{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":38,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"709f209e2cbe","filters":{"venue":"Obiter"}},"results":[{"id":"W3150636024","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v41i1.10549","title":"Electricity Theft in South Africa: Examining the Need to Clarify the Offence and Pursue Private Prosecution?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Electricity Theft Detection Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electricity; Statutory law; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Business; Context (archaeology); Law; Engineering; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01964106993845125,"gpt":0.2041054797810636,"spread":0.1844644098426124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002866456,0.0001388449,0.0001270738,0.00007733539,0.00009092055,0.00007676049,0.0002591756,0.0001102254,0.0000100819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001137842,0.00008778088,0.00002203639,0.0008306862,0.00003341624,0.0000887542,0.00007251479,0.0006815868,0.00001917732],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004778014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007941939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000686116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004945968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999162,0.00007163862,0.0001691275,0.0001859817,0.0001383615,0.0002728569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999597,0.00009668224,0.00002696819,0.0002055953,0.00001864013,0.00005517198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001978878,0.00006730572,0.04017543,0.0002016026,0.0001573575,0.00003222593,0.151646,0.005083511,0.7530662,0.004891579,0.00771658,0.03676432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001106038,0.001083448,0.1097223,0.000142636,0.00007602113,0.0000418478,0.001371408,0.094924,0.733068,0.003528573,0.05351182,0.001423976],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772034,0.0002271933,0.01787103,0.002398115,0.00004486328,0.0006893578,0.000002994901,0.0005142851,0.001048808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983038,0.0000130634,0.000392706,0.001052064,0.00007155375,0.00009555095,5.009209e-7,0.00002509351,0.00004567212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1502746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536826666","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v27i3.14358","title":"SECTION 60 OF THE EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT 1998: WILL A COMPARATIVE APPROACH SHAKE THIS JOKER OUT OF THE PACK?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Labour law; Law; Sociology; Liability; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Psychology; History; Advertising","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06232965483382663,"gpt":0.2575214083939907,"spread":0.1951917535601641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002631708,0.0001150735,0.0001753598,0.00004473666,0.0004110973,0.00005849283,0.0003630795,0.0000249266,0.0009277978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000023664,0.00006178059,0.0001499062,0.0002144941,0.0000908169,0.0002642761,0.0007441483,0.0002046203,0.00001775666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004385398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001954818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001520844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002571314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990722,0.00004869066,0.0002136065,0.0001692037,0.0003584416,0.0001378713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992508,0.00001677563,0.0003270255,0.0003427083,0.00005783355,0.000004808177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008993636,0.00406553,0.1895382,0.00137631,0.0009793582,0.0000100043,0.03749286,0.002503932,0.02751536,0.3796691,0.353098,0.002851906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001785528,0.0000793036,0.1611975,0.0001032108,0.0003432662,0.000003400469,0.00140723,0.003683435,0.002667416,0.03916511,0.7889671,0.0005974735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9337471,0.00001876026,0.0000334564,0.0002664756,0.0007441198,0.0003947067,0.00001289656,0.00002082141,0.06476169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916691,3.336055e-7,0.000008139642,0.0006048545,0.000306033,0.00003233266,0.00001439952,0.00001041998,0.00735442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4358691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483718433","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i3.12000","title":"HUNG OUT TO DRY? ATTORNEY-CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY AND THE REPORTING DUTIES IMPOSED BY THE FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTRE ACT 38 OF 2001","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Money laundering; Privilege (computing); Law; Professional conduct; Position (finance); Confidentiality; Commission; Business; Order (exchange); Legal profession; Political science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03209661402555525,"gpt":0.3345268899074748,"spread":0.3024302758819196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002105909,0.000100773,0.0002212803,0.00001355237,0.0004005006,0.0001742596,0.0002998347,0.00007180126,0.0005924604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003949144,0.00006270935,0.00009632421,0.0002068055,0.0006444888,0.0001019552,0.0002181706,0.0001597694,0.00002985742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004987264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001484006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002071765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002185368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998016,0.0003892551,0.0005895575,0.0002501358,0.0004160919,0.000338983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986027,0.0003715457,0.0004278828,0.0003248997,0.0001961431,0.00007681488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009746829,0.00007284008,0.04097949,0.00003249179,0.00005090299,0.00002809489,0.9156397,0.00001064833,0.001062353,0.01607286,0.01961824,0.006334923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003741964,0.00002549554,0.004090196,0.00008356034,0.00007243035,0.00000215702,0.0542177,0.00006986299,0.01625837,0.002121999,0.9223837,0.0003003424],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8683264,0.002482548,0.0007555613,0.01512878,0.002055922,0.0008504159,0.00003794985,0.00006117826,0.1103013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897092,0.00003967815,0.0001542819,0.00063693,0.0002121592,0.000007720864,0.000002696653,0.000006693806,0.009230648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9027655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6487026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485560714","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12130","title":"PROTECTING A WIFE FINANCIALLY AT THE TIME OF DIVORCE – A COMPARISON BETWEEN SOUTH AFRICAN WOMEN MARRIED IN TERMS OF SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL LAW AND ISLAMIC LAW, WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE MAHR","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Islam; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Sharia; Family law; Marriage law; Sociology; Property (philosophy); Political science; Public law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02369994589354808,"gpt":0.2615328005641046,"spread":0.2378328546705565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001142545,0.0001884965,0.0004628573,0.00005159614,0.0004326851,0.0001059736,0.0005249807,0.00009452404,0.0001673302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001601202,0.0001174115,0.0000453314,0.0008293908,0.0009723374,0.00009847324,0.0003793865,0.0003376345,0.00002797719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001689391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001102583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002387463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02179569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975462,0.0005434584,0.0004134922,0.0004145233,0.0005690372,0.0005132919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986556,0.0003359138,0.0003030828,0.000519668,0.00009834211,0.00008741441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001409907,0.00003697172,0.02990594,0.00003261788,0.00003001919,0.000007966169,0.9596707,0.00002249545,0.0006402706,0.009085536,0.00006088447,0.0003656165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003899085,0.001613224,0.1075184,0.001362828,0.0002249239,0.000007508921,0.4164976,0.00008239345,0.008781064,0.01179386,0.4459495,0.002269659],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8194871,0.00007352301,0.0000396255,0.0008034802,0.00002931016,0.000674113,0.00009254061,0.0000245153,0.1787758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970015,0.000001223929,0.0002789421,0.0001800829,0.00009810274,0.00007873138,0.000003602945,0.0000217352,0.002336079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5431731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599648220","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12131","title":"MUTUAL ACCOMMODATION OF RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCES IN THE WORKPLACE – A JOSTLING OF RIGHTS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Duty; Reasonable accommodation; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Labour law; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Diversity (politics); Phenomenon; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03828939394755745,"gpt":0.2371764141480279,"spread":0.1988870202004704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001025116,0.00006268545,0.0001236642,0.00004119926,0.00005335701,0.00003792145,0.0001010516,0.00002427013,0.0001987102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006169475,0.00003708903,0.00004860719,0.00003638778,0.00006048043,0.00005551664,0.00002021355,0.00005555189,0.000009585574],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008828411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001506737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003205794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002256557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994057,0.00005764564,0.0002035986,0.00009299134,0.0001520412,0.00008795965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996381,0.00007857178,0.00006902959,0.0001548515,0.00004969117,0.000009784893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000445172,0.0002299074,0.00672649,0.00006583506,0.0000447596,0.00001361179,0.8700796,0.0000132046,0.0005500025,0.1016742,0.02002355,0.0005342747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002420535,0.0004271032,0.02120674,0.000885246,0.0001549321,0.00002758211,0.506457,0.000475569,0.01764599,0.1035884,0.3459452,0.0007656753],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595746,0.000674847,0.00001228619,0.0003082876,0.000165994,0.00005693011,0.000004686295,0.00000529214,0.03919706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983526,0.000137863,0.00004207524,0.0001314288,0.0001185766,0.000005668143,0.00001154954,0.000003578319,0.001196701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3636226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2175738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W148526578","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i1.12093","title":"THE CRIME OF DEFAMATION – STILL DEFENSIBLE IN A MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Conviction; Context (archaeology); Political science; Freedom of the press; Commonwealth; Freedom of thought; Constitution; Democracy; Criminal law; Human rights; Reasonable doubt; Declaration; Politics; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02523867526518662,"gpt":0.3045188644110031,"spread":0.2792801891458165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003330199,0.00003615861,0.0000615535,0.00003067877,0.0001801034,0.00004205002,0.00007114527,0.00004722752,0.0001601014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004061367,0.00002761908,0.00003304133,0.0001541575,0.0003227797,0.0001609194,0.00002256107,0.00005170373,0.00003007226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003298597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000232572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001185137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005856751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992887,0.0001271897,0.0001530848,0.00008502953,0.0002338672,0.0001121636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994653,0.0001989046,0.00005375829,0.00009717145,0.0001548193,0.00003007857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002230884,0.000063862,0.007120396,0.000008993135,0.000006293089,0.000006083815,0.005381078,0.0002312858,0.007182256,0.9666615,0.006311098,0.007004804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002254924,0.00003789297,0.06226767,0.000372031,0.00003089988,0.00001395922,0.01190471,0.01123964,0.01813383,0.576219,0.3170354,0.0004900764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4690203,0.001141304,0.009829528,0.006753259,0.0007977298,0.0002817713,0.00001188545,0.00005075036,0.5121135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971157,0.00004460145,0.0008234725,0.0002018268,0.00004203642,0.00000469167,0.000005752242,0.000001763863,0.001760133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5280954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1752997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185509208","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v38i2.11441","title":"RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND CASES OF SERIOUS OFFENDING: A SOUTH AFRICAN AND CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retributive justice; Ambiguity; Criminal justice; Criminology; Restorative justice; Criminal law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Perspective (graphical); Conviction; Law; Political science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04253305625274366,"gpt":0.3334118998847734,"spread":0.2908788436320298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001164805,0.00005016022,0.00009536353,0.00009372871,0.001093392,0.0001326843,0.00006792225,0.00003263091,0.00004323357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000416345,0.00004721517,0.00002141699,0.00006820622,0.0003671204,0.0001428711,0.00002369099,0.00005006121,0.000002412472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008420537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001411186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8076819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9112929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995652,0.00003899027,0.00005552989,0.000129857,0.00008015155,0.0001303129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994943,0.00006067258,0.00007098095,0.0001200173,0.0001210239,0.00013305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000655539,0.00003136976,0.02556823,0.00004313559,0.0001058878,0.0001474795,0.9362246,0.000002247247,0.0001152371,0.02327969,0.0005819248,0.0138347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007559408,0.0000629802,0.01732178,0.00001598829,0.0004409861,0.0000068852,0.9787927,0.0000261412,0.00001418756,0.0001645399,0.002994223,0.00008397346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9675894,0.0001470279,0.0000101365,0.0008010756,0.00008932855,0.00005827421,0.00001918826,0.000005380477,0.03128013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989864,0.00005494576,0.00005331834,0.00004647665,0.0000852257,0.000003200769,3.796241e-7,0.000003118064,0.000766887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1036109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8409596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261125889","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i3.12409","title":"THE REVISED CANADIAN TEST FOR THE EXCLUSION OF UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Constitution; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06271134722376055,"gpt":0.3446809712598417,"spread":0.2819696240360811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009403352,0.00004327849,0.00005909012,0.00001058765,0.001305979,0.0000824508,0.0002566283,0.00003181281,0.0001601889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004081686,0.00002488039,0.00006211196,0.0001584011,0.0003621226,0.00011298,0.0000301135,0.00004743883,0.00001510056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008637422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001490824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04682809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5291475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993175,0.00006817546,0.0001194561,0.0001031875,0.0002019865,0.000189743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962993,0.00309501,0.00004134814,0.0001753976,0.000315616,0.00007336172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006627565,0.0000426771,0.01589215,0.00009930139,0.00003650229,0.00002850281,0.008299366,0.00004286832,0.004296286,0.8144263,0.1196976,0.03707216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005024646,0.00001386443,0.003905723,0.0001573511,0.00002176508,0.000001744996,0.00115779,0.00004332187,0.0002155554,0.001602354,0.9927799,0.00005044363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04464972,0.02653636,0.001971034,0.7999312,0.002814542,0.002165285,0.0001165423,0.00006583637,0.1217495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991681,0.0005556123,0.0001651326,0.0009755598,0.0001846238,0.00002201295,0.000001636748,0.000002559019,0.006411838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9470313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167561673","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i2.11229","title":"An Analysis of Mandatory Auditor Rotation Requirements in South Africa in light of International Legislative Trends","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Auditor independence; Audit; Joint audit; External auditor; Audit plan; Business; Quality audit; Chief audit executive; Transparency (behavior); Auditor's report; Corporate governance; Audit committee; Internal audit; Finance; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01658832364650934,"gpt":0.2431318695698697,"spread":0.2265435459233604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001639099,0.0000661712,0.0001647298,0.0007195969,0.000006243651,0.0000189003,0.0001334213,0.00003102503,0.0005429313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001200742,0.00006291101,0.00005182645,0.0008715098,0.0000119244,0.0008906092,0.00003235748,0.00004347812,0.00001797437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003081816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007128028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001855947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000482008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992996,0.000008282895,0.0002681904,0.0001513956,0.0001922928,0.00008024387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994274,0.000008791925,0.0003544567,0.0001329302,0.00007321464,0.000003174616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007559461,0.0001271542,0.9928183,0.00002313249,0.0000605073,0.000002065198,0.001646727,0.0006702465,0.002515827,0.001038569,0.0001525431,0.0008693525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000562423,0.00001287781,0.9732432,0.00005922767,0.0000494766,1.073999e-8,0.0002145754,0.01428365,0.0001674418,0.0001295665,0.01118795,0.00008960268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729018,0.00001857251,0.00004597506,0.00006015537,0.000255667,0.00005444411,0.00001371835,0.00000485559,0.02664484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989899,0.000001086269,0.00003585561,0.00004522071,0.0001012479,0.000005086642,0.00005888931,0.00000483052,0.0007578718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02608814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5944716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199977776","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i2.12265","title":"WHICH STRUCTURES DOES THE HOUSEBREAKING CRIME PROTECT?