{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":22,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":22,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"d8d55b493731","filters":{"venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion"}},"results":[{"id":"W2247834840","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwv024","title":"<i>Holt v Hobbs</i>","year":2015,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Petitioner; Law; Supreme court; Statutory law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Majority opinion; Sociology; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Worley","is_ca":false},{"name":"D. Thayer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02665931980204436,"gpt":0.2802877673961699,"spread":0.2536284475941255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006963463,0.001226216,0.001378741,0.002708894,0.01401158,0.01130685,0.007304641,0.06444963,0.01670182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02113242,0.001879359,0.002508723,0.001623377,0.007738233,0.004964617,0.0044458,0.04060406,0.009125822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009506471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01957577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1405417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2978717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918314,0.001143566,0.0007778839,0.001446819,0.001909168,0.002891282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989467,0.006934696,0.0005344392,0.0005302251,0.001555455,0.000978197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005572945,0.00006091956,0.0007754262,0.0001274627,0.00003713001,0.001193792,0.001283773,0.0001064366,0.0003529587,0.08147576,0.9087158,0.00581494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001449801,0.00006851366,0.00451962,0.001171776,0.000138391,0.0007756824,0.00236057,0.0003090576,0.001049094,0.01996068,0.9693273,0.0001744268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.009051342,0.004168118,0.0008480548,0.5250952,0.02654036,0.0003361492,0.001297201,0.0004587979,0.4322049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01785592,0.0006480383,0.0003895202,0.929114,0.004577552,0.0002428093,0.0001400894,0.00006628852,0.04696584],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1405417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2794474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045506765","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwaa015","title":"From the Tree of Knowledge and the Golem of Prague to Kosher Autonomous Cars: The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence Through Jewish Eyes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Sociology; Judaism; Sketch; Artificial intelligence; Consciousness; Soul; Law; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Nachshon Goltz","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Zeleznikow","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tracey Dowdeswell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07635076700284824,"gpt":0.3693862420098921,"spread":0.2930354750070439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003454211,0.0002052882,0.0002458416,0.0004359671,0.007373119,0.005647012,0.0004794981,0.002904871,0.001958996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003443622,0.0001889532,0.0001743103,0.0002515995,0.03245638,0.002791588,0.002146823,0.003497522,0.0004278939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003245163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001530479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005263842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00560913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979613,0.001327226,0.00003588903,0.0001772521,0.0002563263,0.0002419433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988526,0.0005841849,0.0001111487,0.0001215677,0.0002156772,0.000114922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024264,0.00001635848,0.0004456347,0.00001279364,0.000005187357,0.0002246015,0.0264862,0.0001664198,0.0002665002,0.9624186,0.004232429,0.005700871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003162287,0.00006886956,0.002015081,0.0002025504,0.00001276317,0.0005182988,0.01832653,0.001384494,0.0007613288,0.6705285,0.3060998,0.00005019937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.394998,0.01251482,0.01743479,0.1194362,0.001238052,0.00003236405,0.00004869119,0.0001133651,0.4541836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861441,0.0006901943,0.0009043783,0.003372129,0.0001632106,0.000008249837,0.000006661961,0.0000184009,0.008692724],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007373119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02354538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043803687","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwt038","title":"United States v Windsor: (Docket no 12-307): Supreme Court of the United States: Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan JJ; Roberts CJ, dissenting; Scalia and Thomas JJ dissenting, joined by Roberts CJ as to part I; Alito J dissenting, joined by Thomas J as to parts II and III: 26 June 2013","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Law; Substantive due process; Federalism; Political science; Due Process Clause; State (computer science); Jurisdiction; Appeal; Politics","authors":[{"name":"D. Thayer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Matthew