{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":17,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"bbdffd7c95e3","filters":{"venue":"New Criminal Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2738361053","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2017.20.3.391","title":"Mandatory Sentencing Around the World and the Need for Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Doctrine; Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Relevance (law); Criminal justice; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Anthony Gray","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09892597009970915,"gpt":0.3910029223963675,"spread":0.2920769522966583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06869956,0.0005224354,0.001539145,0.004357081,0.005763776,0.01218314,0.006441632,0.0160713,0.01063687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1766278,0.0008468525,0.0009769691,0.004547931,0.01841573,0.01885512,0.006440125,0.01516047,0.001019265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01927178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05564116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02943107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03398724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9592233,0.02120623,0.003152605,0.004150748,0.008546308,0.003720896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8563385,0.08655085,0.01344698,0.01036248,0.02539923,0.007902037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003530175,0.0001628336,0.000749863,0.001197694,0.0000324387,0.0001763192,0.002436407,0.0007951434,0.0001471636,0.7908453,0.05804,0.1453817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007349201,0.0001553117,0.006708688,0.01151445,0.00004705292,0.0003965351,0.00547249,0.0006265131,0.0003060474,0.1975828,0.7770023,0.0001143611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007577456,0.09326778,0.004646309,0.8499409,0.004582012,0.00009037414,0.0001523702,0.0001085195,0.03963432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.384494,0.1241012,0.02423901,0.4403266,0.01228095,0.0005469871,0.0004961967,0.0001749938,0.01334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06869956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3633224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022522540","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2015.18.4.510","title":"Restorative Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Popularity; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Engineering; Social psychology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Alana Saulnier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Diane Sivasubramaniam","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1619615114029444,"gpt":0.4086180467847368,"spread":0.2466565353817924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009509604,0.0007877756,0.0009132757,0.003124525,0.01020859,0.007556362,0.003050489,0.00573432,0.03150991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02383887,0.0003747386,0.001110885,0.00162104,0.01466586,0.006916676,0.01343021,0.007376363,0.006321789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00441107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01147555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003980003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009522877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9854902,0.004681662,0.0007990669,0.001702247,0.005483078,0.001843694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885247,0.003314365,0.001314625,0.002568077,0.002886777,0.001391467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002001166,0.0001761019,0.001929009,0.0008221657,0.000047617,0.0003648034,0.007513347,0.0003366773,0.0009526526,0.6568447,0.1060132,0.2249797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007026509,0.00005834652,0.002401296,0.001262035,0.00001505997,0.0005290452,0.00475495,0.0001143897,0.0004465286,0.1280323,0.8623511,0.00002787963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01101157,0.02544533,0.03104346,0.07275517,0.003695249,0.0004763085,0.0002573384,0.0004604091,0.8548551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5230364,0.04026394,0.05423094,0.07537933,0.003773342,0.001134934,0.0006092517,0.0008383254,0.3007336],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03150991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1054111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306176763","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2016.19.1.42","title":"Engineering Comprehensible Youth Interrogation Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Waiver; Interrogation; Comprehension; Psychology; Computer security; Social psychology; Political science; Mathematics education; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Joseph Eastwood","is_ca":true},{"name":"Brent Snook","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kirk Luther","is_ca":true},{"name":"Stuart Freedman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06378796767360388,"gpt":0.3350382557161015,"spread":0.2712502880424976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006170688,0.0002653735,0.0002053508,0.001014573,0.0003045256,0.002163762,0.0005128979,0.0005946083,0.0034012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03784465,0.0001965759,0.0003216392,0.000373328,0.001228952,0.003023783,0.001818217,0.0006108793,0.0004528583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005075299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001365226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001341702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001798415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950896,0.002960551,0.0004049366,0.0002477773,0.001019907,0.0002772131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729977,0.0152981,0.005208915,0.002308444,0.003718971,0.0004679034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002926528,0.000527498,0.170261,0.001631155,0.00009289961,0.001241706,0.07271553,0.001932612,0.03199312,0.04587144,0.005783775,0.6676565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001151732,0.002542401,0.5770556,0.003263312,0.0002820891,0.007916733,0.07527555,0.00899114,0.05713126,0.07244344,0.1947838,0.0001995808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9330029,0.002440492,0.02394726,0.001669826,0.00003815097,0.0002264298,0.0001942949,0.0001474932,0.0383331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799619,0.001791274,0.01501271,0.0002125506,0.00002387884,0.00009674,0.0001489137,0.0000239247,0.002728131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006170688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03263414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123779146","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.2.203","title":"The