{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":53,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":53,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"0774f5c29be8","filters":{"venue":"Linguistic Inquiry"}},"results":[{"id":"W4255238406","doi":"10.1162/002438902760168554","title":"Decomposing Pronouns","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":449,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pronoun; Linguistics; Subject pronoun; Predicate (mathematical logic); Object pronoun; Reflexive pronoun; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07165840532117057,"gpt":0.270436217375926,"spread":0.1987778120547555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001931568,0.0001926936,0.0002163959,0.0001218045,0.000441609,0.0002694819,0.0001978142,0.00005973636,0.004226271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001805194,0.0001918925,0.00007766407,0.00003830323,0.0002559209,0.00005786501,0.00004678437,0.0001677514,0.001383376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006733046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001692502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002952701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001701021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986563,0.00004257979,0.0004000476,0.0003002998,0.0002441728,0.000356586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989643,0.0001957204,0.000150684,0.000323624,0.000285222,0.0000805044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000597935,0.0001189119,0.0002679701,0.00004818972,0.00003805883,0.0000324769,0.1952835,0.00001152489,0.0000196382,0.8005919,0.001546305,0.002035524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001481384,0.0002869765,0.0006365406,0.0003959446,0.000339495,0.00004061855,0.01232753,0.03407153,0.0002653579,0.4355898,0.5130256,0.001539192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1379891,0.0006021973,0.0074062,0.009322648,0.05472662,0.0008734547,0.0000447934,0.001231375,0.7878036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772328,0.000007492802,0.001753285,0.0003780873,0.01626609,0.00001402453,0.00001902489,0.00004261185,0.004286586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8392437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074519264","doi":"10.1162/ling.2007.38.1.1","title":"V-Raising and Grammar Competition in Korean: Evidence from Negation and Quantifier Scope","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Negation; Linguistics; Scope (computer science); Verb; Syntax; Quantifier (linguistics); Grammar; Object (grammar); Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Generative grammar; Psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Medicine; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07440254481344265,"gpt":0.3644706590772773,"spread":0.2900681142638346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004538583,0.00009912294,0.0001212256,0.0001161374,0.00006237822,0.00004227895,0.00004829438,0.00008930867,0.000161006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007097607,0.00009906018,0.00001082836,0.0001202983,0.0001279798,0.00005591045,0.00003082172,0.0001083755,0.00003212042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001938254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001457396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001476521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006573776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991563,0.00004666483,0.0002315799,0.0002694967,0.00009650196,0.0001994601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993081,0.0004212497,0.00005927347,0.0001216649,0.00003958687,0.00005012377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006118202,0.0001456788,0.6689465,0.0001054885,0.00005366316,0.0005632158,0.1860076,0.000003189704,0.002622009,0.03721784,0.0006001581,0.1031228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001118066,0.00005168697,0.9823,0.0004463826,0.00002550014,0.00001059178,0.00483451,0.00008726436,0.0003786255,0.009633573,0.0008103662,0.0003033976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833376,0.00294256,0.007744615,0.00005827359,0.001361514,0.0001323108,0.000001860513,0.00003446898,0.004386769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975668,0.00005885858,0.00162092,0.0002115107,0.0003808674,0.00000371472,0.00003751443,0.00001063095,0.000109208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3133535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4039557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097243113","doi":"10.1162/002438900554334","title":"“Substance Abuse” and “Dysfunctionalism”: Current Trends in Phonology","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":300,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Download; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0645980546631899,"gpt":0.3859079644031749,"spread":0.321309909739985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002386602,0.0001526182,0.0002229759,0.0002851245,0.00007398249,0.00001514726,0.0001739198,0.0001670266,0.009938025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004144093,0.0001549978,0.00003510806,0.0003500113,0.0003891381,0.00001567895,0.00001341524,0.0004818348,0.0006107139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000335683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001870774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000147997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000171468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985456,0.0001315343,0.000280864,0.0004444414,0.0001168434,0.0004806578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993209,0.000170156,0.00003731672,0.000329098,0.00004769329,0.00009482616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001276682,0.001211009,0.08021257,0.00005478651,0.0001696185,0.000709062,0.2556329,0.00004904944,0.0002435373,0.0332309,0.02881415,0.5983957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002029171,0.0001998024,0.7467363,0.00003693502,0.00001792857,0.00009611909,0.000219981,0.0001392893,0.00002310306,0.009945199,0.240221,0.0003351402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.968289,0.004213586,0.00003917623,0.0001385811,0.0034981,0.00007461867,0.00001351023,0.00004346439,0.02368992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992339,0.0005540478,0.00007050648,0.000192159,0.0009293247,0.00004995142,0.00003474339,0.00001993145,0.005810364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6665238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240704700","doi":"10.1162/ling.2009.40.1.35","title":"Cyclic Agree","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":258,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Argument (complex analysis); Articulation (sociology); Linguistics; Mathematics; Locality; Inverse; Dependency (UML); Displacement (psychology); Feature (linguistics); Computer science; Pure mathematics; Psychology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05147168151780256,"gpt":0.2782671897956479,"spread":0.2267955082778453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002410421,0.0002062053,0.0002403154,0.0001315934,0.0003263969,0.0002039979,0.0002393203,0.00007164371,0.001136667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002792836,0.0001995617,0.0000916674,0.00004337378,0.0001906398,0.00004890555,0.00002879003,0.0001764596,0.0008737941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005302077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004243548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002747304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001475342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985937,0.00003877557,0.0004017733,0.0003160842,0.0002848849,0.0003647822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989148,0.0001473228,0.0001504447,0.0004017778,0.000294773,0.00009092594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000129944,0.00007763699,0.00007688387,0.00001471959,0.00001892541,0.00003735002,0.07327039,0.000005462721,0.000041669,0.9225238,0.001091962,0.0028282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005699181,0.0002098727,0.002689606,0.00009886651,0.0001149993,0.00001049831,0.003426237,0.0006645445,0.00014858,0.8835328,0.1079971,0.0005369812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1518907,0.0002722041,0.004488408,0.01595369,0.03798942,0.000610486,0.00004027505,0.001123235,0.7876316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732807,0.000005079313,0.0008350372,0.001330162,0.02111162,0.000005016736,0.00003758807,0.00002449028,0.003370271],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118352694","doi":"10.1162/0024389053710666","title":"Category Preservation and Proximity versus Phonetic Approximation in Loanword Adaptation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Loanword; Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy); Representation (politics); Phonological rule; Perception; Phonology; Adaptation (eye); Phonetics; Computer science; Optimality theory; Psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1171801830991132,"gpt":0.3746348657617149,"spread":0.2574546826626017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004481838,0.0001216008,0.0001528705,0.0001828662,0.00006932672,0.00002733105,0.0001243652,0.0001668049,0.0001978363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005920415,0.0001300598,0.00001896804,0.000216831,0.0001532212,0.0000847112,0.00005258234,0.000289851,0.0001508947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006495931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000488952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005683154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004238322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987633,0.0001530386,0.000289331,0.0003277472,0.0001556694,0.0003108748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999252,0.0002444565,0.00008002017,0.0002595493,0.0001002666,0.00006371306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006355931,0.001921528,0.02588192,0.0003777775,0.0002383756,0.0001239654,0.5755087,0.002545609,0.003225065,0.1316051,0.003560324,0.2486556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01094044,0.0009761132,0.800541,0.00008849901,0.00007715965,0.00002961618,0.00472081,0.1252342,0.0007751303,0.04299524,0.01273929,0.0008824044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827665,0.0006361823,0.002673068,0.0003884799,0.001620634,0.000434684,0.000003585496,0.00005117729,0.01142571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972312,0.00002842186,0.001343691,0.00008819525,0.0007193443,0.000101796,0.00004561024,0.00001684771,0.0004248568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7746592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5303684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346446579","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00209","title":"Lightest to the Right: An Apparently Anomalous Displacement in Irish","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Prosody; Irish; Syntax; Dilemma; Phonological rule; Phonology; Balance (ability); History; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03951141142474729,"gpt":0.2799274574898377,"spread":0.2404160460650904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005112694,0.0002322977,0.000237637,0.0001562027,0.0003155467,0.0002090063,0.0004150145,0.00005739174,0.001031145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002245965,0.0001364319,0.00005383897,0.00006599694,0.0002048305,0.00006786297,0.0001001891,0.0001130159,0.000778764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001383912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005967222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009030746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004853542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981989,0.0001028837,0.0005032858,0.0004218987,0.0003286042,0.0004444538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985722,0.0003286897,0.0001373466,0.0005864744,0.0002502582,0.0001250076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007398989,0.0002932463,0.003577526,0.00003359099,0.00003574689,0.00007487557,0.1871763,0.00001560851,0.00005104808,0.8033755,0.003584734,0.001707873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002387252,0.0009151905,0.01635753,0.0008219854,0.0002020153,0.00001613316,0.0142355,0.001169863,0.0003855872,0.1752692,0.7866695,0.001570251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7509727,0.000161756,0.01085052,0.04469584,0.04543341,0.002278196,0.0002442361,0.0005601508,0.1448032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850175,0.000003723571,0.0002827799,0.0009374695,0.01147348,0.00006588749,0.00002314046,0.00003851559,0.002157502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7830848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109654155","doi":"10.1162/002438902760168545","title":"Altruism, Ā-Movement, and Object Agreement in Innu-aimûn","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Agreement; Complement (music); Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Object (grammar); Covert; Argument (complex analysis); Verb; History; Psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05709758142671451,"gpt":0.2631994562090619,"spread":0.2061018747823474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003516681,0.0002314761,0.0002782228,0.0002319199,0.0002156946,0.0001832098,0.0001529206,0.00006863503,0.002450136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001695141,0.0002333192,0.00004578726,0.00006230571,0.0002502131,0.00005465769,0.00008923039,0.0001925289,0.0002709111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001786396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00153535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001749953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983504,0.00006253398,0.0005242483,0.0003800769,0.0002882799,0.0003944355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990922,0.0001935192,0.0001602995,0.0003060907,0.0001663735,0.00008150073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001336288,0.0001972408,0.004102125,0.0001044801,0.00004925748,0.00007541662,0.2321545,0.000009600036,0.00002163861,0.7600829,0.001052585,0.002136864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005078428,0.0007130583,0.01719893,0.0008139067,0.0003213294,0.00001891381,0.03786431,0.02232712,0.0002796167,0.7440453,0.1690734,0.002265655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5851012,0.001193512,0.0007869898,0.007597535,0.02337162,0.001264354,0.00006826317,0.0003554878,0.380261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899657,0.00005467117,0.0004196978,0.0009924361,0.005193524,0.00002745446,0.00001917331,0.00003128819,0.003296028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4048645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172057406","doi":"10.1162/002438900554497","title":"The Mental Representation of Semitic Words","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Morpheme; Linguistics; Semitic languages; Representation (politics); Computer science; Psychology; Natural language processing; Philosophy; Arabic","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02090961977231481,"gpt":0.3221137968990003,"spread":0.3012041771266855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001930903,0.00006937568,0.00008369436,0.00003060045,0.0001387272,0.00007572765,0.0006254606,0.00003468559,0.00002573053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004121041,0.00004909022,0.00003578395,0.0002598353,0.0001283941,0.00007571189,0.00008142258,0.00009765637,0.00001563583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002280108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000298586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002821555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001730734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992179,0.00004408638,0.0001961495,0.0001728241,0.0002186159,0.0001504179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992462,0.0001681444,0.00006781083,0.0004164131,0.00007518636,0.00002629144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000383226,0.00007948027,0.0004684142,0.00005047669,0.00003316435,0.00005575002,0.0252582,0.00001465318,0.002827818,0.2426309,0.00461385,0.723929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007626243,0.000275189,0.0009369491,0.0003898712,0.00004248213,0.0001356875,0.0005320176,0.03922591,0.1738803,0.7509251,0.03214643,0.0007473639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1970585,0.01598216,0.7135068,0.002819346,0.008417986,0.001236007,0.00001044208,0.00274189,0.05822689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9127191,0.00003908294,0.08601924,0.000125091,0.0002653296,0.000007896032,0.000002435162,0.000005623526,0.0008162191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7231816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2001841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108457703","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00183","title":"CPs: Copies and Compositionality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of compositionality; Linguistics; Predicate (mathematical logic); Complement (music); Noun; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematics; Syntax; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1003640122297564,"gpt":0.2972494436623178,"spread":0.1968854314325614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003396148,0.0001369985,0.000185733,0.00006373764,0.0002199066,0.0001866915,0.0000957895,0.0000453245,0.0001877542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002193166,0.000132686,0.00002986237,0.0000201209,0.0004437728,0.00004715789,0.0000620455,0.0001019792,0.0001527478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004683685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006119547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007736289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002324474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999023,0.00005324514,0.000272746,0.0002163544,0.0002482699,0.0001863868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988973,0.0001966647,0.0001003082,0.0001841464,0.0005067389,0.0001148462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001811084,0.00004071316,0.0008130162,0.00003396816,0.00002435731,0.00001313129,0.1009369,0.000003030761,0.000004965925,0.8970755,0.0009050472,0.0001312791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008079062,0.0001238585,0.002214373,0.00009115739,0.0001012726,0.00001727375,0.01360634,0.001207091,0.00003328334,0.863512,0.1178955,0.0003899548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6169403,0.0009690711,0.005117366,0.02045794,0.0410188,0.0007693981,0.0002141696,0.0008609418,0.313652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888118,0.000003328454,0.001277819,0.0004440626,0.008456952,0.00000852716,0.00006814749,0.00001790758,0.0009114575],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3718715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5410778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137338922","doi":"10.1162/ling.2004.35.1.159","title":"First and Second Person Pronouns as Bound Variables","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Download; World Wide Web; Filter (signal processing); Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03917827507620857,"gpt":0.2519196744789836,"spread":0.212741399402775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002677961,0.0002379944,0.000258656,0.0001140046,0.00069664,0.0004453142,0.0001500198,0.00009460268,0.001919264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002166232,0.0002358716,0.00005282665,0.0000343008,0.0004520071,0.0000801987,0.00004754457,0.0001830363,0.0002768358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001086996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001391307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002549514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003081483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986903,0.00002420789,0.0003111905,0.000391872,0.0002246138,0.0003577889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990135,0.0001892673,0.00015124,0.0002784229,0.0002614294,0.0001061689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001629538,0.00006359338,0.0001258816,0.0001373131,0.00004733105,0.00003396852,0.2096264,0.00001599491,0.00001057763,0.7896707,0.0001608413,0.00009115207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001504644,0.0003043605,0.0009404439,0.0003369563,0.0002047494,0.00005054593,0.02386454,0.0004183798,0.0001275603,0.8608292,0.1106976,0.0007210844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7056611,0.0005955189,0.002375376,0.007621746,0.02119866,0.0009298336,0.000102063,0.0005235268,0.2609922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849156,0.00001014686,0.001491157,0.0004207066,0.009504084,0.00002229845,0.00003529947,0.00004481248,0.003555916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2792545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127433725","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00170","title":"Classifiers Are for Numerals, Not for Nouns: Consequences for the Mass/Count Distinction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Numeral system; Linguistics; Noun; Mathematics; Psychology; Computer science; Natural language processing; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0903445450530347,"gpt":0.2939196076415957,"spread":0.2035750625885611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001007536,0.0002565659,0.000337052,0.00007372028,0.001243217,0.0003654552,0.0002776744,0.0001080726,0.00008312536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01662776,0.0001958241,0.0002130721,0.00002624327,0.000588159,0.00005222056,0.00001872015,0.0001086433,0.00002045442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000945378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008719584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003064158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005939287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983366,0.00004561373,0.0005433939,0.000413083,0.0002267789,0.0004345849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941112,0.003916211,0.0004719555,0.0003527892,0.001087308,0.00006057248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002176657,0.00003174677,0.00008370964,0.0002933019,0.0001011064,4.659502e-7,0.01541276,0.00005764334,0.00006927354,0.9788807,0.003788132,0.001063496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001120624,0.0002661012,0.0001276629,0.0001232797,0.0004116895,0.000001610084,0.008935044,0.04324694,0.0002153661,0.4816832,0.4634789,0.0003896317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002471216,0.00009883512,0.9324681,0.01766467,0.04028742,0.002991724,0.0007966849,0.0002436588,0.002977748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626573,0.000006549119,0.005591393,0.001274589,0.02725745,0.0009462854,0.000195118,0.00006175722,0.002009534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9601861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085550632","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00110","title":"Flavors of Division","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Grammar; Division (mathematics); Feature (linguistics); Celtic languages; History; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Arithmetic","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05872356724138984,"gpt":0.2844708530186999,"spread":0.2257472857773101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004102497,0.0001420922,0.0002216557,0.0001152825,0.0001588749,0.00003993767,0.0001502318,0.00005622832,0.001016457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031058,0.0001308862,0.0000767874,0.00003487805,0.000248683,0.00006395394,0.00006352354,0.0001055867,0.0002706117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003014001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002482413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004531057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004409594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988198,0.00004453495,0.0004035477,0.0001451395,0.0002706971,0.0003163416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988897,0.0002411641,0.0002042757,0.000282093,0.0002991511,0.00008356121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007996424,0.0001051439,0.003079049,0.00006497966,0.00002569818,0.000001707039,0.1583497,0.000003610285,0.00005695644,0.8373896,0.0002417947,0.0006737831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002279964,0.0005527537,0.03698155,0.0008753669,0.0007518531,0.00001398117,0.04719693,0.00264892,0.005351029,0.6522567,0.2489542,0.00213679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7416419,0.0004352063,0.006577871,0.0009742413,0.05141666,0.0004051557,0.0000493528,0.0002936617,0.198206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866313,0.00000330007,0.0008367246,0.00009320451,0.01148075,0.000005203562,0.00002577711,0.0000275143,0.000896203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2487124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887880527","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00319","title":"Checking Up on (ϕ-)Agree","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Agreement; Spec#; Computer science; Range (aeronautics); Linguistics; Economics; Philosophy; Accounting; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1145473573553157,"gpt":0.3613303247051586,"spread":0.2467829673498429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001800268,0.0001635992,0.0001559187,0.00009247369,0.0002528129,0.00003593191,0.00033384,0.0000950065,0.0002716216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005768465,0.0001368747,0.00005959683,0.0001673573,0.000593186,0.00002328949,0.00009220697,0.0002244293,0.00136004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001807342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000335775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009270496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000354561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986235,0.00009167062,0.0002083111,0.0005238508,0.0001753372,0.0003772553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989971,0.0003573161,0.00008192539,0.0004230625,0.00006585725,0.00007471794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003566581,0.0002766407,0.0004280503,0.00005376969,0.00001657654,0.004988567,0.03559536,0.000003919494,0.8935387,0.03833498,0.009632694,0.01677405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006508877,0.0007257551,0.0002305053,0.00008542481,0.00002042115,0.000401531,0.0002084433,0.0001410451,0.917653,0.005769864,0.07365815,0.000454979],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9356062,0.00001941639,0.000124647,0.0001368273,0.01019807,0.0001223845,0.00000546729,0.0002249312,0.05356209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829553,0.00000383093,0.0001302805,0.007949935,0.006596765,0.000004238425,0.000002159502,0.00002253655,0.002334935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06402546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795739705","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00277","title":"Particles and Deletion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ellipsis (linguistics); Focus (optics); Linguistics; Set (abstract data type); German; Modal; Computer science; Philosophy; Physics; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05550490225064605,"gpt":0.277600455791997,"spread":0.2220955535413509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000227173,0.0001156009,0.0001274058,0.00006500198,0.0003520823,0.0001623802,0.0000766093,0.00004128093,0.0006006245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002005503,0.0001097161,0.00002467773,0.00002394407,0.0006028213,0.00004075888,0.00004273772,0.00006889005,0.0003449625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002037778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000215406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003968264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000449242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991494,0.00003375078,0.0002362676,0.0002164896,0.0001461301,0.0002178969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991993,0.0001206987,0.00008766771,0.0001803477,0.0003502271,0.00006180135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002095373,0.00002749719,0.0005496407,0.00002198099,0.00001732924,0.000005913625,0.1046347,3.322128e-7,0.00005698698,0.8921143,0.0002966422,0.00225379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006809934,0.000444771,0.003658483,0.0001192966,0.0001528202,0.00001384479,0.009479814,0.005881581,0.0007408321,0.8717522,0.1065585,0.0005169309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9227254,0.0001168288,0.005025164,0.003755108,0.01384972,0.0002473392,0.00001508584,0.0003349235,0.05393045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801706,0.00000468075,0.001159161,0.0003515585,0.01780881,0.000006915202,0.00001025641,0.00001974369,0.000468268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1062618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6576416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129901515","doi":"10.1162/ling.2008.39.2.221","title":"On the Mental Representation of Arabic Roots","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Morpheme; Linguistics; Arabic; Subject (documents); Representation (politics); Selection (genetic algorithm); History; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09980498445431003,"gpt":0.338169158555947,"spread":0.238364174101637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009523721,0.00008571268,0.000113659,0.00004501787,0.000175954,0.000005123718,0.000203597,0.00003891443,0.00009956879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004770278,0.0000556416,0.00005677645,0.000146218,0.0004587286,0.00001585168,0.00004287223,0.0001293206,0.00007197789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000877023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002199677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001488081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001022559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991108,0.0001377192,0.0001890983,0.0002444671,0.0001713294,0.0001465829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987288,0.0008256335,0.00009948141,0.0002900298,0.00003163274,0.00002442266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001842638,0.0002903403,0.001103586,0.00001884918,0.00001160131,0.001873987,0.02630037,0.00004220328,0.9378064,0.02561526,0.006168842,0.000584306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003966344,0.0002494463,0.001465577,0.00003132983,0.00001166966,0.0005595533,0.0003076254,0.0001354572,0.9892415,0.006292708,0.001150326,0.0001582215],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991259,0.00001922642,0.00002201711,0.0002011943,0.001398331,0.0001438178,0.000006121906,0.00003670042,0.00691364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972749,0.00001500711,0.00002870546,0.001776441,0.00040337,0.000005434546,0.000003193776,0.000008368464,0.0004846269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05143505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5710813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971790006","doi":"10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.413","title":"Diagnosing Cyclicity in Sluicing","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogative word; Phrase; Linguistics; Position (finance); Movement (music); Computer science; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02472207681503658,"gpt":0.3269014120462697,"spread":0.3021793352312331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009704835,0.0001250868,0.0001563534,0.0002402893,0.00008151394,0.0000988161,0.0006617516,0.00009112167,0.000003061356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002018505,0.0001208997,0.0000319919,0.0005246889,0.00006187637,0.0001451047,0.0002412915,0.0002972161,0.0000125655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001083694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000355819,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001564481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005670769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987196,0.00002880679,0.0003092746,0.0003279618,0.0002134851,0.0004008694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990253,0.00036803,0.00008575854,0.0003759123,0.00007974658,0.00006521196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002987925,0.000261053,0.03886468,0.0001764244,0.00001368789,0.003013639,0.03372684,0.00003734753,0.008786759,0.6346918,0.000571581,0.2798263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001260579,0.0002269194,0.03536667,0.001559043,0.00002067462,0.0002008937,0.0004027643,0.02484676,0.2310413,0.6981611,0.00493103,0.001982325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06791937,0.001008997,0.9265632,0.00009187815,0.001233341,0.0001004394,1.957568e-7,0.0005959356,0.002486633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6905987,0.000003147211,0.3085132,0.0004397782,0.0004151605,0.000002571648,6.725174e-7,0.000007371428,0.00001941704],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6226793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4930147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171308036","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00147","title":"Syntactic Complexity and Competition: The Singular-Plural Distinction in Western Armenian","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Armenian; Linguistics; Competition (biology); Noun; Interpretation (philosophy); Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05578411906650252,"gpt":0.2704555056957769,"spread":0.2146713866292744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000562989,0.0001963704,0.0002488726,0.00009410951,0.0005042558,0.0003077884,0.0001530206,0.00005467664,0.0002379315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002079984,0.0001602126,0.00004258906,0.00004464509,0.0006807644,0.00006022461,0.00007040318,0.0002386031,0.00007957098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007111551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002301886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001541532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005033588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985924,0.0001837933,0.0004061997,0.0003028528,0.0002341403,0.0002806566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987805,0.0005042583,0.0001791273,0.0003031022,0.0001732333,0.00005975659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002724472,0.00006186712,0.006587889,0.00007362638,0.00001655445,0.000009190716,0.05569789,0.00001088462,0.00001010764,0.936926,0.00001589819,0.0005628496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001477821,0.0002410257,0.08742691,0.0004081089,0.0001968997,0.00005664604,0.009851418,0.01814205,0.00003527695,0.8387334,0.04267928,0.000751139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.944585,0.00005023653,0.007968722,0.01076934,0.01122489,0.0004801257,0.00001961313,0.000209744,0.02469229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992006,0.000002511638,0.0003156078,0.0004323857,0.006857238,0.00001524594,0.00004834953,0.00002516759,0.0002975132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09819257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6533278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129363545","doi":"10.1162/002438904323019048","title":"Disjunction, Focus, and Scope","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ellipsis (linguistics); Focus (optics); Negation; Linguistics; Scope (computer science); Syntax; Reading (process); Computer science; Natural language processing; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03729007565535701,"gpt":0.2581781422434325,"spread":0.2208880665880755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001926238,0.0001685856,0.0001846668,0.00009930161,0.0003864741,0.0002115964,0.000101227,0.00005585426,0.0003788661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001939904,0.0001592171,0.0000408437,0.00003430781,0.0003492465,0.000058605,0.00005204972,0.0001283738,0.0002402207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000605334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000618534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001707992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008772837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989491,0.00002171741,0.0003016198,0.000283564,0.0001960722,0.0002479269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992176,0.00009116018,0.0001066168,0.0002321922,0.0002707247,0.0000816969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001239871,0.00004574929,0.0001682484,0.00003567116,0.00002507721,0.000016744,0.06275894,0.00001282754,0.00001185024,0.9358878,0.0001672186,0.0008574767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009507385,0.0001270226,0.001208938,0.0001594395,0.0001165001,0.00001500051,0.004364847,0.00009618013,0.0001804063,0.950489,0.04189854,0.0003933249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4233699,0.002576637,0.0519528,0.03120797,0.08829226,0.001706141,0.0001178964,0.001813355,0.3989631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865096,0.00002362423,0.001118654,0.0002738537,0.01111034,0.0000114828,0.00002090038,0.00003148669,0.0009000958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5631397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6492684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134928819","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00190","title":"Ergativity and Transitivity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ergative case; Transitive relation; Linguistics; Object (grammar); Verb; Subject (documents); Argument (complex analysis); Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Combinatorics; World Wide Web; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08824547584171796,"gpt":0.2813144731553042,"spread":0.1930689973135862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005323832,0.0001588186,0.0002168475,0.00007188493,0.0002468284,0.0002160855,0.00008588457,0.00005528553,0.000135574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00350834,0.0001539954,0.00003652643,0.00002734954,0.0005213891,0.0000640798,0.00003926309,0.0001373915,0.00009828116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004230932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008866731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001191339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005920518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989557,0.00008130252,0.0002355512,0.0002627495,0.0002344492,0.0002303031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990109,0.0002081914,0.00008785551,0.0002082162,0.0003424378,0.0001423789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002115262,0.00005446395,0.0005087333,0.00003367475,0.00002221404,0.00002496079,0.2399601,0.000003336678,0.000009933043,0.7581811,0.0002331157,0.0009472054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001397296,0.0002269143,0.002210059,0.0001011582,0.0001877168,0.00002207878,0.01714328,0.004172521,0.0002261867,0.8964256,0.07718311,0.0007041079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7966028,0.0002463465,0.01573108,0.007416353,0.02143317,0.0005029499,0.0000850515,0.0005603958,0.1574218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909467,0.000002036161,0.0008512278,0.0002304205,0.007215668,0.000007356867,0.00001815626,0.00002312247,0.0007053515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2228168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.627975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034865525","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00136","title":"Roots