{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":41,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":41,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"a9f48a5af4e8","filters":{"venue":"Modern Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W1994567655","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00654.x","title":"Responsibility Beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"State responsibility; Subsidiary; Human rights; International law; Business; State (computer science); Corporate social responsibility; Law; Corporation; Foreign direct investment; Law and economics; Multinational corporation; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Robert McCorquodale","is_ca":false},{"name":"Penelope Simons","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03376552330188073,"gpt":0.3867815149645235,"spread":0.3530159916626427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005467625,0.0001583092,0.0003504032,0.001242523,0.002433092,0.005394874,0.0007209879,0.003455584,0.003967984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01178029,0.0002017072,0.0004687202,0.0008425348,0.009529262,0.006990233,0.003402221,0.003264078,0.0002664934],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00238295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005274532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005710478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005862431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939017,0.003186309,0.0001772538,0.0005388961,0.001170058,0.001025762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915706,0.004874624,0.001374341,0.0007943949,0.001021293,0.0003647493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007553845,0.00002055258,0.003010068,0.00003559661,0.00000767138,0.0002239686,0.003665657,0.0003032958,0.0001290761,0.9814455,0.002059759,0.009091276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002973743,0.0000874854,0.01714086,0.000798355,0.00007009606,0.0008859574,0.01253392,0.002694271,0.0007312806,0.8313849,0.1335971,0.00004604857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1845205,0.01170072,0.0251082,0.03768494,0.0002703512,0.00008221392,0.00004924015,0.00004249967,0.7405413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879154,0.001666293,0.0007442738,0.001694166,0.000117415,0.00002879069,0.00001161067,0.000007084008,0.007814968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005710478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02891588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041157133","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00501.x","title":"Sovereignty, Migration and the Rule of Law in Global Times","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Globalization; Political science; Immigration; Variety (cybernetics); Human rights; Reign; Rule of law; Law; Political economy; Immigration law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Dauvergne","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01798465050018969,"gpt":0.3059866475015257,"spread":0.2880019970013359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005209074,0.0002127853,0.0004669805,0.001286463,0.004025471,0.007740488,0.0005040034,0.003395045,0.002140304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006376715,0.0001863588,0.0002777734,0.002134874,0.02704879,0.007809191,0.002529591,0.004304225,0.000198089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003614852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004219768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009232982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007107689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963092,0.002246971,0.0001618206,0.0003365689,0.0005422262,0.0004032447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968766,0.002083923,0.0003954139,0.0002055956,0.0002961898,0.0001423285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002324261,0.000003827406,0.0001374539,0.00002159781,0.000002349417,0.00003734612,0.001485443,0.0001335921,0.00001645551,0.9938703,0.001187313,0.003102132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007944398,0.00001523169,0.0007805949,0.0001893729,0.00000579961,0.0000646935,0.002252692,0.0001848036,0.00003695787,0.9210398,0.07541396,0.000008088582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09640323,0.1537711,0.01291022,0.1394234,0.0009586052,0.00003353627,0.00006857447,0.0000291262,0.5964023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558095,0.02459501,0.0009434714,0.006135759,0.0007125677,0.00003337672,0.00002964638,0.00001335617,0.01172719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009232982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02754855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096764311","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00807.x","title":"Parallel Proceedings in Investor‐State Treaty Arbitration: Responses for Treaty‐Drafters, Arbitrators and Parties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Jurisdiction; Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Robin F. Hansen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02663398504595405,"gpt":0.2586271040788011,"spread":0.2319931190328471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06628714,0.0007593547,0.0008116261,0.002375374,0.01612278,0.01561076,0.003801515,0.01878063,0.00865494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1557619,0.0008202936,0.00193172,0.002793382,0.01159536,0.01146534,0.0136928,0.02159047,0.001359658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007203742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01091966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004596823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006038631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9071618,0.04660667,0.005492798,0.004432854,0.02953937,0.006766509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9125614,0.06679583,0.00685775,0.004694039,0.007726909,0.001364044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008463036,0.0001145352,0.001163441,0.0001657071,0.00005308963,0.0007167128,0.0135548,0.001179207,0.0006984869,0.9168423,0.02756304,0.03786382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002343675,0.0003244026,0.00396508,0.0007391535,0.0001941676,0.000864287,0.01646675,0.004929056,0.003626171,0.5744036,0.3939654,0.0002875175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1776823,0.007145002,0.1060025,0.1740458,0.006641018,0.00135309,0.0001470492,0.0004258053,0.5265574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8826754,0.002131107,0.02051023,0.02208499,0.002466662,0.001065883,0.00008786506,0.0001878271,0.06879014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06628714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3505641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140086801","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00859.x","title":"The Death of Socio‐Economic Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Fundamental rights; De facto; Globalization; Law and economics; Hegemony; Law; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Paul O’Connell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09085241872378821,"gpt":0.3181701178223788,"spread":0.2273176990985905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009597225,0.0003532719,0.0005895526,0.001043984,0.003803045,0.005674755,0.001016457,0.00346489,0.004650404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01555804,0.0002562472,0.0003268157,0.0008351376,0.03486893,0.007482713,0.004287886,0.008724629,0.000883271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005345332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007361346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008439584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006615534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929808,0.003264891,0.0002056782,0.0008244909,0.002047877,0.0006762057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918761,0.004138557,0.0004898771,0.001275037,0.001726052,0.0004942905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002726587,0.000002712693,0.00005090194,0.00001231782,0.000001433982,0.0000119975,0.0004236853,0.00003356058,0.00002312269,0.9925559,0.003119569,0.003762035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001286322,0.00001924468,0.0004156672,0.0001777093,0.000003556318,0.0000543089,0.0006646839,0.0001284187,0.000162085,0.6833134,0.3150384,0.000009567406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02884546,0.03450438,0.01366721,0.2952616,0.002401004,0.00004280705,0.0001934876,0.000057308,0.6250269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8524958,0.01560406,0.003119925,0.03868284,0.003318439,0.00009775216,0.0001223939,0.00008005736,0.08647869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009597225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05075562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155724317","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00627.x","title":"Incitement to Religious Hatred: All Talk and No Substance?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Incitement; Political science; Law; Criticism; Legislation; Parliament; Religious studies; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kay Goodall","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03120010831305469,"gpt":0.3464510212056351,"spread":0.3152509128925804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006052067,0.0002711921,0.001117578,0.00172522,0.001540827,0.003981825,0.0009502917,0.004530728,0.006187563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01970442,0.0003454272,0.0003963269,0.001732478,0.006310979,0.005242657,0.001098177,0.004288544,0.001857699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003062184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006299989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01666814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03144297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954373,0.002492721,0.0001741697,0.000238063,0.001335165,0.0003224773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890526,0.006726657,0.001131904,0.0002749444,0.00245174,0.0003622578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001601216,0.00009524239,0.002221166,0.005345193,0.0001913468,0.0004045797,0.002637614,0.0001341093,0.0002530243,0.2448866,0.3108957,0.4327754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007774409,0.0001345704,0.00789371,0.008683724,0.0002112304,0.0006244671,0.004932431,0.00006917275,0.0002657288,0.07307732,0.9039968,0.00003327045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002512384,0.7691227,0.0004885865,0.181304,0.002819312,0.0000157166,0.0000590337,0.000010508,0.04366774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.089801,0.7843097,0.0004285764,0.1025924,0.009113378,0.00005037458,0.00008444059,0.00001997243,0.01360004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01666814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03314227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994898065","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00784.x","title":"Forced