{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":56,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":56,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"07020f5a5e9d","filters":{"venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion"}},"results":[{"id":"W2024535992","doi":"10.1163/157006811x608359","title":"The Collection and Synthesis of “Tradition” and the Second-Century Invention of Christianity*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Literature; History; Religious studies; Art","authors":[{"name":"William E. Arnal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03053199945378417,"gpt":0.257164992158131,"spread":0.2266329927043469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005267716,0.0003256761,0.0004920613,0.005682827,0.00411105,0.005859775,0.0006848553,0.0007941489,0.004771354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007132402,0.0001657923,0.0002095446,0.005260725,0.0189108,0.004767399,0.003514308,0.002112484,0.0002294402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006859499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003943284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003497461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007119281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959247,0.002907581,0.0001462289,0.0002820792,0.0005307167,0.0002086478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924337,0.00490983,0.0006418944,0.00109013,0.0007156862,0.0002088233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003302726,0.00001078453,0.000463544,0.0002836324,0.00001081131,0.00009213817,0.08385413,0.00008789404,0.0001679008,0.8923554,0.00345055,0.01919014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002244301,0.00005592427,0.003482134,0.001817662,0.00002583776,0.0003950965,0.05628197,0.0005250444,0.001235217,0.2789082,0.6572182,0.0000323592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1658733,0.06188694,0.01976357,0.0260914,0.002996102,0.00008228586,0.0003428558,0.0001187804,0.7228448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966643,0.007440934,0.002802213,0.0005247862,0.0006183933,0.00005005602,0.00008124398,0.0000598645,0.02177953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006859499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04976934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130425445","doi":"10.1163/157006810x531067","title":"Ten Implications of Semantic Holism for Theories of Religion","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Holism; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Steven Engler","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mark Q. Gardiner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03389762695376131,"gpt":0.3239184910439424,"spread":0.2900208640901811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02305961,0.000877753,0.001206543,0.004300719,0.004817064,0.009886929,0.002677077,0.003783861,0.009800183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03049728,0.0007997528,0.001314579,0.002811094,0.05598233,0.01860561,0.008563066,0.009991435,0.0007449083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007323309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004538874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001920315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002345355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9860938,0.008939591,0.0005695453,0.0009435623,0.002794197,0.0006593176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650698,0.02399319,0.002095868,0.003804352,0.003253653,0.001782982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001501168,0.00001418205,0.0001585381,0.00002356327,0.000006106578,0.00002346353,0.0004645562,0.0002192221,0.00002459103,0.9969811,0.0005232733,0.001546516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001128501,0.000004033448,0.00008132966,0.00002144874,0.000003636911,0.000009668969,0.0003385638,0.0006829186,0.00003799389,0.9973182,0.001486887,0.000004141608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07717939,0.003781215,0.2096711,0.1788015,0.002051684,0.0004391581,0.0004569251,0.0003628319,0.5272563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671987,0.001218076,0.0217459,0.003833961,0.0009412917,0.0004345511,0.0001685568,0.00009546639,0.004363486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02305961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1219524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025474434","doi":"10.1163/157006812x635709","title":"Computing Religion: A New Tool in the Multilevel Analysis of Religion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Computer science; Empirical research; Epistemology; Space (punctuation); Management science; Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Kristoffer Laigaard Nielbo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Donald M. Braxton","is_ca":false},{"name":"Afzal Upal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06540313143775371,"gpt":0.4294280534069601,"spread":0.3640249219692063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007230734,0.0005561596,0.001222003,0.004350225,0.001644086,0.004807238,0.001885729,0.0009129947,0.009246842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05371249,0.0005073352,0.001886522,0.006142067,0.002628218,0.003834026,0.005818748,0.00300198,0.0009855893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001148132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002157777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004609154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005464626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923259,0.005633828,0.0004025191,0.0005994474,0.000900817,0.0001375093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678234,0.02273832,0.001934896,0.005525496,0.001182476,0.0007953285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001320837,0.0001307914,0.01890187,0.000424439,0.00035524,0.0001761736,0.002190214,0.02444007,0.001539777,0.7639914,0.0103253,0.1773928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004999879,0.00006620782,0.004689473,0.0001475147,0.00007663604,0.0001598509,0.0006786156,0.2719795,0.0009295616,0.6989941,0.02215429,0.0000742503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008546,0.0001725284,0.9868414,0.001236483,0.00005529025,0.00008654076,0.0005121806,0.0008105139,0.001738934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1306156,0.0001289241,0.867784,0.0001552179,0.00006986005,0.0003004576,0.0003898451,0.0001848032,0.0003712168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009246842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03824019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210377738","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10074","title":"‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Ideology; Sociology; Mythology; Politics; Political science; Pedagogy; Theology; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Johannes C. Wolfart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03815193887266696,"gpt":0.402218388240828,"spread":0.364066449368161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007019483,0.0002179185,0.0004908913,0.001608758,0.003843088,0.006944683,0.001850203,0.006645087,0.005257345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01544902,0.0001536104,0.0002957887,0.00168005,0.018524,0.006511592,0.003839661,0.00865606,0.000714207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002516296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002568339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00689629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007980275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963432,0.002388454,0.0001858958,0.0002363494,0.0005547131,0.0002914198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835525,0.01280052,0.0005076435,0.0004547691,0.001888711,0.0007958045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005968592,0.00005948946,0.001842399,0.0005616609,0.000009336616,0.0008640429,0.03272921,0.00006964826,0.000297638,0.7804069,0.1116447,0.07145526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002121755,0.00008064792,0.006073331,0.003171777,0.0000116269,0.001845485,0.04955642,0.000323926,0.0003229287,0.2413653,0.6971635,0.00006395164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01044023,0.03463723,0.0006982882,0.9232437,0.00453432,0.00001418427,0.00006278489,0.00001432362,0.02635499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5210955,0.0551332,0.002228535,0.3733458,0.02976225,0.000131399,0.0001102001,0.00008293153,0.01811017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007019483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03712296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049023236","doi":"10.1163/094330509x12568874557298","title":"Ritual Theory and Attitudes to Agency in Brazilian Spirit Possession","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Possession (linguistics); Deference; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Steven Engler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0309604814388721,"gpt":0.4156748958633761,"spread":0.384714414424504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003852656,0.0002152378,0.0002939333,0.00124086,0.002288309,0.002697359,0.0003536423,0.0005080909,0.002993094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007828034,0.0001852462,0.0002080092,0.0007463003,0.01083494,0.001546707,0.002618173,0.000869596,0.0001035905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002230369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008990188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009543003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009961307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976574,0.001548376,0.00008003567,0.0001335377,0.0004064555,0.0001741261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946418,0.002974186,0.001248707,0.0003202253,0.0004151914,0.000399895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006937274,0.0002381584,0.09121443,0.000288556,0.00005775865,0.0004288011,0.3773737,0.0006327019,0.002803189,0.4835241,0.0009029076,0.04246632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005214826,0.0003034283,0.2319482,0.0008176286,0.00007326041,0.001038918,0.4828946,0.004740184,0.001167224,0.1981154,0.07874725,0.000101757],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9127157,0.00116673,0.004737868,0.001957106,0.00002811124,0.00004129576,0.00002057714,0.0000105133,0.07932223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991436,0.0001372239,0.0002062521,0.00002924668,0.000002263706,0.000004426221,0.000003329118,0.000001026205,0.0004725657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009543003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02037501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041746847","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341304","title":"“Pseudo-Speciation of the Human Race:Religions as Hazard-Precaution Systems”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Environmental ethics; Race (biology); Natural (archaeology); Hazard; Welfare; Sociology; Human welfare; Political science; History; Philosophy; Law; Ecology; Biology; Gender studies; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06522725682895067,"gpt":0.3395080979498099,"spread":0.2742808411208593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001734342,0.00008571369,0.0001360603,0.0004262515,0.001474205,0.001542162,0.0005330248,0.0007646548,0.003213237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004450014,0.00009982517,0.0001555395,0.0002674561,0.01331623,0.002346049,0.002067575,0.0008858344,0.0001831747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008297347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005924889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008890333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001224427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991463,0.0005620307,0.00001885824,0.0001130848,0.00008185781,0.0000778911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983256,0.0005005454,0.0003590654,0.000334906,0.0002300421,0.000249776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008147532,0.00005076321,0.01331569,0.00009726604,0.00001655857,0.0003787793,0.05040237,0.0005183519,0.004033406,0.9001579,0.001263246,0.02968402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003427471,0.0001512476,0.05098874,0.0001114294,0.0000211509,0.001278818,0.03414358,0.003960155,0.001907784,0.875334,0.03201891,0.000050039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.797101,0.0006429595,0.03896778,0.009515711,0.0002195242,0.00008045916,0.00003534955,0.00004084469,0.1533964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970683,0.00004354161,0.001984091,0.0001975999,0.00001051672,0.00001002922,0.000005771195,0.000002618768,0.0006776211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003213237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01074934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800458785","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341441","title":"Liberal Hermeneutics of the Spectacular in the Study of the New Testament and the Roman Empire","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Depiction; Ideology; Scholarship; Empire; New Testament; Sociology; Capitalism; Politics; State (computer science); Status quo; Literature; Philosophy; History; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Classics; Law; Political science; Art; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Christopher