{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":21,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"963bdb34fdc5","filters":{"venue":"Medical Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2344958744","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fww005","title":"CONVERTING THE ‘RIGHT TO LIFE’ TO THE ‘RIGHT TO PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA’: AN ANALYSIS OF<i>CARTER V CANADA</i>(<i>ATTORNEY GENERAL</i>)<i>,</i>SUPREME COURT OF CANADA: Table 1.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Charter; Majority opinion; Constitutional right; Legislation; Economic Justice; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03203193881503012,"gpt":0.3074328444333712,"spread":0.275400905618341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00197511,0.0002389648,0.001007884,0.00002334589,0.0007439785,0.00002832256,0.0008467262,0.0000662797,0.0004535918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002010041,0.0001031382,0.0001335644,0.001233048,0.0003822598,0.00009765155,0.0001952405,0.0001369001,0.000005016223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004027778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001412339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957586,0.0006673761,0.0007322491,0.0004056527,0.001820319,0.0006157863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974954,0.0005517931,0.0002379296,0.0004492451,0.0004259727,0.0008396466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004694964,0.0001709037,0.008558331,0.0008623968,0.003010299,0.00005211874,0.008915166,0.00003592623,0.001704965,0.04868191,0.8894896,0.03847143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001104483,0.00002994117,0.007941698,0.0009345162,0.000647101,4.559216e-7,0.0003754098,0.00001728993,0.0003147673,0.000007891962,0.9894126,0.0002078474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1144572,0.0279141,0.000173713,0.8410913,0.0008011978,0.003006615,0.0004471874,0.00005044748,0.01205817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8931713,0.001921062,0.0001006204,0.1033314,0.0004116253,0.0001141917,0.000008570855,0.0000180427,0.0009232663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.778714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5722156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192873402","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaa042","title":"Abortion Rights after Artificial Wombs: Why Decriminalisation is Needed Ahead of Ectogenesis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Bioethics; Autonomy; Law; Reproductive rights; Normative; Position (finance); Political science; Human rights; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Business; Biology; Pregnancy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07434284508748323,"gpt":0.3501891476310667,"spread":0.2758463025435835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004517481,0.0001319671,0.0005857525,0.00003276476,0.00004243854,0.000003703574,0.00009803771,0.0001464375,0.001701438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001400621,0.00009057247,0.000132897,0.0003589662,0.0002165771,0.00005334369,0.0000327508,0.0002021561,0.0001041295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003545075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001209066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002897406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002966209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981131,0.00008509132,0.0006383835,0.0003322304,0.0006313664,0.0001998419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990174,0.00004437788,0.0001427877,0.0003232971,0.0001662814,0.0003058905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00208247,0.001470982,0.00530992,0.1090558,0.0003579582,0.0005468057,0.001899336,2.349689e-7,0.003963498,0.09747633,0.1175902,0.6602465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005963379,0.0008121647,0.002291334,0.008024569,0.0005603765,0.00005771146,0.00006231848,0.0000467393,0.03780764,0.003005118,0.9465048,0.0002309381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4795023,0.1496771,0.001355768,0.3650091,0.0002951028,0.001962257,0.00001398796,0.0003035097,0.001880949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9147575,0.01458518,0.0004537734,0.06970537,0.0003372057,0.0001128658,0.00002509915,0.00001309931,0.000009904658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8289145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2651948055","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwx021","title":"Civil Registration and Vital Statistics, Emergencies, and International Law: Understanding the Intersection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Reforms","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Geography; Political science; Environmental health; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1170712892878489,"gpt":0.3198595996677782,"spread":0.2027883103799294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001198797,0.00006533497,0.0001958606,0.000009777314,0.0003793905,0.00009985836,0.0001364285,0.00005724766,0.0002436988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003584502,0.00004250318,0.00002552806,0.00001494233,0.0002430634,0.0001561962,0.00005984354,0.0001295676,0.00001825965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007451038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001537079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004322435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006348276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992541,0.00001705843,0.0003975855,0.000164182,0.00006618251,0.0001008837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994308,0.00001770973,0.0002625464,0.0001789529,0.00001721002,0.00009282862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.027293e-7,0.000004860018,0.0008039162,0.0003869589,0.00001425708,0.00000207269,0.00004992288,9.288827e-9,1.406227e-7,0.9886206,0.0009835436,0.009132858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002858329,0.00006453073,0.005273771,0.001751489,0.000007211906,0.00007040989,0.00009913062,0.0005311092,4.603164e-7,0.1665768,0.8251687,0.0001705268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00498232,0.2106624,0.1382153,0.1285812,0.009964608,0.001592377,0.000502318,0.00007274985,0.5054267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579881,0.03977536,0.00006083992,0.001424466,0.0001954147,0.00001101959,0.00001490057,0.000006164482,0.0005237038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9530058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6534257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094515191","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/10.3.295","title":"Reproductive Cloning: Can Cloning Harm the Clone?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cloning (programming); Human cloning; Harm; clone (Java method); Genetics; Biology; Computational biology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07059149223756356,"gpt":0.3481448652923125,"spread":0.277553373054749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001911911,0.0002217724,0.0006986028,0.00003425072,0.0002772626,0.0000125734,0.0003370026,0.0001576453,0.001631754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008954608,0.0001215651,0.0001713762,0.000509623,0.0007398489,0.00004991994,0.0001384393,0.001061182,0.000282145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008437538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001024801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002178238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001631536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971464,0.0001763189,0.0005912695,0.0007169698,0.0008588295,0.000510258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977558,0.0001712744,0.000167885,0.001399525,0.0001685398,0.0003369493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004754404,0.0005274256,0.002129093,0.009089069,0.0002182781,0.0006760528,0.0004162533,1.580429e-7,0.00008857498,0.2340524,0.2457511,0.5070041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000337556,0.0001960879,0.0005130565,0.004219293,0.0001437765,0.0006931414,0.00002961204,0.00001452934,0.0004491208,0.000657857,0.9926056,0.0001403296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004780816,0.4646938,0.00002521178,0.4822777,0.0004892596,0.001539438,0.000002940626,0.0003942141,0.04579658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5403664,0.3657005,0.0009779272,0.08688428,0.00211496,0.0004641984,0.00002327644,0.00007068202,0.003397847],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051178177","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwn018","title":"GOING OUT ON A LIMB: PROSTHETICS, NORMALCY AND DISPUTING THE THERAPY/ENHANCEMENT DISTINCTION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Psychology; Therapeutic touch; Sociology; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Medicine; Philosophy; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1339127566436069,"gpt":0.3519846679299396,"spread":0.2180719112863327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001102478,0.0002108309,0.0002935477,0.00002958243,0.0008166296,0.00003592594,0.000383548,0.00007306791,0.0005619057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003646933,0.0001261286,0.00007515433,0.0003096002,0.001431093,0.00008870442,0.0001670461,0.0006848489,0.0002423178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004011909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006810846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007585919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000955102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969521,0.0003406659,0.0006144706,0.0005039241,0.001215296,0.0003735513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983983,0.0007125066,0.0002181693,0.0004300134,0.00005498934,0.0001860172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009314687,0.001682439,0.0002773144,0.002771836,0.00003944206,0.0002676897,0.0009571389,4.130988e-7,0.01960435,0.5807474,0.01362942,0.3799294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004860446,0.0004340922,0.0001773664,0.002994376,0.00002007212,0.0001009608,0.00000361119,0.0001531568,0.01583623,0.0008364486,0.978699,0.0002586831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3136854,0.0612346,0.0157688,0.4558558,0.00737285,0.01317902,0.00006066221,0.00129116,0.1315518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7979709,0.09366021,0.00006588548,0.1068269,0.0003066584,0.0002002008,0.000007002078,0.00003158459,0.0009306853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6280937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046456670","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwr009","title":"REGULATING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS: THE CASE OF DOWN'S SYNDROME","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Context (archaeology); Genetic