{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":40,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":40,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"393170629b33","filters":{"venue":"Organizational Research Methods"}},"results":[{"id":"W2896240344","doi":"10.1177/1094428118802626","title":"Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Mental Health Research Topics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":688,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Experience sampling method; Sampling (signal processing); Phenomenon; Face (sociological concept); Domain (mathematical analysis); Management science; Computer science; Data science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.591366031924202,"gpt":0.7249645327786124,"spread":0.1335985008544104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009141758,0.0001144554,0.0002207072,0.0004591997,0.0008014692,0.000119352,0.0001992367,0.000117819,0.008384231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03974257,0.0000872395,0.00002951587,0.001019219,0.0011442,0.0003530088,0.0002574259,0.0003412206,0.00001695034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001260972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002550001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002782833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007655595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946012,0.003217081,0.0004563046,0.0004916746,0.000661391,0.0005723819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871129,0.0099052,0.00005967761,0.0003560446,0.002238018,0.0003281094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001400641,0.0002659383,0.0008809373,0.000119629,0.00002338436,0.000001484779,0.005889104,4.234526e-7,0.05536038,0.6759695,0.0008092794,0.2605399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003396429,0.004323651,0.04969429,0.0002710878,0.00004414791,0.00009543625,0.01495403,0.002652864,0.1675621,0.5907625,0.1655146,0.0007288719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00211387,0.0004358341,0.9814143,0.01136136,0.0003735916,0.0005140841,0.00005488666,0.00002525163,0.003706845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08913911,0.00002728523,0.9077014,0.0001777214,0.0002589044,0.0002399196,0.00001894235,0.00003023438,0.002406448],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.259811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322924434","doi":"10.1177/1094428115621148","title":"Multiple-Group Analysis of Similarity in Latent Profile Solutions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":617,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Similarity (geometry); Psychology; Econometrics; Popularity; Latent class model; Psychological intervention; Social psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5855302590746941,"gpt":0.6383649475205937,"spread":0.05283468844589956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007533289,0.00007985516,0.0002508377,0.001126344,0.0001165027,0.00001463424,0.0002489822,0.0001414287,0.00645679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003340214,0.00007795488,0.00009228309,0.005826262,0.0001659688,0.00008771758,0.0001456529,0.0003987978,0.0001158758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002145535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002441284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001800392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008505897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956226,0.002644978,0.0004671261,0.0002869996,0.0005250119,0.0004532858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973685,0.0007763325,0.00007476415,0.0003277636,0.001191742,0.0002609415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000175757,0.002590694,0.8487962,0.00002342754,0.0003321361,0.00001028395,0.002101714,0.0002174159,0.00223271,0.1106183,0.01201424,0.02088709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006727165,0.0002050539,0.988656,0.00001417209,0.00007869929,0.000001313747,0.0006718004,0.004804049,0.0002665767,0.001698911,0.002831995,0.00009870417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7417664,0.001717843,0.2212368,0.003896752,0.001179525,0.001930355,0.0007981432,0.0001426546,0.0273315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356481,0.000009096608,0.06171115,0.00004670304,0.00004352727,0.00009251881,0.0004159986,0.00001855996,0.002014293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1938818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326958296","doi":"10.1177/1094428112474693","title":"A Critical Examination of Common Beliefs About Partial Least Squares Path Modeling","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":421,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Partial least squares regression; Path analysis (statistics); Simple (philosophy); Structural equation modeling; Path (computing); Psychology; Computer science; Management science; Econometrics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Machine learning; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1335857627017374,"gpt":0.4506450462742926,"spread":0.3170592835725553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004378626,0.0001263895,0.0001838452,0.0006314756,0.0003599217,0.0003735199,0.0003058601,0.00007964775,0.002871551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005584549,0.0001203583,0.00003565367,0.002027863,0.0001554355,0.0008555991,0.0003873978,0.0002367989,0.0005729006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000619153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005351362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001389832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007064429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977491,0.0002924801,0.0004443165,0.0002798564,0.0008788549,0.0003554199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947414,0.0004054355,0.00008562725,0.0002322906,0.004510723,0.00002446163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006893522,0.0002091317,0.001030004,0.0002212004,0.00001436069,0.00000103534,0.0001184352,0.0001306212,0.003250354,0.9697251,0.001186347,0.02410646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006710145,0.00004575546,0.02035291,0.0001662249,0.00002761555,0.000001242599,0.001932963,0.841902,0.002098923,0.1229168,0.009485554,0.0003990404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04664667,0.0001811589,0.48179,0.005072328,0.000641933,0.001180205,0.000006250835,0.0002097364,0.4642718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778028,0.000006304228,0.02033554,0.0003432856,0.0008035993,0.00005640373,0.00009487647,0.00003610593,0.0005211175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9311561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129008721","doi":"10.1177/1094428109356476","title":"A Multifoci Person-Centered Perspective on Workplace Affective Commitment: A Latent Profile/Factor Mixture Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":411,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Workgroup; Psychology; Organizational citizenship behavior; Construct (python library); Social psychology; Latent class model; Perspective (graphical); Organizational commitment; Latent variable; Construct validity; Job satisfaction; Sample (material); Confirmatory factor analysis; Applied psychology; Structural equation modeling; Developmental psychology; Psychometrics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09474942749977633,"gpt":0.4284154142329835,"spread":0.3336659867332071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001644756,0.0003034803,0.0003464932,0.001436017,0.0008282516,0.0005459372,0.0004278795,0.0002236719,0.0170106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004778964,0.0002692352,0.0001696382,0.006380848,0.0001917504,0.0006075443,0.0002132194,0.001113921,0.00115734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004305072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001580419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003764521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003130101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968023,0.0003753424,0.0002625512,0.0007320438,0.001299129,0.0005286909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951985,0.0008197494,0.0001531895,0.000415435,0.003327012,0.0000861258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003603877,0.001291063,0.557934,0.00007094625,0.001220322,0.00002932993,0.001871168,0.0001004333,0.06513138,0.3564363,0.009352558,0.006202187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001455805,0.00006224518,0.9737253,0.00002952311,0.0003195795,0.000004451783,0.002320467,0.003399944,0.004975893,0.002536904,0.01059126,0.0005786298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8622609,0.0002391947,0.0450911,0.02904568,0.003161048,0.005493477,0.0003819987,0.001159728,0.05316681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746524,0.000006214536,0.02057281,0.0007653058,0.0009426306,0.00007310835,0.0003399593,0.00009315724,0.002554414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4157913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158178950","doi":"10.1177/1094428109339839","title":"The Philosophy and Practice of Interpretivist Research in Entrepreneurship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":295,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Generalizability theory; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Management science; Knowledge management; Psychology; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1910179163740644,"gpt":0.49753902553652,"spread":0.3065211091624556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01543721,0.00009988112,0.0001384106,0.0006004797,0.0006521011,0.0003187662,0.000420355,0.0000446694,0.0001503739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02920396,0.00007602429,0.00001739839,0.003830896,0.000427135,0.0005904175,0.0005840732,0.0003564136,0.00004626954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000558652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004465008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000684053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001599102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971736,0.0007838692,0.0002946384,0.0003023071,0.001082585,0.0003630173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914497,0.006218501,0.00009180159,0.0002242435,0.001999179,0.00001657775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001129982,0.0001133364,0.01450764,0.00005513149,0.00001778213,0.000004834722,0.0001384144,0.000007850356,0.0006821482,0.9664918,0.003349632,0.01451849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003553013,0.00004993311,0.08290011,0.00009814897,0.00001116754,0.000002496173,0.001059568,0.0004649923,0.0003211567,0.8134978,0.1010902,0.0001491327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007617482,0.003951278,0.008653829,0.1613486,0.0002954723,0.00138167,0.000002986638,0.00009187434,0.8166568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900365,0.000516891,0.007740121,0.0005785746,0.0005143659,0.00001136854,0.00001307435,0.00002094173,0.0005681547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.982419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9789734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807641130","doi":"10.1177/1094428118773856","title":"Person-Centered