{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":46,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":46,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"65b986286aaa","filters":{"venue":"Ottawa Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W3179039051","doi":"","title":"Corporate Stakeholders in Canada—An Overview and a Proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Statutory law; Stakeholder analysis; Statute; Stakeholder theory; Shareholder; Business; Public relations; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1951138478063188,"gpt":0.2662354070395456,"spread":0.0711215592332268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005261771,0.0001892866,0.0003937916,0.00004030728,0.00006975179,0.0001361823,0.0001816532,0.00002612509,0.000238677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001031975,0.000147676,0.00002805689,0.0002622257,0.00005233087,0.0008126996,0.00007355743,0.0001071109,0.00008734746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001109705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004787825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7383098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988183,0.00003069223,0.0003571688,0.0002889668,0.0002549151,0.0002499842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992607,0.000007879696,0.000290182,0.0002752431,0.0001145124,0.0000515122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004079669,0.00002810618,0.003852387,0.002571201,0.000005895189,0.00009148371,0.000006547362,0.000001375108,0.000001199369,0.9730791,0.01648636,0.003872279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004340651,0.00001057924,0.001761124,0.001609476,0.00005361244,0.000006545691,0.00002071497,0.0001050311,9.034023e-7,0.05943526,0.9362686,0.0002941276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.471873,0.3055889,0.00001153743,0.01221223,0.001349446,0.004365311,0.00002381371,0.0003166015,0.2042591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565398,0.006789255,0.0002174366,0.03469875,0.0006486582,0.00008636789,0.0001445433,0.0000830951,0.0007920846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6022054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396690612","doi":"10.7202/1111095ar","title":"The Future of Treaty Interpretation in Yahey v British Columbia: Clarification on Cumulative Effects, Common Intentions, and Treaty Infringement","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"David Suzuki Foundation","keywords":"Treaty; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00900719023656461,"gpt":0.2936056872627835,"spread":0.2845984970262189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001252493,0.00005484491,0.0001611679,0.00001773976,0.0006307152,0.00009244064,0.0001371889,0.00002994181,0.00008435005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009652418,0.00006097133,0.00005940184,0.0001873776,0.00009469314,0.0001217661,0.00003533124,0.0001463304,0.00000209627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003282479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03511194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3802098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983327,0.0007395155,0.0003095799,0.0001477706,0.0003707146,0.00009970391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993355,0.0002316871,0.000217695,0.0001061549,0.00008547231,0.00002346386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001438232,0.0001575836,0.009924626,0.0002802309,0.00002893162,0.000002419618,0.0007166736,0.00001201814,0.000008316617,0.768939,0.003051855,0.216864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004230632,0.000190413,0.09499471,0.001721759,0.00006246057,0.000002337652,0.0005413081,0.0001213192,0.00001067599,0.008596609,0.8931941,0.0001412494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5223958,0.1292822,0.0001384728,0.02519122,0.002413602,0.008764623,0.0002163952,0.0001559619,0.3114417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788349,0.01947605,0.00002376789,0.0005252359,0.0000467802,0.0002416841,0.00005398684,0.000005693025,0.0007919576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8901423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9713134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019924","doi":"10.7202/1105760ar","title":"Deceptive Design and Ongoing Consent in Privacy Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Privacy law; Law; Information privacy; Psychology; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Privacy policy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04872657270097992,"gpt":0.2843932778620251,"spread":0.2356667051610452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003139345,0.0001135056,0.0002365708,0.00003041893,0.0001229463,0.0001520746,0.00007632879,0.00003147398,0.0005784381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001148495,0.000105607,0.0000587473,0.0003272945,0.00006444623,0.0004038351,0.0001038613,0.00009276802,0.0003041227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002834626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003160352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004100222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001515553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991966,0.00004127134,0.0002486786,0.0002219735,0.0001139988,0.0001774321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995599,0.00007426448,0.00009456036,0.000174832,0.00008058784,0.00001589336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001210229,0.00005649896,0.0001873465,0.001127835,0.00001112831,0.00002551182,0.000004656261,0.000003540201,0.00004199045,0.9831167,0.01001739,0.005406141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002143215,0.000002075855,0.0004178504,0.001985228,0.00004730289,0.00001008314,0.00001910496,0.0001304694,0.00001663211,0.001095893,0.9959335,0.0001275147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009133237,0.06199292,0.002242058,0.01093936,0.0002468396,0.0007383788,0.000001790155,0.0001150635,0.9228103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7706463,0.08077434,0.006150711,0.1381907,0.0007118792,0.0002791562,0.00008824172,0.0001009838,0.003057658],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6333492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784731","doi":"10.7202/1111194ar","title":"Gatekeeping Reconciliation: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Piecemeal Erosion of Aboriginal Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Charter; Sociology; History; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02823347896043296,"gpt":0.3104470827724549,"spread":0.282213603812022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001374984,0.00009154844,0.0003300393,0.000006112101,0.001476327,0.000008089532,0.000345483,0.0000205616,0.0009670987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009954566,0.00006061996,0.00009618983,0.0002529421,0.0002820399,0.00007945221,0.00004469433,0.0001405721,0.000002547025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004930085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005377979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8223768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8834199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979159,0.0004905962,0.0004141941,0.0001444779,0.0008184686,0.0002163555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990647,0.0001613779,0.0003420832,0.0001586872,0.0002206103,0.00005255752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008297336,0.00007572039,0.001316393,0.0009093247,0.00008287768,0.000003622667,0.007881409,0.00003032712,0.0001287205,0.8360398,0.1508803,0.002643179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008034585,0.00002043121,0.001095441,0.0004695363,0.00004677406,6.507661e-7,0.0004894336,0.000003368821,0.00005104768,0.0002604615,0.997401,0.00008153373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07361507,0.2484423,0.00001718262,0.1438499,0.002997538,0.004541816,0.0002531562,0.0001111941,0.5261718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872628,0.01016568,0.0001007818,0.001010462,0.0001278564,0.00007129359,0.000008693865,0.000006239122,0.001246221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9136477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400881146","doi":"10.7202/1112508ar","title":"Mediator Liability 23 Years Later: The “Three C’s” of Case Law, Codes, &amp; Custom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediator; Liability; Law; Business; Political science; Medicine; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03205114993770327,"gpt":0.2794745769289808,"spread":0.2474234269912775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009107946,0.0001318927,0.0003019155,0.00003956154,0.0001873667,0.00007886026,0.0002440251,0.00005052954,0.0007356883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001034085,0.00009391145,0.0001844997,0.0007108095,0.000167364,0.0002895833,0.0001472314,0.0001234948,0.003445416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002022756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001702674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00173918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01142295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998916,0.00002757855,0.0003832083,0.0002092327,0.0002367735,0.0002271749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990667,0.0000734948,0.0002011351,0.0005290358,0.0001087356,0.00002095958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002429404,0.00008002723,0.001030483,0.003293582,0.00005182841,0.00005778937,0.0000106218,0.000007042461,0.00001904348,0.7318617,0.2553684,0.008217091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001092316,0.000001888696,0.001196826,0.0003735021,0.0001329348,0.00001355087,0.00001165907,0.0001133099,0.000001881686,0.0007188545,0.9972176,0.0001087908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06057802,0.02490565,0.0001598317,0.02537546,0.002509029,0.003301969,0.0001521206,0.001024695,0.8819932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775483,0.006477445,0.0001048948,0.01193026,0.0008810769,0.0002126295,0.0002105005,0.00006962081,0.002565256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9169703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020093","doi":"10.7202/1105956ar","title":"“Other Materials” — Traitorous Love and Decolonizing the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02054674410615965,"gpt":0.3112986960041308,"spread":0.2907519518979712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008703896,0.00007449416,0.0001449019,0.000001670002,0.0006408559,0.0002264386,0.0001392691,0.00007684883,0.001115064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001569074,0.00005218916,0.00004621264,0.0002157119,0.000117314,0.0001290592,0.00001613685,0.00006431404,0.0001350809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001524185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003398348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2081428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9555919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990975,0.0001925447,0.0001631232,0.0001420468,0.0001791837,0.000225644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995253,0.00004047307,0.00004511124,0.0001248636,0.0001141147,0.0001501567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[2.820019e-7,0.000005009421,0.00002467628,0.0001479515,0.00001515407,0.000008431588,0.00516286,2.917331e-7,0.00008953638,0.8886757,0.1027295,0.003140515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003625251,0.000004950006,0.0001055071,0.0003044551,0.00002671506,0.000004574533,0.0009912679,8.540303e-8,0.00006996503,0.0006416123,0.9977332,0.00008141456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003179764,0.04817859,0.000007372118,0.1272275,0.0007742674,0.0007596156,0.00004255542,0.00003306732,0.8197972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4138376,0.08604459,0.00660483,0.3821418,0.003430971,0.0001731124,0.00006814561,0.000101027,0.107598],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8950037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400879696","doi":"10.7202/1112504ar","title":"Speech