testing; Blastomere; Sex selection; Embryo; Medicine; In vitro fertilisation; Gynecology; Intervention (counseling); Biology; Genetics; Obstetrics; Psychiatry; Embryogenesis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04229113099288589,"gpt":0.3040917729409079,"spread":0.2618006419480221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005480175,0.000094259,0.0003323118,0.00001222272,0.00005560862,0.00000281955,0.0001151627,0.00006968497,0.0007085588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00183008,0.00005271218,0.00008792682,0.0001283458,0.0001662036,0.00002681793,0.00005470417,0.0001715261,0.00003766517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009647122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004683853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001017287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000566087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988823,0.0001199269,0.0004059089,0.0001401385,0.0003012353,0.0001505057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998893,0.0004251383,0.0001198218,0.0003122597,0.00005210582,0.0001976417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007131181,0.0006348307,0.02028983,0.02320776,0.0002941585,0.03936995,0.0004433147,9.056133e-7,0.00000969362,0.06130054,0.008973837,0.8454039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005037172,0.003485738,0.1990132,0.2444832,0.007097008,0.4427724,0.000147507,0.000929321,0.002957779,0.005246146,0.08766161,0.001168962],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.526199,0.4236243,0.001121259,0.006287929,0.0004144933,0.002882632,0.00005052828,0.0002112078,0.03920866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788725,0.01675673,0.001391782,0.002797991,0.00004992002,0.00009268137,0.00001404556,0.00001039649,0.000013942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8442349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7758222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394868993","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae012","title":"‘My Advocacy is Not About Me, My Advocacy is About Canadians’: A Qualitative Study of how Caregivers and Patients Influence Regulation of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Legislature; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Legislation; Regulatory reform; Public administration; Sociology; Nursing; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04416365183645548,"gpt":0.4329534221110781,"spread":0.3887897702746226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005121103,0.0002464377,0.00113951,0.0001135344,0.0001097137,0.00001026668,0.0004139919,0.0002719439,0.002146929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01165967,0.0001973862,0.00005666824,0.0008070358,0.0003385499,0.0002639133,0.000146492,0.001326772,0.000007534695],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006832311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008678238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9598445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9589307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921902,0.002604582,0.001725647,0.0005669669,0.002392796,0.0005197986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941287,0.00396267,0.000450475,0.0004336307,0.0003046529,0.0007198721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001812012,0.0008433843,0.2016123,0.09726898,0.0002135882,0.0002560692,0.5971279,0.000001303934,0.000003699866,0.008319204,0.03165415,0.0625182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004146414,0.0003994469,0.1715564,0.1742851,0.0002584874,0.000002445916,0.1662471,0.0005731476,0.000005439178,0.0002605404,0.4816687,0.0005966963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9154643,0.02288847,0.000006457261,0.05885193,0.0003134004,0.001774319,0.00005966166,0.0000133132,0.0006281065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797584,0.01098145,0.00002647812,0.008888667,0.0000458363,0.0001769837,0.00002165733,0.00001832055,0.00008216732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4500146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330452927","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwu005","title":"Niche Markets and Evidence Assessment in Transition: A Critical Review of Proposed Drug Reforms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Niche; Drug; Business; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Pharmacology; Chemistry; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1279570697773933,"gpt":0.5651604456804467,"spread":0.4372033759030534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02297375,0.0007117443,0.007948654,0.0000944062,0.0002174278,0.000006589627,0.0008350557,0.0008563837,0.003480315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01274286,0.0004398655,0.0006097591,0.0007830366,0.0005665188,0.0001602224,0.0003380099,0.003731473,0.0003383893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006490773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004015937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003123033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.97953,0.01088095,0.005563324,0.0009558405,0.002087255,0.0009826701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892417,0.006875578,0.001175359,0.001190986,0.0004983252,0.0010181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003107027,0.00005129042,0.000001510956,0.7265638,0.00001530555,0.00004559773,0.00001812276,1.280053e-10,1.505238e-9,0.01026766,0.01855549,0.2444781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108696,0.00004506745,0.000004387788,0.4991793,0.0005046614,0.00003524233,0.000003550339,6.672474e-7,3.484638e-9,0.0000778146,0.4998558,0.0001847721],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[1.198109e-7,0.9552953,0.00001917361,0.0282802,0.0005812976,0.008238507,0.00004036697,0.00006044553,0.007484592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000004181566,0.9634193,0.0005248954,0.03415184,0.0002999968,0.001336134,0.00009132004,0.00006528456,0.0001071046],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4813004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297489070","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwac036","title":"The