{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":38,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"709f209e2cbe","filters":{"venue":"Obiter"}},"results":[{"id":"W3150636024","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v41i1.10549","title":"Electricity Theft in South Africa: Examining the Need to Clarify the Offence and Pursue Private Prosecution?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Electricity Theft Detection Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electricity; Statutory law; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Business; Context (archaeology); Law; Engineering; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jamil Ddamulira Mujuzi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01964106993845125,"gpt":0.2041054797810636,"spread":0.1844644098426124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005998905,0.0003628833,0.0003102784,0.002708726,0.01067044,0.005822441,0.00111393,0.004393473,0.006279402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02357654,0.0003728285,0.0002959108,0.002529379,0.007511661,0.007758411,0.004170997,0.004776882,0.0004374874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007167443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01731407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03959601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1176313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971696,0.001333937,0.0001540889,0.0001179756,0.0003184633,0.0009060625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985553,0.009970827,0.001776615,0.0002435503,0.001719527,0.0007364258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001784592,0.0002861767,0.05003267,0.002742831,0.00004236819,0.02485462,0.3469542,0.0007424763,0.003084433,0.3877342,0.0213072,0.1620404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000295189,0.0001168533,0.03161503,0.004375544,0.00006798557,0.005171971,0.7926732,0.0005625057,0.00131905,0.0268834,0.1371345,0.00005047087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6204201,0.02213809,0.004215124,0.1930927,0.0006962128,0.0004970861,0.00008404823,0.00001749955,0.1588393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663066,0.01416948,0.001739401,0.008704267,0.00008697964,0.0001003174,0.0000204096,0.00001318619,0.00885941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03959601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07873112,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536826666","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v27i3.14358","title":"SECTION 60 OF THE EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT 1998: WILL A COMPARATIVE APPROACH SHAKE THIS JOKER OUT OF THE PACK?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Labour law; Law; Sociology; Liability; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Psychology; History; Advertising","authors":[{"name":"Rochelle Le Roux","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06232965483382663,"gpt":0.2575214083939907,"spread":0.1951917535601641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01205096,0.0004646777,0.0007232946,0.002265019,0.006749924,0.01234222,0.00184412,0.01412017,0.01215851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01867004,0.0003369152,0.0006014606,0.002656861,0.01376608,0.01386472,0.003015874,0.008675206,0.001700864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01077679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009996373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03636275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05075352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900608,0.004455908,0.0002648299,0.0007303627,0.003066606,0.001421483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924818,0.004692107,0.000410732,0.0002819089,0.001633891,0.0004994448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001659497,0.0000290909,0.0002267099,0.00006256118,0.000003203148,0.00006546253,0.002284209,0.00004838633,0.0001019831,0.9384894,0.04574455,0.0129278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003354474,0.00009875448,0.004241243,0.001956708,0.00001584271,0.0001607932,0.01214436,0.0002623108,0.0002454309,0.2572248,0.72357,0.00004611993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01237968,0.05079294,0.002516167,0.4144433,0.005127672,0.00004246523,0.0001272737,0.00002207899,0.5145484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5521169,0.0393653,0.004860539,0.2197407,0.009165368,0.0002984889,0.0003242332,0.0001385401,0.17399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03636275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07819146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483718433","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i3.12000","title":"HUNG OUT TO DRY? ATTORNEY-CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY AND THE REPORTING DUTIES IMPOSED BY THE FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTRE ACT 38 OF 2001","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Money laundering; Privilege (computing); Law; Professional conduct; Position (finance); Confidentiality; Commission; Business; Order (exchange); Legal profession; Political science; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Daleen Millard","is_ca":false},{"name":"Viviana Vergano","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03209661402555525,"gpt":0.3345268899074748,"spread":0.3024302758819196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02527913,0.0002717885,0.0003603143,0.0006306851,0.008769122,0.01236513,0.00188161,0.01480535,0.007625167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07373036,0.0006280898,0.0003465596,0.001223814,0.008535611,0.008983654,0.004077023,0.009494605,0.001807744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009133022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02697743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0891791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1066446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9705595,0.0124004,0.001946784,0.001958473,0.007305968,0.005828859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612337,0.02525404,0.005099346,0.003050234,0.003972128,0.001390552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002743187,0.00002510414,0.002387836,0.00006513985,0.000003913098,0.0006198353,0.02519071,0.00009873097,0.000316373,0.9125134,0.04469913,0.01405241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004385942,0.00007677862,0.01374487,0.001833138,0.00003471665,0.002006277,0.02237276,0.0009496807,0.001774127,0.1116113,0.8453982,0.0001542052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.07195556,0.008419454,0.005322434,0.3902921,0.001115234,0.0001986788,0.0003888671,0.00008007858,0.5222275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7748299,0.004335542,0.00479785,0.09299213,0.0005692135,0.000381334,0.0001252951,0.00005467332,0.121914],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0891791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1773201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485560714","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12130","title":"PROTECTING A WIFE FINANCIALLY AT THE TIME OF DIVORCE – A COMPARISON BETWEEN SOUTH AFRICAN WOMEN MARRIED IN TERMS OF SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL LAW AND ISLAMIC LAW, WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE MAHR","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Islam; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Sharia; Family law; Marriage law; Sociology; Property (philosophy); Political science; Public law; History","authors":[{"name":"Marita Carnelley","is_ca":false},{"name":"Suhayfa Bhamjee","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02369994589354808,"gpt":0.2615328005641046,"spread":0.2378328546705565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006257974,0.0001073191,0.000211681,0.001170784,0.002558219,0.0008683777,0.0002034621,0.0003461515,0.004159223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002803231,0.0001393687,0.0001570225,0.001151861,0.001511456,0.0009993907,0.001501259,0.0004945983,0.000232695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009812653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001094895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01048956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02329889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995054,0.0001944958,0.00003430973,0.00002547709,0.00009301941,0.0001472933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994274,0.0002495052,0.0001511273,0.00001616972,0.00006149229,0.00009432466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004991259,0.0003542277,0.3990525,0.0005482866,0.00006253844,0.005763559,0.470737,0.0001229733,0.003145655,0.03418486,0.00122803,0.08430127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002363907,0.0005389359,0.4105118,0.0003779674,0.00003114073,0.003274813,0.5587523,0.00009138327,0.0005238532,0.001634252,0.02421741,0.00002254413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900699,0.001373095,0.00006671261,0.0007108716,0.00001884086,0.00001314823,0.00002103674,4.282962e-7,0.007725978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970725,0.001533121,0.00004314542,0.0001406965,0.000008691259,0.00000770489,0.00001303067,8.627616e-7,0.001180314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01048956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02085698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599648220","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12131","title":"MUTUAL ACCOMMODATION OF RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCES IN THE WORKPLACE – A JOSTLING OF RIGHTS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Duty; Reasonable accommodation; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Labour law; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Diversity (politics); Phenomenon; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Radley