Methodologies in the Organizational Sciences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":273,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Scope (computer science); Computer science; Organizational studies; Management science; Presentation (obstetrics); Data science; Industrial and organizational psychology; Knowledge management; Psychology; Organization development; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8332067860115948,"gpt":0.7157843732719706,"spread":0.1174224127396242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07719368,0.0001332501,0.0002277561,0.0008441465,0.003367855,0.0004993386,0.001851556,0.0001052348,0.01270005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09622786,0.00009583957,0.00005104734,0.01299968,0.006828941,0.0004057196,0.0002424325,0.0005141495,0.0006511458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003352622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001718227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006516615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008395173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9528889,0.04247791,0.0002969191,0.0005171028,0.003036229,0.0007829612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711423,0.02380173,0.00008876182,0.0003123135,0.004513049,0.0001418615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002154903,0.0001022306,0.01862118,0.000005531473,0.00003292598,0.000003046487,0.05801711,0.000007587809,0.004300582,0.9019414,0.01464571,0.002301154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006011801,0.0004574689,0.09212177,0.00004505921,0.00001471793,0.000005395912,0.2763491,0.001286968,0.008029737,0.4899493,0.1306539,0.0004854063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0322587,0.0007313596,0.4024267,0.07493787,0.0003630453,0.001424866,0.00002359308,0.000134048,0.4876998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6769786,0.0001466229,0.3168019,0.0006568952,0.0009046377,0.00005092558,0.00002753634,0.00002590706,0.004406997],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6447199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977022467","doi":"10.1177/1094428114565028","title":"What Grounded Theory Is…A Critically Reflective Conversation Among Scholars","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":258,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Grounded theory; Conversation; Scope (computer science); Creativity; Epistemology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4710903864788523,"gpt":0.67825432184202,"spread":0.2071639353631677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07436575,0.0001327112,0.0002021137,0.000381022,0.00140583,0.001036835,0.0006240632,0.0002001554,0.002282577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1077619,0.000130461,0.0000575576,0.003324408,0.002434761,0.00198342,0.0002141673,0.0007444376,0.0003370748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008677387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002325878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004047404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008165094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9673442,0.02858485,0.0003112411,0.0005055185,0.002547031,0.0007071228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772265,0.01159214,0.00007190256,0.0003424159,0.009943072,0.0008239581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003610143,0.00008759321,0.0004049239,0.000007427099,0.00003302452,0.000002479047,0.0305972,0.00000131211,0.001937338,0.9454967,0.002940507,0.01845539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002811877,0.00006722822,0.002019866,0.00002677345,0.000007039866,8.041986e-7,0.106704,0.00009489889,0.003501706,0.8437457,0.04339648,0.0001542823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.007559488,0.000606409,0.8055881,0.05610453,0.0004541313,0.001351052,0.00001986883,0.0001797735,0.1281367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1789212,0.001096662,0.7976355,0.001685264,0.0008444379,0.000286975,0.00007529576,0.00009112899,0.01936356],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1713617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126474382","doi":"10.1177/1094428109334977","title":"Using Experience Sampling Methodology to Advance Entrepreneurship Theory and Research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Mental Health Research Topics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Experience sampling method; Entrepreneurship; Protocol (science); Phone; Research design; Computer science; Data collection; Feeling; Sampling (signal processing); Knowledge management; Management science; Data science; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Business; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7935101978894712,"gpt":0.7469832577202233,"spread":0.04652694016924785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05619606,0.0001876849,0.0003153265,0.00107901,0.001025724,0.0001308661,0.0007702649,0.000215571,0.004359641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0488609,0.0001857704,0.00002947315,0.003603179,0.0006338828,0.0001873633,0.0005820551,0.001361909,0.0002068745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004226667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003805467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009388827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005018916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9619383,0.03326485,0.000462063,0.001055058,0.001637542,0.00164222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745744,0.02219781,0.00005307055,0.0007886944,0.00156673,0.000819328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000571481,0.0001693561,0.003410416,0.00003617427,0.00001759393,0.00003420025,0.01011603,0.00003069401,0.1079341,0.6720819,0.0003980372,0.2052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001060851,0.001482031,0.090462,0.0001588868,0.000009212725,0.0002479158,0.0129693,0.0002608858,0.05708278,0.7901048,0.04553122,0.0006301466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2295876,0.002121325,0.7492084,0.00463431,0.000487959,0.001532687,0.00001427833,0.00009577408,0.01231773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1630308,0.000121362,0.8312668,0.0008729756,0.0004489348,0.00008958227,0.00001139855,0.00005714747,0.004100993],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2045698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159759566","doi":"10.1177/1094428114529165","title":"Reflections on Partial Least Squares Path Modeling","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Public Safety Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Partial least squares regression; Econometrics; Path analysis (statistics); Path (computing); Null hypothesis; Sample (material); Computer science; Key (lock); Management science; Data mining; Mathematics; Machine learning; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8883201917735504,"gpt":0.7223769447242043,"spread":0.165943247049346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06253579,0.0001467375,0.0002883489,0.001282149,0.00106095,0.0004673812,0.001035656,0.0001277641,0.002042453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6258862,0.0001081489,0.00007870325,0.008319179,0.0001600108,0.0001984145,0.0003344943,0.0006041473,0.0004933419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009993977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002029834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003713503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003486795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9847786,0.009993893,0.0006348278,0.0007764727,0.003240185,0.0005759626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8996348,0.0960344,0.0001473845,0.0009307622,0.002939647,0.0003129803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001006035,0.0002257445,0.005737127,0.000008848325,0.00003064167,0.000003838862,0.0005542514,0.04064928,0.01221176,0.4774978,0.009631028,0.4533491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003097136,0.0003249111,0.0042274,0.00002379658,0.000004644241,0.00001128883,0.0007926367,0.3703606,0.002296014,0.5735325,0.04788698,0.0002295091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007150548,0.00004684508,0.9206955,0.001904125,0.0005489531,0.000135377,0.000005469632,0.00008752642,0.06942562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5071223,0.00001539478,0.4907097,0.000205224,0.0005935716,0.00001463822,0.000006506049,0.00002599218,0.001306646],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5633504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108576434","doi":"10.1177/1094428106292900","title":"Prospective Case Study Design","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":175,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Test (biology); Research design; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Post hoc; Test theory; Management science; Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics; Social science; Economics; Psychometrics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6267343918571314,"gpt":0.7266288616994395,"spread":0.0998944698423081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1087378,0.0001244622,0.000231877,0.0008072857,0.002584115,0.0002470165,0.0005207112,0.00008603164,0.006137695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04568901,0.0001163458,0.00004586391,0.007588284,0.001041534,0.0003118534,0.00022734,0.0006092915,0.0004828059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008177545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001241258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002600657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002373176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9690692,0.02648202,0.00035914,0.000513478,0.002734017,0.0008421246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734053,0.01917937,0.00006467792,0.000302855,0.006628121,0.0004197017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002412167,0.002404241,0.1216835,0.0000127973,0.0005190986,0.00363794,0.3545356,0.00008580916,0.008674102,0.4712117,0.0096403,0.02735364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001129788,0.0009288221,0.04173857,0.00001271638,0.00003558622,0.00008916587,0.8023603,0.0004527654,0.01293166,0.1151477,0.02462704,0.0005458954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03686883,0.0001116317,0.9018604,0.0005995473,0.00006387135,0.00168876,0.000002030198,0.00007121205,0.05873378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8211516,0.00001234912,0.1697129,0.0000267758,0.0002864351,0.00004985492,0.00000281902,0.00002607222,0.008731212],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7842827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983604458","doi":"10.1177/1094428115571894","title":"How