{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":22,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":22,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"245d7e6dd0be","filters":{"venue":"Library Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2103280316","doi":"10.1108/00242530910969794","title":"Sociability and social interaction on social networking websites","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; World Wide Web; Social media; Internet privacy; Social web; Publicity; Social network (sociolinguistics); Web 2.0; Value (mathematics); Virtual community; Social media optimization; Perspective (graphical); The Internet; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0466059298537975,"gpt":0.3154690016558901,"spread":0.2688630718020926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001884014,0.0001435603,0.0002577242,0.00007322329,0.0003066174,0.0001261732,0.0003258618,0.00009480918,0.00009202037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001531266,0.0001339918,0.0000789142,0.0004055452,0.00005539387,0.001818551,0.0001200756,0.0003740876,0.00008417747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003589714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001995632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.283141e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.642572e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989198,0.0001625179,0.000277277,0.0003312383,0.0001189982,0.0001902061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999525,0.00006549362,0.0001958111,0.0001710656,0.00002729596,0.00001540044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001062999,0.00008370742,0.0003876225,0.0002248032,0.0000180367,0.000005717677,0.0002582661,1.041888e-7,0.0001404709,0.220433,0.06497708,0.7134606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003303789,0.0003150556,0.03069537,0.001523412,0.00003233666,0.0000405073,0.00003888367,0.0006660718,0.000837574,0.06203396,0.902907,0.0005794775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1549413,0.04464627,0.01428964,0.606608,0.005177428,0.003210013,0.00001390639,0.005739491,0.165374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466506,0.004481756,0.002970385,0.04402828,0.001283377,0.00003343364,0.000030637,0.00002002337,0.0005015295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8379299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5464026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972200153","doi":"10.1108/00242530610660807","title":"The information needs and information seeking behaviour of immigrant southern Sudanese youth in the city of London, Ontario: an exploratory study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Information needs; Information seeking; Focus group; Interpersonal communication; Immigration; Exploratory research; Population; Psychology; Nonprobability sampling; Sociology; Medical education; Social psychology; Geography; Library science; Social science; Medicine; Demography; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02472980939029872,"gpt":0.2547113927829175,"spread":0.2299815833926188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001276076,0.00007218866,0.0001412676,0.0000611735,0.0002163833,0.0001675771,0.0003178887,0.00002999773,0.00002308985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002474236,0.00004167834,0.00003461136,0.0005766827,0.0001330028,0.01405462,0.00003197744,0.00008555177,0.000002689903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007544799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002301376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01914934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03344323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986435,0.0003372305,0.0005185953,0.000046078,0.0003389284,0.0001157367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993955,0.00005693171,0.0003187051,0.0001736289,0.00002798696,0.00002724453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001033838,0.0000673765,0.6805519,0.00009442353,0.000001935487,2.434436e-7,0.3122103,0.00000102787,0.000001610874,0.003437873,0.00008587039,0.003537082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002859647,0.0002236298,0.4389511,0.0003939362,0.00004419448,6.900509e-7,0.5408077,0.000008346512,0.00001639848,0.0005797877,0.01854765,0.0001405869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950211,0.001545969,0.000004502519,0.0007364129,0.00003969477,0.000715063,0.00001721986,0.0000143838,0.001905679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982155,0.001239928,0.00001257685,0.0003902965,0.00001980859,0.00001439061,0.00006433373,0.000001734994,0.00004142122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2416008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034124715","doi":"10.1108/00242531011031151","title":"Making information literacy relevant","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Relevance (law); Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Lifelong learning; Computer science; Experiential learning; Knowledge management; Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0220138641666121,"gpt":0.3351061613364144,"spread":0.3130922971698022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004419805,0.00008620264,0.0001359713,0.00008243739,0.0003382033,0.0006082938,0.0004783995,0.00005476302,0.007268338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002199326,0.00006964405,0.00007827659,0.0006786354,0.00009934398,0.1043551,0.00007108061,0.0002106625,0.001828154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004162411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001960393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007611252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.93863e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988621,0.00007781654,0.0004273481,0.00008777672,0.0003074683,0.0002374902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993443,0.00006146171,0.0001863631,0.0002501635,0.00003731332,0.0001203682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002117365,0.000009724418,0.001831983,0.0004593128,0.000002489946,0.000001032772,0.004896509,9.704866e-8,0.000004841271,0.5253258,0.0992768,0.3681893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003858245,0.000006940785,0.000814123,0.0005479446,0.000003218254,0.000002587863,0.00008403535,0.00003048134,0.000009764162,0.001833862,0.9965234,0.0001050074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.003831547,0.007025878,0.00008616101,0.06630244,0.001556775,0.0007736655,0.00001824107,0.0005194384,0.9198859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1133792,0.1441359,0.03752332,0.6746323,0.001969564,0.0001585278,0.0005796947,0.00004206862,0.02757942],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8972467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068069595","doi":"10.1108/00242531211292114","title":"Baby