{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":26,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"c28c261dcba3","filters":{"venue":"Legal Theory"}},"results":[{"id":"W2550873366","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000033","title":"LEGAL POWERS IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Private law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03096325639208147,"gpt":0.3228814066680886,"spread":0.2919181502760071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00125334,0.00006908748,0.00009102749,0.00003202557,0.0001726774,0.000112217,0.0002909045,0.00006498351,0.0001038165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001182384,0.00006505165,0.00003904546,0.0002295033,0.000292735,0.0003768681,0.00005964902,0.0001657703,0.0002829508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001151498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001616482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008717176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004443096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990099,0.0001956773,0.0001341946,0.0001591063,0.0002282901,0.0002728101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995165,0.00007094273,0.0000361114,0.0001821014,0.00003432361,0.0001600048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001575606,0.00003283819,0.0001578661,9.643287e-7,0.000002625535,0.000006813314,0.002618783,0.00001677982,0.00004538028,0.9957712,0.0005043739,0.0008266299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001744865,0.00001069515,0.0001531861,0.000005222989,0.000002191609,5.63694e-7,0.001620419,0.0000074122,0.00008435397,0.1575669,0.840291,0.00008361947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08615957,0.0000868231,0.0002452458,0.00312911,0.0002026214,0.0001711712,0.000004266989,0.00008382795,0.9099174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882125,0.000007315586,0.0002343946,0.001048829,0.0002100993,0.00001938732,0.000002287665,0.000008854229,0.01025639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9020529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303810331","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000021","title":"THE FAILURE OF UNIVERSAL THEORIES OF TORT LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Punitive damages; Law; Jurisdiction; Damages; Delict; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Element (criminal law); Private law; Comparative law; Sociology; Black letter law; Liability","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01793305386216588,"gpt":0.2905690088404181,"spread":0.2726359549782523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001006813,0.00003835172,0.00007051566,0.000008214862,0.0002296837,0.00002234645,0.0002952933,0.00003643119,0.00003032874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001134747,0.00002569014,0.00004315063,0.000114455,0.0009969494,0.0001275255,0.00004837116,0.00006113487,0.000008983098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000233919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001719639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002407283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002383799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993785,0.0001591362,0.000104294,0.00006144093,0.0001886061,0.0001080058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993536,0.0002353689,0.00007192339,0.0001707822,0.0001160771,0.00005218128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021626,0.00001278305,0.0000599603,0.000001488439,0.000008465339,2.163574e-7,0.004608361,0.000004703842,0.00009500254,0.9942243,0.0003885352,0.0005745507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006267147,0.00001383291,0.00003025442,0.000003275638,0.000005901836,1.137134e-7,0.01544921,0.000001248781,0.0007120119,0.3851998,0.5984942,0.00002746077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03779885,0.0001884992,0.000471455,0.002955408,0.0001311361,0.0001371058,0.00001444587,0.00002818499,0.9582749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938918,0.00001195213,0.0001016553,0.00005195287,0.00009332078,0.000003114798,7.210734e-7,0.000003499256,0.00584197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3673302,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077991194","doi":"10.1017/s1352325210000017","title":"THE FIDUCIARY CONSTITUTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Constitution; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Duty","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01507150372188459,"gpt":0.3292822357210367,"spread":0.3142107319991521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006822254,0.00003693138,0.00005086469,0.00001180192,0.001483767,0.00004010257,0.0002056802,0.00003464059,0.00005574537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003518459,0.00002447966,0.0000417406,0.00009666164,0.0004931334,0.0001042591,0.00001111727,0.00007475852,0.00002601185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002206142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005044997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008683537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007052916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994435,0.0001209996,0.0001087923,0.00007366392,0.000130523,0.0001224841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996135,0.0001132042,0.00005134309,0.0001495981,0.00003826038,0.0000341531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003968197,0.00001979297,0.00000927316,3.806458e-7,0.000002534059,3.679058e-7,0.0005589881,0.000001299114,0.0005504729,0.9952763,0.0005091538,0.00306745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003799168,0.00001175921,0.0004840376,0.000004089833,0.000003690467,1.77429e-7,0.0001750446,0.000001122314,0.0007268565,0.4940912,0.5044349,0.00002916187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06167967,0.0001376901,0.0002739748,0.002569703,0.00009109358,0.0001428904,0.000003134364,0.00004226936,0.9350595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943141,0.000008931766,0.00003174866,0.000132062,0.0001705525,0.000003907818,0.000001315282,9.918044e-7,0.005336437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9326344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167187158","doi":"10.1017/s1352325206060277","title":"RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HATEFUL SPEECH","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Harm principle; Harm; Sanctions; Punishment (psychology); Action (physics); Rationality; Law and economics; Coercion (linguistics); Legislature; Defeasible