{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":56,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":56,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"26bc8496c543","filters":{"venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes"}},"results":[{"id":"W2059164392","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2885","title":"An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":434,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Competitor analysis; Knowledge transfer; Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge value chain; Dimension (graph theory); Computer science; Organizational learning; Business; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04298982692889501,"gpt":0.3445787858227728,"spread":0.3015889588938778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002545527,0.00009814918,0.0001207634,0.000114125,0.000789783,0.00008907658,0.0001614264,0.00007570988,0.003868294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061087,0.00009180725,0.00001789649,0.0005091054,0.000191365,0.0003316737,0.00001560237,0.0000653843,0.00003832104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001872566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001047175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002391542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005579565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990435,0.00005713381,0.0002220038,0.0002387981,0.0003133899,0.0001251422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992589,0.0001074537,0.00002496783,0.0001129887,0.0003818668,0.0001138053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000483303,0.001119298,0.7153022,0.00008725822,0.00001553072,0.000003988666,0.02940225,0.00003203041,0.003037225,0.228804,0.001214346,0.02093359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001433492,0.0004507247,0.9207234,0.0003248517,0.0002562488,0.000001537299,0.002191145,0.00003827656,0.01194112,0.04582506,0.01601251,0.0008016888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908604,0.0000823575,0.00006976343,0.00004762128,0.00003924926,0.0001811079,0.000007815571,0.00005605348,0.008655651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978083,0.00009114522,0.0001016675,0.00004750625,0.00007845776,0.00001185053,0.0000493168,0.00001396044,0.001797833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2054212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989706212","doi":"10.1006/obhd.1999.2867","title":"Just Doing Business: Modern Racism and Obedience to Authority as Explanations for Employment Discrimination","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":351,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Obedience; Racism; Prejudice (legal term); Milgram experiment; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04542528435333817,"gpt":0.3896524482705285,"spread":0.3442271639171903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001764424,0.00009691934,0.000109354,0.00009763907,0.001391782,0.0001847792,0.0001309893,0.00008119962,0.0008915156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004235343,0.00009379438,0.00001237432,0.0004322721,0.000125648,0.0003832391,0.00002884493,0.00004254016,0.00001673502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004031812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009552206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001499484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000905334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990236,0.0000218943,0.0001986084,0.0003017195,0.000295455,0.0001587182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989708,0.0001447211,0.00004546022,0.00006204626,0.0006595099,0.0001174795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001344187,0.0009434455,0.05621763,0.00008983063,0.00001836844,0.000006262328,0.09064028,0.00002547346,0.002380121,0.2567912,0.005121207,0.5876318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00109929,0.0002947268,0.8252929,0.0001798227,0.0001429621,0.00001578058,0.007549869,0.00001169947,0.000355992,0.09974967,0.06465504,0.0006522443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837988,0.0001228086,0.01158698,0.001526192,0.0001599471,0.0004399592,0.00002235029,0.00006044903,0.00228251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994809,0.0001966159,0.001516338,0.0002587793,0.0001749194,0.0001058475,0.00004727003,0.00001320459,0.002877982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7690753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969624676","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2941","title":"Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":335,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Consumer choice; Econometric model; Consumer behaviour; Task (project management); Choice set; Empirical research; Econometrics; Construct (python library); Computer science; Management science; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1552349688658422,"gpt":0.3955967711956773,"spread":0.2403618023298351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001639053,0.0004696116,0.0008751075,0.0004658656,0.001014405,0.0006532934,0.0006457231,0.0002996213,0.001009724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002991503,0.0003837329,0.00009004847,0.0006447986,0.002459942,0.0008008847,0.0007794212,0.0002579202,0.000008825531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005717173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001461448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004678153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001132623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952472,0.0001391135,0.001613484,0.001353731,0.001285838,0.0003606621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925787,0.004935722,0.0006400672,0.0005797312,0.0008740203,0.0003917402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000230359,0.001054567,0.8921451,0.00004329012,0.00001744115,0.000007401432,0.0003167016,0.00002752911,0.0003925138,0.01211744,0.001392336,0.09225529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002529787,0.000343423,0.3035353,0.0001064775,0.0003174721,0.0002276067,0.000433881,0.003656823,0.0001482214,0.6851957,0.002739205,0.0007661748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398336,0.0005770732,0.05808447,0.00007861619,0.00007285982,0.0008121023,0.0002291152,0.0000418634,0.0002703154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386817,0.0002165092,0.06056896,0.0001260786,0.00005590945,0.0000878447,0.000126174,0.00005702821,0.00007982532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6730782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072895574","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2908","title":"Deception and Retribution in Repeated Ultimatum Bargaining","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":316,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Retributive justice; Ultimatum game; Social psychology; Punishment (psychology); Economic Justice; Microeconomics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02276741416241558,"gpt":0.3335386243858938,"spread":0.3107712102234783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002264659,0.00009917084,0.0001329202,0.0001037907,0.0007647329,0.0001409198,0.00007673248,0.00008793345,0.001448233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001699754,0.0001100737,0.000009382961,0.0003898117,0.0001911517,0.0004141129,0.00003887854,0.00007412879,0.00002260357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001008073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006272102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002451474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008272742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990731,0.00003092255,0.000255879,0.0002860875,0.0001931073,0.0001609239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999578,0.00006524585,0.00005172218,0.00006219737,0.0001690741,0.00007376546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002484823,0.0001595228,0.969153,0.000007460033,0.000002362902,0.0000056864,0.005479501,0.000002742834,0.00209652,0.008221471,0.0001243669,0.01472248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000807569,0.00008322157,0.985253,0.0001176513,0.00002535561,0.000008682332,0.002665122,0.000004928504,0.00140849,0.008042404,0.001255608,0.0003279508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996466,0.0003391666,0.00001617208,0.00006905364,0.00002486151,0.0002511297,0.000009242297,0.00005378657,0.002770634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982715,0.0006832364,0.0004400091,0.0000390379,0.00003613437,0.00003603878,0.00005666823,0.00001323605,0.0004241412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01609998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129808449","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.003","title":"Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":315,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Deviance (statistics); Psychology; Social exchange theory; Abusive supervision; Moderation; Social psychology; Organizational justice; Organizational commitment; Affective events theory; Perception; Perceived organizational support; Job satisfaction; Job performance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02332325134041661,"gpt":0.2593853088062995,"spread":0.2360620574658829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002148994,0.0003461227,0.0002297868,0.0002541604,0.001388821,0.001056834,0.0002018628,0.0001012725,0.003056754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003200947,0.0001725207,0.00002375289,0.001180001,0.0001775097,0.00174464,0.0002636226,0.0002070865,0.00003356096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004273315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006410562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000238372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001169833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983659,0.00002207132,0.0002808956,0.0005131658,0.000572622,0.0002452951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998071,0.0001703458,0.0002681374,0.0002008234,0.001230757,0.0000590064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005403766,0.00005785327,0.9874654,0.00005576682,0.00002011708,0.000005348938,0.00199213,0.000002902035,0.0009942274,0.003690353,0.0004790573,0.005182738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004930908,0.00004217208,0.9945084,0.0001135868,0.0001572569,0.00005521578,0.001965232,0.00001023988,0.0003082029,0.0007350055,0.001292352,0.0003192198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951777,0.0002021369,0.001286495,0.002317768,0.0001449732,0.0006151576,0.00001818317,0.00009683847,0.000140722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969141,0.00006486689,0.0004738817,0.001737069,0.0002872756,0.00004200717,0.00007825764,0.00007847953,0.0003240495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007042957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019243091","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2001.2979","title":"Reversing the Gender Gap in Negotiations: An Exploration of Stereotype Regeneration","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":292,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Stereotype (UML); Psychology; Social psychology; Disadvantage; Set (abstract data type); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Communication; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.300163925228215,"gpt":0.3587851679612153,"spread":0.05862124273300029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003432539,0.0000562492,0.00007149616,0.00008837965,0.0008495075,0.00009349111,0.0001238898,0.00005636218,0.0009162236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002875157,0.00004933609,0.00000977154,0.0004935767,0.00009639049,0.001374742,0.0000254956,0.00005112759,0.000007135764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003316001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004888869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001202181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001522986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991173,0.0001058846,0.0002005931,0.0001504769,0.0003430275,0.00008269394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992619,0.00007849806,0.00009031904,0.00009149146,0.0004407525,0.00003706959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002307251,0.0009616781,0.5524641,0.00007232224,0.00001000012,0.000002842977,0.1624773,0.0002648794,0.001212746,0.2713867,0.001509624,0.009614791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001860682,0.0002764534,0.7568774,0.0001486218,0.0001867288,0.000004938194,0.08733241,0.000186061,0.003525154,0.1435564,0.00526656,0.0007785675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994045,0.0002453182,0.003245025,0.0005401634,0.00007933561,0.0002426989,0.000008625971,0.00002389128,0.001569951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990249,0.00026605,0.0003713591,0.00006861256,0.00005515131,0.000004480958,0.0000318263,0.000004908604,0.0001727229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2044133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987253013","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003","title":"Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Situational ethics; Ambiguity; Job satisfaction; Autonomy; Structural equation modeling; Social comparison theory; Developmental