Henrico","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03828939394755745,"gpt":0.2371764141480279,"spread":0.1988870202004704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01318175,0.0002306839,0.0003948827,0.0006490091,0.008727591,0.005994642,0.00124808,0.00317511,0.007783835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01536419,0.0003035635,0.0005073712,0.0004235352,0.03509231,0.006246316,0.01515459,0.005933288,0.0007694033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002911635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007677095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003763768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006887971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861754,0.007140066,0.0004614385,0.001242595,0.002804128,0.002176412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889827,0.003070283,0.001108074,0.003286944,0.00098055,0.00257144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002380673,0.00006688252,0.002043195,0.00003433538,0.00001069668,0.0002040394,0.05137889,0.00009867586,0.001356086,0.9098254,0.003887345,0.03107058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004809553,0.0002284957,0.00796195,0.0004277821,0.00001688159,0.0009450687,0.05426015,0.0003816864,0.001092919,0.6118573,0.3227265,0.00005317428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2142369,0.002057774,0.03444991,0.1069358,0.0008530467,0.0001229966,0.00005630022,0.0001284524,0.6411588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654924,0.0002150315,0.002871813,0.005197333,0.0002017064,0.00004760972,0.00001697933,0.00002463126,0.02593245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01318175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06971264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W148526578","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i1.12093","title":"THE CRIME OF DEFAMATION – STILL DEFENSIBLE IN A MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Conviction; Context (archaeology); Political science; Freedom of the press; Commonwealth; Freedom of thought; Constitution; Democracy; Criminal law; Human rights; Reasonable doubt; Declaration; Politics; History","authors":[{"name":"Shannon Hoctor","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02523867526518662,"gpt":0.3045188644110031,"spread":0.2792801891458165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007235685,0.0002554622,0.0005124157,0.0009712749,0.008972147,0.01556062,0.001297952,0.007997439,0.01302284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01440486,0.0002854676,0.000306817,0.001103484,0.06092748,0.02791638,0.004694672,0.01242156,0.001777295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005879926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004220373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005761071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006528206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931772,0.003334509,0.0001425849,0.0009430264,0.001200032,0.001202602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994749,0.002252694,0.0005337201,0.00127446,0.0005573666,0.0006327432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005075564,0.000007374107,0.00009853338,0.00001177343,0.000002167741,0.00002461003,0.001797211,0.0000392025,0.00002155267,0.9893075,0.005492919,0.003191963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000722603,0.000009879845,0.0002624656,0.0001138263,0.000002074987,0.00005082109,0.002694404,0.0001098602,0.00006237154,0.8528214,0.1438547,0.00001105253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.03983343,0.019561,0.006542896,0.5269864,0.003093145,0.00002094382,0.0001055083,0.00006028442,0.4037964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904535,0.006362984,0.001362587,0.04091603,0.003634573,0.00004272659,0.00005921469,0.00009992294,0.04298691],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01556062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04356575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185509208","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v38i2.11441","title":"RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND CASES OF SERIOUS OFFENDING: A SOUTH AFRICAN AND CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retributive justice; Ambiguity; Criminal justice; Criminology; Restorative justice; Criminal law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Perspective (graphical); Conviction; Law; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Emma Charlene Lubaale","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04253305625274366,"gpt":0.3334118998847734,"spread":0.2908788436320298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003540708,0.0007751904,0.0007014093,0.007393585,0.04273239,0.009643334,0.003245363,0.007351107,0.006682031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009152093,0.0005997973,0.0008706378,0.007766821,0.02280105,0.003329921,0.005396773,0.007852073,0.0003417686],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1439805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2072822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951139,0.0008446963,0.0001918048,0.0002450218,0.001060776,0.002543829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940983,0.00208806,0.0005198412,0.000117846,0.001693559,0.001482383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046991,0.00008677003,0.005973479,0.000807191,0.00002606805,0.007499308,0.1222675,0.0006460801,0.0006417451,0.8105587,0.02305825,0.0283879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000296714,0.00004614603,0.03086545,0.004864312,0.000107911,0.004638469,0.3371367,0.0009426385,0.0005572573,0.05918942,0.5612763,0.0003458117],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1913936,0.1081572,0.001306606,0.2595206,0.001377024,0.0003182823,0.0003766993,0.00003669177,0.4375133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8723224,0.06689055,0.002383464,0.02198555,0.0002411752,0.00009526729,0.0000994746,0.00004003834,0.03594211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1439805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261125889","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i3.12409","title":"THE REVISED CANADIAN TEST FOR THE EXCLUSION OF UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Constitution; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"BC Naudé","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06271134722376055,"gpt":0.3446809712598417,"spread":0.2819696240360811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04385784,0.00115349,0.002116765,0.009411353,0.01205079,0.01221588,0.009443576,0.0152798,0.008669714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1310955,0.001170029,0.003253747,0.006224477,0.03264862,0.007328046,0.007534544,0.01460274,0.001986974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04579723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1547841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7536355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7884874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8932401,0.01474708,0.009057433,0.01147069,0.06328382,0.008200842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8923262,0.0294732,0.003929114,0.007280266,0.06299779,0.003993337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001195356,0.00002652198,0.002691382,0.000310088,0.00009302027,0.0004732193,0.001225709,0.0005722673,0.0006250088,0.917403,0.05426948,0.02219067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005327494,0.0001654695,0.01459274,0.00202541,0.0006119187,0.001818575,0.001943229,0.004506551,0.003418895,0.4540358,0.5153775,0.0009713117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02543312,0.008289008,0.06737862,0.1596198,0.006441867,0.001136996,0.006712631,0.0005410996,0.7244469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6312426,0.005925741,0.1698644,0.09946665,0.002596268,0.001357519,0.00255845,0.0002892344,0.08669908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2463645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4956308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167561673","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i2.11229","title":"An Analysis of Mandatory Auditor Rotation Requirements in South Africa in light of International Legislative Trends","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Auditor independence; Audit; Joint audit; External auditor; Audit plan; Business; Quality audit; Chief audit executive; Transparency (behavior); Auditor's report; Corporate governance; Audit committee; Internal audit; Finance; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Vela Madlela","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01658832364650934,"gpt":0.2431318695698697,"spread":0.2265435459233604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005177951,0.0002501958,0.0003096286,0.003953942,0.001899095,0.003543384,0.0009698763,0.0007564058,0.003649137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02455703,0.0004275705,0.0004422851,0.008082403,0.001181976,0.001681788,0.001461566,0.001223631,0.0003546229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006625955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008700471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05542045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07312855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933123,0.001366392,0.0005904462,0.0004138004,0.001699715,0.002617382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98036,0.008296961,0.006719011,0.000543487,0.003359017,0.0007216212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001279657,0.0003115129,0.4197198,0.004235988,0.0001174432,0.01163933,0.07187352,0.006778453,0.01489643,0.2266089,0.01577153,0.2267675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004222177,0.000246807,0.7862936,0.00153541,0.00009108716,0.001869605,0.04805464,0.0014053,0.00411178,0.002476714,0.1537907,0.00008224144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9072546,0.00410421,0.001676932,0.005327036,0.0001080606,0.0003351505,0.0009094174,0.00002970088,0.08025487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880018,0.003474732,0.0008494369,0.0008333601,0.0000449297,0.0001141687,0.0003571396,0.00002471389,0.006299913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05542045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1101958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199977776","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i2.12265","title":"WHICH STRUCTURES DOES THE HOUSEBREAKING CRIME PROTECT?