Comparative History and Theory of Corporate Criminal Liability","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal liability; Criminal law; Legal liability; Civil law (Civil law); Delict; Political science; Strict liability; Comparative law; Mens rea; Legal history; German; Liability; Public law; Private law; Black letter law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Markus D. Dubber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1851422299710186,"gpt":0.3700543134958156,"spread":0.1849120835247971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003245839,0.0002901299,0.0004120663,0.005630983,0.002614466,0.004153679,0.001150148,0.002626332,0.006903818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006758088,0.0002153269,0.0002860691,0.004889139,0.0224133,0.007513575,0.001913276,0.002173758,0.0004036152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007429723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00267848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005925207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006193093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969307,0.001944506,0.00007317073,0.0003146774,0.0005212962,0.0002157388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994909,0.003766792,0.0004149848,0.0003059891,0.0004153669,0.0001879015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001462028,0.000005297391,0.0001525112,0.00002251267,0.000002186327,0.0000243297,0.0004362646,0.0001925357,0.000007565133,0.9939513,0.0007620542,0.004442031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005395661,0.00002581442,0.002158451,0.0003315346,0.000006198735,0.0001745371,0.001931784,0.0006270123,0.00007742543,0.8157217,0.1789298,0.00001041099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04943636,0.1888076,0.02160449,0.05621855,0.0007648171,0.00003443632,0.0001219439,0.0000283051,0.6829835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9051627,0.06708942,0.003364444,0.003387355,0.001264144,0.00007078839,0.00009467638,0.00002982675,0.0195367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007429723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05390662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057903113","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.2.190","title":"Citizenship and Penal Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Citizenship; Normative; Nothing; Proxy (statistics); Law; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Markus D. Dubber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04619434642369532,"gpt":0.3506959758147435,"spread":0.3045016293910482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001467109,0.0001654667,0.0002375261,0.001400364,0.001899006,0.003579261,0.0004408894,0.001462787,0.00319372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003127339,0.00009025473,0.0002163082,0.001383028,0.01082332,0.002498564,0.0018471,0.001588179,0.0003209757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002230979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002559271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006892908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008958367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997459,0.001434504,0.00007241699,0.0002031953,0.0004355529,0.0003953832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983565,0.0006863157,0.000296634,0.0001269839,0.0003007917,0.0002328827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000669427,0.00001377506,0.001725833,0.00005008866,0.000006547079,0.00007787201,0.0008189494,0.0001827196,0.00003712577,0.9714407,0.00491155,0.02072821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001044091,0.00004704259,0.01422907,0.0004475003,0.00001326106,0.0003440204,0.002776357,0.0005222798,0.000135766,0.8043685,0.1770866,0.0000190942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1308566,0.1180622,0.007545274,0.0622297,0.0006830976,0.00002910784,0.00008887042,0.00005215223,0.680453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661052,0.01539077,0.0006353018,0.002564757,0.0004446372,0.00002251807,0.00003647949,0.000009615481,0.01479076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006892908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01618689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896385499","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2018.21.4.640","title":"The Prison as Reserve","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Scholarship; Indigenous; Governmentality; Criminology; Sociology; Centrality; Punishment (psychology); Phenomenology (philosophy); Colonialism; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kelly Struthers Montford","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dawn