psychology; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01821480909614049,"gpt":0.2582630987137168,"spread":0.2400482896175763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000820246,0.0001347175,0.0001977467,0.0001236721,0.0004684336,0.0001054738,0.0001182667,0.00006976841,0.0004150084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009644343,0.0001037571,0.000020139,0.0006092305,0.0004205383,0.00031263,0.0001848352,0.00005845887,0.000004375329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001383089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003794246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001424777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002231822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989657,0.000007887465,0.0003616255,0.0002115827,0.0003548731,0.00009834671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990119,0.00004890376,0.0002613153,0.00007420115,0.0005916174,0.00001208148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008428024,0.00007004163,0.9740311,0.00006717926,0.000003347983,6.043842e-7,0.00004615227,8.375754e-7,0.007725561,0.01698748,0.0008749629,0.0001842888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000383982,0.000005814964,0.9927635,0.00005282505,0.00009574708,0.00000768891,0.0000938252,3.662603e-7,0.001904112,0.004235834,0.0003381605,0.0001181027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989117,0.0003276457,0.00007227938,0.000160943,0.00006780396,0.0001681141,0.0000265976,0.00002333527,0.0002415164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993786,0.00001907151,0.0002084077,0.00007449614,0.00008098462,0.000005667144,0.00004397165,0.00001743494,0.0001713335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01873243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4544051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086309276","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2943","title":"Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":270,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Operationalization; Group decision-making; Cognition; Viewpoints; Social psychology; Unanimity; Similarity (geometry); Context (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02085135856079764,"gpt":0.3167991813581006,"spread":0.295947822797303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001694955,0.0001419338,0.0001930382,0.0001438873,0.000556767,0.0000463711,0.0001236825,0.00009047346,0.0002614103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002676977,0.0001049178,0.000009934048,0.0004360238,0.0002142039,0.0001061677,0.0003343066,0.0001116628,0.000002516731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009987035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003501021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004856263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003912782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990435,0.00002221256,0.0002691289,0.0002982538,0.0002324748,0.0001344866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987265,0.0006436927,0.0001241058,0.00009861773,0.000361338,0.00004568798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001024779,0.0001780241,0.9818247,0.00002886611,0.000008573028,0.00001001002,0.002413475,3.849665e-7,0.00002246004,0.00257291,0.00002328945,0.01281486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007837558,0.00008780946,0.989314,0.0001154932,0.00004493454,0.00007545423,0.00100888,0.000006222526,0.00001646215,0.008247796,0.0001690559,0.0001301158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972175,0.001907925,0.0002760812,0.00004207202,0.00004163351,0.0002264496,0.00004484385,0.00001532589,0.0002281484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993006,0.0003255487,0.000155531,0.00008737522,0.00001492646,0.0000114593,0.00001888689,0.00001454438,0.00007114035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01268474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4282258,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074869549","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.09.001","title":"Organizational supports and organizational deviance: The mediating role of organization-based self-esteem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Deviance (statistics); Social psychology; Conscientiousness; Agreeableness; Neuroticism; Personality; Organizational commitment; Belongingness; Big Five personality traits; Extraversion and introversion; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01099863732035686,"gpt":0.2743699300671661,"spread":0.2633712927468093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002294209,0.0002756084,0.000299097,0.0001633039,0.001699998,0.00007831176,0.0002940365,0.0002297059,0.005099554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009462577,0.0002323152,0.00002693059,0.001862873,0.0003265844,0.0002228807,0.0001566133,0.0001754074,0.00004303469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004159411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006104551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001839587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001589376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977757,0.00007664197,0.0006368218,0.0005009687,0.0007574596,0.0002524139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964123,0.000516157,0.0003371256,0.0002378798,0.002338731,0.0001578173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001458757,0.0005135246,0.9573758,0.00004491214,0.00002810494,0.00001163447,0.005188182,0.00001175306,0.001394373,0.03466835,0.0004578884,0.0002908553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001396274,0.0001455678,0.9835923,0.00005867774,0.0001779604,0.0002810854,0.001370118,0.00002308646,0.003645025,0.007636112,0.001175302,0.0004985337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963766,0.0007633936,0.001013353,0.0002222783,0.0001896531,0.0004032728,0.0000982324,0.0001525905,0.0007806183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968458,0.0001752118,0.001304737,0.0003422825,0.0002192186,0.00002074004,0.0006673565,0.00008685046,0.0003377612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02703224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030299881","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2881","title":"Information Processing at Successive Stages of Decision Making: Need for Cognition and Inclusion–Exclusion Effects","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mindset; Cognition; Set (abstract data type); Information processing; Inclusion (mineral); Need for cognition; Purchasing; Quality (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Decision quality; Social psychology; Marketing; Computer science; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0275843643319885,"gpt":0.3520217450133791,"spread":0.3244373806813906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001177417,0.0003537826,0.0005735615,0.0007170684,0.003032415,0.0006125786,0.0005767879,0.0002555609,0.001185972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004927799,0.0002832694,0.00007759927,0.001101797,0.0002461159,0.002136285,0.001573268,0.0001295338,0.00004052407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008083029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001773507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005355311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003502149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959816,0.00005904738,0.001482262,0.0006172523,0.001571728,0.0002880631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922652,0.003983032,0.0007732812,0.0003416768,0.002459235,0.0001775845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004585723,0.0002271593,0.02108145,0.0001249455,0.000005971292,0.000004650395,0.001965287,0.00006956876,0.001728664,0.0003116839,0.0005319279,0.9734901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009525416,0.001801755,0.1805064,0.003349719,0.000722882,0.0002971004,0.001707054,0.001241617,0.02087309,0.7619207,0.01582758,0.002226704],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856271,0.0004624296,0.01243513,0.00007478749,0.0001359801,0.0008205074,0.0001644648,0.00006426514,0.00021535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940436,0.0001350657,0.005114472,0.0001945959,0.00006133089,0.00006189459,0.0001623006,0.00003828842,0.0001883796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9712634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994190158","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.004","title":"Exploring links between polychronicity and well-being from the perspective of person–job fit: Does it matter if you prefer to do only one thing at a time?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":195,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Moderation; Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Person–environment fit; Preference; Value (mathematics); Well-being; Dimension (graph theory); Moderated mediation; Multilevel model; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09578338513297892,"gpt":0.3447116854141499,"spread":0.248928300281171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001016132,0.0001861936,0.0002401595,0.00006885175,0.0004854581,0.0001486323,0.0002068481,0.0001132656,0.009476373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007347806,0.0001166439,0.00003055671,0.0001953444,0.0000897132,0.0002966473,0.0001686851,0.0001846006,0.0001531169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006172124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002738182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002823798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002403639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987497,0.00003604915,0.0002720327,0.0004579512,0.0003079263,0.0001763785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990155,0.0002897579,0.0001007923,0.0001740773,0.0003324613,0.00008740756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000461802,0.0001169796,0.9296185,0.00001586282,0.00005125694,0.000001132476,0.06426114,0.000002232551,0.001344616,0.001458184,0.0008612509,0.002222688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003493719,0.00007324533,0.9903731,0.0001571366,0.0001331539,0.000005215146,0.006449797,7.99029e-7,0.0009109465,0.001036949,0.0003218245,0.0001884097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969987,0.0003511155,0.00005714913,0.001341845,0.00005196227,0.000241226,0.00006985365,0.00002684235,0.0008612724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963452,0.00005253216,0.0003524341,0.0002814819,0.0003345534,0.0000213646,0.00003577078,0.00002693064,0.002549717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06075468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053476798","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.007","title":"What types of advice do decision-makers prefer?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Situational ethics; Psychology; Decision maker; Perspective (graphical); Autonomy; Interpersonal communication; Decision analysis; Social psychology; Management science; Applied psychology; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05479233121572701,"gpt":0.4294093933916098,"spread":0.3746170621758828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001502901,0.0002061821,0.0003189763,0.0004394329,0.0004308307,0.0008085694,0.0006722049,0.0001508702,0.0166381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003453507,0.0001511357,0.00005063038,0.00139286,0.0001900713,0.001659458,0.0002076443,0.0002084624,0.0002314206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000444329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004820073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001990721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958792,0.00004185323,0.0009492529,0.0005734662,0.002368971,0.0001872995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937398,0.00170147,0.0003833798,0.0005341902,0.003469952,0.0001711947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001400468,0.0008063802,0.7151518,0.0000515618,0.00002521915,0.000007017143,0.001952549,0.0001385549,0.01166826,0.03014119,0.007680716,0.2322367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001777648,0.0003094625,0.8145102,0.0002626299,0.0001276666,0.00006620827,0.002545171,0.0001368879,0.00866717,0.1348003,0.0361392,0.0006575148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959916,0.0003319652,0.001054461,0.0001671025,0.0007876543,0.0002599924,0.00002314817,0.00004915467,0.001334933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937312,0.0002438065,0.004440813,0.000144956,0.00009569023,0.000021522,0.0000325369,0.00002499046,0.001264472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2315792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122342105","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.06.001","title":"The effect of conspicuous consumption on men’s testosterone levels","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Testosterone (patch); Psychology; Conspicuous consumption; Consumption (sociology); Set (abstract data type); Social psychology; Mechanism (biology); Developmental