Worley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008336688054690365,"gpt":0.2561875288732041,"spread":0.2478508408185137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003280282,0.001146508,0.001048042,0.001973359,0.01040215,0.01095894,0.003660062,0.03247084,0.06516838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007902236,0.002571517,0.001766898,0.002569217,0.001983723,0.004135441,0.00229597,0.01508062,0.02974912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01104226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0320821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3858428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.675898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947217,0.0003773336,0.0004310717,0.0008396041,0.002188576,0.001441731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969867,0.0007182384,0.0001929237,0.0002629018,0.001462318,0.0003769839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059788,0.0000920386,0.001113874,0.00007748128,0.00003071301,0.000403397,0.0002816225,0.00008276443,0.0005523438,0.03057393,0.9588234,0.007908671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008010597,0.0000212917,0.004076586,0.0004073387,0.00004432597,0.0000898457,0.0002826962,0.000132625,0.0004873656,0.002803114,0.9915041,0.00007056166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0121865,0.007413517,0.001166716,0.08050121,0.01368639,0.001353818,0.0160009,0.0008157081,0.8668752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03282556,0.00213367,0.001226459,0.09570663,0.001689142,0.0007784474,0.003918177,0.0002869587,0.8614349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3858428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7671939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388497676","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwad015","title":"Inside Indonesia’s Religious Courts: An Argument for Domestic and Family Violence Screening and Exemption from Compulsory Mediation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Domestic violence; Argument (complex analysis); Family law; Law; State (computer science); Family mediation; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Alternative dispute resolution; Medicine; Environmental health","authors":[{"name":"Balawyn Jones","is_ca":false},{"name":"Amira Aftab","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02614896637258973,"gpt":0.3204583637783315,"spread":0.2943093974057418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010639,0.0003267546,0.0008892225,0.001434594,0.01276677,0.007978958,0.003122486,0.01583325,0.008641057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03277839,0.0007677111,0.0009244662,0.0006902556,0.02926419,0.006077286,0.008147493,0.01725155,0.0007419526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006208558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01017877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02675928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02665072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9883334,0.004400789,0.0005832175,0.001594696,0.002246683,0.002841234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659917,0.01978935,0.004882818,0.002876064,0.003057163,0.003402994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007247107,0.0001372701,0.00679324,0.00003983832,0.00001707632,0.001340885,0.003260587,0.0003110618,0.00018833,0.9796214,0.004017556,0.004200354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000504415,0.0001992974,0.0379266,0.001737412,0.000284027,0.003712147,0.01614379,0.01166202,0.003247744,0.7866077,0.1376761,0.0002987854],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2555097,0.001299726,0.01340746,0.1645533,0.0006784406,0.0002817679,0.0001458743,0.00008550911,0.5640382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746878,0.0001657661,0.001779109,0.0158365,0.0002337614,0.0001090279,0.00001906725,0.00001442699,0.007154611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02675928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05626506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092013050","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwaa024","title":"Masterpiece Cakeshop and the Foundations of Free Speech and Toleration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Toleration; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Politics; Dialogical self; Free speech; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; History","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy D Tedesco","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01296776561055154,"gpt":0.2238879050854606,"spread":0.2109201394749091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01453025,0.0003320593,0.0005569073,0.002467306,0.008625515,0.01497304,0.001578289,0.007456354,0.01133202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03497833,0.000398988,0.0004131131,0.001113065,0.09341092,0.01172095,0.008101636,0.009083299,0.0007890941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006350462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00631478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007684418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005718256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9819324,0.01081731,0.0004677702,0.001987834,0.002849718,0.001945005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9513583,0.03571302,0.003826733,0.003795572,0.002977873,0.002328607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006843517,0.00001049516,0.0003226424,0.00001140093,0.0000019541,0.00005376738,0.004273564,0.0000768958,0.00002213788,0.9911941,0.001481417,0.002544769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001778303,0.0000226643,0.001276702,0.0002482008,0.000006449335,0.0001332619,0.008428514,0.0006400346,0.0002277249,0.9487666,0.04020255,0.00002957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08074797,0.004832888,0.02873944,0.1607501,0.0006569359,0.00006921802,0.0000716959,0.00008903642,0.7240427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893945,0.0003217969,0.001074842,0.002664542,0.0002005813,0.00003352085,0.00001150768,0.00001755719,0.006281085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01497304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07684416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119218814","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rws051","title":"S L v Commission scolaire des Chenes: 2012 SCC 7: Supreme Court of Canada: McLachlin CJ, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ: 17 February 