{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":26,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"c28c261dcba3","filters":{"venue":"Legal Theory"}},"results":[{"id":"W2550873366","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000033","title":"LEGAL POWERS IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Private law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Essert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03096325639208147,"gpt":0.3228814066680886,"spread":0.2919181502760071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006553776,0.00033187,0.0004477115,0.002311563,0.004082077,0.008767785,0.0008354883,0.003137588,0.006543684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01268372,0.0003577375,0.0004884173,0.001566403,0.04641888,0.01259506,0.005229358,0.004643221,0.0006032125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005329336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004074353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003762664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00201317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938409,0.003310393,0.000215021,0.0006366215,0.001422814,0.0005742052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887214,0.007543871,0.0008595322,0.001211724,0.001046065,0.0006173546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[5.550631e-7,0.000001551029,0.00002696798,0.000002473653,3.863231e-7,0.000005611491,0.0002220956,0.00005072614,0.000007489224,0.9991425,0.000138989,0.0004005723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003847049,0.000002770329,0.00008845708,0.00003120436,0.000001614782,0.0000145067,0.0002776012,0.0003488151,0.00004312251,0.9895744,0.009610858,0.000002937564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05873137,0.003745024,0.07939199,0.03800921,0.0003739626,0.00006548883,0.00009446368,0.00008595832,0.8195025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844232,0.0008439925,0.003288093,0.001148063,0.0002828922,0.00005141082,0.00002197058,0.00002348736,0.009916909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008767785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03866726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303810331","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000021","title":"THE FAILURE OF UNIVERSAL THEORIES OF TORT LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Punitive damages; Law; Jurisdiction; Damages; Delict; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Element (criminal law); Private law; Comparative law; Sociology; Black letter law; Liability","authors":[{"name":"James Goudkamp","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Murphy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01793305386216588,"gpt":0.2905690088404181,"spread":0.2726359549782523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02375467,0.001334224,0.002233457,0.006850406,0.003850678,0.008057642,0.006364526,0.006083888,0.008863962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04880118,0.001156426,0.002321017,0.002244353,0.04863816,0.02036031,0.008171674,0.01078448,0.001538079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008044443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005243436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005276954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003587594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.980735,0.008564725,0.0008083458,0.002618479,0.005852888,0.001420546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9320342,0.03900552,0.005576494,0.01254162,0.008795218,0.002046911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006827922,0.00001830372,0.00032334,0.00004990293,0.00001605449,0.0000287133,0.0002552063,0.0006161472,0.00001453006,0.9941266,0.001227353,0.003317143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000815822,0.000007539287,0.0002071156,0.000059761,0.000006253102,0.00003821124,0.0001769443,0.001337441,0.00002615724,0.9951932,0.002932021,0.000007060082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07663942,0.01399328,0.2360215,0.1828455,0.001590618,0.000253007,0.0006366792,0.000910424,0.4871096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623985,0.004075996,0.01697045,0.007389866,0.001511955,0.0002253675,0.0001678928,0.0001345746,0.007125352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02375467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1256282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077991194","doi":"10.1017/s1352325210000017","title":"THE FIDUCIARY CONSTITUTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Constitution; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Duty","authors":[{"name":"Evan Fox-Decent","is_ca":true},{"name":"Evan J. Criddle","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01507150372188459,"gpt":0.3292822357210367,"spread":0.3142107319991521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009374382,0.0004523527,0.0007316101,0.002235168,0.004251499,0.007303604,0.001528818,0.004243488,0.004483342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01148572,0.0004473269,0.0007575008,0.00131348,0.03316064,0.006623031,0.004885477,0.00518105,0.0009779325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00441898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005589533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003424172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002345365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926887,0.003020688,0.0003764752,0.001302076,0.001818989,0.0007930885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959139,0.001896161,0.0003729272,0.0008951687,0.0007167779,0.0002050608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[3.820135e-7,0.000001021428,0.000007585521,0.000002009722,5.044618e-7,0.00000343211,0.000082087,0.00004045169,0.0000103863,0.9992148,0.0002022544,0.0004351216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004956831,0.000003252174,0.00004922215,0.00003315244,0.000002341995,0.00001929967,0.00006931182,0.0002098762,0.00005416988,0.9809826,0.01856695,0.000004896299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0206759,0.003773166,0.1800306,0.03839293,0.000875702,0.0001201624,0.0002301732,0.0001171965,0.7557842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8875201,0.002686112,0.06178107,0.006118678,0.001277156,0.0005901812,0.0002071401,0.00009032097,0.03972926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009374382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04957706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167187158","doi":"10.1017/s1352325206060277","title":"RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HATEFUL SPEECH","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Harm principle; Harm; Sanctions; Punishment (psychology); Action (physics); Rationality; Law and economics; Coercion (linguistics); Legislature; Defeasible estate; Law; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Evan