{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":426,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":426,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"486508743cfa","filters":{"venue":"McGill Law Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2887140835","doi":"","title":"Gender Crimes as War Crimes: Integrating Crimes against Women into International Criminal Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; War crime; Criminology; Law; Criminal law; International law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Rhonda Copelon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03715039055804624,"gpt":0.3199736136314488,"spread":0.2828232230734025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001722393,0.0005617419,0.0004383382,0.002608366,0.003079524,0.009772694,0.0008835113,0.002372317,0.0053807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005555667,0.0002417179,0.0004232857,0.003296011,0.0138004,0.007406116,0.003655702,0.003098464,0.0001707493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003604531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006423201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02824319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06428885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986246,0.000908075,0.00003006159,0.00005638887,0.0001474919,0.0002333534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996136,0.002474032,0.00044829,0.0001028635,0.00026584,0.0005729496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003894772,0.0001476616,0.03681857,0.0001804908,0.00002966051,0.0004180484,0.06701725,0.0006170808,0.0001034202,0.8456364,0.009812902,0.03917954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001754751,0.0001251246,0.0721939,0.001128222,0.00008383616,0.0005965569,0.2838083,0.001732818,0.0001758011,0.5238544,0.1162333,0.00005017322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3595001,0.07648935,0.007581494,0.115558,0.001779224,0.00008936724,0.0002827792,0.00004463019,0.4386751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809184,0.01126237,0.0006561964,0.002630206,0.0004787323,0.0000380941,0.00002594776,0.00001728553,0.003972692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02824319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05615759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496343264","doi":"10.7202/1002371ar","title":"Qu’est ce que l’interculturalisme ?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Gérard Bouchard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03998965420852022,"gpt":0.2358753448484506,"spread":0.1958856906399304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005037124,0.0007492361,0.000790463,0.001541626,0.01180294,0.01335308,0.001700329,0.003578473,0.01051903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005326227,0.000323091,0.000769109,0.00209252,0.031949,0.01002378,0.006596283,0.007000934,0.001457052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02360311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02267483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3502774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3694594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938246,0.002701313,0.0001207854,0.0007836793,0.0009814422,0.001588128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960296,0.00112688,0.000341572,0.000482523,0.001286296,0.0007331429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003897557,0.0000305778,0.003439643,0.0002277104,0.00004239357,0.000284811,0.05317508,0.0002051446,0.0003928195,0.8979849,0.01679377,0.02738412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001734329,0.00003256786,0.007754521,0.001110344,0.00003835847,0.0002669668,0.07131543,0.0003982795,0.0005819116,0.1933973,0.7250146,0.00007232271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0623155,0.0454338,0.0199683,0.3560597,0.004057688,0.00006499565,0.0002142312,0.000116568,0.5117692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8661219,0.01728707,0.003893935,0.03055499,0.001024484,0.00008961962,0.0001017304,0.0001461348,0.08078014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6497226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6964771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784255215","doi":"10.7202/1042776ar","title":"“Sacrifice Zones” in the Green Energy Economy: Toward an Environmental Justice Framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental justice; Sacrifice; Capitalism; Framing (construction); Grassroots; Resistance (ecology); Political economy; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Geography; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Dayna Nadine Scott","is_ca":true},{"name":"Adrian A. Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03800127482925175,"gpt":0.3117718309379289,"spread":0.2737705561086772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00548904,0.0006277628,0.0005455098,0.002470532,0.008516802,0.01312728,0.002454927,0.004080416,0.003155215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003425882,0.0002836136,0.0005977767,0.001635766,0.08024341,0.009678454,0.00780644,0.005782562,0.0002270531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01340059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007139202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03831561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06552679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961211,0.001959047,0.00008096136,0.0003844045,0.0005290547,0.0009254348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974644,0.001090085,0.0004322885,0.0003013687,0.0003871626,0.000324611],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006047566,0.00001146222,0.000867606,0.00001780169,0.000003302581,0.0000782904,0.01093521,0.0002969188,0.00009043248,0.9853957,0.0003362318,0.001961003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006179185,0.00001490341,0.003168314,0.0001268903,0.00001010082,0.00006123773,0.02329846,0.001178583,0.0001983758,0.9328438,0.03907132,0.00002189989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2733034,0.008729466,0.07614402,0.1132273,0.0005088428,0.0001390691,0.0001228899,0.00007740116,0.5277476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906002,0.0005818971,0.003710422,0.001632501,0.0000733641,0.00003458996,0.00001285045,0.0000237925,0.00333041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03831561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09722853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21665667","doi":"10.3732/ajb.89.4.664","title":"Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, a New Age","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Byers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05830837734920551,"gpt":0.3040873362336409,"spread":0.2457789588844354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006916909,0.0004812812,0.0008257105,0.0008028834,0.006002423,0.00975341,0.001581649,0.007102442,0.02648468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01321041,0.0003818996,0.0004090912,0.0008677564,0.03427047,0.01761302,0.006786714,0.01109762,0.008606479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002665344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003428038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003850826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005857508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933047,0.002106928,0.0004675335,0.001648941,0.001622445,0.0008494413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923971,0.002686056,0.000417546,0.002390873,0.001191431,0.000917038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001477696,0.00001181315,0.0003626751,0.0000363838,0.000005553746,0.0001398212,0.00206417,0.00002848627,0.0001573642,0.9199992,0.05050322,0.02667643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007752806,0.00001431215,0.000296151,0.0001494356,0.000004930226,0.0004159799,0.0006947953,0.00005481796,0.00008558579,0.09756603,0.9006963,0.0000139528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007303651,0.02034104,0.01155876,0.1414969,0.009663717,0.00007569551,0.0002637856,0.000198335,0.8090981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2867854,0.01742644,0.00844147,0.08206616,0.02052504,0.0003302399,0.0002542823,0.0007092801,0.5834616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02648468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08860004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589511104","doi":"10.7202/1038487ar","title":"An Inside Job: Engaging with Indigenous Legal Traditions through Stories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Law; Narrative; Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Traditional knowledge","authors":[{"name":"Val Napoleón","is_ca":true},{"name":"Hadley Friedland","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06392293215609136,"gpt":0.3653175644832329,"spread":0.3013946323271416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01470433,0.001117798,0.0005918891,0.002035427,0.01661893,0.01280824,0.003008013,0.004354387,0.00625161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0235786,0.0006189941,0.0007086401,0.001193029,0.0292651,0.01691372,0.01782336,0.00539866,0.001409307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004252682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005085035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006071358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01320866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9760611,0.01941242,0.0003118091,0.0007127206,0.001994974,0.00150689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752777,0.01754976,0.001423111,0.001500557,0.001053233,0.003195639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008617422,0.00003408901,0.0006088273,0.000067941,0.000004455873,0.0005541924,0.982088,0.00004067783,0.000297646,0.00823959,0.001956232,0.006099664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005944534,0.00004006555,0.0004686064,0.0002758808,0.00001156289,0.000756709,0.9090986,0.000209754,0.0006085752,0.006637153,0.08186177,0.00002532884],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6463505,0.004474863,0.05001454,0.04947301,0.001412987,0.0005185583,0.0001900356,0.0004255153,0.24714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589135,0.00183387,0.0137471,0.002922202,0.0002097954,0.0002224587,0.0000688295,0.0001890401,0.02189331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01661893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07776487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996733001","doi":"10.7202/1006419ar","title":"No Taps, No Toilets: First Nations and the Constitutional Right to Water in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Sanitation; Constitutional right; Human rights; Constitution; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Obligation; Right to health; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Economic growth; Business; International human rights law; Right to property; Medicine; Economics","authors":[{"name":"David R. Boyd","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01965953804361491,"gpt":0.2262583701786501,"spread":0.2065988321350352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003093167,0.0004672596,0.0005023149,0.001077757,0.03580223,0.01089862,0.002075846,0.007251187,0.006252093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006790997,0.0005394581,0.0004539181,0.001855762,0.02415538,0.003587337,0.004566439,0.00916203,0.0003505985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1238068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2387878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927443,0.0007692127,0.0001436765,0.0007276143,0.002181722,0.003433529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971854,0.0009004613,0.0001361334,0.000134633,0.0008644902,0.0007789696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001244683,0.00001080005,0.0009512244,0.00002306658,0.000004888136,0.0002248968,0.005021619,0.0002504194,0.0001102542,0.971396,0.01838268,0.003611692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009165627,0.00003538129,0.01052043,0.0005917811,0.00007145977,0.0002433719,0.01840814,0.001452621,0.0006083465,0.178722,0.7889851,0.0002697352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.05360361,0.009698533,0.002504826,0.1423748,0.0008565944,0.0001595636,0.0005920015,0.00006480548,0.7901452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7966962,0.006011051,0.002267941,0.04901499,0.0002267581,0.0001345522,0.0001854856,0.00005877769,0.1454041],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1238068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8982856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2660585010","doi":"10.7202/1040049ar","title":"The Complainant: The Canadian Human Rights Case on First Nations Child Welfare","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Human rights; Law; Tribunal; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Political science; Welfare; Indigenous; Public administration; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Cindy