{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":19,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"95942559480a","filters":{"venue":"Law and Critique"}},"results":[{"id":"W165117462","doi":"10.1023/a:1008994221249","title":"Deconstructing Diplomacy: Derridean Political Theory and U.N. Deal-Making","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; International relations; Political philosophy; Nationalism; Civil society; Reading (process); Politics; Declaration; Philosophy of law; Sociology; International law; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Michael Plaxton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01497176293597851,"gpt":0.3533498309519053,"spread":0.3383780680159268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007758298,0.00008865339,0.000126376,0.00001479518,0.0007686407,0.0001285134,0.00007084779,0.00009442885,0.000694009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001930603,0.00008787104,0.00003225211,0.00004878182,0.001136203,0.0001938366,0.00002309727,0.000151551,0.000008767163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000203021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002792203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001757929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987494,0.0004594626,0.0001281052,0.0001934056,0.00009581989,0.0003738063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984581,0.001210368,0.00000888141,0.00007458984,0.00002332584,0.0002247699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002320577,0.00001129103,0.0006742698,0.00001406832,0.00000511868,0.00001487193,0.001124326,3.617437e-8,0.000009418818,0.9889148,0.000004664447,0.009203959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001021738,0.00001764049,0.0001134867,0.00004360089,0.00001281282,0.00002259861,0.00151896,0.000002214933,0.00005809402,0.9639149,0.03407238,0.0001211386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2753907,0.0002745492,0.00009432142,0.002635485,0.00002887732,0.00006690383,0.000005771665,0.0000646775,0.7214388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992072,0.00005498383,0.0002899762,0.007116077,0.0003026274,0.000005017915,6.737229e-7,0.00000898157,0.0001496369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7212891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7598912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034325192","doi":"10.1007/s10978-020-09269-5","title":"The Spatio-Legal Production of Bodies Through the Legal Fiction of Death","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legal fiction; Biopower; Legal realism; Law; Politics; Spectacle; Legal profession; Assisted suicide; Philosophy of law; Sovereignty; Sociology; Legal pluralism; Political science; Public law","authors":[{"name":"Joshua Shaw","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01648351324600985,"gpt":0.2748752077773665,"spread":0.2583916945313567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006295674,0.00003833949,0.00006810448,0.000004566754,0.00008797531,0.000009024279,0.00001950948,0.00002256752,0.000008825831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004176747,0.00002195342,0.00002172129,0.00003545814,0.00008851799,0.00009978753,0.000003540477,0.00006440195,5.519254e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003253369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001698814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002340895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996539,0.00002720441,0.0001182086,0.0000667061,0.00009278647,0.00004114675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997727,0.0000419306,0.00003406312,0.00005683162,0.00008090323,0.00001356836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002726614,0.00004552901,0.003203768,0.0003016264,0.00004312617,0.000002408214,0.003480893,0.000007107022,0.00660394,0.9839085,0.001335022,0.0007954583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00172464,0.0008954658,0.09338079,0.0002071835,0.0003541831,0.0001137822,0.00402991,0.0002495469,0.5523619,0.005845959,0.3406736,0.0001630185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.746381,0.001282183,0.003546583,0.1720195,0.0004281069,0.000771825,0.00002512039,0.00007528077,0.07547043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979041,0.0004466857,0.00008478583,0.001177139,0.00009520593,0.000005306163,0.00001130398,0.000003923348,0.000271546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08952343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211244192","doi":"10.1007/s10978-022-09319-0","title":"Jurisgenerative Tissues: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Legal Secretions of 3D Bioprinting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Individuation; Epistemology; Sociotechnical system; Temporality; Process (computing); Sociology; Generative grammar; Relation (database); Human body; Environmental ethics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Biology; Computer science; Anatomy","authors":[{"name":"Joshua Shaw","is_ca":true},{"name":"Roxanne Mykitiuk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009103766128117356,"gpt":0.2978529361791465,"spread":0.2887491700510291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003468544,0.00004137022,0.0001158039,0.00001291227,0.0002874722,0.00001277282,0.00002221392,0.00005242387,0.00005122745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002791246,0.00002649935,0.0000214852,0.00004714476,0.001933499,0.00002536016,0.00007780398,0.0002844098,9.96846e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006356749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003544431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002743739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002154434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995538,0.00007176985,0.0001070433,0.00008759273,0.0001189997,0.00006078317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999742,0.00009874833,