estate; Law; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03808470325603933,"gpt":0.3400983090680734,"spread":0.3020136058120341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002049795,0.00006023605,0.00008547957,0.00003026277,0.0004134147,0.0000633842,0.0001515007,0.0001182628,0.0001412861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001159815,0.00005578557,0.00007784766,0.0000734742,0.0006664193,0.0001635842,0.00001644332,0.0001257432,0.00006681302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005119241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001554332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001307291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004233435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989379,0.000306009,0.0001160146,0.0001310457,0.0001811399,0.0003279008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982605,0.001460911,0.00002032718,0.0001263613,0.00006740347,0.00006452615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008386216,0.00002139133,0.00001497914,0.000007115607,0.000002709801,0.000002458695,0.0008151477,0.000001037777,0.00005177493,0.9971024,0.00122144,0.0006756537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007257376,0.00001730169,0.00006779566,0.00000520606,0.000004227178,2.933652e-7,0.0005897979,0.000001647514,0.0005028842,0.7086704,0.2900091,0.00005871251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04206565,0.0001448339,0.0006930229,0.01050266,0.0003988207,0.0001970016,0.00002787443,0.0001236203,0.9458465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407552,0.000002995894,0.0004960762,0.001099909,0.001303143,0.00001244389,0.000003140254,0.000007729957,0.05631936],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8986896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3179693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895460886","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000113","title":"REASONING BY PRECEDENT—BETWEEN RULES AND ANALOGIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Analogical reasoning; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; Process (computing); Deductive reasoning; Epistemology; Case-based reasoning; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01967771035387806,"gpt":0.3037214548208461,"spread":0.2840437444669681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004482082,0.00005496202,0.00008634486,0.00001687268,0.0009165187,0.00006585995,0.00009780302,0.00003974464,0.0000861062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000283561,0.0000468098,0.00002006165,0.0000732047,0.001574481,0.0001520175,0.00005850548,0.00005280545,0.00006049179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002109843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004110573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002849763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006418627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993839,0.0001164152,0.00006796696,0.0001184291,0.0001420825,0.0001712061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996798,0.0001597178,0.00002678251,0.00004346767,0.00004307967,0.00004714048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008411902,0.0000042844,0.007853884,7.488753e-7,0.00002067832,6.324191e-7,0.001677514,1.633196e-8,0.00003255792,0.9738007,0.001762961,0.0148376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009249862,0.00004317142,0.02230109,0.00003269755,0.00002274777,5.277435e-7,0.004484201,4.781257e-7,0.0002190729,0.5404159,0.4322484,0.0001391306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2981688,0.001791642,0.0004012479,0.0009878195,0.0001767952,0.00006716604,0.00001696297,0.0000834352,0.6983061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970961,0.0001775853,0.00009810057,0.0001510388,0.0006821244,0.000003899382,0.000002067648,0.000002511569,0.001786534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6989273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7049213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172239277","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000255","title":"THE STATUS OF HEARERS’ RIGHTS IN FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Freedom of expression; Jurisprudence; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Human rights","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008376557374638853,"gpt":0.2312050392591772,"spread":0.2228284818845384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005294318,0.00005170393,0.00008007639,0.0000479329,0.00005920174,0.00001531362,0.0002680302,0.00003503366,0.00001007921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000491638,0.000031928,0.00003454775,0.0001622432,0.00006879702,0.0003040834,0.00007804754,0.00009318636,0.000009396202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002086185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002722294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003603136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002777803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991552,0.0001632147,0.0001511733,0.00008159113,0.0001508577,0.0002980168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993775,0.0001567538,0.0000710515,0.0003066593,0.00002466995,0.00006336915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006654528,0.00008441963,0.001179917,0.000008766916,0.000007524665,0.000001339927,0.001916157,0.0000379856,0.04389619,0.9276898,0.0001700379,0.02494135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006043643,0.0001764933,0.01531858,0.0001223412,0.000005270962,0.000006722101,0.0002418404,0.0006494467,0.8274977,0.0797878,0.07540709,0.0001824037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9189316,0.001644416,0.05069708,0.00007300331,0.001219347,0.0001826808,0.000002408849,0.00005635778,0.02719313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974128,0.00001972615,0.002246202,0.00001075924,0.0000399852,0.000003322365,2.299375e-7,0.000002287809,0.0002646804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8479019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1301986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977354580","doi":"10.1017/s1352325208080129","title":"LOCKEAN PROPERTY AND LITERARY WORKS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Intellectual property; State of