Blackstock","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02412311173988238,"gpt":0.3123006633558495,"spread":0.2881775516159671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002876337,0.0005814814,0.0004354151,0.001151261,0.06888465,0.007540022,0.002816545,0.00818556,0.005056632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006526285,0.0005157706,0.000552516,0.002641133,0.02279608,0.002169829,0.00473636,0.01045819,0.0003051036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1023217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1431143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949467,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920905,0.0007331918,0.00008187442,0.0004592645,0.002177584,0.004457568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979802,0.0005812459,0.0001257572,0.00007404626,0.0005572888,0.0006816083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004770084,0.00005003431,0.004988999,0.000103908,0.00001825035,0.01130286,0.1474745,0.0004329017,0.0005349274,0.7282103,0.09273442,0.01410123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004450835,0.00003713758,0.009446618,0.0005157971,0.00005652446,0.002901526,0.1804494,0.0005347687,0.0007509331,0.01766836,0.7873809,0.0002135065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1716458,0.008249095,0.001522902,0.1562088,0.00108478,0.0001875129,0.0002456601,0.00008019809,0.6607753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8587182,0.004319712,0.000683463,0.04763491,0.0002086582,0.00008138619,0.00006960181,0.00006023753,0.0882237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1023217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7423991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2604334801","doi":"10.7202/1038490ar","title":"The Lifeworlds of Law: On Revitalizing Indigenous Legal Orders Today","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Indigenous; Law; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Democracy; Social science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Aaron L. Mills","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03365580843012047,"gpt":0.3125579615218664,"spread":0.278902153091746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007556404,0.000522233,0.0005034493,0.002435357,0.0243335,0.01635806,0.002588622,0.005387567,0.004044549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006636509,0.0003009768,0.00052187,0.001706525,0.1149556,0.01905897,0.009673482,0.009668235,0.0003895147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04323096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03893531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3426077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.435782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953589,0.001904495,0.00009125062,0.0003398309,0.0009944815,0.001311026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962011,0.001981559,0.0002120734,0.000440146,0.0006853821,0.0004797548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000170418,0.000007186248,0.00009968191,0.00001914296,9.394597e-7,0.00006976262,0.06343503,0.00006173497,0.00006046538,0.9308353,0.00163012,0.003778771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006011709,0.00001968077,0.0008837714,0.000317228,0.000007824514,0.0001451192,0.1547166,0.0004268082,0.0003294971,0.5128417,0.330269,0.00003682583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.08359757,0.02041519,0.01764681,0.1813866,0.001350331,0.000108489,0.00004395292,0.0002080392,0.6952429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369811,0.007409603,0.00466228,0.01071557,0.0003011673,0.0000820027,0.00003206657,0.0001084856,0.03970768],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6573923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.681227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984964656","doi":"10.7202/1026129ar","title":"Epidemiological Uncertainty, Causation, and Drug Product Liability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Product liability; Epidemiology; Actuarial science; Liability; Context (archaeology); Economics; Law; Medicine; Political science; Pathology; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Richard Goldberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07926483891439622,"gpt":0.4198371947832955,"spread":0.3405723558688993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06192746,0.0006637106,0.001294703,0.005328226,0.00852585,0.009760072,0.002971934,0.01803996,0.003591848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.159573,0.0009128851,0.001464482,0.002650618,0.04612254,0.01508392,0.008334986,0.01169598,0.000409129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006684436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00930974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006117603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004958032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9323786,0.04070108,0.003738657,0.004558851,0.01610078,0.002521931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7438199,0.2336613,0.01006108,0.004898382,0.006243099,0.001316265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000736389,0.000009356741,0.0005664398,0.00005378469,0.00001075698,0.0001786082,0.0006032924,0.0003437017,0.00002778764,0.9926153,0.001000704,0.004583002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002164233,0.00003494782,0.0008131667,0.0004025599,0.00002768991,0.0003490948,0.000546173,0.0008172252,0.0001199821,0.9772455,0.01958609,0.00003587091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04255132,0.06096918,0.1375485,0.5491721,0.002388117,0.0001940091,0.0001902884,0.0001008575,0.2068857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8819468,0.02022576,0.02440145,0.06133533,0.00496458,0.0002384917,0.00005221027,0.00002703297,0.006808436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06192746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3275076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020489753","doi":"10.7202/1000785ar","title":"Rethinking Criminal Responsibility for Poor Offenders: Choice, Monstrosity, and the Logic of Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Retributive justice; Punishment (psychology); Aside; Power (physics); Sociological theory; Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Economics; Social science; Social psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Marie-Ève Sylvestre","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1091001274527506,"gpt":0.3525811739076435,"spread":0.243481046454893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0191526,0.0005907033,0.0007995783,0.002660691,0.01408253,0.01479845,0.002894527,0.006146033,0.001646026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02261789,0.0004661061,0.0005449342,0.00204188,0.2211791,0.01565754,0.01337086,0.00811991,0.0001549711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0276433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01867389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04708463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04527031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9749305,0.01772177,0.0005534698,0.001747799,0.002907471,0.002138992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841547,0.0106316,0.001369877,0.001487354,0.001427687,0.0009288221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000582197,0.000005442221,0.0004083749,0.00001577347,0.000002645814,0.00005968581,0.01936419,0.0001644003,0.00003047639,0.9767674,0.0003844234,0.002791408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001008849,0.00001586268,0.0007123956,0.0001231294,0.000007941616,0.00006989099,0.0208946,0.0006571485,0.0001210633,0.9606064,0.01676233,0.00001912813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2224257,0.007138642,0.08863094,0.2841507,0.0005417392,0.0001687287,0.00004555248,0.000104753,0.3967933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930624,0.0004450974,0.002663,0.001471378,0.0000548557,0.00003965162,0.000003161153,0.00001392667,0.002246599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04708463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2005672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018588254","doi":"10.7202/1005848ar","title":"Covert Derogations and Judicial Deference: Redefining Liberty and Due Process Rights in Counterterrorism Law and Beyond","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Deference; Political science; Parliament; Derogation; Human rights; Judicial deference; Covert; Judicial review; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Helen Fenwick","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gavin Phillipson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03083224154445312,"gpt":0.2818543575952852,"spread":0.251022116050832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01654885,0.0004518246,0.0007258418,0.001431905,0.005831429,0.01555334,0.001914432,0.01202823,0.002427834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03155723,0.0005865607,0.00062669,0.0007317254,0.05276855,0.01190989,0.007995968,0.01007101,0.0003247218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007190376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005332443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007261733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007655207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9811732,0.01092074,0.000653322,0.001614266,0.003156817,0.002481685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797815,0.01534985,0.001225775,0.001912909,0.001198065,0.0005319095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008944701,0.000007195677,0.0001077491,0.00001616969,0.000003234505,0.0001433566,0.004261199,0.0001640904,0.0002233196,0.9916972,0.0004925074,0.002875064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003103409,0.00006709804,0.0006000172,0.0002449985,0.00001629921,0.0002466243,0.002325704,0.001094098,0.0009585382,0.947138,0.04722533,0.00005232548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1979344,0.01824349,0.09529645,0.1350668,0.001353077,0.0001394211,0.00004295585,0.0001635557,0.5517598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845476,0.0008135087,0.003183482,0.004884381,0.0003490946,0.00005755984,0.000004345075,0.00002517021,0.00613501],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01654885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08751971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612798282","doi":"10.7202/1038489ar","title":"Heroes, Tricksters, Monsters, and Caretakers: Indigenous Law and Legal Education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Subject (documents); Political science; Sociology; Categorization; Epistemology; Library science","authors":[{"name":"John Borrows","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02327443722608941,"gpt":0.3214301690673661,"spread":0.2981557318412767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002126217,0.000191929,0.0001657651,0.0008339278,0.02145622,0.00490864,0.0009106571,0.001499046,0.004527132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002901503,0.000189527,0.0001483264,0.0007383905,0.01659568,0.002628138,0.004051899,0.002608586,0.0001972815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03067264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0432795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8607326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9680646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980416,0.0006795224,0.00002483227,0.00009846243,0.000475388,0.0006800176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987844,0.0004087751,0.00008816047,0.00003768213,0.0001501161,0.0005309506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002339112,0.000158417,0.01151978,0.0002157533,0.000007585734,0.001135411,0.7108698,0.0002378525,0.000807307,0.1780079,0.01380243,0.08321443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001061295,0.00007344304,0.02919374,0.0006091241,0.00002501644,0.0005079176,0.6905352,0.00051415,0.0008058147,0.01489711,0.2627813,0.00004647361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5808972,0.006836529,0.002505056,0.0606778,0.0002772066,0.00007777333,0.00002911653,0.00006718568,0.3486322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758148,0.002062604,0.001038051,0.001831704,0.00002072786,0.00001301517,0.000008224642,0.000009293009,0.01920169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8607326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2801751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029513835","doi":"10.7202/039646ar","title":"The Grammar of Customary Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Normative; Indigenous; Legal history; Sociology; Legal realism","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy Webber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01241771421676745,"gpt":0.2751842133774959,"spread":0.2627664991607284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003328269,0.0002732177,0.0003402992,0.001475701,0.003681373,0.005848117,0.001058917,0.001781535,0.004479415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005957354,0.0003411968,0.0004889318,0.001556955,0.03342824,0.006707208,0.00274966,0.002673048,0.0005776951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004617973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01648296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01277186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967828,0.001279543,0.0001825774,0.0005615433,0.0008777432,0.0003156697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971654,0.001500522,0.0002066373,0.0006331158,0.0003789562,0.0001154638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.108694e-7,8.62443e-7,0.0000444428,0.000004547567,7.933446e-7,0.000007455104,0.0008476377,0.00005552442,0.00001314161,0.9969495,0.0007324388,0.001343135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002487425,0.000002772193,0.000242938,0.00003980274,0.000002381571,0.00004847068,0.0005399326,0.000264029,0.00004865153,0.9405568,0.05824545,0.000006340979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02715072,0.005631428,0.0621098,0.02674158,0.0004482417,0.00004829331,0.0002384111,0.0002428858,0.8773886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467266,0.002035647,0.01171537,0.002625966,0.000323497,0.00008788329,0.0001525003,0.0001482917,0.03618427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01648296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03350592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044500382","doi":"10.7202/1018393ar","title":"How the Charter Has Failed Non-citizens in Canada: Reviewing Thirty Years of Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Dauvergne","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03101737801003715,"gpt":0.2320557403653359,"spread":0.2010383623552988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01489022,0.0005103817,0.001103257,0.01125912,0.03655672,0.01640506,0.004237847,0.004523821,0.001887704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03554964,0.0009117924,0.0008752209,0.01762104,0.02247772,0.003481789,0.00275767,0.007804242,0.0001977338],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.325088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3909802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9779449,0.001795274,0.0007664597,0.001399733,0.01257842,0.00551514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952723,0.01716602,0.001829701,0.0008021668,0.02468258,0.002796511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009408414,0.00009110064,0.020453,0.001220594,0.0001509782,0.002050307,0.1210441,0.001740458,0.0005884747,0.5822579,0.1491391,0.1211699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002057699,0.0000467904,0.07233447,0.003248247,0.0001904081,0.0002933548,0.0504747,0.0007575311,0.0006773002,0.009566871,0.8621122,0.0002776529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2112757,0.3881095,0.001437294,0.1175202,0.003004059,0.0001726108,0.00105622,0.00008521516,0.2773392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8581448,0.1043719,0.00104335,0.01768112,0.0005906196,0.00004579749,0.0003517648,0.0001086697,0.01766203],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.325088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7828023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005027983","doi":"10.7202/1007818ar","title":"Breakdowns in the Democratic Process and the Law of Canadian Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Supreme court; Politics; Normative; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Pal","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02575296900620931,"gpt":0.2818926077589995,"spread":0.2561396387527902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004509893,0.0003791409,0.0004201969,0.003397512,0.02477279,0.009852796,0.001374303,0.001845262,0.005224592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01464193,0.000379972,0.0005024643,0.004059214,0.03121073,0.003635812,0.004179962,0.005798413,0.0003013303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1372478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1128443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9685344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9865556,0.001488572,0.0003223147,0.00141638,0.00564977,0.004567279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938226,0.001374445,0.0006205984,0.0006683445,0.002484425,0.001029668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006976792,0.000002669238,0.000613026,0.0000118897,0.000002182324,0.00003294929,0.00258466,0.0003823756,0.00007278239,0.9897491,0.001491127,0.005050271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005696875,0.00002214572,0.01552581,0.0002430459,0.00003506608,0.0001601892,0.008834325,0.004637182,0.0006787285,0.689232,0.2804584,0.0001160398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.118869,0.003597822,0.01846682,0.02785603,0.0002527482,0.0002202178,0.0004586094,0.0001724736,0.8301063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736394,0.0008853565,0.003478695,0.0009477136,0.00003938002,0.00004960216,0.00008597073,0.00003019682,0.02084373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1372478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125842437","doi":"10.7202/1025139ar","title":"Property in Licences and the Law of Things","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Property law; Tangible property; Law; Government (linguistics); Bundle of rights; Public property; Numerus clausus; Right to property; Intangible property; Reservation of rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Business; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Essert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01975974329420483,"gpt":0.274742387572499,"spread":0.2549826442782942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006824301,0.0002999579,0.0006375366,0.001654887,0.005013711,0.008016941,0.001451139,0.006117838,0.00960321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01410252,0.0004700121,0.0009507395,0.001386201,0.03903513,0.01439861,0.004388885,0.005257535,0.001078464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005323391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003730242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009538731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004990598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931791,0.00308496,0.0003381363,0.0009115252,0.001450316,0.001035913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894953,0.006895107,0.0007548959,0.001579043,0.0008493543,0.0004262388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001526802,0.000002511717,0.00004549784,0.00000476943,0.000001014197,0.00001614127,0.0001204216,0.00006300324,0.00001179227,0.9988629,0.0002848663,0.0005856181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006752437,0.000006053469,0.0001634559,0.0000282812,0.00000274545,0.00003552295,0.0001174579,0.0002387163,0.00004609883,0.9877827,0.0115664,0.000005802126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06146354,0.005280836,0.04654992,0.04787404,0.0003526029,0.00007816845,0.0002147341,0.0001039404,0.8380823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563277,0.001574855,0.005751668,0.003529798,0.0004281656,0.0001550846,0.00008397971,0.00005013654,0.03209856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00960321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03862411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122182973","doi":"10.7202/1018988ar","title":"Contract’s Meaning and the Histories of Classical Contract Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Individualism; Law; Social contract; Vision; Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Anat Rosenberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02367814637409953,"gpt":0.2768374858055749,"spread":0.2531593394314753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006538525,0.0003410091,0.000334689,0.002104032,0.007623865,0.008093087,0.001382387,0.003518764,0.002981489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01178507,0.0003953608,0.0003190803,0.002044065,0.06919432,0.01120236,0.003922449,0.004884757,0.0002965788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01888249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007549184,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01701123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940843,0.003129596,0.0001894897,0.0005317,0.001501695,0.0005632466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949191,0.003416541,0.0002840156,0.0005396798,0.0005445488,0.0002961121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001829207,0.000001178907,0.00002151657,0.000003701759,3.652306e-7,0.00001071262,0.002100738,0.00003630813,0.000005587725,0.9969358,0.0002797469,0.0006024959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004653704,0.000004396309,0.000129149,0.00005625103,0.000001780557,0.00003993683,0.001736202,0.0003227277,0.00004447947,0.9544254,0.04322835,0.000006556069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07351072,0.01902035,0.03840603,0.05048405,0.0008101084,0.00005102032,0.0000800906,0.00005354875,0.817584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766236,0.002704727,0.002556039,0.001667239,0.0002791068,0.00003802919,0.00002349827,0.00004423748,0.01606358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01888249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1370027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081632868","doi":"10.7202/1013028ar","title":"Legal Hybridity in Hong Kong and Macau","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Mainland China; China; Political science; Ideology; Acknowledgement; Politics; Law; Sociology; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Ignazio Castellucci","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0273633526495178,"gpt":0.3041547007290828,"spread":0.2767913480795651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001512637,0.0002090854,0.0002609145,0.00162518,0.01036546,0.005543087,0.001194229,0.0007388572,0.003462446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002941994,0.0003267802,0.0002725605,0.002516905,0.012403,0.002162277,0.005456316,0.00148957,0.0001109946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03528231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01457243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5108503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5831751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997887,0.0006024516,0.00006990704,0.0002080858,0.0002676784,0.0009648519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998529,0.0004256501,0.0002523017,0.0001590579,0.0002488254,0.0003852141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002216627,0.00008522515,0.1118713,0.0001836863,0.00009502223,0.01515258,0.2761071,0.001035666,0.001577229,0.5697212,0.002395353,0.02155399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001129562,0.0002296624,0.2320831,0.0004814582,0.0001747225,0.004265721,0.5950761,0.003844269,0.002127516,0.03389617,0.12756,0.0001484056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9574136,0.0006012275,0.0002825919,0.001175159,0.00001696203,0.00003817535,0.00002687242,0.000009533083,0.04043593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771,0.00007987701,0.0001012648,0.0001259882,0.000001489022,0.00001398861,0.000009981308,0.000001562278,0.001955769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5108503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790988331","doi":"10.7202/1043159ar","title":"Conditions géographiques de mise en liberté et de probation imposées aux manifestants : une atteinte injustifiée aux droits à la liberté d’expression, de réunion pacifique et d’association","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Marie-Ève Sylvestre","is_ca":true},{"name":"Francis Villeneuve Ménard","is_ca":true},{"name":"Véronique Fortin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Céline Bellot","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicholas Blomley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01611624990052503,"gpt":0.3280149736920107,"spread":0.3118987237914857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001877549,0.0004054576,0.0004280421,0.002227694,0.007390047,0.01096398,0.001023441,0.002922637,0.01561231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007988289,0.0003031127,0.0003915639,0.003365902,0.02328584,0.006191984,0.006408793,0.002528966,0.001393167],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005571454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05383542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06372648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949936,0.002284545,0.0002093584,0.0005901069,0.0009184738,0.001003999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949227,0.001953077,0.001586025,0.0005823498,0.0006754291,0.0002804902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005048869,0.00002202854,0.01015762,0.0001103549,0.00001402325,0.0006523676,0.04935865,0.0003435356,0.000436177,0.92291,0.006155371,0.009789328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005653911,0.0001093988,0.09291445,0.0006542075,0.00008871494,0.001672883,0.3086192,0.000827036,0.001845369,0.2441213,0.3489136,0.000177416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.4207481,0.004275647,0.01332046,0.06852219,0.0006135151,0.0001026047,0.00168575,0.0001935673,0.4905382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795528,0.001032513,0.0008698652,0.0008792346,0.0001212448,0.00008060931,0.0001439105,0.00003700565,0.01728286],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9461646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1070441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973249466","doi":"10.7202/1005849ar","title":"Glamis