{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":16,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"bb7adb6525e4","filters":{"venue":"Legal Ethics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2730947195","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1345202","title":"The Achilles heel of the Canadian judiciary: the ethics of judicial appointments in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Impartiality; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Transparency (behavior); Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial review; Representativeness heuristic; Accountability; Judicial activism; Public administration; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Richard Devlin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Adam M. Dodek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06405922035223657,"gpt":0.3406251412774748,"spread":0.2765659209252382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008944619,0.0002225432,0.0004141124,0.001876225,0.03021758,0.01442762,0.002158889,0.004406334,0.002753886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02469323,0.0003639273,0.0002641625,0.00326461,0.0256194,0.002223544,0.00226914,0.005403181,0.000197292],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1846241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2963952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.984843,0.004050693,0.0003275295,0.0009698906,0.005319523,0.004489354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842026,0.006609416,0.0008282549,0.0003652345,0.005102091,0.002892504],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002627805,0.0000173127,0.00448291,0.00005986001,0.00001308768,0.0003084847,0.02156899,0.0008303993,0.0001877906,0.9349259,0.0197974,0.01778171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009226101,0.00007720041,0.05356518,0.001059394,0.0001408587,0.0004191563,0.09221474,0.007282164,0.001056478,0.2748436,0.5688571,0.000391888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2165603,0.01390797,0.007885695,0.3236394,0.0007102823,0.0001184743,0.0002291423,0.00006923245,0.4368795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796695,0.001757197,0.001326428,0.004818079,0.00008360111,0.00001261557,0.00001471131,0.00001752084,0.01230036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8153759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9457204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912581125","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2018.1551677","title":"Governance gone wrong: examining self-regulation of the legal profession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Duty of loyalty; Statutory law; Accountability; Duty; Legal profession; Loyalty; Law; Duty of care; Function (biology); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Fiduciary; Management","authors":[{"name":"Anita Anand","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09074423956251462,"gpt":0.4184622964780271,"spread":0.3277180569155125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01763334,0.0001473637,0.0003257614,0.001478172,0.01027386,0.01124281,0.001537636,0.003097415,0.001552015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02139131,0.000214659,0.0004239298,0.001743411,0.05225647,0.006364005,0.005027073,0.003341093,0.0001318083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0506168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05037069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3280229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3188243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9801489,0.01020133,0.0004459255,0.001272054,0.004320639,0.00361131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743314,0.01128526,0.004880298,0.001728232,0.004884855,0.002889895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001428149,0.00007888097,0.02901928,0.00005174616,0.00001445596,0.0001922834,0.1718115,0.0005238457,0.0002225465,0.7866606,0.001634603,0.009776074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005158196,0.0001216374,0.1297635,0.0007942336,0.00004415915,0.0001737592,0.4085909,0.003963731,0.0007544431,0.3351896,0.1204688,0.0000836632],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6524997,0.001759696,0.007239432,0.06261309,0.0001218216,0.000105237,0.00003768176,0.00002328657,0.2756001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969929,0.000180821,0.0002387174,0.0009831804,0.0000132738,0.00001488878,0.000007605643,0.000004460901,0.00156395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3280229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6522272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123271246","doi":"10.5235/le.15.2.243","title":"Regulation in Practice: The ‘Ethical Economy’ of Lawyer Regulation in Canada and a Case Study in Lawyer Deviance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Deviance (statistics); Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Alice Woolley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08432628590548419,"gpt":0.4334728592694356,"spread":0.3491465733639514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007648443,0.0004423028,0.0005969154,0.002896908,0.05450634,0.0110612,0.002979939,0.009632233,0.003403387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01849538,0.0005473759,0.0007157053,0.00570765,0.03150022,0.003452431,0.006148815,0.009590686,0.0002001581],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2096714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2397342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.982033,0.005036238,0.0002413766,0.000881689,0.005599338,0.0062084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872909,0.005050119,0.001050896,0.0003981972,0.003311839,0.002898087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001062496,0.0005604421,0.04356596,0.0002147448,0.0000541904,0.00850329,0.2763197,0.002025201,0.0008381379,0.6169729,0.02112201,0.02971725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002184885,0.0001884318,0.1021072,0.0008827757,0.0001175949,0.002024349,0.5389962,0.007394863,0.001064633,0.05298864,0.293702,0.0003148835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6841878,0.003799816,0.002940845,0.09219628,0.0002037867,0.0003272935,0.0001180438,0.00003375546,0.2161924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808483,0.001239496,0.001127853,0.004286774,0.0000306811,0.00006434154,0.00002691107,0.00002019871,0.01235549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7903286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9166692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055399757","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.73","title":"The