{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":12,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"e72c25461911","filters":{"venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W1591818506","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047655","title":"Good Faith Duties in Contract Performance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fair dealing; Law; Honesty; Good faith; Obligation; Bad faith; Loyalty; Power (physics); Faith; Unconscionability; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01579050959091266,"gpt":0.2533316598242262,"spread":0.2375411502333135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008660387,0.00007137463,0.000134113,0.00006523562,0.001990057,0.0000821711,0.0004030012,0.0000666139,0.000121123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002172093,0.00007351188,0.00004404554,0.0002282274,0.0001982135,0.0004857501,0.00005204929,0.0004070134,0.000009571142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002644137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001690508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006802718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05888196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989911,0.0002113497,0.000144067,0.0000993867,0.000219824,0.0003342514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993462,0.0001061227,0.0001336219,0.000117381,0.00008418508,0.0002124858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002319529,0.00004785506,0.03082862,0.000004979438,0.000004654534,0.000004427906,0.001696101,0.00007435604,0.000001795676,0.959352,0.0001705648,0.007791467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004935974,0.00004973472,0.02677643,0.00002114767,0.000006020507,0.000005403052,0.002785316,0.0003847821,0.000004216673,0.001061906,0.9683172,0.00009428158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4195266,0.00001901547,0.000304158,0.004302915,0.0001020466,0.00009264369,0.000003983692,0.00002827017,0.5756204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997647,0.0005591977,0.000300593,0.0003235517,0.0001538947,2.135437e-7,0.00000146938,0.000004388527,0.001009659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9681466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081954869","doi":"10.5235/147293410794895287","title":"Canada's ‘Orphan Works’ Regime: Unlocatable Copyright Owners and the Copyright Board","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Copyright law; Law; Political science; Common law copyright; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009360850431118319,"gpt":0.2184555939818756,"spread":0.2090947435507573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001794645,0.0001982152,0.0003234467,0.0000749318,0.007599677,0.0003595388,0.001089991,0.0001811702,0.001013852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001589302,0.0001356952,0.00009268521,0.0003915249,0.002288071,0.0006313922,0.0001791832,0.001588346,0.000007936865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005540979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002242591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8632984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997397,0.000692822,0.0002507169,0.0002395255,0.000671737,0.0007482098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979013,0.0005776387,0.0002588142,0.0003298802,0.0002994594,0.0006329177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056898,0.00003369277,0.0003142185,0.00000900644,0.0000691923,0.0001225673,0.003657511,0.000007636657,0.000008520386,0.8478431,0.1439623,0.00340334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001441602,0.00003693568,0.00005653272,0.0000358684,0.00004475809,0.00005636526,0.004971072,0.0001919944,0.00004035206,0.002654403,0.9902617,0.0002083921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0501139,0.000351887,0.0003492054,0.07075752,0.002237873,0.0005640713,0.00002076374,0.00008282663,0.875522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826069,0.001060763,0.0005373564,0.002708719,0.0004206838,4.485391e-7,0.000003442575,0.00001841553,0.01264323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520347466","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047651","title":"<i>R v Hart</i>: A New Common Law Confession Rule for Undercover Operations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Law; Supreme court; Commonwealth; Suspect; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criminal procedure; Common law; Criminal law; Certainty; Exclusionary rule; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04186499080328038,"gpt":0.3167666893080189,"spread":0.2749016985047386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001037638,0.0001302367,0.0002401191,0.00005391443,0.006089245,0.000303987,0.0005345549,0.0001328145,0.000203219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004804497,0.0001345514,0.0001468401,0.000137629,0.0003164455,0.001087435,0.00008282277,0.0003632134,0.00001370328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002890496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000395472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2831407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983953,0.0003886073,0.0002194659,0.0001820869,0.0003494372,0.0004651503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985529,0.0003330137,0.0001277146,0.0001911405,0.0002006929,0.0005945726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009845,0.00004977684,0.0003572848,0.00001218939,0.00001134449,0.000005448765,0.00146411,0.0001157943,0.00002136499,0.9814005,0.0132152,0.003248468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008608386,0.000149075,0.0001539513,0.00007652104,0.00004830439,0.00001237301,0.003408694,0.0002481718,0.00002750402,0.02001163,0.9748395,0.000163429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06777412,0.0001674505,0.06411686,0.07898476,0.001780094,0.0008205812,0.00004997543,0.0001950562,0.7861111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98708,0.0003065304,0.003160391,0.003140941,0.0005788442,4.404938e-7,0.00001189889,0.00001294401,0.005707953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033719684","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2020.1773017","title":"Remedying