Gold, Ltd. v. The United States and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Treaty; Plaintiff; Political science; Law; Arbitration; Interpretation (philosophy); Customary international law; State (computer science); Standard of review; Jurisprudence; Free trade agreement; Law and economics; International law; Economics; Free trade; International trade; Public international law; Judicial review; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Clare Ryan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02818626240530645,"gpt":0.2241302193366712,"spread":0.1959439569313648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004946225,0.0004724955,0.0004003246,0.001201467,0.01054471,0.00809841,0.001621168,0.01214974,0.002630371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006458571,0.0004611396,0.0006879108,0.0010932,0.009869352,0.003138222,0.003359263,0.009483062,0.0006225713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01592911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01220814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1813733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2865345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928677,0.001619668,0.0002358842,0.0007860077,0.003037941,0.001452813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984455,0.0009045856,0.0001061869,0.0001094038,0.0003197768,0.000114639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009978527,0.000008118422,0.0003657018,0.00001615333,0.000003929745,0.0002163551,0.001666981,0.0001133753,0.0001728474,0.9727519,0.01984346,0.004831128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006465412,0.00006554351,0.003170203,0.0004442795,0.0000358699,0.0002990366,0.002311777,0.0007753928,0.001168316,0.2073912,0.7841811,0.00009261912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04974269,0.01576081,0.003949848,0.2229585,0.002033225,0.00007800653,0.0001028742,0.0001043704,0.7052696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6355829,0.004175415,0.002674992,0.1843164,0.0008079091,0.0001730153,0.00009363038,0.00007626833,0.1720996],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1813733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3606352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783681570","doi":"10.7202/1042775ar","title":"“Legalizing” the Great Bear Rainforest Agreements: Colonial Adaptations Toward Reconciliation and Conservation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Australian Government; Institute of Science and Technology Austria; Tula Foundation","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Colonialism; Indigenous; Government (linguistics); Political science; Environmental governance; Indigenous rights; Rainforest; Human rights; Geography; Law; Business; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Deborah Curran","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03721140324976968,"gpt":0.2390502351249021,"spread":0.2018388318751324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01361235,0.0002063526,0.000231143,0.0009640359,0.02062938,0.01021667,0.001965348,0.003318631,0.002833009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02083684,0.000303431,0.0002300619,0.001658511,0.05449167,0.004592004,0.009223809,0.006889658,0.0002126727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03939448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08780234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6282073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7695686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870408,0.006214919,0.0004864147,0.0009340943,0.002553808,0.002770017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912191,0.003950953,0.0007400062,0.001188232,0.00187583,0.001025882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003567884,0.000009185775,0.001133562,0.00002709922,0.000002541066,0.0002262236,0.0807658,0.0002319871,0.0001970461,0.8944022,0.00708971,0.01591107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001098162,0.0000167958,0.004521577,0.0004526914,0.00001209867,0.0002937718,0.08086677,0.0007565337,0.0005081893,0.1317699,0.7807345,0.00005610841],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1063476,0.004371914,0.02088967,0.106643,0.0007576167,0.000265575,0.00005227199,0.0001286686,0.7605436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9292254,0.002558465,0.0114355,0.01309749,0.0001631171,0.0001246889,0.00005085323,0.00008670158,0.04325785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3717927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7479645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063574972","doi":"10.7202/038178ar","title":"Between Exclusion and Assimilation: Experimentalizing Multiculturalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Reasonable accommodation; Epistemology; Charter; Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Faisal Bhabha","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06003431359858567,"gpt":0.3527072880083043,"spread":0.2926729744097186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02049881,0.0004543504,0.0006860871,0.001241804,0.01101559,0.007968449,0.002442927,0.002033056,0.004093064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01922544,0.0003300681,0.0005605991,0.0009829341,0.08689298,0.008037395,0.01960992,0.004310777,0.0001701826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006377362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004940059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004563555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004941114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9781305,0.01853044,0.000213775,0.001109011,0.001041814,0.0009745079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735557,0.02074266,0.001589478,0.002614334,0.0006794064,0.0008183763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001121214,0.0003149816,0.001158574,0.00006821576,0.00001079605,0.0001352897,0.1180476,0.0002293752,0.0006762206,0.8723957,0.0003574555,0.006493677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000242573,0.0005276307,0.002168596,0.000256827,0.00003568546,0.0001545746,0.1230494,0.00152922,0.002137718,0.832167,0.03767916,0.0000516313],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6708384,0.001069917,0.0164015,0.01721407,0.0003218771,0.0002155269,0.00002367849,0.00004174461,0.2938733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954233,0.0001753532,0.001601887,0.0006933686,0.0000405651,0.0001802176,0.000005535063,0.00001127741,0.001868529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1084094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977942614","doi":"10.7202/1013387ar","title":"The 1969 African Refugee Convention: Innovations, Misconceptions, and Omissions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Convention; Expansive; Political science; Silence; Refugee law; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Marina Sharpe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02826671819194547,"gpt":0.2215184647804792,"spread":0.1932517465885338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02571655,0.0005071017,0.0004340534,0.003405858,0.00820672,0.00961336,0.00177333,0.004948091,0.001664001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04105007,0.0004219546,0.0003912441,0.004224679,0.028343,0.008327359,0.005093783,0.01154248,0.0003861389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01251041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01030187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02223158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01532583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9837563,0.008506603,0.001220479,0.001376174,0.004044776,0.001095731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979835,0.0152469,0.001350641,0.001147685,0.00204847,0.0003713875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001665382,0.00001208834,0.0005540262,0.0001832618,0.000004642744,0.0002278763,0.04539031,0.0001652175,0.0003366647,0.8973759,0.02295004,0.03278339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004386953,0.00001512921,0.0009934258,0.001736728,0.000008102601,0.0002884424,0.02004926,0.0002154555,0.0009548227,0.04638528,0.9292972,0.00005182379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08231248,0.1293076,0.01408536,0.5351729,0.01633042,0.0001384331,0.0002336756,0.0001180074,0.2223011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8174803,0.05744556,0.01191167,0.06702194,0.006748751,0.0002005741,0.0001013388,0.000248454,0.03884137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02571655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1360037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001310812","doi":"10.7202/1002368ar","title":"The Judicial System in the Digital Age: Revisiting the Relationship between Privacy and Accessibility in the Cyber Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Transparency (behavior); Openness to experience; Information privacy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Internet privacy; Copying; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Law; Privacy policy; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Karen Eltis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0929479725175142,"gpt":0.2803846439826713,"spread":0.1874366714651571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008232546,0.0002453604,0.0003652504,0.002527722,0.009260183,0.01736343,0.001451523,0.004049452,0.006587482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02394574,0.0003890082,0.0005772427,0.00214717,0.05410266,0.02473981,0.01095037,0.005142157,0.0003805518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005360117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004058898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006804093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006231014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877177,0.008469859,0.0004070279,0.0007140994,0.001535982,0.001155208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588962,0.03324865,0.003240946,0.002048408,0.001675417,0.0008903723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001861709,0.0000390086,0.002010032,0.00005557083,0.000005651927,0.0003018547,0.02483799,0.0003516867,0.0001055218,0.9651724,0.0005636574,0.006538051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004365957,0.00008894744,0.007859959,0.0006279577,0.0000447234,0.0008337494,0.06791591,0.002012599,0.0006867144,0.843846,0.07598661,0.00005324374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4081103,0.01365496,0.02640367,0.08557349,0.0005497798,0.0000880691,0.00008108951,0.00003964425,0.465499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943948,0.001681537,0.000850166,0.001284424,0.000162856,0.00001748878,0.000005812471,0.000009087937,0.001593833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01736343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04353839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003998827","doi":"10.7202/045086ar","title":"Principles-Based Securities Regulation in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Financial crisis; Financial regulation; Business; Systemic risk; Financial market; Regulatory reform; Economics; Finance; Accounting; Financial system; Market economy; Macroeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Cristie Ford","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02600271453978982,"gpt":0.2259938378811224,"spread":0.1999911233413326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01427809,0.0002534372,0.0004154564,0.0006711963,0.003632884,0.00601881,0.00108721,0.01066299,0.001427514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02503024,0.0003691337,0.0006871651,0.0006727753,0.01535829,0.004373385,0.00380762,0.01164608,0.0003556294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006300646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007698477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009994991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007499361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889614,0.004152284,0.0005836485,0.001178823,0.00372025,0.00140353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877738,0.006104516,0.00150236,0.001396874,0.002666792,0.0005555104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001569933,0.00001653261,0.0005680922,0.00002194258,0.000004621346,0.0001387115,0.001307863,0.001132238,0.0002751989,0.9755333,0.01371899,0.007266824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005111781,0.00006075811,0.002352596,0.0002198035,0.00001746672,0.0001579068,0.0007617493,0.002572743,0.0007288647,0.8072975,0.1857297,0.00004981219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08465805,0.005678876,0.02893218,0.5106597,0.002792492,0.0001265238,0.0000811662,0.0002296886,0.3668413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8754793,0.002245511,0.007536687,0.08488074,0.001141682,0.0001463464,0.0000446919,0.00008260918,0.0284425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01427809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07551062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126051783","doi":"","title":"Enhancing