{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":426,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":426,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"486508743cfa","filters":{"venue":"McGill Law Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2887140835","doi":"","title":"Gender Crimes as War Crimes: Integrating Crimes against Women into International Criminal Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; War crime; Criminology; Law; Criminal law; International law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Rhonda Copelon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03715039055804624,"gpt":0.3199736136314488,"spread":0.2828232230734025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001349295,0.0003545925,0.0003681671,0.0001384028,0.006558941,0.0005107517,0.001040152,0.0002185111,0.008766034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001796645,0.0003243999,0.0002794128,0.0001919513,0.0005825105,0.0009952283,0.0001030971,0.0008162715,0.0004840679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005843003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001546402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01448389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009374011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962749,0.0004417436,0.0006713862,0.0004584713,0.00119091,0.0009625399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983439,0.0001322677,0.0002226231,0.0002541998,0.0004306807,0.0006162992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001252087,0.0003011743,0.0001291126,0.00002760549,0.0002685768,0.0002000894,0.1347279,0.000039665,0.0003255994,0.8024361,0.002278877,0.05914003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000558375,0.0001089358,0.0001431211,0.00005036587,0.00004722803,0.0001012181,0.09566726,0.00003577631,0.0006752468,0.02432954,0.8778641,0.0004188785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.163715,0.0005846482,0.00002702019,0.001111381,0.001319336,0.0001361486,0.00001577462,0.0001266441,0.832964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894383,0.0009083214,0.000967378,0.003971427,0.001678337,0.00001819506,0.000009096527,0.00004392872,0.002965041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8755852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496343264","doi":"10.7202/1002371ar","title":"Qu’est ce que l’interculturalisme ?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Gérard Bouchard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03998965420852022,"gpt":0.2358753448484506,"spread":0.1958856906399304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005064779,0.0001426761,0.0002053487,0.0001399398,0.008830047,0.0003825579,0.000434697,0.0002009554,0.02159589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004163799,0.0001676204,0.0002572202,0.0002336295,0.001452522,0.0008984295,0.00003911382,0.0006136294,0.001738696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001496272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001285423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8871604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983165,0.0002630517,0.000335347,0.0001848023,0.0003501538,0.000550167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988101,0.00002372856,0.0002021283,0.0001376431,0.0001754659,0.0006509526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009561121,0.00008157999,0.00001634524,0.00001374862,0.00004727404,0.0003417897,0.01188228,0.000001578671,0.00001112399,0.9311635,0.0428927,0.01353853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001865275,0.00006616615,0.000174115,0.00009976085,0.00006189111,0.0004796901,0.00248931,0.000002284334,0.00002051825,0.003821039,0.9923704,0.0002283173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001558595,0.005185719,0.0000149427,0.004700791,0.00813541,0.0000677088,0.0001025204,0.0000258686,0.9802085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9209442,0.005856713,0.0003094491,0.001497125,0.002150825,0.000002467312,0.00000194706,0.00002735434,0.06920996],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784255215","doi":"10.7202/1042776ar","title":"“Sacrifice Zones” in the Green Energy Economy: Toward an Environmental Justice Framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental justice; Sacrifice; Capitalism; Framing (construction); Grassroots; Resistance (ecology); Political economy; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Geography; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Dayna Nadine Scott","is_ca":true},{"name":"Adrian A. Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03800127482925175,"gpt":0.3117718309379289,"spread":0.2737705561086772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001019898,0.000130822,0.0001472625,0.00004259949,0.00498797,0.0001330123,0.0005298583,0.0001505296,0.001057814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002699357,0.00010667,0.00005767921,0.00008620129,0.0007189483,0.0006456196,0.00004529058,0.0004315115,0.000134841],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002595788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001882487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01093369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06805417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981781,0.0004562557,0.0003005388,0.0001999739,0.0003386803,0.0005264521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992549,0.0001905196,0.0001219676,0.0001852089,0.00001062982,0.0002367784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004017704,0.0002141984,0.0008330428,0.00002719799,0.00001165761,0.00004789317,0.01701827,0.000006662943,0.000006350389,0.9757609,0.00035081,0.005682826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001912242,0.0001904097,0.003611762,0.00004595179,0.00005694114,0.0000409585,0.06612514,0.00002144541,0.00002424017,0.01797,0.9115418,0.0001801559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08113396,0.001915516,0.001379149,0.02466734,0.002373829,0.0003896024,0.00008970406,0.00007248328,0.8879784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809224,0.001388122,0.0008850438,0.01444616,0.002153394,0.000009930868,0.00000319605,0.00001482641,0.0001769397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9577909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21665667","doi":"10.3732/ajb.89.4.664","title":"Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, a New Age","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Byers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05830837734920551,"gpt":0.3040873362336409,"spread":0.2457789588844354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002481905,0.0000676788,0.0001369522,0.00002960042,0.003730649,0.00003466468,0.0001989564,0.00004573832,0.0007221478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003333927,0.00005308775,0.00007580893,0.0001379678,0.0004001469,0.0003500047,0.00001708123,0.0001343527,0.00004837288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005906918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009594271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03451132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1158149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990306,0.00007381669,0.0002058214,0.00009013432,0.0003837153,0.0002158975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995007,0.00002972972,0.0001024063,0.00006731011,0.00009449592,0.00020538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005079421,0.00008453405,0.0001269831,6.016762e-7,0.00002304476,0.0000320363,0.00148811,0.000005640516,0.00001536247,0.9964476,0.0006416489,0.001129331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002131053,0.00004183602,0.0004768693,0.00002188571,0.00001459324,0.00001403108,0.0002633643,0.000002406572,0.00004580147,0.05795266,0.9408754,0.00007810769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0300748,0.0003884801,0.00002325915,0.0007073171,0.0003618562,0.00006513112,0.000009514417,0.0000268191,0.9683428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975228,0.000341202,0.0003417045,0.0002551878,0.0006089493,8.463004e-7,2.824548e-7,0.000002992867,0.0009260414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589511104","doi":"10.7202/1038487ar","title":"An Inside Job: Engaging with Indigenous Legal Traditions through Stories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Law; Narrative; Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Traditional knowledge","authors":[{"name":"Val Napoleón","is_ca":true},{"name":"Hadley Friedland","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06392293215609136,"gpt":0.3653175644832329,"spread":0.3013946323271416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007177623,0.00008648897,0.00009244288,0.00005936933,0.0109138,0.000381308,0.0002000114,0.000052774,0.0006559839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000156176,0.00005757459,0.0000321957,0.0003248387,0.0002896082,0.004773102,0.000004434313,0.0004947185,0.00004030429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002423633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003184567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01421079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08969457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986944,0.0003193813,0.0002026675,0.0001236176,0.0003707896,0.000289198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989987,0.0002142779,0.0001651325,0.0001325129,0.0003235202,0.0001658718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001306668,0.00009911523,0.0005522942,9.88887e-7,0.00002550401,0.00001813688,0.02731355,0.000003803587,0.0001143281,0.9665779,0.0006562166,0.004625031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002377239,0.0000844908,0.0008791558,0.00002221784,0.00001687865,0.0001276391,0.01394943,1.824957e-7,0.0001985347,0.005092041,0.979268,0.0001237557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1436395,0.00004520837,0.002118815,0.07491281,0.001563688,0.0001814956,0.00005971146,0.0001472481,0.7773315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944599,0.00007103518,0.002718989,0.001261643,0.0008189054,0.000007775615,0.000001869315,0.00001311414,0.0006467174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996733001","doi":"10.7202/1006419ar","title":"No Taps, No Toilets: First Nations and the Constitutional Right to Water in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Sanitation; Constitutional right; Human rights; Constitution; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Obligation; Right to health; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Economic growth; Business; International human rights law; Right to property; Medicine; Economics","authors":[{"name":"David R. Boyd","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01965953804361491,"gpt":0.2262583701786501,"spread":0.2065988321350352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004795866,0.00005777584,0.00008377819,0.00003601278,0.005490832,0.00005016064,0.0001414155,0.00002164426,0.003848589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005375264,0.00002827961,0.00001810808,0.00005115631,0.0003973984,0.0001202818,0.00003062878,0.00011667,0.0001148145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003508147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002051612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8187288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991693,0.00006956448,0.0001773858,0.00008136644,0.0002788481,0.0002235102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999582,0.00007373012,0.00002821422,0.00004456248,0.0001280189,0.0001434656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001550938,0.00001123399,0.0003052631,0.000001176113,0.000009578795,0.00003736342,0.001967558,0.000003601026,6.19483e-7,0.9950606,0.0025329,0.00005463099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000346976,0.00000581142,0.0005983032,0.00001816156,0.000002661637,0.00001493028,0.0001966324,0.000002393194,0.00003401151,0.002948142,0.9957642,0.00006775757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006549761,0.00001841967,0.00001439712,0.003292252,0.0007837259,0.0001293509,0.00001551389,0.000004957294,0.9891917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970552,0.00003831921,0.0003343911,0.0008770317,0.0001404441,0.000007618691,9.130828e-7,0.000002152112,0.001543961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2660585010","doi":"10.7202/1040049ar","title":"The Complainant: The Canadian Human Rights Case on First Nations Child Welfare","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Human rights; Law; Tribunal; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Political science; Welfare; Indigenous; Public administration; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Cindy