{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":16,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"bb7adb6525e4","filters":{"venue":"Legal Ethics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2730947195","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1345202","title":"The Achilles heel of the Canadian judiciary: the ethics of judicial appointments in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Impartiality; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Transparency (behavior); Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial review; Representativeness heuristic; Accountability; Judicial activism; Public administration; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Richard Devlin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Adam M. Dodek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06405922035223657,"gpt":0.3406251412774748,"spread":0.2765659209252382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003024674,0.00008895309,0.0001599587,0.00001726841,0.009422161,0.00007580014,0.001179806,0.000190312,0.000007148701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006099447,0.00004768291,0.00006777496,0.0001498879,0.004165785,0.00007587911,0.0001756403,0.00149183,0.00000148898],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004523179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02822662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977208,0.0005226828,0.0002565237,0.0001161147,0.001056385,0.0003275237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997736,0.001309827,0.0002575562,0.000340109,0.0002878742,0.00006859875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079574,0.000007242767,0.03215261,0.000003479164,0.00003103464,0.000002506544,0.00843914,0.00002303172,0.000002866122,0.9579065,0.0007823497,0.0006412698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002191689,0.00001574949,0.4989013,0.0001559106,0.00003857683,7.332375e-7,0.01562873,0.00001609409,0.0000685418,0.1879847,0.296809,0.0001615385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09368746,0.0008867311,0.000002537802,0.632449,0.002406923,0.0004614374,0.0000889482,0.000005643915,0.2700113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966594,0.0004225544,0.000004143555,0.002618266,0.0001835132,0.000008506046,5.275404e-7,0.000003775764,0.00009931144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9029719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912581125","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2018.1551677","title":"Governance gone wrong: examining self-regulation of the legal profession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Duty of loyalty; Statutory law; Accountability; Duty; Legal profession; Loyalty; Law; Duty of care; Function (biology); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Fiduciary; Management","authors":[{"name":"Anita Anand","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09074423956251462,"gpt":0.4184622964780271,"spread":0.3277180569155125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002105541,0.00007098922,0.00008166511,0.00002422542,0.001145146,0.0001645248,0.0002880489,0.0002313242,0.00021933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003634103,0.0000557338,0.00003121707,0.0007520345,0.0004828616,0.00147515,0.00005383097,0.0009900371,0.00003907404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001153479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002322771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00836451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005534742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982408,0.0005335388,0.0002448438,0.000148015,0.0006566202,0.0001761747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982553,0.000455771,0.0003443488,0.0002497201,0.000656724,0.00003809449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009952955,0.00006468502,0.001169806,0.00001413724,0.000008702189,1.087649e-7,0.04941833,0.000002827346,0.001503661,0.9432669,0.003051639,0.001489206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001328512,0.00003449457,0.0618169,0.00007119936,0.00001745952,9.879838e-7,0.004891969,0.00007411567,0.002432948,0.001792474,0.9286319,0.0001026882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3231573,0.00005390381,0.0006569835,0.2878861,0.005207813,0.0004327402,0.000007291325,0.0001391258,0.3824587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757504,0.00001822448,0.001150257,0.001793577,0.0007566336,0.000007638782,0.000002047231,0.000008241344,0.02051295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123271246","doi":"10.5235/le.15.2.243","title":"Regulation in Practice: The ‘Ethical Economy’ of Lawyer Regulation in Canada and a Case Study in Lawyer Deviance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Deviance (statistics); Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Alice