the Accountability of Credit Rating Agencies : The Case for a Disclosure-based Model","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Credit rating; Business; Accounting; Financial system; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Stéphane Rousseau","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03555714488539851,"gpt":0.2465311075655131,"spread":0.2109739626801146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03782517,0.001076424,0.002271628,0.001221399,0.001931493,0.009711315,0.003699904,0.009452661,0.008553129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1146892,0.0007590631,0.001264277,0.001316879,0.006625575,0.0162364,0.004346794,0.008212668,0.001268296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004350161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006259575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004648482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003937598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9727472,0.01838678,0.0008887334,0.002585667,0.003175447,0.002216199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8730101,0.08798565,0.01329948,0.01312923,0.009225934,0.003349615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001419134,0.0001988648,0.002551747,0.00007499044,0.00006992745,0.0001380794,0.0004390232,0.05107343,0.0003124009,0.9244592,0.004061965,0.01647841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001190937,0.00007813906,0.0007055228,0.00004349347,0.00004615062,0.00006387239,0.0001026825,0.1203367,0.00024086,0.8741786,0.004046442,0.00003835409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1216082,0.001589212,0.6343314,0.1256426,0.0007512345,0.0003318914,0.0004916529,0.0006199798,0.1146338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714293,0.0005166343,0.01665011,0.002498891,0.0005578079,0.0001104266,0.00004901339,0.0000459234,0.008141945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03782517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2000411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1829280546","doi":"10.7202/1032678ar","title":"Challenges to Assessing Same-Sex Relationships under Refugee Law in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Adjudication; Refugee law; Credibility; Identity (music); Cherokee; Criminology; Political science; Context (archaeology); Multiculturalism; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Hersh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1415938503480424,"gpt":0.3402310838880431,"spread":0.1986372335400007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04411772,0.0003969586,0.0007683039,0.00483467,0.028115,0.01073389,0.006281479,0.003453598,0.003919527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09930847,0.000835534,0.0006335927,0.005104691,0.009096463,0.003403614,0.00930373,0.006241679,0.0003393113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1159596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2930495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9866533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9658278,0.00817802,0.002947187,0.002254888,0.01625614,0.004535969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9281586,0.02410303,0.004458151,0.002660006,0.03520811,0.005412014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002774531,0.0001974409,0.1348378,0.001983851,0.0002108022,0.01053376,0.436435,0.001461309,0.00308283,0.1058221,0.04127052,0.2638872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005666961,0.0001666375,0.1702524,0.005515554,0.0002055422,0.002492181,0.5434088,0.003029558,0.003556397,0.02381475,0.2471295,0.000372005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6287152,0.01665732,0.01256896,0.1815219,0.001794351,0.002020534,0.001761726,0.0001174834,0.1548426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580839,0.00574227,0.009046606,0.01236522,0.0001072717,0.0003008769,0.0002703063,0.00004103725,0.01404254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1159596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8413499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804742156","doi":"","title":"Negotiating an Institution for the Twenty-First Century: Multilateral Diplomacy and the International Criminal Court","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Negotiation; Institution; Political science; Criminal court; Law; International law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Philippe Kirsch","is_ca":false},{"name":"Valerie Oosterveld","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03346872051504347,"gpt":0.3182715107814587,"spread":0.2848027902664153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01009271,0.0004416052,0.0006244018,0.001492254,0.016964,0.02730758,0.001809496,0.01388011,0.009450648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01361588,0.0004309531,0.0005332705,0.001341424,0.03334555,0.01742785,0.01353415,0.01379468,0.0005209017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01679966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01728446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02382997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03824882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937524,0.002428573,0.0001080386,0.0005728662,0.0006553425,0.002482761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961365,0.001599634,0.0004361206,0.0002619805,0.0003768236,0.001188964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007733743,0.00000675163,0.00009693568,0.000003248693,0.000002039081,0.00003191869,0.001148471,0.000108156,0.0000201631,0.9959674,0.001328663,0.001278523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000362348,0.00002088045,0.0004935036,0.0001504481,0.0000115449,0.00007901488,0.005798472,0.0008277629,0.0002020011,0.89964,0.09269496,0.00004509639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1269091,0.007504063,0.0115842,0.1212195,0.0006772158,0.00005482678,0.00005564012,0.00006641048,0.731929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696418,0.0006610701,0.001191068,0.005923003,0.0001578105,0.00005005082,0.00001214832,0.00002738925,0.02233575],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02730758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1218906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033495146","doi":"10.7202/1000788ar","title":"L’ordre juridique arbitral : réalité, utilité et spécificité","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Emmanuel Gaillard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0495763181199125,"gpt":0.2475403390992334,"spread":0.1979640209793209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008756101,0.0003775089,0.0003891695,0.001785649,0.005618251,0.01858406,0.001292888,0.002843828,0.01073596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01319426,0.0003842274,0.000384722,0.003381486,0.01647181,0.01104715,0.004766703,0.003741597,0.001177078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00651945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005048689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01678235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01800688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909751,0.005206052,0.0003464839,0.0008342414,0.001874346,0.000763787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928289,0.003955004,0.0006941695,0.0007580071,0.001228909,0.0005350031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002658446,0.00001257136,0.002630118,0.00008555951,0.000009391119,0.0001225693,0.02963161,0.0001698428,0.0002421198,0.9480788,0.002202411,0.01678857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003316951,0.00006036651,0.02156859,0.001104125,0.00005149702,0.0009134971,0.08271357,0.002096757,0.001261892,0.4249944,0.4650488,0.0001532821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1322697,0.00871566,0.02269089,0.02760444,0.0002309079,0.00005970728,0.0001374386,0.00009177989,0.8081995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627486,0.001987868,0.00289432,0.0009520709,0.0001153695,0.00005575416,0.00005661056,0.00006728327,0.03112214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01858406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04730213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849736915","doi":"10.7202/1032679ar","title":"Bedford and the Structure of Section 7","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Section (typography); Norm (philosophy); Political science; Individualism; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Hamish Stewart","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01971968227042641,"gpt":0.2825392223551058,"spread":0.2628195400846794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003768193,0.000308611,0.0002878,0.001256263,0.01240892,0.007793475,0.001990313,0.007499926,0.01791746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008158301,0.00075336,0.0004847687,0.0009459818,0.01069104,0.003024074,0.003635011,0.007327456,0.001951798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01847841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02981985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4809779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6091549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925655,0.001206467,0.0002067037,0.0009752452,0.002240287,0.002805681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957638,0.001166157,0.0002976188,0.0003638838,0.001819292,0.0005892926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001036535,0.000009751764,0.0005021981,0.000008952998,0.000002348923,0.00006444081,0.001084092,0.00005238401,0.000104775,0.9791124,0.01563397,0.003414354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000469659,0.00007363506,0.008228329,0.0003409824,0.00002601844,0.0001677174,0.002326622,0.0004735261,0.0009411212,0.1822096,0.8050587,0.0001068521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03671306,0.001838804,0.003240348,0.02899711,0.0008500171,0.00008038254,0.0001846773,0.0001021312,0.9279935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5470825,0.001031734,0.00367766,0.04330932,0.0005491605,0.0002036784,0.0002970002,0.0001160362,0.403733],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4809779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9563565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624634460","doi":"","title":"The U.S. Perspective on the International Criminal Court","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Criminal court; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; International law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"David J. Scheffer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02818016512065683,"gpt":0.3121881790722094,"spread":0.2840080139515526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00229138,0.0004958268,0.0004497547,0.002318389,0.01069238,0.01388563,0.000919163,0.01365224,0.01313395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004135187,0.0003649841,0.001017897,0.003016855,0.009657648,0.005394488,0.002257735,0.01020194,0.001291977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009556524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1478107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2838958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971864,0.0009591204,0.00008925856,0.0003376447,0.0004654975,0.0009621198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983867,0.0007474992,0.0001691672,0.00008517821,0.0003192799,0.0002921281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001358322,0.00001470904,0.0003667198,0.00001666428,0.000004396794,0.0001473063,0.0009139183,0.000148841,0.00005449327,0.9585226,0.03431877,0.005478047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000379568,0.00006900832,0.004824166,0.001087624,0.00004508724,0.0003739725,0.006828235,0.0007345992,0.0002565726,0.3901208,0.5955566,0.00006545925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01202686,0.0286385,0.0007757951,0.219694,0.001799922,0.00001443962,0.0002174262,0.00001636698,0.7368167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7135313,0.03027711,0.001405559,0.1633572,0.003373219,0.0001164959,0.0001632901,0.00005660053,0.0877194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1478107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2939008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097724759","doi":"10.7202/1009065ar","title":"Toward A Federal Legal Theory of the City","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Legitimacy; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Institution; Politics; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political economy","authors":[{"name":"Hoi