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Law; Fence (mathematics); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Shannon Hoctor","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01719254539295409,"gpt":0.3081281536896537,"spread":0.2909356082966996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003443802,0.0004397618,0.0005712964,0.00217545,0.004694146,0.01088994,0.002202304,0.002885874,0.01910807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01873865,0.0006970805,0.0006973968,0.001928486,0.02036786,0.01718915,0.003614656,0.002698187,0.007378865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01062501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01146078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04729349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07123447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961283,0.001146201,0.0001492544,0.0005921319,0.0009424611,0.001041525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911631,0.002240937,0.002376043,0.001177011,0.001784183,0.001258743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008451127,0.0001175606,0.02839131,0.0004173494,0.0000611514,0.000497642,0.01615065,0.0008256644,0.0003715408,0.8187726,0.04384249,0.09046761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003014794,0.00009343036,0.05214766,0.00199276,0.00007517528,0.001218179,0.04235873,0.001000479,0.001126245,0.6243161,0.2755509,0.00009022238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1550403,0.009471414,0.01517085,0.1483496,0.0006853248,0.0002026278,0.001947706,0.0002793118,0.668853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618382,0.007400956,0.002373225,0.005814619,0.0005164586,0.00008941621,0.0007628364,0.0001708026,0.02103364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04729349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0940364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547440466","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i2.12258","title":"HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL NETWORK SITES: PERPETRATOR AND SERVICE PROVIDERS’ LIABILITY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Liability; The Internet; Hatred; Service provider; Service (business); Political science; European union; Internet service provider; Law; Business; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Politics; International trade","authors":[{"name":"Frans E Marx","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01938135336999929,"gpt":0.2380310972295631,"spread":0.2186497438595638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005028037,0.0003175554,0.000395173,0.003358787,0.003753443,0.003476973,0.0005235543,0.001922122,0.006528005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03175043,0.0002726164,0.000273144,0.001962119,0.00356519,0.004635162,0.003763724,0.002141664,0.0008342309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001372929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009919088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002586332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002599245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925665,0.003798947,0.0005849421,0.0004197501,0.00182555,0.0008041903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688466,0.01705624,0.009751474,0.001365713,0.001965793,0.001014114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001915042,0.0002954714,0.52389,0.000876367,0.00009403175,0.01013696,0.1715827,0.0004947563,0.001977207,0.1154389,0.01105125,0.163971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001781556,0.0004182874,0.4092872,0.003806131,0.0001855,0.0461799,0.4123277,0.006568448,0.005814599,0.03761289,0.0776271,0.0001544928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8828386,0.00569099,0.007534028,0.009375347,0.0001540433,0.0001808698,0.0002144218,0.00003286977,0.09397875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939177,0.001807035,0.0006278757,0.0005117818,0.00006833956,0.00003391956,0.0000432137,0.0000059133,0.002984131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006528005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02659112,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383375884","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i2.14052","title":"TACIT CHOICE OF LAW IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS: PROGRESS OR STAGNATION IN THE COMMON- LAW JURISDICTIONS?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Comparative law; Private law; Municipal law; Public law; Commercial law; Choice of law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Conflict of laws","authors":[{"name":"Garth Jody Bouwers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05646339171551969,"gpt":0.387100000997883,"spread":0.3306366092823633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02892801,0.0002241538,0.0007817835,0.002986283,0.00664261,0.01813099,0.002402985,0.003555081,0.002896271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0535705,0.0003925562,0.0005142922,0.004715833,0.04301928,0.01837683,0.00912653,0.006205469,0.0002964304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01203887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01807102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01568413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01557827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9747854,0.01111168,0.001772893,0.002793662,0.006795752,0.002740626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9550191,0.02724428,0.006623108,0.00431798,0.004331164,0.002464349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005609385,0.00001259129,0.0009089524,0.00002233032,0.000002866338,0.00003740744,0.006682409,0.0001449506,0.00003744467,0.983813,0.000291898,0.008040521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001726669,0.00003048623,0.004948277,0.00051181,0.00001610638,0.0001480923,0.01378692,0.001682217,0.0003751651,0.9438529,0.03458606,0.00004469449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3806534,0.01602031,0.06105527,0.07081755,0.0003241678,0.0002122655,0.0001360793,0.00005116719,0.4707298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908122,0.001591071,0.003510922,0.001055899,0.00007155456,0.00005086584,0.00002611232,0.00001322629,0.002868082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02892801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1529878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W107021197","doi":"","title":"Double inchoate crimes : serving a useful purpose or double trouble? : Déry v The Queen; Attorney General of Canada et al, Interveners [2007] 213 CCC (3d) 289 (SCC) : cases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Incitement; Law; Stalking; Harm; Criminology; Political science; Queen (butterfly); Legislation; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Shannon Hoctor","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0607728268755498,"gpt":0.3230944197212049,"spread":0.2623215928456551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001117331,0.0005971837,0.0002671665,0.0007506247,0.01302584,0.004583629,0.001790355,0.01049744,0.006601647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003642908,0.0005781317,0.00026588,0.0009210549,0.005496245,0.001632944,0.002622656,0.005551981,0.0008787166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01819766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05350459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9104008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9789604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980586,0.0002099624,0.00005180575,0.0001438962,0.0006139587,0.0009217772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985579,0.0003183956,0.0001154038,0.000045447,0.0003805039,0.0005823916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007449772,0.00009552241,0.01353852,0.0001356937,0.00002216442,0.002665043,0.0206183,0.0002817349,0.0004304989,0.1355629,0.7969561,0.02961895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001382445,0.00006792054,0.06598767,0.001123762,0.0001017671,0.001687717,0.04895354,0.0007995584,0.0009653097,0.01641846,0.8635826,0.0001736017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1048006,0.02993154,0.0008646111,0.3160874,0.001803128,0.0002438493,0.000977547,0.0001264254,0.5451649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5278394,0.01049109,0.0008056786,0.2299928,0.0006623669,0.000187126,0.0003049745,0.000078626,0.2296379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08959919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1802537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192292574","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i3.11189","title":"The Role of Expert Evidence in the Defence of Provocation and Emotional Stress in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Provocation test; CLARITY; Culpability; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Liability; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Sandhya Maharaj","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04652257504750107,"gpt":0.3123317418682517,"spread":0.2658091668207507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0434472,0.0003880189,0.0007459981,0.003928003,0.008225382,0.01580915,0.002299414,0.01494153,0.002682483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1012934,0.0008698815,0.0006966037,0.001775743,0.03085213,0.01181035,0.01367126,0.01175335,0.0001834196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01117388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02366748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01739413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01891012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9672667,0.02050863,0.003284703,0.001424195,0.003843197,0.003672539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8436159,0.1340871,0.008808154,0.002725874,0.006097606,0.004665454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001305435,0.00006159562,0.007992269,0.001865341,0.00007221918,0.01084974,0.07919212,0.0009356214,0.00207306,0.8055834,0.006540931,0.0847033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001336277,0.0002812639,0.02324099,0.01549743,0.0001844015,0.007089349,0.07492678,0.001680776,0.00312877,0.623215,0.2501475,0.0004740949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1456043,0.0711491,0.007342435,0.6514909,0.001340213,0.0002385261,0.00004173041,0.00001539523,0.1227774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478993,0.01571913,0.002966614,0.02835616,0.0006813307,0.00007928511,0.000008259168,0.00001033922,0.0042795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0434472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2297735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186550581","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11328","title":"CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY AND THE CONFLICT OF LAWS IN COMMON-LAW JURISDICTIONS (PART 1): THE UNITED KINGDOM","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Common law; Comparative law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Choice of law; Position (finance); Municipal law; Public law; Business","authors":[{"name":"Eesa A Fredericks","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07260518125190656,"gpt":0.3266917376229886,"spread":0.254086556371082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002445497,0.0001794008,0.0003179377,0.001712658,0.004589178,0.008761553,0.0006576841,0.002793844,0.003758301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007032683,0.0002294713,0.000292709,0.002622011,0.01086017,0.005847039,0.004501595,0.001869301,0.000267579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00822825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003691153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06112657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05821095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942596,0.003060951,0.0004338435,0.000307077,0.0008845711,0.001053985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958388,0.002350282,0.0007694445,0.0002857189,0.0005348424,0.0002209013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001933773,0.0000105671,0.001459806,0.0001528639,0.000007779113,0.0002730798,0.02087396,0.0002083969,0.000104608,0.963733,0.002859883,0.01029678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003319186,0.0001036326,0.02593325,0.003522575,0.000037461,0.001968797,0.08690159,0.0008395829,0.0007029509,0.1763394,0.7035148,0.0001028177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.19917,0.1360686,0.004015263,0.02436602,0.000636041,0.00006733592,0.00009368041,0.00001519265,0.6355678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983381,0.008584463,0.0005253055,0.001201142,0.00004661298,0.00003051422,0.00002400362,0.000006176615,0.006200698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06112657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1215416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385241220","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v25i1.16525","title":"SENTENCING OF PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLERS IN CANADA. LESSONS FOR SOUTH AFRICA?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Punishment (psychology); Prison; Criminology; Legislation; Sentence; Attendance; Political science; Service (business); Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Business","authors":[{"name":"Marita Carnelley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08449379811015129,"gpt":0.3356930658024427,"spread":0.2511992676922915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001646479,0.0005922334,0.0004665353,0.0016596,0.01811255,0.00317756,0.002363011,0.003545134,0.008003089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007612398,0.0005152242,0.0005708043,0.00263441,0.002611905,0.001974009,0.003619372,0.004653796,0.0006198339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05757335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2367581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978327,0.0002659679,0.00008330336,0.000115153,0.0003118112,0.001391121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937996,0.000418811,0.0003359192,0.00007677707,0.002001164,0.003367692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009173685,0.001310798,0.1801179,0.002967057,0.0001707845,0.01993871,0.1313536,0.001051919,0.002381608,0.05768802,0.2363664,0.3657358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003226816,0.0003935931,0.3975889,0.005355735,0.0002630842,0.003344804,0.3783427,0.001139627,0.0007619247,0.008715268,0.2033593,0.0004123231],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4252486,0.0217859,0.0004166557,0.4937095,0.002274773,0.00054283,0.001127275,0.00004843024,0.05484602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8628919,0.03619769,0.0018925,0.05882439,0.0004062507,0.0003499958,0.0006250117,0.00005776327,0.03875446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05757335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4177259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572964298","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i2.12437","title":"JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN THE DETERMINATION OF POST-DIVORCE CHILD SUPPORT: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MAINTENANCE ACT 99 OF 1998 AS COMPARED TO THE CANADIAN FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES OF 1997","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Discretion; Interpretation (philosophy); Obligation; Child support; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Duty; Judicial interpretation; Political science; Law; Family law","authors":[{"name":"Marita Carnelley","is_ca":false},{"name":"Juanita Easthorpe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02794610623046433,"gpt":0.3223150179788927,"spread":0.2943689117484283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008131975,0.0004741365,0.0008247996,0.005848627,0.005067546,0.009667952,0.002237146,0.006379839,0.002398248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01086676,0.000786699,0.0009656165,0.006657481,0.00877187,0.004354614,0.002902073,0.006714175,0.0004737549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02232102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02156382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1675547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.202762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911228,0.002995104,0.0007041238,0.0006491928,0.002943521,0.001585143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946277,0.003963808,0.0003611078,0.0001168081,0.0008177195,0.0001127998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003469528,0.00005415696,0.00178437,0.001322845,0.00002295425,0.001047842,0.01144835,0.000733283,0.0008329543,0.8752866,0.01249858,0.09493335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002044269,0.000141529,0.01550922,0.006653575,0.00004136717,0.001038978,0.007119867,0.0007841143,0.001023344,0.05722412,0.9103407,0.0001029039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02520562,0.7151619,0.006958256,0.0530728,0.001931632,0.0002547257,0.0001607112,0.00002699196,0.1972274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.272294,0.6615002,0.008068707,0.02023593,0.003186181,0.0003635361,0.0002211605,0.00005718962,0.0340731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8324453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3331588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981107737","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11326","title":"UNTANGLING THE REQUIREMENT OF GOOD FAITH IN THE DERIVATIVE ACTION IN COMPANY LAW (Part 2)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Fair dealing; Statutory law; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Good faith; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Maleka Femida Cassim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08242535669262861,"gpt":0.369411996836841,"spread":0.2869866401442124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009109022,0.0003286018,0.0005526514,0.00138071,0.005482178,0.01164681,0.001408199,0.01015894,0.00324632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01581528,0.0005716373,0.0008474055,0.0006873895,0.03565588,0.008638737,0.003588551,0.009421877,0.0004547238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006172598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006340838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009319495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009960004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916693,0.003309794,0.0004602571,0.0009694166,0.002155394,0.001435791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800283,0.01681781,0.000966262,0.0007921103,0.001123881,0.0002715825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005078005,0.000007067439,0.0001468674,0.00003002288,0.000002457212,0.0002004313,0.003488335,0.00008218746,0.0001865637,0.9931048,0.001001512,0.00174472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003924606,0.0001647968,0.00439093,0.001036939,0.00004463268,0.0009185781,0.01106433,0.001435552,0.003974655,0.7992663,0.1775645,0.00009943007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1488959,0.01349434,0.02829617,0.1045953,0.00151463,0.0002574886,0.00009169545,0.00006243599,0.702792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580631,0.001835014,0.003651127,0.01318137,0.0004959127,0.0001042524,0.00001293114,0.00002215283,0.02263417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01164681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04817367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387533342","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i3.16964","title":"A CRITICAL LEGAL PERSPECTIVE ON STATUTORY INTOXICATION – TIME TO SOBER UP?