Woolley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08432628590548419,"gpt":0.4334728592694356,"spread":0.3491465733639514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00674397,0.00006895195,0.000114732,0.00009228752,0.0001943788,0.00007295157,0.00008433597,0.0002140232,0.00004461627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005688733,0.0000628517,0.000009102245,0.0007887761,0.0001429584,0.001445402,0.00002386762,0.00183503,0.000001796342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004889113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004015124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974684,0.00149503,0.0004011777,0.0001357385,0.0002971517,0.0002025388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963469,0.003024388,0.0002103991,0.000155782,0.000212592,0.00004996234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003128446,0.0002173825,0.2638454,0.00001694483,0.000006713533,0.00002505076,0.1959374,0.0001668425,0.00000813746,0.538591,0.0001667875,0.0009870735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006610086,0.00002695674,0.5838723,0.00004840461,0.00002146003,0.0000593672,0.2123547,0.0005251784,0.00002277464,0.003926244,0.1982756,0.0002060406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.790612,0.00006845943,0.000023526,0.1910276,0.0002622312,0.0004520891,0.000001445642,0.000005366836,0.01754731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959113,0.00001202445,0.0001982002,0.003616355,0.00008993383,0.00002944593,0.000001804454,0.000005336472,0.0001356044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5346648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7972395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055399757","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.73","title":"The Not Now Habit: Procrastination, Legal Ethics and Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Habit; Law; Procrastination; Legal ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Annalise Acorn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jason Buttuls","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03459229676768236,"gpt":0.3548542671339901,"spread":0.3202619703663078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002650564,0.0003449008,0.0002521985,0.0001249429,0.003272745,0.0007888901,0.0003584416,0.0007251588,0.0001375613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005128177,0.0002865009,0.00009063619,0.0004045676,0.0008653867,0.0009021763,0.0001470948,0.00429954,0.0005808632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001569896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001109408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003294199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004546683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966826,0.0007924447,0.0005458555,0.0006422928,0.0007707806,0.0005660593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994321,0.002743137,0.0002857714,0.0004910826,0.002013546,0.000145484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008974785,0.0004671356,0.006932246,0.0002442224,0.0002091138,0.000005172813,0.02083958,0.00001814241,0.0007533409,0.8440437,0.09940267,0.02699495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006267852,0.0002275637,0.1777267,0.00007669905,0.00007400176,0.0002457478,0.005348558,0.0003068073,0.0003337539,0.006903609,0.807611,0.0005187914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1677008,0.003049645,0.006261377,0.6711266,0.01119617,0.002798489,0.0000331167,0.0008287674,0.137005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9153555,0.0003848691,0.0008262448,0.007443335,0.001009854,0.0006813214,0.00002297348,0.00006165063,0.07421426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8371401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969138315","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.1","title":"The Past, Present … and Future(?) of Judicial Ethics Education in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Richard Devlin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Claudia Kent","is_ca":false},{"name":"Susan Lightstone","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04619985192939027,"gpt":0.3933745093764602,"spread":0.3471746574470699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001648122,0.00004989168,0.00006295439,0.0000339816,0.0006281363,0.0001538543,0.0001512458,0.0001585065,0.0000894703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001328802,0.00004052535,0.00001075709,0.0003531627,0.0002428958,0.0004149704,0.00002104108,0.001690163,0.000005028648],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000184266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0386964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985542,0.0005138622,0.0002122766,0.00009148303,0.0004757703,0.0001523938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968118,0.002297803,0.0001270288,0.0001202641,0.00058043,0.00006266969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003876684,0.00003682602,0.003341956,0.00001665192,0.000005193512,1.594782e-7,0.03691212,0.000003422889,0.00001112377,0.8757473,0.04956524,0.0343562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003934125,0.000004826592,0.02122845,0.000007957331,0.000003162802,3.595493e-7,0.03918248,0.00001149088,0.000009620993,0.008489574,0.9309741,0.00004866209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03852491,0.000317375,0.000007781283,0.8999366,0.001801098,0.0002270949,0.000001826135,0.000006329351,0.05917704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881427,0.0006746954,0.0002247221,0.00658792,0.002155529,0.0000345624,0.000003357443,0.000005299643,0.002171229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9667533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124202993","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.16.2.373","title":"Canada: Depending on the Kindness of Strangers—Access to Civil Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Kindness; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Noel