Simpson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03808470325603933,"gpt":0.3400983090680734,"spread":0.3020136058120341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02050473,0.0007047041,0.0006164957,0.001827102,0.007947016,0.007444277,0.001615949,0.004647844,0.006205152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03498686,0.0008567325,0.0008729097,0.0006598362,0.03445693,0.0077105,0.009729799,0.007539059,0.001171978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002572079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004848857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001307193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001420654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9790805,0.009938961,0.001446509,0.002301461,0.005025861,0.002206783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9569241,0.02503598,0.003903605,0.007138468,0.004283512,0.002714311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002643475,0.00003222118,0.001679401,0.00004409968,0.00000994003,0.0002383313,0.01606926,0.0003674851,0.001190467,0.9713407,0.0004744329,0.008527325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003607005,0.00009356967,0.003014277,0.0002899683,0.00004246632,0.000904185,0.01055406,0.001309833,0.003654935,0.9192052,0.06083447,0.00006090326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2590274,0.002377229,0.1253017,0.02261494,0.0006430536,0.0001549192,0.0000601788,0.0002397187,0.5895809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981553,0.0003749183,0.004005236,0.001020984,0.0002174781,0.0001251971,0.00002107053,0.00004045262,0.01264168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02050473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1084406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895460886","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000113","title":"REASONING BY PRECEDENT—BETWEEN RULES AND ANALOGIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Analogical reasoning; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; Process (computing); Deductive reasoning; Epistemology; Case-based reasoning; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Katharina Stevens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01967771035387806,"gpt":0.3037214548208461,"spread":0.2840437444669681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02692246,0.0004722074,0.001014081,0.003115676,0.002326904,0.00908976,0.003318325,0.004633829,0.01104293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07500809,0.0006573366,0.001816289,0.00156278,0.02217037,0.0236347,0.003625733,0.005314494,0.001124655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003537383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002548914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002402801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001651518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9742798,0.01574486,0.001454397,0.00322644,0.00431091,0.0009837258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303079,0.05601854,0.002993944,0.0069252,0.003128322,0.0006261783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002772548,0.0000220922,0.0003332009,0.00005352713,0.00002012333,0.0001106569,0.0007196292,0.001466961,0.0001470601,0.9899312,0.0007901738,0.006377648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002049748,0.000009000473,0.0001499899,0.00004703169,0.000008742006,0.00005238954,0.0001448675,0.003013552,0.0002924323,0.9925212,0.00372754,0.0000126674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1504304,0.004753199,0.495364,0.02855323,0.0009674084,0.0003089927,0.0003074252,0.0004918046,0.3188236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930495,0.0008230087,0.06236322,0.001299263,0.0003113905,0.00008194846,0.0001225849,0.00006413857,0.004439416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02692246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1423813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172239277","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000255","title":"THE STATUS OF HEARERS’ RIGHTS IN FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Freedom of expression; Jurisprudence; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Marc Ramsay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008376557374638853,"gpt":0.2312050392591772,"spread":0.2228284818845384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02772269,0.0004683472,0.0008209285,0.002131227,0.009101313,0.01643061,0.002259244,0.01001745,0.009369012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05953525,0.0006717393,0.001010791,0.001272013,0.0676807,0.02132703,0.009576868,0.01269017,0.001293216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003604581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003888351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004474026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002559861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9666929,0.01591964,0.001652938,0.004946305,0.007291348,0.003496754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.918944,0.06176198,0.003751776,0.008278879,0.005158868,0.002104528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001349876,0.000008460143,0.0003642789,0.00001502424,0.000004374638,0.00004056332,0.00540596,0.00004231241,0.0001325056,0.9896237,0.0008751844,0.003474046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003298706,0.0000323852,0.00130352,0.0001839351,0.00002411641,0.0001571691,0.004257351,0.0004932596,0.0008065768,0.9474203,0.04524218,0.00004621956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06216405,0.004104856,0.0467148,0.07710146,0.0006666567,0.00005822888,0.0001074954,0.00008827518,0.8089942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648042,0.0008645005,0.00318806,0.005477566,0.0006707576,0.000117176,0.00004978734,0.00006669733,0.02476119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02772269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1466134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977354580","doi":"10.1017/s1352325208080129","title":"LOCKEAN PROPERTY AND LITERARY WORKS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Intellectual property; State of nature; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Linguistics; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan Peterson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01790390522157764,"gpt":0.2634462141706649,"spread":0.2455423089490872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002033456,0.0002832078,0.0003357703,0.003078338,0.006034077,0.009058162,0.00107191,0.002372839,0.009950868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005139465,0.0002024087,0.0004322856,0.002015062,0.03095881,0.01106145,0.004372397,0.002344764,0.001088766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004103499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00136873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002582761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002530469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982339,0.0007802235,0.00006520954,0.000224648,0.0004108804,0.0002850181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964145,0.002130554,0.0003283159,0.0006019679,0.0003221662,0.0002024548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002832757,0.000004054101,0.00008195475,0.00000907657,0.000001026131,0.00002557327,0.001214754,0.00005423996,0.00001247907,0.9964411,0.0004568739,0.001696181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009580796,0.000009524996,0.0003512128,0.00008073325,0.000004133552,0.000082144,0.001651834,0.0002484157,0.0000983663,0.9231184,0.07433946,0.000006275874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04254452,0.00791031,0.01550648,0.01504539,0.0002759516,0.00002273926,0.00004378595,0.00005009156,0.9186007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604388,0.001768991,0.001244006,0.000827955,0.0003467748,0.00002952734,0.00002603896,0.00002890213,0.03528895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009950868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03328902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123524410","doi":"10.1017/s1352325212000249","title":"LEGAL OBLIGATION AND REASONS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Action (physics); Legal positivism; Philosophy of law; Positivism; Political science; Legal profession; Legal realism; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Essert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01261595673283347,"gpt":0.2825988814295207,"spread":0.2699829246966872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009494323,0.0005132488,0.0007277716,0.002014927,0.006547281,0.008670652,0.00153845,0.007423466,0.01181637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01582611,0.0003983627,0.0007291989,0.001112506,0.05056417,0.01405472,0.006856072,0.006987324,0.001788189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00613335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006664637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006015459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003703231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900064,0.004131319,0.0005192959,0.001657146,0.002338868,0.001346907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891402,0.006144153,0.0008741455,0.001398868,0.001590173,0.0008525146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001311203,0.000002849855,0.00003874105,0.000006189748,8.086981e-7,0.000009714957,0.0004335603,0.00002271582,0.000007838429,0.9975593,0.0009088169,0.001008045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000832495,0.000005588371,0.0001245522,0.00008075751,0.000002430905,0.00004745524,0.0005211419,0.000102361,0.00003811525,0.9355305,0.06353091,0.000007827184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0100258,0.00825341,0.0279626,0.06174086,0.0008276482,0.00007327966,0.0001124097,0.00008767442,0.8909163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9114994,0.004265199,0.009375155,0.01463961,0.001362285,0.0002171424,0.0001528309,0.0001112489,0.05837703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01181637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05021137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125060229","doi":"10.1017/s1352325214000056","title":"PROPERTY AND THE RULE OF LAW","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Private law; Political science; Public law; Rule of law; Property (philosophy); Common law; Property law; Framing (construction); Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Due process; Municipal law; Property rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01389398429845694,"gpt":0.2754533410965535,"spread":0.2615593567980965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009653763,0.0004289735,0.001002809,0.00238635,0.004515489,0.009466499,0.001751809,0.005437235,0.005567815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01394507,0.000405252,0.00133143,0.001708619,0.04666067,0.011346,0.004283135,0.007155552,0.00095002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005977873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006087698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008297646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00346253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898677,0.004035414,0.0005300449,0.002138422,0.002507694,0.0009207457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895971,0.006631929,0.000855203,0.001470936,0.001091681,0.0003531679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[7.920494e-7,0.000001963821,0.00002371076,0.000005034854,0.000001445829,0.000008024631,0.00007499925,0.00008314535,0.000008805687,0.9988574,0.00022755,0.0007072526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003746787,0.000003720413,0.00004100567,0.00001655842,0.000001821023,0.00001185662,0.00003547727,0.0001646931,0.00001825417,0.9906766,0.009022708,0.000003404189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03090324,0.01891907,0.2220311,0.08510503,0.001470293,0.0001944583,0.0002938677,0.0002074548,0.6408754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8970836,0.007083451,0.05078746,0.01099453,0.00184077,0.0003278539,0.0001799658,0.0001073798,0.031595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009653763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0510546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135936424","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000061","title":"OWNERSHIP AND SOCIAL SOLIDARITY: <i>A Kantian Alternative</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Instrumentalism; Normative; Law and economics; Harmony (color); Individualism; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Property rights; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Larissa Katz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06766350222503802,"gpt":0.2858179182738254,"spread":0.2181544160487873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003744293,0.0002976396,0.0004131908,0.001200019,0.003890951,0.006839307,0.001368493,0.003472802,0.004211454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002887419,0.0002311806,0.0007256606,0.001114213,0.04569628,0.01045603,0.005317774,0.003561081,0.0006028443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003828559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002748822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002217816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001608963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963892,0.001934424,0.00009912245,0.0003634414,0.0007187821,0.0004951224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980952,0.0008302461,0.0002652525,0.0003903373,0.0002532491,0.000165772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001313067,0.000002707323,0.00002294978,0.000003935842,9.066459e-7,0.000005830771,0.0002675575,0.00006886561,0.00001158052,0.9988099,0.0002289067,0.0005755114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002748169,0.000004543764,0.00006493201,0.00001975154,0.000002262616,0.00001362996,0.000329442,0.0002998345,0.00005643113,0.9903123,0.00889086,0.000003294511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08665663,0.009471376,0.125457,0.09951933,0.0006589754,0.00004420388,0.00009909309,0.0001107923,0.6779826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769099,0.001494319,0.005422328,0.00246698,0.000373206,0.00004923081,0.00001830116,0.00002500716,0.01324068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006839307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02777827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053753315","doi":"10.1017/s1352325210000170","title":"CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE, CORRECTIVE