{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"343fe3cd95d5","filters":{"venue":"Law in context"}},"results":[{"id":"W2300397219","doi":"","title":"My People's Courts as Agents of Indigenous Decolonisation?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Project commissioning; Decolonization; Politics; Law; Treaty; Autonomy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Publishing; Judicial review; Assertion; Economic Justice; Public administration; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Peter H. Russell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03678089804619587,"gpt":0.3414542548347494,"spread":0.3046733567885535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004031139,0.0001503218,0.0002755882,0.001238834,0.009611852,0.01248151,0.001102568,0.003928023,0.007079857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009771687,0.0002919713,0.0002010509,0.001194505,0.02137253,0.008945984,0.004590339,0.004183817,0.0004866256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005999903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006236691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04734836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05591277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949989,0.002333478,0.00008544401,0.0004106326,0.0005900904,0.001581518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965019,0.001519097,0.0006632896,0.0002255849,0.0004557484,0.0006342549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008653878,0.00002176195,0.002713857,0.00003140619,0.000006218158,0.0004467922,0.180922,0.00004112164,0.0001080639,0.794907,0.00880775,0.0119853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003781688,0.00003243759,0.007367763,0.0004316925,0.00002398013,0.0005590351,0.2750248,0.000279961,0.0003896365,0.2100438,0.5057757,0.00003332647],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2225001,0.01202426,0.002606956,0.1743761,0.0009604607,0.00005005378,0.00003727038,0.00004597334,0.5873988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673443,0.002513553,0.000262542,0.00641337,0.0005056494,0.000026996,0.000008912139,0.00001386843,0.0229107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04734836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09414548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262111829","doi":"","title":"What's the Issue?: Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Project commissioning; Function (biology); Political science; Law; Publishing; Resolution (logic); Sociology; Public relations; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Hugh F. Landerkin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrew J. Pirie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0212712727829017,"gpt":0.2739185031918245,"spread":0.2526472304089228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00542692,0.0002173895,0.0005241727,0.002387717,0.0386065,0.01085012,0.00288657,0.004518182,0.005186351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01977345,0.0003589398,0.0003213817,0.006092888,0.008231683,0.002351514,0.003674088,0.004619963,0.0002964756],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1864375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3412898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892427,0.001409794,0.0003315228,0.000701383,0.004067741,0.004246849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892899,0.002620789,0.000809273,0.0001658968,0.004606874,0.002507162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000182808,0.0002027102,0.05094671,0.0005882758,0.0000931863,0.002337088,0.09156828,0.002852065,0.0008583713,0.6376817,0.1096493,0.1030395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002109016,0.000100678,0.1328043,0.001142635,0.0001459068,0.0006338765,0.1575201,0.004214456,0.001281472,0.04950713,0.6520885,0.000350071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.4851109,0.03125159,0.002179253,0.2276677,0.001122331,0.0002344989,0.0007170725,0.00006934909,0.2516473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693499,0.00574901,0.0009594723,0.008883059,0.0001072842,0.00002990046,0.0001011128,0.00001633062,0.01480388],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1864375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9436172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341051856","doi":"10.26826/law-in-context.v33i1.61","title":"Chasing the Chimera: The Rule of Law in the British Empire and the Comparative Turn in Legal History","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Colonialism; Project commissioning; Law; Ideology; Contingency; Publishing; British Empire; Colonial rule; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal history; Rule of law; Metropolitan area; Political science; History; Archaeology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"John