of Justice McKinnon: Induction Into the Common Law Honour Society","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05323877694658328,"gpt":0.3711379928403167,"spread":0.3178992158937334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001542934,0.00007163259,0.0001823049,0.000005576238,0.0007811159,0.00003564499,0.0003430865,0.00005783652,0.0001082701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003975104,0.00005048311,0.0001416642,0.0007395702,0.00034496,0.000119778,0.00007648591,0.00015056,0.0002740895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004263156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005641827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01238251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990031,0.0001591972,0.0002578782,0.0001434245,0.0002688945,0.0001675322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992869,0.000122968,0.0001419698,0.000310605,0.00008976248,0.00004772868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[1.849697e-7,0.00001454181,0.00001435215,0.0004261934,0.000008846212,2.626993e-7,0.001120122,0.000001098241,0.00005026553,0.9645508,0.02164401,0.01216931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003131046,0.000006141267,0.0001014211,0.0002644208,0.00007721107,5.407117e-7,0.0005158013,0.000006371558,0.00005485996,0.005459002,0.9934204,0.00006252278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01087374,0.02451781,0.00005826382,0.140402,0.0006540692,0.0018478,0.00002261187,0.0003287565,0.8212949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8734576,0.1073855,0.0009688287,0.01294758,0.0009701917,0.0001852088,0.00003303815,0.00002960223,0.004022423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9717764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696533","doi":"10.7202/1114749ar","title":"Debt, Deals, and Dominion: Insights on Canadian Insolvency Law from Debt and Federalism by Thomas G.W. Telfer and Virginia Torrie","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Dominion; Debt; Federalism; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01988775842622087,"gpt":0.2977578292982002,"spread":0.2778700708719793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003188984,0.0001430266,0.0002676832,0.00002138401,0.001049574,0.0001924633,0.0001353514,0.00009706766,0.00007286854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004300358,0.0001193492,0.00003216396,0.0002071922,0.0002512338,0.0001715559,0.00005036931,0.0001167814,0.0000573125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004717845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008410541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4679804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7944755,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988671,0.0001386595,0.0002171232,0.0003374405,0.0001699802,0.000269728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991379,0.0001573,0.00006183321,0.0001971469,0.00002764844,0.0004181783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[8.248226e-7,0.000008880819,0.0004926809,0.00008260466,0.00001060821,0.000006276405,0.0005585129,2.162408e-8,0.00001903435,0.9659538,0.0266819,0.006184801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001363443,0.00001580614,0.002148702,0.0003339391,0.00002348723,0.000001107937,0.0000578181,0.000002908957,0.000008134796,0.005679443,0.9914331,0.0001591952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1931939,0.193096,0.00000470678,0.05454941,0.0003092229,0.001919752,0.0004216477,0.0002045244,0.5563009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8795183,0.1084945,0.0001376702,0.01017835,0.000185325,0.00009547165,0.00007251962,0.00002287536,0.001294958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8072579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696867","doi":"10.7202/1114748ar","title":"Techno-Utopianism for Lawyers?: Abdi Aidid &amp; Benjamin Alarie, The Legal Singularity (2023)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Digital Transformation in Law","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Singularity; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04847266432629894,"gpt":0.2692669468030969,"spread":0.220794282476798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001595093,0.0002153535,0.0005407752,0.00007219561,0.0002906273,0.0002421416,0.0005330716,0.000117574,0.0004122013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002487238,0.0001925345,0.0003257535,0.000660378,0.0001601992,0.0005684767,0.00006896644,0.0001916695,0.003999875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006291011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000213199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002274412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004317224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981763,0.00001860482,0.0009139045,0.000393599,0.00008043894,0.0004171696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987316,0.0001298082,0.0002838322,0.000716326,0.00006199435,0.00007648233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.983504e-7,0.00002394863,0.0000547551,0.001109362,0.00002975146,0.000001039189,0.000015986,0.000003192914,0.000001133057,0.9775305,0.01818984,0.003039475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000198964,0.00001988947,0.0001187357,0.0003451968,0.00001701249,0.000006299704,0.000003103185,0.00004825528,0.00001700446,0.08092443,0.9180735,0.0002276486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003097142,0.04065681,0.01204245,0.02391701,0.001212756,0.002804651,0.001417537,0.0005172392,0.9171218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4151171,0.1747073,0.03430029,0.1103103,0.002504397,0.008036483,0.004908147,0.001051045,0.2490649],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784763","doi":"10.7202/1111192ar","title":"“Untethered”: How the majority decision in Toronto (City) v Ontario tries (but fails) to break away from the Supreme Court of Canada’s unwritten constitutional principle jurisprudence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Legislation; Obligation; Categorical variable; Constitutional review; High Court; Constitutional right; Constitutional theory; Normative; Political science; Constitutional court; Sociology; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Politics; Constitution; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.023964222277309,"gpt":0.292511346107088,"spread":0.268547123829779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002155415,0.0001492301,0.0003534259,0.000001699831,0.001495312,0.0000839663,0.001087793,0.00006389285,0.003415666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000324144,0.00009126755,0.0001488874,0.0002726475,0.0006790921,0.0002435017,0.0002461891,0.0003533396,0.000003297225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001995656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003178741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973094,0.0006007184,0.0003524632,0.000287212,0.001138665,0.0003115669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986326,0.0005345459,0.0001689355,0.000417994,0.0001417162,0.0001041772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001775655,0.00006988541,0.005787536,0.00005688351,0.00004472883,0.0000106181,0.006547472,0.00001588771,0.00001152343,0.8340144,0.1522222,0.001201154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001285352,0.00001519455,0.004663148,0.0003498895,0.00003397748,0.000002411575,0.005966402,5.811955e-7,0.000009881794,0.001243909,0.9874583,0.000127788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1024948,0.2295916,0.0001658597,0.2834274,0.002947007,0.006672759,0.001542775,0.0001043887,0.3730533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731938,0.007521169,0.0003949609,0.01220976,0.0002270702,0.0002343984,0.00003378722,0.00001088111,0.006174125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.870699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020097","doi":"10.7202/1105763ar","title":"L’accès à la justice en temps de pandémie : leçons apprises dans une clinique juridique","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05683290319225533,"gpt":0.4304499942108884,"spread":0.3736170910186331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01239871,0.0005531634,0.001760831,0.0000303594,0.001171234,0.00003466423,0.0004995875,0.001824215,0.002179286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006312353,0.0005097959,0.0005737929,0.00100165,0.0004415586,0.000230155,0.0002565409,0.00545715,0.001237655],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005576387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01188129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005340312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0121542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9783292,0.01662486,0.002189599,0.0008292209,0.0004802668,0.001546877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874055,0.009001409,0.0006188586,0.001306013,0.0005152029,0.001153054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005889295,0.0005261182,0.001684307,0.1457912,0.0001511399,0.0006060685,0.0125104,0.000002069473,0.00004033941,0.2997791,0.4972027,0.04170074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006304184,0.00008616481,0.001007568,0.04929399,0.001244611,0.0001607068,0.003106935,0.00001315845,0.00003623497,0.000940804,0.9430514,0.000428007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001166897,0.4487048,0.002802457,0.1912016,0.002287619,0.001988695,0.0001582361,0.0001797538,0.3515099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005855701,0.7975982,0.006780892,0.1502254,0.00211635,0.0003396681,0.0000965095,0.0001271509,0.03686018],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4458487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696509","doi":"10.7202/1114750ar","title":"Droit électoral québécois : repères et enjeux contemporains de Pierre