Voluntary Sterilisation Act: Best Interests, Caregivers, and Disability Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Best interests; Eugenics; Commonwealth; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Compromise; Human rights; Convention; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02614458308699585,"gpt":0.3358336273762773,"spread":0.3096890442892815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001343274,0.00004932001,0.0001073773,0.000002079184,0.0018035,0.00003265917,0.0003101641,0.00002179289,0.001544059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001662297,0.00003133976,0.00004267768,0.0001050457,0.0007636312,0.00006662548,0.0002072986,0.0001867916,0.00001920388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001061651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007245866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01384159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02904437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986901,0.0003731679,0.0001665029,0.000147291,0.0004913223,0.0001316237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993614,0.0002412967,0.00004753632,0.0001869534,0.00001943536,0.0001434115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003047345,0.00005645813,0.0005633191,0.0001310017,0.00000702395,0.000002005771,0.000989089,4.45404e-8,2.149743e-7,0.9164143,0.007285532,0.07454803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004061779,0.00001321854,0.0002939853,0.00009955435,0.00001607628,0.000001416745,0.000330615,0.000006395142,1.766433e-7,0.002202832,0.9969528,0.00004225422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09618332,0.1487462,0.00006386769,0.5582724,0.001290716,0.003392864,0.0001166612,0.0001822503,0.1917517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798316,0.01722757,0.00001401268,0.002010556,0.0001797195,0.0001557912,0.0000176635,0.000003624872,0.000559438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400723744","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae026","title":"Towards a rights-based approach for disabled women’s access to abortion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Abortion; Reproductive rights; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science; Pregnancy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05934614302924285,"gpt":0.437815176485652,"spread":0.3784690334564091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002381003,0.00009540433,0.0002678066,0.00002247327,0.0002761542,0.0002152645,0.0003667583,0.00009106266,0.002552503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005409406,0.00005561709,0.0001338697,0.0004283868,0.0003464711,0.0002270559,0.00003145041,0.00009431814,0.00005787158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001964538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003519437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001635188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001060221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980226,0.0002053064,0.0003066802,0.0003316846,0.0008329173,0.0003008109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999164,0.0001590385,0.00002786587,0.0001708185,0.0000754463,0.0004028582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007840257,0.0001251493,0.00000649365,0.003423282,0.00001517051,0.000002085175,0.0005354074,0.000002323158,4.395345e-7,0.9054357,0.0190439,0.07140215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009196984,0.00002854264,0.00001011054,0.001173679,0.00003208932,2.563289e-7,0.0000230515,0.0005109701,0.000006045986,0.0279555,0.9700712,0.00009659777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.000922277,0.02121707,0.1737862,0.357685,0.002121588,0.008736651,0.00006382618,0.0007388105,0.4347286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8726838,0.01284416,0.007956618,0.07896522,0.004386888,0.01428438,0.0004977531,0.00009815667,0.008283031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9510273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754291607","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwx039","title":"A Human Rights Perspective of Assisted Suicide: Accounting for Disparate Jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Parliament; High