boomers, their elders and the public library","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boomers; Originality; Scope (computer science); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Sample (material); Population; Public relations; Gerontology; Social science; Political science; Medicine; Demographic economics; Qualitative research; Demography; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04281548077091341,"gpt":0.2802616647573031,"spread":0.2374461839863897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006396848,0.0001131701,0.0002015149,0.00002994752,0.000498142,0.0004124007,0.0004622021,0.00005054826,0.002821982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007042773,0.00006328066,0.0000927596,0.0005921316,0.000630588,0.01553565,0.0001187335,0.0001195829,0.0001113984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002358681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002176864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005669376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001186423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984857,0.0005545139,0.0002131473,0.0001598196,0.0002070839,0.0003797051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991692,0.0002339545,0.0000962051,0.0002242045,0.000003782708,0.0002726553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005552892,0.00002807023,0.02732858,0.0001827952,0.00001186976,0.000001022005,0.001765147,4.458358e-9,0.00000147453,0.7371658,0.1850237,0.048486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001016436,0.000009483529,0.0008845299,0.0001748459,0.000009874008,0.000002990126,0.0007435188,0.000001307642,0.00001773374,0.003240467,0.9947119,0.0001016786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003293438,0.3550031,0.000004993354,0.3120449,0.0004054298,0.0006702474,0.000008696418,0.0002171705,0.3283521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3526936,0.5742642,0.000323884,0.05364066,0.0009909907,0.00005319008,0.00005110006,0.00002311669,0.0179593],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8096883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1548764173","doi":"10.1108/00242530910942081","title":"Untangling the relationship between libraries, young adults and Web 2.0","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Originality; Scholarship; Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); World Wide Web; Web 2.0; Information science; Computer science; Scholarly communication; Webometrics; Sociology; Library science; Knowledge management; The Internet; Publishing; Social science; Political science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02594580180837676,"gpt":0.234502853105234,"spread":0.2085570512968573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001524309,0.0001573692,0.0002361245,0.000042644,0.0002188231,0.0004728606,0.001106817,0.00005128305,0.00004407352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003181859,0.0001021074,0.00006400076,0.0007501189,0.00003154107,0.006531188,0.0002614653,0.0002091685,0.0000501074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001908556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006897504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001767864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.309208e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988262,0.0001749473,0.000310556,0.0003170383,0.0001590351,0.0002122437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987574,0.0004042643,0.0001126435,0.0006088003,0.000006025372,0.0001109156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003174553,0.00001273775,0.3621703,0.0006803483,0.000009404968,0.00001132732,0.0002894509,2.292571e-7,7.02198e-7,0.5672069,0.01188476,0.0577306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001949529,0.00008008664,0.6037726,0.003284641,0.00002713021,0.00002781111,0.0000134397,0.0004614022,0.00001765821,0.04197088,0.3498605,0.0002888815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03076333,0.7692831,0.0007151084,0.145477,0.0002736462,0.000923607,0.00001587609,0.001079642,0.05146876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8944714,0.04861873,0.01594563,0.03828153,0.0005934427,0.00001974769,0.0000755805,0.00002735525,0.001966603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8637081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4734953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493892631","doi":"10.1108/00242531111147189","title":"Advocacy and evidence for sustainable public computer access","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Public relations; Government (linguistics); Information and Communications Technology; Empirical evidence; Business; Political science; Economic