{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":28,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"7fefbfe607e5","filters":{"venue":"Metacognition and Learning"}},"results":[{"id":"W2114184575","doi":"10.1007/s11409-007-9016-7","title":"Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":274,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Metacognition; Self-regulated learning; Construct (python library); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Psychology; Adaptation (eye); Exploratory research; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education; Cognition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2898974300896617,"gpt":0.4333952759236632,"spread":0.1434978458340015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0127975,0.0002776704,0.0003446791,0.0004787734,0.0008189039,0.000112177,0.000262422,0.0001865661,0.0009525183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002106503,0.0002798811,0.00003743873,0.0007692839,0.00005772241,0.0002318691,0.0001806031,0.002063557,0.000383974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003073532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001693475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004770667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003617572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952044,0.002621409,0.0004636994,0.0008133564,0.0002827675,0.000614334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979988,0.001048133,0.0002219669,0.0003819642,0.0001479509,0.0002012096],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002714481,0.0001741693,0.02730491,0.00003972359,0.0003511915,0.0001054727,0.1021909,0.0003093957,0.01843091,0.0005732779,0.00077533,0.8494732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001896268,0.0008162694,0.3857615,0.0001631524,0.0002363696,0.0001584952,0.06830381,0.001580724,0.0005459015,0.00006122245,0.5395515,0.0009247381],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.85364,0.0003136065,0.1191671,0.0001584163,0.00039382,0.0001827657,0.000001337695,0.0007595869,0.02538335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609823,0.000005919351,0.03070846,0.0003688087,0.0003534088,0.00001302375,0.0001504625,0.00007046372,0.007347128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8485485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985231015","doi":"10.1007/s11409-014-9117-z","title":"Productive group engagement in cognitive activity and metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning: can it explain differences in students’ conceptual understanding?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Australian Research Council; Johnson and Johnson","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Cognition; Collaborative learning; Coding (social sciences); Empirical research; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Self-regulated learning; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.11002184756409,"gpt":0.3743352506099288,"spread":0.2643134030458389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007133251,0.0003873981,0.0006232809,0.0007223249,0.0007429947,0.0001497768,0.0000889167,0.0001825815,0.0002832473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003296199,0.0003883823,0.00004323185,0.0008525067,0.0004587832,0.0003243789,0.000107495,0.002281569,0.000007906098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001821316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002543732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002254946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002699552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9832114,0.01451928,0.0004567728,0.0009286881,0.0003915642,0.0004922973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969903,0.002226893,0.000410435,0.00009305254,0.000182316,0.00009704523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001652878,0.000591878,0.5833933,0.00007930394,0.0004646102,0.00003754113,0.371949,0.00008510944,0.005648779,0.0052092,0.00001293377,0.03087551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003960175,0.0006249766,0.7576615,0.0003004258,0.00009057173,0.000007887666,0.2355018,0.0003100293,0.000391212,0.0005364062,0.000199626,0.0004154209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777251,0.0001104275,0.0143787,0.0004148272,0.0001561047,0.0007285834,0.000006185104,0.00008679742,0.006393304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997678,0.00003911537,0.0003796435,0.0001588792,0.0001038205,0.0002072161,0.00005221621,0.00003813041,0.001342941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1742682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965723601","doi":"10.1007/s11409-014-9132-0","title":"Using multiple, contextualized data sources to measure learners’ perceptions of their self-regulated learning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen","keywords":"Self-regulated learning; Metacognition; Psychology; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Exploratory research; Perception; Sample (material); Qualitative research; Computer science; Sociology; Cognition; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2672148054649116,"gpt":0.4177545587708127,"spread":0.1505397533059012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007336454,0.0002833302,0.0005162379,0.000423088,0.0005568368,0.00008010199,0.0002614057,0.0001917036,0.0003792755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00373448,0.0002560765,0.00007612006,0.000648107,0.0001345044,0.0002124797,0.0001884031,0.001381492,0.0001008565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000365788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005824062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002977882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001250042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917507,0.006442962,0.0004892478,0.0006111648,0.000316982,0.0003889454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979407,0.0006727974,0.0003488972,0.0003767806,0.0004496507,0.0002112121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001111391,0.0005476436,0.2159799,0.00009570782,0.001490209,0.00001950825,0.4315861,0.01022526,0.08158454,0.0005323419,0.000595292,0.2562321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01326863,0.001856307,0.1302157,0.0006884734,0.001156413,0.0002871871,0.5931355,0.08321459,0.0009690674,0.0001986256,0.1728091,0.0022004],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.906994,0.0003875994,0.08669991,0.0001140706,0.0002233536,0.0002497394,0.0000108486,0.0003559853,0.00496444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979269,0.000004596567,0.01850678,0.0001473069,0.000155047,0.0000116947,0.0001745024,0.00006041512,0.001670688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2540317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971056750","doi":"10.1007/s11409-011-9077-5","title":"Supporting collaboration with technology: does shared cognition lead to co-regulation in medicine?