{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":12,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"e72c25461911","filters":{"venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W1591818506","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047655","title":"Good Faith Duties in Contract Performance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fair dealing; Law; Honesty; Good faith; Obligation; Bad faith; Loyalty; Power (physics); Faith; Unconscionability; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jeannie Paterson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01579050959091266,"gpt":0.2533316598242262,"spread":0.2375411502333135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02322553,0.0005763579,0.000778373,0.001385262,0.008207702,0.01031822,0.002284794,0.008440062,0.005705445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03781827,0.0005826761,0.0007319877,0.001270406,0.0602823,0.008467978,0.009986011,0.009819522,0.001339991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00638629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01162639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008488028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006769514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9690064,0.01230825,0.002041241,0.002846643,0.009782193,0.004015211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725633,0.01110993,0.002839442,0.005696225,0.004769606,0.00302159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003935038,0.00001255645,0.000185155,0.00001460366,0.00000239614,0.00005715891,0.002209578,0.0001727799,0.0000755059,0.9935086,0.0009151385,0.0028426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002139321,0.00006120481,0.001135149,0.0002455739,0.00001083773,0.0003099992,0.002252203,0.0008195309,0.0003761684,0.919548,0.07517447,0.00004540256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05393357,0.002973103,0.06595857,0.0400751,0.000618002,0.0002464206,0.00006136322,0.0001170655,0.8360168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933365,0.001057796,0.01283523,0.005736823,0.0003260465,0.0001605038,0.0000377613,0.00005945731,0.04642137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02322553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1228298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081954869","doi":"10.5235/147293410794895287","title":"Canada's ‘Orphan Works’ Regime: Unlocatable Copyright Owners and the Copyright Board","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Copyright law; Law; Political science; Common law copyright; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy de Beer","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mario Bouchard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009360850431118319,"gpt":0.2184555939818756,"spread":0.2090947435507573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003793697,0.000461555,0.0005148555,0.001514326,0.02538017,0.01276501,0.00264091,0.01737759,0.01183798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01388981,0.0006998149,0.000563083,0.00265009,0.01160642,0.005841281,0.002837273,0.01022866,0.001366448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05976664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9698629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915673,0.0004354171,0.0001867893,0.0004846529,0.004726775,0.00259916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924908,0.00216838,0.000399255,0.0003204859,0.003511422,0.001109524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003992197,0.00002307228,0.001327266,0.00005865051,0.000008754336,0.0003629696,0.006318246,0.0001311289,0.0002889804,0.6184671,0.3608713,0.01210268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006218903,0.00002681227,0.008112561,0.0003492155,0.00004344012,0.0001856327,0.003893273,0.0003945102,0.0008570949,0.03318833,0.9527858,0.0001011361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03153365,0.0236106,0.00246131,0.3275523,0.001590453,0.0001003463,0.001164534,0.0001935891,0.6117932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4748386,0.01049543,0.002083309,0.1162188,0.0009254033,0.0001310905,0.0003622342,0.000192945,0.3947521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05976664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4336393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520347466","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047651","title":"<i>R v Hart</i>: A New Common Law Confession Rule for Undercover Operations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Law; Supreme court; Commonwealth; Suspect; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criminal procedure; Common law; Criminal law; Certainty; Exclusionary rule; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Chris Hunt","is_ca":true},{"name":"Micah B. Rankin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04186499080328038,"gpt":0.3167666893080189,"spread":0.2749016985047386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01645176,0.0006729333,0.00137266,0.001843173,0.01371287,0.01725457,0.009261273,0.02457467,0.002976702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03703618,0.001688351,0.001813942,0.001598797,0.01774094,0.005706708,0.003582894,0.02306518,0.001468216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03659204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08921358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8287508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8783827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.964783,0.003765238,0.002496108,0.004616893,0.01813044,0.006208325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757237,0.008883552,0.001425706,0.002214998,0.01026481,0.001487282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002776345,0.00002401045,0.0008974476,0.00005640264,0.00001869629,0.0004376232,0.002962527,0.0002880797,0.000559325,0.8592278,0.128499,0.007001451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001464994,0.000094323,0.005563113,0.0008798052,0.0001887843,0.0008990905,0.003166702,0.003229939,0.003057551,0.2221525,0.7600986,0.0005231915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04248075,0.005734695,0.0461278,0.3114499,0.007212791,0.001110057,0.002072876,0.001082823,0.5827282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5115018,0.002171965,0.04159878,0.3264838,0.003329911,0.0006037119,0.0006097353,0.0003107142,0.1133896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8287508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3445154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033719684","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2020.1773017","title":"Remedying