{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":19,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"95942559480a","filters":{"venue":"Law and Critique"}},"results":[{"id":"W165117462","doi":"10.1023/a:1008994221249","title":"Deconstructing Diplomacy: Derridean Political Theory and U.N. Deal-Making","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; International relations; Political philosophy; Nationalism; Civil society; Reading (process); Politics; Declaration; Philosophy of law; Sociology; International law; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Michael Plaxton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01497176293597851,"gpt":0.3533498309519053,"spread":0.3383780680159268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006897826,0.000298868,0.0003286861,0.001412609,0.006572349,0.009323648,0.001173405,0.004614789,0.00430837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009512839,0.0001751552,0.0002442989,0.001237461,0.0319243,0.008325367,0.00470162,0.004726648,0.0002881215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009423088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005924162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009563201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02020439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965954,0.002370561,0.00006086873,0.0003024208,0.0003365781,0.0003341783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967486,0.002374023,0.0002014616,0.0002503695,0.0002621148,0.000163558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002781818,0.000002086739,0.00005787524,0.000003672904,4.926646e-7,0.00001043559,0.001865,0.00005493153,0.000008767621,0.9958435,0.0005866744,0.001563716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000708532,0.000004629888,0.00018958,0.00007112533,0.000001740253,0.00001447037,0.003045004,0.0004520068,0.00008458699,0.9614277,0.03469726,0.000004834359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08162789,0.007324159,0.01749497,0.0884719,0.0004323146,0.00003410185,0.0000312051,0.00002698023,0.8045566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740319,0.0009349941,0.001748941,0.00386558,0.0001126939,0.00004032937,0.000008205302,0.00002200612,0.01923523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009563201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06836963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034325192","doi":"10.1007/s10978-020-09269-5","title":"The Spatio-Legal Production of Bodies Through the Legal Fiction of Death","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legal fiction; Biopower; Legal realism; Law; Politics; Spectacle; Legal profession; Assisted suicide; Philosophy of law; Sovereignty; Sociology; Legal pluralism; Political science; Public law","authors":[{"name":"Joshua Shaw","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01648351324600985,"gpt":0.2748752077773665,"spread":0.2583916945313567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006759211,0.0003970261,0.0005074092,0.001852551,0.008997419,0.01055625,0.001697656,0.007897157,0.006748601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01297495,0.0004238158,0.0005563216,0.001417711,0.1047196,0.009993123,0.005259193,0.00780928,0.0008152619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007136962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004436976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008131417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01024765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948236,0.003780073,0.0001202545,0.0004367458,0.0005069872,0.0003324374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909977,0.006874161,0.0004383732,0.0009567151,0.0005245137,0.000208516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002197386,0.000001007394,0.00002264587,0.000009274466,7.526476e-7,0.00002854705,0.003710936,0.00004670689,0.00001543412,0.9947608,0.0009235815,0.0004781057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009127534,0.000007356975,0.0001938311,0.0001789538,0.000005795681,0.0001416983,0.005802854,0.0002277774,0.0001769145,0.8537584,0.1394866,0.0000108024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02978107,0.01208819,0.03415101,0.1191124,0.001865957,0.0000317111,0.000174615,0.00008340697,0.8027117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9460472,0.002669637,0.004365007,0.005579556,0.001010961,0.00004841026,0.00005148127,0.0001186217,0.04010915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01055625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05178249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211244192","doi":"10.1007/s10978-022-09319-0","title":"Jurisgenerative Tissues: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Legal Secretions of 3D Bioprinting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Individuation; Epistemology; Sociotechnical system; Temporality; Process (computing); Sociology; Generative grammar; Relation (database); Human body; Environmental ethics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Biology; Computer science; Anatomy","authors":[{"name":"Joshua Shaw","is_ca":true},{"name":"Roxanne