{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":43,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":43,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"30b7eb0a9921","filters":{"venue":"Metaphilosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2072471026","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01607.x","title":"HOW WE HAVE BEEN LEARNING TO TALK ABOUT AUTISM: A ROLE FOR STORIES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neurotypical; Autism; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Autism spectrum disorder","authors":[{"name":"Ian Hacking","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04628814462062808,"gpt":0.3084788014256312,"spread":0.2621906568050031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01031345,0.0009464826,0.0005092412,0.002264492,0.01116299,0.01251826,0.002116447,0.004132094,0.007341404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02745109,0.0005395444,0.0004717222,0.0008513571,0.03807299,0.02217937,0.01060361,0.00695338,0.001129183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003140418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001803043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001702941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00225895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9853159,0.01214645,0.0002396898,0.0005997618,0.001021918,0.0006763001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699295,0.02251079,0.002367155,0.001212723,0.001446091,0.002533725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003714381,0.00004050591,0.001004072,0.0001421984,0.00001311545,0.001371188,0.884832,0.00005640001,0.0004874179,0.09658758,0.006474055,0.008954348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002152522,0.00008438474,0.001391762,0.0006228175,0.00003255609,0.004921077,0.6997491,0.0002993206,0.0009204673,0.04802303,0.2438833,0.00005063005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.349674,0.01746586,0.02556516,0.1290604,0.002366605,0.0001665816,0.0002720534,0.0005743972,0.4748549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767656,0.002282716,0.003708119,0.002821801,0.000227045,0.00009941932,0.00005862871,0.0001196,0.01391712],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01251826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05454338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239735155","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00285","title":"Constitutive Luck","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Latus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05346291251323264,"gpt":0.254783815402392,"spread":0.2013209028891593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003394395,0.000451378,0.0004708904,0.001050249,0.002888254,0.005927775,0.0009717442,0.002476523,0.007388096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00586033,0.0003061535,0.0004897656,0.0008647058,0.02976616,0.008163044,0.004803882,0.003647282,0.001438875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003583718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002387199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001241504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001033575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961393,0.001292851,0.000197825,0.0008183357,0.001060629,0.0004909494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971339,0.0007258938,0.0005091416,0.0008323457,0.0005153247,0.0002834654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005559371,0.00000566386,0.000229488,0.00003204129,0.000004249327,0.00004170519,0.002045011,0.00006568209,0.0001847163,0.9928823,0.001485825,0.003017799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007569251,0.00002312269,0.0007865734,0.0001168168,0.00001351584,0.0004280369,0.00129962,0.000367185,0.0008758507,0.9156827,0.08037625,0.00002270727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03828865,0.002901379,0.07516438,0.01748705,0.000575558,0.00007871893,0.0001554966,0.0002201241,0.8651285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660224,0.000748302,0.004863458,0.002747296,0.0002343825,0.00009071996,0.0000892927,0.00008751787,0.02511674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007388096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02600181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006596923","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00333.x","title":"Epistemological Metaphors and the Nature of Philosophy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Coherentism; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Metaphor; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Paul Thagard","is_ca":true},{"name":"Craig Beam","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02193853136171424,"gpt":0.2814271955218167,"spread":0.2594886641601025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006882748,0.0003746261,0.0004793378,0.003392928,0.00301332,0.007133073,0.0009378801,0.002217609,0.003494788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01151924,0.0002970279,0.0004340767,0.002914588,0.04626087,0.01318237,0.004262499,0.003911188,0.0003443842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003176661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00169638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006947175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004905174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992119,0.006035902,0.0002189699,0.0003459395,0.001045128,0.0002351214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913749,0.006322401,0.0005948668,0.0007485677,0.000661023,0.0002981973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004018771,0.000004120399,0.00008376968,0.00002738713,0.000002682384,0.0000225931,0.002329093,0.00006554548,0.00004630434,0.995364,0.0003580879,0.001692479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000738653,0.000005743979,0.0001394064,0.00005894795,0.00000196699,0.00009565742,0.00172126,0.0003892903,0.00004070053,0.9854299,0.01210599,0.000003841921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.132632,0.04877781,0.2383752,0.09697938,0.002093568,0.00009836945,0.0001787227,0.00026713,0.4805978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795058,0.002874273,0.0137576,0.001315738,0.0003141355,0.00006976751,0.00003084156,0.00003610885,0.002095726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007133073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03639984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135858668","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01716.x","title":"Minimally Creative Thought","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Novelty; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Action (physics); Creativity technique; Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognition; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Dustin Stokes","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1323051549234892,"gpt":0.350952909384375,"spread":0.2186477544608858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002538414,0.000301455,0.0003586409,0.001268381,0.001720565,0.004307722,0.0007626169,0.0009935432,0.004752578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005866303,0.0001521443,0.0006602552,0.0005760083,0.01991768,0.004335234,0.002509038,0.002347161,0.0005880315],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002166614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001038598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004472249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003508803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971703,0.001347551,0.0001224362,0.0004176654,0.0007357072,0.0002064487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966216,0.001671608,0.0003585051,0.0005701828,0.0004845192,0.0002934994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006409517,0.000002946043,0.00005606324,0.00001636804,0.000001913118,0.00001818091,0.0006361443,0.00008962699,0.000122043,0.9967427,0.0003864525,0.001921255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006797736,0.000007652498,0.00008457569,0.00001834981,0.000002328913,0.00005697904,0.0002070584,0.0004705586,0.0001105878,0.9901829,0.008848591,0.000003556245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.102767,0.00380922,0.1593749,0.01417676,0.0008583799,0.000103727,0.0001319119,0.0002920822,0.718486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705804,0.0004103149,0.01653484,0.0005797631,0.0002886329,0.00006336161,0.00004822183,0.00003790451,0.01145659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004752578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01589894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189039354","doi":"10.1111/meta.12508","title":"Two dogmas of aesthetic empiricism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hedonism; Pleasure; Appeal; Aesthetics; Aesthetic value; Philosophy; Empiricism; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Mathematics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Dominic McIver Lopes","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06425636355701177,"gpt":0.3179274221905319,"spread":0.2536710586335201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01303881,0.0003860535,0.0007527019,0.002923818,0.002996729,0.008457267,0.001538908,0.004016429,0.007223987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02096817,0.0004475496,0.0004703298,0.0007700367,0.06502583,0.009372628,0.006343131,0.007386585,0.0007072621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00471268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001637014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009173537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000757717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905052,0.005009473,0.0002874936,0.001472493,0.002134507,0.0005908535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858015,0.007920653,0.0008623617,0.002954961,0.001730898,0.0007296072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001219832,0.000008715953,0.0001520017,0.00001191387,0.000004157021,0.00002467318,0.0006686763,0.00009131188,0.00004644022,0.9966248,0.0006646204,0.001690491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009397956,0.000003959082,0.000141269,0.00001529083,0.000001333207,0.00002464025,0.0002596212,0.000443868,0.0000522094,0.9958304,0.003214656,0.000003357934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08676882,0.003181994,0.07651994,0.1381428,0.001224341,0.00007767151,0.0001090526,0.0001992751,0.6937761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881219,0.0003505986,0.004208202,0.002163253,0.0004087382,0.00006712998,0.00002470735,0.00005646386,0.004599101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01303881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06895661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493333246","doi":"10.1111/meta.12044","title":"Getting Luck Properly Under Control","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Attribution; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Analogy; Value (mathematics); Control (management); Positive economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Management; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Rachel