{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"ee57e1254706","filters":{"venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W61319265","doi":"","title":"One View of Compulsory Licensing: Comparative Perspectives From India and Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Intangible property; Law and economics; Property rights; Tangible property; Business; Law; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Padmanabha Ramanujam","is_ca":false},{"name":"Yugank Goyal","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.103323282231626,"gpt":0.231398186279903,"spread":0.128074904048277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002203323,0.0002108591,0.0003934497,0.004207193,0.01406962,0.01379817,0.001943276,0.003251154,0.01234396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007500159,0.000173658,0.0004514944,0.006994641,0.01249831,0.003456426,0.002504422,0.004292573,0.0003887098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04740287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0752317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9313778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957746,0.0004664104,0.00007190539,0.0002201955,0.001525568,0.001941271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906629,0.003666206,0.000538198,0.0002658856,0.003860621,0.001006272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007468873,0.00003438689,0.007146975,0.0002014395,0.00003256952,0.000671547,0.01926116,0.0003599746,0.0002175562,0.9326367,0.01716605,0.02219699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008319183,0.0001059981,0.08560927,0.002240312,0.0002945179,0.0008634785,0.2362716,0.001456869,0.001279598,0.1436659,0.5278714,0.0002578027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1700713,0.01897269,0.001092314,0.099774,0.0002438722,0.00004072852,0.0005241907,0.00003024364,0.7092507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720496,0.00627863,0.0002742875,0.004532487,0.00005664822,0.00001112872,0.0001025501,0.00001992692,0.01667477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06862217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3439335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124276848","doi":"","title":"Emerging Scholars Series: A Sui Generis Regime for Traditional Knowledge: The Cultural Divide in Intellectual Property Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Traditional knowledge; Law and economics; Fair use; Equity (law); Tangible property; Political science; Instrumentalism; Sociology; Law; Indigenous; Intangible property; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"J. Janewa OseiTutu","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2838458954655239,"gpt":0.2683259924508578,"spread":0.01551990301466616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006196687,0.0003705729,0.0005069192,0.002525243,0.002522146,0.007416962,0.001364189,0.006179203,0.01151159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01171316,0.0002320941,0.0005952261,0.003233858,0.006524638,0.006045456,0.002126126,0.007079418,0.002227003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005468579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005874435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006791282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008326005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973348,0.0008957241,0.0001921636,0.0005606873,0.0008015853,0.0002150587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870418,0.0089548,0.0008907531,0.0005545299,0.002157431,0.0004007496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002347556,0.00005043254,0.0009237814,0.0005004508,0.00001171011,0.0003619592,0.00210587,0.0001901352,0.000238828,0.7467806,0.1916875,0.05712505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001542423,0.00005334446,0.002155432,0.001111262,0.00001491662,0.0003608784,0.002538153,0.0003620463,0.0005656062,0.07965315,0.9131479,0.00002186217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01078048,0.2002111,0.006422082,0.4844077,0.01942305,0.0001599104,0.0002449187,0.00007102622,0.2782798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3225069,0.279701,0.00669179,0.09532629,0.03126525,0.0003457065,0.0004108828,0.0002368619,0.2635152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01151159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0396775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600076070","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights At The Intersection of Human Rights And Intellectual Property Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Indigenous; Human rights; Indigenous rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Jurisprudence; Law","authors":[{"name":"Chidi Oguamanam","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05394631974626652,"gpt":0.2307683484872289,"spread":0.1768220287409624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005176473,0.0001408541,0.0004759691,0.0008234446,0.004291041,0.003970319,0.001392117,0.003864349,0.02001154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01429912,0.0001638005,0.0002824137,0.0009808649,0.00468622,0.002529768,0.002462184,0.003149316,0.001650528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00195692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01287945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06358748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1096859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996053,0.001111902,0.0001863294,0.0003102904,0.001463224,0.0008753232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915544,0.00472326,0.0004320545,0.0004568668,0.002243801,0.0005895449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009865506,0.00005783322,0.004417673,0.001571464,0.00005209218,0.001886344,0.03537868,0.0002031011,0.001113807,0.6565881,0.1680947,0.1305375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001481102,0.0000525898,0.01105571,0.001673291,0.00005862566,0.0006700079,0.01595934,0.0001219781,0.0006795279,0.02738909,0.9422905,0.00003439359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03574296,0.03262919,0.001225712,0.2234817,0.002812313,0.0001227814,0.0003918454,0.00007457554,0.703519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5393865,0.03781025,0.002597977,0.04699326,0.002383247,0.0002300121,0.0002355905,0.00004245519,0.3703206],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06358748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1264347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549218909","doi":"","title":"I'm