{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":56,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":56,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"07020f5a5e9d","filters":{"venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion"}},"results":[{"id":"W2024535992","doi":"10.1163/157006811x608359","title":"The Collection and Synthesis of “Tradition” and the Second-Century Invention of Christianity*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Literature; History; Religious studies; Art","authors":[{"name":"William E. Arnal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03053199945378417,"gpt":0.257164992158131,"spread":0.2266329927043469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003067444,0.00007755045,0.0002003178,0.00007582496,0.000330808,0.00002192975,0.000124064,0.00002321417,0.00004315388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002155306,0.00003552457,0.00005498928,0.00009860087,0.0005745335,0.0000603683,0.00003897256,0.00009556608,2.558344e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006286613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004379532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001333526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001263985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980063,0.001366064,0.0003304375,0.00009749278,0.0001316849,0.00006803015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977648,0.001743236,0.0002558718,0.0001433667,0.00008451034,0.000008177183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001064481,0.00033788,0.0002231388,0.00007322283,0.0001453067,1.678295e-7,0.181466,3.248011e-7,0.00004329925,0.803876,0.001221187,0.01154901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002202791,0.001698138,0.01513892,0.0001535439,0.0003994204,0.000005594656,0.2463694,0.000209252,0.001396386,0.7201822,0.01209038,0.0001539423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476928,0.005044786,0.000369806,0.0002998264,0.0002388286,0.0009330406,0.00001464291,0.000008951107,0.04539735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982248,0.001461749,0.00005810429,0.0000742163,0.00002723046,0.00007540207,4.162106e-7,0.000004656756,0.00007345348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08369379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2544341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130425445","doi":"10.1163/157006810x531067","title":"Ten Implications of Semantic Holism for Theories of Religion","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Holism; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Steven Engler","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mark Q. Gardiner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03389762695376131,"gpt":0.3239184910439424,"spread":0.2900208640901811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003510276,0.0002033542,0.0005076771,0.0002505723,0.0002434865,0.00002377408,0.0006089355,0.00008235289,0.00001819013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000345537,0.0001353876,0.0002151823,0.0001558537,0.0004189341,0.00009749341,0.00006876303,0.0002507496,0.00000191306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006535456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002373715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00114881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006972076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979293,0.0006300766,0.0007061805,0.0002658479,0.0002716102,0.0001970285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960983,0.002338027,0.0005161159,0.0007259144,0.0002974508,0.00002423167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003725717,0.0006913608,0.0006495508,0.00009013957,0.0000749034,3.196546e-7,0.0811107,0.000009582148,0.001926153,0.911507,0.0007934222,0.002774269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009787745,0.001180812,0.001645095,0.00006219491,0.0002147575,0.000004065942,0.009552237,0.00001059155,0.002557529,0.9792851,0.004355323,0.000153541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689571,0.0005011479,0.002286449,0.0009967933,0.0005686329,0.001945514,0.00007555261,0.00003300948,0.02463578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979858,0.0001535932,0.001147466,0.0001076172,0.0002384338,0.0001879969,0.000009014631,0.00002263531,0.0001474908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07155847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5520948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025474434","doi":"10.1163/157006812x635709","title":"Computing Religion: A New Tool in the Multilevel Analysis of Religion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Computer science; Empirical research; Epistemology; Space (punctuation); Management science; Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Kristoffer Laigaard Nielbo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Donald M. Braxton","is_ca":false},{"name":"Afzal Upal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06540313143775371,"gpt":0.4294280534069601,"spread":0.3640249219692063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03147706,0.0002604104,0.0007896879,0.0006583765,0.0003238373,0.00004341474,0.00128348,0.0002309636,0.00001346244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001274354,0.0001702796,0.0003519642,0.003094937,0.0002962777,0.0001658793,0.0001033349,0.0004586818,0.000007602165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006892675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007916259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07116728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009318552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.983351,0.01343164,0.001191563,0.0004406927,0.0009672914,0.0006178354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928504,0.005394773,0.0006194635,0.0009500674,0.0001234294,0.00006187174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004219495,0.001704837,0.1233855,0.00002475605,0.0003245248,0.000007237541,0.6922374,0.000577782,0.00009155853,0.159047,0.009440246,0.01273721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004209771,0.001189741,0.4386724,0.0002165901,0.002273944,0.00001785916,0.2549928,0.0004476981,0.000128868,0.2827248,0.01420453,0.0009210579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766185,0.002342466,0.009432699,0.001607357,0.0004768969,0.001233093,0.000003530324,0.00003153813,0.008253978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953002,0.0008692692,0.002242458,0.001135453,0.0003067526,0.00003479669,0.000004783051,0.00001578209,0.00009049058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4372447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210377738","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10074","title":"‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Ideology; Sociology; Mythology; Politics; Political science; Pedagogy; Theology; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Johannes C. Wolfart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03815193887266696,"gpt":0.402218388240828,"spread":0.364066449368161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009051796,0.00009411498,0.000183432,0.00022125,0.001429165,0.0001034257,0.0003236641,0.00003264663,0.00007643451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001201334,0.00007836262,0.00004826126,0.0005864915,0.0001271483,0.00009594615,0.0001032754,0.0003007467,0.000003627128],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006254443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001464066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002593991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002670589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913375,0.007334609,0.0003786742,0.0002346095,0.0005195612,0.0001950576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963942,0.002940186,0.0001576962,0.0003584065,0.0001035273,0.00004599712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004112806,0.0002916282,0.003737592,0.000003654638,0.00001854041,0.000005559311,0.347426,0.0001923872,0.00004055432,0.6141876,0.03253422,0.001521099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004107688,0.000194431,0.001964398,0.000006212494,0.00002707082,0.000007377344,0.118669,0.00002289568,0.000009128182,0.8657057,0.01288852,0.00009443391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750379,0.001620489,0.0003304195,0.009516153,0.0003522963,0.001262134,0.000008787747,0.00004316503,0.01182864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952073,0.0006645662,0.001524757,0.001469918,0.00007813612,0.0003983863,0.00000328426,0.000008863575,0.0006447635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2515181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049023236","doi":"10.1163/094330509x12568874557298","title":"Ritual Theory and Attitudes to Agency in Brazilian Spirit Possession","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Possession (linguistics); Deference; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Steven Engler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0309604814388721,"gpt":0.4156748958633761,"spread":0.384714414424504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008489151,0.0001261114,0.0002980632,0.00009728515,0.0004747134,0.00002854877,0.0003539959,0.00007862951,0.00005474434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008240793,0.00007499815,0.00004438548,0.0004798315,0.0002958614,0.00008807894,0.00008435459,0.0001815638,0.00000432447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003658833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001483049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002610984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002623063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943686,0.004478139,0.0002993112,0.0002768582,0.0003083591,0.000268711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983804,0.001272342,0.00007695318,0.0001863303,0.00003524376,0.00004872773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004714858,0.001180639,0.0101884,0.000006250921,0.00001345752,0.00002334328,0.2047074,0.0000133226,0.0001630774,0.6326984,0.0004840078,0.1500502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006302868,0.00198293,0.2421425,0.00007214055,0.0000214687,0.000001181896,0.1543338,0.000001763348,0.00005375934,0.5965313,0.004043503,0.0001853735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716926,0.001328784,0.00144711,0.002803126,0.0001027172,0.0007457437,8.086803e-7,0.00002019443,0.02185891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970739,0.001021769,0.000921788,0.0007694125,0.00006519966,0.00001901559,2.313337e-7,0.000003914845,0.0001247873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2319541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3947044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041746847","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341304","title":"“Pseudo-Speciation of the Human Race:Religions as Hazard-Precaution Systems”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Environmental ethics; Race (biology); Natural (archaeology); Hazard; Welfare; Sociology; Human welfare; Political science; History; Philosophy; Law; Ecology; Biology; Gender studies; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06522725682895067,"gpt":0.3395080979498099,"spread":0.2742808411208593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002901435,0.0001583757,0.0002760465,0.0001376015,0.0002763106,0.00002517417,0.0007516926,0.0000836548,0.00002916298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000471132,0.00009045204,0.0001206642,0.0004559639,0.0001721256,0.0001197131,0.0001198549,0.0002612683,0.00005213627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004524567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001552288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007788896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000237131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940135,0.004332782,0.000548464,0.0003348991,0.000567595,0.000202713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979162,0.0009411811,0.0004200661,0.0006164325,0.00007940545,0.0000267262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002797417,0.003627405,0.006665463,0.00007838659,0.00006438563,0.000006501602,0.01898797,0.002958775,0.4877114,0.4622413,0.01397874,0.003399974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003212715,0.002152801,0.2059304,0.000335584,0.0001835415,0.0001127763,0.01230689,0.0005874177,0.08020176,0.6931185,0.00138737,0.0004701739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891574,0.00009224004,0.0006117913,0.001549333,0.0005799094,0.001522396,0.000004024247,0.00002374565,0.006459109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986385,0.00006919423,0.0001371428,0.0004061727,0.00006406365,0.0001810802,0.000001089492,0.0000108012,0.0004920338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4075096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3688527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800458785","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341441","title":"Liberal Hermeneutics of the Spectacular in the Study of the New Testament and the Roman Empire","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Depiction; Ideology; Scholarship; Empire; New Testament; Sociology; Capitalism; Politics; State (computer science); Status quo; Literature; Philosophy; History; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Classics; Law; Political science; Art; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Christopher