{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":223,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":223,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"9c03cc236ad1","filters":{"venue":"Organization Science"}},"results":[{"id":"W2160004216","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1100.0620","title":"Social Entrepreneurship: A Critique and Future Directions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1435,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Social entrepreneurship; Field (mathematics); CLARITY; Sociology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Social science; Epistemology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01925133326456895,"gpt":0.2511113694268407,"spread":0.2318600361622717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001536138,0.00007335959,0.00006423435,0.0001280999,0.0008121416,0.0002401348,0.0001706755,0.00002426527,0.0003934549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001691112,0.00006508489,0.00001031049,0.001681111,0.0002632364,0.001388495,0.0001445997,0.00004261069,0.00006523694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009980067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001806143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009819691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002340816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993187,0.000004012171,0.00009780915,0.0002498784,0.0001699905,0.0001596583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994784,0.000006515397,0.0000659473,0.00008553232,0.0003524827,0.00001113279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002791367,0.00004569985,0.8001944,0.00001858633,0.000004112764,0.000001853305,0.002501099,2.516512e-7,0.001193557,0.1845728,0.001253067,0.0102118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001231401,0.000005254039,0.9189844,0.000006883294,0.00002045989,0.000003817562,0.001667794,0.00002074757,0.001279371,0.00294568,0.07475109,0.000191344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.952075,0.0001687134,0.0001169955,0.005519296,0.0006959677,0.0001316633,9.534377e-7,0.0002586023,0.04103283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975605,0.0001050071,0.0000822305,0.001343345,0.0008247756,0.00000268044,0.000001421913,0.000007671691,0.00007238718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1816271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6246419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098934250","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1090.0426","title":"Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1407,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambidexterity; Conceptualization; Ambiguity; Construct (python library); Dimension (graph theory); Unpacking; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Balance (ability); Industrial organization; Yield (engineering); Knowledge management; Microeconomics; Computer science; Economics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006817154551700177,"gpt":0.2094174826503284,"spread":0.2026003280986282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004492305,0.0001187204,0.0001061099,0.0003893949,0.0007092395,0.0007910994,0.0002116751,0.00002805982,0.000123962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001483782,0.0001144764,0.000007532044,0.004511661,0.0001502415,0.001115866,0.0001807001,0.00005351117,0.0002263815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004638174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004879056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004981389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002585217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998883,0.000005748745,0.0001974738,0.0003216516,0.0003748352,0.000217271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998687,0.0000210405,0.0001360356,0.0001607335,0.0009774445,0.00001769477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000121028,0.00003409263,0.01528098,0.00002760212,0.000002047557,0.000003003591,0.00005618334,0.000003238064,0.05094455,0.9310601,0.0006801476,0.001906888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00319559,0.00009741015,0.7742268,0.0004477496,0.0002217929,0.00002320117,0.001914125,0.02683925,0.04820436,0.09727684,0.04495578,0.002597049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7989017,0.0001297693,0.03010232,0.004606424,0.001689964,0.0006947197,0.000001040015,0.0007888423,0.1630853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929891,0.000004956117,0.0005336165,0.005878007,0.0002645272,0.000001062449,0.00001699077,0.00001282618,0.000298891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8337832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.762859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033292790","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1100.0602","title":"Attention to Attention","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Top-down and bottom-up design; Vigilance (psychology); Schema (genetic algorithms); Stimulus (psychology); Unitary state; Selective attention; Cognitive science; Neuroscience; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01796490931795348,"gpt":0.3640303057704326,"spread":0.3460653964524791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004796111,0.00006308029,0.00004876915,0.0002479074,0.0003862917,0.0001554482,0.0003718947,0.00003283085,0.002848893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008479267,0.00006286062,0.00001116338,0.003669204,0.0002549888,0.0003648254,0.00005951305,0.00009481775,0.00326482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002645612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009380358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001436474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001142891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989301,0.00002113543,0.0001250845,0.000390048,0.0003280014,0.0002056592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990471,0.00002494478,0.00005598686,0.0003545068,0.0003615655,0.0001559247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[9.036867e-7,0.00007261239,0.102068,4.824989e-7,3.136012e-7,3.315917e-7,0.0006424442,0.000001050478,0.8703993,0.02293858,0.001515987,0.002359997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007616532,0.00002278272,0.978295,0.000001958536,0.000002182932,0.00002176356,0.0003143949,0.00002146318,0.015323,0.00006098112,0.00576921,0.00009111956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711429,5.419774e-7,0.009908477,0.002347108,0.00436327,0.0001390584,0.000001636855,0.0001011731,0.01199585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917236,3.914234e-7,0.0006669309,0.0007582688,0.00009647216,0.000006580469,0.000003307885,0.000008504604,0.006735957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.876227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151835681","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1070.0307","title":"Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Knowledge management; Information technology; Function (biology); Organizational studies; Organizational learning; Service (business); Hierarchy; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005416501595037395,"gpt":0.274239067596838,"spread":0.2688225660018007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003808863,0.00004163264,0.00006540433,0.0006874776,0.001239812,0.0001320598,0.0002063554,0.00003838657,0.00007742317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002209326,0.00003201125,0.000004914536,0.01059115,0.001139479,0.001884977,0.00006805736,0.00003134336,0.00001859647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006985309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001614724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006488545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001274956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990305,0.00002864151,0.0002996864,0.00005202935,0.0004099328,0.0001792051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981701,0.00006172243,0.0002770016,0.00009463725,0.001364426,0.0000321381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002022801,0.000001663077,0.009694148,0.000004263262,0.00000103821,1.203005e-8,0.07278256,0.000004366481,0.000469028,0.9113298,0.00001790823,0.00569319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002274743,0.00004735086,0.04423063,0.00004184311,0.00002738959,0.00001914625,0.8198047,0.0003531023,0.08951485,0.01070797,0.03261728,0.0003610386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5007589,0.00001154717,0.4859173,0.002166398,0.0003454316,0.0004356318,0.000001890199,0.00009636161,0.01026649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999286,0.00001887109,0.00040579,0.0001758808,0.00003261971,9.706631e-7,0.00000661126,0.000002797765,0.00007046396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9535758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113421427","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1090.0453","title":"The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1093,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nonmarket forces; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Champion; Business; Context (archaeology); Institutional theory; Affect (linguistics); Embeddedness; Industrial organization; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Market economy; Management; Social psychology; Factor market; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0148857906350548,"gpt":0.2227869180793035,"spread":0.2079011274442487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006148033,0.00004883914,0.00006864387,0.0000408696,0.0005275645,0.00007359879,0.0002795415,0.00001504986,0.000009857338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001813383,0.00002783942,0.000009449934,0.001834528,0.00092812,0.0005150508,0.00007878146,0.00002904211,0.000004743766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001066074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001054451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002733477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001444808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993318,0.000007593884,0.0001644062,0.0001150683,0.0003055182,0.00007563634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998729,0.00006680137,0.0002702348,0.00013636,0.0007934639,0.000004167091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000597843,0.00003473986,0.4086442,0.000008388312,0.000002199122,3.618842e-7,0.00006062919,0.0003754021,0.01376723,0.5754194,0.000107689,0.001519952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003325349,0.000004358079,0.9875122,0.000007469273,0.000005221033,0.000002121677,0.00001676438,0.001385696,0.006773114,0.003118824,0.0007986162,0.00004309516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925835,0.00004226194,0.004916702,0.001962154,0.00007001912,0.00009101111,0.000003243005,0.00001090472,0.0003202696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992116,0.00003856212,0.00009598459,0.0005697882,0.00005323234,3.920569e-7,0.000001911707,0.000002127613,0.00002641008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.578868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4057653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143952996","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1100.0614","title":"Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1022,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Knowledge management; Scope (computer science); Sociology; Resource (disambiguation); Identity (music); Organizational learning; Public relations; Online community; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08015043130400824,"gpt":0.3525837457897183,"spread":0.2724333144857101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008798552,0.00004324639,0.00005234808,0.0002686609,0.0006489583,0.0001333891,0.0004507134,0.00002540001,0.0005820449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003994691,0.00004621258,0.000004493098,0.005059015,0.0004382234,0.0008758988,0.0001137856,0.0000468484,0.0001161535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001273743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003030662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006625109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02264617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999337,0.00007275894,0.000117322,0.000103504,0.000199926,0.0001695127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992964,0.00002228548,0.00003936476,0.0001250068,0.0004709256,0.00004600841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001275288,0.0001486614,0.3920052,0.000004473802,9.066538e-7,6.447742e-7,0.3845155,0.000004457387,0.0003342974,0.2196855,0.0002081104,0.00309104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004663783,0.00003810935,0.5328673,0.00006184197,0.000008849277,3.515528e-7,0.42298,0.001436998,0.003537636,0.003722295,0.03445755,0.0004227721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7085345,0.00003093731,0.0006955045,0.0001953085,0.000349797,0.0001391666,9.234808e-7,0.00009186907,0.2899619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973573,0.00003906733,0.0005995865,0.00004696298,0.00004540558,0.000001513413,0.000005090231,0.000004855286,0.001900201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2888228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115973166","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1110.0665","title":"Family Control and Family Firm Valuation by Family CEOs: The Importance of Intentions for Transgenerational Control","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Family Business Performance and Succession","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":817,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Socioemotional selectivity theory; Transgenerational epigenetics; Control (management); Valuation (finance); Perceived control; Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Accounting; Developmental