{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":41,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":41,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"a9f48a5af4e8","filters":{"venue":"Modern Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W1994567655","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00654.x","title":"Responsibility Beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"State responsibility; Subsidiary; Human rights; International law; Business; State (computer science); Corporate social responsibility; Law; Corporation; Foreign direct investment; Law and economics; Multinational corporation; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03376552330188073,"gpt":0.3867815149645235,"spread":0.3530159916626427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003911686,0.000170076,0.0003466838,0.00005584372,0.001267178,0.00008198585,0.0004505997,0.0001103731,0.0003456475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001452542,0.0001539586,0.0002187208,0.00009278276,0.0006687877,0.0005059137,0.00003785654,0.000143303,0.00001129135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002492031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001785273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008298862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1268293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997357,0.0003547448,0.0009026583,0.0004165653,0.0006636968,0.000305369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976544,0.0005111419,0.0003745075,0.0003722193,0.000954251,0.0001334965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001343196,0.0001837181,0.00003810282,0.00008858871,0.00003605694,0.000001128067,0.0004836487,0.000001311075,0.0005129767,0.99651,0.001902647,0.0001075134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002416389,0.0000402212,0.00007734382,0.0001523142,0.00002713243,3.009172e-7,0.000002705898,0.00001670678,0.0004158225,0.5391325,0.4597772,0.000116054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4479371,0.007167094,0.05787484,0.007867401,0.007967784,0.01086799,0.00477601,0.0005342478,0.4550076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936159,0.00006676698,0.00124062,0.0004734781,0.0005335922,0.00006322299,0.0003773544,0.00001541034,0.003613718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5456788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041157133","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00501.x","title":"Sovereignty, Migration and the Rule of Law in Global Times","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Globalization; Political science; Immigration; Variety (cybernetics); Human rights; Reign; Rule of law; Law; Political economy; Immigration law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01798465050018969,"gpt":0.3059866475015257,"spread":0.2880019970013359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006556739,0.00006342658,0.0001849765,0.000006005693,0.0001422596,0.00003134261,0.00009544397,0.00004306145,0.0000803228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006286096,0.00004060449,0.00005292144,0.0001065765,0.0003082497,0.0002235634,0.00001145705,0.00004311289,0.00001007929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006053879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006388097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02904701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1611058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999204,0.0001628679,0.0002323473,0.0001074503,0.000198046,0.00009532813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996922,0.00002722206,0.00008824122,0.0001077973,0.00005966121,0.00002485962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004376595,0.00001556112,0.00006150848,0.00008522078,0.000002830533,1.07561e-7,0.002598007,0.000007056616,0.000004005812,0.9944223,0.0000669998,0.002732081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005442322,0.00001941845,0.0002077383,0.0009650635,0.0000332895,0.000001094159,0.00008142809,0.000154417,0.00006834491,0.8376651,0.1601652,0.00009466925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06185654,0.2796009,0.00199935,0.02021431,0.0001808596,0.002277409,0.00003161031,0.00006944754,0.6337696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632806,0.03465348,0.0001499007,0.001715709,0.00004010964,0.00002034744,0.000008435765,0.000002743948,0.0001286514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9014241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096764311","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00807.x","title":"Parallel Proceedings in Investor‐State Treaty Arbitration: Responses for Treaty‐Drafters, Arbitrators and Parties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Jurisdiction; Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02663398504595405,"gpt":0.2586271040788011,"spread":0.2319931190328471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000442512,0.0002288462,0.00031258,0.0001037914,0.0001484004,0.0002914699,0.0001440554,0.00005901195,0.00007790788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001065773,0.0001929742,0.00009232339,0.0001564244,0.0001348337,0.001402564,0.00003668058,0.0001591843,0.00003600417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002112025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002871438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002059639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001137815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987791,0.000009360578,0.0004427916,0.0003376121,0.0001951548,0.0002360366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999448,0.00003871997,0.0001948481,0.0001268297,0.0001633086,0.00002831477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009641513,0.00007635685,0.002193562,0.001271083,0.00001794042,0.000002659478,0.00007955911,0.000001156405,0.0007595861,0.992099,0.002879216,0.0005234932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001171296,0.00004135164,0.002052048,0.0009436102,0.0000884375,0.000008348351,0.00001405624,0.005153372,0.0003472626,0.1046051,0.8851061,0.0004689778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7701525,0.01023693,0.0003587258,0.02277704,0.0006444796,0.004205518,0.0000318699,0.0003836376,0.1912093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8659241,0.001804994,0.001532083,0.1278162,0.0005837804,0.0008870018,0.00007824872,0.00005662747,0.001317012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8874938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7869259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140086801","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00859.x","title":"The Death of Socio‐Economic Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Fundamental rights; De facto; Globalization; Law and economics; Hegemony; Law; Economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09085241872378821,"gpt":0.3181701178223788,"spread":0.2273176990985905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000375816,0.00004552565,0.0001404241,0.000002614086,0.0007940578,0.000006152628,0.0001742748,0.00001907473,0.0001312629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001521204,0.00002713112,0.00008091424,0.00001915236,0.0005763418,0.00005221316,0.00002842994,0.00003191502,0.0001164449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003303722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006634245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02946283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00847786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994928,0.00006715651,0.0001466082,0.00007492881,0.00009987479,0.0001186672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997393,0.00004821423,0.0000655421,0.0000848128,0.00003475638,0.00002735016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[9.178253e-7,0.000006368002,0.0001863372,0.00001505333,0.00001500243,2.613688e-7,0.0004615932,2.95267e-8,2.60347e-7,0.995536,0.0002583689,0.00351979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001645578,0.00000388471,0.0002035657,0.0001270455,0.00001967245,1.343956e-7,0.00001495698,6.905508e-7,0.000004477156,0.5263214,0.4732551,0.00003257775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001137586,0.1454598,0.00005902589,0.001215764,0.0001574336,0.0001944834,0.000003555745,0.00001751124,0.8517548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402338,0.05903219,0.0000361825,0.0003914712,0.00007593916,0.00001676124,3.030461e-7,0.000001666131,0.000211662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9390962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9770001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155724317","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00627.x","title":"Incitement to Religious Hatred: All Talk and No Substance?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Incitement; Political science; Law; Criticism; Legislation; Parliament; Religious studies; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03120010831305469,"gpt":0.3464510212056351,"spread":0.3152509128925804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001242425,0.0001673758,0.0003197788,0.00002595506,0.0001943307,0.00005600946,0.0002781711,0.00007943664,0.00008426417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000726466,0.0001480607,0.000079076,0.0001388633,0.000172328,0.000154793,0.00004915516,0.0001212843,0.000264927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001325938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000366256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003198919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008835514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981194,0.0001033982,0.0003797967,0.0003428547,0.0004442918,0.0006102688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990004,0.00009073376,0.00007023262,0.0002901725,0.0001109811,0.0004375011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001479354,0.0005756444,0.001642884,0.006151788,0.0001900207,0.0004669518,0.2447787,0.00000205167,0.000519093,0.135571,0.103946,0.506008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001097206,0.00005635268,0.0001298065,0.001660855,0.00003960152,0.000004453655,0.0006553957,0.000008370793,0.0000167514,0.00281172,0.9942626,0.0002444251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4158377,0.4291919,0.0119231,0.02085243,0.002058687,0.003596352,0.00005546509,0.0005132142,0.1159711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202975,0.05622159,0.0001207484,0.02257518,0.0002746128,0.00002639793,0.000003295383,0.00001511489,0.0004655447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8903166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6037741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994898065","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00784.x","title":"Forced