{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":37,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":37,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"4b4648abf5b5","filters":{"venue":"Negotiation Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2147508824","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2007.00126.x","title":"Insight Mediation: A Learning-Centered Mediation Model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Transformative learning; Party-directed mediation; Narrative; Transformative mediation; Epistemology; Action (physics); Sociology; Relation (database); Psychology; Alternative dispute resolution; Social science; Pedagogy; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02397372634493279,"gpt":0.3047423765918821,"spread":0.2807686502469493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001224676,0.0001624436,0.000169634,0.0003123021,0.0002971809,0.00009133419,0.0001727786,0.0002062412,0.000779511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001340808,0.0001595597,0.0001130514,0.000261315,0.00003064455,0.0002942017,0.00001127635,0.0006448072,0.0001843883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001714008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009404741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005485788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003945802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982055,0.0001382011,0.0005926369,0.0002140348,0.0004896831,0.0003598902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986661,0.0001458656,0.0004951729,0.0001679102,0.0003328821,0.000192063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00161895,0.001075696,0.1553244,0.00002460965,0.0005634769,0.0001388055,0.5361222,0.06790466,0.005195566,0.01605978,0.02695556,0.1890163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01681073,0.001073269,0.4020986,0.0000809831,0.0002025895,0.0008832701,0.03722562,0.3859494,0.000045186,0.01585055,0.1380499,0.001729908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4890773,0.0004149058,0.5023158,0.0005038115,0.002809531,0.0001179059,0.00000278242,0.00008746095,0.004670449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993802,0.0004296695,0.001637087,0.0009148991,0.00165212,0.000004343536,0.00005198925,0.00003386242,0.001474011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5047247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8535099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087607390","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00743.x","title":"Common Language, Different Meaning: What Meidators Mean When They Talk About Their Work","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Affect (linguistics); Facilitation; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Perception; Transformative learning; Diversity (politics); Psychology; Exploratory research; Social psychology; Work (physics); Sociology; Pedagogy; Social science; History; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02299010317391141,"gpt":0.2713068850848597,"spread":0.2483167819109483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003928994,0.0002772461,0.0003104428,0.0001820457,0.0002990503,0.000452133,0.000386342,0.0001823006,0.005041088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001840764,0.0002159381,0.0002073936,0.0001353184,0.00004180751,0.0003988529,0.0000260888,0.0006786239,0.0002325804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001219118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001020481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000275225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002352053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980862,0.0003369048,0.0005059279,0.000263416,0.0003778092,0.0004297232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987106,0.0001574198,0.000399329,0.0004207519,0.0001068873,0.0002049886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001589336,0.0005049287,0.03055011,0.000008006987,0.0004195516,0.00007353897,0.7737084,0.0002169164,0.0003828155,0.001388703,0.01516004,0.1774281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0128844,0.001202803,0.2677248,0.001063731,0.0005009579,0.001605604,0.5514596,0.006499346,0.0001142833,0.02628357,0.1275627,0.003098199],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830645,0.005074896,0.00266973,0.0006922148,0.003727863,0.0001636972,0.000006956268,0.0001066573,0.004493474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935718,0.002228182,0.00015091,0.001163388,0.001022925,0.000006296586,0.00001890231,0.00005636203,0.001781247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2371747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003052243","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00767.x","title":"The Challenge of Learning","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Key (lock); Psychology; Philosophy of law; Pedagogy; Rest (music); Cognitive science; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01990290225782997,"gpt":0.2911470049372865,"spread":0.2712441026794565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009965264,0.00003298991,0.0000456304,0.00003502376,0.001064962,0.00009553513,0.0001300812,0.00002721684,0.00289357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000146377,0.00002492563,0.0000452999,0.000132226,0.0000524774,0.0002107748,0.000005368971,0.0001378949,0.00005934843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002997677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004465313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003611467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000150894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991629,0.0001923386,0.0001680817,0.00004535136,0.0003063468,0.0001249548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995864,0.000110009,0.0001331102,0.00004830998,0.00008283553,0.0000393324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002387066,0.00002462366,0.003805058,0.000002049252,0.00002354226,8.521272e-7,0.02701541,0.0004062028,0.00002542773,0.05256609,0.001842389,0.9142645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001674682,0.00003335535,0.006834784,0.000007159643,0.00000844544,5.166875e-7,0.002104681,0.0002556648,0.00001185595,0.00274418,0.9877933,0.00003861154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1836834,0.000788171,0.0006917581,0.0341351,0.0006717324,0.00018695,2.295689e-7,0.00005878833,0.7797838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834777,0.003882832,0.00002447405,0.00003356158,0.0004213933,0.000001041894,4.740152e-7,0.000003156691,0.01215539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117366544","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00228.x","title":"What Makes Parties Trust Mediators?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Process (computing); Element (criminal law); Key (lock); Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02309123053450535,"gpt":0.3060804106763125,"spread":0.2829891801418072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007543229,0.0000814306,0.00009735645,0.0001466909,0.0007418544,0.0009092292,0.0001697718,0.00006688837,0.001335801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002094217,0.00007846671,0.00007515383,0.0002438986,0.00004615368,0.002183038,0.000008054625,0.000148449,0.0001194196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000973439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008893586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001430403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001276383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987041,0.0001523886,0.0002434127,0.000105333,0.000540297,0.0002544373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993942,0.00005190291,0.0001969149,0.00008234751,0.0001341603,0.0001404833],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007989512,0.000189218,0.02565581,0.000007087081,0.00006716614,0.00002043149,0.1392856,0.000166816,0.0003803285,0.1442594,0.0637746,0.6261137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007308756,0.0001123979,0.09494294,0.00004422883,0.00004768095,0.000005201685,0.02313097,0.0002553607,0.000207061,0.01686493,0.8633998,0.0002585546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7718936,0.002003013,0.002810119,0.1243578,0.01000216,0.0004864339,0.000001123342,0.0003282671,0.08811758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898563,0.002499326,0.0001069762,0.001411366,0.001962629,0.000001847393,0.000003553102,0.000005060976,0.004152926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7996252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122211520","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00771.x","title":"The Illusion of Transparency in Negotiations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Negotiation; Illusion; Social psychology; Psychology; Curse; Feeling; Political science; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01925240849677107,"gpt":0.3051105203088044,"spread":0.2858581118120333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001727916,0.00005726023,0.00008231237,0.0001437358,0.0008113029,0.00008908175,0.000166251,0.00004896232,0.0003742672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000641841,0.00004597793,0.00006242526,0.0005122388,0.00007374623,0.0003498645,0.000005642867,0.0001472121,0.00001161395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009279905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001792118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001048945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002026741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985229,0.0004067466,0.0003934606,0.00007756516,0.0004018766,0.0001974389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999254,0.0002078432,0.0002466457,0.00009227189,0.0001432262,0.00005603061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003168452,0.0001590351,0.09162155,0.000008819608,0.00003089513,0.000002926435,0.06167753,0.0009425335,0.0005876678,0.7913159,0.001680653,0.05194084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00152733,0.00007940533,0.2884164,0.00005836581,0.00004054646,0.000004412627,0.01688823,0.0004271685,0.0003081853,0.02924334,0.6627666,0.0002400675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6346406,0.001494709,0.02384831,0.01931298,0.003588557,0.0009123099,0.000002731618,0.00007005809,0.3161297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976242,0.001160072,0.0001517942,0.00005692676,0.0001024185,0.000003696503,9.938191e-7,0.000004605915,0.0008952441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7620726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6239968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042750548","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2007.00127.x","title":"Perceptions of Time and Their Impact on Negotiations in the Arabic-Speaking Islamic World","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Islam; Conceptualization; Arabic; Perception; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01787996390290813,"gpt":0.3187191103222136,"spread":0.3008391464193054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002520017,0.0001027867,0.0001240082,0.0005249197,0.0005367632,0.0001441292,0.0001858601,0.00004772213,0.0006051176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001991099,0.00006632841,0.0000959148,0.0007251058,0.000084786,0.0004493188,0.00001381071,0.0002566073,0.00002515462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001482512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006755434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003326307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005967361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987094,0.0002731705,0.000336954,0.0001067079,0.0003335884,0.000240136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989445,0.0005385206,0.0002556015,0.0001086914,0.0001070308,0.0000457024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001978357,0.0005481771,0.2726136,0.00001335695,0.0001348621,0.000009312854,0.4868074,0.003542563,0.005005596,0.07063773,0.003810724,0.1566789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005527195,0.00007800527,0.9788842,0.00004245078,0.00002027755,0.000005818315,0.01203986,0.001068906,0.00003745026,0.003182325,0.003969939,0.0001180222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9546887,0.00004858838,0.002222853,0.003166606,0.000156185,0.0002529169,0.00000286147,0.00001871599,0.03944258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998732,0.0001064872,0.00005921667,0.0002724108,0.000367719,0.000001771013,0.000005433234,0.000006675665,0.0004482794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7062707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6625613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125576498","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00773.x","title":"Ready for Prime Time: The When, Who, and Why of International Mediation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Dimension (graph theory); Prime (order theory); Alternative dispute resolution; Politics; Dispute resolution; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02810352933078411,"gpt":0.3069462785040301,"spread":0.278842749173246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001461146,0.00005203118,0.00007400798,0.00009110691,0.0003744413,0.0001259874,0.0001247737,0.00004483282,0.0005197724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008239541,0.0000416217,0.00003858808,0.00009131354,0.00005847708,0.0004094057,0.000009471064,0.00007155662,0.000006723454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005182289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007828396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000272745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007377851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990653,0.0001669559,0.000227324,0.00007861649,0.0003520835,0.0001097281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990932,0.0002110183,0.0002991608,0.00005870782,0.0002938167,0.00004405125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001393494,0.0001651432,0.04544101,0.00002385438,0.0002811995,9.071617e-7,0.08655187,0.000126155,0.00328688,0.6141,0.1478767,0.1020068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007348486,0.00004901463,0.01203449,0.00001371197,0.0000398953,0.000002679667,0.001402802,0.001148326,0.0004170128,0.01123399,0.9728349,0.00008827084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.301742,0.00182219,0.2336786,0.1686523,0.009274728,0.003853222,0.00004640388,0.0001871327,0.2807435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884726,0.0008331103,0.001724994,0.001024972,0.001123025,0.00001791753,0.00002490058,0.00001437383,0.006764072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8249582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5691143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211118972","doi":"10.1111/nejo.12376","title":"Toward a Normative Turn in Track Two Diplomacy? A Review of the Literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Normative; Negotiation; Epistemology; Sociology; Conflict resolution; Mediation; Political science; Diplomacy; Field (mathematics); Law and economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06183316530307573,"gpt":0.4268249410700567,"spread":0.3649917757669809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001888533,0.0001691546,0.0007967333,0.0001314497,0.0001877594,0.0001504269,0.0005722479,0.0001509119,0.000363113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002007165,0.0001087189,0.0006858947,0.00100868,0.00007125448,0.0003247229,0.00005347227,0.001154283,0.000007881591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003862528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009413952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005406917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007651962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961349,0.001848457,0.0009383773,0.0001489752,0.0007465234,0.0001827033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978672,0.0002084697,0.001229923,0.0001387318,0.0004761158,0.00007956648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003148765,0.0001714399,0.0001034236,0.03208673,0.0001785606,0.00003784456,0.03558372,0.000003457461,3.260614e-7,0.0138865,0.02253771,0.8954071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008591556,0.000004690586,0.00002346295,0.1872371,0.00008813386,0.00006801739,0.0001566572,0.000001043765,2.791422e-7,0.0002511092,0.8119949,0.00008872458],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001250304,0.9929733,0.00001526499,0.001023732,0.0006331158,0.000296401,0.00003464746,0.00000697859,0.005004068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001884909,0.9985169,0.00006517338,0.0003204705,0.0006522929,0.00001200449,0.00002076502,0.000009493934,0.0002143868],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8953184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5014851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131086407","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00277.x","title":"Dispute Resolution and the Politics of Cultural Generalization","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Politics; Generalization; Dispute resolution; Power (physics); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Comparative law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01447693382664075,"gpt":0.2261922906804805,"spread":0.2117153568538397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003174413,0.00005350018,0.00006236684,0.00006911319,0.0002559065,0.0001884855,0.00005129318,0.00002154904,0.0001313369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001864408,0.00003399288,0.00003780513,0.0001052324,0.00007153248,0.0008343859,0.000009983659,0.00006569489,0.00001135777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001844732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001417032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000254413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005572282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994255,0.00003050664,0.0002233329,0.00005247806,0.0001926315,0.00007554021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993955,0.00001653114,0.0002564613,0.00004123739,0.0002828275,0.000007481403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000999729,0.00001085568,0.001256325,0.000005577858,0.000009762683,1.693483e-7,0.0000999831,0.000376796,0.0001610794,0.9954098,0.002617802,0.00004183256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006654202,0.00002779132,0.02377463,0.000065036,0.0001481838,0.0001079399,0.000960569,0.1292728,0.001201216,0.3054336,0.5320351,0.0003189216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6639473,0.0006219738,0.05035413,0.01431592,0.002287491,0.0004341913,0.000003006577,0.00005658754,0.2679794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925846,0.00003921446,0.0003825364,0.005962024,0.0006107821,0.000001784917,0.00001162772,0.000004717642,0.0004026743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6899762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1968251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107365024","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00782.x","title":"Bringing Horses to Water? Overcoming Bad Relationships in the Pre-Negotiating Stage of Consensus Building","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Negotiation; Incentive; Public relations; Political