Vallée","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2075482075410895,"gpt":0.4486595504913636,"spread":0.2411113429502741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003072767,0.0004129547,0.0007944831,0.00005121931,0.0005211394,0.0001759948,0.0005796136,0.000293196,0.001844366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001460406,0.0003951922,0.0004946901,0.00081584,0.00116407,0.0005257897,0.0001124487,0.0003839904,0.002088933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001444701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002091105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2578808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4302006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949294,0.001708128,0.0009359116,0.0006310334,0.0007068432,0.001088644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976388,0.000389742,0.000421725,0.000634095,0.0004172623,0.0004984176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001057771,0.00005510851,0.001086388,0.002038109,0.00007432439,0.00003789693,0.01057224,0.000004182529,0.00001510164,0.6885189,0.2952455,0.002351222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002062333,0.00003757637,0.003329274,0.003548912,0.0001906894,0.00001883234,0.001246144,0.00005640352,0.00001466818,0.002121184,0.9887583,0.0004717938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01234249,0.4840679,0.0000421134,0.285613,0.003601294,0.002365495,0.0003037367,0.0007447084,0.2109193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1175336,0.3906014,0.0007448113,0.1467595,0.002011253,0.0002405408,0.0003880714,0.000166779,0.341554],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6935128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207756132","doi":"10.7202/1105757ar","title":"A Pandemic Federal Election: Democracy Under Conditions of Emergency","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Democracy; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public administration; Medicine; Law; Politics; Internal medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04908734895265845,"gpt":0.3816702687375725,"spread":0.3325829197849141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005114927,0.0001070421,0.0003000444,0.00001782622,0.0006591299,0.0000216765,0.0001773992,0.00006689852,0.006450279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001733553,0.0001007292,0.0001797913,0.0005107818,0.000102098,0.0002059025,0.00003249863,0.0001192916,0.0001386808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001031663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002481045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001514725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01272938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983191,0.000376238,0.0004490377,0.0002260071,0.0003569524,0.0002726936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992186,0.00004911843,0.000188114,0.000236988,0.0002023013,0.0001048408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.811337e-7,0.0001504447,0.007739908,0.0006393783,0.00009021227,0.000009567464,0.0002659088,0.000001113752,0.000497379,0.9250127,0.0635745,0.002018071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001386061,0.00001337946,0.002809583,0.0008859402,0.00008396585,0.000004536435,0.00007143954,7.196514e-7,0.0001388757,0.04162918,0.9540582,0.0001656088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04152232,0.1499527,0.000681745,0.02923136,0.004013834,0.001664062,0.00006945261,0.0004234164,0.7724411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8236481,0.1436568,0.0005309644,0.008384048,0.0004823242,0.00008611238,0.00009235364,0.00003684714,0.02308251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019964","doi":"10.7202/1105761ar","title":"La place des autorités jurisprudentielles, de la doctrine et des faits d’intérêt public dans l’interprétation des lois au Canada : l’ascendance du contexte","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02692606463478807,"gpt":0.3303873247335358,"spread":0.3034612600987477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004205596,0.0003913174,0.0006841011,0.00002573971,0.001240513,0.0004359023,0.0006060894,0.0002019796,0.0009257957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002404606,0.0004041061,0.0002589494,0.0008936587,0.002586367,0.001022567,0.0001634274,0.0004544928,0.00006947914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002938066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004991026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8659187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937488,0.003370557,0.0006972032,0.0005758597,0.0006401523,0.0009674621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966707,0.001587553,0.0002940082,0.0003717941,0.0005472334,0.0005286718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007129119,0.00017766,0.007833605,0.007619862,0.00009551887,0.0004776368,0.008727926,0.000008152187,0.0000683363,0.8128853,0.02003507,0.1420638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002078671,0.00004505418,0.003932042,0.01434703,0.000293959,0.0002863053,0.00177982,0.00002386014,0.0001283708,0.001890522,0.9766532,0.0004119826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.107503,0.641987,0.001621839,0.02026167,0.001195943,0.0005122278,0.00009872343,0.0001024621,0.2267172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7409954,0.2453237,0.001346029,0.002167279,0.0003067265,0.00005184391,0.0000208611,0.00003792425,0.009750246],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9566181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019603","doi":"10.7202/olr","title":"Ottawa Law Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02834787802326639,"gpt":0.3589320265077607,"spread":0.3305841484844943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002445189,0.0004581347,0.001163136,0.00004415316,0.0004940381,0.0002307637,0.0008965774,0.0003587263,0.03493524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002039009,0.0003898164,0.0007061676,0.0004789608,0.0003205029,0.0002806626,0.0001032625,0.0006598099,0.1198485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003465916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004474993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01530276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01773557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958721,0.0006875253,0.001076014,0.0006892715,0.001168843,0.0005062016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981557,0.0001696522,0.000542041,0.0005264765,0.0004111626,0.0001949558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[1.549718e-7,0.00001145327,8.605317e-8,0.01547442,0.0000336569,0.000005919803,0.00001064409,4.798763e-8,2.13247e-7,0.4927559,0.4902193,0.001488199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003682285,0.00001478228,2.387531e-7,0.1162501,0.0003458448,0.000004805393,0.000001517265,2.069878e-7,0.000002547453,0.001972237,0.8809776,0.0003932373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[5.966415e-8,0.4583391,0.00000499104,0.01464974,0.00282769,0.0008177054,0.000133926,0.00005590151,0.5231709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00004534235,0.5808101,0.00006011845,0.03366838,0.001698602,0.0001743572,0.0006002037,0.00004868038,0.3828943],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4907837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400880852","doi":"10.7202/1112506ar","title":"Eliminating Guilt by Association: Reviewing the Limits of Ezokola in Canadian Refugee Law Complicity Decision‑Making (2013–2020)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Refugee; Association (psychology); Law; Refugee law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0331467607344857,"gpt":0.3531765005085518,"spread":0.3200297397740661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007556586,0.0001609845,0.0004761686,0.00005754502,0.0009230227,0.0001031068,0.0006607085,0.0001365569,0.0002965456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005004122,0.0001240909,0.0001577966,0.001330508,0.0001108902,0.0003376206,0.00004712502,0.0002478255,0.0001514515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006063159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002576952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2854597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9565881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968275,0.0008335568,0.000885197,0.0002873299,0.0006635495,0.0005028503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977471,0.0008075619,0.000507919,0.0004556644,0.000349811,0.0001320077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001144746,0.00002361089,0.003329129,0.0006577608,0.00002272344,0.00000273636,0.002251236,0.000007485095,0.00005973356,0.6452427,0.3094245,0.0389773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005735836,0.0000132126,0.0006964198,0.004027686,0.00003069779,6.036566e-7,0.0001337601,0.00006810465,0.00001865025,0.001315912,0.9934987,0.0001388698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05673398,0.3081904,0.0001610627,0.08800595,0.002078551,0.006480359,0.0002605788,0.0004261087,0.537663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8492057,0.1374814,0.0006811816,0.01027156,0.0003441312,0.0001447727,0.0001023476,0.00003700038,0.001731953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7924717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7192985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019965","doi":"10.7202/1105759ar","title":"Wither the Divisional Court? Looking at the Past, Analyzing the Present, and Querying the Future of Ontario’s Intermediary Appellate Court","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Court of record; Business; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01363107699274922,"gpt":0.2866863568475972,"spread":0.273055279854848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002569647,0.0001288318,0.0002327524,0.000007093353,0.001486329,0.0001318171,0.0004051128,0.00004988431,0.0007496029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003424194,0.00005041968,0.0001680704,0.0002135349,0.0006614724,0.00009887374,0.0002461138,0.0003051741,0.000008941346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008213032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001774358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01137133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981613,0.0006425416,0.0003068815,0.0002004599,0.0004664571,0.0002224024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998655,0.0005215715,0.0002464493,0.0004153894,0.0001152546,0.0000463873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000282422,0.0001159752,0.06039716,0.0008651956,0.0006951892,0.00002874377,0.05522577,0.00002846937,0.0001008463,0.2374941,0.1662205,0.4787998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006523574,0.000007208579,0.005263091,0.0008220027,0.0001450525,0.0000106293,0.0006604425,0.00001314255,0.000006973737,0.0003407082,0.9925947,0.0000708749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02244054,0.4992138,0.00007134295,0.3856594,0.000961834,0.001165602,0.00001189406,0.00003009407,0.09044558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8015639,0.171344,0.00003912737,0.009648598,0.00327852,0.00007519681,0.00001431835,0.00004013872,0.01399616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8263741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400880635","doi":"10.7202/1112507ar","title":"Considérations sur l’équité en matière de pertes et