Blackstock","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02412311173988238,"gpt":0.3123006633558495,"spread":0.2881775516159671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001211056,0.00009530623,0.00008363088,0.00005956075,0.9524801,0.0007669897,0.0007190299,0.00008503558,0.0001539515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001739968,0.00004696592,0.00007102668,0.00006554963,0.0006681929,0.0001941371,0.000002119568,0.00044141,0.00005779805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005626563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009594738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985822,0.0002310792,0.0001996932,0.0001150895,0.0003374313,0.0005345123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986484,0.0001568373,0.0002304113,0.0003707382,0.0002254889,0.0003681028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001327105,0.00002197248,0.00002873381,0.000001511067,0.0000113331,0.0001227373,0.01372174,0.000002852112,3.690249e-10,0.9859866,0.00004006014,0.00006105591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001047103,0.00002606799,0.001101677,0.00002712728,0.000009774178,0.000548912,0.001319228,0.000001537682,0.000002515112,0.0006289092,0.996145,0.00008450887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002894407,0.00003366112,1.83682e-7,0.02514676,0.001543767,0.0002715928,0.00003543576,0.00001128271,0.9700629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997866,0.0002073612,0.000006385483,0.00002464612,0.001123006,0.000002201817,0.000002218693,0.000007969615,0.0007602301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2604334801","doi":"10.7202/1038490ar","title":"The Lifeworlds of Law: On Revitalizing Indigenous Legal Orders Today","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Indigenous; Law; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Democracy; Social science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Aaron L. Mills","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03365580843012047,"gpt":0.3125579615218664,"spread":0.278902153091746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001212012,0.000128575,0.0002038948,0.00001735985,0.01193105,0.0001151292,0.0003971156,0.00007740319,0.00008028853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004180023,0.00005968817,0.0001605982,0.0001132596,0.0007995277,0.0003270896,0.0000599691,0.0002352705,0.00004536561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000312713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001916223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01585066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07141685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980646,0.0003218275,0.0003356825,0.0001346489,0.0006578902,0.0004853934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987549,0.0004756796,0.0002614539,0.0001239978,0.000234506,0.0001494703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003285993,0.0000374087,0.0002710682,0.000004384853,0.00009320278,0.00001357317,0.00385832,0.000002971039,0.0001750994,0.9781104,0.0008498037,0.01655092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002637206,0.00008435412,0.0003688835,0.0001139966,0.00001676662,0.000006510044,0.001846234,1.227987e-7,0.0005231883,0.001455085,0.9952025,0.0001186099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09197352,0.001247651,0.00001365313,0.03055447,0.001784399,0.00043813,0.00003288499,0.00007954177,0.8738757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968848,0.0009021559,0.00009275394,0.0003992701,0.0004387185,0.000004844185,1.414886e-7,0.00001112424,0.001266161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984964656","doi":"10.7202/1026129ar","title":"Epidemiological Uncertainty, Causation, and Drug Product Liability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Product liability; Epidemiology; Actuarial science; Liability; Context (archaeology); Economics; Law; Medicine; Political science; Pathology; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Richard Goldberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07926483891439622,"gpt":0.4198371947832955,"spread":0.3405723558688993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01247737,0.000153727,0.0004047931,0.00002928282,0.003981153,0.00001457778,0.0001598256,0.0001495095,0.001789143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02157543,0.00009802799,0.00006401008,0.00008561899,0.0002704388,0.0002293509,0.0001139301,0.001617358,0.0001899704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001045553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002543388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001428104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002069779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939091,0.00417133,0.0007986965,0.0003256071,0.0002973644,0.0004979463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938681,0.004676647,0.0003421955,0.0003180708,0.0003128727,0.0004821148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002294965,0.0003438677,0.2292329,0.0005080126,0.00005534371,0.00001416089,0.001499511,0.00006155982,0.00007193788,0.7004161,0.0360426,0.03152454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004157828,0.00008616428,0.02523994,0.00007943349,0.00002528877,0.00002509246,0.0005734951,0.0001543659,0.00001098374,0.02633359,0.9469391,0.0001167676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6051143,0.0002249643,0.0003341051,0.1945097,0.002019676,0.0008582863,0.00001964843,0.0001547224,0.1967645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922458,0.0001069732,0.00117632,0.004627407,0.001312439,0.00002234771,0.000004470342,0.00001041529,0.0004938238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9108965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020489753","doi":"10.7202/1000785ar","title":"Rethinking Criminal Responsibility for Poor Offenders: Choice, Monstrosity, and the Logic of Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Retributive justice; Punishment (psychology); Aside; Power (physics); Sociological theory; Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Economics; Social science; Social psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Marie-Ève Sylvestre","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1091001274527506,"gpt":0.3525811739076435,"spread":0.243481046454893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004368766,0.00008179993,0.0001939119,0.00006103111,0.004423452,0.0000712539,0.0002200052,0.00007023362,0.00006992133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002802199,0.00005590836,0.0001725651,0.0001793878,0.000770244,0.0003886922,0.00005013306,0.0002752468,0.000001364244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005961324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003369736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03740199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08908759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983602,0.0006484574,0.000302234,0.0001492387,0.0003215673,0.0002183521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974015,0.001545823,0.0003266511,0.0001369677,0.0004953921,0.00009365024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002323989,0.0002715544,0.0004339953,0.00004408348,0.0002076818,0.00001365469,0.05474028,0.000007463663,0.00006738106,0.9109292,0.0001168331,0.03084386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002217036,0.0005246513,0.001267683,0.0000935248,0.004362056,0.0002876602,0.8277748,0.0002418698,0.0006339874,0.08527157,0.07701322,0.0003119099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5791423,0.001232279,0.0109313,0.008932726,0.001594183,0.001040708,0.00004765416,0.00008034271,0.3969985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938026,0.0002152545,0.005314969,0.0004492663,0.0001584309,0.000005926562,2.96263e-7,0.000005188248,0.0000480823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018588254","doi":"10.7202/1005848ar","title":"Covert Derogations and Judicial Deference: Redefining Liberty and Due Process Rights in Counterterrorism Law and Beyond","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Deference; Political science; Parliament; Derogation; Human rights; Judicial deference; Covert; Judicial review; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Helen Fenwick","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gavin Phillipson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03083224154445312,"gpt":0.2818543575952852,"spread":0.251022116050832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003621518,0.0001037351,0.000151361,0.0000605335,0.003650839,0.0001499017,0.0001079149,0.00009384789,0.0001398168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001425932,0.00008377236,0.00001996872,0.000037651,0.0004616585,0.0005652843,0.00002852537,0.0002382129,0.000003482905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004608438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001963124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01118255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2575063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990267,0.00008070809,0.0002281639,0.0001730806,0.0002676972,0.0002236979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995219,0.00006194352,0.0001041673,0.00004234572,0.0001225338,0.0001471018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002200588,0.00002892866,0.0004569433,0.000004022416,0.00001120604,0.00003612828,0.007261632,1.713396e-7,0.000002970844,0.9920567,0.00001896126,0.0001002871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007470287,0.00009831419,0.004515484,0.0001086784,0.00002834659,0.0001814839,0.0007171493,0.00003247737,0.0001105672,0.9346727,0.05857085,0.0002169744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4794916,0.00005280769,0.00000744731,0.0001887435,0.0001706602,0.00006953376,0.00001356278,0.00001182704,0.5199938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990168,0.00003253269,0.0001946176,0.0004088565,0.0001390853,0.000004272119,0.000001786349,0.000005861309,0.0001961542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5197976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612798282","doi":"10.7202/1038489ar","title":"Heroes, Tricksters, Monsters, and Caretakers: Indigenous Law and Legal Education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Subject (documents); Political science; Sociology; Categorization; Epistemology; Library science","authors":[{"name":"John Borrows","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02327443722608941,"gpt":0.3214301690673661,"spread":0.2981557318412767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006234858,0.00008338813,0.00009488429,0.00007151877,0.003876209,0.0004119744,0.00009855837,0.00007326911,0.0001568934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001486696,0.00006182674,0.00002475696,0.0001667224,0.0002957975,0.001753526,0.0000175805,0.0002475829,0.00001497195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001484919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002256433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0202833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02757451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990113,0.0001963621,0.0002097621,0.0001355266,0.0002274602,0.0002195978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991787,0.000152879,0.0001626963,0.00008606124,0.0002045224,0.0002151529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001303411,0.00006407988,0.0006244719,0.000004084326,0.00002182855,0.000004521611,0.004641498,5.534377e-8,0.00006315169,0.9189686,0.001101422,0.07449332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002535095,0.00003509181,0.0003720143,0.00002901039,0.0000195214,0.000154071,0.008290742,1.39511e-7,0.00004612386,0.00197253,0.9887251,0.0001021753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09022138,0.0008891103,0.00006460082,0.07579504,0.001987973,0.0002902392,0.0000308851,0.00005446334,0.8306663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945731,0.0004012589,0.0004347981,0.00247542,0.000377575,0.000005640892,0.000001438853,0.000008673901,0.00172215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029513835","doi":"10.7202/039646ar","title":"The Grammar of Customary Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Normative; Indigenous; Legal history; Sociology; Legal realism","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy Webber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01241771421676745,"gpt":0.2751842133774959,"spread":0.2627664991607284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001169394,0.00006073737,0.00008716194,0.000001622135,0.01029734,0.00008659932,0.0004155471,0.0001315029,0.0002455081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006474784,0.00003600545,0.0001517811,0.00009631979,0.001036384,0.0001850986,0.00003168845,0.0005926121,0.0000215658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002237516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001519163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001691623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0875062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989879,0.0001185426,0.0001725784,0.00006770181,0.0003993899,0.0002538926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993474,0.0001123975,0.0001253519,0.0001239815,0.0001639163,0.0001269123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004821554,0.00001907564,0.00003230998,0.000001309745,0.00001698604,0.000003437676,0.0009205344,5.767507e-7,0.0003130276,0.9923894,0.003306095,0.002992369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001089861,0.00001295768,0.00004212312,0.000005126905,0.0000103424,0.00001874559,0.002253155,6.949771e-7,0.0005326702,0.03055785,0.9664024,0.00005497111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006187856,0.0001578688,0.00000176442,0.004184042,0.00152839,0.00005875017,0.000008140193,0.00002292689,0.9878502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966262,0.0003751243,0.0003255642,0.0005140271,0.0006986422,0.000001678038,3.871873e-7,0.000006361126,0.001452024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044500382","doi":"10.7202/1018393ar","title":"How the Charter Has Failed Non-citizens in Canada: Reviewing Thirty Years of Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Dauvergne","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03101737801003715,"gpt":0.2320557403653359,"spread":0.2010383623552988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004772962,0.00006785228,0.0002251769,0.00001492029,0.001421768,0.00003161784,0.0002667123,0.00002327386,0.0001099341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001452302,0.00004795175,0.00004746145,0.0001455953,0.0003524303,0.0001449779,0.00003719425,0.000180416,0.000001069352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004222873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001191491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986739,0.0001010597,0.0002618561,0.00007863494,0.0006218664,0.0002626905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993053,0.000117461,0.0001817237,0.00007265734,0.0002412748,0.00008157638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006305807,0.0001783755,0.1848283,0.0001627262,0.000705609,0.0004018901,0.01216534,0.0002480712,0.001101518,0.6203277,0.1397893,0.04002815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003974932,0.000029234,0.2722934,0.0004857292,0.00003745214,0.00001343733,0.01171879,0.00002345325,0.0002643985,0.00369344,0.7107904,0.000252769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7276403,0.002774358,0.00002305903,0.09035488,0.00187524,0.0007925119,0.000137692,0.000008559481,0.1763934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991137,0.0003363012,0.00002429108,0.0003573254,0.0001050788,0.000004849919,2.107566e-7,0.000002676046,0.00005556576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6166342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005027983","doi":"10.7202/1007818ar","title":"Breakdowns in the Democratic Process and the Law of Canadian Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Supreme court; Politics; Normative; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Pal","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02575296900620931,"gpt":0.2818926077589995,"spread":0.2561396387527902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001453116,0.00005046041,0.00010251,0.00003780188,0.005766836,0.00003222141,0.0001809061,0.00002839378,0.00002670132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001072414,0.00002549396,0.00003276738,0.0002550596,0.001187348,0.0002052109,0.00001275423,0.000162404,0.000003480971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003886364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004511667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6727419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9641386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990819,0.0002147691,0.0001491567,0.00004135818,0.0002480484,0.0002647556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995418,0.0001820788,0.00006349902,0.00003918427,0.00006905451,0.0001043468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006356661,0.00001276063,0.003398633,0.000001386063,0.00001069454,0.000002339669,0.004235878,0.000001656954,4.799701e-7,0.9916505,0.00007963306,0.0005997066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007585281,0.00002147359,0.02285369,0.00005872446,0.00006338923,0.0001158266,0.02667027,0.000004108864,0.00002017933,0.4371889,0.5120991,0.0001457871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04305178,0.001122803,0.000001708675,0.0275946,0.0001770819,0.0001444581,0.000008502087,0.000003202321,0.9278958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981096,0.0002624973,0.00001338566,0.001378254,0.0002158937,0.000004367659,1.404769e-7,0.000001698234,0.00001415098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125842437","doi":"10.7202/1025139ar","title":"Property in Licences and the Law of Things","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Property law; Tangible property; Law; Government (linguistics); Bundle of rights; Public property; Numerus clausus; Right to property; Intangible property; Reservation of rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Business; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Essert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01975974329420483,"gpt":0.274742387572499,"spread":0.2549826442782942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001577593,0.0000305351,0.00007605083,0.000008161371,0.001711002,0.00005067946,0.0001640334,0.00002365308,0.00003133914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006336909,0.0000140356,0.00002456998,0.00006748479,0.0005234175,0.0001881544,0.00002787684,0.0001333223,0.000003238534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001371394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006123397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03788915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04978548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994051,0.0001433667,0.0001314971,0.00005201076,0.0001499719,0.0001180523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996786,0.0001017357,0.00007601741,0.00005320632,0.00003989162,0.00005062194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005215094,0.00001016872,0.0001718412,0.000001379942,0.000001872929,1.591484e-7,0.001906061,0.000001792437,0.00001274876,0.9953514,0.00001406048,0.002523343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003065871,0.00001162037,0.0002872091,0.00001709283,0.000003982223,0.000003680131,0.001035612,0.00008765071,0.00007140714,0.02465877,0.9734828,0.00003351907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009752969,0.00004818097,0.00002547635,0.01219192,0.00004273603,0.00008806366,9.135559e-7,0.000005765535,0.977844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987892,0.00008341487,0.0002206126,0.0006136704,0.00007366208,0.000003087848,5.161456e-8,0.00000191008,0.0002144086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122182973","doi":"10.7202/1018988ar","title":"Contract’s Meaning and the Histories of Classical Contract Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Individualism; Law; Social contract; Vision; Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Anat Rosenberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02367814637409953,"gpt":0.2768374858055749,"spread":0.2531593394314753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000647052,0.00005646285,0.0001461743,0.000007895818,0.00328114,0.0001219546,0.0001662684,0.00004854395,0.0002215221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000955503,0.00003467924,0.00006278722,0.00004399996,0.001000202,0.0002971694,0.00002629355,0.0002399306,0.000008775348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005415936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001359796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01824586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02749984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991707,0.0001336292,0.000217946,0.00007125291,0.0002327416,0.0001737344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991683,0.0003229787,0.0001605059,0.00007910061,0.0001510656,0.0001180147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009022902,0.00001673987,0.00004816559,0.000001105025,0.00001337177,7.725096e-7,0.001107211,0.000001198306,0.00006852115,0.9970854,0.0001732286,0.00147528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005290802,0.00001273738,0.0003008153,0.000006419193,0.00001866511,0.00001131855,0.000746641,0.00004976926,0.00008447346,0.03285235,0.965335,0.00005269996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00829422,0.0001945054,0.00004828846,0.03125693,0.0002058307,0.0002163641,0.000009601052,0.00001806384,0.9597562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998637,0.0000566048,0.0001748379,0.0005434541,0.0002056611,0.000008861629,2.202914e-7,0.0000047819,0.0003685776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081632868","doi":"10.7202/1013028ar","title":"Legal Hybridity in Hong Kong and Macau","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Mainland China; China; Political science; Ideology; Acknowledgement; Politics; Law; Sociology; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Ignazio Castellucci","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0273633526495178,"gpt":0.3041547007290828,"spread":0.2767913480795651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001135775,0.00005523365,0.00008719409,0.00004060332,0.001954424,0.0001035829,0.00006882453,0.00004719348,0.0002100631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000352905,0.00005128546,0.00003432027,0.00008048337,0.0001044173,0.0007033519,0.00002424212,0.000231821,0.00001142803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008386125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007543807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006671789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02019904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991384,0.000118187,0.0001406179,0.00006720242,0.0002263392,0.0003092645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996285,0.00003557704,0.00005776394,0.00004281476,0.00003075063,0.0002045366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000178478,0.00008339003,0.08575793,0.000004046289,0.00001179565,0.00003530966,0.002306326,0.000002269489,0.00007473853,0.8646324,0.0002821622,0.04679184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002013519,0.0000132504,0.04752633,0.00001447724,0.000005502176,0.00006032255,0.0006136358,0.000004992054,0.0000676474,0.0004053797,0.9510138,0.00007328337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5354382,0.0003095522,0.00001220219,0.001005229,0.0006851581,0.0000490217,0.000003613066,0.00001614076,0.4624809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986194,0.0002461367,0.0000778884,0.0001026535,0.0007756972,7.908565e-7,2.324504e-7,0.000004811949,0.0001723302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9507316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790988331","doi":"10.7202/1043159ar","title":"Conditions géographiques de mise en liberté et de probation imposées aux manifestants : une atteinte injustifiée aux droits à la liberté d’expression, de réunion pacifique et d’association","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Marie-Ève Sylvestre","is_ca":true},{"name":"Francis Villeneuve Ménard","is_ca":true},{"name":"Véronique Fortin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Céline Bellot","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicholas Blomley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01611624990052503,"gpt":0.3280149736920107,"spread":0.3118987237914857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004894771,0.0003718612,0.0003484451,0.00004576587,0.005898774,0.0005127793,0.0004747527,0.001124026,0.0003796201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005648533,0.0003588359,0.0003858649,0.0007210094,0.0009319963,0.001619302,0.0000956252,0.001415825,0.0000457333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001759267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005246956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005508081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03650203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937312,0.003466133,0.0006376674,0.0003914268,0.0007253469,0.001048227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969795,0.0005742047,0.0007609186,0.0002100523,0.0009000758,0.0005752417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007242027,0.0003532781,0.002858669,0.00007316869,0.0002155245,0.00006781675,0.05899291,0.00006261992,0.005595031,0.8915122,0.03894028,0.001256161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007571172,0.0002452974,0.005842525,0.001190527,0.0002475301,0.0003506031,0.0106115,0.000125531,0.00464646,0.144088,0.831366,0.0005289047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2665839,0.001546285,0.001390323,0.1893309,0.002338872,0.001251979,0.000718789,0.0004650066,0.536374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686581,0.009363479,0.002312121,0.004131296,0.001734764,0.00005565473,0.00006049729,0.00006602488,0.01361806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7924257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973249466","doi":"10.7202/1005849ar","title":"Glamis