McKinnon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0565495966401459,"gpt":0.240894962134914,"spread":0.184345365494768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007032876,0.0006322647,0.0006109437,0.001404267,0.002501873,0.008544052,0.001063241,0.002574703,0.008446449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01754066,0.0003242701,0.0005882476,0.000847412,0.03156017,0.009563481,0.004726758,0.004064783,0.0009871329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005486989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003565244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003689221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001875871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936811,0.003221135,0.0002256134,0.0009043151,0.001119021,0.0008487516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916896,0.002944816,0.001203398,0.002077461,0.001391245,0.0006935558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002411896,0.00001407598,0.001243927,0.00003533362,0.00001903753,0.000079591,0.001796626,0.001409524,0.0001453852,0.9884294,0.001081473,0.005721533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009116468,0.00001901464,0.0009229598,0.00007280586,0.00001133316,0.00004077093,0.0007001405,0.001512588,0.0002424868,0.9846831,0.01176907,0.00001670504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1451691,0.003119968,0.1541418,0.04859993,0.000679424,0.0001074679,0.0002492877,0.0003687171,0.6475643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874107,0.0003404125,0.002527696,0.001189136,0.0001099691,0.00003576948,0.00002926696,0.00007532986,0.008281738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008544052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03981113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498873853","doi":"10.1111/meta.12139","title":"Caricatures, Myths, and White Lies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Analogy; Epistemology; Period (music); Empiricism; White (mutation); Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Kirsten Walsh","is_ca":false},{"name":"Adrian Currie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1028423331531241,"gpt":0.2201854608822905,"spread":0.1173431277291664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01895089,0.0005370022,0.0005455316,0.002291703,0.007520608,0.0112258,0.001687566,0.003898863,0.002179157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02585343,0.0005057626,0.0003936024,0.001346701,0.1211764,0.01396776,0.007964297,0.009340439,0.0002960474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005330519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002909994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001616373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001378301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9824412,0.0125338,0.0004277573,0.001270252,0.002574446,0.0007525687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974428,0.01719226,0.002899046,0.002772031,0.001831907,0.0008768136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006699629,0.00001117594,0.0001868524,0.00002039809,0.000004556349,0.00006041149,0.02590769,0.0001783072,0.00005447786,0.9712036,0.0006936054,0.001672178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008187741,0.00001724833,0.0002523957,0.0001533678,0.000005741171,0.0001287807,0.02268642,0.0007097312,0.000353166,0.9492465,0.02642288,0.00001573182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3267314,0.008019447,0.08620397,0.1970552,0.001688806,0.00008497914,0.00005727739,0.0001782451,0.3799807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944065,0.0004548351,0.001972389,0.0009798357,0.000107251,0.00002032996,0.000006055374,0.00002084099,0.002031918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01895089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007195710","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01569.x","title":"MOTIVATING THE GLOBAL DEMOS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Toolbox; Global justice; Solidarity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Order (exchange); Prudence; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Realisation; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06855442791955355,"gpt":0.3597890572704313,"spread":0.2912346293508777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006709286,0.0004015264,0.0002334891,0.0007311336,0.004956412,0.005273246,0.0005102273,0.003406347,0.006980226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004046824,0.0002002751,0.0003321366,0.0003855941,0.01941972,0.004784681,0.009902415,0.003903368,0.0008628368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002485992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002199917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005440698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001354093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964025,0.002503144,0.00005855525,0.0003232102,0.0002547141,0.0004578737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978173,0.0008101495,0.0002162285,0.0002905915,0.0003169451,0.0005487826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009016659,0.00001512521,0.0004907644,0.00002062999,0.000003157616,0.00009765304,0.004368668,0.0001576221,0.0001607277,0.989727,0.002283524,0.00266608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000271685,0.00006347398,0.001410325,0.0002221474,0.00001173683,0.0002402028,0.01640211,0.0007658566,0.0006485091,0.7484458,0.2317468,0.00001593425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1025586,0.0009303192,0.0194366,0.04413419,0.0004049504,0.00006858943,0.00002983897,0.00005607734,0.8323808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977013,0.0003715032,0.003181093,0.00452486,0.00008867664,0.0000749071,0.00001562073,0.00003527495,0.01469516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006980226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03548253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910537218","doi":"10.1111/meta.12107","title":"You Make Your Own Luck","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Luck; Counterfactual thinking; Causation; Epistemology; Positive economics; Metaphysics; Psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Rachel McKinnon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08191204937160894,"gpt":0.2694806599483048,"spread":0.1875686105766959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00402978,0.0004660155,0.0003686938,0.0006302611,0.003821834,0.00714545,0.0007379755,0.002313793,0.01588701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01157813,0.0002328204,0.0003765252,0.0003575116,0.01759432,0.006529353,0.004220419,0.005226183,0.006246019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002282354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001545877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001135893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001195575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943039,0.003067156,0.0001545873,0.0005410152,0.001318281,0.0006150421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945661,0.001817188,0.0006217211,0.000829657,0.001251311,0.0009140756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004264881,0.0000525973,0.001682235,0.0001156998,0.00003300545,0.0003550142,0.01547724,0.0003202864,0.0005250731,0.8889812,0.06486145,0.02755355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147378,0.00008241547,0.00143471,0.0004459549,0.00002597516,0.000511292,0.00968514,0.0005135262,0.001344931,0.3193869,0.6664962,0.00005827425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04291331,0.00462272,0.02647395,0.1541543,0.004171531,0.0000585322,0.0001550324,0.0003340418,0.7671165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8210304,0.002142676,0.003391042,0.0190111,0.001111514,0.00006743429,0.00008290131,0.0002546213,0.1529083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01588701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05314738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955282148","doi":"10.1111/meta.12379","title":"Is Global Poverty a Philosophical Problem?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Famine; Normative; Philosophical methodology; Action (physics); Morality; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Sylvia Berryman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05556175145589243,"gpt":0.3400481132052234,"spread":0.284486361749331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00502476,0.0004565994,0.0006422116,0.001883107,0.00445356,0.005575443,0.0008607132,0.004597009,0.005668787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004307933,0.0001820015,0.0003253164,0.001548886,0.03500536,0.009937808,0.003907033,0.006502849,0.0005867833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004412867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00199049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002012677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001049744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975418,0.001686793,0.00004545968,0.0002686123,0.0003049247,0.0001525248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963577,0.002483518,0.0002195218,0.0001773024,0.0004613437,0.0003006166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006248177,0.00001327478,0.0001239417,0.00005794698,0.000004808582,0.00005291905,0.002420833,0.0001381672,0.00004739925,0.9826986,0.01175032,0.002685573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004425705,0.000005466986,0.00009899949,0.0001420206,0.00000241343,0.0000417981,0.003149318,0.0002087071,0.00003126097,0.9495536,0.04675714,0.000004881427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0137341,0.04575462,0.007364619,0.8236888,0.002174235,0.00001651437,0.00006768968,0.00002816099,0.1071713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8738447,0.02800858,0.00309872,0.07304268,0.007100638,0.00009645477,0.00006838885,0.0000747739,0.01466502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005668787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03201777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115065741","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01624.x","title":"RIGHT ACT, VIRTUOUS MOTIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Action (physics); Relation (database); Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Computer science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Hurka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05604761966791063,"gpt":0.4515562491710352,"spread":0.3955086295031246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003555961,0.0002355905,0.0002751238,0.0012049,0.002155993,0.003043701,0.0004552628,0.00232773,0.006856784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007061117,0.0001236452,0.0001857505,0.0005440263,0.01868205,0.004456204,0.00296439,0.002851953,0.0007021189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001666996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001656614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006825094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006377395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951516,0.002991206,0.0001967491,0.0004941056,0.0008555657,0.0003108127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936671,0.003619359,0.0008529217,0.0004168148,0.0007541932,0.0006896698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001968129,0.00003187808,0.0007975759,0.00005805981,0.000003113082,0.00006643417,0.002609721,0.00007838735,0.00009092536,0.988246,0.002683108,0.005314967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003194471,0.00005196315,0.002877642,0.0002280118,0.000007686949,0.0006384564,0.004672674,0.0007357841,0.0002149585,0.9199642,0.07056282,0.00001382051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.1042596,0.01076696,0.04362533,0.07716341,0.001144322,0.00007610161,0.00009216597,0.00006915617,0.762803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978928,0.001241993,0.003800861,0.002989948,0.0002655571,0.00006393454,0.00002449435,0.00001500931,0.01267021],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006856784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02293819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981549461","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00357.x","title":"THEORIZING