Careless Responding and Acquiescence Response Bias Can Influence Construct Dimensionality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Acquiescence; Construct (python library); Psychology; Social psychology; Curse of dimensionality; Job satisfaction; Response bias; Construct validity; Psychometrics; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4956493336332864,"gpt":0.5785101068527488,"spread":0.08286077321946239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007179015,0.0001618891,0.0002299072,0.0003154096,0.0003564136,0.000279102,0.0003278716,0.0001446654,0.0003156296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02346262,0.0001287077,0.00002562047,0.001633926,0.0007312866,0.0001944414,0.0003476084,0.0003861114,0.00002797725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001708023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004521157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002883421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002058816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911256,0.006798293,0.0002202791,0.0005172074,0.0008910202,0.0004476311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932618,0.00398017,0.00007607842,0.0003433097,0.001924441,0.0004141765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002388312,0.0001134307,0.3052461,0.00004543979,0.000121955,0.00009669157,0.0126837,0.00001361781,0.2099344,0.4495582,0.006117583,0.01368066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008133295,0.0002798394,0.9489489,0.00006461722,0.00001277671,0.0001224198,0.01060401,0.00008555176,0.007655434,0.02260861,0.008469138,0.0003353887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918281,0.0004889619,0.0009312142,0.005527441,0.0002279638,0.0002232689,0.00004719352,0.00005014634,0.0006757177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709622,0.00001831055,0.02198359,0.0001616035,0.00009400082,0.00001899925,0.00002578159,0.00002323346,0.006712252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6437028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9847631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105148141","doi":"10.1177/1094428104263674","title":"Uncovering Faking Samples in Applicant, Incumbent, and Experimental Data Sets: An Application of Mixed-Model Item Response Theory","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Behavioral and Psychological Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Personality; Sample (material); Social psychology; Test (biology); Item response theory; Personality test; Big Five personality traits; Class (philosophy); Response bias; Econometrics; Psychometrics; Test validity; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5198422274660762,"gpt":0.5916335378818836,"spread":0.07179131041580733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006952399,0.0001283616,0.0002090385,0.0001806849,0.0001790537,0.0000289563,0.0005062221,0.0001215412,0.0002199769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009913542,0.0001128897,0.00001431691,0.0008125689,0.00033807,0.0001699368,0.0005813037,0.0002784157,0.00000992995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001109344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006468935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003067484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004741715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965862,0.001819184,0.0003219009,0.0006022536,0.0003642845,0.0003061967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976161,0.001504888,0.00007546476,0.0005553826,0.0001471701,0.00010107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003518355,0.002261618,0.0848323,0.00004345146,0.00008129911,0.00001634528,0.007596717,0.001284181,0.4605525,0.2600552,0.0001700085,0.179588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003057582,0.0007077002,0.7275845,0.00007382068,0.00002389099,0.00003931259,0.009935775,0.001238002,0.03327008,0.2205354,0.002921428,0.0006124371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8445969,0.0006963741,0.1535026,0.0002073107,0.00004070584,0.0003520732,0.0001105352,0.00002968993,0.0004638411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9201664,0.00002817212,0.07947171,0.00005264101,0.00003442424,0.00008037444,0.000102919,0.0000243915,0.00003900049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6427522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.460351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800971021","doi":"10.1177/1094428118770731","title":"Extensions of Auxiliary Variable Approaches for the Investigation of Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Effects in Mixture Models","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Moderation; Mediation; Econometrics; Latent variable; Psychology; Structural equation modeling; Syntax; Moderated mediation; Statistical model; Empirical research; Computer science; Statistical hypothesis testing; Latent variable model; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1910024361199231,"gpt":0.4615244380861428,"spread":0.2705220019662197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003520068,0.00007296287,0.0001405744,0.0001891798,0.000206672,0.00002797012,0.0003232808,0.00007707994,0.000006693045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008500748,0.00005711554,0.00001184332,0.0009817176,0.0004605966,0.0003730979,0.0001777781,0.0001370357,2.422823e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003734755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003254159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001130179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000352653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982121,0.0006254032,0.0002898205,0.0002593576,0.0004595333,0.0001537861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894012,0.008122949,0.00008695546,0.0002588647,0.002075083,0.00005499412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008857259,0.00002376376,0.0001082609,0.00004776294,0.000007969603,7.750479e-8,0.0004293856,0.00760268,0.009933632,0.9789021,0.0002602537,0.002675225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008017322,0.000039844,0.0008886023,0.00001334255,0.000001767815,7.526971e-7,0.000007204231,0.4832385,0.01388713,0.5018077,0.000008155824,0.00002678822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003291873,0.0001354367,0.9976917,0.001190972,0.00003161216,0.000510164,0.00002320178,0.00002311701,0.00006461318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2738025,0.00001591355,0.725968,0.00005337855,0.00003417455,0.00007034506,0.00003540745,0.000007683095,0.00001253619],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4770944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011367146","doi":"10.1177/109442810034001","title":"Enhancing Team Mental Model Measurement with Performance Appraisal Practices","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental model; Psychology; Similarity (geometry); Performance measurement; Field (mathematics); Applied psychology; Performance appraisal; Structural equation modeling; Computer science; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Management; Mathematics; Business; Machine learning; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.202281332311183,"gpt":0.5418131087715147,"spread":0.3395317764603317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006616511,0.0001650814,0.000164484,0.0001744513,0.0005293245,0.00009534515,0.0003764257,0.0001006741,0.009687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006763648,0.0001366798,0.00002326607,0.0009295226,0.0001650059,0.0003535643,0.00006741449,0.0005588357,0.0005388317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002058764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004400211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006447748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000335535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964851,0.0007626217,0.0002683277,0.0004560036,0.001456709,0.0005712927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981521,0.0004577662,0.0001133746,0.0003809436,0.0007346663,0.0001611742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003678389,0.003013483,0.0771411,0.0003544793,0.0009634689,0.00002837362,0.0435173,0.009868003,0.1014274,0.03732775,0.02417351,0.6985068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003671026,0.001817953,0.07047907,0.000252191,0.00007460731,0.0003119511,0.002629472,0.6971792,0.02270081,0.001277595,0.1981514,0.001454763],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7393216,0.0003663618,0.06912004,0.001350219,0.0003602959,0.0006604973,0.00002532828,0.0001425736,0.1886531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8557088,0.0001446036,0.1342818,0.0001037674,0.0002161267,0.00006910272,0.0000380336,0.00006117862,0.009376592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.697052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769881047","doi":"10.1177/1094428117741967","title":"Being Where? Navigating the Involvement Paradox in Qualitative Research Accounts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Field (mathematics); Ambiguity; Legitimacy; Qualitative research; Sociology; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Craft; Narrative; Psychology; Social science; Computer science; Political