Marriage as a Harm in Domestic and International Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Forced marriage; Harm; Refugee law; Forced migration; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03485341438807433,"gpt":0.3876018783847494,"spread":0.352748463996675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003365454,0.000100763,0.0002079998,0.00002619185,0.00004626387,0.00001991418,0.0001262839,0.00007111693,0.002237672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003962941,0.00008842087,0.00003716536,0.0000549532,0.00005576299,0.00007827357,0.00002180378,0.0002231147,0.0003431129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001131797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001897133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001100956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006254538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991372,0.0000635377,0.0002906416,0.0002349725,0.00008953962,0.0001841713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994951,0.0000613723,0.00006550053,0.000242165,0.00003088653,0.0001049832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001839293,0.00005529449,0.0003249941,0.0005105338,0.00001282653,0.00002464315,0.0007216993,1.277312e-7,0.00004545434,0.9718695,0.0007090639,0.02570746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001853821,0.00008319216,0.006554163,0.001115295,0.00004938525,0.0003700994,0.0000152446,0.0003264771,0.000008657858,0.1078602,0.8814548,0.0003086266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3885692,0.09991886,0.0006981715,0.01254732,0.002803355,0.002431002,0.00005092207,0.0001413114,0.4928399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833984,0.003343272,0.0002017212,0.01101096,0.00009728708,0.0001327003,0.00002764108,0.00001388672,0.001774125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8807457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047361851","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.00375","title":"The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Tying; Political science; Liberal democracy; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Democratization; Law; Popular sovereignty; Order (exchange); Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0792369281200715,"gpt":0.3500334249339207,"spread":0.2707964968138492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001011246,0.00007081548,0.0003075091,0.000008430248,0.0003110005,0.000006146431,0.0004651138,0.00005592365,0.0001490342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004930945,0.00003789099,0.0001149415,0.0001544719,0.002228852,0.00004886106,0.00007393355,0.0001244793,0.00001741836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003570955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000621694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003453862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005732999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985229,0.0005415595,0.0003738119,0.00010571,0.0002263987,0.0002296225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989141,0.000594284,0.0001084878,0.0002594486,0.00006541538,0.0000583011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002357928,0.00003928368,0.0005656104,0.00004736834,0.000008718369,1.503394e-7,0.0004563715,0.00006289787,0.000002835373,0.9966478,0.0001508337,0.002015712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001008183,0.00001056995,0.00059745,0.0007094505,0.00001889253,7.22957e-7,0.00004555998,0.001099954,0.00005329744,0.9563687,0.04092875,0.00006583199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02136756,0.1092552,0.003318526,0.02120394,0.0002949666,0.001532603,0.00006412037,0.00002736264,0.8429357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930847,0.005023677,0.00004166594,0.001631933,0.00002299767,0.00001201102,3.442238e-7,0.000002233044,0.0001804949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9717171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8212299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053797283","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00602_1.x","title":"Constitutional Rights and Social Welfare: A Comment on the Canadian <i>Chaoulli</i> Health Care Decision","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Deference; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Health care; Judicial deference; Social security; Legislature; Judicial review; Social Welfare; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0361121533054164,"gpt":0.323076463333312,"spread":0.2869643100278956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004766051,0.0001277956,0.000256742,0.000006783286,0.00708915,0.00008768962,0.0001534871,0.00005803384,0.0000782663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002483673,0.00007575747,0.00007928602,0.00008130799,0.0009912275,0.00006052932,0.00003294927,0.0001406455,0.00002534303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008774457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001585125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.758769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9294023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985548,0.000258358,0.0002138807,0.0001972672,0.0004465806,0.0003290889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995134,0.00009986062,0.0000814922,0.0000896221,0.0001006272,0.0001150178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001200137,0.000009705768,0.00002196021,0.00007226479,0.000007129102,0.000001475719,0.002936168,7.432249e-7,4.419736e-8,0.9530265,0.03915236,0.004770452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009588779,0.000009951327,0.0001783208,0.0002873197,0.0000135547,5.405024e-7,0.000174784,0.000001835717,3.334327e-7,0.004749949,0.9943874,0.0001000557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009810092,0.08743686,0.00003154432,0.8517221,0.000187564,0.001347095,0.00009541542,0.00004431809,0.05815408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477627,0.002086064,0.0000836824,0.04976152,0.0001661739,0.00005513569,0.00002309486,0.000003425396,0.00005818682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080329056","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00606.x","title":"A Potential Framework For Privacy? A Reply To <i>Hello!</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Appeal; Cause of action; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Privacy laws of the United States; Supreme court; Law and economics; Sociology; Information privacy; Liability","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0308655950345468,"gpt":0.3269577290358255,"spread":0.2960921340012787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001022382,0.0001393949,0.0002985985,0.00002426243,0.0005906686,0.0001243416,0.000597026,0.000104742,0.00008459933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007930052,0.0001337821,0.0001774341,0.000253028,0.00008949472,0.000261205,0.0001840142,0.000140249,0.0001340323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008073988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007737646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00630509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000973434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983617,0.0001633793,0.0003266851,0.000399208,0.0003492521,0.0003997549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989552,0.00007048164,0.0001130706,0.0006123954,0.0001157181,0.00013306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003191435,0.0001448124,0.0000186486,0.001166837,0.0000153599,0.000004825205,0.0007951817,0.000005127576,0.0001092696,0.8755907,0.08348506,0.03863225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007402016,0.00002512365,0.000009813248,0.0005854529,0.00003352752,0.00000121054,0.000005430395,0.00003087777,0.00003711539,0.3172801,0.6817895,0.0001277776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007710845,0.06897688,0.8471775,0.06263516,0.0008793956,0.005085804,0.0001098077,0.0004074505,0.01395691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5914393,0.05385945,0.1866251,0.1527966,0.008446328,0.003075848,0.0002819274,0.0001890662,0.003286411],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6605524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9531451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167445073","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12143","title":"The Politics of Jurisdiction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Politics; Political science; Law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Framing (construction); Exclusive jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Scholarship; Federal jurisdiction; Sociology; Original jurisdiction; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07583192905293384,"gpt":0.3692030168382543,"spread":0.2933710877853205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005656907,0.00002575123,0.00006757605,0.000002078703,0.0002867312,0.00001508308,0.0001379033,0.00001593243,0.000007109766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005718006,0.00001666922,0.00003514417,0.0000678669,0.0001431941,0.00004404606,0.00001953913,0.00003444803,0.00003499023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002921408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008575922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001702615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000650002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995149,0.00006469915,0.0001181221,0.00004845936,0.0001627132,0.00009107662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996158,0.00003374857,0.0000516806,0.0001480618,0.00009128288,0.00005945395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[1.281898e-7,0.000006215748,0.00000916344,0.00002900071,0.00000166002,2.706687e-8,0.000388089,6.812972e-7,0.000001250395,0.9912643,0.002382363,0.005917166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001781875,0.000003274384,0.000008856478,0.00007127123,0.00001057081,1.246018e-7,0.00002796183,0.00003425281,0.000005963262,0.05774058,0.9420596,0.00001971981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001557378,0.1865164,0.00240463,0.04719368,0.0001940348,0.0007418185,0.00001227324,0.00007023806,0.7613096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492444,0.04478657,0.0001693251,0.001448815,0.0001891921,0.0000381911,0.000002202816,0.000005806247,0.004115495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.947687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2573857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912126940","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12415","title":"Thinking