2012","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Commission; Political science; Human rights; Freedom of religion","authors":[{"name":"C. Beresford","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01771298925432544,"gpt":0.2607400016444446,"spread":0.2430270123901191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004029639,0.001230118,0.001257741,0.001489062,0.02285075,0.01519338,0.003756656,0.02836293,0.0278456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01414901,0.001517578,0.001668028,0.002107597,0.003237051,0.002327536,0.002486123,0.01879208,0.006980792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06804222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1981539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918213,0.0004667271,0.0002788383,0.0008453723,0.003911809,0.002676039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935854,0.0009363786,0.0001345644,0.0002578009,0.00426931,0.0008165705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004721578,0.00005834932,0.001200233,0.0000783212,0.00002094057,0.0002368676,0.0007693327,0.000262679,0.0003385482,0.08269107,0.9081835,0.006113007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004264353,0.00001306604,0.004387473,0.000266741,0.0000347572,0.0000612181,0.0009343844,0.0003310663,0.0004386109,0.005726763,0.9876416,0.0001217666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01418995,0.01667867,0.002074903,0.2224722,0.01209148,0.0009150628,0.0123223,0.0008085577,0.718447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04620775,0.002671988,0.001825191,0.1519257,0.0008709799,0.0004457287,0.001265213,0.0002645957,0.7945228],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06804222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4936832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1751529791","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwv026","title":"<i>Loyola High School v Quebec (Attorney General) </i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Statutory law; Constitution; Political science; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Janet Epp Buckingham","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0194864749677954,"gpt":0.2854379150549369,"spread":0.2659514400871416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002813536,0.0005690855,0.0005802194,0.001460688,0.01603409,0.006164921,0.002737819,0.01243811,0.06179472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006133803,0.0009528215,0.000927716,0.00174146,0.00222985,0.001979135,0.001281525,0.007040952,0.008924377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05480464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1175672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957516,0.0003199642,0.0001767932,0.0004119842,0.001169203,0.002170436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940101,0.001230106,0.0002149987,0.0002570284,0.003033723,0.00125419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006153037,0.00005306937,0.003882335,0.0001050086,0.00002035167,0.0003272568,0.0006438079,0.0001005343,0.0004341588,0.03227682,0.9535586,0.008536384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009222369,0.00003113795,0.02091334,0.0002914585,0.00004679061,0.00008105521,0.001225838,0.0002212342,0.0004404219,0.001324487,0.9752523,0.00007973672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01722694,0.00491543,0.0006638469,0.1185114,0.003837337,0.0007107003,0.007987979,0.0004481204,0.8456982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0898184,0.001302499,0.0008432598,0.1989388,0.0004904105,0.0004613301,0.001375278,0.000146564,0.7066234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06179472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3976374,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148946511","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwu030","title":"The Byzantine Legacy of Religious and Legal Pluralism: A Contemporary Reassessment of Byzantine Church-State Relations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Byzantine Studies and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Byzantine architecture; Pluralism (philosophy); Christianity; State (computer science); Politics; Conceptualization; Faith; Religious pluralism; Empire; Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Religious studies; Philosophy; Classics; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Athanasios Giocas","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01290709120699093,"gpt":0.2250268397726178,"spread":0.2121197485656269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003436915,0.0002782033,0.0005182074,0.001222781,0.01322673,0.007679152,0.0007966749,0.002705797,0.001648193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003511615,0.0002864431,0.0001863201,0.001451685,0.04695005,0.005332076,0.004836742,0.004954641,0.0002022037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008181686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002507863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007321812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01717664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977345,0.001393632,0.0000419202,0.0002209932,0.0002784506,0.0003305147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986481,0.0007525746,0.0002525075,0.00016965,0.00006791372,0.0001093343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003865409,0.00001282568,0.0004672669,0.0001136935,0.000005841819,0.0004719005,0.3045092,0.00009513181,0.00048759,0.6816548,0.004178893,0.007964184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002778443,0.00006532005,0.004480045,0.0005637804,0.00001227745,0.0009590091,0.1138606,0.0003034167,0.0007315069,0.08526829,0.7936932,0.00003475546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.5218589,0.03345955,0.004269514,0.08131636,0.00122482,0.00003127397,0.00005975215,0.00005554099,0.3577242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878085,0.002647642,0.0003092421,0.001056706,0.0002205487,0.00001238502,0.000007394459,0.00002715154,0.007910425],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01322673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05936259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178083431","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwv043","title":"<i>Mouvement