Not Now Habit: Procrastination, Legal Ethics and Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Habit; Law; Procrastination; Legal ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Annalise Acorn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jason Buttuls","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03459229676768236,"gpt":0.3548542671339901,"spread":0.3202619703663078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005019113,0.0002705875,0.0002702631,0.00115282,0.006089591,0.006849478,0.0007031431,0.001987701,0.003472005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01219582,0.0002015619,0.0002318641,0.0007472183,0.03176643,0.006590296,0.003674827,0.005878565,0.0002668707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00353673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005815246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009004297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01224536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994233,0.003932884,0.00008378829,0.0002372565,0.00084501,0.0006680596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889976,0.00620201,0.001452515,0.0004126763,0.0006523285,0.002282806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004445965,0.0009815522,0.02329859,0.0001940744,0.00002412145,0.001202582,0.599513,0.00008902228,0.0004507028,0.2731805,0.01383713,0.08718429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004432359,0.0003047957,0.05003437,0.0007452018,0.00002420298,0.002658395,0.6758956,0.0004142186,0.000382577,0.1400687,0.1293492,0.00007836046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.679442,0.01464203,0.001809946,0.1315551,0.0004546625,0.00005016506,0.00001329612,0.00004211362,0.1719908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861817,0.002186297,0.000224926,0.005182615,0.00008406948,0.00001664064,0.000003236048,0.000007904201,0.006112486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009004297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02654392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969138315","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.1","title":"The Past, Present … and Future(?) of Judicial Ethics Education in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Richard Devlin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Claudia Kent","is_ca":false},{"name":"Susan Lightstone","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04619985192939027,"gpt":0.3933745093764602,"spread":0.3471746574470699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005795151,0.0002248687,0.0004143884,0.001636762,0.0177277,0.008701791,0.001792545,0.003489631,0.008852085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01487848,0.0004558077,0.0004069258,0.002704765,0.005339413,0.002962964,0.003649824,0.006358938,0.0003873722],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2398971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5565636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917498,0.0008599014,0.0002222436,0.0003813079,0.00339576,0.003390868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683607,0.002414938,0.00124731,0.0001346414,0.01003996,0.01780247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002164814,0.0002547526,0.05773491,0.001122619,0.00005451838,0.0007956406,0.03021072,0.001133759,0.001003811,0.1907988,0.4387533,0.2779208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001518631,0.0001450843,0.248081,0.003248,0.00009214074,0.0003841373,0.06555755,0.002416081,0.0009694138,0.01829373,0.6603826,0.0002783373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.120152,0.03946782,0.0007745965,0.7742913,0.00174947,0.00007694511,0.0007958908,0.00007382956,0.06261815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9178972,0.02322987,0.002111058,0.03071206,0.0003224795,0.00005497829,0.0003152124,0.00003592021,0.02532117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7601029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8816116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124202993","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.16.2.373","title":"Canada: Depending on the Kindness of Strangers—Access to Civil Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Kindness; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Noel Semple","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1696915769654931,"gpt":0.4332841545108171,"spread":0.263592577545324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002046593,0.0002415278,0.0004079747,0.001038805,0.02682452,0.006186282,0.001711613,0.003275289,0.01149768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006904982,0.0004079628,0.000468079,0.002787628,0.00500757,0.002548505,0.004201534,0.005437946,0.0004492109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2890065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968604,0.0002603611,0.00007557173,0.000168935,0.001038695,0.001596025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907177,0.0007837015,0.0004322446,0.0001160956,0.003316277,0.00463386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001969203,0.000091938,0.07046483,0.0002813861,0.0000594969,0.001524777,0.04252241,0.0002440136,0.0006864198,0.1058949,0.6856117,0.09242124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009598512,0.00004544128,0.2541335,0.0009510851,0.0001094516,0.0006260587,0.1421991,0.0003018914,0.000587334,0.01296439,0.5876997,0.0002860216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1931423,0.02311228,0.0006790922,0.6025817,0.001549444,0.0001294973,0.005143066,0.00008046608,0.1735823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8614447,0.01199462,0.0009400015,0.06368702,0.0002098574,0.0000738157,0.0009299458,0.00008183339,0.06063825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8694026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209201845","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2021.1979729","title":"Soft law, legal ethics and the corporate lawyer: confronting human rights and sustainability norms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Hard law; Legal profession; Soft law; Human rights; Sociology; International law","authors":[{"name":"Sara L. Seck","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard Devlin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Siobhan