préjudices","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04180924274981215,"gpt":0.2662487581204763,"spread":0.2244395153706642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003672366,0.0003165297,0.001471352,0.0001372993,0.0003002625,0.0002661472,0.0004594814,0.0003067499,0.004678324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005785266,0.0004702041,0.0004557588,0.0005567397,0.0003229242,0.0006431484,0.0001381231,0.0003017418,0.01680425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003092772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001533929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008773803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009982019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963812,0.0002721872,0.001826936,0.0006835869,0.00006452607,0.0007715937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976646,0.0005589382,0.0008238654,0.0006793074,0.00007727821,0.0001960023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.09434e-7,0.00006368848,0.003718273,0.003781028,0.0001370279,0.00001328406,0.0003689424,0.00002116148,0.000001876097,0.7989824,0.1899222,0.00298915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000294552,0.0000512794,0.001429994,0.00380476,0.00008430317,0.00003076443,0.00005136986,0.0006397774,0.000006969799,0.04552904,0.947568,0.000509218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001249199,0.4201927,0.00009296933,0.05592874,0.002853615,0.0009577547,0.0009303403,0.000148378,0.5176463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08713757,0.8132454,0.0004143198,0.01759127,0.002467465,0.0003530817,0.0003047082,0.0001643563,0.07832181],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7576458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784727","doi":"10.7202/1111195ar","title":"Promoting Privacy, Fairness, and the Open Court Principle in Immigration and Refugee Proceedings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Immigration; Political science; Internet privacy; Criminology; Law; Computer security; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0333068797050475,"gpt":0.337187332621475,"spread":0.3038804529164275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004932551,0.00006808834,0.0001691237,0.00001450282,0.0009122594,0.0001981602,0.0003167595,0.00001447422,0.00004640112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003420106,0.0000496729,0.00001569484,0.0002308902,0.000163409,0.0004762458,0.0005160828,0.00017174,0.000003685787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004695003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004298162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003076494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002113849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988934,0.0003201951,0.0002227667,0.0002176179,0.0002095959,0.0001364386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996319,0.00005216968,0.0001471358,0.00009560153,0.00003708427,0.00003609687],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000212152,0.00003200061,0.0007112964,0.001415543,0.000004712922,0.000003590138,0.008287309,8.664736e-8,0.00002638664,0.9633005,0.001059728,0.02513767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002579385,0.00003510497,0.0003907262,0.0005334522,0.00004218883,0.000009548711,0.001323706,0.00003519891,0.000004590554,0.001017649,0.9962735,0.00007646295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4864007,0.1281196,0.00007063947,0.1455457,0.0004380138,0.02111243,0.00003727081,0.0002398869,0.2180357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649558,0.0310298,0.0002722137,0.002681628,0.00009651991,0.0005038964,0.00001167413,0.00001596776,0.0004325162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7016454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019642","doi":"10.7202/1105756ar","title":"What Meaning in a Right to Strike? MedReleaf and the Future of the Agricultural Employees Protection Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Agriculture; Business; Political science; History; Epistemology; Philosophy; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01306592208200144,"gpt":0.2471801745991963,"spread":0.2341142525171949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005941637,0.0001307296,0.0003184733,0.00001496035,0.0001935626,0.000264581,0.0001766131,0.00004798664,0.00003496844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002741107,0.00006061128,0.0001390607,0.0007718952,0.00008135838,0.0007078252,0.0001227152,0.0001530323,0.000004357935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002112424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009326847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004938187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990407,0.0001194657,0.0002747062,0.0001776647,0.0002082121,0.0001792824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999426,0.00002959467,0.0001477484,0.0002046646,0.0001801772,0.00001183251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004667046,0.0002507769,0.007572531,0.01404164,0.0001221399,0.00001612451,0.002313508,0.00002030446,0.0001054661,0.9190817,0.00537989,0.05104918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009908957,0.00001755211,0.04739369,0.006562866,0.0002962175,0.00000948086,0.01014419,0.000008534722,0.00008173667,0.01148375,0.9226682,0.0003428436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6874453,0.1493496,0.000005652455,0.1203354,0.0016845,0.005338402,0.000004642072,0.00008746584,0.035749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907212,0.004849502,0.000009079674,0.003819067,0.0004633125,0.00004158902,0.000003418876,0.00000809072,0.00008479488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9172884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2755624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020033","doi":"10.7202/1105957ar","title":"Le onzième sénateur. Une pause d’archéologie constitutionnelle récente","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05880410174452506,"gpt":0.2606686902927354,"spread":0.2018645885482103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005694901,0.0003705292,0.0008868019,0.00004085626,0.001106726,0.0001545671,0.0003527544,0.00009495846,0.01673734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003857601,0.0003720257,0.0005964469,0.0002392447,0.003174633,0.0003079067,0.0001943245,0.0004648264,0.008576264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001534238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005404994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004145739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008630409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966404,0.0008980684,0.0008903168,0.0006017946,0.0002971963,0.0006721725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979955,0.0002249601,0.0002125007,0.0008492161,0.0004029732,0.0003148441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001686843,0.000303023,0.000004187611,0.003918268,0.0001771425,0.0007656055,0.000120109,0.000002319274,0.000008426119,0.8598289,0.1335029,0.0013674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002550048,0.00004364267,0.000005918666,0.005454647,0.0008744731,0.00008104843,0.000105226,0.000004127938,0.0000294032,0.005361288,0.9873716,0.0004136467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001414442,0.4252831,0.00003283824,0.0247225,0.0008536116,0.0001406288,0.0001697576,0.00006127476,0.5487221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03253821,0.3169903,0.0002563051,0.0292879,0.001125695,0.00002867052,0.0002326563,0.00008367968,0.6194566],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8544676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784722","doi":"10.7202/1111190ar","title":"Les délais injustifiés dans l’administration publique : la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada dans l’arrêt Law Society of Saskatchewan c Abrametz","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02260898432843,"gpt":0.3172808208319242,"spread":0.2946718365034942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006072806,0.0003427182,0.0007029126,0.0000133527,0.001533746,0.000145321,0.0008638839,0.0002249598,0.001456427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002582289,0.0003600342,0.0004334136,0.0007002914,0.001538683,0.0004541953,0.0002195491,0.0006883786,0.000006379144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001244091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005264451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9731171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993866,0.002951145,0.0009080844,0.0005387556,0.001120901,0.000615168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971654,0.001296288,0.0005133959,0.0004890097,0.0002055133,0.0003303904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000111708,0.0002577188,0.0009765578,0.00408867,0.00005994843,0.000076656,0.007570569,0.00003622207,0.0002344855,0.8838032,0.09285832,0.01002641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001249266,0.0001368033,0.0003184145,0.001664202,0.000327723,0.0001150417,0.01134529,0.00004611957,0.0001821502,0.001335061,0.9840469,0.0003573138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09182888,0.2748637,0.0007337339,0.1853525,0.002442128,0.002535068,0.001331234,0.0001903398,0.4407224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568536,0.03163445,0.000932919,0.004002407,0.0002413043,0.0001081002,0.00005843955,0.00004030067,0.006128465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8911886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784720","doi":"10.7202/1111191ar","title":"Le secret ministériel : fondements, enjeux et réforme — un entretien avec le professeur Yan Campagnolo","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Economic Zones and Regional Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Secrecy; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Psychology; Law; Art; Visual arts","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02815491173576542,"gpt":0.2395193848602777,"spread":0.2113644731245123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002225966,0.0004758202,0.001302484,0.0001163016,0.0007759699,0.00009897511,0.0008054041,0.0001625305,0.008896695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006260557,0.0006047818,0.0005017514,0.0003838312,0.0002134482,0.0003682338,0.0007072426,0.0006092284,0.001261647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004041911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000805341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002109522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006172752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959395,0.0002507523,0.001871575,0.0009757213,0.0001317643,0.0008306881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997659,0.0001060453,0.001180832,0.0007672507,0.00006034047,0.0002265732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006770506,0.0004562947,0.001276709,0.002469509,0.0002504605,0.00003701804,0.0006507014,0.00002345564,6.706354e-7,0.9035514,0.08685198,0.004425038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009074279,0.0001419379,0.00112424,0.00111209,0.00005299058,0.000102949,0.0002277793,0.00008292759,0.000008755717,0.01788346,0.9776258,0.0007296833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003736524,0.6111429,0.0001407566,0.2127271,0.004239166,0.001645315,0.0008475186,0.00005261234,0.1654681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2098204,0.5341839,0.003269478,0.05961414,0.0004097845,0.001414918,0.001265518,0.000253901,0.189768],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8907738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019937","doi":"10.7202/1105758ar","title":"Callow in More Ways Than One: The Supreme Court Causes More Confusion in