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Law; Fence (mathematics); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01719254539295409,"gpt":0.3081281536896537,"spread":0.2909356082966996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003041144,0.00008155882,0.00009089857,0.00001707246,0.0005574734,0.0002950797,0.0003168005,0.00008258026,0.001418786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004940918,0.00004491894,0.00004750892,0.0003492501,0.0001634643,0.0001407359,0.000106242,0.000199719,0.000115722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004416809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001334118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006609833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00176228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987878,0.000248544,0.0001063938,0.0002032255,0.0003492949,0.000304777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993303,0.0001122679,0.00004314595,0.0003035557,0.0001560801,0.00005464104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002213475,0.00006312858,0.012895,0.00004351001,0.0001000319,0.00008360699,0.7318786,0.00001648329,0.004022553,0.2263267,0.01183099,0.01271717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008970241,0.00000639005,0.004074802,0.00001532879,0.00001581433,0.000002054,0.004229875,0.000004260941,0.004648856,0.01539,0.9713789,0.0001440385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1883552,0.001025832,0.0001616886,0.01475418,0.002049755,0.0005549458,0.0000145133,0.0003352707,0.7927486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895723,0.00000554048,0.0006810543,0.0007532508,0.0007720164,0.00002134519,0.000001193723,0.00001354245,0.008179733],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9595479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547440466","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i2.12258","title":"HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL NETWORK SITES: PERPETRATOR AND SERVICE PROVIDERS’ LIABILITY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Liability; The Internet; Hatred; Service provider; Service (business); Political science; European union; Internet service provider; Law; Business; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Politics; International trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01938135336999929,"gpt":0.2380310972295631,"spread":0.2186497438595638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002237995,0.0001194652,0.0001231584,0.00002322143,0.0002230442,0.0003252064,0.0001740348,0.00008428095,0.00005326848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002669371,0.0001124315,0.00004541486,0.0003888958,0.00002159139,0.0002845702,0.0001350775,0.0001648663,0.0001504774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003290883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005374887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001489164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006752958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988891,0.0001010436,0.0001274479,0.0004282698,0.0001817801,0.0002722844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994152,0.00005036728,0.00003795329,0.0003081438,0.0001098112,0.00007852555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002107783,0.0009215465,0.02167789,0.0006980464,0.0002376659,0.001054587,0.01606251,0.0002452918,0.06385822,0.02491225,0.08043683,0.7896844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003950121,0.0009671457,0.1351085,0.0003946041,0.0001040564,0.0005614142,0.0007816858,0.0432853,0.1329402,0.03889225,0.6398835,0.00313122],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790659,0.0001133345,0.004809295,0.009734515,0.0006119365,0.0001962818,0.000004182003,0.0002530578,0.005211529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633234,0.00001423549,0.02138502,0.01162317,0.0009582079,0.00002381043,0.00001319081,0.00002385055,0.002635072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7865531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4584824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383375884","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i2.14052","title":"TACIT CHOICE OF LAW IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS: PROGRESS OR STAGNATION IN THE COMMON- LAW JURISDICTIONS?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Comparative law; Private law; Municipal law; Public law; Commercial law; Choice of law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Conflict of laws","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05646339171551969,"gpt":0.387100000997883,"spread":0.3306366092823633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008655891,0.00006188887,0.0001116871,0.0001129565,0.0001663934,0.00008708461,0.0002393268,0.00007677641,0.0001658885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004122107,0.00004733255,0.00003655964,0.0004265278,0.0002430411,0.0003441357,0.00002899499,0.0001481358,0.00001916191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007200556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003721404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0132029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1479502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988967,0.0001886115,0.0002643106,0.0001138233,0.0003656975,0.0001708749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993957,0.0003228761,0.00008553861,0.0001029084,0.00006915442,0.00002379013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001756051,0.0005327446,0.1732385,0.00001961109,0.00002947375,0.00003118151,0.09666494,0.00003560558,0.00008916772,0.6994386,0.002244381,0.02750026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005915532,0.00003590092,0.2300343,0.00004161438,0.00000502233,5.186618e-7,0.001256619,0.0001413896,0.00002853251,0.0009516115,0.766843,0.00006997895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.841284,0.00003287135,0.000006666131,0.01685374,0.0006858032,0.0004599224,0.00003885743,0.00006161113,0.1405766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998269,0.00003883672,0.00001569706,0.0008440932,0.0002389926,0.00005790704,0.00003421706,0.000005506945,0.0004957938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7645985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W107021197","doi":"","title":"Double inchoate crimes : serving a useful purpose or double trouble? : Déry v The Queen; Attorney General of Canada et al, Interveners [2007] 213 CCC (3d) 289 (SCC) : cases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Incitement; Law; Stalking; Harm; Criminology; Political science; Queen (butterfly); Legislation; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0607728268755498,"gpt":0.3230944197212049,"spread":0.2623215928456551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007634598,0.0003152241,0.0003988471,0.0001091936,0.0009268424,0.0001658789,0.000653094,0.0001102034,0.001750619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005370879,0.0002256179,0.0001941505,0.0003504948,0.0003644838,0.0004730475,0.0002312167,0.0002801811,0.00001440856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000617208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002043688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8529299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8232369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971434,0.0002424338,0.0005239593,0.0004683149,0.0008152029,0.0008066641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985039,0.0002417889,0.0003162851,0.0004967633,0.0001952903,0.0002459994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001643687,0.0004807826,0.105651,0.0001244171,0.0005202199,0.0008764635,0.08832496,0.0004249563,0.000682319,0.01092031,0.7890673,0.001283573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002436784,0.0001410984,0.01223198,0.0001137176,0.00006728234,0.00004146016,0.004639682,0.00005825358,0.001539905,0.00007384278,0.9781418,0.000514137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555813,0.0003650808,0.00003226313,0.005180062,0.001196215,0.000571925,0.00003810977,0.00008500013,0.03695003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622582,0.0002364374,0.0003362642,0.005536241,0.0002972876,0.00007360578,0.00001793562,0.00004518142,0.03119881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1890745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192292574","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i3.11189","title":"The Role of Expert Evidence in the Defence of Provocation and Emotional Stress in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Provocation test; CLARITY; Culpability; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Liability; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04652257504750107,"gpt":0.3123317418682517,"spread":0.2658091668207507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064719,0.00002852333,0.00004837925,0.00001780022,0.00004768389,0.00001977205,0.0001762445,0.00002143063,0.00001718579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001587537,0.0000166417,0.00001275704,0.0001200969,0.0001432955,0.0001545201,0.00002116409,0.00004291787,0.0000035362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001195316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004273419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008725091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001266345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993975,0.0001220568,0.0001064709,0.00007651018,0.0002103504,0.00008711134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994277,0.0003828582,0.00004961569,0.00009429246,0.00003599147,0.000009520269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000424348,0.00004906753,0.5617501,0.00003403692,0.000001705889,4.202083e-7,0.397621,0.0000154261,0.003182378,0.03115015,0.00005235259,0.006100982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000242119,0.0001444986,0.7437435,0.001507779,0.000007626913,8.91987e-7,0.2274241,0.000392516,0.003148296,0.009776419,0.01343339,0.0001788477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941494,0.001471998,0.000003473398,0.001019811,0.00002647569,0.0001570345,0.000001104985,0.000001455013,0.003169264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997206,0.00008306759,0.00002826529,0.00002267536,0.00001675841,0.000009466195,1.695595e-7,0.000001078841,0.0001179402],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1819934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1318979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186550581","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11328","title":"CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY AND THE CONFLICT OF LAWS IN COMMON-LAW JURISDICTIONS (PART 1): THE UNITED KINGDOM","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Common law; Comparative law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Choice of law; Position (finance); Municipal law; Public law; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07260518125190656,"gpt":0.3266917376229886,"spread":0.254086556371082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001182709,0.00007275509,0.0001538119,0.00004542585,0.0006408391,0.0000714441,0.0001586017,0.0000764975,0.0001887845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004757688,0.00004239886,0.00004560744,0.0002526002,0.002860923,0.0001105605,0.00003559911,0.000168553,0.00001024125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002228554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002900555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04304456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03790703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989535,0.0003326718,0.0002266416,0.0001104641,0.0001937156,0.0001829567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990852,0.0004850665,0.00009692128,0.0001855795,0.0001040667,0.00004315716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001083077,0.00005552876,0.006289206,0.000003233147,0.00003064297,7.718097e-7,0.07009267,0.000001190572,0.0001074233,0.9207489,0.001622251,0.0009398884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008288707,0.00003654799,0.01061702,0.00002018252,0.00002232134,0.000001619533,0.0008551276,0.0001570418,0.0001039328,0.001588209,0.9857079,0.00006125227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9205071,0.00003634355,0.00003462041,0.006529644,0.0003022906,0.0002774603,0.00001476107,0.00002343673,0.07227438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976872,0.00004375691,0.0000110415,0.001497396,0.0003351071,0.00001472317,0.000002905137,0.000004985405,0.000402918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385241220","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v25i1.16525","title":"SENTENCING OF PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLERS IN CANADA. LESSONS FOR SOUTH AFRICA?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Punishment (psychology); Prison; Criminology; Legislation; Sentence; Attendance; Political science; Service (business); Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08449379811015129,"gpt":0.3356930658024427,"spread":0.2511992676922915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004618412,0.00005873276,0.0001387009,0.00006151601,0.00008564666,0.00001310341,0.0001824847,0.00005411007,0.00006342137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004107414,0.00005202389,0.00004067012,0.0004811826,0.00009060786,0.00004875856,0.0000472455,0.00007553601,0.00001996254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002152731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004559486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3459341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7059749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989995,0.00007398162,0.0001582086,0.0001575625,0.0002454505,0.0003652662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995183,0.0002120119,0.00004999275,0.0001079782,0.00004597415,0.00006570889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003932136,0.00003738796,0.1162501,0.00005380193,0.00001708336,0.0001335827,0.8512844,0.0002438162,0.0008198368,0.01185395,0.01654435,0.002722261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001176554,0.00007613915,0.05801909,0.000127402,0.00003306686,5.959939e-7,0.3439007,0.0008717597,0.0005669847,0.004100124,0.5904961,0.0006314766],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9630954,0.0000942146,0.00008720024,0.003379644,0.0004835376,0.0003433673,0.00009463938,0.00007016883,0.03235186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974855,0.000002810457,0.0003507605,0.00008216201,0.00006512026,0.00002740286,0.000003192358,0.000006897676,0.001976164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5739518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6584214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572964298","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i2.12437","title":"JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN THE DETERMINATION OF POST-DIVORCE CHILD SUPPORT: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MAINTENANCE ACT 99 OF 1998 AS COMPARED TO THE CANADIAN FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES OF 1997","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Discretion; Interpretation (philosophy); Obligation; Child support; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Duty; Judicial interpretation; Political science; Law; Family law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02794610623046433,"gpt":0.3223150179788927,"spread":0.2943689117484283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001143151,0.0001258494,0.0003065151,0.00006126888,0.0002712774,0.00002761452,0.0009313287,0.0000878078,0.00007140284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005817729,0.00006797975,0.0001917345,0.000913693,0.0005321286,0.0000939392,0.0001191776,0.0001676363,0.000002894005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000976077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005746309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1584392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5059037,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976581,0.0004419876,0.0006979412,0.0002090753,0.0007416169,0.0002513301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981092,0.00008028196,0.0006695974,0.0006191815,0.0004673393,0.00005436737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001656536,0.0004040203,0.06939345,0.0003390694,0.00009777091,0.000004519185,0.8825433,0.0002574799,0.00180307,0.03187072,0.004264507,0.008856489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001430893,0.000340243,0.6495783,0.001302908,0.000283297,0.00001894201,0.06394269,0.0006068776,0.01185888,0.002288101,0.26774,0.0006087854],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8460222,0.0004933907,0.0002788858,0.06821867,0.0006435595,0.003834699,0.001805542,0.00001898209,0.078684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981596,0.000007160934,0.0001154615,0.001338883,0.00009028377,0.00002967192,0.00002476682,0.00001035487,0.0002237796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8471649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981107737","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11326","title":"UNTANGLING THE REQUIREMENT OF GOOD FAITH IN THE DERIVATIVE ACTION IN COMPANY LAW (Part 2)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Fair dealing; Statutory law; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Good faith; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08242535669262861,"gpt":0.369411996836841,"spread":0.2869866401442124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009743808,0.00005200534,0.00008005228,0.0000251502,0.000160714,0.00003928926,0.000280704,0.00003876434,0.0001270674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006588226,0.00003016151,0.00002175042,0.0003483987,0.0004978638,0.000158858,0.00003772538,0.0001132907,0.00003404875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009001091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002631784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00321775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01810904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989675,0.0003191963,0.0001596109,0.0001027019,0.0002751355,0.0001758862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995491,0.000156466,0.00007022377,0.0001631761,0.00004707433,0.00001397285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002459438,0.00007822189,0.01816971,0.000005504407,0.000008762704,0.0000026501,0.8643653,0.000005724278,0.0002949923,0.1155401,0.0007522776,0.0007521498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004180814,0.0001040398,0.01390971,0.00009732568,0.0000113373,3.099145e-7,0.08975324,0.00005785853,0.002665943,0.004954086,0.8878835,0.0001445752],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6895199,0.00008299126,0.00003292472,0.002696266,0.0003257862,0.0003222874,0.000002765731,0.00001341604,0.3070036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987373,0.000003827493,0.0001086243,0.0006383289,0.0002665261,0.0000152785,7.050238e-7,0.000003774064,0.0002255762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387533342","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i3.16964","title":"A CRITICAL LEGAL PERSPECTIVE ON STATUTORY INTOXICATION – TIME TO SOBER UP?