{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":60,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":60,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"cf0cfc08f8ad","filters":{"venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities"}},"results":[{"id":"W2064996605","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355583","title":"Cuts, Flows, and the Geographies of Property","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Spatialization; Ambivalence; Sociology; Space (punctuation); Intangible property; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Boundary (topology); Production (economics); Property rights; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Linguistics; Anthropology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Blomley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01690794552491665,"gpt":0.2544052982374007,"spread":0.237497352712484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001798247,0.0002226126,0.0002669099,0.001926185,0.003986253,0.009278286,0.0007498644,0.00217456,0.004484525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005320776,0.0002649717,0.0002531132,0.002284826,0.05104283,0.0158741,0.004628358,0.002380524,0.0003883583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003564946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001516414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008530905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007947308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983234,0.001031827,0.00004487427,0.0002166142,0.0002128702,0.0001703465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978043,0.001200254,0.0003590001,0.0003731326,0.000134186,0.0001291609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002494932,0.00000119373,0.000163028,0.000004994493,8.576328e-7,0.00001716216,0.004162628,0.00009037303,0.00001846616,0.9937727,0.0005392824,0.001226797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005234478,0.000004555894,0.0006796389,0.00004261614,0.000002562319,0.00005290762,0.01336111,0.0002727954,0.00006659979,0.9417478,0.04375812,0.000006068576],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2385135,0.009170872,0.06618746,0.1085443,0.0004074701,0.00005754763,0.0003548426,0.0001636387,0.5766004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885736,0.001261701,0.002341837,0.0007600817,0.00007197507,0.00003242679,0.00004123652,0.00003990013,0.006877193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009278286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02586555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105541953","doi":"10.1177/1743872111407022","title":"Timely Deaths: Medicalizing the Deaths of Aboriginal People in Police Custody","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inquest; Criminology; Dead body; Race (biology); Law; Medical examiner; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; History; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Gender studies; Poison control; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Sherene H. Razack","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03185601205035762,"gpt":0.2953365637524799,"spread":0.2634805517021223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003128862,0.0002218079,0.0002248421,0.001752714,0.003602408,0.00201504,0.0007737126,0.00149085,0.001893125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01849861,0.0002082007,0.0002836645,0.0009542275,0.003083069,0.002771763,0.003303529,0.002403682,0.000147333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003861232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009931105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0431048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0858463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998075,0.001099067,0.0001408341,0.0001198037,0.0002522668,0.0003130196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952496,0.001777585,0.001593965,0.0002321194,0.0006218405,0.0005248457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003070823,0.0005237486,0.1476998,0.001078173,0.00004826986,0.002243062,0.6752521,0.0005837814,0.001896246,0.03404895,0.009420178,0.1268987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000347888,0.0007684291,0.1823747,0.001088014,0.00008478438,0.0008240475,0.7676422,0.0005314095,0.00136745,0.010327,0.03489773,0.00005950445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9167776,0.004649104,0.001925166,0.05377993,0.0004798442,0.0002883169,0.0002020727,0.00001979744,0.02187822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871497,0.005114626,0.002376778,0.002638119,0.0004291115,0.0001379756,0.00010564,0.000006532352,0.00204153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0431048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08570778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124631202","doi":"10.1191/1743872105lw010oa","title":"Legal Claims to Culture in and Against the Market: Neoliberalism and the Global Proliferation of Meaningful Difference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Political economy; Cultural homogenization; Cultural globalization; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Globalization; Environmental ethics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Rosemary J. Coombe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02010497831383144,"gpt":0.2466901113241274,"spread":0.2265851330102959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009466982,0.0002656643,0.0004946808,0.001448835,0.01068764,0.01675531,0.001446223,0.005953236,0.004866429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01056557,0.0002777512,0.0004193986,0.001632264,0.1334242,0.01276958,0.01073802,0.008697519,0.0003660837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009772403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006364044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005062565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006481289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935672,0.003554424,0.000156172,0.0006951775,0.00119387,0.0008331269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923671,0.004603956,0.0006791301,0.001177669,0.0005568636,0.0006152718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002914941,0.000004219204,0.00007358755,0.000005537334,8.464997e-7,0.00003036613,0.005292277,0.00002391012,0.00002713555,0.9923125,0.0005954825,0.001631197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001118783,0.000009841096,0.0002942996,0.0001051752,0.000003354919,0.00005697951,0.006913569,0.0001494037,0.0001294918,0.9471682,0.04514929,0.000009333567],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09540233,0.01368071,0.007891197,0.2108677,0.0005466265,0.00002955018,0.00003147142,0.00004331276,0.671507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786022,0.001524244,0.00123711,0.00881235,0.0002856796,0.00004299326,0.000008644319,0.00002425774,0.009462476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01675531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07090408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324008955","doi":"10.1177/1743872110366653","title":"Is Religious Freedom Impossible in Canada?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Multiculturalism; Charter; Political science; Epistemology; Human rights; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lori G. Beaman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01274123940099889,"gpt":0.2421537199259563,"spread":0.2294124805249574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002258169,0.0002976243,0.0005466611,0.001432224,0.03678356,0.01169943,0.001933581,0.004161398,0.009645174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006889602,0.0003423057,0.000541821,0.003090704,0.01526549,0.003017622,0.004058979,0.008151941,0.0004302586],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2208789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3560926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943562,0.0004487497,0.00008943833,0.000536891,0.001784572,0.00278405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953328,0.0007273069,0.0002538456,0.0001497024,0.001520868,0.002015516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006966696,0.00003984325,0.007629549,0.0001749469,0.0000299962,0.001123292,0.01386964,0.0006259514,0.000236957,0.8354983,0.1031578,0.03754405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007147162,0.00003170811,0.03717439,0.0007377033,0.00007353474,0.0004732451,0.05199911,0.001276376,0.00040362,0.1183551,0.7891114,0.0002923411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.128983,0.0219257,0.000985726,0.4595269,0.001611239,0.00007953506,0.001065334,0.00007130987,0.3857512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789116,0.01168859,0.001035233,0.0466413,0.0002883145,0.0000333179,0.0003457094,0.00005488203,0.06100104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2208789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330223703","doi":"10.1177/1743872113478530","title":"Governing Through Privacy: Authoritarian Liberalism, Law, and Privacy Knowledge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Authoritarianism; Liberalism; Information privacy; Relation (database); Sociology; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Law and economics; Business; Politics; Democracy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Randy K. Lippert","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kevin Walby","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03824641855335167,"gpt":0.2817167842378749,"spread":0.2434703656845232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03537297,0.0004739431,0.0008611332,0.00271743,0.01071537,0.01863397,0.002033887,0.005162799,0.002321553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03272551,0.0005224982,0.0008463713,0.002827899,0.1826581,0.02091784,0.01022181,0.009638894,0.0002608782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01132476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01352187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01009834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005444904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9671939,0.02100093,0.001226798,0.002630948,0.005874214,0.002073184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478192,0.0342101,0.00411411,0.009316583,0.003287734,0.00125212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002366184,0.000005500881,0.0001744412,0.00001021438,0.000002331871,0.00002551804,0.007310797,0.00009693469,0.00003607406,0.9908092,0.0001870403,0.001339536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000650832,0.000007562221,0.0001934957,0.00008451452,0.000003414192,0.00004874807,0.004640297,0.0003201765,0.0001560379,0.9802885,0.01424139,0.000009314874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1447957,0.006789752,0.1758026,0.1669501,0.0004853495,0.0001602371,0.00008245128,0.0001215334,0.5048122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873583,0.0007792785,0.005138311,0.003012607,0.0001630762,0.00007827669,0.00001715878,0.00003148421,0.003421643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03537297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1870724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319469791","doi":"10.1177/1743872114534017","title":"New Resistance to Hate Crime Legislation and the Concept of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Criminalization; Legislation; Hate crime; Resistance (ecology); Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal law; Sexual orientation; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Amy Swiffen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02033744317997799,"gpt":0.2558328618838228,"spread":0.2354954187038448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0177857,0.0003706107,0.0008758837,0.003927305,0.01398071,0.01452151,0.002714774,0.009370504,0.002819109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02732538,0.0004130687,0.0004547689,0.002337309,0.1455434,0.02017037,0.006331516,0.01127011,0.0002349207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02607613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01467887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06729037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04068846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9793931,0.008905777,0.0006441427,0.002368695,0.006370394,0.002317942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731958,0.01858196,0.001996993,0.001648779,0.003639894,0.0009365743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003617139,0.000006767024,0.0001453333,0.00001450442,0.000001453693,0.00004020872,0.01157081,0.00003597734,0.00003802274,0.9850684,0.0006501032,0.002424849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001826318,0.00003344091,0.001307652,0.0003536623,0.00001106317,0.0002081364,0.03196933,0.0005452237,0.0003695966,0.8348226,0.130312,0.00004913822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1683473,0.0159191,0.0219989,0.3359427,0.001534648,0.00006699454,0.00004833533,0.00006804411,0.456074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773233,0.002473951,0.001929815,0.01113427,0.0005325756,0.00003882165,0.00001041933,0.00003830107,0.00651854],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06729037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1891965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320093329","doi":"10.1177/1743872116643693","title":"Against the Witness: Hindu Nationalism and the Law in India","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Law; Witness; Political science; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Hindu nationalism; Nationalism; Politics; Criminology; Sociology; Geography; Religious studies","authors":[{"name":"Moyukh