Contract","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04844921608553188,"gpt":0.252253833694125,"spread":0.2038046176085931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001553528,0.0002098382,0.001203361,0.00006409556,0.0001030919,0.00008948231,0.0003561325,0.0001514621,0.0007925463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002220233,0.0002227322,0.0002220244,0.000294534,0.000167137,0.0002183091,0.00008895156,0.0002826582,0.0004164473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002086984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000676879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01312097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03412162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974424,0.0000791924,0.001434995,0.0005506548,0.00006088458,0.0004319322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863,0.0001156864,0.0004540223,0.0006559652,0.00004845244,0.00009587035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005139563,0.0001649141,0.08456092,0.0008011804,0.00003811393,0.00005950415,0.0003073455,0.00001750724,0.00001516302,0.9106972,0.002641375,0.0006916435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001018352,0.00003077834,0.05556275,0.002755909,0.00002528121,0.00002436563,0.00008206439,0.0002930953,0.00005106336,0.01200539,0.9276168,0.0005340952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1637474,0.5260907,0.00008202647,0.02994539,0.001856881,0.002704434,0.0004627932,0.00008314182,0.2750272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062276,0.08586735,0.00004143337,0.007162096,0.0001991368,0.0001049333,0.00005763732,0.00004149063,0.0002983427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9249755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020117","doi":"10.7202/1105955ar","title":"[ Sans Titre - No Title ]The Ecological Constitution: Reframing Environmental Law by Lynda Collins","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Constitution; Environmental law; Law; Ecology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Biology; Philosophy; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01190375192481645,"gpt":0.2849044354230155,"spread":0.273000683498199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002296772,0.00006651577,0.0001159103,0.00000146511,0.0006488588,0.00003541266,0.0001174382,0.00005842498,0.01255613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002843235,0.00004980045,0.00006614525,0.0000461958,0.0006415875,0.00004695456,0.00003749313,0.0000859277,0.004667207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009746783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004074262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002541067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001233092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992708,0.0001440774,0.0001344806,0.0001280969,0.0001543112,0.0001682621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996797,0.00006394358,0.00003932995,0.0001401575,0.000004418144,0.00007240917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[1.921566e-7,0.00002837436,0.00002990894,0.00002264282,0.000005365032,0.00000689513,0.00001295508,3.586587e-8,0.00004130766,0.9037532,0.09514106,0.0009580525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003791154,0.000008346628,0.00001128456,0.00007801297,0.00001553317,0.000003368964,0.00001731216,2.589238e-7,0.00004533591,0.0002297954,0.9994853,0.00006758413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008804741,0.02972388,0.000002043973,0.002228862,0.0001936105,0.0001332392,0.0000469474,0.00001831586,0.9675651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2362658,0.5693939,0.0006233601,0.03921502,0.000906289,0.00008121522,0.000211041,0.00002732706,0.153276],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9043442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400879728","doi":"10.7202/1112503ar","title":"Allocution du juge McKinnon : Intronisation à la Société honorifique de common law","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02731903189587618,"gpt":0.3304635123510134,"spread":0.3031444804551372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003557364,0.0002750117,0.0005930963,0.00002685679,0.001047906,0.000159233,0.0003861379,0.0004103397,0.0005024388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001244812,0.0002836206,0.0003649361,0.0009547317,0.001017555,0.000591887,0.00009710773,0.0004633681,0.00189796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005938718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002702983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02545567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01176689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957778,0.002151107,0.0005675511,0.0003705259,0.0004782063,0.0006548077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987094,0.0003744857,0.0002839683,0.0002726542,0.0001332104,0.0002262587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002171802,0.0000747443,0.00009459078,0.001351126,0.00003972624,0.00001873261,0.001505078,0.000002805749,0.00001373672,0.9343987,0.0249374,0.03756126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001520959,0.00003580955,0.0001160441,0.00179087,0.0001385153,0.000003101926,0.00006734232,0.00001820393,0.0000131863,0.1805102,0.8169017,0.0002528572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001290321,0.07327822,0.00003743063,0.1682768,0.002026507,0.0008829821,0.00004333474,0.0003171522,0.7538473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6768754,0.2804952,0.0001237327,0.02559703,0.005004131,0.0001726918,0.0001562881,0.00006532631,0.01151023],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7919644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396689851","doi":"10.7202/1111094ar","title":"Indemnité additionnelle, discrétion et démesure : pour une actualisation des paramètres de l’exception de la réclamation grossièrement exagérée","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04590768152160387,"gpt":0.3568684281283386,"spread":0.3109607466067347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003733361,0.0002188332,0.0002727936,0.0000436576,0.001502794,0.0001402292,0.000256899,0.00007297271,0.006812737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003555411,0.0002244562,0.0001976198,0.0004780946,0.0005563847,0.0005127548,0.0001046645,0.0003255094,0.0002880221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009292195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001764165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004214268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003229556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941091,0.004103128,0.000511998,0.0002991284,0.0006308231,0.000345847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988223,0.0003621923,0.0003946421,0.0001634546,0.0001513451,0.0001061081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006506714,0.0003128072,0.0004334996,0.0005672668,0.00006349057,0.000007412313,0.002729898,0.0002406076,0.00003886044,0.8219419,0.1575584,0.01609936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000239594,0.0000960831,0.01182749,0.00149535,0.0001511644,0.0000212356,0.0006668495,0.00007104425,0.000008483787,0.03279606,0.9523959,0.0002307276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02656586,0.2049922,0.00509639,0.1061851,0.001890178,0.002627974,0.006567069,0.0003431593,0.6457321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7779654,0.1923059,0.00100898,0.01228845,0.0007466137,0.0005044124,0.004270955,0.00005097226,0.01085831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7948375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161251050","doi":"10.7202/1125051ar","title":"Assessing Gross Disproportionality in Climate Change Litigation: The Case for a Justificatory Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Harm; Scope (computer science); Global warming; Section (typography)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1307384564005558,"gpt":0.42592906000201,"spread":0.2951906036014541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002470257,0.00008155328,0.0001424413,0.00001018469,0.0005103264,0.0001689498,0.0001173595,0.00004586609,0.00008769353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004387238,0.00005626531,0.00009894978,0.0002028803,0.0003167911,0.0003835049,0.00002602617,0.0001015081,0.00003584262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008650873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003989398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002241291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002237864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989029,0.0002556677,0.000253051,0.0002108469,0.0001461944,0.0002313395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995764,0.0001397878,0.00005654952,0.0001597058,0.000009601381,0.00005794137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[2.525738e-7,0.00002321502,0.000118534,0.002420601,0.000003412622,0.00002385251,0.000521449,1.109577e-7,0.000001110957,0.977909,0.0005157653,0.01846267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003342809,0.000004000942,0.0005004615,0.001040002,0.00004921655,0.00003078591,0.0002560243,0.00003015606,0.000001897802,0.002220441,0.9957404,0.00009317947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01357167,0.446216,0.0002978983,0.06675661,0.001079142,0.00686995,0.0003245507,0.000277134,0.4646071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767479,0.01664905,0.0004209883,0.003961268,0.0007717822,0.001099925,0.00005364159,0.00001782116,0.0002776034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3925069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161248724","doi":"10.7202/1125043ar","title":"Réussir ses études en droit : une affaire de coeur","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Identity (music); Field (mathematics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01416774154994264,"gpt":0.2582365722521043,"spread":0.2440688307021617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009262816,0.0003316453,0.0005593554,0.00006838886,0.000319184,0.0008759665,0.0003378839,0.0001472314,0.002006971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000125924,0.0002877155,0.0003575671,0.001050169,0.0001722332,0.002012333,0.0001577056,0.0003173489,0.006740158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001901782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001621802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01165389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003437356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981227,0.00006170059,0.0006127764,0.0004324871,0.0002694396,0.0005008763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992472,0.00006374231,0.0001425396,0.000378283,0.0001199794,0.00004828597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.814747e-7,0.00005073253,0.00009494909,0.04704928,0.00008091486,0.0001332277,0.00001726812,0.000003017305,0.00001065907,0.7515321,0.1729502,0.02807719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008689,0.000009667923,0.00008398201,0.05522694,0.0005659926,0.00005309902,0.0000188113,0.0002466826,0.000002505831,0.001889375,0.9414755,0.0003406364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007950798,0.5650895,0.0001165022,0.04554823,0.002029369,0.0004674782,0.00001621178,0.0001946681,0.3864585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6084452,0.206202,0.0003882328,0.02333562,0.009435527,0.0002458707,0.0001251579,0.000172137,0.1516502],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7685252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696846","doi":"10.7202/1114754ar","title":"Return to <i>Smith</i>? Harper-Era Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Canadian