{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"e6b9e5252826","filters":{"venue":"Law Probability and Risk"}},"results":[{"id":"W2008815158","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgm042","title":"A forensic approach to the interpretation of blood doping markers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"World Anti-Doping Agency","funders":"Bundesamt für Sport; World Anti-Doping Agency; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Prior probability; Odds; Population; Bayesian probability; Athletes; Fallacy; Statistics; Test (biology); Sorting; Medicine; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Algorithm; Physical therapy; Epistemology; Logistic regression","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0210194790790406,"gpt":0.2551814619903546,"spread":0.234161982911314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009759665,0.00005074485,0.0001001148,0.00001135144,0.000455109,0.00001581306,0.0001133586,0.00004497606,0.000005837412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000216007,0.000035021,0.00003894102,0.0001442029,0.0006624031,0.00008692036,0.00003730618,0.00007805002,0.000001369348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001533876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004160331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00648715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004494227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992108,0.0001732161,0.0001491414,0.0001656874,0.0001719876,0.0001291341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995649,0.00009998628,0.0000689239,0.0001677677,0.00005245042,0.00004598139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001383428,0.0003375776,0.3119723,0.0001609551,0.0001043905,0.000001536002,0.185158,0.001600083,0.000007676329,0.4758195,0.0004061956,0.02429338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00170671,0.0006741728,0.5994152,0.0004591,0.0006121062,0.0000535928,0.01984526,0.006228277,0.0004951615,0.309316,0.06002963,0.001164719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493543,0.00009980347,0.001249076,0.0003136203,0.0001068354,0.0005090648,0.000003542885,0.00003033276,0.04833346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99371,0.00008010385,0.005968346,0.000080768,0.0000418042,0.00001986783,9.152703e-7,0.000002956476,0.00009523061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.287443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9806673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137686272","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgs003","title":"Burdens and standards of proof for inference to the best explanation: three case studies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Burden of proof; Computer science; Proof of concept; Epistemology; Calculus (dental); Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0708033377505903,"gpt":0.3365980885486243,"spread":0.2657947507980339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001502088,0.00006750514,0.0001240358,0.00001234887,0.0002545536,0.00003545337,0.00008805021,0.00002876511,8.409082e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002772448,0.00003961857,0.00001829574,0.00006486943,0.00007942339,0.0002408143,0.000102859,0.00003810543,3.942866e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002407804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002048645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003882767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00560797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993187,0.00006370802,0.0001719364,0.0001613294,0.0001677011,0.0001165776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991173,0.0002349464,0.00008231566,0.0002326019,0.0002822164,0.00005064871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005724467,0.0002656701,0.123139,0.001024787,0.0001457574,0.000003312141,0.04604775,0.000307991,0.00006101935,0.7546962,0.0003960094,0.0738553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008756365,0.006247135,0.1431374,0.00125781,0.0008333144,0.001036133,0.01363035,0.1278036,0.01763065,0.4825299,0.1940994,0.003037946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7697922,0.00161797,0.2264033,0.0006424388,0.0002156993,0.001139376,0.00007767076,0.00001667899,0.00009470571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927517,0.00006738733,0.007004297,0.00002332715,0.00006130368,0.00007752814,4.262897e-7,0.000001811542,0.00001222938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2721663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3129379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886443927","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgy016","title":"A formal approach to qualifying and quantifying the ‘goodness’ of forensic identification decisions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Lausanne; York University; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Identification (biology); Forensic identification; Computer science; Inference; Perspective (graphical); Data science; Management science; Forensic science; Point (geometry); Field (mathematics); Empirical research; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0636521818125617,"gpt":0.3279384853436287,"spread":0.264286303531067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001012117,0.00007819537,0.000101817,0.00001546455,0.0003342978,0.00003366612,0.000115968,0.00007620207,0.000001499474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002603426,0.00004989896,0.00003433819,0.00008780523,0.0006936602,0.000006363407,0.0002010229,0.00006644861,0.000001610669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003027556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000223917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002510191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006064065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991042,0.0001044226,0.0002067545,0.0002846156,0.0001258908,0.0001741021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993287,0.00004806474,0.00005953024,0.0003645655,0.0001344014