Mykitiuk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009103766128117356,"gpt":0.2978529361791465,"spread":0.2887491700510291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02760116,0.0007233804,0.0006562049,0.001971887,0.009004352,0.01499906,0.002927777,0.02087894,0.004100064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03187995,0.0005565525,0.0007445691,0.0008835984,0.1313177,0.01161489,0.007979037,0.01381001,0.0006206556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006595674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006529158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003236348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003998415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9827559,0.01120036,0.0005086976,0.00111399,0.003655605,0.0007653884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654264,0.02810434,0.001317757,0.00221833,0.002208701,0.0007243988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002840267,0.000005760771,0.00003391992,0.00001468356,0.000001568662,0.00005013852,0.002641342,0.00009968963,0.00005392335,0.9941944,0.001546405,0.001355266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007543945,0.00000897986,0.00006667721,0.000134644,0.000003306955,0.0001166094,0.00274543,0.0002831641,0.0002133008,0.9510952,0.04531382,0.00001147452],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02876384,0.01966444,0.05557304,0.4827083,0.003007161,0.00006481205,0.00006577458,0.00007711595,0.4100756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911639,0.004738776,0.01343434,0.04112439,0.002592284,0.0001842322,0.0000277547,0.000121987,0.02613724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1459706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285726576","doi":"10.1007/s10978-022-09328-z","title":"Critique and the Coloniality of Being: Rethinking Development Discourses of Encounter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Sociology; Politics; The Imaginary; Sensibility; Normative; Epistemology; Critical theory; Framing (construction); Openness to experience; Subjectivity; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"David Chandler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02023097618930921,"gpt":0.338368656624584,"spread":0.3181376804352748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02969267,0.0008484469,0.001153132,0.005386971,0.02862947,0.0222833,0.003202529,0.007653486,0.003376417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0361701,0.0006336762,0.0004966619,0.003289685,0.1912577,0.02140705,0.01642113,0.0108361,0.0002973931],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02302502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009206082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01919793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01582301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.96355,0.02980912,0.0005222799,0.001689455,0.00258919,0.001839948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481756,0.04282592,0.00199761,0.002430355,0.003136191,0.001434327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009680458,0.000007073862,0.0001856522,0.00003547701,0.00000251429,0.0001833571,0.4767742,0.00008504992,0.0001266431,0.520004,0.0007446872,0.001841652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001813312,0.00003656858,0.0004684793,0.0005261351,0.00001309776,0.0003683826,0.4967138,0.0007405365,0.0006513651,0.3333691,0.167051,0.00004344462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2966421,0.008343223,0.02887546,0.1364307,0.0008998116,0.0001056202,0.00003947566,0.0001395635,0.528524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939649,0.0005006729,0.0008981389,0.0008864697,0.00007130259,0.00002040824,0.000003812789,0.00005163337,0.003602711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.167059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755406911","doi":"10.1007/s10978-017-9215-6","title":"Before the Law: Criminalization, Accusation and Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Law; Criminal law; Sociology; Criminal justice; False accusation; Politics; Dialectic; Philosophy of law; Political science; Criminology; Public law; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"George Pavlich","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02616452379993024,"gpt":0.3572489490767577,"spread":0.3310844252768275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00276241,0.0004582428,0.0005979286,0.002750912,0.004633574,0.009296744,0.001054626,0.003753941,0.002537983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009892355,0.0002233007,0.0003608471,0.00265649,0.02933297,0.00800739,0.002497608,0.004227194,0.0004827653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004328624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01258571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916629,0.005274225,0.000354104,0.0004822276,0.001619373,0.0006072747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937783,0.004028986,0.0009714148,0.000271705,0.0007860177,0.0001635405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002916369,0.00004336957,0.001708766,0.001332267,0.00003106432,0.0005214307,0.09172145,0.000168407,0.0003873134,0.8134465,0.0149745,0.07563587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000747841,0.00008049348,0.007853191,0.007008684,0.00005797396,0.001179275,0.08827286,0.0002748775,0.0008971073,0.1882226,0.706084,0.00006129908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0916183,0.4992157,0.006432904,0.09839154,0.004536736,0.0000735361,0.00007420811,0.00008512019,0.2995719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8264155,0.1390895,0.001143221,0.01091835,0.002994774,0.00007904157,0.00005612513,0.0001056285,0.01919783],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0101346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03140652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186020754","doi":"10.1007/s10978-021-09302-1","title":"Unrecognised States: The Necessary Affirmation of the Event of International Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Cyprus History, Politics, Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Jerome's University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Sovereignty; Comparative law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Municipal law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Anastasia Tataryn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Erdem