psychology; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03193330391874093,"gpt":0.2356614481455243,"spread":0.2037281442267834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008640015,0.0001342861,0.0001751634,0.0001679725,0.0006904785,0.0001914058,0.0003423809,0.00004973344,0.00003526816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000248564,0.00009768594,0.0000392748,0.00135747,0.0003557466,0.002240461,0.00003559473,0.0000543139,0.00001073374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001947747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001247432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008242923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001613169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985961,0.00000991332,0.0003653431,0.000300913,0.0005208662,0.0002068382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979151,0.00004519974,0.0002718162,0.0001945242,0.001557294,0.00001610108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007755327,0.0001583821,0.2560606,0.0000854677,0.00006738758,2.980013e-7,0.0003676582,0.0002587776,0.7106633,0.02580294,0.004669626,0.001788052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001999112,0.00003268582,0.9356009,0.00002642603,0.0003352678,8.691082e-7,0.0007480549,0.05582627,0.001960607,0.00169868,0.00149505,0.0002760341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7789356,0.0003376745,0.2177567,0.0008245342,0.0003440101,0.0006560595,0.00003140125,0.00005202972,0.001062084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994769,0.00003427433,0.0003459169,0.004591422,0.0001202035,0.00003780469,0.00004524588,0.00001650293,0.000039611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7087026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5310673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169982830","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1060.0241","title":"Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":765,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Misconduct; Incentive; Executive compensation; Accountability; Business; Accounting; Compensation (psychology); Sample (material); Financial statement; Appearance of impropriety; Economics; Actuarial science; Finance; Microeconomics; Audit; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007151296843150893,"gpt":0.2251186837897499,"spread":0.217967386946599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008294853,0.00008654519,0.00007612151,0.0001924902,0.0004429827,0.0001462862,0.0002992768,0.00001882375,0.00002145985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008054463,0.00007219559,0.000007247309,0.002669365,0.000261336,0.001315995,0.0002171079,0.00006352412,0.00006058251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004686785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003098233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007775877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001575755,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988555,0.000005228658,0.0001954286,0.0002660081,0.0004984339,0.0001793569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973061,0.00004468454,0.001928769,0.0001581603,0.0005497632,0.00001254114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004763014,0.00005460444,0.8666712,0.00007878659,0.000003612251,0.00000116776,0.002366661,0.01100422,0.04800341,0.03595521,0.0005800758,0.03523344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001234614,0.00001275023,0.986,0.0000458126,0.000005159028,3.666484e-7,0.0002145867,0.0005520416,0.01025228,0.00008855039,0.002619041,0.00008595093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9553199,0.000002764797,0.04176525,0.0005459489,0.00009337185,0.0002515849,5.347866e-7,0.00003102305,0.001989589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982756,0.000005488077,0.0001592784,0.001304698,0.0001050971,0.000002201544,0.000002836731,0.000007853858,0.0001369641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1193288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9642527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107828769","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1060.0197","title":"Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":745,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Michigan","keywords":"Mindfulness; Psychology; Complementarity (molecular biology); Action (physics); Normative; Context (archaeology); Bridging (networking); Performative utterance; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Psychotherapist; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01166504234756937,"gpt":0.2243787857740178,"spread":0.2127137434264484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004238182,0.0002072221,0.0001484859,0.0006142464,0.002797213,0.00226915,0.0002998148,0.00003857565,0.0004426512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000592921,0.0002038563,0.00001328681,0.004491323,0.0004911987,0.002109012,0.000306029,0.0001020737,0.0001309983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006657591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001019981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002702333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980983,0.00001065643,0.0002440186,0.0006285982,0.0007006431,0.0003178391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986146,0.00002534336,0.0002132282,0.0001542784,0.0009685145,0.00002404201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008052922,0.0001898106,0.4994566,0.00004568123,0.00001032451,0.000004767702,0.001168999,0.003147511,0.003293358,0.4904113,0.0006629599,0.001600586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001136564,0.00004859347,0.9348288,0.00009860293,0.00007798405,0.00001175211,0.01337552,0.02676247,0.006990908,0.008402159,0.00702521,0.001241474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9645629,0.00007415485,0.0217195,0.001075587,0.00021698,0.000197336,0.00000132134,0.000286622,0.01186562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972869,0.000004388789,0.0003995165,0.0004463417,0.0009800771,0.000002999328,0.0000685901,0.00004215188,0.0007690933],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4820092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040523205","doi":"10.1287/orsc.14.5.497.16761","title":"Learning About Failure: Bankruptcy, Firm Age, and the Resource-Based View","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":714,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Business; Business failure; Resource (disambiguation); Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009780128376077028,"gpt":0.1977773578182403,"spread":0.1879972294421632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008493995,0.00009020029,0.00009762454,0.0000742069,0.0007113341,0.0005721513,0.0002493239,0.00002285385,0.0001742861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001431535,0.00006458478,0.00001294711,0.002929772,0.0004074605,0.00079747,0.00005926892,0.00008926873,0.0001394395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001714156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006857295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003962527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002123283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991078,0.00001557708,0.0001346923,0.0002520161,0.0003106689,0.0001792923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993428,0.00003970328,0.0001951063,0.0001764131,0.0002364196,0.000009549623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000310353,0.00006864946,0.6535226,0.0001559194,0.000006833876,0.00002780358,0.0005990206,0.00402989,0.00300018,0.3073522,0.01777777,0.01342814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009238255,0.00000437922,0.2239932,0.00004987432,0.00001485628,0.000002696906,0.0001203829,0.00201264,0.0003640142,0.0006610043,0.7716631,0.0001900489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9407835,0.0005337557,0.02034096,0.008547698,0.0003867415,0.000568527,0.00000119108,0.00027378,0.02856387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961009,0.000020808,0.0001407435,0.002855094,0.00008628084,0.000002879418,0.000002987592,0.0000122415,0.0007780593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7538853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5517268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159759833","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1060.0224","title":"Corporate Greening Through ISO 14001: A Rational Myth?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":714,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Environmental standard; Process (computing); Mythology; Business; Public relations; Management; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02111338569873875,"gpt":0.2344995816007786,"spread":0.2133861959020399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009071252,0.0001142384,0.00008412157,0.0001761163,0.0006448026,0.000405337,0.0003742572,0.00003675567,0.000671046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007781783,0.0001133045,0.00001335669,0.004245423,0.0004751787,0.004116164,0.0002784679,0.0000660603,0.0005383399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001860627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007687125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008984871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000176801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985062,0.000003444686,0.0002364576,0.0003449492,0.0006018094,0.0003071432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989399,0.0000264419,0.0002605101,0.000219755,0.0005381893,0.00001515399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001138232,0.0001099567,0.8443832,0.00005026807,0.00000318153,0.00001377919,0.0003126181,0.001152293,0.04335627,0.1077993,0.001114743,0.001692975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003658322,0.000006092132,0.9627841,0.00001600574,0.00001409496,0.00000996375,0.0006247105,0.001862156,0.008623875,0.008520359,0.01679672,0.0003760503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8537616,0.000007539268,0.1386082,0.001810533,0.0003697684,0.0002028811,5.788224e-7,0.0001514665,0.005087508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941113,0.000001109962,0.00237009,0.002807592,0.000379643,0.000001550412,0.00002305782,0.00001884928,0.0002867802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1403498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7347483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138086691","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1050.0126","title":"Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":689,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Conceptual framework; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006903313857084808,"gpt":0.27614376660951,"spread":0.2692404527524252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004017183,0.00005271066,0.0000485689,0.0001941184,0.0001218821,0.00004341272,0.0001264412,0.0000296513,0.0002274913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000644436,0.0000498733,0.00000178926,0.002815931,0.0001625439,0.0005484725,0.00003867971,0.00006963737,0.000155089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008040471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008484319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000167401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000152844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993597,0.00000857637,0.0001358463,0.0002000481,0.0001269174,0.0001688857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995995,0.000009810363,0.00005407769,0.0001189136,0.0001866817,0.00003104356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003933238,0.00003723111,0.8256927,0.000003540884,8.529502e-7,2.528647e-7,0.006663039,0.0001448393,0.003997098,0.02737639,0.00004825068,0.1360319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001622377,0.00002181819,0.986313,0.000004280237,5.159507e-7,0.00000729838,0.0003123327,0.01061166,0.001422896,0.00003323987,0.001030922,0.00007983034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904636,0.00001002038,0.001749794,0.000514905,0.0001351587,0.00007894848,9.508093e-7,0.00002625206,0.007020371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985327,0.00001119813,0.0006811838,0.0002867275,0.0000419001,0.000002950021,0.000003375621,0.000006161506,0.0004337734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1606203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.249087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147281917","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1030.0045","title":"The Institutional Effects on Strategic Alliance Partner Selection in Transition Economies: China vs. Russia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"International Business and FDI","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":647,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Business; China; Selection (genetic algorithm); Emerging markets; Strategic alliance; Economic system; Industrial organization; Face (sociological concept); Transition economy; Market economy; Transition (genetics); Marketing; Economics; Finance; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00976702198181782,"gpt":0.2199762822746189,"spread":0.2102092602928011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002942648,0.00008611437,0.00005959081,0.0001368153,0.0006868518,0.0005246228,0.0002154086,0.00002827956,0.00005300288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001145067,0.00006503114,0.00001250184,0.001705836,0.0001351359,0.001610718,0.00002135407,0.0000722879,0.0002419383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001786497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001424674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001157367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001050476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991982,0.000003980098,0.0001478227,0.0002224472,0.0002645203,0.0001630332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996197,0.00001476082,0.00008535112,0.00006556505,0.0002066168,0.000008008485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000198127,0.00005420666,0.004202701,0.00001935718,0.000002172929,0.000002915159,0.00006410181,0.05552594,0.003607654,0.9358526,0.00003683625,0.0006116316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001204375,0.00002760263,0.9225332,0.0001426012,0.000008791745,0.000009141118,0.00007294631,0.01847136,0.008350874,0.04595307,0.002899705,0.0003263601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850791,0.000007268902,0.003675142,0.00447632,0.0004267161,0.0001641434,4.940332e-7,0.00005060128,0.006120217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982699,0.00001130834,0.00004772457,0.00123771,0.0003581941,0.000008673234,0.00001153407,0.000007523584,0.00004739182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9183305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5282778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115148186","doi":"10.1287/orsc.14.5.510.16765","title":"From