Chatterjee","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01986569357435486,"gpt":0.2423537540403558,"spread":0.2224880604660009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001997993,0.0002713788,0.0002871244,0.001629836,0.01557874,0.009835562,0.001724956,0.001795249,0.002457329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005226885,0.0003949672,0.0001704895,0.002463569,0.02328966,0.003365341,0.008682608,0.00461478,0.0002152731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004781719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005924747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03042028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05956658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973573,0.001421823,0.00009187444,0.0001810654,0.0003404963,0.000607379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953832,0.002813812,0.0008505936,0.0002403945,0.0002175274,0.0004944895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001871475,0.00006360398,0.01209787,0.0001125865,0.0000113676,0.002736861,0.9046383,0.00004504342,0.0004411714,0.06813744,0.001822753,0.009874334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004432338,0.00003672788,0.01616392,0.0002442374,0.00001590112,0.001121069,0.948307,0.00006967426,0.0002229036,0.004012165,0.02977823,0.00002367224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315037,0.002252894,0.0002314919,0.01031828,0.0001035288,0.00002127227,0.000021783,0.00001106286,0.05553604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969456,0.0008992014,0.00007183769,0.0007452868,0.0000258102,0.000006790739,0.000007844147,0.000004038326,0.001293707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03042028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06048644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104163685","doi":"10.1177/1743872111416328","title":"Little Red Riding Hood Crime Films: Critical Variations on Criminal Themes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Referent; Narrative; Criminology; Political action; Action (physics); Criminal justice; Cultural criminology; Crime control; Sociology; Political science; Law; Art","authors":[{"name":"Steven Kohm","is_ca":true},{"name":"Pauline Greenhill","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07740679401220715,"gpt":0.2904318767336935,"spread":0.2130250827214863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002732045,0.0006128609,0.0002834709,0.00326056,0.01110205,0.009505074,0.0008528706,0.001772448,0.00333458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007305229,0.000326921,0.0001833348,0.002894359,0.01352932,0.006476584,0.004786435,0.003934987,0.0002110214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004826061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001385703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01288168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03558097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979728,0.001378498,0.00005133019,0.0001448302,0.0001954811,0.0002570889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946582,0.003942784,0.0003749678,0.0001841701,0.0004894687,0.0003504415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004337136,0.00003175611,0.001493608,0.000110258,0.00000657804,0.0005779596,0.9260575,0.00002461171,0.0005400295,0.0539009,0.008190978,0.009022403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004834859,0.00001401193,0.005843018,0.0004133623,0.000009945741,0.0003111443,0.8708174,0.00007124497,0.0003862981,0.004060822,0.1180561,0.00001177038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6136411,0.0130223,0.00201552,0.03187586,0.001326758,0.0001566817,0.0001581446,0.00004686069,0.3377569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823454,0.004033377,0.0005451015,0.001876388,0.0003290876,0.00007716254,0.00005386124,0.00008218532,0.01065742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01288168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03501564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122932972","doi":"10.1177/1743872112448362","title":"The Changing Relationship Between Labor and the State in Contemporary Capitalism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Power (physics); Industrial relations; Trade union; Labor relations; Market economy; Collective bargaining; Capitalist state; Political economy; Political science; Labour economics; Economic system; Economics; Law; Politics; History","authors":[{"name":"Chris Howell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05665776059628801,"gpt":0.2852952096162898,"spread":0.2286374490200018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960139,0.00009144541,0.0001775024,0.001295672,0.006696803,0.008657631,0.0003909438,0.001464116,0.002973031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002189334,0.0001734586,0.0001082432,0.002087059,0.03119937,0.004723809,0.003254087,0.00215858,0.0001254681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008873426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002446718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02018558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03097295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984738,0.0007578719,0.00003369812,0.000172778,0.0002230376,0.0003387332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999101,0.0004211339,0.000182904,0.00005856754,0.00007634868,0.0001599594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001622738,0.00002438161,0.004909009,0.00002366511,0.000003759851,0.0001133699,0.08761168,0.0001197112,0.0002450606,0.8941281,0.0009640557,0.01184091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002362496,0.0001001437,0.05280782,0.0003976991,0.00001800262,0.0003836896,0.219643,0.0006931198,0.0003825308,0.4688275,0.2566499,0.00007301358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6930766,0.008291093,0.00171231,0.05928209,0.0002037022,0.000009200489,0.00003428302,0.00001660398,0.2373741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966737,0.0008883444,0.00009693424,0.0006939751,0.00008502907,0.000003142698,0.00000278849,0.000003161672,0.001552939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02018558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06438154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464882502","doi":"10.1177/1743872116656777","title":"Sociological Aesthetics of Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Sociological theory; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Andreas Fischer-Lescano","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04097697863533825,"gpt":0.2739822557519672,"spread":0.233005277116629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005885612,0.000775238,0.0004458861,0.003279535,0.00620541,0.009349629,0.001188053,0.003359296,0.007317439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00687873,0.0003550566,0.0008108419,0.001518091,0.06140856,0.007703356,0.005162764,0.004736394,0.001003379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005661838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003268894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002150611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00204606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928555,0.004279796,0.0002371261,0.0004812386,0.001747862,0.0003985028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963648,0.001680721,0.0003834789,0.0007156236,0.0005940797,0.000261283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001034858,0.000002776008,0.00003718734,0.000009371618,8.695012e-7,0.00001615541,0.001316345,0.00008744674,0.00003865526,0.9963256,0.0008799637,0.001284662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003550695,0.000004786279,0.0001136095,0.00003568536,0.00000137361,0.00006688409,0.001773128,0.0002980701,0.00004349446,0.9433142,0.05433974,0.000005347954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01637569,0.005056862,0.0628284,0.05071433,0.001278653,0.00006349952,0.00007979268,0.0001425111,0.8634602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9173856,0.003042443,0.02147153,0.00570547,0.001256915,0.0002094774,0.0000830462,0.0001961205,0.0506494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009349629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04107976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058088445","doi":"10.1177/1743872110388215","title":"Walter Benjamin and the Ethics of Violence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Messianism; Politics; Sovereignty; State of exception; Proletariat; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Kellogg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09369156461787526,"gpt":0.2348028045185141,"spread":0.1411112399006388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001930296,0.0005738343,0.0003335849,0.001159057,0.008088801,0.005106449,0.000901439,0.005390575,0.006783144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004929665,0.0002531207,0.0001990451,0.001042246,0.02262242,0.004087792,0.002902611,0.004333596,0.001286222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009053501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004995061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01341052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01449876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968555,0.001790902,0.00005845385,0.0002014592,0.000753561,0.0003401303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982498,0.001172793,0.0001353743,0.0001078373,0.0001823223,0.0001517777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007696351,0.000004841887,0.0000577413,0.00003839898,0.000001620101,0.00005789431,0.004238316,0.00007519625,0.0000378367,0.9483723,0.04123814,0.005870085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006456868,0.000005492147,0.0001158411,0.0002471735,0.000001875253,0.000109643,0.002181915,0.00009155918,0.00007207641,0.3490648,0.6480926,0.00001053303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00895413,0.07610589,0.003521778,0.2030968,0.003919982,0.00002326384,0.00009504167,0.00005801769,0.7042251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6758946,0.0344442,0.002985439,0.03459981,0.006040586,0.0001547558,0.00008136594,0.0002328399,0.2455664],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01341052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06568801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777922634","doi":"10.1177/1743872117749524","title":"Human Waste and the Border: A Vignette","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Romani and Gypsy Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Casual; Refugee; Narrative; Law; Humanity; Amnesty; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Sherene H. Razack","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05558397762098469,"gpt":0.3878379489928381,"spread":0.3322539713718534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00297829,0.0008836296,0.0008088193,0.001308946,0.04389213,0.007525133,0.002438147,0.01888081,0.006575597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006607181,0.0008705905,0.001002697,0.002891741,0.01423555,0.007279622,0.01106672,0.02251755,0.00068699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008028648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004304511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02318279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03706567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960063,0.002208304,0.0001216031,0.0002333408,0.0003372206,0.001093331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974484,0.001164151,0.0001988807,0.0001018657,0.0001575204,0.0009290641],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001416243,0.0005106518,0.004821342,0.0003002451,0.00002749779,0.1890614,0.5454246,0.0006292435,0.0005303182,0.1658643,0.08023089,0.01245784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000330025,0.0001322845,0.002223955,0.0008129447,0.0000180167,0.05666969,0.7497571,0.0005360405,0.0002960506,0.01366688,0.1757489,0.0001050541],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4947993,0.01047347,0.002637729,0.3700351,0.004646369,0.0002547298,0.0001660722,0.0001100367,0.1168772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8711818,0.006558456,0.001480135,0.09487676,0.001069131,0.0001862135,0.00009111848,0.0001052518,0.024451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04389213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05825216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328568497","doi":"10.1177/1743872113509443","title":"Evitable Conflicts, Inevitable Technologies? The Science and Fiction of Robotic Warfare and IHL","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Space exploration and regulation","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Robot; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Computer security; Law; Political science; International law; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Ian Kerr","is_ca":true},{"name":"Katie