{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":17,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"bbdffd7c95e3","filters":{"venue":"New Criminal Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2738361053","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2017.20.3.391","title":"Mandatory Sentencing Around the World and the Need for Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Doctrine; Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Relevance (law); Criminal justice; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Anthony Gray","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09892597009970915,"gpt":0.3910029223963675,"spread":0.2920769522966583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002772613,0.0001280769,0.000304153,0.000009758382,0.003778182,0.000425198,0.0007819086,0.0000321667,0.00006382824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005176642,0.00006343255,0.0001609968,0.00004953455,0.001275924,0.0003851219,0.0001256939,0.0001528702,0.00002504483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007875207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000125727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04289961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07545374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987842,0.0001446242,0.0002463909,0.0002092925,0.0003085758,0.000306929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985692,0.0004171037,0.0002266561,0.0005749071,0.00008826819,0.0001238585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004794306,0.00000456442,0.0000179659,0.0006308769,0.00001089213,0.000001886549,0.0008598914,2.709113e-8,0.000002110631,0.9516627,0.01259379,0.03416735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002792809,0.00001788276,0.0001299326,0.001628766,0.00037672,0.000007648018,0.001969661,0.000004964847,0.000007314727,0.007498538,0.9879759,0.0001034102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003699927,0.1619989,0.0001361311,0.4228654,0.0009976276,0.002888304,0.000007460551,0.00006677239,0.4073395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7922515,0.1194316,0.0009087757,0.04951175,0.003698593,0.0002756354,0.000004789039,0.00004403729,0.03387335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022522540","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2015.18.4.510","title":"Restorative Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Popularity; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Engineering; Social psychology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Alana Saulnier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Diane Sivasubramaniam","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1619615114029444,"gpt":0.4086180467847368,"spread":0.2466565353817924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007726421,0.0000914082,0.0001969296,0.000001010805,0.0003584808,0.00004606787,0.0002560469,0.00008205935,0.0003658289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003964061,0.0000717427,0.00009727099,0.0001983389,0.0002439392,0.0002372152,0.00002846397,0.0001515632,0.0005679764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001012133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003980149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001937092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001257483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987831,0.0002510324,0.0001544934,0.0001583819,0.0004366559,0.0002163137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991784,0.00004783725,0.0000726678,0.0001571625,0.0002023941,0.0003415218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002089651,0.000009235778,8.890372e-7,0.0002464269,0.000003654408,0.000003414902,0.006879721,1.237937e-7,8.079928e-7,0.6038176,0.3866718,0.002364165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000874365,0.00002975798,0.000002279058,0.0006268828,0.0002962308,0.0000025022,0.004700128,1.38117e-7,0.000005055615,0.00572187,0.9884241,0.0001036822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007288032,0.1873558,0.00003006913,0.01557865,0.0005099702,0.0002800761,0.000002230776,0.00007795008,0.7960923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03151385,0.5842017,0.01501232,0.1721624,0.01012642,0.0001125111,0.00004779032,0.00006975419,0.1867532],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6093391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7300377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306176763","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2016.19.1.42","title":"Engineering Comprehensible Youth Interrogation Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Waiver; Interrogation; Comprehension; Psychology; Computer security; Social psychology; Political science; Mathematics education; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Joseph Eastwood","is_ca":true},{"name":"Brent Snook","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kirk Luther","is_ca":true},{"name":"Stuart Freedman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06378796767360388,"gpt":0.3350382557161015,"spread":0.2712502880424976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001528105,0.0001559894,0.0002728213,0.00005921712,0.00004610518,0.00001048546,0.0001467701,0.00008417573,0.01155253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001149793,0.0001038984,0.0001280523,0.0001237898,0.00006204472,0.00009207725,0.00002218705,0.0001079164,0.007282714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004639916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001247135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000170967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005038798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989154,0.0000781421,0.0003392522,0.0003109033,0.0001200987,0.0002362527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992558,0.0000477481,0.00009682381,0.0004000153,0.00005291946,0.0001466412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008417061,0.0001001307,0.00001110721,0.0003736037,0.0000931771,0.00002426829,0.0009312475,3.699458e-7,0.0008215567,0.6809209,0.09197433,0.2246652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006371918,0.0001176702,0.0003456183,0.001405807,0.0001239406,0.0001502711,0.00005192762,0.000001210258,0.0001300067,0.0005106998,0.996348,0.000177715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05107201,0.04204625,0.05083371,0.007606016,0.01732212,0.001584997,0.00004750527,0.001360204,0.8281272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675121,0.001311693,0.001155834,0.008377252,0.0007496469,0.0000469896,0.00002074597,0.00004720068,0.02077859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123779146","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.2.203","title":"The