and the Derivation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Morpheme; Root (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Syntax; Linguistics; Noun; Computer science; Verb; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03468581705607945,"gpt":0.2475228477780545,"spread":0.212837030721975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002736307,0.0001184751,0.0001484929,0.0000498489,0.0003676433,0.0003331731,0.0001147541,0.00003779356,0.0008734151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003459095,0.00008085708,0.00003408704,0.00002200248,0.000546519,0.00005713512,0.00005017877,0.0001045968,0.0003259325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001764321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001818834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002120771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001953141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991721,0.0000574285,0.0002628085,0.0001690912,0.0001608027,0.0001777724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988992,0.0004109133,0.0001169996,0.0002165782,0.0003176493,0.00003867129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009015104,0.00001154019,0.0001788131,0.00001866762,0.00001874417,0.00000119864,0.07741453,0.000002013621,0.000007629325,0.9207729,0.000507852,0.001057107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009949441,0.00002940011,0.004898474,0.00004554647,0.00007701311,0.000004695769,0.007394671,0.005775843,0.0000248875,0.9625573,0.01797619,0.0002210613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6943606,0.0004833086,0.008253336,0.04849009,0.02731396,0.001989139,0.00001449293,0.0005359305,0.2185592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899498,0.000006779864,0.000391135,0.0007166684,0.007438464,0.00004479356,0.00001316709,0.00001824163,0.00142097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2955892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9563283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239325927","doi":"10.1162/002438904322793347","title":"Lethal Ambiguity","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Phrase; Index (typography); Linguistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02822122959501709,"gpt":0.3109081200118878,"spread":0.2826868904168707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002201964,0.0001232672,0.0001226537,0.00007797663,0.0001131772,0.0001303394,0.0009196632,0.0000811458,0.000006737296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008374865,0.0001116533,0.00004544525,0.0002616363,0.00009734673,0.0001250655,0.0002809554,0.0002238525,0.00007876298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008088015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001056708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008113288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003174369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989843,0.00002049635,0.000170568,0.0003206284,0.0002341317,0.0002698883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991771,0.00003858544,0.00006405103,0.0005178072,0.0001292076,0.00007323326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003380025,0.00005518927,0.00004958444,0.00002939258,0.00000657495,0.000372563,0.003699274,0.00001615744,0.001046777,0.9818489,0.0003359794,0.01253621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003036176,0.0000759148,0.0001748598,0.00008469605,0.0000062513,0.0001073961,0.00001712152,0.0003979862,0.02930972,0.9665095,0.002692576,0.000320355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005461787,0.0007699259,0.9868805,0.000396768,0.001600025,0.00008039489,7.191711e-7,0.001226905,0.003582988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5847521,0.000001424057,0.4142855,0.0004161276,0.000471722,0.000004615017,0.000001207783,0.000006241746,0.0000610932],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5792903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4553089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2820330329","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00290","title":"ɸ-Features at the Syntax-Semantics Interface: Evidence from Nominal Inflection","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Linguistics; Inflection; Principle of compositionality; Natural language processing; Semantics (computer science); Representation (politics); Abstract syntax; Realization (probability); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Programming language; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06176866726393266,"gpt":0.3076211826860228,"spread":0.2458525154220902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004664607,0.0002899102,0.0002694256,0.000102064,0.00109124,0.0004090591,0.0004315045,0.0001180796,0.002651637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007797204,0.0002214844,0.0001031805,0.00006830916,0.001134404,0.00009787315,0.0002486176,0.0003089758,0.001399254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001987047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007591943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005914588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01156446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980848,0.0001315275,0.0005012013,0.0004710614,0.0004199029,0.0003914666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971847,0.001053263,0.0003124344,0.0006460313,0.0007269698,0.00007663276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005677313,0.0001550347,0.002279491,0.0001345591,0.0003526769,0.00004916385,0.7395792,0.00003715674,0.003710996,0.2319801,0.01822191,0.002931959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002471881,0.002010532,0.03851589,0.004462376,0.002660011,0.0001458376,0.05601977,0.01117253,0.05848469,0.4586652,0.3615335,0.003857827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8909512,0.001003924,0.00848504,0.0102357,0.05905987,0.0006923858,0.00009351347,0.0004467613,0.02903163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581692,0.00001800576,0.0005767674,0.0004518207,0.03557894,0.0000185905,0.0000291126,0.00004544998,0.005112113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6835594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122596881","doi":"10.1162/002438906775321148","title":"Tone Circles and Contrast Preservation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Tone (literature); Computer science; Download; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Library science; Art; Literature; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04931907751775394,"gpt":0.3798333008619786,"spread":0.3305142233442247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001975662,0.00007862711,0.0001173845,0.00006323637,0.00008158426,0.00002641905,0.00009773184,0.0001069363,0.0003523419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002151026,0.00008011638,0.00001752504,0.00007919132,0.000239293,0.00001531356,0.00004340333,0.0001481252,0.0001328284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009877726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001693354,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008081466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005586838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999203,0.00006071532,0.0001679003,0.0002164554,0.00009194359,0.000259985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943,0.0001934363,0.00003890325,0.0002082298,0.00008494937,0.00004448595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006232174,0.0009888118,0.2179175,0.0001476312,0.0002632378,0.0005075375,0.04267574,0.00003394565,0.02066079,0.6146626,0.08033666,0.02118232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001016679,0.0001392099,0.9055002,0.00001596171,0.00002097258,0.00003159805,0.0002193,0.0003452141,0.0004029085,0.06931244,0.0228043,0.0001912615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9511328,0.001010523,0.0007831851,0.0002273522,0.00148984,0.0001393215,0.00001088772,0.00004957109,0.04515654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952143,0.000009467468,0.0001647245,0.0001278254,0.001421772,0.00002224228,0.00002761883,0.00001275463,0.002999257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6875827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3857896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979344993","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00366","title":"Diagnosing Object Agreement vs. Clitic Doubling: An Inuit Case Study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clitic; Agreement; Morpheme; Linguistics; Mirroring; Object (grammar); Syntax; Morphology (biology); History; Computer science; Psychology; Communication; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07157312559856567,"gpt":0.3120867509820009,"spread":0.2405136253834353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009286057,0.0003787745,0.0004972905,0.0002821845,0.0005404981,0.000658412,0.000314023,0.00009248866,0.002622178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00209775,0.0003745416,0.000109271,0.00008174287,0.0001857464,0.0001491665,0.0001404983,0.0003187219,0.0007557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002160658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000158564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009093454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008978463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971447,0.0002013912,0.0008230519,0.000699137,0.0005481438,0.00058355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975047,0.0005400514,0.0003090322,0.0008606869,0.0006089441,0.0001765849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005883141,0.0009801029,0.01173093,0.0001451148,0.0001453549,0.002888328,0.8081207,0.00006276576,0.000005817035,0.1743282,0.00007723907,0.001456608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006754606,0.004811608,0.00349164,0.0006136865,0.001318396,0.0007254691,0.8830779,0.0136224,0.0001007835,0.06881715,0.01378142,0.002884985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732715,0.00003720607,0.000147776,0.0002469108,0.01747172,0.001137301,0.00004185543,0.0002451202,0.007400613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852269,0.0000015763,0.0003541781,0.0003588444,0.01265025,0.00004887758,0.00004608857,0.00007507457,0.001238164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.105511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249917842","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00386","title":"Feature Gluttony","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Nominative case; Computer science; Clitic; Linguistics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Focus (optics); Distinctive feature; Predicative expression; Hierarchy; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Verb; Philosophy; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05929808606483453,"gpt":0.2664994727716295,"spread":0.207201386706795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001290944,0.000206557,0.0002483377,0.00005355411,0.0002762642,0.0002062974,0.0002455576,0.00008285336,0.001285082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005679285,0.0001977066,0.00009161693,0.00005166746,0.0002157446,0.00004235295,0.00007287281,0.0002572757,0.001034049],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003328688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005674599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001259741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006389364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987887,0.00004018913,0.0002438572,0.0003420638,0.0002790913,0.0003060898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988903,0.0001453873,0.0001332466,0.0002450634,0.0004340063,0.0001520421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002568628,0.0000273928,0.0001311478,0.00007403895,0.00004119373,0.00005429183,0.1837031,0.00000884972,0.00003375008,0.8009416,0.01448261,0.0004763032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006476197,0.0001689686,0.0002639311,0.00007874305,0.00015909,0.000005901398,0.0104167,0.003544926,0.000165442,0.1046215,0.87934,0.000587227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05248917,0.0007221555,0.01150253,0.3655105,0.0637821,0.001229031,0.0002274243,0.002427256,0.5021098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955499,0.000004043738,0.001292122,0.005373382,0.03545632,0.000008738802,0.00005834684,0.00004549141,0.002262557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9030098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537359480","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00226","title":"Covert