Courts (2008–2023)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Deference; Charter; Judicial deference; Jurisdiction; Political science; Discretion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Parliament; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03696657238943699,"gpt":0.3404204396241535,"spread":0.3034538672347165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002606593,0.0001734078,0.0003942606,0.0001183776,0.0004635997,0.0001020538,0.0005358896,0.00009279562,0.0009929066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005006513,0.0001624095,0.0001049572,0.001104761,0.0001994926,0.0002708671,0.00005651787,0.0001925297,0.002337257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002640143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008674298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6856051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9645707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975091,0.0002728805,0.0004078699,0.0004135447,0.0005015086,0.0008950891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986193,0.0001498769,0.00007300286,0.0003247262,0.0001016873,0.0007314166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003265124,0.00001997215,0.005273409,0.001057253,0.00001011283,0.0003421255,0.001414482,0.000001627657,0.00001582304,0.05886591,0.9219269,0.01106909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004736706,0.00001947641,0.001513338,0.003272938,0.00002095998,0.000003496096,0.0002686078,0.000003774408,0.000005685564,0.0002468004,0.9943798,0.0002177444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02762002,0.1464553,0.000002548831,0.2840906,0.002620241,0.002539946,0.0001109418,0.0003317199,0.5362287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7161137,0.2008732,0.0003177187,0.05305548,0.0009106856,0.000344559,0.00004797889,0.00007039488,0.02826628],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6884937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696590","doi":"10.7202/1114751ar","title":"L’accompagnement des personnes victimes lors d’entrevues sur les faits au Québec : pratique ou droit ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07283077099402628,"gpt":0.3271521683299568,"spread":0.2543213973359305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002086721,0.0004420871,0.0008414149,0.00005414908,0.001514637,0.0001786912,0.0006770375,0.0001784857,0.004624387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006549963,0.0004176093,0.0004583478,0.001055362,0.00138378,0.0007850186,0.0001614313,0.0002755211,0.004194102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007460707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008770272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5802798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.879711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961353,0.0007483721,0.0007863864,0.0006449597,0.0006647824,0.001020216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979516,0.0006464617,0.0003287481,0.0004267168,0.0002811283,0.0003654029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005762355,0.0002021637,0.005337123,0.01884848,0.0001232707,0.000100692,0.01784016,0.000008256759,0.00001897629,0.6163678,0.1394934,0.201654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009932184,0.0001038644,0.002199907,0.01689407,0.0003767988,0.00001312148,0.003947722,0.00002209729,0.00002896503,0.0009663644,0.9748705,0.000477236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03177145,0.6700732,0.00001879119,0.2160936,0.001185922,0.001202986,0.00003474021,0.0003235516,0.07929578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.373585,0.5365547,0.0003531905,0.00297356,0.001306855,0.0002304739,0.00002889359,0.00007895756,0.0848883],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8353771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161281364","doi":"10.7202/1125046ar","title":"Incalculable Harm: Analyzing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Immigration Detention in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration detention; Pandemic; Immigration; Dehumanization; Agency (philosophy); Mental health; Racism; Refugee","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04310444225365894,"gpt":0.3605109815044349,"spread":0.3174065392507759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002291356,0.0001787662,0.0003032176,0.00003728287,0.0003587463,0.00008385572,0.0002929914,0.00008737099,0.0009417393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004273211,0.00009515011,0.0003212038,0.00134776,0.0001885627,0.0003207329,0.0000194086,0.0002975838,0.00003285451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002868562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003494285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971597,0.001258329,0.0006391127,0.0002573295,0.0004270101,0.0002584889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989818,0.0002860258,0.0002505283,0.0002937293,0.00009310379,0.0000947881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001039325,0.0001017918,0.05182107,0.004671391,0.0001848568,0.0000061931,0.004471882,0.001550597,0.0003224939,0.6546556,0.1928169,0.08938686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007846954,0.00004558978,0.003810974,0.004752421,0.0001459088,0.000005707706,0.0002253307,0.002773847,0.00002526802,0.00151572,0.9864677,0.0001530524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1600749,0.7809539,0.0005102414,0.03856165,0.002451676,0.002398135,0.0001275978,0.0000464668,0.01487544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8791316,0.1160785,0.000006800436,0.002067429,0.0001575022,0.00004104812,0.00002733892,0.00001157767,0.002478197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7936508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161309311","doi":"10.7202/1125049ar","title":"Security of Tenure in Foreclosure Proceedings: The Judicial Role when Borrowers are Absent or Self-Represented","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreclosure; Fair Housing Act; Government (linguistics); Adversarial system; Consistency (knowledge bases); Security interest; Balance (ability); Power (physics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01948278008600714,"gpt":0.3090290546011148,"spread":0.2895462745151077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001342192,0.0001397149,0.0003702124,0.00003209404,0.0001949479,0.0000938056,0.0003482249,0.00008609654,0.0005703887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001911446,0.00006610923,0.000147463,0.0006096102,0.0002084442,0.0002420835,0.00005833078,0.0002763548,0.00003855197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007781551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001746063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007696914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02286056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984677,0.0001245806,0.0003924688,0.0002745267,0.0004488661,0.0002918695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994428,0.00006876067,0.0001203043,0.0001606664,0.0001282475,0.00007920338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002878785,0.000227306,0.001868452,0.005651461,0.0001247716,0.00007069016,0.01212935,4.037973e-7,0.00002605454,0.788849,0.1841627,0.006861004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008907553,0.00003198743,0.0001200277,0.004095569,0.00007052615,0.000003668898,0.0003813199,0.00003496759,0.00002686457,0.003964753,0.9910709,0.0001103684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008037285,0.2890771,0.000001518392,0.0839763,0.0006633569,0.003433601,0.00004816723,0.0003497412,0.614413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499202,0.04480407,0.0000567076,0.001990604,0.0006082549,0.0001263053,0.000005601704,0.00002740841,0.002460885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161345549","doi":"10.7202/1125050ar","title":"Freedom of Association and the Resurrection of Effective Impossibility? A Comment on <i>Société des casinos du Québec</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Undoing; Supreme court; Impossibility; Freedom of association; Legislature; Section (typography); Subject (documents); Scope (computer science); Supreme Court Decisions","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009596155487293988,"gpt":0.2773963141010287,"spread":0.2678001586137347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002832474,0.00006032004,0.0002241555,0.00001324937,0.0001578888,0.00004429015,0.00006106139,0.00003910254,0.00002666979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000331862,0.00004030334,0.0001135446,0.0001673813,0.0003445727,0.0002740351,0.000008047466,0.00006987349,0.00000827938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002245035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000763599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02700015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01641073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989812,0.000396736,0.0002968919,0.00009437595,0.0001476386,0.0000831003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985342,0.001153687,0.0001400634,0.00007767935,0.00007121937,0.00002312545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002207484,0.00004664459,0.000924812,0.001695197,0.00006390498,1.596492e-7,0.003785605,0.000001848042,0.000001393385,0.7931819,0.003755207,0.1965213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003848592,0.00009770082,0.0006348825,0.003683987,0.0001322851,6.059518e-7,0.0002585888,0.00002763623,0.0001081222,0.00930129,0.9852934,0.00007658378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01234237,0.07150093,0.00009696741,0.03359235,0.0004827022,0.00235982,0.00003794694,0.00006187349,0.8795251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831748,0.01578585,0.00000985172,0.0008539531,0.00004301493,0.00005214211,0.000002738986,0.000003491677,0.000074142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9794791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696545","doi":"10.7202/1114752ar","title":"One Rule to Rule Them All: Subordinate Legislation and the Law of Judicial Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Supreme court; Lawmaking; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Ultra vires; Rule of law; Legislature; Law and economics; Common law; Economics; Politics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06088305575232307,"gpt":0.3331813953176798,"spread":0.2722983395653567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002318452,0.00009484634,0.0004661222,0.00001113658,0.000554608,0.00002004186,0.000195123,0.00003091104,0.0001382127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003541352,0.00006623415,0.0001138611,0.0005510057,0.0008983342,0.0001010536,0.00009633655,0.00007097434,0.000312504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002315463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005511243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01508871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006452786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985935,0.0002897633,0.0003419306,0.000170276,0.0003935416,0.0002109751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993349,0.000192464,0.0001321181,0.0001418826,0.0001350316,0.00006358433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002929183,0.00000984733,0.00005137414,0.0004967117,0.0000282469,6.949003e-7,0.0001894358,9.574829e-8,0.000003341778,0.980018,0.008655997,0.01054334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001197395,0.00000824861,0.0004289453,0.005014975,0.0001406789,4.638511e-7,0.00003154048,2.364169e-7,0.000004719496,0.05215983,0.942003,0.00008759332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004080622,0.3016728,0.000007015279,0.1003129,0.0001727722,0.001125475,0.00001650353,0.00006745761,0.5962171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1958955,0.7795402,0.00006237526,0.02379688,0.0002422195,0.0001131731,0.00001021022,0.000008558861,0.0003308559],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.933347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161236244","doi":"10.7202/1125048ar","title":"Les