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Government (linguistics); Environmental health; Alcohol abuse; Statutory law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Zero tolerance; Falling (accident); Alcoholic liver disease; Mortality rate; Psychiatry; Political science; Cirrhosis; Geography; Law; Surgery","authors":[{"name":"Gina Marie Stevens","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jolandi Le Roux-Bouwer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05681382074834623,"gpt":0.4995697204961752,"spread":0.442755899747829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008727017,0.0006916657,0.0007743576,0.002096576,0.01425804,0.01416806,0.003008933,0.02565044,0.01053589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01353848,0.0003817285,0.0007445322,0.001796225,0.06053104,0.02511539,0.006244984,0.03233128,0.001126808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01444026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01233133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01804976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01794339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940498,0.002950793,0.0002164528,0.0006729018,0.0007821327,0.001327972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824938,0.01318319,0.0007992939,0.0002741903,0.001680863,0.001568695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006491748,0.00002221424,0.0001096088,0.00007553946,0.000001857053,0.0002952521,0.006773717,0.00005592472,0.00003346176,0.9345092,0.05303361,0.005083186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001432222,0.00004519428,0.0003195319,0.00123783,0.000005358696,0.0007262343,0.01851448,0.0002049777,0.00007696264,0.4841129,0.4947016,0.00004069226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002342687,0.04039253,0.002096296,0.870993,0.008266643,0.00002451531,0.000041287,0.00001613987,0.07582694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3052042,0.07095744,0.002275243,0.5434599,0.03906621,0.000168097,0.00009643713,0.0001130139,0.03865959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02565044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1047719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297235682","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v25i2.14860","title":"DNA EVIDENCE IN SOUTH AFRICA: FALLACIES AND THE FUTURE","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Profiling (computer programming); Legislature; Political science; Law; DNA profiling; Common law; Biology; DNA; Genetics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"R Kirby","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03152925795317972,"gpt":0.2845128952228036,"spread":0.2529836372696239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0215611,0.0004630245,0.0008080081,0.00581633,0.008815116,0.0127439,0.001684205,0.01457922,0.008336054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04518352,0.0005687027,0.0005949938,0.004444852,0.02945697,0.01820318,0.008259817,0.01268464,0.0007258754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0147783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02872632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0271164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0293987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991003,0.004394941,0.0009197812,0.000748446,0.001671158,0.001262562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9518229,0.03450436,0.004269815,0.001259197,0.005098023,0.003045721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004380483,0.00006521711,0.003503374,0.001908051,0.00003561616,0.002682589,0.01964032,0.0002709166,0.0009589097,0.8073202,0.02144582,0.1421252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002434834,0.00008204252,0.006740719,0.01272955,0.00005596126,0.002556107,0.02970013,0.0003257333,0.0008473939,0.408104,0.5387186,0.0001153132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01230182,0.1403482,0.001317398,0.8170767,0.001399436,0.00003648391,0.00005362818,0.00001233675,0.02745396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4523847,0.2967019,0.006520203,0.2272162,0.004272683,0.0001635582,0.0001123604,0.00005591365,0.01257258],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0271164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1140274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210534343","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i1.12607","title":"CONTRACT AND AGENCY LAW AND THE 2008 COMPANIES BILL","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Law; Agency (philosophy); Position (finance); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Finance; Social science","authors":[{"name":"J S McLennan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01343812441815508,"gpt":0.1920753030178705,"spread":0.1786371785997155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004865161,0.0004667035,0.0003354482,0.001013271,0.006333629,0.01044031,0.001372167,0.01686172,0.0145237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01567094,0.0006777566,0.0007760918,0.001149103,0.004683727,0.004990972,0.002735775,0.01049084,0.005307244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01156383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02061551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05348469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05695212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9895573,0.001900334,0.000482968,0.0007944604,0.005832107,0.001432742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951792,0.001799564,0.0003030972,0.0004953623,0.001836495,0.0003863017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008850062,0.00001484439,0.0001526037,0.00001301282,0.000001812509,0.00004737659,0.0003557398,0.00005440967,0.00003422202,0.7195947,0.274703,0.005019411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001635813,0.00001215573,0.0006471689,0.000160656,0.000005080646,0.00008884661,0.0002581417,0.0001502174,0.00007732965,0.03604514,0.9625227,0.00001616055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004619409,0.002667099,0.002256522,0.1124837,0.002988849,0.0001016932,0.0003218476,0.00009360536,0.8744674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07501853,0.003429391,0.005124013,0.1415814,0.002257413,0.0008080765,0.0007297489,0.0001487383,0.7709027],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05348469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1063467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412454440","doi":"10.17159/zvd30693","title":"A Critical Analysis of the Application of Section 37C(1) of the Income Tax","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Economics; Business; Advertising","authors":[{"name":"Cara Thiart","is_ca":false},{"name":"Elana du Plessis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006322872847640396,"gpt":0.2551360647828392,"spread":0.2488131919351988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0177399,0.0007761698,0.0006015245,0.00363489,0.008685648,0.01257197,0.002551478,0.0114569,0.00943382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05006387,0.0009987667,0.001855773,0.00284641,0.007771957,0.006959612,0.002077676,0.01652426,0.002735995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02626546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03350695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1187689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1119784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.982327,0.003561174,0.0008539809,0.001710488,0.008746416,0.002800933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97165,0.01515751,0.0009400159,0.0008337854,0.01101895,0.0003997129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004872348,0.00005089395,0.0006362187,0.0001514546,0.000008213874,0.0003589091,0.003988467,0.0003910329,0.0005418292,0.8139939,0.164651,0.01517928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002169106,0.00005856653,0.004251487,0.0007824179,0.00002744424,0.0001302144,0.003995557,0.0006184888,0.001677749,0.05083597,0.9375005,0.00009986093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02824204,0.009240897,0.01830098,0.271632,0.02028547,0.002118116,0.002221574,0.0002954818,0.6476634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3338793,0.008996627,0.02466756,0.2142955,0.01005949,0.00255125,0.001483936,0.0005718296,0.4034946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1187689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2361552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553136995","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12146","title":"THE PURPOSE AND AMBIT OF THE OFFENCE OF CONCEALMENT OF BIRTH S v Molefe 2012 (2) SACR 574 (GNP)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Dignity; Political science; Statutory law; Statute; Context (archaeology); Constitution; Memorandum; Criminology; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Shannon Hoctor","is_ca":false},{"name":"Marita Carnelley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01943973870665325,"gpt":0.2838164968300847,"spread":0.2643767581234314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004179917,0.0003737326,0.0003806344,0.0008033063,0.008517954,0.005846997,0.002038287,0.01450747,0.003825946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113407,0.0006621393,0.0005472648,0.000558658,0.01068991,0.002176062,0.003838556,0.01256909,0.000864682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008152015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01128515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1789721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2696331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99483,0.001100219,0.000259101,0.0007242252,0.001776351,0.001310139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980056,0.001117718,0.0002090394,0.0001160368,0.0003706332,0.0001810601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002891824,0.00002832653,0.002342168,0.0000628804,0.00001123434,0.001972768,0.01470148,0.0001244343,0.0007335644,0.9097036,0.05680978,0.01348093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004862164,0.0001411313,0.01176832,0.00121602,0.00006059844,0.00257259,0.01420364,0.0005214035,0.002216487,0.08404308,0.8830327,0.0001754238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1020306,0.004071604,0.002951116,0.1428525,0.002950458,0.0001790845,0.0003210739,0.00009117128,0.7445523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6663616,0.002655803,0.001905322,0.1484416,0.00112938,0.0002791297,0.0001086362,0.00006393569,0.1790546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1789721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3558607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417005967","doi":"10.17159/r3n3gv92","title":"What the Doctor Ordered: Lessons From Abroad to Strengthen South Africa’s Medical-Parole System","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Dignity; Legislation; Imprisonment; Criminal Conviction; Sentence; Value (mathematics)","authors":[{"name":"R.J. Botha","is_ca":false},{"name":"Karabo