{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":7,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"1472aa00662c","filters":{"venue":"Maine law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2253036634","doi":"","title":"Open Source Approaches in Biotechnology: Utopia Revisited","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Open source; Criticism; Open innovation; Management science; Business; Biotechnology; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Marketing; Law; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Yann Joly","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01837962078774978,"gpt":0.2947667808200521,"spread":0.2763871600323023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02980093,0.001247101,0.001652464,0.006940284,0.00864542,0.02093032,0.003300673,0.01776208,0.008816345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02703109,0.0008673143,0.001398231,0.005232171,0.09342548,0.03089531,0.01512578,0.02059087,0.001865477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01440231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009753921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004422527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002811031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9807098,0.01057081,0.0007125369,0.001969637,0.00499057,0.001046645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9555116,0.03515859,0.001464019,0.004041684,0.002470096,0.001354056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004997919,0.000006479939,0.00002262385,0.00004327181,0.000002556147,0.00002351387,0.0007077071,0.00009470027,0.00002933871,0.9932355,0.001474552,0.004354745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126403,0.00001240003,0.00005276743,0.0001770968,0.000002397426,0.00004996277,0.0004330419,0.0003007296,0.00005514159,0.9521139,0.04678224,0.000007684665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006587059,0.1176828,0.06265965,0.4306175,0.003538496,0.00006713482,0.00006072175,0.0002823196,0.3785043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6647009,0.1155392,0.05696562,0.08601469,0.01739787,0.0009404806,0.00009446555,0.0008143389,0.05753247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1576043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763138432","doi":"","title":"Enforcement Dissonance: Lobsters, the Legislature, and Federal Waters in State v. Thomas","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Legislature; Enforcement; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Fishery; Law; Economics; Biology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Christopher J. Rauscher","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04551994356527655,"gpt":0.2918166684997344,"spread":0.2462967249344579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01380856,0.0006148073,0.0007964604,0.001051434,0.03491651,0.01842355,0.003848089,0.03977786,0.01045741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021224,0.001111938,0.001394067,0.001091769,0.01091996,0.00967335,0.009986036,0.0362776,0.001101367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01346142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03590444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2471651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.343578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9882609,0.002360903,0.0004437141,0.00130991,0.001571332,0.006053247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887682,0.006307993,0.0006524991,0.0003738804,0.0009762234,0.002921285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001467984,0.0003218722,0.01488573,0.0001208012,0.00008224676,0.006048803,0.04117513,0.0003837739,0.0006146844,0.475987,0.4397593,0.02047381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003085948,0.0002178268,0.01951366,0.001353516,0.0002638748,0.001502416,0.0903002,0.001715959,0.001333028,0.09514906,0.7878807,0.0004611945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08950237,0.004288428,0.000937068,0.7245574,0.003979695,0.000128485,0.0001899917,0.00009937375,0.1763172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2983879,0.00126708,0.0004644471,0.6436123,0.001680121,0.0002446902,0.00008778329,0.00006519382,0.05419042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2471651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4914528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006317170","doi":"","title":"The Use of American Precedents in Canadian Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subpoena; Pretext; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Gloom; Limiting","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03465251296274413,"gpt":0.2982047500476032,"spread":0.2635522370848591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01129357,0.0005810454,0.0005009312,0.004021718,0.03934294,0.01488252,0.003041494,0.008173414,0.01007536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02367322,0.0009488997,0.0006515938,0.005295805,0.01633988,0.005843181,0.004578656,0.01219258,0.0009837109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1153663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1035229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9543954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9754758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868421,0.002529992,0.0004555015,0.001689695,0.004573259,0.003909387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824216,0.007221215,0.0005960369,0.0007963888,0.007623977,0.00134084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005593305,0.00000584754,0.0004193411,0.00001572769,0.000003313134,0.00009418876,0.003282149,0.0001170597,0.00004051012,0.9710287,0.02114453,0.003843002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002616667,0.00001157351,0.002710784,0.0005153712,0.0000542065,0.0001378108,0.005551534,0.001005743,0.0003249104,0.1443152,0.8452209,0.0001258245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01511978,0.005159833,0.00339842,0.03990947,0.000815167,0.0000661128,0.000274534,0.00007139969,0.9351854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7545718,0.009585895,0.008099844,0.07193895,0.0006559231,0.0002431614,0.0003368064,0.0001246641,0.1544428],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1153663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8370451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2852858962","doi":"","title":"Volunteer Lawyers and Nation-Building: Using Experience to Serve the World Community","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Jean