growth; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2446526709416585,"gpt":0.392106598834707,"spread":0.1474539278930485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004546726,0.00007403697,0.000142246,0.00003402068,0.0003491339,0.0004863708,0.0005073854,0.00003392075,0.0007941256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001565878,0.00006025313,0.00004886036,0.0004168581,0.000157611,0.01896189,0.0001341544,0.00004150927,0.00001530218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004813665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006455487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006303365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004307287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990644,0.0001248535,0.000173139,0.0002219102,0.0001298322,0.0002858775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994364,0.0001368994,0.00008311897,0.0001458725,0.00003325457,0.000164468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001189885,0.00005653264,0.03559654,0.00336942,0.000008321433,0.00001376971,0.002170202,1.879896e-8,8.354671e-7,0.7269648,0.1437498,0.08805779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006101927,0.0000820188,0.005172567,0.0009711384,0.00001150392,0.000001288702,0.0002776848,0.0000107659,0.00002095948,0.0133733,0.979888,0.0001298179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02232296,0.4506571,0.002726102,0.1621138,0.0008167746,0.007599021,0.000006773729,0.0008474357,0.35291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4163572,0.4533073,0.0176536,0.05426874,0.001526505,0.000392528,0.00003739598,0.0000444773,0.05641225],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8361381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068314018","doi":"10.1108/00242531111176763","title":"Readers' advisory and underestimated roles of escapist reading","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Escapism; Reading (process); Originality; Pleasure; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Critical reading; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Psychotherapist; Creativity; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08182628560375427,"gpt":0.3064348483137809,"spread":0.2246085627100266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002123362,0.00006604034,0.0001656183,0.00003146675,0.0001284178,0.00003437073,0.0001927065,0.00003842827,0.0009243602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005166212,0.00005553366,0.00003500539,0.0002961551,0.0002798852,0.002374757,0.00003463076,0.00004686812,0.00001968414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002176967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001449724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004575056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001042346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992526,0.0001283357,0.0002057727,0.0001454422,0.000128646,0.0001391649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996215,0.00004520862,0.0001039137,0.0001221515,0.000008249204,0.00009900783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002326374,0.0001378189,0.0678461,0.003156615,0.0000297064,0.00002193302,0.020413,9.650401e-8,0.0002393131,0.7888648,0.03657997,0.08268739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005104219,0.0004951859,0.04915972,0.01663792,0.0001841628,0.00002080752,0.01643385,0.00005866517,0.005928199,0.08689361,0.8225375,0.001139927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03336553,0.1284679,0.00005667851,0.01116027,0.0002071607,0.0007952158,0.00001503486,0.0003236907,0.8256085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7123249,0.2680676,0.007636496,0.00436415,0.0001347873,0.000015781,0.00003620486,0.00002248553,0.007397568],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8182109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170280500","doi":"10.1108/00242530910928915","title":"Mind the<i><b>gap</b></i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Market orientation; Originality; Competence (human resources); Service (business); Marketing; Service provider; Value (mathematics); Business; Customer satisfaction; Qualitative research; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03763424413047198,"gpt":0.2549628146897418,"spread":0.2173285705592698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002331308,0.0001311209,0.000213158,0.00003447006,0.0001228807,0.000206763,0.0004247172,0.00003044831,0.003225308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001784227,0.00008411846,0.0001239941,0.0005914844,0.00002036149,0.002052922,0.00008560911,0.0001259235,0.003223313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001781888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001068331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001105628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000208905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992027,0.00002009451,0.0002594182,0.0001768983,0.0001496636,0.0001911738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994448,0.00002561456,0.0001256625,0.0003791338,0.0000138973,0.00001085123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000838235,0.00007436173,0.001138514,0.00246762,0.00001158166,0.00001236995,0.00001943595,6.044123e-7,0.000007482401,0.08760177,0.552553,0.3561049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007347204,0.000003848387,0.002693287,0.0007941223,0.00005081988,0.000002328956,0.00001022588,0.00002084796,0.000004767336,0.00386604,0.9923505,0.0001297872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.004842757,0.1980215,0.00001886325,0.2491433,0.0003775182,0.0007371249,0.00000313978,0.0002985446,0.5465572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05447191,0.02368383,0.0001744467,0.9101182,0.002993508,0.00002305432,0.0001098965,0.00003426412,0.008390851],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.660975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036217063","doi":"10.1108/00242530610689356","title":"Emergent user roles and perceived requirements in a social‐oriented community","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Perception; Online community; Value (mathematics); User requirements document; Computer science; Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Requirements