Quigg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05257131203613633,"gpt":0.2952785501892197,"spread":0.2427072381530833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03193774,0.0004576661,0.0007665466,0.002229921,0.01520012,0.02648352,0.002329258,0.01365533,0.003506765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03119939,0.0004162621,0.0004384581,0.00165771,0.1549148,0.02113727,0.01274221,0.01915271,0.0003658276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01215038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01285747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01122146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01662498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9730409,0.01854726,0.0005628239,0.001175672,0.004365899,0.002307371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619784,0.02980501,0.002387478,0.00132173,0.002044234,0.002463093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003969468,0.00001976819,0.0002580966,0.00002776255,0.000003142174,0.00008468606,0.01847769,0.0001021454,0.00008380606,0.9723789,0.003192488,0.005367415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008744941,0.00001883694,0.0005331318,0.0002427072,0.00000371999,0.00008199742,0.040241,0.0003441662,0.000244327,0.9060688,0.05218927,0.00002326204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07617667,0.01064851,0.01983438,0.7018752,0.001564824,0.00005324527,0.00001730919,0.00004241069,0.1897875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365869,0.003434096,0.004340988,0.04203021,0.00110635,0.00009059661,0.000009380075,0.00004563601,0.012356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03193774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.168905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231824399","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2008.11423916","title":"Regulating Dignity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Alice Woolley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2491237121529009,"gpt":0.4644112228197452,"spread":0.2152875106668443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01516455,0.0007152089,0.000912999,0.001771478,0.008051953,0.01245636,0.003420408,0.0312442,0.01280348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03028174,0.0007869239,0.001134727,0.0007824211,0.03153226,0.006729179,0.008321644,0.02280989,0.003293321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007486718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0118193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01107876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01488535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9799685,0.00595802,0.001139549,0.003730923,0.006516132,0.002686735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862421,0.008190803,0.0007780442,0.001804033,0.002198258,0.0007867765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006252984,0.00001907097,0.000115382,0.00002343252,0.00000639784,0.00007092465,0.00120489,0.00006044649,0.0002187208,0.9827974,0.01111432,0.004362788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003253197,0.00004270469,0.0005877895,0.0004623843,0.00003727736,0.0002107114,0.001143981,0.000307724,0.001267477,0.6935465,0.3023122,0.00004875382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009849347,0.004629335,0.008673416,0.122638,0.00222092,0.0001656438,0.0001065931,0.00009333382,0.8516235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4618934,0.003309515,0.008012607,0.1741179,0.003056759,0.0006133602,0.0001344627,0.0001595724,0.3487024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0312442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08019876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2433704002","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2005.11424225","title":"“Change is Pain”: Ethical Legal Discourse and Cultural Competence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Sociology; Legal education; Political science; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Rose Voyvodic","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1464432053593176,"gpt":0.4494581569858102,"spread":0.3030149516264926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05430834,0.0006575208,0.0009081227,0.004712202,0.01926687,0.02470522,0.003325466,0.01370786,0.004099818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09306674,0.0006024454,0.000436235,0.00370884,0.2061279,0.02421457,0.01407313,0.01614406,0.0002490548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009752499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01436016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008406567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006367926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9216821,0.0666013,0.001405247,0.002404664,0.005076687,0.002829951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8744231,0.1045133,0.006735014,0.00611768,0.004719407,0.003491469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006607385,0.00002329371,0.0004015589,0.00003722044,0.000007271411,0.0000853637,0.1597274,0.00006345144,0.00003995357,0.8351935,0.001546655,0.002867808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002920317,0.0000264344,0.001625302,0.0004611963,0.00002145145,0.0002470653,0.2046177,0.0003566448,0.0002761909,0.7514965,0.04080566,0.00003660699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.165757,0.008703585,0.01301648,0.3119902,0.001053949,0.00008065152,0.00003618684,0.00005493162,0.499307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921939,0.0004869898,0.0006057867,0.004793241,0.0001519729,0.00003909766,0.000006913782,0.00002133703,0.001700713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05430834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2872134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241185470","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.2.299","title":"A Spotlight on Judicial Regulation in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review","authors":[{"name":"Suzanne Le Mire","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gabrielle Appleby","is_ca":false},{"name":"Micah B. Rankin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alain Roussy","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lisa