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Metacognition; Psychology; Lead (geology); Neuroscience; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06111102779936895,"gpt":0.4043286265249417,"spread":0.3432175987255728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00265304,0.0001756822,0.0002696094,0.0009007293,0.0002824972,0.00003055769,0.0000588832,0.0001549336,0.001840538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000896745,0.0001329554,0.00001513402,0.001151811,0.0001290622,0.0001945864,0.00001471382,0.0006908669,0.00009721253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002719996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000181034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009447271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005370828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976972,0.001067369,0.0003695289,0.0004056519,0.0001654705,0.0002947436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999175,0.0001549507,0.000256477,0.0001102796,0.0002499621,0.00005331217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001555814,0.0003177605,0.3411663,0.0001042825,0.000238407,0.00008417835,0.1813219,0.00006999424,0.08265611,0.008391918,0.0007499085,0.3833434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004818706,0.002185003,0.8572456,0.0006984809,0.0002179628,0.00008002439,0.1024751,0.0005208887,0.01062017,0.003795477,0.01647492,0.0008676572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8934646,0.00005499981,0.06620906,0.0008470402,0.0001627399,0.0004186411,0.00000364233,0.0002892901,0.03854993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846309,0.000001765302,0.01291909,0.0003700247,0.00008256385,0.0001028515,0.0001194626,0.00002864921,0.001744683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5160792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005462082","doi":"10.1007/s11409-009-9041-9","title":"Epistemic profiles and metacognition: support for the consistency hypothesis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Empirical research; Psychology; Session (web analytics); Context (archaeology); Think aloud protocol; Cognition; Mathematics education; Protocol analysis; Cognitive psychology; Empirical evidence; Rationality; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07536978327440856,"gpt":0.3312625127068852,"spread":0.2558927294324766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005726653,0.0001295941,0.000178423,0.00005461285,0.0006144898,0.0000981143,0.00005511814,0.00007254633,0.0007360195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003076642,0.00009155909,0.00006724795,0.0000801259,0.0001459374,0.00009204667,0.00001022237,0.0001876354,0.00003889691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006694239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002187735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000157976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002029026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990766,0.0001738353,0.0002119838,0.000252124,0.00008414302,0.000201317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984893,0.001165495,0.0001095565,0.00008744471,0.00009764885,0.00005054626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004827916,0.0003163439,0.006751851,0.0002090015,0.0007643916,0.00001885711,0.006845987,0.00001371575,0.0023238,0.1564323,0.009180487,0.8166605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002435209,0.001492825,0.7462912,0.00009293138,0.001162649,0.000621947,0.06313281,0.0001639455,0.0005066143,0.06524687,0.1180849,0.0007681565],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8103921,0.01387793,0.003118822,0.02947648,0.0008368426,0.001556063,0.00005599334,0.0003043269,0.1403814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904768,0.000303865,0.001182849,0.001265349,0.0001696715,0.0001637464,0.00004087421,0.0000101654,0.006386679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8158923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8058897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149497228","doi":"10.1007/s11409-014-9123-1","title":"Issues in dealing with sequential and temporal characteristics of self- and socially-regulated learning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institute of Education Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Self-regulated learning; Metacognition; Self-control; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Cognition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02568017868819967,"gpt":0.335636960734529,"spread":0.3099567820463294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00289547,0.0001503945,0.000335258,0.0002005801,0.0002535331,0.00004736848,0.00002809645,0.000112752,0.00009293879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003559768,0.0001378343,0.00001764845,0.0001507843,0.0001301326,0.00007511818,0.00002724957,0.0008071152,0.0000024797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007279019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001328092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001911433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009713632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971517,0.001999816,0.0002751382,0.0002719457,0.0001093406,0.0001920914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992858,0.0002815722,0.0002490882,0.0000517431,0.00008691687,0.00004485932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002674908,0.00007388648,0.708711,0.0001467152,0.0001849521,0.00001445699,0.03582947,0.00003671015,0.006862392,0.009140128,0.000003987189,0.2387288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002492143,0.000776758,0.9769375,0.000254119,0.0001495849,0.00005854975,0.005261489,0.003338547,0.0002632127,0.0005257911,0.009526466,0.0004158652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904306,0.0002005987,0.006789491,0.0001556487,0.00005177365,0.00008458822,7.093136e-7,0.0000917627,0.002194829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878001,0.00003292408,0.01136717,0.00005174607,0.00008349793,0.00000499904,0.00002498409,0.0000253868,0.0006092421],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2682265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5620719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041990263","doi":"10.1007/s11409-013-9104-9","title":"A domain-specific account of self-regulated learning: the cognitive and metacognitive activities involved in learning through historical inquiry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Comprehension; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Empirical research; Discipline; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06518183871485757,"gpt":0.3354500238756334,"spread":0.2702681851607759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004095221,0.0004426703,0.0007599012,0.0004601335,0.0008316827,0.0001446162,0.0001343795,0.0003019148,0.0007893759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007486245,0.0003565211,0.000126848,0.0008367701,0.0005104294,0.0004964306,0.0001282866,0.00357686,0.00005754271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001320312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003670362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005703248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009998903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9890434,0.008586475,0.0006926354,0.0007200193,0.0003760894,0.0005813636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995442,0.003327943,0.0006205218,0.0001464318,0.0003741826,0.0000889384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009872389,0.0008377143,0.1238037,0.0002105751,0.001589544,0.00005842521,0.6538939,0.0001760498,0.02002909,0.009543112,0.0004566559,0.1884139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006496888,0.001539216,0.3819458,0.0005280144,0.0004487114,0.000103211,0.4608288,0.0004133104,0.001070802,0.002814615,0.1425398,0.001270893],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729049,0.002702609,0.01326847,0.0003513384,0.0003049671,0.0005847967,0.000001349891,0.0002339738,0.009647658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934623,0.0002056223,0.003045243,0.0001906024,0.0001873003,0.0002083067,0.00004269818,0.00007226906,0.002585613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.258142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076994293","doi":"10.1007/s11409-011-9070-z","title":"Measuring