B. Zeichmann","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02371837730764312,"gpt":0.3726446952527649,"spread":0.3489263179451219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00655649,0.0001901551,0.0002875068,0.001116095,0.00415825,0.00641313,0.00063871,0.0009208952,0.002354962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007907513,0.0001586355,0.000142265,0.001014584,0.06945536,0.003052182,0.003655596,0.003198563,0.0001653085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003576365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002728629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002473017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004277618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861287,0.01243493,0.0001625249,0.0002773346,0.0007389288,0.0002574881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926388,0.005240178,0.0007238489,0.0008016443,0.0003196457,0.0002759486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008592608,0.00001375619,0.001078355,0.00002067094,0.000001918907,0.0000253719,0.02250604,0.00009155348,0.00004560212,0.9722251,0.0007544496,0.003228508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002114131,0.00004416935,0.004202288,0.0006086689,0.000007044924,0.0001691961,0.0646853,0.0014804,0.0006230235,0.7636142,0.164518,0.00002643083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3076618,0.01081496,0.02541243,0.0667873,0.0009899852,0.00007701767,0.00008095959,0.00003902373,0.5881366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931779,0.0005462863,0.001127516,0.0004780975,0.0001025015,0.00003045624,0.00000554933,0.000007891988,0.004523788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00655649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03467447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023835741","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00246","title":"Categorical Designations and Methodological Reductionism: Gnosticism as Case Study1","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Gnosticism; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Relation (database); Philosophy; Categorical variable; Embodied cognition; Instrumentalism; Psychologism; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Philip L. Tite","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.131301129910355,"gpt":0.3633004200684343,"spread":0.2319992901580793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06237062,0.0005534063,0.0007510712,0.003636479,0.01163078,0.0121291,0.002833287,0.003969833,0.001912326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03976031,0.0005273733,0.0007308484,0.004078041,0.06007251,0.008385836,0.0129546,0.00554848,0.0002318053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01026679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004885141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003001144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004588305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8417464,0.1497123,0.001438259,0.001343362,0.004272207,0.001487419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9356295,0.05331227,0.002190249,0.005543383,0.002304659,0.001019989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002597537,0.00008883453,0.0008677416,0.0000856088,0.000007927171,0.0005379074,0.09777819,0.0003039449,0.000224034,0.8924282,0.001094971,0.006556694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008538112,0.0001367793,0.001104668,0.000639505,0.00002478173,0.001430568,0.1942058,0.005958564,0.002109296,0.6890231,0.1052064,0.00007516514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.383445,0.002536085,0.3398424,0.05571261,0.0007281029,0.001451586,0.0001656174,0.0002130347,0.2159056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9291746,0.0004215201,0.06504768,0.001065547,0.00004572691,0.0008245418,0.00003761034,0.00003688381,0.003345944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06237062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3298513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031168812","doi":"10.1163/157006811x549670","title":"Conversion as a Thematic Site: Academic Representations of Ambedkar’s Buddhist Turn","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Indian and Buddhist Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Trope (literature); Depiction; Sociology; Hinduism; Epistemology; Hermeneutics; Narrative; History of religions; Sociology of religion; Literature; Religious studies; Social science; Philosophy; Theology; Art","authors":[{"name":"Shane Gannon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0635432758461328,"gpt":0.3291871614852219,"spread":0.2656438856390891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004965837,0.000455662,0.0004122458,0.002964327,0.0114029,0.01444145,0.001451448,0.001899349,0.004184338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007493323,0.0003110224,0.0002817014,0.003271449,0.0460648,0.006320666,0.008494443,0.004905797,0.0003032994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008656134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003005067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008996543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01054796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948326,0.003840289,0.0001053751,0.0002565113,0.0005232898,0.0004419026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939078,0.004285489,0.0004733052,0.0005632868,0.0003275049,0.0004425433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001656024,0.00001208237,0.0003585347,0.00003587048,0.00000264036,0.0003481507,0.7979236,0.00007276756,0.0002853931,0.1976994,0.0006415364,0.002603448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001308484,0.00002547464,0.001207662,0.000191341,0.00001253518,0.0005590288,0.8617108,0.0004711869,0.0007335592,0.0351752,0.09987713,0.00002303561],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.599182,0.001714706,0.01123356,0.01115137,0.0004616035,0.0000857957,0.0001084363,0.0001702897,0.3758923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963279,0.0001697039,0.0004377465,0.0001506485,0.00002505598,0.00001226528,0.00001524015,0.00002172533,0.002839752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01444145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06280488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085013143","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341299","title":"Change the Name! On the Importance of Reclaiming NAASR’s Original Objectives for the Twenty-First Century","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; History","authors":[{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05563113604833764,"gpt":0.3729482716472992,"spread":0.3173171355989616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02243868,0.001017744,0.001300207,0.00123812,0.007992591,0.01078114,0.002822096,0.01363687,0.007684415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07934108,0.0003644901,0.0009617474,0.001103393,0.01909587,0.01146865,0.00661497,0.03435235,0.006050171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005139911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005951103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006809196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008281031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9807861,0.01067555,0.001258676,0.001475825,0.004955496,0.0008484082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9432665,0.03427998,0.00245145,0.002776188,0.01466304,0.00256273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005887269,0.0000309536,0.0001590476,0.0001477434,0.00001635726,0.0001138978,0.004448811,0.00007042754,0.0002252001,0.09760041,0.8834537,0.01367448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001030388,0.00001728802,0.0003136841,0.0003586494,0.000006629575,0.0001110707,0.002987074,0.0001074658,0.0001956164,0.02784191,0.9679949,0.00005543474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004259534,0.006139942,0.0009109267,0.9002751,0.08677565,0.000009592497,0.00003533134,0.00004151995,0.005385992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02987482,0.007825905,0.00390531,0.8540556,0.0625419,0.0001139956,0.00005813026,0.0003898972,0.04123434],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02243868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1186686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060422088","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341310","title":"The Scientific Study of Religion: Two Case Studies, One Response","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Luther H. Martin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08038610696636907,"gpt":0.3516738463904878,"spread":0.2712877394241187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04253769,0.0008029176,0.0009226745,0.003349393,0.00852583,0.004910774,0.003004383,0.01794799,0.005783031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1598843,0.0008637045,0.001411415,0.003674794,0.006780912,0.005271186,0.008406417,0.009200091,0.0007001017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007860718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005582802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00192392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003561986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.951956,0.03603148,0.003412824,0.001518476,0.005576447,0.001504803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8587178,0.1108076,0.009141332,0.003946315,0.01344567,0.003941286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001077047,0.002053729,0.01379508,0.008890478,0.0001791217,0.0450501,0.6811687,0.0005888334,0.005921866,0.0652508,0.1216182,0.05440604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004286496,0.0009401604,0.008602097,0.004014091,0.0001160379,0.01336457,0.5119475,0.0006052392,0.002764259,0.01047829,0.4465094,0.0002298258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4104547,0.01525883,0.01860924,0.4690008,0.02735,0.00715506,0.0007048684,0.0001196418,0.05134694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7765798,0.01091821,0.01479264,0.1411228,0.005819287,0.007850491,0.0002770025,0.0001070099,0.04253283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04253769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2249635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078445284","doi":"10.1163/157006811x549715","title":"Does “Q” Have Any Representative Potential?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Q Methodology Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Product (mathematics); Sociology; State (computer science); Reflection (computer programming); Work (physics); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Physics; Geometry","authors":[{"name":"Sarah E. Rollens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2105553800503836,"gpt":0.48588304929996,"spread":0.2753276692495763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01307814,0.0002264726,0.0006929751,0.00113426,0.004182901,0.006079,0.001363733,0.002919722,0.01236842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05918617,0.0002931402,0.000422459,0.001389246,0.02199932,0.01236689,0.002677123,0.002225311,0.0009136552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001934563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002602428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001623081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00134922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902369,0.006033076,0.0003447325,0.00117648,0.001548009,0.0006608271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9512379,0.03487158,0.003755735,0.004424573,0.003848591,0.001861754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001131857,0.00003309497,0.00231548,0.0000889579,0.00001885581,0.0002581834,0.004187684,0.0004238954,0.0002591047,0.9747045,0.002260991,0.01533615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002882752,0.00004317309,0.001134549,0.0001090747,0.00001393638,0.0001501477,0.00690808,0.001560228,0.0004331155,0.9670652,0.02253591,0.00001785304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3787968,0.001586923,0.1246753,0.07665358,0.0005782516,0.0002113307,0.0001914704,0.0001193678,0.417187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944869,0.000145182,0.002326678,0.0008522547,0.00009079445,0.00002815944,0.00002618278,0.000015372,0.002028376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01307814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06916463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000848332","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341247","title":"Provocation and Its Responses","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Islam; Provocation test; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Rippin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06164488228594979,"gpt":0.4327181329129964,"spread":0.3710732506270466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02157516,0.0009631136,0.0006130736,0.002105159,0.01145019,0.008099318,0.002782499,0.007535885,0.01968199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1180062,0.0003965725,0.0007995242,0.00133873,0.01495098,0.005491433,0.009715204,0.01182057,0.004372034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005417195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002376971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001070337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008434943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9529341,0.0362028,0.000853785,0.002279971,0.00510787,0.002621562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9251538,0.05317304,0.002677923,0.004501277,0.01131576,0.003178248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005073534,0.0002823819,0.002019006,0.0005076488,0.00002686138,0.001850727,0.3488656,0.0001602735,0.002807416,0.4797886,0.1403684,0.02281582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006621185,0.0001494957,0.0009968753,0.0003385034,0.00001616635,0.0004725724,0.1974498,0.0004042271,0.001884285,0.05409678,0.7440681,0.0000570085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1252927,0.001727954,0.02249132,0.1518116,0.03429534,0.001279051,0.0005423731,0.0009947894,0.6615649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8597946,0.0004028728,0.002614389,0.03667758,0.00373878,0.001131272,0.000163164,0.0006051114,0.09487227],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02157516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1141016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W275336053","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341346","title":"Theory, Method, and