nature; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Linguistics; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01790390522157764,"gpt":0.2634462141706649,"spread":0.2455423089490872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002089299,0.00004786558,0.0000632077,0.00001604544,0.0005048212,0.00003152651,0.00007693972,0.00003830983,0.0001948624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007681245,0.00003300796,0.00002211998,0.0000689954,0.001532802,0.0001984804,0.00002171692,0.00009081468,0.00003174823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000192382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003961835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005559756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002947742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994212,0.0001485707,0.00006236287,0.00009030954,0.0001138084,0.0001637142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996759,0.0001176629,0.00001747168,0.00006538931,0.00002565992,0.00009792521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001100869,0.00001040793,0.0007183525,0.000001288056,0.000004162054,0.00002179724,0.001938151,3.090591e-7,0.000003564803,0.9864929,0.0009564384,0.009841585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005757391,0.00001249817,0.0003685083,0.00001667711,0.000003125405,0.0000165026,0.0003774374,0.000001614269,0.000007526281,0.0216157,0.9774483,0.00007449851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05477568,0.001168626,0.0003894487,0.001188782,0.0001409692,0.00007245737,0.000004439572,0.00005909116,0.9422005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407923,0.0001516335,0.0002422513,0.001471109,0.0003152726,0.000002717115,0.000001382016,0.000003323328,0.05701999],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5647672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123524410","doi":"10.1017/s1352325212000249","title":"LEGAL OBLIGATION AND REASONS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Action (physics); Legal positivism; Philosophy of law; Positivism; Political science; Legal profession; Legal realism; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01261595673283347,"gpt":0.2825988814295207,"spread":0.2699829246966872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003947501,0.00005260383,0.00005729853,0.00002234879,0.0004376079,0.0002238034,0.000115984,0.00005070086,0.0004881084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010469,0.0000473885,0.0000249677,0.0001193641,0.0002202072,0.0005075443,0.00003478234,0.00009319967,0.0003215564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002534494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005753157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006148019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004137699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993835,0.0001094072,0.00008300975,0.0001294439,0.0001268801,0.0001677608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995906,0.0001065178,0.00003258704,0.0001203507,0.00004615879,0.0001038101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001489524,0.00001081254,0.000181729,0.000001316146,0.000003094712,3.083896e-7,0.0008615862,5.85465e-7,0.0003024133,0.9847016,0.001539581,0.01239546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007792077,0.000008828465,0.005256735,0.000006152266,0.000006071607,0.000001139883,0.001546663,0.00002820026,0.0001096009,0.1786771,0.8141915,0.00009008045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2706754,0.0001333168,0.0008161091,0.01049827,0.0001009003,0.0003118004,0.000004579046,0.0001173849,0.7173423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781405,0.00003579185,0.0003504961,0.0005020571,0.0002275134,0.00005095255,0.000002594825,0.000005976628,0.02068414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8126519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9294007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125060229","doi":"10.1017/s1352325214000056","title":"PROPERTY AND THE RULE OF LAW","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Private law; Political science; Public law; Rule of law; Property (philosophy); Common law; Property law; Framing (construction); Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Due process; Municipal law; Property rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01389398429845694,"gpt":0.2754533410965535,"spread":0.2615593567980965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001104515,0.00002601527,0.00005551221,0.000004058014,0.0002691776,0.000029759,0.0001256428,0.00001995484,0.00004702833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008669217,0.00001201785,0.00002201255,0.00003661554,0.000856163,0.00006186341,0.00003246747,0.000048596,0.00001439324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004046161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001663555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003283076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002683057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995396,0.0001884884,0.00006073113,0.00005769032,0.00008061706,0.00007294432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999633,0.0001875486,0.00002726572,0.0001070271,0.00002056302,0.00002461384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001157695,0.000006627758,0.00001559242,0.000001893107,0.000002376224,2.156394e-8,0.002980164,5.516779e-7,0.00005384933,0.992089,0.00004708769,0.004791241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001358719,0.000003962749,0.00009167572,0.00000277094,0.00000416565,1.257272e-7,0.0002523582,0.00002194358,0.0001319005,0.2633947,0.7359387,0.00002181854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01488802,0.00006975785,0.0003972037,0.006973031,0.00003209444,0.0001288152,0.00000131246,0.00001826039,0.9774915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897767,0.00001329827,0.00008269444,0.0007517887,0.00009899754,0.00001107577,2.127354e-7,0.000002430524,0.009262766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9748887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.496305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135936424","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000061","title":"OWNERSHIP AND SOCIAL SOLIDARITY: <i>A Kantian Alternative</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Instrumentalism; Normative; Law and economics; Harmony (color); Individualism; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Property