Marriage as a Harm in Domestic and International Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Forced marriage; Harm; Refugee law; Forced migration; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Dauvergne","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jenni Millbank","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03485341438807433,"gpt":0.3876018783847494,"spread":0.352748463996675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005667384,0.0001820225,0.000535649,0.00297201,0.005641758,0.004717924,0.0006582772,0.001898535,0.003152794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01438245,0.0002479517,0.0002210137,0.005164021,0.009740504,0.002122116,0.005308181,0.001625649,0.0002240713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004719619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00577835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0533135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09339687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921286,0.003883834,0.0004153822,0.000372294,0.001845273,0.001354623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913614,0.004726465,0.002076912,0.0004521156,0.0009245902,0.0004584161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006379007,0.000125406,0.09638058,0.0008483268,0.00004992283,0.005735057,0.6330393,0.0002755094,0.0004720968,0.1686483,0.009977191,0.08438452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001049681,0.0001149677,0.1338072,0.002336337,0.00005573756,0.006678682,0.6373971,0.000143777,0.0003334566,0.008061181,0.2110082,0.00005290489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8482422,0.03197856,0.0006929996,0.008554662,0.0002423266,0.00005775727,0.00007186102,0.00001116846,0.1101486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874291,0.007815879,0.000121979,0.001097458,0.00005791248,0.00001638452,0.00003306804,0.000006532849,0.003421751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0533135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1060063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047361851","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.00375","title":"The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Tying; Political science; Liberal democracy; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Democratization; Law; Popular sovereignty; Order (exchange); Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"James Tully","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0792369281200715,"gpt":0.3500334249339207,"spread":0.2707964968138492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02120693,0.0002677625,0.0005791489,0.00270828,0.005750555,0.01179609,0.0009801674,0.002819806,0.002434713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02575337,0.0003021801,0.0003339247,0.002378996,0.06357101,0.01252947,0.005244879,0.007874989,0.0003720532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005320224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004212589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002857906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004032171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9774702,0.01402809,0.000545295,0.001647209,0.005056531,0.001252643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820412,0.01192437,0.001531183,0.001966485,0.00179597,0.0007408711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005369333,0.000002953554,0.0001353121,0.00001972715,0.000002528613,0.00001154742,0.002346186,0.00005125724,0.00001883292,0.9933606,0.001128579,0.002916924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009803343,0.00002267344,0.0009194839,0.0001448096,0.000004466222,0.00007904431,0.003553095,0.0002019397,0.00007396957,0.8343706,0.1606107,0.000009309259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06312616,0.04606555,0.01682074,0.2428347,0.00175718,0.00004122013,0.00007312204,0.00005959164,0.6292217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589021,0.01222003,0.002915486,0.01128694,0.002587832,0.00006433675,0.00003056131,0.00005411697,0.0119387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02120693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1121543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053797283","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00602_1.x","title":"Constitutional Rights and Social Welfare: A Comment on the Canadian <i>Chaoulli</i> Health Care Decision","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Deference; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Health care; Judicial deference; Social security; Legislature; Judicial review; Social Welfare; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jeff King","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0361121533054164,"gpt":0.323076463333312,"spread":0.2869643100278956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01270367,0.001024695,0.001578188,0.002163829,0.03346584,0.01423563,0.008137722,0.06446041,0.005633518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02047884,0.001178956,0.001944045,0.004287591,0.0267622,0.003959223,0.002694549,0.03625215,0.0009531398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1051411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1243759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9641997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.978365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876687,0.001530788,0.0003564876,0.001333368,0.005076436,0.004034244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841302,0.009652476,0.0005994399,0.0003804546,0.003744849,0.001492441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005553146,0.00002672965,0.0007956137,0.0001194351,0.00002919175,0.0006117054,0.006026966,0.0003246455,0.0003299854,0.3774339,0.6089547,0.005291612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001550442,0.00003599909,0.004158459,0.0006505955,0.0001380284,0.000198059,0.006950912,0.0006522819,0.0006367356,0.04881819,0.9373554,0.0002502982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004181182,0.007340509,0.0003332997,0.9434499,0.002637017,0.0000362635,0.0002662062,0.00003538861,0.04172023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07250974,0.003388092,0.0005522241,0.8900521,0.003787539,0.00006264412,0.00008566594,0.00005985541,0.02950207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1051411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7628555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080329056","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00606.x","title":"A Potential Framework For Privacy? A Reply To <i>Hello!</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Appeal; Cause of action; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Privacy laws of the United States; Supreme court; Law and economics; Sociology; Information privacy; Liability","authors":[{"name":"Rachael Mulheron","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0308655950345468,"gpt":0.3269577290358255,"spread":0.2960921340012787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02265716,0.001011402,0.001489645,0.001432891,0.01123839,0.01256067,0.006278634,0.05664051,0.005873855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03307011,0.0009490078,0.001833534,0.001850149,0.04628811,0.03183223,0.007689477,0.06470077,0.001994443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01241644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01490872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03851495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04451596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9855011,0.006893902,0.0008294414,0.002242703,0.003208499,0.00132433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692118,0.02505782,0.0008753262,0.0007991803,0.002780569,0.001275364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002115358,0.00001565581,0.0001118739,0.0001095523,0.000008028902,0.0002177189,0.004083462,0.00009991267,0.00008305335,0.5999626,0.3901597,0.005127397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005328258,0.00003066562,0.0003556685,0.0006338567,0.00001091285,0.0002812596,0.006562886,0.0002576131,0.000130739,0.2955227,0.6960768,0.0000836274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001868045,0.003540392,0.0003872059,0.9923516,0.001443169,0.000003147325,0.00001637103,0.000006740649,0.002064589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01579712,0.004449479,0.0008990925,0.968997,0.005025376,0.00003430146,0.00001917619,0.00002764249,0.004750886],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05664051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1198239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167445073","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12143","title":"The Politics of Jurisdiction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Politics; Political science; Law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Framing (construction); Exclusive jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Scholarship; Federal jurisdiction; Sociology; Original jurisdiction; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Asha Kaushal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07583192905293384,"gpt":0.3692030168382543,"spread":0.2933710877853205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008562733,0.0002417433,0.0006347885,0.001981807,0.005543386,0.009599387,0.001176563,0.003128229,0.004721433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01356059,0.0002756387,0.0004094627,0.00246958,0.04667656,0.00959771,0.00572755,0.004715419,0.0006555776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006327147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007299986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007354371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005268218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9852468,0.009443734,0.0003707712,0.001749096,0.002199293,0.0009902755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930734,0.004555738,0.0005255216,0.0008283518,0.0006948174,0.0003221954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[9.134695e-7,6.44309e-7,0.0000547898,0.000009745049,0.000001412851,0.000007938294,0.0005802662,0.00003754707,0.00001711451,0.9964012,0.0006561218,0.002232307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003706575,0.00001090707,0.0004009541,0.0001806925,0.000007220217,0.00006746848,0.001170898,0.0001273982,0.00007020069,0.8530452,0.1449064,0.000009168465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03499639,0.07223823,0.06374978,0.09127521,0.001387118,0.00006807211,0.0001784215,0.00007718672,0.7360295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564552,0.01348215,0.004682884,0.007884169,0.001175375,0.0001022584,0.00006563589,0.00004432929,0.01610809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009599387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0459069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912126940","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12415","title":"Thinking Outside the Box – Eliminating the Perniciousness of Box‐Ticking in the New