Madness in Religious Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Legitimacy; Sociology; Function (biology); Aura; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Hart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08167268275727134,"gpt":0.4626269002765907,"spread":0.3809542175193193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1122859,0.0009088417,0.001387346,0.008698366,0.0105172,0.01683933,0.002984307,0.004567009,0.002926575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08135874,0.0007506383,0.000769477,0.006927794,0.1134143,0.01778394,0.01094186,0.009407615,0.0003936352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01027304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01299579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005981787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006092308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8780738,0.1110463,0.002547558,0.00235703,0.004866154,0.001109227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8009484,0.180186,0.006139699,0.006413125,0.003485354,0.002827367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001208599,0.00002671378,0.001195944,0.0002635183,0.0000123539,0.00005264334,0.0283215,0.0001309948,0.00004995934,0.9592722,0.001418116,0.009243895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003007642,0.00004943833,0.0007719445,0.001025236,0.000009315829,0.0001430662,0.011334,0.0004969094,0.0001365131,0.9314752,0.05449591,0.00003257565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.05230336,0.1076793,0.2326893,0.3736044,0.007168738,0.0007643824,0.0001252062,0.0002234834,0.2254418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.832783,0.02451332,0.1080215,0.02229374,0.003222216,0.001936353,0.00006598934,0.0002089332,0.00695491],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1122859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5938318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083901661","doi":"10.1163/094330509x12568874557252","title":"You Show Your Smith and I’ll Show Mine: Selection, Exegesis, and the Politics of Citation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Constructive; Citation; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Exegesis; Poetics; Object (grammar); Selection (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Linguistics; Computer science; Law; Art; Political science","authors":[{"name":"John W. Parrish","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0222123477526411,"gpt":0.3484354068318179,"spread":0.3262230590791768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02920917,0.0002315089,0.0007388773,0.006523735,0.008275021,0.0162909,0.001298485,0.002097972,0.005226925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1014524,0.0003547602,0.0002740653,0.01033711,0.03090891,0.0156055,0.005482807,0.002693414,0.0007332521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003851355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002863435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00199926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00231756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9683666,0.02325817,0.001098966,0.001643913,0.004983685,0.000648714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8762487,0.1040981,0.004300886,0.007597299,0.006875339,0.0008796906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003099594,0.000009017204,0.001223174,0.0001024293,0.00001059334,0.00007253841,0.02858204,0.00006369709,0.0001698801,0.9298267,0.01568404,0.02422502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002385275,0.00003209606,0.002284662,0.0008238195,0.00002767941,0.0002294523,0.0283191,0.0005582619,0.001594173,0.6116935,0.3543685,0.0000448089],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1672992,0.02431148,0.08316711,0.2243729,0.006801619,0.0001585223,0.0004833347,0.000381494,0.4930243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527513,0.005768616,0.008821017,0.004434932,0.001880775,0.0001741601,0.000108644,0.0003230062,0.02573758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1544747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131662226","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341259","title":"Authenticity, Sincerity and Spontaneity: The Mutual Implication of Nature and Religion in China and the West","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Theme (computing); Morality; Epistemology; Philosophy; China; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"James Miller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01079358009765086,"gpt":0.3173577046331332,"spread":0.3065641245354824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00146823,0.0001179028,0.0002031415,0.001098007,0.001844428,0.002202836,0.0003351018,0.0003051676,0.001557162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001646596,0.0001106089,0.0000959012,0.00132181,0.009031816,0.001705468,0.00165869,0.0004821755,0.00002877967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002994316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00237465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01291314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01865121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991449,0.0004564737,0.00003883243,0.00008139304,0.0001491076,0.0001292845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987277,0.0005770531,0.0003199093,0.00007375907,0.000136587,0.0001650078],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000155697,0.00008875271,0.1163775,0.0003918221,0.00006007761,0.001825096,0.2927896,0.0007781812,0.004110114,0.5302731,0.001063978,0.05208602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004906989,0.0002129569,0.4699869,0.0004548313,0.000108828,0.0006737919,0.2308657,0.005416309,0.002229756,0.2496236,0.04029175,0.00008654692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719787,0.0006240999,0.0007452837,0.001508556,0.00001793527,0.000008893135,0.00001134594,0.000002202774,0.02510288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995005,0.00007840643,0.00005909804,0.00002100198,0.000003549377,0.000001384984,0.00000166964,4.075449e-7,0.0003340137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01291314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02567595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211766733","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341528","title":"“So Many Mothers, So Little Love”: Discourse of Motherly Love and Parental Governance in 2019 Hong Kong Protests","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Power (physics); Nationalism; Politics; Wife; Sociology; Gender studies; China; Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Ting Guo","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01726931201494262,"gpt":0.3639592339961578,"spread":0.3466899219812151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004299445,0.0004947051,0.0003278246,0.0007213521,0.01286916,0.005764,0.0006360948,0.001288439,0.002223469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003336636,0.0003512,0.0001805249,0.0006767404,0.01653167,0.002622623,0.00357319,0.002619848,0.0001551426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01364568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006073885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09295648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.120129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997689,0.001602409,0.00005949364,0.0001213041,0.0001359345,0.0003918259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969451,0.001720571,0.0004030375,0.0001471137,0.0002813183,0.0005029103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001949468,0.00001747338,0.004066486,0.00002759082,0.00000470396,0.0005784505,0.980206,0.00003620486,0.0001790222,0.01139689,0.001577355,0.001890329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003776967,0.00002091035,0.004886792,0.0001027491,0.000005984884,0.0001015566,0.9606349,0.00009632712,0.0002483434,0.0005874598,0.03329867,0.00001251198],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9574892,0.001142298,0.0003657542,0.01060192,0.0001982526,0.00002130577,0.00002060216,0.000009873192,0.03015073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958547,0.0003017695,0.00004926181,0.0004762812,0.00002004847,0.000008721677,0.000005355818,0.000003720631,0.003280116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09295648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1848308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008755468","doi":"10.1163/157006809x416805","title":"“On Thursdays We Worship the Banana Plant”: Encountering Lived Hinduism in a Canadian Suburb","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Worship; Sociology; Hinduism; Field (mathematics); Lived experience; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Religious studies; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Theology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Janet Gunn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04704789189382556,"gpt":0.3608277934225868,"spread":0.3137799015287612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003463731,0.0009638187,0.0008606821,0.002395851,0.04642744,0.006244356,0.00388339,0.002397808,0.003951434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005334039,0.0007463301,0.0004640137,0.002969173,0.02750576,0.002372134,0.006174566,0.004316282,0.0002872577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06069021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04765465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965724,0.001296681,0.00004970613,0.0003559569,0.0004744872,0.001250797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964738,0.001178788,0.0002871732,0.0001501846,0.0007929597,0.001117026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001975924,0.00001195409,0.001622437,0.00002390325,0.000003141656,0.0005751864,0.9942058,0.00001955419,0.0004394647,0.0006604171,0.0007669141,0.001651512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001197316,0.00001076883,0.002813235,0.00003315405,0.000003691393,0.0001015759,0.9886605,0.00003236526,0.0001114718,0.00007791317,0.008139015,0.00001520576],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839421,0.0005391703,0.0005990865,0.002849783,0.00007161238,0.00008643186,0.0001518533,0.00002328901,0.01173663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993097,0.0003993057,0.0005102368,0.0006043437,0.00001369545,0.0000291708,0.00005866629,0.00002514656,0.005262367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06069021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4403403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W847888219","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341328","title":"The Future of Religious History in Habermas’s Critical Theory of Religion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Sociology; Intellectual history; Christianity; Political history; Epistemology; Identity (music); History of religions; Critical theory; Conceptual history; Religious studies; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth MacKendrick","is_ca":true},{"name":"Matt Sheedy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04884210258477259,"gpt":0.3804293564707374,"spread":0.3315872538859648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007209563,0.0004398132,0.0004367793,0.003044902,0.004681092,0.005853181,0.001209337,0.002625272,0.00246066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004601655,0.000269781,0.0004068844,0.001676288,0.05111552,0.01227125,0.002986243,0.003736763,0.0002728764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007135184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003588226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003302878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003480426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968414,0.002393961,0.00005989424,0.0002322256,0.0002763016,0.0001961532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973361,0.001834389,0.0002297994,0.0001626259,0.0002119798,0.000225018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005337092,0.000004957543,0.00005517961,0.00001019948,7.762309e-7,0.00001526098,0.002565868,0.0000648018,0.00001180166,0.9956032,0.000618511,0.001044073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007865421,0.000005546955,0.00007080472,0.00003941752,0.000001327772,0.00001670943,0.00128891,0.0001839936,0.00003066109,0.9792332,0.01911685,0.000004677593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1002729,0.03950308,0.08955482,0.2751653,0.003594992,0.0002399051,0.0001537552,0.0001265821,0.4913887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96833,0.003421305,0.009512408,0.005652246,0.0009059084,0.0001513087,0.00002312866,0.00002915811,0.0119745],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007209563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05176961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988930514","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341470","title":"A