Ertürk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01408716596185903,"gpt":0.3083207282983821,"spread":0.294233562336523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009796388,0.0002917486,0.0005754717,0.001440452,0.01230944,0.01529823,0.001790561,0.01101741,0.005103606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02435356,0.0003726929,0.0005650244,0.001279584,0.0620261,0.005931297,0.005502838,0.01159164,0.0004671345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01063617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01224198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01541342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01459878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905379,0.005301123,0.0003218918,0.0009411027,0.001168957,0.001728972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873388,0.007914879,0.0009126122,0.001941702,0.001491647,0.000400435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001179774,0.000005269719,0.0001078061,0.00001396963,0.000002286078,0.00006651066,0.004736739,0.00005857724,0.00005410533,0.9918004,0.002065436,0.001077001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001885343,0.00001913485,0.001979684,0.0003448688,0.00002508645,0.0001587622,0.01233326,0.0005123327,0.0007356065,0.8774775,0.1063654,0.00002939287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09480088,0.004380119,0.004068419,0.1183258,0.00118124,0.00004473985,0.00006441684,0.00004252248,0.7770919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760418,0.000507038,0.0004670965,0.006201321,0.0004831738,0.00004225456,0.00001203332,0.00002243988,0.01622278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01541342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07717115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084873847","doi":"10.1007/s10978-012-9113-x","title":"Freedom, Law, and the Colonial Project","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Marxist philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Susan Dianne Brophy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01037860949742618,"gpt":0.2655224573035038,"spread":0.2551438478060776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004158894,0.0004354228,0.0005458921,0.003584183,0.04573218,0.01706031,0.001446603,0.004083739,0.008859657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009450224,0.0003203942,0.0002752943,0.004342324,0.07597151,0.003810691,0.004643818,0.004945312,0.0002706997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1186785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1623631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9777399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961773,0.00113202,0.00006870663,0.0002780663,0.0008130064,0.001530861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947607,0.002623067,0.0002430084,0.0002486715,0.001109925,0.001014583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009674885,0.000007548992,0.0004272696,0.00002088745,0.00000238197,0.00005670395,0.01627038,0.00008517988,0.0000322598,0.9703481,0.007754878,0.004984749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003137021,0.00001564627,0.008480444,0.000489966,0.00002865388,0.0001125981,0.07951245,0.0004167639,0.0002716197,0.2938655,0.6166952,0.00007993881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08642958,0.020665,0.001172031,0.1100545,0.000515445,0.00003876681,0.0001461879,0.00003972453,0.7809387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403372,0.003396936,0.0004230411,0.003662436,0.0001299295,0.00001596944,0.00002598815,0.00003048713,0.05197804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1186785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8610772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343877681","doi":"10.1007/s10978-016-9184-1","title":"Post-secular Messianism Against the Law: Judith Butler on Walter Benjamin and ‘Sacred Life’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Messianism; Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Law; Reincarnation; Theology; Sociology; Political science; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Karyn Ball","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01610182657373246,"gpt":0.2220541677105255,"spread":0.205952341136793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005816084,0.0005419178,0.0006894167,0.001117862,0.0151341,0.007875697,0.001716236,0.01170539,0.006014031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105636,0.0004186943,0.000271135,0.001122804,0.04429775,0.007294144,0.004655267,0.01508154,0.001044313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008968147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006379948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05406154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1221844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957217,0.002521048,0.00008593665,0.0003927623,0.0006836126,0.0005949083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965007,0.002587559,0.0001476629,0.0001976968,0.0003261755,0.0002400912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001433196,0.00001120332,0.00005511615,0.00002991981,0.000003651914,0.00004584938,0.01968922,0.00005994452,0.0000810576,0.9107646,0.06539296,0.003852249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002605603,0.00001296543,0.0003563885,0.0003131026,0.000007857684,0.00005901131,0.01213584,0.0001325524,0.000313354,0.5345566,0.452051,0.00003543069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02405308,0.04332057,0.002454666,0.557097,0.006176282,0.00004678711,0.00007013416,0.00005971444,0.3667218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6749368,0.008251398,0.001644541,0.1066299,0.005268,0.0001152525,0.00002525465,0.0003305582,0.2027982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05406154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1074937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309027089","doi":"10.1007/s10978-022-09339-w","title":"How Not to Talk About Environmental Personhood: Thinking Transitional Concepts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"King's University