Pied-Piping in English Multiple <i>Wh</i>-Questions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Piping; Syntax; Preference; Linguistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Engineering; Philosophy; Mechanical engineering; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04037437355552342,"gpt":0.2612087265536648,"spread":0.2208343529981414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004274352,0.0002425609,0.0003001769,0.0002286255,0.0002653965,0.0001489943,0.0002447052,0.0001025126,0.0006960514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0199933,0.0001988792,0.0000823256,0.00006709313,0.0003197385,0.000113871,0.00008603626,0.000177632,0.0003234788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009666237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001282594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002401514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981686,0.00008293301,0.0005852463,0.0004144515,0.0002809594,0.0004678194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977345,0.001007721,0.0001752561,0.0004102084,0.0005770943,0.00009515681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003351595,0.0001381387,0.00490745,0.00004991809,0.00003060663,0.00004178585,0.1244273,0.00001470112,0.0001650005,0.8680351,0.0007664044,0.001390087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005263534,0.0002572543,0.007814884,0.002216889,0.0002062741,0.00001130795,0.01379602,0.00269099,0.0008138787,0.5024887,0.4624526,0.001987657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.461717,0.0004404371,0.03479064,0.01136056,0.1223511,0.002045959,0.0004404313,0.00264641,0.3642074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824232,0.00001822428,0.0007306883,0.0002847366,0.01442884,0.000039048,0.00002642919,0.00005025656,0.001998604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5207062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138622955","doi":"10.1162/002438903321663389","title":"Deriving the Feature-Filling/Feature-Changing Contrast: An Application to Hungarian Vowel Harmony","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Vowel harmony; Negation; Linguistics; Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Harmony (color); Vowel; Natural language processing; Contrast (vision); Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04204858491006174,"gpt":0.3583032041976087,"spread":0.3162546192875469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001117197,0.0002427723,0.0002485129,0.0002037527,0.0005206716,0.0001031818,0.0005130809,0.00028261,0.0002145304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001082642,0.0002007897,0.00007163535,0.0004672084,0.0001943593,0.00002308854,0.00007664077,0.0007067292,0.0004243802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005010699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006333886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001440107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001075828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977457,0.0003280786,0.0002319606,0.000595892,0.0002374722,0.0008608757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981733,0.0003798419,0.00009534002,0.0009098045,0.0001982744,0.0002434387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006700036,0.0010241,0.009662939,0.0001017476,0.0007043603,0.0003932483,0.527571,0.0004784744,0.04833641,0.3081072,0.06884186,0.03410872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003403196,0.001201549,0.1694661,0.0001603613,0.0003054194,0.0004597491,0.01256275,0.005133755,0.008786168,0.03403572,0.7622489,0.002236281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6586337,0.003530541,0.2335233,0.007017828,0.01975121,0.003436283,0.00006991257,0.0005637393,0.07347342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905064,0.000008356837,0.001667894,0.002307253,0.001899344,0.0001968162,0.00003305634,0.00005606879,0.003324812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6934071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8187967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109119863","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00021","title":"Variation in Circumstantial Modality: Polish versus St'át'imcets","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Language and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Circumstantial evidence; Citation; Download; Library science; Variation (astronomy); History; Humanities; Information retrieval; Art; Computer science; Linguistics; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Archaeology; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0368478281712212,"gpt":0.355484235202784,"spread":0.3186364070315628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005437799,0.00009036376,0.0001221858,0.00005226117,0.0002295208,0.0000994546,0.0002229218,0.0002213806,0.0006184414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003561132,0.00008854644,0.00004247728,0.0002329767,0.00017398,0.0000813292,0.00003149647,0.0003143539,0.00005369571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000612178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002095249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006217709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01250948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998863,0.00009470134,0.0001766842,0.0002171725,0.0003244145,0.0003240548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994098,0.0001181554,0.00006455355,0.000191651,0.0001233942,0.00009247573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001145042,0.0001527629,0.002080631,0.00002098722,0.00002781175,0.0001457112,0.4158234,0.000008005558,0.002569059,0.5736621,0.001353163,0.004041831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008639578,0.000252142,0.1012216,0.0001480617,0.0002508786,0.000008748342,0.07796527,0.000586342,0.0005334752,0.2069865,0.6011857,0.002221693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8349568,0.00006112036,0.000262824,0.0007244758,0.01805555,0.0002368244,0.00001980843,0.000148604,0.1455339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907293,0.000006576468,0.000254097,0.0002127096,0.008311474,0.000007127069,0.00001660657,0.000009409688,0.0004526756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5998326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9399358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198850996","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00443","title":"Case as an Anaphor Agreement Effect: Evidence from Inuktitut","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Linguistics; Agreement; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07263871497636243,"gpt":0.3094470192901338,"spread":0.2368083043137714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004839949,0.0002916263,0.0003641217,0.00009864466,0.0004985622,0.0004697061,0.0002263445,0.0001011925,0.004842072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01142583,0.0002891791,0.000106738,0.00006775997,0.0002571378,0.0001345029,0.0001324963,0.0002359501,0.0008955834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001168946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001917216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01392123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007412387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978216,0.0002423374,0.0005127881,0.0006228414,0.0004231346,0.0003772606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972482,0.0009238122,0.0001900673,0.0007576183,0.0007015724,0.0001787519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001353624,0.0003454888,0.001646783,0.0002361641,0.0002769628,0.03144408,0.4189233,0.00003589345,0.000416023,0.5411445,0.0008490925,0.004546395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005331699,0.003091944,0.002647385,0.00388383,0.003029506,0.002924619,0.08659259,0.0132165,0.01937482,0.746623,0.1084714,0.004812779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9657013,0.0005213502,0.0009319695,0.0008904153,0.01762154,0.0003275205,0.00007547118,0.0001936138,0.01373687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980112,0.00001642995,0.001222457,0.0005068574,0.01667431,0.00003069522,0.0001544285,0.00004022934,0.001242577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3323307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283325051","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00478","title":"Probe Specification and Agreement Variation: Evidence from the Algonquian Inverse","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Agreement; Variation (astronomy); Inverse; Linguistics; Predictive power; Computer science; Natural language processing; Physics; Astrophysics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1105764653606933,"gpt":0.3125676580600695,"spread":0.2019911926993762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003908991,0.0001059845,0.00009616052,0.00003123666,0.0005748937,0.00004744963,0.000343693,0.00002732301,0.0004738465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002764496,0.0000816004,0.00002794104,0.0001597738,0.0002336691,0.00004193332,0.0002832478,0.0002414007,0.00004757154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003828815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004853601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001615052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000163243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985891,0.0003505147,0.000210235,0.000443458,0.0002340999,0.0001725884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984716,0.0009468608,0.0001286068,0.0003806094,0.00003173781,0.00004055085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002532793,0.0002809666,0.003683859,0.00003700977,0.00002856563,0.001548446,0.2304472,0.0001087442,0.735222,0.01217134,0.008281872,0.007936638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005886526,0.003102869,0.09966154,0.0005163819,0.000752795,0.002531638,0.03279151,0.01584306,0.1788555,0.1065045,0.5495008,0.004052917],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902225,0.0004251431,0.001140108,0.003240312,0.00362351,0.0005207081,0.00004473241,0.00008912485,0.0006938256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924442,0.00004726555,0.0004833994,0.005197708,0.001396012,0.0000487579,0.00001257052,0.000009465429,0.0003606797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5563666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5188287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743341791","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00258","title":"Syntactic Tense from a Comparative Syntax Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Copula (linguistics); Syntax; Variety (cybernetics); Perspective (graphical); Verb; Computer science; Subject (documents); Syntactic structure; Present tense; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1076155998456233,"gpt":0.3315065028109822,"spread":0.2238909029653588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002513148,0.0003369086,0.0005103012,0.0001157903,0.001783677,0.0009968457,0.0005865946,0.0001004528,0.001583426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009408851,0.0003237344,0.0001407117,0.0000177628,0.0009463157,0.0001681337,0.0001723599,0.0003342093,0.001108885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002213392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001160201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02287729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003746193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980885,0.00009443207,0.0004390045,0.0005853297,0.0003775946,0.0004150774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996552,0.0006512235,0.0005787097,0.001060386,0.001025057,0.0001326604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006339423,0.0001023908,0.0004299813,0.00001491995,0.0001816825,0.0000921426,0.2958238,0.00000286079,0.00003008278,0.7027526,0.0004001964,0.0001060264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001253892,0.0001831805,0.01201738,0.0003541546,0.0005782009,0.00001106133,0.1241358,0.002500335,0.0003305782,0.8427632,0.01487154,0.001000683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4724066,0.0003145144,0.0021619,0.01143254,0.04187069,0.0009645878,0.0004578961,0.0005747824,0.4698165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797311,0.000005931891,0.0009271085,0.0002413534,0.01755014,0.00002847514,0.00003539779,0.00004515162,0.001435362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5073245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083596169","doi":"10.1162/ling.2009.40.4.567","title":"Glottalization and Lenition in Nuu-chah-nulth","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Markedness; Linguistics; Covert; Focus (optics); Adverbial; Computer