science; Process (computing); Business; Economics; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1881038449592963,"gpt":0.4518151814544571,"spread":0.2637113364951609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01740336,0.0001159989,0.0001996175,0.0005483035,0.000519753,0.0004639999,0.0003704167,0.0000536325,0.0006169632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007584512,0.00007100654,0.00007699095,0.0007389123,0.00002735764,0.0004727708,0.00003475243,0.0004536679,0.00003700995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001132687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001883554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002365525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005102817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952337,0.001453025,0.00117728,0.0002085002,0.001637844,0.0002896474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965879,0.002135597,0.0004906558,0.0002790033,0.0004158537,0.00009100771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003252537,0.0000557955,0.4481874,0.000008197625,0.0000159459,0.000006829897,0.02543442,0.4940048,0.009132286,0.01583134,0.0007504261,0.006540097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002100951,0.0002285607,0.7673,0.0002200814,0.00003411542,0.0002641907,0.04006829,0.1238506,0.01482682,0.01145168,0.03916482,0.0004898432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641128,0.00004378397,0.02965633,0.00169475,0.0005265485,0.0002197963,0.00000255339,0.00000876629,0.003734628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926389,0.00000674181,0.006555907,0.0002125104,0.000104019,0.000005672086,8.757246e-7,0.000008164368,0.0004672511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3701541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9079916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039694717","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2005.00076.x","title":"Improvisation and Teaching Negotiation: Developing Three Essential Skills","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Negotiation; Mediation; Psychology; Sociology; Art; Social science; Visual arts","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007204212614606896,"gpt":0.2146741215768083,"spread":0.2074699089622014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005152199,0.0001494189,0.0001342894,0.0002528783,0.000955317,0.0007454208,0.0001228455,0.00004789195,0.0003836445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002425459,0.0001430724,0.00004105136,0.0001615901,0.00002474323,0.002602273,0.0001203966,0.0001899364,0.0001535173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008311024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002333744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002396414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001252078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988876,0.0000121828,0.0003726518,0.0001868895,0.000316352,0.0002243231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992961,0.00002935679,0.0003840056,0.00007303765,0.0001999084,0.00001755537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002505199,0.0001249125,0.2699168,0.0001241925,0.00015933,0.000005467822,0.0007815001,0.001263984,0.0004253902,0.5910308,0.02383732,0.1123052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00187882,0.0000161427,0.6683217,0.00009049245,0.000144064,0.00003209383,0.0004192839,0.01963154,0.00009658252,0.03463544,0.2740993,0.0006345034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3770422,0.0005022744,0.541026,0.04417259,0.001962793,0.0005150764,0.000001345153,0.0003157108,0.03446206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831823,0.00003847039,0.00694341,0.003108049,0.006371391,0.000003675503,0.00002319459,0.00002222576,0.0003072946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6061401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7347623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995259012","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00219.x","title":"Does Interest-Based Bargaining (IBB) Really Make a Difference in Collective Bargaining Outcomes?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Collective bargaining; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Bargaining power; Business; Political science; Economics; Market economy; Microeconomics; Law; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0282786573706958,"gpt":0.3079337610122785,"spread":0.2796551036415827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008032066,0.000123594,0.0001873338,0.0001974732,0.0007687926,0.000288072,0.0002417587,0.00008684973,0.003514866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004174946,0.00008363248,0.0000748438,0.0004675579,0.00007185298,0.0002430317,0.00001451506,0.0003693283,0.000008457482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004158753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006375773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005895345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008000041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998247,0.0004095797,0.000385439,0.0001818661,0.0004006487,0.0003754128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991736,0.0002317041,0.0001766254,0.0001037678,0.0001413486,0.0001729413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001743964,0.0004439985,0.7434708,0.000003389076,0.00009911451,0.00008397545,0.06839172,0.001246001,0.0003104453,0.05407477,0.001429323,0.130272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001464516,0.00008353814,0.9704094,0.000097894,0.00001327248,0.000001398702,0.003901463,0.0006236122,0.0000346778,0.008649637,0.01451979,0.0002008249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9344338,0.00004803412,0.001400697,0.005437622,0.000561728,0.0002584633,0.00001256906,0.00006418396,0.05778293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898999,0.0000659166,0.0005413048,0.003378074,0.0002043533,0.000008804333,0.0000034914,0.00001194308,0.005886205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2269386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013622019","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2010.00269.x","title":"A Theory Matrix for Mediators","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Perspective (graphical); Dialectic; Psychology; Bridge (graph theory); Intervention (counseling); Dialogical self; Perception; Matrix (chemical analysis); Social psychology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0128446559804233,"gpt":0.3329675315850952,"spread":0.3201228756046719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001921445,0.00005671933,0.00006979833,0.0001276953,0.0007183542,0.0001946895,0.0001644887,0.0000759935,0.001532598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007928315,0.0000536212,0.00008160057,0.000143976,0.00004939568,0.0003960027,0.00001008515,0.0001866682,0.00005270814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003424851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000125745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001340632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004906666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991485,0.00009710845,0.0001746585,0.00008375506,0.0003018225,0.000194145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992387,0.0002374869,0.000166327,0.00007077728,0.0001719946,0.0001146618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005282344,0.0000447106,0.006363451,0.000005904886,0.00003418012,0.000001152614,0.02194183,0.00001004849,0.001562956,0.8897975,0.0176513,0.06253412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006270552,0.00002926449,0.008562773,0.000004006135,0.00003561577,0.000002446584,0.002458774,0.0001796897,0.000113045,0.04342047,0.944449,0.0001178456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7580557,0.0001582375,0.1098445,0.02644301,0.0150146,0.001225161,0.000008388939,0.0002871398,0.08896328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892609,0.0000481016,0.001575851,0.0003040741,0.003018171,0.00001252246,0.00000486514,0.00001018419,0.005765351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9267977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977857017","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00187.x","title":"Mega-Simulations in Negotiation Teaching: Extraordinary Investments with Extraordinary Benefits","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Sophistication; Experiential learning; Diplomacy; International business; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Political science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1466615670446245,"gpt":0.3859594520714634,"spread":0.239297885026839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004476048,0.0002089007,0.000271906,0.0004624108,0.003773805,0.0001586231,0.000517406,0.000183649,0.0002916697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002680425,0.000187289,0.00007478603,0.001216291,0.0006253349,0.002019792,0.00005463428,0.0009937192,0.000009194798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007482586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007136661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005947739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005570283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948911,0.002458202,0.0005908469,0.0003371248,0.001128742,0.0005939598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998004,0.0007719697,0.0005481456,0.0001736222,0.0003133981,0.0001889056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001027717,0.0004095592,0.6596237,0.000006546879,0.00005092895,0.00008763633,0.1831819,0.01403371,0.0006327403,0.1066389,0.002691097,0.03254053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001659339,0.0003930435,0.931148,0.000131553,0.00003071715,0.0001887662,0.02534421,0.0006507636,0.0001168161,0.0264856,0.01318036,0.0006708411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503529,0.0001558316,0.01346187,0.003559178,0.000989929,0.0003550999,0.000004438844,0.0001256395,0.0309951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672523,0.000124149,0.03086044,0.0004411102,0.000709035,0.00001045223,0.000009132209,0.00001926508,0.0005740896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2715243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112049446","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00203.x","title":"The