psychology; Endocrinology; Sociology; Medicine; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03043798671689121,"gpt":0.3560218440890212,"spread":0.32558385737213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002794792,0.0001954558,0.0002190856,0.000128551,0.0007326436,0.00004569612,0.0002223625,0.0001500914,0.002453396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001403961,0.0001368378,0.00003177346,0.000187283,0.0003209095,0.00009445506,0.0000257238,0.0001661793,0.000172772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002402951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002692745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002437413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008403995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998664,0.00009480643,0.0003952258,0.000357099,0.0002940856,0.000194783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985253,0.00069365,0.0001761982,0.0002867824,0.0002484387,0.00006965976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006208314,0.0008591503,0.8721308,0.00003924398,0.00003568994,0.00003031689,0.0006536681,0.00000215981,0.005958184,0.08990918,0.008399302,0.02136149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001335452,0.001808252,0.9920126,0.0000563025,0.0001021749,0.00007936917,0.00003723797,1.207556e-7,0.001667793,0.002268637,0.0004789633,0.0001531161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961215,0.0008753035,0.00007927803,0.0001307287,0.0002017556,0.0003851548,0.00003796354,0.00006023934,0.002108095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975852,0.00003665718,0.00004307197,0.0001011302,0.00006297586,0.00005043512,0.00004315775,0.00001862509,0.002058695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1198818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168350273","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.01.001","title":"An exploratory field experiment of the effect of subconscious and conscious goals on employee performance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subconscious; Psychology; Brainstorming; Social psychology; Goal setting; Task (project management); Control (management); Applied psychology; Marketing; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02368480251436728,"gpt":0.3713223413354138,"spread":0.3476375388210465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001435473,0.0001216794,0.0001907077,0.00009104897,0.0002187355,0.00001800771,0.000154312,0.00008462789,0.0006053921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000597548,0.00008459484,0.00002702073,0.0001974695,0.0001154962,0.0001101288,0.00002618012,0.00009080335,0.000004407804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000100412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003894563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001080636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001881505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990541,0.00006194909,0.000342765,0.0002177662,0.0002076728,0.0001157476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992192,0.0001343447,0.0001362802,0.0002259434,0.0002076681,0.00007657534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001761462,0.0004750848,0.973123,0.00004953435,0.000004729206,0.000001786317,0.001178279,7.443069e-7,0.005930065,0.001420544,0.0006463191,0.01699384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007926829,0.00482849,0.9027082,0.0001551831,0.00004711082,0.00001241574,0.0001271094,2.649676e-7,0.09102833,0.0001557502,0.00004010363,0.000104344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988574,0.0005135299,0.00001600334,0.00003596281,0.0001221202,0.0002931032,0.00001808135,0.00001850807,0.0001252905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996625,0.00002672412,0.00002828147,0.0001121395,0.00002179798,0.00003020136,0.000009706991,0.00001119074,0.00009750966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08509827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6628619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169848230","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.02.003","title":"Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; McGill University; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Operationalization; Psychology; Test (biology); Empirical research; Econometrics; Dispersion (optics); Social psychology; Statistics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.40184467338185,"gpt":0.5088002697968736,"spread":0.1069555964150236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004307048,0.0002216408,0.0003948362,0.004664782,0.0009906635,0.002741964,0.001575697,0.000160117,0.001849994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0967619,0.0001295475,0.00003839271,0.02314911,0.0003499124,0.0006968097,0.002645063,0.0003030376,0.00003366329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000885854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005102222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004168792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006546141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914078,0.0002453121,0.001032568,0.001273194,0.005721848,0.000319352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757494,0.01931166,0.0002349076,0.001041717,0.003244308,0.0004180013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003350879,0.0007446285,0.9731975,0.000007814864,0.000008005637,0.00005557182,0.0004119231,0.000005302762,0.001100025,0.0006381309,0.008298753,0.01549883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00108502,0.00007955969,0.9818957,0.00004186965,0.00003116783,0.00006938494,0.0006185091,0.0002754102,0.0005890341,0.01051839,0.00458525,0.0002106923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923694,0.002055703,0.0004571505,0.00422283,0.0000901392,0.0002723518,0.0004184658,0.00001517854,0.00009876007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995685,0.001079856,0.0009908184,0.0004885405,0.00007953961,0.00001550495,0.0002769124,0.00001785952,0.00136591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09245486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054821576","doi":"10.1016/s0749-5978(03)00089-x","title":"Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Procrastination; Psychology; Focus (optics); Optimism; Task (project management); Trait; Neglect; Personality; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive bias; Optimism bias; Cognition; Big Five personality traits; Social psychology; Debiasing; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03458387996993406,"gpt":0.3303503047046937,"spread":0.2957664247347597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009746578,0.0001817928,0.0002911722,0.0002975454,0.0005064013,0.0003042254,0.0003574213,0.0001322722,0.001506443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001541714,0.0001249288,0.00003770901,0.0009211979,0.0002338668,0.000345928,0.0001180473,0.0001721226,0.00002281739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002931645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001629977,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001008848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003036084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976955,0.00008247643,0.000762776,0.0005073722,0.0007865489,0.0001653026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977692,0.0008910641,0.0002474158,0.0003085586,0.0006754203,0.0001083653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003660544,0.0003980504,0.9569635,0.000009070671,0.000009360638,0.000007455756,0.001559423,0.0003780324,0.0003865349,0.009208601,0.001368223,0.02967515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009006897,0.0002227692,0.7412224,0.0001231559,0.0001146523,0.0002438932,0.003226598,0.0002311667,0.0005750311,0.2402962,0.01250397,0.0003394315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961615,0.001398149,0.0005046978,0.00009727805,0.0001283002,0.0002145939,0.0001216315,0.00002743253,0.001346369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987891,0.00005758025,0.0006570072,0.00002650248,0.00008066562,0.00001995221,0.00001676113,0.0000189092,0.0003334607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2310876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047047857","doi":"10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00017-1","title":"Goal assignment and performance: Assessing the mediating roles of goal commitment and self-efficacy and the moderating role of power distance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Self-efficacy; Social psychology; Multilevel model; Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory; Structural equation modeling; Dimension (graph theory); Goal setting; Moderation; Power (physics); Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02893640151490188,"gpt":0.3237306559353363,"spread":0.2947942544204344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001623477,0.0001189869,0.0001796784,0.00002574496,0.0005109553,0.0001334458,0.00008567766,0.0000445897,0.0001852655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007091861,0.00006372252,0.00001041994,0.0001013987,0.0002455759,0.000146712,0.0000887302,0.00008200148,3.708407e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000066235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009182643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006346097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008266668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991285,0.00004697352,0.0002928242,0.0001912237,0.0002434247,0.00009708396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991628,0.0003761121,0.0001763681,0.00008958571,0.000160323,0.0000348228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004397788,0.0005401495,0.9271863,0.00009083803,0.00004579511,8.018702e-7,0.02789629,0.000009147218,0.002133146,0.01376362,0.0000786809,0.02821124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001187009,0.0001347026,0.9919087,0.00009282554,0.00009148874,0.00001818818,0.004644215,0.0004103193,0.0004977224,0.0008601763,0.0000469832,0.0001076352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952485,0.004108104,0.00009780227,0.00007398136,0.0000242968,0.0002074619,0.00001279377,0.00001064303,0.0002163985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992496,0.0003955463,0.0002147627,0.00002463584,0.00002555303,0.00001651353,0.000007838278,0.000009628321,0.0000558937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06472242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3929906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411098340","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.004","title":"Big picture is better: The social implications of construal level for advice taking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Psychology; Reputation; Social psychology; Self construal; Advice (programming); Interdependence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08118225863232126,"gpt":0.3704155334995473,"spread":0.2892332748672261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001915841,0.00007521905,0.00009571583,0.00006379938,0.001534057,0.00009027567,0.0002476118,0.0000513015,0.0005881951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003549053,0.00004775095,0.00002610156,0.000308055,0.0002463133,0.0001367394,0.00007404937,0.00003016553,0.000004686826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001981762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001176152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001212416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003140019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992633,0.00001567906,0.0001968344,0.0001735981,0.0002264949,0.0001240269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998746,0.0003034376,0.0001478184,0.00007577768,0.0006963029,0.0000306998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001283391,0.0001294737,0.5759975,0.0000567301,0.00002347813,2.530136e-7,0.01286712,7.624758e-8,0.002750538,0.2516106,0.007742942,0.1488084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009728814,0.00004356507,0.8692679,0.0001113839,0.0001844257,0.000001538718,0.004025263,4.807355e-7,0.002152279,0.06863085,0.05429352,0.0003158975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741791,0.0001347255,0.01557034,0.004947516,0.0001589258,0.0005701397,0.0002223592,0.00007557363,0.004141316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976477,0.00002300258,0.0003847448,0.0002020514,0.0002666242,0.00003649355,0.0000127778,0.00001138239,0.00141522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2932704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072436783","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.005","title":"Intergroup trust and reciprocity in strategic interactions: Effects of group decision-making mechanisms","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Psychology; Social psychology; Group decision-making; Mechanism (biology); Dictator game; Social dilemma; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02912733385876866,"gpt":0.3365004001285343,"spread":0.3073730662697657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001840693,0.0001547534,0.0002605034,0.0002229237,0.0007402705,0.00007567107,0.0001646322,0.00008478226,0.0002238971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003381593,0.0001552955,0.0000235657,0.0004295749,0.0003288388,0.0004930077,0.0001525012,0.0001155468,0.000004203193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001102507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008966213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001826342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001893977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987488,0.0000401567,0.0004141753,0.0003459117,0.0002823903,0.0001685378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989084,0.0005345581,0.000155876,0.00009284991,0.0002352064,0.00007310523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001026859,0.001086441,0.8325014,0.0001209548,0.00001815977,0.00005805807,0.01713651,0.000002383664,0.01345459,0.128566,0.00007431453,0.00687852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002145243,0.0005756367,0.7119858,0.001434598,0.0001125749,0.00007879002,0.01672535,0.000008324077,0.01051718,0.255366,0.0001445998,0.0009058719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977,0.0005640865,0.0006875523,0.00001818528,0.0001511513,0.0003172249,0.000006704752,0.0000320558,0.0005230778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955805,0.0006471387,0.003578276,0.00002990306,0.00003103791,0.00004909681,0.000007612535,0.00001926642,0.00005717777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6332768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1749836545","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.12.002","title":"Mere