rights; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06766350222503802,"gpt":0.2858179182738254,"spread":0.2181544160487873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008929551,0.00009771634,0.0001305378,0.00003978561,0.0006694747,0.0001075247,0.0002318868,0.00008072025,0.0007612827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000420771,0.000067074,0.00005157533,0.00008683249,0.0006610916,0.0003704133,0.00005600177,0.0001855075,0.00007179834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002393678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006927988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004303063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008391152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988449,0.0003396793,0.0001108768,0.0001913488,0.0002000656,0.0003131109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996849,0.0000466797,0.00004777066,0.0000856533,0.00004043156,0.00009458585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005550394,0.00003351906,0.0001611506,0.000004200219,0.00001804139,0.00001911264,0.02681075,8.951972e-9,0.00007977222,0.957697,0.0003153338,0.01480556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002863378,0.00004571543,0.0006730127,0.000009518511,0.0000195683,0.000002721838,0.002460715,0.000004019216,0.0007646211,0.2692407,0.7262887,0.0002043868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06047804,0.0002092795,0.0002490605,0.00243288,0.000367468,0.0001478855,0.000006240561,0.0001183834,0.9359908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807047,0.00003786696,0.0001069191,0.00109871,0.0005895246,0.00000483321,0.00000121864,0.000009976085,0.01744625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9202266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8335512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053753315","doi":"10.1017/s1352325210000170","title":"CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE, CORRECTIVE JUSTICE, AND DISGORGEMENT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Economic Justice; Damages; Prima facie; Law and economics; Business; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Exclusion clause; Law; Contract management; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.012048273427275,"gpt":0.307070829349146,"spread":0.295022555921871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007805399,0.00006252429,0.0001118884,0.00002240545,0.0003355839,0.00003681083,0.0001218021,0.00006084199,0.00009531704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002192814,0.00005383236,0.00003754423,0.00005851574,0.0003285398,0.0001783051,0.00002250072,0.0001425596,0.000005101253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001267738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008461584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000327204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004318426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994198,0.00003685161,0.0001317569,0.0001243067,0.000112621,0.0001746554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991158,0.0005296862,0.00008012162,0.0001044901,0.00009769508,0.00007215936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006945487,0.00006068025,0.0004200115,0.00001624988,0.00001324733,1.21552e-7,0.002529377,0.000001334707,0.001801223,0.962449,0.0001733408,0.03246601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001317157,0.000177741,0.03629234,0.00002398498,0.0002430267,0.000002719749,0.006763862,0.0006783649,0.003779944,0.02538595,0.9250269,0.0003080043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8625578,0.00004568548,0.002097398,0.000547066,0.0004844762,0.0005983664,0.00005893402,0.0000337405,0.1335765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971616,0.00003393259,0.0002979703,0.0001450701,0.0002706732,0.00006041864,0.000004247704,0.000006446498,0.002019612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.937063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2581074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170288185","doi":"10.1017/s1352325208080014","title":"SUBJECTIVE FAULT FOR CRIME: <i>A Reinterpretation</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivism; Mens rea; Denial; Law and economics; Punishment (psychology); Agency (philosophy); Deterrence (psychology); Liability; Law; Epistemology; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02875944622168463,"gpt":0.2663320938775052,"spread":0.2375726476558206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001197166,0.00009307948,0.00009333238,0.00003629946,0.0002239859,0.00001788645,0.0001848937,0.00003627707,0.00008647367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006983825,0.00007763723,0.00008761763,0.0001111904,0.0001602884,0.0002399867,0.00002575088,0.00009400435,0.0001402772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001747609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003390767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008328821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.969514e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999209,0.0001015161,0.0001189434,0.0002599825,0.0001162885,0.0001942464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993028,0.0004074928,0.00004167077,0.0001695601,0.00003271294,0.00004574695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000234321,0.00006839901,0.00003883158,0.00001284784,0.000004716263,0.00004832385,0.001187183,0.0000244299,0.2907128,0.7002721,0.002741297,0.004654696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004993822,0.0001813196,0.000536504,0.00001809408,0.000009236009,0.0001049033,0.0000663531,0.0004551657,0.8412283,0.110904,0.04577255,0.0002241958],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4733347,0.0003143944,0.05213425,0.0005207355,0.001730294,0.0008637566,0.00009562606,0.0004081846,0.4705981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979264,0.00001701813,0.0002487194,0.002174846,0.0001380158,0.00004627866,0.000001679023,0.00001558289,0.01809388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5893682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3165954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163792791","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000021","title":"WORKING AS EQUAL MORAL AGENTS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Compromise; Scope (computer science); Moral agency; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Power (physics); Expression (computer science); Control (management); Sociology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06465731992012115,"gpt":0.2331440492115466,"spread":0.1684867292914254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001554011,0.0001367359,0.0001385018,0.00004922308,0.000178858,0.0003754651,0.0002513357,0.00004220688,0.002795476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001721162,0.000116512,0.0000759717,0.0001768651,0.00004864938,0.0006218164,0.0001631741,0.0001482475,0.004054531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009271175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001239727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004714718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002186105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999202,0.000013474,0.0001515832,0.0002277519,0.0001775481,0.0002276246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997004,0.00002027914,0.00009295369,0.0001343339,0.00003030262,0.00002169751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009272749,0.00001836011,0.0006553804,0.00002113246,0.00001453693,0.00008892854,0.00007053762,0.00001243153,0.00008269239,0.9898604,0.005717875,0.003365006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003011198,0.000009340162,0.0005124947,0.00002153098,0.00002514628,8.458007e-7,0.00006137452,0.0004442506,0.00004796701,0.5385246,0.4598659,0.0001854541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4671776,0.00007591541,0.0005159205,0.001935489,0.0007935548,0.0001645416,6.21609e-7,0.0003482419,0.5289881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748089,8.760103e-7,0.00002636435,0.01739233,0.003252015,0.000004119755,0.00001490644,0.00002539062,0.004475124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.524513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133666442","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000097","title":"COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CONTRACT RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Normative; Collective action; Law and economics; Damages; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08977575809959364,"gpt":0.3397999600887056,"spread":0.250024201989112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005561185,0.00004048899,0.00005776421,0.00001882776,0.0004376001,0.00002201714,0.00005408991,0.00009183775,0.0002772275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001985371,0.00003413358,0.00002086777,0.00005635857,0.0004951322,0.0002100928,0.000009361162,0.0001555463,0.00003722338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005754317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001214161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002460239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006191284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993423,0.0002709063,0.00005144234,0.00008543962,0.00009319503,0.0001567236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995119,0.0002960421,0.00001761427,0.00004775113,0.00003158147,0.00009513917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000536231,0.00002044111,0.00003293753,0.000001299715,0.000007552792,0.000003500687,0.01326988,9.736764e-9,0.0000219186,0.9859253,0.00003141264,0.0006321332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008387995,0.00002705816,0.002240634,0.000004534585,0.000007938116,7.419716e-7,0.0004815499,0.00000118819,0.0004233795,0.9775552,0.01912234,0.00005158277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06087154,0.00004568752,0.0001204663,0.0004952685,0.0002137576,0.0000699731,0.000002398547,0.00004239532,0.9381385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939783,0.000007568836,0.00004164888,0.0004812664,0.0002327527,0.000003310902,1.987103e-7,0.000002427708,0.00525251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3719161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749929397","doi":"10.1017/s1352325217000209","title":"SLAVES, GLADIATORS, AND DEATH: KANTIAN LIBERALISM AND THE MORAL LIMITS OF CONSENT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Liberalism; Autonomy; Sovereignty; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05689273181752526,"gpt":0.2789213543494513,"spread":0.2220286225319261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002967313,0.00009378004,0.0001412885,0.00002059333,0.0003494981,0.0001235873,0.0002544283,0.00003689493,0.00002062651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005517773,0.00005659263,0.00003700338,0.00002004217,0.0009098217,0.0001807443,0.0001206345,0.0001046405,0.000005701027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002540342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002213098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000171127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002062167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992511,0.0001832967,0.0001168339,0.0001976403,0.0001020163,0.0001491078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991139,0.000342697,0.000103722,0.0003699886,0.000009556046,0.00006012275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009673303,0.00001494782,0.002252625,0.00001448706,0.000004697291,0.0000255859,0.0003808672,2.651951e-7,0.01047536,0.9833328,0.0001933785,0.003208275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00565952,0.0002310901,0.1411668,0.0002062338,0.0001086102,0.0002987553,0.0001413197,0.000459985,0.2331223,0.5921622,0.02583363,0.0006095344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707053,0.0008851997,0.00001251728,0.002061123,0.0002826786,0.0001404267,0.00001891682,0.00001843036,0.02587537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951685,0.0002890748,0.00003184396,0.0007369359,0.00007480348,0.000003541727,2.661835e-7,0.000008261336,0.003686771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3911706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3352276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913194095","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000186","title":"GROUNDING PROCEDURAL RIGHTS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Harm; Punishment (psychology); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Political science; Punitive damages; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01362256500416681,"gpt":0.2351133273856229,"spread":0.221490762381456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001268559,0.00008197339,0.00007741402,0.0000350726,0.0001033369,0.00004918217,0.0002124336,0.00003008478,0.0007517296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000752382,0.00005874499,0.00004430706,0.0001209342,0.00005332295,0.0003304292,0.00004173457,0.0001179883,0.002233675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001541728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001299427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001045042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000161379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992527,0.00007468181,0.0000873129,0.0002319423,0.0001398552,0.0002134477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996415,0.0001046724,0.00002956862,0.0001738002,0.000006489078,0.00004400895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001923123,0.00001792228,0.00009681663,0.000009970744,8.354421e-7,0.0000164914,0.000103519,0.000001818472,0.1859124,0.8125866,0.0002536508,0.0009807171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004886708,0.0001249117,0.001350336,0.0000610681,0.000006504275,0.00009697713,0.00005557063,0.0001788767,0.4209071,0.4324357,0.1439327,0.0003616356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7595655,0.00002238484,0.00005723027,0.0001242717,0.000709915,0.0001099647,0.000001451862,0.0000937457,0.2393155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566681,0.000001480536,0.00002742196,0.0009825665,0.0001346492,0.000004762465,3.890862e-7,0.000008614919,0.04217203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3801509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198668915","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000161","title":"FREEDOM