{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":33,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":33,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"33d224a049bf","filters":{"venue":"New Library World"}},"results":[{"id":"W2008693071","doi":"10.1108/03074800510587354","title":"Participation in the global knowledge commons","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Developing country; Interoperability; Originality; Dissemination; Public relations; Business; Publishing; Information Dissemination; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Commons; Political science; Economic growth; Computer science; World Wide Web; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5602271843494625,"gpt":0.5868514926554681,"spread":0.0266243083060056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004000229,0.00009044565,0.000143481,0.013195,0.0001196436,0.002081558,0.002381962,0.00003799041,0.002702632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002251504,0.00005142295,0.00007837899,0.2112917,0.00006494156,0.001746383,0.0004155655,0.0002007076,0.001655025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004629219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000207202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003647683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001406176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957888,0.0003550381,0.0004547223,0.0003411132,0.002637102,0.0004231825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961487,0.002806079,0.00007883228,0.0006102705,0.00009496093,0.0002611633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007036851,0.0001192414,0.359265,3.415293e-7,0.000001119516,0.000002486169,0.0001273261,0.00003261996,0.00000130165,0.01500625,0.3547377,0.2706996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001756991,0.00001681404,0.4577517,0.000002164805,7.968724e-7,6.731915e-7,0.00003572844,0.001398501,0.00004624299,0.01395676,0.5265685,0.0000464202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3746564,0.001924246,0.0002614342,0.04356794,0.0003008845,0.0002329271,0.00001702578,0.00004476187,0.5789943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766659,0.00001912778,0.0005499374,0.001062015,0.0003007046,0.000008290202,0.000004321442,0.000004716134,0.02138506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6020094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057676825","doi":"10.1108/03074801111117014","title":"Canadian academic libraries and the mobile web","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Mobile Learning in Education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); World Wide Web; Originality; Mobile device; Mobile business development; Mobile technology; Mobile Web; Computer science; Public relations; Library science; Business; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Social science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01471474454702565,"gpt":0.2076893078840661,"spread":0.1929745633370405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001052837,0.0001039901,0.000100151,0.0001804218,0.0001495518,0.0002352799,0.001035017,0.00004920555,0.0008655843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001684918,0.00007579211,0.00002683712,0.0005495776,0.0001114167,0.002391864,0.0002300158,0.0003417259,0.000138731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001324481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000820122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006400944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002697379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991475,0.0001010785,0.0001447968,0.0002528224,0.00009929309,0.0002544994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990545,0.0001497677,0.00005691639,0.0004583584,0.000005012435,0.0002754604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001180682,0.000007766482,0.04033525,0.000005739686,0.00001027701,0.000004185992,0.007462095,0.000008881365,0.000005545171,0.6479199,0.2541489,0.05007971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003920717,0.00002536677,0.02444984,0.00002409108,0.00000541483,0.00001272617,0.00008468563,0.002434265,0.0003920362,0.07681066,0.8951879,0.0001810045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07958757,0.009081965,0.002008464,0.08416349,0.003234872,0.001466525,0.000006388175,0.001409941,0.8190408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8644212,0.0001763591,0.03063418,0.008831779,0.0005099516,0.0001000732,0.000005914396,0.0000322622,0.09528822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7848337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9676355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986872795","doi":"10.1108/03074801211199022","title":"Are books becoming extinct in academic libraries?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Reading (process); Originality; Value (mathematics); Population; Public relations; Higher education; Academic library; Sociology; Perception; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07972099364853592,"gpt":0.2343388877966575,"spread":0.1546178941481215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005995689,0.0002112361,0.0002158472,0.0006823403,0.00009568782,0.0005077341,0.001402022,0.00008025538,0.001263799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002466678,0.0002003294,0.00006880853,0.001708063,0.00003814608,0.01264854,0.0008394419,0.0003617508,0.0001759248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001398741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002622265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001032874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001250838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998477,0.00004909197,0.0003848759,0.0004535014,0.0002203734,0.000415141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990641,0.000115808,0.0001872616,0.0003636748,0.000004447133,0.0002646353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006954438,0.00006477481,0.5763353,0.00001674147,0.00001727927,0.0001449335,0.003070952,0.000003497646,0.00001352675,0.1281936,0.256831,0.03523895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007907565,0.00003444095,0.3193056,0.000129905,0.000002126075,0.00001072151,0.00008293706,0.0004474329,0.007818842,0.1209666,0.5498757,0.0005349251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06717364,0.0008955908,0.001551374,0.003158008,0.0005872688,0.0002646354,0.000001601216,0.00119234,0.9251755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4554445,0.00004166943,0.0525987,0.01054122,0.0004019369,0.00003172905,0.000007220892,0.00006451784,0.4808685],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4443071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047082859","doi":"10.1108/03074801311304050","title":"Going mobile: creating a mobile presence for your library","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Mobile Learning in Education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Mobile phone; World Wide Web; Mobile technology; Mobile device; Mobile Web; Computer science; Mobile business development; Resource (disambiguation); Construct (python library); Originality; Multimedia; Telecommunications; Qualitative research; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01408237306972712,"gpt":0.2528466668095961,"spread":0.238764293739869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008707788,0.0002440307,0.0002270004,0.0002588144,0.0002217928,0.001241709,0.001611843,0.00007049075,0.00213382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006281882,0.0002391077,0.0001129911,0.001043856,0.00003932758,0.01006457,0.0005885795,0.0002761135,0.0005418283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000178493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003573344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000284233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.299762e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998037,0.0001011174,0.0003921517,0.0006852244,0.0002472117,0.0005373382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977825,0.0007664029,0.0002076275,0.0009194979,0.00002415847,0.0002998609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001188557,0.000157769,0.02782288,0.0001087059,0.00002558463,0.000003775541,0.002816101,0.003084303,0.0006821269,0.02234971,0.6592787,0.2836585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005525969,0.0002839033,0.007547313,0.0002454019,0.000009519412,0.00001305814,0.0001811303,0.1088467,0.007071594,0.0179763,0.8566635,0.0006089653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.3392406,0.006044077,0.2330934,0.0215598,0.0075935,0.01576916,0.00003017691,0.01117534,0.365494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1945033,0.00003898165,0.5065036,0.00221314,0.001656509,0.003093063,0.00005207931,0.0001180595,0.2918213],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2830495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980824593","doi":"10.1108/03074800610654871","title":"Comparing