INTERNATIONAL FAIRNESS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Mainstream; Spell; Sociology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Nancy Kokaz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01784467246631162,"gpt":0.3207035065448339,"spread":0.3028588340785223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126334,0.0004836379,0.0004739081,0.002724857,0.004083504,0.006309331,0.001627955,0.003793617,0.007693856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01337534,0.0002299671,0.0007029344,0.002096393,0.02814949,0.008177987,0.006417197,0.004063926,0.0006592014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00552982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004032553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00240043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001320183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923928,0.004109105,0.0002750758,0.0009626408,0.001595828,0.0006645896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937314,0.003474286,0.0004733718,0.001019277,0.0009903481,0.0003112893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001098287,0.000003002489,0.00007818214,0.000007320432,0.000001653724,0.000007439195,0.0005507998,0.0002426868,0.00001005853,0.9978655,0.0003111003,0.0009211142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003898359,0.000002864113,0.00007071189,0.00004433777,0.000003337491,0.00001382654,0.0003705748,0.0005359867,0.00004152203,0.9900575,0.00885354,0.000001917534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0346662,0.00310358,0.1614889,0.03937856,0.0005799064,0.00009586183,0.00008497984,0.0001032198,0.7604988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686152,0.001141866,0.01326003,0.002586798,0.0004162508,0.0002062836,0.00007437835,0.00006796276,0.01363125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06681257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322233634","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01714.x","title":"Distant Peers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Mark Vorobej","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2338974441778215,"gpt":0.2480571472949604,"spread":0.01415970311713891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004610625,0.0005063497,0.0005232024,0.001294525,0.005214913,0.007520593,0.001681378,0.004197625,0.03618025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01861354,0.0002708849,0.0003659769,0.0007281979,0.0147016,0.01064986,0.007703563,0.003911196,0.003990555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003063242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001530621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001688996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001174376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906009,0.004826348,0.0002611773,0.001730398,0.001908382,0.0006726513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898608,0.003811895,0.001110014,0.001511236,0.001954993,0.001751033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002852221,0.00002332657,0.0005560326,0.00006023313,0.00001506177,0.0003178209,0.004959811,0.0003132804,0.0003357524,0.9760558,0.006558126,0.01077628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002658611,0.00003983109,0.0005525558,0.0001448695,0.00001782667,0.000367946,0.007374345,0.001148576,0.0004453719,0.8533675,0.1364853,0.00002917765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04844198,0.002589282,0.06203191,0.05512324,0.001164018,0.0001465906,0.0001205538,0.0002214322,0.830161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387935,0.0008855129,0.005450029,0.005128243,0.0005004201,0.0000643416,0.00005877267,0.00009429629,0.04902482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03618025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975334706","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00205","title":"Does Philosophy of Action Rest on a Mistake?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Foundationalism; Epistemology; Rest (music); Action (physics); Action theory (sociology); Task (project management); Philosophy; Pragmatism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Sneddon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1123893339424616,"gpt":0.2935694555709934,"spread":0.1811801216285318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01466042,0.0008396019,0.001780383,0.001662065,0.005796901,0.007775678,0.00335046,0.009361677,0.007642712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02292677,0.0006202056,0.00111029,0.001321829,0.07037672,0.03070925,0.007228698,0.01697357,0.003891956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004340665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00386331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003097219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002637885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917129,0.003601634,0.0003875713,0.001426534,0.002342892,0.0005284837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849117,0.008960698,0.0007773949,0.002336848,0.001832578,0.001180885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001872833,0.00001341109,0.0001532074,0.00007203465,0.00001346519,0.00004175432,0.001735047,0.00009990325,0.00004686763,0.9756864,0.01527569,0.006843625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001064135,0.00001113989,0.0001192064,0.00008696635,0.000003128632,0.00006239983,0.0009662812,0.0002151102,0.00003112854,0.9642691,0.03421429,0.00001052997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006859123,0.013507,0.04753543,0.8488248,0.009123027,0.00002872751,0.00009756969,0.0002448683,0.07377951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.637187,0.01826826,0.03443357,0.2532589,0.01813055,0.0003075057,0.0001569685,0.0006975903,0.03755961],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01466042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07753265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782079141","doi":"10.1111/meta.12279","title":"Show Me the Argument: Empirically Testing the Armchair Philosophy Picture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inductive reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Point (geometry); Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Zoe Ashton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Moti Mizrahi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1492556079415219,"gpt":0.2848046365637626,"spread":0.1355490286222408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04163465,0.0003864287,0.000925582,0.005391352,0.002328675,0.006140036,0.00214309,0.003628804,0.009148989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2856555,0.0004634004,0.0004630772,0.007354977,0.006145037,0.01440904,0.004950029,0.004691385,0.001916002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00170855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001497925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001080255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000870387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9601029,0.02653722,0.002392197,0.003400784,0.00641838,0.001148469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4571425,0.4491956,0.04052276,0.01757867,0.03225377,0.003306796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006391391,0.006917684,0.4299551,0.003038997,0.001179842,0.002421562,0.1922219,0.004289144,0.007466117,0.2107876,0.01014378,0.1251868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001195845,0.007800373,0.4111376,0.003011019,0.001760238,0.001470397,0.2418822,0.02646528,0.01211759,0.1889267,0.1038547,0.0003780242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647338,0.0009110334,0.005170366,0.003549825,0.0001188681,0.0002542314,0.0002880415,0.00003346103,0.02494043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956618,0.0002337805,0.002297543,0.0004373368,0.000062738,0.00025137,0.0002149425,0.00002083683,0.0008195339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04163465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2201877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787680258","doi":"10.1111/meta.12194","title":"Truth Analysis of the Gettier Argument","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Scrutiny; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Construct (python library); Analytic philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Contemporary philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Yussif Yakubu","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06180871193112166,"gpt":0.2495694578540717,"spread":0.1877607459229501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01264147,0.0006462307,0.0008961086,0.004909224,0.004081575,0.006003724,0.001965692,0.00561439,0.01723123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03804509,0.000556992,0.002013033,0.002468159,0.0214164,0.01277698,0.007919391,0.005610116,0.001087019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004253924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001253246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001121228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008259353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9858655,0.006871851,0.0005853943,0.001866721,0.003927819,0.0008828037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716406,0.02017986,0.001133387,0.002984408,0.003522319,0.0005393803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008018831,0.000003990463,0.00005018021,0.00001620292,0.000006636848,0.00003560876,0.0003283765,0.0001317865,0.00004743424,0.9976483,0.0006412392,0.001082215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006873787,0.000005769599,0.0000604298,0.00002715205,0.000008844882,0.00003476966,0.0001584731,0.00144731,0.0002344718,0.9933249,0.004685183,0.000005690608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06918578,0.003114004,0.3411075,0.04904042,0.001840596,0.0001585075,0.0002724315,0.0004602802,0.5348205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957053,0.0004347484,0.02574314,0.003693589,0.0005825069,0.00009386329,0.00008800688,0.0001340336,0.01217698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01723123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06685525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130217881","doi":"10.1111/meta.12089","title":"Whole Lives and Good Deaths","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Currency; Value