{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"2c80e50ca43f","filters":{"venue":"Natural Language Semantics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2532343671","doi":"10.1007/s11050-016-9126-3","title":"Children interpret disjunction as conjunction: Consequences for theories of implicature and child development","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Implicature; Conjunction (astronomy); Linguistics; Philosophy of language; Syntax; Psychology; Epistemology; Pragmatics; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006875922696099795,"gpt":0.2352333974338733,"spread":0.2283574747377735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001616547,0.0001612817,0.0002075496,0.00007670339,0.0002226993,0.00007192838,0.0001074943,0.00007371244,0.0001254518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005404847,0.0001000325,0.00005429521,0.0000256813,0.0003555028,0.0001265851,0.00004320213,0.00009319074,0.000009168616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002906958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003489301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001729365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005620835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991463,0.00002578582,0.0002779675,0.0002219339,0.0001584233,0.0001696025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992462,0.0001954072,0.0001458333,0.0001552678,0.0002215524,0.00003574309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001289967,0.00003462485,0.001397675,0.000117983,0.0001717889,0.000001683602,0.03571973,1.16771e-7,0.001874299,0.9488527,0.0001205028,0.01157988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009268733,0.001583989,0.05390724,0.004659776,0.001306134,0.0005546344,0.07255983,0.000268281,0.2579342,0.5690072,0.02543944,0.003510653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718729,0.001700127,0.002976158,0.01597239,0.003241497,0.000818588,0.0002132681,0.0001691026,0.003035935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970729,0.00002346068,0.0007148704,0.0001817206,0.0009229417,0.00001405978,0.00006894996,0.00001758991,0.0009835284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3798456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4079205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016503323","doi":"10.1007/s11050-007-9017-8","title":"Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deixis; Linguistics; Philosophy of language; Future tense; Semantics (computer science); History; Computer science; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01411529588007817,"gpt":0.2598194923863278,"spread":0.2457041965062496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005995435,0.0001780888,0.0002376713,0.0002263751,0.0001340646,0.0001749178,0.000119708,0.00008332689,0.0002148003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009966595,0.0001573854,0.00004982136,0.00005648218,0.0001231847,0.0001419129,0.00006301101,0.0002641119,0.00004164455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005113957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001777055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007403852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05666975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987025,0.00004473514,0.0003836225,0.0002446238,0.0002775375,0.0003469956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991997,0.0002779171,0.0001305929,0.0001985409,0.0001293144,0.00006391268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002911631,0.0003318498,0.03582041,0.0005144283,0.0001951636,0.001841967,0.4274041,0.00000714396,0.007253072,0.4587398,0.0002955979,0.06730528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01276982,0.0009448463,0.5488455,0.002454268,0.001561388,0.0006038703,0.2466667,0.0336175,0.03315661,0.1050126,0.008038072,0.006328814],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910037,0.001151424,0.0003850176,0.002222942,0.002149207,0.0002506825,0.00001272862,0.0001000695,0.002724262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964622,0.00001925345,0.0005727386,0.0002752276,0.001736623,0.000001488278,0.00003132533,0.00002763079,0.0008735116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5130251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040265027","doi":"10.1007/s11050-007-9024-9","title":"Bare nouns and number in Dëne Sųłiné","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Noun; Numeral system; Mathematics; Linguistics; Denotation (semiotics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Arithmetic; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01506019862156062,"gpt":0.2419926711741586,"spread":0.226932472552598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001219718,0.0001737157,0.0002295346,0.00009535003,0.0001998919,0.00008481552,0.0001174572,0.00007976992,0.0005549011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003759795,0.0001536599,0.00004686431,0.00005549372,0.0001563423,0.00014431,0.00005613752,0.0002885048,0.0001392516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000387011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002452706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001999942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005264862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989542,0.00003701496,0.0002639876,0.0002334923,0.0002360908,0.0002752017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999456,0.0001180214,0.00005677263,0.0001982124,0.0001196647,0.0000513194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006477466,0.0002365134,0.05263566,0.0002558127,0.0001053859,0.001363171,0.5327391,0.000008072695,0.0008002183,0.4065554,0.001624481,0.00361141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0179413,0.0006493914,0.372703,0.002149273,0.0008840833,0.002765205,0.389579,0.04418405,0.007203444,0.08122435,0.07159004,0.009126834],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839747,0.000722924,0.0000170386,0.003025502,0.001298662,0.0001663508,0.00002696501,0.0001013409,0.0106665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946533,0.00005642388,0.0006185492,0.0003413186,0.001084976,0.000003263778,0.00005316501,0.00002761208,0.003161394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.325331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6266068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903213390","doi":"10.1007/s11050-018-9146-2","title":"Factive