Still Your Baby: Canada's Continuing Support of U.S. Linkage Regulations for Pharmaceuticals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Notice; Pharmaceutical industry; Status quo; Patentability; Business; Statutory law; Law and economics; Public economics; Law; International trade; Economics; Political science; Patent law; Medicine; Pharmacology","authors":[{"name":"Ron A. Bouchard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3343465214202145,"gpt":0.4277973384479963,"spread":0.09345081702778174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01732461,0.0003664017,0.0005515668,0.001597937,0.01433357,0.01281267,0.002264441,0.007412505,0.00821637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04434458,0.0003687341,0.0006492984,0.002529312,0.005152405,0.003071161,0.002472319,0.007129333,0.0007217254],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08279271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4274156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9713463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9817655,0.001965756,0.000365104,0.001052436,0.009839803,0.005011364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9207006,0.01591882,0.003405202,0.001338394,0.03236343,0.02627353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001491574,0.0001840228,0.01868209,0.0003570656,0.00005666038,0.0008663261,0.006468428,0.0004231472,0.001317595,0.04665722,0.8365729,0.08826531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001377418,0.0001218406,0.05295924,0.0004849964,0.00005867945,0.0001242439,0.006541601,0.000764725,0.0007100766,0.004322011,0.9335701,0.0002047266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0290704,0.01236692,0.0006336505,0.8889917,0.004003176,0.0001644777,0.0008508849,0.0001135997,0.06380526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3361018,0.01696896,0.005934889,0.5272086,0.002490145,0.0001750417,0.001035464,0.0001353722,0.1099498],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9172073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.600706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134481699","doi":"","title":"Tailoring Patent Policy to Specific Industries","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patent troll; Business; Patent law; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Economics; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Dan L. Burk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2373789672555741,"gpt":0.2545659620955213,"spread":0.01718699483994718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04541421,0.0006331375,0.001024269,0.005925651,0.004999506,0.01187375,0.002714912,0.02152901,0.004026223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09478333,0.001128945,0.001343109,0.002719652,0.008521985,0.01070331,0.004320065,0.01007224,0.001453625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007450802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01307604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006947335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01192745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9593999,0.01561323,0.003680337,0.00519214,0.009653115,0.006461371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9224156,0.05926849,0.004487873,0.004647916,0.007065549,0.002114698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005650793,0.0001360053,0.002309622,0.0002005269,0.00005307594,0.0003523738,0.001221735,0.003155859,0.00280584,0.9080498,0.03845212,0.04320658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001679738,0.0005601104,0.00886023,0.0009948685,0.0002030991,0.000513687,0.001775673,0.008659735,0.007786652,0.6709788,0.2992302,0.0002689711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.07411689,0.01151178,0.09148445,0.3440395,0.002176485,0.001111519,0.0003703943,0.0008465929,0.4743423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7866024,0.005151584,0.03345535,0.1396204,0.002750717,0.0007292258,0.0001415684,0.0001618416,0.03138684],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04541421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2401761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602225646","doi":"","title":"U.S. v. RxDepot: The Battle Between Canadian Store-Front Companies, the FDA and Brand-Name Companies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Business; Advertising; Brand names; Intellectual property; Law; Political science; History","authors":[{"name":"Michael Rosenquist","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09902926359137242,"gpt":0.2304771281758857,"spread":0.1314478645845133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002553315,0.0007120543,0.0005548328,0.001246507,0.02257134,0.008801087,0.001771929,0.02096223,0.01099781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006188571,0.0007837281,0.0009608407,0.001832247,0.003727135,0.002048551,0.001843128,0.01301501,0.002078834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04740244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1545905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954718,0.0002194873,0.0001065618,0.0003646002,0.002357085,0.001480404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960046,0.0008038349,0.000113117,0.00009351868,0.001967189,0.001017745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000592481,0.00004483043,0.002328788,0.00008747763,0.00002435891,0.0008929792,0.0009830709,0.0001505739,0.0006545084,0.07171213,0.9044586,0.01860331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006103408,0.00004218476,0.004526366,0.0002952954,0.00006647864,0.0002761769,0.0008703019,0.0002711187,0.0004650141,0.004217567,0.9888141,0.00009443169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01291278,0.01611488,0.0007655109,0.4170671,0.005144298,0.0001946458,0.001337096,0.0002414453,0.5462222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1065613,0.01214127,0.001495854,0.5812142,0.00111198,0.0001481254,0.0005575398,0.0001279079,0.2966418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04740244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3439304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}