Issues to Actions: The Importance of Individual Concerns and Organizational Values in Responding to Natural Environmental Issues","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":611,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Scope (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Organizational commitment; Scale (ratio); Organizational studies; Organizational learning; Organization development; Public relations; Discretion; Organizational performance; Organizational culture; Organizational behavior and human resources; Natural (archaeology); Knowledge management; Business; Psychology; Political science; Marketing; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01382895213134791,"gpt":0.2687313246214031,"spread":0.2549023724900552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006062704,0.0001116733,0.0001087687,0.0003686302,0.0003007266,0.0002583946,0.0003839514,0.00002874135,0.0005148919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001644055,0.00009542603,0.000007160802,0.004070471,0.000315434,0.001248878,0.0003512703,0.00006395159,0.00004981306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001507773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003433513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007803112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002299837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998668,0.00002022687,0.0002328233,0.0003481298,0.0005476457,0.0001832247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995142,0.00005379434,0.0001064107,0.0002114857,0.00009415867,0.00001989965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004625822,0.00003587479,0.9652551,0.000006380783,0.000002448759,7.950025e-7,0.001792491,0.0003114916,0.02337651,0.008826889,0.000252569,0.00013477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001467268,0.000006005348,0.973697,0.00001798051,0.000008977247,0.000001114601,0.005923738,0.00007387885,0.01296297,0.00205308,0.00494776,0.0001607797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959024,0.00008807016,0.0002032233,0.003231212,0.0001659099,0.0002954971,0.000008353785,0.00002205807,0.00008327426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973888,0.000007473389,0.0009418652,0.001275995,0.0001520508,0.000005063854,0.00002233475,0.00001548748,0.0001909257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01041354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5637705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149570223","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1110.0688","title":"Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":601,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Carnegie Mellon University; Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation","keywords":"Knowledge transfer; Knowledge management; Cohesion (chemistry); Bridging (networking); Organizational learning; Boundary spanning; Organizational network analysis; Context (archaeology); Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04517712081325926,"gpt":0.2291855003249409,"spread":0.1840083795116816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002093891,0.0001526365,0.0001594104,0.000139666,0.001081952,0.0001399471,0.0008110479,0.00003863611,0.000160984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006092049,0.00008466227,0.00001566021,0.008941832,0.000754168,0.0004634366,0.0003301255,0.0001314017,0.00005396264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002484074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001356399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000187219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003285306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986708,0.00005588807,0.0004010297,0.0002433879,0.0003667345,0.0002621863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970307,0.0001835151,0.0002199533,0.0003464429,0.002205965,0.00001338764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005487279,0.00003079475,0.1690321,0.00003926703,0.0000147369,9.627575e-8,0.001525375,0.0003551597,0.0001121172,0.8264498,0.001702848,0.0007321691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004932801,0.00003161828,0.9787083,0.0002477307,0.0001279521,0.000001092323,0.001732864,0.003646297,0.001114447,0.005023243,0.00852876,0.000344387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8737045,0.0002159303,0.009189666,0.001716103,0.0005795072,0.001040417,0.000004856042,0.0001023882,0.1134467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998552,0.00001224975,0.0000300659,0.0005821391,0.000582179,0.000005120105,0.000008378345,0.00002125958,0.0002065685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8214266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8321609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126374572","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1030.0048","title":"Generation Cohorts and Personal Values: A Comparison of China and the United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":572,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Universidade de Macau; Dalian University of Technology","keywords":"China; Baby boomers; Generation x; Communism; Value (mathematics); Generation y; Consolidation (business); First generation; Political science; Cultural revolution; Sociology; Demographic economics; Economics; Demography; Business; Marketing; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.068979739775957,"gpt":0.3625866200477895,"spread":0.2936068802718325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000210913,0.00004632677,0.0000795509,0.00004845616,0.0002454583,0.00007108795,0.00007066439,0.0000178565,0.00009281084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009065318,0.00002700805,0.000004658825,0.0007003172,0.0006541443,0.0001026185,0.0000290862,0.00003196458,0.000002944201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001033167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001996964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003708179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001437947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994991,0.0000323421,0.0001056564,0.0001414238,0.0001487734,0.00007270173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996804,0.00001976261,0.00006550791,0.00006132384,0.0001438567,0.00002916971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002938415,0.0001162159,0.5446714,0.00001382909,0.00002093535,5.486996e-7,0.296324,0.0006726921,0.02513481,0.130252,0.0005325117,0.002231605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000835906,0.0000662519,0.9766575,0.000009966253,0.0000165065,0.00001247391,0.006507038,0.01091785,0.00356846,0.001289828,0.00004201519,0.00007623191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968043,0.000118752,0.001982487,0.00080063,0.00008971378,0.00009030401,0.000002390305,0.00001163164,0.00009981024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996105,0.00004261002,0.000118727,0.0001037377,0.00002155702,0.000001066741,0.00001872823,0.000002618177,0.00008039178],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.431986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2410222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099281799","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2014.0960","title":"Short on Time: Intertemporal Tensions in Business Sustainability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":564,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Term (time); Climate change; Business; Organizational change; Business as usual; Economics; Industrial organization; Peak oil; Environmental economics; Marketing; Economic system; Public relations; Political science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02694500324972542,"gpt":0.3106365466483565,"spread":0.2836915433986311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001266349,0.0001005134,0.0001258711,0.0002762166,0.0001687602,0.0001031695,0.0004566638,0.00006240524,0.0001158612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01217428,0.00008684886,0.00001136756,0.00706899,0.0004969974,0.0004763923,0.0002320182,0.0001128808,0.0001467594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001026275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00140056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007709514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001244368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982719,0.0001011081,0.0002063744,0.0004115353,0.000628414,0.0003806198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953612,0.00004439371,0.00002093726,0.0004250577,0.003933794,0.0002145947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002024839,0.001297197,0.4575065,0.0000602238,0.0000074622,0.0001583108,0.003453317,0.1551462,0.005201071,0.3315559,0.002725932,0.0426854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001324347,0.0002936319,0.8707201,0.00005240716,0.000007625968,0.00004158416,0.00721709,0.02496089,0.01294054,0.06353828,0.01802704,0.0008764485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816546,0.000004123669,0.0003997329,0.003785658,0.0001282638,0.0001621831,8.464794e-7,0.0000915456,0.01377299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982796,9.711457e-7,0.00006800628,0.0001554663,0.00002273018,0.000004282009,0.00001075894,0.00001044144,0.001447761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4132136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126744981","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1060.0239","title":"Aspiration Performance and Railroads’ Patterns of Learning from Train Wrecks and Crashes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":546,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Organizational learning; Accident (philosophy); Complement (music); Adaptation (eye); Traffic accident; Psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management; Engineering; Transport engineering; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01019809609704529,"gpt":0.1959911553405761,"spread":0.1857930592435308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008127506,0.00006742462,0.00007459163,0.0001997353,0.0002700126,0.0002188389,0.0001007936,0.00002157276,0.00007993758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002334099,0.00006360687,0.000004920881,0.000712753,0.00009765432,0.0009125006,0.0001092557,0.00004699556,0.00001008579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001087875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009212195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001333602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002952486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992788,0.000003961728,0.0001508621,0.000202669,0.0002337642,0.000129899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996156,0.00002669222,0.0001146143,0.00007703435,0.000154432,0.00001168908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001861816,0.000007479294,0.9721871,0.00003041932,0.000001513343,3.791433e-7,0.000471533,0.000279603,0.006841261,0.0007424635,0.00001460425,0.01942176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001933339,0.00001101591,0.978653,0.00003023293,0.00001009208,4.237276e-7,0.001209883,0.01523969,0.002701505,0.00006755101,0.001783453,0.00009979744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403176,0.00000963141,0.05784374,0.0002268352,0.00007520241,0.00006666169,2.613203e-7,0.00004072729,0.001419391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992526,0.000009598688,0.0002167211,0.0002316232,0.0001190604,4.021743e-7,0.000009322272,0.000008114413,0.0001525356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05893508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2593813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143161865","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1100.0613","title":"Legitimating Nascent Collective Identities: Coordinating Cultural Entrepreneurship","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":498,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Institute for Nanotechnology; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta; Boston College","keywords":"Collective identity; Legitimacy; Legitimation; Identity (music); Organizational identity; Entrepreneurship; Sociology; Social identity theory; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Public relations; Social group; Reputation; Psychology; Social science; Law; Aesthetics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03650924164087975,"gpt":0.2321308926168047,"spread":0.1956216509759249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003738381,0.0001435685,0.0001182395,0.0002915273,0.001274832,0.000689311,0.0004497923,0.0000225873,0.001947108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001423012,0.0001324256,0.0000205051,0.004505252,0.0002503879,0.003210941,0.0004637355,0.00005573161,0.0004714959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001161377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005288911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006052956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001023129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985795,0.000006648119,0.000235805,0.0003636476,0.0005237968,0.0002905787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983331,0.00002002966,0.0002290086,0.0001439151,0.001258088,0.00001586311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000460307,0.0000886819,0.8112636,0.00007385985,0.00002023904,0.000008923808,0.003102736,0.00005028152,0.001376168,0.1728102,0.01072226,0.0004784305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001244925,0.00002860081,0.9198569,0.0001536159,0.0001432573,0.00001519048,0.01470843,0.004531372,0.01767068,0.03626835,0.004002392,0.001376269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5063744,0.0000479935,0.01483412,0.0004616275,0.001240842,0.0005745072,0.000001833237,0.0006382522,0.4758264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994927,0.000003616296,0.0009490563,0.0007463795,0.0002900383,0.000005863787,0.00001225077,0.00002061625,0.003045213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4885526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104132592","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1050.0118","title":"A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"ERP