exposure affects perceived descriptive norms: Implications for personal preferences and trust","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Social psychology; Perception; Social connectedness; Interpersonal communication; Preference; Affect (linguistics); Norm (philosophy); Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1334038372881627,"gpt":0.3791108878982824,"spread":0.2457070506101197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000807598,0.0001721973,0.0001832724,0.00007174708,0.0004160107,0.0001683468,0.000119141,0.00010684,0.0006120164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001745614,0.0001277785,0.0000226517,0.0001875819,0.0001266128,0.000220762,0.00004903117,0.0000695511,0.00001093927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002148016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000808301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002320245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001170751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990751,0.00002256003,0.0001817757,0.0003933209,0.0001646385,0.000162604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988144,0.0001397681,0.00008170865,0.00008263608,0.0007193865,0.0001620704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000750542,0.0002566569,0.9566976,0.00004511302,0.00002825831,0.000001063717,0.01673228,1.354593e-7,0.001503734,0.0110717,0.004409452,0.009178977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008230642,0.0003820778,0.9839961,0.00003539013,0.0000931875,0.0000330899,0.005637293,0.000001698966,0.00005761503,0.008290343,0.0004550596,0.0001950603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975318,0.000942307,0.0003035669,0.000143696,0.0001026121,0.0004077395,0.0001581701,0.00004943664,0.0003606982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975601,0.00005123896,0.0004104596,0.00005689762,0.000107342,0.0001789174,0.0002158461,0.0000199792,0.001399171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02729854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.670115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015848817","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.09.001","title":"What fair procedures say about me: Self-construals and reactions to procedural fairness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Construals; Psychology; Social psychology; Interdependence; Identity (music); Outcome (game theory); Self construal; Construal level theory; Independence (probability theory); Self; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03447805462571547,"gpt":0.3685180949037773,"spread":0.3340400402780619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001920633,0.0002571266,0.0002418969,0.0002025466,0.000610756,0.0004840486,0.0001780992,0.0001541693,0.001510049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002549964,0.0002035559,0.00002524002,0.0005934534,0.0001103703,0.0006315546,0.00009791021,0.0001296249,0.00005971466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002918995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009326365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002393475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002460227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982995,0.00001852607,0.000455462,0.0005700073,0.0003532596,0.0003032043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985591,0.0001841316,0.0001256676,0.0001558807,0.0007289723,0.0002462327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001996732,0.001349712,0.8485431,0.0005040288,0.0001012077,0.00004351286,0.02625234,0.000001953078,0.01184591,0.0770872,0.00991087,0.02416049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005221115,0.0001652165,0.9828176,0.0002458636,0.00009381124,0.0002584717,0.007067115,3.405748e-7,0.00163168,0.003663605,0.003145745,0.0003884572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969938,0.0008513419,0.0004252812,0.0002911205,0.0003321791,0.0004936425,0.0000229892,0.0001710415,0.0004185569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953963,0.000199638,0.0007912319,0.0003685602,0.0001660077,0.00006874082,0.0000697623,0.00003494092,0.002904775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1342745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040619016","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.05.002","title":"Man up and take it: Gender bias in moral typecasting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Harm; Joke; Harassment; Social psychology; Cognitive bias; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2042021700704595,"gpt":0.3954427018876451,"spread":0.1912405318171856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001292258,0.00008156768,0.0001150366,0.00005819827,0.0004031732,0.000107312,0.0001078197,0.00008266145,0.001352631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006263939,0.00007836353,0.000009913741,0.0004390074,0.000151033,0.0001834436,0.00005443317,0.00008495831,0.00002023683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001555624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000737529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000640853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005415101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99918,0.0000337217,0.0001883168,0.0002405192,0.000221452,0.0001360291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995154,0.0000981359,0.00005127196,0.00003469915,0.0001943538,0.0001061607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001749903,0.00006803442,0.9467285,0.00002052536,0.000003421178,0.00001169927,0.02360153,4.853671e-7,0.0004232349,0.02209927,0.002928576,0.004097193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000712599,0.00009526458,0.9651972,0.00004118233,0.000027108,0.000007317119,0.009887859,0.000003618767,0.0001075406,0.01250888,0.01113429,0.0002771454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947824,0.0001847974,0.00009632981,0.001121004,0.0001055606,0.0001102027,0.000005612905,0.00003552803,0.003558559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982091,0.00008980322,0.0001603683,0.0009380319,0.0001776204,0.000006447015,0.0000117154,0.00001225038,0.0003946463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01846866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091293017","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002","title":"Creative destruction in science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"California State University, Fresno; Harvard Kennedy School; University of California, Santa Barbara; Technische Universität Dortmund; Singapore Management University; Universität Kassel; Universität Konstanz; Stockholms Universitet; School of Psychology, Cardiff University; Universidade Federal de Sergipe; Universiteit van Tilburg; Syddansk Universitet; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Università degli Studi dell'Insubria; Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; Universitetet i Bergen; Linköpings Universitet; KU Leuven; Universiteit Maastricht; Université de Genève; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Radboud Universiteit; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Warwick; Trinity College Dublin; University of Otago; Northern Illinois University; University of Limerick; Technische Universiteit Eindhoven; University of Auckland; Universidad de Alicante; Cardiff University; Ariel University; De Montfort University; University of Toronto; Macquarie University; University of Alberta; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Chittagong; Technion-Israel Institute of Technology; Universidad de La Laguna; Trinity Western University; Universität Wien; American University of Sharjah; Slovenská Akadémia Vied; Toulouse School of Economics; Central Queensland University; Univerzita Karlova v Praze; University College Dublin; University of Essex; Carnegie Mellon University; Western Kentucky University; Kingston University; University of Regina; King's College London; Indian Institute of Technology Delhi; Universiteit Gent; Georgia Southern University; Louisiana State University; Lunds Universitet; Pennsylvania State University; University of Cincinnati; Karolinska Institutet; Yale University; University of Queensland; Emory University; Tulane University; National University of Singapore; Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg; University of Texas at Austin; Loyola University Chicago; International Research and Exchanges Board; Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach; University of Washington; Loughborough University; Uniwersytet Wrocławski; Technische Universität Dresden; University of Pennsylvania; National Research University Higher School of Economics; Umeå Universitet; University of Denver; Fordham University; University of Oxford; Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse; Florida State University; York University; University of Missouri","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2942668498997326,"gpt":0.4532838181846081,"spread":0.1590169682848755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000218026,0.00005698573,0.00006990266,0.0001142117,0.0008882321,0.000159206,0.0001970071,0.00004040915,0.002324267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008390835,0.00005812071,0.000006564981,0.001268771,0.0003968212,0.0004542759,0.0000675542,0.00006488076,0.00002695794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006287957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002067735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001097646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007606817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991881,0.00002914712,0.0001463626,0.0001933974,0.0003385139,0.0001045204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992576,0.00006008775,0.00004721736,0.00006416741,0.0004609463,0.0001099969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002896763,0.0002060609,0.8010103,0.00003287749,0.000001438793,0.000002950447,0.08434745,0.000005203575,0.01045697,0.07244998,0.0002626716,0.03119511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000466296,0.00006177339,0.9691547,0.00005834807,0.00001414643,0.000002866912,0.01561454,0.00001018806,0.0007632177,0.007542635,0.006083554,0.0002277607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924269,0.00006859961,0.0001974683,0.0008505946,0.00003255038,0.0001472275,0.000005034856,0.00004837969,0.006223293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985074,0.0006591313,0.0004637742,0.0001911212,0.00006308122,0.00001130077,0.00002205163,0.000006579225,0.00007556154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1681444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115767181","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.01.003","title":"Reputational and cooperative benefits of third-party compensation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Compensation (psychology); Social psychology; Punishment (psychology); Narcissism; Third party; Machiavellianism; Injustice; Trait; Psychopathy; Personality; Internet privacy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07928856821865791,"gpt":0.3127925481996657,"spread":0.2335039799810078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006856026,0.00009554084,0.0001297062,0.00006241725,0.0003096691,0.00005091,0.00006422731,0.00005043821,0.0004708127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000505529,0.00008578915,0.00001149888,0.0003016723,0.0001614832,0.0002088207,0.00006830713,0.00004800309,0.000008875948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008948599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008549185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001228082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008024364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989874,0.00003179642,0.000243474,0.0003365625,0.000320692,0.00008003661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989484,0.0002313821,0.00008777892,0.00007119309,0.0006050925,0.00005616258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009363223,0.001328407,0.2202318,0.000120702,0.00001401236,0.00003698594,0.001101048,0.000275827,0.4241721,0.3458756,0.001495136,0.005254748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007040082,0.000106892,0.7652478,0.00007437973,0.00002933013,0.0001979444,0.00009447319,0.000009811307,0.2211316,0.0119918,0.0002483802,0.0001635396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984873,0.0002378394,0.0002833904,0.0003149908,0.00006375298,0.00009006557,0.00005884728,0.00001942588,0.0004444113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983448,0.0001598249,0.0006537731,0.0003764655,0.00002993738,0.000007825432,0.00008271883,0.000008774859,0.0003359063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5450161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5155069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988224984","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.07.002","title":"The hungry thief: Physiological deprivation and its effects on unethical behavior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Social psychology; Reinforcement; Context (archaeology); Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06386560107190511,"gpt":0.3136378409673594,"spread":0.2497722398954542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001915568,0.0001595443,0.0001325944,0.00005532009,0.001114539,0.0001197185,0.0002055304,0.0001273549,0.00007570025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001560506,0.0001017567,0.00001862846,0.0002161284,0.0001861451,0.0001266283,0.0001099425,0.0002064631,0.0000528202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001313543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001986416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.470087e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001636529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986033,0.00009315499,0.0002154355,0.0004704741,0.0004444692,0.0001731018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985052,0.00103389,0.00007770478,0.0001252098,0.0001592705,0.00009868055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001616917,0.001153737,0.04881346,0.00008309889,0.000006074908,0.00002498253,0.0001504433,0.000009407762,0.5613656,0.3487943,0.001576945,0.0378603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005956312,0.0004483619,0.9089409,0.00005317134,0.00003298514,0.00004594862,0.000007122271,0.00001237762,0.06780667,0.02078428,0.001070684,0.0002018702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984718,0.00008227177,0.0001268333,0.0007060662,0.0001503271,0.0002593201,0.000005315207,0.0000582437,0.0001398399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980298,0.0001519678,0.00006919022,0.001323224,0.000126421,0.00006012217,0.00001529212,0.00001511187,0.0002089288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8601274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8572242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011918826","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.01.010","title":"Authenticity at work: Its shapes, triggers, and consequences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intrapersonal communication; Psychology; Humility; Situational ethics; Social psychology; Identity (music); Foundation (evidence); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Empirical research; Interpersonal communication; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03465025736169756,"gpt":0.2627648845013226,"spread":0.228114627139625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008558539,0.00021283,0.0002084235,0.0001373255,0.0005984535,0.0004585476,0.0001518305,0.00008984144,0.005417421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004670034,0.0001943841,0.00002121493,0.0009058726,0.0001483227,0.0008419795,0.0002418328,0.00009803929,0.0002932959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002333818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005274698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001090042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002504306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986212,0.000006998874,0.0003332506,0.0004406528,0.000424581,0.0001733636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990196,0.00007431256,0.0001467334,0.00006465276,0.0006282957,0.00006637991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004522535,0.00008669691,0.9676627,0.0001259809,0.000009154596,0.00001628052,0.0001800465,0.000002759273,0.004400033,0.02217322,0.004013661,0.001284246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00111858,0.00002790981,0.9750746,0.00007024173,0.000223554,0.0000252716,0.0001860881,0.00001653184,0.001303663,0.002074048,0.0193509,0.0005286014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969244,0.0005804451,0.0002024522,0.001342653,0.00007811506,0.0002720001,0.00002095387,0.00017407,0.0004049123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968697,0.00006327724,0.000167253,0.001969483,0.0002544102,0.00001387824,0.0001153374,0.00003937117,0.0005072763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02009917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945717469","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.06.002","title":"The gravitational pull of expressing passion: When and how expressing passion elicits status conferral and support from others","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Intrapersonal communication; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02848526771900625,"gpt":0.3093627914269143,"spread":0.2808775237079081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001747482,0.0001911304,0.0002279301,0.00009951371,0.0004842438,0.0002687069,0.0001202766,0.0001327784,0.003508087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000148169,0.0001410158,0.00002041172,0.0001424841,0.0002210526,0.0003288697,0.00008706343,0.0001248281,0.000006628776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001067155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009429406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001656242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001021447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984999,0.00005883084,0.0003480368,0.0004386114,0.0004432147,0.0002113473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983999,0.0004749339,0.0002866827,0.0001952341,0.0005092379,0.0001340143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009460697,0.0001322029,0.9585478,0.0000327408,0.00002134253,0.000005087644,0.006597643,0.000001367033,0.006430889,0.007104159,0.004258121,0.01677408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001277157,0.0001266319,0.9730024,0.0001741246,0.00004345286,0.0000178636,0.004585141,0.000003112912,0.001592462,0.007004162,0.01189443,0.0002791101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972729,0.0006075177,0.0006748182,0.0003189262,0.0002202141,0.0002618422,0.00006856414,0.00003067194,0.0005445582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964589,0.00009655337,0.0007793205,0.000189487,0.00007136587,0.00002176335,0.0002263867,0.00003406491,0.002122154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01649497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023449517","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.005","title":"Rethinking reappraisal: The double-edged sword of regulating negative emotions in the workplace","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Cognitive reappraisal; Psychology; Social psychology; Control (management); Task (project management); Cognition; Burnout; Management; Clinical psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07193674624577125,"gpt":0.37297425529245,"spread":0.3010375090466788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008857706,0.0001110642,0.0001413844,0.00006501652,0.001740788,0.0001317583,0.0004975018,0.00009597925,0.0003358366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003063469,0.00007226568,0.000024709,0.001558531,0.0004061651,0.000288753,0.0001102603,0.0002785071,0.000005203488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001935064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003209412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008400375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001143535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982337,0.0002331279,0.0003457096,0.0002513807,0.0007777932,0.0001582685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969642,0.001888796,0.0002030958,0.0001451108,0.0007365447,0.00006229305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004823457,0.0001782101,0.1302209,0.00004072061,0.000009059746,0.000003545377,0.1702616,0.00006518798,0.0005901751,0.6961323,0.001621214,0.0008288474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001447376,0.00009578915,0.7725872,0.0005972637,0.0001268979,0.000007670333,0.05280217,0.00001455023,0.0006411102,0.1665334,0.004747972,0.0003986484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.979085,0.0001262917,0.0004156319,0.0138633,0.0001101138,0.0005747356,0.00001576931,0.00005791302,0.005751256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980682,0.0000462943,0.001024991,0.0003844346,0.0001582606,0.00002826441,0.00002129976,0.0000168144,0.0002514931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6423662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123780659","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.002","title":"Short horizons and tempting situations: Lack of continuity to our future selves leads to unethical decision making and behavior","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Social psychology; Cheating; Psychology; Negotiation; Trait; Personality; Identity (music); Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1405097730741749,"gpt":0.3742440053394004,"spread":0.2337342322652255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002236759,0.0001874042,0.0002428211,0.0002177617,0.0004601395,0.00008179538,0.0001867517,0.0001344016,0.00008395126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006512695,0.0001644755,0.00001941433,0.0004580688,0.00009479655,0.000224793,0.000233584,0.0001500802,0.00001100385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001617489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003834643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003140349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004116142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983537,0.00003466832,0.0003983682,0.0005778265,0.0004511042,0.0001843721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990613,0.0001670536,0.00007985617,0.0001413866,0.0003624281,0.0001880153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001854075,0.0008934637,0.8171886,0.00007623062,0.000005428835,0.00003130969,0.002608827,0.000003525826,0.1214899,0.008112491,0.0008043076,0.04860055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000282331,0.0002831774,0.9825237,0.000170968,0.00006711766,0.00008801141,0.000418777,8.161743e-7,0.01260098,0.003262975,0.0000806215,0.0002205741],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973875,0.00007803086,0.001508045,0.0003487675,0.0001371027,0.0003792895,0.00004740985,0.00003975572,0.000074045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911355,0.00006158868,0.008151416,0.0004304104,0.00008792873,0.00003609493,0.00000796792,0.00002146656,0.00006761276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1653351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6707115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278734235","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.02.002","title":"Can peers’ ethical and transformational leadership improve coworkers’ service quality? A latent growth analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Psychology; Normative; Social psychology; Service (business); Leadership style; Service quality; Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Business; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04243790523907523,"gpt":0.2839891249702708,"spread":0.2415512197311956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003222455,0.0002639439,0.0002981433,0.000503279,0.0005971909,0.000422788,0.0001780368,0.0002286412,0.002431558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004232567,0.0001999481,0.00005170787,0.001789174,0.0001318458,0.0009481143,0.00009783403,0.0001821564,0.00007452242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004768377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009589107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001541448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008007151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979649,0.00001930621,0.0005348416,0.0004836626,0.0007501433,0.000247185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975005,0.000218824,0.0001890927,0.0001381457,0.001884133,0.00006928966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003643004,0.0001066505,0.9261527,0.0001442659,0.00006066197,0.000003064871,0.0002932098,0.00000188625,0.003006182,0.06844436,0.0003234909,0.001427071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00113642,0.00001433869,0.990905,0.00005991884,0.0006237206,0.00000816834,0.0003770659,0.000007259729,0.0003958609,0.005393319,0.000691372,0.0003874985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98066,0.00008086817,0.003231481,0.015183,0.0001154454,0.0003148266,0.00009859705,0.0001688066,0.0001469505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940643,0.00003091299,0.0002381353,0.004814297,0.0001927559,0.00002829479,0.0002780966,0.00004073214,0.0003124849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06475233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979469729","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.10.001","title":"History backfires: Reminders of past injustices against women undermine support for workplace policies promoting women","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Injustice; Denial; Disadvantaged; Social identity theory; System justification; Psychology; Equity (law); Identity (music); Social psychology; Rhetoric; Public policy; Social group; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05360309982985568,"gpt":0.3073166135925006,"spread":0.2537135137626449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006424131,0.0001224713,0.000217298,0.0001344593,0.0004758627,0.0000645977,0.0002564937,0.000106051,0.001894433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004786933,0.0001250256,0.00002291213,0.0003102815,0.000224813,0.0003838985,0.00009016956,0.00006590378,0.00001169396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000378363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005667568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003624307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009674286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986048,0.00003745882,0.0003015197,0.0002806581,0.0004786305,0.0002969872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985734,0.0002793481,0.0002213428,0.0001156339,0.0006692952,0.000140935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001049981,0.0005674155,0.7127185,0.0009747474,0.00003511773,0.000002149158,0.2659965,0.000009721352,0.002163476,0.01160246,0.003658553,0.002166288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004163509,0.001302259,0.4156986,0.0005820502,0.0002149203,0.000005691168,0.4533074,0.000008163111,0.002115959,0.01534818,0.1056727,0.001580509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967693,0.00006516692,0.0001005986,0.00007950119,0.0001290215,0.0003734204,0.00003520969,0.0000377055,0.002410094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942862,0.00005775979,0.0002311135,0.000138473,0.00008069541,0.0000254035,0.0000507145,0.00001555755,0.005114126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.29702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030503897","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.11.004","title":"Unfairness