{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":43,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":43,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"30b7eb0a9921","filters":{"venue":"Metaphilosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2072471026","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01607.x","title":"HOW WE HAVE BEEN LEARNING TO TALK ABOUT AUTISM: A ROLE FOR STORIES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neurotypical; Autism; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Autism spectrum disorder","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04628814462062808,"gpt":0.3084788014256312,"spread":0.2621906568050031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002826495,0.0002915528,0.0003833515,0.0003746079,0.0005326825,0.0003579704,0.0006640489,0.0001025131,0.00004990734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009052085,0.0002805777,0.0002002501,0.0006375883,0.0001153241,0.0004084877,0.0001461768,0.0004225266,0.0001155349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007739988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005166262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002573171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001611983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972938,0.0001811923,0.0002262467,0.0008123905,0.0006871487,0.00079926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989044,0.0002266568,0.00009966808,0.0004772553,0.00002243078,0.00026958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002726994,0.0002912605,0.0001384878,0.0000486296,0.00003102634,0.00006853556,0.004660382,0.0002918906,0.2035071,0.7585312,0.0008725676,0.03128614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007829363,0.001267161,0.001072775,0.00002914362,0.00003073433,0.00001745987,0.0001818473,0.001318261,0.1145442,0.6078181,0.2724119,0.0005254553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1665526,0.002660018,0.01080696,0.7824754,0.0006359621,0.004010707,0.0001359829,0.001023365,0.0316991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908247,0.00006334118,0.001247811,0.001242595,0.0002288275,0.0001525974,0.000004810309,0.00005273184,0.006182609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8242721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239735155","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00285","title":"Constitutive Luck","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05346291251323264,"gpt":0.254783815402392,"spread":0.2013209028891593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009456863,0.0001158547,0.0001308015,0.00006961582,0.0001400867,0.00002342471,0.0001615016,0.00003489945,0.0004783977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005557851,0.00009375401,0.00008349706,0.0003174497,0.0002255533,0.000137209,0.0000209455,0.0001070568,0.001195451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001029382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002712033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002428675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.665995e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990561,0.0001199746,0.0001312554,0.0003038114,0.0001818803,0.0002069683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995398,0.00008093004,0.00003976586,0.0002412455,0.00001649737,0.00008178857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003243627,0.0000550125,0.0001528011,0.000003576703,0.000003537284,0.00004672207,0.00004254896,0.00000441131,0.06867645,0.9302273,0.0004612329,0.000323132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000336988,0.00005153654,0.0001192904,0.000006137785,0.0000162999,0.00004674486,0.000008833845,0.00001482253,0.5056376,0.3196656,0.1738764,0.0002197755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06177095,0.0002203267,0.0003134176,0.0006290938,0.0007574892,0.0001586391,0.00001379187,0.0001173538,0.9360189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966679,0.00002178022,0.0003498919,0.001752182,0.00007376066,0.00001142791,4.321694e-7,0.000009156085,0.001113531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9349054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006596923","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00333.x","title":"Epistemological Metaphors and the Nature of Philosophy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Coherentism; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Metaphor; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02193853136171424,"gpt":0.2814271955218167,"spread":0.2594886641601025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007943596,0.0002721546,0.0005918346,0.0001722716,0.0001403022,0.00002333696,0.000342954,0.000344036,0.0003624089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001873815,0.0001561319,0.0003432732,0.0004181341,0.0009097731,0.00008981292,0.00008448345,0.0005925262,0.00011942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001510136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001721892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008887329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004716886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980347,0.0004241147,0.0004519353,0.000463061,0.0003361435,0.0002900861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986929,0.0002540671,0.0002276736,0.0005906071,0.000137909,0.00009687287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004831998,0.0001983251,0.0001863696,0.00002843392,0.0004000251,0.00004904755,0.00143727,0.000001784697,0.0002382161,0.9953913,0.00007364229,0.001512378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004811252,0.0002090816,0.003630528,0.00002397835,0.0004229707,0.0001243118,0.0004105282,0.000001542882,0.001237442,0.9875352,0.001354709,0.0002384696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6636843,0.02794485,0.0005421833,0.01584437,0.00154736,0.001024897,0.00008318001,0.0001603636,0.2891685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953592,0.00009189289,0.0005380342,0.00323788,0.0004128432,0.00008560739,0.00001698319,0.00002698374,0.0002305302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.331675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6366875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135858668","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01716.x","title":"Minimally Creative Thought","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Novelty; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Action (physics); Creativity technique; Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognition; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1323051549234892,"gpt":0.350952909384375,"spread":0.2186477544608858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001757157,0.0001255606,0.0001501288,0.0001334499,0.00009311759,0.00001441163,0.0002684995,0.00005063432,0.00875986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000724205,0.0001096142,0.00008596661,0.000365796,0.0002111122,0.0001092018,0.00003350864,0.0001167928,0.002073132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001125478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002107373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005481718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003151206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990034,0.0001411677,0.0001611625,0.0003417745,0.0001405062,0.0002119958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992921,0.00006925613,0.0000767403,0.0004135679,0.00004637168,0.0001019656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002252664,0.002205819,0.01669967,0.00000826283,0.0001177111,0.00007526022,0.03177251,1.155828e-7,0.005570435,0.9191543,0.01595474,0.008215956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001203653,0.0009555732,0.7050915,0.0000179025,0.0001594294,0.00009507641,0.003043152,0.000007516456,0.02623363,0.08097011,0.181369,0.0008533842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2709378,0.00009915201,0.0000907856,0.0005646881,0.001061574,0.0001167979,0.000008288074,0.00007966565,0.7270412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794276,0.000005992594,0.001439553,0.001302397,0.0001802306,0.00005403598,0.00000206905,0.00001501014,0.01757312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8381842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189039354","doi":"10.1111/meta.12508","title":"Two dogmas of aesthetic empiricism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hedonism; Pleasure; Appeal; Aesthetics; Aesthetic value; Philosophy; Empiricism; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Mathematics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06425636355701177,"gpt":0.3179274221905319,"spread":0.2536710586335201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000116236,0.0001183787,0.0002598749,0.000122902,0.00007454488,0.00001976623,0.0001937702,0.00003457139,0.001039739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001113004,0.0001033636,0.000252746,0.0007252235,0.0001591338,0.00007133737,0.00006418405,0.0001023291,0.0003733491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001018607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003591927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006045718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001941036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987141,0.0001839718,0.0002641694,0.0003386848,0.0003360222,0.0001630276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993052,0.00001895549,0.00009310513,0.0004385847,0.00006339777,0.00008077103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001518937,0.0004636078,0.0005968995,0.00001798997,0.000008127313,0.0001919232,0.0005424695,0.0001132746,0.8730234,0.1085435,0.000350885,0.01613275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002034076,0.0001755278,0.00133765,0.0000512246,0.00030858,0.0005678107,0.0002465685,0.001408284,0.7484995,0.1933843,0.05123482,0.000751716],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9084632,0.0002226236,0.0005675941,0.005943581,0.0001511387,0.00006345802,0.00001113628,0.00007309371,0.08450419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995537,0.00006823261,0.0006112515,0.002530827,0.00004118157,0.000004677239,0.000002512964,0.00001375436,0.001190539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1245239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493333246","doi":"10.1111/meta.12044","title":"Getting Luck Properly Under Control","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Attribution; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Analogy; Value (mathematics); Control (management); Positive economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Management; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0565495966401459,"gpt":0.240894962134914,"spread":0.184345365494768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003484625,0.0002434901,0.0003974211,0.0001053446,0.0004201968,0.0002529515,0.0002613333,0.00009271158,0.001876357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005473812,0.0001840004,0.000222766,0.00004282931,0.0005707786,0.000444062,0.0000364121,0.0003670008,0.002393232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002012239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000341664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003685173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007459278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984952,0.0001756756,0.000362376,0.0003300903,0.0002527032,0.0003839677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988959,0.0001562815,0.0001489033,0.0003824315,0.0003046049,0.0001119018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007199856,0.00009297158,0.00009966928,0.00004988025,0.0001924645,0.000003197569,0.005626772,0.00000806035,0.0007733723,0.9890924,0.002603394,0.00145064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001020362,0.0002009806,0.0005559422,0.00003210467,0.0001981386,0.000004768659,0.00187625,0.0001784011,0.0002370383,0.7814479,0.2136977,0.0005503748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1566043,0.001896926,0.0006232499,0.03608565,0.003034365,0.001403881,0.00004444406,0.0004945259,0.7998127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800924,0.000009023654,0.0002278998,0.007429152,0.002336826,0.0001085052,0.00001044205,0.00004440716,0.009741329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498873853","doi":"10.1111/meta.12139","title":"Caricatures, Myths, and White Lies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Analogy; Epistemology; Period (music); Empiricism; White (mutation); Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1028423331531241,"gpt":0.2201854608822905,"spread":0.1173431277291664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002185751,0.0001419966,0.0001987286,0.0001108986,0.0002812558,0.0001382388,0.0001959918,0.0000399012,0.000133214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007030554,0.0001083798,0.00005745743,0.00007942742,0.0004823046,0.0002913298,0.00006393535,0.000154735,0.000175466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002849888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002512705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005056158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003410145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990434,0.0000483748,0.0001613208,0.0002651901,0.0002895354,0.0001921957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993579,0.00003039823,0.00005092513,0.0002317854,0.0001023317,0.0002266621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001362426,0.00004113736,0.00009448099,0.000008440996,0.00001607532,0.000007726951,0.01929468,0.000001916844,0.00001026268,0.9573141,0.02253439,0.0006631894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001456434,0.0000882421,0.00004010609,0.000003799209,0.00002154506,0.000003608034,0.0003457412,0.00001781605,0.000007479314,0.2568605,0.742315,0.0001504992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005146823,0.003495703,0.00002044979,0.009066192,0.001078586,0.0001112409,0.00002250911,0.0001285108,0.98093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990283,0.00001519878,0.0002430395,0.001249991,0.001210582,0.000009911414,0.000004641579,0.00001194469,0.006971652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9851362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4419602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007195710","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01569.x","title":"MOTIVATING THE GLOBAL DEMOS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Toolbox; Global justice; Solidarity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Order (exchange); Prudence; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Realisation; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06855442791955355,"gpt":0.3597890572704313,"spread":0.2912346293508777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009554935,0.0001110804,0.0001392994,0.00002053053,0.00105567,0.0000875286,0.0004603537,0.0001212703,0.00008430744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001048243,0.0000775063,0.0001319679,0.0004921981,0.0004794364,0.0001783121,0.00002999208,0.0002745487,0.0001953927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008420078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000860384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002207407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003322073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983768,0.0003222483,0.0001824372,0.0001888459,0.0004972615,0.0004324053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991957,0.0002525298,0.00005199764,0.0002459193,0.00007610788,0.0001777221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003706235,0.00003006801,0.0003051,0.000001214889,0.000009998311,0.000002923088,0.0008888621,0.000003208198,0.000006104257,0.9958602,0.0002428398,0.002645789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000780312,0.00002969693,0.002766098,0.000006281855,0.00001957763,8.670032e-7,0.0001622116,0.00001098825,0.00002014009,0.9629923,0.03381477,0.00009902821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01111946,0.000210617,0.000190113,0.2024797,0.0002506314,0.000148405,0.000007055074,0.000132608,0.7854614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831813,0.00001470972,0.0003236299,0.01484695,0.001484954,0.000003615366,0.000001189832,0.000003989116,0.0001396573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8119463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910537218","doi":"10.1111/meta.12107","title":"You Make Your Own Luck","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Luck; Counterfactual thinking; Causation; Epistemology; Positive economics; Metaphysics; Psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08191204937160894,"gpt":0.2694806599483048,"spread":0.1875686105766959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006428676,0.0002683168,0.0004420147,0.0001416986,0.0004119544,0.000142987,0.0003419696,0.0001127574,0.0007982275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001212129,0.0002215452,0.0002932163,0.00005551262,0.0005983747,0.0001559558,0.00007224984,0.0003751573,0.001217191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001515569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002246511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001057516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001687347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983832,0.0002032783,0.0003555598,0.0003873767,0.0002967983,0.0003737587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988121,0.0001307048,0.0001572208,0.0005995939,0.000175019,0.0001253083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001146488,0.00008524697,0.0001081379,0.00004814845,0.00009471064,0.000003582335,0.006484127,0.000002122668,0.00008061265,0.9875326,0.002023588,0.003525666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002646729,0.0000948449,0.00009387049,0.00001062749,0.0000890562,0.000002344943,0.0002918039,0.00003118481,0.0001374815,0.3324836,0.666274,0.0002265085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04371581,0.0006704922,0.0002448597,0.007439119,0.003582773,0.0002331456,0.00005010524,0.0002936856,0.94377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641565,0.00002831239,0.0003517205,0.004216056,0.005322359,0.00002657558,0.00003536148,0.00005403246,0.0258091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9204407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955282148","doi":"10.1111/meta.12379","title":"Is Global Poverty a Philosophical Problem?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Famine; Normative; Philosophical methodology; Action (physics); Morality; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05556175145589243,"gpt":0.3400481132052234,"spread":0.284486361749331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009302121,0.0002754848,0.0004261909,0.00008020144,0.0004560332,0.0001189959,0.0006748852,0.0004327468,0.001890354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002410877,0.0002526112,0.0003618094,0.0007512154,0.0006039081,0.000441601,0.0001444066,0.0005261801,0.004842815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002148971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002886135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005389148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003477243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966524,0.00036303,0.0003868,0.0006055561,0.001139595,0.0008526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984279,0.0001993382,0.00009914994,0.0005471206,0.0001827444,0.0005436984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003202745,0.0001283591,0.00325643,0.00003018468,0.00006068225,0.000008350149,0.0007887933,9.985575e-7,0.00002719074,0.9937088,0.001721898,0.0002362993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003683758,0.00008067238,0.0007487815,0.00002203612,0.00004183755,0.000002423403,0.00006021789,0.00001069428,0.00002408104,0.8634724,0.134874,0.000294523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01486473,0.0002238491,0.00002634531,0.200698,0.000608508,0.0004618967,0.00008044329,0.0002282358,0.782808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682731,0.00004464569,0.0005996446,0.02842763,0.001487028,0.00002017367,0.000007869492,0.00002210521,0.001117777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9534084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115065741","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01624.x","title":"RIGHT ACT, VIRTUOUS MOTIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Action (physics); Relation (database); Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05604761966791063,"gpt":0.4515562491710352,"spread":0.3955086295031246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004844069,0.0002094205,0.0003403923,0.000142522,0.001471443,0.00001224826,0.0005195535,0.0006466708,0.006995735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01345639,0.0001646386,0.0001157487,0.0003242554,0.0004138036,0.0002916599,0.000218177,0.01193753,0.00849026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004244135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002373831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008179818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001206033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958912,0.001951584,0.0005255018,0.0004168479,0.000671454,0.0005434764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913428,0.00697338,0.0002919468,0.0008237548,0.0002199223,0.0003482006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007071008,0.0002066206,0.005517404,0.00009473486,0.0001230495,0.00007487209,0.001840541,3.188255e-7,0.004507769,0.9746465,0.01105705,0.001860398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005934209,0.00005683127,0.004453599,0.0000341728,0.00008076143,0.000005027853,0.0002018024,0.00003069035,0.0003679508,0.6596031,0.3343575,0.000215123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08757506,0.00008661094,0.0004225776,0.04116072,0.007103387,0.0006494594,0.0000211157,0.0003073773,0.8626737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975051,0.00002655189,0.004201029,0.01437375,0.002680839,0.00009537451,0.000008918078,0.00005058653,0.003511924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.887476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981549461","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00357.x","title":"THEORIZING