science; Philosophy; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05807824637727476,"gpt":0.3988079699116597,"spread":0.340729723534385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002048013,0.00008072762,0.0001139436,0.0001381193,0.00004953526,0.00001735156,0.00007417353,0.0001236772,0.0002059682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002693094,0.00008389128,0.00001405768,0.0001559568,0.0001006487,0.00001419994,0.00001781916,0.0001685397,0.0001037949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002099309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001800945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001215362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002687395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992052,0.00007804214,0.0001713703,0.0002190808,0.00008245721,0.0002438702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996247,0.00007085043,0.0000341079,0.0001659653,0.00005225475,0.0000521013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001003607,0.001662779,0.07710615,0.0001126894,0.00009819015,0.001092063,0.2430993,0.0000526541,0.008163447,0.5516506,0.01256501,0.1033935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00145011,0.0004705558,0.8921191,0.00004883567,0.00001277449,0.00005793807,0.0005554264,0.0006121916,0.0002079021,0.09970703,0.004512114,0.0002460614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639511,0.0005872278,0.0009272989,0.0003048253,0.001258817,0.0001603305,0.000005087878,0.0000435121,0.03276177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984753,0.00004286532,0.0001360625,0.0003704362,0.0004939832,0.000008193188,0.00002807745,0.000007895835,0.0004372057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8150129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3420987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984990514","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00086","title":"On Raising out of Control","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Transitive relation; Linguistics; Bantu languages; Inversion (geology); Control (management); Grammar; Feature (linguistics); Computer science; Movement (music); Universal grammar; Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07087884453781038,"gpt":0.2947050845790838,"spread":0.2238262400412735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004483689,0.0001608812,0.0002753947,0.0001153775,0.0001632207,0.00005045417,0.0001294976,0.00005919665,0.0008099665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005471523,0.0001488803,0.0000851371,0.00001919536,0.0002378641,0.00004443171,0.00002289138,0.0001307728,0.0003409526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004057465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002889097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000160842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003606355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987621,0.00006065911,0.0004125712,0.0001551083,0.0002702103,0.000339392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985047,0.0006044772,0.0002351556,0.0002792999,0.0002965727,0.00007977061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003670212,0.000118995,0.0006235235,0.00004485776,0.0000448245,0.000002543267,0.1266235,0.00001057956,0.00004351763,0.8717942,0.0002969378,0.0003599062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004084278,0.0005849091,0.004304862,0.0007358693,0.0007184694,0.000006434,0.01199119,0.001515141,0.001219834,0.887197,0.08627665,0.001365333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.337617,0.0004244069,0.03513967,0.002537604,0.1291589,0.0009473993,0.000151717,0.0004862152,0.4935371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821925,0.000001150593,0.000243327,0.000380737,0.01644752,0.000006500494,0.00001428901,0.00003121682,0.0006827799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6445755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8868564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988085378","doi":"10.1162/ling.2006.37.2.275","title":"In Defense of a Quantificational Account of Definite DPs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Positive-definite matrix; Mathematics; Witness; Set (abstract data type); Pure mathematics; Linguistics; Computer science; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Physics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02715187364240099,"gpt":0.3011279714391424,"spread":0.2739760977967414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003087895,0.00008015099,0.0001569738,0.0001924857,0.00001828234,0.00001796828,0.0004972221,0.00006061569,0.000005307345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006012017,0.00007573038,0.00003621004,0.0003942832,0.0001172803,0.00007957671,0.0001036488,0.00009778253,0.00000463488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002415356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008600778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002782966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001634555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990404,0.0000293595,0.0003801249,0.0001955782,0.0002209407,0.0001335805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999024,0.0001733171,0.0001998329,0.0003452182,0.0002433632,0.00001422514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008187522,0.00008613388,0.001621036,0.00007177056,0.000002356684,0.00001904936,0.0009067705,0.00002132556,0.003585805,0.9929037,0.0002754218,0.0004984552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000320584,0.00005867714,0.003885542,0.0002253118,0.000009152797,0.00002136766,0.00002839854,0.006029883,0.05817171,0.9300163,0.0009769053,0.0002561801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1266866,0.004445151,0.8605796,0.000240606,0.001316408,0.000263195,0.00001654502,0.0002758749,0.006176108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7359809,0.00000203756,0.263827,0.00005060382,0.00009990446,0.000004445404,0.000003767349,0.0000041818,0.00002720258],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6092943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3088195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765658883","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00260","title":"The Activity Condition as a Microparameter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Cheyenne; Mathematics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05950764850246014,"gpt":0.313497314914422,"spread":0.2539896664119618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004068668,0.000165716,0.0001692878,0.00003948599,0.003100908,0.001336357,0.0004386221,0.00006136821,0.0003224897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009431479,0.0001256275,0.00008698424,0.000007695246,0.0009236748,0.0000878916,0.0001103526,0.0001957145,0.0007708917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005153518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000607017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001979156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007617933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989208,0.00006183962,0.0002338433,0.0002543751,0.0002299979,0.0002991563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997988,0.000438678,0.0003665134,0.0008056066,0.0003438598,0.00005727061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005071098,0.00005046459,0.0001861088,0.00002142776,0.00005916712,0.00002746423,0.0341818,8.815256e-7,0.0001362991,0.9615155,0.0009538221,0.002816283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000680377,0.0001408257,0.005629359,0.0001053594,0.0001671168,0.0000146826,0.002832931,0.0009446684,0.001334309,0.7958856,0.1917762,0.0004885735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.746604,0.00006379643,0.0009907121,0.0119584,0.0371365,0.0005023225,0.0000457803,0.0002113185,0.2024872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833571,0.000008056188,0.0001285665,0.0002226797,0.01050738,0.00002302612,0.00001225372,0.00002662332,0.005714279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2367531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203899623","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00447","title":"Feature Geometry and Head Splitting in the Wolof Clausal Periphery","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Head (geology); Feature (linguistics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Computer science; Distinctive feature; Linguistics; Bundle; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Geometry; Geology; Philosophy; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04766803379865964,"gpt":0.2868508265204224,"spread":0.2391827927217627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006078507,0.0001852435,0.0002450479,0.00009895964,0.0003283274,0.0003621528,0.0001666934,0.0001028887,0.0002932909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005604094,0.0001509131,0.00005418079,0.0001040829,0.0002641309,0.00004242268,0.0000863134,0.0003977367,0.00003330698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004267372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007890323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003458208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001208701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986328,0.0001420983,0.0002881168,0.0003417007,0.0002694809,0.0003257544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986659,0.0005871006,0.0001113266,0.0003327286,0.0002585723,0.00004435765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001843209,0.00009388442,0.005577801,0.0001444837,0.00003592335,0.000342334,0.2263196,0.000006110987,0.00003560151,0.7649522,0.0007980433,0.001675551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002397394,0.000249383,0.05971105,0.0009659293,0.0003576913,0.0002950265,0.2441461,0.003102637,0.0001642703,0.3205363,0.3665504,0.001523907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9164736,0.001611569,0.0003389589,0.01817653,0.01102661,0.0003038108,0.0000314319,0.0001292874,0.05190816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858852,0.00001905103,0.0009416475,0.001314297,0.01007596,0.00001159722,0.00004641785,0.00002672947,0.001679115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4444159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.670903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118105954","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00186","title":"Lapsed Derivations: Ternary Stress in Harmonic Serialism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Mathematics; Stress (linguistics); Ternary operation; Harmonic; Philosophy; Computer science; Physics; Acoustics; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05554518527594796,"gpt":0.3226713479722413,"spread":0.2671261626962934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003295887,0.0001330237,0.0001519356,0.0001710444,0.00005134349,0.0001606254,0.0009086159,0.00009142295,0.000004442066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00145825,0.0001267379,0.00002530166,0.0003903583,0.00006310317,0.0002127079,0.000304199,0.0002064332,0.00002463522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001026127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001758355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001525446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001486178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988484,0.00006341023,0.0002638552,0.0003166983,0.0002490878,0.0002585226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990883,0.00007147097,0.00009304511,0.0004774236,0.0001793918,0.00009040842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001154906,0.0007307002,0.01918861,0.0003693097,0.000055379,0.003073181,0.09898656,0.0001845839,0.006159265,0.8008123,0.01317987,0.05714475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001610451,0.000204602,0.001181128,0.0005913446,0.00001507343,0.00008436095,0.0003019694,0.03641382,0.04037799,0.910372,0.007862718,0.0009845925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0876865,0.005810022,0.8922638,0.001178893,0.00777508,0.0005320054,0.000008393062,0.00218876,0.002556522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7176486,0.00000496094,0.2812413,0.0003764216,0.0005935009,0.00002161111,0.000008858106,0.0000108639,0.00009388789],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.629962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.516822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148386031","doi":"10.1162/ling.2006.37.2.329","title":"Raising to Object in Japanese: A Small Clause Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Download; Computer science; Object (grammar); Raising (metalworking); Linguistics; Information retrieval; Library science; Filter (signal