Semple","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1696915769654931,"gpt":0.4332841545108171,"spread":0.263592577545324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001112943,0.0000617804,0.00007236312,0.00004641656,0.0008269357,0.0003493523,0.0004440406,0.0001027698,0.001408805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006537999,0.0000480592,0.000018728,0.0006536607,0.0001179007,0.0006325941,0.00002931658,0.0009668855,0.00005306709],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001348488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006078892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9660031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9709498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986099,0.0002851061,0.0001676264,0.0001124061,0.0006332685,0.0001917132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964532,0.002665323,0.0001046142,0.0001720545,0.0005097357,0.00009508098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003613457,0.00002930669,0.0001482159,0.00001858142,0.000009160796,7.481873e-7,0.01822087,0.0000728037,0.00007333721,0.8865423,0.09414861,0.0007324711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000467898,0.00001409064,0.003680551,0.00003291152,0.00002176529,3.673165e-7,0.02054227,0.00001673213,0.0003953392,0.001591545,0.9735478,0.0001098172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0391495,0.000005914482,0.0001759075,0.6796397,0.001288525,0.0002798622,0.000009615197,0.00001641941,0.2794346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642591,0.000007200998,0.00007982776,0.03310482,0.0002282434,0.00002737294,0.000001678033,0.000005960242,0.002285825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209201845","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2021.1979729","title":"Soft law, legal ethics and the corporate lawyer: confronting human rights and sustainability norms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Hard law; Legal profession; Soft law; Human rights; Sociology; International law","authors":[{"name":"Sara L. Seck","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard Devlin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Siobhan Quigg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05257131203613633,"gpt":0.2952785501892197,"spread":0.2427072381530833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002227696,0.0001968435,0.0002927354,0.00003337502,0.002829293,0.001114142,0.0001370722,0.0002210342,0.00002654848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008267764,0.0001379595,0.00006411215,0.0002112641,0.001362361,0.0008314849,0.0003931225,0.001572304,0.00000847615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002369566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009353955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005482425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01471084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985484,0.0001372103,0.00030237,0.0003624341,0.0003767573,0.0002728534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978278,0.0005480013,0.0002585285,0.0002763416,0.001071416,0.00001790831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003152329,0.00001794047,0.002674611,0.0003493763,0.00003023793,0.00002166353,0.0009153818,0.00002666005,0.00001822232,0.995277,0.0004427538,0.0001946369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00130009,0.000007209838,0.009315277,0.00006849114,0.000073642,0.00001050723,0.001967375,0.002120842,0.00004443339,0.5233437,0.4614518,0.0002965743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5435016,0.001945487,0.003316339,0.2617683,0.001201815,0.001027365,0.000007561949,0.0004373057,0.1867942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872755,0.00001504766,0.00007351099,0.008497402,0.0004776989,0.0000130888,0.00001326378,0.00001516436,0.003619269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4719332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231824399","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2008.11423916","title":"Regulating Dignity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Alice Woolley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2491237121529009,"gpt":0.4644112228197452,"spread":0.2152875106668443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001331344,0.0000436802,0.0000515318,0.00003691258,0.001943256,0.0001040139,0.0001202505,0.00015714,0.0003244518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007316296,0.00004598442,0.00002617453,0.0004602406,0.0003270315,0.0007812709,0.00001507753,0.001185829,0.0001654385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005648973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00202926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0138762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002892796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989411,0.0002859585,0.0001285753,0.00009836666,0.0003884528,0.0001575545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986099,0.0008199101,0.00007128314,0.0001177641,0.0003115114,0.00006965912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002287505,0.000032139,0.001351197,0.000002973906,0.000003507239,0.00000241254,0.07207628,0.00000496754,0.00004530516,0.9170027,0.008720348,0.0007559055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005029012,0.000005325046,0.002530476,0.000004561173,0.000002726871,0.000003999143,0.003174984,0.00001055258,0.00008916358,0.004425854,0.9896307,0.00007134383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05125644,0.00002157114,0.000463744,0.2280357,0.0007260885,0.00007776378,0.000001407976,0.0001271272,0.7192902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685618,0.00004134451,0.00176619,0.005414899,0.0004784259,0.000004627964,0.000003539226,0.000005213364,0.02372394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2433704002","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2005.11424225","title":"“Change