strategy use in context with multiple-choice items","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Psychology; Vocabulary; Metacognition; Context (archaeology); Reliability (semiconductor); Concurrent validity; Construct validity; Measure (data warehouse); Comprehension; Inference; Construct (python library); Reading (process); Vocabulary development; Social psychology; Internal consistency; Computer science; Psychometrics; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Teaching method; Linguistics; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1421308067241243,"gpt":0.2906518890518613,"spread":0.148521082327737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003710229,0.0001190531,0.000152067,0.0001568253,0.00009976019,0.00005956675,0.00003720921,0.00005586264,0.0005355877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002168606,0.0000995786,0.00001954214,0.0001275107,0.00003344213,0.0002146672,0.00001035073,0.0003577448,0.00008623947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000120113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000931955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001201701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003931299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998965,0.0002852187,0.000191442,0.0002531511,0.00009454448,0.0002106514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993816,0.0003503496,0.00007485926,0.00007427626,0.00005137114,0.00006754254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002011503,0.00009999321,0.8795071,0.00001538033,0.00007794559,0.00006383663,0.02726231,0.00001713063,0.0002930333,0.0002925472,0.00002436564,0.09214521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00161583,0.0001312226,0.9792951,0.0001143076,0.00002194805,0.00003542863,0.007142975,0.0001297827,0.0002040617,0.00002044545,0.01108704,0.0002018867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793686,0.0001947953,0.0004521734,0.000009392122,0.00008414771,0.0001203017,8.92518e-7,0.00006069392,0.01970898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954135,0.000007774531,0.0005290332,0.0001259046,0.00002683044,0.00003842123,0.0000123004,0.00001710459,0.003829087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09978798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.586431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956977098","doi":"10.1007/s11409-019-09198-4","title":"Does domain matter? Monitoring accuracy across domains","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Task (project management); Calibration; Psychology; Generality; Resolution (logic); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Domain (mathematical analysis); Artificial intelligence; Metacognition; Domain knowledge; Computer science; Machine learning; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0662592283616116,"gpt":0.3990462324451357,"spread":0.332787004083524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002995988,0.0001720756,0.0003288798,0.0001651602,0.0004770181,0.0009927665,0.0002812603,0.00009657888,0.002272973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009947084,0.0001023166,0.0001266088,0.0002878074,0.00006390866,0.0006951874,0.0001834581,0.0004139789,0.005421899],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002486506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001381401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001548213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004138424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977303,0.0003166367,0.0005298614,0.0005710463,0.0005281321,0.0003240422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975494,0.001583025,0.0002934639,0.0003038714,0.0001440089,0.0001262288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003325019,0.00003194429,0.3363387,0.000005198699,0.00001266703,0.000009770895,0.001788451,0.0001073123,0.003508736,0.00003670126,0.000114736,0.6580126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002825923,0.0002168252,0.5146496,0.0002430261,0.00006637416,0.00007883376,0.05393656,0.0008474316,0.0033884,0.1004786,0.3220964,0.001172045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938811,0.00005507518,0.0009808771,0.0003518572,0.001124118,0.0001346996,0.000008817286,0.0000652357,0.003398233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934351,0.00002329298,0.001896003,0.0002036812,0.0001598034,0.000008790822,0.000005039418,0.00001859508,0.00424963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6568405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991370972","doi":"10.1007/s11409-019-09213-8","title":"Recognizing early childhood as a critical time for developing and supporting self-regulation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Early Childhood Education and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Early childhood; Context (archaeology); Child development; Self-control; Self-regulated learning; Cognition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01457347962490077,"gpt":0.308789612183807,"spread":0.2942161325589062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001364386,0.00009788318,0.0001430693,0.0001092678,0.0008861801,0.0002507927,0.00003633348,0.00008214379,0.0004143564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00147551,0.0001051162,0.00003317171,0.0001457804,0.00004451556,0.0003747389,0.00002214814,0.0001654891,0.0001869495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000333957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002351132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005518532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006883067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988492,0.0002132005,0.0002141899,0.0002625608,0.0001881564,0.0002726824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991004,0.0004938877,0.00009129418,0.00003663024,0.0001637714,0.0001139866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004739774,0.0001420979,0.07398437,0.0001980376,0.0002025488,0.000002034109,0.403229,0.000006657293,0.001768288,0.04902609,0.0002615869,0.4711319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002086268,0.0003202912,0.8515366,0.0004448451,0.0001917411,0.00002394422,0.04229079,0.0006187652,0.0007713084,0.02201282,0.07864088,0.001061767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843676,0.000109235,0.001016968,0.002373185,0.0001582819,0.0004143351,8.03194e-7,0.0001572348,0.01140236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807165,0.00004415866,0.01656386,0.0005420088,0.0001566354,0.00002125961,0.00002277801,0.00001480075,0.001918041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7775522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.681587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063772878","doi":"10.1007/s11409-011-9074-8","title":"Statistical estimates of learners’ judgments about knowledge in calibration of achievement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Calibration; Measure (data warehouse); Psychology; Statistic; Correctness; Metacognition; Mathematics education; Sample (material); Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Cognition; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1019453062351795,"gpt":0.3849430238929029,"spread":0.2829977176577234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001996784,0.0001025339,0.0002424995,0.0002344668,0.00006822169,0.000005925005,0.00004586435,0.00007139396,0.001082291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003835376,0.00009659093,0.00002660061,0.0002012208,0.000114775,0.00006286246,0.00002373261,0.0004427741,0.00001154077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009158376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001294612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002203667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000521194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997784,0.001410525,0.0003705124,0.0001883052,0.00009410629,0.0001525159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993105,0.0003246642,0.000199908,0.00007195357,0.00006165373,0.00003130849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004911646,0.001193272,0.5523043,0.000246253,0.0002279333,0.00001097948,0.1006312,0.00005729751,0.01513303,0.05167749,0.00007294599,0.277954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001413283,0.0005869091,0.9823823,0.000153011,0.00007389515,0.00000383097,0.007453143,0.001832245,0.004034145,0.001317248,0.0005678487,0.0001821463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8417931,0.0002054002,0.1341575,0.00001164539,0.0001083228,0.0000980783,0.000003615893,0.00002768033,0.02359468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775364,0.000006406156,0.02188454,0.00002354769,0.00001456812,0.00001263501,0.00003242179,0.00001327716,0.0004762201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4300779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967281592","doi":"10.1007/s11409-010-9066-0","title":"Consistent results with the consistency hypothesis? The effects of epistemic beliefs on metacognitive processing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Context (archaeology); Think aloud protocol; Recall; Metaphor; Empirical research; Protocol analysis; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education; Cognition; Cognitive science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05999279552421096,"gpt":0.2769992554757469,"spread":0.2170064599515359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000698627,0.000164415,0.0002211203,0.00005764185,0.0005439783,0.00003888806,0.0001096973,0.00006121171,0.00009201631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005922111,0.0000806739,0.00006709697,0.0001648273,0.0005404531,0.00006001214,0.00002089297,0.0003740771,0.00003300458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009349081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004138706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001439846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983442,0.0007554256,0.0002582905,0.0002700112,0.0001702851,0.0002017399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968815,0.002417191,0.000328918,0.0001557271,0.000178581,0.00003805105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008248813,0.002437833,0.01200987,0.001772516,0.004884499,0.0002278137,0.3534098,0.00005656144,0.004570013,0.1375252,0.003461477,0.4713956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003578049,0.003304806,0.8098853,0.0009882193,0.001354804,0.0002704624,0.166719,0.00002201884,0.003573443,0.005573321,0.004124949,0.0006056661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8331698,0.002882536,0.0001106764,0.002678713,0.0001873072,0.0005161816,0.000007098954,0.00005732794,0.1603904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968129,0.00007389076,0.000197546,0.0006129432,0.00005135549,0.0001247105,0.000007516332,0.00001518375,0.002103893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7978754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4183896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385241929","doi":"10.1007/s11409-023-09352-z","title":"Supporting self-regulated learning in clinical problem-solving with a computer-based learning environment: the effectiveness of scaffolds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Problem and Project Based Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metacognition; Scaffold; Context (archaeology); Task (project management); Self-regulated learning; Mathematics education; Cognition; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0201107742434052,"gpt":0.3130845970661943,"spread":0.2929738228227892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0226212,0.0002239457,0.0004478616,0.0003379376,0.00150655,0.0001454649,0.0001654593,0.0001805829,0.000091261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009545024,0.000178361,0.0001201453,0.001142252,0.0003321654,0.000262225,0.0000895809,0.001033731,0.00002529952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005607716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001904166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003076489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005566518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877763,0.009977387,0.0006168739,0.0004896662,0.0005103925,0.0006293343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949005,0.004264031,0.0005194814,0.0001033934,0.00009666582,0.0001159662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003888362,0.0001573289,0.683614,0.000457266,0.0001697734,0.00004788224,0.01982358,0.1850667,0.001251089,0.000590233,0.000007799057,0.1084256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009202474,0.003221818,0.6374226,0.003592765,0.0005567392,0.00001891031,0.03039373,0.2675391,0.001022769,0.0008571276,0.04451452,0.00165743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903592,0.0001322993,0.004889828,0.0001969477,0.00005074443,0.0006653304,5.168538e-7,0.0005052084,0.003199937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973447,0.00012664,0.001987222,0.00003998572,0.00009291444,0.00005170095,0.00004368422,0.00003930681,0.0002738262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1067681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023360218","doi":"10.1007/s11409-009-9039-3","title":"Metacognitive learning: the effect of item-specific experience and age on metamemory calibration and planning","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Metamemory; Metacognition; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04773316465582826,"gpt":0.3736131248472255,"spread":0.3258799601913973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003446591,0.0002517179,0.0004134061,0.0002388248,0.0006733728,0.0001035142,0.00006377659,0.0001164673,0.0001242221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001547071,0.0001766939,0.0000564216,0.0002833554,0.0002699573,0.0001548818,0.00002770194,0.001316939,0.000004750879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008089397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004256171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001195345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.39311e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935505,0.005249082,0.0003025004,0.0004447277,0.0002036016,0.0002495693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971658,0.002326787,0.0002646066,0.0001133136,0.0000629323,0.00006653466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001266872,0.00008886838,0.03363638,0.00006816274,0.0003128254,0.00008273279,0.1222105,0.0002924622,0.03373768,0.003697133,0.0001298262,0.8044766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005576599,0.009106832,0.8942605,0.000524737,0.0006056349,0.0002092609,0.04157412,0.00323025,0.01926615,0.0007573973,0.0237547,0.001133817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790853,0.001679092,0.009197289,0.0001538156,0.0001365714,0.0002520659,0.000001074067,0.00009887674,0.00939594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977185,0.00004874602,0.000573412,0.0002938984,0.0001132217,0.00002944952,0.00001961927,0.00002099177,0.001182131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8606241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7205366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143973764","doi":"10.1007/s11409-021-09263-x","title":"Are children’s judgments of another’s accuracy linked to their metacognitive confidence judgments?