of life; Meaning of life; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Kathy Behrendt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02663642335183479,"gpt":0.2185802447526135,"spread":0.1919438214007786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003568467,0.0003103607,0.0004422315,0.001009075,0.007161076,0.007217895,0.0007161276,0.001847749,0.01736636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006272541,0.000181857,0.0003062113,0.0005036094,0.03063441,0.007316463,0.007852816,0.003760655,0.00129939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002367288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002095616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001614902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002893743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963177,0.00244842,0.0000610611,0.0002755858,0.0003764871,0.0005207303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967878,0.001251511,0.0003273007,0.0004510572,0.0003755263,0.0008068842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002357331,0.00001551499,0.0003511097,0.00004426745,0.000006811201,0.0001341485,0.03366106,0.00009483597,0.00004149102,0.9463099,0.01117292,0.008144299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001528065,0.00004112074,0.0008946097,0.0003425269,0.00001261343,0.0004270715,0.07129061,0.0001322417,0.0002713242,0.4977234,0.4288261,0.00002319704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06882091,0.007637697,0.00818063,0.07212453,0.00171604,0.00005387248,0.0001656369,0.000112048,0.8411887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410174,0.001585225,0.0009985263,0.003664384,0.0002532357,0.00002878745,0.00005368519,0.00005115959,0.05234757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01736636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05809623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022064695","doi":"10.1111/meta.12408","title":"CARTESIAN PHILOSOPHY AS SPIRITUAL PRACTICE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Epistemology; Cartesianism; Philosophy; Analogy; Cartesian coordinate system; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Joseph I. Breidenstein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07732346710249455,"gpt":0.2499078683256589,"spread":0.1725844012231644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004965239,0.0003612032,0.0003954359,0.001054094,0.003805009,0.005568866,0.0005754738,0.002088448,0.002884657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004479319,0.0001879728,0.0002931796,0.0007744336,0.06861187,0.005050297,0.004564757,0.003885257,0.0005047156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004030133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00318137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002390338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001398386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948046,0.004129347,0.0001264029,0.000313312,0.000451988,0.0001744199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966447,0.001845166,0.0003197122,0.0004481807,0.0004951587,0.0002470052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001403882,0.000001515379,0.00002464249,0.000009900809,4.881232e-7,0.00001115173,0.002251484,0.0000302092,0.00002424946,0.9967076,0.0003375901,0.0005996955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007261019,0.00001490948,0.0001237574,0.00008530758,0.000002400915,0.00006198901,0.002592352,0.0002329927,0.00008896875,0.9335066,0.06327968,0.000003788258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04802582,0.01815683,0.05274776,0.07903131,0.001328656,0.00005545763,0.000039239,0.0001126296,0.8005024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665133,0.00357651,0.008411791,0.00258958,0.0005495665,0.00008372822,0.000017845,0.00004394635,0.01821367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005568866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02924085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400609253","doi":"10.1111/meta.12695","title":"Beyond gatekeeping: Philosophical sources, Indigenous philosophy, and the Huarochirí Manuscript","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophical methodology; Epistemology; Philosophical theory; Indigenous; Section (typography); Philosophical analysis; Field (mathematics); Philosophy; Western philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Jorge H. Sanchez-Perez","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0100384226249112,"gpt":0.2110709832786071,"spread":0.2010325606536959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008351422,0.0003767276,0.0005019921,0.002876165,0.006180108,0.009853261,0.00116039,0.001691184,0.004659058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01685259,0.0002044049,0.000218906,0.002879349,0.02154752,0.006992307,0.004276718,0.003618361,0.0004576761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004713875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00613852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003062319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003982258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960394,0.002479162,0.0001603371,0.0002619113,0.0008217505,0.0002375072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853321,0.009599999,0.001127088,0.001182293,0.002204697,0.0005538291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001903399,0.00001627485,0.0004886842,0.0001988663,0.000006771864,0.0003525862,0.09050782,0.0001028943,0.0001968638,0.8876937,0.006873867,0.01354262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002179572,0.00003676658,0.001559253,0.00171116,0.00002065241,0.0004564912,0.08729574,0.0005473588,0.0009721117,0.3666598,0.5406674,0.00005151305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09847541,0.02754548,0.03755474,0.1404784,0.007319754,0.0001650001,0.0002378926,0.0002699141,0.6879534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582858,0.005850971,0.006840954,0.003056456,0.001716464,0.0001110813,0.00006005944,0.0001496228,0.02392849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009853261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04416704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212931209","doi":"10.1111/meta.12542","title":"Grounding interventionism: Conceptual and epistemological challenges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Interventionism (politics); Epistemology; Causation; Counterfactual thinking; Impossibility; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Ground; Political science; Law; International relations; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Amanda Bryant","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2060862247704341,"gpt":0.275872038539246,"spread":0.06978581376881188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06571873,0.001383627,0.003429599,0.005636719,0.007230593,0.01571112,0.008424441,0.01190904,0.006206187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06051659,0.001394345,0.002181849,0.004080726,0.1248213,0.04066285,0.01466705,0.02085207,0.0007423416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01080578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009782421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003079923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002110553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9525157,0.03201274,0.001726111,0.00535745,0.006731898,0.001656138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8597179,0.1175355,0.005091129,0.01041157,0.005355022,0.001888865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003291385,0.000007152338,0.00003174913,0.00003067401,0.000003521543,0.000007154644,0.0004762329,0.0002015767,0.000006828194,0.9972885,0.0001972707,0.001746189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005226243,0.000002369937,0.00001323858,0.00003246994,0.000001226539,0.000005091184,0.0002925032,0.0003424848,0.00001482944,0.9976146,0.001672438,0.000003501049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02550438,0.02463368,0.4741292,0.3925313,0.001382512,0.0001363998,0.0001915338,0.0002720566,0.08121897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8684044,0.008572266,0.1045892,0.01131757,0.002500473,0.0006991156,0.0001362116,0.0002176126,0.003563141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06571873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.347558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322504453","doi":"10.1111/meta.12615","title":"On the inseparability of reasoning and virtue: Madame de Maintenon's Maison royale de <scp>Saint‐Louis</scp>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; Mores; Virtue; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Curriculum; Set (abstract data type); Aesthetics; Art history; Pedagogy; Art; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Shapiro","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02574200678598042,"gpt":0.2722498311184368,"spread":0.2465078243324563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002519241,0.0002562624,0.0002844458,0.0005095226,0.01237196,0.003974081,0.0005832835,0.001552789,0.008119009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002091753,0.0002829865,0.0001495375,0.0003169571,0.01233382,0.001505138,0.002626359,0.004181291,0.0005781799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01266563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004299467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1701126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4213562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982887,0.001008763,0.00002093113,0.0002004346,0.000219857,0.0002613956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982241,0.001071698,0.0001386862,0.00007281527,0.0002160599,0.0002767299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001040594,0.00007444256,0.003038604,0.00007798627,0.00001388039,0.001674543,0.2443731,0.000342833,0.001098188,0.667145,0.05424655,0.02781077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001359683,0.00005389464,0.007813348,0.0001375009,0.000005990543,0.0004817923,0.03062254,0.0003439391,0.0008749979,0.02242994,0.9371879,0.00003453526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.35128,0.01207705,0.001713077,0.1260146,0.0007305825,0.00004344657,0.00009039701,0.00007781896,0.5079729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8881509,0.0008288076,0.0003867296,0.002075644,0.0001029522,0.00000901556,0.00001012799,0.0000437107,0.1083922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1701126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3382449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549944756","doi":"10.1111/meta.12165","title":"Overcoming Instructor‐Originated Math Anxiety in Philosophy Students: A Consideration of Proven Techniques for Students Taking Formal Logic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Education, Achievement, and Giftedness","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Anxiety; Mathematics education; Apprehension; Mathematical anxiety; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology","authors":[{"name":"Brian