Practice of One Ombudsman","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Medical Association; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01666754751172351,"gpt":0.310421208748876,"spread":0.2937536612371525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001109346,0.00003782545,0.00006039828,0.00002754859,0.001376073,0.0001582004,0.0001883561,0.00003604916,0.003473252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002110262,0.00002628946,0.00004815795,0.00009965301,0.0001495866,0.0004141573,0.000004026938,0.0001649736,0.000167437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004494925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001330714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007526341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003341744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988566,0.0002917342,0.0002079414,0.0000523915,0.0004399444,0.0001513879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992238,0.0002445565,0.0001812476,0.0000824152,0.0001874581,0.00008047226],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001373923,0.0002794303,0.0006613341,0.000004230239,0.00009786418,0.000007886285,0.07539813,0.00008851105,0.0000987528,0.6457543,0.02404585,0.2534263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002306152,0.00004331016,0.004439442,0.00001061158,0.00002063713,0.00000893548,0.002502179,0.00001434705,0.00005342548,0.01947417,0.9731519,0.00005038829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2172415,0.0003924349,0.0001609149,0.01972345,0.0006347723,0.0001377366,8.929117e-7,0.00003149761,0.7616768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836455,0.001119248,0.000378038,0.0002872606,0.0009012863,7.29578e-7,3.939239e-7,0.000004671447,0.01366289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004291310","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00227.x","title":"What Difference Does a Robe Make? Comparing Mediators with and without Prior Judicial Experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Process (computing); Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01452357359814348,"gpt":0.2452840162899854,"spread":0.230760442691842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001022756,0.0001230228,0.0001482537,0.0001525407,0.0004557833,0.001324994,0.0001081716,0.00003735526,0.0001056958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003326,0.00008317751,0.00003086427,0.000205253,0.00005047055,0.001962754,0.00002540533,0.0001812402,0.00001382031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003206778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002565259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001914484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001363944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991159,0.000009790143,0.0002087653,0.0001559514,0.0003096895,0.000199889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994973,0.00001029132,0.0002468514,0.0000817969,0.0001243861,0.00003935308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003136621,0.0003577662,0.7581776,0.00004742127,0.00006991888,0.00002009546,0.003239877,0.0003700518,0.001872312,0.03504622,0.0007292028,0.1997558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001594211,0.00003867045,0.952718,0.0002120562,0.00006740042,0.00007428954,0.005009129,0.01476607,0.00006024705,0.001657516,0.02348692,0.0003154445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878513,0.0001002237,0.005535535,0.002015574,0.0007372569,0.00009781571,1.898486e-7,0.00006248479,0.003599682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969292,0.00009288492,0.0002107516,0.001660493,0.0009966785,0.000003712737,0.000002122852,0.000007861176,0.0000963354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1994404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084002522","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2007.00143.x","title":"The Paradox of Accepting One's Share of Responsibility in Mediation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Party-directed mediation; Context (archaeology); Moral responsibility; Social psychology; Psychology; Process (computing); Social responsibility; Political science; Public relations; Law and economics; Sociology; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03978653731585803,"gpt":0.3542404391273831,"spread":0.3144539018115251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006992184,0.00004354487,0.00009385379,0.0001665398,0.0002864458,0.00004238632,0.0001763979,0.00005425005,0.000189035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002157693,0.00003728885,0.00005089695,0.0004541806,0.00007094062,0.0003379807,0.00001932285,0.0001371818,0.000002691976],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001161807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001192091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001329107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003726508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983979,0.0002761753,0.0005439795,0.00007325095,0.0005400451,0.0001686525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983346,0.0007092643,0.000571381,0.00009162625,0.0002507825,0.00004232828],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003716387,0.0001442793,0.6604378,0.00002222546,0.00003156244,0.000001596567,0.06178972,0.0001731617,0.002719244,0.04493111,0.0003360182,0.2290417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003806295,0.00003394316,0.9830837,0.00002978488,0.000007417142,2.754823e-7,0.007109721,0.0001918613,0.0009456887,0.003422241,0.004742786,0.00005198661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847272,0.0001181983,0.002305052,0.001800909,0.0003353886,0.0002047144,0.000001077232,0.000009872821,0.0104976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999322,0.0001540213,0.0001727161,0.0000261197,0.0002090931,9.372597e-7,0.000001930449,0.000003014076,0.0001101435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3226459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2583117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160896102","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2005.00064.x","title":"A Study of the Emergence of Cooperation in Mediation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Party-directed mediation; Order (exchange); Process (computing); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02930148637681134,"gpt":0.3274014130096869,"spread":0.2980999266328756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009264831,0.0000368428,0.00007211271,0.000120778,0.0001627499,0.00001907269,0.0001452298,0.00002815659,0.0003214091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002933253,0.00002960397,0.00002856583,0.0004887315,0.00002488181,0.0003879606,0.00001484227,0.00008327702,0.000002823454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004512156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008535317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001842216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009058478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988118,0.0002723411,0.0003604839,0.00005598259,0.0004213415,0.00007801326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993371,0.00004132805,0.0003471592,0.00007119883,0.000182834,0.00002031538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003791792,0.0007833282,0.6123953,0.000007588738,0.00002897072,4.336165e-7,0.3095542,0.01459756,0.002153765,0.01269771,0.001388332,0.04635487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001444769,0.0001350663,0.9541185,0.00002768004,0.0000299657,6.036469e-7,0.03455855,0.002532899,0.0008568281,0.0002911808,0.005907978,0.00009598985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935119,0.00002904956,0.0003599385,0.002085721,0.0003236284,0.0002698201,2.765306e-7,0.00000456306,0.003415116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994686,0.00007364821,0.00004325756,0.00003618675,0.0002063044,0.000003040859,5.387248e-7,0.000002265643,0.0001661717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3417232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5054843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849738471","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00311.x","title":"Rethinking Conflict: Perspectives from the Insight Approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Construct (python library); Conflict resolution research; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Conflict