users' perspectives of in‐person and virtual reference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Database transaction; Correctness; Face-to-face; Psychology; Applied psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Database","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02918064709251603,"gpt":0.2603972080447974,"spread":0.2312165609522814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000949254,0.00006172879,0.0001138338,0.0002123577,0.0001055724,0.0001370695,0.0001948202,0.00002600566,0.0006106221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001250128,0.00005810392,0.00001948426,0.0006756022,0.0001866743,0.01462306,0.00003823709,0.00008628181,0.00001341017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001026974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001387362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001507475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002914154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993085,0.00004932538,0.0001704078,0.0001237641,0.0001802022,0.000167764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996948,0.00007415269,0.00006994274,0.00007976135,0.000008142545,0.00007319649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001233748,0.00001752706,0.4193143,0.000003378384,0.000001153822,6.321472e-7,0.02294786,0.00002004627,0.00003254569,0.5475149,0.008803,0.001332347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003900827,0.00003662996,0.7997029,0.00006114377,0.000001783984,3.304222e-7,0.03757516,0.0001943134,0.000362021,0.003939454,0.1575791,0.0001570519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6652334,0.0001847509,0.00000444235,0.002153168,0.00004752543,0.00006357627,0.000001787651,0.00004144478,0.3322699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763158,0.00003777037,0.0006506995,0.0003531507,0.0001276438,0.000001044112,0.000006593675,0.00000336972,0.02250396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5435754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093983606","doi":"10.1108/03074801011089314","title":"Once you get them, how do you keep them? Millennial librarians at work","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Relevance (law); Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Administration (probate law); Sociology; Public relations; Relation (database); Library science; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Social science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02071520556392999,"gpt":0.2373006983757471,"spread":0.2165854928118171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002993279,0.0002862696,0.0002682389,0.0001796532,0.0008860004,0.002041707,0.001636927,0.0001817548,0.03073108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008346707,0.0002427974,0.0001945879,0.001978347,0.0004833191,0.04139801,0.0003946671,0.000545544,0.00238504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002217939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006104771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006254217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003094665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975014,0.0001394291,0.0003548974,0.0004648134,0.0007407686,0.0007987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981648,0.0002509701,0.0002377809,0.0006437531,0.0000233398,0.0006793383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005942706,0.0000392357,0.08322406,0.000006435138,0.00001314096,0.000008512383,0.01539315,0.000002622292,0.00006209072,0.1893761,0.6803492,0.03146606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003490488,0.00001582945,0.004405185,0.00003258043,0.000005951343,0.000003137204,0.001007882,0.00001855021,0.0005053574,0.009366101,0.9839338,0.0003565851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1374433,0.0001360439,0.00001782309,0.1071898,0.002770421,0.0003772042,0.00003541864,0.0006450422,0.7513849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3040782,0.000166732,0.006833018,0.01509519,0.004489945,0.00001785374,0.00008852223,0.00004921631,0.6691813],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3035846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964732546","doi":"10.1108/03074801111136266","title":"Exploring a new learning landscape in tertiary education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Sociology; Higher education; Knowledge management; Digital learning; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Conceptual framework; Pedagogy; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Qualitative research; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05735768444378773,"gpt":0.2094824649141822,"spread":0.1521247804703944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004209208,0.0001304349,0.0001134641,0.0003863522,0.00004518661,0.0001893957,0.0008238314,0.00002451261,0.0008744075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002690877,0.0001257977,0.00004032116,0.0008424935,0.000005761154,0.01142245,0.0002901592,0.0002148195,0.0001671021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004504526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003591166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000298065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004740779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990789,0.00005664645,0.0001741851,0.0003230267,0.000117624,0.0002496775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993669,0.00003625946,0.00006027651,0.0003290354,0.000002584971,0.0002049294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001587528,0.00007680919,0.7299968,0.00001962925,0.000006746514,0.00001747693,0.006130834,0.00002125151,0.00003271389,0.03007934,0.02830156,0.205301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003635824,0.00004119046,0.7681402,0.000154979,0.000002768115,0.000006354287,0.0002095373,0.00130936,0.003562349,0.01097067,0.2149276,0.0003114147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4688065,0.00238325,0.002869728,0.01092762,0.001993398,0.0003233315,3.909778e-7,0.001584842,0.5111109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8825293,0.00008305082,0.0546604,0.003346568,0.0006531773,0.00001898586,0.00001170482,0.00003221598,0.05866463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4524463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9574149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470870246","doi":"10.1108/nlw-03-2016-0020","title":"A two-way street: building the recruitment narrative in LIS programs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Accreditation; Originality; Sociology; Conversation; Attractiveness; Value (mathematics); Diversity (politics); Higher education; The Internet; Public relations; Psychology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Qualitative research; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05948329804637635,"gpt":0.3278642741703837,"spread":0.2683809761240074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000332243,0.0001100887,0.0001097712,0.000159776,0.0003565285,0.000402203,0.000619093,0.00002966058,0.002509482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004004676,0.00005771324,0.00005832422,0.001396208,0.0002187049,0.02159284,0.0001057375,0.0001071005,0.00009858971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003847202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004282524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004783791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005413051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998583,0.0001921984,0.0002882826,0.0001934635,0.0003510808,0.0003920087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992853,0.0002016727,0.0001122775,0.0002128262,0.00001138596,0.0001764815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001944035,0.00003774209,0.06164901,0.000002201423,0.000006774328,0.000003356197,0.05527184,0.000003325935,0.00003118863,0.4965378,0.0420353,0.344402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003617325,0.00003427376,0.004752407,0.0001108465,0.000001209688,2.014458e-7,0.007430051,0.00001185599,0.0003831862,0.01155494,0.9752362,0.0001230696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2591086,0.0003153455,0.00006746487,0.2353984,0.0009485211,0.002012797,0.000009692114,0.0004172233,0.501722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8913327,0.00008064862,0.00243937,0.007523833,0.0007378024,0.0001013485,0.000007438638,0.00001259259,0.09776431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.933201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117499497","doi":"10.1108/nlw-05-2014-0051","title":"A study of print and computer-based reading to measure and compare rates of comprehension and