0.00002391704,0.00006303051,0.0000407603,0.00003154351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003736188,0.00002221782,0.00005105039,0.0000408816,0.00001267162,0.000004042138,0.0008936916,4.520432e-7,0.003078409,0.9948112,0.00008790835,0.0009600516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007388492,0.001043094,0.007057957,0.0002355457,0.0003720035,0.0007301547,0.009874885,0.005988008,0.01791071,0.4402732,0.5087109,0.0004150699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3731948,0.007208631,0.007605089,0.5859091,0.0001882062,0.0006961561,0.0000494569,0.00008196805,0.02506661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964089,0.0001791029,0.0007124211,0.002354092,0.00004982685,0.00001979856,0.00001033435,0.000004049316,0.0002614707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6232141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7124056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285726576","doi":"10.1007/s10978-022-09328-z","title":"Critique and the Coloniality of Being: Rethinking Development Discourses of Encounter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Sociology; Politics; The Imaginary; Sensibility; Normative; Epistemology; Critical theory; Framing (construction); Openness to experience; Subjectivity; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"David Chandler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02023097618930921,"gpt":0.338368656624584,"spread":0.3181376804352748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007829333,0.00004841198,0.0001581288,0.00000586957,0.001308346,0.00001527786,0.0000878705,0.00003112972,0.0001553099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007673095,0.00003096079,0.0000249715,0.00004561701,0.002228298,0.00005080498,0.0001432903,0.0001001957,5.449222e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001643396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004109571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009161822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006590568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999177,0.0002866482,0.0001558682,0.00009950977,0.0001693606,0.0001116079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995282,0.0003019577,0.00004927528,0.00004584083,0.00005053382,0.00002420809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002757652,0.0000274747,0.001134106,0.0000160899,0.00001076941,0.000001390357,0.04085177,1.187605e-7,0.00001312926,0.9574923,0.0001614593,0.0002638237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006678909,0.0001952184,0.004012017,0.00005280042,0.0000299072,0.000002500305,0.1364948,0.000005118512,0.001051269,0.4717617,0.3855472,0.0001796219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8163412,0.001873091,0.0001470853,0.03196004,0.0001692148,0.0002860621,0.00001090364,0.00001680793,0.1491956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974346,0.000607741,0.0001021365,0.001597679,0.0000262844,0.00002380857,6.201599e-7,0.000002010741,0.0002050992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4857306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755406911","doi":"10.1007/s10978-017-9215-6","title":"Before the Law: Criminalization, Accusation and Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Law; Criminal law; Sociology; Criminal justice; False accusation; Politics; Dialectic; Philosophy of law; Political science; Criminology; Public law; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"George Pavlich","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02616452379993024,"gpt":0.3572489490767577,"spread":0.3310844252768275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002755689,0.00004880574,0.00006066283,0.00001030759,0.004065694,0.000485781,0.0001110544,0.00004770485,0.00003693922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001819954,0.00003711517,0.00002034246,0.00002883415,0.0005093155,0.0003259477,0.0000320248,0.00005845564,0.000002909595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009429967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001709961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05434771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2981524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995486,0.00006408134,0.00007152822,0.0001118922,0.00009928476,0.0001046466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995852,0.00006056706,0.00004213041,0.0001542023,0.000109511,0.00004836369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002484563,0.000007893398,0.0004805077,0.00002128691,0.000005497324,0.000001429456,0.01932998,6.633925e-7,0.000005524732,0.9738176,0.0001714729,0.006155613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002405569,0.00008121932,0.00977976,0.00006970608,0.001629078,0.0000119924,0.588606,0.0004301335,0.0001108454,0.07862938,0.3201567,0.0002546165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6599738,0.0007120112,0.00433931,0.03546069,0.0005610231,0.0002606784,0.00000810812,0.00007531669,0.2986091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961208,0.0003841835,0.00004183705,0.002432259,0.0002508363,0.00001075717,0.000001950454,0.000003454629,0.0007539333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8951883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186020754","doi":"10.1007/s10978-021-09302-1","title":"Unrecognised States: The Necessary Affirmation of the Event of International Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Cyprus History, Politics, Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Jerome's University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Sovereignty; Comparative law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Municipal law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Anastasia Tataryn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Erdem