MacPherson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05383977275878466,"gpt":0.3971402323379571,"spread":0.3433004595791724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005377791,0.0003177374,0.0003834824,0.0009700846,0.001623511,0.002671302,0.001455048,0.0007975271,0.00258307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0173047,0.0001820527,0.0004594907,0.0003874663,0.002014094,0.00181783,0.002036898,0.001890049,0.0002195703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001048785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003827133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007977643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003360989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972343,0.00153675,0.00008516724,0.0001066104,0.0007844183,0.000252844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906907,0.006514288,0.0006807761,0.0003691256,0.0006073362,0.001137826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004841629,0.01216532,0.03588893,0.001051124,0.00006632959,0.001433973,0.06849386,0.001153194,0.008121886,0.02274918,0.003922453,0.8444698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002041233,0.03657581,0.2276657,0.003464121,0.001030331,0.009476234,0.3753187,0.03877936,0.03317919,0.09410468,0.1778408,0.0005238082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9610987,0.001305704,0.01770406,0.007576399,0.00009956058,0.0002118835,0.00000895134,0.0001719203,0.01182282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790933,0.001018386,0.0175152,0.0003896616,0.00003804622,0.0001151519,0.000009455191,0.00002435306,0.001796413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005377791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02844077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400588946","doi":"10.1111/meta.12699","title":"Aristotle's tyche (τύχη) and contemporary debates about luck","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Existentialism; Scope (computer science); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Louis Groarke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05645477353636011,"gpt":0.2458058950611083,"spread":0.1893511215247482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002791786,0.00033824,0.0004324243,0.001661442,0.004367372,0.005334682,0.0005565513,0.003041657,0.002762896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00317758,0.0002013308,0.000237412,0.001351954,0.03983866,0.005369824,0.001993421,0.00409557,0.0004182212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007215022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001972269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005645599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00535261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983753,0.000913561,0.00004001954,0.0001773848,0.0003405927,0.0001531657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984145,0.001069893,0.0001091075,0.0001216222,0.0002020896,0.00008276357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006110077,0.000002149936,0.00002552624,0.000009289774,8.493358e-7,0.00001776678,0.002112638,0.00007910319,0.00001895121,0.9960256,0.0007719329,0.0009300634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005637542,0.000006289157,0.0001780053,0.00007947393,0.000001642046,0.00002356506,0.00155221,0.0001851859,0.00005101274,0.9596633,0.03824582,0.000007825281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.08519873,0.03221796,0.02381948,0.109042,0.001320267,0.00002465361,0.0001148255,0.00008572437,0.7481765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798704,0.003219375,0.001286351,0.003038542,0.0004121713,0.0000192529,0.00001895378,0.00002679828,0.01210801],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007215022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05234891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1701715910","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01708.x","title":"AN ARCHIMEDEAN POINT FOR PHILOSOPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Skepticism; Philosophy; Linguistics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"S. Ranganathan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2204650754327842,"gpt":0.292120796015897,"spread":0.07165572058311281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004449995,0.0004660311,0.0003915332,0.001444483,0.0043077,0.005794915,0.001147862,0.003169325,0.005774878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003808888,0.000217632,0.0005171802,0.000947712,0.03717909,0.007657551,0.003498917,0.006512875,0.001402554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005235356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002884062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001495849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001014324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969664,0.001693628,0.0001019688,0.0004510893,0.0006416877,0.0001451859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977129,0.001104591,0.0001608175,0.0003877008,0.0004593752,0.0001747404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002296909,0.000002520545,0.00001371005,0.000008080094,6.298021e-7,0.000005913163,0.0003675074,0.00002911236,0.00001788525,0.9981055,0.0008763819,0.0005704608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004888347,0.000004293774,0.00003276563,0.00003298711,0.000001403298,0.00001951109,0.0002448108,0.0001616962,0.00005270858,0.9699301,0.02951259,0.000002199435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02036314,0.01009743,0.1126093,0.1836193,0.003366729,0.00008220544,0.000247687,0.0001958698,0.6694183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8499544,0.004396532,0.04230482,0.02421783,0.00353326,0.000462756,0.0001569334,0.0001808529,0.07479274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005794915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03798538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044010586","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2007.00508.x","title":"THE COMMUNITY VIEW REVISITED","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Ottawa; City University of New York","keywords":"Epistemology; Key (lock); Content (measure theory); Reflexive pronoun; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Claudine Verheggen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0687676447740696,"gpt":0.2672389219329435,"spread":0.1984712771588739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006025309,0.0004754571,0.0006560748,0.004370125,0.01408192,0.01376946,0.002807652,0.01043974,0.02154609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120614,0.000272801,0.0006295764,0.003460645,0.03510524,0.01918542,0.008793361,0.008448291,0.001781065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01116378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006506529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02023509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01539334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936618,0.002849387,0.00009086943,0.0009860261,0.001446374,0.0009656125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914421,0.003855673,0.0005436906,0.0007297976,0.00158476,0.001843874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004290572,0.000004523443,0.00006913579,0.0000139271,0.000001838156,0.00003594216,0.001681917,0.00005095041,0.00001217393,0.9903908,0.00611205,0.001622632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002763009,0.000007627788,0.000200112,0.0001419258,0.000007403033,0.0001229343,0.00418325,0.0005504285,0.00005218009,0.8600075,0.1346888,0.0000103554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0270216,0.006746717,0.01022743,0.2366569,0.00131056,0.00003843086,0.0001365313,0.00009165642,0.7177702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362496,0.002680029,0.001380037,0.01979128,0.002138969,0.00007951348,0.00008734664,0.0001355222,0.03745775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02154609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08099931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023683608","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2007.00515.x","title":"PHILOSOPHY, MYTH, AND THE “SIGNIFICANCE” OF SPECULATIVE THOUGHT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Parallels; Mythology; Philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Relation (database); Similarity (geometry); Metaphysics; Western philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Philip Rose","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01700582519115804,"gpt":0.2155681305002931,"spread":0.198562305309135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008128795,0.0003482415,0.0003452651,0.001703372,0.003733203,0.008384782,0.0008096255,0.001918528,0.002362833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009150083,0.0002511374,0.0003574598,0.001350803,0.06016785,0.006647857,0.003798019,0.004228306,0.0002431948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004485075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003653747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001117819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007958376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949813,0.00387515,0.0001017891,0.0002893546,0.0005184907,0.0002339907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908111,0.00682027,0.0006595872,0.0007408212,0.0006902762,0.0002779551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007563761,0.000004329751,0.0001869504,0.00003132435,0.000003062679,0.00002427667,0.004768642,0.0001386691,0.00008626796,0.9926202,0.0005764024,0.001552247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001024135,0.00001439821,0.0003884168,0.0001191625,0.000005515887,0.00007408078,0.003674785,0.0008817582,0.0002413972,0.9680154,0.02656756,0.000007256445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2124646,0.02553689,0.1404155,0.1888134,0.001738126,0.0001117295,0.00010479,0.0001810861,0.4306339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888005,0.001741994,0.004363743,0.001222667,0.0002958571,0.00003587443,0.00001616925,0.00002893578,0.003494161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008384782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04298967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091068716","doi":"10.1111/meta.12458","title":"Argumentation, Adversariality, and Social Norms","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Politeness; Adversary; Sociology; Faith; Argumentative; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Audrey Yap","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.104790184121411,"gpt":0.3270651986978478,"spread":0.2222750145764368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02945564,0.0005141167,0.0005652716,0.002911104,0.005400969,0.008873657,0.001808857,0.003977792,0.003048867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03487241,0.0003151294,0.0004075314,0.001307669,0.07018663,0.007620561,0.007126059,0.002746738,0.0002387413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004668487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002462186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001197657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007596275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9574667,0.0349596,0.0009385477,0.002349837,0.003451583,0.0008337424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9299933,0.05528339,0.006084572,0.003116547,0.003724589,0.001797658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006311094,0.00001132664,0.0002997628,0.00001523149,0.000004593284,0.000032721,0.006012463,0.0002011597,0.00006355085,0.9913557,0.0003035979,0.001693661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001249638,0.00001101543,0.0002373279,0.0000644464,0.000003863721,0.00004606761,0.003410955,0.000763602,0.0001409564,0.9819852,0.01331389,0.00001025465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2690663,0.004309216,0.1233926,0.08462732,0.0005171501,0.0001247639,0.00008323597,0.0001728841,0.5177065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948767,0.0002430149,0.002818044,0.000499646,0.00007792813,0.00004039983,0.000007791241,0.00001352872,0.001422886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02945564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1557782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240850837","doi":"10.1111/meta.12153","title":"Self‐Images