Court; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09521898072499438,"gpt":0.454386274419599,"spread":0.3591672936946047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001865219,0.0001288963,0.000542945,0.000007050097,0.003434734,0.00007916339,0.0007675315,0.0001080871,0.0004045343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004371438,0.00008412662,0.0002083081,0.00006874046,0.001528969,0.0002493717,0.0001375289,0.0001636665,0.00002652063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001405024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006400586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04632232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04629214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980417,0.0001719045,0.0003691999,0.0002623027,0.0008274754,0.0003273725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984534,0.0002415999,0.0004285093,0.0002697947,0.0004340556,0.0001726522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002834734,0.00006094566,0.0004921234,0.0007818469,0.00006069904,0.000005670783,0.001321009,1.172024e-8,0.00001530162,0.9907,0.003770076,0.002789469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004515588,0.00004872586,0.01497541,0.008081366,0.0001961328,0.000001040186,0.0003429484,0.000004553066,0.00004568259,0.008397455,0.9671673,0.0002878713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06764734,0.2014152,0.0002152897,0.1992537,0.001810815,0.00757309,0.0000745762,0.0003199102,0.5216901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937066,0.003810937,0.0002741058,0.000721006,0.0004071585,0.0001245144,0.000002552114,0.000007794826,0.0009453103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407592773","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf006","title":"A common law power to dissect: a medico-legal history","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Royal College of Surgeons of England; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Law; Common law; Legal history; Jurisdiction; Power (physics); English law; Medical law; Scots law; Sociology; Political science; Sources of law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0153649514994605,"gpt":0.3362676197077136,"spread":0.3209026682082531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001887412,0.0001309906,0.0004326121,0.000002941844,0.0004010433,0.00002369147,0.0006367409,0.000234397,0.01021393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006546853,0.0000968488,0.0002158704,0.0003230878,0.0009297533,0.00009492107,0.0001106894,0.0004071736,0.0002730032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003232285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004478513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00307377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01164529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976169,0.0003722647,0.0003367881,0.0002637415,0.001056692,0.0003536332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989321,0.0001704092,0.00004890047,0.0002771141,0.00007345072,0.0004980653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001285759,0.00003700503,0.000005160578,0.0002457864,0.00001178986,0.00001374174,0.000824094,3.28376e-9,6.639972e-7,0.6283437,0.3678953,0.002621472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009994016,0.00001702732,0.000008826664,0.003747166,0.0000468075,0.000001651403,0.0001467806,2.151311e-7,0.000001347978,0.00265904,0.993156,0.0001151816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006014769,0.1613004,0.00001543528,0.09731127,0.001065424,0.0003776766,0.000002688549,0.00009717453,0.7397698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08863185,0.08954831,0.0002150277,0.7719936,0.0007251424,0.0002695799,0.0000210407,0.00002302672,0.04857241],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6911974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412802334","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf021","title":"Support for decision-making guidance in England: a pragmatic review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Autonomy; Applied psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05413149822967526,"gpt":0.4937805391464066,"spread":0.4396490409167313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01381342,0.00089349,0.007646839,0.0002666635,0.0001336685,0.00003035875,0.001848095,0.001165318,0.008448782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04255521,0.0005971786,0.00163701,0.001245773,0.0001695255,0.00004923022,0.0002663309,0.001743605,0.001208368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002488403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002349138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004136241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001444675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884551,0.002557973,0.00507082,0.001445715,0.001370503,0.001099919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767453,0.01931776,0.001184168,0.001999612,0.0002125569,0.000540613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002506814,0.00007308432,8.416075e-8,0.4100432,0.00005196614,0.0009119293,0.000009396539,2.476058e-9,5.492768e-11,0.003120412,0.02089104,0.5648964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001539195,0.00004300764,2.889307e-7,0.4934016,0.0004762869,0.0006411319,5.912556e-7,3.836076e-7,1.438255e-10,0.0004873161,0.5045357,0.0002597917],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[1.872756e-8,0.9740704,0.0008797069,0.001667649,0.002323897,0.007972407,0.0001821725,0.00009455421,0.01280925],"genre_scores_gemma":[3.837284e-7,0.9703122,0.001445892,0.02230138,0.000419529,0.004452847,0.0002082739,0.00009660818,0.0007628856],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5646366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394793383","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae008","title":"Thierry Vansweevelt and Nicola Glover-Thomas (eds.), <i>Privacy and Medical Confidentiality in Healthcare: A Comparative