Corporate Governance Code","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Flexibility (engineering); Code (set theory); Process (computing); Business; Compliance (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Accounting; Law and economics; Computer science; Management; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Finance; History; Social psychology; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","authors":[{"name":"Bobby V. Reddy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03591423212146928,"gpt":0.2388890618892884,"spread":0.2029748297678191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01486548,0.0002356556,0.0003171524,0.001471665,0.004817283,0.01063076,0.0008687116,0.005851084,0.003128228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03691826,0.0003551258,0.0003046566,0.001171955,0.02781272,0.01201887,0.003522957,0.009611513,0.0005784897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006328361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01188506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01888186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02114307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845304,0.00797035,0.0004786141,0.0009671724,0.004662031,0.00139144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969599,0.01978274,0.001748608,0.002398358,0.005473952,0.0009972857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000874162,0.000007553606,0.0002187774,0.00002858847,0.000001551426,0.00004363351,0.002318765,0.0001615459,0.00007457659,0.9604489,0.02757137,0.009115987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002094984,0.0000476548,0.00136263,0.0009063527,0.000008562961,0.0001152652,0.003150004,0.001006567,0.0008244517,0.2930337,0.6994484,0.00007527867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05559737,0.02165416,0.04225908,0.5546495,0.01043717,0.0001298744,0.0001423371,0.0002150696,0.3149154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8322618,0.007318576,0.01161243,0.07739221,0.004245008,0.0001844216,0.0001072552,0.0002353194,0.06664296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01888186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0786171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014252366","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00733.x","title":"Cohabitation and Comparative Method","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Canadian Association of Physicists","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Legislature; Sociology; Family law; Comparative law; Political science; Law; Common law; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Robert Leckey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1575410648442428,"gpt":0.4168717554287403,"spread":0.2593306905844975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01753388,0.0006227173,0.001036955,0.006297975,0.005179054,0.002623813,0.003228832,0.001482934,0.03619995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02997822,0.0003754985,0.0004859176,0.008447364,0.005568657,0.003826746,0.004958543,0.001762528,0.002146812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00354607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002865819,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005204075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006043207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9716375,0.02320946,0.0006950548,0.002153657,0.001615445,0.0006888557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986612,0.007880609,0.0008254727,0.002004553,0.002262919,0.0004144446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002421265,0.0001719549,0.00461722,0.001516909,0.00007137533,0.0004201315,0.02643588,0.0002102438,0.0005356929,0.8258078,0.01121328,0.1287572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001807438,0.0004668568,0.01162022,0.002198156,0.0001681175,0.001041212,0.04277507,0.001217871,0.00156365,0.3160793,0.6226106,0.00007822253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1038012,0.03381641,0.2369793,0.007767675,0.003157771,0.01214951,0.002755463,0.0002064893,0.5993661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6076173,0.0145209,0.2368058,0.007449977,0.001095764,0.0512108,0.001816609,0.0002957385,0.07918704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03619995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1211009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533854209","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12046","title":"The Symbiosis of Property and English Environmental Law – Property Rights in a Public Law Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Legitimacy; Discretion; Property (philosophy); Environmental law; Law; Public property; Context (archaeology); Property law; Law and economics; Political science; Land law; Adverse possession; Business; Economics; Land tenure; Politics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Eloise Scotford","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rachael Walsh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02285209322943195,"gpt":0.2443695302860826,"spread":0.2215174370566507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005462424,0.000165549,0.0004966846,0.001792604,0.003369447,0.008271355,0.0009851819,0.002677921,0.004193181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008042164,0.0003243023,0.0002938341,0.001717193,0.03304172,0.01201654,0.003354727,0.003172661,0.0003973256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005914954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004058019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01634667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01708841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943659,0.002936277,0.0002192299,0.0005316216,0.001327329,0.0006196789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990149,0.007462992,0.0008046625,0.0005370511,0.0008115368,0.0002347719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002917187,0.000006589462,0.0002167808,0.0000401777,0.000001990552,0.00008331803,0.002979797,0.0000943541,0.00007267787,0.9932894,0.0007114465,0.002500428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001479587,0.00003459838,0.003799215,0.0004779134,0.00001623902,0.0002315205,0.008961075,0.0006745836,0.0005299717,0.7345632,0.250666,0.00003082748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1053802,0.03795487,0.03660235,0.1153608,0.0007048641,0.00003640587,0.000134997,0.00004905701,0.7037764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970116,0.006228137,0.002062496,0.003799016,0.0004867488,0.0000238725,0.00003327711,0.00003628897,0.01721416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01634667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04291624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178424575","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12671","title":"Boycott, Resistance and the Law: Cause Lawyering in Conflict and Authoritarianism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Boycott; Authoritarianism; Resistance (ecology); Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Kieran McEvoy","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anna Bryson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03692962382267419,"gpt":0.3153610075767582,"spread":0.278431383754084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006009628,0.0001842622,0.0006074501,0.001965787,0.001850933,0.004596915,0.0007770768,0.002426521,0.003405657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01222466,0.0001587556,0.0001840425,0.00194835,0.01234178,0.003661387,0.002136469,0.00230757,0.0002267068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003196496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003978308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006099169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009268692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916286,0.006908411,0.0001363969,0.0002323637,0.0007045054,0.0003895924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844754,0.01188095,0.001985582,0.000258666,0.0009252537,0.0004740941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001050405,0.000209099,0.006226082,0.002845276,0.00007286236,0.0009688511,0.05353544,0.0005899592,0.0003129163,0.7825435,0.02013748,0.1324534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001064633,0.0004536148,0.03251043,0.007503874,0.0001060641,0.001848219,0.1062367,0.0006600682,0.0005998769,0.3106833,0.5392253,0.00006612442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09154814,0.6970537,0.002015703,0.08629126,0.0008117993,0.00003975602,0.00002721432,0.00001202929,0.1222005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906932,0.1002299,0.0003196007,0.00382243,0.0006618838,0.00002668068,0.00001173691,0.000007208633,0.004227273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006099169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03178233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893794509","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00867.x","title":"Deference on Questions of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Presumption; Law; Judicial deference; Political science; Delegate; Competence (human resources); Legislature; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Paul Daly","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.161179879593113,"gpt":0.3499320435283463,"spread":0.1887521639352333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02608919,0.0003138525,0.0008946088,0.002661191,0.004137961,0.006904607,0.001650563,0.004566606,0.004109834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09205003,0.0003755404,0.0005400651,0.001491646,0.03277287,0.009312893,0.005754032,0.006200695,0.000535352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004806141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005070043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003593497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002988801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9740517,0.01309278,0.001194789,0.002839884,0.00724155,0.001579281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9470038,0.03663555,0.002753187,0.005524967,0.006888622,0.00119386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001343388,0.00001012491,0.0002581882,0.00008715527,0.000007353042,0.00007846432,0.003159937,0.00006587507,0.0001608297,0.9844881,0.002852306,0.00881833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001470337,0.00004200049,0.0008444765,0.0003135666,0.00001275241,0.0001364454,0.001118099,0.0001238441,0.0001611658,0.9118417,0.08537877,0.0000126401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09088803,0.06251297,0.03916722,0.1624322,0.005712896,0.0001828438,0.0001861389,0.00009534913,0.6388224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367232,0.0085146,0.003530784,0.02474774,0.005127664,0.0001304797,0.0000454306,0.00002920862,0.02115093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02608919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1379745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387330817","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12845","title":"Communicating