formal irregularities in wills: a comparative analysis of testamentary rescue in Canada and South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Law; Statute; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03996326956342198,"gpt":0.2599483294766122,"spread":0.2199850599131903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005781958,0.0001073222,0.00045573,0.0002581646,0.0005620483,0.00003746202,0.000371361,0.00005300856,0.0000451814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005020436,0.0001201497,0.00006254851,0.001493851,0.0003118502,0.0005464399,0.0001539876,0.0004744449,1.157528e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001102667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009421708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9009472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981784,0.0004669295,0.0003255932,0.0001584687,0.0004400937,0.0004304686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990889,0.000199268,0.0002094818,0.00009215341,0.00008251583,0.0003277254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002368317,0.00003426561,0.4456266,0.00002931643,0.0001591847,0.000218016,0.534805,0.001361957,0.000002325557,0.01709167,0.0001012174,0.0003336535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001626651,0.0001471988,0.07366315,0.0001229451,0.0002619449,0.000001999019,0.7839147,0.003682259,0.000007644053,0.0002303872,0.1360085,0.0003325618],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606287,0.0003743506,0.0000564519,0.00151848,0.00005434357,0.0001492825,0.00006729194,0.000009425532,0.03714166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990118,0.0001196555,0.0006026389,0.0002027392,0.00002598103,1.653947e-7,0.000003526256,0.000003260096,0.00003020589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3719634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4899564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896173369","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2018.1530862","title":"Exclusive rights of patent owners versus rights of chattel owners: the implied licence approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Law; Patent law; Business; Common law; Law and economics; Exclusive right; Political science; Intellectual property; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04915031867083292,"gpt":0.2853740135228697,"spread":0.2362236948520368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007806265,0.0001433052,0.0002827223,0.0001203926,0.003505404,0.00004406684,0.0007834799,0.0001314744,0.000168049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001264306,0.00009909314,0.0001737227,0.0004065321,0.00145908,0.0003885226,0.0001130475,0.0003558794,0.00000251106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002021548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01207814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0174216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981118,0.0003755152,0.0003177724,0.0001854247,0.000594372,0.0004151432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982204,0.0001928121,0.0006707244,0.000275984,0.0003782561,0.0002617955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001793507,0.0003761855,0.00101753,0.00002757248,0.0002449086,0.00002083271,0.05940998,0.00003595016,0.0001371751,0.9299997,0.001366729,0.0055699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002444937,0.0007033449,0.002082295,0.00007444715,0.0001369626,0.00001347876,0.03046137,0.0001499285,0.0004330663,0.002503057,0.9607542,0.0002428776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3999024,0.00006839843,0.001209244,0.002290091,0.001097425,0.0003771159,0.00001989258,0.0000376618,0.5949978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982886,0.0002344053,0.0005188749,0.00006898199,0.0003815942,2.72283e-7,0.000003436247,0.000005665562,0.0004981508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036854270","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2006.11421463","title":"Fairness and Equality in The Criminal Process","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Process (computing); Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0364001800636866,"gpt":0.3040428577709776,"spread":0.267642677707291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001629815,0.00007100451,0.00009461282,0.00006576806,0.002177349,0.0001482685,0.0003703198,0.00004842993,0.00002082053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003127761,0.00005999834,0.000028089,0.0002230562,0.0002867457,0.0005854871,0.00004185277,0.0004157792,0.000001777181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001124603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008012863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02208132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09174038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984166,0.0007621638,0.0001411759,0.0001153347,0.0003001122,0.0002646245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995008,0.0001163332,0.0001220418,0.0000951886,0.00008108085,0.00008459761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001803764,0.0001472236,0.006233323,0.00008890543,0.000004368384,0.0002081258,0.0176366,0.0000375667,0.000005751695,0.965325,0.0004638337,0.00966895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007665833,0.0001467286,0.02213246,0.00006560414,0.00008401034,0.0001223051,0.2861222,0.0000435783,0.000009724557,0.01041861,0.6798825,0.0002057783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7695868,0.00008152065,0.001823607,0.003383648,0.0001135457,0.0001675929,0.000007980629,0.00002485751,0.2248104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989645,0.000265019,0.0001111685,0.0003051692,0.0002128718,1.657873e-7,0.000003240016,0.00000345899,0.0001344152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9549063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031535197","doi":"10.5235/147293412803188829","title":"Ontario's Administrative Tribunal Clusters: A Glass Half-full or Half-empty for Administrative Justice?