Manifesto for the Scientific Study of Religions or Setting the Parameters for a Scientific Study of Religions In the Modern University","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Religious studies; History; Political science; Law; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06861194764720867,"gpt":0.3664234382078462,"spread":0.2978114905606375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03450931,0.0002708267,0.0004998142,0.001050001,0.005674773,0.007714747,0.000855844,0.003887376,0.004665743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0225899,0.0001943337,0.0003138575,0.001152797,0.04221833,0.009542628,0.003736324,0.006688123,0.0006162863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005320872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009781036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002827912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002910793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850914,0.01143325,0.000634339,0.0007309435,0.001587422,0.0005226207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783361,0.01315234,0.001495376,0.003539411,0.002110388,0.001366339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005004009,0.000005303711,0.00004970034,0.00001297035,6.146985e-7,0.000005862812,0.001498293,0.00002128549,0.00006187343,0.9952749,0.002179804,0.000884433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002694948,0.00003657486,0.0003969798,0.0001946277,0.000005801992,0.00004622146,0.003225597,0.000343626,0.0003907701,0.8240387,0.1712699,0.00002426389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03942621,0.009618871,0.08198171,0.4515022,0.01029768,0.0003320903,0.0006501773,0.0002540346,0.405937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307938,0.00184431,0.01851686,0.01330728,0.00221524,0.0003427599,0.0001069275,0.0001115864,0.03276126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1825049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408854945","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341376","title":"“It Was Like That When I Came In”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Encyclopedia; Epistemology; Sociology; Identification (biology); Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Nathan Colborne","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04198250474039451,"gpt":0.3873660580555587,"spread":0.3453835533151642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003166366,0.0006622592,0.0004806641,0.0007301592,0.00846837,0.004456382,0.0007858,0.001983023,0.02526192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01173396,0.0003542323,0.0005297877,0.0006322396,0.007867638,0.005347764,0.003107646,0.009919142,0.01535155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002200696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002026654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007367387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01462711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961424,0.002108687,0.00009128257,0.0004622421,0.0007620463,0.0004333103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997031,0.0005043896,0.0002922064,0.0002949024,0.00099696,0.0008804452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001238652,0.000121,0.00612259,0.0002556811,0.00005757642,0.001152867,0.1115739,0.00007267528,0.001306708,0.08355134,0.7404603,0.05520149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001478726,0.00007200651,0.00224651,0.0002737276,0.00001901266,0.001402866,0.06082072,0.00008840775,0.0004565589,0.01148632,0.9230562,0.00006289055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06728019,0.009750099,0.01911983,0.3365248,0.0279443,0.0004276025,0.0008270548,0.0008955397,0.5372307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.368522,0.004288117,0.01466609,0.1942392,0.002222179,0.0004408675,0.0004656942,0.0007359031,0.4144199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02526192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08450949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135979915","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341513","title":"Religious Studies and the Spiritual Turn","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Emic and etic; Sociology; Scholarship; Sociology of religion; Epistemology; Social science; Anthropology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Sharday Mosurinjohn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Galen Watts","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03775651125878855,"gpt":0.4166253721737679,"spread":0.3788688609149793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00659628,0.0001530875,0.0002225506,0.001997637,0.003754256,0.003528706,0.0005036809,0.0009922099,0.003547557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009506641,0.00009580258,0.0001748183,0.001122792,0.02121391,0.003697045,0.005435992,0.002183917,0.0001441367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002148833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001428569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001538135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003002009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930935,0.005927433,0.00009964308,0.0001478097,0.0004913194,0.0002403379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981414,0.01423996,0.001636412,0.0005965795,0.0008990102,0.001214057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003059175,0.00006701232,0.009962997,0.000225744,0.00001445726,0.0002019758,0.1123048,0.0001314156,0.0002500995,0.8343989,0.005347801,0.03706416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002822543,0.0001174093,0.02245836,0.002273851,0.00001740124,0.0004431255,0.2374183,0.0005189642,0.0003687397,0.4390794,0.2972438,0.00003243468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.447687,0.05448957,0.006012753,0.1718345,0.001424213,0.00004033071,0.00004335685,0.00002014341,0.3184482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909696,0.003606571,0.0004159852,0.003119272,0.000254787,0.000008254263,0.000008016421,0.000004739961,0.001612792],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00659628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03488487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028934107","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00255","title":"Reflections On Religion, Modernization, and Violence in the Islamic Middle East","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Militant; Islam; Modernization theory; Middle East; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Political violence; Political economy; Criminology; Social science; History; Law","authors":[{"name":"Paul Kingston","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0587793687950898,"gpt":0.3697168288912863,"spread":0.3109374600961965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002471679,0.0002312007,0.0002445646,0.001036474,0.008470116,0.003936781,0.0005219519,0.001434189,0.002511371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001856408,0.000148193,0.0001593367,0.0009444589,0.028764,0.001760759,0.004566179,0.0031365,0.00009802749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004305512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001386585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007558218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01321627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976751,0.001783456,0.00003881948,0.00004560342,0.0001631255,0.0002938455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998387,0.001066241,0.0002950673,0.00005032878,0.00008472447,0.0001166981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005326851,0.00007004671,0.005912887,0.0001105018,0.00001422818,0.001008953,0.5131242,0.0001841052,0.0004011991,0.4657306,0.003043815,0.01034617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002612785,0.0001079923,0.0205672,0.0006817743,0.00001633242,0.0007033385,0.6986685,0.0002843756,0.0006022459,0.08169618,0.1966171,0.00002873521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.7726724,0.02128052,0.0006602058,0.0556642,0.0006589339,0.00001465865,0.00002062066,0.000005336265,0.1490232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961603,0.001282607,0.00004464145,0.0008484201,0.0001057796,0.00000277149,0.000001799359,0.000001219133,0.001552416],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008470116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03123879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024221467","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341477","title":"A Report on the Special Executive Committee Meeting of the International Association for the History of Religions in Delphi","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Delphi method; Politics; Executive committee; Executive director; Delphi; Sociology; History of religions; International relations; Political science; Religious studies; Law; Management; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Don Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06862229842747186,"gpt":0.2969687302763154,"spread":0.2283464318488436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1111019,0.001013243,0.0007808927,0.002988352,0.006201862,0.005213153,0.002083191,0.004381615,0.049806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1353397,0.001187355,0.0008846059,0.002014932,0.001815078,0.003198318,0.006400788,0.007724774,0.01000982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006028112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0221888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008084524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006583385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9404919,0.03772382,0.003269846,0.001898171,0.01162702,0.004989215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8581336,0.05075894,0.003451426,0.005192007,0.07164583,0.01081823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002453609,0.0002473712,0.002372204,0.0006613787,0.0000230946,0.0003070778,0.009644589,0.0006114066,0.003052978,0.01204895,0.8681443,0.1026412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007530236,0.0002862349,0.009978678,0.001628913,0.00001774236,0.0001156505,0.02267228,0.001921837,0.001638667,0.005221972,0.956317,0.0001257894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.08334913,0.005634269,0.09513174,0.4949923,0.08534922,0.0587488,0.011881,0.001184645,0.1637291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3166582,0.008031726,0.1109414,0.08063299,0.02299771,0.1068905,0.01031317,0.001811373,0.3417229],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1111019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5875702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012942321","doi":"10.1163/157006811x567733","title":"Sikhism, Traumatic Repetition, and the Question of Aesthetic Sovereignty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"South Asian Studies and Diaspora","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Sikhism; Argument (complex analysis); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Sociology; Epistemology; Repetition (rhetorical device); Work (physics); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Religious studies; Linguistics; Computer science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Michael Nijhawan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04040485174126623,"gpt":0.2846243276139518,"spread":0.2442194758726856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005182347,0.0002074807,0.0003552806,0.0006742043,0.00543894,0.004843472,0.0009412146,0.001433622,0.003291584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006730955,0.0001964537,0.0002082811,0.0006503006,0.06524851,0.005460696,0.00723324,0.003000247,0.0001781094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002427777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001547179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001313398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001781185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963316,0.002579598,0.0001011043,0.0002481535,0.0004292111,0.0003102807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952033,0.002786725,0.0005397968,0.001023538,0.000220755,0.0002258763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003086557,0.00001943358,0.0007823451,0.00004680414,0.000003486313,0.0002148658,0.1918431,0.00007675034,0.0003585449,0.8000617,0.0005682299,0.00599377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002792414,0.0001226817,0.003753685,0.0003222432,0.00001103146,0.001175889,0.3045378,0.0006614237,0.001620494,0.6105345,0.07719402,0.00003832498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.700204,0.002453027,0.01022365,0.01862387,0.0003266008,0.00003646647,0.00002670158,0.00004873241,0.2680568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981893,0.00008081986,0.0002170089,0.000103795,0.0000215776,0.000006106555,0.000001833866,0.000004692271,0.001374923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00543894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02740717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018544991","doi":"10.1163/157006809x460338","title":"The Mennaisian “Catholic Science of Religion”: Epistemology and History in Early Nineteenth-Century French Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Object (grammar); History of science; Dual (grammatical number); Religious studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Arthur