B. Zeichmann","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02371837730764312,"gpt":0.3726446952527649,"spread":0.3489263179451219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00957438,0.0001569265,0.000320772,0.00004609075,0.0006748615,0.00005357445,0.001410696,0.00007043831,0.00001083258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006031129,0.00006025473,0.0001920824,0.0008772414,0.0009425631,0.00006057405,0.0002209271,0.0004085441,9.710265e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005109361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009091665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008625628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01014756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873619,0.01084951,0.0005347899,0.0002159597,0.00081905,0.0002187652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963214,0.002314575,0.0003942911,0.0008474589,0.0000986833,0.00002353101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001683227,0.001121762,0.01304148,0.000006252181,0.00009763183,9.115665e-7,0.9328085,0.00004772352,0.0001061725,0.0494215,0.002181462,0.000998279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001960142,0.0007476006,0.05299288,0.0000696555,0.0002016929,0.000003789743,0.8125023,0.00004279895,0.0002038258,0.1286003,0.002571669,0.0001033111],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798405,0.0001644759,0.00002478752,0.006822155,0.0002988747,0.002340984,0.00000162859,0.000007617747,0.01049903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983596,0.0002355075,0.00008188481,0.0008068364,0.0001071658,0.00005559854,1.134216e-7,0.000009468168,0.0003438382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1203062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023835741","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00246","title":"Categorical Designations and Methodological Reductionism: Gnosticism as Case Study1","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Gnosticism; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Relation (database); Philosophy; Categorical variable; Embodied cognition; Instrumentalism; Psychologism; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Philip L. Tite","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.131301129910355,"gpt":0.3633004200684343,"spread":0.2319992901580793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00440621,0.0002282545,0.0004891853,0.0001665512,0.000977754,0.00006635899,0.0002416566,0.00008030511,0.00008422675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001249347,0.0001413171,0.00009470215,0.000209001,0.0004444603,0.00007257855,0.00009392774,0.0003815316,0.00001454014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005036436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000142237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002913483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005323717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943498,0.004157673,0.0005234197,0.0003790874,0.0003398329,0.0002502013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940133,0.005334044,0.0001514236,0.0003042354,0.0001355975,0.00006141489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002952269,0.00133177,0.0001422908,0.00001258671,0.0001108583,0.0007557857,0.1563183,0.00004278747,0.0000222358,0.8330735,0.00226786,0.005626801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000766833,0.001970652,0.0001360985,0.00001088726,0.0002683573,0.001136666,0.05054472,0.00002590374,0.00001280466,0.9159954,0.02889723,0.0002344292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9020882,0.005007167,0.01657231,0.00466906,0.0009705155,0.002106583,0.000008777654,0.0001414367,0.06843597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962881,0.0009532172,0.001243079,0.0003104216,0.0004078925,0.0001709394,0.000001456224,0.00001594673,0.0006089634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1057736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7520192,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031168812","doi":"10.1163/157006811x549670","title":"Conversion as a Thematic Site: Academic Representations of Ambedkar’s Buddhist Turn","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Indian and Buddhist Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Trope (literature); Depiction; Sociology; Hinduism; Epistemology; Hermeneutics; Narrative; History of religions; Sociology of religion; Literature; Religious studies; Social science; Philosophy; Theology; Art","authors":[{"name":"Shane Gannon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0635432758461328,"gpt":0.3291871614852219,"spread":0.2656438856390891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002387367,0.0001498711,0.0003360118,0.0001918464,0.0002412317,0.00001280556,0.0003611471,0.00004854101,0.0003676012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000239363,0.00009508761,0.0001110542,0.0001119482,0.0003597145,0.0001090419,0.00009306271,0.000243941,0.00004107112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001826375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001423021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002634643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977279,0.001107711,0.0005109289,0.0001975112,0.000291214,0.0001646823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998309,0.0008252938,0.0003464586,0.0003855219,0.0001149865,0.0000187542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002643132,0.0004332309,0.001831128,0.00007741219,0.00007485259,0.000006559826,0.6916205,0.000002576117,0.0001270632,0.3040077,0.001090111,0.0004645727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00202137,0.001687871,0.004628904,0.0002287557,0.0004172449,0.00001734969,0.6413971,0.00003017809,0.003076741,0.3428462,0.003300396,0.0003478428],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8760678,0.0003933552,0.0001218544,0.00007826668,0.0002354436,0.0006398145,0.00001063754,0.00002214496,0.1224307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974581,0.0001162276,0.0002995379,0.0001493343,0.00006975902,0.00005566624,0.000002751246,0.00001316592,0.00183546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1213903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4024975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085013143","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341299","title":"Change the Name! On the Importance of Reclaiming NAASR’s Original Objectives for the Twenty-First Century","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; History","authors":[{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05563113604833764,"gpt":0.3729482716472992,"spread":0.3173171355989616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01201471,0.0001369467,0.0001945052,0.00006067508,0.001128524,0.00005644547,0.0009685673,0.00004449423,0.0001054168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000518406,0.00005522819,0.0001314213,0.0003572034,0.0003482983,0.0001032579,0.00008693715,0.0002110981,0.000009776143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005982325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002062954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004767905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002772519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956769,0.003023527,0.0003114496,0.0002211115,0.0005116173,0.0002553567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994711,0.004315898,0.0003108353,0.0005473264,0.00009539146,0.00001951947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002118108,0.0004477018,0.002652085,0.00002043816,0.00009741906,4.944587e-7,0.4612884,0.00005587271,0.00002675548,0.4801514,0.005681949,0.04936564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005769596,0.0005856598,0.0201862,0.00007188437,0.0001263114,5.658199e-7,0.6768109,0.000119862,0.00005399054,0.109559,0.1917539,0.0001546622],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9234491,0.002020675,0.003141442,0.04089035,0.001052055,0.01130667,0.000007166706,0.00004660421,0.01808597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934684,0.003156767,0.0003592539,0.001114831,0.0002021849,0.00133998,5.456952e-7,0.00001170092,0.0003463501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3705924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8679811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060422088","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341310","title":"The Scientific Study of Religion: Two Case Studies, One Response","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Luther H. Martin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08038610696636907,"gpt":0.3516738463904878,"spread":0.2712877394241187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01729309,0.000366943,0.0007086377,0.0003688561,0.00194999,0.0002604453,0.0009668952,0.00005347818,0.00003299018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008725927,0.0002076838,0.0001818254,0.00046293,0.0009223542,0.0002146869,0.0002942329,0.0004442525,0.00003496739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004047541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005706742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004060586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880309,0.008807149,0.00116986,0.0005981259,0.0009676339,0.0004262982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896666,0.007570741,0.0006017279,0.001489109,0.0006181074,0.00005367782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004010617,0.006242904,0.0004850096,0.00006746129,0.0007197587,0.0002156577,0.7831685,0.00007980141,0.0002225917,0.1857484,0.01084057,0.008198731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004498641,0.008638293,0.0004918107,0.0001491532,0.0005149072,0.0001271542,0.5916148,0.00003164226,0.0002142601,0.3826481,0.0106353,0.0004358253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875126,0.003819403,0.00002102551,0.0007799232,0.001009889,0.003503006,0.000007307671,0.00004527767,0.003301492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976239,0.0002617327,0.0001239093,0.0001235127,0.0002549013,0.0005143331,0.000001341299,0.00003169931,0.001064628],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1968998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078445284","doi":"10.1163/157006811x549715","title":"Does “Q” Have Any Representative Potential?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Q Methodology Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Product (mathematics); Sociology; State (computer science); Reflection (computer programming); Work (physics); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Physics; Geometry","authors":[{"name":"Sarah E. Rollens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2105553800503836,"gpt":0.48588304929996,"spread":0.2753276692495763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04647056,0.0001689373,0.0004507716,0.0003908755,0.0001922679,0.00003265919,0.001910457,0.00009630978,0.0001555012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007099062,0.00007741302,0.0001422431,0.000924626,0.0003125198,0.0001517566,0.0002843715,0.0003149439,0.00006305108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001608973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002178375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006251974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002026885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9741162,0.02282433,0.001064819,0.0007844493,0.0009221047,0.0002880736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837695,0.01351934,0.0005667746,0.001835584,0.0002655494,0.00004324715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002194888,0.003756943,0.09025979,0.0000109409,0.0002640465,0.0001028516,0.5760717,0.0003365228,0.005817997,0.2381912,0.00660144,0.07639168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004172155,0.0002613541,0.06442343,0.000005414267,0.00005500876,0.00001226308,0.08682026,0.00004193788,0.004468255,0.843166,0.0002333305,0.00009555688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6330165,0.00009305273,0.3440993,0.0006184637,0.0004111771,0.001358878,0.000007682659,0.00003362069,0.02036136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9138705,0.00002194889,0.08467004,0.000177135,0.00004780666,0.0002360441,6.154024e-7,0.00001210999,0.000963782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6049747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000848332","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341247","title":"Provocation and Its Responses","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Islam; Provocation test; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Rippin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06164488228594979,"gpt":0.4327181329129964,"spread":0.3710732506270466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009983688,0.00005011083,0.00009556269,0.00007165157,0.0002265887,0.00001100335,0.0001253237,0.0000257372,0.000008145495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001507044,0.00003381351,0.00001475478,0.000235529,0.00007089305,0.00009763925,0.00002468535,0.00006378191,0.000004126809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001802965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002340641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004568678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000162538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956522,0.003815935,0.0001360889,0.00008267583,0.0001844277,0.0001286562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982064,0.001548198,0.00007396711,0.000105691,0.0000494603,0.00001632012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000723081,0.0003317198,0.01933783,0.000006171759,0.00001153071,9.20983e-8,0.6896716,3.191408e-7,0.0001187693,0.2810721,0.0004702867,0.00890726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004353351,0.0002336331,0.1375409,0.00002388473,0.0000525554,0.000001459171,0.776947,0.000002981059,0.0003861283,0.06870769,0.01554785,0.0001206176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785459,0.001798338,0.0001309409,0.001411866,0.0002049916,0.0005138786,3.782478e-7,0.00001239422,0.0173813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997971,0.0005088326,0.0003680513,0.0001325422,0.00009827991,0.00006864903,1.648875e-7,0.00000308843,0.000849411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2123644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3460167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W275336053","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341346","title":"Theory, Method, and