begets unfairness: Victim derogation bias in employee ratings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Derogation; Psychology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Job performance; Identity (music); Job satisfaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03981663994385404,"gpt":0.3421642891389443,"spread":0.3023476491950903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004712319,0.0001910433,0.0002481279,0.0001983088,0.001153456,0.0002572569,0.0002370915,0.0001269705,0.0004251028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007175503,0.0001978257,0.00002463301,0.0006002152,0.0002806054,0.0005927706,0.0001269798,0.0001089742,0.00003536449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001512575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001587581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007192009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007011257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983886,0.00007966654,0.0004410424,0.0004297783,0.0004022552,0.0002586299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988576,0.0002795801,0.0001540252,0.0001284208,0.0004661677,0.0001142056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008135564,0.0001649306,0.9673088,0.00001653652,0.000002940957,0.00000221262,0.01099496,0.000005918831,0.000606562,0.01905302,0.000102875,0.001733138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001555445,0.0001774809,0.9452687,0.0002203323,0.00006984548,0.000006774605,0.01588117,0.000006406266,0.007478126,0.02599967,0.002523398,0.000812661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970623,0.000176587,0.0001887497,0.0001737478,0.0001370883,0.000309318,0.000008711641,0.00009809848,0.001845358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986005,0.00009840219,0.0006679316,0.0001022612,0.0001074078,0.00007713704,0.00006957975,0.00003304403,0.0002437442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0220401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.887157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944437944","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.05.001","title":"Being sensitive to positives has its negatives: An approach/avoidance perspective on reactivity to ostracism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Ostracism; Psychology; Temperament; Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Developmental psychology; Norm (philosophy); Personality","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02671998305457454,"gpt":0.3418846095510373,"spread":0.3151646264964628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001968492,0.0002565128,0.0002789402,0.000208129,0.0007710974,0.000189559,0.0001870851,0.0001575621,0.0005434756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003603396,0.0002500617,0.0000350592,0.0006645326,0.00007189911,0.0004124403,0.0001122177,0.0002193555,0.0004313383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001214352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001120206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005100083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003166668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981066,0.00009833967,0.0002354081,0.0008386234,0.0004513008,0.0002697059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981304,0.0002494668,0.00008759704,0.0002250766,0.001039396,0.0002680754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001772144,0.004888485,0.0516177,0.00008291449,0.00009794026,0.0001181016,0.267188,0.0001344911,0.08505476,0.57371,0.0008334526,0.01450195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008944583,0.001163797,0.9596921,0.000157726,0.00005774804,0.00004834211,0.02196391,0.000003243304,0.01012207,0.0047933,0.0004647493,0.0006385086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805691,0.00002799842,0.00171086,0.0002778639,0.0001641159,0.0007864747,0.00007793073,0.00008564569,0.0163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959207,0.000005422009,0.0008659942,0.0007521786,0.0001561295,0.00004861561,0.00007715381,0.00004857361,0.002125243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9080744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068574046","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.004","title":"Location in negotiation: Is there a home field advantage?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Singapore Management University; Lee Foundation","keywords":"Negotiation; Visitor pattern; Disadvantage; Psychology; Space (punctuation); Social psychology; Intervention (counseling); Field (mathematics); Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01672252414758224,"gpt":0.3600233846835948,"spread":0.3433008605360126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002216681,0.00008462595,0.00009744449,0.0001074793,0.0005856741,0.0001111935,0.0002117377,0.0001712883,0.002596224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006350904,0.00008804398,0.00001059541,0.0006918141,0.000195775,0.0004420434,0.00003179649,0.0001746466,0.00004943327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002252337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002076022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001501696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003200129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990796,0.00002311914,0.0002018184,0.000240567,0.0003121848,0.0001427454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990411,0.0001996084,0.00007666452,0.0001029984,0.0005092288,0.00007040498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000727715,0.0001334114,0.9601973,0.0000130793,0.000001720779,0.000004143973,0.005765156,4.060443e-7,0.0009774093,0.02812196,0.0007263009,0.004051794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003270379,0.00004054262,0.9593847,0.0000444314,0.00001129951,0.000003587561,0.001560199,3.408731e-7,0.0006015148,0.03355312,0.00429401,0.0001792549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995808,0.0001845302,0.0002266083,0.001195578,0.0002062452,0.0001681705,0.000003546915,0.00004652276,0.002160814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982538,0.0001092134,0.0004336253,0.0004955473,0.0001425286,0.00001956705,0.000008682323,0.0000109841,0.0005260406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005431158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057943930","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.003","title":"Do I want to know? How the motivation to acquire relationship-threatening information in groups contributes to paranoid thought, suspicion behavior, and social rejection","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Attribution; Social cognition; Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Cognition; Anger; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04974545921882258,"gpt":0.3261371016521119,"spread":0.2763916424332893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004919553,0.0001472561,0.0001690507,0.0003388936,0.00154841,0.0003143568,0.0001863093,0.0001718888,0.0001205469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001021904,0.0001246747,0.00002046092,0.001207003,0.0001143232,0.0008497144,0.00009108165,0.0001210917,0.00002315725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001203063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007072443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001986645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001346823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986982,0.00009639641,0.0003435127,0.0002786039,0.0003554735,0.0002278156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988251,0.0001646621,0.0001116275,0.00008935583,0.0007106357,0.00009858105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001129645,0.0001516136,0.8323427,0.0000136415,0.000005068055,0.000001570858,0.07509303,0.000001881999,0.0009525596,0.07874734,0.001393307,0.01118426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003247161,0.0001287905,0.9821938,0.00005607651,0.00003138558,0.000002431374,0.009401659,2.930224e-7,0.0003094104,0.004876448,0.002509051,0.000165886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922637,0.00005980203,0.00322811,0.00298482,0.0002236768,0.0008503982,0.00001362057,0.00005728637,0.0003185391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985344,0.00003138478,0.0003305131,0.0004873861,0.0001340831,0.0002025871,0.00004742103,0.0000146843,0.0002175417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1498511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117723935","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.002","title":"Goal choices and planning: Distinct expectancy and value effects in two goal processes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Expectancy theory; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Goal setting; Social psychology; Goal orientation; Goal pursuit; Life expectancy; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Sociology; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02699594900612748,"gpt":0.3898238932968682,"spread":0.3628279442907407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000176513,0.0002330176,0.0002796336,0.0002241538,0.0004062704,0.0001485628,0.0001345631,0.0001050458,0.0004010033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004941848,0.0002097994,0.00001625488,0.0004407085,0.0001518718,0.0002879079,0.00009021381,0.0001764721,0.00001480502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001929971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006503405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008522546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000289778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984513,0.00006536786,0.0004257229,0.0005439822,0.0002362358,0.0002774193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988316,0.0004122179,0.0001334164,0.0001417968,0.0002843583,0.0001966233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004684193,0.0003898946,0.9843853,0.0002543719,0.00000425833,0.00001542131,0.001056372,5.014689e-7,0.000120329,0.006755267,0.000230427,0.006741043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00159835,0.0003200032,0.9927065,0.0003798062,0.00005714495,0.0000599005,0.000235524,0.000004136136,0.0001588725,0.003693779,0.0005315068,0.0002544867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949437,0.003087573,0.0007222972,0.00003577441,0.0001928542,0.0003580596,0.00002008572,0.00006497502,0.000574698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987395,0.00003318571,0.000334645,0.00008604295,0.0001477293,0.0001355062,0.00006670474,0.0000373508,0.0004192992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008321218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8555372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037677868","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.09.001","title":"Perspectives on prediction: Does third-person imagery improve task completion estimates?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Fallacy; Neglect; Focus (optics); Cognitive bias; Cognition; Quality (philosophy); Mental image; Plan (archaeology); Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05754511247873817,"gpt":0.3568803890697421,"spread":0.299335276591004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001464749,0.0002218335,0.0002166198,0.0002206253,0.000625845,0.00008411719,0.0001730871,0.0001494923,0.01294101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001170691,0.0001777048,0.0000539973,0.0003212425,0.0001814575,0.0003029888,0.0000388163,0.0002100149,0.0002588158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005629625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005291682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007824011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002348762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984525,0.00003247614,0.0004010011,0.0005790536,0.0002842797,0.0002506333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987182,0.00007778498,0.0001659602,0.0002492568,0.000624357,0.0001644636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004694999,0.006403879,0.7835029,0.0001397682,0.00006311386,0.0000676779,0.02302163,3.719153e-7,0.004111491,0.1563178,0.01549461,0.01040728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007770392,0.0008331787,0.9883838,0.0001227995,0.0001032423,0.00004239133,0.004429042,0.000001436555,0.0009344334,0.003678204,0.0004274086,0.0002670077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898129,0.0005235942,0.001765654,0.00008146397,0.0007664894,0.0004761446,0.0003191212,0.000242371,0.006012243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961285,0.00002676569,0.00140415,0.0001034501,0.0001654389,0.0001401823,0.0001734305,0.00004355612,0.001814502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2048809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078002573","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2905","title":"Information Technology Support For Debiasing Group Judgments: An Empirical Evaluation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Debiasing; Psychology; Group (periodic table); Empirical research; Social