science; Politics; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6960288763128991,"gpt":0.767700311833412,"spread":0.07167143552051292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4079707,0.0001763165,0.000312207,0.0003730819,0.01357115,0.001784329,0.002784638,0.0002752795,0.0009544726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2780391,0.0001375949,0.00006937013,0.002648032,0.008174066,0.0008920078,0.001299945,0.004526079,0.0001643004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001048711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002945779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0188056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007828509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8789178,0.1118725,0.0005857178,0.0006922422,0.00620851,0.001723264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9176155,0.07353245,0.0002193613,0.001151923,0.007034997,0.0004457375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002587672,0.00008422347,0.006608977,0.00004360259,0.00002741842,0.00001019851,0.2595851,0.000004385779,0.001411479,0.7018372,0.001121627,0.02923994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002923977,0.00005839167,0.008737281,0.0002718644,0.000002171838,3.941746e-7,0.2314767,0.0001782108,0.0009972607,0.7216961,0.03610912,0.0001801829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1471645,0.002579116,0.0672713,0.4963727,0.001053529,0.00514179,0.00006785963,0.000154911,0.2801943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6893627,0.003243382,0.2978754,0.0002865963,0.001292956,0.0004020526,0.00002227307,0.0001064786,0.007408164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5421982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081951058","doi":"10.1177/1094428106/294731","title":"Assessing the Impact of Nonresponse on Work Group Diversity Effects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Diversity (politics); Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Social psychology; Econometrics; Group (periodic table); Statistics; Mathematics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4532337125440092,"gpt":0.613187032598835,"spread":0.1599533200548258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04420544,0.00006672087,0.0001107343,0.0001713805,0.002414653,0.0001062429,0.0005091992,0.0000963264,0.0006214654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01983349,0.0000485307,0.00007480288,0.002323539,0.0005475715,0.0002377973,0.0004379177,0.0003254759,0.00003198386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003807344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003731356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001840787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004339492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902842,0.007743399,0.0001237678,0.0001767697,0.001278962,0.0003929171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844862,0.01439075,0.00006179197,0.0001887003,0.0007154344,0.0001571763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005779434,0.0006484867,0.762104,0.00003594732,0.0001880713,0.00002290719,0.04666797,0.0001100287,0.006915754,0.1459579,0.005280948,0.03149009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001498709,0.00008982184,0.9846193,0.00001533041,0.000006055584,1.877802e-7,0.004125633,0.000006911831,0.00150848,0.008933896,0.0004815517,0.0000630217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8553997,0.00005195982,0.1159211,0.0009848637,0.000178896,0.0003381644,0.000004812494,0.00003242637,0.02708807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890935,0.00001486752,0.01038369,0.00004983072,0.0001289729,5.153919e-7,0.000004867824,0.000005943118,0.0003177606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2225153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118033245","doi":"10.1177/1094428106297804","title":"Using Content Analysis to Elaborate Adolescent Theories of Organization","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Elaboration; Content analysis; Elaboration likelihood model; Content (measure theory); Robustness (evolution); Identification (biology); Computer science; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2520552448956692,"gpt":0.477734861289015,"spread":0.2256796163933458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006264711,0.0001796025,0.000321952,0.001873284,0.0005358467,0.0002017839,0.000405939,0.00007015895,0.00220796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007674747,0.0001663441,0.0000541724,0.02226465,0.000147596,0.0004742026,0.0006586444,0.0001464355,0.0001104526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001458046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007315516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001438793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000695601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973854,0.0001255169,0.0005397924,0.0003820432,0.001128027,0.0004392673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921123,0.0003894386,0.0002125656,0.0002664416,0.006975584,0.00004366678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004847623,0.000149645,0.3002427,0.0001004695,0.0004420094,0.000003406353,0.0001409482,0.001041775,0.03452714,0.6611035,0.0009658248,0.001234183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006992529,0.00003532321,0.8849795,0.00007428607,0.0007963204,0.000001095737,0.002955948,0.002727886,0.04605641,0.04464893,0.01631681,0.0007082628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04282388,0.00009520378,0.9473659,0.0008801818,0.0001936564,0.0004387118,0.0000064692,0.00008096997,0.008115026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8732785,0.00002049866,0.124534,0.0007668366,0.0006373538,0.000002985768,0.0001442992,0.00006102932,0.0005545219],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8304546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2380785170","doi":"10.1177/1094428116629218","title":"A Dynamic Process Model for Finding Informants and Gaining Access in Qualitative Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Element (criminal law); Qualitative research; Process (computing); Psychology; Data collection; Qualitative property; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; Social science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7505255319573663,"gpt":0.7599459092716419,"spread":0.009420377314275585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0472202,0.00007566527,0.0001358353,0.0007468673,0.001340838,0.0002364271,0.0004421418,0.0001406097,0.0001865292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08819978,0.00005972696,0.00001349202,0.002240791,0.0005551994,0.0009819121,0.0002102684,0.0003423331,0.00001074549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003455129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001421684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001094194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007943863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934496,0.004139347,0.0002708797,0.0003010359,0.001195461,0.0006436842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781185,0.01957743,0.00005016401,0.0001192488,0.001953743,0.0001808817],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001396971,0.00007245315,0.0100153,0.0001170637,0.00002143839,0.000002095729,0.3785156,0.0002022915,0.002142603,0.5514197,0.0005021092,0.05684969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008022558,0.00007225339,0.003663322,0.0001734038,0.000002810454,5.666932e-7,0.06042981,0.08294271,0.000344276,0.850175,0.001176543,0.0002170828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.22093,0.0001387299,0.7406145,0.009845338,0.0000838087,0.001729295,0.00004457265,0.00005623114,0.02655755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495936,0.0001502432,0.04270119,0.00003143461,0.00005349296,0.0001558094,0.00001274161,0.00002113909,0.007280327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7286636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519696195","doi":"10.1177/1094428116663636","title":"Mapping the Terrain","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Situated; Organizational behavior; Action (physics); Computer science; Psychology; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1753864438952608,"gpt":0.4273831106526831,"spread":0.2519966667574224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004550482,0.0001185871,0.0001094178,0.000359665,0.0009853176,0.0002701761,0.000557087,0.0000394951,0.007050341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006832783,0.00006125191,0.0000330451,0.002701514,0.0002428814,0.000536702,0.0008054625,0.0001199109,0.00167141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006588504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003635032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004011126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000153977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981797,0.0001627251,0.000208359,0.0002794693,0.0007965924,0.0003731393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997666,0.001024714,0.00007108336,0.0002480412,0.0009764287,0.00001375872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007892235,0.00003711284,0.02493232,0.00003767321,0.00005353428,0.000002636356,0.0001035618,0.000002668094,0.007791701,0.8188205,0.1078994,0.04031098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002363506,0.00000363408,0.06296197,0.00002898245,0.000006202884,8.72423e-7,0.0003777804,0.0001316086,0.0003866492,0.1600999,0.7756203,0.0001457091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003794801,0.0004603863,0.6057289,0.1192459,0.0006719998,0.0007906316,0.00000460724,0.0003228408,0.2689799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8811617,0.0002104186,0.05813039,0.007954725,0.007784958,0.000111513,0.00006148354,0.000170549,0.04441421],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.877367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238980318","doi":"10.1177/1094428109356114","title":"Pursuing Failure","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Development theory; Positive economics; Sociology; Computer science; Management science; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1040179821502072,"gpt":0.4421014089652457,"spread":0.3380834268150384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002716929,0.0001498535,0.0001592763,0.0005554245,0.0008083468,0.0005067931,0.0004530575,0.00006355184,0.004839718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003918647,0.0001378349,0.00003754601,0.003494519,0.00008773703,0.0008294837,0.0003292703,0.0002318541,0.001115756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006539076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000372615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001944967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001086222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979454,0.00008824521,0.0002295265,0.0003459948,0.0009521439,0.0004386979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981394,0.0002446254,0.00007106133,0.0002070702,0.001315288,0.00002254397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009523051,0.00007466107,0.00784615,0.00003012495,0.00002297793,0.000005632093,0.00003368019,0.00003355989,0.002784168,0.8905196,0.08478166,0.01385823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003461424,0.00001837772,0.07764503,0.00002531834,0.00002058286,0.000001768965,0.0002788544,0.0009379463,0.0007060131,0.3362798,0.5834327,0.0003075317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006531377,0.0008681315,0.26339,0.06858116,0.0006813374,0.001098376,0.000003408068,0.0008676985,0.6579785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7768812,0.00007235296,0.1996229,0.007405472,0.005462569,0.00002050636,0.0002394048,0.00009632913,0.01019932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7703498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044478943","doi":"10.1177/1094428103254672","title":"How