is Pain”: Ethical Legal Discourse and Cultural Competence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Sociology; Legal education; Political science; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Rose Voyvodic","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1464432053593176,"gpt":0.4494581569858102,"spread":0.3030149516264926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001363107,0.0001035173,0.0001366679,0.00002124001,0.0008552365,0.0001823738,0.0001753695,0.0002264788,0.0001441724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007385791,0.00008469834,0.00005324156,0.00009549072,0.001139127,0.0005339773,0.00008332138,0.00122778,0.00005357246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005838635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001178635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007038703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02504028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984452,0.0004017143,0.000140918,0.0002003277,0.0005817753,0.0002300835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988382,0.0006795793,0.00004685811,0.00007325783,0.0002663604,0.00009574868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007840287,0.00002020115,0.0006662259,0.000005165638,0.00001227898,0.000003207653,0.05603479,9.352981e-7,0.00003190753,0.9344856,0.006089718,0.002642104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001063166,0.00004196507,0.002040863,0.00004006788,0.000008356546,0.000001647762,0.006756694,0.0003005911,0.00005245436,0.001904618,0.9886045,0.0001419467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1105962,0.001437956,0.0004977884,0.7923522,0.0004188365,0.0002267335,0.00002351041,0.00008914769,0.09435764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965721,0.0004944787,0.000622775,0.02802584,0.001070371,0.00001505002,0.000002309185,0.000004565815,0.00404363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241185470","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.2.299","title":"A Spotlight on Judicial Regulation in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review","authors":[{"name":"Suzanne Le Mire","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gabrielle Appleby","is_ca":false},{"name":"Micah B. Rankin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alain Roussy","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lisa Webley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1447894613108209,"gpt":0.4697292247956498,"spread":0.3249397634848289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002487998,0.00005507539,0.00006712057,0.0001117973,0.0003442733,0.0001538695,0.0001131197,0.0002369265,0.0005209362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004883613,0.00005789173,0.00002153456,0.0005723624,0.0001316068,0.0004717033,0.000007237197,0.001143037,0.0003856726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005446603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02311609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0256918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986551,0.0004779135,0.0001695828,0.000131406,0.0003983866,0.0001675416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988863,0.0007157331,0.00007777466,0.0001212269,0.0001460997,0.00005280574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001010554,0.00004223305,0.0003643331,0.00000260981,0.000001251881,4.29427e-7,0.01529667,0.0000345701,0.00004276797,0.9789942,0.00432422,0.0008866359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001179139,0.00002236916,0.01531141,0.00001777207,0.000002951787,2.494033e-7,0.0006126749,0.00004443402,0.00008139256,0.04238717,0.9413198,0.00008190697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06717857,0.000002540948,0.0004097466,0.4628488,0.001592311,0.00015997,0.00000150989,0.0000748425,0.4677317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809487,0.00000413413,0.0003153644,0.0063064,0.0006974033,0.000007321643,0.000006132785,0.000005442593,0.01170912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033011605","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.223","title":"Canada: Foreclosures, Freemen, Foreign Law Schools and the Continuing Search for Meaningful Access to Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Public access; Free access; Through-the-lens metering; Law; Lens (geology); Public administration; Engineering; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Amy