McLaren","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06952050044582664,"gpt":0.3431950428245429,"spread":0.2736745423787162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002543841,0.0001086898,0.0003432917,0.002199062,0.006369374,0.005614206,0.0006057451,0.000947201,0.003181541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008443383,0.0002058219,0.0000853973,0.003193486,0.02721973,0.00423039,0.00248313,0.001441055,0.0001383056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009378169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003864527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.284414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5037201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997663,0.001232887,0.00007052771,0.0002371736,0.0004000183,0.0003964965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967049,0.001863311,0.0004364555,0.0003140546,0.0004266654,0.0002547399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009965467,0.0000255055,0.03065578,0.0001457245,0.00002857706,0.0007933669,0.4969605,0.0003949438,0.001157326,0.395607,0.001770655,0.0723609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002012795,0.0001374315,0.2676136,0.0007519698,0.00004854869,0.001466871,0.4424424,0.0007857158,0.0006135476,0.09704295,0.1889943,0.00008253016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8660055,0.007720046,0.0009933322,0.006478897,0.00005150394,0.000008147079,0.00002263181,0.000007892821,0.1187121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973157,0.0007887873,0.0001378747,0.0001470523,0.000006502123,0.000001887419,0.000005812562,0.000005355416,0.001591027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.284414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5655169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337170931","doi":"10.26826/law-in-context.v33i1.67","title":"The Many Meanings of Judicial Independence: Examples from British North America","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Constitution; Law; Autonomy; Meaning (existential); Project commissioning; Colonialism; Judicial independence; Contextualism; Publishing; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jim Phillips","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02050790643746507,"gpt":0.2805783302942585,"spread":0.2600704238567935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002295053,0.0003453525,0.000425243,0.001995546,0.0215446,0.004554656,0.0008870093,0.00161559,0.002201576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004056719,0.0003146485,0.0001808871,0.005095086,0.01683921,0.002019475,0.003901295,0.003629521,0.0002150484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01677743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006608807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5766674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8220621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966881,0.001762212,0.00009813386,0.0002161579,0.0005441438,0.0006912551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962768,0.002385949,0.0002154066,0.0001395276,0.000632888,0.0003493441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004632078,0.00002497977,0.004915267,0.000154218,0.00001296306,0.002046396,0.8040097,0.0001097629,0.0006801341,0.1617335,0.008232127,0.01803455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002099821,0.00001865974,0.03090322,0.0006845251,0.0000220408,0.0008288921,0.5589002,0.0001594863,0.000315002,0.019683,0.3884006,0.00006330475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5561896,0.01130059,0.001862001,0.01399931,0.0001892732,0.00003845586,0.00008910322,0.0000218274,0.4163099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814805,0.004536318,0.0007910913,0.001676365,0.00003699307,0.00003181026,0.00004174646,0.00004375718,0.01136148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4233326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8516514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230968116","doi":"","title":"The personal property security interest: Identifying some essential attributes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Statutory law; Acknowledgement; Database transaction; Argument (complex analysis); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Project commissioning; Personal property; Common law; Publishing; Business; Internet privacy; Law; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Sheelagh McCracken","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05614441770730251,"gpt":0.3273826782009113,"spread":0.2712382604936088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005034902,0.0003236324,0.0004112504,0.002665707,0.006505284,0.009616166,0.0014904,0.004219874,0.003464247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007076907,0.0002995127,0.000650265,0.002892582,0.04450585,0.0116188,0.005873017,0.007068807,0.0003264909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0170507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01469155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1393161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1936167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954023,0.001313283,0.0001987076,0.0004799536,0.001520331,0.001085309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961014,0.00181772,0.0004482099,0.000392371,0.0009035887,0.0003366112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002810718,0.00000237392,0.0005172055,0.00001099181,7.636198e-7,0.00007796655,0.003967001,0.00006017312,0.00006644063,0.9933881,0.0001883854,0.001717807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001089062,0.00003598342,0.01162417,0.0003719608,0.00002501467,0.0006759319,0.02905296,0.001602523,0.001110679,0.8486407,0.1067868,0.00006243159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1719424,0.003296275,0.04834571,0.03014669,0.0001858041,0.0002322704,0.0002470163,0.00005411108,0.7455497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775989,0.0009649302,0.006081147,0.001130102,0.00007534023,0.00006364268,0.00004297078,0.00001723104,0.01402584],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1393161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2770103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}