Ertürk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01408716596185903,"gpt":0.3083207282983821,"spread":0.294233562336523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003142289,0.00003612226,0.00006503573,0.000003582391,0.000215227,0.00001841331,0.0001386095,0.00004130342,0.0001171858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008536033,0.00002620905,0.00005950696,0.0000401805,0.0006356179,0.0000860885,0.00003824875,0.00006706799,7.778646e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004941495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001197807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006631599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01630931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993302,0.0001908168,0.0001349911,0.00006659645,0.0001964574,0.00008091898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994525,0.0001879698,0.00006124251,0.00009655921,0.0001784781,0.00002320465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001647885,0.0000328577,0.0003902065,0.00001840944,0.00001191504,3.196766e-7,0.02159632,0.000003538443,0.0001144706,0.976317,0.001421946,0.0000913699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003956978,0.00001902332,0.003951655,0.0001121928,0.00003753484,0.000001751807,0.06735963,0.0001141993,0.01058422,0.1416746,0.7756199,0.0001295047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3189675,0.001117709,0.0002241548,0.03481276,0.001251308,0.0002733456,0.0001393565,0.00002756027,0.6431863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955158,0.0002629441,0.00004447612,0.003472506,0.00006816071,0.000004966828,0.000005891876,0.000003115607,0.0006220905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8346424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084873847","doi":"10.1007/s10978-012-9113-x","title":"Freedom, Law, and the Colonial Project","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Marxist philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Susan Dianne Brophy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01037860949742618,"gpt":0.2655224573035038,"spread":0.2551438478060776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003933742,0.00003019231,0.00006071022,0.00001695701,0.001070075,0.0002014684,0.00004831409,0.00005129776,0.00006461516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000342907,0.00002734905,0.00001763545,0.00003535917,0.00194207,0.0001759347,0.00001427148,0.00006701708,0.000005955171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003736275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008435512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8350901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9653658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995653,0.0001112142,0.00004442895,0.00005647127,0.00007018549,0.0001524053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997699,0.00008303535,0.00001064039,0.0000460646,0.00001581924,0.00007457465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007342509,0.000006193157,0.00008813816,0.000005361888,0.00000243397,9.730057e-7,0.0132971,4.232889e-9,0.000002269366,0.9777653,0.008719407,0.0001055428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002046367,0.000006937253,0.0002727127,0.000004095864,0.000009033095,0.000002071187,0.0009431883,4.416612e-7,0.000001790448,0.007399984,0.9911106,0.00004448047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03766915,0.002991164,0.00000679114,0.009274499,0.0004025862,0.0002379063,0.00001530184,0.00002950764,0.9493731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903405,0.0003460882,0.00002223437,0.004977864,0.0004228424,0.00001727801,5.908614e-7,0.0000031165,0.003869526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8230257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343877681","doi":"10.1007/s10978-016-9184-1","title":"Post-secular Messianism Against the Law: Judith Butler on Walter Benjamin and ‘Sacred Life’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Messianism; Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Law; Reincarnation; Theology; Sociology; Political science; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Karyn Ball","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01610182657373246,"gpt":0.2220541677105255,"spread":0.205952341136793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000126021,0.0001698803,0.0001668375,0.00001966407,0.0006303309,0.0001930317,0.00008802622,0.00004708879,0.0001939276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000203192,0.0000909675,0.00003913562,0.000008680364,0.0005119003,0.0002053438,0.00007405761,0.00009479922,0.00002938866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009902813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008397103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001902247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003992715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991621,0.00008023936,0.0001672094,0.000244783,0.0001306966,0.0002149649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994124,0.0001816283,0.00004162261,0.0002061413,0.00008580957,0.00007236998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001959786,0.00002425772,0.00003991675,0.00001996042,0.00003583844,0.000007243405,0.004387653,1.138335e-7,0.0003122493,0.9915993,0.00269014,0.0008637259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009294652,0.0002546044,0.001820746,0.0001886651,0.00004738191,0.00000682533,0.002052083,0.00001565298,0.0009874133,0.02790012,0.9654104,0.000386706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4553308,0.001834884,0.000234543,0.03857567,0.000751147,0.0006375537,0.0003978661,0.0001841747,0.5020534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754266,0.0002323774,0.00001763049,0.0212022,0.0004650997,0.00003336468,0.0000119637,0.00002251624,0.002588291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9636992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4848059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309027089","doi":"10.1007/s10978-022-09339-w","title":"How Not to Talk