Comparative History and Theory of Corporate Criminal Liability","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal liability; Criminal law; Legal liability; Civil law (Civil law); Delict; Political science; Strict liability; Comparative law; Mens rea; Legal history; German; Liability; Public law; Private law; Black letter law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Markus D. Dubber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1851422299710186,"gpt":0.3700543134958156,"spread":0.1849120835247971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00168356,0.0001723074,0.0004489688,0.00001617499,0.000453239,0.00004303997,0.0003603087,0.00006228107,0.00111324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002633583,0.0001160826,0.0001334504,0.0000964426,0.00210584,0.0002294301,0.00006584507,0.0001850468,0.000130185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000134767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004294412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02445446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002552534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997757,0.0008992011,0.0004369281,0.0002385447,0.0003394049,0.0003289392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979942,0.0007832593,0.0003608109,0.0003393861,0.0002555537,0.0002668297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002098886,0.00002687478,0.000026625,0.0007734574,0.00001099843,7.986663e-7,0.005247488,2.693161e-8,0.00002240999,0.9435305,0.02475606,0.02558376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000859215,0.0001016931,0.000947622,0.0004823756,0.0003017739,0.000004590955,0.001782606,9.557154e-7,0.00003500185,0.03441475,0.9616961,0.0001465917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08265639,0.3456643,0.00004638889,0.007601494,0.0005746447,0.001972729,0.00001048046,0.00007381479,0.5613998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9237102,0.05373232,0.0005913246,0.005870848,0.0005246124,0.0001008305,0.000006144046,0.00002224553,0.0154415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057903113","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.2.190","title":"Citizenship and Penal Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Citizenship; Normative; Nothing; Proxy (statistics); Law; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Markus D. Dubber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04619434642369532,"gpt":0.3506959758147435,"spread":0.3045016293910482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005980618,0.0001193174,0.000264815,0.00002578096,0.0006789042,0.0001225152,0.0001921699,0.00007162768,0.001787504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001751049,0.0001063072,0.0001351505,0.0002175556,0.0003713747,0.0001273863,0.00003768715,0.000278774,0.0001744201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001727928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001060922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03037738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08528981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988714,0.0001067652,0.0002177398,0.0002405151,0.000299583,0.0002639773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991841,0.0001294233,0.00007142375,0.0002175668,0.0001062473,0.0002912017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004192731,0.00001434204,0.00001995604,0.0004171861,0.00001354613,0.000009703169,0.0008286182,3.221106e-8,0.00009606056,0.8983664,0.006473807,0.09375615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008299795,0.00003597436,0.00003979765,0.000460528,0.001419477,0.00003762873,0.00366459,0.000001969208,0.00002612062,0.004893534,0.9891412,0.0001962366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06911995,0.04777823,0.0001586981,0.008961085,0.0009959938,0.0004997852,0.000007567889,0.0001656783,0.872313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9274924,0.04682761,0.001721694,0.01657047,0.001709192,0.00002863847,0.00001157372,0.0000250014,0.005613372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896385499","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2018.21.4.640","title":"The Prison as Reserve","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Scholarship; Indigenous; Governmentality; Criminology; Sociology; Centrality; Punishment (psychology); Phenomenology (philosophy); Colonialism; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kelly Struthers Montford","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dawn