JUSTICE, AND DISGORGEMENT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Economic Justice; Damages; Prima facie; Law and economics; Business; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Exclusion clause; Law; Contract management; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Botterell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.012048273427275,"gpt":0.307070829349146,"spread":0.295022555921871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03157085,0.000913851,0.001446114,0.002306782,0.009106776,0.01074585,0.004115841,0.0160182,0.006308491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0545805,0.0005139332,0.001281851,0.001831905,0.07135622,0.01692257,0.01156141,0.016256,0.0006422324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00817247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01327943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005071979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003774327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9560466,0.0160474,0.002689749,0.005750259,0.01343359,0.006032332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697971,0.01252623,0.005013052,0.007208603,0.003695092,0.001760009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004049174,0.000009412788,0.00008535535,0.00001241473,0.000003578871,0.00003968041,0.0003773799,0.0002300859,0.00004870596,0.9971186,0.0003997693,0.001670984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001272235,0.00002807744,0.0002271031,0.00008122531,0.000007862202,0.0001094662,0.0004822459,0.00083591,0.0001584001,0.9846842,0.01334939,0.00002346296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06463716,0.004956492,0.2296269,0.101342,0.001562116,0.0003379757,0.00008167214,0.0002836796,0.597172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586415,0.001007612,0.01673531,0.004889929,0.0006686969,0.0002524672,0.00002991951,0.00008190971,0.0176928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03157085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1669646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170288185","doi":"10.1017/s1352325208080014","title":"SUBJECTIVE FAULT FOR CRIME: <i>A Reinterpretation</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivism; Mens rea; Denial; Law and economics; Punishment (psychology); Agency (philosophy); Deterrence (psychology); Liability; Law; Epistemology; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis","authors":[{"name":"Alan Brudner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02875944622168463,"gpt":0.2663320938775052,"spread":0.2375726476558206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002580631,0.0004086558,0.0004197241,0.001809234,0.002702262,0.008592441,0.001351358,0.00316268,0.003070882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005130878,0.0001961509,0.0004321251,0.0008207416,0.04306625,0.008897396,0.004250085,0.004272502,0.0004314086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004681369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002571036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002527406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002049582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974259,0.001295469,0.0001112353,0.0002602875,0.0006712073,0.0002358205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970003,0.00144178,0.0004895692,0.0004441496,0.00039706,0.0002270933],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003003986,0.000003667138,0.0001243148,0.000009952205,0.000001281079,0.00002504526,0.001628624,0.00009606903,0.00002908256,0.9958069,0.0009027941,0.001369149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004749769,0.0000124943,0.0003951902,0.00004967545,0.000004289725,0.00009579706,0.001252133,0.0004209276,0.0001006452,0.9684582,0.02919735,0.000008498589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1206646,0.01306302,0.1516643,0.17343,0.003158504,0.00004765544,0.0001344148,0.0001398914,0.5376976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756337,0.002095751,0.003875477,0.005600995,0.001038829,0.00004177278,0.00004559212,0.0000551841,0.01161263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008592441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03396583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163792791","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000021","title":"WORKING AS EQUAL MORAL AGENTS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Compromise; Scope (computer science); Moral agency; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Power (physics); Expression (computer science); Control (management); Sociology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Management","authors":[{"name":"Sabine Tsuruda","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06465731992012115,"gpt":0.2331440492115466,"spread":0.1684867292914254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02895525,0.0004176674,0.0007393263,0.001604013,0.008171291,0.01701217,0.002507809,0.005937646,0.009204912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03083566,0.0004117723,0.000580863,0.0005743811,0.04849854,0.01095267,0.01348495,0.007131834,0.002079779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004335164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007766582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002256918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001865486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9618682,0.02360609,0.0009845654,0.003241831,0.006585118,0.003714171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776207,0.007613527,0.002604186,0.0048698,0.003138972,0.00415289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006902332,0.00002289025,0.0003607647,0.00001037844,0.000003914443,0.00002965474,0.00620387,0.0001190407,0.0001180402,0.9869243,0.001693909,0.004506204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001986451,0.00004381153,0.0005474758,0.0001675248,0.00001137972,0.00009928431,0.008123762,0.000810566,0.0005151699,0.8590786,0.1305531,0.00002953161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.07773776,0.001786002,0.08733092,0.08935794,0.001523676,0.000160811,0.00003596733,0.0001152108,0.7419516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9432387,0.0004228701,0.008652322,0.007365075,0.0003389361,0.0001264986,0.00002306507,0.00005072169,0.03978188],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02895525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1531318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133666442","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000097","title":"COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CONTRACT RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Normative; Collective action; Law and economics; Damages; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Louis‐Philippe Hodgson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08977575809959364,"gpt":0.3397999600887056,"spread":0.250024201989112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0116104,0.000567194,0.0007456494,0.001256094,0.006972959,0.008534646,0.001747698,0.008635875,0.01148819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01201135,0.0004127979,0.0009312619,0.001125509,0.04477623,0.009268898,0.006467251,0.006817101,0.001350418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007015754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006113288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005634568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002749122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884856,0.004639236,0.0004752055,0.002077746,0.002893904,0.001428282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929515,0.003486109,0.0007428859,0.001460638,0.0008450355,0.0005139069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001179889,0.000001859987,0.00001940278,0.00000403746,0.000001083866,0.000006870592,0.000145735,0.00005696292,0.00001218073,0.9986577,0.0003707682,0.000722165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006432575,0.000005593618,0.00006562184,0.00003007856,0.000002162428,0.00002794234,0.0001109426,0.0001941811,0.00004122826,0.9755571,0.02395436,0.000004338239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01902612,0.006546403,0.07710135,0.05384363,0.0005962137,0.0001236477,0.000116065,0.00007890988,0.8425677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8926838,0.003636575,0.01832196,0.009736839,0.0011568,0.0005121596,0.0001095923,0.00008449759,0.07375775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06140232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749929397","doi":"10.1017/s1352325217000209","title":"SLAVES, GLADIATORS, AND DEATH: KANTIAN LIBERALISM AND THE MORAL LIMITS OF CONSENT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Liberalism; Autonomy; Sovereignty; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Marc Ramsay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05689273181752526,"gpt":0.2789213543494513,"spread":0.2220286225319261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008761743,0.0002813127,0.0005470753,0.001179078,0.004248851,0.007916881,0.001142688,0.004454658,0.002976095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009215445,0.0002874898,0.0004069411,0.000616556,0.07279293,0.007830738,0.005750495,0.00603323,0.0004173056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006103353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003285604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00251388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002424639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919851,0.005442782,0.0001884626,0.0006836642,0.001103558,0.0005964495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929183,0.004778163,0.0006108164,0.0007603154,0.0005507888,0.0003817219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000424582,0.000002922072,0.00002487602,0.000004680815,8.267204e-7,0.00001139007,0.0007577252,0.00007402954,0.00001890101,0.9979994,0.0005557518,0.0005451746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005221847,0.000002205328,0.00003415147,0.00001905424,8.6367e-7,0.00001274079,0.0002887342,0.0001513254,0.00003641498,0.994195,0.005249787,0.000004317914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1214484,0.01392516,0.0502551,0.2384544,0.0007409385,0.00004210777,0.00006926294,0.00008960248,0.5749751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823842,0.001135726,0.002626146,0.0047787,0.000188545,0.0000375362,0.0000118466,0.00002067012,0.008816651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008761743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04633713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913194095","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000186","title":"GROUNDING PROCEDURAL RIGHTS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Harm; Punishment (psychology); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Political science; Punitive damages; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"N. P. Adams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01362256500416681,"gpt":0.2351133273856229,"spread":0.221490762381456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02941928,0.0008052556,0.001171254,0.00218207,0.005643632,0.01237871,0.003817311,0.01028739,0.01697332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0585587,0.0008354392,0.001573793,0.001095593,0.06216912,0.01670778,0.01133697,0.01306323,0.002422379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006456536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01037378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005232442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003586587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9728674,0.0108974,0.001785727,0.005795256,0.006071911,0.002582192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9413928,0.02842658,0.003979866,0.0168209,0.007511595,0.00186828],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002145781,0.000003850384,0.00003796385,0.000006941029,0.000002301472,0.00001155863,0.0001616796,0.0001088777,0.00004416346,0.9983676,0.0003799792,0.0008728964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008465386,0.000007016959,0.00004433599,0.00006500172,0.000005832657,0.00001841192,0.00006851612,0.0004024017,0.0001929189,0.987794,0.01138462,0.00000846243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02026007,0.001169389,0.3858096,0.04946054,0.001011121,0.0002287954,0.0002204084,0.0003149215,0.5415252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9050601,0.0008205539,0.05863361,0.008091509,0.0009522882,0.0004880982,0.0001744352,0.0001890171,0.02559048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02941928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1555858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198668915","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000161","title":"FREEDOM FROM THINGS: A DEFENSE OF THE DISJUNCTIVE OBLIGATION IN CONTRACT