L. Kong","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06941978909998069,"gpt":0.3163119711825669,"spread":0.2468921820825862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002138148,0.0002340823,0.0005656699,0.002854115,0.009012295,0.01021098,0.001673336,0.003630841,0.008951532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002161295,0.0004045877,0.0007868145,0.002420695,0.01613671,0.005209727,0.003826482,0.005195895,0.0009485861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02260066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01809214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1820636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1700671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977645,0.0006654766,0.00005795819,0.0003887036,0.0004997064,0.0006237401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988946,0.0002908045,0.00009694968,0.0001598977,0.000393388,0.0001643252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.296829e-7,0.000001223712,0.00003950414,0.000001662577,3.708849e-7,0.000003001789,0.00008327682,0.0001954666,0.000003855734,0.998718,0.0005991955,0.0003540725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009025995,0.000005041596,0.0005391059,0.00003740643,0.000006247748,0.00001627655,0.0004940121,0.002728306,0.00005428896,0.9265937,0.06950694,0.000009714168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03635309,0.00298031,0.1081608,0.07749338,0.0003670857,0.00008985163,0.0004391479,0.0002253067,0.7738911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9004603,0.001874878,0.02235154,0.006345352,0.0003572013,0.0001963652,0.0003504062,0.00008627953,0.06797769],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1820636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3620077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122476906","doi":"10.7202/1042774ar","title":"“The Earth is Our Mother”: Freedom of Religion and the Preservation of Indigenous Sacred Sites in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Religious Tourism and Spaces","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Worship; State (computer science); Supreme court; Religious persecution; Persecution; Law; Political science; Faith; Indigenous rights; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Human rights; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Natasha Bakht","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lynda Collins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01155045049990511,"gpt":0.2482197070313942,"spread":0.2366692565314891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001922044,0.0002783962,0.0004042443,0.001210845,0.0440199,0.01130834,0.002250027,0.003998954,0.006307618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004245623,0.0004106193,0.000394589,0.00192045,0.01813313,0.00229969,0.004992786,0.00672225,0.000240572],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.157502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2603553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959785,0.0003951881,0.00009128974,0.0003038328,0.001283381,0.001947806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968756,0.0006352624,0.0001625224,0.000105716,0.0009768751,0.001243986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006339445,0.00007911175,0.01671933,0.000231334,0.00003956869,0.002778381,0.07436311,0.001015274,0.0008213437,0.778554,0.07927524,0.04606005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004949295,0.0000499747,0.0531798,0.0008397292,0.00009452821,0.0008299956,0.1231967,0.00141446,0.0009999449,0.05379021,0.7652501,0.0003049498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2922723,0.01975617,0.002011517,0.1335226,0.0009931908,0.0002008919,0.0005527386,0.00005710771,0.5506334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9009512,0.006679815,0.001452195,0.01698542,0.00007771484,0.00003369467,0.0001080685,0.00003632209,0.0736756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.157502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9771782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061805555","doi":"10.7202/045699ar","title":"From Norms to Facts: The Realization of Rights in Common and Civil Private Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal culture; Private law; Legal realism; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Empirical legal studies; Legal profession; Normative; Philosophy of law; Legal history; Ideal (ethics); Comparative law; Public law; Sociology; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Helge Dedek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04192305796101551,"gpt":0.2951831574120748,"spread":0.2532600994510593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01309253,0.0004749521,0.0005429436,0.00207851,0.008353393,0.01423059,0.002189363,0.005229784,0.003326346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01892725,0.0005507001,0.0005675872,0.001626058,0.1048845,0.02041635,0.007577012,0.00712528,0.0005447673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01190918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01428981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03343267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0257085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9844094,0.008679833,0.0004305668,0.001175061,0.003871194,0.001434018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902161,0.006160358,0.0006682228,0.001343986,0.0009815532,0.0006297747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001436176,0.000002193636,0.00003027042,0.000004703823,6.002925e-7,0.00001404852,0.001830699,0.00005605479,0.00001326522,0.9964195,0.0005856164,0.001041683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004962319,0.000005010481,0.0001119973,0.00004510642,0.000001585948,0.00001713809,0.001154952,0.0001715144,0.00004795215,0.9777931,0.02064014,0.00000663193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03711258,0.008240807,0.07006382,0.1058969,0.0008221215,0.0001142925,0.0001481423,0.0001181536,0.7774832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564683,0.002546773,0.01269045,0.00436617,0.0006128724,0.0001703636,0.00005884532,0.00007845124,0.02300789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03343267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08640748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123801536","doi":"","title":"Measuring Judicial Activism on the SupremeCourt of Canada: A Comment onNewfoundland (Treasury Board) v. NAPE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Political science; Law; Public administration","authors":[{"name":"Sujit Choudhry","is_ca":false},{"name":"Claire E. Hunter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05662370584923329,"gpt":0.2501783787137477,"spread":0.1935546728645144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008378278,0.0005740922,0.0006483646,0.003968022,0.02231298,0.01015091,0.003338887,0.004733729,0.005194856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06020153,0.0004718596,0.0006234712,0.01165802,0.006824727,0.002487307,0.002184787,0.005649007,0.0004376754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1051756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1408337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9823509,0.001708739,0.0005888009,0.001219204,0.01038313,0.00374916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9462154,0.0185751,0.003658777,0.001244557,0.02626087,0.004045346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002652948,0.0001601589,0.3565832,0.0003597642,0.00026925,0.0003533223,0.03678351,0.001431749,0.001043292,0.1077036,0.4358013,0.05924561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006473056,0.00009594827,0.7088825,0.0006970757,0.0004042159,0.00008347601,0.05119633,0.00139941,0.004470081,0.005716475,0.226789,0.0002007974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.4094871,0.006772947,0.002466603,0.2701373,0.001029776,0.000387274,0.009165891,0.0001374989,0.3004156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355409,0.00145165,0.002050392,0.02907512,0.000267826,0.0001124999,0.001150909,0.00007603716,0.03027477],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1051756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7631061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243080737","doi":"10.7202/mlj","title":"McGill Law Journal","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06950990085544063,"gpt":0.3569736682425543,"spread":0.2874637673871137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001742588,0.001001186,0.0009087421,0.002940228,0.007547177,0.01366306,0.002152103,0.01310897,0.3607959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009946603,0.0009554055,0.0007556544,0.002477628,0.003821393,0.004064297,0.002787261,0.008068446,0.1339839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009715617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01118653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1773404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3574217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978866,0.0002919848,0.00009756734,0.0003311163,0.001068232,0.0003244995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967626,0.001169188,0.0001339406,0.0004526104,0.001065944,0.0004156287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001129165,0.00002583402,0.00008465449,0.00004755154,0.000003646235,0.00005404846,0.0001337439,0.00004314095,0.00006840131,0.08760254,0.8914173,0.02050781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009113017,0.000008009588,0.0003601756,0.0001260985,0.000005864255,0.0000205103,0.0001200456,0.00007210053,0.00004914911,0.009170047,0.9900456,0.00001326747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004783897,0.003871832,0.0002445194,0.02155785,0.001890704,0.00005344715,0.0008290867,0.0001882174,0.9708861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00463596,0.0009649637,0.0001360548,0.01073516,0.0008482292,0.00005424818,0.0001314382,0.000113023,0.982381],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6392041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9117471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011668810","doi":"10.7202/1005132ar","title":"The Lockean Constitution: Separation of Powers and the Limits of Prerogative","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Constitution; Legislature; Separation of powers; Law; Political science; Fiduciary; Accountability; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David Jenkins","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0459272203032034,"gpt":0.3189576571520233,"spread":0.2730304368488199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008502008,0.000383347,0.0005200077,0.001539249,0.005973168,0.01030432,0.001357599,0.006968711,0.004639256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01732645,0.0005138524,0.0005934278,0.001358591,0.03420914,0.01201298,0.005049983,0.009263618,0.0008742065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006988259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008310247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005842348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005427031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912913,0.003709215,0.0003237007,0.001316078,0.001906806,0.001452911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931824,0.004027806,0.0005867915,0.001055729,0.0007222017,0.0004250596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001572278,0.000001341794,0.00001859802,0.000001455577,3.347692e-7,0.000007084168,0.0001459783,0.00003543138,0.000007835598,0.9990267,0.0002591097,0.0004947028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001601043,0.000008606611,0.0001464919,0.0000456903,0.000003076089,0.00003218604,0.0001633136,0.0003790687,0.00007944589,0.9710941,0.02802089,0.0000112599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03786639,0.006836645,0.07887689,0.06443116,0.0009415025,0.00008800106,0.0001150303,0.00008020263,0.8107643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338773,0.00203144,0.01319899,0.01000334,0.0008494031,0.0003260181,0.00006584233,0.00008263568,0.03956499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01030432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05070359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115453667","doi":"10.7202/038892ar","title":"Regulating Greenhouse Gases in Canada: Constitutional and Policy Dimensions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Ratification; Kyoto Protocol; Negotiation; Carbon tax; Constitution; Natural resource economics; Political science; Economics; Economic policy; Politics; Law; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Shi-Ling Hsu","is_ca":true},{"name":"Robin Elliot","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01764415870632885,"gpt":0.267927565561959,"spread":0.2502834068556302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008746034,0.0004823582,0.0005892751,0.002912558,0.02070029,0.01427818,0.002941003,0.007191479,0.004340469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01677745,0.0006858949,0.0007266669,0.004258045,0.02459524,0.003108779,0.003341095,0.006398529,0.0001888394],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.180568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3731413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9831772,0.001898835,0.0004476852,0.00108692,0.007740635,0.00564869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888793,0.004481106,0.000751207,0.0005090961,0.004013778,0.00136551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001169554,0.00001915594,0.002106768,0.0001102332,0.00002328408,0.0001202816,0.001928997,0.002081399,0.0006094312,0.9703072,0.01348329,0.009198119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009243395,0.00004984945,0.03040899,0.000911685,0.0002468638,0.000148221,0.008915384,0.005818988,0.002127,0.2697712,0.6811488,0.0003606255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07774832,0.01677265,0.007612113,0.3279586,0.0007943934,0.0002277802,0.001072897,0.0001921675,0.5676211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9074392,0.01077431,0.006105315,0.04167163,0.0003745513,0.0001579909,0.0002613149,0.00005305993,0.03316264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.819432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.950425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037174929","doi":"10.7202/1000625ar","title":"Roncarelli v. Duplessis and Damages for Abuse of Power: For What Did It Stand in 1959 and For What Does It Stand in 2009?