to Deal with Missing Categorical Data: Test of a Simple Bayesian Method","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Missing data; Imputation (statistics); Bayesian probability; Computer science; Regression; Statistics; Regression analysis; Data mining; Econometrics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2853940616044742,"gpt":0.5576315963265147,"spread":0.2722375347220405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01157226,0.0002011138,0.0004651883,0.0002836733,0.0002697574,0.0001884584,0.0006903062,0.0001191754,0.0007120274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1056991,0.00015431,0.00002611658,0.002644252,0.0002012441,0.0001865074,0.0002988933,0.0004284293,0.000006941783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001063201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007636196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002978226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001134835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931231,0.004070884,0.0003990149,0.0006353979,0.00118551,0.0005861097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610198,0.03574469,0.0001230322,0.0009146096,0.001709624,0.0004882104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002596531,0.0002058108,0.001393124,0.0001194411,0.00003928059,0.00001802752,0.0001598198,0.00000133787,0.01299796,0.8908046,0.002323964,0.09191067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002840985,0.0002796717,0.0007019725,0.00003564248,0.00003426096,0.00005744923,0.0002465046,0.001621404,0.03409451,0.9506983,0.01171666,0.0002295797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000390385,0.00002545699,0.9945213,0.00166296,0.00002056637,0.0003616515,0.00009097142,0.00003531408,0.003242722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007882115,0.00000426923,0.9915045,0.00006294974,0.00008525346,0.00001708428,0.00003458149,0.00006783514,0.0003414478],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09412679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.901834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093699715","doi":"10.1177/1094428120965706","title":"Partnering Up: Including Managers as Research Partners in Systematic Reviews","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Systematic review; Process (computing); Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Management science; MEDLINE; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5559546612049909,"gpt":0.5642555888056462,"spread":0.008300927600655261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02117509,0.0002606417,0.000613977,0.001139327,0.0009838903,0.0006746969,0.000899145,0.0000967402,0.002213005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05352219,0.0002336015,0.00007204471,0.0105354,0.0002181161,0.001011432,0.001897662,0.0006878615,0.003233532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002284151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008821816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001550157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004131267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941937,0.001447656,0.0008437506,0.0007054625,0.001951138,0.0008583122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959047,0.002050785,0.000195823,0.0003394024,0.001429378,0.00007993998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008247892,0.0001353425,0.02001466,0.03105992,0.0001418961,0.00008015931,0.001834134,0.0002998192,0.003315527,0.8532434,0.08731021,0.002482503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002017084,0.00009127743,0.008264832,0.005225517,0.0001230804,0.000005017914,0.01279633,0.02601789,0.001041025,0.1021616,0.8406716,0.001584711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01560721,0.01561093,0.09480814,0.09807705,0.001959499,0.01960969,0.00000696387,0.001281124,0.7530394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491476,0.002330331,0.02724113,0.00702068,0.003885443,0.0007765961,0.0001864338,0.0003089431,0.009102887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9335403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347185300","doi":"10.1177/1094428116647785","title":"Systematic Behavioral Observation for Emergent Team Phenomena","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Computer science; Management science; Data science; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Organizational behavior; Behavioural sciences; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2869013448512628,"gpt":0.5738299818436593,"spread":0.2869286369923965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004925563,0.0001110846,0.0001957981,0.0001968357,0.0002557085,0.00003655773,0.0003154429,0.00009929851,0.003360683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001516608,0.00007604606,0.00004874788,0.0006617014,0.00008040879,0.0001273141,0.00007594955,0.0001142904,0.0003090752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001984956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001139426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002076557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005967693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975384,0.0008685479,0.0003814235,0.0003212988,0.000465372,0.0004249036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970527,0.001383231,0.00009293437,0.0003759877,0.0009771283,0.0001180415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001920354,0.0008845992,0.03083769,0.002926148,0.0002648872,0.000002637391,0.003354135,0.00001182212,0.05125907,0.8437884,0.0224551,0.04402345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020782,0.006273034,0.4438448,0.007927021,0.000567812,0.0001257511,0.008520661,0.02113468,0.01872349,0.2256752,0.241897,0.004528612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09061053,0.0004070869,0.8962219,0.002630179,0.001552137,0.002382291,0.0001511108,0.000125462,0.005919281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6530886,0.0001350993,0.2530932,0.0002194095,0.001312866,0.001799085,0.0002477951,0.0001971147,0.08990686],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6431288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472509034","doi":"10.1177/1094428116656238","title":"“Zooming With”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"Brigham Young University","keywords":"Zoom; Reflexivity; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Knowledge management; Ethnography; Qualitative research; Sociology; Data science; Epistemology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1218319408481415,"gpt":0.4326183694627089,"spread":0.3107864286145674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002221544,0.0001295384,0.0001316745,0.0004263973,0.0005764964,0.0002153803,0.0003307507,0.00004041798,0.006119425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003250209,0.00007690343,0.00002058681,0.00228569,0.0001875585,0.0007910325,0.0004565102,0.00009436867,0.001155386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007072593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004540608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002793906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001525981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982105,0.00007770694,0.0001742505,0.0003263621,0.0008319531,0.0003792147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977273,0.0006121412,0.0000661202,0.0001952109,0.001380031,0.00001924101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003483701,0.0000536991,0.08960434,0.00005121344,0.00005703111,0.000007660069,0.00002021868,0.00000313999,0.009479834,0.8587211,0.02362484,0.01834204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001031569,0.0000267485,0.108007,0.0001057161,0.00003153898,0.000003264497,0.0002088756,0.0001884953,0.002212765,0.1448968,0.7428464,0.0004408175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007538023,0.0002351156,0.67561,0.02305537,0.0003224929,0.0005862624,0.00000268627,0.0003828932,0.2922671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6925393,0.0001148681,0.2707845,0.002385845,0.004229595,0.00007013353,0.00004621752,0.0001928223,0.02963679],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7192216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123559407","doi":"10.1177/1094428106290199","title":"Ethnostatistics and Organizational Research Methodologies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Construct (python library); Field (mathematics); Relevance (law); Organizational studies; Centrality; Sociology; Epistemology; Organization development; Management science; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Statistics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3129129160368437,"gpt":0.5185534153953503,"spread":0.2056404993585066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01257314,0.0002487798,0.0002950936,0.001280292,0.002034722,0.0008418018,0.0005491083,0.0001529194,0.004095114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02320412,0.0002328417,0.00002967441,0.006439273,0.0008430555,0.0007063081,0.001638836,0.0005739694,0.0005523281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001349591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001221454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005300062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008637796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953154,0.0007954803,0.0004693342,0.0006771272,0.001971375,0.0007712616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989592,0.00459845,0.0001219631,0.000300777,0.00535037,0.00003650942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001736591,0.00007039411,0.02784135,0.0001211722,0.00003491051,0.000008934717,0.00004242815,0.0000557223,0.002236399,0.8935677,0.07336366,0.002639966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003678055,0.0000183249,0.1074853,0.00002330831,0.00002445954,0.000003800088,0.0005731392,0.0009607286,0.0007568072,0.7542278,0.135246,0.0003124864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008979245,0.003171593,0.6222619,0.02194727,0.0009744774,0.001863585,0.0000504326,0.0008163336,0.3399352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2229591,0.0003695007,0.7576005,0.0010852,0.005000205,0.00007427831,0.001068972,0.0002276873,0.01161456],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3283207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964855696","doi":"10.1177/1094428106290786","title":"Ethnostatistics