Szilagyi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01607923005712447,"gpt":0.2152213757329652,"spread":0.1991421456758407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008224803,0.0004330885,0.0004116618,0.001898601,0.006840765,0.01089948,0.001395714,0.004406673,0.004147086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02532704,0.0002360811,0.00038196,0.0009347844,0.06338929,0.01127681,0.005237818,0.006489782,0.0005588473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005502762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002535841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001335302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001574612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917699,0.005268103,0.0002078324,0.0006208431,0.001644872,0.0004884139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731739,0.02181759,0.002025631,0.001397055,0.001188696,0.0003970989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000388027,0.000003870571,0.00009614779,0.00002126025,0.000001446597,0.00002404357,0.004871448,0.0001168088,0.00003341164,0.9893081,0.002358928,0.003160735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069108,0.00002478135,0.0003111649,0.0001933516,0.000005370155,0.0001415427,0.006643666,0.0003656959,0.0004150977,0.7609502,0.2309236,0.00001872555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05603535,0.01725124,0.03634004,0.3221622,0.003509057,0.00003838638,0.00005926152,0.00009682784,0.5645076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628826,0.003594465,0.003187692,0.01285536,0.001666158,0.00005392397,0.00002313021,0.00006214074,0.01567443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04349744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141531973","doi":"10.1177/1743872109339109","title":"Having Your Porn and Condemning it Too: A Case Study of a “Kiddie Porn” Expose","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Rhetorical question; Child pornography; Sexualization; Sociology; Taboo; Narrative; Rhetoric; Media studies; Performative utterance; Contradiction; Voyeurism; Aesthetics; Psychology; Criminology; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Art; The Internet; Literature; Human sexuality; Epistemology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Ummni Khan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08324905464131462,"gpt":0.3231634378619522,"spread":0.2399143832206376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002829458,0.001385764,0.0009603135,0.002517496,0.02480823,0.006143121,0.002597242,0.007398033,0.005377238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01109137,0.001267331,0.0008237161,0.001842011,0.01311349,0.005870414,0.007270893,0.007703112,0.0008817263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004303959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002260517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01306279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03892561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956214,0.002807086,0.000136329,0.0003017986,0.000434153,0.0006992565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963612,0.001957883,0.000497698,0.000208225,0.000245274,0.0007297643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003841292,0.0002085494,0.003513257,0.0001565469,0.0000139964,0.04201721,0.9371363,0.00006813891,0.0004901535,0.008147168,0.003413443,0.004796789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004332906,0.00006203682,0.001374043,0.0001963181,0.00001254949,0.02104625,0.9494518,0.00009700096,0.0004598617,0.000696498,0.02657764,0.00002170945],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9489694,0.001476675,0.001929368,0.0146456,0.0004417443,0.0001621684,0.0001210991,0.00004255608,0.0322113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777095,0.002526786,0.001508226,0.002759633,0.0001863172,0.0001128339,0.00005462403,0.0001009453,0.01504109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02480823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03122759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045204968","doi":"10.1177/1743872120942770","title":"Confronting Jurisdiction with Antinomian Bodies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Metaphor; Law; Common law; Dance; Sociology; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Joshua Shaw","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02239190263427221,"gpt":0.2317014670405033,"spread":0.2093095644062311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004470215,0.0002767615,0.0003219659,0.0009328968,0.01718954,0.01023877,0.001152871,0.004791314,0.006283361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00744023,0.0003166977,0.0002441024,0.0006272822,0.05384054,0.008468387,0.00954632,0.006502252,0.0004450699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005967135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003369615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01731956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02887231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956084,0.002533836,0.00008378873,0.0004819679,0.0004077672,0.0008842393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970462,0.001791688,0.0003261972,0.0002371224,0.0002833375,0.0003155103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001634134,0.00001086654,0.0007327643,0.00001518901,0.000003179753,0.0004268645,0.1660706,0.00006480653,0.0001990456,0.8249153,0.003011814,0.004533221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000268332,0.00004613664,0.001438669,0.0003095936,0.00001246507,0.0005084972,0.3961333,0.0004015769,0.0007046476,0.2860045,0.3143754,0.00003828277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.316955,0.002165644,0.009204844,0.05761868,0.0008735591,0.00003048254,0.00001516931,0.00003894905,0.6130977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855802,0.0002592619,0.0003528725,0.001961377,0.00006940601,0.000009877249,0.000003294296,0.00001418904,0.01174957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01731956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04329485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329449469","doi":"10.1177/1743872114538908","title":"Affirming the Human? The Question of Biopolitics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Rhetorical question; Fable; Constitution; SOCRATES; Subject (documents); Relation (database); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Law; Political science; Politics; Art; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Stuart J. Murray","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03524589939056276,"gpt":0.3236154099245809,"spread":0.2883695105340181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104387,0.0003969434,0.0005882361,0.001524906,0.007206877,0.007726631,0.0009786987,0.003542902,0.003213098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01283882,0.0001661753,0.0003511019,0.0007207656,0.09425735,0.01218061,0.004470283,0.007013317,0.0005957868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006071286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005014167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003995974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003150141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908419,0.007136714,0.0001101416,0.0004116298,0.001105863,0.0003938577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924536,0.005705242,0.0003525309,0.0005381777,0.0006020477,0.0003482831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002758479,0.000003014489,0.00001924509,0.00001069163,7.975261e-7,0.00001189542,0.005979197,0.00001998102,0.00003441402,0.9913948,0.001053113,0.001470027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006185631,0.00001248249,0.00005331252,0.0001392838,0.000002465696,0.00004312063,0.006994058,0.00009227607,0.0001996024,0.8951922,0.09725735,0.000007683519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0426989,0.02880844,0.0367938,0.4015759,0.003499709,0.0000425059,0.00003527437,0.00011832,0.4864272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521929,0.004183306,0.004506805,0.0196269,0.001364682,0.00005893328,0.00001024628,0.00009093029,0.01796532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05520576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500281862","doi":"10.1177/1743872116661271","title":"Relative Lust: Accidental Incest’s Affective and Legal Resonances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect theory; Human sexuality; Kinship; Sociology; Psychology; Fetishism; Lust; Pornography; Affect (linguistics); Subjectivity; Queer; Accidental; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Gender studies; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Communication; Feeling; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Lara Karaian","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03050299979201022,"gpt":0.3034520406291384,"spread":0.2729490408371282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001356275,0.0002690679,0.0001894463,0.000497118,0.002652656,0.003390884,0.0004230439,0.0009602907,0.002145039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006580601,0.0001464933,0.0002138631,0.0002599588,0.01400096,0.002990208,0.003581876,0.002910279,0.0002305913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007353188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003370691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008718361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008407123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980668,0.001191342,0.00003340338,0.0001045626,0.0004327079,0.0001710629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975158,0.001370226,0.0004035914,0.0002425962,0.0002582103,0.0002096192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002353945,0.000100461,0.01022219,0.0001202405,0.000029464,0.00163853,0.8090346,0.0003184746,0.01143519,0.128501,0.004178923,0.03418548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002261434,0.0003706676,0.02324839,0.0001642887,0.0000466428,0.003908676,0.7986987,0.001399157,0.006111011,0.05105451,0.1148638,0.0001116075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8606126,0.001019874,0.008728819,0.008057685,0.0004106089,0.00001573201,0.00002312422,0.00009196694,0.1210396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957296,0.0001319291,0.0002768177,0.0006224084,0.00006096985,0.000006071255,0.000006657498,0.00001852258,0.003146974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003390884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007175922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465461882","doi":"10.1177/1743872115627413","title":"Is Narrative Essential to the Law?: Precedent, Case Law and Judicial Emplotment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Narrative; Law; Invocation; Political science; Legal opinion; Legal realism; Focus (optics); Sociology; Judicial opinion; Legal profession; Black letter law; Public law; Philosophy; Private law; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Benjamin Bricker","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02537967009557925,"gpt":0.289484105843372,"spread":0.2641044357477927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004523084,0.0003158588,0.0003643015,0.001236755,0.00395177,0.01136097,0.001033244,0.002128603,0.003884995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01597548,0.0003464489,0.0002397465,0.001323951,0.04576476,0.01504834,0.004551555,0.002960093,0.0003171186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003856887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002742611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005973913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00463298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944306,0.004590431,0.0001401612,0.0002589595,0.0002807988,0.0002990023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905413,0.006510659,0.001426319,0.0004487434,0.0003959695,0.0006770843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002225973,0.00002321984,0.001454021,0.00006891269,0.000005847241,0.0002263023,0.06164873,0.0001643835,0.0000816806,0.9276261,0.000901434,0.007777104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003086408,0.00007300042,0.004411164,0.0007015963,0.00001887607,0.0006143353,0.1168959,0.001066159,0.0005125738,0.813359,0.06227207,0.0000444003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4149321,0.02005368,0.02098844,0.1084812,0.0005209363,0.00006410762,0.0001040427,0.00005109394,0.4348044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946952,0.001890193,0.0009440762,0.0006888905,0.00006173828,0.00001609247,0.00001335191,0.000007051019,0.001683484],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01136097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02798378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112284780","doi":"10.1177/1743872113499226","title":"Museums as Constitutions: A Commentary on Constitutions and Constitution Making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Negotiation; Politics; Meaning (existential); Political science; Focus (optics); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Stacy Douglas","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02541017143397505,"gpt":0.2756824729573618,"spread":0.2502723015233867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008888154,0.000820659,0.001156223,0.002590207,0.01909309,0.0101404,0.005134762,0.04112437,0.005434108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02531245,0.0006593557,0.001135804,0.00375178,0.0298577,0.01380709,0.005353014,0.03004611,0.0009810078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02054977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01808664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07985295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1405115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990101,0.005274573,0.0004067702,0.0007806194,0.002289269,0.001147763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682714,0.0280837,0.0007081805,0.0004015432,0.001803566,0.0007316846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002776899,0.00001071229,0.00006368381,0.0001892855,0.000005527458,0.0002558104,0.009376402,0.0001561996,0.00006890184,0.3261746,0.6603711,0.003299945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004386337,0.00001763741,0.0003449562,0.001094596,0.00001568684,0.00009555311,0.008683342,0.0002009874,0.0001332681,0.06503309,0.9242983,0.00003869095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001156999,0.02142706,0.0003711681,0.9347506,0.01858059,0.00001571904,0.00005251902,0.00001850316,0.02362686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1007872,0.02105015,0.001005174,0.7988139,0.04460608,0.0002299113,0.00007783153,0.0001536383,0.03327613],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07985295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1587763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344815150","doi":"10.1177/1743872115603665","title":"Truth