INTERNATIONAL FAIRNESS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Mainstream; Spell; Sociology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01784467246631162,"gpt":0.3207035065448339,"spread":0.3028588340785223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004094012,0.00006751972,0.00008700261,0.0000640836,0.0002364353,0.00008036441,0.0003441167,0.00005754872,0.0003350387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100348,0.0000661481,0.0000812162,0.0001623743,0.0001252368,0.0003106165,0.00004157012,0.00009116316,0.000341255],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007090525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003127475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001959962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006150035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991366,0.00007548495,0.0001149553,0.0001411446,0.0003438149,0.0001879555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996682,0.00003518261,0.00003908273,0.000110859,0.00007068428,0.00007599214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004036194,0.0000358821,0.0005817508,8.313525e-7,0.00001905852,0.000002023595,0.002938107,0.00002183736,0.00002352236,0.9881779,0.0005357245,0.00765934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001280084,0.00000628931,0.0002432853,0.000003999958,0.00001054714,6.171329e-7,0.0008069842,0.0002488325,0.00001706295,0.1937339,0.804691,0.0001095102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08351613,0.0002025364,0.0004823849,0.04032175,0.0008998459,0.0001008564,0.000009398635,0.0001365238,0.8743306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952853,0.00008266292,0.0009169414,0.001154303,0.001471297,0.000004090154,0.000006864557,0.000005778357,0.001072744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9117692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4386256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322233634","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01714.x","title":"Distant Peers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2338974441778215,"gpt":0.2480571472949604,"spread":0.01415970311713891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002923162,0.0001816561,0.0002726242,0.00009443206,0.0002673314,0.00004815535,0.0002452346,0.0000596349,0.001980942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003505577,0.0001475441,0.0002091674,0.00003985325,0.0006869722,0.0001915139,0.00004321169,0.000232282,0.000662757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001307242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000211304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001980392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001620581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998942,0.00008269009,0.0002509903,0.0002649789,0.0001964691,0.0002628828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992513,0.00004885044,0.00009839963,0.0003824795,0.0001249433,0.00009403802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001745401,0.00009702185,0.0001095063,0.00002444429,0.00008870683,0.00001286486,0.03011328,7.427776e-8,0.00003752495,0.9677528,0.001383239,0.0003630994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001930977,0.0001052345,0.0001177544,0.000008914662,0.00009897778,0.00000199233,0.001485105,0.00000367151,0.0004104868,0.6037064,0.3936396,0.0002288035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02391746,0.0004815066,0.00008556002,0.0009825871,0.00237708,0.0001501785,0.00003486293,0.0001722575,0.9717985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893879,0.00002114363,0.0003926786,0.001183051,0.001075783,0.0000193101,0.00001441444,0.000031303,0.007874453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9654704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975334706","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00205","title":"Does Philosophy of Action Rest on a Mistake?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Foundationalism; Epistemology; Rest (music); Action (physics); Action theory (sociology); Task (project management); Philosophy; Pragmatism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1123893339424616,"gpt":0.2935694555709934,"spread":0.1811801216285318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001159891,0.0001921346,0.0002454282,0.0002119244,0.0001290816,0.00002007235,0.000313034,0.00007019721,0.0002590549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002636735,0.0001160583,0.0001716489,0.0005617655,0.0001769664,0.0001900581,0.00003643139,0.0001757417,0.0002540308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002041776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001395323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001681966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004620022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984612,0.0001197985,0.0002984004,0.00045648,0.0004242968,0.0002398227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990777,0.0001309499,0.0001572812,0.0005042609,0.00003549706,0.00009436068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003029977,0.0006178537,0.0006694298,0.00006865573,0.00001737872,0.0001169998,0.0001245573,0.00003492878,0.8452848,0.1468233,0.0004089636,0.005530125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006403881,0.0003997941,0.001904794,0.00006403124,0.0000338446,0.0000201948,0.00001271368,0.00006798808,0.6392303,0.3081799,0.04912538,0.0003207491],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7462234,0.0000632095,0.00004399461,0.007961604,0.0012064,0.0002814756,0.00004152485,0.0001609524,0.2440174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967222,0.000131555,0.00007990561,0.001085515,0.000547786,0.00001615653,0.000002469244,0.00002357875,0.001390877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2504987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4732719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782079141","doi":"10.1111/meta.12279","title":"Show Me the Argument: Empirically Testing the Armchair Philosophy Picture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inductive reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Point (geometry); Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1492556079415219,"gpt":0.2848046365637626,"spread":0.1355490286222408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001128369,0.000428566,0.000440126,0.00009942348,0.0022628,0.0003356044,0.00105141,0.0001381856,0.0006262528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003633251,0.0002172821,0.0003525306,0.0002207505,0.003231826,0.0002329864,0.0002129068,0.0008642212,0.0006422616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000292754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006673741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006624513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001545056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974272,0.0004244589,0.0005090642,0.0005227163,0.000563232,0.0005532895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970984,0.000870375,0.0003016313,0.001070299,0.0005464728,0.0001128603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002680088,0.0001184113,0.0001794943,0.00003954045,0.0002866576,0.000007103968,0.02681497,0.000004239334,0.0002329133,0.964895,0.006332257,0.00106268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002381573,0.0002569046,0.0001616918,0.00003122103,0.0002009813,0.000009867735,0.0008971927,0.000107043,0.0001809487,0.5999063,0.3977195,0.0002901595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03647268,0.001622769,0.0002056578,0.1195704,0.004813969,0.001043053,0.0001135101,0.0004349206,0.835723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596997,0.00001690767,0.000296972,0.02155962,0.01515449,0.00007483106,0.00001701189,0.00006527419,0.003115197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.923227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787680258","doi":"10.1111/meta.12194","title":"Truth Analysis of the Gettier Argument","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Scrutiny; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Construct (python library); Analytic philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Contemporary philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06180871193112166,"gpt":0.2495694578540717,"spread":0.1877607459229501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004590513,0.0001341187,0.0003908055,0.0001774292,0.0001319489,0.00002098848,0.0002927914,0.0000471932,0.00059495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009804833,0.00006272643,0.0005012295,0.0001742921,0.0006975235,0.0000966529,0.00006549183,0.00009278284,0.00005030237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002298847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003211669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004627135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001151005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988386,0.000167852,0.0003044174,0.0002034862,0.0003183342,0.0001672995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988194,0.0001912237,0.0001940801,0.0005376678,0.0002061987,0.00005146003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001055947,0.00007426197,0.0006944182,0.00001113159,0.001510749,6.061033e-7,0.004608815,0.000003919949,0.0001843763,0.991267,0.0008071234,0.0008270002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005668673,0.00009853695,0.002163159,0.00002951819,0.004111889,4.32947e-7,0.0005986264,0.00001992498,0.001945853,0.6238557,0.3663245,0.0002849882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4652099,0.001358671,0.0001999537,0.01877954,0.004358395,0.0004087854,0.0004449773,0.0001047117,0.5091351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922975,0.00001620678,0.00003881768,0.0005873974,0.0004455147,0.00001113425,0.00000409353,0.00001242969,0.006586913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5270876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6514286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130217881","doi":"10.1111/meta.12089","title":"Whole Lives and Good Deaths","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Currency; Value of