Censure: The Relevance of Conditions of Imprisonment at Sentencing and During the Administration of the Sentence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Relevance (law); Punishment (psychology); Blame; Sentence; Typology; Prison; Legitimacy; Criminology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; State (computer science); Administration (probate law); Retributive justice; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Economic Justice","authors":[{"name":"Marie Manikis","is_ca":false},{"name":"A. T. Matheson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03769700447173646,"gpt":0.3347367215381697,"spread":0.2970397170664333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01003103,0.0002513284,0.0005061851,0.002440752,0.003805803,0.005329005,0.001136693,0.002048254,0.002919211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05066184,0.0002681618,0.0004265916,0.001337793,0.01838771,0.008874706,0.006180855,0.002589334,0.0002081711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004565871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004717095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006413419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007223651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9812135,0.01307398,0.001037003,0.0008177998,0.002462143,0.00139557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448196,0.03920861,0.008913726,0.002688483,0.003164229,0.001205306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005117554,0.0001580326,0.04381202,0.001420937,0.0001008371,0.003501449,0.2387085,0.002028511,0.002456115,0.619778,0.001896087,0.08562781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005858689,0.0006248098,0.2086367,0.003506072,0.000275022,0.00518373,0.3175868,0.002735649,0.00403948,0.4104052,0.04661992,0.0003279431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8039638,0.006790419,0.01780542,0.01637551,0.0001933579,0.0001839454,0.0002796695,0.00006012986,0.1543477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878,0.0004523058,0.0003348856,0.0001003285,0.00002245171,0.00001707095,0.00001214524,0.000003810468,0.000276944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01003103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0530498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1750822166","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00888.x","title":"In Defence of Quasi‐Contract","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Liability; Unjust enrichment; Doctrine; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Normative; Law; Sociology; Political science; Business","authors":[{"name":"Dan Priel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0988565991060648,"gpt":0.3592609695346046,"spread":0.2604043704285398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02447721,0.0006340475,0.001209353,0.001469954,0.005286482,0.008682879,0.002944019,0.01185544,0.005173544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02550678,0.0004791029,0.00154214,0.001585791,0.04514127,0.01402078,0.006765046,0.01247253,0.0011276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006861188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007259763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003508431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001879423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9752091,0.01534927,0.0009006255,0.002320638,0.004996079,0.001224253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824536,0.01183823,0.00129438,0.002598428,0.001409828,0.0004055948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001224771,9.495054e-7,0.00001178605,0.000007409548,0.000001071137,0.000006816933,0.0001414856,0.00003508895,0.00000729491,0.9990261,0.0003367583,0.0004240569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005389232,0.000008561475,0.00004341172,0.00007305534,0.000002914632,0.00003280563,0.0001096207,0.0002443201,0.00006486618,0.9734952,0.02591489,0.000004925288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01664773,0.03098733,0.1699442,0.1788635,0.001925129,0.0001243439,0.0001332754,0.0001221503,0.6012523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8627357,0.01019214,0.02143637,0.04383387,0.002589599,0.0006446993,0.00008921154,0.0001498927,0.0583286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02447721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1294494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137437015","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12087","title":"Tort Law for Cynics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty; Idealism; Damages; Cynicism; Context (archaeology); Law; Duty of care; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Liability","authors":[{"name":"Dan Priel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05530293285794409,"gpt":0.372401103392749,"spread":0.3170981705348049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01170004,0.0005791313,0.001003515,0.003408487,0.005464864,0.008891922,0.001365285,0.008942226,0.006581917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0254663,0.0002931108,0.0008438616,0.001488137,0.02670147,0.01069757,0.00556369,0.01663654,0.001768091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006133277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00460768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001739612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001758671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9879642,0.006048447,0.0004244253,0.001118149,0.003602085,0.0008426052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776672,0.01541544,0.001839712,0.001164812,0.002900013,0.001012824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001408237,0.0000328667,0.000353287,0.0001746482,0.00001425699,0.0001018951,0.004251968,0.0001267985,0.0001129232,0.884606,0.09187224,0.01833899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001632413,0.00002765191,0.000668453,0.0007104711,0.00000941385,0.0001568962,0.002031494,0.0002667087,0.00009424176,0.6267704,0.369233,0.00001485992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.005979334,0.05874165,0.004748184,0.8450689,0.004706468,0.00002441632,0.0000321937,0.00006243357,0.08063641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3783928,0.04040747,0.004760879,0.5053461,0.02347399,0.0002162101,0.00007116645,0.0001949898,0.04713649],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01170004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06187642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044181713","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12565","title":"Fingerprint Comparison and Adversarialism: The Scientific and Historical Evidence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Fingerprint (computing); Scientific evidence; Categorical variable; Mainstream; Adversarial system; Psychology; Identity (music); Legislation; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Gary Edmond","is_ca":false},{"name":"Emma Cunliffe","is_ca":true},{"name":"David Hamer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1101672374324809,"gpt":0.3317582871389124,"spread":0.2215910497064316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04702299,0.0003668999,0.0007847807,0.006063511,0.003055849,0.008890935,0.002424504,0.004385644,0.007389459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08998927,0.0003523059,0.0003764825,0.003483466,0.03765063,0.01588794,0.004466889,0.006504654,0.0006414558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004176963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002938843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002391117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002687139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9715372,0.01764141,0.001134016,0.003242627,0.005688112,0.0007566285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7889331,0.184802,0.01114906,0.007291857,0.006825002,0.0009989834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007689723,0.00005150636,0.003134331,0.0007490513,0.00004391885,0.0004063858,0.01027957,0.0003349768,0.0002227182,0.9078606,0.003673081,0.07316701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000316525,0.0002000335,0.0134979,0.007911718,0.00009167535,0.001981727,0.01939557,0.001471116,0.002614717,0.6267752,0.3259116,0.0001170156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1202468,0.3453774,0.047889,0.1953813,0.003337128,0.0001132698,0.0002988429,0.00009212796,0.2872641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9239085,0.05907228,0.004869136,0.00614369,0.001665559,0.00004576191,0.00005831186,0.00004424547,0.004192563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2486843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128090591","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12616","title":"Being Conscious of Unconscionability in Modern Times: <i>Heller</i> v <i>Uber Technologies</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Arbitration; Supreme court; Doctrine; Bargaining power; Law and economics; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Law; Arbitration clause; Power (physics); Political science; Federal Arbitration Act; Business; Economics; Compulsory arbitration","authors":[{"name":"Jodi Gardner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02212018092094167,"gpt":0.3042425961141602,"spread":0.2821224151932185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01915017,0.0001765094,0.0004622774,0.001397374,0.01060412,0.01447557,0.001620885,0.01434676,0.003400435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01606491,0.0003990175,0.0003053728,0.001498546,0.0481252,0.00990327,0.003558934,0.0114566,0.0002988384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01843776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01528544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1614721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2108825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9869344,0.005533571,0.0003843377,0.001142298,0.003890911,0.002114499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882717,0.007599253,0.001054001,0.0008396955,0.001769312,0.0004659979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005359651,0.000007183814,0.0002349961,0.00001393583,0.00000234238,0.0001340937,0.008051558,0.00006443101,0.00008734883,0.9826564,0.005018489,0.003723977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001802062,0.00005088854,0.003432594,0.0006658751,0.00002291572,0.0004451878,0.0204854,0.0006834403,0.0009503902,0.4641982,0.508917,0.0001300894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1325606,0.0183311,0.008480815,0.2217714,0.001068509,0.00006019565,0.00006336947,0.00004869282,0.6176154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457546,0.00300068,0.001027731,0.02887784,0.0004744049,0.00002687166,0.00001238541,0.00002747105,0.02079796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1614721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3210644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081855718","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00931_3.x","title":"DawnOliver<i>and</i>CarloFusaro<i>(eds)</i>, How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011, 510 pp, hb £55.00.