laïque québécois v Saguenay (City)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Tribunal; Conscience; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Neutrality; Duty; Constitution; Statutory law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Barry W. Bussey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03963257883280171,"gpt":0.2987751175640989,"spread":0.2591425387312972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002276083,0.0007586433,0.000609237,0.001385911,0.01429053,0.008075998,0.002179067,0.01466829,0.02488566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004994975,0.0009263098,0.001247805,0.001355001,0.002959318,0.001930307,0.001915833,0.01046975,0.004088442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03287848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07795012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9559134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966878,0.000254823,0.0001278304,0.0004091211,0.0009039405,0.001616416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981498,0.0004881283,0.00008243349,0.0001124465,0.0007562442,0.0004109363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006932898,0.00005106371,0.003046424,0.0001080557,0.0000339629,0.0008486928,0.00108678,0.0001625062,0.0005083163,0.09060962,0.8939069,0.009568441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005502023,0.00001892136,0.008846723,0.0001925252,0.00002731826,0.0001690898,0.0007927062,0.0001249142,0.0003086331,0.002274102,0.9871329,0.00005720015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01657192,0.008275715,0.0008753492,0.1173779,0.008101589,0.0007322069,0.004279781,0.0002786496,0.8435069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07951275,0.002283578,0.001038395,0.2659035,0.0009812681,0.0005133562,0.001194896,0.0001392059,0.6484331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04408664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2385511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110917822","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwaa022","title":"Conscience and Cakes: Reaffirming the Distinction Between Institutional Duties and Individual Rights","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Lesbian; Legislation; Law; Sociology; Scope (computer science); State (computer science); Political science; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Mariëtta van der Tol","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06871187651626011,"gpt":0.3140811990489273,"spread":0.2453693225326672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02011812,0.0003981917,0.0006924717,0.002486879,0.007309827,0.01173414,0.00290253,0.008037019,0.003194564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03638307,0.0003910021,0.0005655966,0.001312221,0.1185051,0.01670889,0.01213604,0.01036715,0.0002853631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008952966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01208257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02502529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0288655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9787301,0.01269213,0.000576807,0.001614841,0.004133811,0.002252148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634791,0.02518239,0.001922911,0.004087439,0.003496908,0.001831256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007337652,0.000004805325,0.000210794,0.00001291133,0.000001237034,0.00005105878,0.007528144,0.0000543551,0.00003405422,0.989639,0.0005210753,0.001935052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000399247,0.00003555423,0.002175381,0.0005437385,0.00001819094,0.0001353788,0.01732009,0.0009913911,0.0003001501,0.9028563,0.07553476,0.00004915021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1217037,0.002579636,0.04068187,0.1180093,0.001492553,0.00007995076,0.00003128756,0.00007075974,0.7153508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883311,0.0002826057,0.001895745,0.003309836,0.0002469476,0.000038284,0.000005947089,0.0000277946,0.005861637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02502529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208497582","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwab013","title":"Making Sense of a Complex Notion: Debates on State Religious Neutrality in Canada — A View from Quebec","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Indoctrination; Law; State (computer science); Multiculturalism; Sociology; Supreme court; Democracy; Political science; Establishment Clause; Ideology; Politics; First amendment","authors":[{"name":"Pierre Bosset","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03426809075966237,"gpt":0.3032502000815562,"spread":0.2689821093218938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006757271,0.0003461694,0.0005586359,0.002182554,0.04033507,0.01723366,0.002949374,0.006120402,0.004884831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009227235,0.0003723921,0.0005895242,0.003290489,0.03034833,0.004128691,0.003442127,0.00830322,0.0001691622],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2801992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2096105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945245,0.001539835,0.0001285989,0.0005071186,0.001585947,0.00171398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891583,0.004007915,0.0003491912,0.0003171476,0.004655157,0.001512393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003567518,0.00001811496,0.002524221,0.00005838291,0.00002390208,0.0003476964,0.03265879,0.0007305229,0.0002296976,0.9309896,0.02370326,0.008680093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008009755,0.00004357296,0.0237044,0.001215943,0.0001537182,0.0002732422,0.1436322,0.005054769,0.0008253085,0.205141,0.6193689,0.0005067823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1830021,0.01782455,0.003873816,0.4239367,0.001075048,0.0000656552,0.0003834112,0.00005479767,0.369784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713544,0.002476958,0.000712359,0.01483634,0.0001051852,0.00001467793,0.00003811605,0.0000229941,0.01043893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2801992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8348669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129410355","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rws005","title":"How