resolution; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1077510748919364,"gpt":0.2861986241689787,"spread":0.1784475492770423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00101219,0.000085846,0.00008940463,0.00006961247,0.001323058,0.0002760537,0.0003442776,0.00007605691,0.001664852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002841427,0.00006355665,0.00008177443,0.0002420771,0.0001262261,0.0006069996,0.00003330176,0.0003088073,0.00005339924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009934133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009576545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009854691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003459496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985977,0.0003683108,0.0002097344,0.0001484999,0.0004780147,0.0001977442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992189,0.0001369074,0.0002393217,0.0001358051,0.0001893861,0.00007964498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001678496,0.0000452262,0.008680614,6.912164e-7,0.00004729332,0.000001628387,0.8848048,0.000004207027,0.00004012004,0.09845301,0.002540804,0.005364827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009140375,0.00005477576,0.2680324,0.00003210684,0.0001261383,0.000005411518,0.1753028,0.0005281632,0.000104586,0.03354491,0.5210084,0.0003462808],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1813061,0.001592664,0.01972122,0.007922246,0.001581409,0.0004779394,0.000003867236,0.0001709892,0.7872236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951577,0.0005210511,0.001172618,0.0005865369,0.001477504,0.000004443701,0.000004651356,0.000009161645,0.001066316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8138516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131326349","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2004.00036.x","title":"Constraining a Principal’s Choice: Outcome versus Behavior Contingent Agency Contracts in Representative Negotiations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Negotiation; Outcome (game theory); Principal–agent problem; Agency (philosophy); Microeconomics; Economics; Social psychology; Business; Actuarial science; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Management; Computer science; Corporate governance; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1213577675245686,"gpt":0.4255336989870671,"spread":0.3041759314624985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001348589,0.0001702391,0.0002371266,0.0003832697,0.0008281464,0.0003455205,0.0002596452,0.0001263485,0.0006778176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002101651,0.0001876868,0.0001354516,0.000567144,0.0001353264,0.001101121,0.00003952635,0.0004610868,0.00006780556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006971871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000439592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001093795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00689846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974434,0.0002885324,0.00077653,0.0002719602,0.0007163371,0.0005031915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983979,0.000338843,0.0006091643,0.0001522983,0.0002724176,0.0002293759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001732848,0.0006273315,0.7425559,0.00001131634,0.0001343497,0.0001529327,0.1471733,0.002699636,0.0006279923,0.0783043,0.0003395402,0.0272002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00803653,0.0001170862,0.9585143,0.0000593976,0.0001258335,0.000007907877,0.01238789,0.0000908761,0.00007755795,0.0009776,0.01924445,0.0003606161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609294,0.0001113906,0.002489281,0.00516889,0.002430596,0.0008580442,0.000005081758,0.0001050456,0.02790227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977865,0.0001110994,0.0006971059,0.000221635,0.000644978,0.00004359391,0.00001334007,0.00001567535,0.0004660509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2159584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7653647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114936236","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00741.x","title":"A Framework for Understanding Consensus-Building Initiation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Process (computing); Political science; Washington Consensus; Table (database); Management science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Data mining; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1338850562670031,"gpt":0.293890849436365,"spread":0.1600057931693618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005112477,0.000116869,0.000114557,0.0004559552,0.0005998138,0.0006385935,0.000111305,0.00006814155,0.0008067205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005353669,0.000117214,0.00007887309,0.0004972194,0.00001967451,0.0005135339,0.00003078776,0.0001865029,0.0001811426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001629345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008267621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.695197e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002395317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990187,0.00001078225,0.0003659326,0.0001407239,0.0002313271,0.0002325307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990613,0.00009628695,0.0004254032,0.00009034665,0.0003132217,0.00001340406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001230008,0.00003417843,0.0008481054,0.00003892921,0.00002102931,0.000002131053,0.0001172842,0.00004437786,0.00006030489,0.9856539,0.01134513,0.001822329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001222907,0.00001823295,0.0003409574,0.0001076091,0.00006031428,0.00001299647,0.001615089,0.06502395,0.00002635046,0.8711201,0.06018689,0.0002645861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005292227,0.00006564571,0.8031047,0.009260908,0.002478849,0.0003540465,0.000001206033,0.0001408516,0.1793016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824155,0.000006127357,0.01004089,0.003977465,0.003302561,0.00001061798,0.000006897303,0.00002290238,0.0002170361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8833023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606272886","doi":"10.1111/nejo.12177","title":"Precedents in Negotiated Decisions: Korea–Australia Free Trade Agreement Negotiations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Free trade agreement; Political science; International trade; Philosophy of law; Agreement; International economics; Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics; Free trade; Comparative law; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1197231724402521,"gpt":0.3946480700785601,"spread":0.274924897638308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001798276,0.0002281182,0.0002678542,0.0004948333,0.003079378,0.001529822,0.001433939,0.0002015,0.002218355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003313937,0.0002392465,0.0001593458,0.0003446141,0.0001660315,0.002297868,0.0001589924,0.0004705444,0.0002171205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004830259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002212708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001700682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01773115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996679,0.0003868294,0.000781927,0.0003450378,0.001178269,0.0006289181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976751,0.0002046932,0.0009041587,0.0007314012,0.0001730401,0.0003116636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001969334,0.0009727137,0.7043225,0.00001975004,0.0002567479,0.00009924036,0.04773161,0.001229938,0.0005868276,0.05974454,0.0907683,0.09407093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00254146,0.00006050325,0.9233938,0.00012936,0.00005872505,0.000005798592,0.001988463,0.0004195503,0.0000695147,0.008873191,0.06213395,0.0003256982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8666908,0.000198164,0.00424385,0.04794614,0.005961508,0.001555502,0.0000264049,0.0001671478,0.0732105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936387,0.000639738,0.0006311929,0.0002388648,0.0009043229,0.00002231442,0.00002062,0.00001964207,0.003884593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2190713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085269292","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00249.x","title":"Supporting Accountability in the Field of Mediation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Mediation; Field (mathematics); Comprehension; Work (physics); Public relations; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02205254047965057,"gpt":0.2928167469691864,"spread":0.2707642064895358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006377187,0.00004953222,0.00006962594,0.0001427242,0.0001210933,0.0001374585,0.0001312329,0.00003518598,0.002060625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004917496,0.00003637146,0.00005467178,0.0003454413,0.00001252708,0.0009239846,0.00001369416,0.0001695992,0.00006039026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002301824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007602783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005807129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009272572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992185,0.00001985903,0.0003222658,0.00006219901,0.000257305,0.0001199206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993624,0.0001045982,0.0003302673,0.00008552396,0.0001116329,0.000005561053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006053104,0.001077957,0.5473833,0.0001522871,0.00004288477,0.00001112274,0.003592465,0.00139806,0.0008165357,0.07696202,0.2123315,0.1561713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001310729,0.00003071628,0.5316762,0.00004732535,0.0000498712,0.0000313186,0.005998747,0.05581944,0.00007659042,0.006343391,0.398383,0.0002326744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7853851,0.0001350254,0.005113402,0.03097217,0.001118988,0.000250275,0.000001270301,0.0000399003,0.1769839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966159,0.00001554356,0.00003244638,0.002664376,0.0006161078,0.000002958646,0.000002713572,0.000003339758,0.00004661809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2112308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010132249","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00251.x","title":"The Negative Impact of Attorneys on Mediation Outcomes: A Myth or a Reality?