retention","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Media, Communication, and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Reading (process); Comprehension; Computer science; Hypertext; Reading comprehension; The Internet; Guardian; Presentation (obstetrics); Chunking (psychology); Psychology; World Wide Web; Multimedia; Advertising; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08412756495929888,"gpt":0.3220249121508618,"spread":0.2378973471915629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002653169,0.00005231925,0.0001412172,0.0001014664,0.0001300763,0.00003820703,0.00008687086,0.00001581438,0.00001391102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000289756,0.00004969811,0.000008605118,0.0002074505,0.00007040499,0.0002077701,0.00005689936,0.00004375233,3.117054e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004316312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004668404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006573893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001089453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992433,0.0002790012,0.000160809,0.000120604,0.0001276625,0.00006868364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993939,0.0002238865,0.00009082155,0.0001519073,0.00003252387,0.0001069907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006023373,0.0001840158,0.89774,0.00008703257,0.00001294894,9.630926e-8,0.06171208,0.00002452106,0.0005210899,0.005508813,0.002711199,0.03143799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006954973,0.0002172457,0.9842814,0.0002899138,0.0000204528,2.220891e-7,0.006702409,0.001152216,0.000644945,0.00113226,0.004760855,0.0001026047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967111,0.0001638227,0.000214156,0.001284397,0.00007781007,0.0002857302,6.351641e-7,0.0000206762,0.001241721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956139,0.00003187812,0.004063859,0.00007919785,0.0000698236,0.000002994983,0.000006289257,0.00000448063,0.0001275831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08654139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.202663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060078184","doi":"10.1108/03074800510575311","title":"The academic library as congenial space: more on the Saint Mary's experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Academic library; Value (mathematics); Public relations; Library science; Position (finance); Media studies; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Business; Qualitative research; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02669685267046045,"gpt":0.3059376528921263,"spread":0.2792408002216659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002466798,0.0001892116,0.0001226965,0.00007305536,0.001628835,0.0009287231,0.001558691,0.0001027459,0.006215942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009590022,0.0001102447,0.0001020468,0.001017946,0.0008312505,0.007066313,0.0001816903,0.0005118398,0.0007170204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002688732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009750671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001008815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001077418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978334,0.0002677162,0.0002867155,0.0003701459,0.0006818026,0.0005601941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983972,0.00070835,0.0001282419,0.0004098411,0.000006180825,0.0003501324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006037909,0.00001700098,0.006659099,7.770126e-7,0.00000517328,0.000006377474,0.008035535,0.00000901331,0.00005729953,0.5834543,0.3813308,0.02036423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113806,0.00004239686,0.004482181,0.00002221783,0.000003121035,0.000001394725,0.003966392,0.00004975248,0.003546513,0.01137336,0.9762291,0.0001697216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2496341,0.0004079572,0.000001486572,0.4575227,0.0004822961,0.0003447376,0.000004965092,0.0002541661,0.2913476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6339394,0.0004847644,0.000222715,0.02492598,0.003072738,0.00002642927,0.000008973037,0.00002179538,0.3372971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5948983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984242297","doi":"10.1108/03074801111100454","title":"City councillors and the mission of public libraries","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Sociology; Public relations; Content analysis; Dimension (graph theory); Homogeneous; Public administration; Value (mathematics); Library classification; Library science; Political science; Social science; Qualitative research; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1477952794523823,"gpt":0.2416087219366266,"spread":0.09381344248424431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001313291,0.00005737191,0.0001221839,0.00002405382,0.0004370118,0.00006650614,0.0001975621,0.00002322226,0.002613407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000879742,0.00003047921,0.0000442198,0.0003127369,0.0008040879,0.0009919705,0.00012672,0.00005989241,0.00001067075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009374586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009676914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001889165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004879786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993933,0.00007972423,0.00009900524,0.00009392884,0.0002019775,0.0001320291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996503,0.00009728996,0.00005461216,0.00006292302,0.00001763498,0.0001172185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004035699,0.00001590909,0.01610875,0.000003210178,0.00001310894,6.467018e-7,0.01909048,7.84437e-9,0.000001349204,0.8220552,0.1380949,0.004576071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002188822,0.000008855003,0.008440115,0.000006966864,0.000007558369,5.693076e-8,0.001770948,3.275581e-7,0.00004203914,0.03553789,0.9539167,0.00004963352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01364763,0.002448103,0.000002099603,0.01433679,0.0002465438,0.0001006358,0.000002660061,0.0000770556,0.9691385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8394852,0.0008608012,0.0004676075,0.0006708652,0.0002200862,0.00000184187,0.000001330052,0.000004731743,0.1582875],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8258376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538090608","doi":"10.1108/nlw-06-2013-0054","title":"“Ask me what I read”: readers' advisory and immigrant adaptation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Adaptation (eye); Immigration; Perception; Originality; Sociology; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02975125788611799,"gpt":0.2544855232785179,"spread":0.2247342653923999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001224762,0.0001097444,0.0001122089,0.0001249303,0.0003395737,0.001199746,0.0002297476,0.00005712129,0.004252037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002338254,0.00009920045,0.00003874613,0.0005538451,0.0002082295,0.02353937,0.00003859938,0.0001062374,0.0002770312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008133493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000335904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001730732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007776603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988295,0.0001132647,0.0001902378,0.0002768522,0.000299172,0.0002909714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993386,0.0001172323,0.00007649416,0.0001505611,0.00001248153,0.0003046198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004140773,0.00008582747,0.01555892,0.00002366056,0.0000209562,0.0000124872,0.09561893,0.00001249726,0.0007113504,0.1730956,0.2886753,0.4261431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004607896,0.000124281,0.03518404,0.0001474469,0.0000145487,0.000002361542,0.1092828,0.0004716381,0.0009506258,0.07337554,0.7795029,0.0004831213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3240024,0.003723348,0.0002403786,0.2741455,0.001738522,0.001461795,0.000007047323,0.0009036476,0.3937774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7666487,0.00123087,0.003741156,0.004868086,0.0007842991,0.00001873536,0.00003855353,0.00001829879,0.2226513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4908276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079562825","doi":"10.1108/nlw-05-2014-0063","title":"New perspectives on community library development in Africa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Community development; Originality; Sociology; Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Politics; Public relations; Knowledge management; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Geography; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09255229338010165,"gpt":0.2976566037655878,"spread":0.2051043103854862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002887287,0.0001346138,0.0001401593,0.0002628358,0.0003450819,0.0004176029,0.0006998808,0.00004851044,0.002028423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006003701,0.0001265022,0.00003284306,0.001467109,0.0001115676,0.007017064,0.0001369958,0.000350604,0.0002742621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004531377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003848632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000563277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008062291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983683,0.0004064993,0.0002189879,0.0002279211,0.0004112691,0.0003669898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989231,0.0001707801,0.00006451323,0.0002373457,0.000006213898,0.0005979966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001026813,0.0002244916,0.03264249,0.000002853917,0.000005321607,0.00001376695,0.1466796,0.00001097041,0.000007774701,0.1679726,0.6396953,0.01264213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003988636,0.0001397124,0.0167117,0.00004558,0.000001236547,2.539815e-7,0.02885082,0.00000314327,0.0006461554,0.01998521,0.9330148,0.0002025865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0937694,0.0003297848,0.00001591065,0.02530053,0.000267771,0.0002242758,0.000002046651,0.0003185655,0.8797717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7244117,0.00003666733,0.009153617,0.001290136,0.0005398383,0.000005004494,0.0000206684,0.00001756251,0.2645248],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6306423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203777132","doi":"10.1108/nlw-08-2015-0056","title":"Can we talk?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpersonal communication; Diversity (politics); Emotive; Outreach; Promotion (chess); Cultural diversity; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Public relations; Dialog box; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Politics; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05838018412209337,"gpt":0.2942225907936403,"spread":0.2358424066715469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001176004,0.00007038227,0.00007549869,0.00008500981,0.0001792692,0.0003143253,0.0003515053,0.00003358347,0.002312497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002815781,0.00006431007,0.00003408348,0.0008169817,0.0001240692,0.003744795,0.00004409713,0.00007859822,0.0002337587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001358555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001497768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006763838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001929349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999061,0.00007474762,0.0001150793,0.0001716758,0.000324037,0.0002534985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992384,0.00003702882,0.00004168178,0.0001358597,0.000007253141,0.0005397164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008547204,0.00001952796,0.01612225,0.000001326768,0.000002354668,0.00001491599,0.006296435,0.000003142037,0.00001745476,0.2089265,0.7550181,0.01356944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001169778,0.0000245027,0.0008692632,0.000008409235,0.000001596196,4.910829e-7,0.001539059,0.000006574795,0.0004866775,0.07488242,0.9219708,0.00009326573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02370124,0.0002074061,0.000007650235,0.2001641,0.0007001185,0.0001196325,0.000004596894,0.0002818468,0.7748134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5549521,0.00003296441,0.001077824,0.002943621,0.00117481,0.000002115573,0.00001353476,0.000008091361,0.4397949],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5312509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968934425","doi":"10.1108/03074801011044089","title":"Readers' advisory interactions with immigrant readers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Aside; Public relations; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Originality; Political science; Social science; Law; Qualitative research; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02373436705260232,"gpt":0.2784547317379792,"spread":0.2547203646853768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001005075,0.0001133121,0.0001024034,0.0001623555,0.0004517907,0.0003522708,0.000372711,0.00004654012,0.005568404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002384282,0.00009305108,0.00005190996,0.000867223,0.0003432001,0.006682654,0.00002669414,0.0003509139,0.0002053586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007363114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008806492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001094039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01270062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988999,0.00005918289,0.000156988,0.000270291,0.0002942548,0.0003194053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992375,0.000115963,0.00007636112,0.0002350927,0.00001074931,0.0003242908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001599018,0.0001896475,0.07774347,0.00001177697,0.00003456546,0.00005064379,0.04871459,0.000007956747,0.002665477,0.2434054,0.595634,0.03138259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001905239,0.00004726823,0.007276379,0.0000261295,0.000007816659,0.000003736948,0.01297902,0.00001138564,0.001864528,0.00360747,0.9737945,0.0001912441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1491182,0.00003978536,0.000111977,0.1174584,0.001526238,0.0003424083,0.000008455224,0.0005904031,0.7308041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7596447,0.00001741451,0.005865614,0.002518772,0.001055357,0.000007708264,0.00002632316,0.00001666461,0.2308474],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6105266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500242449","doi":"10.1108/03074801111117032","title":"Righting the academic paper","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Service (business); Academic writing; Process (computing); Sociology; Pedagogy; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05305505927075289,"gpt":0.2748758315925603,"spread":0.2218207723218075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002448775,0.00007350274,0.00006482528,0.00008280272,0.0005966785,0.0001779651,0.0007805154,0.0000429115,0.0219433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002932474,0.00004578031,0.00005092111,0.0008552669,0.0001881968,0.03551258,0.00008810481,0.0002377306,0.001214482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005497529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002505005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000194488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001460022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990163,0.00009082822,0.0002211632,0.0001162352,0.0002610393,0.0002944274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994457,0.0001047404,0.00008575619,0.000182587,0.000006725814,0.0001744881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004693956,0.000004003939,0.01363156,0.00000100462,0.000002372554,7.563078e-7,0.03084783,3.059177e-7,0.000004719215,0.6501363,0.2936938,0.01167269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005750933,0.000005355849,0.0125942,0.00001092995,0.000001710546,3.473118e-7,0.001259029,0.000009266789,0.0001915319,0.03217405,0.9536183,0.00007771117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.009350872,0.0001803426,0.00001253711,0.03027527,0.0004874819,0.0001345473,0.000001441899,0.000229148,0.9593284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3865521,0.0001664167,0.002389138,0.08439089,0.001944184,0.000009097169,0.00001110007,0.00001553808,0.5245215],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6599246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1803315191","doi":"10.1108/nlw-01-2015-0007","title":"How we missed the boat: reading scholarship and the field of LIS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Reading (process); Sociology; Originality; Conceptualization; Value (mathematics); Library science; Computer science; Political science; Social science; Law; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06661482387480523,"gpt":0.3073543919430358,"spread":0.2407395680682306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000513392,0.00006159356,0.00009075701,0.0000411632,0.0002844202,0.0006268434,0.0004346044,0.00003464192,0.000127004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003859145,0.00003304015,0.0000374697,0.0005689452,0.0003356724,0.003729891,0.0000605898,0.0001378753,0.000005313233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003132278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003744591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001776023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001412782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991148,0.0002262815,0.0001061778,0.0001227882,0.0002759694,0.0001539609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998888,0.000705825,0.00007887273,0.0001667337,0.00001119163,0.000149356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009754574,0.00001242609,0.02030467,0.000005616073,0.000008746259,0.000002423254,0.01718842,5.648867e-7,0.00006728547,0.5646994,0.3839989,0.01361408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003775876,0.00003801567,0.001753295,0.00003390889,0.000007435127,5.308899e-7,0.005534114,0.00001436134,0.003083825,0.09491827,0.8941655,0.00007315367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03577127,0.0008964976,0.00001120117,0.8002837,0.0002457917,0.0002054,0.000001554144,0.00005045145,0.1625341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8933607,0.0001365515,0.0003671425,0.006420695,0.0004772413,0.00000278361,0.000001639422,0.000004933285,0.09922834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8575894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6044665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971021845","doi":"10.1108/03074800910975151","title":"What do LIS students in the United States know about liaison duties?