,0.00006470896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00124936,0.0005248004,0.09927664,0.0004040621,0.0003216731,4.512822e-7,0.008669463,0.0001746802,0.2072013,0.387141,0.00135792,0.2936786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002185052,0.002497906,0.3033437,0.0001301312,0.0002068758,0.00007228963,0.005083872,0.004649716,0.5480402,0.1014954,0.03141729,0.0008776294],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798899,0.0003937689,0.01821796,0.00009447339,0.00004392649,0.0003581802,0.00001581866,0.000003872653,0.0009821504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924657,0.0002416695,0.007077695,0.00005104981,0.00006775727,0.00002343996,0.00001199743,0.000005846377,0.0000547855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3408388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2571182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122190416","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgm033","title":"Visualization tools, argumentation schemes and expert opinion evidence in law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Visualization; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Information visualization; Data science; sort; Focus (optics); Management science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Information retrieval; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1354791331725621,"gpt":0.4212660351369331,"spread":0.285786901964371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002396727,0.00007311363,0.00009549328,0.00002012377,0.0005083014,0.0001216995,0.00006999518,0.000107686,0.00003150596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005346778,0.00006915376,0.00001604515,0.0001673312,0.001045727,0.0009312188,0.00003577426,0.0000857518,0.000004403393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008442319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002592326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02738336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1014227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988453,0.0002323082,0.000256378,0.0002613509,0.0002026466,0.0002020509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992484,0.000441792,0.00007256769,0.00009954681,0.0000654309,0.00007224803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003125245,0.00004555369,0.04939027,0.00001428914,0.000002114604,3.358599e-7,0.01099571,0.00000868929,0.00009708203,0.9202649,0.000005837003,0.01914398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003041904,0.0002438631,0.02913024,0.0004058996,0.00001520321,0.000001539337,0.0152463,0.000945512,0.01833402,0.7873107,0.1474625,0.0006000153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.981436,0.001614262,0.009665874,0.0006811941,0.0002797791,0.0006681216,0.000002595047,0.0000699137,0.005582277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950908,0.003162301,0.001397538,0.0002053544,0.0001059112,0.00001282432,0.000002586094,0.000004067597,0.00001858574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1474567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112892950","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgp008","title":"The effect of dependence between observations on the proper interpretation of statistical evidence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Econometrics; Statistics; Initial public offering; Goodness of fit; Statistical hypothesis testing; Parametric statistics; Independence (probability theory); Value (mathematics); Jury; Statistical significance; Interpretation (philosophy); Actuarial science; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Accounting; Law; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02747400398686201,"gpt":0.2378196219747978,"spread":0.2103456179879357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001362351,0.00009722403,0.0001531072,0.00001270784,0.0004479316,0.0000451077,0.0002321484,0.00002903019,0.00001379277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01356541,0.00004921871,0.00003761455,0.0001629054,0.0006949934,0.0003817929,0.0001463377,0.0001704046,0.00001049976],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001340487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009147679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001191198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002632623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990108,0.0001142083,0.0002732595,0.0001938084,0.0002854298,0.0001224983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952904,0.001947967,0.002383365,0.0002662092,0.000106063,0.000005974976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001070124,0.00002050423,0.7516196,0.0003067769,0.00003261421,5.089794e-7,0.0001343703,0.0002607549,0.00002469957,0.2215081,0.0001455167,0.02583943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002018782,0.0001440619,0.9702308,0.000280624,0.000123699,3.356743e-7,0.00003032827,0.00335218,0.0003337228,0.02155482,0.003636766,0.0001108328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577478,0.00006710352,0.03998792,0.0005353123,0.0000418289,0.0006153125,0.000007329799,0.00002050478,0.000976858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994718,0.00007762641,0.0002118577,0.00007600286,0.0000634633,0.00003570701,0.000002328693,0.000006132904,0.00005508278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2186111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989236958","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgq001","title":"Recent trends in evidence law in China and the new evidence scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interdependence; Status quo; China; Modernization theory; Empirical evidence; Perspective (graphical); Positive economics; Law; Political science; Scientific