Moore","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06360111537930566,"gpt":0.3974796558095016,"spread":0.3338785404301959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001620057,0.0002115301,0.0002552156,0.001227737,0.009384098,0.007754477,0.0009523723,0.001922145,0.002840321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004088501,0.0001230022,0.0001738734,0.000949294,0.0363088,0.005359789,0.002900048,0.002543389,0.0001530522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0185178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02748221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3089918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3864373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978567,0.0009845467,0.00003968555,0.0002006736,0.00032384,0.0005946158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978693,0.0007737848,0.0002176819,0.0001770215,0.0005547109,0.0004075316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002465612,0.000008572138,0.001244727,0.0001245403,0.000005239278,0.0002457641,0.04310901,0.0001463229,0.0001435768,0.9319228,0.01064875,0.01237605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000144429,0.0000455346,0.009878402,0.001715328,0.00002892689,0.0005170788,0.1575715,0.0004678065,0.0004201579,0.2006983,0.6286024,0.00004004375],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2544994,0.08026337,0.005816198,0.1760495,0.001281331,0.00006854725,0.0001576805,0.00007991471,0.4817841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863806,0.003571413,0.0002398831,0.001768327,0.00008727286,0.00001015409,0.000009904785,0.00001342696,0.007919062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3089918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6143864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125188325","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.4.665","title":"The Age of Innocence: A Cautious Defense of Raising the Age of Consent in Canadian Sexual Assault Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Innocence; Criminalization; Law; Informed consent; Girl; Psychology; Sexual assault; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Developmental psychology","authors":[{"name":"Janine Benedet","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06048393632447276,"gpt":0.3578498590280782,"spread":0.2973659227036055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01232975,0.0007337599,0.0007832731,0.004768193,0.03268408,0.01450506,0.005047389,0.0126106,0.003109239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03249209,0.0007577622,0.0008942262,0.004255296,0.03781338,0.006184414,0.005466658,0.01709481,0.0002418115],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1407878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2965407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9817379,0.003229065,0.0006729215,0.001256495,0.007666086,0.005437461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785163,0.00988246,0.001139025,0.0005490446,0.007881442,0.002031647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001304051,0.00001564459,0.002193861,0.0001185114,0.0000085311,0.0004905994,0.01736849,0.0002943238,0.0001465437,0.9414767,0.02196802,0.01590583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005507705,0.00007534274,0.02542858,0.002414198,0.000160094,0.0006987429,0.05652072,0.002510513,0.00088678,0.2051146,0.7057522,0.0003832055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.07591752,0.04680023,0.006366719,0.4472742,0.003013595,0.0002737111,0.0002449758,0.0001040463,0.4200051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8434302,0.01625392,0.00368074,0.09082055,0.0008611371,0.000109169,0.00005370327,0.00008131587,0.04470924],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1407878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968438279","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.135","title":"Offenses of Sex or Violence? Consent, Fraud, and HIV Transmission","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Criminology; Argument (complex analysis); Jurisdiction; Law; Sexual assault; Jurisprudence; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention","authors":[{"name":"Sharon Cowan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05589979706979423,"gpt":0.3518334693640954,"spread":0.2959336722943012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005377442,0.0002230044,0.0003969771,0.001410456,0.005409881,0.0060594,0.00101613,0.003778011,0.002604623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01362002,0.0001784228,0.0003775683,0.001296404,0.03571337,0.003839942,0.003466461,0.004105369,0.0001658764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01261505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01806955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3667452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3303292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949786,0.002169295,0.0001843519,0.0002353588,0.0008015256,0.001630862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947042,0.003032267,0.0008309989,0.0001869151,0.0006439326,0.000601709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001666412,0.00003421566,0.008486009,0.00008334431,0.000006411641,0.0006482532,0.03396451,0.0001266827,0.0001044378,0.9362383,0.002623855,0.01766731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003668293,0.000121683,0.05370643,0.00316076,0.00004933827,0.005240047,0.1733379,0.001181681,0.0008609836,0.5992544,0.1628937,0.0001564451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3931628,0.03968185,0.002758536,0.3447764,0.0007164322,0.00008785,0.000107811,0.00001686318,0.2186915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739681,0.01018158,0.0004137591,0.009566252,0.0001858998,0.00001242129,0.00001448211,0.000003839966,0.005653735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3667452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7292211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123699039","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2007.10.2.278","title":"The Sentencing Theory Debate: Convergence in Outcomes, Divergence in Reasoning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Convergence (economics); Mathematical economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Macroeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Allan