analysis; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03176705907135788,"gpt":0.2855412914863618,"spread":0.253774232415004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002761346,0.0001180959,0.0002329266,0.00007296523,0.0002203574,0.00008797997,0.000567947,0.00003363123,0.00008863868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002294609,0.0001105924,0.00004166328,0.0009846289,0.00004019127,0.001479374,0.0005250448,0.0002031276,0.000029184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001406063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003246911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005489645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001450644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987286,0.0003648458,0.0003894949,0.000184246,0.0001535431,0.0001793084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993818,0.00004258002,0.0001024009,0.000416833,0.00002415634,0.00003221749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007277967,0.0009832648,0.3762555,0.002843644,0.0000512612,0.00003524976,0.002697822,0.000003677864,0.0003495183,0.3191959,0.2164185,0.08115827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004010565,0.00003647475,0.4818702,0.001899516,0.00001368861,0.000006816786,0.00004821653,0.0001317743,0.00003399104,0.006367336,0.5088633,0.0003276544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7828796,0.09796084,0.01547767,0.05984118,0.0005074046,0.003438281,0.00004641784,0.001467024,0.03838161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83799,0.0308267,0.08945888,0.03369986,0.0003320567,0.0003919867,0.0004121962,0.0001147661,0.006773493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3128286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4509827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058331690","doi":"10.1108/lr-09-2014-0097","title":"Understanding Semantic Web: a conceptual model","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Social Semantic Web; Semantic Web; Semantic analytics; Semantic Web Stack; Web standards; World Wide Web; Data Web; Web modeling; Semantic grid; Semantic search; Web intelligence; Information retrieval; Data science; Web service","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3159856673524363,"gpt":0.2956843675773294,"spread":0.02030129977510692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001771249,0.0001256318,0.0002895988,0.00003771768,0.00004289281,0.000106119,0.0008110827,0.00003770676,0.00002831634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004836649,0.00009636345,0.00007635035,0.0003246528,0.00006946974,0.001548597,0.0003321119,0.0000896147,0.000166423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001864114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002188408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.263364e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.713803e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998999,0.00008107115,0.0002253403,0.0002650979,0.0002013069,0.0002281857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992353,0.00005811525,0.00006919906,0.000487876,0.00001131949,0.0001382043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001503705,0.00001871879,0.0004498354,0.0003803301,0.0000118276,0.00003532184,0.00028615,0.0000472639,0.00000501542,0.8119505,0.1848261,0.00198741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009478964,0.000175009,0.00005439325,0.004977887,0.00006932815,0.0001601144,0.0003732565,0.5524758,0.0001102649,0.2378253,0.201967,0.0008637501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004859508,0.2509249,0.6380069,0.02270435,0.0005189496,0.0004656563,0.000002851494,0.001110157,0.08578032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6886802,0.1057909,0.1529193,0.04633785,0.0002544283,0.00006187502,0.00001794085,0.00006028303,0.005877274],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6881942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3929588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583855671","doi":"10.1108/lr-03-2015-0032","title":"Readers’ advisory: can we take it to the next level?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Reading (process); Originality; Public relations; Embeddedness; Sociology; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Library science; World Wide Web; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2458865691042723,"gpt":0.3433493954687794,"spread":0.09746282636450701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000680797,0.0001102887,0.00018632,0.00004641847,0.0003146693,0.0004135446,0.0009721318,0.00003945346,0.002169095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002179789,0.00006834077,0.00008038237,0.001162616,0.0001197852,0.01648717,0.0001237837,0.0001139254,0.002294728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001459607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005821313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009934313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001525264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984666,0.0002593546,0.0003295574,0.0001657861,0.0004581532,0.0003205817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990249,0.00006530796,0.0001063699,0.0003646643,0.00003251608,0.0004062521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001431389,0.000005437748,0.0001997981,0.0000684667,0.000002396664,9.785123e-7,0.01858639,8.775487e-7,1.231487e-7,0.02668084,0.8892778,0.06517553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004461784,0.0000252495,0.0001247152,0.0005571923,0.000005235721,0.000001400203,0.005911119,0.000006016699,0.00000344172,0.0009612489,0.9922436,0.0001162023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001657323,0.0284021,0.00001922154,0.7526125,0.0004668688,0.0006418642,0.00002356349,0.000121794,0.2175464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004314999,0.1124864,0.001997838,0.7524407,0.00088664,0.00009420367,0.00007322608,0.00002193581,0.1276841],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1029658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030524750","doi":"10.1108/00242530610689329","title":"Integrating