{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":12,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"4bb2cf3d323c","filters":{"venue":"Logica Universalis"}},"results":[{"id":"W2417553771","doi":"10.1007/s11787-016-0150-3","title":"The Klein Group, Squares of Opposition and the Explanation of Fallacies in Reasoning","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"AI-based Problem Solving and Planning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Phenomenon; Propositional calculus; Inference; Binary number; Binary opposition; Computer science; Mathematics; Calculus (dental); Philosophy; Discrete mathematics; Political science; Law; Arithmetic","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006441353353435574,"gpt":0.1869280982988993,"spread":0.1804867449454638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004977834,0.00004453578,0.00007634171,0.00004327458,0.00009080379,0.00002164052,0.0002597281,0.00002683567,0.000001941229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007577075,0.00002013084,0.00001946481,0.000135847,0.0001408742,0.0001771314,0.00006663184,0.0000349252,3.215078e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001369695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002819147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007008376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999455,0.0001567637,0.0001098464,0.00009484973,0.0001020785,0.00008150188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989546,0.0007438353,0.0001079578,0.0001481022,0.00003349786,0.00001203953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009666965,0.00001156695,0.004719614,0.00001055972,0.00001156516,0.000004102333,0.00446956,0.0001378415,0.00298377,0.9614267,0.0002042082,0.02592382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02646638,0.003045928,0.3150636,0.005136784,0.0001636156,0.00009860367,0.02353591,0.1835367,0.04886892,0.365713,0.02636908,0.002001476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.573813,0.001308541,0.4016877,0.01312109,0.0001399378,0.000326913,0.00001441688,0.00008426504,0.00950421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980536,0.0001450055,0.001721243,0.00002444286,0.000005259603,0.000001468142,0.000001022405,0.00000132147,0.00004670823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5957137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0820912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244393162","doi":"10.1007/s11787-007-0033-8","title":"Preface","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0547482475818036,"gpt":0.2133557363061642,"spread":0.1586074887243606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005329929,0.0001098335,0.0001169391,0.00007694043,0.00016128,0.000007166846,0.0002439994,0.00006260605,0.00152323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003809145,0.00009816555,0.00006022299,0.0003428479,0.0001791937,0.0001863973,0.00006865476,0.00009609806,0.0075642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009499371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003142468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001325053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001418077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992092,0.00005673334,0.00007852624,0.0002224023,0.0001891822,0.0002439505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994726,0.00003295135,0.00004722455,0.0002954609,0.0000515993,0.0001001486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003610481,0.000594889,0.03363671,0.00001437496,0.0001698352,0.003127365,0.007608715,0.0009472321,0.06701674,0.09165549,0.7940013,0.0008663356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009067442,0.0001160351,0.03794445,0.000006191648,0.00002290669,0.0001455809,0.0004326177,0.0001196802,0.003467849,0.0005580445,0.9559335,0.0003464156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5684758,0.00005702024,0.0001571393,0.0001946084,0.00006216874,0.0001148233,0.00004127,0.0005951244,0.4303021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856113,0.00003268711,0.001069623,0.0001429394,0.00004007536,0.000001285292,0.00001657088,0.00002715429,0.0130584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4172437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255435609","doi":"10.1007/s11787-007-0015-x","title":"On Preserving","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Consistency (knowledge bases); Generalization; Relation (database); Computer science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Rule of inference; Natural language processing; Theoretical computer science; Data mining; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02792824008662721,"gpt":0.3093205292949134,"spread":0.2813922892082862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002766261,0.00006022129,0.00005980383,0.00004570084,0.00007500568,0.000008208492,0.0002806211,0.00006386726,0.005514992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000575849,0.00004680123,0.00003477741,0.0002006738,0.0001489044,0.00004469723,0.00004601922,0.0001029894,0.0005981509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002151717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002903192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000440429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005261452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999341,0.00003874789,0.00006613322,0.0001925026,0.000111521,0.0002501654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993846,0.0002544382,0.00002306588,0.0002241701,0.00001400604,0.00009972094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007599344,0.00005690564,0.00007419449,4.924536e-7,0.000005188191,0.0001094577,0.0003540864,0.000002286432,0.000163645,0.9964478,0.00116266,0.001547316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003570137,0.0002823857,0.0146695,0.000008078261,0.000006961355,0.000007234923,0.000399484,0.00001084491,0.0003850336,0.9477401,0.03598141,0.000151893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08571969,0.00001272209,0.002112729,0.0006348552,0.0002279504,0.00004614659,0.000002635388,0.00006986371,0.9111734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960415,8.886686e-7,0.0001063116,0.0009366628,0.00006896721,4.845775e-7,0.000001145099,0.000003451297,0.002840639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9103218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896430270","doi":"10.1007/s11787-018-0214-7","title":"Pecularities of Some Three- and Four-Valued Second Order