Gold, Ltd. v. The United States and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Treaty; Plaintiff; Political science; Law; Arbitration; Interpretation (philosophy); Customary international law; State (computer science); Standard of review; Jurisprudence; Free trade agreement; Law and economics; International law; Economics; Free trade; International trade; Public international law; Judicial review; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Clare Ryan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02818626240530645,"gpt":0.2241302193366712,"spread":0.1959439569313648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004516905,0.0001187384,0.0001102296,0.00005675548,0.001689133,0.0003767378,0.0001254578,0.00002157966,0.0003101405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001803184,0.00005491898,0.00004403795,0.00009566278,0.0002285484,0.0005735926,0.00007888975,0.0001040002,0.00002305797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003466956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002895406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004273159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001934935,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993133,0.00002635821,0.0001909959,0.00009961954,0.0001884568,0.0001813014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995621,0.00004551223,0.0001431035,0.00008539702,0.000146944,0.00001690163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001566578,0.00002519971,0.0002248509,0.00000508321,0.00006992777,0.000006669674,0.0001235034,0.00000761559,0.000007808337,0.9974357,0.001143315,0.0007936595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001897433,0.0000476462,0.0004682715,0.00001646067,0.00006811812,0.00003935909,0.0005642083,0.001822535,0.00015051,0.03832316,0.9565084,0.00009388078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1193284,0.0002767793,0.0001029641,0.008486422,0.000360821,0.0003221513,0.00002241067,0.00004769221,0.8710523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829947,0.0003998223,0.00009960097,0.01547562,0.0002913385,0.00001058036,0.00001343035,0.00001307622,0.0007017986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9591125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783681570","doi":"10.7202/1042775ar","title":"“Legalizing” the Great Bear Rainforest Agreements: Colonial Adaptations Toward Reconciliation and Conservation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Australian Government; Institute of Science and Technology Austria; Tula Foundation","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Colonialism; Indigenous; Government (linguistics); Political science; Environmental governance; Indigenous rights; Rainforest; Human rights; Geography; Law; Business; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Deborah Curran","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03721140324976968,"gpt":0.2390502351249021,"spread":0.2018388318751324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003031155,0.00008611232,0.00007597299,0.0000429668,0.001246247,0.00009821636,0.00008441871,0.00003878731,0.0001082106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003177968,0.00006287562,0.00002832196,0.00008156657,0.00008804738,0.0001257506,0.00002218175,0.0001356428,0.00003538371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002850788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001721634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001324942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993885,0.00003194645,0.0002007902,0.00007088568,0.0001560149,0.0001519289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996848,0.00003318604,0.00005688494,0.00008686094,0.00008102978,0.0000572097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003157407,0.0001366253,0.01086338,0.0003108596,0.001916965,0.0001115662,0.03185027,0.03567874,0.001374135,0.4987711,0.1434063,0.2752644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004248393,0.00008390169,0.005883316,0.00003614033,0.00003444624,0.00004773459,0.0004151748,0.02398127,0.0001211315,0.0001382286,0.9687362,0.00009756305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5283812,0.0004013564,0.006736878,0.009031639,0.002467572,0.0005744052,0.00005546288,0.000312378,0.4520391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982381,0.00006785937,0.0006516189,0.000422863,0.0003131704,0.000006789754,0.000004570565,0.00001263833,0.0002823328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.82533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.958525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063574972","doi":"10.7202/038178ar","title":"Between Exclusion and Assimilation: Experimentalizing Multiculturalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Reasonable accommodation; Epistemology; Charter; Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Faisal Bhabha","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06003431359858567,"gpt":0.3527072880083043,"spread":0.2926729744097186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003862406,0.0001246779,0.0001766799,0.0000188362,0.01068837,0.0001750697,0.0001261615,0.00009497006,0.0001067426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000802315,0.00008978962,0.00007024184,0.00009065407,0.0001951961,0.0005605315,0.00003721006,0.0002173328,0.00001038563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002454185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002772615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001609621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00137722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987249,0.0001563993,0.0002335019,0.0001501876,0.0004320896,0.0003028671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994255,0.00006771874,0.0001257352,0.00004942686,0.0001151213,0.0002164455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001026561,0.0003776946,0.0159086,0.00002876264,0.0004322757,0.0002080125,0.2927245,0.00006027729,0.02002238,0.4580018,0.008835444,0.2032976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008911252,0.000101829,0.04942743,0.00008207944,0.00004961478,0.00002658366,0.02223327,0.00001026644,0.002754394,0.001092321,0.9229337,0.0003973993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5147362,0.001600354,0.0000246273,0.0297067,0.0007552106,0.0004501225,0.00001753604,0.0001970349,0.4525123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972032,0.0002539979,0.001178492,0.0003865839,0.0007829149,0.000001583742,0.000002072716,0.000004838377,0.000186276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9140983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977942614","doi":"10.7202/1013387ar","title":"The 1969 African Refugee Convention: Innovations, Misconceptions, and Omissions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Convention; Expansive; Political science; Silence; Refugee law; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Marina Sharpe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02826671819194547,"gpt":0.2215184647804792,"spread":0.1932517465885338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001436971,0.00008946079,0.00009967443,0.00002822384,0.006951181,0.0003202847,0.0001218518,0.00002766517,0.001712646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003648056,0.00005311051,0.00005693606,0.00003522178,0.0004367213,0.0002938105,0.00003100962,0.0002539029,0.0001429875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004725479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008542365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004377413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001240476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991905,0.00006234629,0.0003069668,0.00009200379,0.000143278,0.0002049162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993581,0.00009181257,0.00008963903,0.0001085515,0.0001886196,0.0001632622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002759027,0.00002289288,0.000009590213,0.000002246531,0.00001557256,0.000001871693,0.000200588,1.315574e-7,0.000004427468,0.989706,0.005979259,0.004054701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001462085,0.00004351497,0.00007169304,0.00001267274,0.000009244891,0.00002442718,0.001049839,0.00007194634,0.000001605172,0.07007531,0.9284133,0.00008024772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008382422,0.0004075231,0.00004080003,0.01469881,0.0008496949,0.000149032,0.00004832538,0.00004470846,0.9753787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679143,0.00005333971,0.00006358218,0.0005844735,0.000470505,0.00001678065,0.000004694037,0.000009124063,0.03088325],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9595318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001310812","doi":"10.7202/1002368ar","title":"The Judicial System in the Digital Age: Revisiting the Relationship between Privacy and Accessibility in the Cyber Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Transparency (behavior); Openness to experience; Information privacy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Internet privacy; Copying; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Law; Privacy policy; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Karen Eltis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0929479725175142,"gpt":0.2803846439826713,"spread":0.1874366714651571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002748023,0.0001122482,0.0001235171,0.00004895545,0.003870753,0.001385167,0.000590199,0.0000459262,0.00001226035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004916494,0.00004711131,0.0000772459,0.000306255,0.0001596587,0.0009573186,0.0001228575,0.000604551,0.00002559686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004931452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005692642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006727556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002297281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987416,0.0001658608,0.0004257676,0.0001304704,0.0002954316,0.0002408572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986736,0.0007271165,0.00027713,0.0002522306,0.00005862545,0.00001125033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001495447,0.00002167989,0.2321593,0.00001876768,0.00001158445,0.00001581138,0.0003430421,8.189841e-7,2.052276e-7,0.7504928,0.0001909231,0.01673017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002422201,0.000003043737,0.7302665,0.00007761825,0.00002723808,0.00002875788,0.006131149,0.00004624136,1.806138e-7,0.003917706,0.2591967,0.00006260908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3616516,0.0002006509,0.00003634273,0.007461231,0.0002329943,0.0004354299,0.000007204324,0.00002715267,0.6299474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984114,0.000006983673,0.000003438583,0.0006305585,0.0009003874,0.00001434697,0.0000026107,0.000008386332,0.00002192493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7465751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003998827","doi":"10.7202/045086ar","title":"Principles-Based Securities Regulation in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Financial crisis; Financial regulation; Business; Systemic risk; Financial market; Regulatory reform; Economics; Finance; Accounting; Financial system; Market economy; Macroeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Cristie Ford","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02600271453978982,"gpt":0.2259938378811224,"spread":0.1999911233413326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007336428,0.0001012585,0.0001915673,0.00004675981,0.0006659717,0.00005526614,0.0003854496,0.0001016264,0.0001803452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002154525,0.00007185149,0.0001754705,0.0003079842,0.0001069368,0.0001423806,0.00003173419,0.0002873822,0.00001692196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007087555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001782837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005510851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009977131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989379,0.00003693839,0.0005906879,0.0001342649,0.0001048088,0.0001954076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992097,0.00002825699,0.0004029236,0.0002568615,0.0000653841,0.00003684998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001471339,0.0000500446,0.01917036,0.000005973526,0.000002893517,0.000001400716,0.00004858293,0.0003268068,0.000006174937,0.9797625,0.0002826206,0.000327948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000380522,0.00002366127,0.4058732,0.00001394196,0.000003798485,0.00002540394,0.00004737225,0.0002957279,0.0001640311,0.0785423,0.5145429,0.0000871202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6900743,0.0003487856,0.0004644036,0.008973714,0.002334675,0.0003353077,0.0005358338,0.00001852888,0.2969145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989025,0.00001000905,0.0002324234,0.0006870251,0.0001293519,0.000004621296,0.00000199111,0.000005668323,0.00002638876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9012202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5567473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126051783","doi":"","title":"Enhancing