Outside the Box – Eliminating the Perniciousness of Box‐Ticking in the New Corporate Governance Code","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Flexibility (engineering); Code (set theory); Process (computing); Business; Compliance (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Accounting; Law and economics; Computer science; Management; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Finance; History; Social psychology; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03591423212146928,"gpt":0.2388890618892884,"spread":0.2029748297678191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002016099,0.0002585181,0.0004699408,0.00002083844,0.0003853824,0.0003632238,0.001416712,0.00004685713,0.0001560703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003999839,0.0001185019,0.0001723396,0.0003389707,0.0001177799,0.0005766492,0.0002950139,0.0003575871,0.0001763947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002980319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004382503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001194881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004036731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980321,0.00009105031,0.0005990755,0.0003213551,0.0006243038,0.000332146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997659,0.0002125167,0.001150674,0.0008455357,0.0001236577,0.000008597308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008717349,0.00003138653,0.001203789,0.001747584,0.00001818782,0.000009420666,0.0007008268,0.0001416992,0.0000373035,0.9866604,0.001746716,0.007693927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007654287,0.00001927551,0.006266825,0.01073888,0.0003577863,0.00001496337,0.0002311302,0.008569784,0.00003316576,0.5177563,0.4546419,0.00060454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5429744,0.1894949,0.003219249,0.09298421,0.00200032,0.009339373,0.0000200518,0.0003454502,0.159622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793728,0.001601495,0.00004628708,0.01775272,0.0004205786,0.00002797963,0.000007843335,0.00003643645,0.0007338837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4689042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4832368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014252366","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00733.x","title":"Cohabitation and Comparative Method","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Canadian Association of Physicists","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Legislature; Sociology; Family law; Comparative law; Political science; Law; Common law; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1575410648442428,"gpt":0.4168717554287403,"spread":0.2593306905844975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000450376,0.00004987035,0.0001690798,0.000008110517,0.0004055428,0.00001327072,0.00004493243,0.00002561396,0.00006088733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002049202,0.00004438417,0.00003365095,0.00007536084,0.000140227,0.0001356766,0.00001042828,0.00004526221,0.00002310959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001878151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002700861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001082538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007862114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993137,0.0002126306,0.0001163124,0.00011165,0.0001537353,0.00009194412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971,0.00005809345,0.00004882262,0.00006637957,0.00006159008,0.00005514857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000407179,0.00003216592,0.0003764391,0.0002589463,0.00001739393,0.000003371241,0.01999691,0.000001705956,0.00004835453,0.9054902,0.002001666,0.07176881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007460128,0.00001548129,0.001016309,0.0002829965,0.00002199344,0.000004340043,0.00003230566,0.0001690479,0.00001018017,0.002922396,0.9953783,0.00007204107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02051525,0.3480262,0.03664632,0.01396655,0.0002696654,0.001557881,0.000007296414,0.0002228482,0.578788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8894181,0.1032252,0.003277151,0.002777661,0.0001055025,0.00003113154,0.000004204839,0.000004704224,0.001156402],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3119148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533854209","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12046","title":"The Symbiosis of Property and English Environmental Law – Property Rights in a Public Law Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Legitimacy; Discretion; Property (philosophy); Environmental law; Law; Public property; Context (archaeology); Property law; Law and economics; Political science; Land law; Adverse possession; Business; Economics; Land tenure; Politics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02285209322943195,"gpt":0.2443695302860826,"spread":0.2215174370566507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005717555,0.0001518232,0.0003106246,0.000007718338,0.0005851759,0.00009980187,0.0003039618,0.00007641906,0.0003096136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002400953,0.00006794272,0.00007866365,0.00006261422,0.001614152,0.0004740082,0.0001120749,0.000132719,0.00007791806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008924882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001849289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07136092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04724257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983611,0.0004011421,0.0003425491,0.0002462538,0.0002991324,0.0003497895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993808,0.00007731309,0.0001044437,0.0002818125,0.00001479578,0.0001408053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002396762,0.0001121844,0.0003813852,0.0001861373,0.00001564869,8.189203e-7,0.001809111,2.853246e-8,0.00009478675,0.980491,0.0005200415,0.01638651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001636658,0.00003164869,0.0001170101,0.0003956911,0.00001663897,9.209882e-7,0.00007611926,0.00000802658,0.00009643243,0.005870219,0.993085,0.000138676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05440693,0.08735666,0.00000177808,0.01590146,0.0001611535,0.00455557,0.00004299074,0.00006790394,0.8375056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758007,0.01813947,0.0000190114,0.00367416,0.00005341309,0.000185254,0.000004475461,0.00001064812,0.002112871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9701428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178424575","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12671","title":"Boycott, Resistance and the Law: Cause Lawyering in Conflict and Authoritarianism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Boycott; Authoritarianism; Resistance (ecology); Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03692962382267419,"gpt":0.3153610075767582,"spread":0.278431383754084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009006253,0.00008846262,0.0002625157,7.389194e-7,0.0005656562,0.000111841,0.0001110415,0.00008219061,0.0000369593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000865492,0.00006176216,0.00005453853,0.0001113211,0.0006131556,0.0001447794,0.00006324988,0.0001771841,0.000003461742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002695752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004174708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001244385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03203475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988742,0.0003644939,0.0001739218,0.0002144826,0.0001818981,0.000190961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995651,0.000107838,0.00004560616,0.0001713616,0.00004910145,0.00006097627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002467249,0.000006248822,0.00001212469,0.0003324245,0.00001034269,0.00001324578,0.008348377,1.359863e-7,0.0000128833,0.9897765,0.001037547,0.0004477297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002590438,0.00000153262,0.00002514695,0.0009983114,0.00003870513,0.000003666263,0.0005002966,0.00000712076,0.0000105792,0.03729967,0.9607592,0.00009675877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001213213,0.8550969,0.00001979041,0.02570976,0.00009327121,0.0003734723,0.000006110834,0.00003226627,0.1174552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1718239,0.8062978,0.0004095538,0.01320343,0.0001294093,0.00005655591,0.000003708411,0.0000126438,0.008062923],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9597216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9856281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893794509","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00867.x","title":"Deference on Questions of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Presumption; Law; Judicial deference; Political science; Delegate; Competence (human resources); Legislature; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.161179879593113,"gpt":0.3499320435283463,"spread":0.1887521639352333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002101991,0.000049937,0.0001538935,0.000005276038,0.0003111861,0.00000369767,0.0001215061,0.00002226215,0.0001818316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000520557,0.00003995809,0.00005847006,0.0000664391,0.000583083,0.00005497566,0.00002142436,0.00004326832,0.0001070168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001678444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004646009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0255837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009735577,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994324,0.00007190416,0.0001295448,0.00009160402,0.0001705785,0.0001039516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997158,0.00003047244,0.00004686213,0.00008893346,0.00008014575,0.00003780724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001150721,0.00003200764,0.00004428711,0.00004185761,0.000006507913,5.612194e-7,0.0005111376,9.069863e-8,0.000001622675,0.9955788,0.00009543794,0.003686512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003159754,0.00002674653,0.0003103616,0.00161544,0.00004083512,2.893676e-7,0.00001657096,6.612895e-7,0.00002265952,0.5310187,0.4668313,0.00008484415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004183449,0.03873227,0.000193902,0.000695756,0.00007427632,0.0001573706,0.00000642071,0.00002780885,0.9596938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727423,0.02505738,0.0001268084,0.001926234,0.00003424984,0.00001875525,6.739809e-7,0.000001865487,0.00009175763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387330817","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12845","title":"Communicating