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Psychology; Sample (material); Medical education; Library science; Survey research; Point (geometry); School library; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine; Applied psychology; Engineering; Geography; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01616677369437111,"gpt":0.3078358465215492,"spread":0.2916690728271781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004086562,0.0001300795,0.0001281692,0.0004141763,0.0003651126,0.00369806,0.001364264,0.0000482446,0.002589698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003078634,0.00009195745,0.00005669656,0.003163216,0.0001209437,0.05181635,0.00006870617,0.0002166994,0.0002171502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001726894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001800447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003252306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005051538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981493,0.000238239,0.0003306778,0.0001788899,0.0006956605,0.0004072467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992551,0.0001902743,0.0001080946,0.000263271,0.00001610283,0.0001672196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003720574,0.0001431886,0.07034159,0.00000523957,0.000005959366,0.0000107049,0.1730499,0.00009115854,8.486691e-7,0.1592248,0.5267642,0.07032517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002298122,0.00004275064,0.04915408,0.0001188918,0.000001786994,2.8424e-7,0.01761938,0.00005526285,0.00001980035,0.0114909,0.9211409,0.0001261331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5528561,0.004291698,0.000006296473,0.2100048,0.001522866,0.0008425473,0.00001194462,0.0003983012,0.2300654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5830998,0.01512747,0.0004645873,0.2208317,0.00126763,0.00001592592,0.0003026641,0.00001896895,0.1788712],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3943768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015816663","doi":"10.1108/03074800510575366","title":"The education of public librarians to serve leisure readers in the United States, Canada and Europe","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Graduate Education; Public Library Association; American Library Association","keywords":"Curriculum; Coursework; Originality; Service (business); School library; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Medical education; Political science; Pedagogy; Business; Medicine; Computer science; Marketing; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03166555983964788,"gpt":0.2616235349534934,"spread":0.2299579751138455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002913089,0.00006678336,0.00006339897,0.0001025858,0.0002964552,0.0004312521,0.0005039876,0.00001922753,0.0001523671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005668608,0.00004264908,0.00001145591,0.002250116,0.0001134321,0.002620647,0.00003579638,0.0001022369,0.000004039989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001366047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003835504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2827167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8470485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988942,0.0002994693,0.0001754821,0.0001361075,0.0002744055,0.0002203603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993567,0.000242,0.00006259882,0.0001650261,0.00001534394,0.0001582755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001235638,0.00004639023,0.0994164,0.000004939786,0.000004487403,0.00000184571,0.02144849,0.00007395511,0.000005817479,0.1659986,0.6834864,0.02950035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004923008,0.00001605768,0.04282812,0.00001179308,0.000001388051,3.371418e-7,0.01234028,0.0000282982,0.00004965156,0.001065743,0.943552,0.000057145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4284071,0.0002514342,0.000003434943,0.511538,0.0001854383,0.0002976805,0.00000883346,0.00003031828,0.05927774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323198,0.000234191,0.0003368796,0.01393422,0.0003791675,0.000007398338,0.00007006995,0.000009235353,0.05270903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5643318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7220598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538659700","doi":"10.1108/nlw-03-2016-0019","title":"Economic well-being and social justice through pleasure reading","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Reading (process); Government (linguistics); Mandate; Public relations; Originality; Recreation; Value (mathematics); Literacy; Economic Justice; Sociology; Information literacy; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Law; Computer science; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02438155108679882,"gpt":0.2793436034678743,"spread":0.2549620523810755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001140698,0.00009211025,0.0001062646,0.00005377751,0.0006681249,0.0003093114,0.0002302455,0.0000537082,0.002434665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001430834,0.00007211067,0.00003759301,0.0001809698,0.0002022939,0.007566776,0.00005366883,0.00006631387,0.0002399649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002238788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004062595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001073721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001979202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990771,0.00008043451,0.0001513942,0.0002565553,0.0001466469,0.0002878857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995566,0.0001650985,0.00006830458,0.00008487958,0.000003403569,0.0001217014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001578779,0.000006860466,0.01528675,0.000007445326,0.000005767713,0.000004211118,0.006705128,3.961476e-7,0.0002155167,0.8172271,0.1494682,0.01105687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002094415,0.00001642697,0.00438547,0.00002982431,0.0000124222,7.109898e-7,0.001332313,0.000003741895,0.0008182698,0.05807301,0.9349631,0.0001552487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07979713,0.00004742358,0.00006723402,0.1025284,0.0006815735,0.0001229668,0.000004905588,0.0002062333,0.8165441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8419002,0.0001100703,0.0008703851,0.002756712,0.002524434,0.000002079492,0.000004061819,0.00001282392,0.1518193],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.785495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989339084","doi":"10.1108/03074800510575357","title":"Ethical perspectives of library and information science graduate students in the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical code; Professional ethics; Value (mathematics); Reading (process); Originality; Population; Information ethics; Information science; Prejudice (legal term); Graduate students; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Library science; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Social psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04210879178433129,"gpt":0.3180402010609664,"spread":0.2759314092766351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001531373,0.0000683887,0.0001033546,0.000544504,0.00005043094,0.00008135377,0.0002365715,0.00003125138,0.00009971631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005641382,0.00004645461,0.00001792132,0.001514766,0.0002145276,0.005780752,0.0001324265,0.0003608658,0.000007777087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004909366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000125347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001324866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.82619e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991755,0.00006200145,0.0001839682,0.00009020529,0.0003628332,0.0001254667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995539,0.0001504736,0.00005313751,0.0001483452,0.00001078631,0.00008335552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008147712,0.000503245,0.7535755,0.0001418952,0.00003418406,0.00001182065,0.124752,0.00007683331,0.0001507547,0.0825694,0.0216647,0.01570486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001458614,0.0001910808,0.910318,0.0001673641,0.0000143667,0.000006278853,0.005201449,0.0005248743,0.002317176,0.002519689,0.07718563,0.00009545411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9423059,0.0001460605,0.000004178562,0.04324397,0.0000177594,0.0001968607,0.000005176502,0.00003692561,0.01404322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877617,0.000461501,0.0008410006,0.01037953,0.00005001513,0.000002223475,0.00005994367,0.000004646467,0.0004394943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1567425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4190906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273030711","doi":"10.1108/nlw-11-2015-0083","title":"Immaterial labour, public librarians, and third-generation public libraries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Sociology; Public relations; Ideology; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Value (mathematics); Prosumer; Public value; Political science; Public administration; Politics; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05020638233496871,"gpt":0.2543847553952387,"spread":0.20417837306027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002508298,0.0001909405,0.0001825596,0.0002737255,0.0007747984,0.003825898,0.0005491163,0.0001227055,0.007579567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001244622,0.0001387072,0.00005468228,0.000993935,0.0004718656,0.03796974,0.0001715516,0.00009155007,0.0001553036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001660784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008009473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003440869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979493,0.0002831733,0.0003215389,0.0004628335,0.0004158154,0.0005673141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988189,0.0001464209,0.0001324563,0.0002696214,0.00001824508,0.0006144039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001504693,0.00002384921,0.02282014,0.000003718409,0.000007562478,0.000004210531,0.0007434213,2.634374e-8,0.002650936,0.8109441,0.1431721,0.01961484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004071943,0.00005158536,0.009083032,0.00002004457,0.000003584256,0.000001495674,0.0002462585,0.000005213434,0.00534399,0.05142889,0.9331554,0.0002533028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3359182,0.0005942941,0.0002546094,0.480612,0.002173134,0.000434426,0.00006150523,0.001030467,0.1789213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8223679,0.0003257078,0.002275868,0.003433707,0.003894018,0.00001323559,0.00006069527,0.00002820342,0.1676006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7899833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565179793","doi":"10.1108/nlw-04-2013-0036","title":"Making sense of liaison consultations: using reflection to understand information-seeking behavior","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Information seeking behavior; Information seeking; Originality; Thematic analysis; Value (mathematics); Experiential learning; Information literacy; Psychology; Information behavior; Reflection (computer programming); Process (computing); Information needs; The Internet; Medical education; Qualitative research; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Pedagogy; Medicine; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07882484346875022,"gpt":0.3515871714652245,"spread":0.2727623279964743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001350739,0.00008928421,0.0001118816,0.0004922585,0.0004111285,0.0006214584,0.0001713139,0.00004402287,0.002421414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008006289,0.00008921754,0.00004298018,0.001785823,0.00008578588,0.05149484,0.00005154554,0.00008646934,0.000202884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004437378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003970427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008202987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003224684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99882,0.00006492552,0.0004374855,0.00009794586,0.0003410582,0.0002385931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993005,0.0001092549,0.000218361,0.0001342384,0.00007425086,0.0001633707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007109482,0.0000893145,0.04725223,0.00007876658,0.0000296701,0.000002536399,0.2692587,0.001290525,0.001572907,0.406372,0.18488,0.08910222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008399135,0.0001092581,0.02409397,0.0004056328,0.00003118466,0.000005400145,0.07685277,0.00405001,0.001934251,0.009819476,0.8811971,0.0006610415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5972136,0.00007102933,0.007580321,0.01405246,0.001211354,0.001792687,0.00002483272,0.0004456906,0.377608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953901,0.00001205885,0.02809503,0.007704155,0.0002778096,0.00001287871,0.00002709191,0.00001055016,0.009959431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6963171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071418318","doi":"10.1108/03074800810873588","title":"Evolution of a summer research/writing workshop for first‐year university students","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Originality; Information literacy; Medical education; Academic year; Value (mathematics); Mathematics education; Library science; Computer science; Psychology; Medicine; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09433431835742966,"gpt":0.3524881447099692,"spread":0.2581538263525395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004608699,0.00005921168,0.0001011816,0.0003477107,0.0009567021,0.00009178217,0.0006469475,0.00004419879,0.0008105122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000967298,0.0000617972,0.00006965475,0.001772969,0.0003131108,0.01547011,0.0001412456,0.0001238883,0.00005502253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005216932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005434533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000188269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006277187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986218,0.0001190548,0.0001942181,0.0001495383,0.0005884407,0.0003269795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991337,0.0003962111,0.00008338489,0.0001481345,0.0000612438,0.0001773317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006958953,0.00004581107,0.397878,0.00001295825,0.000006551613,0.000002110909,0.01066542,0.00001787421,0.00000300959,0.2728049,0.3177673,0.000726443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004977087,0.00003177857,0.03478079,0.00006828064,0.000002215155,2.504789e-7,0.01377146,0.00006475519,0.00006299119,0.003872862,0.9467495,0.00009738278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7301849,0.0002429287,0.0005296755,0.0177609,0.0004506056,0.0009826195,0.00003752911,0.0002399244,0.2495709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8543299,0.0001147748,0.00337088,0.0002501019,0.0004058892,0.000001992403,0.00001453665,0.000007383504,0.1415045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6289822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029557388","doi":"10.1108/03074800110400778","title":"A national library association for Vietnam","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"African Education and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Vietnamese; National library; Library science; Association (psychology); Standardization; Political science; Computer science; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03121508828707212,"gpt":0.3188953958860664,"spread":0.2876803075989942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000126844,0.00006536262,0.00007986486,0.0001215274,0.0002756623,0.0001839636,0.0001889118,0.00005622998,0.006957726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001471098,0.00007107016,0.00006764682,0.0006082593,0.00003154502,0.00144401,0.00002107017,0.00007402927,0.00019372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007317811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001416142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002653546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008617405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990958,0.00007360528,0.0001421968,0.0001259162,0.0002955933,0.000266893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992385,0.0003763129,0.00009109859,0.00006487702,0.00002693515,0.000202286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005531168,0.00002267525,0.03250435,0.000001225578,0.000005529229,1.455965e-7,0.001162966,0.0000011117,5.646917e-7,0.3560811,0.6087841,0.001430666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001584721,0.000007353708,0.005452197,0.000005220173,0.000004312993,1.35142e-7,0.0003899251,0.00001509523,0.00001535247,0.07772928,0.9161398,0.00008285063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001739716,0.0001088536,0.00003403655,0.1238566,0.0006100123,0.0001983211,0.00002937009,0.0002384605,0.8731846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08505318,0.00006405285,0.002790017,0.01228652,0.003748229,0.00002185737,0.00009108365,0.00001971379,0.8959253],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3073557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001608372","doi":"10.1108/03074800510575339","title":"Toward a template for systematic reference and instruction programme analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Computer science; Service (business); Order (exchange); Academic library; Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Process management; Engineering management; Library science; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Engineering; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0509453912901249,"gpt":0.2963072423694455,"spread":0.2453618510793206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002379733,0.00008988501,0.0002011986,0.0003593305,0.0002950614,0.0006154968,0.0002336479,0.00004122271,0.0005149361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004268965,0.00007381963,0.00007488071,0.001630049,0.00008180436,0.01964272,0.00003562784,0.00006217904,0.00003803955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001540608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001589078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009300088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009035255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989402,0.00006344791,0.0003331774,0.0001720116,0.0002215305,0.0002696632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993611,0.0001081003,0.0001516442,0.0001363864,0.00001957635,0.0002231992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006700934,0.00005161081,0.02706168,0.001720955,0.0002282188,0.000001033693,0.03521864,0.00007879615,0.000007088064,0.8180382,0.03727273,0.08025407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004650703,0.0000436843,0.003893877,0.0002890132,0.0001056528,0.000001540466,0.002602495,0.002036813,0.00008034013,0.005627675,0.9846164,0.0002374434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3378427,0.001427293,0.005424199,0.1399631,0.0009647956,0.00765469,0.00009584126,0.002216664,0.5044107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902979,0.00006341406,0.03122526,0.004044573,0.0005932803,0.00009394765,0.00007706993,0.00001128612,0.07359319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971255115","doi":"10.1108/03074800210428551","title":"Providing digital opportunities through public libraries: the Canadian example","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Work (physics); Laptop; The Internet; Digital divide; Internet access; Foundation (evidence); Public relations; Library science; Business; Political science; Public administration; World Wide Web; Engineering; Computer science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2461852289020598,"gpt":0.2707030155667394,"spread":0.02451778666467958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001183198,0.0001336799,0.0001064899,0.0001369749,0.00200175,0.005826588,0.0008453681,0.00006033451,0.01167632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006331705,0.0001018998,0.00006431539,0.001073419,0.0005194669,0.02995821,0.00007477184,0.0001709782,0.0002229349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003285296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00228339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04487414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1608259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984446,0.00009623393,0.0002042872,0.0002567265,0.0004040797,0.0005940936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988905,0.0001905318,0.00007484652,0.0002676398,0.00001146786,0.0005650307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.331533e-7,0.00001041532,0.005305976,0.000001593537,0.000004480305,0.00001044447,0.01073642,3.579173e-7,4.037916e-7,0.5522738,0.4217773,0.009877838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006310735,0.00001844927,0.0003064529,0.000009572183,0.000002236063,0.000001238684,0.006232881,0.00002510217,0.00003480449,0.02636069,0.9667972,0.0001482596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003451469,0.0002997212,0.000006574537,0.2173147,0.0003225886,0.0002154172,0.0000176347,0.0002364556,0.7781354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6826011,0.00007369925,0.0002716723,0.007500955,0.0008440639,0.000008360809,0.00003718533,0.0000150209,0.3086479],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6791496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053790652","doi":"10.1108/03074800710722162","title":"Education for library and information studies in Canada: a cross‐cultural comparison","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Library science; Originality; Internship; Curriculum; Competence (human resources); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Creativity; Computer science; Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05373629915418587,"gpt":0.3666315671728902,"spread":0.3128952680187044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001285631,0.00008230342,0.0001178314,0.0001423836,0.0002507409,0.0003589623,0.0001588542,0.00003027523,0.00009371441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004800354,0.00007422996,0.00001857316,0.0006447519,0.0001278698,0.03368524,0.00003639473,0.00007437437,0.000002915297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004689107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003815574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0575369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.407546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991164,0.00003013307,0.0003046421,0.0001248127,0.0001757664,0.0002482418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994684,0.0001882087,0.0001039814,0.0000644387,0.00001300806,0.000161987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006285997,0.00002059302,0.6244831,0.00003167062,0.000004982049,8.211163e-7,0.008946453,0.000008493925,0.000006087108,0.1762151,0.1478825,0.04233737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002260186,0.00002226168,0.22566,0.00004128596,0.000002430221,4.238214e-7,0.01842446,0.00003662271,0.0005858801,0.004469859,0.7504013,0.000129469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8438611,0.001185392,0.00002078088,0.02175402,0.00119973,0.0005990873,0.00001290302,0.0001029957,0.131264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785581,0.0001504514,0.002168246,0.003782463,0.0004617183,0.00001135823,0.00008616236,0.000005244836,0.01477629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6025189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9798301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075959705","doi":"10.1108/03074800210415032","title":"The library as congenial space: the Saint Mary’s experience","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Power (physics); Fund raising; SAINT; Library science; Public relations; Management; Political science; Higher education; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02843996253463529,"gpt":0.2692480903126307,"spread":0.2408081277779954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001662062,0.0001609479,0.000113729,0.00005656969,0.002031362,0.001733273,0.001404396,0.00006121532,0.01781991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006771426,0.00009428496,0.0001041945,0.001181005,0.0008664713,0.007339071,0.0001869569,0.0002457355,0.000870756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001499387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004235277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002498093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002481782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980326,0.0002841422,0.00025363,0.0003248533,0.0005719631,0.0005327896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986351,0.0004835681,0.0001081209,0.0004368775,0.000006588311,0.0003297357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001950915,0.00002205897,0.0095837,9.736468e-7,0.000005759288,0.00001459367,0.009640591,0.000001722862,0.00002158117,0.38425,0.5778967,0.01854284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001162068,0.00003799123,0.00299746,0.00001005885,0.000003543782,0.000002384176,0.003278906,0.00006541475,0.0007177875,0.01390576,0.9787107,0.0001537974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07028224,0.001224501,0.000003471062,0.2892162,0.001089913,0.000370581,0.000004549802,0.0003305329,0.6374781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4951786,0.0006253422,0.0002239468,0.00727886,0.001665219,0.00001839587,0.000004981965,0.00001718529,0.4949875],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4248964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281474558","doi":"10.1108/nlw-08-2015-0059","title":"Design-based