Logics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Order (exchange); Mathematics; Propositional calculus; Many-valued logic; T-norm fuzzy logics; Truth value; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Description logic; Calculus (dental); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Programming language; Fuzzy logic","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02407551781598009,"gpt":0.2185111476771034,"spread":0.1944356298611233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001824411,0.0001563659,0.0002360087,0.00009687833,0.0001655321,0.00007585045,0.0005760521,0.0001194605,0.0002551182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006869078,0.0001251296,0.00006069627,0.0003055207,0.0004555539,0.000443035,0.0004238861,0.0001011427,0.00002712676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000249184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000578313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006558934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001696665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989817,0.00006303569,0.0001520396,0.0003579697,0.0001716479,0.0002736582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990581,0.00007433134,0.0001070998,0.000417502,0.0002477223,0.00009527427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001237756,0.00004825802,0.00129617,0.00002316803,0.00003524929,0.00003909351,0.001725353,0.000001918356,0.0005941773,0.9928477,0.001521764,0.001854733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004851771,0.003717862,0.06464217,0.0001366909,0.0001470786,0.0002437108,0.002010927,0.03487867,0.01277475,0.7141636,0.1602825,0.002150307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4087488,0.001434015,0.3176508,0.0008437323,0.0009141611,0.0004108831,0.00002775186,0.0004627971,0.2695071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782375,0.0000483303,0.01929534,0.0003367639,0.0001326852,0.000001479553,0.000002545943,0.000007540412,0.001937796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5694887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5102637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999258758","doi":"10.1007/s11787-011-0027-4","title":"On a New Idiom in the Study of Entailment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Logical consequence; Natural language processing; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1671434931500538,"gpt":0.2250500747339904,"spread":0.05790658158393661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008827713,0.00004691206,0.00007033549,0.00004893159,0.0000843148,0.000008832851,0.0002389332,0.00001032829,0.001118685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000875132,0.00002681124,0.00002416924,0.00005749066,0.00008308402,0.00005972505,0.00001727747,0.00005762576,0.00002280145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002336497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008223688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002959175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009438063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995524,0.00005496677,0.00008093786,0.00009566003,0.0001422988,0.0000737122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997778,0.00003687519,0.00003265226,0.0001187235,0.00001166942,0.00002231195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002666165,0.0004928947,0.00007318679,7.20236e-7,0.000003013815,0.00001531886,0.2767487,0.000001552783,0.000003069646,0.7201849,0.002243616,0.0002064214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002488928,0.009386343,0.007497612,0.00003384829,0.00005961534,0.000001444809,0.3000531,0.00002107272,0.00004420573,0.2473662,0.4326212,0.0004264518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3512835,0.00001052196,0.000005655433,0.0001959689,0.0001367068,0.0001398088,0.000001858061,0.000009709786,0.6482162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980915,0.000001394241,0.000006485939,0.0002419971,0.00004868721,0.000001198846,2.925778e-7,0.000001371055,0.00160705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.646808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320353775","doi":"10.1007/s11787-016-0144-1","title":"A Square of Oppositions in Intuitionistic Logic with Strong Negation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Negation; Intuitionistic logic; Falsity; Law of excluded middle; Negation as failure; Mathematics; Calculus (dental); Paraconsistent logic; Axiom; Axiomatic system; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Propositional calculus; Epistemology; Autoepistemic logic; Linguistics; Computer science; Multimodal logic; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01645153217185681,"gpt":0.2197394676817104,"spread":0.2032879355098536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008650443,0.00009688747,0.0001358153,0.0001334253,0.00007359915,0.00003081605,0.0003665755,0.00005555581,0.00008209575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004121929,0.00005913574,0.00003650361,0.0004131885,0.0001172561,0.0003905085,0.0000868666,0.00005396669,0.0000221053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001000017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006330455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007396211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001550025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992334,0.00007665238,0.0001315914,0.0002460706,0.0001311492,0.0001811914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993485,0.0001219726,0.00009516973,0.0002694558,0.000109522,0.00005536426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001680646,0.00009717343,0.002264759,0.000008994944,0.000008142166,0.00003689956,0.0005769967,0.000070365,0.0008770333,0.9924111,0.0001230628,0.003508625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01644226,0.008435993,0.3442445,0.002249215,0.0001881221,0.0002685102,0.003990436,0.0199961,0.01240168,0.5782824,0.0104545,0.003046286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03416709,0.00003796232,0.9153161,0.001140432,0.00007145391,0.0001882117,0.00001475338,0.0001268131,0.0489372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917759,0.00001625168,0.00782542,0.00004218359,0.00001675284,0.000005662852,0.000005100977,0.000003654528,0.000309094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9576088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2411486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202309894","doi":"10.1007/s11787-021-00289-y","title":"The Role of the