Religious Arbitration Could Enhance Personal Autonomy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Autonomy; Religious freedom; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Law and economics; Law; State (computer science); Business; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Farrah Ahmed","is_ca":false},{"name":"Senwung Luk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01715009676357333,"gpt":0.2908915983203651,"spread":0.2737415015567918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008199523,0.0001539061,0.0002768998,0.0005211734,0.003337835,0.004640209,0.000845183,0.00356822,0.008974981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01910747,0.0001881162,0.0006328437,0.000329791,0.01324844,0.005801751,0.007647068,0.003573367,0.000749047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001572857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002169591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001503194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924728,0.004104049,0.0002240858,0.0006682622,0.001327859,0.00120299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905306,0.004865036,0.0009498156,0.001967266,0.0008035789,0.0008837801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002726447,0.00006123406,0.001378247,0.00002010831,0.000008103809,0.0001993719,0.005339451,0.0004626143,0.0006107333,0.9817519,0.00118788,0.008953114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005373003,0.00007559645,0.002836388,0.00007620396,0.00001936047,0.000297765,0.002447174,0.001605678,0.001049612,0.9494997,0.04200971,0.00002896141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2435116,0.000717743,0.02461248,0.04181617,0.0002869506,0.00006206739,0.00002697089,0.0000535355,0.6889125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927799,0.00007075265,0.001297866,0.0009234228,0.0000585916,0.00001239343,0.000003779963,0.000006661887,0.004846755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008974981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04336375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903789803","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwy048","title":"Trinity Western University v The Law Society of Upper Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Statutory law; Supreme court; Political science; Appeal; Constitution; Common law; Public law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Barry W. Bussey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0201969302703281,"gpt":0.2676772516344703,"spread":0.2474803213641422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001739065,0.0004602846,0.0002875765,0.001269719,0.01728397,0.006169653,0.001294366,0.005701581,0.03270547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006844928,0.0006125742,0.0004441424,0.00133917,0.003160384,0.001811838,0.002375609,0.006207654,0.003048286],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04188756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1562487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.959129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9873468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953693,0.000235484,0.0001058125,0.0004228227,0.00212336,0.001743177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954639,0.0006083227,0.000130916,0.0001986422,0.002063019,0.001535195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006358592,0.00002950003,0.004137587,0.00009485249,0.00001641633,0.0006601053,0.002331118,0.0001688027,0.0006179051,0.3644982,0.5996072,0.02777454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002546615,0.00001609384,0.004685926,0.0001571491,0.00001583982,0.0001103196,0.001012504,0.0001543123,0.0002869492,0.004912335,0.9885805,0.000042666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01938604,0.004280314,0.0007388515,0.06347169,0.002039934,0.0001826683,0.001021758,0.0001858656,0.908693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1245133,0.001876795,0.0006773147,0.06200853,0.0003656847,0.0001577661,0.0003256928,0.00009333541,0.8099817],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3039169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765205482","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwx050","title":"Religious Freedom in the New World? Indigenous Sacred Sites and Religious Beliefs in the Courts in British Columbia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Law; Politics; Religious freedom; Political science; Indigenous rights; Diversity (politics); Sociology","authors":[{"name":"James Hickling","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01350349097571014,"gpt":0.2772826966525577,"spread":0.2637792056768476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001043388,0.0001062006,0.000371656,0.00196931,0.02277526,0.008814178,0.001561835,0.001993804,0.007555321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004356124,0.0003407276,0.0001357681,0.003433679,0.009893546,0.001938172,0.002849221,0.004764694,0.0002958708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07692575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04265539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976656,0.0003212522,0.00006351026,0.0001499744,0.0004498433,0.001349807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955822,0.001151163,0.0004401511,0.00009051996,0.001190861,0.001545148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000172402,0.0004645389,0.209358,0.0003314379,0.00006423875,0.005592471,0.4416059,0.0006999483,0.002272266,0.2296579,0.03222661,0.0775542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003240647,0.00003760213,0.4473737,0.0007236844,0.00005074243,0.0005326499,0.4279862,0.0006309499,0.0002900978,0.00942799,0.1127817,0.0001324231],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050654,0.003649641,0.0001006343,0.01916758,0.00005673424,0.00002542954,0.0001064282,0.000007902114,0.07182012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871368,0.001010952,0.00004437229,0.001494281,0.000009946601,0.000007749066,0.00002741367,0.000004217782,0.01026415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07692575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.558138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408417310","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwaf003","title":"Protecting