digital libraries and virtual learning environments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Advanced Data Storage Technologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Digital library; Metadata; World Wide Web; Virtual learning environment; Multimedia; Digital content","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00783938370383463,"gpt":0.1994095692742482,"spread":0.1915701855704136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003706081,0.0001404744,0.0001984552,0.00003923559,0.00008987332,0.0003647789,0.0006101211,0.00003612314,0.00001995208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006999799,0.0001148515,0.00003167607,0.0002345447,0.0001065817,0.008577,0.001132559,0.0001890205,0.00005415633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004949354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001199284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.973804e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.540554e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991568,0.00003008715,0.0002165484,0.0003112838,0.0001121618,0.0001730759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994162,0.00008523488,0.00009951456,0.0003660186,0.000001357007,0.00003170485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.08781e-7,0.00001712179,0.002377881,0.0001508737,0.000004814211,0.00003723428,0.00001854111,0.000006680653,0.00007183975,0.3577278,0.004653046,0.6349335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009958376,0.00009838405,0.0006285205,0.001018547,0.000005593521,0.00005053382,0.00002517574,0.0005953468,0.0006625891,0.02630583,0.9702052,0.0003046485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003828668,0.3578643,0.614979,0.003932255,0.0001380463,0.0004995767,0.00002251941,0.002727561,0.01600806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.227273,0.1301717,0.6233598,0.004262153,0.0002244242,0.0001112321,0.0004059797,0.00011171,0.01408],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6218118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530290066","doi":"10.1108/lr-04-2016-0035","title":"Readers’ histories as a way of studying and understanding multicultural library communities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Multiculturalism; Context (archaeology); Originality; Value (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Immigration; Qualitative research; World Wide Web; Public relations; Computer science; Pedagogy; Social science; Political science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1573846997512105,"gpt":0.3178432738979354,"spread":0.1604585741467249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000188324,0.0001007928,0.0002277891,0.00003987983,0.00037555,0.0001117825,0.0002395526,0.00004301669,0.0008990784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000564482,0.00006201243,0.00005424978,0.0002806055,0.0006178164,0.007851123,0.00009983696,0.00005824894,0.00001063752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001576269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001589701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006061236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000129938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989265,0.000292139,0.0002571299,0.0001259836,0.0002150812,0.0001832301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992961,0.0002958127,0.0001364069,0.0001563023,0.00000767542,0.0001076719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002798279,0.00007906363,0.04549314,0.001645672,0.00004209045,0.00001602447,0.1012346,4.938695e-8,0.0002017235,0.7988355,0.03462868,0.01779542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003805774,0.0002479322,0.001939892,0.008361404,0.00005318424,0.000009552114,0.135617,0.000001787888,0.0005990296,0.01751547,0.8348347,0.0004395451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2210533,0.1849548,0.00008768423,0.238937,0.0009547714,0.002097997,0.00007082301,0.0008485971,0.3509951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8792859,0.1088502,0.0006083368,0.001844827,0.00009209532,0.00001017946,0.00001179657,0.00001097158,0.009285691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.800206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2539378427","doi":"10.1108/lr-02-2016-0015","title":"Redeploying public librarians to the front-lines: prioritizing digital inclusion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Public relations; Sociology; Inclusion (mineral); Argument (complex analysis); Relevance (law); Public service; Service (business); Front line; Democracy; Professional development; Political science; Business; Marketing; Social science; Pedagogy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05190971663042163,"gpt":0.3007792899340251,"spread":0.2488695733036035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004793231,0.0001267025,0.0001853503,0.00004918343,0.001257742,0.0008152029,0.0009952695,0.00005391851,0.0009545339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004870129,0.000065565,0.0001039325,0.000692168,0.0001344008,0.01440968,0.0007032627,0.00007716075,0.0006369717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001654479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005303505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009387895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001429283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998307,0.0002134802,0.0003322306,0.0003129086,0.0004510193,0.0003833802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990358,0.0002146396,0.0001045186,0.0003458813,0.00001800429,0.000281103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006847265,0.00004830174,0.01083138,0.0001709141,0.000009703669,0.00001492273,0.003651053,6.023729e-8,0.0001468722,0.08391926,0.204306,0.6968946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005162217,0.000029732,0.0003242787,0.001405541,0.000004756013,0.000001862528,0.0002402878,0.000001142554,0.00003463979,0.003012985,0.9947591,0.0001340304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005575316,0.02691098,0.0004095006,0.8202822,0.0006331097,0.001156711,0.00003579509,0.0005405617,0.1444559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7643195,0.09942842,0.001881956,0.07261016,0.003420945,0.0001221414,0.00005224191,0.00007232167,0.05809225],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7904531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114113954","doi":"10.1108/lr-11-2014-0125","title":"The