Analysis</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Health care; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05296230122589637,"gpt":0.3886952447145482,"spread":0.3357329434886518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00284358,0.0002608761,0.001441905,0.0001253409,0.00008011168,0.00004688085,0.0002051842,0.000295806,0.0009347427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001161723,0.0001949948,0.0001997271,0.001039395,0.0005665025,0.0001490264,0.0002470497,0.001065028,0.0000435875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006117232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005209238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001595784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001121931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960396,0.0006540807,0.0009081017,0.0005933599,0.001436435,0.0003683722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976874,0.0007031194,0.00008364403,0.0003762946,0.00007037917,0.001079143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004843666,0.00186491,0.04920736,0.1038053,0.004538872,0.006406033,0.004110845,1.656826e-7,0.00004385941,0.4532759,0.05817057,0.3180918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001329696,0.000238223,0.008252985,0.01966483,0.00151268,0.0003221596,0.00001836207,0.000768868,0.00001575461,0.001770785,0.9658105,0.0002951523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04017222,0.8552656,0.0004104617,0.09522879,0.0003126093,0.001267432,0.00004242306,0.0001279691,0.007172503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7211033,0.2411397,0.0001444982,0.03713863,0.0001539816,0.00004984041,0.0001094492,0.00001376495,0.0001468414],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9076399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403462383","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae036","title":"Lawrence O. Gostin and Benjamin Mason Meier (eds), <i>Global Health Law &amp; Policy: Ensuring Justice for a Healthier World</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Queen (butterfly); Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04806605110503748,"gpt":0.4371796674806875,"spread":0.38911361637565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008463722,0.0002287913,0.0006633788,0.00003765973,0.001025544,0.0001917716,0.0004034065,0.0001970279,0.0005509168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002355122,0.0001956608,0.0001343584,0.001136845,0.0007113755,0.0002389055,0.0001176582,0.0004880929,0.00009771567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000486984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003358299,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.084522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2234152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955669,0.0009024524,0.0007286796,0.0005682695,0.001098908,0.001134768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968864,0.0008593883,0.0001215914,0.0002535886,0.00009772289,0.001781357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000357981,0.00003062854,0.000009098466,0.007911074,0.000009587587,0.000006282678,0.0004446149,3.895251e-8,2.575672e-8,0.8022147,0.06569678,0.1236736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001474778,0.00005275011,0.00002139557,0.007484616,0.00004576673,0.00001651799,0.000026422,0.00001825228,8.004789e-8,0.01198566,0.9800283,0.0001727542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008252414,0.4202863,0.0003725845,0.4822964,0.001096015,0.001299608,0.0002058503,0.0002101771,0.09415052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03426835,0.5415201,0.002696507,0.4158896,0.003556072,0.0002402914,0.0001538264,0.00004020365,0.001635034],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9143316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9215742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095125761","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaa031","title":"Thierry Vansweevelt and Nicola Glover-Thomas (eds), <i>Informed Consent and Health: A Global Analysis</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Informed consent; Doctrine; Position (finance); English law; Liability; Test (biology); Subject (documents); Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Business; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1167885508085294,"gpt":0.3914428599898981,"spread":0.2746543091813687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006678075,0.0001957889,0.001049255,0.00001537538,0.00009639186,0.00001790938,0.0001188621,0.0001178496,0.0003687779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001447966,0.0001453702,0.000165524,0.0006060879,0.0002757507,0.00007236649,0.0001563458,0.0002960389,0.00003825283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004751316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000809262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000206235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003229994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979135,0.0001491288,0.0006177871,0.0003321047,0.0006810167,0.0003064274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978804,0.0002388648,0.0001451096,0.0002382437,0.00004724171,0.001450168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003976612,0.0008361539,0.07617408,0.09658089,0.00349673,0.0007975518,0.0009491183,2.035914e-7,0.000008237525,0.08132847,0.3166877,0.4227432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001342725,0.0004153117,0.007355824,0.004792212,0.001295498,0.0001232441,0.00001108925,0.00008322386,0.000002378654,0.0001470997,0.9842663,0.0001650452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.005027674,0.6779007,0.0004584405,0.2886264,0.0001141783,0.001451423,0.000084767,0.00012594,0.02621038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1003781,0.4290691,0.0008051702,0.4693244,0.0001649496,0.00002408888,0.0001402889,0.00001272676,0.00008107784],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6675786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5928023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978135056","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwm021","title":"THE