C. Berman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2048538476620234,"gpt":0.4550879058964419,"spread":0.2502340582344185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01657944,0.0004009166,0.0005078532,0.001195458,0.01743668,0.0141787,0.002182072,0.004653051,0.01004322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01600678,0.0003919216,0.0003421228,0.001167246,0.009951474,0.009017177,0.01571603,0.005457848,0.001506897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002605669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0104489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002574152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01574881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857907,0.01094726,0.0001466931,0.0003567753,0.000641997,0.002116631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799947,0.006885795,0.0008078435,0.0008258408,0.001127554,0.01035824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006250747,0.0007842115,0.004490735,0.000314228,0.00001453624,0.001865624,0.6048186,0.00009155446,0.0007023176,0.05686188,0.2098617,0.1201322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003081992,0.0001619614,0.0008568985,0.0002267843,0.000005619988,0.000509106,0.2769464,0.00007353586,0.0001654486,0.00593096,0.715072,0.00002051801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.306298,0.02511457,0.007644393,0.4790841,0.009871044,0.0005928869,0.00008284519,0.0003652841,0.1709469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8207106,0.01402405,0.008104534,0.06437733,0.002376454,0.0006322939,0.000124809,0.0002868393,0.08936313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01743668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08768147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621087158","doi":"","title":"Personal Jurisdiction in the Data Age: MacDermid v. Deiter's Adaptation of International Shoe Amidst Supreme Court Uncertainty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Personal jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Almy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06082935640126188,"gpt":0.3381627950855944,"spread":0.2773334386843325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01165175,0.0002289079,0.0004743198,0.001262477,0.01024209,0.01293032,0.002406946,0.01064462,0.003180643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02074214,0.00040604,0.0004595415,0.001343977,0.02952126,0.01012632,0.005882789,0.01252977,0.00029701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01567477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01087547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1401385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1562483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991541,0.003045155,0.0002430739,0.00168111,0.002200158,0.00128961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930115,0.004780148,0.0003142731,0.000676349,0.0007701663,0.0004474797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009153168,0.000005965072,0.0002754225,0.000005654646,0.000002466012,0.0002031344,0.005765799,0.0001209482,0.00005908836,0.9845955,0.006703889,0.002252921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005364373,0.00004090183,0.002219231,0.000338947,0.00003210207,0.0003994739,0.009027069,0.001762301,0.0008462034,0.6495928,0.3355765,0.00011082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1227494,0.008427515,0.01527505,0.2782486,0.001081555,0.00009444063,0.0001865701,0.00008643528,0.5738504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429141,0.000910776,0.001846683,0.03693795,0.0002982917,0.00005091764,0.00002314625,0.00002701566,0.01699117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1401385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2786456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124387999","doi":"","title":"Legal Institutions of Farmland Succession: Implications for Sustainable Food Systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Craft; Diversity (politics); Business; Agriculture; Control (management); Sustainable development; Property rights; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography; Law; Ecology; Political science; Microeconomics; Management","authors":[{"name":"Jamie Baxter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03107750400559856,"gpt":0.2607271036489926,"spread":0.229649599643394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003363437,0.0002150369,0.0004219055,0.001375475,0.006987164,0.01017031,0.002019119,0.002928032,0.007397725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006845074,0.0002649114,0.0003207343,0.002002976,0.0425095,0.00901863,0.004237975,0.002267673,0.0003131742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05707541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04631487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5378853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6223261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981874,0.0004934762,0.00004608487,0.0001302131,0.0003194845,0.0008234118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940937,0.001893153,0.001044629,0.0002861541,0.001387362,0.001295023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001165033,0.0000253806,0.004174296,0.00005141089,0.000003594352,0.0001735103,0.005909053,0.001077073,0.0000656204,0.9789916,0.00325581,0.006260979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002395844,0.00002272189,0.02960886,0.000572217,0.0000124974,0.0001429544,0.05232992,0.002530736,0.0001908786,0.8039662,0.1105424,0.00005674686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2181437,0.02209715,0.01052349,0.2743978,0.000367574,0.0001388455,0.0004333485,0.00008109224,0.473817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800814,0.006758483,0.001532612,0.002295506,0.0001126993,0.00004266523,0.00006316484,0.00001351656,0.009099894],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5378853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9296724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765267238","doi":"","title":"Rewriting Hockey's Unwritten Rules: Moore v. Bertuzzi","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rewriting; Law and economics; Programming language; Law; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Patrick K. Thornton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0404144973460183,"gpt":0.3595711320834672,"spread":0.3191566347374489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004551639,0.0005054672,0.0003416913,0.001078742,0.01171231,0.007701173,0.003156833,0.01000583,0.006844902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01679162,0.0007738435,0.0004842553,0.0005388773,0.00784657,0.003630967,0.004076399,0.01458222,0.001699087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01426979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01415269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3477134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4701721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946954,0.0008164441,0.0001929505,0.00101716,0.001824124,0.001454053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971151,0.001256632,0.0001538203,0.0002130823,0.0006627351,0.0005984875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005726095,0.00007061888,0.002271936,0.00007158308,0.00002664985,0.001488717,0.01239738,0.0004626013,0.0004470527,0.5345775,0.4198336,0.0282951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000518827,0.00008561397,0.004496203,0.0004707302,0.00005366314,0.0005966206,0.005869766,0.0006765066,0.0008085682,0.04340292,0.9433575,0.0001299357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03961042,0.005324985,0.002892653,0.1682756,0.007027017,0.0001785544,0.0001348126,0.000157832,0.7763982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4554127,0.002874038,0.001823415,0.2228876,0.002380911,0.0002772123,0.0001170769,0.0002180507,0.3140091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3477134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.691379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}