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04280736492586102,"gpt":0.3954400677989413,"spread":0.3526327028730802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001875402,0.0001003187,0.0001357379,0.0001327476,0.0009148104,0.0002075153,0.0002518086,0.00008410394,0.0007673326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003009105,0.00005735357,0.000164123,0.0003439246,0.0001176597,0.0004400256,0.00001706567,0.0003357596,0.00003468972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001537329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003758094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004747827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003900473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983265,0.0003033564,0.0003634995,0.0001071348,0.0006754916,0.0002240211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979066,0.0009112196,0.0005838781,0.0001597725,0.0003189434,0.0001196215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001404532,0.0006063965,0.3258147,0.00002047088,0.0007681861,0.00001163238,0.1583762,0.0007316071,0.002692133,0.2101574,0.06437487,0.2350418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001410472,0.0004044131,0.92636,0.00002143719,0.0000549519,0.000002730475,0.004077048,0.0006991887,0.0001468798,0.007469696,0.05914677,0.000206433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9365164,0.00001281995,0.001032034,0.02484565,0.002491263,0.0005776315,0.000008202667,0.00006264213,0.03445335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973393,0.000131756,0.00007905132,0.0001867355,0.0006794925,0.000006326401,0.000003453561,0.000007786596,0.001566072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6005453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8401753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855957090","doi":"10.1111/nejo.12054","title":"Conflict Assessment in Energy Infrastructure Siting: Prospects for Consensus Building in the Northern Pass Transmission Line Project","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Process (computing); Negotiation; Citizen journalism; Environmental planning; Public relations; Political science; Business; Environmental resource management; Management science; Computer science; Engineering; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02023813440293928,"gpt":0.3304840525108197,"spread":0.3102459181078805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001851412,0.0001235844,0.0001914454,0.0001581764,0.0005461002,0.0002075673,0.0002765701,0.0001396884,0.00002833171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005061433,0.00009445698,0.00008068333,0.0004703362,0.00007035695,0.0001641574,0.000009167552,0.0003116443,1.990849e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003626292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006343913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001655776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01411245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979438,0.0006155012,0.0003873462,0.0001773312,0.0005152231,0.0003608285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988876,0.0004666845,0.0003136005,0.00008077179,0.000184085,0.00006728451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001495372,0.0002052074,0.1207098,0.00003307924,0.00003684451,0.00002056108,0.06192845,0.05931785,0.003677744,0.08830019,0.001604407,0.6640163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008346532,0.0006451938,0.1540639,0.0004214415,0.00006228521,0.00005393797,0.09696519,0.05550051,0.0009836932,0.07290233,0.6090795,0.0009754656],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9331053,0.0001995234,0.0514046,0.009707342,0.0006448757,0.000602787,0.000002773494,0.00004418629,0.004288569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931461,0.0001223732,0.005019486,0.0003835698,0.001208681,0.00003758874,0.000004495276,0.00001455522,0.00006315489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6630408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7875077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026637938","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2005.00060.x","title":"Compensation Schemes and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Beyond the Obvious","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Dispute resolution; GRASP; Reading (process); Resolution (logic); Political science; Law and economics; Core (optical fiber); Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Dispute mechanism; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0156531217613471,"gpt":0.3615279847738509,"spread":0.3458748630125038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001047855,0.00008519811,0.0000756151,0.00005339845,0.001247692,0.0002400859,0.00012818,0.00006122432,0.0006516828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001125401,0.00006668163,0.00003983885,0.0001078322,0.0001529805,0.0007305617,0.00002812209,0.0001915381,0.00008417339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003398041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005843529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006924961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003208964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986498,0.0002733884,0.0002128068,0.0001145011,0.0005032363,0.0002462248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994656,0.00006089747,0.0002107132,0.0000900562,0.00003100581,0.0001416737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002615135,0.0008006357,0.02924749,0.00002095444,0.0003304917,0.00002020192,0.139319,0.008539733,0.04310263,0.5362847,0.0406017,0.2014709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004871566,0.0005533372,0.1300867,0.0001027265,0.0002758757,0.0002673213,0.0354102,0.02198733,0.00590944,0.0544945,0.7449322,0.001108805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8756073,0.0005062884,0.0774918,0.03544216,0.0007389206,0.0004432546,0.000006843597,0.00006035064,0.009703091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960374,0.0003616017,0.001721286,0.0009288089,0.0004788119,0.000002856189,0.000005276429,0.000008661573,0.000455326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7043306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9596362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573467095","doi":"10.1111/nejo.12172","title":"Sport Mediation: Mediating High-Performance Sports Disputes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Philosophy of law; Psychology; Law; Public law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01635534872521845,"gpt":0.2302006859946524,"spread":0.2138453372694339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008976352,0.0001651628,0.00019843,0.0001539837,0.001821599,0.00133922,0.0004336331,0.0001174586,0.0004524498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003867646,0.0001446134,0.00005950466,0.0001227144,0.00007417922,0.005192605,0.0001109202,0.0003962125,0.0001623749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003392763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007120903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000711329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002304877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983829,0.000003937036,0.0004291178,0.0001798697,0.0007168541,0.0002873478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979321,0.00002192362,0.001222259,0.0003263613,0.0004666364,0.00003073541],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002847009,0.0000458478,0.9317833,0.0001034458,0.00002228282,0.00004011127,0.0001112014,0.0007102417,0.00007801853,0.02502669,0.002092964,0.0399574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006205504,0.00000492443,0.9567414,0.00007496362,0.00004026236,0.00002675417,0.00004599194,0.006580467,0.00006699997,0.002939543,0.0326309,0.0002272208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762999,0.00003853522,0.000846019,0.008467372,0.00464029,0.00008817775,8.149528e-7,0.0000827033,0.009536163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865956,0.00008888574,0.0004376347,0.001305933,0.01136509,0.000004046569,0.00003328757,0.00002578577,0.0001436937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03973018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044933191","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2006.00083.x","title":"The Risks of Peace: Implications for International Mediation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Negotiation; Mediation; Settlement (finance); Political science; International law; Law and economics; Law; Business; Sociology; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0672018413557321,"gpt":0.4156899184016398,"spread":0.3484880770459077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009161736,0.00003323577,0.00003998449,0.00005753201,0.0008203087,0.0001197102,0.0001800245,0.00002992653,0.0001217766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003326657,0.00002597239,0.0000620254,0.0000926412,0.00006376277,0.0001851215,0.00000894512,0.00005446447,0.000007816292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009935137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007741212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001371785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993004,0.00007189086,0.0002436546,0.0000545369,0.0002276908,0.0001017785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990191,0.0001288807,0.0002709306,0.00005943141,0.0004895952,0.00003199955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002832925,0.00009817706,0.03801075,0.000002933469,0.00003855623,6.692444e-8,0.0049798,0.001357149,0.0006868104,0.5216467,0.2848583,0.1482923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002728313,0.0000113472,0.2631738,0.00000217812,0.000009817605,5.494837e-7,0.001237038,0.0001962295,0.00002382281,0.01832052,0.7167158,0.0000360831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09003857,0.0005088035,0.482917,0.2645253,0.009881185,0.001441066,0.00004662443,0.0001258214,0.1505156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934299,0.000788713,0.001519909,0.0001147491,0.001675706,0.00002434854,0.0000183256,0.000004566399,0.0024238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9033913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6309234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123243168","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2006.00101.x","title":"Confectionery