Madness in Religious Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Legitimacy; Sociology; Function (biology); Aura; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Hart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08167268275727134,"gpt":0.4626269002765907,"spread":0.3809542175193193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0304537,0.0001848699,0.00047571,0.0002143875,0.0002662631,0.00005353433,0.0004821102,0.0001217767,0.000004273872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003225943,0.0001298893,0.00009768754,0.0008092577,0.0003329238,0.0001488615,0.0001206396,0.0003845774,0.000007032301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001348613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008288345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005890748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00242925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9840657,0.01415538,0.0005321499,0.0003515912,0.0005718393,0.000323322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935944,0.005539923,0.000207615,0.0003838588,0.0001954033,0.00007881364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002713631,0.0004066268,0.003036798,0.00001307596,0.00007788729,0.00001612526,0.7152897,0.0001478983,0.00002214926,0.26882,0.004037783,0.007860676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007148517,0.0002114122,0.0004130729,0.00003817568,0.00004272717,0.000005736635,0.4832482,0.00001906604,0.00002250519,0.5098406,0.005335175,0.0001084783],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9295533,0.00881894,0.01980453,0.004944622,0.001132766,0.002210064,0.000003770447,0.00009953931,0.03343244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887414,0.004170526,0.005538836,0.0006873594,0.00009561225,0.0001762194,6.785075e-7,0.00001722285,0.0005721414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2410206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083901661","doi":"10.1163/094330509x12568874557252","title":"You Show Your Smith and I’ll Show Mine: Selection, Exegesis, and the Politics of Citation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Constructive; Citation; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Exegesis; Poetics; Object (grammar); Selection (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Linguistics; Computer science; Law; Art; Political science","authors":[{"name":"John W. Parrish","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0222123477526411,"gpt":0.3484354068318179,"spread":0.3262230590791768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008699067,0.00008244195,0.0002285087,0.0001173656,0.000349762,0.00004444871,0.0002212153,0.0000297319,0.000002497215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000647053,0.00004775053,0.00004380344,0.0004099462,0.0002427465,0.00009505206,0.00003159575,0.0001036516,1.28931e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000106411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002248952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001867801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006258712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958655,0.003286045,0.0002536409,0.0001586357,0.0002936655,0.0001425033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981772,0.001401548,0.0001684653,0.0001661824,0.00006270194,0.00002386596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002632493,0.0004737735,0.02518447,0.00002763493,0.0001139142,0.000001301143,0.3486223,0.00008530534,0.0006377543,0.5467147,0.0006338909,0.07724167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001766035,0.0006189188,0.090441,0.00007677831,0.0004558845,0.000004447797,0.2634819,0.0005601904,0.0003119819,0.6407208,0.001361106,0.0002010357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894515,0.0009117704,0.003869672,0.001828733,0.00002981758,0.0003995301,0.000004279119,0.000008925673,0.003495814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970725,0.0007417934,0.001813816,0.0001240967,0.00005670996,0.000007882513,0.000001186527,0.000003557222,0.0001785118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09400607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.301494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131662226","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341259","title":"Authenticity, Sincerity and Spontaneity: The Mutual Implication of Nature and Religion in China and the West","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Theme (computing); Morality; Epistemology; Philosophy; China; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"James Miller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01079358009765086,"gpt":0.3173577046331332,"spread":0.3065641245354824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00843138,0.0001090529,0.000241127,0.00007101278,0.0003756848,0.0000354703,0.0002941399,0.0001015838,0.000003022146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005144111,0.00005428903,0.0000325972,0.0003069161,0.0007925881,0.000110683,0.0001089292,0.0003667882,3.931854e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002111067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001806158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01300369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004024638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950609,0.00411063,0.0002660177,0.000201081,0.0002526622,0.0001087416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976008,0.001873895,0.0001794264,0.0002823204,0.00004108394,0.00002250547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005535589,0.0002306232,0.01341737,0.00003072297,0.00001970715,0.00000136622,0.3596309,0.000004137253,0.0002518799,0.6199845,0.00007981566,0.005795429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007809511,0.0001275437,0.1516122,0.00002578116,0.00003983724,0.000007112114,0.008117675,0.00004433643,0.00002055248,0.8388739,0.0002828406,0.00006718874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893939,0.001615403,0.00004230715,0.004919569,0.00007127626,0.001139296,0.000002738845,0.00000704172,0.002808439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991318,0.0005026437,0.00008344898,0.0001540428,0.00005091927,0.00005061716,6.534761e-7,0.000005041865,0.00002081845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3515132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211766733","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341528","title":"“So Many Mothers, So Little Love”: Discourse of Motherly Love and Parental Governance in 2019 Hong Kong Protests","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Power (physics); Nationalism; Politics; Wife; Sociology; Gender studies; China; Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Ting Guo","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01726931201494262,"gpt":0.3639592339961578,"spread":0.3466899219812151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003276507,0.0001366361,0.000360556,0.00004748205,0.0001535656,0.00003160046,0.0002671281,0.0000816501,0.00001168124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004842106,0.00009338609,0.00007533616,0.0004336669,0.0006209355,0.0001133734,0.00009654919,0.0001935472,0.000004165547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000525193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000876277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01266987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007692067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965755,0.00222182,0.0003259324,0.0002354756,0.0003846363,0.0002565951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986907,0.0007766827,0.0002440776,0.0002144872,0.00004790338,0.00002621327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001887708,0.0008693101,0.06543186,0.00005308196,0.00008909529,0.00001666333,0.8528243,0.00002313679,0.0003255643,0.06358363,0.0002200063,0.01637452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001308498,0.0003439647,0.1643088,0.0002307814,0.00005774287,0.000002305544,0.6339554,0.00001547574,0.0006689413,0.198565,0.0003167956,0.0002263177],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862385,0.002878112,0.00007287131,0.001999881,0.0001346209,0.0008204749,0.00001586336,0.000007004096,0.007832644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965827,0.001941245,0.0002895484,0.00008296629,0.000108369,0.00001448949,4.549548e-7,0.00001199835,0.0009681816],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2188689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008755468","doi":"10.1163/157006809x416805","title":"“On Thursdays We Worship the Banana Plant”: Encountering Lived Hinduism in a Canadian Suburb","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Worship; Sociology; Hinduism; Field (mathematics); Lived experience; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Religious studies; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Theology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Janet Gunn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04704789189382556,"gpt":0.3608277934225868,"spread":0.3137799015287612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007335147,0.0001500204,0.0002778216,0.0001285851,0.0007975247,0.00004036613,0.0006910829,0.0000999394,0.00005898873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000580866,0.00007750413,0.00006848394,0.0005254438,0.0002785581,0.00005455634,0.00003412593,0.0003617593,0.00000612153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001764515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005787357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.525586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7182781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949858,0.003623824,0.000290525,0.0002447345,0.0003687328,0.0004864363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977098,0.001826835,0.0001051959,0.0002645742,0.00002715857,0.00006642187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002730589,0.0004334147,0.002581217,0.000003811914,0.00002846557,0.00007648248,0.4263531,0.00008412412,0.00001647247,0.5458589,0.001498183,0.02279287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007278254,0.001631945,0.03402057,0.0001529246,0.00003836287,0.000002284778,0.438646,0.00005518151,0.00003345851,0.5002871,0.02411026,0.0002941234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.907841,0.001321061,0.0001101253,0.0105737,0.000295244,0.0009695699,0.000003062162,0.00002139056,0.07886484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972,0.001442708,0.00005129513,0.001080773,0.00009217628,0.00002938051,5.196188e-7,0.000005059374,0.00009814552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.192692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6133996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W847888219","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341328","title":"The Future of Religious History in Habermas’s Critical Theory of Religion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Sociology; Intellectual history; Christianity; Political history; Epistemology; Identity (music); History of religions; Critical theory; Conceptual history; Religious studies; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth MacKendrick","is_ca":true},{"name":"Matt Sheedy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04884210258477259,"gpt":0.3804293564707374,"spread":0.3315872538859648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03454459,0.0002191727,0.0005791486,0.0002115893,0.0001878213,0.00001574342,0.001133623,0.0002149561,0.00001097948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005078613,0.0001417226,0.0001958038,0.0006516495,0.001578438,0.0001357554,0.000134194,0.0005592171,0.000004131688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001779116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001797622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001293251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005690953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9793823,0.01786696,0.0009879133,0.0003536986,0.0009786366,0.0004305022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864296,0.01212368,0.000272029,0.0007656923,0.0003068154,0.0001021966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001503796,0.0007139077,0.0003983537,0.00003510296,0.0000215054,0.00001257171,0.1013407,0.00002210834,0.00008322806,0.8889031,0.001992437,0.004973169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000745824,0.0006763964,0.0001293038,0.0000814407,0.00006810592,0.000003447989,0.06738841,0.000005539579,0.0001576973,0.8992065,0.03139572,0.0001415952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7721498,0.05702946,0.002165738,0.008910533,0.003409687,0.002932185,0.00001858336,0.00009021797,0.1532938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972919,0.001439543,0.0004849776,0.0003094129,0.0002824524,0.00006062082,0.000001002611,0.00002017952,0.000109932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2251421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988930514","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341470","title":"A