islands and meaning-driven unacceptability","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Triviality; Linguistics; Epistemology; Sentence; Psychology; Denotation (semiotics); Philosophy of language; Logical consequence; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Mathematics; Semiotics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006919957663771415,"gpt":0.2741501614267935,"spread":0.2672302037630221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002148957,0.0002222801,0.0002267399,0.0001218745,0.000200182,0.0002326193,0.0007809682,0.0001385181,0.00002700645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000264722,0.0001728463,0.00005555568,0.0003955757,0.0002141651,0.0006570454,0.0005544394,0.000414238,0.00002098694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005530199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003571857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005321754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009366521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985424,0.00006935281,0.0001977418,0.0005111553,0.0003209603,0.000358362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988988,0.0001036976,0.0001111883,0.0005672477,0.0002276748,0.00009137123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001134067,0.0002347613,0.01041289,0.0003363967,0.0002103082,0.0004877626,0.0821159,0.000001596886,0.1403422,0.2063263,0.004182509,0.5552359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00218941,0.00115849,0.00925464,0.000390219,0.0001313913,0.0007334886,0.00234291,0.211724,0.6752931,0.09049436,0.003177269,0.003110645],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6085967,0.01618916,0.3512244,0.003286214,0.003137919,0.001125337,0.00003625132,0.005149494,0.0112546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7888651,0.000009754002,0.2103115,0.0003710187,0.0001776332,0.000002869556,0.00000472025,0.00001236223,0.0002449424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5521253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7048466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091615204","doi":"10.1007/s11050-008-9038-y","title":"Proportions in time: interactions of quantification and aspect","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Predicate (mathematical logic); Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Operator (biology); Semantics (computer science); Scope (computer science); Homogeneous; Computer science; Quantifier (linguistics); Event (particle physics); Mathematics; Philosophy; Combinatorics; Programming language; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0228024465340584,"gpt":0.2648148303944953,"spread":0.2420123838604369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001087283,0.00009384735,0.0001588996,0.0001773004,0.0001268147,0.0000344742,0.00008282228,0.00003347935,0.0008847462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005107668,0.00008467012,0.00003641683,0.00006791514,0.0001533882,0.0001295598,0.00002715455,0.0001671155,0.00004855296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002713348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002425669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008804977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002388477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992262,0.00003188628,0.0003009988,0.0001489407,0.000173007,0.0001190048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993817,0.0001284736,0.0001586932,0.0001593165,0.0001490477,0.00002278444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009645228,0.0008610384,0.01411946,0.0003378345,0.0001743154,0.0001850242,0.3942311,0.00002767953,0.02324866,0.5569105,0.003639953,0.006168003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008029778,0.0009295872,0.5112746,0.002761509,0.001104411,0.001252715,0.155322,0.1600515,0.05147265,0.06591558,0.0367294,0.005156263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929805,0.0002796233,0.00006549016,0.002377082,0.0006172042,0.0002265897,0.0000940364,0.00006746763,0.003291976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952288,0.00001707781,0.0007426065,0.00002972736,0.0002763745,0.000005038948,0.0001601504,0.00001275405,0.003527503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4971552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021396458","doi":"10.1007/s11050-015-9113-0","title":"Experimental investigations of ambiguity: the case of most","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Advanced Algebra and Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Superlative; Quantifier (linguistics); Ambiguity; Predicate (mathematical logic); Philosophy of language; Linguistics; Computer science; Semantics (computer science); Epistemology; Philosophy; Programming language; Metaphysics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02292118244552072,"gpt":0.2936210731533737,"spread":0.2706998907078529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001129732,0.00006916004,0.0001055067,0.00003309338,0.00004416185,0.00001520973,0.000360863,0.00003012466,0.000002615017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001406262,0.00004379748,0.00003344489,0.0002951988,0.0001241157,0.0001626598,0.0001723018,0.0001084366,0.000002821215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001355622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004033977,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001318947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003573222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994571,0.0000400256,0.0001493306,0.0001071103,0.0001406137,0.0001058035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999357,0.0000594446,0.00009862836,0.0003436551,0.00009122833,0.00004998589