College","keywords":"Personhood; Epistemology; Conceptualization; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Russell J. Duvernoy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01010412352877875,"gpt":0.2873574015965842,"spread":0.2772532780678054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02637303,0.0009052024,0.001373476,0.002618494,0.01235997,0.01805059,0.004859845,0.01318447,0.006665025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03237706,0.000926038,0.001145601,0.001887109,0.1193403,0.05546775,0.01034789,0.02287031,0.001184252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006726174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007922707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006582365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00587096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9821593,0.01359101,0.0003632719,0.001638334,0.00128763,0.000960408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780977,0.01463354,0.001131478,0.002005299,0.002412001,0.001720035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007029922,0.000009466094,0.0001125306,0.00002772503,0.000005434511,0.0000299603,0.01497588,0.00008695996,0.00004241908,0.9813456,0.001680124,0.001676789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005264405,0.000003221668,0.0000349763,0.00005662042,0.00000518299,0.00002306298,0.007802225,0.0001559788,0.00005584785,0.9827728,0.009077731,0.000007075402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04266704,0.005726791,0.1697396,0.579532,0.002456991,0.0000963835,0.0001120464,0.000199421,0.1994697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9237182,0.001543358,0.03719801,0.02610994,0.0006415442,0.0003130251,0.00006155554,0.0003815047,0.01003281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02637303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1394756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194277122","doi":"10.1007/s10978-021-09308-9","title":"Theft in Broad Daylight: Racism and Neoliberal Legality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Racism; Sociology; Neoliberalism (international relations); Identity (music); Critical theory; Critical race theory; Capitalism; Biopower; Law; Race (biology); Political science; Gender studies; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Brenna Bhandar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01745732600669981,"gpt":0.2361575254539397,"spread":0.2187001994472399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004848239,0.0002605367,0.0006445245,0.001340314,0.006891815,0.008691764,0.001302564,0.005452977,0.008278955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01040869,0.0001807378,0.0004111013,0.001220562,0.05113146,0.00934306,0.003874653,0.008477336,0.0004171849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009444855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006313856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02570249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0306244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967943,0.001834364,0.0000501916,0.0003247749,0.000514431,0.0004820303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942558,0.003292118,0.0003650887,0.000712793,0.0008893266,0.0004849075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004305802,0.00001084566,0.0001138606,0.000007172727,0.000001744175,0.00001514102,0.001352779,0.00004832658,0.00001415497,0.9913117,0.005386055,0.00173397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009358011,0.000005779528,0.0004611625,0.00009520661,0.000002688387,0.00002479164,0.004016225,0.0002836441,0.00006130398,0.9273636,0.0676676,0.000008752339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07329879,0.01932809,0.007722104,0.5724391,0.001597796,0.00001982801,0.00007996598,0.00004152209,0.3254727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419568,0.002391711,0.001106107,0.02158006,0.001798704,0.00002937803,0.00002066684,0.0000610672,0.03105556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02570249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06852746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953580245","doi":"10.1007/s10978-015-9168-6","title":"Hearing Voice: A Theoretical Framework for Truth Commission Testimony","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Philosophy of law; Law; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Mickey Vallee","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08947084020002825,"gpt":0.3354247903515883,"spread":0.2459539501515601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0133406,0.000909234,0.0008394767,0.004811266,0.008949451,0.01864809,0.00445628,0.01189123,0.01175091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03045793,0.0008126093,0.001329654,0.003776739,0.04367698,0.01792689,0.004888253,0.006803075,0.001579453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008253035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007375147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006496259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00479461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864081,0.009709336,0.0004118056,0.0009515073,0.001513525,0.001005726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765084,0.01870332,0.001021497,0.001563955,0.001609512,0.000593308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002054314,0.00000318756,0.00002398702,0.00001065211,0.000001202263,0.00001681793,0.001734545,0.00008951426,0.00001570698,0.9968151,0.0004088732,0.0008782715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001237236,0.000007727538,0.00004879378,0.00006077396,0.000006577393,0.00004683019,0.001716685,0.001179714,0.00008586809,0.9870492,0.009776722,0.000008793822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01725714,0.003043144,0.4277667,0.04937375,0.0008867236,0.0002835502,0.0002137703,0.0002032544,0.500972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132878,0.0008325648,0.0628102,0.003031374,0.0008142971,0.0005917684,0.0001000759,0.0001672912,0.01836463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01864809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07055265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183381979","doi":"10.1007/s10978-021-09307-w","title":"‘Authorizing