Censure: The Relevance of Conditions of Imprisonment at Sentencing and During the Administration of the Sentence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Relevance (law); Punishment (psychology); Blame; Sentence; Typology; Prison; Legitimacy; Criminology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; State (computer science); Administration (probate law); Retributive justice; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Economic Justice","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03769700447173646,"gpt":0.3347367215381697,"spread":0.2970397170664333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006832696,0.00004291979,0.0001358296,0.000007533027,0.0006884562,0.00000689642,0.0002323988,0.00001426792,0.00001047398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001889229,0.00002291807,0.00009007839,0.0003309928,0.0003967394,0.00003869299,0.0001183405,0.00006843627,9.476723e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002616724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002778805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003248438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01394146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991238,0.0002394328,0.0002615844,0.00007188279,0.0002236854,0.00007962529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998951,0.0003314848,0.0002798844,0.0003412714,0.00008361872,0.00001276023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000141772,0.0007091215,0.0359494,0.03217652,0.001056805,0.000008199426,0.3174166,0.002739024,0.1426039,0.1483304,0.00151015,0.3173581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009945948,0.0002856282,0.113369,0.04264536,0.009000503,0.0001005494,0.6949483,0.03506054,0.03136297,0.007499842,0.0635628,0.001169942],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819529,0.0139689,0.0000501227,0.003308069,0.00003360857,0.0002615375,0.00001260547,0.000007769162,0.0004045062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499391,0.04985433,0.00001584191,0.00008506432,0.000008480642,0.00001510229,0.000001312273,0.000002413851,0.00007837197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3775316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7779661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1750822166","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00888.x","title":"In Defence of Quasi‐Contract","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Liability; Unjust enrichment; Doctrine; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Normative; Law; Sociology; Political science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0988565991060648,"gpt":0.3592609695346046,"spread":0.2604043704285398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004265557,0.00003728367,0.0001396102,0.000006521441,0.00005407514,0.000004125076,0.0001845311,0.00002361456,0.0003269379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003514754,0.00003205707,0.00004555257,0.0001111516,0.00009629879,0.0001208012,0.00001784994,0.00004948809,0.00005670415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001840388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004102605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01581223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007787938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994595,0.00006128343,0.0001748386,0.00009062975,0.00010365,0.0001100938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996948,0.00002452108,0.00006380094,0.0001498952,0.00002947355,0.00003756324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.119809e-7,0.00005564797,0.0002201611,0.0001177584,0.000001291399,6.071926e-7,0.001478815,9.211853e-8,0.00001621443,0.9911881,0.0000576783,0.006863141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008516882,0.00001435639,0.001261671,0.0008970028,0.00002069368,5.057462e-7,0.00003053539,0.00004433712,0.0001004498,0.0685,0.9289241,0.0001211412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01417981,0.08020692,0.001885299,0.004516124,0.00007955287,0.001083203,0.0000106876,0.00004567862,0.8979927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827794,0.0155623,0.0003918847,0.001043397,0.00001687575,0.00003001479,3.766711e-7,0.000002965535,0.0001728318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137437015","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12087","title":"Tort Law for Cynics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty; Idealism; Damages; Cynicism; Context (archaeology); Law; Duty of care; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Liability","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05530293285794409,"gpt":0.372401103392749,"spread":0.3170981705348049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006174091,0.000053192,0.0001432035,0.000002361201,0.0004028397,0.00003658462,0.0002018531,0.00003342895,0.00005485147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004898314,0.00004553967,0.00009001094,0.00005001763,0.00009266495,0.00007915824,0.00002411864,0.0000398533,0.00009536053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000249898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002815136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001225574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003612954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993917,0.00004773488,0.0001388032,0.0001355243,0.0001258301,0.0001604567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995459,0.00006386613,0.00004691313,0.0002141519,0.00005693482,0.00007228494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[2.364602e-7,0.00001010927,0.000001583776,0.0001574587,0.000002087871,2.099261e-8,0.00008849373,6.895399e-7,0.000005919072,0.9854992,0.001833183,0.01240099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003837711,0.000005710712,0.000002189436,0.0001373194,0.00001907097,1.013824e-7,0.000002173652,0.0001370266,0.000007899915,0.06177818,0.9378097,0.00006222146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001487628,0.02331287,0.02998494,0.02267559,0.0001405053,0.00147534,0.00002118986,0.0001376982,0.9221031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355782,0.01598146,0.004110228,0.03681802,0.0007991368,0.0006009003,0.00002513526,0.00003039597,0.006056573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9359766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3098358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044181713","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12565","title":"Fingerprint Comparison and Adversarialism: The Scientific and Historical Evidence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Fingerprint (computing); Scientific evidence; Categorical variable; Mainstream; Adversarial system; Psychology; Identity (music); Legislation; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1101672374324809,"gpt":0.3317582871389124,"spread":0.2215910497064316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003465334,0.00007852424,0.000156391,0.000003655161,0.000138699,0.00004776284,0.0001424285,0.0000365112,0.000009988678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001721432,0.00005167122,0.00003674775,0.00005083573,0.0002490191,0.000002733829,0.0002257756,0.00008042857,0.000006540359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009391349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003158204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004613809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002030985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991922,0.00008329576,0.0001446445,0.0003052631,0.0001500477,0.0001245687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995682,0.00002048962,0.00003520968,0.0002321715,0.00004526515,0.00009861536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002636763,0.0001185472,0.004481793,0.007828201,0.0001876374,0.00001839665,0.001712359,0.00005455317,0.1841729,0.01410699,0.3490708,0.4379841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001156713,0.0001371706,0.0002305181,0.0003304966,0.00003652136,0.000009407405,0.000004459813,0.001290099,0.001830993,0.0002434328,0.9956579,0.000113287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05953359,0.9106772,0.003474772,0.02523782,0.0001290249,0.0004725152,0.000003117805,0.000008746363,0.000463227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599985,0.0363169,0.0003005159,0.003003336,0.0000973362,0.0000141412,0.000006317943,0.000007420432,0.0002554864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.900465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2107091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128090591","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12616","title":"Being Conscious of Unconscionability in Modern Times: <i>Heller</i> v <i>Uber Technologies</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Arbitration; Supreme court; Doctrine; Bargaining power; Law and economics; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Law; Arbitration clause; Power (physics); Political science; Federal Arbitration Act; Business; Economics; Compulsory arbitration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02212018092094167,"gpt":0.3042425961141602,"spread":0.2821224151932185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00108751,0.0001314115,0.0004128074,0.00002876697,0.0001241076,0.0000306741,0.0003854964,0.00008927043,0.0002557641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007286162,0.0001245141,0.0001527377,0.0003009436,0.0004838873,0.000211894,0.0001306014,0.0002215491,0.00004818464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001057748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002515856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003659656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002515522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980947,0.0003750624,0.0005121467,0.0003380564,0.0004116411,0.0002684301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989012,0.0002140867,0.0001361872,0.0003815758,0.0003149869,0.00005189732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005175537,0.0001581965,0.0007006376,0.0004751495,0.00002232269,0.00004037067,0.0004593215,0.00001398612,0.0005029684,0.9660058,0.0006500619,0.03096604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002987907,0.00001391576,0.00004957721,0.002539458,0.0000349883,0.000004842299,0.00009337731,0.0003746456,0.0008622884,0.1313691,0.8641098,0.0002492082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01406671,0.1626031,0.0007579679,0.01401009,0.000283455,0.0008196277,0.00003228259,0.0002650089,0.8071618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539037,0.03986925,0.0003056584,0.003930254,0.00002974462,0.0000198949,0.000008975736,0.00001523639,0.001917233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.939837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5077536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081855718","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00931_3.x","title":"DawnOliver<i>and</i>CarloFusaro<i>(eds)</i>, How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011, 510 pp, hb £55.00.