GENDERED POLITICS OF EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH IN THE USA AND CANADA: AN AMERICAN OVERLAP AND CANADIAN DISCONNECT","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Embryonic stem cell; Political science; Law; Politics of the United States; Biology; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09473067631462376,"gpt":0.3635159947332643,"spread":0.2687853184186406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002536624,0.00007972356,0.0003013185,0.00003033723,0.0002998291,0.000007573876,0.000156845,0.00007766917,0.0000229779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001219187,0.00003725022,0.00002372699,0.0002635008,0.003046781,0.00001726808,0.0000348714,0.0005717071,6.072506e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003033006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9612333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976894,0.000500815,0.0002827952,0.0001639742,0.001024714,0.0003383328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984172,0.0005635908,0.00005045715,0.0002781534,0.00007353768,0.0006170393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003964826,0.0002675859,0.02898955,0.01050919,0.00009636957,0.00117156,0.001791552,1.423168e-7,0.00003713674,0.645303,0.01349485,0.2982995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006733745,0.000427425,0.126322,0.00274941,0.00006429954,0.0004592238,0.0008441645,0.00023316,0.00001277177,0.0006613286,0.8674009,0.0001519219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6008709,0.12932,0.000002898571,0.2647465,0.00008786038,0.0008991914,0.00002077853,0.00000418561,0.004047719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9144047,0.07906358,0.000009126625,0.006331216,0.00006152385,0.000009956498,0.000008425483,0.000006205475,0.0001052015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8539061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290541","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf040","title":"<i>The Welfare of Future Children: Reproductive Ethics and Disability Screening</i> , Rebecca Bennett.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Eugenics; Reproductive technology; Reproductive rights; Reproductive justice","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01861046843541169,"gpt":0.3678214657605746,"spread":0.3492109973251629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006509386,0.00008340795,0.0002684049,0.000004498397,0.001146078,0.00002878339,0.0002956416,0.0001643162,0.0001890707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005102427,0.00004499588,0.00009553428,0.0002949896,0.00461709,0.00008112243,0.00009383037,0.0005006738,0.000001453704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002343998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000123444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004441976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007675147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971983,0.001212322,0.0003758819,0.0003320658,0.0007114351,0.000169961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985519,0.0006695928,0.00009878109,0.0004194478,0.0001432327,0.0001170465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005840544,0.00005308041,0.002847843,0.000561485,0.00002138316,2.440118e-7,0.0004931458,4.004039e-8,1.04282e-7,0.8705572,0.002389091,0.1230705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008875968,0.00001315404,0.008782485,0.000990788,0.00005548567,7.306581e-7,0.0005264741,8.945954e-7,0.000003381969,0.01030676,0.9791707,0.00006043236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002658786,0.08620576,0.00004540186,0.8850445,0.0004363663,0.0009354663,0.000008856225,0.00003654061,0.02462832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6895236,0.296362,0.0003289421,0.01063048,0.00153791,0.00008750027,0.00003981963,0.00001430343,0.001475452],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9767815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409601977","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf016","title":"Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust UKSC 1: no quarter for deserving