the Accountability of Credit Rating Agencies : The Case for a Disclosure-based Model","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Credit rating; Business; Accounting; Financial system; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Stéphane Rousseau","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03555714488539851,"gpt":0.2465311075655131,"spread":0.2109739626801146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003587246,0.0001339957,0.0002641328,0.00005149978,0.002676419,0.0001084937,0.0003092394,0.00006106004,0.00005194475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003402398,0.00008985811,0.000233442,0.0001849881,0.0002356658,0.000218078,0.00003864382,0.0002025936,0.000002311465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001917523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002488086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001665929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01616915,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998373,0.0000490719,0.0009885153,0.0002301896,0.00007835688,0.0002808325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981701,0.0005153817,0.0007111494,0.0004062339,0.0001685868,0.00002855304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003070683,0.0001604395,0.005161298,0.00007298189,0.00002749244,0.000004478919,0.0004950715,0.1681356,0.0001895713,0.8251541,0.0001036146,0.0004646844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00116523,0.000131033,0.008225934,0.0000464226,0.00005167533,0.0002800392,0.0008579966,0.6691487,0.003867327,0.304676,0.01112818,0.0004214692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8752706,0.0006933812,0.1126114,0.001091612,0.0004110963,0.0005144976,0.0004432872,0.00002271082,0.008941381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971819,0.000002369694,0.002484455,0.00006952177,0.0001890821,0.00002411562,0.000002844567,0.00001734677,0.0000283493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5204781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1829280546","doi":"10.7202/1032678ar","title":"Challenges to Assessing Same-Sex Relationships under Refugee Law in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Adjudication; Refugee law; Credibility; Identity (music); Cherokee; Criminology; Political science; Context (archaeology); Multiculturalism; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Hersh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1415938503480424,"gpt":0.3402310838880431,"spread":0.1986372335400007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001848255,0.00009714494,0.000143355,0.00006740496,0.002194631,0.0001513345,0.0001750051,0.00008572799,0.00006319195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000311459,0.00008716336,0.00003151996,0.0001897283,0.00005343737,0.000747654,0.00001546232,0.0003922419,0.0000210172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00176124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004834595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8904344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980815,0.0005498817,0.0003230159,0.0001570418,0.0005958381,0.0002927314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999081,0.0001129682,0.0001167235,0.0001135244,0.0002318191,0.0003439981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000547909,0.0000188775,0.0008635478,0.000001817847,0.000006563774,0.000007620605,0.004609897,0.0004852732,0.000007683195,0.9889267,0.001222536,0.003843976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002069271,0.00002667185,0.003555658,0.00005170711,0.000006058186,0.00001293768,0.03491182,0.00005446384,0.00006279635,0.0170841,0.9438758,0.0001510418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1091073,0.0006276469,0.0002774709,0.01244697,0.001133007,0.0001881375,0.000008195514,0.00003508915,0.8761762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976072,0.0001081686,0.0006721652,0.000780915,0.0003468662,0.000004367928,0.000002768167,0.00001052748,0.000467027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804742156","doi":"","title":"Negotiating an Institution for the Twenty-First Century: Multilateral Diplomacy and the International Criminal Court","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Negotiation; Institution; Political science; Criminal court; Law; International law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Philippe Kirsch","is_ca":false},{"name":"Valerie Oosterveld","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03346872051504347,"gpt":0.3182715107814587,"spread":0.2848027902664153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001028086,0.00009322158,0.00009068077,0.0000314795,0.01141464,0.0005618613,0.0004287351,0.00004263288,0.0001447983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008364436,0.00005039943,0.00008247048,0.00002413215,0.0005121041,0.0006202889,0.00004051323,0.0002095944,0.000005482397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001274622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001771001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003091198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01974656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988663,0.00009547109,0.0002257836,0.0001260061,0.000452829,0.0002336266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991654,0.0002548499,0.0001556018,0.00007362461,0.0002605951,0.00008992288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001795727,0.00003372652,0.0001600582,0.000001266799,0.00004044135,0.000006460312,0.001875344,0.000200269,0.000002424282,0.9965042,0.00007034092,0.0009259006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001521073,0.00003449625,0.001347949,0.00002185807,0.00005070651,0.0001044159,0.001011761,0.005376447,0.00000748503,0.02957563,0.9608502,0.00009799532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5051329,0.0004421929,0.003094985,0.03375646,0.01095653,0.001409928,0.0001152452,0.0001206717,0.4449711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965461,0.0002345369,0.0002221059,0.0005794695,0.00192265,0.00001426682,0.000005397732,0.000007729509,0.0004677792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033495146","doi":"10.7202/1000788ar","title":"L’ordre juridique arbitral : réalité, utilité et spécificité","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Emmanuel Gaillard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0495763181199125,"gpt":0.2475403390992334,"spread":0.1979640209793209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00102973,0.0004228178,0.0003392353,0.0002163631,0.001881431,0.0005875118,0.0005129295,0.0002200872,0.01306333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007689388,0.0004050742,0.0003935892,0.0002651182,0.0002514219,0.003901499,0.0001574543,0.0009296622,0.002500368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001415065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004036462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004941035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00503921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973686,0.0001014082,0.0008745355,0.0003762143,0.0006020312,0.0006771833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983694,0.00003868605,0.0005655161,0.0002558408,0.0006616706,0.0001089108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009980806,0.0004808177,0.0004463921,0.0001069596,0.0001522655,0.000229172,0.00007448641,0.000008271558,0.00006206187,0.9896687,0.00787595,0.0007950887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007751738,0.00006265567,0.001180146,0.0002803102,0.0001106857,0.0002711188,0.0001274289,0.0005068442,0.0008889598,0.07202227,0.9233345,0.0004399222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004566811,0.001208685,0.0002018692,0.01225693,0.005644551,0.0002206195,0.00004863016,0.0000897282,0.9757622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9159485,0.0003281614,0.001513573,0.07038403,0.00304463,0.00001187466,0.00004202999,0.00008453347,0.008642665],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9671195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849736915","doi":"10.7202/1032679ar","title":"Bedford and the Structure of Section 7","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Section (typography); Norm (philosophy); Political science; Individualism; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Hamish Stewart","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01971968227042641,"gpt":0.2825392223551058,"spread":0.2628195400846794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004712254,0.00003120588,0.00006895778,0.00001398072,0.001430796,0.000031369,0.00007113109,0.0000617172,0.00005362169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006454149,0.00001668305,0.00002453078,0.00007784324,0.0003082593,0.00008358507,0.00001160225,0.000174217,0.000001099695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001939092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007243575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002130097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002690168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994586,0.0001411378,0.00009090286,0.00003590537,0.0001880472,0.00008537701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996943,0.00003693899,0.00007053283,0.00003437515,0.00009179067,0.00007210307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002497958,0.00002593849,0.002114769,0.000005476275,0.0001282884,0.000009996636,0.06571133,0.0001832688,0.0001598461,0.9115655,0.002271143,0.01757457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008617414,0.00003592008,0.0001090103,0.00001515017,0.00002465309,0.00005575723,0.01771953,0.00001414356,0.0005174933,0.03275062,0.9478505,0.00004552035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6310152,0.001390696,0.00001267951,0.002977657,0.001685061,0.00008937882,0.000002070289,0.00001728025,0.36281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990613,0.0002185948,0.00008550644,0.00005782853,0.000379206,7.33006e-8,1.471366e-7,0.000002462729,0.0001948657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9455793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624634460","doi":"","title":"The U.S. Perspective on the International Criminal Court","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Criminal court; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; International law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"David J. Scheffer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02818016512065683,"gpt":0.3121881790722094,"spread":0.2840080139515526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008907589,0.00007519687,0.00005429945,0.00001874113,0.01351278,0.0003761344,0.0007245072,0.00003437894,0.008705946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006236929,0.00003734003,0.0001072888,0.00002563276,0.0004156784,0.0001601077,0.00001516253,0.0003500092,0.000505214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003861262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002585551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001798711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01844359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985877,0.0001487322,0.0001483462,0.0001035636,0.0007885094,0.0002231182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991751,0.000284304,0.00006903156,0.00009126195,0.0003062437,0.00007406615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004645714,0.00002827507,0.000002143568,8.741992e-8,0.00003655607,0.0000138599,0.0009780036,0.00001007748,0.000001172761,0.993864,0.003825374,0.00119401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009494916,0.00002747626,0.0001241193,0.000008376243,0.000007289214,0.0000243132,0.001255467,0.0000131347,0.00003284,0.2125715,0.7857913,0.00004919139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02072755,0.00001954844,0.000001918683,0.04324777,0.0008648089,0.00006284975,0.0000102693,0.00001550616,0.9350498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704115,0.00009265955,0.00001849399,0.001912824,0.001531272,0.000004167171,5.201521e-7,0.000006532186,0.02602201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.949684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097724759","doi":"10.7202/1009065ar","title":"Toward A Federal Legal Theory of the City","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Legitimacy; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Institution; Politics; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political economy","authors":[{"name":"Hoi