LAW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Impossibility; Duty; Plaintiff; Damages; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Law; Business; Breach of contract; Economics; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Nadler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01295292926484872,"gpt":0.2703564050383964,"spread":0.2574034757735477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01622286,0.0006095968,0.0009192155,0.002463145,0.005064425,0.008543179,0.002798773,0.009196718,0.006330943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01650616,0.0006738963,0.001372467,0.001509968,0.05719411,0.01335373,0.008212446,0.01144528,0.0008367259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005587728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004210125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002275697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001470573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861752,0.006901443,0.0005673459,0.001561829,0.003750479,0.001043732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847516,0.01034901,0.0009031931,0.001902661,0.001363411,0.0007300346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001564452,0.000003160129,0.00001569603,0.000003657436,7.933021e-7,0.00001195883,0.0001245417,0.00007233927,0.00001112301,0.9992529,0.000161965,0.0003402786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006342152,0.000004326226,0.00002516809,0.0000243274,0.000001653448,0.00002384845,0.00007179171,0.0004769883,0.00002668061,0.9952733,0.004062171,0.000003577873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02991218,0.003905279,0.2564102,0.05716342,0.0006050296,0.0001856707,0.000139776,0.00007832955,0.6516001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499729,0.001417051,0.02562834,0.006377341,0.0008953838,0.000356636,0.0000730514,0.00005577724,0.01522353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01622286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08579576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947699162","doi":"10.1017/s135232521900003x","title":"MULTIPLE REASONABLE BEHAVIORS CASES: THE PROBLEM OF CAUSAL UNDERDETERMINATION IN TORT LAW","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underdetermination; Causation; Tort; Plaintiff; Liability; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy of science","authors":[{"name":"Maytal Gilboa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01618762667587611,"gpt":0.3026653194304473,"spread":0.2864776927545712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07385922,0.0007274772,0.001936128,0.004841032,0.005802829,0.007571011,0.003921318,0.01695489,0.004732203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2170845,0.00114634,0.001717358,0.002514754,0.04185206,0.01538664,0.007440892,0.01748954,0.0003206594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005287866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004496635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003141825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002660199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9007783,0.06834546,0.004287513,0.008151437,0.01527137,0.003165809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6543835,0.3107458,0.01327364,0.01269181,0.007057692,0.001847607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001618439,0.00002361351,0.001242522,0.00003366393,0.00002489864,0.0009984713,0.001097703,0.000756448,0.0000434225,0.9906362,0.00105583,0.004071091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003220866,0.00001041923,0.0002755262,0.0000573218,0.00001755407,0.0005425329,0.0003390741,0.003678133,0.0001310285,0.9919001,0.002998684,0.00001745802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1633862,0.005871359,0.4265291,0.2587944,0.001023416,0.0005667094,0.0002007794,0.0002377976,0.1433901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675303,0.0007667941,0.02299937,0.006069113,0.0007403388,0.0002030706,0.00002345021,0.000029163,0.001638236],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07385922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3906096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410377239","doi":"10.1017/s1352325225000126","title":"#MeToo and #ShoutYourAbortion: Claiming Standing and Exploding the Private Sphere","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Physics; Business","authors":[{"name":"Maggie O’Brien","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02398651717698035,"gpt":0.3566526298699391,"spread":0.3326661126929588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007652816,0.000245846,0.0002420708,0.001445492,0.007946244,0.009603409,0.0007544657,0.004014819,0.006840573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01304685,0.0003061599,0.0003086154,0.0006687655,0.04166674,0.008917046,0.008755104,0.005824732,0.000450222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004462383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002251463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004783306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006114325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926918,0.004649523,0.0001109047,0.0004002039,0.001083462,0.001064084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798329,0.01497637,0.001766166,0.001585858,0.0009037335,0.0009350061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006166378,0.00007321484,0.004278676,0.00008037489,0.00001255664,0.0005045139,0.1388172,0.00009797957,0.0008054934,0.8094259,0.009455447,0.03638693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004433451,0.0001680212,0.01054336,0.001387019,0.00003709678,0.0008343477,0.1863198,0.0008912351,0.003633661,0.3595925,0.4364509,0.00009766217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3915316,0.003046186,0.00981184,0.1512895,0.000587996,0.00005622488,0.00004179386,0.0000656382,0.4435692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807716,0.0005428453,0.0006261711,0.007237699,0.0001609649,0.00002202614,0.000007729763,0.00002082455,0.01061013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009603409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04047245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092396186","doi":"10.1017/s1352325220000154","title":"PROCEDURAL RIGHTS AND FACTUAL ACCURACY","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Political science; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Morality; Settlement (finance); State (computer science); Politics; Business; Computer science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Hamish