evidence; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07071523477077973,"gpt":0.3721160392842198,"spread":0.3014008045134401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007885765,0.000112538,0.0002051984,0.00004446396,0.000481881,0.0002818629,0.0003754561,0.0001517573,0.0001074362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006428221,0.00007364769,0.00002709921,0.0006376059,0.001624921,0.0009660244,0.0001347029,0.00073611,0.000004673024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004610387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001343327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03096877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5974595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978076,0.0008399482,0.0002942703,0.0004258613,0.0003574236,0.000274854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975962,0.001797577,0.00009797911,0.0003287971,0.00005884474,0.0001206128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002274366,0.00004872981,0.1237274,0.00002366426,0.000002618276,0.000002003309,0.01019412,0.000007980479,0.00001018106,0.5724133,0.00003278678,0.2933098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005491067,0.00002921418,0.3595211,0.0002330679,0.00001143719,0.000001681284,0.0001305319,0.00001560524,0.0000292454,0.6080384,0.03131154,0.0001291012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972537,0.00614176,0.000006360311,0.0160912,0.0001838387,0.0003356688,0.000001461387,0.00003243495,0.004670212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883586,0.01022198,0.0008834714,0.0002445237,0.00007073974,0.00001633991,1.505407e-7,0.000004557854,0.0001996689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5664907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9754841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331299321","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgt008","title":"Incommensurability, proportionality, and defeasibility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02805811791004876,"gpt":0.2923665893656954,"spread":0.2643084714556467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001502182,0.00008859243,0.0001317933,0.000008160782,0.001069748,0.0001496907,0.0001089228,0.00009451684,0.0002175524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002590528,0.00007081319,0.00003643263,0.0001016183,0.00146781,0.0003103368,0.0001440018,0.0001648129,0.00002186922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005031051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005693337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0536444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03673318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986944,0.0003091895,0.0002345154,0.0003608583,0.0001883015,0.000212793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991133,0.0002026243,0.00007466046,0.000274621,0.0001400507,0.0001947942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000197911,0.00008424636,0.4218767,0.00002101366,0.000004635476,3.730691e-8,0.0007946229,5.269475e-7,0.000004423324,0.5743658,0.00005906701,0.002786949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007892155,0.00001290498,0.4123875,0.0000023935,0.00000851051,4.304655e-7,0.0001905079,0.00002287748,0.000007621939,0.5564548,0.03076153,0.00007201578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556726,0.00006603725,0.00005516,0.007384145,0.00002734975,0.00101797,0.0000253881,0.0000784328,0.03567293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974871,0.0001536018,0.001770282,0.0001998497,0.00005809334,0.0001210813,0.000003365563,0.000003846856,0.0002027883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0418145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9808439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095612437","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgl006","title":"A retail sampling approach to assess impact of geographic concentrations on probative value of comparative bullet lead analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Irvine; Ryerson University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Distribution (mathematics); Public domain; Law; Statistics; Business; Geography; Mathematics; Political science; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05699373531188846,"gpt":0.3014105985818857,"spread":0.2444168632699972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006521095,0.0001465448,0.0004500993,0.00004271429,0.000148419,0.00001616807,0.0001120765,0.00007143435,0.00006123273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003623751,0.0001057932,0.0002186536,0.0006893643,0.0006052945,0.0001031395,0.00005352725,0.0001410648,0.000004151324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006110974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001648756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01987687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004538412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984815,0.0003122141,0.0003864837,0.00037155,0.0002551009,0.0001931846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999263,0.0001562175,0.0001879452,0.0002750317,0.00003468525,0.00008307191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008058932,0.0007900974,0.7792459,0.00002178244,0.0002542486,9.358374e-8,0.0008156695,0.1950502,0.002461099,0.0211567,0.000007140522,0.0001165061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002439654,0.0004387369,0.9764147,0.00001023215,0.0002885406,4.169075e-7,0.00007408948,0.00619329,0.006288355,0.00982662,0.00007042206,0.0001506149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773746,0.00002207661,0.009454757,0.00001730843,0.000007456522,0.0006036299,0.0001226259,0.00001235799,0.01238523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912159,0.000007774919,0.008687126,0.00001291192,0.000007973235,0.00002449845,0.00001914309,0.000003430444,0.00002118659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1971689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135985478","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgp022","title":"Statistics in the law, by Joseph B. Kadane","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Probability and Statistical