L. Kong","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06941978909998069,"gpt":0.3163119711825669,"spread":0.2468921820825862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001035849,0.00004417891,0.00006889989,0.000008065828,0.003664254,0.00004869333,0.0002760774,0.00003790708,0.0003152934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006167503,0.00002756909,0.0001072889,0.00009011658,0.0002204242,0.0002633696,0.00005754835,0.0002042326,0.00001333692],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005586468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001904576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002106071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003040515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991537,0.0001793832,0.0001383061,0.00004393691,0.0002561131,0.0002285535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999568,0.00005255925,0.0001048089,0.00009437584,0.00005967227,0.0001205173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000354747,0.00003765034,0.001615859,9.498964e-7,0.000007887315,2.181235e-7,0.0007808519,0.000001150938,0.00003864953,0.996101,0.0001414448,0.001270756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008433366,0.000005478788,0.005903093,0.000005839406,0.000008549359,0.00001454645,0.001015554,7.367371e-7,0.0005115076,0.01146099,0.9809439,0.0000454516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07493787,0.0000805039,0.0001684879,0.004424632,0.0004438673,0.00009043185,0.00001537655,0.00001377729,0.9198251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982049,0.00001365911,0.0001490477,0.0003106541,0.0004730326,0.000002231956,1.139205e-7,0.000003866959,0.0008425129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9846401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122476906","doi":"10.7202/1042774ar","title":"“The Earth is Our Mother”: Freedom of Religion and the Preservation of Indigenous Sacred Sites in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Religious Tourism and Spaces","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Worship; State (computer science); Supreme court; Religious persecution; Persecution; Law; Political science; Faith; Indigenous rights; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Human rights; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Natasha Bakht","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lynda Collins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01155045049990511,"gpt":0.2482197070313942,"spread":0.2366692565314891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032867,0.00005299696,0.0001302731,0.00002292383,0.001739681,0.00003895211,0.0002309919,0.00003774634,0.000004366741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001108812,0.00002997127,0.000030722,0.0001369567,0.000298928,0.0001156939,0.00002415717,0.000111064,5.720127e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004876001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001320139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989164,0.0002173897,0.0002515346,0.00006398125,0.0003716087,0.0001790172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993035,0.0001371599,0.0002512709,0.0001033071,0.0001570035,0.00004778196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001883822,0.0001862812,0.2603125,0.00008757825,0.0004446208,0.00005077734,0.1614353,0.0004329973,0.001422389,0.4048515,0.146444,0.02244835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002132178,0.0002459191,0.01128418,0.0001160236,0.00003964656,0.00001856774,0.01622977,0.0004581383,0.003122537,0.02582324,0.9403188,0.0002109935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683853,0.001657568,0.000005573594,0.002597272,0.0002028178,0.0001807375,0.00001420943,0.000003205315,0.02695333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945469,0.004875945,0.00006406083,0.0001117761,0.0001447218,0.000001166647,1.809173e-7,0.000004338062,0.0002508652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7938749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061805555","doi":"10.7202/045699ar","title":"From Norms to Facts: The Realization of Rights in Common and Civil Private Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal culture; Private law; Legal realism; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Empirical legal studies; Legal profession; Normative; Philosophy of law; Legal history; Ideal (ethics); Comparative law; Public law; Sociology; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Helge Dedek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04192305796101551,"gpt":0.2951831574120748,"spread":0.2532600994510593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003369561,0.00004210289,0.00008083261,0.00001542305,0.001342408,0.00003194385,0.0001778543,0.00003430629,0.000081935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000964013,0.00002638099,0.00001897275,0.000107822,0.0001228505,0.000155443,0.0000386463,0.0001015874,0.000006028268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003071607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003809317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1972504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6281805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999414,0.00007668336,0.0001815265,0.00006924231,0.0001461161,0.0001124164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996584,0.00004019001,0.00009209397,0.00009275705,0.0000386211,0.00007792967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005746797,0.00002339583,0.0008745615,6.308086e-7,0.000003930319,9.93812e-7,0.004020114,0.000004555469,0.00004769802,0.9946994,0.0000300296,0.0002889779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001487801,0.00002226006,0.01014796,0.00002569008,0.000007170919,0.000001447411,0.0004944718,0.000007978015,0.0009372112,0.2509191,0.7372272,0.00006071437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4259848,0.00002306554,0.0002411556,0.001074584,0.00008667537,0.0001914708,0.0000435341,0.00001185545,0.5723429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994912,0.00002373694,0.0001871214,0.0002009617,0.00006591753,0.000003127182,0.00000129119,0.000002731874,0.00002395259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7437803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123801536","doi":"","title":"Measuring Judicial Activism on the SupremeCourt of Canada: A Comment onNewfoundland (Treasury Board) v. NAPE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Political science; Law; Public administration","authors":[{"name":"Sujit Choudhry","is_ca":false},{"name":"Claire E. Hunter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05662370584923329,"gpt":0.2501783787137477,"spread":0.1935546728645144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001151072,0.0001057526,0.0001840069,0.00002341581,0.007802678,0.00003515432,0.0001919904,0.00003887671,0.0001984963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003391158,0.00007264281,0.00008528674,0.0001204747,0.0003407657,0.00008101965,0.00002213399,0.0002669728,0.000004465871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000503097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000333797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7429253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981266,0.0003097929,0.0002267886,0.0001050843,0.0008962073,0.0003354857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999203,0.0002541318,0.0001456915,0.00007902499,0.0001897295,0.0001283909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002919773,0.00006413201,0.001188317,0.000001174071,0.0001035299,0.0000154864,0.0002772839,0.00002771653,0.00002205209,0.9947699,0.002900977,0.0006002015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002968996,0.00004870287,0.002651946,0.00006518784,0.00003011558,0.00001363313,0.00225488,8.369888e-7,0.0004240766,0.01976719,0.9743128,0.0001337377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0391559,0.0001735562,0.00001565298,0.01493202,0.0009926803,0.000133101,0.00001759967,0.00001066632,0.9445688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983057,0.00008324894,0.00002008586,0.001258796,0.0002718906,0.000004061827,1.678158e-7,0.000005147601,0.00005088777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243080737","doi":"10.7202/mlj","title":"McGill Law Journal","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06950990085544063,"gpt":0.3569736682425543,"spread":0.2874637673871137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001869396,0.0009275749,0.001278307,0.0002475348,0.03480525,0.001160559,0.001488526,0.0005678823,0.02513757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001094854,0.0007808604,0.001404873,0.0005802413,0.002006733,0.001231305,0.000464253,0.004497487,0.03677406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001899251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009110125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01070667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1274116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928538,0.001067213,0.001731282,0.0007085307,0.002252074,0.001387134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955503,0.0005051728,0.001122548,0.0002642584,0.00167537,0.0008822905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004631798,0.0001522919,0.000003381469,0.00004912696,0.001175096,0.0004942059,0.0004184273,0.0001123907,0.000009335222,0.7629249,0.2310249,0.003589625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005154701,0.000379837,0.000009937875,0.001205552,0.0003878842,0.002125311,0.001407506,0.00004007736,0.0001412787,0.02749355,0.9654449,0.0008486489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002710695,0.02545999,0.00002945898,0.00884063,0.03801462,0.0002271943,0.001175524,0.00004109742,0.9259404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6236243,0.03355063,0.0004730361,0.003063474,0.02156321,0.00002504374,0.00003460134,0.0001690961,0.3174966],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7354313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011668810","doi":"10.7202/1005132ar","title":"The Lockean Constitution: Separation of Powers and the Limits of Prerogative","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Constitution; Legislature; Separation of powers; Law; Political science; Fiduciary; Accountability; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David Jenkins","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0459272203032034,"gpt":0.3189576571520233,"spread":0.2730304368488199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007564053,0.00004279291,0.0000924179,0.00001014857,0.00287618,0.00001372818,0.000124897,0.00002648009,0.00004216156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000191053,0.00002324143,0.00004792988,0.00006536455,0.006921471,0.0001139986,0.00001344883,0.00009695417,0.00000148143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002308442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001211538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002477411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003658098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992074,0.0002375152,0.000191827,0.00004255197,0.0002086063,0.0001121424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990675,0.0003094509,0.0002212331,0.00005805944,0.0002876663,0.00005608962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004996346,0.000009612925,0.0001171678,0.000001079188,0.00002751518,9.773856e-7,0.001411081,0.00000322292,0.000003288339,0.9979628,0.00006533114,0.000348008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000640022,0.00009468012,0.000383274,0.00003434162,0.00006029305,0.00005753255,0.008949845,0.000007613601,0.0009653531,0.02375406,0.9649775,0.00007551119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005381221,0.0002441177,0.0001599829,0.001037435,0.0002302316,0.00009842014,0.00001811347,0.000003873711,0.9928266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999301,0.0001970049,0.0001680727,0.0001144606,0.00006609578,0.000001171849,2.33761e-7,0.000001148308,0.000150842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115453667","doi":"10.7202/038892ar","title":"Regulating Greenhouse Gases in Canada: Constitutional and Policy Dimensions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Ratification; Kyoto Protocol; Negotiation; Carbon tax; Constitution; Natural resource economics; Political science; Economics; Economic policy; Politics; Law; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Shi-Ling Hsu","is_ca":true},{"name":"Robin Elliot","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01764415870632885,"gpt":0.267927565561959,"spread":0.2502834068556302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002553638,0.0000558631,0.00008391563,0.00004728947,0.002524427,0.00003493209,0.00008658776,0.0000380352,0.00007534619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000426101,0.00005549735,0.0000188433,0.0001364772,0.0005282288,0.0001622514,0.00001839706,0.0002995908,0.000001699118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004027855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001236009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992079,0.00004864349,0.0001469021,0.00008312183,0.0002265054,0.0002869241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994225,0.0001074135,0.00007560581,0.0000557857,0.00004098398,0.000297737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002515107,0.000004328976,0.003648756,7.834594e-7,0.000002712011,0.0000474765,0.0001134451,0.00001842007,0.00004920926,0.9933237,0.001447459,0.001341167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002433498,0.000004854523,0.02421754,0.0000250269,0.000002893147,0.0002061502,0.0001782691,0.00002005397,0.00005438416,0.005097045,0.9698517,0.00009875058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7866667,0.00009696365,0.000004260023,0.03173165,0.0005999085,0.000105496,0.0003945678,0.00001369421,0.1803868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972764,0.00003917736,0.0001537419,0.001935772,0.0004090456,8.692746e-7,3.359071e-7,0.00000327136,0.0001813317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037174929","doi":"10.7202/1000625ar","title":"Roncarelli v. Duplessis and Damages for Abuse of Power: For What Did It Stand in 1959 and For What Does It Stand in 2009?