Sease","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0288925303479448,"gpt":0.3352269723553151,"spread":0.3063344420073703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01456337,0.0003861194,0.00049351,0.0009381723,0.008950593,0.007373769,0.001765805,0.005268986,0.014401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01946203,0.0003419803,0.0005581724,0.0009201636,0.01038391,0.009444013,0.009773612,0.01379859,0.00111718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01102988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0457429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06172838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0912127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944664,0.002754731,0.0001661391,0.0002516569,0.0003373624,0.002023748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826317,0.008897017,0.0005637053,0.0008608284,0.001540347,0.005506436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003885001,0.0003919382,0.008818209,0.001238279,0.00005563904,0.005709267,0.07965282,0.0009602673,0.001337668,0.6519887,0.06592763,0.183531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002159934,0.0003663939,0.01216681,0.005903582,0.00005752513,0.001176757,0.1251748,0.0004269488,0.001156432,0.1496291,0.7035818,0.0001438545],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07002363,0.02120727,0.002186829,0.782497,0.002909575,0.0001181398,0.00007105926,0.00004293666,0.1209435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.796735,0.01934176,0.003934233,0.1423234,0.001056335,0.0001737592,0.0000739055,0.0001292411,0.03623231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06172838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1227382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186537419","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i3.11191","title":"Caveat Jurisconsultus: Warrantless Access to the Client Records of Legal Practitioners","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislation; Warrant; Law; Legislature; Confidentiality; Political science; Business; Constitution","authors":[{"name":"Abraham Hamman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Raymond Koen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02412930648927853,"gpt":0.3477416968573261,"spread":0.3236123903680476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02197543,0.001620288,0.002004472,0.002259305,0.01316006,0.00649211,0.01032398,0.01720604,0.04806866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1409125,0.001387369,0.002142505,0.002223219,0.01650341,0.01799182,0.007552689,0.03140176,0.01492508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006345959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009494275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04267038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03931836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9740956,0.007289079,0.001844072,0.006968673,0.00724043,0.002562146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8930705,0.07860863,0.004389355,0.009929644,0.01272379,0.001278174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001671286,0.00006672267,0.002161047,0.0004875006,0.00006343818,0.001411047,0.006380739,0.0004258542,0.0002346171,0.5696827,0.4018161,0.01710299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001716582,0.00004404852,0.001714984,0.0009219465,0.00008337023,0.001385039,0.002612803,0.002008451,0.0007987347,0.5352969,0.4547949,0.0001671719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007391647,0.002682645,0.03729049,0.7315074,0.01348607,0.0005985013,0.004019434,0.0007882803,0.2022356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2574963,0.002108818,0.04736422,0.6036137,0.01474969,0.003321717,0.0007266247,0.0005515736,0.0700674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04806866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1608057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513938139","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i2.12036","title":"CURRENT ISSUES OF CONSTITUTIONAL DAMAGES LITIGATION: A CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF RECENT COMMONWEALTH DECISIONS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Commonwealth; Law; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Jurisprudence","authors":[{"name":"Chuks Okpaluba","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07882269416384635,"gpt":0.4100255463537328,"spread":0.3312028521898864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01067302,0.0003129901,0.0005418257,0.005893496,0.02183321,0.0228745,0.002299563,0.007200108,0.005051515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02937292,0.0006388528,0.0006887738,0.01087764,0.03152969,0.009951075,0.008029154,0.01098358,0.0002465702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03305679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01782402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1586835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2879154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.98702,0.005458275,0.0006608927,0.001210593,0.002407442,0.003242756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650779,0.02841829,0.003318281,0.0007277158,0.001534764,0.0009230589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004103067,0.00006353894,0.007912948,0.000319812,0.00002975316,0.002914992,0.2724061,0.000581554,0.0004597469,0.6929877,0.008372933,0.01390993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000219907,0.00008065433,0.04623255,0.001926985,0.00005960102,0.0009032611,0.4743288,0.0005014759,0.0006245702,0.09140949,0.3837465,0.0001641588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5615671,0.03756386,0.002615767,0.1466986,0.0005598989,0.0001690712,0.0004177797,0.00004223403,0.2503655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981707,0.008081225,0.0003216499,0.005714173,0.0002487609,0.00004926949,0.00007700561,0.00003520353,0.003765725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1586835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3155197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801111753","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v28i1.14290","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO SCHOOL RULES*","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Marita Carnelley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03890829450555221,"gpt":0.3198555049603515,"spread":0.2809472104547993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02885523,0.0004388432,0.001039252,0.001280097,0.01556973,0.0204431,0.004681551,0.02002621,0.008628672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04384487,0.0009051434,0.0011469,0.00164249,0.03369579,0.008157545,0.007690605,0.02690306,0.001487753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01836234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1309053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1391266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9660652,0.00901067,0.002036552,0.005522161,0.01016579,0.007199686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973536,0.01510515,0.00137727,0.002820733,0.005134001,0.002026944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004568831,0.000009185738,0.0001491345,0.00001031979,0.000003807025,0.00004364091,0.001447448,0.0001136529,0.00003740153,0.986188,0.01005717,0.001935699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005132323,0.000035839,0.001058742,0.0002525823,0.00002238119,0.0001285234,0.003902988,0.0004938893,0.000376627,0.5623295,0.4312683,0.00007920215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02886532,0.004924907,0.01036279,0.2696078,0.00234074,0.000177099,0.0004800685,0.0001309268,0.6831104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7855533,0.002373341,0.006088669,0.1097568,0.002289258,0.0003149617,0.0003512576,0.0001512813,0.09312112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1309053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2602866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510579985","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i1.12319","title":"AT LAST A SOUTH AFRICAN PROPER LAW OF DELICT Burchell v Anglin 2010 3 SA 48 (ECG)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delict; Law; Common law; Locus (genetics); Haploinsufficiency; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Private law; Biology; Genetics","authors":[{"name":"Frans E Marx","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02781023754473503,"gpt":0.2834699522834022,"spread":0.2556597147386672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001437599,0.0004162478,0.0002552966,0.0005078594,0.004586125,0.002939724,0.0008482836,0.007625174,0.01771573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003529566,0.0005078694,0.0005016878,0.0004110814,0.002719173,0.001962306,0.002371897,0.007827064,0.003008874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004096488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005199207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1285037,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983869,0.0003201108,0.0001062139,0.0003254266,0.0003439952,0.000517477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991942,0.0003572288,0.0000799484,0.00007132137,0.0002023369,0.00009498618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007889102,0.00006293413,0.003454362,0.0003184406,0.00002484735,0.00253612,0.01046047,0.0001567371,0.00267703,0.7229761,0.2291513,0.02810272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002637492,0.00006498214,0.005873977,0.000421117,0.00002615769,0.000848968,0.001607244,0.0001204638,0.000840502,0.01659019,0.9735274,0.00005270339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.05971721,0.007572243,0.002718059,0.08954744,0.004691427,0.0004762475,0.0007457577,0.0001870127,0.8343446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.272625,0.002009555,0.001688349,0.1109878,0.0006324702,0.0003626471,0.0002535242,0.0000819769,0.6113588],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09832036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390143988","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i4.17505","title":"PROVIDING A LEGAL DEFINITION FOR CYBERBULLYING IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; CLARITY; Interpretation (philosophy); The Internet; Political science; Confusion; Phenomenon; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Public relations; Internet privacy; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Sershiv