About Environmental Personhood: Thinking Transitional Concepts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"King's University College","keywords":"Personhood; Epistemology; Conceptualization; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Russell J. Duvernoy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01010412352877875,"gpt":0.2873574015965842,"spread":0.2772532780678054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002022794,0.00008372249,0.00008831653,0.00001474512,0.001703099,0.00009357002,0.0001240471,0.00004050878,0.001187478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003714639,0.0000957858,0.00004817649,0.00003508538,0.0002854093,0.0001657596,0.00004617991,0.0001462267,0.00000886278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009406046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002237442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001245561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990034,0.000159585,0.00006726391,0.000191283,0.0003417236,0.0002368032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997138,0.00005286971,0.00001539234,0.00006523141,0.000001775016,0.0001509595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001293105,0.00004736015,0.0001950943,0.000003958714,0.000006243589,0.0000185777,0.03095902,0.000005692649,0.001698344,0.9662011,0.0003908645,0.0004608454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002256677,0.00008440714,0.001305714,0.000005753005,0.000008671156,0.00001106992,0.02232763,0.000002260603,0.0006274848,0.005390085,0.9698229,0.0001883045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8165091,0.0003506637,0.0001446934,0.04381074,0.0002103691,0.0003800546,0.0005221904,0.00006803023,0.1380041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725952,0.00007270178,0.000135143,0.02284518,0.0001821061,0.0000400034,0.00002625464,0.000009856116,0.004093559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9694321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194277122","doi":"10.1007/s10978-021-09308-9","title":"Theft in Broad Daylight: Racism and Neoliberal Legality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Racism; Sociology; Neoliberalism (international relations); Identity (music); Critical theory; Critical race theory; Capitalism; Biopower; Law; Race (biology); Political science; Gender studies; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Brenna Bhandar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01745732600669981,"gpt":0.2361575254539397,"spread":0.2187001994472399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002345705,0.0001343528,0.0003402992,0.0000500369,0.00009610603,0.0001154567,0.0000657015,0.0001342332,0.0001069508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001198541,0.0001570324,0.00004623419,0.0001099151,0.0001141118,0.0002914791,0.00006181566,0.0001877192,0.00002108277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001946335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001674795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002545868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989451,0.00002986974,0.0003410197,0.0003980144,0.00002198286,0.0002640258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995935,0.00004072117,0.00006055321,0.0002064714,0.00001974276,0.00007904368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007468487,0.00004723182,0.00860178,0.00003866887,0.000007010087,0.00007922534,0.001112617,9.173348e-7,0.00003712801,0.9890276,0.0002918249,0.0007485308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001129978,0.00003837665,0.0767654,0.00005733434,0.000004792348,0.00008493133,0.0001000623,0.0001665926,0.0009222563,0.2331201,0.6871652,0.0004449389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7559111,0.006644564,0.0002185966,0.002159502,0.0001790409,0.00007666274,0.00005453076,0.00002662383,0.2347294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988514,0.001664069,0.0003551389,0.005877267,0.00007876103,0.00001170954,0.00001049744,0.00001717984,0.003471354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7559075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6403595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953580245","doi":"10.1007/s10978-015-9168-6","title":"Hearing Voice: A Theoretical Framework for Truth Commission Testimony","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Philosophy of law; Law; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Mickey Vallee","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08947084020002825,"gpt":0.3354247903515883,"spread":0.2459539501515601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001563602,0.00007213162,0.0001152518,0.000009290454,0.0003752592,0.0001115238,0.00008033367,0.00003983258,0.00004882518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001800386,0.00005531853,0.00002715197,0.000009375617,0.0003901853,0.00007408083,0.00005876454,0.0001035804,0.00000820137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007813196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000145305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007428281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003150433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995965,0.00003399121,0.0001036985,0.00009530692,0.00006397373,0.0001065669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991289,0.0005208162,0.00001771014,0.0001476641,0.0001089134,0.00007599496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001822024,0.00002667594,0.00004898576,0.00001381269,0.000007104941,3.492432e-7,0.007691427,1.100429e-7,4.999563e-7,0.9865701,0.005276512,0.0003461698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001283416,0.0000622053,0.00002007924,0.0000355879,0.00000633473,8.857123e-7,0.004793438,0.00006227237,0.00001408347,0.5667393,0.4280761,0.00006140461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004764473,0.002630336,0.01285069,0.009323336,0.0003745121,0.000218426,0.00001817394,0.000143117,0.9696769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995093,0.00004148845,0.002003481,0.001541268,0.0002397764,0.00005174797,0.0000032395,0.000009306652,0.001016672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2886228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183381979","doi":"10.1007/s10978-021-09307-w","title":"‘Authorizing