life; Meaning of life; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02663642335183479,"gpt":0.2185802447526135,"spread":0.1919438214007786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001596242,0.000100302,0.0001479699,0.00006393148,0.0002682688,0.000168159,0.00007800827,0.0000178132,0.0005430642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002508564,0.00008117429,0.00005087475,0.00001997286,0.0001733644,0.0001434535,0.00004211289,0.00007207043,0.0002442415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004594094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000479242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005592648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003979027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994328,0.00005674575,0.0001170718,0.0001619164,0.0001040276,0.0001274188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996751,0.00004033482,0.00003778928,0.0001367916,0.00004782418,0.00006216762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002873938,0.00003904543,0.0005723037,0.00001389308,0.00003373928,0.000001366713,0.002014183,2.348285e-7,0.0002720491,0.9943689,0.0008254438,0.001856042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001959128,0.0001056173,0.001906809,0.000008000132,0.00003313911,0.000001093117,0.0001243024,0.00007002075,0.0001607627,0.2672604,0.7299934,0.0001405557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3868149,0.0003411564,0.00001807064,0.001747778,0.0003647408,0.00009864751,0.0000197305,0.0000604837,0.6105345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923189,0.0000157107,0.0000525071,0.0005171697,0.000708847,0.000007291441,0.000004303785,0.00001151415,0.006363777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.729168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5946172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022064695","doi":"10.1111/meta.12408","title":"CARTESIAN PHILOSOPHY AS SPIRITUAL PRACTICE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Epistemology; Cartesianism; Philosophy; Analogy; Cartesian coordinate system; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07732346710249455,"gpt":0.2499078683256589,"spread":0.1725844012231644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002514879,0.0003185313,0.0003984464,0.0001150741,0.0006758326,0.0002237703,0.0006183949,0.00007367147,0.002412759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006769021,0.000280274,0.0002626374,0.0002602844,0.0006213673,0.001089085,0.0001033466,0.000419832,0.006000191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004641344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006630888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008718934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006500535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976532,0.0001524842,0.000431565,0.0006412915,0.0007149748,0.0004065259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985154,0.0001810301,0.0001700536,0.0003847498,0.000232279,0.0005164893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007142551,0.0001227429,0.000004295449,0.00002354114,0.00004785096,0.00007464036,0.01661606,0.000004731878,0.0001037247,0.9751337,0.007238715,0.0005586115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000279767,0.0004457561,0.000002224841,0.000008000464,0.00007328415,0.000009005327,0.0004057231,0.00004616818,0.00006582645,0.2100326,0.7883021,0.0003295478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001081287,0.0006062046,0.00005643818,0.1605598,0.0008119207,0.0002270655,0.00003193226,0.0002888275,0.8363365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477571,0.00001372818,0.00041808,0.04453949,0.006346444,0.00002218247,0.00001100927,0.00003820755,0.0008538137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9466758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400609253","doi":"10.1111/meta.12695","title":"Beyond gatekeeping: Philosophical sources, Indigenous philosophy, and the Huarochirí Manuscript","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophical methodology; Epistemology; Philosophical theory; Indigenous; Section (typography); Philosophical analysis; Field (mathematics); Philosophy; Western philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0100384226249112,"gpt":0.2110709832786071,"spread":0.2010325606536959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003600057,0.0003854313,0.0003989867,0.00004220141,0.000750771,0.0001566739,0.0004143952,0.000105536,0.001394481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002069026,0.0002188998,0.0002449166,0.0004149157,0.002691573,0.0002637118,0.0006656357,0.0004604205,0.001130718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000790078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004145101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000936469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005407463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977731,0.0001367892,0.0003724105,0.0007010059,0.0005606191,0.0004561064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992681,0.0001402608,0.00007082699,0.0003484797,0.00000389334,0.0001685066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007573593,0.0008064016,0.0131112,0.0004541885,0.001771917,0.0005622288,0.02340889,0.0003198354,0.00671254,0.7567495,0.01418706,0.1811589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008808037,0.0001907783,0.003067016,0.00004435109,0.0002431922,0.000152115,0.0001678324,0.0002756351,0.0002452362,0.9229028,0.07125219,0.0005780217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3561839,0.02516134,0.0001116961,0.06014067,0.001137202,0.001139224,0.00004217554,0.0004007377,0.5556831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932632,0.0009568481,0.0003495822,0.003491341,0.0006804813,0.00008822181,0.00001355862,0.00003753816,0.001119214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6370794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212931209","doi":"10.1111/meta.12542","title":"Grounding interventionism: Conceptual and epistemological challenges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Interventionism (politics); Epistemology; Causation; Counterfactual thinking; Impossibility; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Ground; Political science; Law; International relations; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2060862247704341,"gpt":0.275872038539246,"spread":0.06978581376881188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008040908,0.0001797003,0.0003472427,0.0001114633,0.001064703,0.00008358639,0.000216808,0.00004648494,0.001555677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004545934,0.0001640994,0.0001946739,0.00003445968,0.001158632,0.0001474559,0.0002702399,0.0004615258,0.00005980178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000341317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001397735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003516356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003346528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983414,0.0004831913,0.0003059856,0.0003664497,0.0002578262,0.000245083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993099,0.0001978947,0.0001413529,0.0002196297,0.00005679802,0.00007440009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000175598,0.0001117088,0.00005335815,0.00004323974,0.0001088693,0.00002093017,0.01938992,9.553281e-7,0.00001389984,0.9782928,0.0003377746,0.001608971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004014286,0.0004943003,0.0001528844,0.00001016592,0.00009319445,0.00002448461,0.01546094,0.00001253257,0.00001045439,0.4695391,0.5135581,0.0002424169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4209234,0.06954128,0.0001459085,0.03352545,0.01017947,0.0008711408,0.00022323,0.0005912677,0.4639989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945813,0.0002086168,0.00009054464,0.0009138057,0.001062706,0.00009039606,0.00003131271,0.00002223657,0.002999086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5736579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322504453","doi":"10.1111/meta.12615","title":"On the inseparability of reasoning and virtue: Madame de Maintenon's Maison royale de <scp>Saint‐Louis</scp>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; Mores; Virtue; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Curriculum; Set (abstract data type); Aesthetics; Art history; Pedagogy; Art; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02574200678598042,"gpt":0.2722498311184368,"spread":0.2465078243324563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001804765,0.0001279341,0.0002517013,0.00008327863,0.0005957342,0.00003594211,0.0002479127,0.00007975513,0.00002498448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002736054,0.00009101837,0.0001127186,0.000613453,0.0005203908,0.0000700232,0.00009027072,0.0001957111,0.00004209528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001603485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005982536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001452011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009144258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983603,0.0005096369,0.0001951217,0.0002499503,0.0003263151,0.0003586859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980627,0.001444656,0.00008629056,0.0002169759,0.00006127525,0.0001281374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001507975,0.00007503816,0.01881773,0.00002778414,0.00006525964,0.00001467167,0.02313288,0.00001418826,0.0001755323,0.9517787,0.004987169,0.0008959435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002213882,0.000207073,0.03542012,0.00005948212,0.00006004873,0.000001390465,0.00297189,0.0002184443,0.0001640221,0.6090652,0.3514937,0.0001172551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9215861,0.000511045,0.00004112791,0.005261689,0.0001477589,0.0001839593,0.00001840356,0.00009904747,0.07215087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958516,0.00007746489,0.0002052021,0.0005853907,0.0001864276,0.00002977026,0.000001809106,0.00001092839,0.003051366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3465065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4581966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549944756","doi":"10.1111/meta.12165","title":"Overcoming Instructor‐Originated Math Anxiety in Philosophy Students: A Consideration of Proven Techniques for Students Taking Formal Logic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Education, Achievement, and Giftedness","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Anxiety; Mathematics education; Apprehension; Mathematical