Commission Discourse and the Aesthetics of Reconciliation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Commission; Confession (law); Testimonial; Spectacle; Law; Aesthetics; Materiality (auditing); Sociology; Forgiveness; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Mickey Vallee","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04915393180586895,"gpt":0.2950421446103727,"spread":0.2458882128045037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01661652,0.000897492,0.0005794559,0.004499926,0.02348054,0.02554539,0.002930136,0.006863706,0.005500949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02559274,0.0004895903,0.0006072246,0.003085733,0.1257624,0.01578764,0.01455219,0.006543139,0.000580843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01973484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01212493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02255687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01664337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9760691,0.01665786,0.0004720157,0.001295548,0.003752026,0.001753442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881697,0.006884329,0.001258881,0.001729429,0.001322074,0.000635608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007016165,0.000002561319,0.00007089875,0.00002573058,0.00000252732,0.0001026425,0.05903116,0.0001086963,0.00005180409,0.9360369,0.001472227,0.003087773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002310834,0.00002015972,0.0003572531,0.0003716557,0.00001983883,0.0003629092,0.09107468,0.0006817031,0.0005273222,0.6520475,0.2544779,0.00003609963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05845356,0.009415429,0.04109852,0.08050353,0.001713382,0.00008540742,0.00007463925,0.0002809264,0.8083746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797468,0.0007907425,0.003608507,0.001515977,0.0003113046,0.00005117392,0.00002401792,0.0001173919,0.01383408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02554539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1431869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124316098","doi":"10.1177/1743872109360122","title":"‘ ‘Passing through the Mirror’’: <i>Dead Man</i> , Legal Pluralism and the De-territorialization of the West","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Indigenous; Realm; Sociology; Scholarship; Frontier; Premise; Legal pluralism; Negotiation; Embodied cognition; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Legal realism; Political science; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Ruth Buchanan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01443250552076582,"gpt":0.255492472209391,"spread":0.2410599666886251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001695332,0.0003157285,0.0002408839,0.0006463579,0.008078099,0.008766283,0.0008051555,0.001873755,0.003333338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002965952,0.0002171118,0.000151051,0.0005167789,0.03196768,0.008450844,0.003607716,0.003950078,0.0003313507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002398984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001590488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008915921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01340922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986975,0.0008064211,0.00003195372,0.0001486185,0.0001459647,0.000169585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992331,0.0003487305,0.0001145598,0.0001148674,0.00006950556,0.0001191576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002465106,0.00001710869,0.0005766085,0.00007107773,0.000004528343,0.0003729876,0.2811376,0.00004746005,0.0009552425,0.6979244,0.005729655,0.01313868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001518564,0.00009925353,0.00278939,0.0004561393,0.00002807949,0.001493965,0.3546765,0.0005054094,0.003212518,0.1608373,0.4758419,0.00004436124],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3286662,0.01135949,0.01943571,0.07902667,0.001520939,0.00005408993,0.00005063077,0.0001297579,0.5597565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96895,0.001698749,0.001408751,0.002183659,0.0001663563,0.00001476806,0.00001089544,0.00004706907,0.0255199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008915921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01772809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476390622","doi":"10.1177/1743872116660778","title":"Derrida’s Kafka and the Imagined Boundary of Legal Knowledge","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Franz Kafka Literary Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary (topology); Law; Space (punctuation); Context (archaeology); Consciousness; Focus (optics); Subject (documents); Epistemology; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; History; Comparative law; Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics; Physics","authors":[{"name":"William E. Conklin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01418445016402706,"gpt":0.1986020528813015,"spread":0.1844176027172744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003960737,0.000557317,0.0007135246,0.002385271,0.009793318,0.01237793,0.001529312,0.007309685,0.004106166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009065453,0.0003889496,0.0006467387,0.001216272,0.0649935,0.01761114,0.01029135,0.005352559,0.001219472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01270039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006382195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01058041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005840935,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951201,0.002237773,0.0002340407,0.001011035,0.0007885552,0.0006084996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967427,0.001675584,0.000265315,0.0006055979,0.0004230475,0.0002878734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004930561,0.000002596772,0.00004756814,0.00000965092,0.00000106282,0.00003999757,0.004131848,0.00004783499,0.00002404703,0.9933625,0.001052127,0.001275833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001190398,0.000007414956,0.0001591095,0.00008535445,0.000002831716,0.0001407426,0.003672317,0.0001704172,0.0001188743,0.9035869,0.09202686,0.00001716446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0620124,0.02049446,0.02514012,0.1771634,0.001377857,0.00006071432,0.0001255943,0.0001484303,0.7134771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651169,0.002153045,0.003618334,0.005531485,0.0002832238,0.00008889139,0.00003793267,0.00006782445,0.0231022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01270039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09214824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122772823","doi":"10.1177/1743872111406428","title":"Legality Against Orality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Temporality; Orality; Indigenous; History; Oral history; Law; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Anthropology; Philosophy; Literacy","authors":[{"name":"Bradley Bryan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07098577379253916,"gpt":0.27080291452486,"spread":0.1998171407323208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01244432,0.0003587581,0.0006443402,0.001878491,0.01110973,0.01361941,0.001746304,0.006128486,0.006460517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02876185,0.000376871,0.000506862,0.001603065,0.07792152,0.01065484,0.01128315,0.01111921,0.0009518997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006384599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007798108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008149971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006694693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9848658,0.0068517,0.0006354966,0.00208564,0.004195552,0.001365725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770834,0.01320994,0.00247513,0.003592641,0.002724438,0.0009144855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002972871,0.000003756445,0.0001268122,0.00001679019,0.000002283936,0.00002596217,0.003892777,0.00002166653,0.00003358344,0.9925362,0.0007482904,0.002588932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001248774,0.00001793365,0.000467516,0.0002600409,0.00001618355,0.0001331092,0.004080896,0.0001940455,0.0004613399,0.8633469,0.1309929,0.00001666213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04124361,0.005374751,0.0207669,0.07905132,0.0009357592,0.00004249435,0.0000497752,0.00007141191,0.852464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492269,0.001904747,0.002853113,0.01259451,0.0008965898,0.00009231042,0.00002555662,0.00007428997,0.0323319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01361941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06581265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110624938","doi":"10.1177/1743872110378707","title":"Legal Judgment and Cape Colonial Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Contradiction; Performative utterance; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Power (physics); Legal realism; Epistemology; Political science; History; Legal profession; Philosophy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"George Pavlich","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01480268893002282,"gpt":0.2618092153669088,"spread":0.247006526436886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002457173,0.0002493181,0.0001898095,0.001213259,0.01601351,0.006667308,0.0006013723,0.001878624,0.00556327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01667508,0.0002386866,0.0001034499,0.001880142,0.03044072,0.003603136,0.004200949,0.00357517,0.0002800649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01719465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009629608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1134902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1468841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997178,0.001494692,0.0001231288,0.0002681249,0.0004307307,0.000505435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955963,0.002658725,0.0005777371,0.000271458,0.000509771,0.0003859436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001156716,0.000007683067,0.001109821,0.00007293162,0.000003012987,0.001117913,0.1124159,0.00009035206,0.0001987826,0.8681156,0.007530042,0.009326496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000223783,0.0000240691,0.008068944,0.001484681,0.00001355437,0.001163206,0.09983636,0.0003593121,0.0005723941,0.1958821,0.6925237,0.0000491091],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1785558,0.02005421,0.001667226,0.08772153,0.0006994078,0.00005336951,0.00005792239,0.00002327642,0.7111673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724324,0.002495658,0.000385603,0.003015026,0.000106152,0.00002113624,0.000007293728,0.0000155151,0.02152121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1134902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2256592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001802528","doi":"10.1177/1743872114524879","title":"Biopolitics and the Enemy: On Law, Rights and Proper Subjects","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Appeal; Law; Adversary; Sociology; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"J. Hardes","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01519372437108563,"gpt":0.2320422127931087,"spread":0.2168484884220231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008922691,0.0004830783,0.0007118952,0.001870819,0.008366563,0.01067942,0.001311531,0.006246256,0.005106006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01187981,0.0003064525,0.0004625088,0.001270445,0.1081725,0.02093161,0.009407509,0.008994022,0.0006343352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005394698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003581257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003547388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003023694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924887,0.004564134,0.0001900979,0.0006245049,0.001513922,0.0006186013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924269,0.005493021,0.0005732386,0.0006842185,0.0005354785,0.0002872594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002708939,0.000004322671,0.00005396179,0.00000720561,7.118019e-7,0.00002446595,0.005109063,0.00001744484,0.00003013893,0.9930605,0.0002932589,0.00139615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007308699,0.00001703346,0.0003051389,0.0002388141,0.000004248349,0.00007635155,0.007772925,0.0001275163,0.0001930415,0.9305664,0.06067946,0.00001188491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0910932,0.02167492,0.02982608,0.1487763,0.001121927,0.00003657169,0.00002915477,0.0000646511,0.7073771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678334,0.004221013,0.002408696,0.009192276,0.0006841703,0.00005057384,0.0000146833,0.00006339365,0.01553189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01067942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04718828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964157049","doi":"10.1177/1743872119864674","title":"The Invisible Center: Christian Liberalism in American Religious Freedom Jurisprudence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Establishment Clause; Free Exercise Clause; Neutrality; Political science; Supreme court; Sociology; Separation of church and