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Statutory law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Administrative law; Business; Quality (philosophy); Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1455071646610825,"gpt":0.4024929902439274,"spread":0.256985825582845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001958648,0.0002223719,0.0003073079,0.0001538348,0.005711875,0.0003977579,0.0005390092,0.0002134032,0.00201878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005350501,0.0002156684,0.0001725369,0.0005447272,0.0004358625,0.003131818,0.00005806077,0.001278075,0.00001826705],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001785535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007186994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0373445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7149226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973978,0.00064585,0.0004235985,0.0002203903,0.0004929602,0.0008194261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961956,0.001258777,0.0007139468,0.0001977721,0.0007546494,0.0008792772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00227645,0.000806245,0.001820965,0.0000378906,0.0001528561,0.00003099161,0.0658346,0.000003821168,0.000003305503,0.9044339,0.02269384,0.001905157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001242959,0.0005244874,0.0007119856,0.00003253301,0.0002014543,0.00008739637,0.1005496,0.00001531543,0.000009160291,0.0006622692,0.8957185,0.000244318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04873381,0.00007856274,0.01427521,0.1218087,0.004817422,0.001478764,0.000178314,0.0001251357,0.8085041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968246,0.00009375719,0.008166559,0.001771306,0.001183181,0.000004787645,0.00004528533,0.00001570242,0.02047345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9195122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547042486","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2016.1244451","title":"The meta-constitution: amendment, recognition, and the continuing puzzle of supreme law in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law; Limited government; Judicial review","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03969973666432076,"gpt":0.2353595175876274,"spread":0.1956597809233067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001131326,0.00006541432,0.0001922629,0.00001804085,0.002858827,0.00003182917,0.0002303189,0.00002298205,0.00004069096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006964018,0.0000336974,0.00006354198,0.0001230969,0.002428049,0.0002213797,0.00006623621,0.0001396833,5.197778e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000371488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005396543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9250062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988402,0.0003964044,0.0001909753,0.00007570191,0.0002717785,0.0002249367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988559,0.0006480936,0.0001847992,0.00006296008,0.0001625212,0.00008565567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009281497,0.000006435306,0.001894019,0.000001110345,0.00009712386,0.000008864045,0.0005860343,0.000001014158,0.00000159891,0.9936174,0.0001405016,0.003553112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001432001,0.00001499418,0.0007218564,0.00005814501,0.0001468008,0.0000122912,0.0136374,7.510306e-7,0.00001650192,0.06412328,0.9197511,0.00008486416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1872854,0.00268028,0.000246102,0.0756589,0.0007636097,0.0004880011,0.0001151943,0.00001686751,0.7327456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948058,0.00473991,0.00001924383,0.0002467588,0.00005551408,6.003031e-7,3.594823e-7,0.000001083463,0.0001307553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9294941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210046552","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2021.1991648","title":"The HMCS Unconscionability: adrift in the Atlantic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Reinterpretation; Law; Commonwealth; Supreme court; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01721462301651873,"gpt":0.2026091340541372,"spread":0.1853945110376184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009437914,0.0001253006,0.0001576405,0.00007258532,0.002987509,0.0006106981,0.0006867131,0.00005073327,0.0001613614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000182184,0.00007797368,0.0001140783,0.0004354123,0.000185027,0.0006856248,0.000201197,0.0005710445,0.00002344594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009210462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001239362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001285594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.155465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988337,0.0001221321,0.0002241021,0.0001582695,0.0003128386,0.0003489873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989825,0.0002144016,0.0002156522,0.0003336611,0.0002280734,0.00002570885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005126703,0.00007366764,0.02657569,0.00002257738,0.00001371063,0.000475892,0.0000934955,0.0000168988,0.000001256749,0.9666924,0.004570126,0.001413026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005316367,0.000008475326,0.01650011,0.00002820024,0.00002859519,0.00006990931,0.002054338,0.0001311788,6.411268e-7,0.08628135,0.8942612,0.0001043961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8667263,0.000145994,0.00006813267,0.02240773,0.0005588818,0.0001683253,0.000001659376,0.00003407936,0.1098888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958988,0.0001751233,0.00003076794,0.00262925,0.0005491027,2.61117e-7,0.00001093292,0.000008027177,0.0006977468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8896911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081040206","doi":"10.5235/147293411797394397","title":"Towards a Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conventions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Law; Political science; Proposition; Enforcement; Politics; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Subject (documents); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05537614845299849,"gpt":0.2838432333722492,"spread":0.2284670849192507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004677585,0.00007060305,0.0001579041,0.00007492606,0.002786558,0.00001417855,0.0003326997,0.00005916827,0.0005767166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004255896,0.00007372513,0.0001215765,0.0002325567,0.003712358,0.0003158331,0.00007675005,0.0002072571,0.000006786714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001694197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008527645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01421654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01303679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989908,0.0001551622,0.0001803486,0.00008989729,0.0003469193,0.0002369003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991663,0.00004821398,0.0001874466,0.00006688963,0.0003334312,0.0001977379],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004783727,0.00009003489,0.006604511,0.000002976888,0.00004005668,0.00003146256,0.001746777,0.000001375806,0.000002105166,0.9901132,0.0003430795,0.0009765574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005452774,0.00009752542,0.01128638,0.00007047982,0.00005990403,0.00003530555,0.01084255,0.000002337496,0.00002596087,0.1000185,0.8768687,0.0001471029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01945085,0.0001924278,0.005355382,0.001072101,0.0004593582,0.00009279462,0.00003121956,0.00002786211,0.973318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997326,0.00100243,0.001239471,0.0001219753,0.0000990862,1.745258e-7,0.000001217161,0.00000149144,0.0002081766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473080226","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2005.11421452","title":"Statutory Limitation Periods and the Traditional Representative Action Procedure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Action (physics); Order (exchange); Federal court; Political science; Commonwealth; Statutory interpretation; High Court; Business; Supreme court","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04205754940978738,"gpt":0.2460560294623617,"spread":0.2039984800525743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003099215,0.00009331558,0.000108938,0.000117654,0.001916135,0.0002637665,0.0001339093,0.00004363263,0.0001485546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002495571,0.00007677908,0.00007405245,0.0001915528,0.0002423895,0.002021115,0.0000495258,0.0003375483,0.00001409106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000143693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005107207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001844653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001879086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993005,0.00004960395,0.0001408536,0.0001203507,0.0002189023,0.0001697299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994295,0.00007194261,0.0002381397,0.00008006502,0.0001461701,0.00003415747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002681185,0.00007791364,0.0007519543,0.00002308395,0.00003694759,0.000005054708,0.0002473551,0.0002196835,0.000006020605,0.9750538,0.01690195,0.006408136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001822005,0.00001118235,0.01552331,0.00001655885,0.0000558042,0.0000534534,0.006534717,0.00522688,0.000001122614,0.002291351,0.9683695,0.00009405064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2623339,0.0002229412,0.003665182,0.06270581,0.0005581166,0.0004910016,0.00001804814,0.0001528097,0.6698522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951481,0.0003629378,0.0002451898,0.002274319,0.0008581579,9.554466e-7,0.00002449806,0.000007947369,0.001077929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556718980","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2002.11421416","title":"Lord Cooke of Thorndon's Final Appeal (<i>Delaware Mansions Ltd v Westminster City Council</i>)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Commonwealth; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1021600999512309,"gpt":0.2738799733223523,"spread":0.1717198733711213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008078914,0.0001457569,0.0002616548,0.0000669274,0.003277973,0.00007986678,0.0007097502,0.0001424938,0.0008687275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003356583,0.0001524825,0.0001812612,0.0003647524,0.0005371689,0.000459393,0.00014246,0.000602302,0.00002110982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006866487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000386573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004313248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03678565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980038,0.0002468392,0.0002991154,0.000199104,0.0007711236,0.000480043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983005,0.0001256694,0.0003327327,0.0002754678,0.0005103819,0.000455256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001446592,0.0006530909,0.01398012,0.00004257801,0.00007693409,0.0001286997,0.008205564,0.0001499751,0.00003140563,0.940044,0.02451316,0.01202981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007019006,0.00009402257,0.001494375,0.00004271823,0.00004044449,0.0000269521,0.003809665,0.0001437821,0.000006763734,0.0008813428,0.9925933,0.0001647203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2515573,0.0002125807,0.002713194,0.01188497,0.0003251343,0.000362488,0.0001390312,0.00008664648,0.7327187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897645,0.001386288,0.001052704,0.0004709305,0.0002168268,4.470492e-7,0.000004487689,0.00001045899,0.007093379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9680802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}