anxiety; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05383977275878466,"gpt":0.3971402323379571,"spread":0.3433004595791724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009849045,0.0002915841,0.0004740924,0.0004480403,0.0001232014,0.00005734849,0.0005223943,0.0001889163,0.0001076792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001424994,0.0002236918,0.0001468465,0.0003460957,0.0001385296,0.0006356377,0.0001128431,0.000141957,0.00001107525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001365378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005353815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008442331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003394633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976412,0.0001897269,0.0007783604,0.0005168279,0.0004549923,0.0004188637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984222,0.0001734211,0.0006295152,0.0004729222,0.0002327971,0.00006914126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002669855,0.001229529,0.7007542,0.0001306336,0.0002493499,0.000003259625,0.002441774,2.806538e-7,0.006413657,0.28373,0.00007801065,0.004702325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00992757,0.001339128,0.4598859,0.0007001634,0.0002624281,0.0000154893,0.000975635,0.00001005503,0.01731024,0.5051357,0.003411595,0.001026207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991412,0.0001330985,0.00188272,0.0008937762,0.0007556739,0.001802541,0.00007468403,0.0001086629,0.002936847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958281,0.00003476923,0.002582256,0.0004114727,0.0003320595,0.0006166392,0.00003283418,0.00004211329,0.0001197863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2408683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9121888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400588946","doi":"10.1111/meta.12699","title":"Aristotle's tyche (τύχη) and contemporary debates about luck","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Existentialism; Scope (computer science); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05645477353636011,"gpt":0.2458058950611083,"spread":0.1893511215247482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001936887,0.000267387,0.0003304539,0.0001795925,0.000299637,0.0004918288,0.0001622926,0.00007826938,0.0006415636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003300871,0.0002017762,0.0001917254,0.0000915308,0.0005476467,0.0003999215,0.00008567854,0.0003226893,0.000594567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001828838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000340134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004912012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002505162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998733,0.00006389957,0.000312103,0.0004387153,0.0002198353,0.0002324282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992965,0.0002041047,0.00004513094,0.0002617642,0.00005028697,0.000142222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002412998,0.00005899437,0.00002809183,0.0001234465,0.0001553178,0.00007593518,0.002378325,2.750017e-7,0.00006257789,0.9874649,0.007432874,0.002195098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001236891,0.00005637901,0.00003344333,0.00005787878,0.00004785099,0.00000512007,0.00006894437,0.00008526564,0.00005848646,0.4839394,0.5153497,0.0001738002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02021402,0.04459924,0.00003394078,0.01787619,0.002169566,0.0002876198,0.000150721,0.0005997734,0.9140689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912684,0.0001075216,0.00004482276,0.001231675,0.002875457,0.00002856622,0.00003092786,0.00004882691,0.004363783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8228195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1701715910","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01708.x","title":"AN ARCHIMEDEAN POINT FOR PHILOSOPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Skepticism; Philosophy; Linguistics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2204650754327842,"gpt":0.292120796015897,"spread":0.07165572058311281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006297746,0.0003187749,0.0004636093,0.0002112574,0.0004867081,0.00007977723,0.0004893697,0.0001042748,0.0007614596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006992978,0.0002753403,0.0003867251,0.00004842509,0.0008230023,0.0004530325,0.00004331742,0.0002837542,0.0002115291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001595856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003775353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001205057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001347925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982406,0.0001547423,0.0004302644,0.000505418,0.0002285922,0.0004404177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984401,0.0001301818,0.0001804436,0.0007089641,0.0003334949,0.0002067516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008730489,0.0003451889,0.00004996395,0.00007626078,0.000141699,0.000004991406,0.02868009,3.501846e-7,0.0001393812,0.9688483,0.0006090324,0.001017398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000488493,0.0006563792,0.00006320702,0.00001641397,0.0001462956,0.000002915935,0.0007493586,0.00003258095,0.0009069556,0.9120622,0.08451059,0.0003646274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02852443,0.0004945546,0.001562786,0.003644914,0.0032561,0.001108498,0.0002953098,0.0005105159,0.9606029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861156,0.00001383961,0.004295117,0.00393058,0.004059792,0.0001422539,0.00008510247,0.00008355513,0.001274111],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044010586","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2007.00508.x","title":"THE COMMUNITY VIEW REVISITED","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Ottawa; City University of New York","keywords":"Epistemology; Key (lock); Content (measure theory); Reflexive pronoun; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0687676447740696,"gpt":0.2672389219329435,"spread":0.1984712771588739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001236381,0.0001458831,0.0001626953,0.00006076353,0.002722177,0.0001964303,0.0004634966,0.00003226308,0.0002628773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004857609,0.00009414335,0.0001407299,0.0001166728,0.00050181,0.0001301767,0.00006990164,0.0003816694,0.0006195628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001546084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008865854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004461177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001460252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989593,0.0001434552,0.0003312489,0.0001270156,0.0001847649,0.0002542242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985565,0.0004284676,0.0001076607,0.0007037155,0.0001212527,0.00008238833],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001066888,0.00005867849,0.000008897173,0.00001130427,0.0000408003,0.000001329617,0.002614347,8.833202e-8,0.00004707098,0.9886908,0.002244816,0.006271192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084288,0.0000285552,0.0001276807,0.000009708018,0.00002685902,0.000001781204,0.0003789935,0.000001345439,0.0001117673,0.3231553,0.6759773,0.00009640004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01870038,0.001945648,0.00007372194,0.009793056,0.0003352111,0.000356725,0.0000356186,0.0001901372,0.9685695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945838,0.00005532986,0.00007453512,0.001817377,0.001387441,0.00002324044,0.00002013541,0.00001991309,0.002018236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023683608","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2007.00515.x","title":"PHILOSOPHY, MYTH, AND THE “SIGNIFICANCE” OF SPECULATIVE THOUGHT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Parallels; Mythology; Philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Relation (database); Similarity (geometry); Metaphysics; Western philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01700582519115804,"gpt":0.2155681305002931,"spread":0.198562305309135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001280731,0.0001312751,0.0002779025,0.00008405311,0.0001365801,0.00001691041,0.0001545116,0.00005179409,0.000158934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004165054,0.00007711903,0.0001010245,0.0003018205,0.0004664263,0.0001265433,0.00001145024,0.0001237646,0.00004931994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002086656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001620089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008223493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003199379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987968,0.0001358044,0.0003489065,0.0002134065,0.0003005493,0.0002045772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991481,0.0003135533,0.0001776583,0.0002291803,0.00005673499,0.00007482288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001138823,0.00005634809,0.2307577,0.000171768,0.00031533,0.00003075648,0.001774398,0.0003061835,0.0002739888,0.7309778,0.0004679073,0.03372895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001558819,0.0001574891,0.5770077,0.00004396628,0.00008173314,0.00002937483,0.0002507915,0.001012342,0.0004083465,0.4128284,0.006366026,0.0002550189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.587056,0.01180662,0.001992823,0.004551611,0.0008974673,0.001151426,0.00009238215,0.00006914368,0.3923825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983643,0.00006116445,0.0006212847,0.0003659739,0.0004178848,0.000001233212,0.00001027968,0.00000331347,0.0001545747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4113083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3144823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091068716","doi":"10.1111/meta.12458","title":"Argumentation, Adversariality, and Social Norms","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Politeness; Adversary; Sociology; Faith; Argumentative; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.104790184121411,"gpt":0.3270651986978478,"spread":0.2222750145764368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002571447,0.00007033088,0.0001482404,0.00001902288,0.0008198445,0.00002872184,0.00009658864,0.00006122534,0.0000813685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007790566,0.00006689414,0.00004653385,0.0001354164,0.0004231884,0.00009849822,0.00005412077,0.00007320245,0.00006306807],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000116758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002840549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008951612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006592953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992493,0.0001457657,0.000117813,0.0001783932,0.0001655369,0.0001432279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997656,0.00004962154,0.00004736859,0.00003818019,0.00003502283,0.00006416661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004844794,0.00003303903,0.01479866,0.00003569651,0.0001683211,0.000009273608,0.1815491,3.174813e-7,0.00005866158,0.7942762,0.007206184,0.001816027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00142558,0.0001805951,0.03601963,0.000004280612,0.0002335495,0.000001496064,0.03281898,0.00001005166,0.0001876248,0.361722,0.5668465,0.0005496851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08993746,0.0007952916,0.0002703899,0.5193968,0.0007609155,0.0003837324,0.00002588581,0.0002110041,0.3882185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938433,0.00003078869,0.0001813755,0.004987791,0.0007137437,0.000007340538,0.000004083061,0.000004213724,0.0002273652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9039058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6305664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240850837","doi":"10.1111/meta.12153","title":"Self‐Images