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001648438,0.0003033942,0.0006059766,0.00007385622,0.00007342327,0.001954785,0.0623684,0.000596073,0.1737327,0.7276081,0.002174259,0.03049251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008882796,0.0002497571,0.0003210492,0.00004588016,0.00002786554,0.001512686,0.01653983,0.06389745,0.9040495,0.01182522,0.0003172863,0.0003251919],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862489,0.003331412,0.009029945,0.0004453347,0.0002847203,0.0001027872,0.000005466336,0.00004055968,0.000510952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820449,0.00000127731,0.01762055,0.0002051947,0.00003173653,0.000001481718,0.000002808377,0.000003441153,0.00008858227],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7303168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1786009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981463616","doi":"10.1007/s11050-010-9061-7","title":"Parasitic degree phrases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Degree (music); Adjective; Linguistics; Subject (documents); Specifier; Scope (computer science); Matrix (chemical analysis); Syntax; Similarity (geometry); Phrase; Computer science; Noun phrase; Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Noun; Image (mathematics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02087913086469701,"gpt":0.26177228827711,"spread":0.240893157412413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001787577,0.0002178544,0.0002242769,0.0001166047,0.0002735115,0.0002597373,0.0002667833,0.00009874676,0.001795414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001004373,0.0001838309,0.000103935,0.00004801571,0.0001883751,0.0001556862,0.00003811813,0.0005334315,0.0004275791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001984553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003348024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001035328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01010172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987513,0.00003161736,0.0002769145,0.0002593195,0.0003260638,0.0003547158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990165,0.0002170668,0.0001284085,0.0003897828,0.0001680704,0.00008017398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002284243,0.0001491633,0.001002691,0.00009923918,0.00009364573,0.0001929779,0.06969728,0.000001579133,0.01546078,0.8984519,0.0009279007,0.01390006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01212749,0.001197412,0.05466005,0.001178281,0.003520071,0.001086231,0.2284656,0.04854684,0.1424846,0.3349929,0.1591161,0.01262458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634337,0.0003532197,0.00008834084,0.006170132,0.008762125,0.0002381678,0.00005537928,0.0003562784,0.02054269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900672,0.000004294793,0.001584902,0.0004632644,0.004054821,0.00000490107,0.00008854948,0.00003977269,0.00369232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.563459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407630188","doi":"10.1007/s11050-024-09227-2","title":"Quantization and quantification: scope of bare nouns in Kaingang and beyond","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Noun; Linguistics; Scope (computer science); Psychology; Syntax; Philosophy of language; Mathematics; Quantization (signal processing); Philosophy; Computer science; Statistics; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01142743282568437,"gpt":0.2571444399294507,"spread":0.2457170071037664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002320002,0.0001174497,0.0002052219,0.0002288505,0.0001238737,0.0001093259,0.00007919103,0.00006464599,0.00003800493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005533743,0.0001098934,0.00002211154,0.0001048435,0.0001400595,0.0001223023,0.00004769653,0.0001393297,0.00000247968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001955556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002677511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007867923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005383786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991741,0.00004367069,0.0003124147,0.0002025833,0.0001346269,0.0001326587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993923,0.0001647517,0.0000876838,0.0001617661,0.0001736081,0.00001990432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002172866,0.00004687659,0.004163864,0.0004158932,0.00003337774,0.000008828527,0.06020287,0.000006586001,0.003627694,0.9265271,0.00007596087,0.004869183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009740861,0.0004818069,0.2277406,0.005573392,0.001255351,0.00005365583,0.4129258,0.1296751,0.06616511,0.1346964,0.008239103,0.003452795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807951,0.006549184,0.0004745493,0.00568404,0.001113818,0.0003064857,0.00003205425,0.00005334043,0.004991457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981833,0.0001257947,0.0007051793,0.0001581215,0.0001449641,0.000002435617,0.00006163304,0.00001103976,0.0006075981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7918307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4481324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391941255","doi":"10.1007/s11050-023-09218-9","title":"Eventive modal projection: the case of Spanish subjunctive relative clauses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation; Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Linguistics; Modality (human–computer interaction); Modal; Philosophy of language; Interpretation (philosophy); Modal verb; Present perfect; Semantics (computer science); Event (particle physics); Pragmatics; Relative clause; Philosophy of mind; Semantic