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Yaniv Roznai","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1515370650035863,"gpt":0.354341230788512,"spread":0.2028041657849257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002019856,0.0008794842,0.0006737001,0.002719703,0.002354393,0.00754852,0.001018661,0.002536222,0.02314678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003350272,0.000793031,0.0003971097,0.007145099,0.007032293,0.01017981,0.001493622,0.003767582,0.005685918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006448347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00665165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02447261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05307994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980174,0.0006464867,0.0001038098,0.0002502718,0.0007461361,0.0002359113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985294,0.0009474902,0.000176506,0.00008769384,0.0001421662,0.000116713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005266921,0.00003858142,0.0006915216,0.001645613,0.00002430447,0.0001283177,0.006517986,0.0003847558,0.0002902476,0.2883154,0.4774659,0.2244447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004006503,0.000007760449,0.0009445448,0.0007942453,0.000004666639,0.00007544347,0.001423942,0.00003178402,0.00008902988,0.02752392,0.9690906,0.00001000278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007406708,0.9162124,0.001229031,0.01954613,0.001771669,0.00001086305,0.0001595781,0.00003612787,0.06029361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02796953,0.8846527,0.001969688,0.00303108,0.001626489,0.00004626726,0.0003618013,0.0001191443,0.08022325],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02447261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07743371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176229594","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12648","title":"Citizenship Stripping, Fair Procedures, and the Separation of Powers: A Critical Comment on <i>Damache</i> v <i>Minister for Justice</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Casey House","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Separation of powers; Citizenship; Irish; Judgement; Constitution; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Conor Casey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06491810052361464,"gpt":0.4013696709703735,"spread":0.3364515704467588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03622377,0.000704601,0.001541104,0.001710226,0.01475003,0.01496437,0.00661273,0.0514803,0.00420864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0431677,0.001029311,0.001920619,0.001943051,0.03855435,0.008557161,0.004202535,0.05338027,0.001051209],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03270121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03513752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2462346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2835407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9741078,0.01010553,0.001043683,0.004174254,0.006732723,0.003836027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.962256,0.03081515,0.0009451677,0.0008397256,0.00411623,0.001027667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003470853,0.00002074803,0.0001558751,0.0001374992,0.00001146328,0.0004101802,0.007542517,0.0001520201,0.000105661,0.6051331,0.3831292,0.003167014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008844433,0.00005615702,0.0008888713,0.001229756,0.00004669075,0.0001649665,0.0100202,0.0003981185,0.0005339744,0.1249686,0.8614329,0.000171252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002798736,0.008166175,0.0008073418,0.9422425,0.004804343,0.00005759087,0.000101198,0.00002553099,0.04099651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07474101,0.00477864,0.0009312882,0.8803032,0.008499554,0.0001717405,0.00003656046,0.0000670333,0.03047105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2462346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4896026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901880838","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12378","title":"Developing a European Standard for International Data Transfers after Snowden: <i>Opinion 1/15</i> on the EU‐Canada PNR Agreement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; European union; Context (archaeology); Public opinion; European commission; Politics; Commission; Economic Justice; Law; Balance (ability); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; International trade; Business; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Monika Žalnieriūtė","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1460417835108257,"gpt":0.3649301308831934,"spread":0.2188883473723677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08129615,0.0006236522,0.001172634,0.003814592,0.005210216,0.01561798,0.006435269,0.02285169,0.003697881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08134516,0.0007770442,0.002203461,0.003614289,0.01077479,0.009458146,0.006289979,0.01354137,0.001460074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02278821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08972375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.203357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1299929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9310494,0.01951781,0.008143022,0.006192072,0.0288881,0.006209665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9446972,0.01627718,0.003189482,0.006658607,0.02763946,0.001537972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001726913,0.00002376366,0.0004002633,0.0002051174,0.00001666204,0.000138981,0.0009971473,0.0004550227,0.0003110045,0.9265925,0.05882911,0.01201315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004845344,0.00008474795,0.002837008,0.002724211,0.00006024133,0.0002061495,0.001341367,0.0008377926,0.001552511,0.0998932,0.8902847,0.0001295261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02570853,0.03174976,0.07065359,0.3170722,0.01122272,0.001823731,0.002847489,0.000536407,0.5383856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3872946,0.01959199,0.1182852,0.3437049,0.002670851,0.002444892,0.003553533,0.0003677752,0.1220863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.796643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4299402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412080299","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12972","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0228599439378096,"gpt":0.3477995177011943,"spread":0.3249395737633847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009039083,0.001284886,0.001348502,0.003040679,0.001924718,0.007932337,0.001797916,0.002644292,0.9129118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004734735,0.0006048437,0.000926054,0.003078609,0.0004735299,0.004204026,0.002229417,0.002290906,0.8919314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001038955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002050106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001742984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002834231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990687,0.00007122372,0.0000734811,0.0001628966,0.0005097074,0.0001139858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972058,0.0002598742,0.0001022707,0.0004151783,0.001292037,0.0007248584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001375376,0.00002034969,0.00005370768,0.0001059012,0.000001582776,0.00002141237,0.000009773864,0.00001901655,0.0001292174,0.001444949,0.961957,0.03622326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005544125,0.000008770845,0.0001656549,0.00004951586,9.925999e-7,0.00002421971,0.00001984104,0.00002188154,0.00005060532,0.0004983371,0.9991516,0.000002946513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001818951,0.0006530077,0.000649559,0.001850928,0.01001442,0.0003830903,0.008928009,0.001454404,0.9758847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006840951,0.0005920159,0.000383618,0.0009431461,0.001240494,0.00009433403,0.004600298,0.0004386658,0.9910233],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08708817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1242207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315700262","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12790","title":"K.Bowrey, Copyright, Creativity, Big Media and Cultural Value: Incorporating the Author, Routledge, 2020, 228 pp, hb, £36.99.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Creativity; Section (typography); Sociology; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Luke McDonagh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06395492923406,"gpt":0.3489646009622671,"spread":0.2850096717282071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001728307,0.000988247,0.0007292645,0.002023764,0.002535531,0.01114634,0.00148407,0.004699418,0.02818273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006852407,0.001023414,0.0003768713,0.004896192,0.003815507,0.01824163,0.00326708,0.00428404,0.01430981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003545016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006480611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01418059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03504436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985631,0.0004278779,0.00008727796,0.0001443352,0.0006565547,0.0001207865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964469,0.002607773,0.0002177426,0.000116604,0.0003302254,0.0002807897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002014515,0.00001784814,0.0001606495,0.0009698561,0.000005870601,0.0001791102,0.006634407,0.00008773132,0.0001692798,0.05300695,0.8277658,0.1109825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002716341,0.000005218258,0.0003681794,0.0009760879,0.000003402866,0.000149896,0.002480769,0.00004170016,0.00004680787,0.01199091,0.9839261,0.000008331884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00106679,0.7928851,0.001977113,0.05856641,0.004225801,0.00004173781,0.0003097542,0.0001786361,0.1407486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01790599,0.6583532,0.003139637,0.0143789,0.002502369,0.000177099,0.00027211,0.00032771,0.3029429],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02818273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0942806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394688929","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12890","title":"AbdiAidid and BenjaminAlarie, The Legal Singularity: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Law Radically Better, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2023, 218 pp, hb £31.