and Conflict Resolution? What <i>Chocolat</i> Reveals about Mediation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Metaphor; Conflict resolution; Psychology; Directive; Mediator; Privilege (computing); Style (visual arts); Social psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Pleasure; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law; Art; Computer science; Psychotherapist; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01464364797998318,"gpt":0.2806336728020575,"spread":0.2659900248220743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001548116,0.0001178469,0.000143246,0.0002391828,0.001269037,0.001092691,0.0001040271,0.0001260137,0.000406614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002074982,0.0001246103,0.00006582012,0.0003172459,0.0001070749,0.002439743,0.00002076795,0.0002037822,0.00004643354],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001926395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001110966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004121963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008435592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981989,0.0003405098,0.0004191207,0.000187978,0.0005686748,0.0002847631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988986,0.0001619038,0.0003996013,0.00009652961,0.0003137522,0.0001296565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001856783,0.0003645216,0.2436797,0.00006718648,0.0001753392,0.00002217211,0.03418936,0.001374179,0.006056031,0.4494002,0.1406543,0.1238313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001198502,0.00005371804,0.2619207,0.00006686452,0.00005834775,0.00001544836,0.002597027,0.0008060192,0.00007275635,0.007253068,0.7256849,0.000272626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8207862,0.007172452,0.02573184,0.0348519,0.007051301,0.001863052,0.000006794686,0.0004887052,0.1020478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877708,0.004698756,0.0002158596,0.0006984037,0.00284545,0.00001650354,0.00002432416,0.00001386815,0.00371606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5850306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211911331","doi":"10.1111/nejo.12377","title":"Teaching Entrepreneurial Negotiation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Family Business Performance and Succession","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Entrepreneurship; Class (philosophy); Public relations; Sociology; Entrepreneurship education; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0126597485082997,"gpt":0.2225846832459292,"spread":0.2099249347376295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003700415,0.0001344081,0.000142937,0.0002178726,0.0006229006,0.0008110334,0.0001448376,0.00007370505,0.001156749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002649374,0.0001220191,0.00009863392,0.000317352,0.00001308291,0.003565914,0.00007996844,0.0003564972,0.0004197175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004588949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007660881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000465386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001943258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987833,0.00002788463,0.0003594029,0.0001907913,0.0004037034,0.0002349039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991149,0.00002461983,0.000319765,0.0001524614,0.0003691279,0.00001918316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002451935,0.0006481436,0.496218,0.0003010074,0.0001150155,0.0003111755,0.001039114,0.007130627,0.03931115,0.02790284,0.08643816,0.3403396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004231791,0.00002191052,0.3532017,0.0002955,0.0001684444,0.00029668,0.001218835,0.04595805,0.001727029,0.01200699,0.5800312,0.0008418397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615343,0.0001481032,0.005865423,0.00525864,0.004491365,0.00007536936,6.322084e-7,0.0001187349,0.02250741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865767,0.00003466898,0.0003545548,0.003809252,0.008615426,0.000002439682,0.00005243349,0.0000202681,0.0005342003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4935931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989198639","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00281.x","title":"The Security Council: Adapting to Address Contemporary Conflicts","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Security council; Political science; Cold war; Public administration; Security studies; International security; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07013457932889765,"gpt":0.3116653134287214,"spread":0.2415307340998237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00356521,0.00008515271,0.0001025237,0.0000266114,0.001992434,0.0004750089,0.0002495257,0.00008119076,0.00009353507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002653233,0.00006804684,0.00006846515,0.0002271202,0.00008966146,0.0003165048,0.00001594097,0.0003058656,0.00005744732],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003119372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001162706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003601561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003165996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978094,0.0005163917,0.0002722757,0.0001145143,0.0009558058,0.0003316108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984925,0.0002155555,0.000181584,0.0001098958,0.0007132986,0.0002871904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007918152,0.0001081393,0.01063462,0.000006146097,0.00007430767,0.0000388232,0.1870703,0.0005130185,0.00009425116,0.570115,0.2287,0.002566185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002498583,0.00002972836,0.0005549091,0.00001453208,0.000004646205,0.00001209099,0.01750294,0.0001471019,0.000008519837,0.00497229,0.9764066,0.00009673547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2592604,0.002066765,0.001683756,0.02752773,0.003388218,0.000617659,0.00001355652,0.0001139599,0.7053279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970272,0.0001771687,0.0000969337,0.001633827,0.0003033122,0.000002973678,9.446923e-7,0.000006760244,0.0007508823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7477067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162222815","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2001.tb00245.x","title":"The On-line Auction Phenomenon: Growth, Strategies, Promise, and Problems","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Auction theory; Generalized second-price auction; Eauction; Computer science; Phenomenon; Reverse auction; Spectrum auction; Microeconomics; Revenue equivalence; Economics; Common value auction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.104967024343784,"gpt":0.3664773525162363,"spread":0.2615103281724523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002320731,0.0000983534,0.0001021503,0.0001168371,0.001469153,0.001010614,0.0002892593,0.00004821134,0.0003960686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004795804,0.00005750513,0.00004785984,0.0005167489,0.0001154085,0.0006830257,0.00002425246,0.0002720694,0.0002187039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000418023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008971441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001579008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008135642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982489,0.0002121841,0.000512885,0.0002134381,0.0006406258,0.00017193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983803,0.0004579176,0.000414573,0.0002226781,0.000397484,0.0001270391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003199586,0.0002730854,0.002782363,0.000004317691,0.0000635537,0.000006165023,0.002978027,0.02227169,0.001112862,0.6382785,0.02181622,0.3100932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005343659,0.0001922481,0.005820641,0.000009106102,0.00001010867,0.0003939245,0.002844129,0.002715643,0.0001056232,0.7911237,0.1961348,0.0001156606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3605088,0.000767901,0.5203625,0.0637926,0.002364228,0.000987301,0.000009641893,0.0001540941,0.05105295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941849,0.0003871513,0.0001884685,0.0002304767,0.0007364203,0.00002037088,0.000001761262,0.000007944963,0.004242497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6336761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036362989","doi":"10.1111/nejo.12329","title":"Triangulation of Salient Studies to Date on Trust-Building in Mediation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Salient; Triangulation; Test (biology); Sociology; Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Media