{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"07bd0b7459e0","filters":{"venue":"Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education"}},"results":[{"id":"W2190405042","doi":"10.15845/noril.v5i1.176","title":"Communicating the relevance of the library in the age of Google: Improving undergraduate research skills and information literacy though new models of library instruction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Selkirk College; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Session (web analytics); Relevance (law); Library instruction; Privilege (computing); The Internet; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Feeling; Reading (process); Order (exchange); Library science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Mathematics education; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Rempel","is_ca":true},{"name":"Danielle Cossarini","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02406413904647281,"gpt":0.3217197103582858,"spread":0.297655571311813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006429881,0.0002988204,0.0004419614,0.0009826153,0.002725106,0.01033909,0.001093431,0.002112676,0.00779147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0266601,0.0002413702,0.0004379253,0.001052533,0.003217078,0.01448842,0.007196837,0.003213994,0.003988687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002426872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006295463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002641351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004924779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99588,0.00182432,0.0002045499,0.0003117205,0.001262781,0.0005165874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986617,0.005155997,0.001502329,0.001054028,0.001893301,0.003777437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001735014,0.002075371,0.03109072,0.001411526,0.00003400938,0.000325062,0.07406506,0.00013005,0.002946187,0.02084165,0.06046897,0.8064379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001822301,0.002770573,0.1034615,0.004041397,0.0002682834,0.00172825,0.1301843,0.001082127,0.01079423,0.07083686,0.674364,0.0002862218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5557109,0.01295892,0.01260033,0.2425751,0.001737564,0.0002760502,0.0001570683,0.001456851,0.1725273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338854,0.01081172,0.01110456,0.02473341,0.001422515,0.0001473045,0.0001153212,0.0001566668,0.01762304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03400487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621085053","doi":"10.15845/noril.v3i1.130","title":"Student perspective on plagiarism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Norwegian; Collusion; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Subject (documents); Psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Medicine; Engineering; Social psychology; Business; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Torunn Skofsrud Boger","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anne-Lise Eng","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0152610067663652,"gpt":0.3837719481288197,"spread":0.3685109413624545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008863179,0.0005061234,0.0007301,0.002941498,0.0172653,0.01183844,0.001369488,0.005979211,0.01182341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02662065,0.0005187319,0.0005056194,0.004465793,0.009800058,0.00742046,0.01029159,0.01037283,0.002414947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00730377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005180147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01092508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01261601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9810438,0.01034134,0.0009215748,0.0008966883,0.003655248,0.003141371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9565716,0.01861355,0.00851885,0.001088997,0.005383271,0.009823702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001061416,0.0001714359,0.03788853,0.0003471187,0.00002797192,0.002007092,0.8574434,0.0001010038,0.0007435213,0.01626101,0.05260238,0.03230036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001547536,0.0002099809,0.01891994,0.0006098057,0.00001600288,0.0009905881,0.6732304,0.00007606882,0.0003857097,0.001997519,0.3034649,0.00008357561],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6172253,0.01234826,0.0008420436,0.1979059,0.003669956,0.00005825214,0.0004354111,0.0001508007,0.1673641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566514,0.004576895,0.000121584,0.01774283,0.001604358,0.00002442523,0.000135074,0.00006386653,0.01907936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05299282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2321638448","doi":"10.15845/noril.v3i1.126","title":"Evaluation and Assessment in Information Literacy: WASSAIL as a tool to support diverse methods","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Session (web analytics); Library instruction; Context (archaeology); Sample (material); Computer science; Higher education; Diversity (politics); Medical education; Psychology; Library science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Nancy Goebel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03191031845368344,"gpt":0.4425803561565733,"spread":0.4106700377028898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.146892,0.001065623,0.00146488,0.008906011,0.001801163,0.009579026,0.002228467,0.001282818,0.006141511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1858402,0.000905409,0.001354299,0.004538481,0.003099888,0.0084856,0.01020792,0.002428783,0.001772452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00309457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006389298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009531929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001567909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8347589,0.1377093,0.008218253,0.002447245,0.0151554,0.001710916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7352204,0.1954538,0.006298243,0.01904926,0.03906763,0.004910587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001386653,0.001383878,0.008052281,0.003144934,0.0001479754,0.0002669744,0.03182209,0.001475753,0.007846061,0.02464892,0.01900195,0.9008226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002102055,0.007750991,0.06243081,0.01618325,0.0004753453,0.002750369,0.05382449,0.03829537,0.05712929,0.1173851,0.6404291,0.001243789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.08322362,0.001348411,0.8171765,0.00527653,0.0007702486,0.01575952,0.00128258,0.01133432,0.06382827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1590103,0.0005174915,0.8172289,0.0007694348,0.00008928111,0.01286277,0.0007664823,0.001130978,0.007624332],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.146892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7768486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}