Moore","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06360111537930566,"gpt":0.3974796558095016,"spread":0.3338785404301959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001053825,0.00009944233,0.0001889265,0.00001842267,0.001913274,0.0001500303,0.0004492884,0.00004615208,0.001273117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006139911,0.00006690228,0.0001812617,0.0004611003,0.0004514184,0.0001444581,0.00005330638,0.0001311394,0.001632408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000651692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002522815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09883227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.163994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985312,0.0002572146,0.0002509741,0.0002070082,0.00043735,0.0003162293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988867,0.0002034638,0.0001013316,0.0003695547,0.0002638657,0.0001750728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001524024,0.00002165933,0.00001116219,0.0001917292,0.00002184752,0.000004531918,0.002762988,4.712404e-8,0.000005288948,0.4762666,0.06096262,0.4597363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003132083,0.00009205762,0.00001110778,0.0005150536,0.0006951413,0.000005003123,0.01189866,0.00000227071,0.00002634933,0.001095054,0.9855357,0.00009227923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01462765,0.1662495,0.0002538236,0.0273079,0.001200144,0.0006524005,0.000001493191,0.0001461644,0.7895609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3770535,0.5205526,0.0008433743,0.02391383,0.007145015,0.00009884276,0.000008203314,0.00004806245,0.07033656],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9245731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125188325","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.4.665","title":"The Age of Innocence: A Cautious Defense of Raising the Age of Consent in Canadian Sexual Assault Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Innocence; Criminalization; Law; Informed consent; Girl; Psychology; Sexual assault; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Developmental psychology","authors":[{"name":"Janine Benedet","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06048393632447276,"gpt":0.3578498590280782,"spread":0.2973659227036055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001950426,0.000113106,0.0003925274,0.00005437822,0.0004321418,0.0000347795,0.0004102525,0.00008458633,0.00009522578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007841901,0.0000736094,0.0001479866,0.0006338906,0.001113435,0.00006480759,0.00003379777,0.000317417,0.000004759971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006636215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001125772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9713387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998193,0.0003330671,0.0005601128,0.0001598139,0.0004331942,0.0003208477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984381,0.0005629355,0.0002513978,0.0003660879,0.0002616249,0.0001198733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002846677,0.0001067749,0.0007090812,0.001833001,0.00007254296,0.00007967179,0.02148345,0.000008570131,0.001580781,0.8764265,0.001698999,0.09597211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001979559,0.0001160858,0.000807823,0.001659641,0.001733592,0.0000267292,0.04537775,0.000009758516,0.0001946459,0.0009872569,0.9486574,0.0002313947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8484495,0.04330435,0.00006496425,0.006786773,0.0008182948,0.001174994,0.00004258524,0.00002234903,0.09933614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921845,0.006469654,0.0000671556,0.0009573462,0.00007027207,0.000008597349,0.000005306095,0.000006459183,0.0002307545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9469584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4102499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968438279","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.135","title":"Offenses of Sex or Violence? Consent, Fraud, and HIV Transmission","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Criminology; Argument (complex analysis); Jurisdiction; Law; Sexual assault; Jurisprudence; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention","authors":[{"name":"Sharon Cowan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05589979706979423,"gpt":0.3518334693640954,"spread":0.2959336722943012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005199328,0.0001158202,0.0003904979,0.00003698231,0.0002757976,0.00002688558,0.0001463906,0.00005590296,0.0008489127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002235045,0.00008580161,0.0001290018,0.0002391263,0.0002677536,0.00009195146,0.00001834833,0.00008732485,0.00002716198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001580855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000164992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01354719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005611174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987651,0.0002500056,0.0003081693,0.0002138837,0.0002771083,0.0001858058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990906,0.0003404559,0.0001176625,0.0001716704,0.00008965105,0.0001899294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000294093,0.00004825208,0.00006673372,0.002815904,0.00001810931,0.000003707364,0.002920014,5.57459e-7,0.00007930398,0.02730018,0.002010189,0.9647076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001668755,0.0001470973,0.00003859547,0.006611605,0.001815506,0.00001708818,0.01393625,0.00003174506,0.000208046,0.0004843605,0.9763557,0.0001871725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3449022,0.4177836,0.03284625,0.01360428,0.0008924959,0.002365124,0.00003097843,0.0003665651,0.1872085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5234051,0.4678679,0.001926136,0.0032064,0.0003273983,0.0000139243,0.000006067358,0.0000165057,0.003230573],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9743454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123699039","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2007.10.2.278","title":"The Sentencing Theory Debate: Convergence in Outcomes, Divergence in Reasoning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Convergence (economics); Mathematical economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Macroeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Allan