interpretation; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology; Verb; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0176041700724153,"gpt":0.2693319415773575,"spread":0.2517277715049422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002890681,0.0002026721,0.0002212546,0.0001340028,0.0002998636,0.0002144668,0.0001440057,0.00008199318,0.0003534305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005561083,0.0001327864,0.0001572264,0.0001413721,0.0002875516,0.0002805102,0.00006933391,0.0004711629,0.0000606391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007975748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007146908,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003563172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006650371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988179,0.0001147283,0.0003242256,0.0002790727,0.0002427483,0.0002212895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987106,0.000503163,0.000145614,0.0002447733,0.0003670723,0.00002872792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002831843,0.00004079348,0.00002432405,0.0001346491,0.0002778411,0.0009172784,0.2072238,0.000004782289,0.0001663565,0.7881603,0.000377341,0.00264423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001420809,0.0007000251,0.0008968747,0.001253417,0.002439439,0.002555693,0.6042721,0.077875,0.01030719,0.2871751,0.009455268,0.001649109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9341775,0.0076846,0.001857653,0.01312907,0.01554648,0.001456039,0.0003638948,0.0005868798,0.02519784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922265,0.00001367584,0.0002747525,0.00007396976,0.001949189,0.00001116145,0.00003715509,0.00003457316,0.005379044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5009851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5414871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414169560","doi":"10.1007/s11050-025-09239-6","title":"Polar questions in nɬeʔkepmxcín: monopolar, bipolar, and exhaustive","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ambiguity; Philosophy of language; Semantics (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Singleton; Natural language; Contrast (vision); Natural (archaeology)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008949057745737028,"gpt":0.2551276405490495,"spread":0.2461785828033124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002929404,0.0002123021,0.0002656561,0.0003858235,0.000241128,0.0002127692,0.0001600232,0.0001113775,0.000121429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008616096,0.0001978431,0.00005421933,0.0001402538,0.0001738608,0.0001822437,0.00009483505,0.0004294481,0.00003035532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008416067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005274602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007052781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01333377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988156,0.00007479238,0.0003270684,0.0002965207,0.0001797295,0.000306318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992277,0.0002150509,0.00009347461,0.0002477066,0.0001678735,0.00004820219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003878048,0.0001032872,0.00816472,0.000143032,0.00008066183,0.0000712124,0.04970032,0.000004906374,0.0006871151,0.9354168,0.0003027003,0.005286443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009316299,0.0004855119,0.2741839,0.003747268,0.001606959,0.00009907067,0.2189896,0.05507248,0.006345897,0.2976221,0.1277028,0.004828142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9236773,0.03009862,0.0004734376,0.02249536,0.005997325,0.0008554694,0.0001728783,0.0004130927,0.01581658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993375,0.00009793199,0.0009501238,0.0004464955,0.0005079789,0.000007020667,0.0000569045,0.00002060011,0.004537954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6377947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408362091","doi":"10.1007/s11050-025-09231-0","title":"Timing of evidence and epistemic modal claims","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Jacobs Research Funds","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Modal; Philosophy of science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Epistemic modality; Philosophy; Syntax; Metaphysics; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04595098856795716,"gpt":0.2996282537600079,"spread":0.2536772651920507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002130547,0.000129814,0.0002232329,0.0001319907,0.0001317028,0.00008431793,0.000144986,0.0000615913,0.0001058525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007586994,0.0001010405,0.00005208208,0.00005529212,0.0001609012,0.0001214518,0.00008261452,0.0001831882,0.00000843507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003067803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003290361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008631835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007453423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991271,0.00003911466,0.0002909565,0.0001885478,0.0001846174,0.0001696034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990988,0.000348309,0.0001296702,0.0002091094,0.0001892911,0.00002483325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004204505,0.00005081343,0.001842981,0.0008410447,0.0001109121,0.00002757664,0.07099172,0.000007996882,0.005416368,0.9088802,0.0003054212,0.01148295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00504013,0.0005753165,0.03501585,0.01501116,0.002517047,0.0001082566,0.1758056,0.2225635,0.05331768,0.4812472,0.005301973,0.003496234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712545,0.005624662,0.0004752642,0.014084,0.00258247,0.0002961756,0.0000241246,0.0001172938,0.005541503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942568,0.00004703955,0.000932107,0.0001804433,0.0003628451,0.000002072803,0.00001040468,0.00001144704,0.004196825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.427633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4120314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413833211","doi":"10.1007/s11050-025-09238-7","title":"Semantics of obviation in Atchan: disjointness and long-distance obligatory binding","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Semantics (computer science); Philosophy of language; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language; Theology; Metaphysics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009921979835485338,"gpt":0.2497647269603048,"spread":0.2398427471248194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003053673,0.0002001069,0.0003433532,0.0003034458,0.0001280462,0.0001019163,0.0001581716,0.0001021325,0.00007789829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005870994,0.0001919078,0.00005979583,0.0001852518,0.0001782514,0.0001701787,0.000105781,0.0002619492,0.00001001793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008321249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003716883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008080202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00904108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986759,0.00005952865,0.0004746737,0.0002761715,0.000257165,0.0002565041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991118,0.0002012179,0.0002349774,0.0002536479,0.0001647712,0.00003364017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007022923,0.0001628724,0.07343494,0.001281586,0.0001134328,0.00007661405,0.08354454,0.00004003613,0.002475087,0.8330214,0.0002104926,0.00556879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01188415,0.0004270037,0.4603344,0.01006443,0.001420971,0.00005341826,0.185109,0.1274964,0.04635374,0.1471895,0.004633342,0.005033705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909319,0.00138912,0.001026906,0.002904426,0.001923568,0.0002984879,0.00003751569,0.00007049369,0.00141753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997186,0.00004819102,0.0004610971,0.000106799,0.0002608275,0.000004534998,0.00005368963,0.00002102752,0.001857828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6858319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7825772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393990725","doi":"10.1007/s11050-024-09221-8","title":"Mental states via possessive predication: the grammar of possessive experiencer complex predicates in Persian","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Possessive; Linguistics; Transitive relation; Grammar; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01392631899087739,"gpt":0.2726232411096562,"spread":0.2586969221187789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000204327,0.0001988693,0.0002273873,0.0001564686,0.0001937221,0.0002364032,0.0003343096,0.00006568244,0.0007874757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002042941,0.0001351531,0.00009404914,0.0001360401,0.0004682388,0.000225517,0.00008849153,0.0002983008,0.00002686244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008196113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000631996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001916919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001729462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985257,0.00007766646,0.0004112292,0.0002821667,0.0004315516,0.0002717023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990917,0.0002610379,0.0001641015,0.0002588077,0.0001809594,0.00004339557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003677981,0.0001197002,0.0007855273,0.0003025727,0.0001702016,0.0001032698,0.8656476,0.000026811,0.002327236,0.1248904,0.001011767,0.004578091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001122443,0.0002892351,0.008183509,0.001009568,0.0003486396,0.00009466398,0.7163184,0.2336278,0.005604887,0.026776,0.005671227,0.0009536605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9508324,0.007440921,0.0004588079,0.03226528,0.004449507,0.000987164,0.000389041,0.0002662253,0.002910624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976667,0.00005639186,0.0002782385,0.0001782267,0.0008336766,0.00002057956,0.000362267,0.00002820051,0.0005757232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.233601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8622306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403100095","doi":"10.1007/s11050-024-09223-6","title":"An experimental investigation of implicature and homogeneity approaches to free choice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Connaught Fund; University of Western Sydney; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Implicature; Philosophy of language; Linguistics; Syntax; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Pragmatics; Metaphysics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1054286058551257,"gpt":0.2501554074843684,"spread":0.1447268016292427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001623149,0.00009266862,0.0001483404,0.00008863698,0.00003335775,0.00004647489,0.0001220743,0.00007489143,0.00004299903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002375766,0.00009734638,0.00003523256,0.00008710963,0.00004355116,0.0002234921,0.00005987799,0.0001044529,0.00003536502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005836864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004387491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001215539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003237922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993757,0.000008385307,0.0002128624,0.0002717232,0.00002579171,0.0001055286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996238,0.0000236943,0.0000562264,0.0002314864,0.000002534223,0.00006229649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000295957,0.0001774006,0.5314261,0.0004788955,0.0001875242,0.00001018935,0.03057985,0.0003208932,0.1789088,0.2436618,0.00183609,0.01238287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005691783,0.000245537,0.8380798,0.00006016189,0.00002884937,0.00001890171,0.002109426,0.03124941,0.119474,0.006497826,0.001050515,0.0006163685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828572,0.01569254,0.0001847522,0.0004633467,0.0001758727,0.0001502528,0.0001091386,0.00003060936,0.0003363403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969917,0.00002344538,0.002520467,0.0001468839,0.0001036959,0.000008080435,0.00006731178,0.00001526386,0.0001231324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3066536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.396967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}