Manifesto for the Scientific Study of Religions or Setting the Parameters for a Scientific Study of Religions In the Modern University","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Religious studies; History; Political science; Law; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06861194764720867,"gpt":0.3664234382078462,"spread":0.2978114905606375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02815589,0.0002141918,0.0005209761,0.0002892863,0.002617492,0.00008628903,0.002028854,0.00006397002,0.000002327837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004245176,0.0001007387,0.0001999877,0.002129034,0.0007960989,0.00006464656,0.0002346575,0.000290556,0.00000122799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001152218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001608325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01080436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02198291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915321,0.005629821,0.0007305874,0.0006073094,0.001065866,0.0004343498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781884,0.01970128,0.0005512552,0.001108447,0.0004193197,0.00003131649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001045494,0.004649814,0.004878312,0.0000433357,0.000174965,0.000004435753,0.9673911,0.001172246,0.0000491682,0.01658125,0.00248809,0.001521734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002272001,0.00264335,0.00263313,0.00006050758,0.0004946976,9.817464e-7,0.950387,0.000432235,0.000007761838,0.03525759,0.005652436,0.0001583051],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863707,0.0002565435,0.00119282,0.0007572893,0.0008508328,0.00965778,0.00001623608,0.00001710359,0.0008807008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980448,0.00003315643,0.0005261078,0.00003418868,0.00005104024,0.0002912119,0.000001026354,0.0000137756,0.001004732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02391071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408854945","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341376","title":"“It Was Like That When I Came In”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Encyclopedia; Epistemology; Sociology; Identification (biology); Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Nathan Colborne","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04198250474039451,"gpt":0.3873660580555587,"spread":0.3453835533151642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00763209,0.0001187774,0.0002426196,0.0001277935,0.0002295217,0.00003436604,0.0005728239,0.0001022024,0.0001073592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005685524,0.0000679558,0.0001285311,0.0003396641,0.0001850108,0.0001636896,0.00005712506,0.0002095091,0.00004098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001148169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005180141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00752234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005758543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942616,0.004422796,0.0003212472,0.0002373643,0.0004813163,0.0002757403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965427,0.002839667,0.0001469697,0.0003707087,0.00005809573,0.00004184137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001885258,0.0008559715,0.01584863,0.000007329194,0.00005473385,0.00001326514,0.8404238,0.0000117897,0.0003884934,0.09176925,0.03240288,0.01803535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001651927,0.0003927427,0.005156585,0.0001679966,0.00005001745,0.000004120179,0.4719807,0.000006637852,0.0002593237,0.3434617,0.1765954,0.0002728969],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.852178,0.0003808537,0.005489639,0.02749244,0.001049063,0.00150209,0.000004571873,0.00007347974,0.1118299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940343,0.001189802,0.0006314287,0.001316321,0.00007450553,0.00008954421,3.157934e-7,0.00001015684,0.002653624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3684431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135979915","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341513","title":"Religious Studies and the Spiritual Turn","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Emic and etic; Sociology; Scholarship; Sociology of religion; Epistemology; Social science; Anthropology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Sharday Mosurinjohn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Galen Watts","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03775651125878855,"gpt":0.4166253721737679,"spread":0.3788688609149793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009750521,0.0001236149,0.0003381938,0.0000494707,0.0006679373,0.00007314645,0.0003461754,0.00006832297,0.000007124436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002596813,0.00006817962,0.0001445702,0.0005272671,0.0006858182,0.00007449092,0.000113025,0.0003285767,0.000005528819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004090959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006274703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00241437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00204986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909661,0.00776255,0.0003655473,0.0002382604,0.0004566605,0.0002109103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934298,0.00581066,0.0001549993,0.0003669536,0.0002068396,0.00003072798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001637034,0.0002211704,0.0005419406,0.00001170163,0.0001561896,0.00001741875,0.7053162,0.00002128559,0.00004013126,0.2810894,0.008746848,0.003674031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001209956,0.0001033546,0.0003180942,0.00003862126,0.0001019408,0.00001374611,0.6899676,0.000007584385,0.0000735498,0.2886955,0.01938054,0.00008961345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9324376,0.01893543,0.0008464806,0.02421753,0.0008001507,0.001117521,0.000002143456,0.00005214595,0.02159103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775997,0.01908513,0.0007055733,0.001664992,0.000128442,0.00009417075,4.582447e-7,0.000008409563,0.0007131246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04516213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5137302,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028934107","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00255","title":"Reflections On Religion, Modernization, and Violence in the Islamic Middle East","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Militant; Islam; Modernization theory; Middle East; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Political violence; Political economy; Criminology; Social science; History; Law","authors":[{"name":"Paul Kingston","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0587793687950898,"gpt":0.3697168288912863,"spread":0.3109374600961965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006121411,0.000115105,0.0001868418,0.0001634653,0.0007354334,0.00002511951,0.0004056555,0.00006017723,0.000004488898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004275813,0.00007440377,0.00003921755,0.0007604211,0.0002405999,0.00005995265,0.00003960477,0.0002319896,0.000004137751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000820099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003207632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009179136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02003626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954699,0.003406294,0.0002846608,0.0002481503,0.000376024,0.0002150177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998526,0.0009610672,0.0001227503,0.0003108207,0.0000691645,0.00001020558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001332346,0.0004377056,0.00208122,0.000005839268,0.00001252608,0.000006530363,0.5234767,0.0002866053,0.00002301207,0.4674303,0.0008508569,0.00525553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007836461,0.000535375,0.009473741,0.0001420795,0.00005215298,0.00000827572,0.3434969,0.00008569981,0.000004425368,0.6335256,0.01170087,0.0001913096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8901578,0.001285981,0.00286874,0.00250134,0.0002778229,0.001068744,0.000001654138,0.0000301043,0.1018078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942913,0.004430494,0.0002278886,0.0006154253,0.0000876979,0.00008766921,6.001891e-7,0.000008365895,0.0002505361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1799798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024221467","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341477","title":"A Report on the Special Executive Committee Meeting of the International Association for the History of Religions in Delphi","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Delphi method; Politics; Executive committee; Executive director; Delphi; Sociology; History of religions; International relations; Political science; Religious studies; Law; Management; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Don Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06862229842747186,"gpt":0.2969687302763154,"spread":0.2283464318488436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00652763,0.0001563456,0.0003233014,0.00008556469,0.0002207657,0.00001735484,0.0008861241,0.00005380665,0.00001974778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00232083,0.00007528991,0.0002442813,0.0001363728,0.0002099141,0.00004683711,0.000125063,0.0003607686,0.000001031675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001632217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005545239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001084989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008149844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967127,0.001552791,0.0007373506,0.000220437,0.0006329303,0.0001437837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913248,0.007067191,0.0009716726,0.0004095261,0.0002148373,0.00001192984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001070822,0.0005400122,0.002318109,0.00002593128,0.0002335322,0.000003262642,0.3994194,0.0002695313,0.00009605682,0.5196612,0.07575101,0.000611072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003309586,0.002045934,0.00526917,0.0004346646,0.0005665286,0.000007136253,0.1817947,0.0005142672,0.0008644852,0.5315076,0.2733009,0.0003849776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6435994,0.001545865,0.0003650246,0.06148784,0.005425768,0.005947018,0.0000765856,0.00003640135,0.2815161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972896,0.0001123957,0.00005860384,0.001037987,0.0008629335,0.0001127623,0.000002691275,0.00001399452,0.0005090193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3536902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3070233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012942321","doi":"10.1163/157006811x567733","title":"Sikhism, Traumatic Repetition, and the Question of Aesthetic Sovereignty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"South Asian Studies and Diaspora","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Sikhism; Argument (complex analysis); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Sociology; Epistemology; Repetition (rhetorical device); Work (physics); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Religious studies; Linguistics; Computer science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Michael Nijhawan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04040485174126623,"gpt":0.2846243276139518,"spread":0.2442194758726856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004171622,0.0001157045,0.0002951242,0.00007077732,0.0001776188,0.00001568333,0.0001871202,0.00002362567,0.00008772126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001217034,0.00005826368,0.00007142763,0.00006129051,0.0004807103,0.00005079738,0.0000401637,0.0001066207,0.00000276522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005972368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005959923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001460864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002515503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997567,0.001611675,0.0003883274,0.0001414144,0.0001821442,0.0001094415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988257,0.000521878,0.0002450992,0.0003229256,0.0000720119,0.00001241442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002997096,0.0001753384,0.0001491117,0.00001939372,0.00001939283,0.000001079737,0.3710985,0.000001241298,5.402261e-7,0.6253578,0.00006821017,0.00280964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001415336,0.0004894855,0.002013177,0.00006173014,0.0001340123,0.000006354359,0.3612974,0.00001319206,0.00001930123,0.6342194,0.0002552208,0.00007540624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8966696,0.001242258,0.0004259269,0.0001569435,0.0001504696,0.0009044047,0.000005666326,0.00001998384,0.1004247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999267,0.0001167482,0.0002947464,0.0001078675,0.00003671894,0.00006879192,7.668179e-7,0.000008926103,0.0000984025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1025974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2375924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018544991","doi":"10.1163/157006809x460338","title":"The Mennaisian “Catholic Science of Religion”: Epistemology and History in Early Nineteenth-Century French Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Object (grammar); History of science; Dual (grammatical number); Religious studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Arthur