the Peril’: Mythologies of (Settler) Law at the End of Time","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Temporality; Law; Mythology; Sociology; Colonialism; Neoliberalism (international relations); State (computer science); Capitalism; Scholarship; Legal pluralism; Materiality (auditing); Law and development; Environmental ethics; Political science; Comparative law; History; Politics; Legal realism; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Development studies","authors":[{"name":"Sahar Shah","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01336030490791049,"gpt":0.3062467180296729,"spread":0.2928864131217624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006194305,0.00004688545,0.0001044846,0.000005499389,0.002839369,0.00002408679,0.0001086758,0.0000693924,0.0002633045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001152315,0.00002544719,0.00003600271,0.00007006754,0.001223816,0.00006086811,0.000004676373,0.00007386971,0.000004869613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001859265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009113632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04639399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5252318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991515,0.0003363229,0.0001300428,0.00009443347,0.0001266023,0.0001611247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992704,0.0003880793,0.00004792874,0.0001409114,0.0001242976,0.00002840386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002242522,0.0000169482,0.00005264521,0.00002245526,0.000004647812,0.000001037199,0.1270634,1.877094e-7,0.00011288,0.8725412,0.0001357526,0.00004657291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004791011,0.00002711471,0.000328621,0.00002546847,0.00001415682,0.000005586132,0.02266499,6.2327e-7,0.01176616,0.04774947,0.9173114,0.00005845129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.343708,0.001860671,0.000006092729,0.009129317,0.0002068281,0.0001419206,0.00001624872,0.0000134937,0.6449175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983559,0.003907701,0.00006377541,0.0006027208,0.0001505135,0.000002201885,0.00000445824,0.000004209497,0.01170542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9171757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903640266","doi":"10.1007/s10978-018-9235-x","title":"From Social Uprising to Legal Form","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Liverpool; University of Alberta","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Political philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Anastasia Tataryn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02043506345288243,"gpt":0.2521282063331667,"spread":0.2316931428802843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00002921008,0.00007041226,0.0000993848,0.00001089977,0.0004326661,0.00009891114,0.00005406851,0.00003487232,0.0005271898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000713707,0.00006092214,0.0000307357,0.000009173271,0.0002404702,0.0001639504,0.00002847816,0.00006634822,0.00008947341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001667028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009534127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00682498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005309138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995396,0.0000134803,0.00009952916,0.0001246922,0.00006227595,0.0001604437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997656,0.00003025771,0.000008558586,0.00005304112,0.00004897183,0.00009351083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001020364,0.00001509478,0.000005980302,0.000003985465,0.000004467772,0.000003705512,0.009235576,1.463071e-9,0.00002002083,0.9844519,0.005535948,0.0007130713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006935765,0.00007025298,0.00003325811,0.000007259239,0.000005240256,3.663597e-7,0.0006446239,0.00001619791,0.00003409057,0.1419486,0.857079,0.00009178172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1244377,0.00003309086,0.0004533889,0.005258661,0.0003839417,0.00005407452,0.00008343108,0.00006339964,0.8692324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734041,6.529226e-7,0.00006686133,0.01396892,0.002760661,0.00000523507,0.0000085385,0.000008240311,0.009776759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8594556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412754994","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09425-9","title":"Divine Violence Reconsidered: Instability, Ethics, and the Limits of Revolutionary Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy of law; Human rights; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Critical theory; Political philosophy; Politics; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Amy