McCalla","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02117997587625129,"gpt":0.273487852785389,"spread":0.2523078769091376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003779194,0.0002065743,0.0002522307,0.002118044,0.006157784,0.004436365,0.0004729392,0.0008732858,0.003790352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002686175,0.0001348569,0.0001198473,0.001177163,0.01616432,0.001717093,0.001560906,0.001273564,0.0001399058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02255568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005262537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1743651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2224608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979546,0.001622172,0.00002458749,0.00009772505,0.0001305244,0.0001703814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974065,0.001768089,0.0002051839,0.00006960051,0.0003035998,0.0002469339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005135875,0.00004683077,0.005325094,0.0001284482,0.00001261737,0.0004317001,0.3086311,0.0001603695,0.0003208178,0.6590697,0.004403731,0.0214181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002362768,0.0001161781,0.02676682,0.0007726218,0.00001612789,0.0004593063,0.1863199,0.0006414413,0.0006539997,0.03950082,0.7446889,0.00004026085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6212121,0.04373053,0.003285956,0.03839561,0.0004573448,0.00004469091,0.0001154562,0.00004624624,0.2927121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881009,0.002202659,0.0002755711,0.0006604634,0.0001199665,0.000008493539,0.00001446587,0.000008069332,0.008609525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3467005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993020030","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341294","title":"The Identity of NAASR and the Character of the Critical Study of Religion: Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Media, Religion, Digital Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Mythology; Identity (music); Sociology; Religious studies; Epistemology; Theology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"William E. Arnal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02478025858134681,"gpt":0.3093812030338143,"spread":0.2846009444524675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004222617,0.0005520663,0.0005117042,0.00241484,0.003576829,0.006104585,0.0008629083,0.002549104,0.006095204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006331195,0.0002996041,0.0003074586,0.001824661,0.01231885,0.005944246,0.002885815,0.003999752,0.000798545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005853231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003275122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00581746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005911705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976169,0.001740403,0.00007840695,0.000204806,0.0002623779,0.0000971707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939241,0.00478319,0.0001769679,0.0001557179,0.0006772089,0.0002827513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003627159,0.00004618406,0.0004115775,0.0005402124,0.000006835564,0.0001402115,0.01890284,0.0001821829,0.000316791,0.8825727,0.06516469,0.03167948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001095954,0.00003349601,0.0008738582,0.001509902,0.000004389624,0.0001757903,0.0109604,0.0002753509,0.0001390482,0.217825,0.7681674,0.0000242563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01124575,0.3234149,0.02583909,0.3051394,0.03407297,0.0004085638,0.0004428078,0.0001483276,0.2992881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4746304,0.2358339,0.0309127,0.06873989,0.04053101,0.001909322,0.000450406,0.0004243059,0.146568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006104585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04246837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982776447","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00192","title":"The Female and the Fetish: a Method and Theory Review","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Fetishism; Object (grammar); Worship; Fantasy; Philosophy; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Linguistics; Psychology; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Dawne McCance","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03610018840564659,"gpt":0.322882506166572,"spread":0.2867823177609254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03232819,0.001836218,0.004111021,0.02453617,0.003836015,0.008762961,0.003751644,0.004563591,0.01054006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03590471,0.001497187,0.002476754,0.02001671,0.01033057,0.01049516,0.004686217,0.004581639,0.003123418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0126755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01789165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009127965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01293209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850749,0.01087012,0.001074203,0.001008504,0.001530213,0.0004420321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9346507,0.05848224,0.001807617,0.001204783,0.00330692,0.0005476414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002120044,0.0005656779,0.002525268,0.07837989,0.0003234878,0.0007792826,0.01269386,0.0003721481,0.0003170047,0.2190387,0.04682429,0.6379684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007385411,0.0003862589,0.005854928,0.1741205,0.0007114626,0.001556801,0.01472945,0.0005311536,0.00036438,0.06662035,0.7348893,0.000161619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001043602,0.9753737,0.005672592,0.00962263,0.001735812,0.0006951011,0.0001885733,0.00002227241,0.005645718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01026049,0.9697752,0.008137334,0.006035164,0.001092907,0.002555901,0.0001369523,0.00005672979,0.001949323],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03232819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1709698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286213261","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10085","title":"“‘Cause Even Though Perfect It’s Not/ It’s the Best Thing This World’s Got” – or Not?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Literacy; Sociology; Assimilation (phonology); Point (geometry); Epistemology; Positive economics; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Pedagogy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Johannes C. Wolfart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07842477565232847,"gpt":0.4223320311863749,"spread":0.3439072555340464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006058245,0.0004932496,0.0006074897,0.0005657268,0.004135221,0.005581693,0.001703276,0.007698014,0.01549501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02759846,0.0002265296,0.0004734468,0.0006830127,0.01599116,0.007580412,0.003031082,0.01204062,0.004168869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003314669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002405153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005981833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006151703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931082,0.004336073,0.0003213429,0.0007294706,0.001050756,0.0004541863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848551,0.008780177,0.001077498,0.0009595206,0.00359461,0.0007330503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006827612,0.00002973901,0.001093469,0.0001770841,0.00001550376,0.0002823797,0.0152405,0.0001470566,0.0003583207,0.5174773,0.4526455,0.01246485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001479363,0.00004016129,0.001678115,0.0004006794,0.00001184065,0.0004851915,0.02507307,0.0005630296,0.0007859533,0.1621653,0.808719,0.0000628364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005734859,0.002280043,0.008806597,0.9225377,0.0120242,0.00003309219,0.0001381732,0.0000992468,0.04834618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4022544,0.003240036,0.006442211,0.4743258,0.01386227,0.0001679184,0.0002762909,0.0003724547,0.09905865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01549501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05183595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769181511","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341426","title":"Why Truth Matters for the Study of Religion: A Defense of a Truth-Conditional Semantics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Epistemology; Semantics (computer science); Meaning (existential); Truth value; Logical truth; Truth condition; Coherence theory of truth; Semantic theory of truth; Philosophy; Function (biology); Linguistics; Pragmatic theory of truth; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Mark Q. Gardiner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05805603771629132,"gpt":0.3274413358349599,"spread":0.2693852981186686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01643999,0.0005298089,0.001133302,0.003409409,0.00430089,0.00745585,0.002642771,0.004436951,0.004992942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02228248,0.0006043458,0.001660272,0.002362717,0.05627269,0.02159525,0.00627966,0.007800027,0.0006047134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004116637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003042311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002034939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001238215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992415,0.004638641,0.0004218401,0.0009668542,0.001223301,0.0003343181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748793,0.01802863,0.001484073,0.002732001,0.002085893,0.0007901179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004863368,0.000003366406,0.0000448855,0.0000135489,0.000002719727,0.0000125048,0.0004847255,0.00008376779,0.00002694423,0.9986588,0.0001729643,0.0004909469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004991625,0.000002739035,0.0000299121,0.00001340013,0.000002452007,0.00001216427,0.0001180899,0.0004338979,0.00003320534,0.9982158,0.00113045,0.000002935253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06875778,0.004478056,0.5889298,0.1436982,0.001490851,0.0001833576,0.0004665289,0.0003198941,0.1916756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619609,0.0008679786,0.02876975,0.003640553,0.0009511834,0.0001732486,0.0001023933,0.0001152102,0.003418814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01643999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08694398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W820096865","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341330","title":"Clarifications: A Rejoinder","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"William E. Arnal","is_ca":true},{"name":"Russell T. McCutcheon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1154943075222061,"gpt":0.3383368118532866,"spread":0.2228425043310805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03622004,0.002423928,0.002212653,0.002940624,0.01187277,0.01470349,0.007850397,0.03000887,0.01181902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1649381,0.0009536544,0.002334169,0.002220284,0.0203628,0.02093518,0.01258016,0.05844821,0.007665472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006787624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005995679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007573574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007969045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9604862,0.01872811,0.00275271,0.005842911,0.01074304,0.001446983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8863073,0.07447192,0.003986333,0.007080436,0.02392556,0.004228401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004790794,0.00001556279,0.00008918344,0.0001016381,0.00001581656,0.0001597749,0.002258084,0.00007983205,0.0001196078,0.05194186,0.9384636,0.006707168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001685781,0.00001759337,0.0001635683,0.0003353371,0.00001190434,0.00017274,0.002364163,0.0001754867,0.0001356878,0.03687166,0.9596825,0.00005257512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002848435,0.004596293,0.001489884,0.8269661,0.1619454,0.00002717382,0.00004235297,0.0001048709,0.004542977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01037705,0.002924437,0.002963274,0.7826301,0.1707836,0.0002363189,0.00005419827,0.0004568692,0.02957413],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03622004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1915522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766177670","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341427","title":"Truth-Conditions and Religious Language: Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Semantics (computer science); Grammar; Epistemology; Philosophy; Alethiology; Set (abstract data type); Linguistics; Logical truth; Truth value; Truth condition; Pragmatic theory of truth; Sociology; Coherence theory of truth; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Mark