and “Perspicuous Representations”: Reflection, Philosophy, and the Glass Mirror","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Metaphor; Ambiguity; Philosophy; Reading (process); Sociology; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06760753610240872,"gpt":0.2688825650240173,"spread":0.2012750289216085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006931861,0.0002411119,0.0003314746,0.0002305221,0.001003185,0.0003234293,0.0002514748,0.00004415563,0.00006363402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001204726,0.0001635785,0.00009998267,0.0001320139,0.002227352,0.0005758731,0.0001097256,0.0002141877,0.0000832621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004889046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005760611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004420803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001781233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983568,0.0002077658,0.00031001,0.0004707275,0.0004049455,0.0002497933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988576,0.0001315853,0.0001373374,0.0004154844,0.0002505212,0.0002075147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009834774,0.00007082467,0.00009435631,0.00003009141,0.0000772546,0.000007454787,0.03014488,5.522292e-7,0.00002109268,0.965441,0.003792695,0.0002214652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00186022,0.0001338699,0.0001340818,0.00001193243,0.0001599789,0.00003658705,0.001865418,0.00009134349,0.00002608649,0.6169112,0.3784829,0.0002863313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02266426,0.007247163,0.00001317405,0.03209879,0.001555372,0.0005796634,0.00003910808,0.0002954895,0.935507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932155,0.0002034605,0.0005774535,0.001644936,0.001330093,0.00007391364,0.000006676631,0.00002755162,0.002920444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8206773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100281699","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00442.x","title":"ACKNOWLEDGING AND RECTIFYING THE GENOCIDE OF AMERICAN INDIANS: “WHY IS IT THAT THEY CARRY THEIR LIVES ON THEIR FINGERNAILS?”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Apache (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Demise; Redress; Phenomenon; Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06288955979326025,"gpt":0.2279852917746949,"spread":0.1650957319814347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001675706,0.0002496963,0.0003722959,0.0001156585,0.0004171247,0.00008465804,0.000267475,0.00003429165,0.0001714597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000232526,0.0001422881,0.0001985964,0.00006860364,0.0006879777,0.0001425222,0.00006516364,0.0002390262,0.00002580238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003222996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000183134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003244006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001451831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988687,0.0001301937,0.0002820336,0.0002782251,0.0001642559,0.0002765999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990444,0.000329932,0.0001744566,0.0003191686,0.00006468019,0.00006733405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007648504,0.0002073065,0.001270662,0.00008559013,0.000294521,0.00001294155,0.1534889,0.000003567161,0.0001654428,0.8220488,0.003576285,0.01876946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003205327,0.0004873025,0.001731097,0.0001466589,0.0001243641,0.000006055667,0.01734863,0.0001373571,0.0006766622,0.4814114,0.4969972,0.000612712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4720798,0.002967146,0.00005035187,0.005500792,0.0004811832,0.0002895179,0.0001983305,0.00008692483,0.518346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949417,0.0001041297,0.00003875604,0.002562745,0.0006473643,0.00001860427,0.00000688251,0.00002974037,0.001650078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5228619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.580234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060937840","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00159","title":"Bernard Gert's Moral System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Queen (butterfly); Bond; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Library science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03516350569316903,"gpt":0.1982966613331263,"spread":0.1631331556399573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001819139,0.0002281771,0.0003308183,0.0001001526,0.0004506329,0.00008738796,0.0003094368,0.0000806922,0.02876292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000462189,0.0001897855,0.0002276223,0.0000432648,0.0004026984,0.0002465338,0.00002285202,0.0002070086,0.00819372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002009956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000118557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007859756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001622558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988235,0.0001071653,0.0002831728,0.0002973657,0.0001934961,0.0002952636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993533,0.00004950645,0.00006262553,0.0003808592,0.0000504218,0.0001033031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006641035,0.00005746201,0.00004735918,0.00003057065,0.0001035142,0.0000331364,0.001900836,0.000003088852,0.000003904132,0.9880778,0.004530173,0.0051457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004424824,0.0001299476,0.00006362658,0.00003328589,0.0001099968,0.00002633843,0.0001040397,0.00005954274,0.00004059429,0.2367158,0.7619483,0.0003259951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05330373,0.001060405,0.000001563861,0.004586262,0.0009107425,0.0001503272,0.00005200933,0.0003361056,0.9395989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688122,0.00002682718,0.00009336053,0.00103568,0.003219489,0.00002464323,0.00001798034,0.00002966722,0.02674012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581973813","doi":"10.1111/meta.12042","title":"In Defense of Anti‐Archimedean Moral Realism: A Response to Recent Critics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Moral realism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Realism; Moral psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05617317438031854,"gpt":0.2628304541698182,"spread":0.2066572797894996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005494092,0.0002060151,0.0004288486,0.0004299661,0.0001198819,0.0000399317,0.0002932128,0.00007219019,0.003384814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002520067,0.0001818417,0.0001223003,0.0001283074,0.0004288102,0.0002415402,0.00008538015,0.0002135794,0.0005331687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001873475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000322604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004218208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001310657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998336,0.000392778,0.0004646611,0.0002810105,0.0002016456,0.0003238589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988638,0.0002868004,0.00008896941,0.0004288951,0.000192878,0.0001386354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004806433,0.0002348333,0.0002190926,0.00002875713,0.00004487726,0.00002527482,0.01237932,0.000008131855,0.0007855001,0.9810652,0.00441656,0.0003118212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005365228,0.0004169556,0.001396561,0.00004267012,0.0000364837,0.000006311608,0.0003655912,0.000009788062,0.0005698457,0.9087791,0.0875706,0.0002695758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7893521,0.0002857778,0.00000437793,0.04917602,0.0006319747,0.0004887987,0.00008771273,0.0000514544,0.1599218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945268,0.00002593422,0.0004017906,0.003542279,0.0004743566,0.0000475716,0.000008876057,0.0000259025,0.0009464965],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2051748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387705551","doi":"10.1111/meta.12660","title":"Comparing language and religion in normative arguments about linguistic justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Economic Justice; Sociology; Scrutiny; Epistemology; Linguistics; Liberalism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07777898570228699,"gpt":0.3675755433115601,"spread":0.2897965576092731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009542549,0.0001100127,0.0002117097,0.0002122804,0.0003445356,0.00005816333,0.0001649588,0.0001051044,0.00000971618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001573219,0.0001111562,0.00004225845,0.000635734,0.0003121533,0.0001374343,0.00008410455,0.0003440563,0.000235853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005822318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004351715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001318941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003327334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986004,0.0002413201,0.0002249252,0.0002107141,0.000331751,0.000390955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991522,0.0004545196,0.00005131189,0.0001311739,0.000048564,0.0001622211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001367521,0.00003283808,0.001896414,0.0000916405,0.00001500364,0.00005048907,0.04678426,0.00001670479,0.00002893245,0.9508183,0.0001157731,0.0001359597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004056591,0.00002782622,0.00847826,0.0001200282,0.00006781403,6.919587e-7,0.002725643,0.0005763657,0.00004541214,0.9835358,0.003790074,0.0002264263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5386618,0.0005606188,0.000018082,0.006112946,0.0005378599,0.0002216754,0.00001101061,0.000211006,0.453665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980714,0.0003097541,0.00007913746,0.0007956162,0.0005401003,0.00001198283,0.000009116571,0.00001017231,0.0001726622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4594097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4532817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552006455","doi":"10.1111/meta.12202","title":"Intentionality