Systems Implementation and Impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":481,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Knowledge management; Organizational performance; Computer science; Process management; Business; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0235176747260103,"gpt":0.2794595090071799,"spread":0.2559418342811696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003842817,0.00008376803,0.00008197274,0.0003097967,0.0002815001,0.0001997063,0.0001540022,0.00001804814,0.0005705472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001320178,0.00007707874,0.000007393011,0.001833435,0.00011091,0.003239137,0.00007688118,0.00002826878,0.00005200292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000476829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001157695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003355034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003800073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990025,0.000002519989,0.0003027915,0.0001809296,0.0003742145,0.0001370674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988037,0.000006417967,0.0002329562,0.0001061507,0.000834846,0.00001587816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006013317,0.00004807036,0.6984356,0.00006159055,0.000005911936,5.263735e-8,0.001032396,0.001697473,0.1211832,0.1589482,0.00150364,0.01707789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009068216,0.00002198162,0.5950958,0.00002815336,0.00002652917,0.000005950922,0.001317882,0.3343797,0.06664171,0.0005734752,0.0007035542,0.000298476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745207,0.000004406307,0.02235974,0.0007228358,0.00007018718,0.0001795986,0.000003372415,0.00005568462,0.002083474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970069,0.000006212923,0.001824182,0.0008698077,0.0001428834,0.000002369445,0.00004594136,0.0000130245,0.00008871221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3326823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6247092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104514639","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1100.0541","title":"Stewardship or Agency? A Social Embeddedness Reconciliation of Conduct and Performance in Public Family Businesses","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Family Business Performance and Succession","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":471,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Embeddedness; Agency (philosophy); Stewardship (theology); Stewardship theory; Business; Family business; Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Marketing; Agency cost; Principal–agent problem; Finance; Corporate governance; Sociology; Shareholder; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0559569389656503,"gpt":0.2705335828690023,"spread":0.214576643903352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007603976,0.0001251447,0.0001715378,0.0005790671,0.0004048188,0.0003448148,0.0003421321,0.00007645819,0.000183757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008062146,0.00009942456,0.000009399965,0.005814016,0.0003618482,0.006198024,0.0001646779,0.0001189418,0.00002829596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002344987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003110089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007221544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001282607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987379,0.000005481332,0.0003086075,0.0002936733,0.0004171974,0.0002371707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983659,0.00001863593,0.000242071,0.0001535165,0.001206022,0.00001382242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003194446,0.00007123421,0.8364074,0.0002740601,0.000001484819,0.000001048522,0.0004695934,0.00001465919,0.1411727,0.003258226,0.00009398728,0.0182036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003590037,0.000007809526,0.9927035,0.00003205295,0.000005156435,0.0000019894,0.0003588501,0.002918309,0.002228852,0.00009525789,0.001129317,0.000159917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970347,0.000007853412,0.0001178067,0.000474876,0.0006280048,0.0001433848,8.989898e-7,0.00004865733,0.001543828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999124,0.0000275144,0.0001606311,0.0003798628,0.000222548,0.000004962564,0.00001342104,0.00001437542,0.00005271257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.156296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4493418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169929013","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1070.0288","title":"Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":448,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ostensive definition; Performative utterance; Embeddedness; Knowledge management; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Structuration theory; Sociology; Organizational studies; Grounded theory; Organizational learning; Epistemology; Actor–network theory; Computer science; Realism; Qualitative research; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03259883150988194,"gpt":0.3510042536496249,"spread":0.318405422139743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002614015,0.00005067613,0.00005271533,0.0001821135,0.001378097,0.0001951,0.0001930975,0.00005186614,0.0004723085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001264601,0.00004730455,0.000004214677,0.003225717,0.001214969,0.001221172,0.00006598064,0.00003616615,0.00005842315],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001073155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001470625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004508981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003245985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998906,0.00002442904,0.0001845075,0.0001405258,0.0005156893,0.0002288346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989525,0.00004858434,0.00009292414,0.00007951611,0.0007318857,0.00009458252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[7.870213e-7,0.0000062114,0.03790595,0.000001992813,5.949915e-7,2.899089e-7,0.01469073,2.085637e-7,0.001070587,0.9402062,0.00004951784,0.006066888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00112144,0.00009928762,0.4689505,0.00004351786,0.00001931946,0.00005365827,0.2614491,0.0001966025,0.04797848,0.01877971,0.2002661,0.001042302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6290114,0.00002630748,0.3287254,0.003218694,0.000803207,0.0006869444,0.000006325587,0.000465991,0.03705578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983864,0.00001766083,0.0008644115,0.0004044496,0.00012579,0.000002030164,0.000007938294,0.000004739112,0.0001866002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9214265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967473967","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1050.0159","title":"Reputation, Diversification, and Organizational Explanations of Performance in Professional Service Firms","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":443,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Reputation; Business; Professional services; Workforce; Competitive advantage; Industrial organization; Marketing; Service (business); Economics; Public relations","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008096746508945239,"gpt":0.2115606274571733,"spread":0.203463880948228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004419875,0.00008595351,0.00008225242,0.0003640901,0.0003514248,0.0001152652,0.000298683,0.00002713827,0.0003767209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004011673,0.000089418,0.0000048439,0.005009966,0.0001276284,0.002873004,0.0002215481,0.00006182621,0.0001261204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006672843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001004216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003026857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004378095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987746,0.000005496861,0.0002752464,0.0002882817,0.000509635,0.0001467539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961615,0.00002449722,0.002413352,0.0001382084,0.001250387,0.00001200488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002924816,0.00006187124,0.9372241,0.00006671043,0.00000211155,2.195878e-7,0.0007050603,0.003984208,0.002444981,0.05004725,0.0003937652,0.005066724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002835674,0.000002436883,0.9718008,0.0000429722,0.000006466562,0.000001239998,0.0003131877,0.01267649,0.001020805,0.0002257746,0.01349712,0.0001291579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561971,0.00001055584,0.0368159,0.004136757,0.0001725923,0.0002019176,0.00000227957,0.00006517587,0.002397687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975038,0.0000123432,0.0008510317,0.0009944786,0.0001240996,0.000003774183,0.00004434452,0.00001240468,0.0004537787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04982147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4802637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127988071","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1090.0467","title":"Attentional Triangulation: Learning from Unexpected Rare Crises","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":439,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Triangulation; Interdependence; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Intersection (aeronautics); Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02214077291538177,"gpt":0.2319498499853649,"spread":0.2098090770699832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001930031,0.000118882,0.0001068951,0.0002845638,0.001045643,0.0006368017,0.0003082521,0.00002715952,0.003127683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009854616,0.0001141024,0.0000200267,0.004348274,0.0000956228,0.001984588,0.0001346463,0.00005860579,0.0006265274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004341903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003222752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003121575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006034167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986566,0.000006229715,0.0002076964,0.0003421749,0.0005991025,0.0001882301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988303,0.00002238968,0.0001646069,0.0001229235,0.000846146,0.00001369284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001657058,0.0001460852,0.6986048,0.0000159506,0.0000232627,0.000006863607,0.0002958072,0.002394128,0.02048133,0.2554936,0.01767889,0.004842833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003851157,0.000006029342,0.9739492,0.00001397848,0.00002688766,4.162466e-7,0.0003161173,0.002512158,0.0005965296,0.00709852,0.01487022,0.0002248364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7901271,0.0002827433,0.1135867,0.01539596,0.001529048,0.0006566783,0.000003951044,0.00160071,0.07681713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956738,0.000006862509,0.0005710673,0.001656446,0.0008232752,0.000001125073,0.0001687424,0.0000121297,0.001086604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2753445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125221005","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1100.0531","title":"Strategy and PowerPoint: An Inquiry into the Epistemic Culture and Machinery of Strategy Making","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":437,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Negotiation; Scope (computer science); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Epistemology; Task (project management); Knowledge management; Computer science; Management; Social science; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01587653234764688,"gpt":0.2619764069213149,"spread":0.246099874573668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004460742,0.0001018344,0.00009025993,0.0001268046,0.0006308643,0.0004874129,0.0002750984,0.00003167761,0.0001377219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002680047,0.00006964836,0.000005930952,0.001473867,0.0005576608,0.001488207,0.0003056194,0.00008716688,0.000008580203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006273262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002429693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006585806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001553339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991955,0.000005886164,0.0001632467,0.0002490993,0.0002627388,0.0001235341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992801,0.00001442543,0.0001521967,0.0001505417,0.0003913162,0.00001144903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003810242,0.00003098269,0.2447751,0.00009554448,0.000008204441,0.000001055629,0.002350112,0.00007146956,0.04271272,0.7050645,0.0003515154,0.00453502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004015452,0.00003336804,0.9410322,0.00003944528,0.00006099096,0.00001017534,0.007190886,0.004686635,0.001195048,0.04010959,0.004809046,0.0004310986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886962,0.0001227272,0.001288772,0.0008162119,0.0002338715,0.0001574315,5.087853e-7,0.00005548814,0.00862886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988514,0.00003056182,0.0002451674,0.0004494974,0.0002325829,9.166386e-7,0.000008192056,0.00001121154,0.0001704869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6962571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4852162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104540554","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1090.0494","title":"The