Stewart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02638429220138593,"gpt":0.21264771308212,"spread":0.1862634208807341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05186834,0.0004484889,0.0009429056,0.003804266,0.00327595,0.01238142,0.002524052,0.0050868,0.01322958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1793047,0.0006093906,0.0009611237,0.002608533,0.03603362,0.01480542,0.007228382,0.005685185,0.001587019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00465515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005899467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003316666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001836467,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9458665,0.0267742,0.004843068,0.005481116,0.01413813,0.002896909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7397183,0.1691289,0.02601139,0.0402953,0.02193505,0.002911158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007970006,0.000009597741,0.0005140996,0.00001988431,0.000009704284,0.00002279178,0.0004858651,0.0005523332,0.00005678878,0.9929213,0.0006673752,0.004732381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001253532,0.000008759127,0.0005865637,0.00009922282,0.00001110247,0.00004890865,0.00016961,0.0009534048,0.0001769324,0.9875414,0.01037917,0.00001258161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07263511,0.005024393,0.2983779,0.05800197,0.0006867298,0.0002957641,0.0006525668,0.0002565789,0.564069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485598,0.001469802,0.03029179,0.003260581,0.0008229311,0.000291581,0.0002556989,0.0001209856,0.0149268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05186834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2743093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077417169","doi":"10.1017/s135232521000011x","title":"EXPLAINING COMPENSATORY DUTIES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Duty; Scope (computer science); Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Matthew S. Bedke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0202478254895344,"gpt":0.2473480292394784,"spread":0.2271002037499439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005942299,0.0007906782,0.0004950874,0.001749612,0.002783846,0.003248319,0.001873556,0.004478405,0.01053447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01037177,0.000379943,0.001271985,0.0007733222,0.02264112,0.008935522,0.006460107,0.003743395,0.001106016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002579394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002177371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001629687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001632728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955455,0.001409765,0.0001915585,0.0007698258,0.001225697,0.0008576806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956066,0.001835363,0.0004720317,0.001196388,0.0006290951,0.0002604677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000225524,0.000003854564,0.0001380754,0.000008041236,0.000001921738,0.00004262889,0.0003149846,0.0001681705,0.00006632571,0.9976287,0.0003829895,0.001242059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006835499,0.000005975815,0.0002121762,0.00002686129,0.000003943524,0.0001647775,0.0002083501,0.0008632097,0.0001503132,0.9890682,0.00928217,0.000007088055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05760209,0.001514471,0.2532729,0.02032568,0.0006072926,0.0001402828,0.00009014615,0.0001783538,0.6662688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571738,0.0006477726,0.01906633,0.003257092,0.0002563015,0.000155898,0.00005762109,0.00007558765,0.01930954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01053447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03524131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179491379","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000094","title":"HYPERLEXIS AND THE RULE OF LAW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Private law; Public law; Space (punctuation); Plan (archaeology); Sociology; Computer science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Vincent Chiao","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01789017003850197,"gpt":0.277123529173895,"spread":0.2592333591353931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002368081,0.0001389217,0.0002714228,0.00221044,0.002130471,0.007191411,0.0006455477,0.001412295,0.006584318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01062805,0.0001145081,0.0001520759,0.001261939,0.02612182,0.003839936,0.00265357,0.002385429,0.0004396017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003398992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002617115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004727393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003289657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997076,0.001160339,0.0001855399,0.000456539,0.0008090187,0.0003126466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837444,0.0105373,0.002689564,0.0006941214,0.001586959,0.0007475971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006515457,0.00002990769,0.001589167,0.00001598562,0.000002040643,0.0001392575,0.002526138,0.0001260681,0.00008082479,0.9905357,0.001137778,0.003810762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001358902,0.0000177601,0.00242379,0.00006354049,0.000003186288,0.0002179491,0.002388566,0.0005111198,0.0001125991,0.9717104,0.02252843,0.000009013188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2991954,0.004637535,0.009554191,0.04510403,0.0003304606,0.00004920494,0.000129025,0.00006615013,0.640934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946531,0.0003975558,0.0005141135,0.0007829485,0.00009533235,0.00001059305,0.00001895532,0.00000546461,0.003521908],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007191411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0246616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408581840","doi":"10.1017/s1352325225000059","title":"Youth as Moral Opportunity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Youth Education and Societal Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin Ewing","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0396487528487031,"gpt":0.3519986431679202,"spread":0.3123498903192171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001503687,0.0002067733,0.0001874298,0.0007224579,0.004479202,0.004053327,0.0004084781,0.001175628,0.004955648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002221321,0.0001191346,0.000217029,0.0003166714,0.0114611,0.002310824,0.004914119,0.002571291,0.0003451311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003077587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003130982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005820887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008396779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979924,0.000888758,0.00004351004,0.0001609372,0.0002475769,0.0006667812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980817,0.0002408283,0.0003997435,0.00008580392,0.0002755481,0.0009163196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002312931,0.00007599301,0.01666224,0.000045066,0.00000699214,0.0006760909,0.06106959,0.0001586872,0.0006822122,0.8954389,0.006608082,0.01855295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002520607,0.0002386571,0.04281878,0.0003957362,0.00003276739,0.001524166,0.1117966,0.00128359,0.001480325,0.4003658,0.4399754,0.00006317062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6044515,0.002784034,0.00649062,0.02756572,0.0004571469,0.00005439172,0.0001291008,0.00009395924,0.3579735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931813,0.000240435,0.0003468398,0.0003262067,0.0000287102,0.000007981671,0.00001078599,0.000008147194,0.005849596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005820887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02232951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109469695","doi":"10.1017/s135232520909003x","title":"ACTION