{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"bee526e7a9cc","filters":{"venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law"}},"results":[{"id":"W2217361879","doi":"","title":"Rights-vetting in New Zealand and Canada: Similar Idea, Different Outcomes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vetting; Charter; Legislation; Project commissioning; Law; Political science; Politics; Bureaucracy; Publishing; Obligation; Bill of rights; Public administration; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Janet L. Hiebert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03275547374255387,"gpt":0.3047101050061511,"spread":0.2719546312635972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01261759,0.0003941854,0.0008571023,0.006260553,0.0142129,0.01042098,0.001701748,0.001791563,0.004878808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04974211,0.0003770934,0.001158354,0.01302723,0.01256041,0.004826003,0.005431076,0.004462822,0.0002064247],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1531339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1406013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9748039,0.002509482,0.0006692345,0.001498902,0.01397244,0.006546018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630473,0.007744155,0.005836785,0.001681064,0.01716191,0.004528742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003930801,0.000374403,0.3150604,0.0004294176,0.0002910343,0.001210889,0.09257296,0.001681513,0.0009579898,0.4616297,0.02111677,0.1042819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001252174,0.000156795,0.754544,0.0005684609,0.0003205333,0.0003264141,0.1054814,0.002288446,0.00139631,0.01853062,0.1159112,0.0003505287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6529021,0.00319371,0.002212003,0.02117536,0.0002027324,0.0003936703,0.00103688,0.00006688154,0.3188166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835777,0.0009414699,0.001294544,0.001509464,0.00002468052,0.00006240181,0.0003944837,0.00004370964,0.01215157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1531339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9822446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272968454","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of the Executive - Principled Exasperation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Project commissioning; Statutory law; Law; Management; Publishing; Queen (butterfly); Judicial review; Political science; Operations research; Engineering; Economics","authors":[{"name":"David Mullan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03056853756616095,"gpt":0.3255545468062269,"spread":0.294986009240066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04956869,0.0003559937,0.001030562,0.001951139,0.00505459,0.01039569,0.002907861,0.01606927,0.003215813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1313549,0.0006949718,0.0006416524,0.001635542,0.01062015,0.004871859,0.004213117,0.01399041,0.001060041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005789579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01853645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009896811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01726218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9565449,0.01332483,0.003755236,0.005202295,0.01587413,0.005298675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9226211,0.04428415,0.003590999,0.006873928,0.02073152,0.00189835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000550377,0.00002241817,0.001049495,0.0001634375,0.00004758898,0.0007661853,0.001804631,0.0002690656,0.0003810494,0.8397284,0.1275749,0.02813768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000558162,0.00005691088,0.00264929,0.0008566821,0.0001003899,0.0005083004,0.0009863873,0.0007980694,0.00146266,0.3673632,0.625088,0.00007423584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03520915,0.04618333,0.02113976,0.3983864,0.01297595,0.0003126886,0.0004006204,0.000178867,0.4852133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7421599,0.01870972,0.009426234,0.1339035,0.01350858,0.0002721164,0.000240872,0.0001557652,0.0816234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04956869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2621474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211073227","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Autonomy and Justice in North America","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Autonomy; Project commissioning; Economic Justice; Publishing; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Self-determination; Political science; Indigenous rights; Public administration; Social science; Law; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Mark Bennett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01867803837209676,"gpt":0.2951108024766191,"spread":0.2764327641045224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001290594,0.00012392,0.0002837202,0.0007700305,0.0181672,0.004417493,0.0004994593,0.001988254,0.002362986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002177666,0.0001035202,0.0001283898,0.0008582302,0.02262883,0.002595509,0.006660162,0.00324236,0.00008512379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01596924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01723835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3944796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6569372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980857,0.0006364394,0.00004435216,0.0001918605,0.0003412261,0.0007003506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987977,0.0003647891,0.0001415308,0.00005186543,0.0002388512,0.0004052234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002722572,0.00008031948,0.006097874,0.0001105096,0.00001513399,0.0008583432,0.357234,0.0002158741,0.0004329229,0.5828536,0.0126114,0.0394628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003406697,0.00006009054,0.04853879,0.0006555156,0.00002985918,0.0006589596,0.2748145,0.0002887066,0.0002493677,0.204823,0.4697774,0.00006968564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4112808,0.02556838,0.0005821167,0.09252776,0.0004463813,0.00003003906,0.0000218252,0.00002205986,0.4695207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982241,0.003379418,0.0001631688,0.004082558,0.00008913653,0.00001704406,0.000005670984,0.000006834142,0.0100152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3944796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.784367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398323668","doi":"","title":"Review and appeal in civil aviation de-licensing regimes: A comparative study of New Zealand, Australia and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Civil aviation; Tribunal; Project commissioning; Publishing; Aviation; Political science; Law; High Court; Engineering; Management; Public administration; Economics","authors":[{"name":"J. R. Parnell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05168192377283623,"gpt":0.3332089948969639,"spread":0.2815270711241277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01422436,0.0002642993,0.001197313,0.00704747,0.01452894,0.01232863,0.002341904,0.002538047,0.006430944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09867416,0.0005563616,0.000585955,0.01279587,0.008559358,0.003935538,0.004897693,0.002644798,0.0003684751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09623196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1497383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9832585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9735801,0.003902646,0.001523686,0.001519774,0.01449161,0.004982376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9042583,0.03876908,0.01160132,0.001876108,0.03457019,0.008924985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001126099,0.0008384885,0.1855299,0.002616487,0.0003497684,0.005486551,0.538115,0.0009187954,0.002454957,0.09081715,0.03421176,0.137535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001515854,0.0003839977,0.5419718,0.001004569,0.0002472812,0.001073672,0.2639659,0.0008820629,0.0005816063,0.002453736,0.1869922,0.0002916048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8856806,0.01349511,0.0002718533,0.009196472,0.0001439667,0.0004152081,0.0002444903,0.00003155311,0.09052073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821694,0.006050508,0.000213427,0.001551024,0.00004776696,0.00009184574,0.0001056613,0.00002300148,0.009747389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09623196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.698215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220102439","doi":"","title":"A Comparison of the Impact of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms on Judicial Review of Administrative Action","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Project commissioning; Law; Bill of rights; Publishing; Political science; Judicial review; Sociology; Public administration; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"David Mullan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08819755292381076,"gpt":0.3964468918595072,"spread":0.3082493389356964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03493964,0.0003520332,0.000780001,0.008649721,0.006218981,0.01032098,0.002442533,0.003936561,0.00892164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1857174,0.0005989176,0.001044413,0.00930435,0.01178412,0.003566716,0.004049394,0.005314123,0.0005303483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06867085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1076319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8532042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9351666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8914347,0.02089116,0.002603038,0.002230068,0.06908255,0.01375848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8140961,0.1075497,0.01493163,0.004262296,0.0496505,0.009509726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001402229,0.000558383,0.07916673,0.0009317102,0.000516522,0.001342812,0.02419293,0.003356076,0.001120985,0.5796555,0.1178576,0.1898984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005427431,0.0007174479,0.7315573,0.001315266,0.0006988473,0.0003470064,0.01569295,0.00151706,0.001256344,0.02675358,0.2192891,0.0003123893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2527339,0.01845818,0.000878878,0.06996892,0.0008283469,0.0003597784,0.0008964521,0.00004582281,0.6558297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722188,0.00520578,0.0004637399,0.007096429,0.000348513,0.0001012769,0.0002336354,0.00003367635,0.0142982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1467958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4982442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}