issues and challenges facing a digital library with a special focus on the University of Calgary","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Digitization; Digital library; Function (biology); Variety (cybernetics); Originality; Computer science; World Wide Web; Library science; Value (mathematics); Focus (optics); Sociology; Telecommunications; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0355378381610889,"gpt":0.1868763906015012,"spread":0.1513385524404123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007021394,0.0001117144,0.0001633465,0.00002963246,0.0001539146,0.0003363024,0.0005824491,0.00002057702,0.00003698662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001922632,0.00005531334,0.00004049975,0.0003574,0.0001082102,0.003709484,0.0004603895,0.00007614788,0.00002980401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002858449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001205506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.238426e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.836351e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992829,0.00007686217,0.0001198633,0.0001922045,0.0002025164,0.0001256514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993359,0.0002096661,0.0000780521,0.0002750749,0.000008100658,0.00009324794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008269493,0.00004052603,0.001829646,0.0002813868,0.0000493531,0.0000401499,0.001033417,3.626971e-7,9.888819e-8,0.2760337,0.1752933,0.5453153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001166073,0.0001272429,0.0005137127,0.0005700549,0.000003476071,0.00001102396,0.0001035597,0.00003971269,0.00003431508,0.005136811,0.9932495,0.00009399408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002051967,0.3365867,0.0001590175,0.1016921,0.00009050678,0.0005175296,0.000006432344,0.0002254017,0.5586704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02481701,0.9053083,0.004862506,0.004046703,0.0005708996,0.00001273105,0.00001554905,0.0000546228,0.06031169],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8179561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3242971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006840849","doi":"10.1108/00242530510629524","title":"Topic familiarity and its effects on term selection and browsing in a thesaurus‐enhanced search environment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Thesaurus; Information retrieval; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Originality; Term (time); World Wide Web; Search engine; Subject (documents); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01644140188511563,"gpt":0.2499994655643328,"spread":0.2335580636792172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000160487,0.00008004732,0.0001345049,0.00005365494,0.00005545624,0.00007434876,0.000127647,0.00002963073,0.00002663055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008630929,0.00006337463,0.0000186516,0.0001859664,0.000009331931,0.001228119,0.0001254262,0.0001396135,0.00003822868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001669055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001607986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.270209e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.693308e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992748,0.0001040027,0.0001528598,0.0001684411,0.0001533035,0.00014661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997453,0.00005185605,0.00002554339,0.0001111934,0.000003842832,0.0000622595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004670929,0.00003286413,0.002440313,0.001128986,0.000002113685,0.000002886526,0.0002484342,0.000004031519,0.0007530517,0.003342875,0.00004034215,0.9919994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002406683,0.00130139,0.6519482,0.01097289,0.0000328253,0.00008460919,0.00001223267,0.08834779,0.1422245,0.0006308107,0.1008834,0.001154765],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719595,0.02219544,0.001027545,0.00284481,0.00003131238,0.0007767974,8.994991e-7,0.00006262583,0.001101014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.912111,0.08063871,0.003029149,0.003472718,0.00005445632,0.00004105227,0.000003946627,0.000006929981,0.0006419722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2584343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061464530","doi":"10.1108/00242530410556247","title":"Subject searching requirements: the HILT II experience","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Process (computing); Subject (documents); Information retrieval; Exploratory search; Order (exchange); World Wide Web; Exploratory research; Relation (database); Database","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04962451748935284,"gpt":0.3023398507826521,"spread":0.2527153332932993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002110995,0.0001123924,0.0001814979,0.00002237038,0.0002667661,0.0001446061,0.001747456,0.00001945974,0.0000674761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006393658,0.00006431937,0.00008374604,0.0004250343,0.00006945075,0.001936308,0.0007984794,0.0001180031,0.00009053687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009211537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007902052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008907939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.105907e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998915,0.0001015964,0.0002244607,0.0002755707,0.0002274802,0.0002559338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990144,0.00006206703,0.00006557791,0.0007981153,0.000008273996,0.00005158304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004341625,0.0001331847,0.002959148,0.001307709,0.00003880945,0.0001389058,0.005556227,0.0000126286,0.0002234369,0.644416,0.01569021,0.3295194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004873319,0.0002466598,0.007245788,0.007564635,0.00002418043,0.0001791338,0.0001651614,0.0002100466,0.004246744,0.05049187,0.928519,0.0006194931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03855865,0.7062008,0.05132125,0.1483047,0.001283286,0.001597214,0.000002266876,0.001511047,0.05122072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5247735,0.2915362,0.07994845,0.1001281,0.000410746,0.0002648475,0.000009435337,0.00004742635,0.002881367],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9128287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3247237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767092450","doi":"10.1108/lr-11-2016-0097","title":"The long tail of search and topical queries in public libraries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Long tail; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Value (mathematics); Descriptive statistics; Analytics; Data science; Sociology; Statistics; Social science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09790580240264,"gpt":0.3501606229758795,"spread":0.2522548205732394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004229315,0.00004874793,0.0001299088,0.00001625642,0.0007524404,0.0008042554,0.0005687848,0.00003316731,0.0001855115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002703042,0.00003114358,0.0000295346,0.0001318342,0.001022507,0.006644607,0.0001574533,0.00007866461,0.000005117468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001838308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003511322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008380086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001788657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991649,0.0001911581,0.0001792894,0.0001154791,0.000178103,0.0001710948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994692,0.0001290915,0.00006857602,0.0002505844,0.000007993537,0.00007454012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002309775,0.000008843,0.285789,0.0001701442,0.000001746251,0.000003183585,0.0005125286,6.804725e-9,0.000001291411,0.651123,0.001585247,0.06080272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005981982,0.00003552124,0.2379738,0.0005708075,0.000002752837,8.823556e-7,0.0005433463,0.000003730568,0.0000984104,0.01038297,0.7502475,0.00008044166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2134213,0.1516811,0.000005041614,0.4343833,0.0002695612,0.0006974958,0.000005597688,0.0000588114,0.1994778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.816597,0.1766464,0.0001587299,0.0008546257,0.0001065463,0.00001009711,0.000003130024,0.000003803548,0.005619581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7486623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7755453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606087219","doi":"10.1108/lr-05-2015-0047","title":"The issues and challenges facing a digital library with a special focus on the Taylor Family Digital Library at the University of Calgary","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Digital library; Originality; Library science; Focus (optics); Value (mathematics); Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Social science; Qualitative research; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07014369358479787,"gpt":0.1917956119120636,"spread":0.1216519183272657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009596887,0.0002586172,0.0003287718,0.00002679113,0.0006356062,0.002030302,0.0006345909,0.00003504487,0.001094106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002016573,0.0001145927,0.0001419348,0.00006504938,0.0008843273,0.006263063,0.0006182989,0.0002302069,0.0001614757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006487913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000627852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004185886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001352053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988346,0.0001113825,0.0002449086,0.0002579399,0.0002949693,0.0002562348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988754,0.0004014046,0.0001517234,0.0004360207,0.00001666415,0.0001187798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002760802,0.00007084278,0.0004040402,0.0004753263,0.000110623,0.00005816267,0.005395652,1.117907e-7,5.353144e-8,0.5743521,0.2696316,0.1492254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001705147,0.0002667989,0.0001258316,0.0009294129,0.00002907711,0.00001074679,0.005664535,0.000002129101,0.000004148323,0.008813624,0.9837987,0.0001844379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01488051,0.2614446,1.553699e-7,0.02312048,0.0001005741,0.0004886674,0.0004335273,0.0001114667,0.69942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2531725,0.4213516,0.0000234664,0.00728092,0.003452763,0.00002879091,0.0004156766,0.0002322675,0.3140421],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7141671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515808148","doi":"10.1108/00242531311329455","title":"Role of classification schemes in organization of Islamic knowledge in libraries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Islam; Library classification; Indigenous; Knowledge organization; Computer science; Knowledge management; Grey literature; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Sociology; Data science; Library science; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Qualitative research; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02642193475885409,"gpt":0.2987935425265727,"spread":0.2723716077677186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001274376,0.00005021518,0.0002008898,0.00008617697,0.00002527907,0.00001273063,0.0001535055,0.00003767446,0.001227908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000199928,0.00004578141,0.00002082214,0.001200052,0.0001127832,0.0009159498,0.00003443841,0.00004482231,0.00004849502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001030508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001881616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001430437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004902227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992584,0.0001662915,0.0003294023,0.00009082226,0.00007159857,0.00008351284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996244,0.00008254346,0.0001321317,0.0001031371,0.00004631193,0.00001147673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[5.463405e-7,0.0001442102,0.3929411,0.0009733653,0.000005157216,2.56709e-8,0.01384217,7.824805e-8,0.0005428871,0.5581107,0.007455035,0.02598465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000232659,0.00002042966,0.7866714,0.004908763,0.00001559402,1.433697e-7,0.01998847,0.00003164172,0.002258928,0.03387402,0.1517775,0.0002204891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4622108,0.2748115,0.000004723395,0.01230227,0.0001457827,0.001082624,0.00000320964,0.00005969652,0.2493794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8699269,0.1282627,0.0003313448,0.0001786902,0.00002799947,0.00002695708,0.00001387774,0.000006982117,0.001224519],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5242367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468729986","doi":"10.1108/lr-08-2015-0084","title":"A subject specialist-centric model for library resources management in academic libraries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Originality; Knowledge management; Academic library; Library classification; Sample (material); Library management; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Library science; Sociology; Qualitative research; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03216369428675423,"gpt":0.2513305718314937,"spread":0.2191668775447395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001848019,0.0003361405,0.0005358922,0.0003026903,0.00008992715,0.0003488873,0.003005563,0.0001214885,0.0003003638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001289511,0.0002255481,0.000212072,0.001349942,0.00005616134,0.01618829,0.001289938,0.000172382,0.0001151504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009277031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001212156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.280564e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.6119e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974419,0.0001825896,0.0007212556,0.000778456,0.0002758349,0.0005999166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984236,0.0002626059,0.0002152652,0.0008955837,0.000005551768,0.0001973937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005815499,0.00008165027,0.004485486,0.004227679,0.00004291366,0.00005355561,0.0002949433,0.000008509074,0.000009809384,0.6121792,0.1768276,0.2017305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006736708,0.00004791597,0.001751103,0.004678657,0.00002317924,0.000006963548,0.000006978115,0.005645971,0.0001929612,0.07067244,0.9158337,0.0004664364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004132478,0.7017341,0.03303267,0.15618,0.0007809172,0.004939358,0.0001548789,0.002591403,0.09645417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01007472,0.7231062,0.1432551,0.06382959,0.001000545,0.0007941463,0.00009740933,0.000196626,0.05764563],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7390061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605070708","doi":"10.1108/lr-11-2014-0133","title":"Information Governance and Assurance: Reducing Risk, Promoting Policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Information and Cyber Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Information governance; Information policy; Public relations; Public administration; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Information system; Political science; Management information systems; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01298340470748719,"gpt":0.2403054785950698,"spread":0.2273220738875827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000349336,0.00008445956,0.0001397706,0.00002920966,0.00007164773,0.0002281586,0.0003292196,0.00002545979,0.00001039012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000220826,0.00007080175,0.00002817459,0.0004386135,0.00001394336,0.01169793,0.0001986509,0.0001158128,0.0001051023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001307762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001727921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001474437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.952419e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999227,0.00007483074,0.0003023996,0.00007943899,0.0001788982,0.0001374195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999295,0.00002069725,0.0002709067,0.0002710995,0.00003023236,0.0001120923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001238201,0.000008991785,0.0007481345,0.00165158,0.000005596975,6.489303e-7,0.004402185,0.000003890413,4.601235e-7,0.1876042,0.04329301,0.76228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002487039,0.0000295461,0.003737132,0.001907937,0.00000512383,0.00002874966,0.00001927066,0.007929192,0.00009416309,0.002574987,0.9832351,0.0001900609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01449603,0.3417917,0.04167792,0.1112108,0.00142883,0.002849896,0.00006764208,0.002121367,0.4843558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4008485,0.4368068,0.07952306,0.08038431,0.0008369534,0.0001601647,0.0001166987,0.00004045166,0.001283097],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9399421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8480714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}