Conscientious Choices in National Legislation and EU Non-Discrimination Law: The Case Study of Ireland","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Irish Research Council","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Marta Lasek‐Markey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02382928695213504,"gpt":0.3286982826784614,"spread":0.3048689957263263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01312965,0.0003326411,0.0007960462,0.001359704,0.01300079,0.009199902,0.002438019,0.007291155,0.003574724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0180685,0.0004694774,0.0009426749,0.001932844,0.01923488,0.003567013,0.009192057,0.007429276,0.0004981027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01869314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01155023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1215301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1698059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.982523,0.00955505,0.0005787917,0.0009130209,0.002140344,0.004289834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870853,0.00856612,0.001263413,0.0009991493,0.001072569,0.001013453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000361678,0.00160528,0.05182478,0.0003414401,0.00006545364,0.03417671,0.2793537,0.002978864,0.001280197,0.575148,0.01616396,0.03670005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000226218,0.0005180372,0.03408551,0.001319632,0.0001075297,0.009655518,0.6617769,0.004648623,0.003003491,0.04386925,0.2405297,0.0002596544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7880431,0.0005277848,0.001562187,0.01190684,0.00008574053,0.0001338766,0.0000529694,0.00001616878,0.1976713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863613,0.0002773963,0.0008290577,0.002080754,0.0000154105,0.00006022746,0.00002483904,0.00001353588,0.01033756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1215301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2416453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165483064","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwv015","title":"<i>Trinity Western University v Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Charter; Nova scotia; Jurisdiction; Constitutional court; Conscience; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Barry W. Bussey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04513203442762357,"gpt":0.2976174407610646,"spread":0.252485406333441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002377002,0.0004108666,0.0003823666,0.001343315,0.01929444,0.006818059,0.002035829,0.008602915,0.02332962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066262,0.001036707,0.0005723657,0.001429867,0.003380348,0.001572948,0.002306715,0.008106783,0.004905696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02537487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08982147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9373936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9820729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960479,0.0002321183,0.0002167777,0.0003467545,0.001155986,0.002000329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947193,0.00114759,0.0002578533,0.0003369375,0.002013419,0.001524934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008222547,0.00006077735,0.005378093,0.0001347515,0.00001772832,0.001001639,0.00520358,0.0001044356,0.001521388,0.1026219,0.8754761,0.008397406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004991566,0.00003793908,0.03339577,0.0003536047,0.00002843203,0.0001994605,0.005456537,0.0001175081,0.001104058,0.002313744,0.9568407,0.0001024714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0567988,0.003072084,0.0004600391,0.07985642,0.005081056,0.0008604479,0.003639348,0.000257411,0.8499744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1341603,0.00090397,0.0006786053,0.1313417,0.0004246146,0.0004676131,0.0009341816,0.0001076682,0.7309813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06260639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1841084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414378619","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwaf010","title":"On Prohibiting Pupil Prayers: Conceptions of Religion and Secularism in <i>Webber Academy</i> (Canada) and <i>Michaela School</i> (UK)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prayer; Framing (construction); Secularism; Autonomy; Common ground; Chapel; Foundation (evidence); Expression (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Ashleigh Keall","is_ca":false},{"name":"Howard