psychology; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03521472714740092,"gpt":0.3851471276042106,"spread":0.3499324004568097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002818765,0.0001357788,0.0001304193,0.0002473128,0.0004319762,0.0001220708,0.0001583954,0.0001690472,0.009175569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008168488,0.0001296882,0.00001637435,0.0004496612,0.00006142658,0.0007701942,0.00002191028,0.00008380101,0.00009974994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004101845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008277987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004898788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002305052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988952,0.0000174433,0.0003739811,0.0002257406,0.0003075787,0.0001800293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999003,0.00005071761,0.00009734353,0.0001772988,0.0006043027,0.00006734858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001531152,0.0007037284,0.3991006,0.00004737672,0.00001854991,0.000001409195,0.002484475,0.00002264158,0.000206235,0.01383337,0.001741024,0.5816875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00373317,0.00123554,0.9325856,0.00006103441,0.0002402573,0.0001501557,0.001068374,0.0006701229,0.000180258,0.02286905,0.03656343,0.0006430153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919502,0.00005331104,0.006226325,0.00007961125,0.0001317181,0.000508195,0.00006030914,0.00009275938,0.0008975799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956646,0.0000207308,0.002143115,0.0002543801,0.00006821656,0.0002026292,0.001272868,0.0000221879,0.0003512937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5810444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917302,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884592515","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.07.002","title":"The embedding forces of network commitment: An examination of the psychological processes linking advice centrality and susceptibility to social influence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Embeddedness; Psychology; Social network (sociolinguistics); Normative; Social psychology; Personal network; Social media; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03195387287525941,"gpt":0.4153573579674378,"spread":0.3834034850921784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004816429,0.0001136871,0.0001353793,0.00003572377,0.001188598,0.00006393876,0.0002619775,0.0001135954,0.00009725469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002820992,0.00007067116,0.00001567658,0.0006170794,0.0004823379,0.0001682595,0.0001153418,0.0001023966,0.000001310464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001568082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003588408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006877056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002266315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998786,0.0001121301,0.0003889142,0.0002744048,0.000288785,0.0001497871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981875,0.0003721904,0.0002483166,0.0001741133,0.0009730462,0.00004487723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004394897,0.0002140346,0.9770374,0.00004596794,0.000008959102,1.47301e-7,0.004690222,0.00002040235,0.0001972104,0.01291082,0.0000442239,0.004786699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000215759,0.0001663003,0.9933563,0.00005449219,0.00004749167,0.000003260809,0.0006916331,0.00001228118,0.0001242319,0.005164613,0.0000784334,0.00008514463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983886,0.0001325126,0.0007227538,0.00007043402,0.0001028843,0.0003402412,0.00001800013,0.00002318488,0.0002013358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992931,0.00002203245,0.0003803574,0.00004840737,0.0001098641,0.0000174079,0.00002208083,0.00001091019,0.00009577307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01631899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9141858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306148656","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104192","title":"Using curiosity to incentivize the choice of “should” options","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Psychological and Educational Research Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Psychology; Incentive; Work (physics); Social psychology; Field (mathematics); Nudge theory; Economics; Microeconomics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2282061614124613,"gpt":0.4853280506973012,"spread":0.2571218892848399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002457685,0.00008721876,0.0001155677,0.0001079192,0.001259793,0.00003199533,0.0002851961,0.00002437037,0.007801887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004810847,0.00006252796,0.0000214679,0.0008468388,0.0001300345,0.00005797758,0.0003353535,0.0001409133,0.00001809579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003642635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008250214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005583984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001450365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988296,0.00006662835,0.0002157527,0.0002531066,0.0004848801,0.000150036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987978,0.0004736814,0.00007024394,0.0001524355,0.0004345956,0.00007127209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009754674,0.002558468,0.8929148,0.00003045193,0.00005700063,0.000006340572,0.003644896,0.00009083137,0.005476401,0.06962305,0.02179376,0.003706491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002205965,0.0001160264,0.9787692,0.00001010316,0.00003189335,0.0000149321,0.0009511759,5.957391e-7,0.00009847531,0.006740035,0.01294606,0.0001008455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967592,0.0006287774,0.0004570119,0.0007484576,0.0002001171,0.0002517235,0.00008590625,0.00001722234,0.0008516216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979955,0.00002181001,0.0003085787,0.0003531037,0.00007150004,0.0001244251,0.00002569166,0.00001033018,0.001089056],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08585451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123119462","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.07.008","title":"Defensive reactions to slim female images in advertising: The moderating role of mode of exposure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Coping (psychology); Mode (computer interface); Advertising; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02130536960055581,"gpt":0.2840938187693984,"spread":0.2627884491688426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001487807,0.0001028559,0.0001392937,0.000309227,0.0002424976,0.00009470239,0.0001302949,0.00004331903,0.0002726355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002858865,0.00008534526,0.0000228776,0.0007032338,0.00005367849,0.0007340169,0.00008712467,0.00006486578,0.00001491429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001156953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002619392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009832854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007081584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990441,0.000008545811,0.0004085138,0.0001603235,0.0002603349,0.0001182499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988114,0.00007697638,0.0001949241,0.0001484195,0.0007514188,0.00001683762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001798118,0.0002628933,0.9161922,0.00007839175,0.000003330804,2.291874e-7,0.0006934828,0.0000605584,0.06858367,0.005173737,0.0000858118,0.008847686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002466812,0.000004285219,0.9862114,0.00009930391,0.00007043614,0.000003134332,0.001188081,0.00001312852,0.01047282,0.0009904865,0.0005791159,0.0001211364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988673,0.0003051073,0.000247226,0.0000495381,0.00006507018,0.0002256199,0.000008913382,0.00001929341,0.0002119282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994195,0.00002074204,0.0002427559,0.0000536352,0.00006716995,0.00003496753,0.00003537527,0.00001619248,0.0001097242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07001917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3480279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093461983","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.008","title":"When vigilance prevails: The effect of regulatory focus and accountability on integrative negotiation outcomes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Vigilance (psychology); Negotiation; Accountability; Psychology; Regulatory focus theory; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00898429089182713,"gpt":0.2613197110738735,"spread":0.2523354201820464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003696139,0.0002153727,0.0002587335,0.0001505067,0.000436661,0.0002293131,0.0001657082,0.00007813601,0.0005565681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001031205,0.000133192,0.00002893165,0.0003652976,0.0001547287,0.0006905401,0.0001024423,0.0001107388,0.00002659047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000245075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002302356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005307966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001060452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987308,0.00003063146,0.0003435639,0.0003265154,0.0004554482,0.0001130815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984391,0.0005051557,0.0002327933,0.0002010215,0.0006034314,0.00001848816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003325769,0.00005384822,0.977968,0.0000897233,0.000006752898,1.73711e-7,0.0001159337,0.000003566448,0.0004107527,0.0169295,0.0003680933,0.004020414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006122317,0.00007106768,0.9903839,0.00007250161,0.000108965,0.000002123709,0.00007612,0.00001017737,0.002013127,0.005743578,0.0007510431,0.0001551646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982324,0.0001123099,0.0005414427,0.000253596,0.0001018449,0.0003954127,0.000007681,0.00006024848,0.0002950608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992899,0.000009378771,0.000072455,0.0002835467,0.0001279236,0.00003126778,0.00003777456,0.00002839685,0.0001194121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01241591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6094031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148627868","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.08.003","title":"Wolves in sheep’s clothing: How and when hypothetical questions influence behavior","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Clothing; Social psychology; Elaboration; Consumption (sociology); Voting; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1034600913415043,"gpt":0.3518660322923991,"spread":0.2484059409508948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009717865,0.0003286657,0.000459989,0.0007203977,0.0005351626,0.0009661409,0.0007227238,0.0002366894,0.001477852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003506667,0.0002708253,0.00005002635,0.0008655767,0.000462257,0.001288663,0.0003890804,0.0002814863,0.00008177682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005172553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001824144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005785345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002968862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966752,0.00007900901,0.0009344142,0.001004689,0.0009729353,0.0003337887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970465,0.0008463811,0.0002759938,0.0005047106,0.001030974,0.0002954747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003423575,0.0006494567,0.9154149,0.00000819281,0.000003132405,0.00006217616,0.001897461,0.000003489847,0.0007512363,0.006612429,0.0003909544,0.07417229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005244119,0.0001454154,0.829697,0.00009364144,0.00006434293,0.0001324528,0.0005753733,0.000007782687,0.0004412066,0.1668694,0.001043458,0.0004055242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997954,0.0002569911,0.0006896241,0.0001597272,0.0001412273,0.0003203186,0.00004240602,0.0000774761,0.0003582905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923432,0.00007725881,0.006804541,0.0001367511,0.00004008891,0.00006843124,0.00001251638,0.00004395553,0.0004732199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.160257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016480011","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.001","title":"Entrepreneurs and evolutionary biology: The relationship between testosterone and new venture creation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Testosterone (patch); Disposition; Psychology; Venture capital; Evolutionary theory; Social