Q. Gardiner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02575596333593065,"gpt":0.323438356546195,"spread":0.2976823932102643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001228007,0.0006847552,0.0005648917,0.002204939,0.001488885,0.003745321,0.0009253443,0.002182888,0.01949043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003222268,0.0004437086,0.0006923064,0.001757965,0.006029114,0.006204611,0.002132802,0.003588221,0.002316399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003745912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001002564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003841887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002630271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993511,0.0002823721,0.00003700424,0.0001483451,0.0001281777,0.00005291945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978858,0.001482799,0.00008006331,0.00009320256,0.0003624065,0.0000957454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001185122,0.00002103526,0.0001061592,0.0001557404,0.000006082267,0.00005962684,0.0006668871,0.0003398068,0.0001777452,0.9538453,0.033546,0.01106384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001142705,0.00001701902,0.0004349041,0.000359191,0.000006081097,0.0001000194,0.000322084,0.0005104605,0.0001004927,0.712374,0.2857453,0.00001903191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007735706,0.2688065,0.06544604,0.07565761,0.01512918,0.0001488327,0.001382328,0.0003139735,0.5653797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5303646,0.1665448,0.03654382,0.03626261,0.06633904,0.0007267838,0.002334359,0.000714093,0.16017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01949043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06520194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389257859","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10119","title":"Debating Critical Religion: A Response to Timothy Fitzgerald","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Critical thought; Critical theory; Religious studies","authors":[{"name":"Galen Watts","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sharday Mosurinjohn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04388446427959898,"gpt":0.4512308713831216,"spread":0.4073464071035226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05494457,0.001825577,0.002915255,0.003048039,0.020032,0.01444518,0.006005486,0.0421679,0.006897094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1592656,0.001268103,0.001758639,0.002941484,0.0399162,0.02976339,0.01095772,0.07856672,0.002305132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01410216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01773905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02011273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02238493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9596941,0.02600848,0.001789832,0.004384192,0.006534609,0.001588739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7265081,0.2343129,0.004345291,0.004123489,0.02190903,0.008801161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005438905,0.00005601647,0.000281343,0.0001683951,0.00002257504,0.0002081173,0.01152029,0.00008225686,0.0001308768,0.03826693,0.9397758,0.009433144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009176866,0.00003891845,0.0005342499,0.001483115,0.00003135251,0.0005151951,0.02480615,0.0004547427,0.0004092471,0.06161309,0.9098291,0.0001930976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001740336,0.002855261,0.0002715074,0.9917754,0.004529692,0.000005207027,0.000006402224,0.000008387819,0.0003741641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007040338,0.003725718,0.001276896,0.9755805,0.009384924,0.00009898403,0.0000129161,0.00009849192,0.002781246],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05494457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2905781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774729703","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341354","title":"Reforming Philosophy of Religion: Some Methodological Cautions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Mark Q. Gardiner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1986257328988127,"gpt":0.3682058473765436,"spread":0.1695801144777309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1680688,0.00147566,0.002258002,0.00492322,0.008241974,0.01534366,0.009769584,0.01196575,0.003813418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.239078,0.000916711,0.001682605,0.003895476,0.0550731,0.02144951,0.0107549,0.03467549,0.001903735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00921758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009164097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01001773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01130432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8719925,0.09555342,0.00676373,0.006797602,0.01724153,0.001651326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7777918,0.1676076,0.006457959,0.01581813,0.02940307,0.002921496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006133631,0.00006704846,0.0003744363,0.0003035752,0.00005210546,0.00009233065,0.008590842,0.0002825609,0.0001606678,0.9276881,0.05191763,0.01040936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009039366,0.00003604617,0.0003601533,0.001238412,0.00002759031,0.00009468108,0.005340319,0.001209084,0.000319332,0.9062129,0.08502414,0.00004700518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002767369,0.01338303,0.0176986,0.9515686,0.006490997,0.00009261029,0.00007266916,0.00007326363,0.00785285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1965597,0.02176242,0.08053932,0.6460133,0.041259,0.001994303,0.0001814692,0.0003459718,0.01134444],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1680688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8888433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054595673","doi":"10.1163/157006807x244934","title":"Time, Habit, and Agency in English Puritanism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Habituation; Protestant work ethic; Sociology; Social psychology; Protestantism; Modernity; Epistemology; Late modernity; Leverage (statistics); Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Aesthetics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Religious studies; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Steven Engler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02034825410239564,"gpt":0.2773713304267414,"spread":0.2570230763243458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001250172,0.00008134763,0.0001601174,0.0005949725,0.001545521,0.00273306,0.00029193,0.0002738833,0.002164905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002239367,0.00007971474,0.0001029436,0.000669198,0.009522967,0.00187034,0.001892301,0.000532481,0.00006511641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001907535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006713021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005088407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005522423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991199,0.0005706415,0.00003870154,0.00006661967,0.00009873412,0.0001053204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998001,0.001093102,0.0004074928,0.000152321,0.0001800155,0.0001660451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001014793,0.0001236948,0.03854134,0.0001213571,0.00001374107,0.000570504,0.3359946,0.0002150084,0.0006889081,0.6012751,0.0007690952,0.02158515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004513386,0.0002058498,0.144643,0.0003584934,0.00003832861,0.0009051953,0.4703503,0.001711312,0.001398573,0.2396219,0.1406386,0.00008334021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8743486,0.0009799642,0.001628999,0.001728004,0.0000295501,0.00001930204,0.00002196501,0.000008610075,0.1212349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989495,0.0000572848,0.00007154136,0.00002559658,0.000004918834,0.000003084322,0.000001751162,0.00000113763,0.0008853814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005088407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01384026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401177146","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10128","title":"Critical Religion Takes a Punch: Notes on a Scholarly Skirmish","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Sociology; Epistemology; Critical theory; The Imaginary; Racism; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Law; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Naomi R. Goldenberg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04877601887635644,"gpt":0.4333016444849161,"spread":0.3845256256085597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030806,0.0006174425,0.0008944597,0.002926345,0.02356952,0.01441906,0.00379716,0.02124818,0.00405418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0613347,0.0004248976,0.0008210803,0.002310215,0.07092652,0.01922295,0.01276164,0.03513544,0.000758849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009570287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008958565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01106348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01285501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9762264,0.01646922,0.0006605071,0.001405228,0.003929199,0.001309418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9296923,0.05951242,0.001477807,0.002106641,0.005002668,0.002208202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003361546,0.00003716013,0.0001638035,0.0001541038,0.000008318126,0.0004320693,0.07299853,0.00006373645,0.0001270671,0.6740829,0.2422629,0.009635842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001903334,0.00002128289,0.0002061024,0.001087167,0.000007978841,0.0001963824,0.06439493,0.0001943396,0.0003325587,0.1640975,0.7694044,0.00003835867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.005066169,0.01193724,0.001146559,0.9485952,0.0145511,0.00001758604,0.0000164425,0.00002537375,0.01864437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3752694,0.01342022,0.00240163,0.5424161,0.03225878,0.0002266209,0.00003148686,0.0002700085,0.03370573],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.030806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1629196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1804125812","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341353","title":"Postmetaphysical Thinking and the Philosophy of Religion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Field (mathematics); Philosophy of religion; Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth MacKendrick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0417814899416762,"gpt":0.3042019544072971,"spread":0.2624204644656209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003511718,0.0003004611,0.000237221,0.001264881,0.003037786,0.003981192,0.0007960075,0.00149814,0.0038349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00286753,0.0001649176,0.0002118912,0.001014732,0.03665879,0.00569359,0.002529002,0.004022375,0.0004843742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004134961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002636677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001781838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002080284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977601,0.001562712,0.00006448512,0.0001402559,0.0003563366,0.0001161659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983929,0.0009983013,0.0001881458,0.0001838114,0.0001514051,0.00008545603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001642989,0.000002034162,0.00002099727,0.000009039404,4.635187e-7,0.000005074367,0.001209165,0.00002501211,0.0000189026,0.9976398,0.0002144172,0.0008534907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005753691,0.000008736037,0.0002011495,0.00004162018,0.000001230885,0.00003558062,0.001373077,0.0001698857,0.00008418212,0.9603876,0.03768785,0.000003441763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06727418,0.02346001,0.07747545,0.08267392,0.001403498,0.00007016453,0.0001043455,0.00009644376,0.747442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587964,0.004082189,0.008377394,0.002903898,0.0007392745,0.0001057866,0.0000414341,0.00003697243,0.02491663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004134961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03000146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411704941","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10147","title":"What’s Alternative about Alternative Rationality in CAS-E’s Definition of ‘Esotericism’?