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Task (project management); Theory of mind; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Self-confidence; Correlation; Process (computing); Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07080742795055357,"gpt":0.3047887878891196,"spread":0.233981359938566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003523619,0.0001992192,0.00033369,0.0001240062,0.0003165072,0.0001317212,0.000146079,0.00006263847,0.0008739166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004270017,0.0001719471,0.0000827246,0.0004434364,0.00009919716,0.0004271258,0.0001109645,0.0003274273,0.00008475112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009560394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000419169,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009968561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004239338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980735,0.0004452774,0.0003439258,0.0005585253,0.0003163855,0.0002623723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986372,0.0004918108,0.0004013034,0.0001449329,0.0002092326,0.0001155091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011546,0.0002201508,0.007472229,0.0001289099,0.00009425647,0.00003865722,0.002778142,0.0001306844,0.9485803,0.0004499432,0.00008082295,0.03991051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007674989,0.0001398557,0.04530964,0.0002792588,0.0000862685,0.00004477582,0.001937499,0.0001373292,0.9464672,0.0006068692,0.003921672,0.0003021826],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942689,0.0003976365,0.001438332,0.0004453029,0.0001089277,0.0002668162,0.00003808501,0.00006008268,0.002975937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925205,0.0003549205,0.00028425,0.005890271,0.00005053408,0.00003406283,0.00001117225,0.0000187617,0.0008355587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03960833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9568774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376874759","doi":"10.1007/s11409-023-09342-1","title":"Exploring the effects of a musical play intervention on young children’s self-regulation and metacognition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Society for Education, Music and Psychology Research","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Developmental psychology; Cognition; Test (biology); Curriculum; Task (project management); Clinical psychology; Cognitive psychology; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06106379156402814,"gpt":0.3393742978142715,"spread":0.2783105062502433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002941416,0.0001595957,0.0002155472,0.0003559184,0.0004370422,0.00004902346,0.00004846893,0.00006745822,0.00009011257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009843459,0.0001240522,0.00008074798,0.000463267,0.00007738652,0.0001622315,0.00003856142,0.0007145861,0.00005483695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001302575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003527645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004788828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000160754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962389,0.002776543,0.0002700544,0.0003148992,0.0001959458,0.0002036351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984587,0.001129018,0.0001950021,0.0001073969,0.00007198971,0.00003791319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002989918,0.0003082548,0.02185407,0.0002940653,0.0008396859,0.00001271395,0.05397279,0.00009106306,0.01686051,0.01028959,0.0001664826,0.8950118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001186525,0.0004766048,0.9933203,0.000220463,0.0002191892,0.0000243618,0.00163282,0.0005514942,0.001302023,0.0004329001,0.0004757179,0.0001576382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921777,0.0001006047,0.004920889,0.0001069928,0.0005079207,0.0002721879,0.000001546067,0.0002719497,0.001640245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985138,0.00004374031,0.0004655769,0.00007052417,0.0001619096,0.00011812,0.00007111447,0.00002657181,0.0005286752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9714662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387127679","doi":"10.1007/s11409-023-09359-6","title":"Towards a new theory of student self-assessment: Tracing learners’ cognitive and affective processes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Metacognition; Session (web analytics); Self-assessment; Qualitative property; Learning analytics; Cognitive psychology; Applied psychology; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03971913758098297,"gpt":0.3714180673073345,"spread":0.3316989297263515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001766107,0.0001288486,0.0002300732,0.0001855854,0.0006333474,0.0001403413,0.00006546309,0.00006969462,0.0001505672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003407259,0.0001217612,0.0000436853,0.0006430356,0.0001473725,0.0003069348,0.00006789222,0.0002675336,0.00001371729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002785987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002117916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001061748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005826311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982606,0.0006782472,0.0001665918,0.0002295893,0.0004190833,0.00024595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987103,0.0008448613,0.0001368697,0.00003176786,0.0001613729,0.0001148477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009640171,0.0001986709,0.2413656,0.0002434213,0.0005275243,0.00001289567,0.5321858,0.00001142527,0.0004602227,0.008190863,0.00006120296,0.216646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001287467,0.0002191062,0.4826168,0.0001813613,0.0003010817,0.000001257623,0.5122588,0.00004623634,0.0001359468,0.002244939,0.0004890507,0.000217903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674474,0.0004066519,0.001107137,0.0002216945,0.00007665879,0.0003605701,0.000002116939,0.0002116549,0.0301661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969379,0.001349813,0.0002605784,0.00005076377,0.0001165228,0.00002628204,0.00001249082,0.00001368018,0.001232011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2412513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4965276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402710578","doi":"10.1007/s11409-024-09403-z","title":"Analyzing multimodal data to understand medical trainees' regulation strategies and physiological responses in high- fidelity medical simulation scenarios","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; Montreal General Hospital","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fidelity; Psychology; Medical simulation; High