Role of Analogy in the Institutionalization of Sustainability Reporting","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":399,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of California, Davis; Universitat Pompeu Fabra","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Analogy; Legitimacy; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Institution; Institutional theory; Conformity; Sustainability; Entrepreneurship; Obligation; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Economics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0082096491463549,"gpt":0.243703744421588,"spread":0.2354940952752331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020933,0.00004887289,0.00007097459,0.0001409281,0.0004756089,0.00009575437,0.0004130972,0.00001678688,0.00005130811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009555168,0.00003003676,0.0000110729,0.004203825,0.0005093654,0.0005951156,0.0001513107,0.00005123412,0.000003175641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001001636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001563431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003094831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989194,0.000007736979,0.0004435745,0.000129259,0.0003932166,0.0001068164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975571,0.00005826739,0.0006901149,0.0001858504,0.0015058,0.000002880344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[7.589542e-7,0.0000157651,0.4808252,0.00001084939,8.346923e-7,1.02476e-7,0.0001020324,0.0001128641,0.001850726,0.5165312,0.00003130523,0.0005183471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007242265,0.000002208287,0.9376224,0.000003835822,0.000007684363,6.771568e-7,0.001844707,0.001214885,0.001736912,0.04470851,0.01273186,0.00005390054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798353,0.00003982298,0.002988703,0.002337779,0.000206047,0.0003189408,3.187751e-7,0.00002140312,0.01425163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999666,0.000004925865,0.00006787829,0.0001554001,0.0000754546,0.000002402349,0.000005764655,0.000003379108,0.00001884213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4718227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010381318","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1080.0361","title":"New Directions in Corporate Governance Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":394,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Variety (cybernetics); Business; Work (physics); Sociology; Organization studies; Public relations; Knowledge management; Political science; Management; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0747565756865764,"gpt":0.2782054718399297,"spread":0.2034488961533533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005524842,0.00007407074,0.00007688584,0.0003836165,0.001019731,0.0002046188,0.0003747401,0.00001899189,0.0009537315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001157714,0.00007244392,0.000007272401,0.01413693,0.0002499918,0.001735495,0.0003259327,0.0000816042,0.001092344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009498195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001362491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006251399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002782694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985922,0.000006036694,0.0001552301,0.0002913992,0.0007022727,0.0002528855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989265,0.00002243546,0.0001122245,0.000147399,0.0007769404,0.00001452552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002171395,0.00003651846,0.7331317,0.000009271632,0.000001699249,0.000007602895,0.0001360266,0.000109044,0.0008018182,0.2202737,0.0444889,0.00100158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001757882,0.000002410195,0.9433579,0.00001103687,0.000001903658,0.000001641408,0.00007752022,0.0003034056,0.0004365559,0.00431299,0.05120063,0.0001182499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6705811,0.0004287558,0.01569325,0.01208852,0.001810859,0.0008500023,0.000001821745,0.0005902052,0.2979555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918914,0.0001384755,0.0006014366,0.0004109681,0.0003689216,0.000002194154,0.00000516847,0.0000139144,0.006567536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3213103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148958642","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1080.0389","title":"Learning Through Rare Events: Significant Interruptions at the Baltimore &amp; Ohio Railroad Museum","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":389,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Smithsonian Institution; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Ambiguity; Rare events; Identity (music); Narrative; History; Point (geometry); Sociology; Computer science; Aesthetics; Art; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03567885725158383,"gpt":0.251923815769703,"spread":0.2162449585181191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003697583,0.0001666582,0.0001251769,0.000163876,0.003705323,0.0002385935,0.0006096177,0.00003030068,0.003455879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00123831,0.0001229828,0.00003126872,0.004369885,0.0004543531,0.001815606,0.0008799911,0.0001114734,0.002575313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001102773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000488739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008967642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008273112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998337,0.00001512938,0.0002557944,0.0004074424,0.0006808154,0.0003037971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987206,0.00003960185,0.0002170523,0.0002707684,0.0007369464,0.00001496695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001170836,0.0001458502,0.8525122,0.00006379119,0.0000427611,0.000008070022,0.003954158,0.00299144,0.00547323,0.04791028,0.08633418,0.0005523598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005700695,0.00001345309,0.4644267,0.0000480716,0.00006817423,0.00001438113,0.002343393,0.0009915199,0.0006100352,0.001289486,0.5289986,0.000626074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8523406,0.0001856033,0.0515949,0.02071222,0.001680803,0.000993963,0.00000536007,0.0008950403,0.07159153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862677,0.00008961858,0.000310123,0.001971578,0.0003881683,0.000007854635,0.00008156356,0.00002931677,0.01085412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4426644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062862484","doi":"10.1287/orsc.12.3.253.10104","title":"Organizational Environments in Flux: The Impact of Regulatory Punctuations on Organizational Domains, CEO Succession, and Performance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":386,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Punctuated equilibrium; Context (archaeology); Business; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008477730304278036,"gpt":0.2082473226650214,"spread":0.1997695923607434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003668888,0.0001269471,0.0001063017,0.0002303766,0.0004278363,0.0001202225,0.0003345602,0.00003664209,0.0005649767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004461136,0.00009025373,0.00001217532,0.004951125,0.0002971409,0.001388066,0.0001214076,0.00007077168,0.0001056442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001126817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001804441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004365578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009052782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987326,0.000008001121,0.0002548507,0.0002806382,0.0005458862,0.0001780775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991225,0.00003156805,0.0002879866,0.0002329212,0.0003103219,0.00001470439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000818697,0.00006125015,0.9811174,0.000005326958,0.000002018374,6.996288e-7,0.00007216947,0.002058729,0.007197625,0.008983271,0.0003228395,0.0001705063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002938239,0.00001257085,0.9952126,0.00002614826,0.000004522793,0.000003805005,0.00002833428,0.002554393,0.0007230756,0.0007420969,0.000290262,0.0001083975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963001,0.00001151857,0.00129111,0.0003560829,0.00008130509,0.0001508532,0.000003873826,0.00001865755,0.001786522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990432,0.00004772768,0.00003934902,0.0003552305,0.0001199026,0.000002343603,0.00003194084,0.00001788177,0.0003423854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01409519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6186099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100180614","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1110.0728","title":"Family Firm Governance, Strategic Conformity, and Performance: Institutional vs. Strategic Perspectives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Family Business Performance and Succession","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":381,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conformity; Socioemotional selectivity theory; Corporate governance; Microfoundations; Situational ethics; Business; Institutional theory; Economics; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Management; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02713880786060583,"gpt":0.2325254051971147,"spread":0.2053865973365089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004144922,0.0001576066,0.0001248021,0.0001927591,0.0009977381,0.0005951601,0.0002975885,0.00005432683,0.0002521351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005776253,0.0001310711,0.00001281545,0.002424779,0.0005233977,0.009663546,0.0002015805,0.0001059452,0.0002840286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007530845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002013537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006940619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003777279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986162,0.000002699629,0.0001916023,0.0002675753,0.0005503581,0.0003715894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990709,0.000007475232,0.0001515527,0.0001564176,0.0005789972,0.00003465146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001712471,0.00009309925,0.7090939,0.0001076115,0.00000340984,9.168181e-7,0.0002308665,0.0001053087,0.005119802,0.2838262,0.0001830259,0.00121864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003286818,0.00001139404,0.9895773,0.00004380498,0.00001100031,0.000008707849,0.00175594,0.006133003,0.00030694,0.0003042446,0.001260984,0.0002580209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578654,0.0001786244,0.00006539465,0.0001769266,0.000484818,0.0001086872,0.000001498964,0.00008766065,0.04103097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984022,0.0002428462,0.00008357359,0.0005876916,0.000516715,0.000003332612,0.00001719564,0.00001241832,0.0001340451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.283522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7673895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149193257","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1110.0677","title":"Transcending Knowledge Differences in Cross-Functional Teams","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":369,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Embeddedness; Knowledge management; Knowledge integration; Traverse; Process (computing); Novelty; Flexibility (engineering); Interpersonal communication; Organizational learning; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Domain knowledge; Social psychology; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05546582255576447,"gpt":0.3204567502916684,"spread":0.2649909277359039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003425649,0.00006703767,0.00006732849,0.0001947116,0.0001949174,0.0000513797,0.0002781838,0.0000418136,0.004257988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004796626,0.00006011781,0.000009208912,0.001864015,0.0002866127,0.0003194791,0.00002593951,0.00008149008,0.0004164094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005135445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009827129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004999145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003238792,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992118,0.00001664537,0.0001571748,0.0002616833,0.000143233,0.000209399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996166,0.00001740861,0.00004176833,0.0001453363,0.000127999,0.00005095398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004080083,0.00007919648,0.9400875,0.000001980801,0.000001074255,7.443205e-7,0.008860588,0.00000345093,0.0009785467,0.04801597,0.00001782405,0.001949051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001369116,0.00001917552,0.9977694,0.000005543841,0.000001064314,0.000006362759,0.0003283172,0.0005716386,0.0006601153,0.0003463655,0.00007130457,0.00008387314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506589,0.00002004364,0.01170629,0.00002364263,0.001003183,0.00005429406,0.000002184225,0.00004246974,0.03648904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983354,0.000004061625,0.0001889975,0.00003796558,0.00004021205,0.000003302222,0.00000272896,0.000007760172,0.001379558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05768183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121734177","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1070.0308","title":"Geography, Networks, and Knowledge Flow","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":361,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge flow; Context (archaeology); Economic geography; Knowledge space; Geographical distance; Space (punctuation); Friendship; Knowledge management; Interpersonal ties; Strong