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Government (linguistics); Environmental health; Alcohol abuse; Statutory law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Zero tolerance; Falling (accident); Alcoholic liver disease; Mortality rate; Psychiatry; Political science; Cirrhosis; Geography; Law; Surgery","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05681382074834623,"gpt":0.4995697204961752,"spread":0.442755899747829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007308419,0.0000962101,0.0001521121,0.0001149175,0.0002422797,0.00001664568,0.0001028209,0.0001378149,0.01697601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005821571,0.00007868902,0.00004093536,0.000263324,0.00006019756,0.0001839702,0.0000813371,0.0005427626,0.1319929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002096315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001594923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001351981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000134057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983786,0.00041244,0.0002267816,0.000292065,0.0002891094,0.0004010282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973258,0.001875463,0.00003155036,0.0003001545,0.0002200681,0.0002469691],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001899848,0.0001254404,0.0004776265,0.00009718221,0.00001522865,0.00001833232,0.0175913,0.00000111236,0.001251328,0.08444638,0.8941875,0.001598593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002262295,0.0001729988,0.009654745,0.0001155925,0.00001315513,4.359005e-7,0.006297404,0.00009279298,0.00006182936,0.002027269,0.98122,0.0001175607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3456464,0.00001890473,0.000115633,0.3399023,0.001431014,0.000898617,0.00003609127,0.0004658529,0.3114851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7505924,0.000004998925,0.000273547,0.02773528,0.001252406,0.0002929622,0.00003059232,0.00003373667,0.2197841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.404946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9839226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297235682","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v25i2.14860","title":"DNA EVIDENCE IN SOUTH AFRICA: FALLACIES AND THE FUTURE","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Profiling (computer programming); Legislature; Political science; Law; DNA profiling; Common law; Biology; DNA; Genetics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03152925795317972,"gpt":0.2845128952228036,"spread":0.2529836372696239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001048282,0.00006036365,0.00009770062,0.00003684215,0.0005356555,0.00009619504,0.0003227649,0.00002973116,0.0005044588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001736324,0.00004151105,0.00003183268,0.0003609805,0.0004041302,0.000145221,0.0002417429,0.0002143105,0.00002978179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006945017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004467653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001505295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002308923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987316,0.0004357291,0.00009938033,0.0001583516,0.0003565617,0.0002183518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995028,0.0002470278,0.00003837786,0.0001560786,0.0000173841,0.00003828016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000355103,0.000007209705,0.007335918,0.000002903196,0.000003169989,0.000007890284,0.971107,0.000003620805,0.000008813506,0.01940881,0.001645628,0.0004335188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002659664,0.00001268863,0.001100033,0.000006915304,0.000005936259,4.180646e-7,0.08443748,0.00001118719,0.000002735736,0.002074269,0.9120002,0.00008217563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7217767,0.03661896,0.00001271164,0.03643329,0.001698243,0.0008647782,0.00002265316,0.0001362283,0.2024365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908652,0.00003773273,0.00006719621,0.0004904417,0.0002841174,0.00006071213,2.873791e-7,0.000005305089,0.00818902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9103546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.552347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210534343","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i1.12607","title":"CONTRACT AND AGENCY LAW AND THE 2008 COMPANIES BILL","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Law; Agency (philosophy); Position (finance); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Finance; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01343812441815508,"gpt":0.1920753030178705,"spread":0.1786371785997155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008753722,0.00006814336,0.0001045027,0.00001018393,0.000117803,0.000276173,0.00004102052,0.00001952875,0.0002774138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001429297,0.00003742757,0.00002290438,0.00007597484,0.0001211684,0.0003817913,0.00008712196,0.0000505243,0.0000524584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002045768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004201145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009551559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006643232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996319,0.000005787165,0.00008180238,0.0001170507,0.00006708263,0.00009639168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997519,0.00003269465,0.00005838451,0.0001050919,0.00004736116,0.000004602748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001239157,0.00006635312,0.03357287,0.0001360237,0.00006407913,0.000144783,0.000505486,0.000002563093,0.001066663,0.9169838,0.03597744,0.01135604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001338415,0.000002167681,0.06585045,0.00002906158,0.00003933893,0.00001080356,0.0000662165,0.0004361276,0.00005828533,0.01512998,0.9169126,0.0001265186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8947469,0.002144804,0.00001255404,0.005886984,0.0001914208,0.0001027825,0.000003212225,0.00002856965,0.09688275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848307,0.0001126346,0.00001376787,0.01328569,0.0003147552,0.00000379704,0.000005946993,0.00000657282,0.001426085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9018538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3037486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412454440","doi":"10.17159/zvd30693","title":"A Critical Analysis of the Application of Section 37C(1) of the Income Tax","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Economics; Business; Advertising","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006322872847640396,"gpt":0.2551360647828392,"spread":0.2488131919351988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009912996,0.00003441184,0.00009690638,0.0001329132,0.00003421169,0.00001577426,0.0001243976,0.00002616562,0.0000859783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001043137,0.00001984117,0.0001021196,0.001166622,0.00005716494,0.0001175657,0.00006917296,0.00003803231,0.000002581813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005683722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004950841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001015196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002588466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996301,0.00001039213,0.0001593254,0.00006184106,0.0001006811,0.00003766667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994822,0.00002849431,0.0001499811,0.0001997692,0.0001383247,0.000001246585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001959734,0.0001007536,0.7241896,0.0002948277,0.0001786672,2.793912e-8,0.0001639587,0.0002510299,0.01397437,0.257475,0.001177355,0.002174771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001008325,0.000001493365,0.9317043,0.00003964747,0.0004406232,2.112507e-8,0.00008673294,0.006795994,0.003185629,0.001286148,0.05632359,0.00003500827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9627818,0.00003079767,0.00242924,0.001599103,0.0002188121,0.0001428519,0.000004382444,0.00001094874,0.03278205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988526,3.514132e-7,0.0000205423,0.0003828552,0.00005483986,0.000005851653,0.000002306595,0.000001873092,0.0006788146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2561889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.153468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553136995","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12146","title":"THE PURPOSE AND AMBIT OF THE OFFENCE OF CONCEALMENT OF BIRTH S v Molefe 2012 (2) SACR 574 (GNP)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Dignity; Political science; Statutory law; Statute; Context (archaeology); Constitution; Memorandum; Criminology; Sociology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01943973870665325,"gpt":0.2838164968300847,"spread":0.2643767581234314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002982286,0.00006633229,0.0001625013,0.00000524135,0.0002774206,0.00001676112,0.0001917628,0.00004059464,0.00009137783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000187388,0.00003385727,0.00007347758,0.0001535876,0.0009664737,0.00007992922,0.0001285203,0.00006572557,0.000002151262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002910581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005124024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001695371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001623945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990223,0.0001760861,0.0002039988,0.0001071519,0.0003339508,0.0001565098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992263,0.0002193603,0.0001644964,0.0001578211,0.0001997558,0.00003225312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001144168,0.0004375219,0.3623987,0.0004579729,0.0005867332,0.000008261757,0.3565342,0.00002391456,0.1165244,0.09704438,0.0218937,0.04397579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007531556,0.00009314448,0.5004286,0.0002430119,0.00008678395,0.000001446866,0.04937385,0.00001722444,0.07748214,0.00133943,0.3699209,0.0002603288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860029,0.003865549,0.000003544566,0.00361565,0.000201152,0.0002224581,0.00002219065,0.000005512246,0.006061044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949932,0.0006298547,0.00008294777,0.00009999761,0.00003505858,0.000007536389,3.411616e-7,0.000003091726,0.00414805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3480272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3561012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417005967","doi":"10.17159/r3n3gv92","title":"What the Doctor Ordered: Lessons From Abroad to Strengthen South Africa’s Medical-Parole System","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Dignity; Legislation; Imprisonment; Criminal Conviction; Sentence; Value (mathematics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0288925303479448,"gpt":0.3352269723553151,"spread":0.3063344420073703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001723038,0.0006076861,0.0008262944,0.0001998122,0.00146278,0.002277747,0.003392553,0.0007496042,0.007583579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001092444,0.0004344322,0.0003806275,0.002000883,0.0009505542,0.0007091152,0.001247747,0.0009440816,0.005131221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005541176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001016618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003015392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001300402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926868,0.001294819,0.001017554,0.00127904,0.002287054,0.001434749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955138,0.001350383,0.0002980026,0.001704885,0.0002968408,0.0008360643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007958991,0.0001660262,0.0008638903,0.00008031991,0.0003838212,0.00005076943,0.903797,0.00001982659,0.00001780892,0.02731058,0.05457594,0.01265448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005038537,0.0000418037,0.0002238638,0.001268042,0.0002282016,3.011527e-7,0.1592043,0.0003702865,0.00004237879,0.0005389434,0.8371312,0.0004468722],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1389946,0.02928761,0.0006056596,0.138167,0.03325647,0.003294851,0.0008662712,0.0007278643,0.6547997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099506,0.0001519986,0.0001924765,0.002348331,0.001697346,0.0001723172,0.00001175949,0.00004632572,0.08542892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7825552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186537419","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i3.11191","title":"Caveat Jurisconsultus: Warrantless Access to the Client Records of Legal Practitioners","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislation; Warrant; Law; Legislature; Confidentiality; Political science; Business; Constitution","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02412930648927853,"gpt":0.3477416968573261,"spread":0.3236123903680476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005591916,0.00008661644,0.0001430622,0.00005329543,0.0001746636,0.0001901641,0.0006140947,0.00006844984,0.001325797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001902101,0.00005925272,0.00006425798,0.0004024504,0.0001501738,0.0005266129,0.0001332197,0.0001435225,0.001027919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008177104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001349016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003014897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001046054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987096,0.000175672,0.0001994288,0.0002109465,0.0004334144,0.0002709107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991458,0.0001584067,0.0001071298,0.0003491861,0.0001479225,0.0000915441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002522775,0.0002777751,0.09226061,0.0000758258,0.0001253898,0.00001951345,0.6113681,0.0002293051,0.001274109,0.05241304,0.2334022,0.008301849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001334037,0.00002944611,0.001636558,0.00002525917,0.00001085432,4.335468e-7,0.003970651,0.000005482718,0.0004689542,0.00008612953,0.9935316,0.0001011681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5268259,0.0000813294,0.0000551421,0.01035873,0.001885075,0.0005891283,0.00002681324,0.00003897172,0.4601389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739445,0.00001350174,0.0002140076,0.001105775,0.0002815145,0.00002633648,0.000003251676,0.00001056585,0.02440051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7601295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513938139","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i2.12036","title":"CURRENT ISSUES OF CONSTITUTIONAL DAMAGES LITIGATION: A CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF RECENT COMMONWEALTH DECISIONS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Commonwealth; Law; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Jurisprudence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07882269416384635,"gpt":0.4100255463537328,"spread":0.3312028521898864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004506253,0.00007057346,0.0003039376,0.0001346222,0.0001569023,0.0000297238,0.0001869262,0.00005582506,0.003252994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001075357,0.00006686595,0.0001401692,0.001312504,0.001207874,0.0001185854,0.00007542386,0.00009620798,0.00001996597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006197648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000445667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000254679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006412834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984647,0.0002834482,0.0003674671,0.0001721812,0.0005517382,0.0001604633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982689,0.0004939202,0.0001607934,0.0002459265,0.0007301286,0.00010034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002522859,0.0004270503,0.1031916,0.0000217329,0.0005355735,0.00001105781,0.09905892,0.00009650741,0.0002231307,0.7723809,0.006924739,0.01710356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002132861,0.00001891088,0.01018497,0.00006699881,0.0002751314,2.457932e-7,0.004281696,0.00004677485,0.0007922825,0.001564032,0.9824527,0.000103008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6572206,0.03455545,0.006015906,0.01494514,0.002402727,0.0006549937,0.00149848,0.0001252956,0.2825814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969569,0.0008472304,0.001347732,0.00009530081,0.00009465461,0.000005257075,0.00008274454,0.000002658829,0.0005674658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9755279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801111753","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v28i1.14290","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO SCHOOL RULES*","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03890829450555221,"gpt":0.3198555049603515,"spread":0.2809472104547993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003669191,0.00005079743,0.00006563416,0.00003415885,0.0006478783,0.00004041332,0.0002738232,0.00002450532,0.01157176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001614613,0.00005369275,0.00003407422,0.0001331661,0.0002533725,0.00009226324,0.0001729396,0.0001358796,0.002282997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001912808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001376416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001121285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004058866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998978,0.0001291094,0.00007927849,0.0001662112,0.0004295197,0.0002179025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999604,0.00004908896,0.00001890904,0.0001330631,0.00003520404,0.000159672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001194166,0.0000464508,0.001207026,0.000002599111,0.000009950714,0.00002156601,0.07147423,0.00003236252,0.00003061489,0.8911155,0.03304625,0.003001516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007066705,0.00001833139,0.000333279,0.000002007706,0.000002426057,7.909498e-7,0.002950741,9.934338e-7,0.000005743017,0.001704894,0.9948301,0.00008003118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01370227,0.001229313,0.00005445756,0.01406347,0.0009429841,0.0001957897,0.0000449694,0.0001066196,0.9696601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842269,0.00001206302,0.0008082686,0.001765178,0.0004619558,0.00008153348,0.000003844481,0.00000374105,0.01263648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510579985","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i1.12319","title":"AT LAST A SOUTH AFRICAN PROPER LAW OF DELICT Burchell v Anglin 2010 3 SA 48 (ECG)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delict; Law; Common law; Locus (genetics); Haploinsufficiency; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Private law; Biology; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02781023754473503,"gpt":0.2834699522834022,"spread":0.2556597147386672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003614723,0.0001318421,0.0002297992,0.00003680932,0.0002288891,0.00007252536,0.0003111344,0.0001448193,0.00223002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001830992,0.0001135889,0.0001229301,0.0004129453,0.0005416447,0.0001466429,0.000215567,0.0001757882,0.001022445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001061199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001524847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001000212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002355486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983218,0.0002249699,0.0002463378,0.0003214482,0.000472592,0.0004128798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990212,0.00007501047,0.00009979687,0.0003868782,0.0002516421,0.0001654419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008699568,0.0003100279,0.03282544,0.00007712163,0.0001010032,0.0001753853,0.9057592,0.00001196518,0.007270083,0.0198747,0.03149773,0.00201036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002589061,0.00002564597,0.0003848427,0.0000264405,0.00002571267,0.000001305631,0.005379084,0.00001289463,0.005330284,0.000191762,0.988169,0.0001941178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3117561,0.0009215433,0.00004205321,0.001106831,0.0007421137,0.0002569987,0.00006810246,0.0000993799,0.6850069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9174657,0.000005862156,0.001513864,0.0004953468,0.0003192961,0.00001442088,0.000008557246,0.00002158378,0.08015532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9566713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390143988","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i4.17505","title":"PROVIDING A LEGAL DEFINITION FOR CYBERBULLYING IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; CLARITY; Interpretation (philosophy); The Internet; Political science; Confusion; Phenomenon; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Public relations; Internet