{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"343fe3cd95d5","filters":{"venue":"Law in context"}},"results":[{"id":"W2300397219","doi":"","title":"My People's Courts as Agents of Indigenous Decolonisation?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Project commissioning; Decolonization; Politics; Law; Treaty; Autonomy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Publishing; Judicial review; Assertion; Economic Justice; Public administration; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Peter H. Russell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03678089804619587,"gpt":0.3414542548347494,"spread":0.3046733567885535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003246593,0.00008737984,0.0002026816,0.00001843271,0.0004743953,0.00003402908,0.0001963132,0.00009266601,0.0004804465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002168384,0.00007882242,0.00005419388,0.0001815997,0.0002517769,0.0001589208,0.00004315065,0.00008859221,0.0001269488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002353136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007093966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1586266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5374052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988689,0.0001315239,0.0002231889,0.0001509652,0.0003311167,0.0002943297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994225,0.0001992202,0.0001049816,0.00009189638,0.000115476,0.00006592022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003287083,0.000205879,0.4013762,0.00001343055,0.00005151751,0.00002578128,0.4859076,0.00001843433,0.00005099999,0.1020882,0.0008975976,0.009331554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001026202,0.00009753668,0.5194414,0.00005086473,0.00002221924,0.000001990047,0.06581565,0.0000100718,0.000154188,0.004950725,0.4081258,0.0003033136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9230284,0.0003078924,0.000002334507,0.001814924,0.0002335825,0.0003675612,0.00000303256,0.00002941047,0.07421284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966438,0.0002745019,0.00004075604,0.0006711836,0.0000800012,0.00002958624,0.000002374253,0.00000584024,0.002251918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4200919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8469762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262111829","doi":"","title":"What's the Issue?: Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Project commissioning; Function (biology); Political science; Law; Publishing; Resolution (logic); Sociology; Public relations; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Hugh F. Landerkin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrew J. Pirie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0212712727829017,"gpt":0.2739185031918245,"spread":0.2526472304089228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003201669,0.0000575162,0.0001019937,0.00001245642,0.0004404911,0.00004984848,0.0001632203,0.00003145208,0.0001030922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006965996,0.00004541367,0.00002032533,0.0001984024,0.0003695823,0.0002916676,0.00003534523,0.0001154085,0.00004037993],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006456369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000682632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991063,0.0001051923,0.0001585172,0.0001161751,0.0002652949,0.000248549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997008,0.000141612,0.00003048713,0.0000635641,0.00003131442,0.00003215175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001428001,0.00001648677,0.004204876,5.745276e-7,0.000004625447,0.000007530356,0.004976977,0.00007077569,0.000001918735,0.9484438,0.004004657,0.0382535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001697681,0.000004272357,0.01416575,0.00003479302,0.000002490102,2.231392e-7,0.01774839,0.00003938186,0.000006288821,0.009238341,0.9585125,0.00007776592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3138333,0.009768637,0.00001056827,0.2087955,0.003029173,0.0005077103,0.00000942658,0.00002988824,0.4640158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930451,0.0005122843,0.000005372362,0.005437373,0.0006462752,0.00001853367,8.396725e-7,0.000001987288,0.0003322521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9545079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3387946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341051856","doi":"10.26826/law-in-context.v33i1.61","title":"Chasing the Chimera: The Rule of Law in the British Empire and the Comparative Turn in Legal History","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Colonialism; Project commissioning; Law; Ideology; Contingency; Publishing; British Empire; Colonial rule; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal history; Rule of law; Metropolitan area; Political science; History; Archaeology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"John