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Damages; Supreme court; Liability; Tort; Economic Justice; Abuse of power; Sociology; Power (physics); Common law; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Mullan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07964043449649322,"gpt":0.3457996897785181,"spread":0.2661592552820249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004402265,0.0004083348,0.0007212748,0.00244156,0.01217545,0.009808049,0.002228606,0.01423907,0.002429738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01235929,0.000414716,0.0005858166,0.00198233,0.02114474,0.00726976,0.002814901,0.0132668,0.0003503743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04601696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0285483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7287629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7698148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954746,0.0007989603,0.0001605344,0.0006640127,0.001720282,0.001181534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943805,0.003355786,0.0006164531,0.0001926177,0.0009139792,0.0005407056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002677998,0.00002693884,0.003087837,0.00008339556,0.00001584683,0.0005412702,0.006879505,0.0001189872,0.0001145046,0.909933,0.06321676,0.01595509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007071778,0.00009971854,0.03033248,0.003155594,0.0001623534,0.0006832591,0.01463016,0.0005861226,0.001367388,0.2405655,0.7081174,0.000229356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06041097,0.09313384,0.001262351,0.4770701,0.001851189,0.00007682192,0.0003272247,0.00003902152,0.3658284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7553086,0.03143986,0.0008980504,0.1739688,0.001574752,0.00007720176,0.0001688998,0.00003081341,0.03653289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2712371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5456688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987155948","doi":"10.7202/1000626ar","title":"Some Australian Reflections on Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Political science; Statute; Common law; Misconduct; Liability","authors":[{"name":"Mark D. Aronson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1845492095713299,"gpt":0.3810247983716258,"spread":0.1964755888002959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008155928,0.0005317869,0.0004895866,0.001550409,0.01904102,0.008734627,0.00288917,0.01600348,0.006217361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01442337,0.000709985,0.001046621,0.001944977,0.01581496,0.006802829,0.00482303,0.02418208,0.0008311222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02580844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01379247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4706615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5071068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917132,0.002958652,0.0002897487,0.0009850155,0.002345259,0.001708109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951108,0.002777259,0.0003065098,0.0002164889,0.001015743,0.0005730574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004127845,0.00005626298,0.001042694,0.0001674099,0.00001350538,0.001413399,0.05261815,0.0001932485,0.0006907542,0.7623193,0.1617403,0.01970371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001478087,0.00007531766,0.006351526,0.000490214,0.00002533354,0.0004759848,0.01415109,0.0003269428,0.0005419258,0.06375252,0.9136736,0.0001207006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02754354,0.01589366,0.001172493,0.669997,0.002164358,0.00005371084,0.00009116485,0.00005283327,0.2830313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3668754,0.01253341,0.001613111,0.4505638,0.002431701,0.00008885755,0.00004196173,0.0001063025,0.1657453],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4706615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9358439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028993133","doi":"10.7202/1026134ar","title":"Decreasing the Data Deficit: Improving Post-Market Surveillance in Pharmaceutical Regulation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Postmarketing surveillance; Clinical trial; Business; Pharmaceutical industry; Market failure; Promotion (chess); Drug control; Market access; Public economics; Prescription drug; Medical prescription; Marketing; Industrial organization; Medicine; Adverse effect; Pharmacology; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Trudo Lemmens","is_ca":true},{"name":"Shannon Gibson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3745882471567646,"gpt":0.5135214404674004,"spread":0.1389331933106358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.5739746,0.001429784,0.00330356,0.01848562,0.007232271,0.03547622,0.01171512,0.01990572,0.005425736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.667853,0.002812303,0.002397054,0.01309255,0.02515231,0.05134572,0.02160421,0.02463083,0.001853376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02680655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07622205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01369433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009057926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5171502,0.2932201,0.05425549,0.03663015,0.08636975,0.01237432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1126365,0.6342348,0.1074546,0.0527271,0.08099902,0.01194795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006143848,0.00078203,0.06095412,0.00442589,0.000488656,0.0009182664,0.01581375,0.005057394,0.003183325,0.3627509,0.06242092,0.4825903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001243572,0.002440892,0.1061839,0.0176194,0.000619174,0.001967217,0.008252174,0.01813809,0.007705682,0.3610437,0.4734177,0.001368486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.05009211,0.02953133,0.1982649,0.6562868,0.004075265,0.00299821,0.0007813692,0.001591216,0.0563787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6189027,0.01276799,0.1373726,0.2074935,0.01055061,0.004395169,0.0009640942,0.0006196982,0.006933506],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5739746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5253652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895524770","doi":"","title":"A Comparison of Business Income Trust Governance and Corporate Governance: Is There a Need for Legislation or Further Regulation?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Legislation; Business; Accounting; Political science; Law; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Mark Gillen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03356991373019354,"gpt":0.2488389206145213,"spread":0.2152690068843277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00411616,0.0001267338,0.0004052082,0.001903149,0.001484641,0.006093333,0.0007990021,0.002049213,0.00923447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02730096,0.0001270045,0.0005616241,0.002627468,0.007869444,0.009353663,0.002240715,0.002334704,0.0003070711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006497227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004909329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01958237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02875699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960453,0.001714178,0.0001400521,0.0001798469,0.0009500183,0.0009705691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820987,0.01081728,0.002453114,0.0008470103,0.002311662,0.001472307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009550857,0.00004462526,0.01354552,0.00004468663,0.0000140523,0.00009956535,0.002438232,0.0002759897,0.00005523069,0.9728279,0.00191608,0.008642489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001553622,0.0003244964,0.1852668,0.0005855369,0.0001551017,0.0003803911,0.03749948,0.004999768,0.0007838952,0.7113871,0.05840068,0.00006132334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4821503,0.008016607,0.009536547,0.04645764,0.0003563563,0.00009314142,0.0001858283,0.00003145117,0.4531721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944249,0.0008215459,0.000270175,0.0007772801,0.00006988196,0.00001558849,0.00002957708,0.000007020001,0.003583944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01958237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04714084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771094306","doi":"10.7202/1043160ar","title":"Understanding Fiduciary Duties and Relationship Fiduciarity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Jurisprudence; Scholarship; Law; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Duty","authors":[{"name":"Leonard I. Rotman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.265366381501558,"gpt":0.3598802806836827,"spread":0.09451389918212466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01106838,0.000402638,0.0004995841,0.002728773,0.006942934,0.01195415,0.001354079,0.005561445,0.003437731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01927948,0.0003792531,0.0004662061,0.001610547,0.04797703,0.02041667,0.007121237,0.006266897,0.0006558148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009341772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007999213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008978535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007923741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920333,0.004537361,0.0002957789,0.0008001352,0.001392588,0.0009408181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876138,0.008289567,0.001303771,0.0008725702,0.001102236,0.0008180861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000246908,0.00000469757,0.0002775436,0.0000122334,7.147923e-7,0.00002916834,0.01007753,0.0000818296,0.00002506892,0.9842336,0.0006510533,0.004604098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004418223,0.00001272054,0.001088688,0.0002811827,0.000004269818,0.000166951,0.009480133,0.0005700349,0.0001114431,0.9033102,0.08495232,0.00001778205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1147646,0.02725504,0.06674871,0.1229361,0.0009085657,0.00005549074,0.00006571577,0.00006219079,0.6672036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710194,0.005822478,0.006216171,0.004889493,0.0004918737,0.0000573803,0.00003448975,0.00003234375,0.01143634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01195415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06777966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2400367739","doi":"10.7202/1038707ar","title":"Fiduciary Duties, Conflict of Interest, and Proper Exercise of Judgment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Discretion; Conflict of interest; Duty; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Defeasible estate; Duty of loyalty; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Remus Valsan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1671748433053256,"gpt":0.3585139573750075,"spread":0.191339114069682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01525973,0.0003814435,0.0007300096,0.001408682,0.005867274,0.009415084,0.001937604,0.008340446,0.003096719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02770439,0.0004899227,0.0006437721,0.001134037,0.0557856,0.009359227,0.005461644,0.007391646,0.000506451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00689015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008388628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007596478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005485059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9816134,0.009692714,0.0008547591,0.002003191,0.00394818,0.00188766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798765,0.01305475,0.002123657,0.002093042,0.001840787,0.001011309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003307782,0.000005334588,0.0001206104,0.000007805203,0.000001577213,0.00004653934,0.0007252857,0.0001519589,0.00002683038,0.9968535,0.0006606571,0.001396522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007163072,0.000006112216,0.000279981,0.00004882389,0.000003241323,0.00008065945,0.000415403,0.0005344416,0.00006352631,0.9883679,0.01018185,0.00001094797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06547926,0.008799265,0.1157801,0.06526762,0.0005534081,0.0001413988,0.00008195936,0.00007193739,0.7438251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731507,0.001360916,0.009109046,0.004741545,0.0003210507,0.000148879,0.00001988481,0.00003347311,0.0111145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01525973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08070213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205482211","doi":"","title":"Amendments to the Canada Labour Code: Are Replacement Workers an Endangered Species?