Reddy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04178065195820064,"gpt":0.2433716820714731,"spread":0.2015910301132724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004264987,0.000403495,0.0004042464,0.003216385,0.005528856,0.005676466,0.001250838,0.002877229,0.005948621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100851,0.0003622294,0.0003752652,0.001786744,0.007249182,0.004984445,0.005523429,0.003797409,0.0006511121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005581447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01302356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02351386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02232928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954066,0.001834129,0.001008942,0.0002793907,0.0007435174,0.0007273501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934193,0.002825129,0.001514902,0.0003692498,0.001443455,0.0004278531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001656546,0.0000605505,0.004933925,0.0005900742,0.000005348985,0.002794549,0.05145882,0.0002032289,0.001992421,0.8964981,0.01351878,0.02792756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002591416,0.00005684538,0.0199438,0.006570635,0.00003217653,0.005589734,0.09838397,0.001042962,0.002752925,0.1218219,0.7436611,0.0001180474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1796772,0.03231786,0.04342854,0.222624,0.003548399,0.001625014,0.001040119,0.000101176,0.5156378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9043871,0.01238245,0.03321962,0.015431,0.0004547025,0.001002682,0.000396278,0.00005996011,0.03266623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02351386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980704029","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i2.11355","title":"UNTANGLING THE REQUIREMENT OF GOOD FAITH IN THE DERIVATIVE ACTION IN COMPANY LAW (Part 1)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation","keywords":"Faith; Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Statutory law; Fair dealing; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Good faith; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Maleka Femida Cassim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08262122442472057,"gpt":0.3696140038897634,"spread":0.2869927794650428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008287768,0.0003446767,0.000498342,0.001364042,0.006940682,0.01108932,0.001274158,0.009396407,0.003117454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01406418,0.0005487765,0.0006651674,0.0007969745,0.0462451,0.008182614,0.003960248,0.01009268,0.0004199318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007259973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007448045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0127911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01383853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924077,0.003085867,0.000425319,0.0008226986,0.00194792,0.001310502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839982,0.01309812,0.0009532375,0.0006925949,0.001004839,0.0002531676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000323061,0.00000561824,0.0001067509,0.00002560442,0.000001766737,0.0001458713,0.003102561,0.00005635162,0.0001437647,0.9944572,0.0006412048,0.001310183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003229917,0.0001443173,0.003620783,0.0008876378,0.0000405522,0.0007354542,0.01238158,0.0009954686,0.003233111,0.8334131,0.1444377,0.00007789569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1345768,0.01469199,0.01956562,0.08542519,0.001022889,0.0001977933,0.00006147182,0.0000429287,0.7444153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671642,0.002355202,0.002547098,0.009110542,0.0003603146,0.00008107744,0.000009275078,0.00001790562,0.01835443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05267507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385309200","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i2.16558","title":"THE CONFLICT BETWEEN CERTAIN CAPITAL ALLOWANCES IN THE INCOME TAX ACT AND THE SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES POLICY OBJECTIVES","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Capital (architecture); Public economics; Property tax; Allowance (engineering); Context (archaeology); Income tax; Incentive; Tax policy; Economic policy; Economics; Tax reform; Market economy; Law; Operations management; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Waldette Engelbrecht","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cecileen Greef","is_ca":true},{"name":"David Joubert","is_ca":true},{"name":"S. Parsons","is_ca":true},{"name":"Cara Thiart","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01805645931809351,"gpt":0.3217493208971571,"spread":0.3036928615790636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008581216,0.0002966806,0.0003595227,0.0007906623,0.004114463,0.006265536,0.001252561,0.005077909,0.002165069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01819069,0.0004586289,0.0004333387,0.0009919088,0.01137825,0.003205924,0.003056308,0.006310234,0.0003441299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006375131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01312632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02447645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04379353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908409,0.003360672,0.001085697,0.0009042703,0.002502749,0.001305582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890991,0.005822062,0.002078459,0.001150322,0.001480566,0.0003693822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001689866,0.00002417679,0.002326917,0.00005767544,0.0000061377,0.000171877,0.00510788,0.000258714,0.0005573306,0.9849671,0.002337791,0.004167547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009093509,0.0002663177,0.04337189,0.001450571,0.00009485676,0.001622001,0.02083524,0.00308811,0.005647668,0.2558736,0.6673958,0.000263093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3806239,0.003056593,0.02781473,0.07663734,0.0007271601,0.0004447708,0.0004146372,0.0001387489,0.5101422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665247,0.0006301341,0.007468082,0.006249148,0.0001157542,0.0002226345,0.00005231002,0.00002156147,0.01871556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02447645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04866797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179505124","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11341","title":"EXTRA-CURIAL STATEMENTS BY A NON- TESTIFYING CO-ACCUSED, THE CANADIAN SUPREME COURT AND CHANGE IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Hearsay; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Statement (logic); Common law; Law of the case; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","authors":[{"name":"BC Naudé","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0769069062069869,"gpt":0.3652282569861635,"spread":0.2883213507791765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003398048,0.0004594683,0.0004180163,0.001468076,0.0441291,0.008545438,0.001736723,0.01098852,0.004854408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009513747,0.0007112375,0.0004433089,0.001777764,0.01183236,0.002508548,0.002489398,0.01247201,0.0003416777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07213448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09769493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9837678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948555,0.0004548041,0.0001481662,0.0005839249,0.001463787,0.002493715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964307,0.001081441,0.0002340345,0.0001127849,0.001384355,0.0007567409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001129299,0.00008710234,0.01804842,0.0002250105,0.00006405202,0.01004971,0.196662,0.0004035057,0.002947347,0.6487817,0.09370418,0.02891409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001144176,0.00005925618,0.06140057,0.001101742,0.0002213107,0.001543988,0.1083819,0.0006355196,0.003452015,0.03288988,0.7897537,0.0004455923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3601085,0.02467796,0.001147612,0.2266474,0.001694878,0.0003551634,0.0005527,0.00004343225,0.3847724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887754,0.003785446,0.0005575793,0.03762688,0.0001540049,0.00005791668,0.00006257236,0.00003668339,0.0699649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5233747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482086321","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v36i3.11595","title":"RECONSIDERING THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF MUNICIPAL COUNCILS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Privilege (computing); Law; Legislation; Power (physics); Public administration; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Mbuzeni Mathenjwa","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2961254967365654,"gpt":0.3252237382390101,"spread":0.02909824150244478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01584238,0.0002933728,0.0005438982,0.001387482,0.0162169,0.01109687,0.002092113,0.009219422,0.007104382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03244798,0.0005433573,0.0005615272,0.00114836,0.02909987,0.009170944,0.01018218,0.01051684,0.00069901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02040027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03561241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1325647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.222806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864856,0.004390594,0.0008931548,0.0009123547,0.00204468,0.005273558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856321,0.00690452,0.001181386,0.001573439,0.002303162,0.002405402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001705992,0.00002653939,0.002336304,0.00005886651,0.00000732427,0.0003736269,0.03022806,0.0001731634,0.0004855677,0.9424371,0.01338159,0.01047473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005872194,0.00007236518,0.01192182,0.001057923,0.00005176177,0.0004696543,0.05874806,0.0005539504,0.001281785,0.2271462,0.6985278,0.0001099289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2131434,0.00609483,0.004688882,0.4777443,0.001622839,0.0001339835,0.0001638364,0.00006918934,0.2963388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465058,0.001134619,0.001438254,0.02136314,0.0004903291,0.00006969131,0.00003762197,0.00003033331,0.02893022],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1325647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2635862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139949028","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v41i1.10546","title":"Contractual Capacity and the Conflict of Laws in Common-Law Jurisdictions (Part 2): Australasia, North America, Asia and Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Common law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Private law; Position (finance); Municipal law; Choice of law; Public law; Business","authors":[{"name":"Eesa A