{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":4,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"baed899605b9","filters":{"venue":"Pacific Rim law & policy journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2602890791","doi":"","title":"China's New Anti-Monopoly Law: A Perspective from the United States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Rim law & policy journal","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Competition (biology); China; Economics; International trade; Political science; Legislation; Enforcement; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Market economy","authors":[{"name":"Thomas R. Howell","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alan Wm. Wolff","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rachel Howe","is_ca":false},{"name":"Diane Oh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02908036941458575,"gpt":0.3247554828730919,"spread":0.2956751134585062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001872312,0.0003733248,0.0003360235,0.002753156,0.00550878,0.006115665,0.0009295673,0.004605826,0.003347638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001388786,0.0002020456,0.0005542038,0.003580214,0.01086472,0.004330838,0.002209964,0.004125098,0.0001766939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01637686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01376247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1117265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986467,0.0004310059,0.00005325464,0.0001512446,0.0003646768,0.0003532294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992629,0.0002710688,0.0001036324,0.00004194775,0.00018208,0.0001383623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001402793,0.00003652959,0.002637315,0.0001258855,0.0000111192,0.0005023793,0.005367927,0.0003451476,0.0001869001,0.9558444,0.01526153,0.01966678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003635791,0.0002626026,0.02876564,0.002086829,0.00004468441,0.0004952328,0.01066448,0.002209744,0.000450006,0.2378467,0.7170207,0.0001169065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.1173072,0.09979953,0.001525193,0.1737241,0.002070094,0.0000747454,0.0002350335,0.00004273694,0.6052213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8683606,0.05201212,0.001119861,0.05101177,0.001798194,0.00008627753,0.0001281671,0.00001497958,0.02546803],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1117265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2221523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W347455176","doi":"","title":"Geographical Indications in China: Why Protect Gis with Both Trademark Law and Aoc-Type Legislation?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Rim law & policy journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; TRIPS Agreement; Legislation; Intellectual property; Business; International trade; Unfair competition; TRIPS architecture; Product (mathematics); Consumer protection; Commerce; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Bradley M. Bashaw","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01510894975939863,"gpt":0.2736079838252891,"spread":0.2584990340658904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003759156,0.0002551553,0.0002484989,0.001727101,0.003284925,0.003733527,0.00211181,0.002487592,0.01035108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005529338,0.0002454509,0.000381259,0.002432106,0.004879137,0.003223949,0.002169875,0.001967661,0.0005188237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009198577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02567653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2418433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2512801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976548,0.0003860146,0.0001387851,0.0002859371,0.0008017875,0.0007325681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970114,0.0007290618,0.0004671109,0.0002674461,0.001057408,0.0004674972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001041517,0.0001289328,0.1745248,0.0008086291,0.00005301099,0.002589423,0.01735974,0.001354305,0.002419802,0.5711056,0.0689892,0.1605625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006340946,0.0001998475,0.2687455,0.001289507,0.0001270998,0.0008916293,0.02342998,0.004766053,0.003144774,0.05957665,0.6375948,0.0001706977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.5677963,0.01070292,0.007529212,0.1272094,0.001192682,0.0003961207,0.00108079,0.0003325171,0.2837599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404229,0.002514209,0.002665123,0.01082712,0.0003140518,0.0001243245,0.000477581,0.00003494099,0.04261979],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2418433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4808713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W272703912","doi":"","title":"Comparing Foreign Investment in China, Post-WTO Accession, with Foreign Investment in the United States, Post-9/11","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Rim law & policy journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign direct investment; Foreign portfolio investment; Business; Open-ended investment company; China; Investment (military); Market economy; International trade; Profit (economics); Economics; Return on investment; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jordan Brandt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02480898673024706,"gpt":0.2704574607329369,"spread":0.2456484740026898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004587992,0.0002768998,0.0001507465,0.001587931,0.0006120326,0.002031165,0.0003685438,0.0004237908,0.004087848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001056451,0.00007824157,0.0002718315,0.003303265,0.0007359255,0.001000359,0.0008752784,0.0006816796,0.0006525397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003092621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003202812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1033518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1737993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996513,0.00002857539,0.00002441645,0.00003696682,0.00008278504,0.0001759157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984694,0.00007706468,0.0007540397,0.00004127702,0.0003207818,0.000337376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002970982,0.00009588815,0.9747244,0.00006595226,0.00007036843,0.0003937487,0.0007256368,0.0007428714,0.0001508758,0.00527451,0.006692419,0.0107662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007482659,0.0000689747,0.9903424,0.00003734617,0.00002069584,0.00006905459,0.00164457,0.0003799477,0.0001632071,0.0001596303,0.00709914,0.000007577371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792726,0.001209111,0.00005458004,0.0007715145,0.00009241074,0.00001356277,0.002654842,0.00001334412,0.01591804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990647,0.0008395752,0.00003300728,0.0001234899,0.00003869946,0.00001366113,0.003421748,0.000005922774,0.004876934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1033518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2055005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035835799","doi":"","title":"Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia: A Historical and Critical Analysis of Canadian Aboriginal Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Rim law & policy journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer L. Mendoza","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03663714682865829,"gpt":0.3253964875997724,"spread":0.2887593407711141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00283963,0.0003815364,0.000305533,0.00560542,0.04397395,0.01151331,0.002550066,0.004677747,0.006254718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009105661,0.0005764049,0.0003080431,0.007797536,0.01277097,0.002911744,0.002345093,0.006785052,0.0003045532],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1855143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2598757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973503,0.000365344,0.00006026984,0.0002350294,0.0007342937,0.001254743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944757,0.001911469,0.000266287,0.0001329408,0.002526938,0.0006867151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001136881,0.00005920136,0.01655545,0.000345966,0.00003350346,0.002733667,0.3153648,0.0006329222,0.0008376556,0.4842836,0.1218702,0.05716928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001633298,0.00002507598,0.06029524,0.001230223,0.0001103505,0.0004597934,0.301401,0.0006710046,0.0008003323,0.01627155,0.6185277,0.0001913913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3351058,0.02412756,0.0009391719,0.08390686,0.0007699212,0.0001424661,0.0007132878,0.00008105443,0.5542138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9102138,0.007942501,0.0006049672,0.008366362,0.0000714484,0.00004886219,0.0001234447,0.00006681447,0.07256185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1855143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.944688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}