FROM THINGS: A DEFENSE OF THE DISJUNCTIVE OBLIGATION IN CONTRACT LAW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Impossibility; Duty; Plaintiff; Damages; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Law; Business; Breach of contract; Economics; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01295292926484872,"gpt":0.2703564050383964,"spread":0.2574034757735477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005283388,0.00004965055,0.00009213479,0.000009616037,0.0002026432,0.00004809423,0.0001874641,0.00005766026,0.0001507821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003255031,0.00003714124,0.00006920973,0.0002316137,0.0003022743,0.0002414944,0.00005559896,0.0001517145,0.00001307805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005102272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001528119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02001641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01839355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990677,0.0003500578,0.0001544887,0.0001305819,0.0001793149,0.0001178089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991978,0.000420798,0.00008429915,0.0001970121,0.00006978858,0.00003025712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001202249,0.00004516277,0.0007144786,0.000001096712,0.000008191879,0.000001447277,0.008929887,0.0000279155,0.001177004,0.9884893,0.0000266749,0.0005667596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003871674,0.00000721692,0.01583324,0.00006164038,0.00002422088,3.793665e-7,0.009432376,0.0001042711,0.003359997,0.866424,0.1042478,0.0001177024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4825824,0.0003599725,0.0007427602,0.005922388,0.0003141307,0.0003048674,0.00006316706,0.00003504,0.5096753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981027,0.00001201075,0.0001539885,0.000791365,0.0001105516,0.00001412347,0.000004731861,0.000004600411,0.0008058919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5155203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947699162","doi":"10.1017/s135232521900003x","title":"MULTIPLE REASONABLE BEHAVIORS CASES: THE PROBLEM OF CAUSAL UNDERDETERMINATION IN TORT LAW","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underdetermination; Causation; Tort; Plaintiff; Liability; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy of science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01618762667587611,"gpt":0.3026653194304473,"spread":0.2864776927545712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001258392,0.00005623181,0.00008493518,0.00002132268,0.000171076,0.00003770559,0.0002153838,0.00005736568,0.0001403827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000416166,0.00004285631,0.00003902182,0.0001675119,0.0001952447,0.0002157951,0.000042249,0.0001105534,0.00003832833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008475695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001194406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02150129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0226582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990986,0.0002175308,0.0001529604,0.0001294646,0.0002344836,0.0001669732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993594,0.0002977704,0.00007148583,0.0001828468,0.00005717748,0.00003135398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000973743,0.00005622757,0.004590168,0.000005462324,0.000002339557,0.000001453404,0.002676953,0.00003631741,0.0004413014,0.9905947,0.00002187852,0.001563399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001443833,0.0001666678,0.03264362,0.0001434079,0.00007815017,0.000009902767,0.03032244,0.0003725323,0.003666709,0.1850094,0.7455999,0.0005434451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8100754,0.00003931903,0.00003884265,0.0005394342,0.00005463871,0.0005365187,0.00001114663,0.00002455067,0.1886802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938241,0.000006228478,0.0001160907,0.00009487161,0.00004527602,0.00004921067,0.000003336633,0.000006973526,0.005853964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8055854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410377239","doi":"10.1017/s1352325225000126","title":"#MeToo and #ShoutYourAbortion: Claiming Standing and Exploding the Private Sphere","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Physics; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02398651717698035,"gpt":0.3566526298699391,"spread":0.3326661126929588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008051034,0.0001227605,0.0001492031,0.00007418101,0.0005374144,0.0001537209,0.00013284,0.00009301779,0.0002037738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008352816,0.00009250831,0.00003306739,0.0001762372,0.0001832182,0.0001789917,0.0000894121,0.0002818082,0.00002005607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003675545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003396272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003006019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009651217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988747,0.0002993453,0.0002064959,0.0002416241,0.00008639554,0.0002914654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924,0.0003431019,0.00006651843,0.0002661964,0.0000206752,0.000063478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000617211,0.00001266362,0.02528271,0.0001387719,0.00004423788,0.000009834458,0.001719455,4.619575e-7,0.00009805141,0.949955,0.002285663,0.02039141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00169598,0.0001121069,0.242669,0.0001951907,0.0002543761,0.00008472292,0.006975214,0.00002096348,0.00009064593,0.5652098,0.1822473,0.0004447127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8052757,0.008799923,0.001002704,0.004314816,0.00111162,0.0002255945,0.000006353438,0.00008157961,0.1791817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775414,0.0003697981,0.00006736003,0.001446089,0.0003169046,0.00001854911,0.000001627316,0.00001509339,0.02022313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3847452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4133411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092396186","doi":"10.1017/s1352325220000154","title":"PROCEDURAL RIGHTS AND FACTUAL ACCURACY","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Political science; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Morality; Settlement (finance); State (computer science); Politics; Business; Computer