McCalla","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02117997587625129,"gpt":0.273487852785389,"spread":0.2523078769091376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005128422,0.0001828633,0.0004865537,0.0001939001,0.001121342,0.00003584392,0.0005976901,0.0000367971,0.000006741509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002209266,0.00009553408,0.00009552981,0.0002917045,0.0008505493,0.00009930841,0.0001066561,0.0002593271,0.00000138449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004181927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002172766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01064825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005870671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996663,0.001650994,0.0006120172,0.0003402315,0.0004511504,0.0002825678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984545,0.0006953268,0.0002807669,0.0003962642,0.0001392206,0.00003399295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001029083,0.001052237,0.002915466,0.00000974772,0.00005002778,0.000009582048,0.892562,0.000007227215,0.0000704023,0.09695305,0.000841591,0.005425702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004460974,0.01339422,0.1495869,0.0001235229,0.0008630881,0.000008766754,0.5289034,0.00005660992,0.00002156484,0.2075512,0.0940871,0.0009426249],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.987648,0.007805416,0.000008136687,0.001694357,0.0002059739,0.0006134553,0.000001047678,0.0000110906,0.00201254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997559,0.001728571,0.00004341739,0.0001180818,0.0000549798,0.00004240928,3.373778e-7,0.00000568001,0.0004476012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3636587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993020030","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341294","title":"The Identity of NAASR and the Character of the Critical Study of Religion: Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Media, Religion, Digital Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Mythology; Identity (music); Sociology; Religious studies; Epistemology; Theology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"William E. Arnal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02478025858134681,"gpt":0.3093812030338143,"spread":0.2846009444524675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008235575,0.000181341,0.0004600624,0.0001006486,0.000458037,0.0001198869,0.001149433,0.00004921899,0.00001748904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001853196,0.00007806869,0.0001346078,0.0002099401,0.001617774,0.0003327642,0.0003831205,0.0003547245,0.000002495108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001727465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002228206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003650842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923393,0.005600125,0.0009942263,0.0002281729,0.0006661324,0.0001720043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926125,0.004713417,0.0006412342,0.001519368,0.0004934705,0.00001997062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005063561,0.001218942,0.001021469,0.00007021395,0.0001194204,1.838038e-7,0.162902,0.000008660625,0.0002296224,0.8302505,0.001442585,0.002230037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002127768,0.00139975,0.01220182,0.0001092942,0.0003534822,0.000007472427,0.07013416,0.00006825838,0.0007223907,0.9112603,0.001455176,0.0001601124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867859,0.001253139,0.00008401138,0.002950059,0.0004918788,0.002213751,0.000004485887,0.00001109363,0.006205619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986957,0.000635833,0.00004194066,0.0000843768,0.0001876563,0.0001818975,0.000001376461,0.00001548783,0.0001557834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09276783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5960754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982776447","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00192","title":"The Female and the Fetish: a Method and Theory Review","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Fetishism; Object (grammar); Worship; Fantasy; Philosophy; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Linguistics; Psychology; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Dawne McCance","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03610018840564659,"gpt":0.322882506166572,"spread":0.2867823177609254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02296306,0.0002608516,0.0005281135,0.00007101466,0.001144581,0.0001431223,0.0005589969,0.00004565042,0.00003375213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006033254,0.0001109274,0.0001339898,0.0001499348,0.0008134764,0.00009062408,0.0001692413,0.0003815353,0.000004962767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009501728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001112196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004988291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002812279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888927,0.009571292,0.0005452136,0.0003443846,0.0003788707,0.0002675821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889591,0.01000107,0.0002766864,0.0006450089,0.00008521663,0.00003290005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008926521,0.0001363232,0.00009692778,0.00009176628,0.0001079704,0.000006571786,0.08061145,0.000001525731,0.00000188616,0.8449177,0.001141367,0.07199384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001708389,0.0004975312,0.0002994852,0.0003362006,0.000382413,0.00006584642,0.02975654,0.00001683142,0.000006567494,0.8680636,0.09869266,0.0001739147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1736192,0.550548,0.006080836,0.02785907,0.001085007,0.009284866,0.00001737871,0.0001296165,0.2313761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8594356,0.1335951,0.0005422538,0.003806462,0.0004253281,0.0004540263,0.000001716448,0.00003612562,0.00170333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6858164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8803309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286213261","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10085","title":"“‘Cause Even Though Perfect It’s Not/ It’s the Best Thing This World’s Got” – or Not?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Literacy; Sociology; Assimilation (phonology); Point (geometry); Epistemology; Positive economics; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Pedagogy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Johannes C. Wolfart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07842477565232847,"gpt":0.4223320311863749,"spread":0.3439072555340464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02136852,0.0002473101,0.0004055572,0.0001859226,0.003170943,0.0001590601,0.001705518,0.00008130092,0.0006358023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001629692,0.0001478643,0.0003432459,0.001531448,0.0002764185,0.0002137881,0.0003599339,0.001177252,0.00005200986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002785358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000190931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01195615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007251138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9814425,0.01561004,0.000636765,0.0004446054,0.001392003,0.0004741029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989792,0.008859251,0.0003766965,0.000793086,0.0001167946,0.00006217194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008403677,0.0009998096,0.0003899379,0.0000108479,0.0001885386,0.0000268602,0.826969,0.0005637707,0.0001607267,0.04946896,0.116707,0.003674155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005817832,0.000497228,0.0002174978,0.00003800411,0.0001802553,0.0000136147,0.6511352,0.00008188701,0.0000981177,0.007402689,0.3395311,0.0002226347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5150048,0.0007030853,0.00206532,0.2235522,0.006134226,0.007254781,0.00006387792,0.0003324621,0.2448892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608842,0.0009862129,0.0005721918,0.01362901,0.0002965978,0.0005362967,0.00000264923,0.00003220034,0.02306059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4458795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769181511","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341426","title":"Why Truth Matters for the Study of Religion: A Defense of a Truth-Conditional Semantics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Epistemology; Semantics (computer science); Meaning (existential); Truth value; Logical truth; Truth condition; Coherence theory of truth; Semantic theory of truth; Philosophy; Function (biology); Linguistics; Pragmatic theory of truth; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Mark Q. Gardiner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05805603771629132,"gpt":0.3274413358349599,"spread":0.2693852981186686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004415489,0.0003072943,0.0006998779,0.0002131631,0.0009797708,0.00009800619,0.00120377,0.00006889498,0.00002404438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004961537,0.0001835948,0.0003087564,0.00008141044,0.0005428412,0.0001490604,0.0001615714,0.0002582518,0.000002311744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001668485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001967119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006114991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965621,0.00129666,0.0008682475,0.000375714,0.0006370184,0.0002602989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920012,0.00535616,0.001065329,0.001271305,0.0002757967,0.00003015054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00278578,0.003749146,0.0008839967,0.0001880976,0.0006888654,0.00000940707,0.2233328,0.0001790953,0.00004942195,0.7569945,0.01000192,0.001136933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006851898,0.007321991,0.002462278,0.0002295205,0.001279758,0.00001388029,0.1278766,0.0001142655,0.0003588035,0.8438518,0.009236446,0.000402721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.982816,0.0007631817,0.002323722,0.003124684,0.00122123,0.004122017,0.000116334,0.00003037898,0.005482495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998304,0.0001422232,0.0003027947,0.0005174226,0.0003314948,0.0002891131,0.000006364151,0.00003156859,0.0000749901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09545621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7535704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W820096865","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341330","title":"Clarifications: A Rejoinder","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"William E. Arnal","is_ca":true},{"name":"Russell T. McCutcheon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1154943075222061,"gpt":0.3383368118532866,"spread":0.2228425043310805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004861171,0.0001485814,0.0002477075,0.0001697036,0.0001974226,0.00005346419,0.0004321524,0.00004809604,0.00003228843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002297527,0.00009576328,0.00007786022,0.0001348336,0.0001381883,0.0001029433,0.00004602768,0.0002491396,0.00003980203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002130227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002409213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009089976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002767858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970302,0.001821761,0.0003772166,0.0002277069,0.000382467,0.0001606252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984702,0.0006752912,0.0001637192,0.0005149894,0.000140888,0.00003492454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002163002,0.0006977957,0.0002760928,0.000008427827,0.00003846238,0.000004054515,0.2566318,0.00002665476,0.000006633511,0.7332301,0.006410307,0.002453379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001197303,0.001001694,0.0003257429,0.00002805036,0.00008607543,0.000006469979,0.103716,0.00002181886,0.00003753377,0.8274726,0.06595051,0.0001562846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5698581,0.003033362,0.002440661,0.003238211,0.001169471,0.002358237,0.00001174437,0.0001232403,0.4177669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978466,0.00004999828,0.0005819575,0.0004428988,0.000295456,0.000135759,0.000003391764,0.00001402781,0.0006299154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4279884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3905113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766177670","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341427","title":"Truth-Conditions and Religious Language: Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Semantics (computer science); Grammar; Epistemology; Philosophy; Alethiology; Set (abstract data type); Linguistics; Logical truth; Truth value; Truth condition; Pragmatic theory of truth; Sociology; Coherence theory of truth; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Mark