modifications de fond à la <i>Loi sur les langues officielles</i> du Canada expliquées","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Sedition; Poison control","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03057207661332842,"gpt":0.2981455261160358,"spread":0.2675734495027074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005982232,0.00009597909,0.0002019901,0.000006996505,0.0002910639,0.00008661176,0.0002223131,0.00005714302,0.0001807983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003286373,0.00007790881,0.00008116503,0.0001652328,0.0001354484,0.0000818405,0.00001981391,0.00009980152,0.00003968691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001795781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007176339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9578935,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988332,0.0002264811,0.0002202454,0.0001770644,0.0002616415,0.0002813036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992031,0.0004026213,0.00004619537,0.0001575535,0.00005507769,0.0001354779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[1.008348e-7,0.00000937497,0.00006945234,0.0006230054,0.00000756498,0.00001206673,0.0001447767,5.410186e-7,0.00001450814,0.8847466,0.1090177,0.005354285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001885591,0.000002683063,0.000189125,0.001648717,0.00002268501,0.000004079583,0.00005017622,0.000009816585,0.00001512799,0.0003852171,0.9975524,0.0001011443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003246329,0.3176771,0.000170363,0.0246813,0.0002694378,0.0003354706,0.0001332297,0.0001371291,0.6533496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422047,0.04311549,0.00008338629,0.002057676,0.0004300271,0.00007598027,0.000007338911,0.00001900999,0.01200639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9389584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3177029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161308614","doi":"10.7202/1125047ar","title":"Putting Practice into Theory: Ruth Sullivan’s Contribution to Legislative Scholarship, Practice, and Teaching","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Scholarship; Citation; Work (physics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01233095489879431,"gpt":0.3845760872051047,"spread":0.3722451323063104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009910362,0.0001253862,0.0002140375,0.00003989167,0.0005806661,0.0006111851,0.0001411113,0.0000704142,0.0001196618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02858076,0.0001046463,0.00006349585,0.0002111041,0.00008545456,0.003364497,0.00005371234,0.000435292,0.000240677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000177918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001160466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002641334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000676822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965566,0.002246369,0.000287787,0.0003158277,0.0003523008,0.0002410483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973915,0.001950102,0.0001397609,0.0001468982,0.0002384968,0.0001332616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005964896,0.0000133977,0.000005873452,0.0002356693,0.00003319945,0.00001982791,0.01648845,1.205761e-7,0.00004007084,0.8386645,0.0006344958,0.1438584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004771171,0.00004982449,0.000004360841,0.003913464,0.0001788174,0.00001191185,0.0007054646,0.000007339253,0.00003525022,0.004837261,0.990087,0.0001215475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.000151496,0.1833038,0.004690657,0.04919135,0.0003807489,0.0009606117,0.000006010274,0.0001809201,0.7611344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504645,0.01143444,0.009825263,0.02618322,0.0005200885,0.00007372324,0.00002015547,0.00002776955,0.001450861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9796019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161262478","doi":"10.7202/1125041ar","title":"Les débats sur le secret ministériel sont loin d’être clos","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Military, Security, and Education Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trade secret; Secrecy; Power (physics); Context (archaeology)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06832099190877544,"gpt":0.3557559540289905,"spread":0.2874349621202151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001842913,0.0003407734,0.0007060988,0.00003465476,0.0008133532,0.0001476456,0.0003758715,0.0001849737,0.004139695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002733936,0.0003150975,0.0004337962,0.0006857832,0.0008986022,0.0003520702,0.00009652609,0.0003223408,0.002059609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002057574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007699027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08157901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06455725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969011,0.00065466,0.0006771037,0.0006026909,0.0004820102,0.0006824118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986427,0.0003815505,0.0001135493,0.0003965533,0.0001863917,0.0002792201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.839848e-7,0.0001022337,0.00008638289,0.007732325,0.00007255283,0.00001622872,0.005664571,8.533162e-8,6.684733e-7,0.5176006,0.4329773,0.03574651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007137796,0.00003811145,0.0002146337,0.009022031,0.0002383993,0.000009717669,0.001471939,0.000008535888,0.000003479486,0.003763141,0.9848129,0.0003457604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008628905,0.7032878,0.000008699353,0.09292526,0.003560447,0.000446319,0.00006694327,0.00009166804,0.19875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1047591,0.7641445,0.0002414363,0.00475312,0.002199962,0.0001257481,0.00004085905,0.00004774029,0.1236876],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5518356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161229912","doi":"10.7202/1125044ar","title":"Law School Success: A Matter of Heart","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Artificial Intelligence Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acronym; Key (lock); Word (group theory); Subject matter; Free speech","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04898306406084241,"gpt":0.3490482083549449,"spread":0.3000651442941025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008226048,0.000238724,0.0005031243,0.0000390417,0.0001315279,0.0003199384,0.0009725362,0.0001018772,0.00660245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000390223,0.000226168,0.0003033344,0.001037302,0.0004873023,0.0009496742,0.0002610446,0.0003034319,0.04476714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006952393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001897803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003445901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007140157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997564,0.0001964035,0.000888137,0.0006127685,0.0003390883,0.0003996152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980538,0.0001911955,0.0001211606,0.001224762,0.0001983893,0.0002106444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[1.864057e-7,0.00005225615,0.00004109986,0.005641896,0.00002265118,0.00000865917,0.00003748512,0.000002612329,0.000110022,0.8249046,0.1580997,0.01107883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001144259,0.00002786372,0.00003071434,0.01418703,0.00009200609,0.00006293967,0.000001726879,0.0007645752,0.001467165,0.01572358,0.9674209,0.0002100925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002266542,0.6948838,0.03224232,0.1242804,0.001169091,0.0008615482,0.00002988809,0.0001273203,0.1463829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3212696,0.2348617,0.08803684,0.2591232,0.002575018,0.001570842,0.00005129492,0.0003396769,0.0921718],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8093212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396690151","doi":"10.7202/1111093ar","title":"Les articles de revues de droit les plus cités de tous les temps par la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Art; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04623083932897598,"gpt":0.3195410683068861,"spread":0.2733102289779101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001792475,0.000248397,0.000570857,0.00002163415,0.001924051,0.00008189867,0.000554725,0.00006362435,0.002400313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003864235,0.0002609116,0.0002066912,0.0003103756,0.0005751347,0.0001367212,0.0001979782,0.0003568073,0.00002122434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002106309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001257745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.933441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9551244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964834,0.001500058,0.0005065657,0.0003302969,0.0005750287,0.0006046175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984527,0.0007576501,0.0002376908,0.0001945238,0.0001666413,0.0001908354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000596055,0.00008265515,0.01022445,0.0006088549,0.0001252207,0.0001083974,0.001586321,0.00008442796,0.00001923486,0.8649617,0.1030419,0.01915091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001397647,0.00005785137,0.00221141,0.001053022,0.0001521844,0.00007318505,0.00143652,0.0001015918,0.00005504806,0.004248612,0.9901784,0.0002924193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1858842,0.6180842,0.00007976382,0.04232926,0.0004612002,0.000492967,0.0001933268,0.00006013001,0.152415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8813557,0.1024255,0.0002576278,0.002893152,0.0004523751,0.0001802262,0.000009880645,0.00002436694,0.01240112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161304462","doi":"10.7202/1125042ar","title":"Debates About Cabinet Secrecy Are Far From Over","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Cabinet (room); Accountability; Mandate; Transparency (behavior); Scope (computer