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Singularity; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"William Lucy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02782103530223975,"gpt":0.2758808243345855,"spread":0.2480597890323457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001972141,0.001098258,0.0008607875,0.002310261,0.002425883,0.007435942,0.001390106,0.003845277,0.02771788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005282436,0.00116758,0.0005019301,0.005048213,0.003499259,0.006775608,0.001232247,0.004257649,0.01118323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006420904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009737616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0963776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2629405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985313,0.0003145419,0.0001054536,0.00009761725,0.0008383241,0.0001126993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971391,0.001587701,0.0002041455,0.00008253354,0.0007522763,0.0002342683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002210603,0.00001034182,0.0002161644,0.0006957256,0.00001463217,0.00007614761,0.0009730849,0.00009926549,0.00008015836,0.02890541,0.921853,0.04705389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007188241,0.000004418718,0.0009476953,0.0006336757,0.00001040322,0.00008422676,0.0006548671,0.00004932541,0.00005118506,0.01030741,0.9872375,0.00001219037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002193895,0.9133088,0.0006688173,0.04931373,0.002798513,0.0000144585,0.0002201335,0.00005347368,0.03340262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007128838,0.9100056,0.001166671,0.007573993,0.002860515,0.00003406622,0.0003368801,0.00007313633,0.07082029],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0963776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1916333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196845151","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12678","title":"The Independence of Justice in the Cauldron of International Relations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Judicial independence; Economic Justice; Law; State (computer science); Authoritarianism; Democracy; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Frédéric Megret","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03683912035728569,"gpt":0.3536374860870511,"spread":0.3167983657297654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01105895,0.0001862531,0.0006285716,0.002723888,0.005160358,0.01234273,0.0007327341,0.004217832,0.002321547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01006164,0.0002354162,0.0002697028,0.001983055,0.02728385,0.009591435,0.003895265,0.005905636,0.0002363665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006506877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008716244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01042395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01378531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889607,0.006696886,0.0003247439,0.0007577863,0.001932495,0.001327332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886607,0.007759146,0.0009538594,0.0007846076,0.001195927,0.0006458932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001117635,0.000008871214,0.0002960837,0.00006744055,0.000005359369,0.0000685546,0.003908628,0.0000788051,0.00005417429,0.98269,0.002998847,0.009812065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002694906,0.00004683159,0.005637852,0.001645309,0.00002741742,0.0002001969,0.01177645,0.0003142753,0.0003144186,0.6136965,0.3662804,0.00003344593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04988873,0.1898054,0.003148561,0.1243873,0.0009993217,0.00002836627,0.00004059373,0.0000148136,0.6316869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635007,0.01962412,0.0003935694,0.007128925,0.001153465,0.00002358657,0.00001588179,0.00001131959,0.008148433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01234273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05848604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383225277","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12826","title":"The Travels of Treason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Constructive; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Empire; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); English law; Legal history; Sociology; History; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael Lobban","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0464193526831873,"gpt":0.3444401167106994,"spread":0.298020764027512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002002669,0.0002533401,0.0004700652,0.001673448,0.001867929,0.002602031,0.0004938968,0.001314376,0.007569643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004642388,0.0002088104,0.000208843,0.002182707,0.007233545,0.003349516,0.001156872,0.002966031,0.0009936549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006995871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009221082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05737746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05570909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977067,0.001237271,0.0001254166,0.0001940095,0.0004881401,0.0002485752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978084,0.001163169,0.0002375778,0.0001188689,0.0005239032,0.000148232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004831719,0.00003719922,0.001212236,0.00370413,0.000036527,0.0005196829,0.01517508,0.0003118142,0.0002462605,0.6470292,0.1439354,0.1877441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004034526,0.0000248191,0.001760281,0.001648344,0.000005926615,0.0001977624,0.002446774,0.0000135287,0.00006518665,0.008225847,0.9856015,0.000005929555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008173595,0.7941206,0.000333368,0.03663789,0.001490726,0.00001611381,0.0001369347,0.00001362567,0.1590772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2280726,0.7111383,0.000164648,0.01270206,0.001630867,0.00003126352,0.0001517033,0.00004391293,0.04606457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05737746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393031737","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12885","title":"<i>R (on the application of W80)</i> v <i>Director General of the Independent Office of Police Conduct</i>: Landmark Ruling or Business as Usual?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Law; Political science; Director general; Management; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Clare Torrible","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04685729284560133,"gpt":0.3459466951516419,"spread":0.2990894023060405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007165071,0.0008035746,0.001005731,0.001915622,0.006125535,0.006093809,0.003320436,0.02811304,0.0120018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01987699,0.001186825,0.001818322,0.001887276,0.005725047,0.003172921,0.002527381,0.01587394,0.01105597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007194313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01186601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1107417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2199338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992722,0.001185289,0.0007749318,0.0009844039,0.002637847,0.001695602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928275,0.004338682,0.0005263619,0.0002826694,0.001638907,0.0003859571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003587962,0.00002953925,0.0005459992,0.0001695672,0.00001893051,0.0004723645,0.0007864588,0.00007152916,0.0006278328,0.1160906,0.8730095,0.008141875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005969044,0.0001033228,0.005650286,0.001055431,0.00004609806,0.000279505,0.001553357,0.0001328438,0.000766655,0.01627471,0.9739512,0.0001269974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0103536,0.0224191,0.001728436,0.4967019,0.01867695,0.0005730395,0.002120178,0.0003463775,0.4470804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04310167,0.006647136,0.001425826,0.7924591,0.00549946,0.0005320341,0.0005268129,0.00009880584,0.1497091],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1107417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2201942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413359504","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12977","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0228599439378096,"gpt":0.3477995177011943,"spread":0.3249395737633847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009039083,0.001284886,0.001348502,0.003040679,0.001924718,0.007932337,0.001797916,0.002644292,0.9129118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004734735,0.0006048437,0.000926054,0.003078609,0.0004735299,0.004204026,0.002229417,0.002290906,0.8919314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001038955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002050106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001742984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002834231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990687,0.00007122372,0.0000734811,0.0001628966,0.0005097074,0.0001139858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972058,0.0002598742,0.0001022707,0.0004151783,0.001292037,0.0007248584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001375376,0.00002034969,0.00005370768,0.0001059012,0.000001582776,0.00002141237,0.000009773864,0.00001901655,0.0001292174,0.001444949,0.961957,0.03622326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005544125,0.000008770845,0.0001656549,0.00004951586,9.925999e-7,0.00002421971,0.00001984104,0.00002188154,0.00005060532,0.0004983371,0.9991516,0.000002946513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001818951,0.0006530077,0.000649559,0.001850928,0.01001442,0.0003830903,0.008928009,0.001454404,0.9758847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006840951,0.0005920159,0.000383618,0.0009431461,0.001240494,0.00009433403,0.004600298,0.0004386658,0.9910233],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08708817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1242207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416826384","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.70007","title":"<i>Allan C. Hutchinson</i> , Rethinking Legitimacy: Courts, Constitutions and Politics, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2025, 192 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Judicial restraint; Politics; Dissenting opinion; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Judicial independence; Nothing; Majority