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1515370650035863,"gpt":0.354341230788512,"spread":0.2028041657849257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001369921,0.0002952303,0.0007188696,0.00003920793,0.002239808,0.0003738022,0.0003973828,0.000106775,0.000284598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001940905,0.0002490692,0.0001571204,0.0003055966,0.001751911,0.00256013,0.0002844257,0.0003043487,0.0002046514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001270804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001978438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01659447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01397008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974083,0.0004793532,0.0003408655,0.0003881811,0.0006916919,0.0006916245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986983,0.0001527028,0.0002046989,0.0002651641,0.0003239986,0.0003551676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007937932,0.0003692854,0.00606413,0.0001322098,0.0001573575,0.000005217268,0.01063274,1.93832e-7,0.000002984722,0.9433762,0.03356228,0.005689494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000299514,0.00003975979,0.001236104,0.0005393444,0.0002327743,0.00000596966,0.001074105,0.000005569645,0.000001475896,0.006781287,0.9894583,0.0003257639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004437675,0.7109793,0.0002992474,0.02974472,0.00131137,0.00330156,0.0001450355,0.0002416811,0.2495393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8648077,0.1295045,0.00009181607,0.003883471,0.0008829088,0.0004306574,0.0000189663,0.000009454368,0.0003704605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176229594","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12648","title":"Citizenship Stripping, Fair Procedures, and the Separation of Powers: A Critical Comment on <i>Damache</i> v <i>Minister for Justice</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Casey House","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Separation of powers; Citizenship; Irish; Judgement; Constitution; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06491810052361464,"gpt":0.4013696709703735,"spread":0.3364515704467588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006844018,0.0000773043,0.0002190411,0.000003903399,0.0003913815,0.00006590572,0.0001207788,0.0000393029,0.00002352514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005255737,0.00005466982,0.00008812686,0.00008329751,0.0003286513,0.00004750704,0.00002988909,0.00007631547,0.000003682183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002322086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001156393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003742228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001549783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990504,0.0001713894,0.0002437703,0.0001807105,0.0002033586,0.0001503615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989962,0.000521022,0.00007541159,0.0001905858,0.0001568493,0.00005995732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001319415,0.00003938728,0.000002057445,0.001466516,0.00001040574,3.130336e-7,0.0005683872,8.834438e-7,0.00002251893,0.9818714,0.01471922,0.001285704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003999749,0.00002730009,0.000003007688,0.001012876,0.000214199,0.000001712947,0.0001599336,0.0001640851,0.0001131693,0.03568437,0.9621328,0.00008659202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003653239,0.08465009,0.01079301,0.6571181,0.0001603165,0.003473539,0.0001520558,0.00006159177,0.2432259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8942438,0.01629097,0.0006056511,0.087506,0.0001566175,0.0004475005,0.00002577304,0.00001309422,0.0007106345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9474136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.301023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901880838","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12378","title":"Developing a European Standard for International Data Transfers after Snowden: <i>Opinion 1/15</i> on the EU‐Canada PNR Agreement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; European union; Context (archaeology); Public opinion; European commission; Politics; Commission; Economic Justice; Law; Balance (ability); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; International trade; Business; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1460417835108257,"gpt":0.3649301308831934,"spread":0.2188883473723677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001775767,0.0001137788,0.0001307229,0.00001135528,0.0004925693,0.0001007431,0.0008138134,0.00001621592,0.0002073362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002879672,0.00008142375,0.00004075669,0.00007849923,0.0001354842,0.0002315824,0.0001240274,0.00009310264,0.00007818358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001582392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002448224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0140572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2196898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983616,0.0003530779,0.000258601,0.0003189326,0.0004934764,0.0002143193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991224,0.00009112446,0.0000730338,0.0004508923,0.0002054952,0.0000570601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002984762,0.00004830506,0.00000811935,0.001780933,0.0001213426,0.00001577539,0.00269099,0.000001436806,0.00002581884,0.2483514,0.2508087,0.4958487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001017183,0.00006696997,0.000009485501,0.001689652,0.00004708375,8.396657e-7,0.0001222376,0.00003788308,0.00003362347,0.0002373446,0.997533,0.0001201289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001589858,0.02211948,0.3551748,0.3389535,0.008456538,0.007566,0.003470447,0.000239373,0.2624301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6611933,0.1081444,0.005967172,0.2141233,0.007807094,0.0003374611,0.001087195,0.0001414556,0.001198604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7467243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412080299","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12972","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0228599439378096,"gpt":0.3477995177011943,"spread":0.3249395737633847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003254745,0.0001498237,0.0004199665,0.00003129333,0.0007850095,0.00009272536,0.0002175153,0.0001775047,0.006231891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006208965,0.000122017,0.0001796644,0.0002345457,0.0001602939,0.0002948397,0.00007964655,0.0001831284,0.01718577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001165715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003015358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00395347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001011304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988622,0.000133614,0.0003389419,0.0001332359,0.0003165414,0.0002154576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992951,0.00004221356,0.0001643441,0.000239281,0.0002026555,0.00005639988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.50626e-7,0.000004299255,4.428248e-8,0.002757208,0.00002238948,1.997468e-7,0.000653853,0.000003258651,1.044957e-8,0.06653007,0.8996386,0.03038971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003367527,0.000003644934,3.443716e-7,0.004030816,0.00008543146,1.670719e-7,0.00002249958,0.000007070056,1.358632e-7,0.0004038566,0.9952759,0.0001364347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[5.641033e-8,0.2586908,0.0003177086,0.01028818,0.001895849,0.0005575782,0.00007470605,0.0000240459,0.7281511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006442476,0.4167404,0.00005443212,0.007962858,0.0005393691,0.0000765412,0.0002648927,0.000005192623,0.5742919],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1580496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315700262","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12790","title":"K.Bowrey, Copyright, Creativity, Big Media and Cultural Value: Incorporating the Author, Routledge, 2020, 228 pp, hb, £36.99.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Creativity; Section (typography); Sociology; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06395492923406,"gpt":0.3489646009622671,"spread":0.2850096717282071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002315965,0.0002472847,0.0004738382,0.000003093821,0.001934093,0.0002757111,0.0005071718,0.0001995395,0.0001707824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004095307,0.0001442876,0.0002223435,0.0007786882,0.0009828758,0.0003474591,0.0002374174,0.0003901072,0.0002028283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007594374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001140124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009531297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002831048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973108,0.0007489779,0.0003732927,0.0004167848,0.0006954112,0.0004547334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987337,0.0003730685,0.0002132095,0.0003298704,0.0001591091,0.0001910284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005589288,0.00005511231,0.0003288542,0.0009841153,0.00009525493,0.0000247618,0.0396526,0.000006437589,0.00006951335,0.6385221,0.2913155,0.02894014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001753824,0.00001652457,0.0002229123,0.00128453,0.000159226,0.00000620827,0.001249144,0.0003601457,0.0000132399,0.08356543,0.9126174,0.0003298543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01372876,0.5925325,0.0001645421,0.1221488,0.002347436,0.003239882,0.0001385299,0.00122023,0.2644793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4560061,0.5160172,0.0005541986,0.009427896,0.002659229,0.0002850612,0.0001366254,0.00006908659,0.01484462],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6213019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394688929","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12890","title":"AbdiAidid and BenjaminAlarie, The Legal Singularity: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Law Radically Better, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2023, 218 pp, hb £31.