Common in Cognitive Prosperity: Our Command of the Unspeakable and Unwriteable","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Relevance (law); Principal (computer security); Criminal justice; Criminal law; Inference; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0354634357098894,"gpt":0.2407398823709184,"spread":0.205276446661029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003212283,0.00008224663,0.0001874956,0.00001374093,0.0003904974,0.00003636041,0.0002163377,0.0000519781,0.00003991028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008339694,0.00004143291,0.00007701934,0.00007976215,0.0008335786,0.00006646477,0.0001799244,0.0002344554,5.889102e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001615355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006575856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001490043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01799152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991226,0.0003286342,0.0001527832,0.0001180769,0.0001449973,0.0001329454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991322,0.0002417071,0.0001332746,0.0002498373,0.0002268024,0.00001621612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004286652,0.0001566947,0.0335932,0.00004401395,0.00008289448,0.000003858067,0.0377598,0.000008774629,0.0004418744,0.9261999,0.0005187804,0.001147334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001560988,0.0001335016,0.02247887,0.0003271287,0.0002649474,0.000007825725,0.4524755,0.0001678146,0.01481861,0.1573372,0.3501705,0.0002571665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6929137,0.001875364,6.714643e-7,0.002779446,0.0002077176,0.0003116792,0.00009378891,0.000008219376,0.3018094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993943,0.0001716609,0.000004100568,0.000200783,0.00003597588,0.000003227312,0.000003923143,0.000005231883,0.005632149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7688627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135096857","doi":"10.1007/s11787-014-0099-z","title":"Extracting BB′IW Inhabitants of Simple Types From Proofs in the Sequent Calculus $${LT_\\to^{t}}$$ L T → t for Implicational Ticket Entailment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Logic, programming, and type systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sequent; Sequent calculus; Natural deduction; Combinatory logic; Decidability; Mathematical proof; Mathematics; Cut-elimination theorem; Simple (philosophy); Calculus (dental); Logical consequence; Curry–Howard correspondence; Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Computer science; Proof calculus; Programming language; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03278948530742005,"gpt":0.2732889310425868,"spread":0.2404994457351668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005302604,0.0001188326,0.0001801158,0.00006971684,0.00009657208,0.00006783265,0.0008111199,0.000062333,0.00001669844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001207178,0.00008169143,0.00006754264,0.0002696012,0.00003842397,0.0001576093,0.0001386628,0.00007761327,0.00001676974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007947208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000445798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007973445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002154469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987813,0.0001365595,0.0002479425,0.0003349551,0.0002452388,0.0002540366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988962,0.0003623537,0.0001591157,0.0004274093,0.00009424415,0.00006069366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003480027,0.0002477511,0.005959874,0.00003263889,0.00004395296,0.000009563346,0.006036114,0.0002777709,0.003318765,0.9439291,0.001552424,0.03855729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003649008,0.002060361,0.08193592,0.00006012781,0.0001094556,0.00004004406,0.004925427,0.05081358,0.01122057,0.2569682,0.5868784,0.001338908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.124134,0.0001026682,0.8635916,0.002495328,0.0003643002,0.001494988,0.00003297735,0.0001093797,0.00767478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934027,0.000001852464,0.006036565,0.0003236779,0.000091141,0.00004678543,0.00002729051,0.000005778859,0.00006426613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8692687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.333128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073500481","doi":"10.1007/s11787-011-0028-3","title":"Curry’s Formalism as Structuralism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Curry; Formalism (music); Epistemology; Structuralism (philosophy of science); Philosophy; Computer science; Literature; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0715885690738742,"gpt":0.2832405424332476,"spread":0.2116519733593734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001098837,0.0001244834,0.0001229681,0.00005518901,0.0001194626,0.00001307277,0.0004871261,0.000116913,0.02241708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002658368,0.00009467334,0.00007656526,0.0002198246,0.0003975593,0.0001942311,0.00009011561,0.0001484486,0.001193984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000217717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009730402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005122601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004845366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990261,0.00008164162,0.0001182805,0.0002866419,0.000136931,0.0003503844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993713,0.00004102317,0.0000550744,0.0003282344,0.00003352667,0.0001708542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000586626,0.00003559275,0.00007018513,9.67726e-7,0.00001435918,0.000123415,0.00446678,1.079076e-7,0.00008573883,0.9929659,0.0005565351,0.001621715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003832749,0.0002123637,0.007492537,0.00000434438,0.00001995553,0.00006252406,0.0009074251,0.000004577497,0.0004504019,0.9631056,0.02714329,0.0002137082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1579029,0.00003439368,0.0001684623,0.0003640302,0.0005132349,0.0000803537,0.00001340758,0.0001126056,0.8408107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996555,0.000006610011,0.0003191627,0.001047503,0.00007878064,0.000002921877,0.000004944621,0.000006967383,0.001978135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8388325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981966241","doi":"10.1007/s11787-013-0084-y","title":"A