claimants","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02758016300208845,"gpt":0.3976478237703135,"spread":0.3700676607682251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002288092,0.0002175365,0.0008395553,0.00004141561,0.0001616059,0.00001963441,0.000287212,0.0004037614,0.00654118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003292202,0.0001590977,0.0002664336,0.0002478261,0.0001394016,0.00004083683,0.00009745453,0.0009352365,0.000128627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009255111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005312777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002699013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008351255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974963,0.0000942133,0.000777427,0.0004171879,0.000736071,0.0004787657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979072,0.000596236,0.0000953055,0.0005356244,0.0003571764,0.0005085206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007171804,0.0002009341,0.001457097,0.04614592,0.00009540041,0.00007697329,0.00006007017,4.568248e-8,0.000002435021,0.04278985,0.8584201,0.0506794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008032733,0.0001934616,0.0001094235,0.0170542,0.0002360567,0.00001169901,0.000008923918,0.0002856552,0.000008214783,0.0009451474,0.9802047,0.0001392404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001412753,0.5068932,0.001727998,0.1744077,0.002900886,0.003553673,0.0000455718,0.000246386,0.3088118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2670105,0.2638845,0.005434097,0.4009896,0.005927293,0.001155368,0.0005447001,0.000140398,0.05491357],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2655977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584083607","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fww024","title":"Kirsty Horsey (ed.), Revisiting the Regulation of Human Fertilisation and Embryology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Fertilisation; Embryology; Political science; Legislation; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Reproductive technology; Engineering; Medicine; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03545589736809195,"gpt":0.3470727730997107,"spread":0.3116168757316187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001441873,0.00007064581,0.0003374638,0.00001779679,0.00007653326,0.000001514795,0.00006952726,0.00009018921,0.0002957748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003668352,0.00003026063,0.00004155713,0.00009114491,0.0004412148,0.00003554209,0.00004560162,0.0001231363,0.00001066387],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001878561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003842512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002632238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003752825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988903,0.0001332061,0.0003905474,0.0001944177,0.0002638755,0.0001275862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991781,0.0001586826,0.0001467481,0.0003502208,0.00008902388,0.00007728078],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001803772,0.00001724633,0.00336605,0.00477919,0.00001551526,0.000003060084,0.00001436936,1.7352e-9,0.002762643,0.2208664,0.001275422,0.7668821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001382714,0.0005270804,0.2134989,0.03881696,0.000299689,0.0002765361,0.00002368774,0.00001148072,0.003956273,0.01318776,0.7278194,0.0001995365],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2705189,0.2937368,0.0004235606,0.4231112,0.0001687844,0.001883739,0.000002877799,0.000193747,0.009960369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496457,0.04803643,0.00008761896,0.001918131,0.0001832028,0.00002692563,0.000004392788,0.000006270073,0.00009132837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7666825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4391624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417088249","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf043","title":"Prescribing wearable tech","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Future Earth","funders":"Ian Potter Foundation; David and Elaine Potter Foundation","keywords":"Wearable computer; Wearable technology; Smartwatch; Context (archaeology); Health care; Information privacy; Exploratory research; Data Protection Act 1998","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03596724973880766,"gpt":0.3525416875785548,"spread":0.3165744378397471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002544692,0.00006299048,0.0001948549,0.00001826854,0.0004295357,0.00003937764,0.0005528979,0.0001089386,0.001711631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005093834,0.00005222932,0.00005906224,0.0003708777,0.0002358573,0.0001529546,0.0002079679,0.0002387112,0.0001886893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005260051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002592752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004982132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001814798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985496,0.0002951426,0.000213562,0.0001824308,0.0005315243,0.0002276756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994012,0.00009564509,0.0000352177,0.0002807216,0.00004399526,0.0001432211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001653323,0.00004671681,0.00004815249,0.001284003,0.000009555411,0.000005898168,0.00007749665,6.932281e-9,0.000004381239,0.7619078,0.07587068,0.1607436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006587707,0.000005901885,0.00001037924,0.004840632,0.00001961019,6.724694e-7,0.00001622411,0.000005436857,0.00002414379,0.01433656,0.9806202,0.00005437402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006832329,0.304655,0.002568113,0.08508141,0.0008697545,0.000873573,0.000003926775,0.0002359318,0.605644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1063228,0.8279918,0.0009875916,0.05646693,0.0008482618,0.0003075703,0.00002265753,0.00001811401,0.00703422],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9047495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}