and Sensemaking","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensemaking; Accreditation; Meaning (existential); Rhetoric; Sociology; Position (finance); Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1038571576985953,"gpt":0.4412349686473623,"spread":0.337377810948767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001973073,0.0001158714,0.0001245156,0.0003686692,0.0007075113,0.0003796069,0.0001447639,0.0000466238,0.001146561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002638406,0.0001097253,0.00001380872,0.001669661,0.0001721855,0.0003549405,0.0004764879,0.0001495448,0.0001919813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003531928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002175441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003356944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006126748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985495,0.00007914154,0.0002002004,0.0002728668,0.0006017782,0.0002964993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982769,0.0005866173,0.00006497723,0.0001141822,0.0009459261,0.00001141978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000479188,0.00002984112,0.04554953,0.00007335722,0.00001348991,0.000006680536,0.00001228344,0.00002734945,0.001131903,0.9195334,0.03008074,0.00353667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003498555,0.000007531218,0.1878301,0.00002352697,0.00002807922,0.00000323608,0.0002417651,0.003864502,0.0003906381,0.5276451,0.2793191,0.0002964846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01391474,0.001505862,0.6056024,0.008594115,0.0004962721,0.0007148176,0.00001111047,0.000395917,0.3687647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7011296,0.00009097535,0.284538,0.001482868,0.003745555,0.00001895047,0.00029634,0.0001140078,0.008583681],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6872149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388849514","doi":"10.1177/10944281231215119","title":"Resisting the Objectification of Qualitative Research: The Unsilencing of Context, Researchers, and Noninterview Data","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Objectification; Context (archaeology); Qualitative research; Unpacking; Sociology; Foregrounding; Qualitative property; Subjectivity; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7921531406770574,"gpt":0.6288974703516088,"spread":0.1632556703254486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0658907,0.0001035438,0.0001913001,0.0006111808,0.001432277,0.0002071328,0.001311342,0.0000455396,0.0004438956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05948232,0.00006579207,0.00002411779,0.00795557,0.00123269,0.0004866662,0.003372502,0.0004144799,0.00006604449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004021628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001365089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001077846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002130145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946547,0.002371271,0.0004601891,0.0003902027,0.001745546,0.0003781191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806139,0.01405469,0.0002354895,0.00079083,0.004286965,0.0000180977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006693294,0.00006487907,0.006873943,0.0009956378,0.0002066757,0.00000206509,0.008716647,0.0000328705,0.004508103,0.8567787,0.09358217,0.02817142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009076807,0.00009322382,0.1753216,0.0008502675,0.0001304654,0.000002370384,0.2986131,0.02758143,0.004205179,0.3037615,0.1880366,0.0004966991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.16492,0.04456501,0.09339808,0.4472665,0.001769334,0.01322488,0.0004284992,0.0008659684,0.2335618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912108,0.0008650539,0.004853359,0.0001688722,0.0004665708,0.00003665997,0.0002348009,0.00004941406,0.002114495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8262908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168078160","doi":"10.1177/1094428107300339","title":"Bayesian Variance Estimation for Meta-Analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Residual; Variance (accounting); Econometrics; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Variance components; One-way analysis of variance; Meta-analysis; Computer science; Mathematics; Analysis of variance; Economics; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9274015330511794,"gpt":0.7330875766086397,"spread":0.1943139564425398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6322394,0.0002650787,0.003820819,0.002262449,0.0006159521,0.001236831,0.002175852,0.0001460286,0.08395054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4044811,0.0001388662,0.003571327,0.01910058,0.0001316144,0.0003608639,0.0001987502,0.0002530742,0.001203587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001053019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002325896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001096412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003175598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9459873,0.0322706,0.00756645,0.001545498,0.01196854,0.0006616225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8369332,0.1301657,0.003532532,0.005876367,0.02285052,0.0006416754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005623887,0.0003074559,0.004895841,0.00009500315,0.1514617,0.000008772325,0.0009056461,0.01542321,0.002018315,0.631151,0.1075641,0.08611266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002232918,0.00006983493,0.007736681,0.000002084088,0.06018253,0.000007362441,0.0003471659,0.3226471,0.002177685,0.4279681,0.1782523,0.0003859224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005529329,0.0005953758,0.9864398,0.00277193,0.00009321127,0.0009438685,0.00004315712,0.00000965328,0.009047722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06513981,0.000004453371,0.9059597,0.0002424438,0.0001240445,0.0001259227,0.00008593724,0.00002570108,0.02829194],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3072239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3091627933","doi":"10.1177/1094428120959827","title":"Multilevel Methods and Statistics: The Next Frontier","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Multilevel model; Frontier; Extant taxon; Data science; Field (mathematics); Management science; Sociology; Computer science; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3916304005617204,"gpt":0.5970838665802568,"spread":0.2054534660185364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008526627,0.00008444284,0.0001407225,0.00004104931,0.001505422,0.0002657345,0.0003692731,0.0001103359,0.002556905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0236665,0.00006365665,0.0000230782,0.0009868395,0.0009198554,0.0001725503,0.0002389051,0.0004284994,0.00006192097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006503505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003825207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002974683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004012018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921519,0.006281198,0.0001647384,0.0002651436,0.0007513816,0.000385686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924923,0.006308597,0.00004011667,0.0001041949,0.0007539506,0.000300796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002116012,0.00002028744,0.0005937964,0.00001067033,0.00003390033,0.000002512053,0.04609975,0.000004525192,0.001370249,0.4216302,0.04345967,0.4867533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003188881,0.00008460394,0.008634804,0.000009851633,0.00002242144,9.732375e-7,0.02991574,0.00848115,0.000889529,0.2509699,0.7004019,0.0002702121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005061743,0.001626367,0.9603176,0.02404672,0.0002508488,0.0003576231,0.00002450206,0.00005614358,0.01281405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01553976,0.0008961203,0.9782329,0.001357993,0.001292306,0.00002022829,0.00001646398,0.00002853068,0.002615718],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6569422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101232261","doi":"10.1177/1094428108321153","title":"Decimal Dust, Significant Digits, and the Search for Stars","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Decimal; Rounding; Heuristics; Sample (material); Arithmetic; Numerical digit; Statistics; Mathematics; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6711352949265189,"gpt":0.6261322037562496,"spread":0.04500309117026935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01389314,0.0001111118,0.0002277405,0.0001669143,0.000799487,0.00008603329,0.0002997926,0.00007428271,0.0003914683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08613502,0.00007384044,0.00003695473,0.0006661761,0.001069652,0.00006217854,0.0001735019,0.0002949822,0.00001366874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007113718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006472724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001521345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001095054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954454,0.002947549,0.0002785646,0.0002830683,0.0006616563,0.0003837238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9377438,0.06033306,0.00004850878,0.0002738685,0.001472543,0.0001281914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001556778,0.00006729674,0.0006733402,0.00005344426,0.00004005939,0.000002050834,0.001670169,0.000003208143,0.001715271,0.945914,0.04168865,0.008016782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001956787,0.0001203682,0.007571919,0.00001851722,0.0000278132,0.00006205516,0.002388607,0.001298038,0.02642037,0.9135498,0.04634767,0.0002380666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01099658,0.0002092126,0.981028,0.004142606,0.0002173831,0.0008808315,0.00008488567,0.00005281617,0.002387672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0183173,0.0004348859,0.9736629,0.0001205636,0.0001893432,0.0001113338,0.00003312723,0.00004293043,0.007087648],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07224189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9215629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101152940","doi":"10.1177/1094428106286984","title":"Programs