Salyzyn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.108317896878548,"gpt":0.4190919363500591,"spread":0.3107740394715111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003610732,0.00008676594,0.0001206671,0.00003503835,0.001523619,0.001600865,0.0004210612,0.0001318305,0.0001707018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007428199,0.00006712688,0.00002574876,0.0003675797,0.0003167936,0.00131212,0.00007887006,0.001123158,0.00001166554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001272425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003300064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9718176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9651515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983568,0.0003662074,0.0002192616,0.0001812784,0.0005414551,0.0003349941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945363,0.003881282,0.00008523936,0.0001732419,0.00115968,0.0001642883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001839284,0.00000611251,0.0001160628,0.0000216582,0.00001224234,2.355124e-7,0.01552713,0.00001413546,0.000007715289,0.9149411,0.06853767,0.0007975238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000354452,0.00001432234,0.0002908742,0.00002362334,0.00003522144,7.723431e-7,0.02115771,0.0001112621,0.00007971828,0.01854694,0.9592745,0.0001106207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008807156,0.0000699351,0.002525102,0.7770115,0.0006500838,0.001527594,0.00002408856,0.00003640655,0.2093482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9462144,0.00001768473,0.001432463,0.04789149,0.0004873887,0.0002251325,0.000006345105,0.00001152277,0.00371359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9374073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734728755","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1346550","title":"The resignation of Robin Camp: background and reflections from Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Media studies; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Alice Woolley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1595010244296424,"gpt":0.4066833566739272,"spread":0.2471823322442849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005359095,0.0000283369,0.00003905571,0.000004995941,0.002669132,0.0001448984,0.0001736891,0.00003431095,0.00001110471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001269895,0.00002126048,0.0000106241,0.00001610793,0.0004315919,0.0001186741,0.00003909055,0.0001984746,0.000001704473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005358167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004008605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9544748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994089,0.0001239961,0.00007608186,0.00006393216,0.0002621237,0.00006498233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990464,0.0005721697,0.00008342557,0.0001018882,0.0001750891,0.00002101583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004825604,0.00000267428,0.0004271564,0.000001215112,0.00001529726,8.790378e-7,0.002750818,0.000001586436,0.000153201,0.99348,0.002848907,0.0003134271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005191587,0.000007877939,0.02762419,0.00001307828,0.000004928737,8.855363e-8,0.002161529,0.000007200357,0.0001547493,0.006396949,0.9635412,0.0000362822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09651845,0.0004287667,0.00006188727,0.06569324,0.001029045,0.00007583115,0.00003026912,0.00001135193,0.8361512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895671,0.0005230408,0.00006971001,0.0002814798,0.0001529865,0.000001071621,0.000001169289,0.000002409073,0.009401035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010265656","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.3.425","title":"Legal Ethics at a Time of Regulatory Change: The Sixth International Legal Ethics Conference, London","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Reid Mortensen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1427102844206633,"gpt":0.42337192878588,"spread":0.2806616443652167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01436347,0.0002518393,0.000296993,0.0001854285,0.002067508,0.0006502364,0.001083626,0.001386937,0.001334174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023183,0.0002174542,0.0001563782,0.0007853421,0.001916527,0.001725732,0.0002335652,0.008961026,0.0003936922],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002917665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005981893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02256817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01998873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932237,0.002827856,0.0006443002,0.0004231424,0.002409903,0.0004711023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884501,0.007485087,0.0006126044,0.0006034633,0.002662377,0.0001863445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004663465,0.00009959257,0.0001688497,0.00003802576,0.00004686642,0.00000196063,0.08779627,0.00001394965,0.0002689667,0.9020264,0.008723364,0.0007691032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002973961,0.00006021979,0.0009929648,0.00007811399,0.00004462569,0.00000947013,0.003522777,0.0004535487,0.0003430614,0.005192094,0.9887369,0.0002688229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01315692,0.00009469156,0.0007204571,0.6997949,0.003404085,0.0004171648,0.00004916297,0.0001394556,0.2822232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244902,0.0002498046,0.0005140272,0.02957614,0.001823752,0.0000492659,0.00006709288,0.00003360537,0.04319613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9800135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325869288","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2015.1084787","title":"The Prime Minister v the Chief Justice of Canada: the Attorney General's failure of responsibility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Brent