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Damages; Supreme court; Liability; Tort; Economic Justice; Abuse of power; Sociology; Power (physics); Common law; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Mullan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07964043449649322,"gpt":0.3457996897785181,"spread":0.2661592552820249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001664721,0.0001478409,0.0003440396,0.00009609955,0.001009606,0.0003425319,0.0001916561,0.0001176238,0.00003720129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001508277,0.0001151595,0.00008466123,0.0000935416,0.0003225444,0.002352453,0.00002981115,0.0001245037,2.088657e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001094491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003525464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001900528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1264575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985762,0.00008093347,0.0004348093,0.0002474309,0.0002318419,0.0004288012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988133,0.0005064284,0.0001992569,0.0001021895,0.0002073052,0.0001715499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008639526,0.001330604,0.01569684,0.002729555,0.0002949481,0.0001019109,0.2698572,0.00003602281,0.001050486,0.5731142,0.005216166,0.1219325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003086331,0.0007624037,0.001631249,0.00217033,0.00009427004,0.00001489676,0.2326669,0.00004783933,0.001925521,0.01246721,0.7447294,0.0004036111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9554178,0.02580685,0.0007053165,0.008573124,0.001150477,0.002054577,0.000490238,0.00001867372,0.005782921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633511,0.03450948,0.001674241,0.0001518228,0.00007582939,0.00003870587,0.000001476898,0.00001729026,0.0001800682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7395133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8894824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987155948","doi":"10.7202/1000626ar","title":"Some Australian Reflections on Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Political science; Statute; Common law; Misconduct; Liability","authors":[{"name":"Mark D. Aronson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1845492095713299,"gpt":0.3810247983716258,"spread":0.1964755888002959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003175715,0.00007421827,0.00008320222,0.00004065883,0.006558875,0.00007038388,0.0002458541,0.00007333582,0.0009191912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002128271,0.00006476504,0.00009567285,0.0001517793,0.0001485819,0.000269437,0.00001986388,0.0003087707,0.0003383895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001404732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001765511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008245767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02286236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990923,0.00008370904,0.0001736194,0.0001239112,0.0002426551,0.0002838478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994408,0.00002426281,0.00009025726,0.0001340194,0.00007292871,0.0002377148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004557602,0.00006625952,0.00004366647,6.592022e-7,0.00001137131,0.000005699898,0.0009362299,0.000006770001,0.00003800419,0.9967393,0.0008563187,0.00129113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009658309,0.00004272145,0.000663005,0.000009987149,0.00001295182,0.00000896332,0.001266181,9.162991e-7,0.0005048806,0.01668502,0.9806166,0.00009224522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005147114,0.00002025168,0.00002633605,0.004080426,0.0004502643,0.00008937185,0.00002289528,0.00006388705,0.9900994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941922,0.0001355518,0.0007782661,0.0004113628,0.0007214116,0.000008760228,8.185988e-7,0.00001003963,0.003741592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028993133","doi":"10.7202/1026134ar","title":"Decreasing the Data Deficit: Improving Post-Market Surveillance in Pharmaceutical Regulation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Postmarketing surveillance; Clinical trial; Business; Pharmaceutical industry; Market failure; Promotion (chess); Drug control; Market access; Public economics; Prescription drug; Medical prescription; Marketing; Industrial organization; Medicine; Adverse effect; Pharmacology; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Trudo Lemmens","is_ca":true},{"name":"Shannon Gibson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3745882471567646,"gpt":0.5135214404674004,"spread":0.1389331933106358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008313975,0.0002941631,0.0003460664,0.00009445326,0.003172377,0.00009642225,0.001069258,0.0005020236,0.001958202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001081543,0.0002240988,0.00009052022,0.0003057645,0.0003445856,0.0005191783,0.000359515,0.004285986,0.00007217529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001898655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005074031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002723008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00224932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942632,0.003166264,0.0007866348,0.0004759558,0.0003577842,0.0009501434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965219,0.001797646,0.0002739447,0.000537217,0.0002226132,0.0006466193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003971091,0.001046125,0.06160405,0.0003390495,0.0003361912,0.0003519017,0.0003189098,0.001669887,0.0149869,0.1436137,0.005431354,0.7663309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002339552,0.00009260132,0.0149561,0.00005249624,0.0000924852,0.0008636129,0.0001371141,0.1161074,0.002040438,0.001236706,0.8617139,0.0003675031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5888695,0.00376559,0.001362185,0.06788968,0.009162942,0.002038777,0.001131596,0.0004097746,0.32537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906475,0.0001977907,0.0002863726,0.007719692,0.0009632961,0.000009112373,0.00004500768,0.00003546611,0.0000957644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8562826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895524770","doi":"","title":"A Comparison of Business Income Trust Governance and Corporate Governance: Is There a Need for Legislation or Further Regulation?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Legislation; Business; Accounting; Political science; Law; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Mark Gillen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03356991373019354,"gpt":0.2488389206145213,"spread":0.2152690068843277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000278729,0.0002260515,0.0004028105,0.00004166061,0.0007565062,0.0002189877,0.0001854222,0.00009528377,0.0003169733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003693268,0.0001786805,0.00008993664,0.0004824362,0.0001059764,0.001546525,0.00006445605,0.0001418758,0.0000128859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006294989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001564074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002779377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007965058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984831,0.00001079712,0.0006174587,0.0002345426,0.0003922054,0.0002618476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968325,0.00004130452,0.002386295,0.000183324,0.0005400527,0.00001650001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001484828,0.0003220915,0.2115618,0.0004095787,0.00008643097,0.00002026305,0.00006076324,0.001640051,0.001037188,0.7599506,0.01053738,0.01288903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002522776,0.00004334896,0.4963162,0.000288178,0.00009230633,0.00002219928,0.00007511736,0.007952812,0.0003857598,0.01496434,0.4769921,0.0003448837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315942,0.00124078,0.00205144,0.004748173,0.0009758458,0.0008802051,0.0002942811,0.00009083856,0.05812423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971491,0.00005478604,0.0004389875,0.0003113032,0.0009808943,0.00001027774,0.00001893426,0.00004000805,0.0009957186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7449863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7286379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771094306","doi":"10.7202/1043160ar","title":"Understanding Fiduciary Duties and Relationship Fiduciarity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Jurisprudence; Scholarship; Law; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Duty","authors":[{"name":"Leonard I. Rotman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.265366381501558,"gpt":0.3598802806836827,"spread":0.09451389918212466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008805277,0.00005345402,0.00006643667,0.00003079398,0.01231155,0.0001540768,0.0001132611,0.00006219548,0.0002398742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000138536,0.00004929375,0.00003160848,0.0001244783,0.0004855897,0.0003206576,0.00003742952,0.0002163259,0.00003393369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001793894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002092373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001709528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03700418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992406,0.0001009564,0.000139498,0.0001027642,0.0001951888,0.0002209282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994951,0.0001317435,0.00007174979,0.00007920626,0.0000731587,0.0001490308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002659199,0.000009306361,0.00249536,0.000001142593,0.000005035624,0.000001199392,0.001022284,7.170809e-7,0.000004002702,0.9957137,0.0005311091,0.0002134988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001135744,0.00002102171,0.004352907,0.00001370215,0.00001134347,0.00001721111,0.002814565,0.00001933444,0.00003026191,0.2354437,0.7570755,0.00008687692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01708534,0.00006864239,0.00108481,0.007825783,0.000294179,0.00008617387,0.00001331758,0.00004678584,0.9734949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980286,0.00005558219,0.0006056097,0.0002215666,0.000624014,0.000001670092,5.71005e-7,0.000005346279,0.0004570661],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2400367739","doi":"10.7202/1038707ar","title":"Fiduciary Duties, Conflict of Interest, and Proper Exercise of Judgment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Discretion; Conflict of interest; Duty; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Defeasible estate; Duty of loyalty; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Remus Valsan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1671748433053256,"gpt":0.3585139573750075,"spread":0.191339114069682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004209514,0.00004399238,0.0001197607,0.00001493158,0.002296437,0.00005712876,0.0002595001,0.00003415199,0.0001194658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003887025,0.0000338397,0.00004069834,0.00001663892,0.0004119126,0.0001807835,0.0000871267,0.0001018567,0.000002565937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001971287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001639356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00578844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006690771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994836,0.00002745586,0.0001841441,0.00006760888,0.0001284837,0.0001086876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993936,0.00001583497,0.0002447268,0.0001596192,0.00009954786,0.00008663723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001739928,0.00006764623,0.0008266331,0.00001733315,0.00001764084,0.000002527857,0.001119707,0.00000128576,0.0004030936,0.983586,0.0003299157,0.01361081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002643169,0.00003940702,0.003688255,0.0001238449,0.00002301976,0.000005659936,0.0007783762,0.000007058693,0.00420953,0.002702219,0.9880882,0.00007009369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.238224,0.0004399373,0.00001387191,0.003642992,0.0002077267,0.000255472,0.00005476233,0.000009544887,0.7571517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986219,0.0005228512,0.0002132674,0.00002803315,0.00006568118,0.000002766177,2.501604e-7,0.000003601354,0.0005416343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205482211","doi":"","title":"Amendments to the Canada Labour Code: Are Replacement Workers an Endangered Species?