Swiffen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03774173326958356,"gpt":0.37097654377675,"spread":0.3332348105071665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001820731,0.00004467136,0.000121692,0.000009594687,0.0005869327,0.000008092718,0.00008125276,0.0001523353,0.00002906336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003787589,0.00003308875,0.00002186324,0.00005389847,0.003910979,0.00007249747,0.00005617032,0.0002942275,6.127016e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009336354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001222066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001768825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001105867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986893,0.0008710197,0.000122347,0.0001149691,0.00006922593,0.0001331256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995017,0.004739846,0.00001837869,0.00009480134,0.00008761924,0.00004238025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002805672,0.00001493145,0.0007263973,0.00006852789,0.00000635886,6.486262e-7,0.0008200975,7.28335e-8,0.00000181834,0.9980302,0.00004356728,0.0002593012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002067194,0.00001062412,0.004289816,0.0001017807,0.00002967778,0.000001047619,0.001974868,0.000005763364,0.00006495041,0.9912431,0.002035524,0.00003611854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1203001,0.004882017,0.0002643632,0.03134325,0.0001807028,0.0001916101,0.00001881898,0.00002606071,0.842793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878301,0.003103849,0.00008104696,0.008663926,0.00003042353,0.000006822925,4.232769e-7,0.000001176105,0.0002822064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239357241","doi":"10.1007/10978.1572-8617","title":"Law and Critique","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Liverpool; University of Alberta","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Anastasia Tataryn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01400920012890795,"gpt":0.3029162333801075,"spread":0.2889070332511996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004267913,0.0005613298,0.0006992528,0.000005886087,0.002033907,0.0006970856,0.0003485435,0.001983682,0.006265032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005221966,0.000525614,0.0002185107,0.0001669444,0.004785291,0.0007452369,0.0001627307,0.001125434,0.001102466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007403056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001300691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02240155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01231644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970011,0.0005979504,0.0004170307,0.0007897189,0.0003700941,0.0008241642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982852,0.0004812528,0.0001201888,0.0002835587,0.0003054048,0.0005243702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004009863,0.00005600055,0.00001756355,0.0003868511,0.00004963651,0.00001327023,0.007622358,2.275466e-7,0.00002162384,0.7379836,0.253618,0.000226868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002614237,0.00008641643,0.00002463688,0.0003964637,0.00008705509,0.0000198726,0.006882633,0.000004624502,0.0001107816,0.1061357,0.8853472,0.0006432516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002089544,0.03916895,0.00004027937,0.02402056,0.001614591,0.0005435353,0.0001946259,0.00006961257,0.9322583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1856764,0.09636368,0.0005339322,0.1187426,0.002693783,0.0002562648,0.0001323934,0.0000836551,0.5955173],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6318479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317972511","doi":"10.1007/s10978-016-9178-z","title":"Mastery Over the Time of the Other: The Death Penalty and Life in Prison Without Parole","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Argument (complex analysis); Reading (process); Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Law; Sociology; Politics; Sovereignty; Prison; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Criminology; Political science; History; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Amy Swiffen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01260528926237768,"gpt":0.280542997047062,"spread":0.2679377077846843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003529448,0.00004198137,0.00006012231,0.000005014678,0.0002534116,0.00003478628,0.0001408,0.0000331729,0.0001367311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002285693,0.00001463168,0.00002066917,0.0000118699,0.00037748,0.00007979336,0.00002975699,0.0000513627,0.000003433561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008191306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003196119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004055857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0127238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994646,0.0001606315,0.0000821345,0.0000731172,0.0001290839,0.00009043038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996517,0.0001894882,0.0000304425,0.00008243958,0.00002476477,0.00002111724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006653532,0.000008257071,0.01579963,0.000002084033,0.000004036846,1.996508e-7,0.002187663,4.448839e-8,0.00003711875,0.981765,0.0001482573,0.00004108964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000463094,0.00003616717,0.1543659,0.0001514231,0.00001468218,0.000001827116,0.0004763844,0.00001816291,0.0005792516,0.6449174,0.1988557,0.000119947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9132992,0.00009098285,0.00000586634,0.009117073,0.00003444766,0.0001195838,0.000007134636,0.000004587176,0.07732111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890625,0.00002229457,0.000003381932,0.002837076,0.00009157723,0.000007390991,8.574256e-8,0.000003113337,0.007972551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3368475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7100178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416452400","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09434-8","title":"Alternative Futures of Right in Pashukanis, Kojève, and Bloch","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Socialism; Marxist philosophy; Communism; Constitution; Futures contract; Philosophy of law; Politics; Empire","authors":[{"name":"Igor