formal irregularities in wills: a comparative analysis of testamentary rescue in Canada and South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Law; Statute; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"François Du Toit","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03996326956342198,"gpt":0.2599483294766122,"spread":0.2199850599131903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002239656,0.0003472288,0.0005294997,0.00507989,0.02131718,0.006023744,0.001746524,0.00137103,0.004740455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01226886,0.0004022146,0.0003540325,0.00727863,0.009819131,0.001827618,0.004177356,0.002804088,0.0001795718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1099649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1333338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9879866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953071,0.0005232372,0.000118731,0.0002297621,0.0009812475,0.002839894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926383,0.002458842,0.0008779793,0.0002236514,0.002439928,0.001361232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002765726,0.0001750287,0.1379791,0.0007112386,0.0001522374,0.009875566,0.4624636,0.001981079,0.002890354,0.3078439,0.0102049,0.06544651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003937057,0.00004361372,0.2189709,0.001155439,0.0001116527,0.0008698404,0.6454155,0.0008050126,0.001044485,0.005054621,0.1263617,0.0001278668],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8974178,0.002274159,0.0005073542,0.006103106,0.00004163687,0.0001696239,0.0002006938,0.00001027497,0.09327538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992576,0.001288817,0.0003565532,0.0005567928,0.00000395476,0.00002854091,0.000068831,0.00001035663,0.005110142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1099649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7978548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896173369","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2018.1530862","title":"Exclusive rights of patent owners versus rights of chattel owners: the implied licence approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Law; Patent law; Business; Common law; Law and economics; Exclusive right; Political science; Intellectual property; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Jessica C. Lai","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04915031867083292,"gpt":0.2853740135228697,"spread":0.2362236948520368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01779667,0.0006369732,0.0009114753,0.003334505,0.005836216,0.01312351,0.003371482,0.01453423,0.01176649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04933736,0.0007329761,0.001258648,0.00183078,0.04635396,0.02596624,0.008980245,0.01072865,0.001063641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005756151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006833825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008426302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006346324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9785161,0.009325353,0.001171991,0.00293463,0.005460441,0.002591541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963152,0.02416982,0.003571872,0.005319395,0.002691987,0.001094929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007449854,0.00001226243,0.0003385474,0.00001583923,0.00000312928,0.00008027004,0.0009743802,0.00008952858,0.00006723483,0.9959359,0.0003260397,0.002149411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004184487,0.00006322569,0.001452801,0.0003175108,0.00003823064,0.0004293345,0.001937165,0.001751824,0.0004581164,0.9633445,0.03011678,0.00004861279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.112668,0.003008117,0.1212191,0.0463782,0.0003079801,0.000314188,0.0001926254,0.00008606749,0.7158257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623224,0.000841463,0.006684974,0.003361608,0.0002776667,0.0003473877,0.00003953877,0.00003461474,0.02609043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01779667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09411889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036854270","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2006.11421463","title":"Fairness and Equality in The Criminal Process","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Process (computing); Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Eric Colvin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0364001800636866,"gpt":0.3040428577709776,"spread":0.267642677707291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03496854,0.0005526293,0.001269124,0.002922848,0.008071396,0.008717139,0.001614749,0.004034966,0.004356349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05307578,0.0004613472,0.001113863,0.001808534,0.04088496,0.01215813,0.009971456,0.004668771,0.0004995858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007015727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009111036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00439852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002477889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9495254,0.03227789,0.001698735,0.00419774,0.008187013,0.004113219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582759,0.03098774,0.002336451,0.003599478,0.003348638,0.001451826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008546412,0.000005382397,0.000202183,0.00001325604,0.000003998424,0.00002124652,0.0005032407,0.0003216196,0.00002346824,0.9958061,0.0001404215,0.002950559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008690334,0.00001112492,0.0002654665,0.00004990641,0.000004936053,0.00003124669,0.0001893971,0.0005709967,0.00006834707,0.9933107,0.005481709,0.000007567795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1183217,0.01439825,0.2858,0.04094585,0.001171821,0.0003052858,0.0001403177,0.00006606823,0.5388508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665205,0.001612116,0.01788111,0.001625974,0.0006842132,0.0002122043,0.00002687777,0.00003309076,0.01140391],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03496854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1849335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031535197","doi":"10.5235/147293412803188829","title":"Ontario's Administrative Tribunal Clusters: A Glass Half-full or Half-empty for Administrative Justice?