for Problems Created by Continuous Variable Distributions in Moderated Multiple Regression","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Normality; Multivariate statistics; Econometrics; Statistics; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Regression analysis; Trustworthiness; Variance (accounting); Data set; Multivariate analysis of variance; Variable (mathematics); Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2446448843646756,"gpt":0.5484134780655718,"spread":0.3037685937008963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004543615,0.0001792508,0.0003496692,0.0001359731,0.0003736687,0.00009780531,0.0002022748,0.0001772534,0.0001301468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02416656,0.0001491518,0.00003390239,0.001436523,0.0001565763,0.0001386328,0.00009545747,0.0003379565,0.000003106189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002145219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001836013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000136884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002460458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965495,0.001336137,0.000515122,0.0004642335,0.0004931265,0.0006418898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908366,0.007067604,0.00009669788,0.000245691,0.001622964,0.0001304468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001224785,0.001217633,0.0008459247,0.0001736427,0.00002350547,0.000002502108,0.00006619986,0.000446184,0.1346765,0.8356955,0.01255723,0.0141727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009541233,0.00009413461,0.00006192616,0.00009676983,0.00000961848,0.000002593507,0.00003166675,0.07116269,0.01937503,0.9002163,0.007821583,0.0001735105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008526967,0.0001153027,0.9956088,0.0002750438,0.00003866203,0.001591243,0.0003932519,0.00009941237,0.0010256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02074259,0.00001098651,0.9738246,0.000008040464,0.00005749523,0.0005417369,0.001515818,0.00006411008,0.003234687],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1153014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116253140","doi":"10.1177/1094428115589189","title":"Rejoinder","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"University of New South Wales","keywords":"Nomothetic and idiographic; Nomothetic; Epistemology; Positivism; Snowball sampling; Sociology; Exploratory research; Grounded theory; Field (mathematics); Qualitative research; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.300754107566683,"gpt":0.4857897829601333,"spread":0.1850356753934503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004749541,0.0001261569,0.0001413386,0.0004854194,0.0004290477,0.0003503996,0.000377824,0.00005646922,0.003301305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008277334,0.0001132404,0.00002589724,0.003218083,0.0001329818,0.0007269859,0.0007310496,0.0001877622,0.002836175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009662373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009692202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008019157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001408473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978415,0.0001210356,0.0002121695,0.0003058757,0.001152287,0.0003671108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968991,0.0002456465,0.00006301443,0.0002084238,0.002545925,0.00003785547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001462099,0.00006262691,0.02366824,0.0000324988,0.00003009808,0.000005207006,0.00005275935,0.00004745018,0.0002383696,0.7292725,0.2441013,0.002474277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003922074,0.00000885368,0.0141643,0.000009052797,0.00001281715,0.000001302061,0.0004484919,0.00098627,0.0002091169,0.2549524,0.7286223,0.0001929381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00223082,0.0006085002,0.1452172,0.01269535,0.0008435029,0.0005216674,0.000002067282,0.0003764684,0.8375044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5829113,0.00008639419,0.3467311,0.009144536,0.01154284,0.00008946846,0.0004989686,0.0002927367,0.04870266],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7888018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013998141","doi":"10.1177/1094428108327881","title":"A Proposal for Operationalizing the Pace and Scope of Organizational Change in Management Studies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Construct (python library); Pace; Scope (computer science); CLARITY; Organizational change; Organizational studies; Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Change management (ITSM); Organizational performance; Psychology; Process management; Business; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Marketing; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1968099104389794,"gpt":0.4864331267850287,"spread":0.2896232163460493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003685565,0.0001605838,0.0002277711,0.0005006811,0.000605862,0.0001756807,0.0003053342,0.00004428915,0.000247561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002653007,0.0001200953,0.00002471392,0.002758875,0.0002019022,0.000592944,0.0004293079,0.0001173197,0.00001496784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007082359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005869411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002609782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003940117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981634,0.0001257346,0.0003626019,0.0003462694,0.0006988206,0.0003031885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973536,0.0005853307,0.000115394,0.0001550744,0.001776984,0.00001362813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003117987,0.00009130828,0.01076712,0.0003010234,0.00007074182,0.000001579252,0.0003365901,0.00004249293,0.0004049206,0.9786643,0.004989405,0.004299299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001835207,0.0000918587,0.2655222,0.0003172677,0.00009794069,0.000002973531,0.002979529,0.00353666,0.0009741882,0.6933326,0.03080704,0.0005025733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05112479,0.0655089,0.262644,0.4840029,0.002339739,0.03258814,0.00009732359,0.00075419,0.10094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6693749,0.003472456,0.3171605,0.004598887,0.002172588,0.0004261782,0.0003119176,0.000114138,0.002368324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6182501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4897343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039681502","doi":"10.1177/1094428112438699","title":"The Use of Random Coefficient Modeling for Understanding and Predicting Job Performance Ratings","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Conscientiousness; Job performance; Psychology; Confirmatory factor analysis; Econometrics; Common-method variance; Social psychology; Statistics; Job satisfaction; Structural equation modeling; Mathematics; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7051617245278957,"gpt":0.5929536123058086,"spread":0.1122081122220872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01159432,0.00009129781,0.0001873578,0.00007338529,0.0008528556,0.00006556117,0.0001094296,0.00005290915,0.00001183591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05628907,0.00006276898,0.00002498006,0.0003367097,0.0001967186,0.0002266151,0.0001319765,0.000198652,2.314321e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000958595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007118741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002659407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.208372e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977611,0.0008293772,0.0003499953,0.0001603772,0.0004788739,0.000420333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641457,0.03481682,0.00008524914,0.0001525053,0.0006811062,0.0001186662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001143919,0.00003587123,0.000868557,0.0001651401,0.00002831383,5.991065e-8,0.0009247071,0.003829042,0.003077859,0.9804934,0.00009915156,0.01036354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003828318,0.00003777249,0.0000293889,0.00004528181,0.00001387031,0.00000233746,0.0004235496,0.7202575,0.001426478,0.2770879,0.0002314972,0.00006166453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01246481,0.000142495,0.986544,0.0001347814,0.00007439625,0.0004901804,0.00001559361,0.00001783528,0.0001159128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2368678,0.00008067559,0.7627836,0.000009417932,0.00007041919,0.0000269904,0.000002775455,0.00002625582,0.0001320167],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7164285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414641939","doi":"10.1177/10944281251377154","title":"Generative Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Data Analysis: Analyzing—Or Just Chatting?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Generative grammar; Qualitative research; sort; Interpretation (philosophy); Qualitative property; Thematic analysis; Artifact (error); Generative model","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5143227817647522,"gpt":0.6391483870820126,"spread":0.1248256053172604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0240993,0.000237448,0.0004669381,0.002799992,0.0006038548,0.0006758971,0.004164733,0.0001496991,0.0005326486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02909654,0.0002153192,0.00006590872,0.03145292,0.0003921526,0.001213122,0.002605836,0.000703268,0.0001347779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003947511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001519851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003796197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00111022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889188,0.006806341,0.0009413463,0.001441728,0.001089011,0.0008028158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987013,0.008459878,0.0001571445,0.002022326,0.002163533,0.0001841053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003954149,0.0002205226,0.0004304271,0.00002328013,0.0002638122,0.00003006132,0.01061722,0.003197477,0.00262492,0.9148656,0.0004845813,0.06720258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004106871,0.00006774755,0.0004817205,0.00004442597,0.0000433644,0.000001428902,0.01106036,0.6250614,0.06189918,0.3002338,0.0007839536,0.0002815346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005649469,0.0002833213,0.9890429,0.007526314,0.0001935121,0.000366721,0.00002233799,0.00008509883,0.001914815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1149882,0.0001072292,0.8827335,0.000322615,0.0001226046,0.00005078454,0.0001233416,0.00002010288,0.001531604],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.621864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.989134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152757094","doi":"10.1177/1094428107300202","title":"Deconstructing