and “Perspicuous Representations”: Reflection, Philosophy, and the Glass Mirror","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Metaphor; Ambiguity; Philosophy; Reading (process); Sociology; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Anna Mudde","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06760753610240872,"gpt":0.2688825650240173,"spread":0.2012750289216085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003676505,0.0002831884,0.0002352381,0.00100516,0.003460458,0.007240872,0.0007291141,0.00220383,0.002517849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00428844,0.0002279448,0.0002453901,0.0007106693,0.04757423,0.008066157,0.005935626,0.002689192,0.0002078336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002665934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001394166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001807179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001241172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997368,0.001907865,0.00004695793,0.0001712367,0.0003037436,0.0002020894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983106,0.0009254481,0.0002276272,0.000280691,0.0001264997,0.0001290868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000187961,0.0000147431,0.0003024458,0.00002490435,0.000004230173,0.000146675,0.1111274,0.0001186941,0.0003142524,0.880563,0.0009940348,0.006371003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002968128,0.00008695423,0.001820752,0.000252601,0.00001489372,0.000657922,0.1540321,0.001383278,0.001424027,0.7394322,0.1008273,0.00003842872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4603861,0.007636502,0.04613567,0.04278215,0.0005538129,0.00004428157,0.00004021303,0.0001860343,0.4422352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950386,0.0004309432,0.0008754267,0.000264672,0.00002995784,0.000006973545,0.000003233217,0.00001638933,0.003333839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007240872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01944345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100281699","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00442.x","title":"ACKNOWLEDGING AND RECTIFYING THE GENOCIDE OF AMERICAN INDIANS: “WHY IS IT THAT THEY CARRY THEIR LIVES ON THEIR FINGERNAILS?”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Apache (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Demise; Redress; Phenomenon; Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"William Bradford","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06288955979326025,"gpt":0.2279852917746949,"spread":0.1650957319814347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00436266,0.0002859612,0.0002390743,0.0006752177,0.01975138,0.008300669,0.00104466,0.003251579,0.001829781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004393281,0.0002008249,0.0001871666,0.0006196246,0.04803514,0.004056083,0.005060968,0.007667543,0.0002430972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004162404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005944788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0324125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05143048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979593,0.001029915,0.00003614516,0.0001468569,0.0001953492,0.0006325234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998478,0.000500222,0.00031975,0.0001567658,0.0002794577,0.0002658723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002252348,0.00003762632,0.002482737,0.00003752194,0.000008207484,0.0004905332,0.6127448,0.00009339054,0.0005828818,0.3680422,0.007318422,0.008139168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007198348,0.00003065117,0.00410839,0.0001362752,0.0000187918,0.000429313,0.7695233,0.0002541829,0.0007322579,0.04320488,0.1815145,0.00004029443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5580249,0.003523391,0.003502412,0.1521261,0.001513215,0.0000369312,0.00002371526,0.00005997715,0.2811893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909931,0.0004621183,0.0002649582,0.003920098,0.0001578227,0.000007496035,0.000004374321,0.000009669288,0.004180369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0324125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0644477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060937840","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00159","title":"Bernard Gert's Moral System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Queen (butterfly); Bond; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Library science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"E. J. Bond","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03516350569316903,"gpt":0.1982966613331263,"spread":0.1631331556399573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001923031,0.00050004,0.0004738753,0.00104211,0.003602133,0.00392062,0.0008533563,0.004581128,0.007195927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003520547,0.0002422594,0.0003546621,0.0007364419,0.01541172,0.004534469,0.002131224,0.004782786,0.001208545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003415127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001245659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003803939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002998612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985177,0.0008915451,0.00003258051,0.0001932314,0.0002059841,0.000158944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993064,0.0003588349,0.00004599731,0.0001201436,0.00009867638,0.00006995902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001718452,0.00000139986,0.000008527816,0.00000315337,7.144142e-7,0.000005104424,0.0001582238,0.00003581167,0.000006545603,0.996207,0.003042075,0.0005296095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006082959,0.000002356514,0.00003310241,0.00001211451,0.000001081324,0.00001703512,0.00009224008,0.0001018307,0.00002440639,0.9603608,0.03934556,0.000003257911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01070934,0.01470874,0.01586005,0.09228523,0.002371059,0.00002752817,0.00009330342,0.00008777551,0.8638569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8115295,0.003894366,0.005627731,0.01295177,0.002371797,0.00008578057,0.00005363518,0.0001312144,0.1633542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007195927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02477854,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581973813","doi":"10.1111/meta.12042","title":"In Defense of Anti‐Archimedean Moral Realism: A Response to Recent Critics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Moral realism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Realism; Moral psychology","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Clipsham","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05617317438031854,"gpt":0.2628304541698182,"spread":0.2066572797894996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04168954,0.0005425861,0.001180103,0.002691582,0.007787836,0.01289477,0.003928212,0.02379378,0.002697254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07897235,0.0005104044,0.0007966506,0.001894847,0.04902275,0.01462809,0.006917593,0.03867516,0.0007740411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008760547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004796705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003715766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00333148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9698592,0.0190368,0.0008490033,0.002859078,0.00631334,0.00108257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9196477,0.06481574,0.002435558,0.003554929,0.007951102,0.001595021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003155147,0.00001730593,0.0001852408,0.00007002577,0.00001095192,0.00007036772,0.003828121,0.0001970984,0.0000732297,0.9270382,0.06264231,0.005835509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003865307,0.00002252258,0.0003414245,0.0004892926,0.00001605494,0.0001172737,0.003631595,0.001431689,0.0002647245,0.7691483,0.2244564,0.00004202996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002906961,0.004163356,0.002001663,0.9729297,0.002982439,0.000005633723,0.000008036626,0.00002605496,0.01497603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5357777,0.007383212,0.004490414,0.4161356,0.01993981,0.0001351959,0.00003373411,0.0002619484,0.01584246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04168954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2204779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387705551","doi":"10.1111/meta.12660","title":"Comparing language and religion in normative arguments about linguistic justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Economic Justice; Sociology; Scrutiny; Epistemology; Linguistics; Liberalism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"François Boucher","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07777898570228699,"gpt":0.3675755433115601,"spread":0.2897965576092731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02831647,0.0005205168,0.001133593,0.003989386,0.01016518,0.01323223,0.002507091,0.01133707,0.005919916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049036,0.0004207099,0.0007969501,0.002263524,0.0669089,0.0124901,0.009536938,0.009319126,0.0004088257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008159691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003290914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003488109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00243053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9662547,0.02425302,0.0007139069,0.002166017,0.004394257,0.002218117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938814,0.04911689,0.00390875,0.002377413,0.004034566,0.001748379],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008567458,0.00001025474,0.0001104524,0.000009399619,0.000003987198,0.00002610587,0.001033992,0.00009182827,0.0000269798,0.9978576,0.0003628882,0.0004579596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001303847,0.000006181402,0.0001750217,0.00004441341,0.000004707597,0.00001353794,0.001037682,0.0004099071,0.00006785036,0.9948916,0.003327797,0.00000825497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1447448,0.004249289,0.03946381,0.2821705,0.001072452,0.0000671642,0.0001058205,0.00006510933,0.5280611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990404,0.000362083,0.001261615,0.005079066,0.0005152434,0.00005453461,0.00001308542,0.00002104438,0.002289256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02831647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1497536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552006455","doi":"10.1111/meta.12202","title":"Intentionality