privacy; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04178065195820064,"gpt":0.2433716820714731,"spread":0.2015910301132724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003426817,0.00008834247,0.00009107482,0.0002472758,0.000110273,0.0001895709,0.0002110174,0.00005430033,0.000005006269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006004074,0.00008653137,0.00005650175,0.0006567673,0.000009229742,0.0003828998,0.00007808892,0.00008893525,0.0002374799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004029328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003286455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008834231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007796042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990679,0.00002790019,0.0001500271,0.0002874762,0.000129332,0.0003373791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996223,0.00006666299,0.00003995399,0.0001984924,0.00002921327,0.00004339484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003256751,0.0004287531,0.007216421,0.000705749,0.0001235065,0.0007296695,0.1103059,0.001911241,0.1388511,0.3741201,0.02454836,0.3407334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006705701,0.001125545,0.009041769,0.0007447446,0.00004144075,0.00011581,0.001754236,0.4027999,0.06302229,0.08548585,0.4265651,0.002597648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5206819,0.0000734533,0.4540564,0.001370336,0.001365432,0.001085086,0.00001227883,0.001553773,0.01980137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796943,0.000001625415,0.01875828,0.0001222413,0.00008279397,0.0001653065,0.000007012874,0.00001264234,0.00115578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4590124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3528647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980704029","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i2.11355","title":"UNTANGLING THE REQUIREMENT OF GOOD FAITH IN THE DERIVATIVE ACTION IN COMPANY LAW (Part 1)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation","keywords":"Faith; Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Statutory law; Fair dealing; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Good faith; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08262122442472057,"gpt":0.3696140038897634,"spread":0.2869927794650428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000982896,0.00005199169,0.00007999258,0.00002511995,0.0001606363,0.00003937228,0.0002805514,0.00003875669,0.0001245113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000659084,0.0000301553,0.00002174584,0.000347792,0.0004976849,0.0001587443,0.00003772006,0.0001132624,0.00003402292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008996127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002654574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003169438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01728012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989666,0.0003189892,0.0001606535,0.0001029914,0.000274988,0.0001758001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995489,0.0001561798,0.00007066303,0.0001631707,0.00004716411,0.00001396775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002444651,0.00007713582,0.01805175,0.000005421273,0.000008629082,0.000002612893,0.8658922,0.000005720109,0.0003080652,0.1141375,0.0007288849,0.0007576084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004264213,0.0001074926,0.0139186,0.0001012818,0.00001156723,3.282531e-7,0.09487925,0.00005859086,0.002759151,0.005132539,0.8824571,0.0001476279],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7037138,0.00008443406,0.00003316252,0.002768652,0.0003247569,0.0003220462,0.000002756376,0.00001341251,0.2927369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987386,0.000003934135,0.0001092277,0.0006374288,0.0002659444,0.00001527537,7.094806e-7,0.000003773981,0.0002250451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8817283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9642714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385309200","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i2.16558","title":"THE CONFLICT BETWEEN CERTAIN CAPITAL ALLOWANCES IN THE INCOME TAX ACT AND THE SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES POLICY OBJECTIVES","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Capital (architecture); Public economics; Property tax; Allowance (engineering); Context (archaeology); Income tax; Incentive; Tax policy; Economic policy; Economics; Tax reform; Market economy; Law; Operations management; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01805645931809351,"gpt":0.3217493208971571,"spread":0.3036928615790636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001770522,0.000116309,0.0001712522,0.00006802641,0.0008575962,0.0004264842,0.0006860649,0.00007109727,0.00005424409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003596992,0.00005560619,0.00007069099,0.0003260886,0.001546747,0.0002038173,0.000141596,0.0002107459,0.0002388279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009896024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001373109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009450409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983403,0.0006456412,0.0001938944,0.0001953294,0.0002308203,0.0003940347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975141,0.002118323,0.00007986772,0.000228093,0.00001547774,0.00004417337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004103955,0.000005717683,0.08804949,0.000003135869,0.00003739561,0.000005479024,0.8011456,0.000005354543,0.000001660701,0.1053973,0.002249942,0.003057856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005798387,0.00002638718,0.2213985,0.000009657052,0.00001331719,5.607717e-7,0.04435979,0.00001518892,0.000007265045,0.02163137,0.7118012,0.000156931],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8695551,0.0003448871,4.923535e-7,0.02542446,0.0004153893,0.0004325162,0.0000284273,0.00003893954,0.1037599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907566,0.0002016958,0.000006209204,0.0002540081,0.004977326,0.00004925045,0.00000221141,0.000009799405,0.00374285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7567858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179505124","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11341","title":"EXTRA-CURIAL STATEMENTS BY A NON- TESTIFYING CO-ACCUSED, THE CANADIAN SUPREME COURT AND CHANGE IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Hearsay; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Statement (logic); Common law; Law of the case; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0769069062069869,"gpt":0.3652282569861635,"spread":0.2883213507791765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000680098,0.0001190359,0.000123132,0.00009766364,0.0006443195,0.0002699344,0.0003065364,0.0001044741,0.0006052805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001250901,0.00009332802,0.00002063252,0.0003057434,0.0005476229,0.0003156551,0.00004473768,0.0001574375,0.0002311965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002112043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001796325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2005417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4052235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99853,0.0001303336,0.0001630847,0.000245512,0.0003334349,0.0005975773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993759,0.00007488585,0.00005656986,0.0001880715,0.00006161905,0.0002429293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001303155,0.00001472701,0.05639951,0.00000453297,0.00000835794,0.00001074606,0.9321167,4.414249e-8,0.00006991936,0.0001666153,0.01050561,0.0006901338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004536752,0.0000498495,0.004267348,0.00002772374,0.000009769545,2.333132e-7,0.004166027,0.00006103063,0.00003971711,0.0001560128,0.9905744,0.0001942319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7588925,0.0008553388,0.00002639275,0.005496012,0.00151447,0.001833265,0.0003884372,0.00009501988,0.2308985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968606,0.000005611734,0.0001190713,0.0006610443,0.0006620667,0.00006004594,0.000006313592,0.00001576356,0.001609478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9800687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.804782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482086321","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v36i3.11595","title":"RECONSIDERING THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF MUNICIPAL COUNCILS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Privilege (computing); Law; Legislation; Power (physics); Public administration; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2961254967365654,"gpt":0.3252237382390101,"spread":0.02909824150244478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008481006,0.00004352829,0.00008002474,0.00001594223,0.0001311063,0.00005052405,0.0001657066,0.00003615309,0.00006568173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000297131,0.00003001538,0.00001687539,0.00006765615,0.0005714821,0.0001370124,0.00006028155,0.00007441494,0.00001438571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003062276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006965645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001016959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001044444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993601,0.0001338268,0.00009568957,0.0000587356,0.0002208112,0.0001308049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994551,0.0001937718,0.00004259178,0.0001631259,0.0000989422,0.00004644659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004990193,0.000005974132,0.004128622,0.00000462489,0.000009122445,0.000001329188,0.9889373,0.000001889809,0.00003304919,0.004925062,0.001069883,0.0008781541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001423639,0.00002717994,0.0004410936,0.00002581751,0.00001116757,0.000001200399,0.1066302,0.00001734822,0.0002606226,0.003939655,0.8884193,0.00008411336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7496765,0.001806917,0.000002715794,0.0007654009,0.0002116832,0.00007962629,0.00000316512,0.00002153796,0.2474325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967425,0.000046464,0.0002454284,0.0001176961,0.00009689841,0.000005093215,2.620365e-7,0.000004408079,0.002741253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8873494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2105649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139949028","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v41i1.10546","title":"Contractual Capacity and the Conflict of Laws in Common-Law Jurisdictions (Part 2): Australasia, North America, Asia and Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Common law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Private law; Position (finance); Municipal law; Choice