and Content in McDowell","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Presupposition; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Relation (database); Perspective (graphical); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1401301970339726,"gpt":0.2262766479084287,"spread":0.0861464508744561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001386927,0.0001016583,0.0001415656,0.00008912815,0.00009787543,0.00004007151,0.00009168081,0.00002420146,0.000808214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002050031,0.00006434107,0.00005812895,0.00003030698,0.0003237685,0.0001454202,0.00003811821,0.00005406955,0.000232085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001478382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006297045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005303777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001126486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993077,0.00003541088,0.0002137196,0.000214292,0.00009922016,0.0001296386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996009,0.00006561418,0.00004858633,0.0001744904,0.00005496719,0.00005544177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001113092,0.00006308131,0.0006372245,0.000006770581,0.00001582792,0.00000191638,0.000588072,2.388033e-8,0.0004917891,0.995476,0.0003241034,0.00238408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006617869,0.00004358325,0.005169948,0.00004291858,0.00001716574,0.000002764599,0.0001688394,0.000001953692,0.0002554067,0.7676521,0.2258084,0.0001751284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5266769,0.0005134993,0.0000540919,0.05259018,0.0003044766,0.0003755202,0.0001440453,0.00009756049,0.4192437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948382,0.00002070928,0.00005039519,0.0007097946,0.0003590938,0.00004872697,0.000003649,0.000009187146,0.003960275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4681613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8849376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200912703","doi":"10.1111/meta.12160","title":"Getting off the Wheel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Attribution; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1767834611782031,"gpt":0.2826089073597272,"spread":0.1058254461815241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009705885,0.0001706855,0.0002469683,0.00006175344,0.0004075153,0.0001465677,0.0003433641,0.00005826273,0.0001580105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001689067,0.0001073591,0.0001695059,0.00004935674,0.0006705085,0.0001986277,0.00007890746,0.0003485035,0.0005889554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001819635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005267234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001143531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001581792,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987608,0.0001992171,0.0002576137,0.000221734,0.0002986313,0.0002620178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989281,0.0001719739,0.0001252373,0.0004377296,0.000235891,0.0001010592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008480894,0.00004370294,0.00005673327,0.00001370541,0.00007954686,0.000004975319,0.02681335,0.000004603247,0.00002345918,0.9599761,0.01121704,0.001758244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001880243,0.00004846988,0.00002329583,0.000006950268,0.00006380441,0.000002753868,0.002260106,0.0000343705,0.0000564458,0.3380933,0.6590905,0.0001319509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04036622,0.004143914,0.00004940147,0.02435249,0.003312543,0.0002631333,0.00002299507,0.000189085,0.9273002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785012,0.00002518094,0.0001753628,0.005702295,0.00454874,0.00002658978,0.00001163394,0.0000334795,0.01097555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7570026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792728632","doi":"10.1111/meta.12203","title":"The Challenges of Extreme Moral Stress: Claudia Card's Contributions to the Formation of Nonideal Ethical Theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical theory; Ethical theories; Sociology; Epistemology; Ethical issues; Normative ethics; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Engineering ethics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1488039399552981,"gpt":0.448384150467472,"spread":0.2995802105121739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01615799,0.0001466879,0.0003481627,0.00007234496,0.001106526,0.000005206333,0.0006212233,0.0005110728,0.000109372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03252684,0.000063555,0.0001472661,0.0002151729,0.000735887,0.0001209781,0.0002613257,0.002718312,0.0001521247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008955974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002708111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005005541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003310669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896673,0.007983458,0.0008821693,0.0002072543,0.0008510654,0.0004087433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.964161,0.03336329,0.0005484206,0.0008025395,0.0009829936,0.0001417644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001728656,0.00004071441,0.0001359266,0.00009669282,0.00007487092,7.220889e-7,0.0027902,0.000001699644,0.0004830932,0.9907323,0.001785417,0.003685521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006888402,0.0001445582,0.002274947,0.000419193,0.0001385494,0.000001185393,0.003120447,0.00001771417,0.0007186834,0.9584295,0.03393774,0.0001086635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008573903,0.003955847,0.008854617,0.9226115,0.001461896,0.001591846,0.00072563,0.00005593088,0.05216878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951076,0.001145679,0.0002270726,0.002618232,0.0005915937,0.000170274,0.000004279566,0.00001770626,0.0001175972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105991975","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2010.01636.x","title":"Mental Causation: The Mind‐Body Problem. By Anthony Dardis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Citation; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Computer science; Metaphysics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03561263157694707,"gpt":0.2596950115166866,"spread":0.2240823799397396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006001584,0.0002315326,0.0002759568,0.00005931635,0.0008163471,0.0001892246,0.0003579528,0.0001038298,0.001506025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003533089,0.000153624,0.0002016512,0.00005528633,0.001143114,0.0002461332,0.00006975477,0.0006120664,0.0003717797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001213125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004028261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001483551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004522151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986036,0.0001376192,0.0003190747,0.0003227426,0.0003320561,0.0002849296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998994,0.0001343062,0.0001582965,0.0005015165,0.0001294278,0.00008248844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001649804,0.0001931705,0.000179499,0.00002921815,0.0002202842,0.000003753038,0.02407999,3.018093e-7,0.009249816,0.91824,0.04614028,0.001647209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002635823,0.00007184895,0.00006675027,0.000007378224,0.0001157902,0.00000615951,0.0007711876,0.00001231452,0.002029055,0.1138339,0.8825939,0.0002281679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1620361,0.00141027,0.00006488663,0.05267693,0.007639868,0.001074243,0.00061813,0.0001802446,0.7742993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860576,0.00003656136,0.0002302861,0.00172312,0.002689839,0.00006135178,0.0001274437,0.00003525558,0.009038578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8364536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391816761","doi":"10.1111/meta.12667","title":"Academic hoaxes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hoax; Dimension (graph theory); sort; Work (physics); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04639697067024791,"gpt":0.3922087045427637,"spread":0.3458117338725158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004540293,0.00004915888,0.00005536307,0.0001097901,0.0002091572,0.0001211763,0.0001344033,0.0000726802,0.0006032534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001230915,0.00004574639,0.00004032758,0.0007255943,0.0001036523,0.0002809265,0.000009549441,0.0001368321,0.0008545473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004994942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002081002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005787757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003799578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993004,0.00009860947,0.00009956232,0.0001391131,0.0002431083,0.000119218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997219,0.00006607354,0.00001472311,0.00008588757,0.00004954213,0.00006189243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.377812e-7,0.000007211055,0.0001078916,0.000005174818,0.000009564826,0.000001062383,0.006791029,9.31382e-7,0.0001113391,0.9673121,0.0160888,0.009563942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001550974,0.000004778658,0.0001376729,0.000009103545,0.00001082595,1.934244e-7,0.0008357512,0.00001724209,0.0000951572,0.2021898,0.7966293,0.00005468949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04231685,0.007173625,0.0003359565,0.1037561,0.005530303,0.0002322924,0.000007489281,0.0005859666,0.8400614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884306,0.0003243392,0.0002050843,0.0006929308,0.002064725,0.00002283725,0.000003605217,0.000007518109,0.008248325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9461138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578690651","doi":"10.1111/meta.12201","title":"The <i>Salto Vitale</i> Method in Philosophy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology; Certainty; Analytic philosophy; Contemporary philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04318139815212278,"gpt":0.381389226843338,"spread":0.3382078286912152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002182739,0.0002960691,0.000375975,0.000113611,0.001410767,0.0002829304,0.002423648,0.0001644497,0.0002779278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006121226,0.0001965615,0.0002394182,0.0002782861,0.001280527,0.0003362998,0.0003666876,0.0005205305,0.001186009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003570029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002365694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001031926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002723656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971988,0.0004473544,0.0004614444,0.0007138259,0.0004414865,0.0007371491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964509,0.0006300996,0.0002734835,0.002342418,0.00007816833,0.0002249263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001086259,0.0001350463,0.0006901532,0.000004363937,0.00004431281,0.00007447532,0.000210601,0.000001266956,0.0001778223,0.9874186,0.0002260688,0.01090866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000649258,0.00009374732,0.01037647,0.00001701623,0.00002327184,0.00001993796,0.00002718815,0.00003745635,0.0002662881,0.9697709,0.01845517,0.0002632866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006017677,0.0008563489,0.0005700025,0.0441308,0.001906513,0.0003547073,0.00001722093,0.00007794568,0.9460688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953858,0.00003127138,0.0008791967,0.002075572,0.0008070287,0.0001258557,0.000001856847,0.0000314564,0.0006619106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9893682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911258360","doi":"10.1111/meta.12344","title":"Well‐Being Blindness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Blindness; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08544926162774868,"gpt":0.2738775875061251,"spread":0.1884283258783764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001242524,0.0001130843,0.0001459468,0.00009990111,0.00007666587,0.00002030427,0.0002681577,0.00005000811,0.00108218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003059604,0.00009391849,0.00009206669,0.0002116289,0.00006669263,0.0001390292,0.0000594902,0.0001378342,0.01093157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001191551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007120668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002095619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.341892e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989439,0.0000670811,0.0001419555,0.0003797916,0.0002551969,0.0002120738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995419,0.00006675286,0.00004561705,0.0002629237,0.00001340896,0.00006940336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000136976,0.0006060321,0.005736291,0.00004280396,0.00002782378,0.00007826717,0.0002078856,0.0001302381,0.4142154,0.5733951,0.0027029,0.002720298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001784051,0.0003705113,0.01006329,0.00004035276,0.0000320678,0.00008868342,0.00002048711,0.0004031609,0.2304606,0.6243251,0.1318086,0.000603034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7119333,0.00001944522,0.00001833624,0.004980079,0.001069923,0.0001172179,0.00000178623,0.00006441538,0.2817955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892853,0.00001036656,0.0001309752,0.006954382,0.0001848093,0.000007215984,0.000001766944,0.00001164686,0.003413503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.278382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145446726","doi":"10.1111/meta.12589","title":"The old fisherman's mistake","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Confusion; Foundation (evidence); Naturalism; Consciousness; Epistemology; Fallacy; Morality; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03603165804695974,"gpt":0.2016158693726992,"spread":0.1655842113257394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003003436,0.0001540193,0.0001618925,0.00005237835,0.00304855,0.000203296,0.0004863356,0.0000153975,0.002962513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002523515,0.0001053552,0.0002204008,0.00008422654,0.0003466896,0.0001096075,0.0001907942,0.0003684828,0.0002190996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003795069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001483109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003314843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005242295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987066,0.0001456674,0.0002348546,0.0002371386,0.0004075225,0.0002681951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991924,0.0001863448,0.00008573791,0.0004254631,0.0000402005,0.00006987398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003265818,0.00007751759,0.000005814984,0.000004202081,0.00005635152,0.00001393652,0.001536209,0.000005565488,0.00001106417,0.9714919,0.0252654,0.001499324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001267234,0.00005285105,0.00001117234,8.121282e-7,0.00002095628,0.000002263154,0.0002212946,0.00002014389,0.000009328885,0.3916928,0.6077447,0.00009697642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009628957,0.0009760868,0.000001820602,0.04382296,0.002334088,0.0002290329,0.0001284448,0.0001693524,0.9427093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520001,0.000009148799,0.000008121107,0.003526675,0.002166203,0.0001266544,0.00002262249,0.00002776653,0.04211267],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9423712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250979798","doi":"10.1111/meta.12371","title":"Inarticulate Forgiveness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Forgiveness; Action (physics); Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01257450787409957,"gpt":0.2804197412857387,"spread":0.2678452334116391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001518294,0.0001640213,0.0002497183,0.0001375882,0.00005876387,0.00001829956,0.0001994898,0.0001652496,0.007119952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003258013,0.0001307761,0.000172146,0.0002957813,0.00005426599,0.00009195007,0.00004883966,0.0001951541,0.009084506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001798291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009963339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005309337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.729299e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988986,0.0000700122,0.0002177986,0.0003413088,0.000161994,0.0003103322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992809,0.00002568592,0.00005604938,0.0005122356,0.00004129059,0.00008383452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004918794,0.001396259,0.1669902,0.00008514167,0.001013513,0.0004617115,0.003199058,0.0005144977,0.0160425,0.7898169,0.00138999,0.01859838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01108211,0.001941097,0.5317565,0.000201354,0.001047244,0.0003497665,0.00129947,0.0003434577,0.009020705,0.1080571,0.3319678,0.00293346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123882,0.0004860897,0.00003043495,0.0003884389,0.002231092,0.0002597321,0.000005586946,0.0001096914,0.08410072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919034,0.000004927335,0.00006571569,0.000190126,0.00009624983,0.00003940985,0.00001054281,0.00003399526,0.007655629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6817598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225410264","doi":"10.1111/meta.12565","title":"Chains of being: Infinite regress, circularity, and metaphysical explanationRoss P.CameronOxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. ix + 252.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Citation; Theology; Library science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05912471100144995,"gpt":0.2731131220891251,"spread":0.2139884110876751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004874911,0.0002494279,0.000407987,0.0003177443,0.0007416115,0.00004415373,0.0007031343,0.00007447991,0.0001710302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004773258,0.0002796979,0.0001750254,0.001335431,0.0009599503,0.0003806019,0.0009389021,0.000776985,0.000002824388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000745542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007539882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003149508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002739248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969359,0.000502464,0.0004526707,0.0007375752,0.001017923,0.0003534615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983482,0.0004161631,0.0003922936,0.0005905001,0.000113533,0.0001392569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006341228,0.0004178243,0.0002674298,0.00007206685,0.00008717956,0.00006156366,0.0004824307,0.00004471969,0.0735165,0.9230195,0.00115667,0.0008107168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003042963,0.0008401844,0.001767847,0.00004109042,0.0003902688,0.00004594805,0.000386588,0.002170056,0.1043578,0.2075153,0.6783359,0.001106054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9350393,0.0008207896,0.004870533,0.01810487,0.001676609,0.001909001,0.001616131,0.0004786017,0.0354842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967688,0.0004345525,0.0003454204,0.001401131,0.0001061751,0.00003027141,0.00004857602,0.00003135975,0.0008336863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7155042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245195506","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00287","title":"Oracularity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Falsifiability; Judgement; Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Credibility; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1064484508213111,"gpt":0.2662004836574623,"spread":0.1597520328361512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005085546,0.0001711564,0.0002784976,0.00008317665,0.0003401611,0.0000893281,0.0001576536,0.00007326704,0.001363734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001316858,0.0001456709,0.0002060561,0.00005115671,0.0004702787,0.0001788211,0.00002004847,0.0002852981,0.0006865758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000133111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003361478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004969515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008559052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988515,0.0002122284,0.0002279969,0.0002579856,0.0002000928,0.0002501707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992384,0.00008474581,0.0000819614,0.00036942,0.0001420108,0.00008350869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003297191,0.00008591795,0.0001139713,0.00002194789,0.00006909126,0.000007597663,0.003273959,6.896117e-7,0.00004469611,0.9950002,0.001196515,0.0001821363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001420407,0.00003145932,0.0000225925,0.000003566246,0.00004868108,0.000002462016,0.0002298615,0.000001807719,0.0003173837,0.4406246,0.5584425,0.0001331272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02842024,0.001007428,0.0001403011,0.001610292,0.001930405,0.000164797,0.00002162395,0.0001516029,0.9665533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988335,0.00001989332,0.0005434292,0.002075643,0.0008053699,0.000017068,0.00001125035,0.00002752926,0.008164854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9599147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}