fidelity; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1593491411680241,"gpt":0.4316290803632341,"spread":0.2722799391952099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002261621,0.0001496312,0.0002764658,0.0003631404,0.0001770366,0.0001306331,0.00006266847,0.0002543953,0.0008249087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004644934,0.0001300429,0.00002614692,0.0004448791,0.000107791,0.0004027406,0.00006163978,0.0007543191,0.00001006559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008295252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004984163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002324473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007960475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975952,0.0006289134,0.000463856,0.0005418573,0.0005638726,0.0002063226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972222,0.002068395,0.0000517187,0.0001758758,0.0001418315,0.0003399539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004999862,0.000894917,0.2378558,0.004578909,0.0005483663,0.0006003572,0.05150495,0.2027848,0.006688582,0.005606139,0.0007598349,0.4831775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007176286,0.0001200057,0.365038,0.0005311124,0.00004754633,0.00001624119,0.006338868,0.6265442,0.000007100863,0.0003846305,0.0001439447,0.0001107544],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.969638,0.0006924605,0.0225046,0.006518696,0.0001280003,0.0003371623,0.00001082843,0.0001362136,0.00003398715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974403,0.00007310118,0.0009601199,0.0005436963,0.0003269867,0.00001070268,0.0005848699,0.00001695594,0.00004325987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4830667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9032173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200522671","doi":"10.1007/s11409-021-09273-9","title":"Constraints on the use of the memorizing effort heuristic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Memorization; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Heuristic; Metamemory; Cognition; Context (archaeology); Experimental psychology; Context effect; Social psychology; Metacognition; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Word (group theory)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07855467245522964,"gpt":0.2472317279117424,"spread":0.1686770554565128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000473891,0.0000799966,0.0001096281,0.00002899739,0.0004030644,0.0001634256,0.0001307964,0.00002636719,0.00006317243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008006606,0.00004668332,0.00006863651,0.0001889977,0.00006627451,0.0001182706,0.00009927485,0.0003601809,0.00001503372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008356506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002852317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008140839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.580569e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989217,0.0004053352,0.0001608279,0.0001807038,0.0002069744,0.0001244551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990317,0.0005297959,0.0001181131,0.0001705352,0.0001244834,0.00002542632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001080836,0.00008393724,0.007115775,0.00009457556,0.0001780916,0.00005808728,0.004632367,0.006082415,0.01731094,0.7694923,0.0002611298,0.1946795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001133221,0.0003607138,0.08564077,0.002408588,0.0001821984,0.0004239296,0.004894215,0.08102761,0.1240693,0.0020198,0.6968499,0.0009897518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.585779,0.0002687596,0.4014196,0.00200243,0.001392643,0.0002903326,0.00000219269,0.0001275718,0.008717412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99391,0.000009868659,0.00136771,0.0004285623,0.00004829677,0.000004026673,8.626171e-7,0.000005313559,0.004225399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7674725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3100086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381053771","doi":"10.1007/s11409-023-09348-9","title":"Covert retrieval yields a forward testing effect across levels of successive list similarity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Facilitation; Psychology; Cued recall; Metamemory; Recall; Metacognition; Cognitive psychology; Interference theory; Similarity (geometry); Information retrieval; Computer science; Free recall; Artificial intelligence; Working memory; Cognition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09367351108515826,"gpt":0.3508752699037557,"spread":0.2572017588185975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00111505,0.0001263757,0.0002360851,0.00007652707,0.0005288619,0.0001180626,0.0001060722,0.00007543856,0.000119854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0181367,0.0001067473,0.00005500158,0.0008479382,0.0001391086,0.0003445535,0.00009355669,0.0003256422,0.00002619733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006211351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002350985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001826727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002475392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985748,0.0003038804,0.0002355049,0.0003307438,0.0002880513,0.0002670543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973232,0.002231378,0.0001910156,0.00007817142,0.0001064351,0.00006981255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000166917,0.00002696448,0.01448462,0.0005663164,0.0000158289,0.00004411174,0.001606388,0.0005481525,0.94011,0.00007865402,0.000045616,0.04230645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008832241,0.0006515963,0.01849979,0.0002270907,0.00005281426,0.0000230629,0.0007546135,0.01409933,0.9626126,0.0004635879,0.001452327,0.0002799557],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966684,0.00004711487,0.0004174049,0.00009352875,0.0001043527,0.0001372509,0.00002835676,0.0001373929,0.002366197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990031,0.00003157468,0.00006029381,0.000274434,0.00005100828,0.000006314822,0.00000453793,0.00001162877,0.0005571738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04202649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403336121","doi":"10.1007/s11409-024-09402-0","title":"Modelling the unique contributions of task understanding to academic challenges and performance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Task (project management); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1694899428429313,"gpt":0.3965628355978978,"spread":0.2270728927549665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003518365,0.00009635152,0.0001410431,0.0001790893,0.000328061,0.00002882513,0.0000435966,0.00008801658,0.000055009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001998773,0.00007164309,0.00002504442,0.0002028197,0.00008826671,0.00007579178,0.00002628926,0.001158696,0.00001469244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002182713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001186033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001592981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.345389e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983274,0.0010284,0.0001788921,0.0002139529,0.00008686007,0.0001645312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990788,0.0007190816,0.0000514682,0.00006201681,0.00004990843,0.00003873487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001364995,0.00002678503,0.0004638313,0.0002544415,0.0003255674,0.000006922965,0.1422132,0.009773039,0.005700926,0.3440529,0.0001065517,0.4969393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002021092,0.00187516,0.01663846,0.003226622,0.0008008037,0.0003265626,0.1271458,0.5566162,0.002111817,0.03029037,0.2575477,0.00139945],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.514382,0.00885439,0.4654063,0.001679461,0.0001648396,0.0001216764,0.000003232882,0.00007786699,0.009310222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969603,0.0009842591,0.001089869,0.00009218222,0.00008015319,0.00001657114,0.000005309078,0.00001417228,0.0007572287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5468431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.503402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313433994","doi":"10.1007/s11409-022-09330-x","title":"Temporal