Manson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03353621523045861,"gpt":0.3526770687852039,"spread":0.3191408535547453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004975712,0.0001375115,0.0003014198,0.00006764655,0.0005832635,0.00005244205,0.000416869,0.00005467868,0.0002575768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001123037,0.0001008738,0.000145672,0.0009195048,0.0001943896,0.00019232,0.00006415149,0.0002596754,0.0000766479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002137332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1434601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4951514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979318,0.0003637945,0.0005153263,0.0002648729,0.0004158409,0.0005083198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986228,0.0007621581,0.0001325756,0.000253972,0.00008635988,0.0001420979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003711311,0.00005729041,0.03123823,0.0003530057,0.00001821562,0.000129134,0.007976193,0.00001038181,0.00001268465,0.5042877,0.0003934718,0.4554865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000518736,0.00009018421,0.04629198,0.009257133,0.001475444,0.00004000145,0.40304,0.000100763,0.00007872188,0.005079831,0.5329978,0.001029419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5936706,0.3124063,0.007636558,0.005914323,0.002819537,0.001702288,0.000003224494,0.0001727887,0.07567436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8948932,0.1013118,0.0002955737,0.002204802,0.0001212429,0.00001631578,0.000001524801,0.00001049051,0.001145061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5326043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8622437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123639769","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2012.15.2.277","title":"<i>Ex ante</i> Fairness in Criminal Law and Procedure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Supreme court; Discretion; Criminal law; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Vincent Chiao","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06051355066028592,"gpt":0.2621809337231436,"spread":0.2016673830628577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003571012,0.0001907068,0.0005481782,0.00003371371,0.0001276466,0.000037794,0.0001369354,0.00005793791,0.0002026436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004838739,0.0001768234,0.00009108104,0.0001425309,0.0001816492,0.00044376,0.00008707757,0.000163391,0.0004476001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005275455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002670711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001925417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004280171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987814,0.00001454358,0.000497809,0.000293691,0.00005248471,0.0003600608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995037,0.00002830291,0.0001393239,0.0001544441,0.00002451313,0.0001497216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000932588,0.00006475638,0.00289804,0.00203901,0.00001288479,0.000004658196,0.0001742181,1.332571e-7,0.000001251256,0.991313,0.001755403,0.001727317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002864558,0.00004407502,0.004808455,0.001004963,0.00006601075,0.00007437033,0.00004172811,0.000002258806,0.00001281443,0.0102667,0.9831104,0.0002818024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009439287,0.7188013,0.00006098547,0.002223822,0.000254779,0.000324234,0.00003358993,0.0000250467,0.2688369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9347174,0.05102387,0.0003711398,0.01293432,0.0002992347,0.00004125247,0.000009399689,0.00001448271,0.0005889242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7210647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181301847","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.55","title":"The Right to a Fair Fight","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Harm; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Deadly force; Position (finance); Criminology; Sociology; Business","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04345892375559509,"gpt":0.3566706915972829,"spread":0.3132117678416878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001720951,0.0001473949,0.0002773145,0.0000126683,0.001258352,0.0001635322,0.0007416855,0.00005022958,0.0007588263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008353275,0.00009254239,0.0001581379,0.0002396775,0.0002151504,0.0001777549,0.00007772028,0.0001421555,0.001887326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006201924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001408269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006109453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01589042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980492,0.0003568721,0.000301831,0.0002798855,0.0005403499,0.0004718359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984655,0.0004900769,0.00008092062,0.00043084,0.0001130841,0.0004195477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005302821,0.000006942635,0.000002117027,0.0002062725,0.000002768058,0.000002421745,0.0003758101,1.146325e-7,0.000005724121,0.7403997,0.1936557,0.06533713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003849364,0.00006262611,0.00002972334,0.001383511,0.0001088472,0.000004506594,0.00007145038,7.819568e-7,0.00003774236,0.004880356,0.9932352,0.0001467473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003004117,0.05891783,0.0005655988,0.2218469,0.0007746096,0.0009094019,0.000002260662,0.0001410978,0.7165419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5034785,0.1487659,0.004972042,0.22398,0.007388908,0.0003336842,0.0000121447,0.0001092384,0.1109596],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7995795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025449700","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.3.364","title":"The Third-Party Doctrine and the Third Person","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Analogy; Appeal; Narrative; Viewpoints; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Computer science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Simon