processing); World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05999699038156184,"gpt":0.2845633775433342,"spread":0.2245663871617724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005109881,0.0002540678,0.0004536168,0.0008682862,0.0002217308,0.0002976323,0.0002387492,0.00008805267,0.0004994412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002868755,0.0002630204,0.0001544943,0.000401223,0.0001375508,0.00003587188,0.00007308718,0.000187515,0.0002401353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001418663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005546032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02353887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0401054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980061,0.00008854739,0.0006755143,0.0004676825,0.0002871849,0.0004749381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986293,0.0003465798,0.0001660659,0.0004358179,0.0003400597,0.00008215158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008072705,0.0003095697,0.01126858,0.00009976799,0.0002906302,0.0002249653,0.3813547,0.002860138,0.00010189,0.6025175,0.0003982818,0.000493128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005023474,0.0006249113,0.1341676,0.0009844376,0.00545624,0.00002683805,0.05814064,0.02837251,0.0005987544,0.6794763,0.08184912,0.005279192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9179404,0.00008517601,0.004507686,0.001523249,0.006381012,0.0004605816,0.00003544643,0.0002710883,0.06879538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870019,9.52326e-7,0.00124816,0.0003465571,0.008950192,0.00002429357,0.00008996082,0.00004042582,0.002297537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3232141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943921606","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00342","title":"Null Objects in Korean: Experimental Evidence for the Argument Ellipsis Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ellipsis (linguistics); Linguistics; Argument (complex analysis); Quantifier (linguistics); Adverb; Pronoun; Verb; Object (grammar); Raising (metalworking); Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05239265450870805,"gpt":0.3587575137403947,"spread":0.3063648592316867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000576137,0.0001600271,0.000233638,0.0002131115,0.00009023858,0.0001728486,0.001189048,0.00006760927,0.00002372566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007907316,0.0001138137,0.0001366685,0.0008369244,0.00005144586,0.0001509557,0.0002783813,0.0001571484,0.00002700244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001336264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006398329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001259835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002026795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985898,0.00004853668,0.0002762726,0.0004772401,0.0002940668,0.0003140468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980832,0.0008694284,0.0001201409,0.0007755836,0.0001083621,0.00004329851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005968078,0.001345379,0.04417735,0.0008812085,0.001610837,0.0003527578,0.1978496,0.003283498,0.03617116,0.6532531,0.004375567,0.05610269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001504187,0.0008141733,0.002714035,0.0009506904,0.0005101085,0.00002365203,0.001947464,0.6268796,0.3103386,0.05020132,0.002428468,0.001687757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06370723,0.02342157,0.9068183,0.0005580271,0.002881693,0.0014388,0.000003512,0.0005410227,0.0006298095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8671875,0.00001654073,0.1318525,0.0003996142,0.000244734,0.000090181,0.000002446427,0.000009057853,0.0001973876],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8034803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4641188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317774198","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00503","title":"Commitment Phrase: Linking Proposition to Illocutionary Force","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Linguistics; Predicate (mathematical logic); Pragmatics; Negation; Computer science; Implicature; Speech act; Phrase; Noun phrase; Commit; Utterance; Sentence; Romanian; Projection (relational algebra); Philosophy; Noun","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08509122445944696,"gpt":0.3382189386239118,"spread":0.2531277141644648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002640326,0.0001470841,0.0001457453,0.000165383,0.0005953291,0.0002181438,0.0002938681,0.00004059863,0.000515917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000169946,0.000133758,0.00005938597,0.0001136259,0.0002331326,0.00008277472,0.0001665275,0.0001441355,0.001382891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006946734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005916792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008551005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001050818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989137,0.00006745098,0.000268619,0.0002135607,0.0002609894,0.0002756586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990555,0.0001119652,0.00007563227,0.0004781145,0.0002061783,0.00007260617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001938853,0.00006267182,0.00005113784,0.00006247724,0.00003661164,0.00003948092,0.1527289,0.0001572859,0.0001168911,0.8330098,0.01229925,0.00141606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007795387,0.0003118146,0.0009433504,0.0006288884,0.0001231025,0.00001443322,0.1142879,0.001555685,0.0004315357,0.09773868,0.7822465,0.0009385201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2714262,0.0007996677,0.002578586,0.005618632,0.01038542,0.001819593,0.0002095138,0.002699283,0.7044631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843879,0.00001495249,0.0004786472,0.0008495834,0.003039699,0.0001132982,0.0004258029,0.00002936641,0.0106608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7699473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165351360","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00162","title":"Some Purported Problems for the Movement Theory of Control","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Icelandic; Movement (music); Control (management); Linguistics; Movement control; Epistemology; Computer science; History; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Aesthetics; Medicine; Physical medicine and rehabilitation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04170785901435441,"gpt":0.3061498045490712,"spread":0.2644419455347168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001937107,0.00007388909,0.0001548596,0.00001725693,0.0003959804,0.0000230216,0.0002273143,0.00007830109,0.00004534979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002498003,0.00005161681,0.0000943807,0.00008182455,0.0005523876,0.00002150821,0.00001927677,0.00007429111,0.000006029856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002361659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006243621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001468077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007517597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990403,0.0001466727,0.0002109756,0.0001234076,0.0002247025,0.0002539582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979039,0.001590286,0.0001378712,0.0001402302,0.0001779055,0.00004980536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003530407,0.00003214863,0.0001962969,0.00001869636,0.00004053581,2.022038e-7,0.03397186,0.00005256571,0.00001736341,0.9583388,0.001152,0.00614421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006202364,0.0001139456,0.0007581549,0.0000310086,0.00008679161,4.540249e-8,0.006895739,0.0009192268,0.00002939065,0.9050918,0.08532976,0.0001238737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1996492,0.02934921,0.4440368,0.01602885,0.08589606,0.02005845,0.0001709533,0.001220464,0.20359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902683,0.0000620418,0.00006291273,0.001251296,0.007421869,0.0001096253,0.00000288425,0.000009722562,0.0008113702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.790619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3045601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783111618","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00269","title":"Focus on Cataphora: Experiments in Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Referent; Pronoun; Focus (optics); Coreference; Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Expression (computer science); Prosody; Psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Subject pronoun; Salient; Computer science; Resolution (logic); Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1110553359674236,"gpt":0.3562315381186036,"spread":0.2451762021511801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001402663,0.0001406155,0.0001624597,0.0001115599,0.0002065244,0.0001451416,0.0003131694,0.000040094,0.001583732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002338445,0.0001218854,0.00003578913,0.00003743736,0.0007310687,0.00005852329,0.00007203065,0.0001445511,0.0008780871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004962178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000484684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001050624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003050959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990959,0.00006466833,0.0002527167,0.0001981277,0.0001582555,0.0002303258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999096,0.0001091115,0.000078079,0.0005301055,0.0001441626,0.0000425311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003195048,0.0001058339,0.00007459393,0.000005715763,0.00001261916,0.00001506186,0.2875468,3.024126e-7,0.00002271067,0.707996,0.002914715,0.001273701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002051118,0.0006869996,0.0008019879,0.0003929061,0.00003711099,0.000005007634,0.3459475,0.00009933475,0.005019008,0.07274002,0.571315,0.0009040859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2464558,0.000565962,0.00002194829,0.0002121788,0.00276068,0.00018387,0.00001644683,0.0001063668,0.7496767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993588,0.000006543367,0.00005997252,0.0005679209,0.002996991,0.00003400288,0.00001769116,0.00002130942,0.002707587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7471321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176096644","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00435","title":"Why Plain Futurates are Different","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Schedule; Linguistics; Plain English; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04850344077674531,"gpt":0.2631309876895646,"spread":0.2146275469128192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001354379,0.0002527259,0.0003326117,0.00008670428,0.0004077624,0.0003514127,0.0001770673,0.00008210451,0.002806068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003992652,0.0002311074,0.0001122974,0.00004499745,0.0002045244,0.00003856052,0.00009600431,0.0002080076,0.0002441029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007062906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005410247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002832254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001765334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984188,0.00009229575,0.0004221324,0.0003950528,0.0003104128,0.0003613118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998292,0.0003390819,0.0002009288,0.0004091905,0.0006615268,0.00009727819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001888248,0.000170873,0.0009962254,0.0001343266,0.00009433206,0.000273328,0.08842164,0.000009192626,0.00007626171,0.9022433,0.007260017,0.0003016721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001319068,0.0001234165,0.00470849,0.0005848222,0.0003722292,0.0000398428,0.06295554,0.002033399,0.002418174,0.4863612,0.4377806,0.001303184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6418085,0.001634483,0.007423549,0.04904245,0.1290732,0.000829473,0.0003444097,0.001378483,0.1684654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723447,0.00001414047,0.0003432723,0.002018351,0.02157309,0.0000167067,0.0001439832,0.00004525911,0.003500504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4305206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782970584","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00264","title":"Directionality in Nkore-Kiga Sibilant Harmony: Arbitrary or Emergent?