Q. Gardiner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02575596333593065,"gpt":0.323438356546195,"spread":0.2976823932102643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002221839,0.000167346,0.0002749241,0.0001479139,0.0009689122,0.0001724776,0.00043678,0.00004437998,0.0000392817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003597124,0.0001151282,0.00007108686,0.00003569685,0.000331021,0.0001814361,0.00008780394,0.0002361335,0.00001114495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001197226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007289892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001484518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004096136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982359,0.0007746546,0.00029984,0.0002926333,0.0002318434,0.0001650849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982868,0.0005802388,0.0002734374,0.0007720435,0.00006233617,0.00002513224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002652805,0.0004690929,0.0005289193,0.00003050765,0.00007501461,0.00001511409,0.2511898,0.00000889427,0.00009901944,0.733342,0.005391985,0.008584391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001995369,0.001391971,0.005260208,0.00005931408,0.0002490527,0.00003591907,0.09024425,0.00002163566,0.0002658429,0.8818049,0.01835349,0.0003180354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660162,0.001029457,0.00008692019,0.002380243,0.0008797383,0.0006505001,0.00001271719,0.00003988305,0.02890439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979258,0.0002831855,0.0001459455,0.0001211268,0.001124801,0.00007742423,0.000005280928,0.00001462465,0.0003017754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1609456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7452187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389257859","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10119","title":"Debating Critical Religion: A Response to Timothy Fitzgerald","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Critical thought; Critical theory; Religious studies","authors":[{"name":"Galen Watts","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sharday Mosurinjohn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04388446427959898,"gpt":0.4512308713831216,"spread":0.4073464071035226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01890405,0.0001518355,0.0002875609,0.0002893431,0.0007538362,0.00009085817,0.0006122508,0.0001166839,0.00004082931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009914402,0.0001189682,0.0001760698,0.002007087,0.0001615882,0.0001209655,0.0001078699,0.0003624033,0.0001793142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008372501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003639767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005579335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886956,0.009291242,0.0004991774,0.0003438053,0.0007341927,0.0004360507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871842,0.01199915,0.00009666746,0.0004596473,0.0001558638,0.0001044609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001545481,0.0006037666,0.001082796,0.00001736069,0.00004273453,0.00005633803,0.6931155,0.0004094012,0.00136678,0.1973725,0.09976384,0.004623557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001235377,0.00170397,0.00614106,0.0002205555,0.000100161,0.00001315371,0.5984865,0.0002637824,0.0002719883,0.2510132,0.1400345,0.0005157251],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9369308,0.0001009122,0.003731311,0.03718468,0.0007113671,0.001210201,0.000004754669,0.0002276465,0.0198983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926796,0.0002232796,0.002578507,0.002584518,0.0001608939,0.0002131413,0.000001251007,0.00002010777,0.001538734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09462893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774729703","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341354","title":"Reforming Philosophy of Religion: Some Methodological Cautions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Mark Q. Gardiner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1986257328988127,"gpt":0.3682058473765436,"spread":0.1695801144777309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009876739,0.0002947155,0.000720387,0.0003318611,0.0002860661,0.00003236855,0.0006991369,0.0001133991,0.00001998971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006993604,0.0001847576,0.000240307,0.0002451669,0.0004191358,0.000230538,0.0001579132,0.0004217196,0.00001382855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004726766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003989391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001426444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001413012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935762,0.004179804,0.0008865002,0.0003914066,0.0006678394,0.0002982038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964805,0.002039821,0.0004659537,0.0007045014,0.0002370858,0.00007211202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006103916,0.0008507997,0.0001673622,0.00004024541,0.00008377967,0.00001261364,0.1054575,0.00007833677,0.00005403675,0.8896463,0.001379849,0.001618788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001371257,0.002436173,0.0001047027,0.00009768059,0.0001635569,0.00001675676,0.02463565,0.00001826766,0.0003052533,0.9581097,0.01251264,0.0002283933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8488013,0.005979002,0.001887399,0.003343495,0.001565445,0.002176811,0.00002887352,0.0001440687,0.1360736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960487,0.0003032032,0.002193228,0.0004156874,0.0006579184,0.0001108487,0.000006475508,0.00002355609,0.0002404186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1472473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7534196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054595673","doi":"10.1163/157006807x244934","title":"Time, Habit, and Agency in English Puritanism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Habituation; Protestant work ethic; Sociology; Social psychology; Protestantism; Modernity; Epistemology; Late modernity; Leverage (statistics); Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Aesthetics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Religious studies; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Steven Engler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02034825410239564,"gpt":0.2773713304267414,"spread":0.2570230763243458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005933953,0.000101531,0.0001836952,0.0001629446,0.0001185753,0.00004502045,0.0001729901,0.00003457963,0.0000896707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001512958,0.00006632531,0.0000320486,0.00006737727,0.0001039951,0.0001449083,0.00003806738,0.0001851174,0.00001054189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001625788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006085414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008048898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001569702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984828,0.0006894165,0.0003574487,0.0001309055,0.00018393,0.0001555262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991802,0.0004528118,0.00009654219,0.0001962405,0.0000537809,0.0000204254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001538795,0.000433591,0.0005674108,0.00002390618,0.00001383156,0.00001120518,0.8558977,0.00001106943,0.00004335719,0.1252238,0.0005042648,0.01711598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003947477,0.001636487,0.04051802,0.0001347683,0.00008293851,0.00001306132,0.3259558,0.0004691939,0.0003386838,0.5709788,0.05533494,0.000589806],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9093748,0.0002223391,0.0006965521,0.00004308203,0.0001400438,0.0003838278,0.0000026257,0.00002343612,0.0891133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987528,0.00004751015,0.0003074939,0.0001237286,0.00009955591,0.00001243749,0.000001657444,0.000007864164,0.0006469431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5299419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2704667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401177146","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10128","title":"Critical Religion Takes a Punch: Notes on a Scholarly Skirmish","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Sociology; Epistemology; Critical theory; The Imaginary; Racism; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Law; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Naomi R. Goldenberg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04877601887635644,"gpt":0.4333016444849161,"spread":0.3845256256085597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009765391,0.0002050639,0.0003115356,0.0002499745,0.000598406,0.0005817601,0.0006139425,0.0001810069,0.00004791468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064845,0.0001407932,0.0002824893,0.001014201,0.0002837382,0.0004949512,0.0000404252,0.0008466939,0.00009545162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001272662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001126369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004356658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006262268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926777,0.005134569,0.0004783446,0.000437534,0.0009087193,0.0003630783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888615,0.01034358,0.00007592302,0.0004482321,0.0001908439,0.00007994012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001463517,0.0007852098,0.0002489082,0.00002959623,0.00006445206,0.00004396711,0.2024678,0.00003550588,0.0002874888,0.7742789,0.01251401,0.009097831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007069689,0.001687697,0.0007271244,0.0005989413,0.0002333247,0.00002178744,0.222689,0.0002169815,0.000451837,0.6381654,0.1340396,0.000461328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.720351,0.004769584,0.01968645,0.04949081,0.004057509,0.002929935,0.00002139153,0.0006216825,0.1980717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952874,0.000945331,0.001354821,0.001520089,0.0002853936,0.000148168,0.000001622214,0.00002303064,0.0004341685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2749364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.776302,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1804125812","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341353","title":"Postmetaphysical Thinking and the Philosophy of Religion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Field (mathematics); Philosophy of religion; Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth MacKendrick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0417814899416762,"gpt":0.3042019544072971,"spread":0.2624204644656209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004139047,0.0001187428,0.0003235253,0.00009872233,0.0001688268,0.00004604213,0.0002783122,0.00002768476,0.000005427144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002489693,0.00005534942,0.00009177769,0.0001326717,0.0004279633,0.00009610442,0.0001147697,0.0001749719,0.00000210346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000909856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005909342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001482366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001790821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997458,0.00158444,0.000353867,0.0001545578,0.0003386904,0.0001104303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981671,0.001241983,0.0001984649,0.0002421211,0.0001326199,0.00001770825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006588446,0.0001919509,0.00007609224,0.00001286047,0.00005545449,4.907436e-7,0.1944221,0.000008285581,0.000007462952,0.8009579,0.001453313,0.00215527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015437,0.001006428,0.0001787276,0.00004725906,0.0001165647,0.000001739179,0.03449302,0.0001525004,0.00004431798,0.9557799,0.00655611,0.00007975063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.875818,0.006415793,0.001359086,0.00459652,0.0004223618,0.001356182,0.000006845507,0.00003345095,0.1099917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984369,0.0002043442,0.0001954737,0.0009137084,0.0001540696,0.00003935261,0.000001008705,0.000008482711,0.00004668874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1599291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2257084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411704941","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10147","title":"What’s Alternative about Alternative Rationality in CAS-E’s Definition of ‘Esotericism’?