Stern","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04260818328409051,"gpt":0.314727076156075,"spread":0.2721188928719845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001414554,0.0001282742,0.000248474,7.666826e-7,0.001911632,0.0002655262,0.0004390211,0.00008132477,0.000476821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002139797,0.00005437125,0.0001904731,0.0001432245,0.001132436,0.000217087,0.00005123095,0.0002735382,0.0002820645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002774665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007855045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007943805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001931941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985264,0.0004016097,0.0001869273,0.0001829912,0.0003923181,0.0003097703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990711,0.0003238521,0.0001017337,0.0002602692,0.0001027141,0.0001403271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003716991,0.000004825137,0.000004501114,0.000140521,0.00001186468,4.105856e-7,0.005317674,1.548265e-8,0.000001911475,0.7273167,0.2531869,0.01401093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000202099,0.00001475227,0.0000597927,0.0003190607,0.000155453,0.000004837855,0.004071096,0.000001156376,0.000003768861,0.008462579,0.9866135,0.00009195771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007793141,0.402772,0.000002262559,0.1652899,0.000244239,0.001010117,0.000001182464,0.0000574866,0.4298435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02930263,0.8740237,0.0002545237,0.04073603,0.001253961,0.0001578049,0.000002812819,0.00001420575,0.0542543],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7334265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093639882","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.103","title":"Capacity to Consent to Sexual Risk","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Context (archaeology); Unconscious mind; Law; Morality; Sexual attraction; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Human sexuality","authors":[{"name":"Elaine Craig","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.093634822695311,"gpt":0.3606355353221883,"spread":0.2670007126268773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001155708,0.0001299623,0.0002923776,0.000002207154,0.0005633663,0.00006011272,0.0003285868,0.00008524232,0.0006254252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007799345,0.0001050425,0.0001147896,0.0002284734,0.000147645,0.00007646761,0.00005321102,0.0001723797,0.001330732],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007541821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001017388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01414244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01565695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983494,0.0004059619,0.0002118245,0.0002785666,0.000416858,0.0003374099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988735,0.0001320898,0.00006722931,0.0002595668,0.0001044288,0.0005631612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000385055,0.00002362723,0.00003852989,0.0004409427,0.00001000203,8.685425e-7,0.009684077,0.000001239375,0.00002498679,0.6150255,0.3427826,0.03196368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000579283,0.00007835984,0.00007801769,0.0005409363,0.0001271824,0.000001635598,0.0005796116,2.087133e-7,0.00002289946,0.001630729,0.9967205,0.0001619888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.04533953,0.03441584,0.001306856,0.1246455,0.001643599,0.002977045,0.00005307949,0.0004037309,0.7892148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3300788,0.0692758,0.03344001,0.5048858,0.008239809,0.0002540056,0.00001865019,0.00009045788,0.05371665],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7354982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897199180","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2018.21.4.545","title":"Seropolitics and the Criminal Accusation of HIV Non-Disclosure in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Biopower; Criminal law; Public health; Political science; Governmentality; False accusation; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Amy Swiffen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Martin French","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03270405688430883,"gpt":0.3158556688594977,"spread":0.2831516119751888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006146198,0.00008956278,0.0002562456,0.000001770926,0.0002709603,0.00002041587,0.0002175661,0.00005291321,0.0002309258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001221853,0.00005694344,0.00005817127,0.000151039,0.0008119291,0.0001019088,0.00003368476,0.0001277606,0.000006190818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000140704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00104334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8811648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9555464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988665,0.0001985472,0.0002541727,0.0001306264,0.0003388479,0.0002113079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994249,0.00009932069,0.0001113448,0.0001462411,0.0001259852,0.00009222136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001493228,0.00001069056,0.0003070927,0.001108841,0.000009835305,0.000002007238,0.01323281,1.665517e-7,0.000004285485,0.9518794,0.02966005,0.003769919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005921344,0.00003514642,0.001723917,0.001922012,0.0003677507,0.000005321076,0.01578586,0.00000762549,0.00008028767,0.006078134,0.9732252,0.0001766133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.211876,0.1726851,0.00005651539,0.08214231,0.001226473,0.002798311,0.00005637789,0.00004312608,0.5291158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513353,0.03890134,0.0002792336,0.007769505,0.0005278001,0.00001113436,0.000005179772,0.000007463409,0.001163097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9458013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2991586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978457321","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2007.10.2.239","title":"The Place of Translation in Jerusalem's Criminal Trial Court","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Obligation; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Irus