Manson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03353621523045861,"gpt":0.3526770687852039,"spread":0.3191408535547453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05909423,0.0004719239,0.002018712,0.006573859,0.004184489,0.01391552,0.004770996,0.007614898,0.00671469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1905582,0.0004476949,0.0008559256,0.004808351,0.0284733,0.01936829,0.005125324,0.01108031,0.0005898337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008842602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01111192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005508185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006195849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9413376,0.04309972,0.001469894,0.002768172,0.009229694,0.002094917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8152766,0.1569093,0.004442797,0.006314416,0.01498345,0.002073489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004413151,0.00002670592,0.001094318,0.0001217216,0.00004129963,0.00003524697,0.001333815,0.0006314892,0.00001910863,0.9715368,0.004480302,0.02063508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001629221,0.00001502027,0.001499872,0.0002172029,0.00002499388,0.00003408104,0.001126373,0.001098311,0.0000657124,0.9887206,0.007168659,0.0000129919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1470305,0.05097603,0.07025703,0.4972747,0.002548315,0.00009252311,0.0004406269,0.000113699,0.2312666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771366,0.00609805,0.005043677,0.007315699,0.001424542,0.00008583503,0.0001256116,0.00006608105,0.002703775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05909423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3125239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123639769","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2012.15.2.277","title":"<i>Ex ante</i> Fairness in Criminal Law and Procedure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Supreme court; Discretion; Criminal law; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Vincent Chiao","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06051355066028592,"gpt":0.2621809337231436,"spread":0.2016673830628577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009443112,0.0003318353,0.0003115827,0.0006049636,0.003741531,0.006831793,0.001228196,0.003949507,0.002814325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01026979,0.0002921595,0.0005508696,0.0005764648,0.01516678,0.00488205,0.003056725,0.004073704,0.0006406893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003100282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004171603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004894474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005460574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928235,0.00315796,0.0003965679,0.0009113565,0.001616329,0.001094278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964747,0.001507908,0.0005732297,0.0008263179,0.000489258,0.0001285004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008922295,0.000008317596,0.0003885514,0.000009060649,0.000003075882,0.00001577606,0.0004193526,0.0002045225,0.0001121581,0.9940134,0.001064314,0.003752542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000183755,0.00005585689,0.002332738,0.00007072632,0.00001444672,0.0001068915,0.0003667994,0.001276713,0.001049159,0.9574621,0.03722107,0.00002504095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09548839,0.002306236,0.1805807,0.06084419,0.0007797132,0.0001595817,0.0002904153,0.0001820676,0.6593686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450161,0.0005143448,0.02091546,0.01044859,0.0004180097,0.0002254608,0.00006938714,0.00003784845,0.0223546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009443112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04994059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181301847","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.55","title":"The Right to a Fair Fight","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Harm; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Deadly force; Position (finance); Criminology; Sociology; Business","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04345892375559509,"gpt":0.3566706915972829,"spread":0.3132117678416878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01045058,0.0003618114,0.0009086425,0.001723504,0.003039034,0.004516333,0.001782979,0.005628568,0.008295618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02637741,0.0003481376,0.0005286424,0.0008529168,0.01779464,0.005478116,0.004526906,0.00435973,0.001507786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001443161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007718144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006771091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01069565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9841641,0.006722311,0.0009934283,0.001416705,0.005357776,0.001345733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888916,0.007211199,0.001327462,0.0008279689,0.001218164,0.0005236681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000242286,0.00003995506,0.0009207476,0.0003621028,0.0000156533,0.0001753222,0.001544688,0.0001597926,0.0001672911,0.9468955,0.009081547,0.04061311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004260372,0.0001717706,0.006692638,0.004261552,0.00005680185,0.0008942711,0.003098339,0.0001244588,0.0005053056,0.3298944,0.6542032,0.00005460945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02572135,0.1091662,0.009448115,0.08210673,0.002707704,0.0001276792,0.000171108,0.00003687846,0.7705142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8114133,0.06585472,0.005038426,0.04715124,0.002384846,0.0002827169,0.0001890142,0.00003107723,0.06765471],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01045058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05526865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025449700","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.3.364","title":"The Third-Party Doctrine and the Third Person","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Analogy; Appeal; Narrative; Viewpoints; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Computer science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Simon