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Singularity; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02782103530223975,"gpt":0.2758808243345855,"spread":0.2480597890323457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009089631,0.0001831716,0.0003576784,5.195815e-7,0.0008198475,0.0002807919,0.0005066568,0.0001892562,0.0002870285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004131367,0.0001417259,0.0001934148,0.00005965865,0.001273625,0.0004099152,0.000140971,0.0002501233,0.000004325835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002328571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001667259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1371266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5841904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982851,0.0002991361,0.0002217514,0.0003821709,0.0004874844,0.000324328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992471,0.0001045005,0.00009009383,0.0003109825,0.0001077459,0.0001395557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005812577,0.00004615623,0.000001985801,0.0008161509,0.00006917508,0.00002028053,0.00666765,3.91706e-7,0.0000303909,0.8899387,0.008408556,0.09399477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003007619,0.00002878461,0.000005144243,0.0009255732,0.0001885669,0.000003850461,0.00073178,0.0001595348,0.00002173526,0.01249634,0.9852302,0.00017842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000241443,0.9125031,0.0007175601,0.02630602,0.0003801086,0.0006723288,0.0001038079,0.00008996552,0.05898567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08772237,0.8989898,0.001168662,0.004968312,0.0006914522,0.00001193621,0.00003205793,0.00003048271,0.006384929],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9768217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8686194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196845151","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12678","title":"The Independence of Justice in the Cauldron of International Relations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Judicial independence; Economic Justice; Law; State (computer science); Authoritarianism; Democracy; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03683912035728569,"gpt":0.3536374860870511,"spread":0.3167983657297654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009438191,0.00003526528,0.00008869756,0.00000868522,0.0002092356,0.00001934545,0.0003844091,0.00002682758,0.0002834037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002034615,0.00002060719,0.00005683991,0.00006642779,0.0001800638,0.0000918211,0.00002728493,0.0001013838,0.00001544992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000311762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001309584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001108198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02028632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988955,0.0002322762,0.0002381104,0.00007508439,0.0004872118,0.00007183635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991615,0.0003102866,0.0001127938,0.0001379852,0.0002666688,0.00001071415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001045961,0.00002183451,0.00004320555,0.0000595346,0.000006922044,0.000002025122,0.000953628,0.000007834158,0.000005991626,0.9979628,0.0005194653,0.0004157198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007315665,0.000005483432,0.0007606356,0.0008369189,0.00004592126,0.000002678493,0.00009043988,0.0001049958,0.00003680753,0.2879459,0.7100495,0.00004754972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01985877,0.05338721,0.0008079852,0.06344826,0.0009593525,0.0006573683,0.00003216921,0.00001501113,0.8608339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857573,0.005074716,0.00006079567,0.0006478832,0.00006392218,0.00001157824,0.000005243242,0.00000225066,0.008376322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383225277","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12826","title":"The Travels of Treason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Constructive; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Empire; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); English law; Legal history; Sociology; History; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0464193526831873,"gpt":0.3444401167106994,"spread":0.298020764027512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000741756,0.00004766003,0.0001546214,0.000003731665,0.001022683,0.000007800519,0.0001594804,0.00001999685,0.00004195537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001067584,0.00002763247,0.00009529381,0.0001983332,0.0002914683,0.00003942643,0.00001717765,0.00004025046,0.00009844157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001676602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000250111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009303013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001866199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993212,0.0001481808,0.0001251302,0.00007945456,0.0001925994,0.0001334634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997185,0.00003223342,0.00005243197,0.0001241158,0.00004572932,0.00002692894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001922343,0.00001273493,0.00001048566,0.0004442614,0.00002818298,0.000001825845,0.03183843,5.49617e-7,0.0000211322,0.7759074,0.03847637,0.1532567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002161457,0.000005427526,0.000027325,0.0003589612,0.00002140065,1.161664e-7,0.0004308266,0.000002400526,0.000002322096,0.007883457,0.9912096,0.00003655738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004743561,0.5227793,0.00002515539,0.02355847,0.0003009516,0.000480905,0.000006305103,0.0001190023,0.4522556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5837841,0.3867874,0.00002142228,0.001165654,0.0001862759,0.0001104224,0.000003438548,0.00001263609,0.02792864],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9527332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7865751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393031737","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12885","title":"<i>R (on the application of W80)</i> v <i>Director General of the Independent Office of Police Conduct</i>: Landmark Ruling or Business as Usual?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Law; Political science; Director general; Management; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04685729284560133,"gpt":0.3459466951516419,"spread":0.2990894023060405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009901734,0.00009637192,0.0002744685,0.00001708939,0.0001417082,0.00002088637,0.000320951,0.00005755675,0.0001012057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009596946,0.00005031291,0.000127106,0.0004952202,0.000193215,0.00007841674,0.00005185802,0.0001056571,0.000008419145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003047521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001912473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01990789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003496207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986521,0.0002273921,0.0003657839,0.0001676526,0.0004613172,0.0001257707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989805,0.0002565258,0.0002232573,0.0003110942,0.0001979487,0.00003070387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005476653,0.0001447574,0.0001082831,0.003407234,0.00009659609,8.252568e-7,0.005117401,0.0000774294,0.01107972,0.9392018,0.001116442,0.03959474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001532742,0.00004175571,0.0004453332,0.003875934,0.0002177015,0.0000048811,0.00007417653,0.0005622155,0.002529559,0.002448727,0.9894906,0.0001558801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7509955,0.1050326,0.001971798,0.02096595,0.001330474,0.004471668,0.0001952536,0.0001619688,0.1148748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863033,0.01201691,0.00001974156,0.0009676013,0.0001335255,0.00003807016,0.000004425053,0.00001168072,0.0005046957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413359504","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12977","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0228599439378096,"gpt":0.3477995177011943,"spread":0.3249395737633847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003254745,0.0001498237,0.0004199665,0.00003129333,0.0007850095,0.00009272536,0.0002175153,0.0001775047,0.006231891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006208965,0.000122017,0.0001796644,0.0002345457,0.0001602939,0.0002948397,0.00007964655,0.0001831284,0.01718577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001165715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003015358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00395347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001011304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988622,0.000133614,0.0003389419,0.0001332359,0.0003165414,0.0002154576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992951,0.00004221356,0.0001643441,0.000239281,0.0002026555,0.00005639988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.50626e-7,0.000004299255,4.428248e-8,0.002757208,0.00002238948,1.997468e-7,0.000653853,0.000003258651,1.044957e-8,0.06653007,0.8996386,0.03038971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003367527,0.000003644934,3.443716e-7,0.004030816,0.00008543146,1.670719e-7,0.00002249958,0.000007070056,1.358632e-7,0.0004038566,0.9952759,0.0001364347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[5.641033e-8,0.2586908,0.0003177086,0.01028818,0.001895849,0.0005575782,0.00007470605,0.0000240459,0.7281511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006442476,0.4167404,0.00005443212,0.007962858,0.0005393691,0.0000765412,0.0002648927,0.000005192623,0.5742919],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1580496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416826384","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.70007","title":"<i>Allan C. Hutchinson</i> , Rethinking Legitimacy: Courts, Constitutions and Politics, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2025, 192 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Judicial restraint; Politics; Dissenting opinion; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Judicial independence; Nothing; Majority