Research","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statistics; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0430974454019268,"gpt":0.3384918646113552,"spread":0.2953944192094284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002647813,0.000159324,0.0002696714,0.00001369728,0.0002946222,0.0001054535,0.0002793033,0.0001221059,0.00006078049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001926836,0.0001014405,0.0000386536,0.0001495196,0.0006552109,0.0001069455,0.00004907905,0.000564498,0.00001138079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004725703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003225148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001104681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005916592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977615,0.0006540493,0.0003958585,0.0003549527,0.0004269631,0.0004067158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968472,0.00241507,0.00005956485,0.0004944778,0.00007068473,0.0001129823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005620443,0.0005240568,0.0004653134,0.000109043,0.00000738689,0.000007356217,0.000729241,0.000001122285,0.00001311125,0.9900836,0.002381798,0.005621811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003550653,0.0002569245,0.002229494,0.00001601269,0.00002123877,0.000004718257,0.0000675301,0.0003708267,0.00005235724,0.9890881,0.007406875,0.0001308668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8118213,0.001244953,0.08340938,0.009427823,0.0001399152,0.00451041,0.002777569,0.0002517443,0.08641687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9452686,0.0002996507,0.05343529,0.0007893625,0.00003077335,0.00003696322,0.00002226675,0.000009274309,0.0001077647],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1334473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4136624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063198611","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgu003","title":"Case comment: a critique of the Supreme Court of Canada's use of statistical reasoning in R v. Mabior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Criminalization; Supreme court; Sanctions; Argument (complex analysis); Liability; Law; Criminology; Actuarial science; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02002547739292539,"gpt":0.2766432593370159,"spread":0.2566177819440905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007295557,0.00005174289,0.0002292064,0.000008962747,0.0000399422,0.000001544357,0.00002217849,0.0000412218,0.000009888041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001111716,0.00003413788,0.00001967774,0.00005137404,0.0002551376,0.00002690899,0.00001747073,0.0001346736,2.225033e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003795828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001606307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5917029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5447066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990615,0.0002746314,0.0003005552,0.0001391105,0.0001173132,0.0001068945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991914,0.0002574331,0.0001052782,0.0002572066,0.0001318864,0.00005676984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001135095,0.0005119774,0.8246526,0.002199209,0.0000298309,0.00001909809,0.0007969628,0.00004283879,0.0006123434,0.163076,0.0003129785,0.006611058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001557068,0.0004612781,0.9781998,0.0003400353,0.0001032226,0.0001471272,0.0001793556,0.002091066,0.00367824,0.009780175,0.003378777,0.00008387088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970285,0.00005330755,0.000390075,0.001822404,0.00002936546,0.0004671162,0.000090851,0.000002162679,0.0001161706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981366,0.00002666877,0.001628655,0.0001694416,0.00001523894,0.000007923682,0.000002339068,0.000002953624,0.00001015573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1535472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4636013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970486212","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgi011","title":"Catastrophe: Risk and Response, by Richard A. Posner","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007935909066323122,"gpt":0.2491106106814535,"spread":0.2411747016151304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001470593,0.00009765686,0.0001160433,0.0000163304,0.0008481594,0.0001303071,0.0001401803,0.00007088458,0.00006620052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000155517,0.00007624902,0.00002785569,0.0001143929,0.001008843,0.0002916825,0.00009102027,0.0001350664,0.00002416388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003247482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002453374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00431023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01111014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985338,0.0005348899,0.0001430939,0.0003204048,0.0002045325,0.0002632045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994393,0.0001475962,0.00006917657,0.0001796774,0.00002773077,0.0001365342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001592185,0.0007000187,0.3688326,0.00008982633,0.0001149308,0.000004997004,0.05079552,0.00007850418,0.0002154144,0.2018101,0.03026361,0.3455023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003572124,0.0001004784,0.02964148,0.000008659295,0.00004545994,3.98157e-7,0.001371447,0.0000487318,0.00003815057,0.01254845,0.9556637,0.0001758232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.979818,0.0009544115,0.00009389465,0.001979463,0.00006539317,0.000310639,0.00005595314,0.00005692479,0.01666536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909992,0.002124089,0.00145109,0.0001815512,0.00008367793,0.000012646,0.00000297072,0.000005337451,0.005139463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6523442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964127992","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgr012","title":"Teleological argumentation to and from motives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Circumstantial evidence; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Teleology; Action (physics); Deductive reasoning; Practical