Stern","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04260818328409051,"gpt":0.314727076156075,"spread":0.2721188928719845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006253162,0.000377621,0.0005346549,0.001169944,0.006037873,0.006687236,0.001830903,0.006754718,0.003582142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01141666,0.0003270681,0.0006051845,0.0009738634,0.05796027,0.008643908,0.005523523,0.007860789,0.000821157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004852282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004323965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003855208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002541419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929603,0.003990056,0.0002949322,0.0008524695,0.001414774,0.0004874547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919076,0.004999949,0.0006562228,0.001293335,0.0008167301,0.0003261331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000153375,0.000001175447,0.00002357151,0.000007597761,5.941444e-7,0.00003607952,0.002676908,0.00002135764,0.00002142625,0.996071,0.0005767304,0.0005619883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009334596,0.00001367697,0.0001472395,0.0001720727,0.000004827015,0.0003087593,0.003469428,0.0003840048,0.0002849126,0.8828145,0.1123798,0.00001132916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04335397,0.01139552,0.09676582,0.05952399,0.0009554722,0.00009867606,0.00008837035,0.00008440363,0.7877338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484357,0.002719424,0.009131289,0.006411887,0.000550172,0.0001465294,0.00004385849,0.00007914339,0.03248212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006754718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0352059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093639882","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.103","title":"Capacity to Consent to Sexual Risk","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Context (archaeology); Unconscious mind; Law; Morality; Sexual attraction; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Human sexuality","authors":[{"name":"Elaine Craig","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.093634822695311,"gpt":0.3606355353221883,"spread":0.2670007126268773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04026672,0.0006200118,0.0009040938,0.001786531,0.004571286,0.01067382,0.003137476,0.009957343,0.01011388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07914603,0.0007805857,0.001388428,0.000794774,0.04586007,0.01147412,0.01219403,0.01053805,0.002339593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004408644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0165053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005609723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003597479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9694278,0.0131943,0.002681291,0.004553209,0.007275799,0.002867493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9452502,0.03074515,0.004521611,0.009875366,0.006951665,0.00265602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001338411,0.00002532418,0.0009963918,0.00005100951,0.00001129138,0.0001269325,0.005004571,0.0002479313,0.0003693062,0.9823775,0.002043908,0.008732447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003514966,0.0000611431,0.001121422,0.000421429,0.00002306029,0.0005112566,0.001539693,0.0005306846,0.0007665057,0.9078156,0.08709344,0.00008063013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04158654,0.00312343,0.07461486,0.1128411,0.0008278854,0.0005452085,0.0003437849,0.0001900713,0.7659272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9245437,0.001753996,0.01726112,0.02452248,0.0007299391,0.0008874314,0.0002808897,0.0001070659,0.02991331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04026672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2129533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897199180","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2018.21.4.545","title":"Seropolitics and the Criminal Accusation of HIV Non-Disclosure in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Biopower; Criminal law; Public health; Political science; Governmentality; False accusation; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Amy Swiffen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Martin French","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03270405688430883,"gpt":0.3158556688594977,"spread":0.2831516119751888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003523774,0.000227253,0.0004052557,0.002298207,0.02337107,0.006944473,0.002130917,0.002928948,0.003612007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01784439,0.0003916936,0.0003002317,0.003237032,0.01044792,0.001407488,0.00352269,0.005696501,0.0001462557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1268491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2174487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926859,0.0008936656,0.0002109035,0.0004801544,0.003213795,0.002515604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885699,0.003274068,0.001554989,0.000319804,0.004391094,0.001890139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002066052,0.0002642933,0.1403919,0.0006621872,0.0001212976,0.006092165,0.1562946,0.001820918,0.001452802,0.4963904,0.06876229,0.1275405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001032386,0.0001327331,0.334813,0.001979249,0.0003068178,0.002354373,0.1509891,0.003488935,0.003092806,0.02550912,0.476802,0.0004285402],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6849695,0.01690955,0.001185483,0.0752966,0.0004938375,0.000205016,0.0004231943,0.0000477503,0.220469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727476,0.005299799,0.0002926133,0.006805339,0.00004992741,0.00001648669,0.00006785653,0.00001661326,0.01470361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1268491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9203591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978457321","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2007.10.2.239","title":"The Place of Translation in Jerusalem's Criminal Trial Court","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Obligation; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Irus