studies; Psychology; Geography; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.116628073995321,"gpt":0.4066823853802097,"spread":0.2900543113848887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001002487,0.00006828107,0.0001442919,0.000262105,0.0001696575,0.00005253247,0.0001149452,0.00003983423,0.0001150045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001524025,0.00006829568,0.00004417987,0.0006127868,0.00001886723,0.0003343349,0.00002108455,0.0001050271,0.00002038841],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001277595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005724817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000257301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009801745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986144,0.0002144451,0.000390621,0.0001245015,0.0005126751,0.0001433428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992797,0.0001253629,0.0002862714,0.00005198639,0.0001540367,0.0001025919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006992435,0.0001988971,0.09382103,0.00006637152,0.0001518306,0.00001092345,0.5631168,0.03740857,0.007609355,0.09659205,0.01015678,0.1901681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009407209,0.00171716,0.6078398,0.0005273465,0.0001974337,0.000001390779,0.09133199,0.02240892,0.008758539,0.01117176,0.2454981,0.00114033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9557493,0.00008202034,0.005022883,0.0354834,0.0006673546,0.0003749522,0.000001339109,0.00003001284,0.002588784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997635,0.0001645611,0.000469831,0.001051473,0.0006021243,0.000004512604,0.000003360159,0.000005722129,0.0000634143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5140188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2785017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169533127","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00305.x","title":"How We Feel about the Deal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"ASTER","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07840073462613543,"gpt":0.2905375490812439,"spread":0.2121368144551085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000845107,0.00006793383,0.00006411773,0.0000807631,0.001124099,0.0004215518,0.0002769463,0.00005200952,0.001016945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001247113,0.00004903715,0.00007493507,0.0002151993,0.00007770432,0.0006459733,0.00002197634,0.0001837552,0.00007557821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000662794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008796204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001282875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000649252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989213,0.0002074478,0.0001459329,0.00008682851,0.0004173596,0.0002211347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994228,0.00005666874,0.0002041411,0.00009366892,0.0001327438,0.00008998309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051574,0.0001042517,0.02714296,0.000007514955,0.0001048934,0.00001190073,0.2304887,0.000008773202,0.0001369003,0.3297251,0.06068971,0.3515276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002580589,0.00002605518,0.07606922,0.00001051956,0.00002910137,0.000004083603,0.007877601,0.00006949221,0.00005280998,0.005920323,0.9095879,0.00009488631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.102297,0.00130935,0.03549653,0.2252626,0.005146859,0.0008546311,0.000002573894,0.0002766062,0.6293538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868793,0.0007821373,0.0003709237,0.000518452,0.001211278,0.000004378664,9.964242e-7,0.000007272202,0.01022529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8845823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973468005","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00774.x","title":"New Problem-Solving Scholarship: An Historical Tale with a Happy Ending","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Adversarial system; Scholarship; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Philosophy of law; Negotiation theory; Quarter (Canadian coin); Epistemology; Psychology; Public relations; Social science; Law; Political science; Comparative law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05375713648181519,"gpt":0.3554056204114526,"spread":0.3016484839296374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00148354,0.00007563933,0.00008011128,0.0001555629,0.001400931,0.0007960658,0.0001405793,0.00006995945,0.002331579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00165178,0.00006838537,0.00002934141,0.0006505642,0.00002509864,0.0034949,0.00000380233,0.0007182478,0.00003666476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001075285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002712054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007641275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007986382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985021,0.0004156758,0.0002410429,0.0001282503,0.000480491,0.0002323833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988396,0.0001303667,0.0002867646,0.00009222544,0.0003419331,0.0003091538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003665356,0.0002900556,0.04982209,0.000005966459,0.0000441668,0.00001099756,0.07462139,0.0001431003,0.0008515234,0.8153426,0.03784821,0.02098323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003083877,0.00007692735,0.003245805,0.0000240275,0.00001884492,0.00008122,0.007155522,0.000008059964,0.0000624794,0.005898188,0.9829767,0.0001438879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06979887,0.0004678742,0.165998,0.09711824,0.004627624,0.000580071,0.000001344806,0.0002628334,0.6611452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.934239,0.0000283524,0.05545837,0.0006443519,0.0009282367,0.000003544566,0.000001974754,0.0000135574,0.008682598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106311730","doi":"10.1162/ngtn.a.41","title":"Domestic Veto Players and Negotiation Dynamics: Canadian Internal Politics and International Agreements","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Negotiation; Power (physics); Politics; Subject (documents); Element (criminal law)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009286008594494122,"gpt":0.3031540038672056,"spread":0.2938679952727115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003807083,0.00008264861,0.0001011338,0.0001822412,0.0005602852,0.0003493204,0.0001409076,0.0000818743,0.00009559422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005478815,0.00008399412,0.00002730105,0.0001082278,0.0001104624,0.0003630177,0.00002680741,0.0001802964,0.000007638926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009465771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004924394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1473956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1894104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989532,0.00009299249,0.0002550545,0.0001306258,0.0002620962,0.0003060428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992166,0.00009326746,0.0001281418,0.0000508054,0.0001465919,0.0003645891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007204605,0.00001565527,0.2172487,0.00001020847,0.00006173852,0.00001086952,0.002602145,0.0000192346,0.000007852095,0.7622349,0.002363756,0.01541772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001227453,0.00004821374,0.7144868,0.0002429197,0.00004716228,0.00007477363,0.003247315,0.008576774,0.000005168034,0.03846785,0.2333234,0.0002522418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8416255,0.0006126355,0.01221669,0.03368365,0.005224288,0.0002954643,0.00009133597,0.00003626906,0.1062142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926772,0.0002148316,0.0001423764,0.0008995746,0.0003709655,0.0000021162,0.000005338356,0.000004469273,0.005683188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.723767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.858282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116082608","doi":"10.1162/ngtn.a.54","title":"A Tale of Two Cities: Amazon HQ2 Negotiations in New York and Virginia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Amazon rainforest; Politics; Surprise; Stakeholder","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02034254427402677,"gpt":0.3169139940140778,"spread":0.2965714497400511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006628095,0.00008500611,0.0001527525,0.0004869231,0.000312755,0.0001537431,0.0001471604,0.00006309919,0.0003835958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002774356,0.0000928614,0.00005308763,0.0007369462,0.00007712314,0.0004497257,0.00002836136,0.0001701856,0.000007381168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001170182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004516472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001269396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005387737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988294,0.0001668367,0.0003897347,0.0001288167,0.0002899372,0.0001952769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993272,0.0001651332,0.0002359527,0.00008994093,0.00009612885,0.00008558697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006965287,0.0001381219,0.4244282,0.00004225342,0.00008982736,0.000004053355,0.0777893,0.0006659891,0.0008199321,0.3886133,0.02445608,0.08288329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005530575,0.0001202037,0.6142679,0.0003629103,0.0001245928,0.000004326505,0.02343542,0.002431446,0.0002939581,0.05962322,0.2933755,0.0004298699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8624901,0.001398211,0.01654143,0.01474157,0.001430372,0.0005450567,0.000003883118,0.00006818637,0.1027813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915751,0.0002938403,0.0005389181,0.0003017216,0.000272091,0.000002921003,0.000003505949,0.000005362601,0.007006573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3289901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4200106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}