opinion","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04213518038715577,"gpt":0.3208642374256895,"spread":0.2787290570385338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002818031,0.001387833,0.0006927404,0.002230505,0.00340501,0.008758722,0.002399208,0.00677677,0.02233012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008355837,0.0009998169,0.0003839222,0.003638102,0.01237665,0.01651789,0.003621061,0.009201464,0.01055149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008718552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008113849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05605534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1090591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956843,0.001503831,0.0002244247,0.000365927,0.001828467,0.0003930113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962411,0.002516338,0.000278439,0.0001806175,0.0005346652,0.0002487809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007266064,0.000005269489,0.00006875669,0.0001398543,0.000003438903,0.00004466422,0.001147497,0.00002486095,0.00003949279,0.0532028,0.926951,0.01836516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004186096,0.000002652453,0.000274394,0.0004542686,0.000001592236,0.00005174216,0.0006068751,0.00002094172,0.00003551882,0.02868843,0.9698504,0.000009107359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003757175,0.5758809,0.0011352,0.3104127,0.01507292,0.00003776423,0.0002248346,0.0001291912,0.0967308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03251451,0.4718583,0.002944122,0.1668041,0.01866698,0.0002313643,0.000622928,0.0005837152,0.305774],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05605534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1114581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407367795","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12946","title":"LeahTrueblood, Referendums as Representative Democracy, London, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2024, 168 pp, hb £76.50","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Democracy; Political science; Economic history; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Richard Stacey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03722827369326225,"gpt":0.3528085131893993,"spread":0.315580239496137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002433281,0.001109,0.0008678118,0.002567836,0.001806572,0.005917806,0.001409642,0.004759867,0.07092004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006528759,0.001151599,0.0005467299,0.004256755,0.003237798,0.01003395,0.001780974,0.003519465,0.02916969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005181236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005040952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02947976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06060736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981975,0.0006860219,0.0001391552,0.0001619384,0.0006666955,0.0001487803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975757,0.001484793,0.0001911071,0.0001271618,0.0004658218,0.0001554819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003441856,0.00001143671,0.0001101352,0.000454996,0.000008728258,0.00003812804,0.0003958087,0.0001039939,0.00005868216,0.05999,0.8756536,0.06314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009977197,0.000005778474,0.0006056675,0.0007471001,0.000005976902,0.00006102007,0.0003485427,0.00007478004,0.00005530645,0.02812683,0.9699516,0.000007525741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003127283,0.8576713,0.001318209,0.04664226,0.004045532,0.00002465475,0.0004900224,0.0001637188,0.08933162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01954859,0.7002697,0.002162794,0.01204342,0.005245565,0.0001555654,0.0007168647,0.0002698901,0.2595875],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07092004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2372512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406408310","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12941","title":"Matthew C.Canfield, Translating Food Sovereignty: Cultivating Justice in an Age of Transnational Governance, Stanford University Press, 2022, 280 pp, hb US/CAN $105.00, pb US/CAN $26.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Management; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Tomaso Ferrando","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03543973588508367,"gpt":0.2372049182349417,"spread":0.201765182349858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001639724,0.0008239115,0.0005554704,0.00126476,0.002936986,0.005723022,0.001392597,0.003318704,0.02076089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003602735,0.000868619,0.0003427887,0.002798536,0.004381981,0.01201238,0.001898225,0.005271178,0.007234449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004231278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006086195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04219149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06406736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988205,0.0003317595,0.00006691657,0.0001341946,0.0005208439,0.0001257982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986168,0.0009106866,0.00008591865,0.00004406538,0.0002042527,0.0001381762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009839991,0.00001845967,0.0001609497,0.0002545094,0.000004870527,0.00006560874,0.003586505,0.0001172378,0.00008137667,0.04537062,0.9071129,0.0432171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000448803,0.000004972228,0.0008455564,0.0005038384,0.000003143218,0.00005767992,0.0023789,0.00007392721,0.00005861251,0.02159495,0.974464,0.000009916588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001293734,0.6083166,0.002500832,0.2234264,0.006485127,0.00006005423,0.0003930043,0.000222321,0.157302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03665121,0.5130761,0.004306337,0.04352926,0.004412727,0.0002443713,0.0007458561,0.0005753775,0.3964588],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04219149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08389181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409246270","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12953","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0228599439378096,"gpt":0.3477995177011943,"spread":0.3249395737633847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009039083,0.001284886,0.001348502,0.003040679,0.001924718,0.007932337,0.001797916,0.002644292,0.9129118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004734735,0.0006048437,0.000926054,0.003078609,0.0004735299,0.004204026,0.002229417,0.002290906,0.8919314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001038955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002050106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001742984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002834231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990687,0.00007122372,0.0000734811,0.0001628966,0.0005097074,0.0001139858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972058,0.0002598742,0.0001022707,0.0004151783,0.001292037,0.0007248584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001375376,0.00002034969,0.00005370768,0.0001059012,0.000001582776,0.00002141237,0.000009773864,0.00001901655,0.0001292174,0.001444949,0.961957,0.03622326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005544125,0.000008770845,0.0001656549,0.00004951586,9.925999e-7,0.00002421971,0.00001984104,0.00002188154,0.00005060532,0.0004983371,0.9991516,0.000002946513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001818951,0.0006530077,0.000649559,0.001850928,0.01001442,0.0003830903,0.008928009,0.001454404,0.9758847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006840951,0.0005920159,0.000383618,0.0009431461,0.001240494,0.00009433403,0.004600298,0.0004386658,0.9910233],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9129118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1242207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321351784","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12799","title":"Ernest J.Weinrib, Reciprocal Freedom: Private Law and Public Right, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 240 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Reciprocal; Sociology; Law; Library science; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Gilligan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04293725953304092,"gpt":0.2885946877108314,"spread":0.2456574281777904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00166522,0.001687619,0.000951794,0.001959122,0.001396145,0.004659093,0.001266107,0.004418183,0.05781659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002651531,0.001148677,0.0004777824,0.00301475,0.003553392,0.01009406,0.002097484,0.004983031,0.02487981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003969484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003263572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01407244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03257238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989296,0.0002639663,0.00008651512,0.0001503683,0.0004561081,0.0001133874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987679,0.0008064033,0.000108192,0.00005257718,0.0001498979,0.0001149009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002286289,0.00001731383,0.0001099686,0.0005170978,0.000008618958,0.00008690291,0.0005795622,0.0001284175,0.00007854663,0.05226997,0.86936,0.07682069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008547042,0.000005962656,0.0006702543,0.001044088,0.000004178394,0.0001357089,0.000466018,0.0000681753,0.00003363801,0.03586711,0.9616855,0.00001072729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002167673,0.9014956,0.0009783228,0.03549183,0.003243719,0.0000154756,0.0002601486,0.0000856789,0.0582125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01158707,0.7821711,0.001720281,0.01090728,0.003625505,0.00009086166,0.000453825,0.0002336145,0.1892104],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05781659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1934158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408381554","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12947","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02561431608605547,"gpt":0.3013011847277057,"spread":0.2756868686416502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000975322,0.0012061,0.001361291,0.003101146,0.001923944,0.007743195,0.001736944,0.00269274,0.8953174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005296797,0.0005861712,0.0009032583,0.003000215,0.0004654752,0.004075329,0.002025077,0.00219027,0.8778714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001110471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002312132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001929385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003365554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989761,0.00007511841,0.00007844537,0.0001732853,0.000573903,0.0001231068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968131,0.0002742032,0.000116179,0.0004392306,0.001589456,0.0007677204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001269245,0.00001931903,0.00005126242,0.0001069005,0.000001547882,0.00001974131,0.000008365145,0.00001717143,0.000125126,0.001308571,0.9606969,0.03763244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005020045,0.000008779696,0.0001718143,0.00004997573,9.728266e-7,0.00002239062,0.00001746635,0.00002015604,0.00004855964,0.0004457886,0.9992065,0.000002667324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001909098,0.0009162059,0.0007214212,0.002250388,0.01167402,0.0004455556,0.008300329,0.001483013,0.9740182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006705548,0.0007056046,0.0003701791,0.001016079,0.001473823,0.0001043838,0.003777463,0.0003801485,0.9915018],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1046826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1493171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407589855","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12945","title":"BeckyBatagol, KateSeear, HeliAskola and JamieWalvisch (eds), The Feminist Legislation Project: Rewriting Laws for Gender‐Based Justice, London, Routledge, 2024, 392 pp, hb, £145.