state; Scrutiny; Christianity; State (computer science); Classical liberalism; Politics; Philosophy; Religious studies; First amendment","authors":[{"name":"Hannah Dick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009422889290066083,"gpt":0.2532670554987353,"spread":0.2438441662086693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008867918,0.000140792,0.0002854148,0.001314735,0.0111249,0.007780429,0.0007406489,0.003130232,0.001635605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009400806,0.0002143269,0.0002774257,0.001202112,0.04870989,0.004871276,0.006010347,0.009521222,0.0001083438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005353672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005425338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009727772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01399104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934223,0.003834236,0.0001535863,0.0005320868,0.001315336,0.0007424798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929008,0.005295248,0.0004237097,0.0004954987,0.0004451124,0.0004394906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005511369,0.000009032667,0.0003210093,0.000006235677,0.000001384606,0.00004593677,0.009160229,0.00006005293,0.0001172365,0.9873533,0.0004391843,0.002480893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002450266,0.00003110083,0.002755426,0.0001379648,0.00001423941,0.00008658785,0.01618271,0.0008448985,0.0006239193,0.9054785,0.07377927,0.00004091061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3845392,0.003956324,0.01720181,0.09912293,0.0006168681,0.00004525093,0.00002050356,0.00004434909,0.4944528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924582,0.0002428636,0.0005182538,0.00443678,0.0001195433,0.00001383839,0.000002937848,0.000009144969,0.002198532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0111249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0468986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060378585","doi":"10.1177/1743872109102492","title":"Time's Desire: Literature and the Temporality of Justice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Rhetorical question; Economic Justice; Torture; Spectacle; Aesthetics; Restorative justice; Sociology; Amnesty; Dream; Sacrifice; Punishment (psychology); Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Literature; Political science; Criminology; Art; Social psychology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jon Kertzer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02082696592113149,"gpt":0.2618990157571885,"spread":0.241072049836057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004966798,0.0004404431,0.0004761951,0.00254643,0.009755045,0.01384179,0.001738582,0.004520524,0.004087237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008971198,0.0003064028,0.0004542676,0.003143203,0.05391901,0.02121152,0.005247422,0.005549941,0.0004522104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01049178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004966197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007067184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006411319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950374,0.003225592,0.0001501774,0.0005079628,0.0006763878,0.0004024739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994443,0.003907303,0.0005076001,0.0004139922,0.0004065406,0.0003215561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003398981,0.000003045467,0.00003241238,0.00001691078,0.000001204984,0.00002587337,0.008932987,0.00002688301,0.00001415513,0.9886923,0.0009123925,0.0013384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001137368,0.00001413036,0.0001852605,0.0003928473,0.000006850983,0.0001180424,0.02326837,0.0001426495,0.0001099307,0.8033829,0.1723531,0.00001443854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03739159,0.06970181,0.01284267,0.1102165,0.002326839,0.00001804349,0.00006487549,0.00004595748,0.7673917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579273,0.01595685,0.001019737,0.005734521,0.001336684,0.00004435935,0.00002286152,0.00006932603,0.01788831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01384179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0761236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529062326","doi":"10.1177/1743872116673162","title":"Monsters and Madwomen? Neurosis, Ambition and Mothering in Women Lawyers in Film","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Monster; Subjectivity; Psychoanalysis; Metaphor; Sociology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Mode (computer interface); Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Psychology; Epistemology; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer L. Schulz","is_ca":true},{"name":"JiHyun Youn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01207733358889504,"gpt":0.21933268955251,"spread":0.207255355963615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001654735,0.0003804336,0.0003454541,0.0008794863,0.01275694,0.009424913,0.0006266029,0.002053604,0.003887202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005069531,0.0003551644,0.0001579109,0.000737151,0.02489415,0.005821191,0.004345636,0.004035647,0.0002924334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003378648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001038022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007616101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01593988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971657,0.002123138,0.00004340138,0.0001215456,0.0002262626,0.0003200096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980928,0.001234444,0.0003126146,0.00006130287,0.00007653831,0.0002222922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002089604,0.00001779003,0.001357296,0.00004503126,0.000004009632,0.0005787566,0.9443682,0.00001371865,0.0004753486,0.04638344,0.00344269,0.003292775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008292389,0.00002785644,0.00197434,0.0001690885,0.000007057063,0.0005058651,0.8997336,0.00005098141,0.0004255428,0.004692728,0.09239105,0.00001350686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7647551,0.007154565,0.00156506,0.04816882,0.0006569601,0.00003368038,0.0000470372,0.00005287314,0.177566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894448,0.0009697764,0.0001636687,0.001577069,0.00009973418,0.00001248209,0.000006487039,0.00002045336,0.007705432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01275694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0245139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984670992","doi":"10.1177/1743872107086147","title":"On the Book of Job, Justice, and The Precariousness of the Criminal Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Law; Injustice; Political science; Mythology; Economic Justice; Subject (documents); Sociology; Criminology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin L. Berger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04706356449537347,"gpt":0.2702441567803643,"spread":0.2231805922849909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007590164,0.0004224281,0.0003348917,0.001163481,0.002784363,0.005358071,0.0006912698,0.002202081,0.007925053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004054413,0.0002256688,0.0002396567,0.001654673,0.008551027,0.003710118,0.000939528,0.003718595,0.00144183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002246984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003595334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004481461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01467512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998984,0.0003780563,0.0000305288,0.0000646458,0.000469116,0.00007369783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969024,0.002388506,0.0001526616,0.00008580878,0.0003412849,0.0001292033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001652839,0.00002778407,0.0003833165,0.0001835659,0.000005662543,0.00008565329,0.002587968,0.00009895086,0.00006144455,0.5476806,0.4211502,0.0277183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007010814,0.00001614344,0.001016489,0.0008764489,0.000005800568,0.000161346,0.002052309,0.0001086529,0.00007812656,0.1463599,0.8493089,0.00000881738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004046096,0.1233542,0.002754892,0.1431603,0.01079712,0.00003313273,0.0001918433,0.0000593345,0.7156031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1731092,0.1316937,0.00428014,0.07596897,0.02289546,0.0001384817,0.0003738301,0.0001926449,0.5913476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007925053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02651197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983158694","doi":"10.1177/1743872119886235","title":"Law and Humanities: A Field Without a Canon","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Scholarship; Humanities; Discipline; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Law; Political science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Sara Ramshaw","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0355903174241701,"gpt":0.3173839394147039,"spread":0.2817936219905338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003527464,0.0004793543,0.0007777876,0.002080348,0.018358,0.0148936,0.001550916,0.008185242,0.004004127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009058696,0.0002850939,0.0003239586,0.001783525,0.03535162,0.008417753,0.002797761,0.009320041,0.001120337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0190666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02905534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2152279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3528313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903859,0.005446267,0.0001756307,0.0008420229,0.002247325,0.0009028307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866484,0.008782657,0.0004205578,0.0004117577,0.002644762,0.001091788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000286371,0.00002012037,0.0003733592,0.0003346131,0.000005567753,0.0003370536,0.04243082,0.0001390039,0.0002951454,0.7120788,0.2221616,0.02179534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005613767,0.00001659627,0.0004879526,0.001021016,0.00000498849,0.0001681049,0.04261817,0.0001625367,0.0001029675,0.04898996,0.9064026,0.000019578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008599584,0.05877184,0.004007113,0.7103406,0.03088495,0.00008104547,0.00007920249,0.0001009089,0.1871347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.419643,0.06611198,0.004502622,0.3371186,0.04117898,0.0002407389,0.0001207736,0.0003242884,0.1307591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2152279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4279503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120424606","doi":"10.1177/1743872120987010","title":"The American Border Wall: A History of Legal Division","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Latin American and Latino Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fence (mathematics); Narrative; Law; Political science; Software deployment; Engineering; Art","authors":[{"name":"Marie-Eve Loiselle","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0184501034427095,"gpt":0.2770508615498322,"spread":0.2586007581071227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002229991,0.0001956456,0.000215388,0.001275456,0.01603001,0.007172466,0.0007632864,0.002367442,0.004534293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00321541,0.0002622948,0.0001515146,0.002024767,0.02818281,0.006039716,0.004773403,0.005748535,0.0002457277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01273388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004960016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05615941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07220306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998578,0.0006256272,0.00003337048,0.0001903787,0.0002343557,0.0003383394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987479,0.0006258631,0.0001562473,0.0001051911,0.0001744825,0.0001903539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001596694,0.00002074752,0.0009926083,0.00002881758,0.000001865481,0.0002129485,0.07145304,0.00004653883,0.0001270903,0.9044282,0.007276813,0.01539545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007658089,0.00002360694,0.004257327,0.0004167643,0.000005205179,0.0001762711,0.08553162,0.0001444813,0.0002951065,0.04498612,0.8641306,0.00002530402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2761703,0.02442741,0.002664706,0.07338548,0.0007143872,0.00002659704,0.00006512905,0.00004800461,0.622498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719201,0.005642578,0.0004867842,0.003839583,0.0002218873,0.00002687115,0.00002465168,0.00003212788,0.01780556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05615941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1116651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761163122","doi":"10.1177/1743872117737238","title":"“I’m Making the Streets Safer Ma’am”: Race, Coloniality, and the Redemptive Theologies of Pastoral Police Power","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Sociology; Power (physics); Politics; Sovereignty; Political theology; Sectarianism; Confessional; Race (biology); Criminology; State of exception; Law; Gender studies; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Zahir