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Mark Q. Gardiner","is_ca":true},{"name":"Steven Engler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0617077405977734,"gpt":0.3624498999709779,"spread":0.3007421593732045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01392572,0.0007691317,0.00108747,0.003583849,0.004599146,0.0124284,0.002818434,0.005230608,0.005198183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01870128,0.0002391308,0.0009740323,0.002749987,0.06355862,0.01427231,0.006424993,0.007872047,0.0007472966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005145261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004348136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003421244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003657832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9822337,0.0117899,0.00075821,0.001571385,0.002619481,0.001027347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855934,0.008586099,0.0008534716,0.001945795,0.002436241,0.000585033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005460165,0.00000316519,0.00005893291,0.00001869482,0.000002063239,0.00001657802,0.002982007,0.00003338361,0.0000169279,0.9952089,0.0006592136,0.0009945816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001549132,0.00001158671,0.0001742572,0.0001880588,0.000007264749,0.00009322273,0.00861413,0.0005388143,0.0001848648,0.9096761,0.08047484,0.00002137029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0400012,0.009246727,0.1365065,0.1494507,0.003222924,0.0001650321,0.0001791043,0.0001937499,0.6610342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503837,0.001496931,0.0248488,0.008125344,0.0005939002,0.0003022715,0.00009389565,0.0001331904,0.01402201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01392572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07364708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018520567","doi":"10.1163/157006807x243601","title":"Science, Scholarship and the Domestication of Religion: On Dennett's Breaking the Spell","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Scrutiny; Taboo; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Phenomenon; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology; History","authors":[{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03740200773963592,"gpt":0.3928016362131641,"spread":0.3553996284735282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008336066,0.0004377588,0.0007756641,0.002671301,0.009360784,0.009715801,0.001148997,0.003793499,0.003366733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008859548,0.0003473706,0.0003646196,0.002299083,0.0555371,0.01162958,0.005851613,0.007428056,0.0004645856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005988039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004223251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01231501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0156849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942752,0.004267265,0.0001479277,0.0002675135,0.0007547587,0.0002873923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891036,0.009098145,0.000417626,0.0003654837,0.0006891715,0.0003260434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009313079,0.00001258391,0.0001389983,0.00002710177,0.000001664033,0.00003433783,0.003617288,0.0000354335,0.00001556031,0.974515,0.01603509,0.005557635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001634212,0.00002237626,0.0003557174,0.0003895694,0.000004950554,0.00007400737,0.005659462,0.0002082502,0.0001338791,0.7261106,0.2670095,0.00001535465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01873545,0.05136744,0.01564717,0.513934,0.008847754,0.0000905926,0.00007628655,0.00007232611,0.3912289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7492718,0.02908647,0.01098077,0.09948136,0.005981227,0.0004422628,0.00004967501,0.0001902452,0.1045162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01231501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04408586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045319486","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341503","title":"A Response to My Critics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06257077170416289,"gpt":0.4132839927200797,"spread":0.3507132210159167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03728765,0.002057899,0.002469179,0.003050846,0.009505761,0.01767762,0.008818842,0.06509434,0.01636103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2252139,0.001323467,0.003267586,0.003098609,0.0127051,0.01126837,0.008316856,0.123984,0.01829849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009694536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01116755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006258685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005844348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9601563,0.01378157,0.00335423,0.004616203,0.01562943,0.002462262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7997967,0.09295263,0.007207525,0.009946247,0.07441062,0.01568624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001131025,0.000009928165,0.00006227185,0.00004249241,0.000006824745,0.00005580714,0.0002117147,0.00001559972,0.00004373111,0.001279494,0.9967514,0.001509369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003279417,0.00003064608,0.0004454127,0.0006848154,0.00002452753,0.0002159319,0.001752501,0.0001817675,0.0001901813,0.003620556,0.9927457,0.0000752346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006763182,0.0005643101,0.0001096281,0.9501195,0.04831414,0.00001119012,0.00003046017,0.00005051843,0.0007326566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001258714,0.0003560648,0.0002380441,0.9715348,0.02221276,0.00006381732,0.00001988313,0.00008827105,0.00422762],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06509434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1971983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313897458","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10097","title":"Burton Mack’s Challenge to the Study of Religion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Christianity; Philosophy; Religious studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Willi Braun","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0671163401100917,"gpt":0.3323899542761722,"spread":0.2652736141660805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00572185,0.0004051802,0.0005156541,0.001526447,0.005709856,0.005252327,0.001253122,0.00279521,0.004403555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01189529,0.0003238067,0.0002406564,0.001093229,0.0261392,0.005749322,0.003408212,0.006600863,0.0005166319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004026241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002520078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00569911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006136589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940824,0.004848091,0.00009087548,0.0003519283,0.0004449826,0.0001817192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861196,0.01163754,0.0004810702,0.0004490644,0.0006322825,0.0006803813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003697541,0.00002896827,0.0005292926,0.0002570793,0.000009423717,0.0001861814,0.02819283,0.0001299355,0.0002651886,0.8624551,0.09446879,0.01344021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002383797,0.00003450213,0.001154779,0.000855485,0.000007728316,0.0002353856,0.02105313,0.0004043646,0.0003166804,0.4443069,0.5315778,0.00002943832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03199489,0.04513258,0.005749168,0.7998458,0.004332327,0.00005227213,0.00009987387,0.00004271506,0.1127503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774299,0.01445062,0.008586071,0.05082313,0.005124401,0.0003212993,0.00004135564,0.00009640541,0.04312678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00572185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03026038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W633722913","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341340","title":"Documenting the Delusion: A Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Delusion; Credibility; Deception; Naturalism; Point (geometry); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":true},{"name":"Luther H. Martin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09274885937243119,"gpt":0.3689287374716734,"spread":0.2761798780992423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008835892,0.001412263,0.001042071,0.003106259,0.02034247,0.00598048,0.003378185,0.009788991,0.004083151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02478667,0.001167563,0.001034809,0.002638332,0.009972431,0.004475882,0.007639697,0.0095045,0.001057761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005712677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003525174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009170393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02404969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904774,0.006424444,0.000386156,0.0005062746,0.001147459,0.001058244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810479,0.01328393,0.001704145,0.0008726509,0.0009187429,0.002172517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002842114,0.004546363,0.02037719,0.0006348124,0.00005124973,0.270269,0.6429175,0.0004826748,0.001731841,0.01921901,0.00837725,0.03110878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001229957,0.001073643,0.007045425,0.0009280181,0.00006148095,0.1395432,0.802579,0.001170311,0.001861618,0.005037033,0.04042818,0.0001490862],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9569831,0.002341536,0.006654873,0.01112786,0.000363206,0.001305021,0.000266559,0.00007185622,0.02088587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727395,0.003690411,0.007003593,0.003128487,0.0001720386,0.0006046726,0.0001047707,0.00007043668,0.01248612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02034247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04672927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389762157","doi":"10.1163/15700682-03601000","title":"Front matter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Philosophy; Oceanography","authors":[{"name":"Mitsutoshi Horii","is_ca":false},{"name":"T. Wenger","is_ca":false},{"name":"John W. Morgan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ann Baranowski","is_ca":false},{"name":"Leslie Dorrough-Smith","is_ca":true},{"name":"Naomi R. Goldenberg","is_ca":false},{"name":"Susannah Heschel","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sinding Jeppe","is_ca":false},{"name":"Carool Kersten","is_ca":false},{"name":"Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair","is_ca":false},{"name":"Craig Martin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Russell T. McCutcheon","is_ca":false},{"name":"Suzanne Owen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Annette Reed","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jason Storm","is_ca":false},{"name":"Will Sweetman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robert Yelle","is_ca":false},{"name":"E. Thomas Lawson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Luther Martin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonathan D. Smith","is_ca":false},{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03161808959572699,"gpt":0.365969543458704,"spread":0.334351453862977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001089173,0.001550081,0.0009578624,0.001815542,0.002545718,0.008664154,0.0011954,0.006499717,0.9436564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003636761,0.0006244408,0.0005891022,0.001534906,0.002193747,0.004996364,0.002408664,0.002570676,0.8796192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001708138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00204124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004934044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00739271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993524,0.0001011223,0.00003344392,0.0002104902,0.0002010982,0.0001014295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998,0.0007963626,0.0001113242,0.0002077185,0.000437661,0.0004468632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006484523,0.00009380384,0.0005235128,0.0003408405,0.00001051683,0.0001443057,0.0002237119,0.0000921234,0.0005814864,0.05271131,0.7704147,0.1747989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001753913,0.00001700484,0.0005053792,0.0002220238,0.00000327223,0.0001017827,0.0001745015,0.00008337144,0.0001211207,0.003961324,0.9947861,0.000006462595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003336603,0.0003805841,0.0004984929,0.002590036,0.001080872,0.00004207945,0.00114571,0.0003179174,0.9936107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001739408,0.0003421445,0.0004180135,0.0008301756,0.0002849095,0.00002662324,0.0004432996,0.0002132867,0.9957022],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05634362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08036733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230029655","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341334","title":"Liminal Contradictions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Liminality; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Point (geometry); Lineage (genetic); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Randi R. Warne","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0951801864645066,"gpt":0.3430971898811793,"spread":0.2479170034166727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008096823,0.0006015532,0.0007058915,0.002262399,0.008421957,0.008448803,0.002190409,0.003407668,0.02033321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01825428,0.0003629188,0.0007128402,0.001767343,0.03161285,0.0102671,0.007562686,0.005600513,0.003807909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006015804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00255278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002329096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002720032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914169,0.004708881,0.0003391104,0.001335164,0.001416593,0.0007833939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926823,0.003264197,0.0004371106,0.001719225,0.001530963,0.0003662314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008645543,0.000004907757,0.00005580686,0.00002108399,0.000002854071,0.00006317543,0.004291861,0.00002478706,0.00005287367,0.9912133,0.002618855,0.001641835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001364639,0.000007262456,0.0002083169,0.0001516898,0.000009548885,0.000215012,0.007322457,0.0002321956,0.0003058324,0.7527619,0.2387608,0.00001133751],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01607483,0.003005154,0.02604795,0.03693901,0.001426449,0.00007688038,0.0001773111,0.0001316637,0.9161206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8815402,0.002555336,0.01533121,0.01669146,0.0009709467,0.000282096,0.0003012501,0.000271135,0.08205648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02033321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06802136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313551326","doi":"10.1163/15700682-03501000","title":"Front matter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Philosophy; Geology; Oceanography","authors":[{"name":"Mitsutoshi Horii","is_ca":false},{"name":"T. Wenger","is_ca":false},{"name":"John W. Morgan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ann Baranowski","is_ca":false},{"name":"Leslie