the Peril’: Mythologies of (Settler) Law at the End of Time","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Temporality; Law; Mythology; Sociology; Colonialism; Neoliberalism (international relations); State (computer science); Capitalism; Scholarship; Legal pluralism; Materiality (auditing); Law and development; Environmental ethics; Political science; Comparative law; History; Politics; Legal realism; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Development studies","authors":[{"name":"Sahar Shah","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01336030490791049,"gpt":0.3062467180296729,"spread":0.2928864131217624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008254459,0.0004219884,0.00044987,0.002708964,0.01437896,0.01537391,0.002667156,0.00566209,0.002624697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008800888,0.0002900978,0.0003998922,0.00177791,0.1325687,0.009473266,0.004722361,0.005935865,0.0002734233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02719116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01163225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1630102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.133695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993567,0.003367856,0.0001313205,0.000730528,0.001188855,0.001014414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949182,0.002682815,0.000424689,0.0005066185,0.001051032,0.0004166025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002160628,0.000003433743,0.00009267788,0.000008301696,0.00000108309,0.00004482499,0.04067228,0.00005453882,0.00003758525,0.957673,0.0007087999,0.0007012096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001640229,0.0000222826,0.0007905035,0.0002584582,0.00001036842,0.0001866956,0.07556272,0.0008306633,0.0002435539,0.7360218,0.1860164,0.00004019803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1099962,0.006735439,0.02821694,0.0729624,0.0007150591,0.00009219362,0.00008277458,0.0001246017,0.7810744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841726,0.0006297702,0.001511193,0.001764369,0.000136918,0.0000339997,0.00001718092,0.00004015128,0.01169377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1630102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3241227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903640266","doi":"10.1007/s10978-018-9235-x","title":"From Social Uprising to Legal Form","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Liverpool; University of Alberta","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Political philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Anastasia Tataryn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02043506345288243,"gpt":0.2521282063331667,"spread":0.2316931428802843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003961115,0.0002733672,0.0003796606,0.001349827,0.01076455,0.01093623,0.00084521,0.002461758,0.004217662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007528082,0.0002198469,0.0004542919,0.0008153893,0.05875257,0.008356853,0.007724368,0.005278572,0.0004577246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01130456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006829868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0118275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01204432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959281,0.001891864,0.0001721599,0.0005339842,0.0006777,0.0007961564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963685,0.00154419,0.0005604869,0.0005271645,0.000601812,0.0003977803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002308004,0.00002176134,0.00269669,0.00009366368,0.000009105781,0.0006280877,0.1366834,0.0001447757,0.0002622305,0.8465676,0.002273036,0.01059637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147155,0.00006897099,0.01030693,0.0008084273,0.0000234102,0.0007769077,0.3068368,0.0004782039,0.0009926799,0.3985159,0.2811283,0.000048829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.451041,0.005375943,0.006375375,0.05293369,0.0005725904,0.00006537612,0.0000809304,0.0000650763,0.4834899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946389,0.000351921,0.0002588056,0.0007344371,0.00004149578,0.00000653292,0.000009793876,0.00001364869,0.003944622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0118275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0820207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412754994","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09425-9","title":"Divine Violence Reconsidered: Instability, Ethics, and the Limits of Revolutionary Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy of law; Human rights; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Critical theory; Political philosophy; Politics; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Amy