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Vowel harmony; Harmony (color); Linguistics; Optimality theory; Vowel; Mathematics; Phonology; Philosophy; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1586885826713464,"gpt":0.4501962501652416,"spread":0.2915076674938951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007686047,0.0001726153,0.0002511056,0.0001863057,0.0001279898,0.00001926552,0.0002967047,0.0002061384,0.008143947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008481019,0.0001483224,0.00006158481,0.0003858463,0.0005569588,0.00001632089,0.0001155619,0.0004497649,0.001593518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005267877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001585152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009833756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005488845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980403,0.0002782313,0.0004009382,0.0005015858,0.0002066565,0.0005722844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988595,0.0002677731,0.00006995005,0.000506835,0.0001604764,0.0001354146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005500194,0.004137188,0.4654879,0.000215212,0.0008242695,0.003911295,0.1642399,0.000003995871,0.006810158,0.07568539,0.2549698,0.01821478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001546759,0.0006474375,0.8705688,0.00005876233,0.00002850915,0.00008906668,0.0004897498,0.0001648575,0.001574271,0.04223975,0.08210889,0.0004832133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9121573,0.0003639117,0.0001750152,0.0004013039,0.01150222,0.0002536724,0.00003351107,0.00009366828,0.07501939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887586,0.0000178897,0.0003386399,0.0007689904,0.003911708,0.00005532904,0.00002938694,0.00002830139,0.006091108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4050809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312063465","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00498","title":"Binding and Anticataphora in Mayan","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Linguistics; Object (grammar); Subject (documents); Language family; Property (philosophy); Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0490606737540287,"gpt":0.2701161779960535,"spread":0.2210555042420248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004896726,0.0001364261,0.0001961097,0.0002702138,0.000498119,0.0001283914,0.0001604291,0.000025909,0.001119454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001235264,0.000152799,0.00003069715,0.0000741796,0.0001944254,0.00003343855,0.000195242,0.0002500612,0.00004791507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008496932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000411297,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009394747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002684697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987734,0.00007863147,0.0003318753,0.0002936903,0.0002428616,0.000279547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993631,0.000199867,0.0001085384,0.0002115697,0.00006742076,0.0000495197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001973076,0.00007506338,0.004307263,0.00004318465,0.00001526484,0.00009204228,0.1642435,0.00001557803,0.00004076662,0.8305366,0.0001717145,0.0004393167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002873691,0.0004956303,0.01000752,0.0002180503,0.0002199197,0.00009031549,0.1563431,0.01021366,0.0001490492,0.6298028,0.1878576,0.001728721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588657,0.0001494986,0.0001272965,0.002304371,0.0101392,0.0002922669,0.00006852384,0.0001402287,0.02791288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996008,0.000005921554,0.0002948231,0.0002164089,0.00254789,0.00002876212,0.00005171277,0.0000287912,0.0008177223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2007338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244320821","doi":"10.1162/002438900554415","title":"Strengthening PF","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Property (philosophy); Object (grammar); Verb; Basis (linear algebra); Computer science; Mathematics; Dislocation; Philosophy; Physics; Epistemology; Geometry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0441663706038154,"gpt":0.2664231525432478,"spread":0.2222567819394324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002354511,0.0001955524,0.0002226737,0.00009042396,0.0003864279,0.0002120434,0.0002086778,0.00006232237,0.01776028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001372935,0.0001926351,0.00007975116,0.00003749225,0.0002408151,0.0000497493,0.00002621169,0.0001775548,0.001813649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004261167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004144765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006658136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001817997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986181,0.00004488136,0.0004231767,0.0002980985,0.0002653417,0.0003503641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990712,0.0002120666,0.0001012605,0.00033367,0.0002011398,0.0000806535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002362171,0.00006911057,0.0001331798,0.00003218209,0.00004220983,0.0000326711,0.176817,0.0000471835,0.000006744859,0.8066705,0.0007529024,0.01537272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009212486,0.0001518084,0.000415806,0.0002087333,0.0001977666,0.00001509425,0.009444811,0.005052471,0.0001539465,0.393638,0.588921,0.0008793891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3014313,0.0001301061,0.0006650155,0.002153625,0.01472217,0.0002881423,0.0000418387,0.0006535351,0.6799143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683087,0.000008458448,0.0009845443,0.0003544694,0.01798115,0.00001081455,0.00004517568,0.00004165022,0.01226504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6676492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048188704","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00401","title":"Statistical Evidence for Learnable Lexical Subclasses in Japanese","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Phonotactics; Lexicon; Learnability; Linguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Phonology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1347884067309446,"gpt":0.3918053928929698,"spread":0.2570169861620252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003276397,0.0001456101,0.0002242062,0.0000645304,0.00006957613,0.0001633902,0.000844312,0.00009269579,0.00001365186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01447375,0.0001334767,0.0000396127,0.0003496533,0.0001118042,0.0002023228,0.0002445519,0.0002721504,0.00002652277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005269421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001384146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005362503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005358736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998549,0.00006094971,0.0002938499,0.0004907545,0.0002439769,0.0003615025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982827,0.001090845,0.00006651795,0.0002741803,0.0001467044,0.000139022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002872736,0.0001584258,0.001923357,0.0009819758,0.00001777689,0.0007977874,0.02538359,0.00006271212,0.004095403,0.9395732,0.009278005,0.01744051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002112476,0.002064914,0.001599973,0.001336713,0.00006179388,0.00009120085,0.0007100855,0.4228321,0.01927127,0.528075,0.01971066,0.002133806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002736604,0.001455781,0.9925916,0.001837564,0.0004517177,0.0002622301,0.000003629638,0.0004746707,0.0001861962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6067562,0.000006205867,0.3916763,0.001027904,0.000450611,0.00002771426,0.000002971557,0.000009684406,0.0000424401],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6040196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406364198","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00551","title":"Gaps That Do Not Sprout","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ellipsis (linguistics); Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Linguistics; Argument (complex analysis); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Computer science; Block (permutation group theory); Mathematics; Psychology; Philosophy; Geometry; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05695771257283172,"gpt":0.2897791786359334,"spread":0.2328214660631017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003667971,0.0002408001,0.000301451,0.0002224799,0.000421762,0.0003792935,0.0003013486,0.00009829818,0.001216293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003611992,0.0002332054,0.0001099122,0.00006124392,0.0003338343,0.00004708716,0.0001122844,0.0002249921,0.0005044129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008660333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001090033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006296729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002491363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984535,0.00005613195,0.00041458,0.0003996194,0.0002998158,0.0003763326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985466,0.0003563126,0.0001547807,0.0004950484,0.0003848488,0.00006240249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002802423,0.00005815065,0.000711568,0.0001112195,0.0000615578,0.0000242274,0.05353414,0.000004266481,0.00001624031,0.9426391,0.001883714,0.0009278506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009199152,0.00007010085,0.001802621,0.0004816788,0.0002876349,0.000003906478,0.01145039,0.000758277,0.0008159138,0.6200726,0.3627004,0.0006365401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0646572,0.0004758956,0.006772341,0.01075129,0.07779117,0.0008005597,0.00008515761,0.0008235322,0.8378428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749457,0.00001054827,0.0006522949,0.001330546,0.009530838,0.00002400429,0.0000359513,0.00003217015,0.01343794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9102885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161656160","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00072","title":"Team Weak Crossover","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Crossover; Operator (biology); Spell; Mathematics; Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Linguistics; Pronoun; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0533132427359741,"gpt":0.2855116160400015,"spread":0.2321983733040274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003394245,0.0002180309,0.0002343618,0.0001028651,0.0003990443,0.0002162867,0.0001978181,0.00008527908,0.002659285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003400701,0.0002066611,0.00009335083,0.00003638543,0.0003334894,0.0001150704,0.00007810279,0.0001929503,0.00199206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007656919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004308165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005186117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001064333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984471,0.00004509474,0.0003946544,0.0002303218,0.0003111428,0.00057168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987885,0.0002244137,0.0001641744,0.0003746311,0.0003016865,0.0001465745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001615072,0.0001160595,0.002009896,0.00003636314,0.00003549912,0.000002549793,0.1218266,0.000002079448,0.00001680604,0.8709766,0.004685776,0.0002756062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007275636,0.00006889697,0.003065303,0.00008747188,0.0001705117,0.00001240473,0.0120145,0.0003374439,0.0001719586,0.140758,0.8419112,0.0006747229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08541687,0.0003629504,0.00203852,0.001235874,0.06612711,0.0003960734,0.00005311905,0.0005523654,0.8438171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434922,0.000003369766,0.0007023199,0.000429558,0.04463913,0.00001526566,0.00003727676,0.00004838913,0.01063242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8580754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293766484","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00484","title":"Restricted Structure Preservation in Stratal OT","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic Inquiry","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Voice; Assimilation (phonology); German; Linguistics; Computer science; Phrase; Speech recognition; Natural language processing; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06936725013495842,"gpt":0.3764954075415404,"spread":0.307128157406582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001996514,0.00009602592,0.0001300688,0.0002055299,0.0001472609,0.00001633411,0.0003319952,0.00009088675,0.004352328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004189238,0.000105899,0.00002437992,0.0004778011,0.0000926783,0.00001649578,0.000194056,0.0007172264,0.00003924023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006626303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008879504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007263339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009931447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986295,0.0002592936,0.0002382501,0.000298874,0.0002259518,0.0003481435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993092,0.000164136,0.00005816214,0.0003641045,0.0000544155,0.00004998306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003871337,0.002290881,0.2445555,0.0001615503,0.0004199665,0.0052111,0.3536847,0.003910718,0.02618237,0.251729,0.09520888,0.01277403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001978474,0.0006042948,0.9067345,0.000008850893,0.00001475238,0.00007161149,0.002388702,0.001095725,0.0001468031,0.04896889,0.03764581,0.0003416459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864832,0.0002092306,0.00004300286,0.0001365754,0.00335562,0.000212127,0.00009887217,0.0000381358,0.009423303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997403,0.000002067936,0.00009011567,0.000155475,0.0005952225,0.00006366894,0.0001840848,0.00001686339,0.001489521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6621789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}