Braverman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1025332767285769,"gpt":0.3776869312765682,"spread":0.2751536545479913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002951222,0.0001084987,0.0003094343,0.00002398248,0.0002647227,0.00002325554,0.0002383804,0.0000554724,0.00002462922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002754188,0.0000784306,0.0001259122,0.0002071367,0.0002849444,0.0001183237,0.00001771624,0.0001323258,0.00002352671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004837209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001614574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003638404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04869973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983449,0.0002095688,0.0005021965,0.0001556626,0.0004496845,0.0003379949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989696,0.0005551915,0.0001553448,0.0001446776,0.00007798448,0.00009723935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00122053,0.00005814825,0.0001246327,0.0006372578,0.00001303477,0.000007068563,0.003115944,1.83367e-7,0.000006588592,0.4323343,0.0008368019,0.5616455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003672554,0.0001943043,0.0003803562,0.001506474,0.0002449045,0.000002536471,0.003595008,7.166104e-7,0.00003497942,0.001408107,0.9888108,0.0001492412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02736606,0.6836056,0.0003588929,0.006507264,0.00100129,0.001998319,0.000005001503,0.00004184674,0.2791158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8506181,0.142068,0.0008196212,0.001710378,0.001417693,0.00003669007,0.000005747141,0.00002446472,0.003299341],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.968659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115872543","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.1.143","title":"Sexual Consent as Voluntary Agreement: Tales of “Seduction” or Questions of Law?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntariness; Plaintiff; Plea; Law; Reasonable person; Sexual assault; Psychology; Common law; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Lucinda Vandervort","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1457327385925542,"gpt":0.4411455447944021,"spread":0.2954128062018478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004514551,0.00008702456,0.0002255159,0.00003416004,0.0002385618,0.0000376167,0.0001705461,0.00004515953,0.0110049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008770202,0.00007229998,0.00005631741,0.0003205689,0.0004536085,0.0005877232,0.00002105902,0.0001418262,0.0003968592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004683288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001402415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2671291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01588503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986993,0.0002299328,0.0004710552,0.0001373215,0.0003203119,0.0001420556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985426,0.0003231073,0.0003105527,0.0002101193,0.0004938727,0.0001197411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000480057,0.0001363693,0.00003045346,0.0007782758,0.0000199291,4.318552e-7,0.002411358,2.277446e-7,0.0000918445,0.9325854,0.05571393,0.008226936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007494016,0.00008595467,0.0001550957,0.0007177659,0.0001783347,0.000009489328,0.003362143,3.753907e-7,0.00008052486,0.002207445,0.9930418,0.00008617619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03670507,0.0308864,0.00009564278,0.2861713,0.001529612,0.002163348,0.00003639184,0.00008275923,0.6423295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8879228,0.02932633,0.007220678,0.02426499,0.0009599894,0.0001700321,0.00007597158,0.00002559578,0.05003365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9373278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046543401","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.3.515","title":"The Rule Against Admitting Exculpatory Statements of Accused Persons: A Shiny Coin That has Lost its Currency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Presumption; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Innocence; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Nowlin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1707545437766632,"gpt":0.4189414316355711,"spread":0.2481868878589078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002467327,0.0002487298,0.0004602438,0.00002725423,0.001261264,0.0002102742,0.0009529477,0.0001016358,0.0006760907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001138889,0.0001815392,0.0002620304,0.0002372087,0.0006756715,0.0006998326,0.0001298287,0.0004680243,0.0002852299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006357519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007227798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003556577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006957853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971423,0.000350799,0.0006051891,0.0003762338,0.0009251701,0.0006003536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979924,0.0004997476,0.000457604,0.0004750236,0.0002232414,0.0003519849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009577838,0.0003470734,0.001192757,0.009380716,0.000105622,0.0000579308,0.02394424,4.406712e-7,0.002154214,0.4702307,0.07488605,0.4176045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001660278,0.00004936147,0.0001832744,0.003375444,0.0002162991,0.000003232152,0.001652272,0.000003363511,0.0003316059,0.0003311452,0.9934598,0.0002281485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2680643,0.4603243,0.00006881257,0.05441944,0.004664037,0.004667398,0.0001202646,0.0002814346,0.2073901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9126218,0.0802368,0.0004836949,0.003385455,0.0005625127,0.00005563486,0.00001221245,0.00003828738,0.002603632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9185738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9700747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}