Dorrough-Smith","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daniel Dubuisson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Naomi R. Goldenberg","is_ca":false},{"name":"Susannah Heschel","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sinding Jeppe","is_ca":false},{"name":"Carool Kersten","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anja Kirsch","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nancy Levene","is_ca":false},{"name":"Craig Martin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Russell T. McCutcheon","is_ca":false},{"name":"Suzanne Owen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jason Storm","is_ca":false},{"name":"Will Sweetman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robert Yelle","is_ca":false},{"name":"E. Thomas Lawson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Luther Martin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonathan D. Smith","is_ca":false},{"name":"Donald Wiebe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03161808959572699,"gpt":0.365969543458704,"spread":0.334351453862977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001089173,0.001550081,0.0009578624,0.001815542,0.002545718,0.008664154,0.0011954,0.006499717,0.9436564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003636761,0.0006244408,0.0005891022,0.001534906,0.002193747,0.004996364,0.002408664,0.002570676,0.8796192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001708138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00204124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004934044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00739271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993524,0.0001011223,0.00003344392,0.0002104902,0.0002010982,0.0001014295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998,0.0007963626,0.0001113242,0.0002077185,0.000437661,0.0004468632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006484523,0.00009380384,0.0005235128,0.0003408405,0.00001051683,0.0001443057,0.0002237119,0.0000921234,0.0005814864,0.05271131,0.7704147,0.1747989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001753913,0.00001700484,0.0005053792,0.0002220238,0.00000327223,0.0001017827,0.0001745015,0.00008337144,0.0001211207,0.003961324,0.9947861,0.000006462595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003336603,0.0003805841,0.0004984929,0.002590036,0.001080872,0.00004207945,0.00114571,0.0003179174,0.9936107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001739408,0.0003421445,0.0004180135,0.0008301756,0.0002849095,0.00002662324,0.0004432996,0.0002132867,0.9957022],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05634362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08036733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2865263030","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341451","title":"Why I am Such a Good Christian: Comments on Gil Anidjar, Blood: A Critique of Christianity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Monotheism; Judaism; Protestantism; Philosophy; Ambivalence; Confession (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Kinship; Theology; Religious studies; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; History; Islam; Anthropology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Francis Landy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02981691074118254,"gpt":0.3234905639794878,"spread":0.2936736532383052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01151195,0.000616729,0.0008040411,0.001247699,0.0183692,0.007560847,0.002509333,0.01276449,0.003583461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02250235,0.0004196873,0.0004608696,0.001440573,0.03788979,0.005374319,0.004910179,0.02216549,0.0005671002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01080822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004790843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02637585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03557829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935592,0.00424338,0.000162012,0.0005616742,0.0008622872,0.0006113698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787259,0.01723344,0.0008316424,0.0003714831,0.001784995,0.001052588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007969638,0.00003216538,0.0007159095,0.0002323055,0.00001527987,0.001710213,0.3119545,0.0001383311,0.000410875,0.2967925,0.3821732,0.005745118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002091111,0.00003466779,0.001242314,0.0008036712,0.0000161942,0.000557502,0.1970911,0.0001786881,0.0004012453,0.03471613,0.7648684,0.00006914148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01294537,0.008030501,0.0004562885,0.951628,0.007001165,0.00001794176,0.00003010206,0.0000249531,0.01986576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4760354,0.007057047,0.0008534338,0.4718193,0.01407656,0.00009747752,0.00002677951,0.000188581,0.02984553],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02637585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07841945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810136477","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341450","title":"Food for Thought: The Question of the Animal in Gil Anidjar’s Blood: A Critique of Christianity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Hebrew Bible; Section (typography); Christianity; Hebrew; New Testament; Philosophy; Eucharist; Literature; Old Testament; Early Christianity; Monotheism; Biblical studies; Theology; Art; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Peter Sabó","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03186318786241514,"gpt":0.3376959774180198,"spread":0.3058327895556047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00286175,0.0002333498,0.0002666357,0.001206367,0.005090546,0.004212524,0.0006770329,0.002028287,0.003521484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003043886,0.0001573123,0.0001534468,0.0009657624,0.04412839,0.002495366,0.002396392,0.002624355,0.0002485854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004559976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001921463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006466332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01019757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982493,0.001270119,0.00002536197,0.000108005,0.0002184666,0.0001287306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980263,0.001446515,0.0001479408,0.0001228699,0.0001518462,0.0001045585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002102919,0.00001169851,0.0001769987,0.00006019741,0.000002400298,0.0001243504,0.06216672,0.00005608025,0.000176883,0.9302838,0.004049615,0.002870344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002990662,0.00004685506,0.001694926,0.0005495999,0.00001376928,0.0002993085,0.08815497,0.0003152259,0.0006645373,0.4703532,0.4378495,0.0000281319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1632028,0.01980454,0.006622218,0.1140181,0.001428563,0.00003057111,0.00006855169,0.00006716157,0.6947575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728309,0.001671402,0.001032907,0.003366683,0.0002973567,0.00001536986,0.00001097578,0.00002567093,0.0207487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006466332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03308511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255681613","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00354","title":"Reviews","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jeppe Sinding Jensen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Joseph M. Bryant","is_ca":true},{"name":"Diane Jonte‐Pace","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05220494157956687,"gpt":0.3919005978075737,"spread":0.3396956562280068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001264196,0.0007144286,0.0008690084,0.003474709,0.0007566386,0.003227544,0.00206813,0.00193983,0.2850419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005065386,0.0004344147,0.000637973,0.002906222,0.0008649749,0.00266904,0.001376355,0.001940974,0.2121076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001563492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002957609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003722047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006936457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989003,0.0001926103,0.0000772413,0.0001620432,0.0005760393,0.00009173217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973481,0.000629098,0.0001723289,0.0003537531,0.001218455,0.0002783844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002704505,0.00002267098,0.00008585845,0.001077225,0.00001211671,0.0000463576,0.00004968746,0.00003379625,0.0002685339,0.00513206,0.810778,0.1824665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003167397,0.000004391255,0.0001219177,0.0003532155,0.000003900036,0.00006519305,0.00001789819,0.000004165836,0.00004163753,0.0005924521,0.9987897,0.000002434499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005078628,0.5350003,0.003224099,0.02526669,0.03981729,0.0002809889,0.003302784,0.00088502,0.391715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004107163,0.3607275,0.0040487,0.01674574,0.01388247,0.0002290247,0.004457717,0.0004705777,0.5953311],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7149581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W764916438","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341332","title":"The Public Nature of Critical Discourses on “Religion”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Religious studies; Sociology; Public discourse; Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth MacKendrick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04413669585574895,"gpt":0.4485937896349546,"spread":0.4044570937792057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01000375,0.0006006065,0.0007961288,0.004510994,0.003972143,0.008694621,0.001313913,0.004080067,0.00498007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0231687,0.0003402071,0.0004962573,0.004245006,0.02812741,0.01409715,0.002900655,0.006381965,0.00100079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006913214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005040084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004344275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00494936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932541,0.004572852,0.0001453264,0.0003868989,0.001320424,0.0003204175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968358,0.02655852,0.001142354,0.000873789,0.002561277,0.0005059423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002837515,0.00002101932,0.0001522593,0.001332017,0.00003114303,0.0001083838,0.01442764,0.0001687827,0.0001920361,0.7891442,0.1495332,0.04486102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001653069,0.00001394007,0.0007601788,0.003578894,0.00001987688,0.0001185875,0.007768771,0.0000969166,0.0001773068,0.2631088,0.7243174,0.00002275981],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002923437,0.5955441,0.002118177,0.3028874,0.01276219,0.00001488488,0.00006362021,0.00002477174,0.08366136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.342041,0.530314,0.001434857,0.05619296,0.04885916,0.0001328479,0.0001152292,0.0001534632,0.02075654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01000375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0529055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810041381","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341447","title":"Christianity: “A Manner of Dividing the Sensible”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Abstraction; Reading (process); Hegemony; Politics; Sociology; Nothing; sort; Judaism; Epistemology; Wish; Set (abstract data type); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Computer science; Religious studies; Law; Theology; Linguistics; Political science; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Colin Gow","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03686341055759426,"gpt":0.4051518542654317,"spread":0.3682884437078374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006096487,0.0003535132,0.0003821565,0.001294875,0.007354792,0.007284148,0.00104462,0.001792274,0.007178615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008972733,0.0002416843,0.0002451151,0.001011688,0.03725533,0.005655244,0.005206962,0.004584262,0.0006586306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002815217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002885801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002917739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005816239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993553,0.00508156,0.000120991,0.0003262177,0.0005841155,0.000333976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963852,0.001826973,0.0002698544,0.0007143609,0.0004540611,0.0003494869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001676799,0.00001315441,0.0001677909,0.00003336352,0.000001865297,0.0000231692,0.04159996,0.00003112065,0.0001298184,0.9483741,0.004468232,0.005140702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002826886,0.00005443781,0.0008775761,0.0004334025,0.000009397917,0.0001687675,0.07289248,0.000341414,0.0005588831,0.4653552,0.4592451,0.00003508146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0772878,0.007367344,0.04133145,0.1015958,0.003494274,0.0002100467,0.0001463146,0.0001780889,0.7683889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541289,0.0008960727,0.01117198,0.007481002,0.0003781535,0.0001379198,0.00004117157,0.00008751803,0.02567724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007354792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03224164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}