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Statutory law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Administrative law; Business; Quality (philosophy); Law","authors":[{"name":"Lorne Sossin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jamie Baxter","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1455071646610825,"gpt":0.4024929902439274,"spread":0.256985825582845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002380187,0.0002214839,0.0003237703,0.0006577546,0.0281966,0.009571754,0.002079592,0.003211932,0.008270859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008098624,0.0003941431,0.0003606277,0.001538198,0.01611212,0.00506503,0.004812355,0.002695057,0.0006439412],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06924133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1214407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9452459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9837177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961181,0.0005285277,0.00006511515,0.0003444018,0.001118686,0.00182523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950175,0.000555594,0.000300387,0.0005848833,0.001204079,0.002337679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001256399,0.00007455752,0.01727996,0.0001320812,0.00003487057,0.0007678274,0.05626955,0.0008978906,0.001124525,0.6411528,0.2144752,0.06766517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007899416,0.00006032814,0.03139375,0.0001729405,0.00003999379,0.0001819842,0.08933286,0.001301272,0.0004584679,0.0467267,0.8301311,0.0001217045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3173079,0.002727147,0.006625328,0.3329033,0.001030229,0.0002864384,0.0003964669,0.0002798081,0.3384434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927221,0.0006126723,0.002306226,0.009747002,0.00009016936,0.00007351139,0.00009355006,0.00006812569,0.05978769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9307587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5023834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547042486","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2016.1244451","title":"The meta-constitution: amendment, recognition, and the continuing puzzle of supreme law in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law; Limited government; Judicial review","authors":[{"name":"Sarah E. Hamill","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03969973666432076,"gpt":0.2353595175876274,"spread":0.1956597809233067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006169682,0.0002731229,0.0008084626,0.00216754,0.02646358,0.01663433,0.002703968,0.005097987,0.004704863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0153886,0.000508918,0.0006570554,0.003842407,0.02889154,0.00479093,0.004648575,0.009747392,0.0002571876],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1674814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2254406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989978,0.001362428,0.0002462003,0.00103275,0.003872992,0.003507723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923378,0.002992102,0.00034437,0.0006580583,0.002660281,0.001007507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008868407,0.000004480818,0.0007916695,0.00001672085,0.000006886886,0.0001223135,0.004307696,0.0003526072,0.0001068689,0.9832761,0.005215674,0.00579013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007490253,0.00003131303,0.01473939,0.0005260353,0.0001178365,0.0002423301,0.01603492,0.004838064,0.00114224,0.4708362,0.4911587,0.0002580894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1843312,0.01048519,0.01076149,0.1291062,0.0006392259,0.0001065314,0.0004237482,0.0001702001,0.6639762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705142,0.001472756,0.002077414,0.005834964,0.00007935773,0.00002468384,0.00006053983,0.00005015283,0.01988604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1674814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9656036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210046552","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2021.1991648","title":"The HMCS Unconscionability: adrift in the Atlantic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Reinterpretation; Law; Commonwealth; Supreme court; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Marcus Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01721462301651873,"gpt":0.2026091340541372,"spread":0.1853945110376184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003403567,0.0001940828,0.0003141515,0.00109642,0.01149178,0.007629455,0.00158235,0.005757571,0.01085732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007091075,0.0003201353,0.0004056915,0.001061022,0.01945378,0.003833958,0.004012126,0.008369033,0.0008410284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03207079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03316101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7258943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8250396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944694,0.0005075349,0.0001024006,0.0005125708,0.00288004,0.001527965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971946,0.0008049396,0.0001216193,0.0002560496,0.001214438,0.0004082621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001412746,0.000008429496,0.000474544,0.00001221749,0.000002650059,0.0001320536,0.002096393,0.00007668768,0.0001922558,0.9798183,0.009260389,0.007911948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005469093,0.000047442,0.006017851,0.0004932,0.00004288963,0.0002410296,0.006875594,0.001335938,0.001008854,0.3079774,0.6758114,0.00009375555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0503723,0.00277008,0.003262472,0.07023173,0.000821309,0.0000357796,0.0001030678,0.00004640582,0.8723568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8443275,0.001594149,0.00149417,0.0310656,0.0004537228,0.00003433238,0.00005650809,0.00005550091,0.1209186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7258943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5514399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081040206","doi":"10.5235/147293411797394397","title":"Towards a Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conventions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Law; Political science; Proposition; Enforcement; Politics; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Subject (documents); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Léonid Sirota","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05537614845299849,"gpt":0.2838432333722492,"spread":0.2284670849192507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04724129,0.0008729543,0.00177614,0.004413533,0.009978029,0.01918686,0.004300127,0.0184912,0.002764728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04248434,0.001146969,0.001461804,0.00234807,0.1100226,0.01937244,0.009566589,0.03669212,0.001147621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01272803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01610669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007262805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004511135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.966076,0.01949313,0.001217557,0.004168199,0.007423511,0.0016216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715596,0.01697878,0.001715095,0.004848478,0.003291541,0.001606476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[6.29796e-7,0.000002091269,0.000008463844,0.000003077962,4.948514e-7,0.00000507857,0.0003353751,0.00003218171,0.00001199215,0.9989653,0.0003537772,0.0002814795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008282182,0.000004673702,0.00004016781,0.00003615943,0.000001327873,0.00001095521,0.000234501,0.0001585452,0.0000386018,0.9696092,0.02985232,0.00000524901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01550089,0.01625566,0.1431833,0.290656,0.003012746,0.0001792346,0.0001302628,0.0001537526,0.5309282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7999625,0.007653084,0.09276579,0.0446946,0.005271053,0.0008429363,0.0001697778,0.0003466028,0.04829359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04724129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2498388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473080226","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2005.11421452","title":"Statutory Limitation Periods and the Traditional Representative Action Procedure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Action (physics); Order (exchange); Federal court; Political science; Commonwealth; Statutory interpretation; High Court; Business; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Vince Morabito","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04205754940978738,"gpt":0.2460560294623617,"spread":0.2039984800525743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02008473,0.0005497655,0.0006246964,0.001848883,0.002780534,0.005343175,0.002994867,0.004936828,0.01408195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03209999,0.0008184478,0.0007685584,0.002323344,0.01160532,0.008704778,0.003434459,0.006310976,0.00575494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002613857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004705964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002159901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002001909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9811233,0.006941918,0.001277316,0.002754679,0.006698519,0.001204375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842983,0.009248584,0.0008953389,0.003605511,0.001717681,0.0002346089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012161,0.000007764152,0.00004270222,0.00001348879,0.000001651848,0.00002417393,0.0002618919,0.0001155925,0.000119748,0.9890491,0.002094326,0.00825737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000422924,0.00004755688,0.0002798922,0.0001170103,0.00001289983,0.000165855,0.0001444617,0.002225841,0.0008749056,0.8901963,0.105861,0.00003200158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01732971,0.001799363,0.3472955,0.006805704,0.0008587616,0.0005776039,0.0002961057,0.0004208024,0.6246165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5794472,0.001911091,0.2341032,0.007630043,0.001490133,0.002719739,0.0004418662,0.0003215648,0.1719352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02008473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1062195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556718980","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2002.11421416","title":"Lord Cooke of Thorndon's Final Appeal (<i>Delaware Mansions Ltd v Westminster City Council</i>)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Commonwealth; Art","authors":[{"name":"Jason Neyers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1021600999512309,"gpt":0.2738799733223523,"spread":0.1717198733711213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00177588,0.000584522,0.0006050495,0.0009140875,0.01356037,0.005973347,0.001762975,0.01830907,0.04722679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008868622,0.001144906,0.0007814781,0.0009251834,0.002725195,0.002898729,0.002423195,0.01161624,0.01329765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008557525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01149461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4234008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7288038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997712,0.0002254614,0.0001207736,0.0002870125,0.001000334,0.0006543688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980647,0.0006807069,0.00009105707,0.00006348169,0.0008110846,0.00028902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020355,0.000008264331,0.0003443036,0.00003896873,0.000004136469,0.0001996384,0.0003442785,0.00001443409,0.0001034771,0.01589132,0.9793854,0.003645443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003884175,0.00002460853,0.004328793,0.0003344467,0.000027852,0.0001493827,0.001376584,0.00007022562,0.0003039604,0.005405473,0.9878858,0.00005402991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.008130612,0.02900431,0.0008612242,0.3873128,0.0104924,0.0002818592,0.002522401,0.0002724655,0.561122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05046648,0.003534833,0.000582532,0.2393395,0.001211728,0.0001884636,0.0003856894,0.0001097273,0.704181],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4234008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8418726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}