opinion","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04213518038715577,"gpt":0.3208642374256895,"spread":0.2787290570385338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001035918,0.0002187821,0.0005077352,0.00004256943,0.002835355,0.0005314599,0.0003767915,0.0001279733,0.0001307882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000674639,0.0002017688,0.0001474503,0.0002936366,0.00200197,0.0007318886,0.0002269566,0.0003442862,0.00002795103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001667552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008003665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01968361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01038723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979439,0.0002102298,0.0004398948,0.0004140167,0.0004817629,0.0005102378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989738,0.0001904058,0.0001269767,0.0002435652,0.0002900234,0.0001752152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001617173,0.00003579667,0.0005570291,0.0002427104,0.00005873544,0.000007333868,0.0004715043,0.000001048335,0.000001330319,0.9502705,0.04456126,0.003791176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001239022,0.000005847768,0.00005181395,0.001836476,0.00009577643,0.000002928149,0.00005356428,0.00001330404,0.000001490155,0.2963154,0.7013462,0.0001533334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002575096,0.270832,0.001043107,0.06121726,0.0006390885,0.0006483772,0.00007805758,0.0001669098,0.6651177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6204514,0.3318843,0.0006316311,0.04284161,0.0007642077,0.0001323706,0.00005993835,0.00001615587,0.003218374],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6618993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407367795","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12946","title":"LeahTrueblood, Referendums as Representative Democracy, London, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2024, 168 pp, hb £76.50","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Democracy; Political science; Economic history; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03722827369326225,"gpt":0.3528085131893993,"spread":0.315580239496137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001602413,0.0002746407,0.0007455954,0.00003219535,0.0006756294,0.0005044296,0.000888792,0.0002184695,0.001014343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00214318,0.000235513,0.0002794568,0.0005716985,0.0004171073,0.00112825,0.0002503542,0.0004982147,0.0004113971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002343188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004136936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1483458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01556146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962222,0.0007355738,0.0007060834,0.0006879698,0.0008453346,0.0008028635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998062,0.0003249274,0.0002971163,0.0007083846,0.0002695738,0.0003380618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004658745,0.00005236334,0.0003226255,0.000596526,0.00005017055,0.00001422941,0.0002226872,3.882893e-7,0.000006309287,0.7468261,0.2379603,0.01394363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002475513,0.0000166666,0.0004431693,0.003275455,0.0001032166,0.00000304727,0.00003552986,0.00001335362,0.00003020829,0.08984053,0.9057566,0.0002347038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001217764,0.3891368,0.0004890368,0.03200906,0.0009413192,0.001030195,0.00005614208,0.0001600582,0.5749596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1948495,0.4030755,0.0004607335,0.05107091,0.001260414,0.0003860063,0.00004833984,0.00007471235,0.3487739],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6677963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406408310","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12941","title":"Matthew C.Canfield, Translating Food Sovereignty: Cultivating Justice in an Age of Transnational Governance, Stanford University Press, 2022, 280 pp, hb US/CAN $105.00, pb US/CAN $26.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Management; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03543973588508367,"gpt":0.2372049182349417,"spread":0.201765182349858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021027,0.0002383103,0.0006886533,0.00002287868,0.0009958702,0.00005088449,0.0002970826,0.00007006159,0.0005352621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002330595,0.0001995417,0.0002982343,0.0001642391,0.0001727875,0.0002519092,0.0000458251,0.0002618176,8.613298e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004625688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004777602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00265681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03115434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983636,0.0001347863,0.000531391,0.0003332795,0.0003561222,0.0002808956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992617,0.00009279573,0.0002220475,0.0001921696,0.0001666083,0.0000646401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001677481,0.000108135,0.00007473711,0.002765084,0.0001540871,0.000006964196,0.009048472,0.00007402019,0.00003049116,0.9831272,0.0009240808,0.00366992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007549566,0.0001070526,0.0001046118,0.001784316,0.0007065473,4.326774e-7,0.001590309,0.0007807062,0.00001543368,0.00902886,0.9846736,0.000453191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1451704,0.2603531,0.003931891,0.09435487,0.00114132,0.004448577,0.003979156,0.0005438043,0.4860769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662068,0.02681278,0.0002722741,0.001541735,0.0001191269,0.00001838174,0.00009339649,0.00002535581,0.004910168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9865246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409246270","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12953","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0228599439378096,"gpt":0.3477995177011943,"spread":0.3249395737633847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003254745,0.0001498237,0.0004199665,0.00003129333,0.0007850095,0.00009272536,0.0002175153,0.0001775047,0.006231891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006208965,0.000122017,0.0001796644,0.0002345457,0.0001602939,0.0002948397,0.00007964655,0.0001831284,0.01718577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001165715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003015358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00395347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001011304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988622,0.000133614,0.0003389419,0.0001332359,0.0003165414,0.0002154576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992951,0.00004221356,0.0001643441,0.000239281,0.0002026555,0.00005639988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.50626e-7,0.000004299255,4.428248e-8,0.002757208,0.00002238948,1.997468e-7,0.000653853,0.000003258651,1.044957e-8,0.06653007,0.8996386,0.03038971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003367527,0.000003644934,3.443716e-7,0.004030816,0.00008543146,1.670719e-7,0.00002249958,0.000007070056,1.358632e-7,0.0004038566,0.9952759,0.0001364347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[5.641033e-8,0.2586908,0.0003177086,0.01028818,0.001895849,0.0005575782,0.00007470605,0.0000240459,0.7281511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006442476,0.4167404,0.00005443212,0.007962858,0.0005393691,0.0000765412,0.0002648927,0.000005192623,0.5742919],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1580496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321351784","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12799","title":"Ernest J.Weinrib, Reciprocal Freedom: Private Law and Public Right, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 240 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Reciprocal; Sociology; Law; Library science; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04293725953304092,"gpt":0.2885946877108314,"spread":0.2456574281777904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007499347,0.000190737,0.0003630805,0.00002269621,0.001206911,0.0001741301,0.0006307513,0.0001276562,0.0001584679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005965186,0.0001741097,0.000130987,0.0005696565,0.0005915363,0.0005817186,0.000370642,0.0002451114,0.00007517207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001036681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004465553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006505857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980893,0.0002110694,0.0002821488,0.0004860496,0.0004086444,0.0005227833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988946,0.00009803702,0.000141802,0.0004763309,0.0001082357,0.0002810324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002881903,0.00004469844,0.00009438371,0.0003001292,0.00001801658,0.000009580714,0.0001473539,0.000002704745,0.000007227256,0.9902245,0.006036986,0.003111544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001846915,0.00001418721,0.00006656721,0.0002527343,0.00005158564,0.000001932845,0.00002828367,0.0004251559,0.000005257915,0.009173889,0.9895734,0.0002223639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01200901,0.05773821,0.001599804,0.04872341,0.0004392295,0.003871389,0.0003512856,0.001281642,0.873986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3922528,0.5811269,0.000866221,0.004346446,0.000606844,0.000148339,0.0002179161,0.00007870481,0.02035579],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9282708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408381554","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12947","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02561431608605547,"gpt":0.3013011847277057,"spread":0.2756868686416502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001760444,0.0002212183,0.0003985705,0.00006260085,0.00005332809,0.00005505276,0.0001561986,0.0001875458,0.1783034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001055975,0.0002190255,0.0001168501,0.00009003967,0.00001556733,0.0002783435,0.00002186824,0.0002561618,0.5522954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001369546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003449932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001951056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005372834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990646,0.00004341493,0.0004326942,0.0001060951,0.0002116208,0.0001416099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994817,0.00001014119,0.00006444698,0.0003255008,0.00007640511,0.00004174583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[2.555381e-7,0.000001968067,6.941538e-9,0.015225,0.00001746787,5.870913e-8,0.00004853966,0.001692196,0.000002610017,0.00004615228,0.9311267,0.05183908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000600371,0.000003491362,8.913786e-7,0.006033507,0.00006424927,6.108211e-7,6.716699e-7,0.006893942,0.000003803342,0.00004326324,0.9866979,0.0001976567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001019637,0.1070164,0.01028854,0.0001863865,0.005396209,0.0005667406,0.00007080707,0.0001899748,0.8762839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001031306,0.4603392,0.0001830749,0.009109087,0.001273866,0.0002895909,0.00387225,0.00004972007,0.52478],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3739921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8931599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407589855","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12945","title":"BeckyBatagol, KateSeear, HeliAskola and JamieWalvisch (eds), The Feminist Legislation Project: Rewriting Laws for Gender‐Based Justice, London, Routledge, 2024, 392 pp, hb, £145.