ties; Location; Marketing; Geography; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008493541457838634,"gpt":0.2254282451002244,"spread":0.2169347036423858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001181596,0.00008262409,0.00006176381,0.0005615301,0.0004776569,0.0004413291,0.0002110825,0.00002464809,0.0001334618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002004165,0.00007778976,0.000008336974,0.006245443,0.0002162055,0.0008819863,0.0002481836,0.00004611534,0.0002499467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002207013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002118029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006983923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002677239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991704,0.000001833294,0.000162595,0.0002405249,0.0001895763,0.0002350474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990221,0.00001203593,0.00007585318,0.0001363927,0.0007392124,0.00001443719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002719444,0.00005403677,0.1746626,0.0000271732,0.000003354447,0.000001724516,0.00006976983,0.0000319412,0.0008238211,0.7976423,0.001698761,0.0249818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007986144,0.00001122588,0.7565706,0.00003929613,0.00003235919,0.00000444986,0.001071687,0.06999036,0.0008817388,0.002283323,0.1676558,0.0006606162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.081737,0.00009688922,0.1204128,0.0005349143,0.001823703,0.0002945961,2.349827e-7,0.0003813516,0.7947185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973025,0.000004773151,0.0004556455,0.001310299,0.0005543039,7.294237e-7,0.000007308749,0.00001130706,0.0003531303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4255747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005498212","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1100.0600","title":"Network Exchange Patterns in Online Communities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":346,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fox School of Business, Temple University; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Exponential random graph models; Online participation; Social exchange theory; Online community; Preferential attachment; Information exchange; Norm of reciprocity; Scale (ratio); Complex network; The Internet; Computer science; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Graph; Social capital; World Wide Web; Random graph; Theoretical computer science; Geography; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0147539972098864,"gpt":0.2711749183502127,"spread":0.2564209211403263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002803232,0.0000638826,0.0000817335,0.0001057805,0.0001929173,0.00009077947,0.0004109744,0.00001393087,0.001947675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001011852,0.00006304218,0.00001028686,0.001923629,0.0001254063,0.0002167424,0.0001758663,0.0001518607,0.0000130976],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001272127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004766971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004946473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001037549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994053,0.00002019891,0.0001282182,0.0001140273,0.0001512849,0.0001809907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994327,0.0000275368,0.00005691852,0.0002844518,0.0001614265,0.00003701172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[1.814822e-7,0.00003751726,0.9845933,7.899315e-7,9.446495e-7,1.101699e-7,0.0003909632,0.0001224856,0.001331587,0.008976685,0.0002363937,0.004309049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001585364,0.00001328069,0.9770166,0.00002480559,0.000007394373,8.74559e-7,0.0009917408,0.008841259,0.003144142,0.00674093,0.002803769,0.0002566191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691559,0.000002899833,0.02919251,0.0001542123,0.00009873758,0.00006194664,0.000005799902,0.00005447473,0.001273514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975475,0.000001839466,0.001948676,0.0001113035,0.0002471243,0.00000258846,0.00005901768,0.000008578102,0.00007339469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02839157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156460774","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1090.0472","title":"<b>Perspective</b>—The Interdependence of Private and Public Interests","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":343,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Value (mathematics); Interdependence; Public relations; Sustainable Value; Corporation; Perspective (graphical); Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Business; Sustainability; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02303815516221323,"gpt":0.2742241681284572,"spread":0.2511860129662439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008798744,0.00005912926,0.00007415299,0.0001623632,0.0002651312,0.0004016744,0.0003367317,0.00001722231,0.00004682802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007617665,0.00004519199,0.000009982089,0.003089163,0.0003756952,0.001572209,0.0002292176,0.00005614094,0.0000156553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005538789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009724529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005026045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003308398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991201,0.000007454353,0.0001993121,0.0002218096,0.000314094,0.0001371975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983538,0.00002724969,0.0002962849,0.0001917681,0.001119871,0.0000110636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007390029,0.00005406723,0.3581288,0.00001413116,0.00000256302,0.000002734639,0.0007973011,0.000005984809,0.1258696,0.4972527,0.00006331029,0.01780143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001500495,0.00001638682,0.9382985,0.00003132182,0.00001041572,0.000009650268,0.002544249,0.001028068,0.007948723,0.04903011,0.0007609407,0.0001715337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904001,0.0000117351,0.002602849,0.004250811,0.00008788254,0.0001097797,1.027582e-7,0.0000492221,0.002487552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999225,0.000001879902,0.0001071868,0.0005432296,0.00006880146,3.25421e-7,4.067324e-7,0.000004512038,0.00004862777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5801698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9119607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144783524","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1100.0601","title":"Studying Choice and Change: The Intersection of Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship Research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":331,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Scholarship; Intersection (aeronautics); Context (archaeology); Institutional theory; Sociology; Positive economics; Work (physics); Epistemology; Institutional change; Political science; Economics; Social science; Economic growth; Public administration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06771074360232818,"gpt":0.3172100417193142,"spread":0.249499298116986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001896089,0.00004769161,0.00004773026,0.0001291491,0.0008484244,0.0002474463,0.000193943,0.0000169325,0.00005274595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002839821,0.00003218497,0.000004558965,0.001438479,0.001130252,0.001127645,0.0003435132,0.0001123506,0.000006730303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007576067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002284999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002055263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001354095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992674,0.00001822089,0.00009298694,0.0001969304,0.0003029727,0.0001215133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999132,0.0001581624,0.00006596504,0.0001167356,0.0005185036,0.000008607183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002378624,0.00001223323,0.8108084,0.00001463379,0.000001790836,1.192842e-7,0.0009777464,0.000002104944,0.01343539,0.1641947,0.00002233194,0.01052819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008322534,0.000005697964,0.9931983,0.00001584847,0.000005866289,0.000002278322,0.001229654,0.0000947683,0.001480117,0.002609121,0.001227508,0.0000476146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973567,0.00006817952,0.00006030943,0.001040972,0.000291848,0.0001223955,2.823631e-7,0.00001692282,0.001042381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993783,0.00002309003,0.00001635678,0.0002807902,0.0002745115,0.000004046711,6.265093e-7,0.000003348241,0.00001892447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1823899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6525481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146259587","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1100.0643","title":"Status Differences in the Cognitive Activation of Social Networks","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":324,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Precondition; Cognition; Social network (sociolinguistics); Social psychology; Psychology; Public relations; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06702526260117218,"gpt":0.3375520639918646,"spread":0.2705268013906924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006777464,0.00003844347,0.00006355177,0.00007551355,0.0004810231,0.00003317609,0.0003126014,0.00004761587,0.0004078517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007984713,0.0000288218,0.000009720206,0.002547965,0.00115591,0.0003346011,0.0000226139,0.00006281944,0.000007272153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003686945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001419882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008128514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002135932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991079,0.0001549631,0.0001195312,0.0001262251,0.0002981953,0.0001932107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999423,0.00009352368,0.00009878623,0.00004187758,0.0003189112,0.0000238831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009849988,0.0001077414,0.4311662,9.625768e-7,0.000002334029,2.584334e-7,0.4284225,2.795808e-7,0.0007238201,0.1351212,0.0001242748,0.004320542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008261938,0.00002217563,0.9476106,0.000004542076,0.000002143863,8.982922e-8,0.0504789,0.00001190354,0.000517702,0.001139231,0.00008786691,0.00004219563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514942,0.000003641115,0.00397965,0.000328861,0.0002094853,0.0001159336,7.848473e-7,0.0000147249,0.04385277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995574,0.00001501799,0.00002576301,0.0002696519,0.00007537065,0.000002757294,0.000001403498,0.000002407822,0.00005026502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5164444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.446569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116662294","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1080.0383","title":"Getting Everyone on Board: The Role of Inspirational Leadership in Geographically Dispersed Teams","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":323,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Shared leadership; Psychological safety; Psychology; Team effectiveness; Transactional leadership; Public relations; Charisma; Leadership studies; Social exchange theory; Perception; Team composition; Leadership theory; Social psychology; Leadership style; Management; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02738117570327651,"gpt":0.2161168001357446,"spread":0.1887356244324681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000337829,0.00009098836,0.00008748355,0.0003841349,0.0004518573,0.00009806688,0.0003058546,0.00003699502,0.0004152197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000669768,0.0000712469,0.0000186521,0.00453251,0.0003642458,0.0009878633,0.00006775396,0.0001016446,0.0001398976],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004444537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001183193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001209793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004087601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986796,0.00001011657,0.0002430349,0.0002288752,0.0006554337,0.0001828801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991613,0.00003989636,0.0001399386,0.0001562979,0.0004899295,0.0000126094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003679762,0.00005292572,0.9386377,0.000004376718,0.000001046815,7.387575e-7,0.0002013403,0.0002662092,0.02784676,0.03260138,0.00006068631,0.000323105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002035931,0.000005222054,0.9934373,0.00001364038,0.000004284715,0.000002210811,0.0007101777,0.0005003907,0.004017709,0.0002574257,0.0007495396,0.00009844662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960709,0.00002322067,0.0004690681,0.001394447,0.000134297,0.0001548183,0.000001084301,0.00005681475,0.001695332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972438,0.000003324881,0.0001145146,0.002411914,0.0001192233,0.000002498718,0.0000116995,0.00001370021,0.0000793287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05479961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4546364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978506782","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2014.0959","title":"Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":320,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Institutional logic; Institutional theory; Field (mathematics); Organizational ecology; Competition (biology); Organizational