Swiffen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03774173326958356,"gpt":0.37097654377675,"spread":0.3332348105071665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01255996,0.0003918523,0.0007658905,0.001606513,0.01223022,0.01727506,0.002264685,0.01081269,0.004388641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0262524,0.0003582216,0.0004913477,0.001417293,0.111242,0.009831685,0.008869825,0.01273791,0.0003880666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008477785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008199772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00752878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008411844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9855887,0.01002057,0.0002906807,0.001127184,0.001366597,0.001606268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838108,0.0116369,0.0009773949,0.001678464,0.001182759,0.0007136426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004430889,0.000003916202,0.00006957354,0.000006813706,0.000001763296,0.00001437449,0.004497132,0.00005042518,0.00001671943,0.9930242,0.001012621,0.001298033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007214802,0.00000503806,0.0002103247,0.00008017625,0.000003831803,0.0000261286,0.005864351,0.0001981607,0.00007846101,0.9685594,0.02495826,0.000008577364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1019714,0.01499487,0.01099782,0.3017572,0.001058086,0.00003625843,0.00005076516,0.00004926216,0.5690843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849851,0.0008557885,0.0005936456,0.005190164,0.0004442527,0.000029919,0.000008723816,0.0000359263,0.007856517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01727506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06642425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239357241","doi":"10.1007/10978.1572-8617","title":"Law and Critique","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Liverpool; University of Alberta","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Anastasia Tataryn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01400920012890795,"gpt":0.3029162333801075,"spread":0.2889070332511996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007334034,0.0005597131,0.0005760731,0.001868373,0.009795917,0.01489562,0.001442341,0.007252104,0.008919287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02046285,0.0002131278,0.0004786254,0.002152474,0.04044898,0.007179533,0.004611806,0.005690486,0.002111103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01484987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01312026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0141882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01110512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928949,0.004294626,0.0002674524,0.0008118143,0.001259118,0.0004720255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930719,0.00377039,0.0004305042,0.001147256,0.001308162,0.0002717913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004539616,0.000010278,0.0001774731,0.00007790174,0.000004195513,0.00008527427,0.0143694,0.00008531632,0.0000471719,0.926685,0.04770718,0.01074627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003911258,0.00001238931,0.0003623831,0.0004772567,0.000004413309,0.000110621,0.01349784,0.0001709566,0.0001173634,0.2992427,0.6859936,0.000006732651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01285992,0.02564756,0.006242801,0.2544473,0.004436066,0.0001014319,0.0002076942,0.000160161,0.6958971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71183,0.01068333,0.004115277,0.0467978,0.00295462,0.0002723258,0.0001746676,0.0002223165,0.2229498],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01489562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1077439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317972511","doi":"10.1007/s10978-016-9178-z","title":"Mastery Over the Time of the Other: The Death Penalty and Life in Prison Without Parole","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Argument (complex analysis); Reading (process); Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Law; Sociology; Politics; Sovereignty; Prison; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Criminology; Political science; History; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Amy Swiffen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01260528926237768,"gpt":0.280542997047062,"spread":0.2679377077846843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008707955,0.000372866,0.0007606822,0.001109154,0.0252355,0.01000932,0.002419022,0.01290739,0.005163644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02540344,0.0003294117,0.0006222537,0.0007740478,0.0528269,0.01067186,0.00925494,0.01781887,0.0002733243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01147489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01036092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0346133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05700033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924572,0.004457108,0.0001491048,0.0005882388,0.0003907987,0.001957619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886125,0.00672517,0.001137549,0.0005988151,0.00102918,0.001896916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001012752,0.00007148241,0.001353626,0.00003358451,0.00001337871,0.0005272429,0.1098292,0.0001435123,0.0001135679,0.8788431,0.005276282,0.003693772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007847689,0.0001140943,0.01191773,0.0005531476,0.00006283488,0.0004331932,0.4043772,0.0007073999,0.0005278506,0.5118213,0.06930287,0.0001040017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4076118,0.00508859,0.002507662,0.3125559,0.001486412,0.00004897222,0.00006089834,0.00001621593,0.2706235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986607,0.0003208144,0.0001108097,0.004205411,0.0002045332,0.00002095417,0.000004680173,0.00001128363,0.008514615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0346133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08325654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416452400","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09434-8","title":"Alternative Futures of Right in Pashukanis, Kojève, and Bloch","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Socialism; Marxist philosophy; Communism; Constitution; Futures contract; Philosophy of law; Politics; Empire","authors":[{"name":"Igor