Webley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1447894613108209,"gpt":0.4697292247956498,"spread":0.3249397634848289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01190108,0.0002875252,0.0006870528,0.001539475,0.005502021,0.008200738,0.001494113,0.01425698,0.009473602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01928598,0.0006697684,0.0006988252,0.001268015,0.00918926,0.008858728,0.006702994,0.01726864,0.001215969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009004718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02839471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05086313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07403446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914826,0.002457975,0.0004597015,0.0006625888,0.003424353,0.001512904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818981,0.007454024,0.001539601,0.0005807879,0.004879144,0.003648286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006240318,0.0001167908,0.00159478,0.0009998459,0.00001960968,0.0006742218,0.009748838,0.0003692145,0.002010157,0.4403949,0.4276353,0.1163739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003494561,0.0001373067,0.01829989,0.001884246,0.00002420554,0.0004028217,0.004182488,0.0007368585,0.0006526076,0.08754609,0.8860085,0.00009001944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01135002,0.07492646,0.001622255,0.8722492,0.006672138,0.00003081744,0.00007935603,0.00005633371,0.03301346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3525025,0.0778596,0.006081423,0.4761516,0.008657675,0.0001461195,0.0001288839,0.0001273176,0.07834492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05086313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1011342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033011605","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.223","title":"Canada: Foreclosures, Freemen, Foreign Law Schools and the Continuing Search for Meaningful Access to Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Public access; Free access; Through-the-lens metering; Law; Lens (geology); Public administration; Engineering; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Amy Salyzyn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.108317896878548,"gpt":0.4190919363500591,"spread":0.3107740394715111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001288956,0.0002991003,0.0003859856,0.001937366,0.03193988,0.01422116,0.00211034,0.00701799,0.01092045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004565826,0.000328897,0.0003583306,0.005283637,0.01249045,0.003376163,0.004207994,0.008746004,0.0003887039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1255479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2699102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969892,0.0001998821,0.00003877423,0.0001412741,0.0007498562,0.001881128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942322,0.0009019353,0.0004639609,0.00006862291,0.0009888426,0.003344293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009143105,0.0001527496,0.03715412,0.0004856313,0.00005247715,0.003033026,0.1323052,0.0004169722,0.0003151642,0.2158505,0.5413796,0.0687633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002479342,0.00002532359,0.08129665,0.0007113941,0.00004813636,0.0004003478,0.3243718,0.0002438253,0.0002177938,0.007911495,0.5846183,0.0001301463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.185148,0.02979604,0.000234383,0.6396264,0.002005548,0.00005299801,0.0009281941,0.00005121145,0.1421571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8498545,0.02353273,0.0002810293,0.06764791,0.0007313187,0.00003428827,0.0002925706,0.00005973961,0.05756592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1255479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9109182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734728755","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1346550","title":"The resignation of Robin Camp: background and reflections from Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Media studies; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Alice Woolley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1595010244296424,"gpt":0.4066833566739272,"spread":0.2471823322442849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02340164,0.001078925,0.001808038,0.002553379,0.1175885,0.02274017,0.008244125,0.02907784,0.01019688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04718572,0.001275142,0.0009833754,0.005558791,0.04591411,0.00632361,0.009971949,0.05690601,0.001468832],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2624812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4516241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9632752,0.007850012,0.0008113287,0.003083481,0.01142392,0.01355617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952608,0.01402911,0.00135113,0.000602201,0.01395422,0.01745536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009436131,0.00009322925,0.001672051,0.0004268984,0.0000385635,0.002044312,0.1473963,0.0002567256,0.0004610399,0.06460205,0.7663742,0.01654028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002770008,0.00003096073,0.002845142,0.001132566,0.0000231627,0.0002744522,0.143238,0.0001040606,0.0002431136,0.004564021,0.8473181,0.0001987284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01113814,0.02379788,0.000245428,0.9243752,0.007273211,0.00006531314,0.0001319656,0.00002948181,0.0329433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1991002,0.02615877,0.0009233369,0.6959097,0.002405501,0.0001054638,0.0001078845,0.0003090477,0.07498018],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2624812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8554173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010265656","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.3.425","title":"Legal Ethics at a Time of Regulatory Change: The Sixth International Legal Ethics Conference, London","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Reid Mortensen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1427102844206633,"gpt":0.42337192878588,"spread":0.2806616443652167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02143526,0.0006951441,0.00077944,0.001170343,0.00985429,0.02372318,0.002306201,0.02169643,0.0106593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02427375,0.0007805962,0.0006159522,0.001729128,0.02490627,0.01235384,0.008239398,0.01932953,0.002441304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03616097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03365353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04655244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09591828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9810832,0.009514176,0.0009191537,0.001162128,0.004561305,0.002760025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834533,0.006503924,0.001098738,0.0008235797,0.001945792,0.006174692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000472209,0.00004432982,0.0003898095,0.0002642279,0.00001017906,0.0009674395,0.0245031,0.000180957,0.0002489545,0.1310263,0.8202059,0.02211167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001450987,0.000009801152,0.0005805637,0.0005533193,0.00000227533,0.000159507,0.01211227,0.00002371647,0.00009232069,0.009656123,0.9767717,0.00002392139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003013976,0.07557044,0.0002526118,0.8572291,0.01053923,0.00002422661,0.00003381782,0.00002501866,0.05331155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2684842,0.08389474,0.001808601,0.2065208,0.01166006,0.0002489111,0.0001831968,0.00033655,0.426863],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04655244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2623674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325869288","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2015.1084787","title":"The