science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02638429220138593,"gpt":0.21264771308212,"spread":0.1862634208807341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002902384,0.0001206725,0.0003599305,0.00004622321,0.0001276268,0.0001288025,0.0001793693,0.00008687205,0.0004535917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001700033,0.0001483485,0.00007614656,0.00006807221,0.0001316538,0.0004304854,0.00006294945,0.000132059,0.001094479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003180324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001402111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002940217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002175355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989025,0.00001977283,0.0004421636,0.000374401,0.00001849049,0.0002426935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993823,0.00009009238,0.0002055845,0.000146352,0.00001073739,0.0001649059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004251537,0.00001365843,0.001880637,0.00002455613,0.00003392496,0.000004068532,0.001450607,0.000003456106,0.00001417507,0.9940604,0.001898561,0.0005734724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005796368,0.00009179687,0.001796688,0.00001031606,0.000005122534,0.000008165443,0.0001612373,0.0004438329,0.0001936937,0.7129921,0.2833869,0.0003304637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7036546,0.001880085,0.001507087,0.002727692,0.0007511061,0.0003725349,0.0001476331,0.0001336154,0.2888256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958206,0.0000339938,0.0000568427,0.002589079,0.0006586482,0.0000112099,0.000007013365,0.00001967458,0.0008028734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.292166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077417169","doi":"10.1017/s135232521000011x","title":"EXPLAINING COMPENSATORY DUTIES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Duty; Scope (computer science); Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0202478254895344,"gpt":0.2473480292394784,"spread":0.2271002037499439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002415161,0.00008847898,0.00008209857,0.00003858031,0.0001790557,0.00004664492,0.0002555667,0.00004434365,0.001191585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003645826,0.00007264265,0.00004502363,0.00007854454,0.0002273143,0.0002121209,0.00006444951,0.0003136327,0.0004994471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004163646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002030177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006043678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006223234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999263,0.00009402192,0.0001005676,0.000203115,0.0001334506,0.0002057814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994037,0.0002556271,0.00003250669,0.000238052,0.000008717382,0.00006144996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009204844,0.00001242962,0.00006609345,0.000002201845,5.378939e-7,0.00002415923,0.0001757764,8.905822e-7,0.3828277,0.6135847,0.0002510047,0.00304535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000288281,0.00005072109,0.001214247,0.00001598047,0.000005179223,0.00008041513,0.0002485993,0.00009876212,0.6515588,0.1153933,0.2307511,0.0002946569],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7153121,0.00002986035,0.00008518447,0.0001615609,0.001413516,0.00005162695,0.000003976204,0.0001498791,0.2827924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923334,0.000003700683,0.0001242544,0.001387139,0.0002400858,0.000006131573,3.967912e-7,0.00001255653,0.005892357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4981914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179491379","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000094","title":"HYPERLEXIS AND THE RULE OF LAW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Private law; Public law; Space (punctuation); Plan (archaeology); Sociology; Computer science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01789017003850197,"gpt":0.277123529173895,"spread":0.2592333591353931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004083859,0.00002396089,0.00006747817,0.000003332669,0.0003905811,0.00001596013,0.00004952951,0.00001603551,0.00009181224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001491432,0.00001526036,0.00002909519,0.00005356194,0.001968548,0.00004419112,0.00003800548,0.00003562717,0.000007661637],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005104816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005917454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003964835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009509416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995838,0.0001476718,0.00005064668,0.00005041536,0.0001021204,0.0000652984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996461,0.0002382656,0.00001546908,0.00003999627,0.00004530918,0.00001484317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001880937,0.000006697237,0.00005682814,8.697659e-7,0.00001329684,0.000002033175,0.003070456,1.804155e-7,0.00003578089,0.9947399,0.00003345117,0.002021711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001311187,0.000002180918,0.0002759394,0.000005681034,0.000008893871,8.195648e-7,0.002803558,1.933481e-7,0.000205365,0.7548296,0.2417146,0.00002210778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03636497,0.003881342,0.0000270266,0.005552822,0.0001241399,0.00003337674,0.000002834603,0.000009341547,0.9540042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968199,0.0002106262,0.00002705967,0.0009878719,0.0001157114,0.000002641375,2.341244e-7,9.277663e-7,0.001835002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7253198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408581840","doi":"10.1017/s1352325225000059","title":"Youth as Moral Opportunity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Youth Education and Societal Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0396487528487031,"gpt":0.3519986431679202,"spread":0.3123498903192171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008349983,0.00005659045,0.00007509315,0.00003723699,0.0004279357,0.00008123236,0.0002015735,0.00007905868,0.0007169807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005319325,0.00005641324,0.00006820988,0.0002341058,0.000281708,0.0001352189,0.00002990632,0.0001368965,0.0001112359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007177432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007025945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001184793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001693791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992009,0.0002694878,0.00009414821,0.0001101577,0.0001438423,0.0001814374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995717,0.00008672172,0.00002827834,0.0001345375,0.00005396209,0.0001248216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006761724,0.00003045186,0.0006952873,0.000002217233,0.000008252216,8.390126e-7,0.02069001,7.964538e-7,0.000001988547,0.9744644,0.0005891406,0.003509859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002019871,0.00001501139,0.002671838,0.00002334667,0.00003461019,2.217168e-7,0.1720369,0.00002489537,0.00001711,0.6013047,0.2234884,0.0001809847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1948752,0.00005669984,0.0001967827,0.002389963,0.001015868,0.00009093571,0.000007243756,0.00009228303,0.801275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8263538,0.00002353821,0.00004583932,0.003347052,0.0000943757,0.000003873596,0.000008397447,0.000003427735,0.1701196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6314787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7850436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109469695","doi":"10.1017/s135232520909003x","title":"ACTION