Cotter","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1087945081099092,"gpt":0.3767358994938171,"spread":0.2679413913839079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00820195,0.00007696488,0.0001189651,0.000006083965,0.0009921096,0.00006172486,0.0007664064,0.0001310464,0.00001100779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008386581,0.00003571448,0.00005625056,0.0001836482,0.001616262,0.00009244168,0.0001037933,0.0006614877,0.000002466606],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009874027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00650915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6788512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9585038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970646,0.001284418,0.0002541829,0.0001342635,0.001018086,0.0002444788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949615,0.003776317,0.0001616594,0.0005002369,0.0005130865,0.0000871935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001938549,0.00002437193,0.0004096518,0.00005105383,0.00002280033,0.000003532593,0.05535201,0.00005087519,0.0002186628,0.8731785,0.07012466,0.0003700526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005577302,0.00003526953,0.002030744,0.00001913161,0.00005667297,0.000001420672,0.01755974,0.00002775536,0.0005133568,0.002122092,0.9775192,0.00005888822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2544748,0.0009260874,0.00005324507,0.6763874,0.001321051,0.000431593,0.00003138263,0.00001675053,0.06635769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914459,0.00003354207,0.00009030865,0.001841502,0.0002710863,0.000004577357,5.162255e-7,0.000004695842,0.00630785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9073945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045049176","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.1.135","title":"Canada: Death of a Legal Icon, Dawn of Change?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Law; Supreme court; Icon; Political science; Doors; Prime minister; History; Politics; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Adam M. Dodek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1956874572063559,"gpt":0.424318465318099,"spread":0.2286310081117431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001779378,0.00006149081,0.0001330841,0.00005459755,0.0002491019,0.00004416583,0.0002119278,0.0001502249,0.0001641076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005085637,0.00006232491,0.00003058709,0.0003817192,0.0002126609,0.0004865069,0.00002093449,0.0007156559,0.000004469369],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007943988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008413901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9459558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985949,0.0003226913,0.0002531433,0.0001067623,0.0005567676,0.0001657319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979826,0.0008954518,0.0002266268,0.0001752698,0.000645418,0.00007468354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004487084,0.00003275222,0.00104655,0.00002249045,0.000008310072,3.798175e-7,0.01045112,0.000001581649,0.0000979422,0.9844542,0.003067347,0.0008129155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008645863,0.00002261725,0.002981982,0.00001676323,0.00001257364,6.470184e-7,0.001799395,0.00001969546,0.0005944539,0.001763699,0.9926287,0.00007303375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03218547,0.00007382766,0.000618098,0.4349199,0.001831373,0.0002581432,0.00004405196,0.00003554162,0.5300336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900679,0.00002207878,0.0004193376,0.006101759,0.0003435165,0.000008079158,0.000006854694,0.000006097073,0.003024391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040148068","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.3.437","title":"Equality Rights, Freedom of Religion and the Training of Canadian Lawyers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Scope (computer science); Law; Legal profession; Political science; Freedom of religion; Legal ethics; Legal education; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Alice Woolley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07793966976316671,"gpt":0.326362372260491,"spread":0.2484227024973243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002293846,0.00003458383,0.0001156516,0.00003450925,0.0006210455,0.00001191169,0.00009057562,0.00009094883,0.000004276106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001032179,0.00002316217,0.00003127839,0.0001653236,0.002949065,0.0000461083,0.0000149446,0.0002052404,8.619098e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001598088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004242394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.980037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991946,0.0002702234,0.0001206213,0.00006162662,0.0002425813,0.0001103677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990235,0.0007009619,0.00005743439,0.00005064447,0.0001161177,0.00005135802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009072471,0.000001821232,0.0001957863,0.000003719657,0.000008413595,1.250803e-7,0.0243959,0.000005333085,0.000004602914,0.9750085,0.0001524148,0.0002142873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002810996,0.00001803477,0.00137024,0.00003997962,0.00002129636,2.745464e-7,0.003596693,0.00002448093,0.00002556542,0.4178487,0.5767095,0.00006411508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06238443,0.0005414428,0.0002466247,0.05737577,0.0003855544,0.0001412801,0.00001680858,0.00001451755,0.8788936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989614,0.0001968126,0.00007652826,0.0005620594,0.0001059051,0.000001303739,4.889674e-7,9.550749e-7,0.00009458575],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9365769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}