Prime Minister v the Chief Justice of Canada: the Attorney General's failure of responsibility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Brent Cotter","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1087945081099092,"gpt":0.3767358994938171,"spread":0.2679413913839079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01681779,0.0006059905,0.001229895,0.001651864,0.03626199,0.01443786,0.004719655,0.03971304,0.004706795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06195414,0.001044926,0.0008402205,0.002461867,0.02215427,0.006633332,0.00430888,0.04132872,0.000447894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08280558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3475162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9824752,0.003505492,0.0005488213,0.001482951,0.004956689,0.007030941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701047,0.0139941,0.001310681,0.0006458965,0.007865974,0.006078557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001931257,0.00006329352,0.008271494,0.0001747557,0.0001404535,0.002004311,0.02804133,0.0006642184,0.0004054292,0.4271138,0.5141004,0.01882753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003489643,0.0001069464,0.03156729,0.001709937,0.0005603916,0.0009430821,0.07320933,0.002116313,0.002283052,0.1863283,0.7001588,0.0006675824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03974511,0.005022603,0.0004536671,0.9030424,0.001894544,0.00003820914,0.0001479533,0.00003024659,0.04962528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5533032,0.004200414,0.0008005446,0.3842464,0.0009857013,0.0000323273,0.00006251995,0.0001176071,0.05625135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08280558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6007993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045049176","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.1.135","title":"Canada: Death of a Legal Icon, Dawn of Change?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Law; Supreme court; Icon; Political science; Doors; Prime minister; History; Politics; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Adam M. Dodek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1956874572063559,"gpt":0.424318465318099,"spread":0.2286310081117431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003262341,0.0005007746,0.000644047,0.001368133,0.03616229,0.01446265,0.00312777,0.01059713,0.01148085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01283916,0.0003289914,0.0005877793,0.002325066,0.02262623,0.005433583,0.003413909,0.0119105,0.001041724],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1786194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2962727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909012,0.0006944556,0.0001231958,0.0006926876,0.003995087,0.003593313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927853,0.001099573,0.0002737844,0.0002012113,0.003843982,0.00179622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004233136,0.00001484616,0.002384324,0.0001348164,0.00001626012,0.0005971146,0.01977897,0.0001771614,0.0001593206,0.3263677,0.6291184,0.02120871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001086023,0.000008996013,0.003151197,0.0003007,0.00001878924,0.0001070283,0.02351723,0.0001187206,0.0001672056,0.01015964,0.962372,0.00006754763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009554866,0.01084879,0.0005693272,0.8347458,0.003831225,0.00002429135,0.0002439065,0.00008050794,0.1401012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3658173,0.01587875,0.0009321766,0.4418209,0.001902188,0.00004423731,0.0002579721,0.0002114105,0.1731352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1786194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9526851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040148068","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.3.437","title":"Equality Rights, Freedom of Religion and the Training of Canadian Lawyers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Scope (computer science); Law; Legal profession; Political science; Freedom of religion; Legal ethics; Legal education; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Alice Woolley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07793966976316671,"gpt":0.326362372260491,"spread":0.2484227024973243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007554584,0.0002742752,0.0004450542,0.002105413,0.04265397,0.01178193,0.002534006,0.007226199,0.00720153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02611139,0.0004374376,0.0004171121,0.002497032,0.04023369,0.00412775,0.006010198,0.008258715,0.0003310589],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.145833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2482244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881384,0.001618179,0.0002209104,0.0007103889,0.003707442,0.005604688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851171,0.004713045,0.0009043157,0.000553434,0.00411314,0.004598935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002366804,0.00004195326,0.003651019,0.00006126027,0.000007195916,0.000221366,0.03686035,0.0001992407,0.0002524261,0.8981804,0.03600011,0.02450101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006180733,0.00003730245,0.04232356,0.0008671794,0.00003851557,0.000187002,0.07474004,0.0007443618,0.0006449799,0.1474517,0.7327075,0.0001960127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1059619,0.008252159,0.001662907,0.3908212,0.0006755118,0.00009071373,0.000191564,0.00003768619,0.4923064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9213398,0.003715198,0.001039262,0.03137576,0.0002022702,0.0000338916,0.00006333899,0.00002650433,0.04220393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.145833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}