AND AGENCY IN THE CRIMINAL LAW","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Criminal law; Agency (philosophy); Punishment (psychology); Law; Law and economics; Limiting; Intuition; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04810723001047845,"gpt":0.2924598083225202,"spread":0.2443525783120417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002152964,0.00005208163,0.000041418,0.00002005676,0.00009436328,0.00003859749,0.0001237936,0.00002145289,0.00004374798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006740126,0.00003273088,0.00001721835,0.00008643038,0.00007651793,0.0001866951,0.000009643496,0.0001213303,0.00002482631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005104047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004760465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002402888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001402723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994336,0.0001654997,0.00006492888,0.000130728,0.00008976588,0.0001154972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997638,0.00008979625,0.00001563102,0.0001112484,0.000002575982,0.00001693653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002069085,0.00003321609,0.000005569151,0.000002579461,1.334794e-7,0.00003610891,0.0008564292,0.000001269481,0.08071481,0.8835592,0.00006091291,0.03470905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003022829,0.0002313736,0.01756037,0.00002001258,0.000009879084,0.0001416734,0.0003208125,0.00008783378,0.07273512,0.8845959,0.02382304,0.000171752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8296695,0.00009997127,0.00008573676,0.0009341922,0.0001258906,0.00007434849,0.000001003658,0.00002467933,0.1689847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940866,0.00003278142,0.00001549941,0.005054252,0.00007327724,0.000002416152,1.657004e-7,0.000002287479,0.0007327218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.168252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1334727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414620344","doi":"10.1017/s135232522510075x","title":"Can We Legally Revise the Highest Legal Rule?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison","keywords":"Legal realism; Field (mathematics); Legal ethics; Legal research; Rule of law; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01097619221389509,"gpt":0.2873785289189199,"spread":0.2764023367050248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002168513,0.0001946825,0.0002806378,0.00008403183,0.001518436,0.0006074719,0.0008329298,0.0001550171,0.0002814229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000636266,0.0001356871,0.0001536683,0.0007270327,0.0006649634,0.0004603057,0.0001157161,0.0003969447,0.0001292471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001454451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009299336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02907845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01092791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975926,0.0007343902,0.0003426034,0.0003337163,0.0004659245,0.0005307656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987568,0.0004559858,0.0001236457,0.0003797931,0.0001592146,0.0001245612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003601669,0.00003165679,0.0001646395,0.00004011791,0.00003619134,0.0000156907,0.002357646,0.000003014871,0.00007719923,0.9710844,0.01334647,0.01280696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001683555,0.00001665708,0.0002745726,0.0001545746,0.00003507073,0.000001417458,0.002416467,0.000001691679,0.0001287043,0.1411109,0.8555334,0.0001582213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006684276,0.004706626,0.0001963416,0.1095939,0.001895618,0.0005127738,0.00001073686,0.0002341381,0.8761656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8837596,0.0003123793,0.0000212099,0.00302693,0.00119025,0.00004189759,0.000001842125,0.00001584236,0.1116301],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8770753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905041924","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000149","title":"NONPARTY PARTICIPATION AS A (PARTIAL) REMEDY TO PROCEDURALIST CONCERNS OVER JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Indictment; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04488811439413123,"gpt":0.3884787712637539,"spread":0.3435906568696226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009762187,0.0001109031,0.0002003648,0.0000259747,0.0009423926,0.00005116708,0.0001859544,0.00005155513,0.001640475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001506165,0.00009622741,0.00007080963,0.0003573661,0.0009578703,0.000223838,0.00006629891,0.00008343659,0.001454136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009714855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003334543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008458122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007413704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984916,0.000247817,0.000236866,0.0002394703,0.0004316562,0.0003526173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993261,0.00007641123,0.00007827996,0.0001230595,0.0002314624,0.0001646821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000791856,0.00003541685,0.0002812047,0.00001434592,0.00002189805,0.000003871387,0.00251411,2.748717e-7,0.00009546903,0.9735016,0.01883833,0.004614285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001282649,0.0001174869,0.001826797,0.0004072421,0.00006186166,7.488918e-7,0.0004017988,0.000001264374,0.0003584864,0.07807363,0.9184292,0.0001932494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.10397,0.003625789,0.0003677946,0.02341211,0.001540921,0.001149541,0.00002035461,0.0002142346,0.8656992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788159,0.0004916821,0.00003107999,0.01597921,0.002584659,0.0001020952,0.000003150888,0.000006768959,0.001985521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8995908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}