Scholarship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Structuring; Variety (cybernetics); Relevance (law); Scholarship; Craft; Citation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Tacit knowledge; Computer science; Citation analysis; Knowledge management; Data science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; World Wide Web; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9114990024173193,"gpt":0.791205183478571,"spread":0.1202938189387482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3985402,0.0001286048,0.0002412598,0.059936,0.001086544,0.003064316,0.003192364,0.0001832905,0.007537023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6369525,0.00009778562,0.00008429056,0.3134111,0.000491395,0.0008352364,0.001444239,0.001016736,0.001606242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003265118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007250163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001849223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009075713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9722204,0.003283605,0.00100312,0.0009945142,0.02105675,0.001441571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8487735,0.1111241,0.0002735081,0.001505275,0.03668821,0.00163543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001614041,0.00005824227,0.2715191,0.000002424936,0.000009855752,0.00001824227,0.00007373972,0.000005780306,0.01969862,0.08733825,0.002290823,0.6189688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003613796,0.0000926485,0.4848058,0.000008071372,0.000001954859,0.00005814807,0.0009359997,0.0006841139,0.0667886,0.3557685,0.09025416,0.0002406306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1808596,0.0006930651,0.7268878,0.00153171,0.0006925084,0.0002918228,0.00000934582,0.00005890707,0.08897528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5683432,0.00003841533,0.4275219,0.0001077937,0.0002902911,0.000002783616,0.000005497901,0.00002415359,0.003665978],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6187282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3104205785","doi":"10.1177/1094428120969884","title":"Anticipating and Addressing the Politicization of Research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Ideology; Politics; Sociology; Identity (music); Epistemology; Work (physics); Obstacle; Process (computing); Public relations; Political science; Positive economics; Social science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5244504102721571,"gpt":0.5480158301550799,"spread":0.02356541988292282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005966946,0.00009962467,0.0001560575,0.0003282035,0.001151718,0.0003180218,0.0003532729,0.00004574365,0.0008385699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01551149,0.00007501603,0.00001898121,0.004329605,0.0005166269,0.000438744,0.001022162,0.0003074008,0.00006001873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002589777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005997708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001277642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006455269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974865,0.0003869677,0.0002898118,0.000286345,0.001181674,0.0003687265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955857,0.001556693,0.0001017073,0.000144228,0.002583704,0.00002794805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002286653,0.00004100522,0.06139557,0.0004975551,0.00004460024,0.000002109424,0.0006997,0.00006263181,0.006035439,0.9180453,0.008058128,0.005095038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001703808,0.0001395527,0.352631,0.000466065,0.0001425122,0.000003960982,0.01590885,0.09509806,0.01282313,0.3682706,0.15193,0.0008825446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1505727,0.004356297,0.3152465,0.2032453,0.0006020968,0.003693904,0.00002121756,0.0005377661,0.3217243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983581,0.00006237825,0.01367639,0.001143863,0.001229853,0.00001156905,0.00003221482,0.00003901437,0.000223709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8330083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406300739","doi":"10.1177/10944281241310574","title":"Surveying the Upper Echelons: An Update to Cycyota and Harrison (2006) on Top Manager Response Rates and Recommendations for the Future","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Upper echelons; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1140018070830061,"gpt":0.4879327303528684,"spread":0.3739309232698623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01608353,0.0001210714,0.0001218103,0.0003450978,0.001659098,0.0008452333,0.0003671468,0.00006811647,0.0003197646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004696929,0.00007730861,0.00002087628,0.001799304,0.0000907006,0.0004125625,0.0003813963,0.0002782591,0.00002658682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003505869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007173685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000189569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002613696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997902,0.001010982,0.0001948681,0.0003421276,0.0002718953,0.0002781508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993807,0.005069879,0.00004719872,0.0003564546,0.0006919866,0.00002754439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001396943,0.0001488829,0.01800276,0.0002534378,0.0001444201,0.000001354391,0.000954858,0.00008401625,0.001577529,0.6041896,0.1196508,0.2535953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002850553,0.00002043556,0.1787803,0.00003985753,0.00002784143,5.676251e-7,0.004086414,0.002698795,0.0002568448,0.01547653,0.7981997,0.0001277628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08911838,0.0009952054,0.05352131,0.8527434,0.000598424,0.001709881,0.00005884428,0.000092154,0.001162326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5851714,0.001950207,0.173642,0.2027111,0.006931865,0.001224315,0.001118109,0.0003269332,0.02692404],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6785488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607492691","doi":"10.1177/1094428103006003003","title":"How to Deal with Missing Categorical Data: Test of a Simple Bayesian Method","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Missing data; Imputation (statistics); Bayesian probability; Computer science; Regression; Statistics; Regression analysis; Data mining; Econometrics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2853940616044742,"gpt":0.5576315963265147,"spread":0.2722375347220405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01157226,0.0002011138,0.0004651883,0.0002836733,0.0002697574,0.0001884584,0.0006903062,0.0001191754,0.0007120274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1056991,0.00015431,0.00002611658,0.002644252,0.0002012441,0.0001865074,0.0002988933,0.0004284293,0.000006941783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001063201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007636196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002978226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001134835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931231,0.004070884,0.0003990149,0.0006353979,0.00118551,0.0005861097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610198,0.03574469,0.0001230322,0.0009146096,0.001709624,0.0004882104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002596531,0.0002058108,0.001393124,0.0001194411,0.00003928059,0.00001802752,0.0001598198,0.00000133787,0.01299796,0.8908046,0.002323964,0.09191067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002840985,0.0002796717,0.0007019725,0.00003564248,0.00003426096,0.00005744923,0.0002465046,0.001621404,0.03409451,0.9506983,0.01171666,0.0002295797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000390385,0.00002545699,0.9945213,0.00166296,0.00002056637,0.0003616515,0.00009097142,0.00003531408,0.003242722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007882115,0.00000426923,0.9915045,0.00006294974,0.00008525346,0.00001708428,0.00003458149,0.00006783514,0.0003414478],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09412679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.901834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402546628","doi":"10.1177/10944281241271323","title":"One Size Does Not Fit All: Unraveling Item Response Process Heterogeneity Using the Mixture Dominance-Unfolding Model (MixDUM)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Dominance (genetics); Item response theory; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Chemistry; Psychometrics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3652673129139294,"gpt":0.5867075381417085,"spread":0.2214402252277791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01503674,0.0002778482,0.0003430551,0.0002956907,0.0006783999,0.0003199169,0.0007832572,0.0003655817,0.002213809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006349566,0.0001902965,0.0001225658,0.00182785,0.0004345273,0.0001972388,0.0001969621,0.001203542,0.00006650887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002211364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000597852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004489577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001517841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918234,0.004801532,0.0004968531,0.0009626464,0.001028888,0.000886728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876906,0.01061343,0.00008097248,0.0006085617,0.000804578,0.0002018777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003443321,0.0005303444,0.0009634877,0.0003832067,0.001025865,0.0001458359,0.02720575,0.003505558,0.8694565,0.06995796,0.003194058,0.02018813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00459695,0.0008289009,0.04328806,0.001409293,0.0006083117,0.0009863698,0.008379221,0.4055758,0.2806235,0.1443033,0.1059117,0.003488625],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7505227,0.001695483,0.22617,0.01817065,0.001062427,0.0006466849,0.0002281153,0.0001826813,0.001321202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8997559,0.00006946611,0.09279197,0.001874345,0.0007324512,0.00007338646,0.00002346553,0.0001349812,0.004544056],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.588833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}