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rewriting; Legislation; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04920755559461061,"gpt":0.3601314201411637,"spread":0.3109238645465531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002252776,0.0002701462,0.0004748649,0.000008255333,0.002314551,0.0003306263,0.0004696684,0.0002303929,0.00007509696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005012755,0.0001955925,0.0002689226,0.0005427162,0.0005041581,0.000275372,0.000100453,0.0003465546,0.000016083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009924796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003614074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006238978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001276644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997604,0.0004072287,0.0005102305,0.0005320238,0.0004332203,0.0005133717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984585,0.0005062485,0.0002314203,0.0004211725,0.0002939959,0.00008867883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003494996,0.0001585827,0.0002080181,0.01223516,0.0001472697,0.000004563605,0.01065334,0.00001485432,0.00009437891,0.6404788,0.2876581,0.04831195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003840211,0.00002015603,0.00001314472,0.002075251,0.0004321396,0.000001557203,0.001061396,0.001154218,0.00002538446,0.006370336,0.988214,0.0002484041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027152,0.6755496,0.003305046,0.01974314,0.0007796783,0.004850702,0.0001512375,0.000224993,0.2951241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1841063,0.6768673,0.005556466,0.06169229,0.002509541,0.002830627,0.0003795423,0.0001546417,0.06590327],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7005559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394684636","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12891","title":"ElizabethWicks, Suicide and the Law, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2023, 221 pp, hb £85.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02556924349383541,"gpt":0.3053255106053442,"spread":0.2797562671115088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003490812,0.0002723137,0.0006141718,0.00002806912,0.0008836473,0.001756068,0.0007284245,0.0001579178,0.000711566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003974484,0.0001785031,0.000290129,0.0003860477,0.001363103,0.00128501,0.0001610627,0.0004876401,0.0002039838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006527366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001722435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01205995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01714923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971167,0.0005658937,0.0005515206,0.0005297668,0.0006313913,0.0006047642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985569,0.000431281,0.0001156434,0.0005558369,0.0001135824,0.0002267221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006043485,0.00001652188,0.00009651489,0.0007138605,0.00005792853,0.00001642611,0.003009383,7.620416e-7,0.000003643818,0.9464986,0.03722493,0.01235538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002611287,0.000009944712,0.0000447197,0.002900318,0.0001622304,0.000008229197,0.0001255597,0.0002494439,0.000007998691,0.0398922,0.9560934,0.0002448102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001371174,0.6601014,0.0002299941,0.04303538,0.0006318676,0.0009849606,0.00003355609,0.0002523738,0.2933593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3096871,0.6471167,0.0001477506,0.03651313,0.001007738,0.00009926393,0.00004182515,0.00006671721,0.005319744],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9188685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403213404","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12925","title":"Administrative Law as a Source of Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06154557496675116,"gpt":0.3801778319698697,"spread":0.3186322570031185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003913137,0.0001048782,0.0002802903,0.00001515796,0.0003035988,0.00007241875,0.0002150518,0.00005406007,0.001325337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009502229,0.00007523951,0.0001556337,0.0001113629,0.0004948757,0.0001655807,0.00002192452,0.0001087357,0.0006276799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003449988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001174714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005019782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01538044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988732,0.0001656698,0.0002384745,0.0002192355,0.0003146938,0.0001887467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995341,0.00007793058,0.00005172238,0.0001842371,0.0000516981,0.0001002704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001221491,0.00002214253,2.932964e-7,0.0006879382,0.00001926325,0.00001363478,0.00444048,7.315877e-8,0.000004204796,0.9915264,0.001394003,0.001890373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000247273,0.00002485336,6.223515e-7,0.001988646,0.00004127081,0.000001566336,0.00001476537,0.00001072848,0.00005776294,0.2878086,0.7099507,0.00007567916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002165046,0.1152824,0.0001316651,0.001619172,0.0001821995,0.0004485189,0.00000521946,0.0001402339,0.8800255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783042,0.004842186,0.00007034319,0.001234111,0.0001712351,0.00001771038,0.000003654061,0.00001134354,0.0153452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999072153","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12512","title":"Harry W.Arthurs, Connecting the Dots: The Life of an Academic Lawyer, Montreal &amp; Kingston: McGill‐Queen's University Press/Toronto: the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History, 2019, 170 pp, hb £33.00.WilliamTwining, Jurist In Context: A Memoir, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, 382 pp, pb £24.99.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Queen (butterfly); Context (archaeology); Media studies; Art history; History; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0349188198400008,"gpt":0.2223655660411032,"spread":0.1874467462011024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006422573,0.0004235732,0.0009174134,0.000009256104,0.004451157,0.00006426384,0.001105476,0.0001623197,0.00006245828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001181888,0.0002590669,0.0008147149,0.00008438955,0.000765681,0.0005767302,0.0002292823,0.0007358941,0.000005795841],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00264582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000217848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.878365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6826655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974353,0.0004434642,0.0005414971,0.0005900241,0.0003869654,0.0006026939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980254,0.0003055141,0.0005249722,0.0005111428,0.0002990161,0.0003340216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005820537,0.00004130344,0.00001499566,0.0003948666,0.0004327422,0.000008083855,0.0193281,0.00003631448,0.00000312691,0.1705198,0.8080704,0.001092107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000498598,0.00005964118,0.00003690806,0.0002581562,0.000817312,0.00000153828,0.003082414,0.000589369,0.000001057859,0.00001480247,0.9942875,0.0003526982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008845623,0.6970246,0.0001367188,0.2442405,0.001259713,0.005325933,0.006496113,0.0003179719,0.03635281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4054174,0.4807645,0.0001155651,0.02759044,0.001931907,0.00006984023,0.000478366,0.0001725093,0.08345946],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3965718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400327859","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12906","title":"SuzanneLenon<i>and</i>DanielMonk<i>(eds)</i>, Inheritance Matters: Kinship, Property, Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023, 326 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Publishing; Law; Property (philosophy); Genealogy; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Genetics; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05595393304530727,"gpt":0.3027440661794995,"spread":0.2467901331341922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00192064,0.0004083735,0.0006581871,0.000068402,0.0008480605,0.002261489,0.0009038934,0.0002277015,0.0007988451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008181151,0.0002871398,0.0002775316,0.0008209533,0.0006622883,0.002397194,0.0002346991,0.0005739058,0.0001697266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005682213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008755285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02897878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962868,0.0004689461,0.0006241488,0.0009396764,0.0008571217,0.0008232684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986977,0.0001362463,0.0001333973,0.0005286456,0.0001396427,0.0003643493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009006484,0.0001136329,0.0003247276,0.004912086,0.0001509181,0.00007109815,0.004773646,7.53525e-7,0.00001561643,0.4452167,0.2332362,0.3111756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119839,0.00005161731,0.00006662324,0.004109805,0.00009330887,0.00001162125,0.0001075707,0.0000695302,0.000003598462,0.02557118,0.9693627,0.0004325501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003915769,0.6696702,0.0001691585,0.06204927,0.0009568254,0.000896386,0.00008355493,0.0005571862,0.2652258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4329365,0.5172566,0.000639128,0.03208622,0.0008397477,0.000388358,0.00006816864,0.0001089275,0.01567633],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7361266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}