Shoikhedbrod","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00786770649292876,"gpt":0.3338748413524822,"spread":0.3260071348595535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002532626,0.00004499058,0.0001033941,0.00002337473,0.0001381222,0.00002221106,0.00005669107,0.00005955011,0.00005168561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006600074,0.00004075934,0.00001547523,0.0000786296,0.0004703072,0.00007045017,0.00002360774,0.00008003673,3.962268e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005801618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001455606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001905767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002444618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995078,0.000142895,0.00008968817,0.000104309,0.00005676642,0.00009857166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995841,0.0002942426,0.000008775546,0.00004507346,0.00002944369,0.00003841453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130855,0.00002620822,0.0004673626,0.00002863787,0.000004205789,0.000005182491,0.001710041,9.36776e-8,0.00005049149,0.9972243,0.0000435753,0.0004268472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001387934,0.00001714775,0.000346779,0.00005633817,0.000004857205,2.731142e-7,0.0008280048,0.000002157476,0.001442752,0.9529375,0.04417963,0.00004577255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1990355,0.00123062,0.00007938239,0.007354034,0.0001080955,0.0001107128,0.00001290719,0.00001304679,0.7920557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975916,0.0003769274,0.00004323256,0.001656122,0.00006560533,0.000005291359,5.706316e-7,0.000001592924,0.0002591173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7985561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2880962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412175928","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09413-z","title":"E.B. Pashukanis’ 1927 Speech on ‘Emergency Legislation Against the Toilers and Their Organisations’: Explication and Critical Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Legislation; Law; Political science; Speech act; Philosophy of law; Free speech; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Igor Shoikhedbrod","is_ca":true},{"name":"Rafael Khachaturian","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01660055768053604,"gpt":0.3273768426645128,"spread":0.3107762849839767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004388026,0.00007614718,0.0001141044,0.00003873627,0.0008478397,0.00005852664,0.00006479754,0.0001147392,0.00007688163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003225844,0.00005574246,0.00003135745,0.0002089647,0.0006743515,0.0001290456,0.00002706708,0.0001150493,0.000001789304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001863052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000312823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004465602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007308113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991766,0.0002728281,0.00012635,0.000189313,0.00006902408,0.0001658688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990509,0.0006871619,0.0000157171,0.0001189282,0.00005818953,0.00006915665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004732448,0.00001716857,0.002353385,0.000005128834,0.00003172776,3.693459e-7,0.00123299,3.17046e-7,0.00002471296,0.9948237,0.00006044054,0.001445357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008048865,0.0000186487,0.01883497,0.000009153095,0.00007758276,3.844745e-7,0.003802701,0.0001407005,0.0002682679,0.9699324,0.006749217,0.00008546282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3561165,0.0004344534,0.003122195,0.02259802,0.0001114479,0.0001947429,0.00001830759,0.00004982287,0.6173545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946514,0.0007103806,0.00004266034,0.004064648,0.00005792876,0.00001663577,0.00000611378,0.000002719064,0.000447491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6385349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6520983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411508607","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09423-x","title":"Laughing at Law: A Case for Comic Jurisprudence in the Climate Crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comics; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Harm; Indigenous; Shame; Laughter; Political science; Comparative law; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Sahar Shah","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01307478135513996,"gpt":0.3488230587474624,"spread":0.3357482773923225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007375929,0.00006006386,0.0000927731,0.000002329103,0.001326978,0.0001257026,0.000135427,0.0001136793,0.00001466173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003066604,0.00004414392,0.00005091646,0.00008998434,0.0002446048,0.0001332668,0.00003844305,0.0001136948,0.000001495566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000355596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002080129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006785161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1068103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993176,0.0001477864,0.0000984982,0.0001392887,0.0000775706,0.0002192912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994872,0.000347634,0.00001644355,0.00008934704,0.00003289012,0.00002643844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006971408,0.00001588172,0.00009834654,0.00004248764,0.000003534059,0.00003551767,0.02567084,3.994783e-7,0.000022861,0.9656643,0.00839884,0.00004000299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003435767,0.00001718256,0.00004806376,0.00007020045,0.00002737101,0.00002500967,0.07619208,0.00001459852,0.0002086069,0.1242436,0.7986816,0.0001281025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3624862,0.00366328,0.0002484994,0.1240321,0.000425855,0.001160084,0.00008680885,0.000116471,0.5077807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700477,0.0006705174,0.0001450137,0.02833509,0.00005655558,0.00008276894,0.000002182984,0.000002905414,0.0006572967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8414208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}