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Mark Q. Gardiner","is_ca":true},{"name":"Steven Engler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0617077405977734,"gpt":0.3624498999709779,"spread":0.3007421593732045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003991122,0.0001709816,0.0004267856,0.0002612825,0.0001766749,0.00008940165,0.0003517237,0.0000359778,0.00003079419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003763285,0.0001181274,0.00009182566,0.000176297,0.0002183323,0.000344275,0.0001097658,0.0002642816,0.000002987769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005202737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002616891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01291857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008921338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962827,0.002270993,0.0006846355,0.0002656034,0.0003300754,0.0001659834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965456,0.002524839,0.0004249416,0.0002863657,0.0002078266,0.00001048304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004362949,0.0007571151,0.0005495948,0.00004445837,0.0001244691,0.00000682066,0.2423895,0.0001742147,0.00002896356,0.7525559,0.0004314622,0.002501244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001181636,0.0005563399,0.00285508,0.0002344887,0.00007945403,0.000001192,0.185664,0.0001095529,0.0002417304,0.8065009,0.002447999,0.0001276517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9092451,0.002133466,0.001369209,0.001408752,0.001221966,0.001113915,0.00001904135,0.00001357245,0.08347502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966039,0.002137238,0.0003302502,0.0004339911,0.00008965062,0.0001320974,0.000004612827,0.000007869533,0.0002603659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08735887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018520567","doi":"10.1163/157006807x243601","title":"Science, Scholarship and the Domestication of Religion: On Dennett's Breaking the Spell","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Scrutiny; Taboo; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Phenomenon; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology; History","authors":[{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03740200773963592,"gpt":0.3928016362131641,"spread":0.3553996284735282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02016765,0.0001281537,0.0002478282,0.0001811965,0.001353885,0.00007985356,0.0009583364,0.00006898417,0.000006944118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002564501,0.0000635924,0.0001197958,0.00154577,0.002512367,0.0001920349,0.00008541221,0.0004319746,0.00001020361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006158344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001433722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003134807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002745408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933316,0.004777945,0.0004374591,0.0002704334,0.0009342956,0.000248276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930025,0.005843119,0.000334338,0.0005701777,0.0002099284,0.00003989535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002985135,0.0002900992,0.001977245,0.000005417836,0.00002779409,0.000002259022,0.2031112,0.000104518,0.0002394382,0.7911435,0.0009596574,0.001840363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004046496,0.001193819,0.03748619,0.0002409959,0.0002790504,0.00009472504,0.2554569,0.0002619466,0.001153021,0.6804905,0.01888009,0.0004162959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477583,0.0005391404,0.0007305982,0.005209174,0.0002691285,0.001115583,0.000001007849,0.0000200009,0.04435708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995692,0.002667821,0.0004470087,0.00076081,0.00008660452,0.00002546144,2.942927e-7,0.000007654187,0.0003123646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.110653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045319486","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341503","title":"A Response to My Critics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06257077170416289,"gpt":0.4132839927200797,"spread":0.3507132210159167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0156541,0.0000798857,0.000171685,0.00006155335,0.0002817098,0.0000408352,0.0005346552,0.00005316957,0.00001443099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003913889,0.00005917896,0.00004828315,0.0004416829,0.000108444,0.0000480946,0.00007711809,0.0002402967,0.00001424532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000257561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006383347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009269077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002739998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903373,0.008632236,0.0002027199,0.0001921789,0.0004457451,0.0001897818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961997,0.00339844,0.00005999405,0.0002131729,0.00006486366,0.00006384735],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001151965,0.0002640925,0.0001134499,0.00000578972,0.00001249942,0.00001650231,0.7281954,0.0000215149,0.001741449,0.2643112,0.0008436897,0.003322384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009588688,0.002401153,0.002042575,0.00004655724,0.00005747235,0.000001362125,0.3917791,0.00002812919,0.0009507491,0.4690886,0.1323742,0.0002713025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452105,0.00007532958,0.006456121,0.03350643,0.0001131775,0.000771146,0.000003448467,0.00003462995,0.01382925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940566,0.00002419915,0.001503631,0.004179961,0.00007616418,0.00003230738,1.457924e-7,0.000008360805,0.0001186032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3364163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5425431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313897458","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10097","title":"Burton Mack’s Challenge to the Study of Religion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Christianity; Philosophy; Religious studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Willi Braun","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0671163401100917,"gpt":0.3323899542761722,"spread":0.2652736141660805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007129929,0.0003431355,0.0006119816,0.0004799598,0.0005388621,0.0000655887,0.001154846,0.00007240868,0.0000327798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000238266,0.0001990177,0.0001898304,0.0005991751,0.0001424015,0.0000990738,0.0002888217,0.0003986348,0.00008757732],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002861232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001747304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002608199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941851,0.003203158,0.0008342951,0.0005128179,0.0008808087,0.0003837568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964038,0.001900558,0.0003399985,0.001133087,0.0001748685,0.00004773416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001100785,0.002984367,0.0004662969,0.00006823856,0.0002202115,0.00002628006,0.7208305,0.0004321415,0.00004408655,0.2529164,0.01289019,0.008020543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004224744,0.01620776,0.003296448,0.0002473596,0.0005201283,0.000007577994,0.5012174,0.00007879658,0.0001944156,0.4030697,0.07028301,0.0006526916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.969099,0.0006559567,0.00006293459,0.002683924,0.0008307823,0.003390788,0.00001424596,0.0001037536,0.02315857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974912,0.0005675873,0.00004209677,0.0003061146,0.0004825818,0.0004053716,0.000004756156,0.0000407051,0.0006595865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2196131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8115708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W633722913","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341340","title":"Documenting the Delusion: A Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Delusion; Credibility; Deception; Naturalism; Point (geometry); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true},{"name":"Luther H. Martin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09274885937243119,"gpt":0.3689287374716734,"spread":0.2761798780992423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126317,0.0002006855,0.0003343755,0.00009252698,0.000941116,0.0002085733,0.0005125455,0.00002497945,0.00002900951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000439286,0.00009590764,0.00008669638,0.0001449293,0.000157631,0.0001688677,0.0003005529,0.0003201545,0.00001510812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002466669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001885202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02175822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01377386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944828,0.003953177,0.0005284261,0.000272258,0.0005128214,0.0002505457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968503,0.002046406,0.0003065776,0.0005902622,0.000174559,0.00003190655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002331405,0.001489253,0.0008268161,0.000009405042,0.0001598664,0.0005858468,0.9410645,0.00007191303,0.000001508148,0.04396348,0.005815959,0.005778279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001175526,0.001809865,0.00003451912,0.00001342839,0.0002133076,0.000190202,0.9269308,0.00004446641,0.000002489003,0.03388551,0.03557033,0.0001295098],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9448825,0.00120458,0.0001091972,0.0008523065,0.0004553128,0.001516521,0.000001391147,0.00003056721,0.05094765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982505,0.00007132146,0.0001182924,0.0003503095,0.0002969941,0.0001654824,3.564923e-7,0.00001645793,0.0007303076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05336801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389762157","doi":"10.1163/15700682-03601000","title":"Front matter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Philosophy; Oceanography","authors":[{"name":"Mitsutoshi Horii","is_ca":false},{"name":"T. Wenger","is_ca":false},{"name":"John W. Morgan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ann Baranowski","is_ca":false},{"name":"Leslie Dorrough-Smith","is_ca":true},{"name":"Naomi R. Goldenberg","is_ca":false},{"name":"Susannah Heschel","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sinding Jeppe","is_ca":false},{"name":"Carool Kersten","is_ca":false},{"name":"Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair","is_ca":false},{"name":"Craig Martin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Russell T. McCutcheon","is_ca":false},{"name":"Suzanne Owen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Annette Reed","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jason Storm","is_ca":false},{"name":"Will Sweetman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robert Yelle","is_ca":false},{"name":"E. Thomas Lawson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Luther Martin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonathan D. Smith","is_ca":false},{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03161808959572699,"gpt":0.365969543458704,"spread":0.334351453862977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01997431,0.0007972039,0.001555801,0.001062496,0.0001615525,0.00007433383,0.002271238,0.0004494034,0.003718688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000371192,0.0005371422,0.0003860303,0.00104889,0.0001693666,0.00007735321,0.0005311902,0.001494671,0.3630757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001975099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007578122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002170871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002594273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9749006,0.02053651,0.001369763,0.001110715,0.001335914,0.0007464686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992307,0.004142584,0.000968811,0.002382216,0.0001430756,0.00005633257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008132876,0.0008955053,0.00009401893,0.0001500018,0.0003679689,0.00004136687,0.02222328,0.0006057314,0.0001885072,0.0003349411,0.9732972,0.0009882265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008471384,0.00417653,0.005597544,0.002277739,0.002909712,0.0001044352,0.06926732,0.0001054757,0.001220211,0.1667534,0.7354187,0.003697563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06888251,0.006487024,0.006313771,0.0004768144,0.008747753,0.01116092,0.0008976163,0.000351017,0.8966826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05947103,0.001542335,0.00694832,0.001605423,0.001935688,0.004475544,0.0005798732,0.00215398,0.9212878],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.359357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230029655","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341334","title":"Liminal Contradictions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Liminality; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Point (geometry); Lineage (genetic); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Randi R. Warne","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0951801864645066,"gpt":0.3430971898811793,"spread":0.2479170034166727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004054397,0.000125417,0.0002548923,0.00009718198,0.0002889958,0.0000729841,0.0002895972,0.00002485671,0.00003041971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003160498,0.00007565921,0.00006777826,0.00007729044,0.0001587286,0.0001227951,0.00005148047,0.0002018654,0.00002226619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001893856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001675541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003230945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002295485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976903,0.001345384,0.0003296285,0.0001664039,0.0002955224,0.0001727699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983142,0.001083203,0.0001610016,0.0002878202,0.00012247,0.00003133271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003316124,0.0007775173,0.0002336205,0.000007870997,0.0000870758,0.00001196306,0.3525995,0.00005561165,0.000005030124,0.6208996,0.02121034,0.003780202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001392463,0.002406413,0.0002019406,0.00002121744,0.0001879739,0.00001376153,0.5027514,0.00006238162,0.00001249493,0.2013527,0.2914372,0.0001600738],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5864732,0.002540336,0.001042071,0.00296249,0.001066591,0.001055839,0.000008778142,0.00006446938,0.4047862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979804,0.0001788002,0.0002580835,0.0003485063,0.0002744848,0.00007813212,0.000001053218,0.0000103957,0.0008701381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4195469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4884244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313551326","doi":"10.1163/15700682-03501000","title":"Front matter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Philosophy; Geology; Oceanography","authors":[{"name":"Mitsutoshi Horii","is_ca":false},{"name":"T. Wenger","is_ca":false},{"name":"John