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Code (set theory); Political science; Business; Fishery; Labour economics; Economics; Demography; Biology; Sociology; Computer science; Population; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Luc Vaillancourt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03056747740791407,"gpt":0.2931834143214117,"spread":0.2626159369134976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000656767,0.0001086105,0.0001100545,0.00002223691,0.004380522,0.0001875147,0.0004897197,0.00003375101,0.00907969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003019541,0.00008037236,0.00004648567,0.0001637121,0.00006624307,0.0002104627,0.00002362562,0.0001961117,0.00007267021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008478365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008338275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7103195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980125,0.0001964967,0.0002361366,0.0001671773,0.0009760861,0.0004116168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992318,0.00003551291,0.00009978998,0.0001608694,0.0001546711,0.0003173593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004631042,0.0002409683,0.006699431,0.000004472985,0.0002320703,0.0002092973,0.003149005,0.00161921,0.00005186314,0.8323815,0.1472446,0.007704355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002132079,0.00004710262,0.003607538,0.0000220496,0.000008158592,0.000008685435,0.002218487,0.000003483678,0.0001070725,0.0001649128,0.993485,0.0001142583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2576081,0.00003385324,0.000008721454,0.02773942,0.001625484,0.0002635711,0.0004389961,0.00003330828,0.7122485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955081,0.00004665083,0.00008995391,0.005917098,0.0006902441,0.000007970388,0.000005235447,0.00001162068,0.03815025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8462404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988525678","doi":"10.7202/1013031ar","title":"Israel as a Mixed Jurisdiction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Israeli law; Common law; Supreme court; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Constitutional law; Municipal law; Precedent; Chinese law","authors":[{"name":"Eliezer Rivlin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03365458820360218,"gpt":0.3052021177948547,"spread":0.2715475295912525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005919473,0.00005808437,0.00008329411,0.00002421879,0.00800787,0.0000367573,0.0000891269,0.0000479185,0.0001924751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000816212,0.00004889824,0.00007259526,0.0001066645,0.0002753971,0.0003784868,0.00002425473,0.0001480718,0.0004150522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001139725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001708929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01388026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01412051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990619,0.00009524574,0.0001275278,0.00005565955,0.0003479136,0.0003117675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995826,0.00003670307,0.00006248488,0.00003327232,0.00009332442,0.000191635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007003533,0.000039762,0.002141357,3.475787e-7,0.00002124277,0.000003299368,0.0003863849,5.868414e-7,0.00001068583,0.9930296,0.0005751621,0.003784592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001082363,0.00001707798,0.003569124,0.000008910728,0.00001701717,0.00003702638,0.00206629,2.47491e-7,0.00006818229,0.0175713,0.9764649,0.00007174395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02680665,0.0006486297,0.000043737,0.00217735,0.001963499,0.00004485122,0.000004788552,0.00003663155,0.9682739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971432,0.0002557361,0.00009023897,0.0004703337,0.001777888,0.000002733369,3.845953e-7,0.000003250509,0.0002562538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887804744","doi":"","title":"The Changing Scope of the Fundamental Principle of Equality","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Economic system; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Barnard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07654335096606173,"gpt":0.3755302857204677,"spread":0.298986934754406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00257541,0.00004615072,0.00008816622,0.00001811208,0.00421135,0.00004635417,0.000357193,0.00002907004,0.000185595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001183684,0.00002613634,0.0001088013,0.0002092741,0.000455419,0.0001420232,0.00007706331,0.0001129135,0.000004668531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006664271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001903119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00136425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01712474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985624,0.0003638354,0.0002781491,0.00005449307,0.0005183164,0.0002227989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993591,0.00008757874,0.000252111,0.000123665,0.0001163648,0.00006121767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001041733,0.00003837869,0.0009045778,0.000003614667,0.00001124684,4.566801e-7,0.002064431,0.000004389975,0.00005950107,0.9934408,0.00002205035,0.003440106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002155791,0.00002373615,0.003520153,0.0000441775,0.00001220659,0.000006033591,0.006165837,0.000005853364,0.001842186,0.007202073,0.9809047,0.00005743821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2300913,0.00005096816,0.0000306143,0.002731659,0.0005381963,0.0001043002,0.00001088767,0.000007932214,0.7664342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984983,0.0001148086,0.00002916758,0.0001489432,0.00008650673,0.000001044768,1.798431e-7,0.000003457392,0.001117577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9862388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121429145","doi":"","title":"What Is International Human Rights Law? Three Applications of a Distributive Account","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; International law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Normative; Sovereignty; Fundamental rights; Principle of legality; Sociology; Politics; Economic Justice","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Macklem","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05094792858388508,"gpt":0.3716267187745402,"spread":0.3206787901906551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001092699,0.00007356925,0.0001114377,0.00003559657,0.00421672,0.0001107915,0.0003796338,0.0001214711,0.0003233059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002182738,0.00006399325,0.0001040504,0.0001106909,0.0007517654,0.0006300252,0.00004406861,0.0003738467,0.0000311153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001956806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001200914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005473528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06410047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986889,0.00004306704,0.0002947384,0.0001124504,0.0005709708,0.0002899119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990092,0.0001648323,0.0001431516,0.0001042913,0.0003708845,0.0002076412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007481075,0.00007293025,0.00004139087,0.000001906918,0.00002871399,0.00000459334,0.0004849836,3.617523e-7,0.00001481432,0.9987546,0.00005590041,0.0005323817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009559344,0.0000121,0.000144164,0.00001874163,0.000008990531,0.000004091358,0.0002865388,7.181329e-7,0.0005137292,0.5286148,0.4702516,0.00004896125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002554926,0.00006165692,0.001851341,0.00744567,0.0006285085,0.0001333374,0.0001557674,0.00002297918,0.9871458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982001,0.00002184514,0.0001213912,0.0007028195,0.0008484513,0.000003208659,0.000006200002,0.000004328433,0.00009164731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391310854","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i1.1181","title":"No Country for Old Men","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Peter Szigeti","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02349347345522424,"gpt":0.3100334944892338,"spread":0.2865400210340096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007955865,0.00004469054,0.00006705678,0.00002962829,0.003164363,0.00008841707,0.0001326171,0.00005300133,0.0003942905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001221303,0.00003928767,0.00004902823,0.0001832332,0.00005537076,0.0001416565,0.00001027227,0.00009627291,0.0001941346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006606968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000158591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007635037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05203644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992921,0.00004966239,0.0001250621,0.00006754607,0.0002408393,0.000224816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999543,0.00007182547,0.00005789218,0.00005023387,0.0001617049,0.000115402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000832459,0.000009227074,0.00006457299,0.000002938928,0.00001018178,0.000004292654,0.0006967899,0.00003963764,0.00002809684,0.9595777,0.03865636,0.000901888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001925238,0.00001762418,0.00005860506,0.000006025344,0.000005368419,0.000002149477,0.00113414,0.001261333,0.000007804556,0.002331739,0.9949247,0.00005800613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003724015,0.00001472034,0.0001148064,0.003042056,0.001048835,0.0001522579,0.0001142633,0.0001155231,0.9916735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8179828,0.001459629,0.001593281,0.003859597,0.003241631,0.00003222394,0.00004941898,0.00004821306,0.1717332],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9572459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163783173","doi":"10.7202/1076909ar","title":"Predicting Employment Notice Period with Machine Learning: Promises and Limitations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Predictability; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Period (music); Law; Machine learning; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Samuel Dahan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonathan Touboul","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jason Lam","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dan Sfedj","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07561691443842182,"gpt":0.3173000339906206,"spread":0.2416831195521987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005331089,0.00008805952,0.0001154615,0.00002526444,0.007134569,0.0002615461,0.0001031564,0.00004917975,0.0002206332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008311692,0.00007491106,0.00003566064,0.0001685584,0.0003300548,0.0003491987,0.00004070592,0.0003701463,0.00001430165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000789785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000504754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001368828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1091815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987001,0.0002615855,0.0002122668,0.0001630462,0.0003897501,0.0002731815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990464,0.000265931,0.0001170942,0.00006943684,0.0003040922,0.0001970771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000123934,0.0003908421,0.06529995,0.00002585356,0.0002031224,0.000734477,0.04528294,0.002979906,0.0006836744,0.8273578,0.00006398938,0.05685348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001966876,0.000233407,0.0006283558,0.00009338041,0.00007173468,0.0003135798,0.02927901,0.0006110747,0.002130928,0.001108026,0.9651119,0.0002219525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3399824,0.000681119,0.0007079375,0.01240826,0.0006295643,0.0003126818,0.00001532362,0.0001725944,0.6450901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962143,0.0002060071,0.002312785,0.00015087,0.0002223865,0.000005132355,0.000001487459,0.00001384259,0.0008732016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}