field; Sociology; Business; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2654192783611509,"gpt":0.4120951905648682,"spread":0.1466759122037173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002711076,0.00005309017,0.00006823769,0.0001389265,0.002398507,0.0002240969,0.0005149148,0.00003468889,0.00009941195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008242385,0.00004108213,0.000008240515,0.001678889,0.002579221,0.0005727896,0.0002420079,0.0001111622,0.00001310498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001419463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009885817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004792488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983644,0.0003997107,0.0001611319,0.000129015,0.0007711505,0.0001746177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987369,0.000131216,0.00007001023,0.0001531216,0.0007167753,0.0001919843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002062842,0.00008344083,0.003695958,0.000005052688,0.000002788601,5.458674e-7,0.01687789,0.0004382893,0.01399963,0.9643694,0.0001189203,0.000387455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008609905,0.0002901225,0.9138338,0.00004697739,0.00001209248,0.00002791436,0.0135539,0.003374697,0.01534821,0.04272988,0.009527765,0.0003936779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.94539,0.000004042234,0.04164297,0.008869234,0.0001851683,0.0001653784,0.00002938783,0.00002679759,0.003686955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987221,0.000004621383,0.0006846086,0.0003287009,0.00009927079,0.000003144682,0.000009913027,0.00000173162,0.0001458483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9216395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119332186","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2014.0900","title":"Is Negative Attention Better Than No Attention? The Comparative Effects of Ostracism and Harassment at Work","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":314,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ostracism; Harassment; Social psychology; Psychology; Test (biology); Work (physics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01320872106494809,"gpt":0.3005543269529574,"spread":0.2873456058880093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004144402,0.00008583492,0.0001193923,0.00004708117,0.0005073636,0.00004912552,0.0001835002,0.00005108775,0.0002507883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000144883,0.00006297845,0.00002352555,0.0009253309,0.0005179564,0.0001788873,0.000117226,0.00007030561,0.0003547131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004190472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001811741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001938777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004241092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989635,0.0001349123,0.0001572988,0.0002694003,0.000318058,0.0001567701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991131,0.0001572445,0.0001577145,0.0001899249,0.0003273429,0.00005470338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005658407,0.0002242082,0.8221923,0.00004060053,0.00005454986,0.000001217608,0.05291682,0.000005723936,0.09246782,0.01597699,0.01028118,0.005782019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003242031,0.00006898749,0.992857,0.00002578748,0.00001702685,0.000001628704,0.0003647737,0.00005910892,0.005323984,0.0003801262,0.0004985656,0.00007878362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894172,0.00001682192,0.004199288,0.001278885,0.0005869218,0.0002562755,0.000002303518,0.00001917681,0.004223133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964173,0.000006112996,0.0001755374,0.0006407553,0.00006429746,0.000005787312,0.000006352758,0.000006080952,0.002677777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1706647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4559237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154077938","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1080.0377","title":"Third-World Copycats to Emerging Multinationals: Institutional Changes and Organizational Transformation in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"International Business and FDI","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Emerging markets; Multinational corporation; Business; Industrial organization; Liberalization; Product (mathematics); Product market; Intellectual property; Resource dependence theory; Economic system; Market economy; International trade; Economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03510730411765679,"gpt":0.2895804247207404,"spread":0.2544731206030836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000579819,0.0001060202,0.00007667379,0.0007906174,0.0008308939,0.0002686316,0.0003389452,0.00004832375,0.0003121872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005815517,0.00008700674,0.000007424409,0.005588149,0.000231842,0.001801075,0.00008780345,0.0001616529,0.0001132512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007128275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001381663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005749915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000107049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986351,0.000009280518,0.0002031124,0.0002359479,0.0007276199,0.0001889585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990032,0.00003686266,0.00007826237,0.00008102548,0.0007790134,0.00002162409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001390062,0.0001705135,0.3593251,0.00004984517,0.000005823202,0.00001909818,0.005097866,0.00222245,0.004501959,0.6246271,0.001228796,0.002737551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006093456,0.000005015819,0.9618583,0.00004884932,0.000008475224,0.00007491031,0.0007381861,0.01005488,0.001380923,0.0008940421,0.02403765,0.0002894141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654461,0.00001188378,0.003296809,0.02532179,0.0002845764,0.0002942643,0.000004832127,0.00005319834,0.005286549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901538,0.00000803614,0.0002027733,0.009109481,0.000375088,0.00001079758,0.00005567142,0.000009488746,0.0000748409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.623733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6390648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769899779","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2019.1290","title":"Platform Strategy: Managing Ecosystem Value Through Selective Promotion of Complements","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":303,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Imperial College London; York University; University of Liverpool; University College London; Harvard Business School","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Incentive; Value (mathematics); Loyalty; Business; Marketing; Perception; Complement (music); Industrial organization; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02417850345837195,"gpt":0.2289334674879962,"spread":0.2047549640296242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002774285,0.000080814,0.000111102,0.0001813071,0.0001434461,0.0005627727,0.0002574372,0.00001934617,0.0002257954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003874219,0.00007481786,0.00001360791,0.001786084,0.00003677591,0.01137343,0.0001297332,0.00003184626,0.0006603477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006996055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004870449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004483195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001399768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991607,3.940889e-7,0.0002205342,0.0002239694,0.0002142584,0.0001801613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992872,0.000006014807,0.0002431278,0.0001359507,0.0003202245,0.000007490901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005029803,0.00007369559,0.0773958,0.0001710833,0.00001084827,3.622717e-7,0.0001795423,0.004868517,0.004093292,0.9116015,0.000168884,0.001431414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003761461,0.0002771603,0.2210083,0.0005266547,0.00009938341,0.00001967481,0.01316005,0.3540029,0.06153107,0.3356586,0.007859975,0.002094779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9083144,9.278945e-7,0.001344297,0.00003955814,0.0002285006,0.0002282642,0.000001830512,0.00004428093,0.08979791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995216,9.278373e-7,0.0001437659,0.0001353759,0.00006023005,9.441982e-7,0.00002613815,0.00001169394,0.00009932418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.575943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8487654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978212568","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1100.0534","title":"Rational Decision Making as Performative Praxis: Explaining Rationality's<i>Éternel Retour</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":283,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Praxis; Performative utterance; Ecological rationality; Epistemology; Sociology; Bounded rationality; Economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0122603389360099,"gpt":0.2581662331216266,"spread":0.2459058941856167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001162487,0.0001731835,0.0001270235,0.0003949396,0.002012695,0.001092527,0.0005528399,0.00004870705,0.003567798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004169705,0.0001607259,0.00002317616,0.003479049,0.0002597174,0.004841222,0.0005002808,0.0001813412,0.001349995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004893309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001268092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001417453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003841928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978842,0.000008049657,0.0003464731,0.0004200383,0.001071916,0.0002692796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977982,0.0001103107,0.000292141,0.0002237468,0.001555126,0.00002047342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001642235,0.00006915559,0.255243,0.0000324658,0.00001329271,0.000003106721,0.0008436893,0.0003933139,0.01043278,0.7230931,0.007599263,0.002260371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00145712,0.00002854043,0.8049957,0.0001752162,0.00008564716,0.00002842986,0.003858129,0.0299657,0.006444214,0.0754922,0.0760075,0.001461589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8157548,0.00001688592,0.1044265,0.002930218,0.002023316,0.0004931775,0.000003162028,0.0003268745,0.07402512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905984,0.000004378946,0.004913863,0.003169762,0.0009170442,0.000007652163,0.00005000131,0.00002421565,0.0003146858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6476009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118605285","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1120.0757","title":"Do Women Choose Different Jobs from Men? Mechanisms of Application Segregation in the Market for Managerial Workers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":278,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Socialization; Preference; Affect (linguistics); Test (biology); Order (exchange); Identification (biology); Point (geometry); Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03710399475725454,"gpt":0.2795380882444923,"spread":0.2424340934872378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002572316,0.0000513459,0.0000724994,0.00006913984,0.0004325956,0.00008705606,0.0004355863,0.00004249201,0.0002378746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000393076,0.00004128545,0.00001203174,0.00121858,0.0001713898,0.000577177,0.00005057608,0.00003247905,0.000005642919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001817352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000758498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002614807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005574147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988439,0.0001460753,0.0001361817,0.000159617,0.0004893778,0.0002248553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993992,0.000105687,0.0001207661,0.0001595425,0.0001545686,0.00006020407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003412416,0.000235039,0.2233853,0.00001452124,0.000007539107,4.84181e-8,0.1836827,0.00002015696,0.01922466,0.5678172,0.0007322853,0.004846428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004367963,0.00001938476,0.8233849,0.000005970798,0.00001307132,6.856976e-8,0.1067627,0.0001995552,0.01192161,0.05609227,0.001016157,0.0001475829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8757345,0.000004303376,0.1200383,0.001054339,0.0002469284,0.000504023,0.00001311038,0.00001924104,0.002385282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990951,0.000005096258,0.0006424413,0.00008884343,0.00005880359,0.00001566925,0.00001068678,0.00000300539,0.00008035948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5999995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.332722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122452828","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1040.0070","title":"Toxic Decision Processes: A Study of Emotion and Organizational Decision Making","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":274,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Anger; Shame; Embarrassment; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02481857480239583,"gpt":0.3540887990354483,"spread":0.3292702242330525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000337036,0.00009441788,0.0001110392,0.0003213033,0.0003441539,0.00008053194,0.0002417423,0.00004897765,0.0005160202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009449246,0.00008506252,0.000006324238,0.004790033,0.000151249,0.0004057739,0.0001141692,0.00005350499,0.00005316535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007049517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000202475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001652968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002242012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986453,0.0000187116,0.000294344,0.0004036796,0.0004876337,0.000150328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984156,0.00005809454,0.0001387623,0.000251794,0.001074972,0.00006079922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004853094,0.003122803,0.8662336,0.00002807381,0.00001157383,0.00001451151,0.03590662,0.001217791,0.03044995,0.02163349,0.00008763224,0.04124543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001234599,0.000356088,0.9866523,0.00009661011,0.00002305492,0.00005801297,0.005971734,0.00001607619,0.003244398,0.002183279,0.00001166683,0.0001521681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8975883,0.00002029458,0.1016325,0.00003544507,0.0002557773,0.0002681461,0.000002032787,0.0000433484,0.0001541667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938522,0.000005240671,0.006019117,0.0000421749,0.00002381806,0.000003236499,0.000003425519,0.00001647569,0.00003430519],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1204187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5650059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110621765","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1080.0390","title":"Process