Braverman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1025332767285769,"gpt":0.3776869312765682,"spread":0.2751536545479913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006787575,0.0003803815,0.0004074098,0.001425726,0.02278708,0.0125618,0.001029681,0.002288328,0.004154216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01419319,0.0004841173,0.0001492404,0.0022574,0.02163943,0.003931899,0.004949519,0.003615915,0.0008211941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01168104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006586492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0221462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03992367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988256,0.008620489,0.0003878077,0.0007739991,0.0009789137,0.0009827658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939785,0.003747922,0.000668304,0.0003262301,0.0006636087,0.00061551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000634774,0.00004041208,0.001905745,0.0001252102,0.000004553818,0.002857707,0.8472067,0.0001273537,0.0009594896,0.1090207,0.005699297,0.03198953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003185492,0.0001457989,0.01410227,0.0005942719,0.0000126298,0.001327563,0.7781,0.0003590402,0.0007868939,0.01069895,0.1937808,0.00005991018],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6775981,0.007481367,0.002653735,0.02411712,0.0005563776,0.0001134078,0.00006979973,0.00008364108,0.2873264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926157,0.0005813146,0.0003735311,0.0006011003,0.0000599046,0.00002096066,0.00001477061,0.00002045528,0.005712184],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02278708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08475226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115872543","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.1.143","title":"Sexual Consent as Voluntary Agreement: Tales of “Seduction” or Questions of Law?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntariness; Plaintiff; Plea; Law; Reasonable person; Sexual assault; Psychology; Common law; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Lucinda Vandervort","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1457327385925542,"gpt":0.4411455447944021,"spread":0.2954128062018478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06665879,0.0008686508,0.001017976,0.004195794,0.01081249,0.01841866,0.003675801,0.01167664,0.004542056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1058129,0.001069771,0.001352902,0.002740653,0.1813828,0.04805312,0.01142813,0.01507579,0.0009763885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008559783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01322282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009907952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005391459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9371158,0.04616204,0.002057944,0.004219575,0.008657353,0.001787357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9184753,0.06468857,0.003548694,0.008470949,0.003989356,0.0008271453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006299717,0.000007678019,0.0001321297,0.00002404362,0.000002963716,0.00003144381,0.01281881,0.0000789253,0.00003949892,0.981716,0.000783752,0.004358405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009627521,0.00001564126,0.0001449917,0.0001995888,0.000005101774,0.00007215988,0.006147817,0.0003822151,0.0002213578,0.949017,0.04375957,0.00002488341],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03722664,0.009330507,0.3848123,0.2572467,0.002950029,0.0005357081,0.0001429309,0.0003390574,0.3074161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8748274,0.00383866,0.07218828,0.02265066,0.001413364,0.0008427405,0.00007446609,0.0003317058,0.02383271],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06665879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3525296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046543401","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.3.515","title":"The Rule Against Admitting Exculpatory Statements of Accused Persons: A Shiny Coin That has Lost its Currency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Presumption; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Innocence; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Nowlin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1707545437766632,"gpt":0.4189414316355711,"spread":0.2481868878589078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08280656,0.0008303892,0.00328349,0.00410348,0.008127187,0.01683003,0.006826547,0.03851474,0.001688469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1468689,0.001006607,0.001269249,0.003653913,0.06845255,0.01912196,0.006143278,0.0463274,0.001641486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004343066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009887686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007400975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006581109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9498572,0.01385304,0.005378067,0.008485472,0.02076988,0.001656331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8565334,0.1090408,0.006384816,0.009226529,0.01615108,0.002663395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007473568,0.00003339811,0.0007037693,0.0002958036,0.00004169222,0.0001176762,0.001080306,0.0002220437,0.0002758852,0.9010642,0.04754399,0.04854649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101955,0.0001691536,0.001426269,0.002767458,0.0001628338,0.0003470725,0.0007418154,0.001386454,0.0009185465,0.7689335,0.2228741,0.0001709955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009722902,0.07549464,0.04877661,0.8014881,0.02242565,0.00008401316,0.0001923251,0.0001908628,0.04162488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3447156,0.053596,0.04204183,0.4948624,0.04553717,0.0004465294,0.0002311515,0.0004240355,0.01814539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08280656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4379281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}