0.00003578625,0.00001060916,0.00000462965,0.02973614,5.451259e-7,0.000003355982,0.02750862,0.9365303,0.00005600232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1098099,0.001075129,0.000002462416,0.003933546,0.00007731065,0.0001700266,0.000009442474,0.000003811859,0.8849184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938318,0.0004970176,0.00001142924,0.001031401,0.00007672396,0.00000758024,7.774669e-7,0.000001093214,0.004542136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326672233","doi":"10.1177/1743872113483093","title":"“Your girls that you all love are mine already”: <i>Dracula</i> , Mormonism and New Women’s Degenerate Polygamy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Mormonism, Religion, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Dracula; Vampire; Empire; Popular culture; Relation (database); Power (physics); Law; Sociology; History; Gender studies; Literature; Art; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jenny Roth","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lori Chambers","is_ca":true},{"name":"Dana M. Walsh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04354096638679784,"gpt":0.2024280615728987,"spread":0.1588870951861009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001354284,0.0004060119,0.000457901,0.00004876345,0.00121194,0.001423533,0.0002301689,0.0001080789,0.00121689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000369288,0.0002448178,0.0001126542,0.00001543831,0.001668343,0.0005723946,0.00009621109,0.0002516209,0.0002019429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004672004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002618911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009982917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008195489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998577,0.00007274136,0.0002845399,0.0003399922,0.0002532811,0.0004724538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992213,0.00004026797,0.0001882196,0.0002908744,0.0001108519,0.0001485058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003402517,0.00002370012,0.00002000442,0.00004351549,0.0001110468,0.000005995327,0.2235443,3.457722e-7,0.00004474066,0.7217974,0.05421009,0.0001648513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001253007,0.00008432743,0.00007297371,0.00003542755,0.0001087366,0.00002670204,0.02966345,0.000007342177,0.0001089504,0.03374,0.9345247,0.0003744281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1725971,0.05466974,0.000006259384,0.001877951,0.0007615073,0.0007929981,0.00009215825,0.0001868538,0.7690155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3904289,0.002248052,0.00003322737,0.01105785,0.001570451,0.00007827143,0.00003853741,0.00004928098,0.5944955],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8803146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984473619","doi":"10.1177/1743872112475277","title":"‘A Matter of Time and a Matter of Place’: Colonial Inquiries and the Politics of Testimony","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Narrative; Colonialism; Injustice; Politics; Consolidation (business); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Sociology; History; Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Carmela Murdocca","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01246707490105298,"gpt":0.2298745259186986,"spread":0.2174074510176456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002059979,0.00008998532,0.0002706219,0.000009547344,0.0009889124,0.00005384405,0.00009273502,0.0000506016,0.0002130246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000256975,0.00004243834,0.0000379354,0.00002841073,0.01649292,0.0001238974,0.00006608275,0.00006905838,0.000006578993],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004380059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001184665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002163285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001510652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993752,0.0001507462,0.0001637542,0.00007561612,0.0001265042,0.000108201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995623,0.0001079127,0.0001179072,0.00007878723,0.0001183619,0.00001471161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003327159,0.000008246728,0.0004020341,0.00005007386,0.00004384973,9.219301e-8,0.3331302,9.52281e-8,0.00003554521,0.659961,0.006330041,0.000005442085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003722929,0.000195301,0.004197879,0.0002334171,0.0004603277,0.00001234934,0.3061435,0.000006976855,0.0002143093,0.23609,0.4483728,0.0003502395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4717782,0.01404097,0.000001970962,0.009098422,0.0001455801,0.0008338566,0.00006116491,0.00001929394,0.5040205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416739,0.0001188117,0.00002169318,0.0009771738,0.00009777355,0.00002010997,0.000001151822,0.000004408297,0.05708497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4698957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9861836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401432074","doi":"10.1177/17438721241268889","title":"From the Museum to the Studio: Rethinking Visual Representations of White-Washed Stories of North American History","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Colonialism; Visual culture; White (mutation); Resistance (ecology); Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Studio; Visual arts; Sociology; History; Art; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Archaeology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Natilie Richer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03327252539287641,"gpt":0.2982270825503907,"spread":0.2649545571575143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000403339,0.00009153933,0.0001714913,0.000003150075,0.00186784,0.0001139969,0.0003288979,0.00003321405,0.00004766775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006542791,0.00003901094,0.0001098988,0.0001795195,0.003789666,0.0001304713,0.0001058999,0.0002114306,0.000001894201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004380882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005772241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01994994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1799984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99893,0.0003075057,0.0001623,0.0001382504,0.0003412448,0.0001206549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992145,0.0003766193,0.00009111915,0.000177903,0.0001233483,0.00001653308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008281111,0.000005809764,0.0001757823,0.000006713377,0.00007239203,2.950506e-7,0.5431194,0.00000265441,0.000003779091,0.4450727,0.01147498,0.00005718386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005861552,0.00002120895,0.0008049198,0.00002640238,0.00008006674,1.823145e-7,0.2804073,0.000001454424,0.000008802481,0.004464588,0.7140781,0.00004828665],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6323831,0.03997149,0.00005175111,0.02954787,0.003483946,0.001579801,0.0002991781,0.0002743386,0.2924086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744024,0.000677863,0.00003865839,0.001834455,0.0009239946,0.000033882,0.00001129499,0.00000761201,0.02206986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7026032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734685456","doi":"10.1177/1743872115591311c","title":"Book Review: ‘‘Métis’’: Race, Recognition, and the Struggle for Indigenous Peoplehood","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Race (biology); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Anthropology; Ecology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Jean-Philippe Crété","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02728530809659677,"gpt":0.2340228616831524,"spread":0.2067375535865556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007058839,0.00006403682,0.0001613662,0.00001934242,0.003433989,0.0005860315,0.0001177284,0.0000432607,0.0001540372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009586354,0.00004024479,0.00005088246,0.00003905698,0.002580425,0.0002043409,0.00002187647,0.00008525863,0.00001597794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004867809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001398517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1040445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7152686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993535,0.0001595622,0.0001059491,0.00009200029,0.0001356139,0.0001533858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995813,0.000100857,0.00006382106,0.00008487064,0.0001223401,0.00004680132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028932,0.000003925543,6.233108e-7,0.00005660403,0.0000170369,4.365354e-7,0.1631685,1.128315e-8,5.045818e-8,0.4168795,0.4194171,0.000427275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009308678,0.00001771286,0.000002975393,0.0000581543,0.0000858472,0.000003972795,0.01442252,1.234738e-7,3.483831e-7,0.04256242,0.941846,0.00006908269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002128295,0.7681538,0.00000377787,0.003855,0.0002412588,0.0009277166,0.00008202549,0.00003040865,0.2264932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002054709,0.1694145,0.00002387987,0.07178019,0.001186792,0.0003201928,0.00005580036,0.00001745174,0.7551464],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6112242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}