Kolia","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05120832244541051,"gpt":0.3313462411554134,"spread":0.2801379187100029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002494851,0.0001849906,0.000163242,0.00076835,0.01094148,0.00694273,0.0005222925,0.0008640738,0.002545861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005379475,0.0001731045,0.0001105437,0.0005982678,0.04461512,0.004026802,0.003130934,0.003068485,0.0001986148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003500076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002781032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02072158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02867685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971507,0.002086085,0.00004500523,0.0001355945,0.0002134399,0.0003690747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982325,0.0007595687,0.0003340834,0.0001761767,0.000191674,0.0003060367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001351337,0.00001923736,0.001901256,0.00002303395,0.000003522406,0.000149247,0.1294606,0.00004796746,0.0001034589,0.8578155,0.00361898,0.00684366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003925908,0.00008046113,0.01472696,0.0006849848,0.00002802102,0.0006196052,0.3027968,0.0005929259,0.0007382208,0.2929541,0.3866813,0.00005748603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3920003,0.008527053,0.002344861,0.08976048,0.0006028439,0.00002011159,0.00002404851,0.00002245468,0.5066978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909478,0.0009602794,0.0001708042,0.001617708,0.0000787702,0.000008097814,0.000002545749,0.000009121357,0.006204936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02072158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04120195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112498039","doi":"10.1177/1743872107073234","title":"The Politics and Inhumanity of Torture","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Politics; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Psychology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Mark Antaki","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03622480654959636,"gpt":0.2935495809658566,"spread":0.2573247744162603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003651374,0.0003054313,0.0003405488,0.0008234054,0.0125974,0.00683005,0.001054062,0.008771008,0.003858181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008757127,0.0002756439,0.0002997475,0.0007592729,0.06866259,0.004479536,0.003219491,0.009658196,0.0003800477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005177657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003575396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01787921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02507234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993729,0.003608736,0.0001218676,0.0003447607,0.001117866,0.001077733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940889,0.004228001,0.0006307602,0.000260976,0.0004778862,0.0003133911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002794073,0.000003527438,0.0001194969,0.00001370904,0.000001986184,0.00006026506,0.008849365,0.00007584401,0.00002749398,0.9853942,0.004498038,0.0009531627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001325418,0.00002149073,0.002492562,0.0003901705,0.000009484963,0.0002307532,0.02957612,0.0002211924,0.0002443584,0.6275493,0.3392247,0.00002661395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03825396,0.01520628,0.003300233,0.4022089,0.00127131,0.00001147192,0.0000239661,0.00001636152,0.5397076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9397674,0.004908722,0.0002476169,0.03016845,0.001727527,0.00002333535,0.000008696064,0.00002165048,0.02312674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01787921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03756672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316321423","doi":"10.1177/1743872114552247","title":"Grey Owl in the White Settler Wilderness: “Imaginary Indians” in Canadian Culture and Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Wilderness; Appropriation; National park; White (mutation); Lawlessness; Law; Cultural appropriation; Context (archaeology); History; Ethnology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Archaeology; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Fenn Elan Stewart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00933606165846299,"gpt":0.2062428643222068,"spread":0.1969068026637439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001364691,0.0003090903,0.0002643958,0.001502153,0.03690645,0.00784255,0.001228144,0.001348652,0.005476098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002216101,0.0002336296,0.0001767544,0.002512121,0.02678584,0.002327264,0.004178565,0.003240236,0.0001869384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08071947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09199677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983568,0.0002221477,0.00002138046,0.0001591951,0.0004545959,0.0007858233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985961,0.0003265202,0.00007288236,0.00006892464,0.0004851307,0.0004504672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004896077,0.00004129462,0.01387266,0.00006946595,0.00001537485,0.001571744,0.7064257,0.0002134008,0.001076113,0.2258696,0.02253392,0.02826163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006602954,0.00001626218,0.0164513,0.0001216105,0.00001738839,0.0002873149,0.6950676,0.00018144,0.0003442946,0.005124146,0.282306,0.00007601443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7277521,0.002171479,0.0009368071,0.02483091,0.0002768233,0.00005226332,0.000170263,0.00003750543,0.2437719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741145,0.001024916,0.0003735645,0.001935914,0.00001375703,0.00001033235,0.00003843359,0.00002202602,0.02246664],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08071947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5856635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159606976","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355555","title":"Law and the Foucauldian Wild West in Michael Cimino’s <i>Heaven’s Gate</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Heaven; Lawlessness; Narrative; State (computer science); Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Diana Young","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0142997731638764,"gpt":0.2373610901513585,"spread":0.2230613169874821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001268289,0.0002654344,0.000161771,0.0007886404,0.008658999,0.006160797,0.0005021691,0.002027961,0.003174185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002327789,0.0002152944,0.00009555568,0.0006865927,0.02490018,0.005464196,0.001934555,0.003882846,0.0002732325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00578616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001802472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01744634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03399512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993273,0.0004342179,0.000009139063,0.00006193434,0.0000780226,0.00008933297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992979,0.0004855676,0.00004987997,0.00004305326,0.0000426221,0.00008089643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001802983,0.00001559761,0.0001998393,0.00002830323,0.000001510009,0.0002989569,0.1003834,0.00004982194,0.0002327815,0.8654145,0.0247569,0.008600336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001675687,0.00002626033,0.001162337,0.0003194896,0.000005527995,0.0002306392,0.08313246,0.0002194387,0.0006057181,0.1987955,0.7154656,0.00002030292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.08688512,0.01826189,0.002429693,0.1471487,0.00129724,0.00002494692,0.0000240913,0.0000337641,0.7438947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091983,0.00482035,0.0008237981,0.008247461,0.00038145,0.00003279171,0.000007093315,0.00004965336,0.07643916],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01744634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04198176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146388455","doi":"10.1177/1743872110374264","title":"‘It Won’t Always Be Wrong’: Morality and Monsters in Legal Rational Authority","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gothic Literature and Media Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Bureaucracy; Negotiation; Underclass; Fantasy; Monster; Face (sociological concept); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Function (biology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Social science; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Sheryl N. Hamilton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Neil Gerlach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02434236848045186,"gpt":0.2787753244748404,"spread":0.2544329559943885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01118106,0.0003457876,0.0003224089,0.001393871,0.0109135,0.01479082,0.001190257,0.003405573,0.003801513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01798522,0.0003891505,0.0002516605,0.0009194026,0.08830796,0.01291088,0.004630338,0.00551628,0.0004077365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006083856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002675724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004855399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006080478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911113,0.007034378,0.0001337689,0.000388588,0.000629554,0.000702475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894593,0.007762003,0.001010567,0.0006800877,0.0005580097,0.0005300124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002458535,0.00001492819,0.0006360382,0.00002609839,0.000004976439,0.000151232,0.1314247,0.0001075833,0.00009337639,0.8612729,0.002754694,0.003488943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002972734,0.00002895287,0.001509134,0.000234203,0.00001739346,0.0002733349,0.1920217,0.0009052791,0.0006420312,0.6806552,0.1236358,0.00004717287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3419872,0.004377021,0.01063933,0.1514582,0.0009187901,0.00003530397,0.00003732144,0.00007286925,0.490474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994003,0.000255232,0.0002799056,0.001217528,0.00009577116,0.000008849578,0.000002773242,0.00002430428,0.004112621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0591318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092462912","doi":"10.1177/1743872112446046","title":"Mikhail Bakhtin and the Field of Law and Literature","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroglossia; Dialogic; Narrative; Irony; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Chronotope; Sociology; Literature; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Art","authors":[{"name":"Desmond Manderson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01394084894217721,"gpt":0.2688587383387431,"spread":0.2549178893965659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002072293,0.0003160179,0.000406615,0.001664579,0.00677842,0.007771063,0.0007791102,0.002983226,0.00313919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005117899,0.0002412857,0.0001665988,0.001585623,0.01836012,0.008543466,0.00327273,0.003877135,0.0009661512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005207641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004215093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002789852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003293211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99755,0.001408279,0.00008212338,0.0003361123,0.000408107,0.0002153539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949823,0.003724567,0.0005122776,0.0001972115,0.0003392145,0.0002444051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001628116,0.000008952449,0.0001316408,0.00009794518,0.00000231588,0.00007475433,0.004585246,0.00009978444,0.0000896079,0.9661596,0.01887584,0.009857988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011403,0.00001723937,0.0004373909,0.0004462736,0.00000404575,0.0002445963,0.003313956,0.0003152036,0.000198822,0.5464599,0.448534,0.00001719956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02716871,0.2354614,0.01647099,0.3960176,0.004101752,0.00003832108,0.0001108104,0.0001604117,0.32047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.769644,0.1002294,0.01588265,0.03388108,0.005757899,0.000327327,0.0001034336,0.0001837665,0.0739905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007771063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03778428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316237567","doi":"10.1177/1743872111404174","title":"Wisdom, <i>Torah, Nomos</i> : The Discursive Contours of Biblical Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Torah; Faith; Hebrew Bible; Judaism; Philosophy; Old Testament; Law; Religious law; Hebrew; Sociology; Biblical studies; Theology; Political science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Chaya Halberstam","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01747137822462847,"gpt":0.2045959285828681,"spread":0.1871245503582397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960506,0.0001951937,0.0003178631,0.0009581278,0.007179206,0.00916388,0.0006352817,0.00252747,0.004294785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005044655,0.0001372364,0.0001325165,0.001492278,0.0224032,0.008553432,0.001965781,0.006694259,0.0005781451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004529492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003859274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01368821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02336028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991403,0.0004098635,0.00003457536,0.0001089647,0.0002084612,0.00009786522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982511,0.0009608022,0.0002055483,0.0001652314,0.000283453,0.0001338455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000173729,0.000009304561,0.0004093814,0.0000792146,0.000003808939,0.0000914686,0.03835205,0.00003975043,0.0001468646,0.8931005,0.05601974,0.01173062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001743247,0.00001783779,0.003411403,0.0006129997,0.00001273963,0.0001999299,0.09510606,0.0002095566,0.0005628257,0.4385403,0.4612809,0.00002804247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04416674,0.03499823,0.002428767,0.5210509,0.00481115,0.00001180383,0.0001337223,0.00006595009,0.3923328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.901895,0.0154086,0.001296572,0.0353216,0.003356204,0.00002808023,0.00005567074,0.00009985056,0.04253844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01368821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03286391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912250303","doi":"10.1177/1743872119826455","title":"Jurisprudence