AND AGENCY IN THE CRIMINAL LAW","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Criminal law; Agency (philosophy); Punishment (psychology); Law; Law and economics; Limiting; Intuition; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Vincent Chiao","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04810723001047845,"gpt":0.2924598083225202,"spread":0.2443525783120417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003274766,0.0003930117,0.0004064305,0.001751421,0.0045019,0.006852054,0.001101339,0.003300317,0.002646206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003771859,0.0002458699,0.0004702077,0.0009254232,0.04595314,0.006416774,0.004024009,0.003611729,0.0004666997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005460163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005335211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007444753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005175584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961862,0.001962749,0.0001124409,0.0004782865,0.0007909742,0.0004692262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980397,0.001097851,0.0002306712,0.0001923161,0.0002068063,0.0002327675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[9.661795e-7,0.000002309911,0.0000437471,0.000004279114,6.350758e-7,0.000009599291,0.0003794035,0.00007359046,0.00001008979,0.9981805,0.0003024653,0.0009924121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003497898,0.000004604701,0.0001366149,0.00002974001,0.000001707753,0.00002853982,0.000316568,0.0002156485,0.00002633812,0.9747527,0.02447962,0.000004347619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04415181,0.01903163,0.05411262,0.07137246,0.000739159,0.0000448182,0.00004126826,0.00006163172,0.8104445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527652,0.006094115,0.00825204,0.005611801,0.0005941225,0.0001028511,0.00002724817,0.00002794555,0.02652465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007444753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03961641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414620344","doi":"10.1017/s135232522510075x","title":"Can We Legally Revise the Highest Legal Rule?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison","keywords":"Legal realism; Field (mathematics); Legal ethics; Legal research; Rule of law; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies","authors":[{"name":"Manish Oza","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01097619221389509,"gpt":0.2873785289189199,"spread":0.2764023367050248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02645708,0.0003631057,0.001011341,0.002135836,0.006035384,0.01161043,0.00350541,0.007205243,0.007093012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06419948,0.0005467437,0.001026198,0.0009843699,0.04315725,0.01724847,0.00546361,0.01132069,0.001329898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006580046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007796282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008308609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007097259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9801998,0.009082148,0.001076833,0.003865464,0.003704824,0.002070883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633795,0.01859405,0.002738763,0.008010671,0.005996392,0.001280554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005901714,0.00001083975,0.000156614,0.00001781696,0.00000726751,0.00003825859,0.0007094966,0.000327336,0.00007892002,0.9941789,0.001258245,0.003210369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001187685,0.000006890167,0.0001167596,0.00005140322,0.000007931169,0.00002314873,0.0003686061,0.00103713,0.0001991487,0.9839661,0.0141941,0.00001691084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09225965,0.004240695,0.2109418,0.2036069,0.002841289,0.0001860546,0.0001481603,0.0004669761,0.4853085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511037,0.0007186653,0.0281927,0.01018672,0.0005378039,0.00007421301,0.00005061186,0.0001253411,0.009010348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02645708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1399201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905041924","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000149","title":"NONPARTY PARTICIPATION AS A (PARTIAL) REMEDY TO PROCEDURALIST CONCERNS OVER JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Indictment; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Geoffrey D. Callaghan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04488811439413123,"gpt":0.3884787712637539,"spread":0.3435906568696226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05245196,0.0003876566,0.0009168618,0.001159002,0.004603931,0.009707417,0.002981566,0.007768766,0.008614803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1005802,0.0007106941,0.001067678,0.001224666,0.02072835,0.01007229,0.01227831,0.007893198,0.001113615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002748752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009522467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009589691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001588231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9252633,0.05100945,0.002261189,0.006590595,0.01126995,0.003605558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8903759,0.06540114,0.008017598,0.02756967,0.006413093,0.002222659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002815977,0.00003650776,0.0005083925,0.00004963118,0.00001962026,0.00007540108,0.002403247,0.000672065,0.0005900229,0.9856382,0.001162062,0.008816605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007067261,0.0001998599,0.001465585,0.000184795,0.00005945076,0.0002727159,0.001087052,0.004865086,0.001726237,0.9332346,0.05678649,0.00004746129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1493589,0.001640778,0.2922726,0.06940227,0.0004198047,0.0004937972,0.0001301087,0.0004628133,0.4858189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669977,0.0002184812,0.01543947,0.003051237,0.0003101882,0.000366083,0.00002246702,0.00007153569,0.01352272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05245196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2773958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}