of law; Public law; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04330137539919827,"gpt":0.2712327567788709,"spread":0.2279313813796727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002362095,0.00008738892,0.0002386118,0.00002350191,0.0002476151,0.00005910816,0.00009013626,0.00006255133,0.0001029936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003192195,0.00006746154,0.00004195542,0.0001808722,0.001271578,0.0001504775,0.00003379551,0.0001829439,0.000005457204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001398577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002541525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005465581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008104194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990815,0.0001666366,0.0002350884,0.0001595393,0.0001727924,0.0001844367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994471,0.0002149892,0.00008838101,0.00009169255,0.00003811116,0.0001197044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005389552,0.0002688474,0.1460733,0.00006051615,0.0001608134,0.00001877575,0.6220609,0.00002248811,0.0003455114,0.1995849,0.008509817,0.02235519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009405326,0.000071202,0.03820752,0.00001145302,0.00003143264,0.000001393289,0.002110431,0.000165226,0.00002139789,0.0001957945,0.9581477,0.00009589751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9274706,0.0001877429,0.00002407333,0.01101969,0.00007907358,0.0003071502,0.00005620314,0.00002884838,0.06082658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986961,0.0001981779,0.00003182814,0.0006969894,0.0001261634,0.00001383382,0.000003820948,0.000005199515,0.0002278795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.826236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407032580","doi":"10.17159/wh71jh46","title":"DOUBLE INCHOATE CRIMES: SERVING A USEFUL PURPOSE OR DOUBLE TROUBLE? Déry v The Queen; Attorney General of Canada et al, Interveners [2007] 213 CCC (3d) 289 (SCC)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Law; Criminology; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; History; Zoology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05560598496038626,"gpt":0.3316085947277179,"spread":0.2760026097673317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001469688,0.0002090988,0.0002854937,0.00006420506,0.0009567966,0.0001764196,0.0009640988,0.00005229449,0.003406901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004143606,0.0001552631,0.0001446114,0.0003788871,0.0001909873,0.0004525348,0.0004903747,0.000363575,0.00001449438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005515502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001633754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.871536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7716795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973441,0.0003656951,0.0004231641,0.0003941228,0.0008490367,0.0006238478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988185,0.000200619,0.0002076248,0.0004603534,0.0001324303,0.000180523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001833016,0.0002192228,0.01426884,0.0001270141,0.000144265,0.0001511973,0.02728433,0.001602298,0.000751075,0.01836234,0.9344805,0.0007758805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009172215,0.000100203,0.001081156,0.00005076357,0.00004377277,0.000007581753,0.005214321,0.00007996168,0.0005113253,0.0001085895,0.9916216,0.0002634768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9380447,0.0004367806,0.00002154973,0.03390992,0.00165258,0.0005597469,0.00004867335,0.00006586937,0.02526018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522987,0.00006669925,0.00018392,0.01183347,0.0001994403,0.0001366644,0.00001607513,0.00003287704,0.03523214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09985644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124602040","doi":"10.17159/pjdnzz54","title":"Criminal Justice for Female Victims of Domestic Violence: Time to Deal Defencelessness a Final Blow","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Domestic violence; Legislature; Plea; Notice; Legislation; Law enforcement; Presidential system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02519767450830068,"gpt":0.3496766400808022,"spread":0.3244789655725015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001047206,0.0004183917,0.0007581242,0.0002997226,0.0007146643,0.0002153035,0.001236207,0.0003741406,0.003415546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007680627,0.0004283413,0.0003183658,0.00157202,0.0008221053,0.0002946914,0.0003524345,0.00031294,0.001058955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002593231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008960192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002172622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004574711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961856,0.0002591614,0.0008355785,0.0008620399,0.0007569868,0.001100653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968882,0.001228453,0.000278755,0.0005382855,0.0007152933,0.0003510066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003456133,0.002124634,0.004939965,0.008923991,0.0005243512,0.0001436415,0.7446827,0.0008939289,0.00360731,0.03189439,0.009365938,0.1894431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007810007,0.003893606,0.006216111,0.01248519,0.01393952,0.00001759255,0.09615028,0.01003114,0.009652147,0.01417755,0.8211317,0.004495169],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9032596,0.002256761,0.009060608,0.001131948,0.002670275,0.002645723,0.000317989,0.0001130321,0.07854403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708477,0.00003425336,0.009692929,0.000770862,0.0005760932,0.0002085398,0.000007522455,0.00003123374,0.01783082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8117657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550168670","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i3.12241","title":"THE JURISDICTION OF THE LABOUR COURT IN INTERNATIONAL EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS IN RESPECT OF WORKPLACES OUTSIDE SOUTH AFRICA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Law; Appeal; Labour law; Political science; Conflict of laws; International law; Pleading","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01363470526004381,"gpt":0.2132329902368093,"spread":0.1995982849767655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000257509,0.00005617635,0.00009183332,0.00004510494,0.00002807322,0.00005867704,0.0001509342,0.00002490086,0.0000840472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007461345,0.00003509029,0.00004049217,0.0002900766,0.00003155274,0.0001919241,0.00009803264,0.00008357696,0.000009180499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002648487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002609747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002492587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002260219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993649,0.00001425206,0.0002255344,0.0000960608,0.0002009535,0.00009829151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994832,0.00004586002,0.0002355778,0.0001393333,0.00009368058,0.000002355505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002354098,0.0001857896,0.9624782,0.00003381494,0.00003932984,0.0000204555,0.001531959,0.0003454928,0.003020105,0.02361712,0.005676977,0.002815352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006394949,0.00000326614,0.7636185,0.0001714736,0.000008963878,4.233881e-7,0.000696652,0.0002188971,0.0009595672,0.002017681,0.2315995,0.00006560297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841789,0.0001661069,0.000006495312,0.003555688,0.0004654707,0.00008656322,0.000004885942,0.000004870158,0.01153104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975263,0.0000190906,0.000007949931,0.0003313225,0.0001799168,0.000006582169,0.000002463063,0.000005332159,0.001921041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2259225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.143094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281213616","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v26i2.14750","title":"COMMUNITY LEGAL WORKERS IN ONTARIO: A PARALEGAL CASE STUDY","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Legislation; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Political science; Community organization; Public administration; Community standards; Economic Justice; Community development; Public relations; Law; Business; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1008647453123246,"gpt":0.400237994083749,"spread":0.2993732487714243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001579233,0.00004886071,0.00006432917,0.00009725938,0.001575429,0.0001671308,0.0001691853,0.0000184166,0.005703209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001078524,0.00005461401,0.00002109413,0.0005786617,0.00005268662,0.0005200239,0.00007825185,0.001244796,0.000029474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004938248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001144683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9818266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981871,0.001213203,0.0001467062,0.00008539289,0.0002118445,0.0001557785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999531,0.0001598429,0.00005147002,0.0001771686,0.00003685379,0.00004366263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001564187,0.0009095914,0.6690851,5.125155e-7,0.000007965745,0.0003782494,0.3155733,0.00002120729,0.000001137868,0.001969769,0.01167761,0.0003598667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001838231,0.00004036448,0.04884756,7.516441e-7,0.000004001798,0.00004558483,0.3989202,0.000001478926,1.349695e-7,0.00005866597,0.5518416,0.00005586519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8969836,0.000003039362,0.000001192038,0.007227707,0.0004604771,0.0002300859,0.000001835754,0.0000222896,0.09506974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685975,8.336441e-8,0.00005436552,0.001189345,0.00003368692,0.0001125958,0.000005296719,0.000004251215,0.03000283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6202375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}