Kislowicz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008984373665775662,"gpt":0.291984663660634,"spread":0.2830002899948584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006706696,0.0002685525,0.0005240763,0.001035443,0.03767735,0.01864442,0.002221376,0.007661776,0.00425804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009823528,0.0005570637,0.0003065776,0.001070971,0.06770908,0.004607512,0.006943825,0.01224569,0.0003442073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06873848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05687795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8244091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9073565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906135,0.003205678,0.0002282102,0.0007305355,0.001882668,0.003339315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921181,0.003365222,0.0008377788,0.0004291944,0.001481185,0.001768517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002851305,0.00003601102,0.001852562,0.0000171342,0.000004927183,0.000296206,0.09979729,0.0000789319,0.0001087068,0.8903521,0.005007389,0.002420216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001284615,0.0001195473,0.03003548,0.0009332567,0.00008104378,0.0004287281,0.4262594,0.0009807458,0.001701634,0.2125385,0.3265577,0.0002355293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4041529,0.003865147,0.001415756,0.08750445,0.0002253964,0.00007589431,0.00006474372,0.00002224778,0.5026734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814063,0.0003414121,0.000168667,0.004713639,0.00003497383,0.00001643053,0.000006110644,0.00001166787,0.01330082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1755909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4987349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582707181","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rww080","title":"The Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society v Trinity Western University","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Nova scotia; Ultra vires; Constitution; Political science; Charter; Statutory law; Human rights; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Sociology; Doctrine","authors":[{"name":"Barry W. Bussey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02660440883661307,"gpt":0.2836527271664773,"spread":0.2570483183298642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004660201,0.0008336055,0.0007124599,0.002169501,0.02034105,0.01129707,0.002852842,0.01236958,0.01786805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01084438,0.001947654,0.0009832367,0.001577474,0.00424147,0.00142704,0.00360286,0.01025935,0.004014201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03839589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1610273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9266567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9795903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915659,0.0005664094,0.0004584582,0.0009841952,0.003130702,0.003294172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884715,0.002394774,0.000535648,0.0007669778,0.004237852,0.003593233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000264399,0.0002147139,0.02072858,0.0004083547,0.0001422968,0.007000672,0.005256426,0.0007665682,0.005280455,0.1718421,0.7536197,0.03447576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001493446,0.0001073877,0.05834923,0.00081791,0.0001304173,0.0005418644,0.003549268,0.0006348306,0.001957812,0.004284424,0.9292036,0.0002739462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1091079,0.008133881,0.001162908,0.08671146,0.00578705,0.001994732,0.002945554,0.0004479836,0.7837085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.169441,0.002165043,0.001146923,0.08449838,0.0006025928,0.0006744015,0.0007139831,0.0001101601,0.7406476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07334328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.278583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887550384","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwy032","title":"The Religious and Ideological Freedom of Teachers in the English Legal Framework: Is the Balance Between Collective and Individual Rights Appropriate?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ideology; Statute; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Human rights; Citizenship; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Javier García Oliva","is_ca":true},{"name":"Diana Ginn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01702522475128088,"gpt":0.2849785870961999,"spread":0.267953362344919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008467145,0.0001681016,0.0004417732,0.001106489,0.005739706,0.01068745,0.001312421,0.003419136,0.004438954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01414073,0.0002726335,0.0001984546,0.0008643063,0.02952337,0.01092934,0.003451069,0.004453417,0.0007605278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009451086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01125424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0447266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07487281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993359,0.003541336,0.0002845837,0.0005093878,0.001228858,0.00107686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936993,0.003584123,0.000515044,0.0004473348,0.001083958,0.0006700945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001163782,0.00002504427,0.001294188,0.00006471899,0.000002948926,0.0001745173,0.03961593,0.00008507913,0.0001641461,0.9400767,0.005824901,0.01266034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003893282,0.0000350149,0.01148675,0.00126197,0.00001914525,0.0002798993,0.07265139,0.0009405736,0.0004275921,0.524721,0.3880655,0.00007220721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1318351,0.02003699,0.01149876,0.2096604,0.0008996714,0.00007606438,0.0001875478,0.00004275554,0.6257627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97427,0.002551651,0.001821983,0.006614044,0.0004788468,0.00004213516,0.00005045814,0.00003736708,0.01413347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0447266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08893257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343610063","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwv025","title":"Catholic Schools Can Be Catholic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Religious education; Charter; Establishment Clause; Political science; Protestantism; Parliament; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Free Exercise