and Content in McDowell","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Presupposition; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Relation (database); Perspective (graphical); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Patrice Philie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1401301970339726,"gpt":0.2262766479084287,"spread":0.0861464508744561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00321935,0.0003720001,0.0003667166,0.002867464,0.004529763,0.007342048,0.001121812,0.002065446,0.004673533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006692819,0.0003265394,0.0003780707,0.001764356,0.03536729,0.009171962,0.005708313,0.002330164,0.0003358946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008105365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002996642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008194554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005512227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972235,0.001233994,0.0001532487,0.0005221604,0.0005892779,0.0002778319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964991,0.001930024,0.0002931441,0.0004049472,0.0006167275,0.000255994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002608767,0.000001835602,0.00004751357,0.000007023212,7.723599e-7,0.00001579842,0.001533797,0.00002691107,0.00003693563,0.997363,0.0002048338,0.0007589863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006554888,0.000005191281,0.0001146375,0.00003563275,0.000004602068,0.00003894367,0.00121127,0.0002643673,0.0002113412,0.976097,0.02200422,0.000006150288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1121871,0.004437279,0.08383494,0.02596164,0.0003861547,0.0001185813,0.0001454514,0.0001796219,0.7727492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782462,0.0004370585,0.008339711,0.000949788,0.0001087767,0.0000606579,0.00003186336,0.00004443942,0.01178135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008194554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0588088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200912703","doi":"10.1111/meta.12160","title":"Getting off the Wheel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Attribution; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Bondy","is_ca":true},{"name":"Dustin Olson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1767834611782031,"gpt":0.2826089073597272,"spread":0.1058254461815241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01790024,0.0006389911,0.0009780476,0.003546522,0.006666395,0.01308315,0.001744245,0.006375709,0.011784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02982866,0.0005532622,0.0006934217,0.001614502,0.04975728,0.03125609,0.008387601,0.01667344,0.003127688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008022427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007037523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005476344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00415302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877908,0.0074407,0.0002802582,0.001005322,0.002808409,0.0006744863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981045,0.01169408,0.0005529585,0.002702011,0.002898952,0.001106958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000762633,0.000008487696,0.00005700019,0.00002732514,0.000003709641,0.00001743706,0.001319199,0.0001190675,0.00002692881,0.9798957,0.01409922,0.004418286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004191165,0.000004574605,0.0000479674,0.00012121,0.000002663541,0.00002316948,0.001061494,0.0003079815,0.00008116202,0.9353112,0.06302702,0.000007312666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00919766,0.01383337,0.05894206,0.7066808,0.006016684,0.00003971044,0.0001400845,0.0003422328,0.2048074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7900761,0.01394589,0.02977309,0.07349889,0.007080673,0.0002650827,0.0001748072,0.0008356735,0.08434991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01790024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09466666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792728632","doi":"10.1111/meta.12203","title":"The Challenges of Extreme Moral Stress: Claudia Card's Contributions to the Formation of Nonideal Ethical Theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical theory; Ethical theories; Sociology; Epistemology; Ethical issues; Normative ethics; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Engineering ethics","authors":[{"name":"Kathryn J. Norlock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1488039399552981,"gpt":0.448384150467472,"spread":0.2995802105121739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02094942,0.0005737799,0.0006569257,0.002790202,0.0113799,0.01554972,0.002458812,0.005893144,0.002495932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03385307,0.0005069881,0.0004254212,0.001402427,0.09630467,0.01218868,0.01115701,0.01164803,0.0003467053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01267211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00979502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005254882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003983201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9737657,0.01924579,0.0005925414,0.001281066,0.003697005,0.00141787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664945,0.02393527,0.001653812,0.00173331,0.003800704,0.002382417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006549224,0.00001175765,0.0001485739,0.00001961758,0.000001281002,0.00005518111,0.006749128,0.00011767,0.00001230479,0.9875008,0.003180805,0.002196203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001658726,0.00001538533,0.000233295,0.0001509211,0.000003108757,0.0001552422,0.008768,0.000870148,0.00007419005,0.9027187,0.08696656,0.00002778669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06036227,0.009737566,0.0555923,0.4688951,0.003587806,0.000176974,0.0000357284,0.00007552033,0.4015367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633847,0.002077725,0.008172412,0.01394068,0.0007228795,0.0001783872,0.0000107839,0.00003074684,0.01148164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02094942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1107925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105991975","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2010.01636.x","title":"Mental Causation: The Mind‐Body Problem. By Anthony Dardis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Citation; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Computer science; Metaphysics","authors":[{"name":"Holly Andersen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03561263157694707,"gpt":0.2596950115166866,"spread":0.2240823799397396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002686049,0.001156188,0.001264808,0.001834264,0.002956819,0.004571887,0.001248843,0.005185404,0.004112462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00844736,0.0008409815,0.000554189,0.001918931,0.01358321,0.009598172,0.003270216,0.01352997,0.00133904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002111564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001900069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004243488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003768783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988996,0.0005850667,0.00004848111,0.000177944,0.0002336754,0.00005532099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942714,0.005017941,0.0001586959,0.0001058681,0.0002643613,0.0001818331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004480343,0.00002370771,0.0002130658,0.000335772,0.0000288752,0.0001813838,0.00242588,0.0004071973,0.00009421086,0.5510948,0.4165414,0.02860892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002274934,0.00001274534,0.0003955527,0.0006859376,0.00001183741,0.0003318656,0.001139558,0.0005997327,0.00008058361,0.5893241,0.4073718,0.0000235955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001283819,0.3701626,0.003120397,0.5824707,0.01525482,0.00001443756,0.00007186985,0.00003535633,0.02758601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1946688,0.4534685,0.007634323,0.1813552,0.07792796,0.0002594184,0.0001858567,0.0002093936,0.08429052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005185404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0153206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391816761","doi":"10.1111/meta.12667","title":"Academic hoaxes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hoax; Dimension (graph theory); sort; Work (physics); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Sneddon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04639697067024791,"gpt":0.3922087045427637,"spread":0.3458117338725158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01072551,0.0006130642,0.0005995878,0.002538068,0.007015984,0.009184668,0.001695569,0.002552235,0.02627567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05224432,0.000401862,0.0004026612,0.002678773,0.01039562,0.01564573,0.01108325,0.003888497,0.005909598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002017378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00115445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001352712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9846618,0.00825397,0.0007233316,0.001268614,0.003525101,0.001567202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9247878,0.02571512,0.01211511,0.01423441,0.01260291,0.0105447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005574399,0.0002981043,0.02301741,0.0009675659,0.00008011205,0.001295086,0.09336775,0.0005596318,0.002721369,0.4796734,0.09403066,0.3034315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003672067,0.0001784905,0.01834613,0.001048772,0.00003594527,0.00128243,0.0809987,0.0006512831,0.002502335,0.150346,0.7444469,0.0001262398],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3061376,0.008229755,0.02446952,0.05551859,0.001960389,0.0001957602,0.0003766944,0.001727513,0.6013842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403388,0.001566024,0.002919245,0.002717821,0.0004249907,0.00008923151,0.0001596047,0.0002902591,0.05149411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08790088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578690651","doi":"10.1111/meta.12201","title":"The <i>Salto Vitale</i> Method in Philosophy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology; Certainty; Analytic philosophy; Contemporary philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Goldstick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04318139815212278,"gpt":0.381389226843338,"spread":0.3382078286912152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006896944,0.0004974455,0.0006516529,0.002315986,0.002207683,0.004357277,0.001270093,0.001846568,0.009251328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01024045,0.0004437657,0.001106061,0.001159573,0.01937112,0.006194513,0.003593109,0.00544023,0.002726022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003703697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002534963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002436687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002278664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955237,0.003099188,0.0001613215,0.0004323083,0.0006764732,0.0001071218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934245,0.004529736,0.0001956173,0.001027055,0.0006323499,0.0001906506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001170518,0.000007875356,0.0001050219,0.00006791989,0.00001043324,0.00001935174,0.0002830875,0.0001477541,0.0001306294,0.9715336,0.01769055,0.009992045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001725066,0.00001149495,0.0001411414,0.0001785919,0.000006387123,0.00005159388,0.00006420227,0.0006854593,0.0002377257,0.8750099,0.1235812,0.0000150733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006632475,0.03110031,0.3873756,0.1851371,0.0109672,0.0002149643,0.0005295197,0.0008134602,0.3772295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5515485,0.01656279,0.2715451,0.03213296,0.01304936,0.00117487,0.0003801574,0.001578563,0.1120276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009251328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03647494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911258360","doi":"10.1111/meta.12344","title":"Well‐Being Blindness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Blindness; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Sneddon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08544926162774868,"gpt":0.2738775875061251,"spread":0.1884283258783764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008916308,0.0002691926,0.0007788991,0.0009259824,0.001520295,0.00378092,0.0006097784,0.001304593,0.004979557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02177742,0.0001636462,0.0003132812,0.0005480408,0.01749628,0.004565726,0.002854287,0.004375697,0.0004982369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001377465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001851949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001876558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000901735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935054,0.003521843,0.0001771684,0.001038527,0.001229247,0.0005278054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851202,0.007362348,0.00215407,0.001433711,0.002166901,0.001762673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003430407,0.0002996351,0.03737338,0.000704501,0.0001869837,0.0005187259,0.06712411,0.0004693758,0.005879513,0.7310421,0.01754006,0.1385186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002252833,0.0002125448,0.03454151,0.0005485686,0.00006283027,0.0007574185,0.02181534,0.0007851998,0.002379775,0.8668537,0.07193405,0.00008651588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5867242,0.02820134,0.03547603,0.1990921,0.002266033,0.00009662583,0.0003566738,0.0001376452,0.1476495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893884,0.001757309,0.001091378,0.005576835,0.0001949053,0.00002896646,0.00002682636,0.00001582588,0.001919424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008916308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04715449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145446726","doi":"10.1111/meta.12589","title":"The old fisherman's mistake","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Confusion; Foundation (evidence); Naturalism; Consciousness; Epistemology; Fallacy; Morality; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Carlo Rovelli","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03603165804695974,"gpt":0.2016158693726992,"spread":0.1655842113257394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01072168,0.0005146943,0.0007685815,0.001932042,0.005248873,0.003016056,0.001621405,0.006890124,0.004134475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03726469,0.000351521,0.0003047045,0.0009002429,0.03118115,0.01187002,0.003305748,0.01314408,0.001651932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004660157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00393772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008682583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939202,0.002059351,0.0004175228,0.0009649655,0.002282388,0.0003555792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873986,0.0069596,0.000649242,0.001100929,0.003131033,0.0007605762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001066035,0.00002913947,0.0008106519,0.000109377,0.00002274357,0.0006715494,0.004618647,0.0001568422,0.000178552,0.6600505,0.3096794,0.02356615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003629946,0.00002700373,0.0006440409,0.0005172325,0.00002065975,0.0007791216,0.00203471,0.0009649721,0.0004055985,0.7660057,0.2285168,0.00004787336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01052554,0.00756667,0.009717646,0.9080318,0.02202924,0.00002641278,0.0001046511,0.0001664462,0.04183159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6262071,0.006330933,0.01038896,0.2928125,0.01771768,0.00009187921,0.00005730287,0.0002381868,0.0461555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05670238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250979798","doi":"10.1111/meta.12371","title":"Inarticulate Forgiveness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Forgiveness; Action (physics); Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Emer O’Hagan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01257450787409957,"gpt":0.2804197412857387,"spread":0.2678452334116391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003328274,0.0004252943,0.0002653252,0.000645128,0.002095752,0.003480583,0.0008741877,0.0020274,0.004258524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008969969,0.0001753858,0.0003314423,0.0001980144,0.01788948,0.003851779,0.004886122,0.003042223,0.000601162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001750592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009340949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004911242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005499699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960703,0.002371501,0.000140522,0.0003341591,0.000719451,0.0003641017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957644,0.001507571,0.0008151117,0.001139799,0.0005114614,0.0002616248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004092481,0.0000512814,0.001748725,0.0001035714,0.00001554581,0.0005094061,0.02842025,0.0001516596,0.001285163,0.9494692,0.002243361,0.01596085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003029972,0.0001796296,0.006576424,0.000524844,0.00004045436,0.002329801,0.03434696,0.00118215,0.003999087,0.8081022,0.1426439,0.00004417893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2309119,0.00353411,0.03577932,0.0194674,0.0006674827,0.00008564565,0.00004539947,0.0001554196,0.7093534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848135,0.0003740624,0.001198829,0.0009051223,0.00006283791,0.00002077866,0.00001049524,0.00001772771,0.01259672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004258524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01760185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225410264","doi":"10.1111/meta.12565","title":"Chains of being: Infinite regress, circularity, and metaphysical explanationRoss P.CameronOxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. ix + 252.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Citation; Theology; Library science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Oberle","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05912471100144995,"gpt":0.2731131220891251,"spread":0.2139884110876751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002793674,0.0009090487,0.001003559,0.00182508,0.002315274,0.005550767,0.00109005,0.003161777,0.01067843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005932571,0.0007913607,0.0005961813,0.002036775,0.02746035,0.01403053,0.002891089,0.003847308,0.001569149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004737967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002815682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008660906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00962689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985563,0.0007898419,0.0000776612,0.0001796068,0.0002848525,0.000111768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971344,0.001967011,0.0002287438,0.0003260345,0.0002270637,0.000116787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001900549,0.000007176885,0.0001002235,0.0001094656,0.000009110321,0.00005674236,0.002260854,0.0004116232,0.00007312342,0.9485845,0.02799102,0.02037711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004304481,0.000003334175,0.0002023584,0.000189417,0.000003008151,0.00006009331,0.0007139766,0.0002359329,0.00004850103,0.9230716,0.0754597,0.000007764591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007638836,0.6088699,0.02980683,0.1248832,0.002305717,0.000034529,0.0002677816,0.0001626397,0.2260305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5779326,0.2707628,0.02049365,0.008050376,0.003924297,0.0002393705,0.0004152127,0.0003246751,0.117857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01067843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03572297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245195506","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00287","title":"Oracularity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Falsifiability; Judgement; Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Credibility; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","authors":[{"name":"Jan Zwicky","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1064484508213111,"gpt":0.2662004836574623,"spread":0.1597520328361512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01342768,0.0004623946,0.0004724235,0.001102297,0.006511833,0.008110745,0.001585166,0.00379637,0.0114015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02147745,0.0002530864,0.0003706183,0.001412977,0.02928482,0.009511751,0.005696873,0.006294708,0.00185867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003406834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004750177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005063488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004156986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886466,0.00550869,0.0005985787,0.001964979,0.002435174,0.0008460133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773393,0.008783307,0.003186152,0.003016785,0.006891132,0.0007833935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001813441,0.000007512866,0.0003089237,0.00006457755,0.000006464345,0.00005674041,0.01088829,0.00004452413,0.000163595,0.9774039,0.005963785,0.005073621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001903811,0.00005607694,0.001384419,0.0006733011,0.00005270886,0.000299886,0.02096571,0.001055765,0.001243246,0.5787359,0.3954657,0.00004817714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06805413,0.003577011,0.04444365,0.1162803,0.003486357,0.0000808962,0.0001625164,0.0003440311,0.7635711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637429,0.0007259399,0.003306151,0.009875824,0.0007581642,0.0000607898,0.00006919846,0.0001187245,0.02134238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01342768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07101315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}