reason; Argumentation framework; Defeasible reasoning; Informal logic; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09755210863611309,"gpt":0.3207953461622199,"spread":0.2232432375261068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004627439,0.00005481537,0.0000825337,0.000007451995,0.0004381938,0.00003555961,0.00007091289,0.0000740094,0.0002990903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002427536,0.00004382815,0.00001529429,0.0000586895,0.0009479944,0.000157546,0.00004570843,0.0000710102,0.000027322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001719274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001076719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05049978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0350388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992037,0.0002138332,0.0001182968,0.0002303331,0.00009615254,0.0001376547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995805,0.0001588785,0.00003170556,0.00008444852,0.00003402095,0.0001104282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003687675,0.00006838487,0.1892882,0.000002334747,0.000007928311,6.56749e-7,0.04888768,0.000001725783,0.00003018177,0.7366375,0.00001059742,0.02502793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003097075,0.00008615651,0.1300221,0.000004965359,0.0000134184,1.004981e-7,0.00363905,0.00001460761,0.001351432,0.8600805,0.004669411,0.00008725945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771115,0.00005110821,0.0008736156,0.0003074282,0.00008285932,0.0002812202,0.000009920714,0.00004242428,0.02123995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899254,0.0001334653,0.009677742,0.0001332606,0.00005823319,0.00001323187,7.818265e-7,0.000002032345,0.00005585976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1234431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9825692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108936377","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgt001","title":"The Eighth International Conference on Forensic Inference and Statistics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic science; Inference; Statistics; Computer science; Data science; History; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04599391666660593,"gpt":0.337995040370298,"spread":0.292001123703692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005356175,0.00006554974,0.00007312785,0.00000900416,0.0008118119,0.0003756173,0.0001727267,0.00004941839,0.0001278038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000961842,0.00004008439,0.000009542606,0.00005046767,0.001107725,0.0001681195,0.00006733774,0.0001278709,0.00002583916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001815069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006156118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002163335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01155389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991556,0.0001358928,0.0001314105,0.0001871884,0.0002470768,0.000142859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985638,0.0009339096,0.00007001767,0.0001278022,0.0002360001,0.0000684538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007112265,0.00001297983,0.005114991,0.000004087095,0.000004946235,1.56745e-7,0.000884193,0.000001405206,7.531654e-7,0.8812264,0.0002737822,0.1124692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007948746,0.00003728637,0.02009459,0.00001317064,0.000005205222,2.749107e-7,0.000409127,0.0003893352,0.000006935277,0.9471051,0.03179552,0.00006398079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8552897,0.000309476,0.005518821,0.008965864,0.0007061934,0.001025034,0.0001174744,0.0001162202,0.1279512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922271,0.001771982,0.005334314,0.0001207817,0.00004437637,0.00001934409,0.000001403662,0.000002688268,0.0004779614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1369375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6447342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7130541448","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgaf016","title":"Towards cumulative forensic science: a commentary on ‘Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic science; Plan (archaeology); Forensic anthropology; Forensic psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0665826531179473,"gpt":0.3682310307243785,"spread":0.3016483776064312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00193563,0.0001727585,0.0003512923,0.00007753115,0.0001825182,0.0000229749,0.0002350654,0.0001312148,0.000005756724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003058662,0.0001280679,0.00006408965,0.0003594175,0.00225862,0.00000665593,0.0003940026,0.0002577011,7.134871e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003826401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001029065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002500459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003586286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978984,0.0004931028,0.0003814633,0.0006202808,0.0002843148,0.0003224662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990722,0.0001430304,0.00008715591,0.000476302,0.000146532,0.00007480082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00182033,0.004136633,0.9291575,0.0003305153,0.0002673141,0.000004877309,0.003067787,0.006102875,0.005395986,0.008400415,0.003113652,0.03820214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005882585,0.01019969,0.7961618,0.000209959,0.000111254,0.000003504298,0.003436859,0.00368786,0.08772988,0.08887611,0.003131489,0.0005690631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959004,0.0002091739,0.0004146911,0.0003236049,0.00007487118,0.001200017,0.00002033713,0.000007144639,0.001849783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961796,0.0001358788,0.003279414,0.0002595727,0.00002509494,0.00004687815,0.00001545937,0.000005589659,0.00005246139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1329957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8321981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}