Clause; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Confessional; Supreme court; Human rights; First amendment; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Janet Epp Buckingham","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03652000659873157,"gpt":0.3165724312242084,"spread":0.2800524246254768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002046588,0.0002813667,0.000285684,0.0005043922,0.010503,0.004344661,0.0004078905,0.002840024,0.05465195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005044883,0.0004170935,0.0002283795,0.000516417,0.005481772,0.002762469,0.005755243,0.007155152,0.006910377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005711651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006782749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03082016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1553239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976844,0.0004675481,0.00004867529,0.0002542894,0.0005234253,0.001021706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968329,0.0004198024,0.000183334,0.000269015,0.0004970407,0.00179784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003904352,0.00008670505,0.002797399,0.0001121192,0.000006795165,0.0002856125,0.005060105,0.00003356101,0.0001802412,0.5496545,0.4119318,0.02981222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002024808,0.00001283351,0.001832728,0.0001257246,0.000003776072,0.00007715359,0.001609956,0.00001654419,0.00004215055,0.009608891,0.9866431,0.000006958799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01560703,0.004213803,0.0007477578,0.09592289,0.00329638,0.00009495732,0.0001782579,0.00008058662,0.8798583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3765033,0.002967638,0.0008172476,0.1291653,0.001525912,0.0001083164,0.0001957409,0.0001386794,0.4885779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05465195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.182829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153328781","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwt036","title":"Religious Values and Two Same-Sex Marriage Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Supreme court; Law; Estate; State (computer science); Spouse; Political science; Legislation; Federal law; Constitutionality","authors":[{"name":"Lynn D. Wardle","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01381492651462013,"gpt":0.2771452689122565,"spread":0.2633303423976364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006426513,0.0004240674,0.0006427143,0.001520232,0.02324113,0.005329902,0.002326971,0.01367126,0.008129252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0140134,0.001066177,0.001411209,0.00148902,0.006953528,0.002316422,0.005133992,0.01819642,0.0009055035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007966053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01056874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1174766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2667224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930583,0.001153512,0.0003502475,0.0006137903,0.002041738,0.002782341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945523,0.002712358,0.0003482871,0.0002799663,0.0008839351,0.001223055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002213126,0.0004525994,0.008472593,0.00009336728,0.00007399426,0.01141705,0.02065476,0.0003089419,0.001309899,0.7983478,0.142215,0.01643263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008954204,0.0003733975,0.02849303,0.001076419,0.0003817436,0.003569101,0.03708581,0.001821994,0.005367235,0.1056184,0.8148856,0.0004319773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3736858,0.006429487,0.002011483,0.1277296,0.004922021,0.0003980245,0.0008114583,0.0001031488,0.483909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534591,0.002313755,0.001256977,0.07458378,0.00136624,0.0003047326,0.000296578,0.00004218209,0.06637656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1174766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2335857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171410223","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwv021","title":"Space Enough for a Christian Law School","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Barry W. Bussey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02864602629254484,"gpt":0.308484092758688,"spread":0.2798380664661432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001675028,0.000245476,0.0003047013,0.001063315,0.01183268,0.009859673,0.0006642757,0.005599459,0.2327076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008157476,0.0002873432,0.0002905146,0.0007629345,0.005265488,0.009124189,0.01078814,0.0055111,0.02801512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002339884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005749622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01019135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0246107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976161,0.0005558956,0.00006364388,0.0001719208,0.0006250734,0.0009674902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922,0.0007430776,0.0002964501,0.0004475576,0.001048467,0.005264633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003551701,0.000137167,0.001895861,0.000108072,0.000008209131,0.0007837841,0.01096906,0.00004887745,0.0003838787,0.1953536,0.7547567,0.03551926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001063882,0.00001940926,0.001039593,0.0001754201,0.00000234619,0.0001575064,0.00836673,0.00002983554,0.00006798089,0.01021483,0.979902,0.00001360578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01741681,0.00250699,0.0009389648,0.2299852,0.005437199,0.00007392703,0.0002038269,0.000199335,0.7432377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3270663,0.001828315,0.0008990054,0.078029,0.00322345,0.00007729594,0.000146424,0.0002302319,0.5885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2327076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7784844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}