W. Morgan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ann Baranowski","is_ca":false},{"name":"Leslie Dorrough-Smith","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daniel Dubuisson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Naomi R. Goldenberg","is_ca":false},{"name":"Susannah Heschel","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sinding Jeppe","is_ca":false},{"name":"Carool Kersten","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anja Kirsch","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nancy Levene","is_ca":false},{"name":"Craig Martin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Russell T. McCutcheon","is_ca":false},{"name":"Suzanne Owen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jason Storm","is_ca":false},{"name":"Will Sweetman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robert Yelle","is_ca":false},{"name":"E. Thomas Lawson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Luther Martin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonathan D. Smith","is_ca":false},{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03161808959572699,"gpt":0.365969543458704,"spread":0.334351453862977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01997431,0.0007972039,0.001555801,0.001062496,0.0001615525,0.00007433383,0.002271238,0.0004494034,0.003718688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000371192,0.0005371422,0.0003860303,0.00104889,0.0001693666,0.00007735321,0.0005311902,0.001494671,0.3630757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001975099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007578122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002170871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002594273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9749006,0.02053651,0.001369763,0.001110715,0.001335914,0.0007464686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992307,0.004142584,0.000968811,0.002382216,0.0001430756,0.00005633257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008132876,0.0008955053,0.00009401893,0.0001500018,0.0003679689,0.00004136687,0.02222328,0.0006057314,0.0001885072,0.0003349411,0.9732972,0.0009882265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008471384,0.00417653,0.005597544,0.002277739,0.002909712,0.0001044352,0.06926732,0.0001054757,0.001220211,0.1667534,0.7354187,0.003697563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06888251,0.006487024,0.006313771,0.0004768144,0.008747753,0.01116092,0.0008976163,0.000351017,0.8966826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05947103,0.001542335,0.00694832,0.001605423,0.001935688,0.004475544,0.0005798732,0.00215398,0.9212878],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.359357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2865263030","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341451","title":"Why I am Such a Good Christian: Comments on Gil Anidjar, Blood: A Critique of Christianity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Monotheism; Judaism; Protestantism; Philosophy; Ambivalence; Confession (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Kinship; Theology; Religious studies; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; History; Islam; Anthropology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Francis Landy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02981691074118254,"gpt":0.3234905639794878,"spread":0.2936736532383052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002352934,0.0001881365,0.000390346,0.0001753084,0.0002946983,0.00004619158,0.0003956804,0.00005214916,0.0002176785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002657672,0.0001226776,0.0001072325,0.0001839851,0.0003470229,0.00007734502,0.00009423463,0.0002338939,0.000009335463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001763741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007836085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007505657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002833755,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971343,0.00158496,0.0004940979,0.0002488685,0.0003312574,0.0002064794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998208,0.0009020921,0.0002405432,0.0003830154,0.0002392593,0.00002704046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001368131,0.005700916,0.0006917809,0.0001363807,0.0003802024,0.000007361743,0.2984481,0.0000028352,0.0002600879,0.5925144,0.09236272,0.008127029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006602824,0.03725374,0.006383271,0.0008582147,0.0008566543,0.00001170609,0.1945417,0.0002427489,0.005862147,0.2752778,0.4711882,0.0009210354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8931458,0.001406302,0.003105164,0.002025984,0.0006544596,0.001539489,0.00006775955,0.00005716293,0.09799788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951693,0.000135112,0.0002449029,0.004039743,0.0002261961,0.00007704156,0.000003588165,0.00001569567,0.00008843724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3788254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810136477","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341450","title":"Food for Thought: The Question of the Animal in Gil Anidjar’s Blood: A Critique of Christianity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Hebrew Bible; Section (typography); Christianity; Hebrew; New Testament; Philosophy; Eucharist; Literature; Old Testament; Early Christianity; Monotheism; Biblical studies; Theology; Art; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Peter Sabó","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03186318786241514,"gpt":0.3376959774180198,"spread":0.3058327895556047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004074647,0.0001176101,0.0002698784,0.00008579211,0.0002142639,0.00002064319,0.000407683,0.0000427382,0.00002161298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005480082,0.00005533884,0.000116718,0.0001965486,0.0004186324,0.00006617847,0.00008813249,0.0001626517,3.952083e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001238414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001314378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002090574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009066617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973212,0.0017065,0.000470041,0.0001542623,0.0002097132,0.0001382829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980127,0.001159121,0.0002723876,0.0003019952,0.0002456671,0.000008166225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008782284,0.0008339239,0.0005593473,0.00008125472,0.00008251011,1.590112e-7,0.1276317,0.00000378972,0.0005325463,0.8651845,0.001425686,0.002786415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003241231,0.02279077,0.02753571,0.0005909166,0.000548296,0.000005076375,0.1468981,0.0004847189,0.01418528,0.7553882,0.02797301,0.000358636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867931,0.001160234,0.001887415,0.0009784397,0.0002386868,0.001449755,0.00003653301,0.000009977568,0.007445839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989759,0.0000788659,0.0002825397,0.0003262924,0.0001618132,0.0001253895,8.170771e-7,0.000009632291,0.00003877022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1097963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5059385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255681613","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00354","title":"Reviews","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jeppe Sinding Jensen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Joseph M. Bryant","is_ca":true},{"name":"Diane Jonte‐Pace","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05220494157956687,"gpt":0.3919005978075737,"spread":0.3396956562280068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02940016,0.000228596,0.0005637477,0.000246928,0.00009984874,0.00001846774,0.0008301765,0.00005671173,0.00005795152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001174504,0.0001386859,0.000146188,0.001218343,0.00007483702,0.00009198113,0.0001051842,0.0003118223,0.0006398391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004910812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000116339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003324633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001428046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9828616,0.01515824,0.0007749268,0.00038398,0.0004885942,0.0003326788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969941,0.001414542,0.0003552422,0.001146136,0.00005709565,0.00003285898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006874576,0.01498289,0.04281322,0.0002254798,0.0004097003,0.0003432456,0.2381362,0.0007625972,0.02302639,0.1501959,0.09150972,0.4307201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005748355,0.003231275,0.01684883,0.0003977416,0.0006136485,0.0002317123,0.03243513,0.0001300953,0.001566904,0.5126362,0.4252769,0.0008831289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9458098,0.006924049,0.00707646,0.0001989973,0.0002106776,0.003389476,0.000004022495,0.00009885002,0.03628766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883796,0.002090223,0.008019784,0.0004016205,0.0001124488,0.0003768588,0.000002758329,0.00007440386,0.0005422992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.429837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W764916438","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341332","title":"The Public Nature of Critical Discourses on “Religion”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Religious studies; Sociology; Public discourse; Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth MacKendrick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04413669585574895,"gpt":0.4485937896349546,"spread":0.4044570937792057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01106276,0.0001348611,0.0002527438,0.00009582499,0.0005897692,0.00009119337,0.0008564685,0.0001652501,0.000007074813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007021062,0.00007432042,0.0001747623,0.0006153675,0.0006764272,0.0001316237,0.0000657062,0.000630411,0.00001074384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007129381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001434676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001298525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009532108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922732,0.005844759,0.0004156261,0.0002165674,0.0009509955,0.0002988859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917531,0.007149991,0.0001794469,0.00050665,0.0003244184,0.00008639832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001298736,0.0007712556,0.0004125657,0.000004361195,0.00003136625,0.000002671013,0.07134397,0.00001669837,0.00001380748,0.9026983,0.02292663,0.001648478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005694903,0.0007640537,0.0004250612,0.00004466066,0.00006112822,0.000004184436,0.429738,0.00002202554,0.0001134449,0.4889227,0.07919467,0.0001405331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7146246,0.003891426,0.002337158,0.1015955,0.003916057,0.002120201,0.00001375611,0.0001095589,0.1713917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976777,0.0007220979,0.0002973363,0.0007257954,0.0001459564,0.00006597938,9.013641e-7,0.00001046947,0.0003537546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4137756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8405374,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810041381","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341447","title":"Christianity: “A Manner of Dividing the Sensible”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Abstraction; Reading (process); Hegemony; Politics; Sociology; Nothing; sort; Judaism; Epistemology; Wish; Set (abstract data type); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Computer science; Religious studies; Law; Theology; Linguistics; Political science; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Colin Gow","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03686341055759426,"gpt":0.4051518542654317,"spread":0.3682884437078374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01016048,0.00009636755,0.0002065927,0.00007445588,0.0006578648,0.00003364971,0.0005423483,0.00006680231,0.00004667928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007490733,0.00005518644,0.0001298129,0.0006181105,0.0004922153,0.0000717138,0.00007008272,0.0002366589,0.00001458495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003247449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000402829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00745349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001947912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941273,0.004714566,0.0003330936,0.0001609341,0.0004670102,0.0001970838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970574,0.002121258,0.0002186227,0.0003981107,0.000179685,0.00002488759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015223,0.0006239734,0.002224347,0.0000113243,0.0001245832,0.000003437617,0.6610159,0.00003350883,0.0007268647,0.299614,0.02915747,0.006312421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007482534,0.0007898678,0.004664212,0.00008471539,0.0001787449,0.000006721741,0.66911,0.000104679,0.001633766,0.2167216,0.1057334,0.0002239857],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9188507,0.0003139026,0.004529758,0.003284862,0.000703658,0.0008575717,0.000002859349,0.00003454485,0.07142217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978304,0.0003746614,0.0006105019,0.000472738,0.0002046198,0.00002296636,4.38352e-7,0.000007839188,0.0004758376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08289237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}