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rewriting; Legislation; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Heather Douglas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04920755559461061,"gpt":0.3601314201411637,"spread":0.3109238645465531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003251556,0.002172079,0.001406051,0.003175265,0.002068652,0.007734572,0.001665947,0.003192659,0.03710696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003556451,0.001910463,0.0008938258,0.006927017,0.00276007,0.009956083,0.002962454,0.005327953,0.02711863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003803674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008511291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02904069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05659161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982904,0.0004702765,0.0001298328,0.0001737173,0.0007824323,0.0001533301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982266,0.000943035,0.0001752889,0.00008133359,0.0003325651,0.0002411649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000305104,0.00004156215,0.0002459062,0.003112728,0.00001795202,0.0001017552,0.003357325,0.0001739745,0.0002526279,0.008636054,0.6544634,0.3295662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004222447,0.00001043789,0.0007481459,0.002317395,0.000009955211,0.0001143063,0.001324665,0.00004777257,0.0001088428,0.002790328,0.992511,0.00001294018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002851022,0.9666445,0.001496612,0.008148641,0.003059273,0.00003533443,0.000226241,0.0001404435,0.01996375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003009779,0.9292943,0.002460791,0.001608522,0.001148014,0.0001046419,0.0004239056,0.0002256963,0.06172428],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03710696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1241351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394684636","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12891","title":"ElizabethWicks, Suicide and the Law, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2023, 221 pp, hb £85.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Heloise Robinson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02556924349383541,"gpt":0.3053255106053442,"spread":0.2797562671115088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001136446,0.001416203,0.0008450422,0.002071414,0.001417002,0.005493332,0.001114381,0.003533632,0.137612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003536029,0.0009344082,0.0004640529,0.003486249,0.001551082,0.00640103,0.001904217,0.003539327,0.06062265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00295854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003401074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01202811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03307292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989904,0.0002483172,0.00008991276,0.0001002987,0.0004633376,0.0001076817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985693,0.0007584229,0.0001485003,0.00005454431,0.0002387483,0.0002304714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001101339,0.000009627529,0.00006849756,0.0004293388,0.000003349043,0.00006668334,0.0004791362,0.00007406239,0.00004773622,0.006381723,0.934736,0.05769281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003271306,0.00000651087,0.0003413603,0.001200809,0.000001983281,0.0001342985,0.0005108436,0.0000245995,0.00001934944,0.002479746,0.9952716,0.000005587022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004339012,0.7635444,0.0008146833,0.02355928,0.01020351,0.00003995487,0.0007233226,0.0002467055,0.2004343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00504104,0.376011,0.0009209565,0.006178421,0.002682468,0.00007320212,0.0006502178,0.0002309741,0.6082118],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.137612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.460358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403213404","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12925","title":"Administrative Law as a Source of Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Megan Pfiffer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06154557496675116,"gpt":0.3801778319698697,"spread":0.3186322570031185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02598719,0.0003992729,0.00118179,0.003802947,0.004258754,0.01650255,0.002595918,0.008068259,0.008799955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04866843,0.0007067894,0.0006713828,0.002627736,0.03102634,0.01734534,0.006374854,0.009999433,0.001513223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006146513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01409445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002419784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002185814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9670007,0.01412859,0.001562453,0.003279935,0.01233055,0.001697824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9311457,0.04936855,0.003689979,0.008654167,0.006241312,0.0009003378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.939881e-7,0.0000014484,0.00002123787,0.00001404334,0.000001135831,0.000007143415,0.0001361598,0.0000422531,0.00001495403,0.9969072,0.0007149672,0.0021386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001066203,0.00001123141,0.000160318,0.000197672,0.000008131763,0.00006583284,0.00017371,0.0002706864,0.0001699887,0.8701239,0.1287992,0.000008645558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006888375,0.02329196,0.1017684,0.1200916,0.00191165,0.0001175184,0.0001300317,0.0001336592,0.7456667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8374528,0.02312767,0.02443612,0.02345767,0.008184705,0.0004654109,0.0001368105,0.0002223491,0.08251643],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02598719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1374351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999072153","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12512","title":"Harry W.Arthurs, Connecting the Dots: The Life of an Academic Lawyer, Montreal &amp; Kingston: McGill‐Queen's University Press/Toronto: the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History, 2019, 170 pp, hb £33.00.WilliamTwining, Jurist In Context: A Memoir, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, 382 pp, pb £24.99.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Queen (butterfly); Context (archaeology); Media studies; Art history; History; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Hugh Collins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0349188198400008,"gpt":0.2223655660411032,"spread":0.1874467462011024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002586462,0.001175109,0.000692191,0.003252286,0.008798417,0.008344647,0.00337689,0.006405921,0.03805981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00780546,0.001424147,0.0004639133,0.005899651,0.008507453,0.0135265,0.002591316,0.005338175,0.01035237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01803387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03383758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.735998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8666884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977396,0.000534782,0.00009930423,0.0001917506,0.001086032,0.0003486038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960238,0.001469781,0.0003055996,0.00009858608,0.001221784,0.000880403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104726,0.000009035009,0.0002076103,0.0001762307,0.000004336757,0.00006192943,0.002072893,0.0000313703,0.00003607052,0.008186911,0.9592131,0.02999002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007207333,0.000004844223,0.002138564,0.0006487797,0.000005809786,0.00007499249,0.00354889,0.00002511157,0.0000557493,0.005658479,0.9878113,0.00002023734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004143397,0.8223343,0.0006723195,0.1402944,0.003388481,0.0000387227,0.0004146365,0.0000918744,0.03235089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02784093,0.7548711,0.002523759,0.04329259,0.003447379,0.0001027446,0.0003874706,0.000273631,0.1672604],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.735998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5311135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400327859","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12906","title":"SuzanneLenon<i>and</i>DanielMonk<i>(eds)</i>, Inheritance Matters: Kinship, Property, Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023, 326 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Publishing; Law; Property (philosophy); Genealogy; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Genetics; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Alan Brown","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05595393304530727,"gpt":0.3027440661794995,"spread":0.2467901331341922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001793107,0.001679831,0.001056372,0.001577863,0.001215836,0.005684252,0.001421734,0.002370355,0.05247331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002641236,0.0009272926,0.0005946791,0.002544609,0.002301652,0.008269271,0.002072304,0.004298477,0.02898011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002071889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003946239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01081849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0255081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990578,0.0002518659,0.00007800692,0.0001195298,0.0004010031,0.00009182515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984516,0.00083786,0.000145998,0.00004426099,0.00022869,0.0002916104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000289152,0.00002491538,0.0003184373,0.001840517,0.00001323786,0.0001565979,0.001244826,0.00008923418,0.000146831,0.007156218,0.7258807,0.2630996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003610175,0.00001096398,0.0007657346,0.001647597,0.00000883539,0.0005669718,0.001071537,0.00004380914,0.00006678935,0.003734389,0.9920658,0.00001384325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002542371,0.9548745,0.0007126586,0.01876903,0.006380194,0.00001074435,0.00008260534,0.00005433725,0.01886177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002993309,0.9269062,0.0009942426,0.003481833,0.004330712,0.00002750427,0.0001861402,0.00006963424,0.06101039],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05247331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1755407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}