Fredericks","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04330137539919827,"gpt":0.2712327567788709,"spread":0.2279313813796727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003137531,0.0002515458,0.0002841747,0.002241167,0.00531823,0.006958047,0.0006784779,0.001780996,0.003477358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005986603,0.0001774681,0.0002971735,0.003112756,0.01951996,0.006138077,0.004092948,0.00224633,0.0001064881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005442893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005554116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02323537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02353826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962223,0.001841428,0.0001757772,0.000197892,0.0007572077,0.0008054318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961128,0.002240742,0.0007512161,0.0001436505,0.000369418,0.0003821122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001083816,0.00002577948,0.002256195,0.000129322,0.000006774894,0.0003345434,0.08277881,0.0001549002,0.0002360539,0.8985303,0.001409638,0.01412681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002857482,0.0001612492,0.04512179,0.002617741,0.00003405918,0.002290095,0.2731884,0.0008640556,0.0006245523,0.3643456,0.3106538,0.00007010531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.367365,0.05836053,0.004620541,0.02056593,0.0004634656,0.0001185741,0.00004147976,0.00001321034,0.5484512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906165,0.004544724,0.0005732064,0.0006542559,0.00008425311,0.0000410414,0.0000104658,0.000004747273,0.003470855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02323537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04620028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407032580","doi":"10.17159/wh71jh46","title":"DOUBLE INCHOATE CRIMES: SERVING A USEFUL PURPOSE OR DOUBLE TROUBLE? Déry v The Queen; Attorney General of Canada et al, Interveners [2007] 213 CCC (3d) 289 (SCC)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Law; Criminology; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; History; Zoology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Shannon Hoctor","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05560598496038626,"gpt":0.3316085947277179,"spread":0.2760026097673317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001687191,0.0005561676,0.0003473205,0.0008147637,0.0126816,0.007089051,0.001789327,0.01261017,0.007104348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006250402,0.0005184537,0.0003250839,0.0007904841,0.006473777,0.002137005,0.002336551,0.007899336,0.000895099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0210462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0587548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.888527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9720696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996884,0.0003224293,0.00008889752,0.0002856857,0.000989286,0.001429575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976508,0.0007089197,0.0001512288,0.00006161054,0.0007987171,0.0006287266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003236195,0.00003194423,0.005035296,0.0001245279,0.00001234326,0.001135708,0.006541466,0.00009147677,0.0002513676,0.2607144,0.7078263,0.01820297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008091499,0.00004577302,0.01554207,0.001210648,0.0000808882,0.0009604755,0.02157429,0.000495429,0.0007355917,0.0265114,0.9326324,0.0001300691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03554014,0.02730208,0.0008522766,0.4656226,0.002443414,0.0001497972,0.0006295249,0.00007420818,0.467386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.289031,0.01125515,0.001255662,0.4215881,0.0009684427,0.0001372211,0.0001991449,0.00007152323,0.2754938],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.111473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2242588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124602040","doi":"10.17159/pjdnzz54","title":"Criminal Justice for Female Victims of Domestic Violence: Time to Deal Defencelessness a Final Blow","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Domestic violence; Legislature; Plea; Notice; Legislation; Law enforcement; Presidential system","authors":[{"name":"Rinda Botha","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02519767450830068,"gpt":0.3496766400808022,"spread":0.3244789655725015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00787854,0.0007336973,0.000852628,0.001043371,0.01408236,0.01294676,0.002703392,0.02225358,0.02169052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02295832,0.0006671253,0.0009546681,0.000804856,0.008123307,0.0143486,0.01078395,0.02672142,0.002796085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006375736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02948884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01279109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04111587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924324,0.002419726,0.0003554761,0.0005492591,0.001534468,0.002708655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985873,0.004582319,0.0007293477,0.000495793,0.00237781,0.005941776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004434163,0.0001770755,0.001544344,0.0005346222,0.00001666191,0.001410739,0.0131757,0.00004987808,0.0003903004,0.02884046,0.8411669,0.112649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004266606,0.0001928641,0.003960904,0.003576678,0.00001839567,0.00172317,0.06794566,0.00009788476,0.0001925816,0.01896443,0.9032019,0.00008287092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002267867,0.01013288,0.0001774862,0.969814,0.009786583,0.00002518046,0.00001926267,0.00002233107,0.007754412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07012128,0.03386631,0.00150493,0.8237249,0.02580699,0.0002051411,0.0001033558,0.0001944462,0.04447264],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02225358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07256204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550168670","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i3.12241","title":"THE JURISDICTION OF THE LABOUR COURT IN INTERNATIONAL EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS IN RESPECT OF WORKPLACES OUTSIDE SOUTH AFRICA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Law; Appeal; Labour law; Political science; Conflict of laws; International law; Pleading","authors":[{"name":"Karin Calitz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01363470526004381,"gpt":0.2132329902368093,"spread":0.1995982849767655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02848612,0.000269658,0.0008628647,0.001457196,0.0141918,0.02192279,0.002977693,0.0124365,0.00714585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06900007,0.001021398,0.0007677154,0.001657473,0.02224826,0.01166078,0.01123491,0.01270887,0.0009328168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007639867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01406148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03324778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03032453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9599928,0.01999243,0.002978174,0.00328407,0.005605331,0.008147257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957966,0.02998935,0.002248649,0.003591683,0.003692562,0.002511725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004080277,0.00001998427,0.001571488,0.00005161722,0.00001610622,0.0009165777,0.01804546,0.0003144134,0.00057496,0.967681,0.003134289,0.007633257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002090088,0.0001986652,0.01071006,0.003688002,0.0002521173,0.002194262,0.05718236,0.00316031,0.002494841,0.5859755,0.3336203,0.0003145554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2274124,0.007163783,0.01615703,0.07804544,0.0009706995,0.0001897031,0.0001109332,0.0000465782,0.6699035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783987,0.0008105444,0.001205035,0.007738157,0.0003401902,0.0001050297,0.00001952299,0.00002423309,0.01135859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03324778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1506508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281213616","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v26i2.14750","title":"COMMUNITY LEGAL WORKERS IN ONTARIO: A PARALEGAL CASE STUDY","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Legislation; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Political science; Community organization; Public administration; Community standards; Economic Justice; Community development; Public relations; Law; Business; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Frederick H. Zemans","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1008647453123246,"gpt":0.400237994083749,"spread":0.2993732487714243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001522477,0.0004334309,0.0004100095,0.001582603,0.03906141,0.003010879,0.002184732,0.003327769,0.005733475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003850076,0.0004401949,0.0002655448,0.004066699,0.007738734,0.001143342,0.003449094,0.002143889,0.0004621494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07004943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06586289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9413482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967992,0.0007821783,0.00006375815,0.000178657,0.0007698007,0.001406339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965073,0.0008521716,0.0004116,0.0001152772,0.0006063217,0.00150727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001009632,0.000316818,0.0490039,0.0003143722,0.00001570559,0.06405056,0.797792,0.0005237276,0.001083266,0.04251878,0.02239018,0.02188977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003571185,0.0001434841,0.0414575,0.0003363861,0.00002402966,0.006491996,0.7789289,0.0007802582,0.0002351192,0.0020698,0.1694473,0.00004951423],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8941135,0.00153891,0.0007388954,0.0114725,0.0001125924,0.0003709913,0.0002687316,0.00002564763,0.09135816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705735,0.001895835,0.0006245733,0.001410391,0.00004715549,0.000131038,0.00009055655,0.00002012568,0.02520675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07004943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5082465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}