mathematics workshops","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Aside; Set (abstract data type); Sample (material); Mathematics education; Task (project management); Computer science; Psychology; Engineering; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03667138147024922,"gpt":0.2589678263120431,"spread":0.2222964448417938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009780409,0.00008884646,0.0001097487,0.0001530139,0.0001209979,0.00009816132,0.0003379151,0.0000673246,0.003480104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008587826,0.00006171613,0.00004059944,0.0005722812,0.0001384318,0.0006570495,0.00005373397,0.0000611856,0.0005157037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002087568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004342978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007319005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005859995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992137,0.0000321671,0.0001475117,0.0001553179,0.0001813824,0.0002699016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991971,0.0004411442,0.00004966773,0.000173572,0.00000679455,0.0001316802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002046653,0.00006289852,0.005849972,0.00000367629,0.00001026828,0.00001087004,0.000659133,0.000001278968,0.00006935829,0.396348,0.3979127,0.1990513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003954975,0.00001326357,0.000602094,0.00008542774,0.000003445072,2.754319e-7,0.00008261987,0.000006956488,0.003593667,0.1938624,0.801166,0.0001883851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004434804,0.0001779243,0.0392505,0.09979858,0.0003814534,0.0003840131,0.00000260429,0.001644152,0.8539259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3920633,0.00004662384,0.08783133,0.002454767,0.0004103461,0.00001309892,0.00000408173,0.00003978758,0.5171367],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4032533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511474693","doi":"10.1108/nlw.2002.103.10.414.2","title":"Education and research for marketing and quality management in libraries/La formation et la recherche sur le marketing et la gestion de la qualite en bibliotheque: Satellite meeting/Colloque Satellite, Quebec, August 14‐16 Auot","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1996804950586239,"gpt":0.4329849365432279,"spread":0.2333044414846041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04374623,0.0002015445,0.0002236145,0.001440977,0.0004265195,0.003175796,0.0003657804,0.0003123149,0.0001997289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003453532,0.0002050816,0.00005633253,0.003224433,0.0003060257,0.02929983,0.0002205052,0.0007043662,0.00000606878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001382391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008292026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002560258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009382159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9725848,0.02521253,0.00073155,0.0004077424,0.0005258478,0.0005374915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744291,0.02478874,0.0002609302,0.0002229015,0.00005827115,0.000240086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002578989,0.0001538122,0.02994774,0.0005352764,0.00001464916,0.000002286418,0.06747777,0.000009301663,0.00005739511,0.3652144,0.0356079,0.5007215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005922031,0.00001441432,0.142041,0.0005930125,0.000005013115,0.000003269034,0.01114062,0.0003381047,0.00009006161,0.01659262,0.8283361,0.000253586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1371195,0.002270421,0.0002147238,0.03765777,0.00009389483,0.001068937,0.00001387275,0.0002284052,0.8213325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5216623,0.05209392,0.1260695,0.0084142,0.0005721652,0.0003604238,0.0002906731,0.0001203694,0.2904165],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7927282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050890970","doi":"10.1108/nlw-07-2014-0091","title":"Learning about translators from library catalog records: implications for readers’ advisory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Reading (process); Computer science; Purchasing; Value (mathematics); World Wide Web; Library science; Information retrieval; Sociology; Political science; Business; Qualitative research; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09473188488161399,"gpt":0.2710938760798315,"spread":0.1763619911982175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005507154,0.0001891271,0.0002275452,0.0001345576,0.0003950746,0.0004324531,0.000233081,0.0000438631,0.003141372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009003466,0.0001741827,0.0001279557,0.0001197649,0.00009579572,0.003850451,0.00003262319,0.0002279974,0.0001414286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004894312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001523332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003251161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007755318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998953,0.00006388242,0.0003201434,0.0003099242,0.0000990933,0.0002539811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998906,0.000501712,0.0001410742,0.0002246975,0.0000178317,0.0002087552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002015922,0.00005002948,0.01518211,0.00002211521,0.0001262761,0.000001043582,0.03985316,0.00002331489,0.000004343056,0.06490281,0.7462579,0.1333753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006492655,0.00007156256,0.002295415,0.0000308383,0.0000529497,4.17141e-7,0.003717539,0.00001791517,0.00003039299,0.02132367,0.9715795,0.000230519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006750014,0.01639411,0.000465432,0.0783733,0.001631118,0.0007286464,0.001056498,0.001313484,0.8932874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4676452,0.001592498,0.01527882,0.00916511,0.01025782,0.0002650792,0.004846491,0.0003368176,0.4906122],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4608952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987047618","doi":"10.1108/03074800910928621","title":"IFLA WLIC 2008 Quebec City, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Library Science and Information Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Value (mathematics); Library science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01026009283646616,"gpt":0.1854571603768096,"spread":0.1751970675403435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006546067,0.000150746,0.0001626882,0.0001913599,0.0001386834,0.0008118044,0.001820393,0.00002947965,0.000598347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004970299,0.0001291974,0.00005104085,0.0015569,0.00001957879,0.01851809,0.0001925555,0.0001293836,0.000196453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003279766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002135144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1426283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1413138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985077,0.00003439695,0.0003471469,0.0002709431,0.0004684996,0.0003712573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988833,0.00003878613,0.0001116715,0.0006071368,0.00001141185,0.0003477114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001353673,0.000006800863,0.002762566,0.000001890301,0.000002114611,0.00001157343,0.0002934598,0.0000258432,0.00001133653,0.03531155,0.9332456,0.0283259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001723931,0.00002538074,0.02896664,0.00001926468,3.974564e-7,0.00001249557,0.00002565274,0.002123164,0.001388314,0.002412351,0.9646404,0.0002134823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01820814,0.0005460017,0.01096138,0.134771,0.002666828,0.0004228412,0.00000971927,0.001136249,0.8312778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5604675,0.00001137947,0.006124539,0.05615791,0.00058119,0.000003034249,0.00002003399,0.000008855215,0.3766256],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5422593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}