science)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0394326879247478,"gpt":0.3489361584514766,"spread":0.3095034705267288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007196406,0.0003719779,0.0007434812,0.00002960924,0.0004362543,0.0004551493,0.0004606224,0.000270257,0.01481704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008125662,0.0003463578,0.0004298722,0.0004947757,0.0005089605,0.0003343356,0.00008466948,0.0004839911,0.002684454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002436184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000243323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1311848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04845813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969146,0.0005180305,0.0007032861,0.0005815914,0.0004571715,0.0008252746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984829,0.0003203174,0.0001746621,0.0004810441,0.00008082153,0.0004602908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.378395e-7,0.00003546278,0.0001490517,0.003864496,0.00007062124,0.00008033212,0.0004753639,3.393772e-7,0.000001338501,0.7715471,0.2022739,0.0215015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008240015,0.00002103376,0.0006416655,0.01737988,0.0002853719,0.000005352901,0.00004957379,0.0000396216,0.000004817575,0.03538333,0.9457191,0.0003878587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008963385,0.8178349,0.00001906103,0.06150751,0.003804222,0.0005069548,0.0007434153,0.0001223849,0.1145653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1222363,0.7558809,0.0001540066,0.02378649,0.003212681,0.00005843149,0.0001399603,0.00008926065,0.094442],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7434452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214438174","doi":"","title":"Book Review - The Importance of Being Monogamous: Marriage and Nation Building in Western Canada to 1915","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00981036278964261,"gpt":0.2609015841247093,"spread":0.2510912213350667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009561841,0.00005726054,0.0002356746,0.00003476899,0.0002240679,0.00003742474,0.0001658604,0.00002014002,0.0001812386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000173555,0.00005588271,0.00003248806,0.0002697073,0.00007224709,0.0001372278,0.00001197686,0.00006997555,0.000002915084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004104424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003725448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9229701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990928,0.0001329242,0.0002882597,0.000127751,0.0002148691,0.0001433723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995721,0.00004078677,0.0001208188,0.0001469144,0.00003470916,0.00008466889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.124327e-7,0.000009820335,0.0008119639,0.003314338,0.000005780658,0.00002169828,0.0006562417,5.121104e-7,0.000007652162,0.08117659,0.8874263,0.02656836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002151674,0.000005127349,0.0005400747,0.00629381,0.00001850577,9.747297e-7,0.000008859231,1.424654e-7,5.97485e-7,0.0001166057,0.9929305,0.00006324109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000508622,0.940155,0.000001454299,0.0392307,0.00007038456,0.0005453529,0.000004443109,0.000005995347,0.01947806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008015791,0.8167639,0.00003947969,0.1727292,0.00007065504,0.0000215122,0.000002191931,0.000006122672,0.002351075],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1334985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2278831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207379046","doi":"","title":"Litigating State Secrets: A Comparative Study of National Security Privilege in Canadian, US and English Civil Cases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; State (computer science); National security; Law; Computer security; Public administration; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03110190254602162,"gpt":0.3390622694390587,"spread":0.3079603668930371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001614635,0.00009594574,0.0003482423,0.00003519968,0.0003000785,0.00001577301,0.00009598364,0.00002961422,0.000150999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001065758,0.00008781847,0.00002955773,0.0002549012,0.0002989656,0.0001670196,0.00003252525,0.0001833919,0.00000270419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004387164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002725283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6084026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986172,0.0003765411,0.0003135055,0.0001875812,0.0002737433,0.0002314808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990056,0.00038095,0.00009401202,0.00009368236,0.0002787567,0.000147037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006101439,0.0003220084,0.2434908,0.001430289,0.00008525799,0.00006645067,0.2486945,0.000002002543,0.000005035899,0.5012731,0.004148738,0.0004757287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005091311,0.0001727192,0.02450332,0.00147775,0.00003937535,0.00000503134,0.01524144,0.00001140549,0.000005707039,0.005959779,0.9517356,0.0003387127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8306056,0.0121758,3.29779e-8,0.0001403605,0.00009809875,0.0006266495,0.00007127053,0.00001126555,0.1562709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970825,0.002456193,0.00002380697,0.0002987896,0.00005969711,0.00003952527,0.000003949581,0.00000322751,0.00003236645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3942051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396689874","doi":"10.7202/1111096ar","title":"Different Ways to Get to “Everything”?: Judicializing Everything? The Clash of Constitutionalisms in Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom by Mark S. Harding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; History; Genealogy; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03311867358496082,"gpt":0.275913296588973,"spread":0.2427946230040121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001667716,0.0001412071,0.0004353854,0.00003799255,0.0015961,0.00004119624,0.0004000734,0.00002049744,0.0001132847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004761387,0.00008907451,0.00007362491,0.0007243321,0.0004796352,0.00005709685,0.0003149122,0.0002217397,0.000003001957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004881418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009186493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9824247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9307391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978776,0.0004455376,0.0004186813,0.0002224705,0.0007361282,0.000299587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998967,0.0005470953,0.0001425683,0.0001451166,0.0000689338,0.0001293103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001461052,0.000009211222,0.00230895,0.00002762388,0.00003047384,0.000002907286,0.0009213706,0.00006007319,0.00000435564,0.8844312,0.111454,0.000735158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002656177,0.00001051177,0.0008046307,0.000618226,0.00005263393,0.000003038449,0.000428083,0.000003629616,0.000002383373,0.00607247,0.9916108,0.0001280021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1114599,0.1196752,0.0006753491,0.6391785,0.003452199,0.007665396,0.0006408582,0.0001087897,0.1171438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573565,0.005037131,0.0000427782,0.03711227,0.0001284345,0.0001305363,0.0000140764,0.000007374053,0.0001708677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8801568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400879675","doi":"10.7202/1112505ar","title":"Mixing Oil and Water? Redrawing the Limits of Contract Freedom After the Criminalization of Usury","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Usury; Criminalization; Mixing (physics); Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Theology; Physics; Islam","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04398418003195922,"gpt":0.2442726013845402,"spread":0.200288421352581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001935105,0.00009958984,0.0005734428,0.00003851796,0.0001063123,0.00003552996,0.0002024251,0.00005429988,0.0001106459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001002831,0.00007083724,0.0001393617,0.0001350212,0.0001989161,0.0001367239,0.00005208412,0.00006775975,0.0000934302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001894171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007336998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001393836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002956257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985633,0.00005781164,0.0009483232,0.0002073609,0.00003460519,0.0001885511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989681,0.0001470786,0.0004583306,0.0003579491,0.00003845944,0.00003005238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001672809,0.00003810313,0.01666277,0.005539618,0.0001615269,0.000003639454,0.001490803,0.00003865484,0.0001050537,0.9594129,0.002102001,0.01442822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000538803,0.00007527207,0.01153879,0.003922087,0.0001403813,0.00001516504,0.000104713,0.0007592874,0.0003731887,0.01878252,0.9633403,0.0004094793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2854322,0.5215917,0.0001776337,0.009443611,0.002165272,0.0009512231,0.0002447507,0.00007832696,0.1799152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317465,0.06721845,0.00001433172,0.0006090114,0.0001298033,0.00004050245,0.00001005155,0.00001921097,0.0002121742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9612383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2888659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784733","doi":"10.7202/1111193ar","title":"The Lawyer’s Professional Duty to Encourage Respect for—and to Improve—the Administration of Justice: Lessons from Failures by Attorneys General","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Duty; Administration (probate law); Administration of justice; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Professional responsibility; Business; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04560010974734654,"gpt":0.4368172844004749,"spread":0.3912171746531284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002302191,0.00007629988,0.0001332293,0.00001294301,0.002261025,0.0001191542,0.0003230257,0.00002606272,0.0004328132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001366175,0.00005028249,0.00004823571,0.0003686423,0.00009848288,0.0001551786,0.00006991327,0.0002040569,0.00001009404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006782131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006433327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004394251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01070113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984381,0.0005319845,0.0003171156,0.0001869171,0.0003626345,0.00016322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983664,0.0009450503,0.0002077848,0.0002297413,0.0001643527,0.00008667586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001454575,0.00003463038,0.000008257583,0.00005084263,0.000008965717,1.274054e-7,0.001114618,6.323986e-7,0.0003494643,0.6158943,0.3778033,0.004720336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005870157,0.00005508399,0.0001337636,0.00006017629,0.00005777768,4.910888e-7,0.001247663,0.00000247033,0.00007464615,0.001367366,0.9968707,0.00007118099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003815083,0.00729455,0.0001579868,0.968288,0.001419726,0.001950642,0.0003733205,0.00002203362,0.01667868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975013,0.004246118,0.003361697,0.05683453,0.001280732,0.003443094,0.0001880609,0.00003547638,0.03310903],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9114534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}