psychology; Entrepreneurship; Biology; Business; Epistemology; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03366384429202895,"gpt":0.2771020494358853,"spread":0.2434382051438563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007969506,0.0001301505,0.0001136454,0.000101551,0.0007926949,0.0002556394,0.00008663562,0.00006276411,0.00008183579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003599001,0.00009392908,0.00001050438,0.0003222321,0.0001565719,0.0005077908,0.0001424296,0.00007339723,0.00000863887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007708893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001987842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001629474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007048286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992383,0.000007385628,0.0002145293,0.0002768645,0.0001526855,0.0001101957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992591,0.0003223873,0.0001240181,0.00008795721,0.0001912337,0.00001532396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004116825,0.00002174414,0.9754494,0.00002378195,0.000002975721,4.648954e-7,0.00003484925,0.000002618658,0.0000670731,0.02158302,0.001595322,0.001214587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002372295,0.0000122533,0.9293261,0.00003885213,0.00008330405,0.000004052457,0.00006004062,8.966726e-7,0.00001536774,0.06730478,0.002811571,0.0001055534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958768,0.002376612,0.0001255808,0.001042415,0.00004346959,0.0001620485,0.000008486423,0.00004656422,0.0003180613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987125,0.00006147932,0.0001025283,0.0001744498,0.0005076528,0.000009932071,0.0001565478,0.00001235332,0.0002625247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04612334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6096849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313373035","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104208","title":"How conflict expressions affect recipients’ conflict management behaviors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Windsor","keywords":"Ambiguity; Psychology; Expression (computer science); Role conflict; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Conflict management; Facet (psychology); Forcing (mathematics); Group conflict; Communication; Computer science; Political science; Personality","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03582507723233724,"gpt":0.3257518668058452,"spread":0.289926789573508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004518079,0.0001869192,0.0001806063,0.0003367978,0.004149774,0.0005021661,0.0004272085,0.00006113761,0.002753895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001458161,0.0002014294,0.00004508506,0.0009608064,0.000160548,0.000477862,0.0004226734,0.0001533193,0.00001225671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001048407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001271945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001010208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001633563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977603,0.0001279088,0.000260557,0.0004764793,0.001089506,0.0002852651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990074,0.0001491445,0.0001697026,0.0002129961,0.0003081046,0.0001526476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001175354,0.002294451,0.4400311,0.0001228906,0.00009715064,0.0001159791,0.02407959,0.00003176303,0.004350012,0.4690021,0.0274875,0.03226996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001503419,0.0001592935,0.2470614,0.00006114873,0.000247365,0.000007140789,0.01240921,0.000002121986,0.0005163019,0.001274193,0.7361266,0.0006317858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869684,0.0004002199,0.0008503632,0.001023624,0.0004293279,0.001153559,0.00004995728,0.0002496449,0.008874903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774968,0.0003169235,0.0002380286,0.0001627505,0.00009562016,0.0003043186,0.0002032762,0.00003473469,0.02114757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7086391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990163669","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.11.004","title":"Lead the horse to water, but don’t make him drink: The effects of moral identity symbolization on coworker behavior depend on perceptions of proselytization","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Morality; Psychology; Social psychology; Scrutiny; Moral disengagement; Identity (music); Perception; Autonomy; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral development; Observer (physics); Moral psychology; Epistemology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01701141378059667,"gpt":0.3321419909801587,"spread":0.315130577199562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002788785,0.0001358335,0.0001824507,0.0001201278,0.0007149445,0.00009781141,0.000349668,0.0001246529,0.0007711416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003926688,0.00008155946,0.00004189622,0.0005319626,0.0002213148,0.0002032915,0.00007311845,0.0001134006,0.00006307885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004583717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006794096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009300228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984569,0.0001173377,0.000319759,0.0002750899,0.0006566865,0.0001742466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986626,0.0002522636,0.0001278137,0.0001994441,0.0007027222,0.00005516887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009257629,0.00103489,0.8855059,0.00007598008,0.00001656672,0.000001703214,0.01521154,0.00002762975,0.03298519,0.06002535,0.0006006784,0.004421982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004492734,0.0004332188,0.9847011,0.0001310971,0.0001038986,0.000001890005,0.002764208,0.000001200761,0.008039773,0.002952373,0.0002629993,0.000159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973679,0.00002769874,0.0003595113,0.0002403493,0.0004764223,0.001038923,0.00001394459,0.00002752632,0.0004477551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980385,0.00006072062,0.00002876846,0.0001784948,0.0001124455,0.00008634642,0.00005007017,0.00002112655,0.001423509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09919515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.844346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114531238","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.02.002","title":"Self-selection bias in hypothesis comparison","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Selection (genetic algorithm); Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Statistical hypothesis testing; Probabilistic logic; Social psychology; Confirmation bias; Cognitive bias; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1783336667265042,"gpt":0.4010023078508994,"spread":0.2226686411243951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001651451,0.0002538067,0.0004426626,0.0007781737,0.0004603325,0.000572198,0.0004979537,0.0001795265,0.001969934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003513597,0.0002068159,0.0000537152,0.001887591,0.00007834756,0.001087776,0.0001760465,0.0001929776,0.0004793557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001306876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001427264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001488473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967023,0.00009537696,0.001151227,0.0005828855,0.001103599,0.0003646855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964789,0.001860639,0.0003594774,0.0003044211,0.0007680825,0.0002284705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001555095,0.0007006108,0.9210647,0.000005691798,0.000002608645,0.000001765813,0.0004748548,0.00001488042,0.0001914712,0.0009405036,0.001046269,0.07554109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000594734,0.00009852165,0.9482532,0.00004467484,0.00005544814,0.00005939996,0.0005304712,0.00005724119,0.001584654,0.03659551,0.01168746,0.0004387557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975927,0.0003294004,0.0007776325,0.00005049941,0.0002726814,0.000219219,0.00001429456,0.00009357627,0.0006499374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933667,0.00003993317,0.006011667,0.00008140958,0.0001454472,0.00002647472,0.00001353626,0.00003690089,0.0002778931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07510234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160706434","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.10.001","title":"Why more can be less: An inference-based explanation for hyper-subadditivity in bundle valuation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Subadditivity; Superadditivity; Inference; Valuation (finance); Bundle; Econometrics; Economics; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1510030533674116,"gpt":0.3017594069010703,"spread":0.1507563535336587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006211986,0.000131286,0.0001874585,0.0002740954,0.0002286145,0.00008899855,0.0001037331,0.000104462,0.0005054391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000284462,0.0001574386,0.00002065344,0.0002257132,0.00005228324,0.0004770485,0.00002070225,0.00005882577,0.000008556937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001634948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004821877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001293668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001441237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989159,0.000008178608,0.0004969852,0.0003395499,0.00008394843,0.0001554215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993138,0.0001783544,0.0002096871,0.0001221314,0.0001070421,0.00006903824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001714631,0.0003809067,0.9767184,0.00002304358,0.000002567635,3.28817e-7,0.0004509728,0.000234685,0.0002068058,0.01988443,0.00009978202,0.001980938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001035898,0.0001384685,0.970919,0.00002009911,0.00001204555,0.0000015071,0.0004051366,0.0004859515,0.0013027,0.02475813,0.0006801417,0.0002408935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313232,0.00008066091,0.0676417,0.0001981424,0.00006386029,0.0003354652,0.00022076,0.00002121693,0.0001149811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963541,0.00002031981,0.00149354,0.0004835452,0.00005576154,0.00007359708,0.001433131,0.00002555,0.0000604728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06614816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.642016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296858316","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104184","title":"Social undermining as a dark side of symbolic awards: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Regression discontinuity design; Psychology; Social psychology; Great Rift; Discontinuity (linguistics); Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08564123287154952,"gpt":0.3931062349317414,"spread":0.3074650020601919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000404014,0.0001521018,0.0002729906,0.0001060023,0.002840242,0.0001190335,0.000344967,0.00005848102,0.00104436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005309807,0.000153266,0.00003768403,0.0004430885,0.0003376539,0.0004067565,0.0004421429,0.0001272558,0.000006313687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001875533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004888011,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001071339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004411578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982463,0.0001546289,0.0003809468,0.0003869712,0.0006429674,0.0001881738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988061,0.0004573478,0.0002656438,0.0001089477,0.0002837316,0.00007824435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002133667,0.000977423,0.793919,0.00003855382,0.00004142083,0.00003555931,0.1336016,0.00002556611,0.0437447,0.01677865,0.002474448,0.008149806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002706261,0.001015951,0.6138329,0.0008758369,0.000669917,0.00002675715,0.1548371,0.000006561013,0.06021893,0.1621138,0.001686899,0.002009187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997709,0.0008635429,0.0001610876,0.0001909505,0.00009047277,0.0003074344,0.0000462847,0.00004847728,0.000582785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984804,0.000132451,0.0007586483,0.00004625398,0.00007890583,0.00009523905,0.00003067954,0.00002407396,0.0003533376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.180086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407630891","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2025.104391","title":"The motivating power of streaks: Increasing persistence is as easy as 1, 2, 3","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Psychology; Power (physics); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02036495402732508,"gpt":0.2598212147782751,"spread":0.23945626075095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002574257,0.0001020171,0.0001748809,0.0001368234,0.0005554535,0.0001529368,0.0001916502,0.00005249971,0.0009676469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005014957,0.00008712985,0.00003103293,0.000484487,0.00009528997,0.0001624678,0.00007980535,0.00006762159,0.00002878464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000220803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008032082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006737047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008709776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990999,0.000003432837,0.0004544122,0.0002436941,0.00008310641,0.0001154295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990894,0.0001518637,0.0002317434,0.0001676425,0.0003231114,0.00003621101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001164653,0.00007004854,0.8333126,0.00002888765,0.00001535219,0.000001012546,0.0003264846,0.000007903741,0.0000517435,0.1653096,0.0002453716,0.0006193945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004599732,0.00009454291,0.9130818,0.0002135287,0.00003681384,0.00001171872,0.0008631305,0.00008085575,0.001697226,0.06843375,0.01475022,0.0002764301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870778,0.001662467,0.0002640038,0.0001446694,0.00007390542,0.0000886452,0.00002980147,0.00001094606,0.01064777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965115,0.0003914253,0.000131762,0.0002400895,0.00001690042,0.000005098718,0.00001188646,0.00001160367,0.002679716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09687581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}