Shoikhedbrod","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00786770649292876,"gpt":0.3338748413524822,"spread":0.3260071348595535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005387705,0.0007334652,0.0006164943,0.002085422,0.01040867,0.01264985,0.001194698,0.006987743,0.004201191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006835822,0.0005716449,0.0006261002,0.001499229,0.06513367,0.0238903,0.009651835,0.0106405,0.0006574512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008494885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005530607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01097169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01005377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944077,0.002576107,0.0001567615,0.0009639709,0.001002798,0.0008928108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984468,0.00090419,0.0001126781,0.0002076893,0.0001662961,0.0001624148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002980687,0.000001966115,0.00001449884,0.00000357122,4.381929e-7,0.00001686196,0.001705434,0.00002513483,0.00001039558,0.9974164,0.0003325891,0.0004696155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007152483,0.000005187524,0.00005585183,0.00005339634,0.000001565901,0.00005058097,0.001734284,0.00009112462,0.00007468022,0.9397466,0.05816842,0.00001111392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04956477,0.01960044,0.02070383,0.07797605,0.001635171,0.00006577338,0.00007674067,0.00008223837,0.8302951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265272,0.004243528,0.005850146,0.009607863,0.0005527517,0.0001737596,0.00005071413,0.0001066097,0.05288739],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01264985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06163496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412175928","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09413-z","title":"E.B. Pashukanis’ 1927 Speech on ‘Emergency Legislation Against the Toilers and Their Organisations’: Explication and Critical Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Legislation; Law; Political science; Speech act; Philosophy of law; Free speech; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Igor Shoikhedbrod","is_ca":true},{"name":"Rafael Khachaturian","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01660055768053604,"gpt":0.3273768426645128,"spread":0.3107762849839767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001995077,0.0005628845,0.0002714503,0.001103957,0.004985888,0.004411173,0.0007698261,0.006890366,0.006679841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010011,0.0003540369,0.0002785297,0.0009418234,0.007342698,0.004337758,0.001895831,0.00787948,0.001451745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003044938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002763616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006469117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01238461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998683,0.0005491975,0.00007094695,0.000193095,0.0003323788,0.0001713173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971368,0.002310423,0.0001296926,0.00007927214,0.0002717017,0.00007205638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005753896,0.00001603702,0.0002561169,0.0001881362,0.00001043262,0.0004498283,0.01624888,0.0002069545,0.0003673021,0.7753266,0.1929139,0.01395819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001136406,0.00001130855,0.0007906113,0.000421847,0.000007190535,0.0002056523,0.00332902,0.0001237032,0.001042822,0.08819976,0.9058316,0.00002499015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01946972,0.05189344,0.009198944,0.444428,0.01723165,0.00009965608,0.0004891021,0.00009443126,0.4570951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5513597,0.01910485,0.0050217,0.1232122,0.004196694,0.0002222532,0.0001562891,0.0002042371,0.2965221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006890366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02234626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411508607","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09423-x","title":"Laughing at Law: A Case for Comic Jurisprudence in the Climate Crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comics; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Harm; Indigenous; Shame; Laughter; Political science; Comparative law; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Sahar Shah","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01307478135513996,"gpt":0.3488230587474624,"spread":0.3357482773923225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01890657,0.0007682607,0.0006549691,0.002604409,0.04113391,0.02770965,0.003820823,0.01598832,0.006706604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03265183,0.0006602637,0.0005680767,0.00202197,0.1548253,0.01546607,0.0172857,0.01997627,0.0009496372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01530183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007108874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01906885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0198516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9712673,0.02179448,0.0003724462,0.001768593,0.002230381,0.002566844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683436,0.02198698,0.001795929,0.002671477,0.002598285,0.002603623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001180083,0.00002134161,0.0002187946,0.00002501776,0.000003227139,0.0005563773,0.2804764,0.00005960358,0.0001537951,0.7123601,0.004250563,0.001863048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003361394,0.00002867956,0.0005775603,0.0003545991,0.00000986093,0.0006065128,0.3949692,0.0008916105,0.000580059,0.3389141,0.2629849,0.00004924093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1584833,0.002234153,0.02245422,0.2140988,0.001669556,0.0001504113,0.00004403339,0.0001826931,0.6006829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791608,0.0001912671,0.001142368,0.007915236,0.0002863461,0.00006730764,0.000008814018,0.0001053351,0.0111225],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04113391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1110231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}