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Code (set theory); Political science; Business; Fishery; Labour economics; Economics; Demography; Biology; Sociology; Computer science; Population; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Luc Vaillancourt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03056747740791407,"gpt":0.2931834143214117,"spread":0.2626159369134976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004666077,0.0003836733,0.0005367075,0.001038674,0.01658957,0.005714376,0.003390098,0.01492599,0.008063041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01102067,0.0005900352,0.0006436239,0.001164323,0.01590898,0.002440125,0.002317351,0.008099524,0.001186064],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02733541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07878755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9449959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9787518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942853,0.000456644,0.0001703181,0.0006020837,0.0024284,0.002057231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950647,0.001297861,0.0002824386,0.0003516961,0.002246577,0.0007568254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007739183,0.0000471335,0.009414203,0.00005860021,0.00002658191,0.0005278535,0.007888597,0.0005125053,0.00116471,0.8387036,0.1227029,0.01887591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000623259,0.00005520826,0.01985416,0.0004332745,0.0001065148,0.0005148162,0.008722845,0.001213103,0.001259046,0.07709874,0.8905163,0.0001635175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09289746,0.002712365,0.00426014,0.1385853,0.001552437,0.000122035,0.0006840513,0.00009818718,0.7590879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5625339,0.001867452,0.003430165,0.1343796,0.0004908297,0.0001302853,0.0002565131,0.00007893718,0.2968324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1983332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988525678","doi":"10.7202/1013031ar","title":"Israel as a Mixed Jurisdiction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Israeli law; Common law; Supreme court; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Constitutional law; Municipal law; Precedent; Chinese law","authors":[{"name":"Eliezer Rivlin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03365458820360218,"gpt":0.3052021177948547,"spread":0.2715475295912525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001463231,0.0002226693,0.0002590463,0.0008311717,0.004849996,0.006630197,0.0007616575,0.0014492,0.01530452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001089673,0.0001974198,0.0002291077,0.0006072475,0.006508196,0.002850487,0.005107603,0.002101921,0.001959018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003967547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002876128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01091959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01117733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984357,0.0004188454,0.00004276016,0.0002790406,0.0004179271,0.0004057741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996327,0.00009176293,0.00002955049,0.00003995802,0.00009881701,0.0001072617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007441653,0.000009965956,0.000449907,0.000007493206,0.00000579766,0.0001597769,0.001306113,0.00008156126,0.0001374049,0.9870685,0.004641283,0.006124584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005497818,0.00003757061,0.001738731,0.0001077617,0.00002538932,0.0007555491,0.004517048,0.001324695,0.0004549576,0.3989383,0.5920075,0.0000376315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06129048,0.001406792,0.004984168,0.007181054,0.0001570921,0.00005428694,0.0001235838,0.00004790989,0.9247547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084729,0.0006749406,0.001969547,0.004698294,0.000158754,0.00006697699,0.0001127734,0.00003143582,0.08381432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01530452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05119866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887804744","doi":"","title":"The Changing Scope of the Fundamental Principle of Equality","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Economic system; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Barnard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07654335096606173,"gpt":0.3755302857204677,"spread":0.298986934754406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01696694,0.0003009129,0.00108161,0.001860095,0.006083248,0.009617207,0.002410118,0.01098816,0.008573427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03064788,0.0005145518,0.00076575,0.001560889,0.06102265,0.01828179,0.005721872,0.01601097,0.0007321077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007968789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008252879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009095118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01188564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9875926,0.005609264,0.0003946619,0.001888338,0.00329229,0.0012228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761099,0.01803753,0.0006873676,0.00208402,0.001904952,0.001176308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003440792,0.000003220522,0.00002976873,0.00000742349,0.000001152237,0.000007199788,0.0004322389,0.00003204806,0.00003083931,0.9953896,0.002308704,0.00175429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005981864,0.000003454748,0.000170179,0.00003278803,0.00000164343,0.00001282425,0.0002166105,0.00007882551,0.00003677899,0.9767446,0.02269031,0.000005934181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0286597,0.01790276,0.02226158,0.4252841,0.002876792,0.00002874499,0.0001637458,0.00007096678,0.5027517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9049227,0.005497601,0.008018036,0.05128562,0.005651805,0.0001274063,0.00006090903,0.0001589417,0.02427694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0897308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121429145","doi":"","title":"What Is International Human Rights Law? Three Applications of a Distributive Account","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; International law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Normative; Sovereignty; Fundamental rights; Principle of legality; Sociology; Politics; Economic Justice","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Macklem","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05094792858388508,"gpt":0.3716267187745402,"spread":0.3206787901906551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01099218,0.0007549105,0.0009166818,0.002778081,0.006149671,0.01771187,0.002432399,0.007851241,0.006831282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01148802,0.0004716599,0.001196342,0.0035222,0.05997504,0.0228909,0.009329335,0.007541354,0.0006457911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007987484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004283338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006039751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004259573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919115,0.003762299,0.0002799086,0.000951006,0.001947,0.001148376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935971,0.003886468,0.0003947715,0.001028011,0.0006252709,0.0004682439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001312672,0.000002792915,0.0000566273,0.000003617905,7.353108e-7,0.000009290595,0.0003201971,0.00003698017,0.000005013005,0.9983363,0.0002822554,0.0009450844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004120851,0.000002407434,0.0001357579,0.00003765178,0.000002059333,0.00002384494,0.0004699931,0.0002531586,0.00002362385,0.9876182,0.01142521,0.000003950415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01517069,0.006587342,0.0314759,0.08377624,0.0005947658,0.00006984131,0.00007065427,0.00005621961,0.8621983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424053,0.006007369,0.01125981,0.01239763,0.001814769,0.0004089123,0.00008152742,0.00009469972,0.02552996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01771187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05813295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391310854","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i1.1181","title":"No Country for Old Men","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Peter Szigeti","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02349347345522424,"gpt":0.3100334944892338,"spread":0.2865400210340096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008058191,0.0005023355,0.0004434336,0.0005315221,0.004539578,0.003516474,0.0007177144,0.002863444,0.2095772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00220277,0.0002248816,0.0002487539,0.0003865377,0.001406089,0.003098959,0.004474627,0.003727656,0.127787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008797227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002250653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006082761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01394348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993618,0.0001116265,0.0000241834,0.0001338212,0.0001519479,0.0002166828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991233,0.00006977591,0.00005366978,0.00008024153,0.0001940463,0.0004789995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004155084,0.00006277498,0.001373353,0.0001008673,0.000004579823,0.0002788987,0.001154795,0.000009301712,0.0002392482,0.04358108,0.8693702,0.08378325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002514923,0.00001210713,0.0004286664,0.00006167118,0.000001011275,0.00007954105,0.0003006842,0.000002469215,0.00001296342,0.000488931,0.998607,0.000002385654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004247146,0.01207905,0.0002695129,0.07381208,0.02526998,0.00007029893,0.0008360463,0.0001368675,0.883279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0130697,0.003773425,0.0002026428,0.0343391,0.002177925,0.00005251543,0.0002421254,0.00005011444,0.9460923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2095772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7011055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163783173","doi":"10.7202/1076909ar","title":"Predicting Employment Notice Period with Machine Learning: Promises and Limitations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Predictability; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Period (music); Law; Machine learning; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Samuel Dahan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonathan Touboul","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jason Lam","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dan Sfedj","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07561691443842182,"gpt":0.3173000339906206,"spread":0.2416831195521987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01585341,0.00164383,0.001340395,0.003521589,0.001228117,0.004415546,0.003220763,0.002868659,0.001320321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04493031,0.0005666774,0.001199591,0.004390904,0.001595618,0.005795362,0.001962356,0.005218895,0.001113779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00193975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002393898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01903663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01726408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932154,0.003527299,0.0004771308,0.001400291,0.001028085,0.0003517869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9410202,0.04595811,0.002792609,0.006353424,0.002907997,0.0009676891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003444998,0.0006518122,0.1460592,0.0004090506,0.0003213889,0.0002264298,0.0005273559,0.4648097,0.0006834641,0.01037303,0.01802188,0.3575721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001703896,0.00003284587,0.006333936,0.0001090047,0.00002478007,0.00004408166,0.0002259314,0.967894,0.0005164855,0.020903,0.003863358,0.00003566473],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5031332,0.01797537,0.4266754,0.02708184,0.001004595,0.0003462808,0.00668172,0.002830063,0.01427164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8770831,0.001803882,0.1119614,0.0009969148,0.0008070052,0.0001333674,0.00569708,0.0001292988,0.001387996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01903663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0838418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}