McLaren","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06952050044582664,"gpt":0.3431950428245429,"spread":0.2736745423787162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001176849,0.0000720403,0.000184779,0.00001004702,0.000694067,0.0001121224,0.0003833947,0.00002554962,0.00004099602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006398132,0.0000358363,0.0000398931,0.0001109995,0.004816429,0.0001524626,0.00006851018,0.000205995,0.000005080808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008721765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004724555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2144691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8702267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986317,0.0006563415,0.0002126165,0.0001216134,0.0002300924,0.000147676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987307,0.0009847907,0.00008552155,0.000112061,0.00007769612,0.00000919832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000362426,0.00002735256,0.001127665,9.665657e-7,0.00001152796,0.000001398997,0.1711486,8.949395e-7,0.000006185859,0.8257196,0.001355055,0.0005645719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007738612,0.00003499274,0.03113601,0.00008324185,0.00000604766,0.000002624138,0.04629074,0.0001085903,0.00003258705,0.009614774,0.9118382,0.00007831262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6170591,0.004869267,0.000001611076,0.01037531,0.0001981413,0.0003208006,0.000004042972,0.000003523084,0.3671682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950092,0.00008371998,0.000002373571,0.003952719,0.0001598137,0.00003756036,4.821819e-7,0.000002498878,0.0007516438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9104832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337170931","doi":"10.26826/law-in-context.v33i1.67","title":"The Many Meanings of Judicial Independence: Examples from British North America","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Constitution; Law; Autonomy; Meaning (existential); Project commissioning; Colonialism; Judicial independence; Contextualism; Publishing; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jim Phillips","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02050790643746507,"gpt":0.2805783302942585,"spread":0.2600704238567935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002171558,0.00006312921,0.0001471536,0.00001038634,0.0006270286,0.00006520753,0.0003367758,0.00005684323,0.0003412442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002295494,0.00006071448,0.00004193882,0.0001676838,0.005148311,0.0001029964,0.00005003997,0.0001228882,0.00004725614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005373083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005115324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5668725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7512867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988673,0.0001312147,0.0002172379,0.0001478789,0.0003637454,0.000272561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989901,0.0005400765,0.0001125967,0.0001262265,0.0001631978,0.00006781927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001154494,0.00001479933,0.008602618,6.634313e-7,0.00001053483,0.000005237494,0.003066246,4.26519e-7,0.000007487473,0.9722157,0.001206081,0.01485867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001279097,0.00003591667,0.007905029,0.00002283887,0.000006698488,6.699304e-7,0.004205314,0.000004019797,0.00002136113,0.008746405,0.9788324,0.0000914121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4289978,0.0004574026,0.0002479548,0.0009906768,0.0005378752,0.0001556796,0.0001411164,0.00003119051,0.5684403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966461,0.0001173407,0.000127182,0.001730123,0.0005737162,0.000006502946,0.000005398556,0.000004681507,0.0007889742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230968116","doi":"","title":"The personal property security interest: Identifying some essential attributes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Statutory law; Acknowledgement; Database transaction; Argument (complex analysis); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Project commissioning; Personal property; Common law; Publishing; Business; Internet privacy; Law; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Sheelagh McCracken","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05614441770730251,"gpt":0.3273826782009113,"spread":0.2712382604936088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007931975,0.00006132972,0.0000863852,0.000008810384,0.0009395657,0.0002546349,0.0002904975,0.00005012079,0.00006296505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001479204,0.00003706327,0.00005393539,0.0000899042,0.0003756605,0.0002222295,0.00008755094,0.0001655947,0.0001043303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005543915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004612571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009476353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1296928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991159,0.0001591643,0.0001541673,0.0001575077,0.0001679498,0.0002453484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995273,0.0001873309,0.0000495873,0.0001290959,0.00004928165,0.00005742649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003701786,0.00002264774,0.0003886464,0.000004119749,0.000004111731,4.541387e-7,0.00611548,2.379138e-7,0.0001631481,0.9884197,0.0008963151,0.003981433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001832295,0.00000869252,0.0005923818,0.0000242447,0.000003974356,3.631675e-7,0.003576718,0.0004057264,0.000319439,0.03805904,0.9567321,0.00009411501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.818323,0.0007430073,0.0004311044,0.06553932,0.001009496,0.0008255001,0.00002311001,0.0001515845,0.1129539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969385,0.0000399338,0.0000100939,0.0006571818,0.0004142337,0.0000384704,0.00000219147,0.000005202367,0.001894224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}