by Aphorisms: Francis Bacon and the “Uses” of Small Forms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Politics; Legal formalism; Legal history; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Literature; Philosophy; Black letter law; Legal profession; Political science; Comparative law; Art; Private law; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Penelope Geng","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01320449620338592,"gpt":0.1869158379448764,"spread":0.1737113417414904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005255702,0.0004908773,0.0005623938,0.002189971,0.0098608,0.01303578,0.00150307,0.00699451,0.002910278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01328212,0.0004341417,0.0002376011,0.002266441,0.06322902,0.01449698,0.003419987,0.008296045,0.0009213994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009878772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004578497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02612978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01890928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927269,0.004964344,0.0001205862,0.000556724,0.001225999,0.0004053677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920056,0.006431019,0.0003077813,0.0003652887,0.0006585849,0.0002316494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006298949,0.000004205202,0.00003726596,0.00001504293,8.444272e-7,0.00003290947,0.0107677,0.00003217865,0.00002557932,0.9759621,0.009331973,0.003783853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109171,0.00001097923,0.0001610814,0.0002522305,0.000003668564,0.00008492253,0.004420157,0.0002233631,0.0001067939,0.6707083,0.323996,0.00002148178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02499919,0.1246421,0.01116483,0.3076726,0.002978849,0.00002884774,0.00004106431,0.00007327685,0.5283993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8447022,0.02890205,0.004216128,0.029338,0.004909076,0.000142314,0.00002425,0.0001598589,0.08760615],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07167584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758033517","doi":"10.1177/1743872117732941","title":"On the Duty to Host in International Law: Jacques Derrida and Political Literature","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hospitality; Politics; Duty; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Refugee; Sociology; State (computer science); Law; Political science; History; Tourism","authors":[{"name":"Naor Cohen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ilan Fuchs","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0261139081449226,"gpt":0.2302305377037792,"spread":0.2041166295588566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004654419,0.0003788972,0.0004381876,0.001681104,0.01377574,0.01144893,0.001511819,0.005549735,0.003105052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008389406,0.0002644019,0.0002330325,0.001898162,0.0482567,0.008756846,0.004778992,0.006545123,0.0003776341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009852866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003897019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0107833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009568912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954349,0.00302817,0.00008278574,0.0004436879,0.0004989445,0.0005113626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948723,0.003704985,0.0003632117,0.000316951,0.0003557484,0.0003866785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004806286,0.000008937504,0.0001046265,0.00002702651,0.000001671414,0.0001059113,0.02610652,0.00008381565,0.00002706706,0.9565516,0.01487905,0.002099043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008084334,0.00001360263,0.0004078688,0.0004124652,0.000004537409,0.0002579782,0.04276776,0.0002733206,0.0001221449,0.1966974,0.7590124,0.00002248998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03961122,0.05861736,0.002232714,0.4850703,0.003299467,0.00001598832,0.00002841894,0.00002842455,0.4110961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9161953,0.01784188,0.0005760167,0.02598877,0.00374717,0.0000405707,0.00001300724,0.00007493994,0.03552237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01377574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0714879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191740208","doi":"10.1177/17438721211026880","title":"<i>Belt v Lawes</i> and the Meaning of Authorship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Meaning (existential); Sculpture; Law; Drama; Art; Sociology; Visual arts; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Amitpal C. Singh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02928069570406074,"gpt":0.2576960200962915,"spread":0.2284153243922308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0105253,0.0002875978,0.0004251601,0.001972223,0.01043611,0.01679858,0.001632669,0.01497489,0.003665732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03418369,0.0004062,0.0003282361,0.001565833,0.04733969,0.01529405,0.005040983,0.009802502,0.0005018773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007475495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004817999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01196318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01633553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892333,0.005722141,0.0005217902,0.0009527421,0.002345195,0.001224807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868056,0.009589988,0.001168924,0.0007100528,0.001225691,0.0004998254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006135134,0.000003395016,0.0001124166,0.000007751136,6.780002e-7,0.00004915154,0.003467272,0.00001137106,0.00002394966,0.9889197,0.006129839,0.001268354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003267772,0.00001970113,0.0009515331,0.0004589244,0.000007761677,0.0001981536,0.006703563,0.0002254419,0.0002778891,0.7548321,0.2362587,0.00003355993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03874232,0.01281003,0.002975356,0.3027924,0.002308131,0.00002672107,0.00006716062,0.00004487604,0.640233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8936042,0.0024791,0.0007496675,0.05081391,0.001886293,0.00006961486,0.00002979264,0.00004353666,0.05032399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05566376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315295893","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355562","title":"Remarks on Sacrifice and Punishment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Violence, Religion, and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Sacrifice; Scapegoat; Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Key (lock); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Computer security; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Melissa Ptacek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01405899958435373,"gpt":0.1993264758581792,"spread":0.1852674762738255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005596635,0.0004490493,0.0004771459,0.0005412068,0.007738148,0.003559164,0.002652955,0.01044195,0.003534885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01424163,0.0002188802,0.0006727246,0.0005012947,0.01887629,0.005044363,0.003271367,0.01466305,0.000889615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002652797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002233065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00753362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01045598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949582,0.002603561,0.0001528542,0.0006684134,0.001098854,0.0005179755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931091,0.005102891,0.0002676075,0.0003167691,0.0009434475,0.0002602398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002181847,0.000006177434,0.0001971373,0.00007268353,0.000006064361,0.0002206488,0.008317479,0.0001541123,0.0001035489,0.8499828,0.1368353,0.004082215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001126087,0.00002706033,0.0005209327,0.0002883802,0.00001004597,0.000184836,0.006938694,0.0002517653,0.0002676026,0.2260368,0.7654357,0.00002692087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005169686,0.01445409,0.004444318,0.8488884,0.01346083,0.00001696873,0.00004653476,0.00004983945,0.1134693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3045833,0.008324265,0.002672338,0.5887542,0.02470249,0.0000919267,0.00003734128,0.0001593517,0.07067492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01044195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02959818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076558719","doi":"10.1191/1743872105lw001oa","title":"Making History: Representation and ‘Forgetting to Forget’","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Forgetting; Consciousness; Narrative; Representation (politics); Hegelianism; Reading (process); Emancipation; Politics; Epistemology; Recall; Psychoanalysis; History; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Kellogg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1232069938006473,"gpt":0.2860838863216948,"spread":0.1628768925210475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006129139,0.0004760998,0.000331643,0.001628023,0.005346891,0.01133525,0.001392216,0.002103578,0.004796885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01158107,0.000250482,0.0003969366,0.001423284,0.05216215,0.0219529,0.007930281,0.003701017,0.0004610043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003378353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002878894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003190923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002796327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957508,0.002824707,0.0001080341,0.00035994,0.0005134746,0.0004430125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954706,0.00238535,0.0004678319,0.001016038,0.0003270091,0.0003330873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007341893,0.000004781409,0.0001108272,0.00002008925,0.000001672208,0.00005262884,0.02783101,0.00008034343,0.00006814745,0.9664836,0.0008562495,0.004483212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009339672,0.00002779097,0.0001930246,0.0001370032,0.00001020635,0.0002292987,0.02285679,0.0004035728,0.0005199325,0.8566723,0.1189244,0.00001645546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1604952,0.01147319,0.1423042,0.06993179,0.001516963,0.00008134701,0.00009728,0.0003953092,0.6137047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819297,0.001266224,0.003740428,0.001042887,0.0002703149,0.00002377335,0.00002657775,0.00007792632,0.01162217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01133525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03241444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994924235","doi":"10.1177/17438721100060021002","title":"Book Review: Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. By Jasbir Puar. Durham &amp; London: Duke University Press, 2007, 368 pp. $24.95 (Paper). ISBN: 082234114X The Reification of Desire: Toward a Queer Marxism. By Kevin Floyd. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009, 304 pp. $25.00 (Paper). ISBN: 0816643962","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reification (Marxism); Queer; Sociology; Queer theory; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Robert Nichols","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.020209702988071,"gpt":0.2379077418644733,"spread":0.2176980388764023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007886649,0.00232933,0.002538032,0.005741189,0.001253604,0.003464299,0.002296509,0.003362956,0.05427203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00371536,0.0009333983,0.0007951652,0.0126792,0.002103183,0.005809022,0.001563839,0.003649411,0.02209822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003043957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0214259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04728702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994774,0.0001167687,0.00005160243,0.00008101983,0.0002214132,0.00005181794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967596,0.001720346,0.0002941155,0.00006840371,0.000902758,0.000254732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001115247,0.000008216551,0.00004823562,0.001388423,0.00001164346,0.00002303521,0.00007502915,0.00003349501,0.00002307003,0.00121624,0.9512549,0.04590664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008663837,0.00001185117,0.0006216693,0.003697261,0.00002018025,0.0003033527,0.0001949381,0.00002619763,0.00003133706,0.00136984,0.9937021,0.00001258296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003805754,0.9814812,0.00007261045,0.007938277,0.005830645,0.000008833144,0.000151514,0.00001534356,0.004463563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008926875,0.9674091,0.0001358273,0.003797982,0.00723899,0.00003155109,0.0002662985,0.0000249116,0.02020261],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05427203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.181558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002520626","doi":"10.1177/17438721070030031005","title":"Book Review: The Open: Man and Animal By Giorgio Agamben, translated by Kevin Attell. Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics Series. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004. viii + 102 pp. Index. $40.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8047-4737-0; $15.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-8047-4738-7","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Meridian (astronomy); Art history; Index (typography); Philosophy; Art; Computer science; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Bradley Bryan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01666798171095203,"gpt":0.2548074036976953,"spread":0.2381394219867433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007912876,0.001719051,0.002090411,0.00410523,0.0008085041,0.003381411,0.001526313,0.002292471,0.04031434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00381502,0.0006924272,0.0005851915,0.00639235,0.001374508,0.0033055,0.001211194,0.003087202,0.0301313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002462115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004168076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009779937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02098781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993213,0.00012209,0.00005486868,0.0001095139,0.0003435427,0.0000485869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998054,0.0008156516,0.0001965983,0.00005812797,0.0007044085,0.0001712022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084734,0.000004054945,0.00002221928,0.0008563363,0.000005553993,0.00001869358,0.00004485623,0.00002884702,0.0000475241,0.0007701083,0.9681919,0.03000135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004362572,0.000006852289,0.0002713075,0.001398646,0.000008195971,0.0001759936,0.00005365024,0.00001185771,0.00002455933,0.0006801905,0.9973585,0.000005922368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006736037,0.9651341,0.0001561076,0.01092508,0.01310505,0.00001272034,0.0002144719,0.000037813,0.01034722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002149645,0.8828092,0.0004556139,0.01039087,0.0147729,0.00006957588,0.0004764598,0.0001115359,0.08876422],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04031434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1348649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758958519","doi":"10.1177/1743872117735249","title":"In Praise of Rebellion: Constituent Power and Dissent in the American Revolution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Dissent; Power (physics); Multitude; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Democracy; Sociology; Limiting; Law and economics; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Politics; History; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Márcio Aparecido Pereira","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02269087386086939,"gpt":0.3083726659689862,"spread":0.2856817921081168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007787589,0.000216181,0.0003196092,0.0008236565,0.01371783,0.007412947,0.001040653,0.004885843,0.00282722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01692552,0.0001966657,0.0002564312,0.0007223371,0.03595242,0.00821421,0.006392029,0.008043111,0.0003263751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004677179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002731958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004633371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008210284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939951,0.004090863,0.00008723504,0.0005588639,0.0005794442,0.000688485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938133,0.004261327,0.0004725188,0.0004309099,0.0005739105,0.0004481806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003665582,0.00003496216,0.0004608094,0.00001930054,0.000005622951,0.0002150271,0.09280138,0.0001370863,0.0001907744,0.8919204,0.006068552,0.008109391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004746306,0.00004000459,0.001995812,0.0001124812,0.00001377318,0.0001609928,0.09591758,0.0008221066,0.0006161159,0.7376351,0.1625952,0.00004332951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3174714,0.003554751,0.006660011,0.1521739,0.001572179,0.00003056328,0.00001611965,0.00005594546,0.5184652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860589,0.0002606055,0.0003435914,0.003943319,0.0002201686,0.00001218442,0.000002867503,0.00001652766,0.009141936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01371783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0411852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326672233","doi":"10.1177/1743872113483093","title":"“Your girls that you all love are mine already”: <i>Dracula</i> , Mormonism and New Women’s Degenerate Polygamy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Mormonism, Religion, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Dracula; Vampire; Empire; Popular culture; Relation (database); Power (physics); Law; Sociology; History; Gender studies; Literature; Art; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jenny Roth","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lori Chambers","is_ca":true},{"name":"Dana M. Walsh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04354096638679784,"gpt":0.2024280615728987,"spread":0.1588870951861009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001586905,0.0003517295,0.0001928077,0.0004059378,0.008978454,0.005431462,0.0006546769,0.002130159,0.003243203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002843906,0.0002005587,0.0001701801,0.0004023163,0.01704885,0.00394179,0.002389769,0.005797443,0.0005800085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002187353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006189123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01448664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988075,0.0007480575,0.00002167559,0.0001532093,0.0001437526,0.0001258312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992604,0.0003646617,0.0001107632,0.00006305418,0.00008349211,0.000117609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004414719,0.00003146659,0.000855194,0.00008432468,0.000009161466,0.000445226,0.1036443,0.00006424775,0.0003438321,0.7234091,0.1567929,0.01427616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001223646,0.00002903272,0.001687708,0.0002391118,0.000007421067,0.0006537481,0.06200168,0.0001795407,0.0007191027,0.05631392,0.8781331,0.00002346019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08271236,0.01961066,0.004373732,0.4686297,0.005565634,0.00003850007,0.00009541389,0.00009288224,0.4188812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8369626,0.003960656,0.001150678,0.06463201,0.001392763,0.00005542481,0.00003081742,0.00009704453,0.0917181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008978454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01587045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984473619","doi":"10.1177/1743872112475277","title":"‘A Matter of Time and a Matter of Place’: Colonial Inquiries and the Politics of Testimony","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Narrative; Colonialism; Injustice; Politics; Consolidation (business); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Sociology; History; Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Carmela Murdocca","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01246707490105298,"gpt":0.2298745259186986,"spread":0.2174074510176456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005043016,0.0002408779,0.0002351186,0.001366392,0.01588776,0.007031527,0.001162465,0.001645705,0.002627876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01660957,0.0003875382,0.0001091893,0.00182367,0.0335548,0.004283451,0.00515874,0.002553248,0.0001562664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00853402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006772003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.136558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2920704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995552,0.003156198,0.0001203125,0.0002085339,0.0003771745,0.0005857293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899524,0.007683687,0.0009045543,0.0003813493,0.000527437,0.0005505767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012039,0.000005587553,0.002217913,0.00005847332,0.000004074879,0.001100575,0.9638444,0.0000243774,0.0002707128,0.02556762,0.0008234759,0.006070761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002936213,0.00001150643,0.00454541,0.0002357796,0.000005844149,0.0004123876,0.954338,0.00003070349,0.0002890168,0.002615231,0.03750161,0.00001153207],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8843469,0.006511306,0.001185052,0.01589918,0.0002455265,0.00003264182,0.00004585087,0.000009394767,0.09172405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957274,0.0009637449,0.0001563557,0.0003784189,0.00002757977,0.000005502571,0.000005426786,0.000005883809,0.002729792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.136558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2715263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401432074","doi":"10.1177/17438721241268889","title":"From the Museum to the Studio: Rethinking Visual Representations of White-Washed Stories of North American History","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Colonialism; Visual culture; White (mutation); Resistance (ecology); Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Studio; Visual arts; Sociology; History; Art; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Archaeology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Natilie Richer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03327252539287641,"gpt":0.2982270825503907,"spread":0.2649545571575143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003357936,0.0007222818,0.0002417398,0.002933108,0.01372735,0.01211207,0.001336379,0.001580275,0.007029254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01149075,0.0005477698,0.0002440233,0.002146777,0.02317841,0.007652299,0.007044774,0.003080145,0.0003588461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009079317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004783347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1547815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.362394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974594,0.00176609,0.00003410539,0.0001575018,0.0002834271,0.0002995385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927492,0.005433493,0.0004344063,0.0004676545,0.0004948917,0.0004204139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118333,0.000004862588,0.0004438251,0.00002286867,0.000002218587,0.0001296332,0.986527,0.00003382143,0.0002139242,0.007449185,0.001406239,0.003754544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002949944,0.000009998106,0.001958608,0.000161332,0.00001011855,0.0001153382,0.8921319,0.0002146257,0.0003203129,0.003254063,0.1018031,0.00001761472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7235654,0.001927518,0.006588005,0.01632787,0.0003726211,0.00008641733,0.0002482166,0.0001934174,0.2506905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811101,0.0007061876,0.001221713,0.0006485046,0.00005755395,0.00004997575,0.00005921312,0.0001892337,0.01595757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8452185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3077612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734685456","doi":"10.1177/1743872115591311c","title":"Book Review: ‘‘Métis’’: Race, Recognition, and the Struggle for Indigenous Peoplehood","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Race (biology); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Anthropology; Ecology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Jean-Philippe Crété","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02728530809659677,"gpt":0.2340228616831524,"spread":0.2067375535865556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00131702,0.000922275,0.001314897,0.003408703,0.002389332,0.004563559,0.002233351,0.005573302,0.02162602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005981543,0.0004758489,0.0004691703,0.007417187,0.004280992,0.003482703,0.001729811,0.006319054,0.006184541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01137041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02035449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2554256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5320782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988711,0.0002100152,0.0000658721,0.0001261307,0.0006111583,0.0001156829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956318,0.001994926,0.0002206833,0.00009434383,0.001690774,0.0003675911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003166797,0.000002293864,0.00001867501,0.0003091445,0.000002801889,0.000007893437,0.0000415735,0.00001005385,0.00001114161,0.002116382,0.9873477,0.01012916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003627103,0.000002172926,0.0002139824,0.000854695,0.00000488469,0.00003242061,0.00008069417,0.000005651998,0.000010002,0.0006814316,0.9981046,0.000005848466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000977204,0.791432,0.0001272878,0.1264195,0.05902974,0.00002168006,0.0002555714,0.00002277642,0.02259369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003078642,0.7318423,0.0003050703,0.1074275,0.05535924,0.00008436185,0.0003288936,0.00008647493,0.1014875],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7445744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5078777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}