Capabilities and Value Generation in Alliance Portfolios","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Conceptualization; Portfolio; Corporate governance; Business; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Value (mathematics); Relational capital; Knowledge management; Function (biology); Industrial organization; Dimension (graph theory); Computer science; Intellectual capital; Political science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02545578391337169,"gpt":0.235209541452655,"spread":0.2097537575392833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002475311,0.00006415219,0.00005964446,0.0001771092,0.0003288213,0.0001461906,0.0001110826,0.00002710787,0.00007079895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003105075,0.00006210796,0.000002854106,0.00364842,0.0002243879,0.00348372,0.00003056874,0.00003857711,0.00002505964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002169518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008974877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000734998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001583213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992914,0.00000225712,0.0001533671,0.0002164088,0.0002144128,0.0001221139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999235,0.00000322685,0.00008492551,0.00008277308,0.0005887449,0.000005272429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003351545,0.00005925416,0.7842051,0.00007771802,9.895298e-7,0.00000450583,0.0005544611,0.002953065,0.03456585,0.1764564,0.0004256256,0.0006936607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002766705,0.000004341651,0.9548773,0.00001895506,0.000003230788,0.0000139603,0.0003011875,0.03063807,0.01077959,0.002125229,0.0007285018,0.0002330246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960274,0.00001597508,0.0008613932,0.0007121788,0.0001162386,0.00009890139,1.721672e-7,0.0000432408,0.002124506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988687,0.00001595035,0.0001205547,0.0007066766,0.0001939304,0.000003532485,0.00001379321,0.000006969647,0.00006987037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1743312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2532689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166201974","doi":"10.1287/orsc.11.2.163.12510","title":"Making Connections: Complementary Influences on Communication Media Choices, Attitudes, and Use","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Impact of Technology on Adolescents","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":265,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Media use; Social media; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0522575014683712,"gpt":0.3696682828581616,"spread":0.3174107813897903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007004034,0.00007606987,0.00007626408,0.0001559945,0.002341887,0.0004360961,0.0005762455,0.00005516975,0.0010648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00139848,0.00007816638,0.000006586727,0.001787109,0.001643486,0.001360058,0.00007759398,0.0001099224,0.00008850907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001558488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000149723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008957184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001307824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987755,0.00009832924,0.0001556964,0.0002380991,0.0004955325,0.0002368509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992104,0.0001505513,0.00008387488,0.000268773,0.0002064616,0.00007991074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004944197,0.00008404532,0.9536318,0.000003643764,0.000004522638,7.354622e-7,0.004630833,0.00003620798,0.0005058724,0.02074897,0.0006980911,0.01965036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002217657,0.00002051857,0.9846792,0.00007419488,0.000005999845,0.000003143195,0.001359092,0.00003373235,0.000705329,0.0005357107,0.01221154,0.0001497848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928395,0.00004979611,0.00007693331,0.003141294,0.0001169195,0.0001988629,0.000006018737,0.0002373857,0.003333277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968857,0.0003522287,0.001211619,0.001305527,0.00002634536,0.000001924634,0.000007229345,0.000006858996,0.0002025288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03104742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121915257","doi":"10.1287/orsc.14.4.440.17483","title":"Pathways of Relevance: Exploring Inflows of Knowledge into Subunits of Multinational Corporations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":262,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Multinational corporation; Knowledge management; Affect (linguistics); Business; Knowledge value chain; Organizational learning; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05550520591711174,"gpt":0.2482700353888422,"spread":0.1927648294717304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000756802,0.00007741716,0.0001243778,0.0006330819,0.0001695268,0.00003441281,0.0002485275,0.00002126936,0.0001449318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002416586,0.00007864735,0.00001590147,0.006747732,0.0002322454,0.001189839,0.000114681,0.00003716242,0.00004029315],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003329668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001594163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006960629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000119018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998925,0.000009370322,0.0004360778,0.0001664668,0.000358794,0.0001042728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953037,0.00003574274,0.0004777648,0.0001829522,0.003991895,0.000007958155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001424893,0.0001025103,0.02449272,0.0001240188,0.000002744958,7.731421e-8,0.0005304734,0.0001176906,0.05800263,0.9156601,0.0000619735,0.0009035628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002339632,0.00006420563,0.1138252,0.0003891173,0.00007750335,0.000001491469,0.009648381,0.01597089,0.8003618,0.03026108,0.02623309,0.0008276452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8113547,0.00003238802,0.01736176,0.00008992961,0.0007308052,0.0003094252,0.000002492733,0.00005863355,0.1700599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973835,0.000005410664,0.00236404,0.00004412741,0.0000453546,0.00000494879,0.00001314356,0.000009959594,0.0001294656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8853991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3242062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147654808","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1120.0745","title":"Seizing Opportunity in Emerging Fields: How Institutional Entrepreneurs Legitimated the Professional Form of Management Consulting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":257,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational field; Status quo; Institutional theory; Field (mathematics); Entrepreneurship; Public relations; Leverage (statistics); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Business; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02720178039787736,"gpt":0.2506519718978641,"spread":0.2234501914999868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008485687,0.0001074311,0.0001011085,0.000306413,0.0007449028,0.0001568844,0.0003574494,0.00002337222,0.0003245911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007349161,0.00008161972,0.00001501588,0.003258736,0.0002329489,0.002210533,0.0005574781,0.00007276232,0.00002476868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005126872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004720806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003135013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001569442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987516,0.000009077689,0.0002310074,0.0001867014,0.0005395864,0.0002820632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999197,0.00003580167,0.000221678,0.0001418304,0.0003862381,0.00001746811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003936159,0.0001052476,0.7752877,0.00011825,0.00001262006,0.000001757662,0.000784494,0.0003277399,0.0004928263,0.21955,0.001542905,0.001772498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006404724,0.000003214415,0.9736906,0.0001493883,0.0000463836,0.000003108848,0.00614897,0.004455919,0.00162251,0.001990743,0.01091766,0.0003310793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9511499,0.00009445045,0.009957222,0.007456721,0.001446364,0.0007350845,0.000002519469,0.0001395054,0.02901827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998242,0.00001671627,0.0003895974,0.000821283,0.0001652526,0.000007165308,0.00002420713,0.000008996506,0.000324741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2175593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5729265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171289060","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1100.0633","title":"Not All Bridging Ties Are Equal: Network Imprinting and Firm Growth in the Nashville Legal Industry, 1933–1978","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":257,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Interpersonal ties; Imprinting (psychology); Strong ties; Business; Network formation; Network structure; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03645998213497433,"gpt":0.2164723028180022,"spread":0.1800123206830279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007817617,0.000100777,0.00009208255,0.00009028125,0.0003534728,0.0004299359,0.0004119411,0.00004961646,0.00004693045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004013563,0.00008157468,0.000008968239,0.002430531,0.0001515101,0.001947623,0.0002226071,0.0001709586,0.00003933057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002011578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004057133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001034686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001766063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989831,0.00000755266,0.0001718028,0.0002718508,0.0002902122,0.0002754792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993355,0.00001733417,0.0002660376,0.0001527727,0.0002189152,0.000009391842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000220992,0.00001387749,0.9642295,0.00001556642,9.274157e-7,0.000006729313,0.0003671637,0.00005050084,0.0003174733,0.03354056,0.0009818308,0.0004736892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001337136,0.000003798199,0.9939925,0.00004548273,0.000005255406,0.000003955185,0.0003445589,0.0009912408,0.0003642195,0.0004412823,0.003536384,0.000137582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923228,0.00002334566,0.001296146,0.001109218,0.0002192807,0.0001101091,6.956286e-7,0.00004749668,0.004870933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963329,0.000009944767,0.00009618142,0.003088047,0.0003631325,0.00000243976,0.000001681634,0.000009955441,0.00009571244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03309928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4145882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211079051","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2021.1562","title":"We Are All Theorists of Technology Now: A Relational Perspective on Emerging Technology and Organizing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":252,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Emerging technologies; Knowledge management; Interdependence; Perspective (graphical); Pace; Set (abstract data type); Sketch; Computer science; Data science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01466747592123394,"gpt":0.3158230751228188,"spread":0.3011555992015849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001014941,0.00006075973,0.00009169256,0.0009497292,0.001811905,0.00004320351,0.0002730214,0.00004067158,0.0004017371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001016293,0.00006447039,0.000007929133,0.006909054,0.0006429827,0.0004400414,0.0001834968,0.000105752,0.00001392294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004265525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002911254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002997688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001793309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987801,0.00005924698,0.0002256764,0.0001947579,0.0005601562,0.0001800191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987172,0.00004431556,0.0003150219,0.0001231346,0.0007673684,0.00003294021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002480507,0.00001130614,0.01384055,0.0000023003,0.000003122695,2.732963e-7,0.03222369,0.00004858356,0.003092488,0.9501529,0.0000693126,0.0005530246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003797743,0.0001196522,0.003709225,0.00002521141,0.000009365375,0.0000164776,0.8892094,0.000130248,0.009735433,0.05553207,0.04092672,0.0002063826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.921115,0.0001233875,0.008351755,0.05452245,0.0006152074,0.0005696614,0.00002513493,0.0002688426,0.01440854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999069,0.0000319719,0.0004779195,0.0001321303,0.00002433554,0.000008249925,0.000002705601,0.000006722337,0.0002469143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8946208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}