Reduction Theorem for the Kripke–Joyal Semantics: Forcing Over an Arbitrary Category can Always be Replaced by Forcing Over a Complete Heyting Algebra","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Advanced Algebra and Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; The King's University; Western University","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Mathematics; Forcing (mathematics); Kripke semantics; Order (exchange); Algebra over a field; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics; Intermediate logic; Mathematical analysis; Description logic","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02164358199467545,"gpt":0.2343952923612789,"spread":0.2127517103666034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003916578,0.0003563365,0.0003454792,0.0001152643,0.0009291789,0.0003261572,0.001128098,0.0001490605,0.0001103696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006401156,0.000261976,0.0001912006,0.0003876699,0.0001948571,0.00151519,0.0003162754,0.0003305611,0.000006210063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001597643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006864552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001254889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008135445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975926,0.0001566269,0.0003527105,0.0008357901,0.0003282169,0.00073403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980709,0.0003870217,0.0003120573,0.0009161466,0.0001285821,0.0001852923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008277145,0.0001117246,0.0002125733,0.00004539206,0.0001283364,0.00002459558,0.006663002,0.001319765,0.03398707,0.9384847,0.01150387,0.007436226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002789427,0.0009037348,0.001661921,0.00009076006,0.0001460943,0.0001394075,0.008137463,0.5739971,0.004801992,0.3904134,0.01537737,0.001541343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3152608,0.0003074944,0.6705182,0.00602333,0.0007525004,0.001870273,0.00006574045,0.000812689,0.004389022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812746,0.00003316208,0.01580886,0.001959658,0.0002120231,0.00005779811,0.00006540067,0.00003780696,0.000550711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6660138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416215139","doi":"10.1007/s11787-025-00404-3","title":"Defining without Essences: Ibn Taymiyya’s Critique of Aristotelian Logic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Meaning (existential); Dialectic; Focus (optics); Power (physics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02482835827912202,"gpt":0.2568095182743967,"spread":0.2319811599952747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001044594,0.0001470224,0.0002816935,0.0001224703,0.000205429,0.00004505783,0.0002704873,0.00007690128,0.001628998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008967779,0.0001107536,0.0001118597,0.00009572706,0.000601417,0.0001256537,0.00007187207,0.0001706023,0.00005114034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002957501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005348479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006019305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003869258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991115,0.00006740361,0.0002261785,0.0002365867,0.0001574911,0.0002008825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993768,0.0001309076,0.00009339873,0.0001999993,0.0001355109,0.00006337212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003238839,0.00007290298,0.0001518604,0.00005712751,0.00003202269,0.00001365726,0.002336591,0.000005234228,0.00008811362,0.9918586,0.004712726,0.0006387848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004854106,0.0002281066,0.0001627886,0.000230181,0.00009176636,0.000001088834,0.007880553,0.000086182,0.0004126276,0.4785812,0.5115762,0.000263849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00873576,0.0004232243,0.0003813086,0.005562908,0.0004432618,0.0001171411,0.00005241443,0.0001113011,0.9841727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844449,0.00005804891,0.0002188614,0.001732971,0.0001232539,0.000003693249,0.00001763244,0.000006799708,0.01339383],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9757091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415695681","doi":"10.1007/s11787-025-00380-8","title":"Understanding Money as a Communication Technology","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"National Identity and Symbolism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Currency; Digital currency; Moment (physics); Financial transaction; Information and Communications Technology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08552511407630911,"gpt":0.3346150299020755,"spread":0.2490899158257664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002355248,0.00003894861,0.00006636135,0.0002507582,0.000746517,0.00005393946,0.0003293996,0.0001249129,0.0002411139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002359862,0.0000425746,0.00002852495,0.0007805525,0.0003278513,0.0001709595,0.00007397882,0.0001006598,0.00004439958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003168241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001179861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002635862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002603445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994786,0.000104598,0.00006872276,0.00009688092,0.0001341529,0.0001170664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996237,0.0001091527,0.0000347376,0.0001383362,0.00006851142,0.00002552941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003306352,0.00001537172,0.0006346514,0.000001004689,0.00001025517,0.000002229389,0.001322645,0.000004448437,0.00003921451,0.9939865,0.00381661,0.0001637888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001338937,0.000005849751,0.0003117811,0.00001369381,0.00001015442,2.083228e-7,0.02339409,0.00001182978,0.0000315282,0.7554098,0.2206272,0.00004999314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01556112,0.0001708752,0.003133871,0.04320949,0.000115034,0.0001150221,0.000002479009,0.0001742963,0.9375178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839273,0.0004067183,0.0002823908,0.0003679679,0.00001279981,0.000002026428,0.000005030819,0.000001600953,0.01499415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.574168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}