change of emotions: Identifying academic emotion trajectories and profiles in problem-solving","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Boredom; Curiosity; Self-regulated learning; Developmental psychology; Metacognition; Transition (genetics); Dynamics (music); Latent growth modeling; Academic achievement; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1228705469515492,"gpt":0.3879908070769282,"spread":0.265120260125379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004242692,0.0001209169,0.000223594,0.0004547359,0.0005137664,0.00002239802,0.00005357883,0.00007098497,0.0004294059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003033484,0.000128187,0.00003060647,0.0004751678,0.00007915778,0.0001880534,0.00007161542,0.001527661,0.000002505833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002599812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001115851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002767015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004260929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959509,0.003061541,0.0003363902,0.000285615,0.0001646682,0.0002008313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993798,0.0002291929,0.0002560686,0.00006022475,0.00004711002,0.00002756489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001348073,0.0001411747,0.5974457,0.0002730456,0.00007897686,0.00001357762,0.1747395,0.00007699571,0.01217058,0.006836479,0.0000408166,0.2080484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001006363,0.0003042412,0.9382808,0.00018091,0.00004559483,0.00004831962,0.05553897,0.0004048446,0.0001251288,0.001659645,0.002162177,0.000242965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927796,0.001172289,0.003563181,0.0001866935,0.0002117182,0.0002784285,0.00000439245,0.00007609426,0.001727651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955575,0.00003082839,0.003437898,0.00007240329,0.00008853725,0.0001274088,0.00004205698,0.00002040258,0.0006229678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3408352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6637011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401010658","doi":"10.1007/s11409-024-09399-6","title":"On the confidence-accuracy relationship in memory: inferential, direct access, or indirect access?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Metacognition; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1806195307440185,"gpt":0.3800145258617862,"spread":0.1993949951177678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008379833,0.0001517894,0.0001664804,0.0002520374,0.0004905837,0.001518701,0.0002644561,0.00005961552,0.002652164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0139026,0.00009090779,0.00004209405,0.00091256,0.0001148654,0.001442369,0.00009669176,0.0006966506,0.000142815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001383994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008282892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003830519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003332344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982114,0.0006297888,0.0002534074,0.0004304174,0.0002676544,0.0002073683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938771,0.005832637,0.00009676665,0.0001115714,0.00003033174,0.00005161521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002156038,0.0007886002,0.05496989,0.003441374,0.000246301,0.001167772,0.02387827,0.008633341,0.0783594,0.1763353,0.01327489,0.6367489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003045477,0.001273177,0.1355956,0.006021749,0.0004811142,0.0002386778,0.004650719,0.05009569,0.4755447,0.09950859,0.2205176,0.00302689],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9539669,0.0004487608,0.0001810526,0.001529229,0.0003024183,0.0003052239,0.000004898596,0.0001952459,0.04306626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960414,0.000660258,0.0000077063,0.001476829,0.00006722444,0.00007279187,0.000004978971,0.00001524384,0.001653595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6337219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411565602","doi":"10.1007/s11409-025-09430-4","title":"How do students self-assess? examining the metacognitive processes of student self-assessment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Self-assessment; Self-concept; Developmental psychology; Self-control; Self-regulated learning; Self evaluation; Academic achievement; Cognition; Social psychology; Applied psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04062015942691434,"gpt":0.3783224363652981,"spread":0.3377022769383837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002798354,0.0002337345,0.0003836798,0.0002245983,0.001521393,0.0009589721,0.0004275896,0.0001030024,0.00008371904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002692919,0.0001796221,0.00008475147,0.0009594494,0.0001727911,0.0004998645,0.0002346864,0.0004899621,0.000005265349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001010932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003352469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003789748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005110082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965162,0.001244505,0.0003395611,0.000411621,0.001112322,0.0003758045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976776,0.00116061,0.0003253278,0.0001301189,0.0006214143,0.00008490534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002448199,0.0007192894,0.9231105,0.0002023813,0.001286075,0.000006238651,0.05449579,0.000005004073,0.0002918335,0.005903801,0.0001044946,0.01385013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001485027,0.0001776949,0.6928441,0.0002211765,0.00109731,7.729572e-7,0.2897311,0.00002771854,0.0002223538,0.0004303948,0.01346004,0.0003023275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9518278,0.001134778,0.001098009,0.001002316,0.0003165713,0.0008548786,0.000002621955,0.0002263156,0.04353668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947295,0.001617501,0.001382074,0.0002052243,0.000121533,0.0001481414,0.000008780336,0.00001530048,0.001771989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2352353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303411337","doi":"10.1007/s11409-022-09325-8","title":"An examination of the effect of feedback on meta-ignorance of mental illness public stigma","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Ignorance; Psychology; Mental illness; Clinical psychology; Social stigma; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Mental health; Medicine; Family medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03979937512764321,"gpt":0.3217396022727637,"spread":0.2819402271451205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001369958,0.0001673451,0.0003818219,0.0003559856,0.000357764,0.00001364477,0.0001693662,0.00005110126,0.002040081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004498104,0.0001191886,0.000149372,0.0008985894,0.0001559313,0.000152993,0.00006463614,0.0003056848,0.000004676144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001996671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001116234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002482699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001331216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963509,0.002426365,0.0003096869,0.000323498,0.0004384555,0.000151056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984869,0.0005471005,0.0005514209,0.0001916296,0.0001788538,0.00004404192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006488264,0.001028322,0.06596682,0.0001898385,0.001459764,0.000001483036,0.0080646,0.0001498656,0.007813018,0.0004061895,0.00009276699,0.9141785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007610248,0.006676991,0.8394811,0.00009589131,0.002774996,0.00002652264,0.01776983,0.0002827422,0.1062869,0.0002341845,0.01824033,0.0005203193],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917004,0.002026805,0.0004033541,0.00006839507,0.0003782135,0.0003974277,0.00006810318,0.00002422534,0.004933145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998989,0.0002299104,0.00003556458,0.00004823103,0.00002736813,0.0001870057,0.00007152704,0.00002150597,0.0003898866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9136582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391445032","doi":"10.1007/s11409-024-09373-2","title":"Examining adaptations in study time allocation and restudy selection as a function of expected test format","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Test (biology); Function (biology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Metacognition; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0310090857040449,"gpt":0.2618780166180574,"spread":0.2308689309140125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008155191,0.00009941965,0.0001363835,0.0003763454,0.0001874188,0.0001927871,0.0000449181,0.00003652714,0.00001558285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000283148,0.00009667386,0.00001660701,0.0005352508,0.00001284393,0.0006176053,0.00003871604,0.0002681138,0.00002297603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002495657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002467449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008531394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001570804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988943,0.0002770129,0.0002628263,0.0002791236,0.0001698012,0.0001169528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999415,0.000321978,0.00007942814,0.00005565529,0.0000970944,0.00003088725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009536244,0.0008159219,0.1249231,0.0003724399,0.0003240368,0.00005054444,0.1213476,0.006243546,0.1265598,0.0356716,0.00004265243,0.5835534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001120394,0.003673717,0.50375,0.0008141083,0.000129786,0.00007865766,0.03235197,0.4520918,0.0008588539,0.0004963705,0.004144254,0.0004900753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8770484,0.0003538491,0.1213167,0.00003256779,0.00009232007,0.0002447462,2.065954e-7,0.0001616537,0.0007495123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997529,0.00001853185,0.0007838552,0.00001059389,0.00003808258,0.00003653257,0.000004390725,0.000008973174,0.001570058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5830633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3942246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411188404","doi":"10.1007/s11409-025-09424-2","title":"Do metamemory judgments impair relational encoding?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metamemory; Psychology; Metacognition; Encoding (memory); Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05396592588099029,"gpt":0.3096529800475742,"spread":0.2556870541665839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004089497,0.00009413954,0.0001168624,0.0001462476,0.0004716175,0.0001039417,0.00006607847,0.00004229613,0.0006472931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001249444,0.00008202383,0.00004055323,0.0002899792,0.00007021137,0.0003265447,0.00004313195,0.0002807265,0.00007679084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009025659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002829177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002251365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.630277e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999011,0.0001952644,0.0001742845,0.0002976333,0.0001776406,0.0001441585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995024,0.0002726128,0.00007623241,0.00006161073,0.00004144155,0.00004569236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002060659,0.0002552175,0.02855347,0.0004346998,0.0001061611,0.00004058007,0.002124752,0.001243025,0.6620153,0.07629785,0.001526982,0.2271959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003905959,0.0004170917,0.05300763,0.000597528,0.0003994742,0.00008607356,0.004009661,0.01283133,0.5385808,0.03277006,0.3522063,0.001188056],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8714324,0.0004982472,0.001939912,0.0004232004,0.000228213,0.0001271788,0.000002372593,0.0001162962,0.1252322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914353,0.000145731,0.0003488334,0.0020368,0.00003369649,0.00001567065,0.000003438716,0.000005135463,0.005975327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3506793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7087406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283827058","doi":"10.1007/s11409-022-09313-y","title":"How accurate and predictive are judgments of solvability? Explorations in a two-phase anagram solving paradigm","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"Flinders University; Australian Government","keywords":"Anagrams; Anagram; Psychology; Task (project management); Set (abstract data type); Duration (music); Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1576797683991574,"gpt":0.4104401498600355,"spread":0.2527603814608781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002525063,0.0001131335,0.0003027321,0.0004123155,0.000473286,0.000327854,0.0001330607,0.0000252633,0.0001595918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00181063,0.0001023573,0.0000576552,0.0005035815,0.00009156729,0.0006890457,0.0001854451,0.0003655038,0.000002993261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003201724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002685108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001737067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004443684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979411,0.0006143328,0.0004520441,0.0004240888,0.0004093945,0.0001590455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998482,0.0007898816,0.0004022882,0.0001547761,0.00009468952,0.00007629777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003696347,0.0007166778,0.08425553,0.00001503226,0.00004004542,0.00003879177,0.008802745,0.01113888,0.0014359,0.0002720616,0.0001569949,0.8927577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01330303,0.002476754,0.1198868,0.0002216291,0.0003025438,0.00009340926,0.2543956,0.4013251,0.0007642327,0.1865483,0.01944126,0.001241377],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939989,0.0001598098,0.004794684,0.000462325,0.0001135331,0.0001922633,0.0000755731,0.00001983562,0.0001830253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992999,0.00002063519,0.0003622056,0.00006992008,0.00001571914,0.00005718661,0.00002526003,0.000007974562,0.0001411411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8915163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4174008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}